Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaCount, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lebioda, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaCount, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lebioda, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 46, 30406-30409, November 13, 1998


Structural Origins of L(+)-Tartrate Inhibition of Human Prostatic Acid Phosphatase*

Michael W. LaCount, George Handy, and Lukasz LebiodaDagger

From the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

Acid phosphatase activity in the blood serum is usually separated into tartrate-resistant and tartrate-refractory, which is reported as the prostatic acid phosphatase level. Human prostatic acid phosphatase crystals soaked in N-propyl-L-tartramate were used to collect x-ray diffraction data to 2.9 Å resolution under cryogenic conditions. Positive difference electron density, corresponding to the inhibitor, was found. The quality of the electron density maps clearly shows the orientation of the carboxylate and N-propyl-substituted amide groups. The hydroxyl group attached to C3 forms two crucial hydrogen bonds with Arg-79 and His-257. Previous crystallographic studies compiled on the tartrate-rat prostatic acid phosphatase binary complex (Lindqvist, Y., Schneider, G., and Vihko, P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20744-20746) erroneously positioned D-tartrate into the active site. Modeling studies have shown that the C3 hydroxyl group on the D(-)-stereoisomer of tartrate, which does not significantly inhibit prostatic acid phosphatase, does not form strong hydrogen bonds with Arg-79 or His-257. The structure of human prostatic acid phosphatase, noncovalently bound in N-propyl-L-tartramate, is used to develop inhibitors with higher specificity and potency than L(+)-tartrate.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

Human prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP)1 has been of significant medical interest ever since tests screening for serum PAP levels were successfully used to diagnose and stage prostate cancer (1). Recently, the primary diagnostic protocol for detecting prostate cancer has shifted from evaluating serum PAP levels to utilizing the prostate specific antigen test. However, accurately detecting serum PAP levels is still of considerable interest because of its effectiveness in staging metastatic prostatic cancer and evaluating the progress of chemotherapy in prostate cancer patients (2).

PAP, which is produced by the prostate gland, is found in the seminal fluid at concentrations near 1 mg/ml (3). The enzyme is categorized as an acid phosphatase, because its optimum pH range is between 4 and 7. PAP belongs to the family of high molecular weight phosphatases. Mature PAP is active as a glycosylated homodimer with Mr = ~100,000. The enzyme is capable of hydrolyzing a wide spectrum of substrates including alkyl, aryl, and acyl orthophosphate monoesters and phosphorylated proteins (4). The natural substrate for PAP is uncertain, thus, the discovery of the specific biological function is of great interest and awaits further investigations.

The catalytic mechanism has been intensely studied and it was concluded that the enzyme should be classified as a histidine phosphatase (5). The crucial intermediate is phosphoroamidate, namely phosphohistidine. The rate-limiting step is the breakdown of this covalent phosphoenzyme intermediate through addition of a nucleophilic water molecule to phosphoroamidate with concomitant elimination of inorganic phosphate, via a SN2 mechanism, to form a noncovalent binary enzyme-inorganic phosphate complex. Extensive studies of chemically modified enzyme and a series of site-directed mutants allowed Van Etten and co-workers (5) to propose a sound description of the catalytic process.

L(+)-Tartrate is a fairly good inhibitor of PAP (Ki = 2.9 × 10-5 M at pH 5.0). It is specific for acid phosphatases; in addition to PAP, it also inhibits homologous lysosomal acid phosphatases and acid phosphatases isolated from such tissues as liver, bone, and kidney, which are usually not present in the blood serum (6). The inhibition is a stereospecific property because D(-)-tartrate and mesotartrate are only very poor inhibitors. On the other hand, other alpha -hydroxycarboxylic acids have been tested, and it was concluded that the inhibitor must possess an alpha -hydroxyl group in the D-configuration. The beta -carbon must be part of a carboxyl group or be attached to a carboxyl or hydroxyl group (7). The specificity of L(+)-tartrate inhibition was further investigated by Lindqvist et al. (8) who determined the crystal structure of rat PAP with noncovalently bound L(+)-tartrate. Unfortunately, these studies were based on data at 3 Å resolution and yielded only poor density for the ligand. In addition, a wrong stereoisomer of the tartrate model was used.

Nontoxic and specific inhibitors of PAP should be a valuable tool in the search for its natural substrate(s). Structure-based development of inhibitors can only proceed by first elucidating the accurate molecular structure of human-PAP and its complexes with lead inhibitors. We report here the three-dimensional structure of human PAP complexed with N-propyl-L-tartramate (NPT), which is a mono-n-propylamide derivative of L-tartrate, at 2.9 Å resolution.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

Crystallization and Data Collection-- Human prostatic acid phosphatase was purified from semen using tartrate affinity chromatography as described by Van Etten and Saini (9). NPT was synthesized from L(+)-tartrate according to procedures previously described by Van Etten and Saini (9). Crystals of native human PAP were grown from solutions containing 30% PEG 1500, 7% PEG 1000, 6% PEG 400, 100 mM KCl, and 100 mM glycine at pH 10.0. Typical native crystals grew to 0.2 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm in size. The complex with NPT was prepared by soaking a native human PAP crystal in artificial mother liquor containing 34% PEG 1500, 7% PEG 1000, 6% PEG 400, 100 mM KCl, 100 mM glycine at pH 10.0, and 100 mM NPT for 3 h. Crystal transfers were performed by using cryoloops appropriately sized to directly pick up the crystal. The crystals were orthorhombic, space group P212121, with unit cell dimensions a = 119.9 Å, b = 202.7 Å, and c = 71.1 Å and contained two homodimers per asymmetric subunit.

Data for the binary complex were collected by flash freezing the crystal at 123 K in a stream of nitrogen generated by a Molecular Structure Corp. low temperature X-Stream attachment. A Rigaku rotating anode source at 50 kV and 100 mA with mirror optics and an R-Axis IV area detector at a distance of 150 mm were used to collect data as 1o oscillation frames over 180o range yielding a redundancy factor of 5 and an Rmerge = 13.8%. A total of 224,797 reflections with I > 1sigma (I) was measured and reduced to 39,548 unique reflections using the HKL suite of programs (10). The data set is 98.5% complete to 2.9 Å resolution and contains 60% reflections with I > 2sigma (I) in the 2.98-2.88 Å resolution shell.

Molecular Modeling-- The coordinates for NPT were generated in SYBYL using the interactive model building protocol Sketch Molecule (11). The resultant structure was then subjected to 100 cycles of energy minimization using the Powell method and a gradient termination. Torsion angles of NPT for atoms O1-C1-C2-C3 (tau 1), C1-C2-C3-C4 (tau 2), and C2-C3-C4-O4 (tau 3) were manually adjusted to -131o (sigma  = 12o), -174o (sigma  = 1.0o), and -118o (sigma  = 12o), respectively, within the graphics program CHAIN (12). The sigma  values indicate the standard deviations calculated from small molecule data. Initial torsion angle values were based on the average values observed for L(+)-tartrate using small molecule crystallography on L(+)-tartrate and obtained from the Cambridge Structural data base (13).

Map Interpretation and Refinement-- Initial difference electron density maps for the binary complex were calculated with X-PLOR (online) with phases based on the refined structure of native human PAP solved at 3.1 Å resolution. Visual examination of the maps and model building were done with the interactive graphics program CHAIN. NPT was manually fitted into the appropriate Fo - Fc electron density initially contoured at a 2.3 sigma  level. The agreement between the NPT model and the initial difference density was excellent (Fig. 1). The complex was refined using simulated annealing, positional (conventional least squares) and temperature factor refinement with noncrystallographic symmetry restraints imposed on the four PAP subunits present in the asymmetric part of the unit cell, but not on the ligands or solvent molecules (14-16). The final Rfactor is 21.1% (Rfree = 30.8%) in the resolution range of 8-2.9 Å with root mean square deviations from ideal bond length = 0.014 Å and bond angles = 1.7o.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Stereoview of the positive F-Fmap contoured at the 2.3 sigma  level within the active site of human PAP. The inhibitor (NPT), which was omitted during initial map calculations, was modeled into the electron density. The electron density around the C1 carboxyl group is clearly planar when viewed down the axis of the C1-C2 bond bisecting the O1-C1-O11 angle (orientation not shown).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

Inhibitor Binding in PAP-- Initial difference Fourier maps of the binary complex, which was phased with the nonliganded native structure, revealed interpretable positive electron density within the active site for three of the four monomers present in the asymmetric subunit. NPT was manually positioned within the observed density as a rigid body for subunits A, B, and D. The asymmetric nature of the electron density, because of the mono-n-propyl moiety, facilitated the correct positioning of the tartrate pharmacophore.

The L-tartrate PAP binary complex reported by Lindqvist et al. (8) suffered from incorrect modeling of tartrate, due in part to the symmetrical nature of tartrate and ambiguous electron density. Also, their tartrate model (Protein Data Base access code: 1rpa) corresponds to D-tartrate (2S, 3S) and does not accurately portray the structure of the used inhibitor (Fig. 2). D-Tartrate does not inhibit PAP although its enantiomer, L-tartrate (2R, 3R), is a moderate (Ki = 10-5 M) and specific PAP inhibitor (9). Torsion angle measurements for the final tartrate model reported by Lindqvist et al. (8) were 147o (Delta  = 82o), -83o (Delta  = 91o) and 18o (Delta  = 224o) for tau 1, tau 2, and tau 3, respectively, with Delta  indicating angular deviation from average small molecule values calculated for L-tartrate. Our final tartrate model in subunit A has torsion angles of -125o (Delta  = 6o) 178o (Delta  = 8o) and -134o (Delta  = 16o) corresponding to tau 1, tau 2, and tau 3, respectively. Average torsion angle values and sample standard deviations (s) for all three NPT molecules included in the final model are tau 1 = -123o (s = 3o) tau 2 = 178o (s = 0o), and tau 3 = -135o (s = 3o). Although the torsion angles of NPT deviate minimally outside the sigma  range calculated for small molecule data on L-tartrate, both NPT and L-tartrate have a similar conformational profile. In both cases, tau 1 and tau 3 are mobile whereas tau 2 remains conformationally rigid. This suggests that the hydroxyl groups attached to C2 and C3 in NPT and L-tartrate remain relatively rigid, whereas the carboxylate groups adjust to optimize intermolecular interactions.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Superposition of the rat PAP-tartrate complex (thin lines) onto the human PAP-NPT complex (residues labeled) shows that the C3 hydroxyl group in L-tartrate (TAR1345) is positioned to form strong hydrogen bonds with Arg-79 and His-257, whereas the C3 hydroxyl group in D-tartrate (TAR343) is not. Substrate-protein hydrogen bonding interactions in subunit A of human PAP: Arg-15Neta h-TAR1345O1 (2.30 Å), His-12Nepsilon 2-TAR1345O1 (2.64 Å), Asp-258N-TAR1345O11 (2.92 Å), Arg-11Nepsilon -TAR1345O11 (2.81 Å), Arg-79Neta h4-TAR1345O3 (2.20 Å), His257Ndelta 1-TAR1345O3 (2.67 Å).

The major difference between modeled D-tartrate and observed L-tartrate within the active site stems from the position of the C3 hydroxyl group. In D-tartrate, the C3-OH group points away from His-257 (distance = 4.57 Å) and lies underneath and parallel to the plane of the guanidino group of Arg-79 (Fig. 2). Thus, the C3-OH group of D-tartrate is not in a geometrically favorable position to form strong hydrogen bonds with either Arg-79 or His-257. In contrast, the C3-OH group of NPT is positioned in between His-257 and Arg-79 and is in a favorable location to form hydrogen bonds with His-257 (distance = 2.67 Å), Arg-79 (distance = 2.20 Å) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the C1 carboxylate group of NPT is directed away from the carboxylate group of Asp-258 and into the vicinity of His-12, Arg-11, and Arg-15, thereby decreasing repulsive electrostatic interactions. Conversely, the C1 carboxylate group of D-tartrate is directed toward the carboxylate group of Asp-258 and is in a position to generate unfavorable stereoelectronic interactions.

The guanidino group of Arg-127, which is thought to participate in the substrate specificity of PAP, is approximately 11 Å away from the amide group of NPT and is not in a position to interact with the bound substrate. The hydroxyl group of Tyr-123 is in a geometrically favorable position to form a hydrogen bond with the amide oxygen (O41) of NPT, however, the distance between Tyr-123's hydroxyl group and the O41 atom of NPT is 4.16 Å, thus denying a strong hydrogen bond. A bridging water molecule could afford an indirect hydrogen bonding interaction between Tyr-123 and NPT, however, we did not see electron density to support this hypothesis.

The N-propyl moiety from the amide portion of NPT is in a trans geometry typical of trans-peptide bonds observed in proteins. This geometry extends the propyl group of NPT into a hydrophobic region formed by Trp-174, Phe-171, Ser-175, and Ile-18. The additional noncovalent interactions most likely account for the small decrease in Ki for NPT (Ki = 2.5 × 10-5 M) versus that of L-tartrate (Ki = 2.9 × 10-5 M) (9). The NPT-PAP binary complex provides a good lead inhibitor enzyme model to initiate structure-based inhibitor design.

Overall Structure and Tartrate Inhibition-- The overall topology of human PAP is consistent with rat PAP with the active site located at the C-terminal end of the beta -sheet in the alpha /beta domain (17). Furthermore, human PAP does not experience a significant structural change upon binding the inhibitor. Superposition of the alpha -carbons from a single subunit of native human PAP, vanadate-rat-PAP and tartrate-rat-PAP complexes onto the alpha -carbons of human-PAP-NPT complex yielded root mean square deviations of 0.384 Å, 0.786 Å, and 0.714 Å, respectively. Most of the structural differences in the active site occurred among arginine and histidine residues and involved positional shifts of the side groups to accommodate optimal hydrogen bonding to the inhibitor.

The alpha /beta domain of human PAP has a similar fold compared with the alpha /beta domains found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) phosphoglycerate mutase (SPM) (Protein Data Bank access code: 4pgm) and the recombinant C-terminal (bisphosphatase activity) domain of rat liver fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (RFB) (Protein Data Bank access code: 1fbt) (18, 19). Superposition of alpha /beta domains of SPM and RFB onto the alpha /beta domain of human PAP, utilizing 123 and 121 equivalence points (CA atoms), respectively, yielded corresponding root mean square deviations of 2.85 Å and 3.14 Å.

The sequence motif of RHGXRXP, which is conserved in rat and human prostatic acid phosphatases and in human lysosomal, rat liver lysosomal, yeast, and Escherichia coli acid phosphatases (20), has similar conformation among PAP (RHGDRSP), SPM (RHGESEL), and RFB (RHGQSEW) (Fig. 3). However, the sequence corresponding to the ~XRXP portion in acid phosphatases differs from those present in glycolytic phosphatases. Arg-15 of PAP, corresponding to the second arginine in RHGXRXP, is in a position to donate a single hydrogen bond to the carboxylate group of L-tartrate in PAP. However, SPM and RFB do not have the second arginine found in the motif and instead have a serine (Ser-11). Modeling shows that this serine is too far from L-tartrate and in either case, Ser-11 of SPM and RFB most likely does not hydrogen bond to L-tartrate.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A superposition of the active sites from human PAP (residues labeled), SPM (single lines), and RFB (double lines) shown with the PAP inhibitor NPT (in center).

Moreover, the conserved proline residue in the sequence motif RHGXRXP has a significant impact on the conformational differences observed between PAP, SPM, and RFB. The absence of proline (Pro-17 (PAP), Leu-13 (RFB), and Trp-13 (SPM)) in phosphoglycerate mutase and fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase leads to the formation of a short alpha -helix-coil loop structure. The loop narrows the active site and functions to impart specificity for small molecule phosphate esters such as phosphoglycerate and fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (18). Conversely, Pro-17 in PAP does not allow for the formation an alpha -helix-coil loop structure to close in on the active site. Instead, the large random coil loop structure, which is structurally conserved in rat PAP, extends downward into the alpha -domain causing the active site to be open and accessible to large substrates such as phosphorylated proteins.

In addition to the sequence motif RHGXRXP, residues Arg-79, His-257, and Asp-258 are involved in binding L-tartrate. Residues corresponding to Arg-79 and His-257 in PAP are conserved in RFB (Arg-57 and His-142) and SPM (Arg-59 and His-181). However, Asp-258, which is conserved in the known acid phosphatases, is not conserved in the SPM or RFB. Asp-258 in PAP participates in two hydrogen bonds to L-tartrate. One of the interactions originates from the main-chain and involves the amide nitrogen of Asp-258 donating a hydrogen bond to the C1 carboxylate group of L-tartrate (Asp-258-N ... NPT-O2 distance 3.07 Å). The second involves the side-chain carboxylic acid oxygen of Asp-258 and the C2 hydroxyl group of L-tartrate (Asp-258-OD2 ... NPT-O2 distance 2.83 Å). The residues, which would correspond to Asp-258 in SPM and RFB, are Gly-182 and Gln-143, respectively. The main chain hydrogen bond to L-tartrate would be conserved because of the similar folds of SPM and RFB, however, the side chain of Gly-182 in SPM is not capable of forming a hydrogen bond and the side chain of Gln-143 in RFB, which is one carbon unit longer than Asp-258, would most likely be out of position. Thus, a strong binding of L-tartrate to SPM and RFB is unlikely, even though the phosphate binding site of these enzymes is structurally similar to PAP. Therefore, tartrate resistance is not only a function of differing topology and active site structure, but also is dependent upon the residues within structurally similar active sites.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grants MCB 9604004 and BIR 9419866) and the Department of Energy (Grant DE-FG-95TE00058).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The atomic coordinates and structure factors (access code 2hpa) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Brookhaven National Laboratory, NY.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 803-777-2140; Fax: 803-777-9521; E-mail: lebioda{at}psc.sc.edu.

The abbreviations used are: PAP, prostatic acid phosphatase; NPT, N-propyl-L-tartramate; PEG, polyethylene glycol; SPM, S. cerevisiae (yeast) phosphoglycerate mutase; RFB, rat liver fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

  1. Gutman, E. B., Sproul, E. E., and Gutman, A. B. (1936) Am. J. Cancer 28, 485-496
  2. Shetty, S. D., and Cerny, J. C. (1992) Henry Ford Hosp. Med. J. 40, 93-98[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Rönnberg, L., Vihko, P., Sajanti, E., and Vihko, R. (1981) Int. J. Androl. 4, 372-378[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Apostol, I., Kuciel, R., Wasylewska, E., and Ostrowski, W. (1985) Acta Biochim. Pol. 32, 187-197[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Van Etten, R. L. (1982) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 390, 27-51[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Roy, A. V., Brower, M. E., and Hayden, J. E. (1971) Clin. Chem. 17, 1093-1102[Abstract]
  7. Kilsheimer, G. S., and Axelrod, B. (1957) J. Biol. Chem. 227, 879-890[Free Full Text]
  8. Lindqvist, Y., Schneider, G., and Vihko, P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20744-20746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Van Etten, R. L., and Saini, M. S. (1978) Clin. Chem. 24, 1525-1530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) in Methods in Enzymology (Carter, C. W., Jr., and Sweet, R. M., eds), Vol. 276, pp. 307-326, Academic Press, New York
  11. SYBYL (version 6.3) Manual (1991-1996), Tripos, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
  12. Sack, J. S. (1988) J. Mol. Graph. 6, 224-225
  13. Lovelace, L., Lewinski, K., Jakob, C. G., Kuciel, R., Ostrowski, W. S., and Lebioda, L. (1997) Polish J. Biochem. 44, 673-678
  14. Brunger, A. T., Kuriyan, J., and Karplus, M. (1987) Science 235, 458-460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Brunger, A. T., Krukowski, A., and Erickson, J. (1990) Acta Crystallogr. A46, 585-593[CrossRef]
  16. Brunger, A. T. (1992) Nature 355, 472-474[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Schneider, G., Lindqvist, Y., and Vihko, P. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2609-2615[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Rigden, D. J., Alexeev, D., Phillips, S. E., and Fothergill-Gilmore, L. A. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 276, 449-459[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Lee, Y.-H., Ogata, C., Pflugrath, J. W., Levitt, D. G., Sarma, R., Banaszak, L. J., and Pilkis, S. J. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6010-6019[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Van Etten, R. L., Davidson, R., Stevis, P., MacArthur, H., and Moore, D. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 2313-2319[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Wang, Z. Wei, Q. Bian, Z. Cheng, M. Wan, L. Liu, and W. Gong
Crystal Structure of Human Bisphosphoglycerate Mutase
J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 39132 - 39138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Shakarian, M. B. Joshi, E. Ghedin, and D. M. Dwyer
Molecular Dissection of the Functional Domains of a Unique, Tartrate-resistant, Surface Membrane Acid Phosphatase in the Primitive Human Pathogen Leishmania donovani
J. Biol. Chem., May 10, 2002; 277(20): 17994 - 18001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X.-Q. Zhang, M.-S. Lee, S. Zelivianski, and M.-F. Lin
Characterization of a Prostate-specific Tyrosine Phosphatase by Mutagenesis and Expression in Human Prostate Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2001; 276(4): 2544 - 2550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaCount, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lebioda, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaCount, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lebioda, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement