Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouvier, F.
Right arrow Articles by Camara, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouvier, F.
Right arrow Articles by Camara, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 46, 30651-30659, November 13, 1998


Induction and Control of Chromoplast-specific Carotenoid Genes by Oxidative Stress*

Florence BouvierDagger , Ralph A. Backhaus§, and Bilal CamaraDagger

From the Dagger  Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS and Université Louis Pasteur, 67084 Strasbourg, France and the § Department of Botany, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1601

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

The differentiation of chloroplasts into chromoplasts involves a series of biochemical changes that culminate with the intense accumulation of long chain chromophore carotenoids such as lycopene, rhodoxanthin, astaxanthin, anhydroeschsoltzxanthin, capsanthin, and capsorubin. The signal pathways mediating these transformations are unknown. Chromoplast carotenoids are known to accumulate in green tissues experiencing stress conditions, and studies indicate that they provide efficient protection against oxidative stress. We tested the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as regulators of chromoplast carotenoid biosynthesis in vivo. The addition of ROS progenitors, such as menadione, tert-butylhydroperoxide, or paraquat and prooxidants such as diamide or buthionine sulfoximine to green pericarp discs of pepper fruits rapidly and dramatically induce the simultaneous expression of multiple carotenogenic gene mRNAS that give rise to capsanthin. Similarly, down-regulation of catalase by amitrole induces expression of carotenogenic gene mRNAs leading to the synthesis of capsanthin in excised green pericarp discs. ROS signals from plastids and mitochondria also contribute significantly to this process. Analysis of the capsanthin-capsorubin synthase promoter in combination with a beta -glucuronidase reporter gene reveals strong activation in transformed pepper protoplasts challenged with the above ROS. Collectively these data demonstrate that ROS act as a novel class of second messengers that mediate intense carotenoid synthesis during chromoplast differentiation.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Plastids are plant organelles whose diverse functions include photosynthesis, gravity perception, and biogenesis of micro- and macromolecules. These functions do not occur in all plastids but are associated with structurally distinct plastid types. Plastid differentiation is a highly coordinated process involving programmed, multi-phase events that are transduced by a variety of stimuli. These transducers activate numerous morphological and biochemical changes that ultimately affect plastid compartmentalization. This is particularly evident in chloroplasts undergoing the transformation to chromoplasts, an event characterized by the synthesis and accumulation of carotenoids into unique plastid substructures. These changes are accompanied by the yellow to red color shift in flowers, fruits, and roots of certain plants (1, 2). Although the molecular events controlling these alterations are largely unknown, emerging evidence suggests that reactive oxygen species (ROS)1 may play a vital role in this process (3). In this paper we present data showing how oxidative stress affects carotenogenesis in plants.

Data from several model systems indicate that ROS operate at the molecular level. Homeostatic variations in ROS levels are known to activate normal and pathological events during animal cell development (4, 5). For example, it has been shown that hydrogen peroxide acts as a potent activator of NF-kappa B, a transcription factor that is involved in inflammation, immune responses, and acute-phase responses in animal cells (4).

Plants are also subject to oxidative stresses (6, 7). Being immobile and because of oxygenic photosynthesis, they have the highest internal oxygen concentrations of any other organism. The concentration of molecular oxygen in plant leaf cells is 250 µM, which exceeds the concentration of 0.1 µM found in mammalian mitochondria (8). It has been estimated that 1% of the oxygen consumed by plants is diverted into active oxygen (9). As a consequence, plant cells have developed an array of nonenzymatic and enzymatic mechanisms for scavenging this toxic component. Neutralization by isoprenoids such as carotenoids and tocopherols (10, 11) are examples of nonenzymatic mechanisms. Plants and other organisms also rely on the enzymatic scavenging of ROS by catalase, glutathion peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase (6).

The damaging effects of ROS have been examined during plant stress (12) and senescence (7). More recently, they have also been implicated in plant-pathogen interactions (13-15).

Multiple observations also suggest that oxidative stress regulates carotenoid biosynthesis during the chloroplast to chromoplast transition in plants. First, in Reseda odorata leaves, rodoxanthin, a chromoplast-specific carotenoid, shows a de novo accumulation following stembark removal (16). Apparently this procedure causes a transient disruption of turgor pressure, which leads to oxidative stress (17). Second, in Aloe vera (18) and Cryptomeria (19), stress from drought and high irradiance or low temperatures induces the de novo accumulation of rhodoxanthin in chloroplasts, which subsequently undergo a transformation into photosynthetically active chloro-chromoplasts. Similarly, it is known that drought and low or high temperatures can induce oxidative stress (12). These conditions lead to the de novo accumulation of anhydroeschsoltzxanthin, a chromoplast carotenoid in Buxus sempervirens leaves (20). One explanation is that the extended chromophores of rhodoxanthin and anhydroeschsoltzxanthin provide better photodynamic screens for protection from the oxidative stresses generated under these conditions than do normal leaf carotenoids, in good agreement with data based on model studies (21-23). This mechanism is also observed in nonplants, such as the yeast Phaffia rhodozyma, where singlet oxygen and peroxyl radicals control the biosynthesis of astaxanthin, another carotenoid with an extended chromophore (24).

These data point to oxidative stress as a potent driving force for the expression of carotenoid biosynthetic genes during the chloroplast to chromoplast transition in plants. To test this, we made use of pepper (Capsicum annuum) fruit system (3). As pepper fruits ripen and chloroplasts differentiate into chromoplasts, they accumulate large quantities of carotenoids that include capsanthin and capsorubin, compounds responsible for the red color change. Their pathway is shown in Fig. 1. Several cDNAs for enzymes of this pathway have been characterized (for a review, see Ref. 2). Using these as molecular probes and the promoter directing the biosynthesis of the chromoplast-specific carotenoid, capsanthin, we show that ROS are potent inducers of carotenogenic gene mRNAs expression during chromoplast development.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Pathway of carotenoid biosynthesis in pepper chromoplasts. Enzymes whose cDNAs have been cloned and used in the text are indicated in italics.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Plant Material-- Bell pepper (C. annuum cv Yolo Wonder) plants were grown under controlled greenhouse conditions, and fruits were taken at the mature green stage.

Pericarp Disc Incubation-- After sterilization with 2% sodium hypochlorite, pericarp discs (1.5 cm in diameter) were excised with a cork borer. The discs were immediately treated with 20 µM diphenylene iodonium and 200 µM aristolochic acid, unless otherwise stated, to avoid any wound-induced oxidative stress from challenged cells. Test solutions of 50 µl containing different compounds were deposited in the center of the discs. Generally, six discs were incubated in the presence of light in 12-well titration plates (Corning Glass) at 25 °C as described previously (25).

Polysome Isolation-- Free and membrane-bound polysomal fractions were isolated from frozen pericarp discs using previously described procedures (26).

Nuclear Run-on Analysis-- Nuclei were isolated from pericarp discs using a previously described procedure (27). The 32P-labeled RNAs were hybridized to nitrocellulose membranes containing 20 µg of plasmid DNA corresponding to different probes.

HPLC Analysis-- Pigment and tocopherol analyses were carried out as described previously (28, 29).

Molecular Analysis-- Total RNAs were isolated from frozen polysomal fractions or pericarp discs as described previously (30). The carotenogenic gene probes were available from previous studies. These include geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (Ggps) (31), phytoene synthase (Psy) (32), phytoene desaturase (Pds) (33), lycopene cyclase (34) (Lcy), zeaxanthin epoxidase (35) (Zepd), and capsanthin capsorubin synthase (Ccs) (36). The heat shock probe (Hsp 70 cDNA) was partially characterized from pepper and is available upon request. Total RNA (20 µg) were blotted, and a pepper cDNA encoding 25 S ribosomal RNA was used to ensure that equivalent amounts of RNA were blotted. The purified probes were used for hybridization according to standard procedures (37).

The capsanthin-capsorubin synthase promoter was isolated from genomic pepper DNA according to the polymerase chain reaction method described previously (38). To this end 15 µg of pepper DNA was digested with ScaI, DraI, StuI, and PvuII yielding blunt fragments that were ligated to the adaptor primer. After amplification of the StuI fragment using the adaptor primer and the gene-specific probe: CATTAGAGAAAATGCAAGATTTAT (36), a 650 base pair was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (38) and sequenced to give capsanthin-capsorubin promoter-1 (Ccs 1) (accession number Y14165). Two restriction sites, PstI (5'end) and BamHI (3'end), were introduced to subclone the promoter fragment in frame of Escherichia coli beta -glucuronidase gene using pBI101 plasmid (39). The promoter activity was tested by transient expression using protoplasts prepared from mature green pepper fruit pericarp according to the polyethylene glycol procedure (40). Before transformation, the plasmid vector was linearized, and a sample (40 µg) of purified plasmid DNA was administered to 2.5 × 106 protoplasts. beta -Glucuronidase activity was monitored after a 12-h transfection as described previously (39).

Other Analytical Methods-- Aconitase activity was determined as described previously (41). Analysis of methanesulfinic acid after dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) treatment was carried out as described before (42). Protein concentration was determined by the Bio-Rad assay.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Wound-induced Expression of Carotenogenic Gene mRNAs-- Chromoplasts in pepper fruits begin differentiating when the fruit reaches its mature green stage, and full conversion requires approximately 14 days. Chloroplast to chromoplast differentiation can be conveniently assessed using green pericarp discs isolated from pepper fruits. This in vitro system offers advantages because the discs mimic the developmental changes that occur in whole fruit, and the time course for ripening is more uniform and rapid (25). When discs were incubated alone, in the absence of other treatments, the time-dependent accumulation of two carotenogenic gene transcripts encoding geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (Ggps) and capsanthin-capsorubin synthase (Ccs) (Fig. 2A) was observed, in good agreement with previous work (43). However, when discs were incubated in the presence of diphenylene iodonium and aristolochic acid (Fig. 2A), accumulation of these two gene transcripts was blocked. Diphenylene iodonium (DPI) inhibits plasmalemma superoxide synthase in plant cells (14), whereas aristolochic acid (AT) is a specific inhibitor of phospholipase A2 activity (44). Wounding is known to induce heat formation in fruits (45), and to drastically affect their pigmentation (46) and metabolism (47, 48). Mechanical destruction of cell walls (49) and associated osmotic perturbations (17) lead to oxidative bursts, which generate ROS by a superoxide synthase located in the plasmalemma of challenged cells. Wounding can also induce lipolytic activity (50), yielding fatty acid precursors for jasmonic acid synthesis, which could also potentially activate the expression of Ggps and Ccs (51). Under our conditions, DPI and AT inhibit these responses. Because of its electrophilicity, DPI probably does not permeate cells and reacts only at the periphery of the cut discs. When DPI and AT are combined, they appear to abolish any signals that are transduced by the oxidative burst or jasmonate pathway of challenged peripheral cells.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   RNA gel blot analysis of the expression of geranylgeranylpyrophosphate synthase (Ggps) and capsanthin-capsorubin synthase (Ccs) from C. annuum pericarp discs after wounding and herbicide treatment. A, from left to right, control fruit (unwounded); wounded (excised pericarp discs); wounded discs treated with 20 µM DPI and 200 µM AT. Wounded discs were incubated for 12 h. Wounded discs were incubated for different times as indicated. B, analysis of the pigment content after herbicide treatment. Pericarp discs were incubated for 24 h with 20 µM of metflurazon (Metflu), diflufenican (Diflu), LS 80707, and 5 mM 2-(4-chlorophenylthio)-triethylamine (CPTA). Chl refers to total chlorophylls. C, expression of carotenogenic genes following herbicide treatments (metflurazon) (20 µM) for the indicated times. Total RNA (20 µg) were used and blotted as described previously. A pepper 25 S ribosomal RNA probe was used as a noninducible control.

To test whether ROS might induce carotenogenic genes in developing chromoplasts, DPI- and AT-treated pericarp discs were used to manipulate the in vivo formation of ROS in a predictable way to evaluate their effect on carotenogenesis.

Induction of the Expression of Carotenogenic Gene mRNAs Following Inhibition of Carotenogenesis-- Inhibition of plant carotenoids during the early steps of their biosynthesis leads to elevated photooxidation. Using the desaturase inhibitor metflurazon in our pericarp disc system, we observed a significant accumulation of phytoene in treated versus untreated discs (Fig. 2B). Similar data were observed with other desaturase and cyclase inhibitors, namely, diflufenican, LS 80707, and 2-(4-chlorophenylthio)-triethylamine (Fig. 2B). Under our conditions these inhibitors did not alter xanthophyll content. However, the carotene fraction, which is virtually all beta -carotene from control tissues, was altered in inhibitor-treated discs as shown by the accumulation of phytofluene and zeta -carotene (Fig. 2B). The expression of carotenogenic gene mRNAs for Ggps, Psy, Pds, and Lcy, which encode the consecutive enzyme steps from geranylgeranylpyrophosphate to beta -carotene, showed a general increase following metflurazon (Fig. 2C), and this trend was practically observed for the different inhibitors (3). However, transcripts for the xanthophyll-producing enzymes zeaxanthin epoxidase (Zepd) and capsanthin-capsorubin synthase (Ccs), also showed an unexpected increase in the presence of these inhibitors (Fig. 2C). Thus, blocking carotenogenesis appears to activate the expression of genes for carotenoid biosynthesis. This agrees with previous data where the expression of Psy and Pds mRNAs (52, 53) were examined in tomato seedlings grown in the dark or light.

The fact that oxidative stress serves as a driving force behind carotenogenesis can be inferred from the effect of herbicides, which inhibit phytoene desaturase (fluridone and norflurazon, SAN 6706) or zeta -carotene desaturase (J852) on barley seedlings (54). Here, phytoene, phytofluene, and zeta -carotene accumulation is elevated 2-fold higher on a molar basis than the levels of carotenoid end products (beta -carotene and xanthophylls) produced by control seedlings (54). Similar results were observed in wheat seedlings treated with SAN 9789 (55) and in Phycomyces whose phytoene desaturase was blocked with several inhibitors (56).

The induction of these genes could be explained by a number of ways. Although feedback regulation may be responsible, two other possibilities could explain this induction. The first is photooxidative stress, caused by the absence of biologically active carotenoids that protect excited chlorophylls. However, under our conditions, xanthophylls are virtually unaltered, suggesting that this mechanism is not likely to be operative. Inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis by metflurazon and related substituted pyridazinones offers a second possible mechanism. These compounds inhibit photosynthetic electron transport at the micromolar level (54, 57). Also, aryloxyalkylamine derivatives, structurally similar to 2-(4-chlorophenylthio)-triethylamine, act as uncouplers of photophosphorylation by dissipating the proton gradient (58). These photosynthetic perturbations trigger futile electron cycling and generate ROS (12), which could ultimately act to induce carotenogenic gene mRNAs expression. This is supported by work showing that superoxide anions generated by the Mehler reaction lead to induction of carotenoid biosynthesis in Dunaliella salina (59). This was further examined in our system by evaluating the effects of different ROS progenitors.

Induction of the Expression of Carotenogenic Gene mRNAs by Artificial, Exogenous ROS Progenitors-- To test the involvement of superoxide anion, we used menadione, which is partially reduced in vivo to yield a semiquinone radical that reduces molecular oxygen into a superoxide anion (60). When pericarp discs were treated with this cyclic redox system, a strong accumulation of Ggps and Ccs mRNAs was observed (Fig. 3A). Because superoxides are usually metabolized via hydroperoxides, we decided to test their effects.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   RNA gel blot analysis of the expression of carotenogenic genes following ROS treatments and aminotriazole. A, changes induced by menadione (1 mM). B, changes induced by tert-butylhydroperoxide (1 mM). C, effect of down-regulation of catalase by aminotriazole (20 mM).

Organic hydroperoxides, widely produced during plant metabolism, participate in the synthesis of jasmonic acid and traumatin. Studies on animal cells reveal that a 10-9 to 10-7 M concentration of lipid hydroperoxides exert regulatory roles (61). We observed that tert-butylhydroperoxide causes the pronounced induction of different carotenogenic gene mRNA expression except for lycopene cyclase (Fig. 3B) and that the concentration optimum was extremely low. Levels above 5 mM resulted in a strong bleaching effect, exhibiting a 95% decrease in chlorophyll and carotenoid content. This toxic effect could have been due to excess free radical formation, which can greatly enhance the autoxidation of polyunsaturated molecules in an ambient oxygen atmosphere. This has been observed with beta -carotene (62, 63) and xanthophylls (64). Because the hydrophobicity of organic peroxides allows them to react with membrane components, we also examined the pattern of alpha -tocopherol evolution as a consequence of peroxide treatment. Data revealed that after 24 h, tocopherol content decreased to 50% following peroxide treatment, suggesting that alpha -tocopherol participates in peroxyl radical quenching. Tocopherols appear to control the extent of peroxyl radical formation more effectively than carotenoids because they trap the lipid peroxyl radical (11). The quench rate of peroxyl radicals by alpha -tocopherol ranges between 105 M-1 s-1 and is far more rapid than the autopropagation of peroxyl radicals, which ranges between 10-1 to 5 × 102 M-1 s-1 (65). Our results with artificial compounds extend previous observations showing that oxidative stress induced the accumulation of the long-chromophore carotenoid, astaxanthin, in the yeast P. rhodozyma (24, 66) and the algae Hematococcus pluvialis (67). This argues that under physiological conditions, carotenogenic genes might be subject to regulation by endogenously generated ROS. This was further examined in our study.

Down-regulation of ROS-scavenging Enzymes Induces the Expression of Carotenogenic Gene mRNAs-- Hydrogen peroxide produced during normal plant metabolism diffuses freely across biological membranes. As hydrogen peroxide is a potent signal molecule in plants (14, 15), we attempted to down-regulate the activity of catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathion peroxidase, which are prominent enzymatic peroxide scavengers. We reasoned that intracellular increases in hydrogen peroxide would induce an effect similar to that observed when exogenous artificial peroxides are added. To this end we used amitrole (3-amino-1,2,4-triazole) to inhibit catalase activity (68). The specificity of amitrole is well documented in plants where it does not block histidine biosynthesis, as in bacteria (68). We also observed that under in vivo, physiological concentrations, amitrole did not inhibit lycopene cyclase (69), contrary to previous reports (for a review, see Ref. 54). The amitrole concentration used (20 mM) was optimum for inhibiting different plant catalase isozymes (70) and resulted in a massive increase in expression of different carotenogenic gene transcripts (Fig. 3C). This was paralleled by a de novo synthesis of the chromoplast-specific carotenoid, capsanthin, which was not detected in control discs (Fig. 4).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   HPLC analysis of carotenoid isolated from C. annuum pericarp discs and seedlings treated with aminotriazole. A, pigments from control discs. B, pigments from pericarp discs treated with 20 mM aminotriazole for 24 h. The lipid extract was fractionated into xanthophylls + chlorophylls (chl a, chl b) and carotenes fractions before HPLC analysis, and detection was at 440 nm. The arrows indicate the position of carotenoids and chlorophylls.

The potential involvement of hydrogen peroxide is reinforced by the fact that aconitase activity of treated pepper discs was progressively down-regulated to 50% after 24 h of treatment. In its catalytic form, aconitase has a cubane cluster [4Fe+-4S]2+, which after loss of the labile iron atom due to in vitro oxidation by superoxides or peroxides, is converted to an inactive enzyme containing a paramagnetic cluster [2Fe+-4S]1+ (71-73). In this context, it is noteworthy that in animal cells, aconitase is involved in signaling induced by nitric oxide (74).

Overall, these data suggest cross-talk between ROS-scavenging enzymes and plastid carotenogenesis, which might be inferred by the link between catalase and carotenoid biogenesis as shown by earlier studies with fungi and plants. In Fusarium aquaeductuum, carotenogenesis is photoinductible, and the effect of light can be mimicked by hydrogen peroxide (75). Studies of chloroplast pigment-deficient mutants in plants indicate that catalase activity is strongly reduced (76). Also, barley mutants deficient in catalase show an alteration in plastid ultrastructure (77). In Dunaliella bardawil, carotenoid overaccumulation is paralleled by an increase in catalase activity (78). A similar increase is observed during the ripening of Carica papaya fruits (79), where chromoplast differentiation and increases in carotenoid accumulation are observed. In this regard, it is notable that pear fruit ripening can be induced by inhibition of catalase, which causes the build-up of peroxides (80). Similarly, the ripening of saskatoon fruit is paralleled by increased oxidative stress (81).

The link between catalase and plastid carotenogenesis is further strengthened by studies involving the catalase inhibitor amitrole. It is interesting to note that treatments of maize (82), wheat (83), radish (84), and barley (85) seedlings with amitrole lead to the de novo accumulation of lycopene, a chromoplast-specific carotenoid. Because amitrole is not a carotenoid cyclase inhibitor (69), we propose that elevated hydrogen peroxide, due to catalase inhibition, initiates the production of ROS, which subsequently elicit lycopene synthesis as a defense or adaptation response. Indeed, chromoplast carotenoids possessing extended chromophores such as lycopene, capsanthin, or capsorubin are particularly well suited for quenching ROS compared with normal leaf carotenoids (21, 22). In this respect, it is noteworthy that several maize mutants, when grown autotrophically at high light intensity, become bleached and accumulate lycopene (86). Similarly, cupric ions, which act as strong oxidants by inducing the formation of hydroxyl radicals in plastids via the Haber-Weiss mechanism (87), activate the synthesis of lycopene in tomato fruits (88).

Glutathion peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase can replace catalase as scavengers of hydrogen peroxides, but they have much broader substrate specificities. This necessitated an evaluation of their down-regulation. To this end p-aminophenol, an irreversible inhibitor of ascorbate peroxidase (89), diamide, a potent oxidant of reduced glutathion (GSH) (90), and buthionine sulfoximine, an irreversible inhibitor of gamma -glutamylcysteine synthetase (91), were used. Results showed that treating pericarp discs with these inhibitors to block ascorbate peroxidase and to limit the availability of GSH strongly activated the expression of carotenogenic genes (Fig. 5A).


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   RNA gel blot analysis of the expression of carotenogenic genes following prooxidant treatments. A, changes induced by p-aminophenol (1 mM), diamide (2 mM), and buthionine sulfoximine (2 mM). B, changes induced by paraquat (1 mM) and paraquat plus Me2SO (DMSO) (10%).

In assessing the effect of oxidative stress caused by GSH depletion, it was noted that thiol reagents capable of operating in the dark, such as p-chloromercuribenzoate or p-hydroxymercuribenzoate, can substitute for light to photoinduce carotenogenesis in F. aquaeductuum (92). This specificity was reversed by cysteine or 2-mercaptoethanol (93). This oxidative mechanism has also been observed in Brevibacterium sp. KY-4313, which forms the long carotenoid chromophore, canthaxanthin. This was inhibited when GSH is present in the culture medium (94).

Our demonstration that endogenously generated ROS inaugurate the expression of carotenogenic gene mRNAs in plants raises the question of the role played by plastids and mitochondria in this process, since these organelles represent two main sites of oxygen production in plant cells.

ROS Signals Generated From Plastids and Mitochondria Induce the Expression of Carotenogenic Gene mRNAs-- The herbicide paraquat (1,1'-dimethyl-4,4-bipyridinium ion) has a strong negative redox potential (E'0 = -0.446 v) and diverts electron transport from photosystem I (57). In the presence of paraquat, photosynthetic electrons are transferred to molecular oxygen, yielding superoxide anions. Although paraquat has secondary effects, such as the disruption of membrane integrity, plastids are its main target. This is reinforced by the fact that paraquat-resistant plants possess up to a 300% increase in plastid superoxide dismutase content (95). Pericarp discs treated with paraquat showed a strong induction of capsanthin-capsorubin synthase mRNA accumulation (Fig. 5B). The effect was strongly reduced in the presence of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO). This suggests the involvement of a free radical mechanism, as Me2SO is generally nontoxic and is stoichiometrically oxidized by hydroxyl radical, HO·, to yield methanesulfinic acid (42). The scavenging reaction afforded by Me2SO thus explains this reduced expression.

In mitochondria it has been shown that hydrogen peroxide is produced during normal electron transfer reactions and that this process accounts for 1-2% of the oxygen taken up (96). This activity is enhanced by antimycin A treatment (96). It is also known that mitochondrial electron transfer participates in signal transduction of the tumor necrosis factor (97). When molecular oxygen is reduced to the superoxide anion, it is then converted to hydrogen peroxide by mitochondrial superoxide dismutase. Based on this, we used rotenone, thenoxyltrifluoroacetone, and antimycin A, to block cytochrome electron transport chain (Fig. 6A). One might expect that this would exacerbate the formation of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide from mitochondria. We noted that antimycin A markedly induced the expression of Ggps and Ccs mRNAs (Fig. 6B) compared with rotenone and thenoxyltrifluoroacetone, which prematurely abort the electron transfer pathway.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Mitochondrial electron transport inhibition and subsequent activation of carotenogenic gene expression. A, electron transfer steps inhibited by thenoxyltrifluoroacetone (TTFA), rotenone, and antimycin. B, RNA gel blot analysis of the expression of carotenogenic genes following in vivo inhibition of the mitochondrial electron pathway by TTFA (10 µM), rotenone (5 mM), antimycin A (10 µM). The incubation time was 6 h. cyt., cytochrome.

Our data suggest that plant mitochondria participate in signal mechanisms involving ROS. Similarly, in the dark, antimycin A, an electron transport inhibitor between cytochrome b and c1, replaces the light-induced accumulation of carotenoid in Mycobacterium marinum (98) and Leptosphaeria michotii, a fungus (99). Relevant to this is the yeast, P. rhodozyma, which shows a maximum accumulation of carotenoids in the later phases of culture, when respiration becomes insensitive to cyanide (24). This effect is mimicked by antimycin. A likely explanation is that electron transport is short-circuited, leading to the formation of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide, which trigger carotenoid biogenesis.

Run-on Transcription and Specific Integration of Carotenogenic Gene mRNAs into Polysomal Fractions-- To better understand the role of ROS, pericarp discs treated with different ROS-inducing compounds were used to analyze transcription and integration of Ggps and Ccs mRNAs into polysomal fractions. Run-on analysis showed that Ggps was barely transcribed in control tissues, whereas Ccs was not transcribed (Fig. 7). Conversely, the transcription of Ggps and Ccs was stimulated in amitrole, tert-butylhydroperoxide, and diamide-treated discs. Expression of a pepper heat shock protein 70 (Hsp 70) mRNA, used as a control, was identical in all treatments, thus demonstrating the specificity of the observed effects (Fig. 7). Analysis of polysomal fractions revealed that amitrole specifically induced the recruitment of Ggps and Ccs mRNAs into the high molecular mass polysomal fraction of treated discs (Fig. 8).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Nuclear run-on analysis of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (Ggps) and capsanthin-capsorubin synthases (Ccs) mRNAs from C. annuum pericarp discs subjected to oxidative stress. Discs were treated for 6 h. From left to right: control discs, aminotriazole (20 mM)-, tert-butylhydroperoxide (t-BOOH)- (1 mM), and diamide (2 mM)-treated discs used for nuclei extraction. As a control, C. annuum Hsp 70 probe was used.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Analysis of the recruitment of C. annuum geranylgeranylpyrophosphate synthase (Ggps) and capsanthin-capsorubin synthase (Ccs) mRNAs into polysomal fractions during oxidative stress induced by aminotriazole. A, polysome profiles following aminotriazole treatment (20 mM) for 6 h. The gradients were fractionated as indicated (F1 to F5). B and C, total RNA extracted from the polysomal fractions were used for Northern blot analysis.

ROS Drive the Functioning of Capsanthin-Capsorubin Synthase Promoter-- The partial Ccs-1 promoter was characterized and displayed homologies to several cis-acting elements previously characterized (Fig. 9A). The EcoRI-ScaI fragment ofCcs cDNA (36) hybridized specifically to a pepper 3.2-kilobase pair ScaI genomic fragment containing the coding domain and the 5'-untranslated region of Ccs including the partial promoter (Ccs-1) (Fig. 9B). Transient assays were used to analyze the function of the Ccs-1 promoter under different oxidative stress conditions using protoplasts from mature green fruits pericarp displaying at least 90% viability as judged by fluorescein diacetate staining. Linear plasmids containing a beta -glucuronidase reporter gene driven by the Ccs-1 promoter were introduced into green fruit protoplasts and incubated for 12 h in the presence of prooxidants. Data from three independent experiments revealed that the promoter was dramatically activated by the GSH reagents, diamide and buthionine, and by amitrole, the catalase inhibitor (Fig. 9C). Similarly, tert-butylhydroperoxide and paraquat, two ROS progenitors, activated the Ccs-1 promoter. Collectively, data from these homologous transient expression experiments strongly suggest that Ccs expression is controlled by ROS.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Nucleotide sequence and oxidative stress regulation of Ccs 1 promoter. A, nucleotide sequence of the partial Ccs 1 promoter. The ATG, CAA, and TATA boxes are indicated in bold. The transcription start (+1) is indicated by an arrow. Homologies to cis-acting elements are indicated: ABA (abscisic acid-responsive) (105); ELI (elicitor-responsive) (106); HD (homeodomain) (107); WUN (wound-responsive) (108). B, restriction map of the genomic fragment containing Ccs cDNA. The structure of the 3.2-kilobase pair ScaI fragment containing the partial promoter hybridizing to the EcoRI-ScaI fragment of Ccs cDNA probe is shown. C, linearized plasmid pCcs 1-beta -glucuronidase (GUS) (40 µg) was used for 2.5 × 106 protoplasts transformation. Following a 12-h incubation with the above listed reagents, beta -glucuronidase activity was monitored by measuring the rate of conversion of 4-methylumbelliferyl glucuronide to methylumbelliferone. Data obtained are the mean from three different protoplasts preparations. S.E. normalized as a proportion of the mean is shown.

ROS Scavenging Delays Carotenoid Overaccumulation and Chromoplast Differentiation-- Based on the results, we determined whether ROS could mediate the differentiation of chloroplasts to chromoplasts. We reasoned that if endogenously produced ROS were quenched, we would expect to be able to demonstrate their regulatory role. To this end, intact pepper fruits were dipped in 10% Me2SO, a radical quencher (42), and allowed to ripen for 12 days at room temperature. Data obtained (Fig. 10) reveal a significant reduction of the expression of Ggps and Ccs mRNAs and reduced accumulation of chromoplast ketocarotenoids capsanthin and capsorubin in treated fruits compared with controls (Fig. 10). Moreover, this was paralleled by an increase in the formation of methanesulfinic acid in treated fruits (Fig. 10), demonstrating that OH· radicals formed during the ripening period were quenched. This may explain why Me2SO inhibits chromoplast carotenoid accumulation in ripening tomato fruit (100).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Effect of Me2SO on the regulation of chromoplast differentiation in intact fruits. A, RNA gel blot analysis of the expression of Ggps and Ccs mRNAs following Me2SO treatment. B, effect of Me2SO on the accumulation of chromoplast ketocarotenoids (capsanthin and capsorubin). Control and treated samples are indicated, respectively, by black and open bars. C, formation of methanesulfinic acid following Me2SO treatment. Mature green fruits were immersed into 10% Me2SO for 1 h before incubation at 25 °C. Control fruits were similarly treated with water. Total fruit pericarp was used for analysis. Control fruits revealed no accumulation in contrast to treated fruits (black bars).

It appears that ROS, produced as a consequence of aerobic life, are widely used for signal transduction because they are ubiquitous, diffusible, and uncharged (i.e. hydrogen peroxide) molecules. Virtually all cellular compartments have the ability to neutralize the toxic effects of ROS, which could otherwise lead to cell death at high concentrations (101). This secondary messenger role of ROS is further supported by the fact that oxidative stress induces a transient movement of cytosolic calcium in plants (102). Taken together, our results suggest that in vivo, transient, oxidative stress plays a key role in the induction of chromoplast carotenoid biosynthesis and in the transformation of chloroplasts into chromoplasts (3). In a similar vein, although the mechanism has not been explored, exposure to O3 leads to increased carotenogenesis in poplar (103) and Norway spruce (104). The specific activation of carotenogenic genes under our experimental conditions is further supported by the fact that none of the ROS species used in this work induced the accumulation of capsidiol, a typical isoprenoid stress metabolite produced in elicited pepper cells (43). Future work is needed to scrutinize the signal transduction pathways involved in the massive biogenesis of carotenoids during chromoplast differentiation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Christophe Bastian, Régis Bindner, and Xavier Combeau for helpful technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This research was supported in part by the European Community Agro-industry Programme (FAIR CT96 1633).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) Y14165.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, CNRS and Université Louis Pasteur, 67084 Strasbourg, France. Tel.: 33 3 88 41 72 31; Fax: 33 3 88 61 44 42; E-mail: camara{at}medoc.U-strasbg.fr.

The abbreviations used are: ROS, reactive oxygen species; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; DPI, diphenylene iodonium; AT, aristolochic acid.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

  1. Liedvogel, B., Sitte, P., and Falk, H. (1976) Cytobiologie 12, 155-174
  2. Camara, B., Hugueney, P., Bouvier, F., Kuntz, M., and Monéger, R. (1995) Int. Rev. Cytol. 163, 175-247[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Bouvier, F. (1996) Induction et Contrôle de la Biosynthése des Caroténoïdes au Cours de la Maturation du Fruit de Poivron (Capsicum annuum L.). Ph.D. thesis, Université Louis Pasteur
  4. Schreck, R., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1991) Trends Cell Biol. 1, 39-42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Sen, C. K., and Packer, L. (1996) FASEB 10, 709-720[Abstract]
  6. Foyer, C. H., Descourvières, P., and Kunert, K. J. (1994) Plant Cell Environ. 17, 507-523[CrossRef]
  7. Thompson, J. E., Legge, R. L., and Barber, R. F. (1987) New Phytol. 105, 317-344[CrossRef]
  8. Scandalios, J. G. (1993) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 101, 7-12[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Asada, K., and Takahashi, M. (1987) in Photoinhibition (Kyle, D. J., Osmond, C. B., and Arntzen, C. J., eds), pp. 227-287, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
  10. Krinsky, N. I. (1979) Pure Appl. Chem. 51, 649-660
  11. Fryer, M. J. (1992) Plant Cell Environ. 15, 381-392[CrossRef]
  12. Elstner, E. F., Wagner, G. A., and Schutz, W. (1988) Curr. Top. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 7, 159-187
  13. Tzeng, D. D., and DeVay, J. E. (1993) Adv. Plant Pathol. 10, 1-34
  14. Levine, A., Tenhaken, R., Dixon, R., and Lamb, C. (1994) Cell 79, 583-593[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Dempsey, D. M. A., and Klessig, D. F. (1994) Trends Cell Biol. 4, 334-338
  16. Lippmaa, T. (1926) C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 182, 1040-1042
  17. Yahraus, T., Chandra, S., Legendre, L., and Low, P. S. (1995) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 109, 1259-1266[Abstract]
  18. Diaz, M., Ball, E., and Lüttge, U. (1990) Plant Physiol. Biochem. 28, 679-682
  19. Tôyama, S., and Funazaki, K. (1971) Bot. Mag. Tokyo 84, 123-136
  20. Costes, C. (1969) Bull. Soc. Fr. Physiol. Vég. 15, 55-70
  21. Di Mascio, P., Kaiser, S., and Sies, H. (1989) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 274, 532-538[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Hirayama, O., Nakamura, K., Hamada, S., and Kobayasi, Y. (1994) Lipids 29, 149-150[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Edge, R., McGarvey, D. J., and Truscott, T. G. (1997) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 41, 189-200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Schroeder, W. A., and Johnson, E. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18374-18379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Deruère, J., Römer, S., d'Harlingue, A., Backhaus, R. A., Kuntz, M., and Camara, B. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 119-133[Abstract]
  26. Carde, J. P., Camara, B., and Cheniclet, C. (1988) Planta 173, 1-11[CrossRef]
  27. Cox, K. H., and Goldberg, R. B. (1988) in Plant Molecular Biology: A Practical Approach (Shaw, C. H., ed), pp. 1-35, IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford
  28. Camara, B. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 110, 274-281
  29. Camara, B. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 111, 544-547
  30. Verwoerd, T. C., Dekker, B. M. M., and Hoekema, A. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 2362[Free Full Text]
  31. Kuntz, M., Römer, S., Suire, C., Hugueney, P., Weil, J. H., Schantz, R., and Camara, B. (1992) Plant J. 2, 25-34[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Römer, S., Hugueney, P., Bouvier, F., Camara, B., and Kuntz, A. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 196, 1414-1421[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Hugueney, P., Römer, S., Kuntz, M., and Camara, B. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 209, 399-407[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Hugueney, P., Badillo, A., Chen, H. C., Klein, A., Hirschberg, J., Camara, B., and Kuntz, M. (1995) Plant J. 8, 417-424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Bouvier, F., d'Harlingue, A., Hugueney, P., Marin, E., Marion-Poll, A., and Camara, B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28861-28867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bouvier, F., Hugueney, P., d'Harlingue, A., Kuntz, A., and Camara, B. (1994) Plant J. 6, 45-54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning, p. 545, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  38. Siebert, P. D., Chenchik, A., Kellogg, D. E., Lukyanov, K. A., and Lukyanov, S. A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1087-1088[Free Full Text]
  39. Jefferson, R. A., Kavanagh, T. A., and Bevan, M. W. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 3901-3907[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Krüger-Lebus, S., and Potrykus, I. (1987) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5, 289-294
  41. Cooper, T. G., and Beevers, H. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 3507-3513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Babbs, C. F., Pham, J. A., and Coolbaugh, R. C. (1989) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 90, 1267-1270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Hugueney, P., Bouvier, F., Badillo, A., Quennemet, J., d'Harlingue, A., and Camara, B. (1996) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 111, 619-626[Abstract]
  44. Chandra, S., Heinstein, P. F., and Low, P. S. (1996) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 110, 979-986[Abstract]
  45. Richards, H. M. (1897) Ann. Bot. 10, 29-63
  46. Mohl, v. H. (1838) Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. 9, 212-235
  47. Carrière, E. A., and André, E. (1884) Rev. Hort. 553-554
  48. Ulrich, R., and Renac, J. (1950) C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 230, 567-569
  49. Olson, P. D., and Varner, J. E. (1993) Plant J. 4, 887-892[CrossRef]
  50. Galliard, T. (1978) in Biochemistry of Wounded Plant Tissues (Kahl, G., ed), pp. 155-201, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin
  51. Hugueney, P. (1994) Biosynthése des Isoprénoïdes Chez le Fruit de Poivron (Capsicum annuum L.): Mécanismes et Facteurs de Régulation Cellulaire en Conditions Normales et Sous l'Effet de Différents Stress. Ph.D. thesis, Univerité of Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
  52. Giuliano, G., Bartley, G. E., and Scolnik, P. A. (1993) Plant Cell 5, 379-387[Abstract]
  53. Corona, V., Aracri, B., Kosturkova, G., Bartley, G. E., Pitto, L., Giorgetti, L., Scolnik, P. A., and Giuliano, G. (1996) Plant J. 9, 505-512[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Ridley, S. M. (1982) in Carotenoids, Chemistry and Biochemistry (Britton, G., and Goodwin, T. W., eds), pp. 353-369, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford
  55. Dahlin, C., and Ryberg, H. (1986) Physiol. Plant. 68, 39-45[CrossRef]
  56. Bejarano, E. R., and Cerda-Olmedo, E. (1989) Phytochemistry 28, 1623-1626[CrossRef]
  57. Moreland, D. E. (1980) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 597-638[CrossRef]
  58. Wright, B. J., Baillie, A. C., Wright, K., Dowswett, J. R., and Sharpe, T. M. (1980) Phytochemistry 19, 61-65[CrossRef]
  59. Cowan, A. K., Horne, L. G., and Rose, P. D. (1992) J. Exp. Bot. 43, 1535-1547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Thor, H., Smith, M. T., Hartzell, P., Bellomo, G., Jewell, S. A., and Orrenius, S. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 12419-12425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Baba, A., Lee, E., Ohta, A., Tatsuno, T., and Iwata, H. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 3679-3684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Mordi, R. C., Walton, J. C., Burton, G. W., Hughes, L., Ingold, K. U., and Lindsay, D. A. (1991) Tetrahedron Lett. 32, 4203-4206[CrossRef]
  63. Palozza, P., and Krinsky, N. I. (1992) Methods Enzymol. 213, 403-420[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Lim, B. P., Akihiko, A., Terao, J., Tanaka, K., Suzuki, T., and Takama, K. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1126, 178-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Chaudière, J. (1994) in Free Radical Damage and Its Control (Rice-Evans, C. A., and Burdon, R. H., eds), pp. 25-65, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
  66. Schroeder, W. A., Calo, P., DeClercq, M. L., and Johnson, E. A. (1996) Microbiology (Washington D. C./New York) 142, 2923-2929
  67. Kobayashi, M., Toshide, K., and Nagai, S. (1993) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 867-873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Larrinua, I. M., and Heim, D. R. (1989) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 91, 1226-1231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Bouvier, F., d'Harlingue, A., and Camara, B. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 346, 53-64[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Havir, E. A. (1992) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 99, 533-537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Emptage, M. H., Dreyer, J. L., Kennedy, M. C., and Beinert, H. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 11106-11111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Verniquet, F., Gaillard, J., Neuburger, M., and Douce, R. (1991) Biochem. J. 276, 643-648
  73. Gardner, P. R., Raineri, I., Epstein, L. B., and White, C. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13399-13405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Hausladen, A., and Fridovich, I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29405-29408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Theimer, R. R., and Rau, W. (1970) Planta 92, 129-137[CrossRef]
  76. Eyster, H. C. (1950) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 25, 630-638[Free Full Text]
  77. Parker, M. L., and Lea, P. J. (1983) Planta 159, 512-517[CrossRef]
  78. Shaish, A., Avron, M., Pick, U., and Ben-Amotz, A. (1993) Planta 190, 363-368
  79. Pal, D. K., and Selvaraj, Y. (1987) J. Hortic. Sci. 62, 117-124
  80. Brennan, T., and Frenkel, C. (1977) Plant Physiol. (Rockv) 59, 411-416[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Rogiers, S. Y., Kumar, G. N. M., and Knowles, N. R. (1998) Ann. Bot. 81, 203-211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Guillot-Salomon, T., Douce, R., and Signol, M. (1967) Bull. Soc. Fr. Physiol. Vég. 13, 63-79
  83. Rüdiger, W., Benz, J., Lempert, U., Schoch, S., and Steffens, D. (1976) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 80, 131-143
  84. Grumbach, K. H. (1984) Physiol. Plant. 60, 389-394[CrossRef]
  85. Zito, F., Gough, S., Marcato, C., Rascio, N., and Casadoro, G. (1995) Physiol. Plant. 94, 535-544[CrossRef]
  86. Faludi-Daniel, A., Lang, A., and Fradkin, L. I. (1966) in Biochemistry of Chloroplasts (Goodwin, T., ed), pp. 269-274, Academic Press, Ltd., London
  87. Yurela, I., Pueyo, J. J., Alonso, P. J., and Picorel, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27408-27415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Rushing, J. W., and Huber, D. J. (1985) J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 110, 316-318
  89. Chen, G. X., and Asada, K. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2775-2781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. Kosower, N. S., Kosower, E. M., and Bilha, W. (1969) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 37, 593-596[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  91. Griffith, O. W. (1981) Methods Enzymol. 77, 59-63[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  92. Rau, W., Feuser, B., and Rau-Hund, A. (1967) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 136, 589-590[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  93. Theimer, R. R., and Rau, W. (1972) Planta 106, 331-343[CrossRef]
  94. Hsieh, L. K., Lee, T. C., Chichester, C. O., and Simpson, K. L. (1974) J. Bacteriol. 118, 385-393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  95. Harvey, B. M. R., and Harper, D. B. (1982) in Herbicide Resistance in Plants (Le Baron, H. M., and Gressel, J., eds), pp. 215-233, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
  96. Boveris, A., and Chance, B. (1973) Biochem. J. 134, 707-716[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  97. Schulze-Osthoff, K., Beyaert, R., Vandevoorde, V., Haegeman, G., and Fiers, W. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3095-3104[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  98. Batra, P. P. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. 242, 5630-5635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  99. Jerebzoff-Quintin, S., Jerebzoff, S., and Jacques, R. (1975) Physiol. Vég. 13, 55-67
  100. Raymundo, L. C., Griffiths, A. E., and Simpson, K. L. (1967) Phytochemistry 6, 1527-1532[CrossRef]
  101. Buttke, T. M., and Sandstrom, P. A. (1994) Immunol. Today 15, 7-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  102. Price, A. H., Taylor, A., Ripley, S. J., Griffiths, A., Trewavas, A. J., and Knight, M. R. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 1301-1310[Abstract]
  103. Ballach, H. J., Mooi, J., and Wittig, R. (1992) Angew. Bot. 66, 14-20
  104. Polle, A., Mossnang, M., von Schnborn, A., Sladkovic, R., and Rennenberg, H. (1992) New Phytol. 121, 89-99[CrossRef]
  105. Skriver, K., Olsen, F. L., Rogers, J. C., and Mundy, J. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7266-7270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  106. Ohl, S., Hedrick, S. A., Chory, J., and Lamb, C. J. (1990) Plant Cell 9, 49-60[Abstract]
  107. Korfhage, U., Trezzini, G. F., Meier, I., Hahlbrock, K., and Somssich, I. E. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 695-708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  108. Matton, D. P., Prescott, G., Bertrand, C., Camirand, A., and Brisson, N. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22, 279-291[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. Alos, M. Roca, D. J. Iglesias, M. I. Minguez-Mosquera, C. M. B. Damasceno, T. W. Thannhauser, J. K. C. Rose, M. Talon, and M. Cercos
An Evaluation of the Basis and Consequences of a Stay-Green Mutation in the navel negra Citrus Mutant Using Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiling and Metabolite Analysis
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2008; 147(3): 1300 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S.-H. Ha, J.-B. Kim, J.-S. Park, S.-W. Lee, and K.-J. Cho
A comparison of the carotenoid accumulation in Capsicum varieties that show different ripening colours: deletion of the capsanthin-capsorubin synthase gene is not a prerequisite for the formation of a yellow pepper
J. Exp. Bot., September 25, 2007; (2007) erm132v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
H. Teramoto, T. Itoh, and T.-a. Ono
High-Intensity-Light-Dependent and Transient Expression of New Genes Encoding Distant Relatives of Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll-a/b Proteins in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Plant Cell Physiol., September 15, 2004; 45(9): 1221 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Kato, Y. Ikoma, H. Matsumoto, M. Sugiura, H. Hyodo, and M. Yano
Accumulation of Carotenoids and Expression of Carotenoid Biosynthetic Genes during Maturation in Citrus Fruit
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2004; 134(2): 824 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
F. Bouvier, C. Suire, J. Mutterer, and B. Camara
Oxidative Remodeling of Chromoplast Carotenoids: Identification of the Carotenoid Dioxygenase CsCCD and CsZCD Genes Involved in Crocus Secondary Metabolite Biogenesis
PLANT CELL, January 1, 2003; 15(1): 47 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Teramoto, A. Nakamori, J. Minagawa, and T.-a. Ono
Light-Intensity-Dependent Expression of Lhc Gene Family Encoding Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll-a/b Proteins of Photosystem II in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2002; 130(1): 325 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Grünewald, M. Eckert, J. Hirschberg, and C. Hagen
Phytoene Desaturase Is Localized Exclusively in the Chloroplast and Up-Regulated at the mRNA Level during Accumulation of Secondary Carotenoids in Haematococcus pluvialis (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae)
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2000; 122(4): 1261 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouvier, F.
Right arrow Articles by Camara, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouvier, F.
Right arrow Articles by Camara, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement