Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gut, A.
Right arrow Articles by Matter, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gut, A.
Right arrow Articles by Matter, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 45, 29381-29388, November 6, 1998


The Cytoplasmic Domains of a beta 1 Integrin Mediate Polarization in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells by Selective Basolateral Stabilization*

Anne GutDagger , Maria S. BaldaDagger , and Karl Matter§

From the Department of Cell Biology, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

In Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, newly synthesized apical and basolateral membrane proteins are generally transported directly to their respective cell surface domain due to targeting determinants that mediate sorting in the Golgi complex. In several basolateral membrane proteins, these targeting determinants reside in the cytoplasmic domains. We show here that basolateral expression of the human alpha 5beta 1 integrin in stably transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney cells is also mediated by the cytoplasmic domains. Distinct regions in both cytoplasmic domains were found to be sufficient to mediate basolateral expression independently from one another. Unexpectedly, newly synthesized wild-type alpha 5beta 1 and basolaterally expressed chimeras containing the cytoplasmic domain of either alpha 5 or beta 1 were integrated into both cell surface domains, preferentially apically, during biosynthesis. The apical pools of wild-type integrin and chimeric subunits were found to become quickly degraded, whereas the basolateral pools were stabilized. Thus, the cytoplasmic domains of the alpha 5beta 1 integrin are independently sufficient to mediate sorting by selective basolateral stabilization.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The plasma membrane of polarized epithelial cells is divided into two morphologically, functionally, and biochemically distinct cell surface domains. The maintenance of cell surface polarity requires the continuous sorting of newly synthesized and internalized membrane components. Once arrived at the trans-side of the Golgi apparatus, newly synthesized membrane proteins are sorted into cell surface transport pathways in a manner that can vary from one epithelial tissue to another and from one protein to another (1-4).

With one exception, all studied apical and basolateral membrane proteins are directly sorted to their respective cell surface domain in the Golgi apparatus in MDCK1 cells. Apical sorting can be mediated by different types of determinants including transmembrane domains and glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors as well as luminal N-linked and perhaps O-linked carbohydrates (5-10). Basolateral targeting has been associated with cytoplasmic domain determinants that mediate direct basolateral transport in the Golgi apparatus as well as in endosomes (2, 3). Membrane proteins lacking apical and basolateral targeting determinants accumulate in the Golgi apparatus, indicating that efficient cell surface transport does not occur by default (10).

In one clone of MDCK cells, polarization of Na+K+-ATPase is mediated by selective basolateral stabilization after delivery to both cell surface domains (11). The apical pool of Na+K+-ATPase does not become transcytosed but is degraded, as seen during the repolarization of MDCK cells in calcium switch experiments (12). Although nonpolarized cell surface transport occurs only in a mutant MDCK cell line deficient in glycolipid sorting, the steady-state polarity of Na+K+-ATPase seems to be enhanced by selective basolateral stabilization also in wild-type MDCK cells (13, 14).

Integrins are functionally important basolateral membrane proteins composed of an alpha  subunit and a beta  subunit (15, 16). MDCK cells express a variety of different alpha  and beta  subunits (17, 18). beta 1 seems to be the predominant beta  subunit and is involved in the formation of functional receptors for different extracellular matrix components as well as in the determination of the spatial orientation of polarized epithelial cells (18-20).

We studied basolateral sorting of the human alpha 5beta 1 integrin in stably transfected MDCK cells, which was basolaterally expressed in the steady state. The cytoplasmic domains of both subunits were found to be able to mediate the basolateral sorting of dimeric integrins as well as that of a chimeric reporter protein independently from one another but exhibited different capacities. Unlike other basolateral sorting signals, the presence of the cytoplasmic domains of alpha 5 and/or beta 1 did not result in direct basolateral targeting, but in stabilization of the basolateral pool after transport to both cell surface domains.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Culture, Mutagenesis, and Transfection-- MDCK strain II cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (4.5 g/liter glucose) as described previously (21). For polarity experiments, the cells were cultured for 5-8 days on tissue culture-treated polycarbonate filters (Costar Transwells) with a pore size of 0.4 µm and a diameter of 24 mm (for biochemical assays) or 12 mm (for immunofluorescence).

The cDNAs coding for human alpha 5 and beta 1 (generously provided by Dr. E. Ruoslahti, La Jolla Cancer Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA) were cloned into Bluescript SK+ and into the eukaryotic expression vectors pCB7 (alpha 5; selectable with hygromycin) or pCB6 (beta 1; selectable with G418). alpha 5CT9 and beta 1CT10 were constructed using the Bluescript constructs and PCR-based mutagenesis to introduce premature stop codons. Fc receptor chimeras were constructed as described previously using a modified FcRII-B2 cDNA coding for the apically expressed tail-minus receptor with a AflII site just before the stop codon (21). cDNA fragments corresponding to the cytoplasmic domain of alpha 5 (amino acids 3-28, resulting in FcR-alpha 5:3-28) or beta 1 (amino acids 11-47, resulting in FcR-beta 1:11-47) with a AflII and a XbaI site were synthesized and cloned into the Fc receptor cDNA in pCB6. These two cDNAs were then used to construct chimeras with modified cytoplasmic domains using primers with 5' XbaI sites for cloning. All constructs were sequenced over the entire subcloned PCR-derived fragment by dideoxy sequencing.

MDCK cells were transfected and selected using G418 (pCB6) or hygromycin (pCB7), respectively (21). For double transfections, stable cell lines were first generated expressing either wild-type or truncated human beta 1. These cell lines were then used to co-express alpha 5 cDNAs. Single clones were picked and analyzed for expression by immunofluorescence. At least three clones and an uncloned cell line (derived from a pool of the nonpicked clones) were grown and analyzed for all transfections.

Immunofluorescence and Confocal Microscopy-- Transfected cells were cultured on filters for 5-8 days and then fixed with or without an overnight preincubation with 10 mM sodium butyrate. To label chimeric Fc receptors with a polyclonal antibody (22) and human alpha 5 with monoclonal antibody P1D6 (Life Technologies, Inc.), the cells were fixed for 20 min; to label human beta 1 with monoclonal antibody P4C10 (Life Technologies, Inc.), the cells were fixed for 60 min with 3% paraformaldehyde. The long fixation for the beta 1 staining eliminated background staining due to endogenous beta 1 if the primary antibody was sufficiently diluted (1:8000; each batch was newly titrated). The samples were then blocked and permeabilized with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% saponin, 10 mM glycine, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and 0.05% sodium azide (23). The primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in the same solutions, and the incubations were performed for 60 min at room temperature. In some experiments, cell surface chimeras were labeled by incubating the unfixed cells with primary antibody diluted in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.5 mM CaCl2 added from both sides of the filter culture for 2 h on ice (24). The samples were analyzed by confocal microscopy as described previously (23).

Cell Surface Appearance of Newly Synthesized Proteins and Differential Stability-- Filter-grown MDCK cells were metabolically labeled for 20 min with [35S]methionine/35S-cysteine, chased for different periods of time, and selectively biotinylated (25). The biotinylated cells were solubilized with extraction buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2% SDS, 1% Empigen BB, 10 mM glycine, and 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; 1 ml/filter). The extracts were left on ice for 30 min and then spun in a microfuge for 15 min at 4 °C. The human integrin subunits were immunoprecipitated with the monoclonal antibodies linked to protein A-Sepharose via a rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody, and the chimeras were immunopurified with the rabbit anti-Fc receptor antibody (21). After washing, the immunocomplexes were dissociated, and each precipitate was divided into three samples: (a) one sample was fractionated on a SDS gel, and radioactively labeled protein was visualized by fluorography; (b) another sample was diluted, reprecipitated with streptavidin-agarose, and then analyzed by electrophoresis and fluorography; and (c) the third sample was fractionated on a SDS gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and then probed with streptavidin-HRP.

For the determination of the half-lives of proteins in the apical and the basolateral cell surface domains, cells were cooled on ice, and one of the two cell surface domains was biotinylated as described above. After incubating the cells for different periods of time at 37 °C in normal tissue culture medium, the samples were extracted, and the transfected protein(s) was immunoprecipitated. The precipitates were fractionated on SDS gels and transferred to nitrocellulose, and the presence of biotinylated protein was tested using streptavidin-HRP and ECL.

Steady-State Distribution of Chimeric Fc Receptors-- The steady-state distribution of Fc receptors was determined using a modified antibody-binding assay (21). Filter-grown MDCK cells expressing chimeras were incubated with the polyclonal antibody against the Fc receptor (diluted in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.5 mM CaCl2) from either the apical or the basolateral side on ice for 2 h (the opposite side contained buffer alone). The cells were then washed and incubated for another 2 h in the same way with a HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody. After washing, the filters were excised from the holders and transferred to phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% Triton X-100, and HRP was assayed colorimetrically (26).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Human alpha 5beta 1 Integrin Is Expressed at the Basolateral Cell Surface in Stably Transfected MDCK Cells-- MDCK cells endogenously express several different integrins, but beta 1 seems to be the most prominent beta  subunit (17, 18). We therefore decided to use human beta 1 and alpha 5 for the targeting studies; these two subunits can dimerize together, forming a receptor for fibronectin, and the human alpha 5 subunit can easily be specifically detected because MDCK cells do not seem to express significant amounts of the alpha 5 integrin subunit (17). To reconstitute this human integrin in MDCK cells, we first generated stable cell lines expressing human beta 1. This resulted in several clones that all expressed the human integrin subunit in the basolateral membrane (data not shown). We chose two homogeneously expressing clones into which we transfected a cDNA coding for human alpha 5. Cell lines expressing the two human integrin subunits were then cultured on filters for 5 days to allow full polarization, and the polarity of expression was then studied by immunofluorescence combined with confocal microscopy. Because both the anti-alpha 5 and anti-beta 1 antibodies are derived from mouse, we stained separate cultures for the two subunits.

Fig. 1A shows confocal sections obtained from monolayers preincubated overnight with sodium butyrate and then labeled with the two integrin antibodies. In both cases, very little apical staining could be detected, but the lateral and the basal plasma membranes were efficiently labeled. When nontransfected MDCK cells were labeled with the two antibodies under the same conditions, no staining could be detected (the anti-beta 1 antibody showed some staining in cells that were gently fixed for 15 min, but not if the cells were fixed as described here for 60 min). Basolateral expression of the two subunits was also obtained when they were separately transfected (data not shown). The cell surface expression in such single transfections was lower, and the beta 1 subunit could be detected accumulating in the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting that the expression of only one subunit did not result in efficient cell surface transport due to insufficient amounts of partners for dimerization. Although this suggests that the two transfected subunits dimerized together, it could also be that at least a fraction of the transfected subunits was transported to the cell surface in association with an endogenous integrin subunit. As shown below, however, co-expressed subunits can determine the polarity of each other's cell surface distribution, indicating that in the steady state, the vast majorities of co-transfected human integrin subunits must be dimerized with one another.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Polarized expression of wild-type and C-terminally truncated human alpha 5beta 1 integrin in MDCK cells. Stably transfected MDCK cells co-expressing the human alpha 5 and beta 1 integrin subunits (A), alpha 5CT9 and beta 1CT10 (B), wild-type alpha 5 and beta 1CT10 (C), or alpha 5CT9 and wild-type beta 1 (D) were plated on filters; after 1 week of culture and an overnight incubation with sodium butyrate, they were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence using either an anti-alpha 5 (top) or anti-beta 1 (bottom) monoclonal antibody. The samples were analyzed with a confocal microscope. For each staining, an optical section derived from the apical region of the monolayer (apical), one from approximately the middle of the monolayer (lateral), and one taken close to the filter (basal) are shown. At least two different clones and an uncloned cell line were analyzed for each combination of the transfected subunits. Bars, 10 µm.

Both the alpha 5 and the beta 1 Cytoplasmic Domain Contain Basolateral Sorting Information-- Because basolateral sorting of several membrane proteins has been shown to depend on distinct cytoplasmic targeting determinants, we constructed C-terminally truncated alpha 5 and beta 1 integrin subunits lacking most of the cytoplasmic domains (Fig. 2: alpha 5CT9 and beta 1CT10) and generated stable cell lines co-expressing the two mutant subunits. Filter-grown cells preincubated overnight with sodium butyrate were fluorescence labeled using either the anti-alpha 5 or the anti-beta 1 monoclonal antibody and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Fig. 1B shows that both antibodies efficiently stained the apical membrane of MDCK cells expressing human alpha 5 and beta 1 integrin subunits lacking their cytoplasmic domains (alpha 5CT9 and beta 1CT10), and only a little staining of the basolateral cell surface was detected. Thus, one or both of the cytoplasmic domains are required for basolateral expression of human alpha 5beta 1 integrin in MDCK cells. Furthermore, the absence of cytoplasmic basolateral sorting information results in the preferential apical expression of the integrin, as in the case of many monomeric membrane proteins (2).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Amino acid sequences of the cytoplasmic domains of wild-type, mutant, and chimeric human alpha 5 and beta 1 integrin subunits. The cytoplasmic domain amino acid sequences of wild-type and mutant alpha 5 and beta 1 (A) and of chimeras consisting of the ecto- and transmembrane domains of the mouse Fc receptor for IgG (FcRII) and alpha 5 or beta 1 cytoplasmic domain sequences (B) are shown in the single-letter code. In A, the arrows indicate the positions of the C-terminal truncations (the number after CT indicates the number of residual cytosolic amino acids). In B, amino acids derived from either alpha 5 or beta 1, respectively, are underlined, and the arrows indicate the position of amino acid substitutions (labeled with the code of the replaced and the introduced amino acids and the position in the cytoplasmic domain). For the different chimeric constructs of alpha 5 (FcR-alpha 5) and beta 1 (FcR-beta 1), the stretch of amino acids derived from alpha 5 or beta 1, respectively, is indicated with a double-headed arrow and the number of the first and the last integrin-derived amino acid.

We next co-expressed mutant alpha 5 and beta 1 subunits with the corresponding wild-type subunit to test whether one or both of the cytoplasmic domains are required for basolateral expression; if only one was required, we tested to see which one. In cells expressing wild-type alpha 5 and beta 1CT10, both antibodies resulted in efficient basolateral labeling with little apical fluorescence (Fig. 1C), indicating that the alpha 5 cytoplasmic domain is sufficient to mediate basolateral expression. Cells expressing wild-type beta 1 and alpha 5CT9 were labeled by both antibodies on both cell surface domains (Fig. 1D), suggesting that the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 also mediates basolateral expression, but at an apparently lower efficiency than the cytoplasmic domain of alpha 5. These experiments also demonstrated that one transfected subunit could efficiently redirect the other one, indicating that most of the integrin staining we observed must have been due to the transfected human alpha 5 and beta 1 dimerized with each other. This is also supported by the observation that efficient apical expression was not observed when the cells were transfected with either one of the mutant subunits alone (data not shown). It is important to note that expression of mutant integrin subunits did not negatively affect MDCK cells. We could not detect decreases in transepithelial electrical resistance, indicating that the transfected cells were still forming electrically tight monolayers, and the cells did not show any obvious morphological alterations when observed by electron microscopy after embedding in Epon and thin sectioning (data not shown).

Both Cytoplasmic Domains Are Independently Sufficient to Mediate Basolateral Expression-- Because integrin affinity to the ligand can be affected by mutations in the cytoplasmic domains, it could be that the deletions of the cytoplasmic domains caused a redistribution due to the effects on substrate binding. The effects of mutations that we observed on the polarized cell surface distribution, however, do not correlate with the known effects on affinity (27). To test a direct involvement of the integrin cytoplasmic domains in basolateral sorting, we linked the entire cytoplasmic tail of alpha 5 (amino acids 1-28) or the region of beta 1 required for basolateral expression of the integrin (amino acids 11-47) to the transmembrane and extracytoplasmic domain of the mouse Fc receptor for IgG (Fig. 2), a protein that is apically expressed in the absence of a basolateral sorting signal in its cytoplasmic domain (28, 21). We then generated stable MDCK cell lines expressing these chimeric constructs and analyzed polarized expression in filter-grown cells with an antibody recognizing the Fc receptor ectodomain.

Fig. 3 shows confocal sections taken from such samples derived from cells treated with (A and B) or without (C) sodium butyrate. The chimera containing the cytoplasmic domain of alpha 5 (Fig. 3A) was basolaterally expressed, and only a little apical staining could be detected. The cytoplasmic domain of human alpha 5 is thus sufficient to mediate basolateral expression of the reporter protein. When MDCK cells expressing the beta 1 Fc receptor chimera were analyzed, labeling of both cell surface domains could be detected after the induction of high expression levels by sodium butyrate (Fig. 3B). The staining appeared heterogeneous: some cells were only basolaterally labeled, whereas other cells were fluorescent on both cell surface domains. Because random labeling seemed to coincide with more expression, we repeated the same experiment without induction with sodium butyrate. Indeed, primarily basolateral fluorescence was detected at low expression levels (Fig. 3C). Thus, the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 is also sufficient to mediate basolateral expression of the Fc receptor but seems to do so at a lower efficiency than that of alpha 5. This is in agreement with the mixed cell surface polarity observed in cells co-expressing wild-type beta 1 and alpha 5CT9 (Fig. 1D).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Polarized expression of Fc receptor-integrin chimeras. Chimeras consisting of the ecto- and transmembrane domains of the mouse IgG Fc receptor and the cytoplasmic domain of either alpha 5 (FcR-alpha 5:3-28, A) or beta 1 (FcR-beta 1:11-47, B and C) were stably expressed in MDCK cells. Mature filter cultures of such cells, preincubated with (A and B) or without (C) sodium butyrate to induce higher expression levels, were then incubated with anti-Fc receptor antibodies on ice to label only chimeras at the cell surface. After washing and fixing, the bound antibody was visualized with a fluorescent secondary antibody and confocal microscopy. Shown are three sections derived from a set of serial sections representing the apical, the middle (lateral), and the basal region of the monolayer. Bar, 20 µm. In D and E, the cell surface distribution of the FcR-alpha 5 (D) and FcR-beta 1 (E) chimeras was determined by binding first anti-Fc receptor antibody followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies to filter-grown transfected and nontransfected cells. Bound secondary antibody was then assayed by measuring HRP with a colorimetric assay. The values obtained from nontransfected cells were deducted as background from those from of transfected cells. The values are given as a percentage of total activity (apical plus basolateral). To avoid saturation of basolateral expression mediated by the beta 1 cytoplasmic domain, all determinations in B were done without preincubation with sodium butyrate. The values for each construct are derived from two clones and were determined in two independent experiments performed in duplicates.

The apical expression of the beta 1 Fc receptor chimera at high expression levels could also have been due to a dominant negative effect of the integrin chimera causing a general defect in cell adhesion, as described for fibroblasts expressing a chimera containing the entire cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 (29, 30, 31). We could not detect negative effects on the monolayer morphology, the polarized expression of another basolateral membrane protein (Na+/K+-ATPase), or on the localization of the tight junction protein ZO-1 in cells expressing FcR-beta 1:11-47; such effects could easily be observed when a chimera containing the entire cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 including the first 10 amino acids was expressed.

We next introduced different deletions into the cytoplasmic domains of the alpha 5 and beta 1 Fc receptor chimeras to map the regions in the cytoplasmic tails required for basolateral expression. We assayed the polarity of expression by binding the anti-Fc receptor antibody to either the apical or the basolateral cell surface domain of filter-grown transfected cells on ice. After washing, bound primary antibody was visualized with a secondary antibody conjugated to HRP and a colorimetric reaction. Fig. 3D shows that 80% of the chimera containing the entire cytoplasmic domain of alpha 5 was detected basolaterally, confirming the confocal images shown above. In contrast, C-terminal deletions of 19 or 11 amino acids, respectively, resulted in preferentially apically expressed chimeras (FcR-alpha 5:3-9 and FcR-alpha 5:3-17). In contrast, removal of the membrane proximal domain, which is conserved in all alpha  subunits (32), did not affect basolateral expression (FcR-alpha 5:8-28). Thus, only the C-terminal part of the alpha 5 cytoplasmic domain is required for basolateral expression of the chimeras.

We then expressed a set of beta 1 Fc receptor chimeras and analyzed the polarity of expression without preincubation with sodium butyrate to avoid saturation. Fig. 3E shows that C-terminal truncation also resulted in apical expression (FcR-beta 1:11-28 and FcR-beta 1:11-38), indicating that the C-terminal part of the beta 1 cytoplasmic domain is important for basolateral expression. Interestingly, substitution of tyrosine 44 by an alanine (FcR-beta 1:11-47Y-A44) reduced the polarity of expression (~60% basolateral); hence, the tyrosine substitution resulted in only a partial inactivation of the basolateral sorting activity of the beta 1 cytoplasmic domain because the complete absence of basolateral sorting information results in preferential apical expression of Fc receptors (28). Thus, the last nine amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 are important for basolateral expression, and tyrosine 44 is involved in this process.

Newly Synthesized alpha 5beta 1 Integrin Is Transported to Both Cell Surface Membranes-- Cytoplasmic domain-mediated basolateral expression has thus far always been found to be achieved by direct transport from the Golgi apparatus to the basolateral cell surface, circumventing the apical plasma membrane domain (2). To test whether the cytoplasmic domains of the human alpha 5beta 1 integrin also mediate direct basolateral transport, we pulse-chase labeled transfected cells co-expressing wild-type alpha 5beta 1 integrin and then biotinylated either the apical or the basolateral plasma membrane domain. After extraction, the human integrin was immunoprecipitated with the anti-alpha 5 antibody. Each precipitate was then split into three samples: (a) the first sample was directly analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography to see the total labeled and immunoprecipitable integrin (i.e. newly synthesized integrin); (b) the second sample was reprecipitated with streptavidin-agarose to see the metabolically labeled biotinylated integrin (i.e. newly synthesized integrin at the cell surface); and (c) the third sample was fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, and biotinylated integrin was visualized with HRP-streptavidin and enhanced chemiluminescence to see the total biotinylated integrin (i.e. the steady-state cell surface distribution of human alpha 5beta 1 integrin).

Fig. 4A shows that alpha 5 was synthesized as a higher molecular weight precursor (heaviest band at 0 min) and then processed and also started to co-immunoprecipitate beta  subunits. The total immunoprecipitated alpha 5 appeared to increase with time, suggesting that the monoclonal antibody used in this experiment recognizes the mature forms more efficiently than the early forms, a common behavior of monoclonal antibodies that is often used to assay conformational maturation of proteins in the early secretory pathway (for examples, see Refs. 33 and 34). Newly synthesized integrin was detected on the cell surface after 60 min of chase (Fig. 4A, surface 35S proteins) and started to appear at both cell surface domains in similar amounts. At longer times of chase, the integrin started to disappear from the apical cell surface, whereas it remained at the basolateral domain. Total biotinylated integrin exhibited a clear basolateral expression in all cultures, suggesting that the apical appearance was not due to preferential apical biotinylation or an inability of the antibody (or of the technique used) to immunoprecipitate basolateral integrin. If the immunoprecipitation was done with anti-beta 1 antibodies, the apical cell surface appearance was even more pronounced (Fig. 4B). It is currently not clear what caused the difference in the amounts of apically detected integrin in Fig. 4A and B, but it could be that a fraction of alpha 5 formed dimers with a relatively short half-life (and therefore did not influence the steady-state distribution) with an endogenous beta  subunit that, in contrast to beta 1, is able to mediate direct basolateral transport. Moreover, preferential apical cell surface insertion was also obtained when the human beta 1 subunit was expressed alone and thus could only dimerize with endogenous alpha  subunits (data not shown), excluding that apical transport was induced by human alpha 5. Because the monoclonal anti-beta 1 antibodies that were at our disposition did not immunoprecipitate canine beta 1, we could not directly test whether endogenous beta 1 is also transported to the apical membrane. Nevertheless, endogenous beta 1 integrins have previously been reported on the apical cell surface of MDCK cells, excluding that the apical expression is a transfection artifact due to, for instance, higher expression levels (18-20). Because the apical integrin pool has a short half-life (see below), the different polarity of cell surface insertion observed by different investigators might be due to the different times of chase used (35, 20). In agreement with the results obtained with the dimeric integrin, the alpha 5 and the beta 1 Fc receptor chimera appeared preferentially at the apical cell surface but were detected basolaterally if the steady-state distribution was analyzed (Fig. 4, C and D). Thus, newly synthesized human alpha 5beta 1 integrin and the chimeras are transported to both cell surface domains.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Cell surface insertion of newly synthesized human alpha 5beta 1 integrin and of chimeric constructs. Cell lines expressing either human alpha 5beta 1 integrin (A and B), FcR-alpha 5:3-28 (C), or FcR-beta 1:11-47 (D) were metabolically labeled for 20 min with [35S]methionine/35S-cysteine and chased for the indicated periods of time, followed by selective biotinylation of either the apical (A) or basolateral (B) cell surface. After extraction, immunoprecipitations were performed using antibodies specific for alpha 5 (A), beta 1 (B), or the Fc receptor (C and D). Each immunoprecipitate was then split into three samples of which one was directly analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography to see total newly synthesized and immunoprecipitated protein (total IP), one was reprecipitated with streptavidin-agarose before electrophoresis and fluorography to detect newly synthesized protein at the cell surface (surface 35S), and the third was transferred to nitrocellulose after electrophoresis to visualize the steady-state distribution with streptavidin-HRP (surface total). Note that the same fraction of human beta 1 was found to be apically inserted when cells transfected with only the human beta 1 cDNA were analyzed, indicating that direct apical transport of beta 1 also occurred when it was associated with endogenous alpha  subunits. For each type of transfection, cell surface transport was monitored in at least two independent experiments.

alpha 5beta 1 Integrin Is More Stable at the Basolateral Cell Surface than at the Apical Cell Surface-- Basolateral polarization of the transfected integrin could be achieved by internalization from the apical membrane followed by either transcytosis to the basolateral cell surface or degradation. We found that the cytoplasmic domains of alpha 5 and beta 1 were both able to mediate efficient internalization of Fc receptor chimeras, a prerequisite for both mechanisms (data not shown). Because we observed that large fractions of newly synthesized alpha 5beta 1 integrin and chimeras were degraded relatively quickly, we tested whether apical and basolateral alpha 5beta 1 integrins have different half-lives. To do this, we biotinylated filter-grown cells either apically or basolaterally and then incubated the cells for different periods of time at 37 °C. The cells were then lysed, and the integrin was immunoprecipitated with either anti-alpha 5 or anti-beta 1 antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose, and biotinylated integrin was detected with streptavidin-HRP.

Fig. 5 shows the result of such an experiment in which samples from the same cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with either anti-alpha 5 (A) or anti-beta 1 (B) antibodies. In both cases, apically biotinylated integrin disappeared relatively quickly (t1/2, ~1.5 h), whereas basolaterally biotinylated integrin was very stable and became only slowly degraded (t1/2 >=  16 h). Thus, alpha 5beta 1 integrin is more stable at the basolateral cell surface than at the apical cell surface. To test whether the cytoplasmic domains of the alpha 5 and beta 1 subunits are sufficient to mediate selective stabilization in the basolateral membrane, we repeated the same experiment with MDCK cells expressing either one of the two integrin/Fc receptor chimeras. Fig. 6 shows that both the alpha 5 (A) and the beta 1 (B) chimera exhibited a similar behavior as the integrin; apically biotinylated chimeras were more quickly degraded (t1/2 < 60 min) than basolaterally labeled chimeras (t1/2 >=  180 min). Although basolaterally expressed chimeras were also more stable than apical ones, they were not as stable as basolateral alpha 5beta 1 integrin. Because apical chimeras and apical integrins exhibited comparable half-lives, this did not seem to be due to quicker proteolysis of internalized chimeras but to more efficient stabilization of the basolateral pool of dimeric integrin, due to cooperation between the two cytosolic domains and/or interactions occurring in the extracytoplasmic domains (e.g. with the extracellular matrix). Nevertheless, the cytoplasmic domains of alpha 5 and beta 1 were independently sufficient to mediate stabilization of basolaterally expressed chimeras. Although these experiments do not completely exclude that small fractions of apical chimeras and apical alpha 5beta 1 integrin are transcytosed, the degradation of apically expressed integrin is too fast for efficient transcytosis to occur and too complete for transcytosis to be responsible for a significant amount of the finally basolaterally expressed protein (i.e. the apically biotinylated integrins do not exist anymore). Thus, basolateral polarization of wild-type and chimeric integrins is achieved by selective stabilization of the basolaterally expressed pool.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Stabilization of human alpha 5beta 1 integrin on the basolateral cell surface. Filter-grown and sodium butyrate-treated MDCK cells co-expressing alpha 5beta 1 were apically or basolaterally biotinylated on ice. After incubation at 37 °C for the indicated periods of time, the cells were extracted, and immunoprecipitations were performed with either anti-alpha 5 (A) or anti-beta 1 (B) antibodies. After fractionation by SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose of the immunoprecipitates, the presence of biotinylated integrin was visualized with streptavidin-HRP and chemiluminescence. The films were then quantified by densitometric scanning, and the signals obtained after no incubation at 37 °C were set to 100%.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Basolateral stabilization of chimeric Fc receptors containing the cytoplasmic domain of alpha 5 or beta 1. Cells expressing either FcR-alpha 5:3-28 (A) or FcR-beta 1:11-47 (B) were biotinylated and incubated at 37 °C as described in the Fig. 5 legend. The chimeras were then immunoprecipitated with the anti-Fc receptor antibody, and biotinylated immunoprecipitated protein was again visualized after SDS-PAGE and blotting to nitrocellulose with streptavidin-HRP and chemiluminescence. The films were quantified as described in the Fig. 5 legend. Note that when the cells were radioactively labeled before the experiment, and total immunoprecipitated chimera was directly detected by SDS-PAGE and fluorography, disappearance was paralleled by the appearance of a smear of immunoprecipitated protein indicating the protein was degraded and not sheared into the medium (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Our experiments indicate that basolateral polarization of transfected human alpha 5beta 1 integrin in MDCK cells is mediated by distinct determinants in the cytoplasmic domains of each subunit, similar to other basolateral membrane proteins. In contrast to the basolateral sorting determinants described thus far, the cytoplasmic domains of alpha 5 and beta 1 make use of an alternative sorting mechanism that does not involve direct basolateral sorting in the Golgi complex but involves selective stabilization at the basolateral cell surface after transport to both cell surface domains.

Newly synthesized alpha 5beta 1 integrin and chimeras containing the cytoplasmic domain of either one of the two subunits were transported to both cell surface domains. This was also observed when MDCK cells were only transfected with beta 1 cDNA, indicating that the apical cell surface transport was not due to the alpha 5 subunit, which is normally not an abundant alpha  subunit in MDCK cells (17), but also occurred when the human beta 1 subunit was associated with endogenous alpha  subunits. Because the existence of endogenous beta 1 integrins in the apical membrane of MDCK cells has been reported previously, apical transport of transfected human beta 1 is apparently not just caused by a species difference between human and dog beta 1 (18-20).

Basolateral polarization aided by selective stabilization has also been observed for Na+K+-ATPase (11, 14). In this case, significant apical transport of newly synthesized protein was only observed in MDCK cells deficient in apical glycolipid sorting (13, 14). Importantly, our MDCK strain II cells efficiently sort many apical and basolateral membrane proteins including Na+K+-ATPase and apically expressed glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins and are hence able to recognize all known types of plasma membrane sorting signals ranging from cytoplasmic basolateral targeting determinants over glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors to extracytoplasmic apically sorting carbohydrates (5, 10, 21, 25, 28, 36).

Although the alpha 5 and the beta 1 cytoplasmic domains were independently sufficient to mediate basolateral polarization, basolateral stabilization of the wild-type integrin was more pronounced than stabilization of the chimeras. One possible reason for this is that two cytoplasmic domains may be better than one because at least two interactions, perhaps occurring in a cooperative manner, can be used for stabilization. It could also be that the transmembrane and extracytoplasmic domains of the wild-type integrin participate in basolateral stabilization (e.g. substrate binding). Nevertheless, the chimeras clearly indicate that the cytoplasmic domain sequences that were required for basolateral polarization of the dimeric integrin were also sufficient to mediate basolateral polarization of the truncated Fc receptor, which has been shown to be expressed only basolaterally if its cytoplasmic domain contains sorting signals specific for the basolateral membrane (28, 21, 37, 38).

Stabilization of the basolateral pool of integrins could occur either by selective recycling of basolaterally internalized molecules or by interactions with the submembrane cytoskeleton at the cell surface. Cytoplasmic determinants that mediate basolateral recycling are similar or even identical to determinants that mediate basolateral sorting in the Golgi apparatus (25, 39); hence, it is unlikely that the alpha 5beta 1 integrin possesses a determinant for basolateral recycling, because it is not efficiently sorted to the basolateral membrane during biosynthesis or after internalization from the apical membrane. Nevertheless, the short half-lives of apically expressed chimeras and integrin made it impossible to measure differences in endocytic trafficking. Because basolaterally recycling receptors like those for low density lipoprotein or transferrin exhibit extensive endosomal localization in the steady state, the absence of clear endosomal staining for integrins in our immunofluorescence experiments suggests that stabilization occurs at the basolateral cell surface. Although we were not able to detect significant Triton X-100 insolubility of basolaterally expressed constructs (data not shown), it is likely that basolateral stabilization of the alpha 5beta 1 integrin is mediated by interactions with cytoskeletal components. Integrins are connected to the actin-based cytoskeleton by a linkage consisting of a large complex of proteins that is also involved in the transmission of signals across the plasma membrane. In fibroblasts, integrins, which normally become quickly degraded, have been shown to become stabilized on the plasma membrane upon the addition of ligand (40). Importantly, the addition of ligand stabilizes not only the interacting integrin but also other integrins that cannot interact with the added ligand (40), indicating that the stabilization of integrins at the plasma membrane can also be mediated by their cytoplasmic domains in fibroblasts. Thus, in the steady state, cytoplasmic domain-mediated stabilization in epithelial cells occurs at the basolateral plasma membrane domain because it contains established extracellular matrix contacts and therefore the necessary organization of the submembrane cytoskeleton.

Of all the proteins known to interact with integrin cytoplasmic domains, only calreticulin is known to bind to alpha  subunits by interacting with a membrane-proximal conserved sequence (41); this conserved sequence was neither sufficient for basolateral expression of the dimeric integrin nor required for basolateral expression of the alpha 5-Fc receptor chimera. In contrast, the last 11 amino acids of the alpha 5 subunit were found to be required for basolateral expression. Although this could be due at least in part to reduced rates of endocytosis, the C-terminal 11 amino acids do not contain a motif reminiscent of an endocytosis determinant, suggesting a direct involvement of the C-terminal 11 amino acids in basolateral stabilization.

The cytoplasmic domain of beta 1 is known to interact with many different proteins, and the binding sites cover essentially the entire cytoplasmic domain (15, 41, 42). Similar to alpha 5, the C-terminal amino acids of beta 1 were required for basolateral expression. Although the last 9 amino acids contain a NPXY motif, of which the tyrosine is apparently involved in basolateral expression, previous studies indicate that the C-terminal NPXY motif is not important for integrin internalization but for the accumulation of alpha 5beta 1 in focal adhesions (43-46). Of all the proteins known to interact with the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1, only one of the proposed binding sites for talin and one for focal adhesion kinase overlap with the C-terminal domain required for basolateral expression (47). Additionally, the tyrosine residue involved in basolateral expression is also important for the interaction with the recently identified protein ICAP-1 (48).

In MDCK cells, beta 1 integrins participate in the determination of the spatial orientation of the cells and can trigger a reversal of polarity in response to matrix in contact with the apical membrane (18, 19, 20, 49). The formation of tubulocysts upon collagen overlay or growth in a collagen gel was observed with various epithelial cells, indicating that this is a general phenomenon and suggesting that apical expression of beta 1 integrins is not restricted to MDCK cells (for a review, see Ref. 50). These observations, together with our results, suggest a model in which beta 1 integrins are constitutively transported to both cell surface domains and act as sensors that signal the presence of matrix to the interior of the cells; hence, cells will be able to respond relatively quickly to changes in their environment. Reorientation of the cellular polarity is then a complex process requiring reorganization of the cytoskeleton, remodeling of the cell surface, and stabilization of integrins at the newly forming basolateral membrane.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. E. Ruoslahti for the cDNAs coding for the human alpha 5beta 1 integrin and Dr. W. Hunziker for the pCB7 plasmid. We are grateful to Dr. A. Whitney for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Canton de Genève.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger These authors contributed equally to this work.

§ Recipient of a fellowship from the Swiss Talents in Academic Research and Teaching program of the Swiss National Science Foundation. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology, University of Geneva, Sciences III, 30, Quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Genève-4, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-22-702-6729; Fax: 41-22-781-1747; E-mail: Matter{at}cellbio.unige.ch.

The abbreviations used are: MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Nelson, W. J. (1992) Science 258, 948-954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Matter, K., and Mellman, I. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 545-554[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Keller, P., and Simons, K. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 3001-3009[Abstract]
  4. Weimbs, T., Low, S. H., Chapin, S. J., and Mostov, K. E. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 393-399[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Brown, D. A., Crise, B., and Rose, J. K. (1989) Science 245, 1499-1501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lisanti, M. P., Caras, I. W., Davitz, M. A., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2145-2156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Scheiffele, P., Peranen, J., and Simons, K. (1995) Nature 378, 96-98[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Kundu, A., Avalos, R. T., Sanderson, C. M., and Nayak, D. P. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 6508-6515[Abstract]
  9. Yeaman, C., Le Gall, A. H., Baldwin, A. N., Monlauzeur, L., Le Bivic, A., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 929-940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gut, A., Kappeler, F., Hyka, N., Balda, M. S., Hauri, H.-P., and Matter, K. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1919-1929[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hammerton, R. W., Krzeminski, K. A., Mays, R. W., Ryan, T. A., Wollner, D. A., and Nelson, W. J. (1991) Science 254, 847-850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Contreras, R. G., Avila, G., Gutierrez, C., Bolivar, J. J., Gonzalez-Mariscal, L., Darzon, A., Beaty, G., Rodriguez-Boulan, E., and Cereijido, M. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 257, C896-C905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Caplan, M. J., Anderson, H. C., Palade, G. E., and Jamieson, J. D. (1986) Cell 46, 623-631[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Mays, R. W., Siemers, K. A., Fritz, B. A., Lowe, A. W., van Meer, G., and Nelson, W. J. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 1105-1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Burridge, K., and Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M. (1996) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 12, 463-518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Ruoslahti, E. (1996) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 12, 697-715[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Schoenenberger, C.-A., Zuk, A., Zinkl, G. M., Kendall, D., and Matlin, K. S. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 527-541[Abstract]
  18. Ojakian, G. K., and Schwimmer, R. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 561-576[Abstract]
  19. Schwimmer, R., and Ojakian, G. K. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 2487-2498[Abstract]
  20. Zuk, A., and Matlin, K. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 1875-1889[Abstract]
  21. Matter, K., Hunziker, W., and Mellman, I. (1992) Cell 71, 741-753[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Green, S. A., Plutner, H., and Mellman, I. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 9867-9874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Balda, M. S., Whitney, J. A., Flores, C., González, S., Cereijido, M., and Matter, K. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 134, 1031-1049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Matter, K., and Balda, M. S. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 511-519[Abstract]
  25. Matter, K., Whitney, J. A., Yamamoto, E. M., and Mellman, I. (1993) Cell 74, 1053-1064[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Miettinen, H. M., Matter, K., Hunziker, W., Rose, J. K., and Mellman, I. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 875-888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hughes, P., O'Toole, T. E., Ylanne, J., Shattil, S. J., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12411-12417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hunziker, W., Harter, C., Matter, K., and Mellman, I. (1991) Cell 66, 907-920[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Smilenov, L., Briesewitz, R., and Marcantonio, E. E. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 1215-1223[Abstract]
  30. LaFlamme, S. E., Thomas, L. A., Yamada, S. S., and Yamada, K. M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 1287-1298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lukashev, M. E., Sheppard, D., and Pytela, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18311-18314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hynes, R. O. (1992) Cell 69, 11-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Copeland, C. S., Doms, R. W., Bolzau, E. M., Webster, R. G., and Helenius, A. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 1179-1191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Matter, K., and Hauri, H.-P. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 1916-1923[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Boll, W., Partin, J. S., Katz, A. I., Caplan, M. J., and Jamieson, J. D. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 8592-8596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Gottardi, C. J., and Caplan, M. J. (1993) Science 260, 552-554[Free Full Text]
  37. Hunziker, W., and Fumey, C. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2963-2969[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Matter, K., Yamamoto, E. M., and Mellman, I. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 991-1004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Odorizzi, G., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 1255-1264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Dalton, S. L., Scharf, E., Briesewitz, R., Marcantonio, E. E., and Assoian, R. K. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 1781-1791[Abstract]
  41. Dedhar, S., and Hannigan, G. E. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 657-669[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Yamada, K. M., and Miyamoto, S. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 681-689[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Reszka, A. A., Hayashi, Y., and Horwitz, A. F. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 117, 1321-1330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Vignoud, L., Usson, Y., Balzac, F., Tarone, G., and Block, M. R. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 199, 603-611[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Nhieu, G. T. V., Krukonis, E. S., Reszka, A. A., Horwitz, A. F., and Isberg, R. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7665-7672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Vignoud, L., Albigès-Rizo, C., Frachet, P., and Block, M. R. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 1421-1430[Abstract]
  47. Lewis, J. M., and Schwartz, M. A. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 151-160[Abstract]
  48. Chang, D. D., Wong, C., Smith, S., and Liu, J. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 1149-1157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Wang, A. Z., Ojakian, G. K., and Nelson, W. J. (1990) J. Cell Sci. 95, 153-165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Montesano, R., Soriano, J. V., Pepper, M. S., and Orci, L. (1997) J. Cell. Physiol. 173, 152-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
Z. Cao, C. Li, J. N. Higginbotham, J. L. Franklin, D. L. Tabb, R. Graves-Deal, S. Hill, K. Cheek, W. G. Jerome, L. A. Lapierre, et al.
Use of Fluorescence-activated Vesicle Sorting for Isolation of Naked2-associated, Basolaterally Targeted Exocytic Vesicles for Proteomics Analysis
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, September 1, 2008; 7(9): 1651 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. S. Chmelar and N. M. Nathanson
Identification of a Novel Apical Sorting Motif and Mechanism of Targeting of the M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 35381 - 35396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Lopez, S. Metral, D. Eladari, S. Drevensek, P. Gane, R. Chambrey, V. Bennett, J.-P. Cartron, C. Le Van Kim, and Y. Colin
The Ammonium Transporter RhBG: REQUIREMENT OF A TYROSINE-BASED SIGNAL AND ANKYRIN-G FOR BASOLATERAL TARGETING AND MEMBRANE ANCHORAGE IN POLARIZED KIDNEY EPITHELIAL CELLS
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 8221 - 8228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
P. Nava, S. Lopez, C. F. Arias, S. Islas, and L. Gonzalez-Mariscal
The rotavirus surface protein VP8 modulates the gate and fence function of tight junctions in epithelial cells
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2004; 117(23): 5509 - 5519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Milewski, J. Mickle, J. Forrest, D. Stafford, B. Moyer, J Cheng, W. Guggino, B. Stanton, and G. Cutting
A PDZ-binding motif is essential but not sufficient to localize the C terminus of CFTR to the apical membrane
J. Cell Sci., January 2, 2001; 114(4): 719 - 726.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. Lipardi, L. Nitsch, and C. Zurzolo
Detergent-insoluble GPI-anchored Proteins Are Apically Sorted in Fischer Rat Thyroid Cells, but Interference with Cholesterol or Sphingolipids Differentially Affects Detergent Insolubility and Apical Sorting
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2000; 11(2): 531 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. El Nemer, Y. Colin, C. Bauvy, P. Codogno, R. H. Fraser, J. P. Cartron, and C. L. Van Kim
Isoforms of the Lutheran/Basal Cell Adhesion Molecule Glycoprotein Are Differentially Delivered in Polarized Epithelial Cells. MAPPING OF THE BASOLATERAL SORTING SIGNAL TO A CYTOPLASMIC DI-LEUCINE MOTIF
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 1999; 274(45): 31903 - 31908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gut, A.
Right arrow Articles by Matter, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gut, A.
Right arrow Articles by Matter, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement