Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabourin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osheroff, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabourin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osheroff, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 44, 29086-29092, October 30, 1998


A Mutant Yeast Topoisomerase II (top2G437S) with Differential Sensitivity to Anticancer Drugs in the Presence and Absence of ATP*

Michelle SabourinDagger §, Jo Ann Wilson BylDagger , S. Erin HannahDagger , John L. Nitiss, and Neil OsheroffDagger parallel **

From the Departments of Dagger  Biochemistry and parallel  Medicine (Oncology), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0146 and the  Department of Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38101

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

To further characterize the mechanistic basis for cellular resistance/hypersensitivity to anticancer drugs, a yeast genetic system was used to select a mutant type II topoisomerase that conferred cellular resistance to CP-115,953, amsacrine, etoposide, and ellipticine. The mutant enzyme contained a single point mutation that converted Gly437 right-arrow Ser (top2G437S). Purified top2G437S displayed wild-type enzymatic activity in the absence of drugs but exhibited two properties that were not predicted by the cellular resistance phenotype. First, in the absence of ATP, it was hypersensitive to all of the drugs examined and hypersensitivity correlated with increased drug affinity. Second, in the presence of ATP, top2G437S lost its hypersensitivity and displayed wild-type drug sensitivity. Since the resistance of yeast harboring top2G437S could not be explained by alterations in enzyme-drug interactions, physiological levels of topoisomerase II were determined. The Gly437 right-arrow Ser mutation reduced the stability of topoisomerase II and decreased the cellular concentration of the enzyme. These findings suggest that the physiological drug resistance phenotype conferred by top2G437S results primarily from its decreased stability. This study highlights the need to analyze both the biochemistry and the physiology of topoisomerase II mutants with altered drug sensitivity in order to define the mechanistic bridge that links enzyme function to cellular phenotype.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Topoisomerase II is the primary cellular target for some of the most effective drugs currently used for the chemotherapeutic treatment of human cancers (1-9). These agents act in an unusual fashion. Rather than killing cells by robbing them of the essential activities of topoisomerase II, anticancer drugs "poison" the enzyme (10) and convert it to a potent cellular toxin by increasing levels of covalent topoisomerase II-cleaved DNA complexes that are normal but transient intermediates in the catalytic cycle of the enzyme (1-8, 11-13). This action leads to the generation of permanent double-stranded breaks in the genetic material of treated cells and ultimately triggers cell death pathways (2-8, 14-23).

There is a high degree of variability in the response of different cells to topoisomerase II-targeted drugs (24-26). Despite the impact of drug resistance and hypersensitivity on cancer chemotherapy, relatively few studies have shed light on the mechanistic basis that underlies this physiological variability. In some cases, changes in the cellular response to topoisomerase II poisons appear to result from alterations in the activity or drug sensitivity of the enzyme. All things being equal, increased expression of topoisomerase II tends to produce drug hypersensitivity (27-29). In contrast, decreases in the catalytic activity of the enzyme or in the level of nuclear topoisomerase II (either by reduced protein expression/stability or by improper localization) leads to drug resistance (1, 2, 30-43). Finally, mutations in topoisomerase II have been identified that confer drug resistance or hypersensitivity, depending on how they alter interactions between the enzyme and anticancer agents (36, 44-56).

To characterize more fully the mechanistic basis for cellular resistance/hypersensitivity to topoisomerase II poisons, a yeast genetic system was utilized to select mutant type II enzymes that confer resistance to anticancer agents in vivo (28, 49). The present study describes the characterization of one such yeast topoisomerase II in which Gly437 was mutated to Ser (top2G437S). Although expression of this mutant enzyme conferred cellular resistance to anticancer drugs, purified top2G437S was hypersensitive to these agents in the absence of ATP. The enzyme lost its hypersensitivity to anticancer agents and displayed wild-type sensitivity in the presence of ATP, suggesting a conformational change in the region of residue 437 upon binding of the high energy cofactor. Further analysis indicated that in vivo resistance was caused by decreased levels of active enzyme, while in vitro hypersensitivity reflected (at least in part) an increased affinity for drugs. Thus, top2G437S appears to have distinct physiological and biochemical mechanisms for altered drug sensitivity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials-- Negatively supercoiled bacterial plasmid pBR322 DNA was prepared as described previously (57). CP-115,953 was provided by Drs. T. D. Gootz and P. R. McGuirk (Pfizer Central Research); amsacrine was obtained from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and etoposide and ellipticine were obtained from Sigma. All drugs were prepared as 20 mM solutions in 100% Me2SO and stored at 4 °C. Tris and ethidium bromide were obtained from Sigma; SDS was from Merck; proteinase K was from U. S. Biochemical Corp.; ATP was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; and restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA ligase were from New England Biolabs. All other chemicals were analytical reagent grade.

Yeast Strains and Plasmids-- Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains employed were as described in Elsea et al. (54). Yeast cells typically were grown in rich medium (YPDA) or (to select for plasmids carrying URA3 as a marker) in synthetic complete medium lacking uracil (SC-URA) and transformed as described previously (58). The plasmid carrying the topoisomerase II (TOP2) gene was YCpDED1TOP2 (28). Wild-type and mutant type II topoisomerases were purified using the inducible overexpression plasmid YEpGAL1TOP2 (59).

In Vitro Mutagenesis and Mutant Selection-- Mutations were introduced into the yeast TOP2 gene by exposure to 0.1 M hydroxylamine in vitro (60). Following this treatment, YCpDED1TOP2 was transformed into Escherichia coli strain XL-1 Blue. Plasmid DNA was purified by the method of Sambrook et al. (57). The mutagenized pool of YCpDED1TOP2 was transformed into yeast strain JN394t2-4, and transformants were selected for growth in the presence of 20 µM CP-115,953, as described previously by Nitiss and co-workers (49). Single colonies were selected, and cytotoxicity assays were performed as described below.

Yeast Cytotoxicity Assays-- The sensitivity of yeast strain JN394t2-4 carrying wild-type or mutagenized YCpDED1TOP2 to CP-115,953, amsacrine, etoposide, or ellipticine was determined as described previously (61). Cells were incubated in SC-URA selection media with drug (0-200 µM) for 24 h, and initial phenotypes were established by following the absorbance of cultures at 600 nm. Transformants with phenotypes of interest were plated in duplicate on YPDA medium solidified with 1.5% Bacto-agar and cultured for 3-4 days at 34 °C. Drug sensitivity was quantitated by counting the number of surviving colonies.

Recovery of Plasmids Carrying Topoisomerase II Mutations-- Plasmids carrying the mutant alleles were recovered as described (62). In summary, yeast cells were lysed, and total nucleic acids were extracted with phenol/CHCl3 and precipitated with ethanol. RNA was degraded by RNase A, and the remaining DNA was precipitated with ethanol and transformed into E. coli strain XL-1 Blue. Plasmid DNA was purified using Qiagen plasmid kits (Qiagen).

Construction of Plasmids for Sequencing and Overexpression-- Plasmids were constructed according the procedure of Elsea et al. (54). Briefly, mutagenized YCpDED1TOP2 was digested with restriction endonucleases KpnI and AvrII. DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis, and the 2.2-kb1 fragment (containing the coding sequence for amino acids 317-1045 in yeast topoisomerase II) was gel-purified. In addition, the wild-type plasmids YCpDED1TOP2 and YEpGAL1TOP2 were digested with KpnI and AvrII, and the large fragment containing vector sequences was gel-purified. The mutagenized 2.2-kb fragment was then ligated into YCpDED1TOP2 and YEpGAL1TOP2, replacing the wild-type fragments, and subsequently transformed into E. coli strain XL-1 Blue. YCpDED1TOP2 DNA was used for sequence analysis (63) and transformation of the yeast strain JN394t2-4 for cytotoxicity assays. YEpGAL1TOP2 DNA was used to transform the yeast strain JEL1 for overexpression and purification of topoisomerase II.

Yeast Topoisomerase II Induction, Overexpression, and Purification-- Yeast topoisomerase II was overexpressed in yeast strain JEL1 (transformed with YEpGAL1TOP2) by the addition of galactose in glucose-free media (59). Wild-type and mutant enzymes were purified to >95% homogeneity (as determined by visualization on silver-stained polyacrylamide gels) by a modified procedure (54, 64) of Worland and Wang (59). Although the mutant enzyme appeared to be stable for at least 2 years in liquid nitrogen, it lost activity within a few days following thawing and storage at -20 °C. Therefore, enzymes were aliquoted and stored at -80 °C and utilized for assays within 2 days of their transfer from -80 to -20 °C.

Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA Relaxation-- DNA relaxation was carried out as described by Osheroff et al. (65). Reaction mixtures contained 0.1-3 nM topoisomerase II, 5 nM supercoiled pBR322, and 0.5 mM ATP in a total volume of 20 µl of assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 175 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 2.5% glycerol). DNA relaxation was at 28 °C for 15 min and stopped by the addition of 3 µl of 0.77% SDS and 77 mM EDTA. Samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels in TBE (100 mM Tris borate (pH 8.3), 2 mM EDTA). Gels were stained with 1 µg/ml ethidium bromide, visualized by UV light, and photographed through Kodak 23A and 12 filters with Polaroid type 665 positive/negative film. Levels of DNA relaxation were quantitated by scanning negatively supercoiled plasmid bands in photographic negatives with an E-C apparatus model EC910 scanning densitometer in conjunction with Hoefer GS-370 Data System software. The intensity of bands in the negative was proportional to the amount of DNA present. The requirement of wild-type and mutant topoisomerase II for ATP was determined using relaxation assays in which the concentration of ATP was varied from 0 to 0.5 mM.

Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA Cleavage-- DNA cleavage assays were carried out as described by Osheroff and Zechiedrich (66). Reaction mixtures contained 150 nM topoisomerase II and 5 nM negatively supercoiled pBR322 DNA in a total volume of 20 µl of cleavage buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 100 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 2.5% glycerol, 10% Me2SO) and 0-200 µM drug. For dose-response studies, drug concentrations ranged from 1 µM to 2 mM. Samples were incubated at 28 °C for 6 min and cleavage products were trapped by the addition of 2 µl of 5% SDS. To this mixture was added 1.5 µl of 250 mM EDTA and 2 µl of 0.8 mg/ml Proteinase K, followed by incubation at 45 °C for 30 min. Samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels in TAE (40 mM Tris acetate (pH 8.3), 2 mM EDTA) containing 1 µg/ml ethidium bromide. When DNA cleavage was carried out in the presence of ATP (1 mM), reaction mixtures contained 40 nM topoisomerase II and 10 nM negatively supercoiled pBR322 DNA. Samples were incubated at 28 °C for 3 min, and cleavage products were trapped and analyzed as above.

Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA Religation-- DNA cleavage/religation equilibria were established as in the preceding section using 150 nM topoisomerase II, 5 nM negatively supercoiled pBR322 DNA, and 100 µM drug in a total volume of 200 µl of cleavage buffer. After 6 min at 28 °C, religation was induced by the addition of 500 mM NaCl at room temperature. At time points up to 75 s, 20-µl samples were removed and added to 2 µl of 5% SDS to terminate the reaction. Reaction products were analyzed as described above.

Thermal Stability of Topoisomerase II-- Purified topoisomerase II (1 mg/ml) was diluted 1:250 and incubated at 34 °C. At time points up to 30 min, 1-µl aliquots of topoisomerase II were removed and added to assay buffer that contained 5 nM negatively supercoiled pBR322 DNA and 1 mM ATP (total volume of 20 µl). DNA relaxation assays were carried out as above at 28 °C for 6 min. Reaction products were analyzed as described above.

Steady-state Cellular Concentration of top2G437S-- The S. cerevisiae strain JEL1 was transformed with YCpDED1TOP2, carrying either the wild-type TOP2 or the mutant top2G437S allele behind the DED1 promoter. Cells were grown to confluency in SC-URA media at room temperature (25 °C). Whole cell homogenates were prepared by adding glass beads to culture aliquots and bead-beating for 2-3 1-min pulses. All homogenates were diluted to 10 mg/ml, and serial dilutions of homogenates were subjected to electrophoresis in a 7.5% homogeneous media PhastGel (PhastSystem, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Proteins were transferred to Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Hybond-P paper using the PhastSystem, and immunoblots were prepared using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The primary antibody for yeast topoisomerase II was from Topogen; the secondary antibody was supplied in the ECL kit.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Selection of a Mutant Yeast Type II Topoisomerase in Which Gly437 Is Converted to Ser-- A yeast genetic system was used to further analyze the mechanistic basis for cellular resistance/hypersensitivity to topoisomerase II poisons (28, 49). In this system, the chromosomal copy of the TOP2 gene was replaced by a temperature-sensitive allele (top2-4) and the resulting strain, JN394t2-4, contained a plasmid-based collection of expressed mutated TOP2 genes. Cells were selected for resistance to the quinolone CP-115,953 at the non-permissive temperature (34 °C), to ensure that viability was determined by the phenotype of the expressed mutant type II enzymes. This initial procedure established a library highly enriched for type II topoisomerases that confer altered physiological sensitivity to anticancer drugs (54).

Further screening of the above library identified a yeast colony that exhibited high resistance to CP-115,953, amsacrine, etoposide, and ellipticine. A 2.2-kb fragment of its plasmid-based mutant TOP2 gene (encoding amino acid residues 317-1045) was cut out of the construct and used to replace the corresponding fragment in a wild-type construct, and cells containing the chimeric gene were screened for drug resistance (Fig. 1). The phenotype of the chimera was identical to that of the original isolate, indicating that drug resistance resulted from a mutation(s) within the coding region of the TOP2 gene.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Drug resistance profile of yeast cells carrying the mutant top2G437S or wild-type TOP2 allele. The effects of CP-115,953, amsacrine, etoposide, or ellipticine on the survival of cells expressing either wild-type (WT, closed circles) or mutant (G437S, open circles) topoisomerase II are shown. Data are plotted as relative percent survival after 24 h exposure to drug versus drug concentration. The number of cells at time = 0 was set to 100%. Over the course of a 24-h experiment, cell populations routinely increased to 2000% in the absence of drug. Results are representative of two independent experiments, each carried out in triplicate.

To identify the nature of the resistance-conferring mutation(s), the nucleic acid sequence of the 2.2-kb fragment was determined. A single point mutation was identified that converted nucleotide position 1309 in the yeast TOP2 gene from a guanine to an adenine (consistent with the original hydroxylamine mutagenesis procedure). This mutation converts Gly437, a residue that is conserved in many eukaryotic species (ranging from yeast to humans), to Ser in the topoisomerase II protein (4). No wild-type species thus far reported contains Ser at position 437.

Purification and Characterization of top2G437S-- Yeast top2G437S was overexpressed in S. cerevisiae from a multicopy plasmid that contained a gal1 promoter. The enzyme was purified to >95% homogeneity, and its catalytic properties were compared with those of wild-type yeast topoisomerase II.

First, as determined by its ability to relax negatively supercoiled plasmid DNA, the Gly right-arrow Ser mutation had no effect on the overall catalytic activity of top2G437S. Indeed, over a wide range of enzyme concentrations, rates of DNA relaxation catalyzed by top2G437S were indistinguishable from those of the wild-type enzyme (Fig. 2).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   DNA relaxation activity of yeast wild-type topoisomerase II and top2G437S. Results of DNA relaxation assays utilizing purified enzymes are shown. Closed circles, wild-type topoisomerase II (WT); open circles, top2G437S (G437S). Data represent the averages of four independent experiments. An ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel showing a representative titration of top2G437S is shown at top. Lanes 1-8, the concentration of topoisomerase II was 0.12, 0.16, 0.20, 0.26, 0.40, 0.80, 1.6, and 3.1 nM, respectively; lane 9, DNA standard (std). The positions of negatively supercoiled (FI) and nicked (FII) plasmid molecules are indicated; relaxed plasmid products migrate between these two forms.

Second, since the mutation in top2G437S is contained within the GyrB (ATPase) domain of topoisomerase II (4), the requirement of the mutant enzyme for ATP was determined by analyzing its ability to relax DNA over a 50-fold range of ATP concentrations. It is notable that two previously described mutations in this region of human topoisomerase IIalpha (CEM/VM-1-5, Arg450 right-arrow Gln (46, 67); HL60/AMSA, Arg487 right-arrow Lys (44)) display either an altered affinity for ATP or an altered response to anticancer drugs in the presence of the nucleoside triphosphate. (The positions of these mutated residues correspond to residues 439 and 476 in the sequence of S. cerevisiae topoisomerase II (4).) Contrary to the mutant human enzymes, top2G437S displayed a requirement for ATP that was similar to that of wild-type topoisomerase II (Fig. 3).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Requirement of wild-type topoisomerase II and top2G437S for ATP. The effects of ATP concentration on DNA relaxation activity are shown. Results with the wild-type (WT) and mutant (G437S) enzymes are denoted by the closed and open circles, respectively. Data represent the averages of two independent experiments.

Third, since drug resistance in vivo could result from a decreased level of basal DNA scission activity, the ability of top2G437S to cleave plasmid DNA in the absence of anticancer drugs was compared with its parental enzyme. In both the absence (Fig. 4) and presence (not shown) of ATP, the basal DNA cleavage activity of top2G437S appeared to be similar to that of wild-type yeast topoisomerase II.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   DNA cleavage activity of wild-type topoisomerase II and top2G437S. DNA cleavage activity was determined over a range of topoisomerase II concentrations. Results with the wild-type (WT) and mutant (G437S) enzymes are denoted by the closed and open circles, respectively. Data represent the averages of two independent experiments.

Taken together, the above data indicate that the native activity of topoisomerase II is not significantly altered by the substitution of Ser for Gly at position 437.

Hypersensitivity of Purified top2G437S to Anticancer Drugs in the Absence of ATP-- The cytotoxic potential of topoisomerase II poisons correlates with their ability to stimulate enzyme-mediated DNA scission (1-8). Therefore, DNA cleavage assays were utilized to characterize the sensitivity of purified top2G437S to the anticancer drugs used in the original cytotoxicity screens. In the first set of experiments, the effects of drugs on the DNA scission event that precedes enzyme-catalyzed DNA strand passage were assessed. This was accomplished by monitoring DNA cleavage in the absence of ATP.

In the absence of a high energy cofactor, top2G437S did not display the expected resistance phenotype against CP-115,953, amsacrine, etoposide, or ellipticine. Indeed, the mutant enzyme was hypersensitive to all of these drugs (Fig. 5). Additional experiments were carried out to explore the basis for this hypersensitivity. CP-115,953 and amsacrine were utilized for these studies because they produced the greatest differential in sensitivity between the wild-type and mutant enzymes.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of topoisomerase II poisons on the pre-strand passage DNA cleavage activity of top2G437S. Assays were carried out in the absence of an ATP cofactor. The effects of CP-115,953, amsacrine, etoposide, or ellipticine on the pre-strand passage DNA cleavage/religation equilibrium of wild-type (WT, closed circles) or mutant (G437S, open circles) topoisomerase II are shown. The relative level of DNA cleavage in the absence of drug was set to 1.0. Data represent the averages of two to five independent experiments.

As seen in Fig. 6, drug hypersensitivity was not due to a fundamental change in the mechanistic basis for drug action. Rates of DNA religation in the presence of CP-115,953 or amsacrine were identical for wild-type topoisomerase II and top2G437S (panels A and B). Furthermore, there did not appear to be a change in the rate-determining step of DNA scission, since the presteady-state profiles for drug-stimulated cleavage (normalized so that maximal cleavage levels for both enzymes were set to 100%) were the same for both type II enzymes (panels C and D).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of CP-115,953 and amsacrine on DNA religation and presteady-state DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type topoisomerase II and top2G437S. Assays were carried out in the absence of an ATP cofactor. Panels A and B show the effects of 100 µM CP-115,953 and amsacrine, respectively, on DNA religation (squares) mediated by wild-type topoisomerase II (WT, closed symbols) and top2G437S (G437S, open symbols). The level of DNA cleavage prior to induction of religation was set to 100%. Panels C and D show the effects of 100 µM CP-115,953 and amsacrine, respectively, on presteady-state DNA cleavage (circles) mediated by wild-type topoisomerase II (WT, closed symbols) and top2G437S (G437S, open symbols). Data were plotted relative to the maximal level of DNA cleavage (which was normalized to 100% in all cases).

Dose-response studies for CP-115,953 and amsacrine were carried out over a 3 log concentration range to further define their interactions with top2G437S (Fig. 7). Maximal DNA cleavage levels were attained at <= 1 mM drug in all cases; higher concentrations were inhibitory. As determined from the drug concentration required to stimulate one-half maximal DNA scission, the potency of both drugs against top2G437S was 2-3-fold higher than that for wild-type topoisomerase II. Thus, it appears that the conversion of Gly437 to a Ser yields an enzyme that has a higher kinetic affinity for these topoisomerase II poisons. In addition, the mutant displayed an efficacy (determined by the maximal level of cleavage induced) for amsacrine that was ~2-fold greater than wild type. This suggests that once complexed with the mutant enzyme, amsacrine stimulates higher levels of DNA scission than normally induced in the wild-type topoisomerase II·DNA·drug complex.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Dose-response curves for the enhancement of pre-strand passage DNA cleavage by CP-115,953 and amsacrine. The left panel shows dose-response curves for CP-115,953, and the right panel shows dose-response curves for amsacrine. Data for wild-type topoisomerase II (WT, closed circles) and top2G437S (G437S, open circles) represent the averages of two independent experiments. Results are plotted as the percent maximal DNA cleavage achieved by the wild-type enzyme to allow direct comparison between the wild-type and mutant enzymes.

Sensitivity of Purified top2G437S to Anticancer Drugs in the Presence of ATP-- Topoisomerase II requires ATP binding in order to form a "closed protein clamp" on the double helix and promote the catalytic DNA strand passage reaction (2, 11, 12, 65, 68, 69). Furthermore, the enzyme establishes two distinct DNA cleavage/religation equilibria during its catalytic cycle (one prior to and one following the double-stranded DNA passage event), and drugs have been shown to affect both (2, 11, 12, 54, 70-72). Since the pre-strand passage DNA cleavage activity of top2G437S was hypersensitive to anticancer agents, the sensitivity of the enzyme to drugs was also examined in the presence of ATP.

Remarkably, the drug hypersensitivity observed in the absence of a nucleoside triphosphate was lost in the presence of ATP (Fig. 8). In fact, the sensitivity of top2G437S toward CP-115,953, amsacrine, etoposide, and ellipticine was similar to that displayed by wild-type topoisomerase II. The drug concentrations utilized for this study represented those that produced the highest levels of scission without generating multiple DNA breaks per plasmid. As seen in the inset, a wild-type DNA cleavage stimulation also was observed at sub-saturating concentrations of amsacrine (the drug that produced the highest level of hypersensitivity in the absence of ATP). Thus, top2G437S appears to be the first reported mutant type II topoisomerase that displays an ATP-dependent drug phenotype.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effects of topoisomerase II poisons on the DNA cleavage activity of top2G437S in the presence of ATP. The effects of drugs on DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type (closed bars) or mutant (open bars) topoisomerase II in the presence of ATP (1 mM) are shown. Assays were carried out in the presence of 35 µM CP-115,953, etoposide, or ellipticine, or 10 µM amsacrine. Inset, relative DNA cleavage mediated by wild-type topoisomerase II (closed circles) or top2G437S (open circles) in the presence of 1 mM ATP and 1-10 µM amsacrine (AMSA). For all data, the relative level of DNA cleavage in the absence of drug and ATP was set to 1.0. Data represent the averages of two to four independent experiments. Standard deviations are indicated.

Basis for the in Vivo Drug Resistance Conferred by top2G437S-- Although the drug hypersensitivity described in the absence of ATP is lost in the presence of this nucleoside triphosphate, the wild-type profile observed with ATP in vitro is insufficient to explain the resistant phenotype conferred to yeast cells carrying top2G437S. Therefore, it is unlikely that drug resistance in vivo results from altered interactions between the mutant enzyme and topoisomerase II poisons.

Decreased levels of topoisomerase II activity have been linked to cellular drug resistance (1, 2, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36, 39, 43, 52). As described above, the catalytic activity of purified top2G437S was indistinguishable from that of the wild-type enzyme. However, since the in vitro activity assays were carried out at 28 °C and the mutant selection, screening, and cytotoxicity protocols were performed at 34 °C (necessitated by the requirement for a temperature-sensitive chromosomal TOP2 allele), it is possible that the Gly right-arrow Ser mutation at position 437 generated an enzyme that was temperature-sensitive in nature. Therefore, the thermal stability of top2G437S was characterized at 34 °C.

In this experiment, the mutant and wild-type enzymes were incubated at 34 °C in the absence of ATP and DNA. At various times, ATP and negatively supercoiled plasmid were added, and DNA relaxation was monitored at 28 °C. As seen in Fig. 9, the thermal stability of top2G437S at 34 °C was markedly decreased compared with that of wild-type topoisomerase II. While the t1/2 of the wild-type enzyme was estimated to be 60 min, that of the mutant enzyme was ~2.5 min. A similar t1/2 was observed when top2G437S was incubated at 34 °C in the presence of ATP (not shown). Thus, under the temperature conditions utilized for characterization of physiological drug sensitivity, the cellular activity of plasmid-encoded top2G437S would be expected to be significantly lower than that of the wild-type control enzyme.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Thermal stability of wild-type topoisomerase II and top2G437S at 34 °C. The effects of incubation at 34 °C on the catalytic activity of wild-type (WT, closed circles) and mutant (G437S, open circles) topoisomerase II are shown. The relative level of DNA relaxation at incubation time = 0 was set to 100%. Data represent the averages of two to four independent experiments.

The decreased thermal stability of top2G437S raises the possibility that the Gly right-arrow Ser mutation may reduce the general stability of this enzyme. This is supported by the finding that 1) top2G437S displayed a lifetime at -20 °C that was considerably shorter (on the order of days, not shown) than that of the wild-type enzyme; and 2) the yield of mutant enzyme was ~2-fold lower than that of wild-type topoisomerase II when purified from an equivalent weight of yeast cells. Since a destabilizing mutation might decrease cellular concentrations of top2G437S even at the permissive temperature, physiological levels of the mutant polypeptide were determined at 25 °C. As characterized by immunoblot analysis, the steady-state concentration of plasmid-encoded top2G437S polypeptide was ~10% that of wild-type topoisomerase II expressed from the same plasmid system (Fig. 10).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Physiological levels of plasmid-encoded wild-type topoisomerase II and top2G437S in yeast cells. Steady-state levels of wild-type topoisomerase II (WT, left) and top2G437S (G437S, right) polypeptide were determined by immunoblot analysis of whole cell homogenates. The relative level of wild-type topoisomerase II in 10 mg/ml whole cell homogenate was set to 100%. Immunoblots (shown at top) were quantitated by scanning densitometry (shown at bottom).

Two conclusions can be drawn from the above experiments. First, beyond its effects on drug-enzyme interactions, the Gly right-arrow Ser mutation at position 437 leads to temperature-sensitivity and an apparent destabilization of topoisomerase II. This is despite the fact that the mutation does not affect the catalytic activity of the enzyme at the permissive temperature. Second, the basis for the drug resistance of yeast cells harboring top2G437S appears to be related to the instability of the mutant enzyme (and the consequent loss of active enzyme from the cell), rather than its altered interaction with topoisomerase II poisons.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Alterations in the sensitivity of topoisomerase II to anticancer agents can profoundly affect the efficacy of chemotherapeutic regimens (4, 36, 44-55). In an effort to further our understanding of the mechanistic basis for altered drug sensitivity, a mutant yeast type II enzyme was selected that conferred cellular resistance to several structurally distinct topoisomerase II poisons. The resistance conferring mutation was identified as a single base change that converted Gly right-arrow Ser at amino acid position 437 (top2G437S). This point mutation did not affect the intrinsic ability of the purified enzyme to relax or cleave its DNA substrate (at 28 °C) in the absence of anticancer drugs.

top2G437S exhibited two properties that were not predicted by the cellular resistance phenotype. First, in the absence of ATP, the enzyme was hypersensitive to all of the topoisomerase II poisons examined. This hypersensitivity correlated, at least for amsacrine and CP-115,953, with an increased affinity for drug. Second, in the presence of ATP, top2G437S lost its drug hypersensitivity and displayed wild-type sensitivity toward the same topoisomerase II poisons.

Gly437, which is conserved in a number of eukaryotic species (4), is located in the GyrB domain of topoisomerase II in a tight loop that connects beta  sheet B'beta 1 to alpha  helix B'alpha 1 in the crystal structure of the yeast enzyme (73). The residue is located ~23 Å from the hydroxyl group of the active site Tyr (residue 783), diagonally across the cleft that is proposed to bind the DNA cleavage helix (73, 74). Given the distance between the mutated residue and the point of DNA cleavage, it is unlikely that either Gly or Ser at position 437 makes intimate contact with a bound drug molecule. However, the fact that position 437 lies along the proposed path of the DNA cleavage helix strongly suggests that alterations at this residue could have ramifications for drug action (73). Finally, Gly437 is located in the region of the GyrB domain that is proposed to undergo a substantial conformational change upon ATP binding and the subsequent closing of the N-terminal protein gate (73-76). It is this structural rearrangement that may mask the effects of the Gly right-arrow Ser mutation and ultimately restore wild-type drug sensitivity to top2G437S in the presence of ATP.

Clearly, the resistance phenotype of yeast cells harboring top2G437S cannot be explained by alterations in enzyme-drug interactions. However, since the "wild-type" and "mutant" yeast strains are isogenic except for the replacement of TOP2 with top2G437S, it is reasonable to assume that the Gly right-arrow Ser mutation in topoisomerase II is the root cause of the cellular phenotype. As determined by in vitro and in vivo experiments, the substitution of Ser for Gly at amino acid 437 reduces the stability of topoisomerase II and decreases the cellular concentration of the enzyme. Therefore, it is proposed that the physiological drug resistance phenotype associated with top2G437S results primarily from its decreased stability.

Topoisomerase II is the primary cytotoxic target for a number of widely prescribed anticancer drugs (1-9, 56). Understanding the mechanistic basis for resistance/hypersensitivity to these agents is critical to the continued development of successful chemotherapeutic regimens. This study highlights the need to analyze both the biochemistry and the physiology of topoisomerase II mutants with altered drug sensitivity in order to define the mechanistic bridge that links enzyme function to cellular phenotype. Assumptions made on the basis of either one alone may lead to erroneous conclusions and obscure the actual mechanism that underlies drug resistance or hypersensitivity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Sarah H. Elsea for preliminary work on this project; to Drs. Paul S. Kingma and D. Andrew Burden for helpful discussions; and to Dr. Paul S. Kingma and John M. Fortune for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants GM33944 (to N. O.), CA21765 (to J. L. N.), and CA52814 (to J. L. N.) from the National Institutes of Health, Grant NP-812 from the American Cancer Society (to N. O.), and support from the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (to J. L. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Trainee under National Institutes of Health Grant 5 T32 CA09582.

** To whom reprint requests should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, 654 Medical Research Bldg. I, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-0146. Tel.: 615-322-4338; Fax: 615-343-1166; E-mail: osheron{at}ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu.

The abbreviation used is: kb, kilobase pair.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Pommier, Y. (1993) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 32, 103-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Corbett, A. H., and Osheroff, N. (1993) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 6, 585-597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Chen, A. Y., and Liu, L. F. (1994) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 34, 191-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Liu, L. (ed) (1994) Adv. Pharmacol. 29,
  5. Froelich-Ammon, S. J., and Osheroff, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21429-21432[Free Full Text]
  6. Pommier, Y., Fesen, M. R., and Goldwasser, F. (1996) in Cancer Chemotherapy and Biotherapy: Principles and Practice (Chabner, B. A., and Longo, D. L., eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 435-461, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia
  7. Nitiss, J. L., and Beck, W. T. (1996) Eur. J. Cancer 32a, 958-966
  8. Pommier, Y. (1997) in Cancer Therapeutics: Experimental and Clinical Agents (Teicher, B. A., ed), Vol. 1, pp. 153-174, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
  9. Wang, H.-K., Morris-Natschke, S. L., and Lee, K.-H. (1997) Med. Res. Rev. 17, 367-425[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kreuzer, K. N., and Cozzarelli, N. R. (1979) J. Bacteriol. 140, 424-435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Osheroff, N., Zechiedrich, E. L., and Gale, K. C. (1991) BioEssays 13, 269-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Watt, P. M., and Hickson, I. D. (1994) Biochem. J. 303, 681-695
  13. Wang, J. C. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 635-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ferguson, L. R., and Baguley, B. C. (1994) Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 24, 245-261[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Berger, J. M., and Wang, J. C. (1996) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 84-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Nitiss, J. L., Rose, A., Sykes, K. C., Harris, J., and Zhou, J. (1996) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 803, 32-43[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Walker, P. R., Smith, C., Youdale, T., Leblanc, J., Whitfield, J. F., and Sikorska, M. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 1078-1085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Roy, C., Brown, D. L., Little, J. E., Valentine, B. K., Walker, P. R., Sikorska, M., Leblanc, J., and Chaly, N. (1992) Exp. Cell Res. 200, 416-424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Smith, P. J., Rackstraw, C., and Cotter, F. (1994) Ann. Hematol. 69, S7-S11
  20. Ritke, M. K., Rusnak, J. M., Lazo, J. S., Allan, W. P., Dive, C., Heer, S., and Yalowich, J. C. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 46, 605-611[Abstract]
  21. Negri, C., Bernardi, R., Donzelli, M., and Scovassi, A. I. (1995) Biochimie (Paris) 77, 893-899[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Halicka, H. D., Seiter, K., Feldman, E. J., Traganos, F., Mittelman, A., Ahmed, T., and Darzynkiewicz, Z. (1997) Apoptosis 2, 25-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Solary, E., Bertrand, R., and Pommier, Y. (1994) Leuk. Lymphoma 15, 21-32[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Potmesil, M., and Silber, R. (1990) in DNA Topology and Its Biological Effects (Cozzarelli, N. R., and Wang, J. C., eds), pp. 391-407, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  25. Potmesil, M., and Kohn, K. W. (eds) (1991) DNA Topoisomerases in Cancer, Oxford University Press, New York
  26. Sinha, B. K. (1995) Drugs 49, 11-19[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Davies, S. M., Davies, S. L., Hall, A. G., and Hickson, I. D. (1990) Mutat. Res. 235, 111-118[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Nitiss, J. L., Liu, Y. X., Harbury, P., Jannatipour, M., Wasserman, R., and Wang, J. C. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 4467-4472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. McPherson, J. P., Deffie, A. M., Jones, N. R., Brown, G. A., Deuchars, K. L., and Goldenberg, G. J. (1997) Anticancer Res. 17, 4243-4252[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sullivan, D. M., Latham, M. D., and Ross, W. E. (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 3973-3979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Elsea, S. H., Osheroff, N., and Nitiss, J. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13150-13153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kim, R., Hirabayashi, N., Nishiyama, M., Jinushi, K., Toge, T., and Okada, K. (1992) Anticancer Res. 12, 241-245[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Alton, P. A., and Harris, A. L. (1993) Br. J. Haematol. 85, 241-245[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Nitiss, J. L., Liu, Y. X., and Hsiung, Y. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 89-93[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mirski, S. E., Evans, C. D., Almquist, K. C., Slovak, M. L., and Cole, S. P. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4866-4873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. D'Arpa, P. (1994) Adv. Pharmacol. 29, 127-143
  37. Evans, C. D., Mirski, S. E., Danks, M. K., and Cole, S. P. (1994) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 34, 242-248[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Feldhoff, P. W., Mirski, S. E., Cole, S. P., and Sullivan, D. M. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 756-762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Harrison, D. J. (1995) J. Pathol. 175, 7-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Hasegawa, S., Abe, T., Naito, S., Kotoh, S., Kumazawa, J., Hipfner, D. R., Deeley, R. G., Cole, S. P., and Kuwano, M. (1995) Br. J. Cancer 71, 907-913[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Wessel, I., Jensen, P. B., Falck, J., Mirski, S. E., and Cole, S. P. (1997) Cancer Res. 57, 4451-4454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Malonne, H., and Atassi, G. (1997) Anti-Cancer Drugs 8, 811-822[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Son, Y. S., Suh, J. M., Ahn, S. H., Kim, J. C., Yi, J. Y., Hur, K. C., Hong, W. S., Muller, M. T., and Chung, I. K. (1998) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 41, 353-360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Zwelling, L. A., Hinds, M., Chan, D., Mayes, J., Sie, K. L., Parker, E., Silberman, L., Radcliffe, A., Beran, M., and Blick, M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16411-16420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Sullivan, D. M., Latham, M. D., Rowe, T. C., and Ross, W. E. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 5680-5687[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Bugg, B. Y., Danks, M. K., Beck, W. T., and Suttle, D. P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7654-7658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Jannatipour, M., Liu, Y. X., and Nitiss, J. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18586-18592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Chan, V. T., Ng, S. W., Eder, J. P., and Schnipper, L. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2160-2165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Liu, Y.-X., Hsiung, Y., Jannatipour, M., Yeh, Y., and Nitiss, J. L. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 2943-2951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Nitiss, J. L. (1994) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 34, S6-S13
  51. Nitiss, J. L., Vilalta, P. M., Wu, H., and McMahon, J. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 46, 773-777[Abstract]
  52. Pommier, Y., Leteurtre, F., Fesen, M. R., Fujimori, A., Bertrand, R., Solary, E., Kohlhagen, G., and Kohn, K. W. (1994) Cancer Invest. 12, 530-542[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Wasserman, R. A., and Wang, J. C. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 1795-1800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Elsea, S. H., Hsiung, Y., Nitiss, J. L., and Osheroff, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1913-1920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Hsiung, Y., Elsea, S. H., Osheroff, N., and Nitiss, J. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20359-20364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Patel, S., Sprung, A. U., Keller, B. A., Heaton, V. J., and Fisher, L. M. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 658-666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., pp. 9.31-9.57, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  58. Schiestl, R. H., and Gietz, R. D. (1989) Curr. Genet. 16, 339-346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Worland, S. T., and Wang, J. C. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 4412-4416[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Tartof, K. D., and Hobbs, C. A. (1987) Focus 9, 2-12
  61. Nitiss, J., and Wang, J. C. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 7501-7505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Strathern, J. N., and Higgins, D. R. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194, 319-329[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Burden, D. A., Kingma, P. S., Froelich-Ammon, S. J., Bjornsti, M.-A., Patchan, M. W., Thompson, R. B., and Osheroff, N. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29238-29244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Osheroff, N., Shelton, E. R., and Brutlag, D. L. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 9536-9543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Osheroff, N., and Zechiedrich, E. L. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 4303-4309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  67. Danks, M. K., Schmidt, C. A., Deneka, D. A., and Beck, W. T. (1989) Cancer Commun. 1, 101-109[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Osheroff, N. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 9944-9950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Roca, J., and Wang, J. C. (1992) Cell 71, 833-840[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Osheroff, N. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 6157-6160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Robinson, M. J., and Osheroff, N. (1989) Biochemistry 29, 2511-2515
  72. Robinson, M. J., and Osheroff, N. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 1807-1813[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  73. Berger, J. M., Gamblin, S. J., Harrison, S. C., and Wang, J. C. (1996) Nature 379, 225-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Li, W., and Wang, J. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31190-31195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Lindsley, J. E., and Wang, J. C. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10485-10489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Cabral, J. H. M., Jackson, A. P., Smith, C. V., Shikotra, N., Maxwell, A., and Liddington, R. C. (1997) Nature 388, 903-906[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. T. Rogojina and J. L. Nitiss
Isolation and Characterization of mAMSA-hypersensitive Mutants: CYTOTOXICITY OF Top2 COVALENT COMPLEXES CONTAINING DNA SINGLE STRAND BREAKS
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2008; 283(43): 29239 - 29250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. L. Gilroy, C. Leontiou, K. Padget, J. H. Lakey, and C. A. Austin
mAMSA resistant human topoisomerase II{beta} mutation G465D has reduced ATP hydrolysis activity
Nucleic Acids Res., March 20, 2006; 34(5): 1597 - 1607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Vilain, M. Tsai-Pflugfelder, A. Benoit, S. M. Gasser, and D. Leroy
Modulation of drug sensitivity in yeast cells by the ATP-binding domain of human DNA topoisomerase II{alpha}
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2003; 31(19): 5714 - 5722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Ince and D. C. Hooper
Mechanisms and Frequency of Resistance to Premafloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus: Novel Mutations Suggest Novel Drug-Target Interactions
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2000; 44(12): 3344 - 3350.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Dong, J. Walker, and J. L. Nitiss
A Mutation in Yeast Topoisomerase II That Confers Hypersensitivity to Multiple Classes of Topoisomerase II Poisons
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2000; 275(11): 7980 - 7987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabourin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osheroff, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabourin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osheroff, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement