|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 42, 27557-27564, October 16, 1998
From the Department of Pediatrics and the § Howard
Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
94305 and ¶ Merck Research Laboratories,
Rahway, New Jersey 07065
HLA-DM catalyzes the release of invariant chain
fragments from newly synthesized major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
class II molecules, stabilizes empty class II molecules, and edits
class II-associated peptides by preferentially releasing those that are
loosely bound. The ability of HLA-DM to carry out these functions in vitro is pH dependent, with an optimum at pH 4.5-5.5
and poor activity at pH 7. The structural basis for these properties of HLA-DM is unknown. Sequence homology suggests that HLA-DM resembles classical, peptide-binding MHC class II molecules. In this study, we
examined whether HLA-DM has a secondary structure composition consistent with an MHC fold and whether HLA-DM changes conformation between pH 5 and pH 7. Far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectra of
recombinant soluble HLA-DM (sDM) indicate that HLA-DM belongs to the
Major histocompatibility complex
(MHC)1 encoded glycoproteins
bind antigenic peptides and display them on the surface of
antigen-presenting cells for inspection by T lymphocytes bearing Classical MHC class II molecules load peptides in endosomal
compartments, and this process is regulated by at least three additional molecules: invariant chain (Ii), HLA-DM, and HLA-DO (3, 4).
Ii, which lacks homology to MHC molecules, associates with class II
molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum, facilitates their assembly, and
targets them to endosomes. Here, Ii is degraded, leaving Ii-derived
peptides in the antigen binding groove (class II-associated Ii
peptides, CLIP). CLIP must be released from class II molecules to
permit normal binding of endosomal peptides, a process that is
accelerated by HLA-DM (5-17). In addition, DM-catalyzed peptide
release is not limited to CLIP (15, 18, 19), so that distinct sets of
peptides are loaded onto class II molecules in DM+ and
DM The intron-exon structure and promoter regions of the DMA and DMB genes
that encode DM The mechanism by which DM alters peptide loading of class II molecules
is starting to be elucidated. HLA-DM associates directly with MHC class
II molecules (35); the most stable association seems to be with empty
molecules (25, 26), but peptide-loaded molecules also may have some
affinity for DM (35). DM accelerates peptide dissociation from MHC
class II molecules (15-17, 36) without changing peptide specificity
(37). This result suggests that DM stabilizes an "open" class II
conformation without altering interactions between class II specificity
pockets and side chains of the bound peptide, perhaps by breaking
hydrogen bonds between class II and the peptide (38). Antibody-blocking
experiments and the characterization of a HLA-DR mutant defective for
DM binding suggest that a specific face of the class II molecule is
involved in DM interactions (16, 24, 39). Based on hydrophobic dye binding studies, it has been proposed that the interaction involves hydrophobic sites that are buried at the DM-class II interface (40).
Peptide loading of class II molecules occurs in acidic (pH 4.5-5.5)
late endosomal compartments (23, 24). Structural features of both MHC
class II molecules and HLA-DM may contribute to ensuring efficient
peptide loading under these conditions. In some instances, titratable
side chains at the peptide-MHC class II interface may provide optimal
interactions at endosomal pH (41). In addition, MHC class II molecules
change conformation between pH 7 and pH 5, as shown by spectroscopy and
by differential hydrophobic dye binding (42-45). The most pronounced
rearrangements may occur at sites that are distant from the peptide
binding groove (43); nevertheless, they are associated with accelerated
peptide binding and release at low pH. Not all peptide/MHC class II
combinations behave like this; examples of pH-independent peptide
binding are not uncommon. Even in these cases, however, peptide binding
becomes pH dependent upon adding HLA-DM (15). DM binding to class II molecules and its catalytic activity are greater at pH 4.5-5.5 than at
neutral pH (15, 17, 25, 35).
Hydrophobic dye binding of HLA-DM also increases at pH 5, but the
effects seem modest compared with those previously seen for classical
class II molecules (28, 40).2
We therefore wished to determine the nature and extent of any changes
in HLA-DM conformation between neutral and endosomal pH. Here, we have
used far-ultraviolet circular dichroism and intrinsic fluorescence
spectroscopy to analyze both the secondary structure composition of the
lumenal domains of HLA-DM and the effect of pH on their conformation
and stability.
Cells--
Drosophila melanogaster-derived S2 cells
expressing recombinant soluble HLA-DM (sDM) have been described (15).
Briefly, expression vectors were constructed that contained truncated
DMA*0101 and DMB*0101 cDNAs under the control of a metallothionein
promoter. For both chains, the transmembrane regions and cytoplasmic
tails were replaced by epitope tag sequences, which are recognized by the monoclonal antibodies, M2 and KT3, respectively. A similar strategy
was used to generate transfectants expressing full-length DM, as well
as full-length and soluble HLA-DR1, all without epitope tags. After
transfection and antibiotic selection, highly expressing subclones were
isolated, and expression of transfected cDNA was induced in
serum-free spinner cultures by adding 1 mM
CuSO4. For full-length molecules, cells were harvested
after 24 h, washed in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline
without Ca2+/Mg2+, and stored at Purification of Recombinant Molecules--
Insect cell-derived
recombinant DR1 was purified by immunoaffinity chromatography as
described (46). Soluble DR1 was purified similarly, except that
concentrated culture supernatants were loaded onto the column and
detergent was omitted. For purification of sDM, culture supernatants
were centrifuged (3000 × g, 20 min), and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 10 mM
iodoacetamide were added. Filtered (<0.2 µm) supernatants were
passed over a glycine-coupled CNBr-Sepharose column and an M2
immunoaffinity column (Eastman Kodak) connected in series. After
washing in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl,
specifically bound material was eluted from the M2 column using 100 µM FLAG peptide (Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys; Eastman
Kodak) in wash buffer, and the column was regenerated by alternating
20-min washes in 50 mM glycine-HCl, pH 3.5, and wash
buffer. The column eluate was concentrated by centrifugal ultrafiltration (Centriprep-30 and Centricon-30, Amicon) and loaded onto a 2 × 30-cm Sephacryl S200-HR column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), which was eluted in phosphate-buffered saline. Fractions containing sDM dimer without contaminating proteins were pooled and
again concentrated. After a buffer exchange into water, sDM was stored
in aliquots at Protein Characterization and Quantitation for
Spectroscopy--
Fractions from various stages of the purifications
were separated by SDS-PAGE (47). Total proteins were visualized by
Coomassie Blue staining, and large amounts of protein (up to 20 µg/lane) were loaded to assess purity. Soluble DM 280 = 79270 M 1 cm 1 in 20 mM
sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, 6 M guanidinium chloride (48, 49). The extinction coefficient of sDM was not affected measurably
by the presence or absence of denaturant (data not shown). The
calculated extinction coefficient agreed to within 3% with an
empirical value derived from quantitative amino acid analysis
(performed by the Stanford University Protein and Nucleic Acid
Facility) and was used routinely to quantitate sDM by UV spectrophotometry.
Assay for DM-catalyzed Peptide Binding to DR1 Molecules-- DM-dependent peptide binding to DR1 was measured essentially as described (15). Briefly, 2 nM recombinant full-length or soluble HLA-DR1 was allowed to bind 1 µM N-terminally biotinylated HA307-319 peptide in the presence of varying amounts of full-length or soluble recombinant HLA-DM. After incubation in 150 mM sodium citrate/phosphate buffer, pH 5.0, containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40 at 37 °C for 1 h, HLA-DR molecules were captured on microtiter plates coated with the anti-DR monoclonal antibody, LB3.1. Bound peptide was detected using Eu3+-conjugated streptavidin, which was quantitated by time-resolved fluorescence. A standard curve was generated by serial dilution of DR1 molecules maximally loaded with the biotinylated HA307-319 peptide and fitting to a 4-parameter binding equation, which was used to convert bound fluorescence to percent occupancy. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy--
Far-ultraviolet circular
dichroism spectra were acquired on an Aviv 62DS spectropolarimeter
equipped with a thermostatted cuvette, using previously described
conditions (44, 50). Samples contained 100-250 µg/ml sDM in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, or 5 mM
sodium acetate buffer, pH 5. A 1-mm path length cuvette was used, and
samples were recovered after analysis and quantitated by UV absorption
spectrophotometry as described above. Five CD spectra were acquired
using previously described parameters (44), averaged, and smoothed
using a 9-point (2.25 nm) sliding window; the buffer background was
then subtracted. For pH titrations, samples were made up in appropriate
mixtures of 5 mM sodium phosphate, sodium acetate, and HCl,
and the pH of the mixtures was checked after each experiment. A single
spectrum was acquired at each pH in 0.5-nm steps with a 5-s averaging
time. Estimates for Fluorescence Spectroscopy-- Fluorescence spectra were acquired at room temperature, using a Hitachi F-4010 spectrofluorimeter with excitation at 280 nm. Samples of sDM (50-1000 nM) were prepared in filtered (0.2 µm) 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7) or acetate (pH 5) buffers with or without 150 mM NaCl or 6 M guanidinium chloride and analyzed in a 1 × 1-cm path length cuvette. Emission scans were performed at ambient temperature (23 °C) at 0.5 nm/s with a 2-s averaging time and 4-nm bandwidth for both excitation and emission. Background fluorescence from buffer alone was subtracted. Denaturant titrations were done in a thermostatted cuvette (25 °C) by slowly adding increasing amounts of buffered 6 M guanidinium chloride to rapidly stirred solutions containing 250 nM sDM and 20 mM phosphate (pH 7) or acetate (pH 5) buffer. In the unfolding transition region, progress of the unfolding reaction was followed by measuring fluorescence emission at 350 nm over time, or by repetitive scanning, and spectra were recorded after completion of the reaction. Reversibility was tested by diluting fully denatured samples (2 M guanidinium chloride) back to nondenaturing guanidinium chloride concentrations and following fluorescence emission at 350 nm. After correction for background and dilution effects, limiting slope corrections were applied to fluorescence intensities at 350 nm to estimate the relative amounts of native and unfolded sDM, assuming an irreversible one-step conversion from a native to an unfolded conformation.
For spectroscopic characterization, recombinant-soluble HLA-DM
(sDM) was purified from supernatants of transfected
Drosophila cells, using epitope tag affinity chromatography
and gel filtration (Fig. 1A).
Gel filtration separated heterodimeric sDM from high molecular weight
aggregates containing contaminating proteins, as shown by Coomassie
Blue staining of overloaded native (data not shown) and SDS-PAGE gels
(Fig. 1A). The SDS gels were overrun to resolve sDM chains
as a closely spaced multiplet of bands, which were assigned as either
We have shown previously that sDM catalyzes release of CLIP and a subset of other peptides from MHC class II molecules (15). sDM also promotes association of labeled peptides with class II molecules, likely by catalyzing dissociation of previously bound ligands. Micromolar sDM concentrations are required for half-maximal peptide loading, whereas other groups have reported that nanomolar concentrations of native, full-length DM purified from Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cell lines are catalytically active (16, 17). To assess the role of the transmembrane and/or cytoplasmic domains in the interaction between DM and class II molecules, full-length and soluble, insect cell-derived DM molecules were compared for their ability to catalyze peptide loading of full-length and soluble DR1 (Fig. 2). In this experiment, between 4 and 8 µM soluble DM were required for half-maximal loading of either soluble or full-length DR1 molecules. Even though we were unable to test the activity of high concentrations of full-length DM, at low concentrations similar amounts of full-length and soluble DM were needed to load soluble DR1 molecules, suggesting that the transmembrane region and cytoplasmic tail of DM were unimportant for peptide loading of soluble DR molecules. Interestingly, when full-length DR1 was used, full-length (but not soluble) DM was active at about 200 times lower concentrations (half-maximal loading between 20 and 40 nM DM), a potency comparable with that seen for affinity-purified DM from B cell lines.3 These results showed that optimal catalytic activity required the transmembrane domains and/or cytoplasmic tails of both DM and DR1, either because these domains interact specifically during catalysis or because the transmembrane regions help to align DM with DR through interactions with detergent micelles. However, because peptide loading of soluble DR1 was not influenced by the presence or absence of the DM transmembrane region or cytoplasmic tail, these domains did not seem to be required for correct folding and activity of the extracellular domains of DM. This finding justified the use of soluble molecules for spectroscopic studies investigating the folding and conformational dynamics of DM.
Far-UV CD spectroscopy was used to analyze the secondary structure
composition of sDM (Fig. 3). The CD
spectrum at 25 °C and pH 7.0 revealed a pronounced minimum at 218 nm
and a maximum at 198 nm, placing sDM within the
The qualitative features of the native sDM far-UV CD spectrum resembled those of classical MHC class I and class II proteins, but the spectra were not superimposable (Fig. 3A). The overall shape of the sDM spectrum was somewhat closer to typical class II (I-Ek) than class I (HLA-A2) CD spectra, as reflected for instance in the ratio of the 218- and 198-nm peaks and the presence of a shoulder in the 222-230-nm range. However, the intensity of this shoulder for sDM was intermediate between I-Ek and HLA-A2. The secondary structure composition of sDM, as estimated using a neural net algorithm, was within the range previously determined by crystallographic or spectroscopic analysis of a set of MHC-like proteins (Table I). The differences between the CD spectra of distantly related molecules of the MHC family might reflect differences in the details of tertiary and quaternary structure, or they could reflect non-peptide bond contributions to the far-UV CD spectrum (for discussion of such contributions, see Refs. 44 and 53). In conclusion, overall the CD properties of sDM are consistent with an MHC-like fold, but the precise tertiary structure may differ from that seen for classical MHC class I and class II proteins with peptide-binding function. To study the effect of exposure to low pH on the conformation of sDM, CD spectra were recorded in a series of buffer mixtures ranging from pH 7.3 to pH 2.5. Fig. 4A shows far-UV CD spectra of sDM at pH 7.3, 4.8, and 2.5, recorded at room temperature. Dropping the pH from 7.3 to 4.8 resulted in a slight but reproducible increase in the intensity of the 198-nm peak of the far-UV CD spectrum, with little (if any) change in estimated secondary structure content (Table I). In particular, no changes were observed in the 222-nm region of the spectrum, indicating that helix content was not altered at endosomal pH. A further drop in pH to 2.5 resulted in drastic spectral changes; the pH 2.5 spectrum closely matched that of heat-denatured material at pH 7 (cf. Fig. 3B). This result indicated that the increase of the 198-nm peak at pH 4.8 was not due to incipient acid denaturation because a further drop in pH decreased the CD signal at this wavelength. The intensity of the 218- and 198-nm peaks was measured for a range of pH values between 2 and 8 (Fig. 4B). This analysis revealed that the CD signal at 198 nm increased in intensity between pH 7 and 5 and decreased below pH 3.5; in contrast, the 218-nm peak did not change in intensity until the pH was decreased below 3.5. Together, these observations define three spectroscopically distinct states of sDM: the denatured state (similar for both heat and acid denaturation) and two states differing in abundance between pH 7 and 5.
Changes in far-UV CD spectra tend to be dominated by changes in the
chiral environment surrounding peptide bonds (54). We wished to
investigate whether other aspects of sDM conformation also were
influenced by pH. To this end, we used fluorescence spectroscopy, which
is highly sensitive to the environment of aromatic residues in
proteins, particularly tryptophans and to a lesser extent tyrosines.
The sDM molecule has a large number of aromatic residues, including 11 tryptophans, dispersed throughout both the
To assess the extent to which Trp residues are buried within the folded structure of sDM, we examined spectral changes upon unfolding in the presence of 6 M guanidinium chloride (Fig. 5B). Under these conditions, the emission maximum was red-shifted to 353 nm, and a substantial increase in fluorescence intensity was observed. Given that fully buried Trp residues generally emit maximally at about 330 nm and fully exposed residues at around 350 nm (54), these results confirmed that sDM was substantially folded and indicated that an average Trp (or the majority of Trp residues) in sDM was likely to be shielded from aqueous solvent within the folded structure at both neutral and endosomal pH levels. In contrast to the drastic effects of high denaturant concentrations, addition of 150 mM NaCl had little (if any) effect on the fluorescence spectra (Fig. 5B). This result suggested that the conformational changes measured by far-UV CD in low ionic strength buffers resemble those at more physiological salt concentrations. The changes seen by both CD and fluorescence spectroscopy between neutral and endosomal pH levels were rather subtle and could have arisen from relatively minor structural perturbations. To obtain additional information on the extent of the pH-dependent changes, the stability of sDM was compared at pH 7 and pH 5. Guanidinium chloride was used to unfold sDM at room temperature, low sDM concentrations were used to avoid aggregation of denatured sDM at pH 5 (data not shown), and unfolding was monitored using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence at 350 nm (Fig. 6). At both pH 7 and pH 5, unfolding occurred over a narrow range of guanidinium chloride concentrations, with greater stability at pH 7 (half-maximal unfolding at 1.8 M guanidine-HCl) than at pH 5 (1.3 M guanidine-HCl). At both pH values, unfolding was irreversible (data not shown), precluding analysis of unfolding thermodynamics using simple reversible two-state models. Nevertheless, these results confirmed the stability of sDM at both pH 7 and pH 5 in the absence of denaturant and showed that the conformational stability of sDM was somewhat decreased at pH 5. We concluded that the pH-dependent structural change was sufficiently extensive to perturb protein stability.
In this study, we have used recombinant soluble HLA-DM molecules to explore the secondary structure composition and conformational dynamics of HLA-DM. The choice of analyzing only the lumenal domains as a soluble molecule, rather than full-length material containing the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains, was based on two considerations. First, it permitted comparisons between our CD spectra and published spectra of a number of soluble derivatives of classical MHC molecules analyzed using similar techniques. Use of soluble molecules also obviated the need for detergent to solubilize transmembrane proteins, which interferes with far-UV CD measurements by UV absorption. Despite the requirement for relatively high concentrations of sDM to observe activity in vitro, there is no detectable difference between the amounts of full-length and soluble DM required to catalyze peptide exchange of soluble DR molecules, implying that the absence of the transmembrane anchor in soluble DM does not cause malfolding. Although it is conceivable that the folding of sDM is heterogeneous, the spectroscopic and stability studies reported here do not show evidence for contamination with denatured material and provide direct evidence for pH-dependent conformational changes. Thus, even though it is difficult to rule out minor structural differences between native and recombinant full-length DM, it is unlikely that the structural and conformational properties of sDM differ substantially from those of the native molecule. Secondary structure estimates for sDM based on far-UV CD spectra
suggest that the Previous work has shown differences in binding of the hydrophobic fluorescent dye, anilinonaphthalenesulfonic acid, to sDM at pH 7 and pH 5 (28, 40).2 However, the amounts of protein required to observe substantial dye binding differed 10-fold between the published studies, and the pH effects were relatively small, raising questions about the nature and extent of the conformational change. Our far-UV CD (Fig. 3) and fluorescence spectra (Fig. 5) show that sDM exists in spectroscopically distinguishable, rapidly interconvertible states at pH 7 and pH 5, which are distinct from acid-, chaotrope-, or heat-denatured conformations. These observations could reflect conformational changes or changes in the local dielectric constant near side chains that become protonated at pH 5. That the conformation of sDM does change significantly at endosomal pH is indicated by the observation that the stability of sDM to unfolding by guanidinium chloride is decreased at pH 5. Some destabilization at pH 5 is consistent with the results of experiments using hydrophobic fluorescent dyes that indicate an increased exposure of hydrophobic sites in sDM to solvent at endosomal pH (40). However, the small extent of the pH-dependent changes in the CD and fluorescence spectra indicates that the structural alterations are not drastic; indeed, CD-based secondary structure estimates change minimally, if at all, between pH 7 and pH 5. Clearly, sDM maintains stability and has a long half-life in protease-rich endocytic compartments (7, 33); it therefore must remain sufficiently rigid at endosomal pH to remain resistant to proteolytic attack in acidic peptide loading compartments. How the pH-dependent conformational change identified by our experiments contributes to improved function of DM at endosomal pH remains unclear. A previous report showed evidence for masking of hydrophobic sites within DM-class II complexes, implicating hydrophobic interactions in maintaining affinity (40). However, the global structural changes indicated by the effect of pH on protein stability and the ability of diverse spectroscopic techniques to detect the conformational change raise the possibility that multiple structural rearrangements in DM contribute to optimal interactions with class II molecules. In addition, previously identified pH-dependent conformational changes in class II molecules may contribute to the interaction (see Introduction). Further work will be needed to evaluate the relative contributions of different types of intermolecular interactions to the ability of DM both to bind class II molecules and to catalyze their peptide exchange reactions. The reversibility of the conformational change is compatible with models in which DM release from class II molecules is controlled by pH changes, which occur upon recycling between endosomal compartments and the cell surface (35). However, the alternative view that binding of stable peptides causes DM release within endosomes (25, 26) is not ruled out by our data. In some respects, the conformational dynamics of sDM seem to be intermediate between classical class I and II molecules (cf. Ref. 44). For several classical class II molecules, exposure to endosomal pH causes slight CD changes in the near-UV region (which probes aromatic residues) and even subtler changes in the far-UV region, but no changes in protein stability as measured by thermal unfolding. In contrast, for classical class I proteins, conformational stability tends to be greatly reduced or lost at pH 5; this may be a functional adaptation that prevents aberrant loading of class I molecule recycling through endosomes with exogenous peptides. In our studies, HLA-DM seems to be intermediate with respect to the effect of pH on spectral properties and stability to unfolding. Whereas the conformational dynamics of sDM revealed by our studies may readily be viewed as an adaptation for its function in vivo, it is also possible that the differences between the conformational properties of sDM and classical MHC class I and class II molecules relate to their early divergence in evolution (32).
We thank Dr. Mark M. Davis for use of the spectropolarimeter, Dr. Henk Vreman for use of the spectrofluorimeter, and Drs. Mark M. Davis, Harden M. McConnell, and Thomas G. Anderson for critical review of the manuscript.
* This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (Grant AI-28809) and the Arthritis Foundation and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are: MHC, major histocompatibility complex; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; sDM/sDR, recombinant soluble HLA-DM/DR; CD4/8, cluster of differentiation 4/8 antigen; Ii, invariant chain; CLIP, class II-associated invariant chain peptide; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; mAb, monoclonal antibody. 2 R. Busch, unpublished observations.
3 D. M. Zaller, R. C. Doebele, and R. Busch, unpublished observations.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||