Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bach, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bach, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 46, 30719-30728, November 13, 1998


Endothelial Cell VE-cadherin Functions as a Receptor for the beta 15-42 Sequence of Fibrin*

Tami L. BachDagger , Carl Barsigian, Christopher H. Yaen, and Jose Martinez§

From the Cardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research and Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The contact of fibrin with the apical surface of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) can induce capillary tube formation via the interaction of fibrin beta 15-42 with a putative cell receptor (Chalupowicz, D. G., Chowdhury, Z. A., Bach, T. L., Barsigian, C., and Martinez, J. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 207-215). To characterize this interaction, we studied the binding of the thrombin-cleaved N-terminal disulfide knot of fibrin (NDSK II), a dimeric fragment with exposed beta 15-42, to HUVEC in three separate assay systems. Time-course binding of 125I-NDSK II to HUVEC monolayers or suspensions revealed that binding was specific at 50-60%, as determined by the addition of unlabeled NDSK II. Specific binding of 125I-NDSK II to HUVEC was 70% reversible by dilution or by competition, and was found to be divalent cation-independent. Binding plateaued after 10 min at a saturation of 15-20 nM. Scatchard analysis using the LIGAND computer program defined a single population of receptors with a KD of 7.7 ± 1.6 nM and approximately 21,000 ± 7000 binding sites/cell. N-terminal disulfide knot derivatives in which beta 15-42 was absent (NDSK 325) or unexposed (NDSK, NDSK I) did not show specific binding. Specific binding of 125I-NDSK II could not be inhibited by RGDS or by antibodies to the alpha vbeta 3 or beta 1 integrins, PECAM-1, ICAM-1, or N-cadherin. In contrast, a synthetic beta 15-42/ovalbumin conjugate inhibited total 125I-NDSK II binding by 47 ± 19% (corresponding to 95% of specific 125I-NDSK II bound) and a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) inhibited binding by 35 ± 8% (corresponding to 70% of specific 125I-NDSK II bound). Another assay was based on the capture of cadherins from HUVEC lysates by a polyclonal pan-cadherin antibody immobilized on plastic dishes. Binding of NDSK II to the captured cadherins was 89 ± 5% specific, while specific binding of NDSK 325 and NDSK was negligible. An immortalized line of human adipose-derived microvascular endothelial cells, which express N-cadherin but not VE-cadherin, demonstrated no specific binding of NDSK II by the capture assay. These data define a novel interaction of fibrin with VE-cadherin, which is mediated by the fibrin N-terminal beta 15-42 sequence, and may contribute to the mechanism through which fibrin induces angiogenesis.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

In the final steps of blood coagulation, the soluble plasma protein fibrinogen is enzymatically converted by the action of thrombin into insoluble fibrin monomers, which spontaneously polymerize to yield a fibrin mesh containing entrapped platelets and red blood cells (1). The fibrin blood clot plays a vital role in many physiologic and pathophysiologic processes including hemostasis and thrombosis (1), and in angiogenic processes such as wound healing and tumor growth (2, 3). In these processes fibrin interacts with a variety of plasma proteins, cells, and tissue matrix components. The main hemostatic function of fibrin clot formation in vivo is to provide structural support and scaffolding for the cellular and other blood elements comprising the thrombus (1). Similarly, in the process of normal wound healing, the main purpose of the fibrin clot that fills the wound is to serve as a provisional matrix into which inflammatory cells migrate and upon which new blood capillaries are formed (2). Fibrin formation is also involved in pathological conditions, such as tumor growth, where it is thought to provide a matrix for tumor cell proliferation and possibly for maintenance of angiogenesis (2).

The interaction of the N-terminal region of fibrin with the endothelial cell surface influences cell behavior in several respects. It can disrupt the normal integrity of the endothelial cell monolayer (4), it can stimulate secretion of stored von Willebrand factor (5) and it can induce human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC)1 morphogenesis into capillary tube-like structures (6, 7), thus initiating the process of in vitro angiogenesis. These observations indicate that the thrombin-mediated exposure of neo-epitopes at the N terminus of the fibrin molecule confers fibrin, as opposed to fibrinogen, with the ability to bind to endothelial cell surface receptors and thereby induce the specific cellular responses referred to above.

We have previously shown that a specific form of fibrin designated fibrin II, in which the neo-N terminus of the fibrin beta  chain (beta 15-42) is exposed, induces the formation of capillary tube-like structures when in contact with the apical surface of HUVEC monolayers (7). We have also more recently demonstrated that a monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of VE-cadherin, or cadherin-5 (8), inhibited fibrin II and collagen-induced capillary tube formation whereas antibodies against N-cadherin, PECAM-1, or the alpha vbeta 3 integrin did not (9). In related experiments, others have shown that antibodies against VE-cadherin or PECAM-1 do not inhibit capillary tube formation when used individually, but do inhibit tube formation when incubated together with endothelial cells cultured on single-layer Matrigel (10). In contrast to the aforementioned studies, which report the inability of PECAM-1 alone to induce tube formation (9, 10), others have found PECAM-1 to play an important role in both in vivo and in vitro angiogenesis (11). Taken together, these data suggest that VE-cadherin or PECAM-1 (both of which have a molecular mass of roughly 130 kDa) may serve as endothelial cell receptors for matrix proteins, including but not limited to fibrin, that play an important role in mediating capillary tube formation. This idea is supported by the report that a 130-kDa protein can be purified from human umbilical vein endothelial cell lysates by affinity chromatography over fibrin beta 15-42/Sepharose (12). Based on these findings, the major hypothesis of the present work was that the neo-N terminus of the fibrin II beta  chain (beta 15-42) can bind to endothelial cell surface receptors, possibly VE-cadherin, and that this binding may underlie the reported ability of VE-cadherin antibodies to inhibit fibrin II-induced capillary tube formation (9).

Because angiogenesis is a complex process, which likely involves receptors from various cell adhesion molecule families (13, 14), we also assessed the potential role of members of three families of adhesion receptors including the integrins, the immunoglobulin gene (Ig) superfamily, and the cadherins as putative endothelial cell receptors for fibrin. Among the integrins, we focused on the alpha vbeta 3 (15) and alpha 5beta 1 (16) integrins, which are known to bind fibrinogen. Within the Ig superfamily, in addition to PECAM-1, which participates in both heterophilic and homophilic interactions (17) as well as in capillary tube formation (10, 11), we also examined ICAM-1, which acts as a fibrinogen receptor on endothelial cells and mediates leukocyte adhesion to inflamed endothelium (18, 19). We also examined the role of N-cadherin, which appears to be diffusely distributed over the endothelial cell plasma membrane (20), and of VE-cadherin, which, in addition to being specific to the vascular endothelium (21, 22) and concentrated at cell-cell junctions (23, 24), has also been shown to mediate vasculogenesis (25) and both in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis (9, 10).

In the present investigation, we focused our attention on the interaction of the N terminus of fibrin, namely the beta 15-42 sequence, with an endothelial cell receptor by characterizing binding of the N-terminal disulfide knot (NDSK) of fibrin to HUVEC. We have also utilized a cadherin capture assay to analyze the direct interaction of fibrin with isolated cadherins. Based on our results, we propose that VE-cadherin serves as a fibrin-specific receptor on endothelial cells and that the N terminus of the fibrin beta  chain (beta 15-42) functions as a heterophilic ligand for VE-cadherin.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Reagents and Antibodies-- Medium 199 with Earle's salts and Hepes buffer, Dulbecco modified Eagle's medium, and collagenase type I were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. RPMI 1640 medium was purchased from Fisher Scientific. Carrier-free 125I (NaI in NaOH) and the ECL detection system were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Silicone oil (DC 550) was purchased from Dow Corning Corp. through William K. Nye Inc. (New Bedford, MA). Lyophilized human thrombin, Atroxin, a polyclonal pan-cadherin antibody against the conserved cytoplasmic domain of the cadherin family, and a monoclonal antibody (clone GC-4) against human N-cadherin were purchased from Sigma. A second monoclonal antibody against N-cadherin (clone NCAD2) and a monoclonal anti-ICAM-1 antibody (clone LB-2) were purchased from Becton Dickinson (Bedford, MA). The monoclonal antibody (clone 75) against residues 26-194 of human VE-cadherin was purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). A monoclonal antibody against the human integrin alpha vbeta 3 (clone LM 609) was purchased from Chemicon International, Inc. (Temecula, CA), and another against the integrin beta 1 subunit (clone P4C10) was purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Endothelial cell growth factor was kindly provided by Dr. Kerri Pratt (Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA), and human aortic smooth muscle cells were provided by both Dr. Kerri Pratt and Dr. A. Zalewski (Division of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA). An immortalized line of human, adipose-derived microvascular endothelial cells (HADMEC) were provided by Dr. John T. Flynn (Department of Physiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA), and a polyclonal antibody to von Willebrand factor was kindly donated by Dr. Dorothy Beacham (Cardeza Foundation, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA). Monoclonal (clone 4G6) and polyclonal (WACO) anti-PECAM-1 antibodies were gifts from Dr. Steven M. Albelda (Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). A polyclonal antibody to the alpha vbeta 3 integrin and protease III from the venom of Crotalus atrox were donated by Dr. P. Thiagarajan (Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Center, Houston, TX). Another monoclonal antibody against alpha vbeta 3 (clone 7E3) was a gift from Dr. Barry Coller (Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY), and a monoclonal antibody to the fibrin sequence beta 15-42 was provided by Dr. B. J. Kudryk (New York Blood Center, New York, NY). All other reagents were purchased from Fisher, Sigma, or Life Technologies, Inc.

Cell Culture-- Primary cultures of HUVEC were isolated from human umbilical cords and maintained in culture as described (26). Cells from passages 1-4 were used in this study and were periodically checked for the expression of von Willebrand factor by immunohistochemistry. Human aortic smooth muscle cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, amphotericin, and 20% fetal calf serum. Cells from passages 15-20 were used in this study. HADMEC were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, and 5% fetal bovine serum on tissue culture dishes coated with 1% gelatin and were confirmed to be endothelial cells by immunofluorescent assessment of the expression of von Willebrand factor. Cells from passages 10-15 were used in this study.

Preparation of the NDSK and Its Derivatives from Fibrinogen-- Human fibrinogen was purified as described previously (26). To prepare the NDSK, fibrinogen (10 mg/ml) was dialyzed into 70% formic acid and was treated with cyanogen bromide (1.3 mg/100 mg of fibrinogen) for 24 h at room temperature (27). The solution was dialyzed into 50 mM Tris-buffer, pH 7.4, and contaminating hydrophobic fragments (28) were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g. The supernatant, containing two major cleavage products, was chromatographed on a Sephadex G-100 column, and fractions eluted after the void volume were pooled and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Purified NDSK was treated with thrombin (3 units/ml for 3 h at 37 °C) to generate NDSK II (NDSK lacking fibrinopeptides A and B). NDSK I (NDSK minus fibrinopeptide A) was prepared by treating NDSK with Atroxin (2 µg/ml for 2 h at 37 °C), and NDSK 325, which lacks Bbeta 1-42, was prepared by treatment of NDSK with protease III (8 µg/ml for 3 h at 37 °C) from C. atrox venom (29). The identities of the NDSK derivatives were assessed by SDS-PAGE. For binding experiments, NDSK fragments were labeled with iodine 125, by the IODOGEN method (30), to a specific activity of 3000-5000 cpm/ng.

Synthesis of the beta 15-42 Peptide Sequence-- The beta 15-42 sequence, corresponding to the neo-N terminus of the fibrin beta  chain following cleavage of fibrinopeptide B by thrombin, was synthesized by the Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) strategy of solid-phase synthesis (31) using an Applied Biosystems 430A peptide synthesizer and was purified by reversed-phase chromatography using an Applied Biosystems semipreparative system equipped with a Rainin C18 column. The sequence of the purified beta 15-42 peptide was verified by mass spectroscopy. The purified peptide was conjugated to ovalbumin by glutaraldehyde cross-linking (12).

Binding Assays-- Binding of NDSK derivatives to HUVEC suspensions was performed essentially as described previously for fibrinogen binding to HUVEC (26). Briefly, HUVEC (~250,000 cells/ml) suspended in buffer containing 1% bovine serum albumin and no added cations, were incubated in 12-mm multiwells with the 125I-NDSKs at a final concentration of 20 nM. The suspensions were incubated with horizontal shaking at 4 °C and aliquots of suspension were removed in duplicate and added to microcentrifuge tubes containing a mixture of 1 part light mineral oil and 4 parts DC550 silicone oil (26). The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min, the tips of the tubes were amputated, and the cell-bound radioactivity was counted by gamma -scintillation. Nonspecific binding was determined by preincubating cells for 20 min with a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled NDSK, NDSK I, NDSK II, or NDSK 325, prior to the addition of the respective 125I-labeled derivatives.

Specific binding was calculated from the difference in total binding and nonspecific binding. Reversibility of binding was assessed either by dilution with excess binding buffer or by displacement with excess unlabeled NDSK II. To assess the cation dependence of the system, binding studies were carried out with binding buffer containing added CaCl2 (2 mM), MgCl2 (2 mM), MnCl2 (0.5 mM), or EDTA (8 mM). To assess the integrity of the cell-bound 125I-NDSK, the radioactive pellet was extracted into Laemmli sample buffer (32), electrophoresed, and subjected to autoradiography as described below.

Potential inhibitory agents, such as antibodies (5-10 µg/ml) to endothelial cell integrins, cadherins, or Ig superfamily molecules, or specific fibrin-derived peptides such as beta 15-42 (25 µg/ml) or RGDS (0.5 mM), were preincubated with the cells for 20 min prior to the addition of the 125I-NDSKs. For assessment of the potential inhibitory role of heparin, heparin was preincubated at increasing concentrations with the purified 125I-NDSK II (33). Following incubation of HUVEC with the 125I-NDSK fragments, binding was quantitated as described above.

For the studies in monolayer, HUVEC were grown to confluence on 5-cm wells (~500,000 cells/well), washed twice with 2 ml of serum-free Medium 199 containing 1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4, and preincubated with the same medium for 15 min at 37 °C prior to the addition of the NDSK derivatives. All monolayer studies were carried out at 37 °C. Nonspecific binding was determined as described above for cell suspensions. Following incubation, duplicate wells were washed twice with TBS and detached with TBS/EDTA, 900-µl aliquots of detached cells were added to microcentrifuge tubes containing a mineral oil/DC550 silicone oil mixture, and the cell-bound 125I-NDSK was quantitated as described above for the suspension studies.

Estimation of Binding Parameters-- Scatchard plots of NDSK II binding to HUVEC were analyzed by curve-fitting software developed by Munson and Rodbard (34) for estimation of dissociation constants (KD) and maximal binding (Bmax). The data were analyzed initially using both a two-site and a one-site model with nonspecific binding set at zero. Convergence of the data was obtained with only the one-site model. The data were subsequently analyzed by a one-site model with nonspecific binding set as a parameter proportional to the ligand concentration. The experimental estimates of nonspecific binding, determined from the binding of labeled ligand in the presence of 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled ligand, coincided within 15% of estimates by curve fitting using the one-site model.

Co-immunoprecipitation of VE-cadherin and NDSK II-- Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (35) with some modifications. HUVEC monolayers (10-15 T-75 flasks; ~30-45 × 10 6 cells) were washed three times with TBS containing 2 mM CaCl2 and then scraped, on ice, into TBS, pH 7.4, containing 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 15 µg/ml aprotinin, and 15 µg/ml leupeptin (lysis buffer). The samples were centrifuged for 5-10 min at 1000 × g and the supernatants resuspended in 0.5 ml of the same buffer containing 0.5% SDS and 1% Nonidet P-40, put on ice for 15 min, and aspirated back and forth several times through a 27.5-gauge needle. After 15 min, lysis buffer containing only 1% Nonidet P-40 was added to bring the final concentration of SDS to 0.1%, the samples were allowed to stand on ice for 15 min and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. To the supernatant, 125I-NDSK II was added to a final concentration of 30 nM and the tubes were capped and rotated end-over-end for 20-30 min at room temperature. The NDSK II-bound lysate was then incubated for 2 h on ice with either an anti-pan-cadherin IgG or a control rabbit IgG, both at a final concentration of 50 µg/ml. Subsequently, 100 µl of the Protein A-Sepharose suspension was added to each sample and incubated for 60 min on an end-over-end shaker. The incubation mixture was centrifuged for 1-2 min at 12,000 × g and the pellet washed four times with 1 ml of lysis buffer. After the final wash, the pellets were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer (32), electrophoresed, and immunoblotted as described above.

Co-capture of VE-cadherin and NDSK II-- Antibody capture assays were performed as follows. To each 12-mm well of a Nunclon multiwell dish, 500-µl aliquots of anti-pan-cadherin IgG or control rabbit IgG (10 µg/ml TBS) were added and the dishes incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Following aspiration of the antibody solutions, each well was washed three times with 1 ml of TBS and residual protein binding sites were blocked by incubation with 10% powdered milk in TBS for 1-3 h at 37 °C. The wells were then aspirated and rinsed with lysis buffer containing 0.1% SDS/1% Nonidet P-40, and 500-µl portions of cell lysates (250,000-500,000 cells/ml), lysed as described previously for the immunoprecipitation studies, were added for 2 h at 37 °C. The lysates were then aspirated, and the wells were washed and resupplemented with 500-µl aliquots of detergent-containing lysis buffer. To measure total binding of the NDSK fragments, 125I-labeled NDSK, NDSK II, or NDSK 325 were added to the buffer at a final concentration of 20 nM for 30 min at room temperature. Nonspecific binding was determined by preincubating certain wells for 20 min with a 100-fold molar excess of the unlabeled derivatives prior to the addition of the respective labeled derivatives. The wells were then washed three times with 1-ml aliquots of detergent-containing lysis buffer to remove free radioactivity, and the well contents were scraped into 1-ml portions of 1 M NaOH and counted by gamma  scintillation.

SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis, Autoradiography, and Western Blotting-- Integrity of the various NDSK derivatives was examined by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels followed by either Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining or immunoblotting with a monoclonal antibody (T2G1) to the fibrin beta 15-21 sequence (36). Immunoreactive bands were visualized with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and the ECL detection system. The 125I-labeled NDSK derivatives were analyzed by autoradiography of dried gels. HUVEC and HADMEC cadherins were separated on 7.5% polyacrylamide gels, under reducing conditions, and Western blots performed using either the monoclonal antibody against human VE-cadherin or the polyclonal anti-pan-cadherin antibody, each at 10 µg/ml. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using the ECL detection system.

Statistical Analysis-- The n values for all experiments range from three to six separate determinations of data points measured in duplicate. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using Student's t test (two-sample assuming unequal variances) and single-factor analysis of variance with Microsoft Excel Analysis Toolpak version 5.0 software (Gray Matter International, Inc., Fremont, CA). Probability values of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were considered significant.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Analysis of NDSK Fragments-- Fibrinogen can be cleaved with cyanogen bromide to generate a fragment termed the NDSK, which is composed of the intact N termini of the Aalpha , Bbeta , and gamma  chains held together by disulfide bonds. The NDSK can be treated with thrombin, Atroxin, or protease III to generate modified NDSK derivatives, (i.e. NDSK II, NDSK I, or NDSK 325, respectively). Table I summarizes the composition of these derivatives. Each NDSK fragment, when run under nonreducing conditions on 12% SDS-PAGE, appears as a heterogeneous group of bands as depicted (Fig. 1A). The heavier, lighter-staining bands have been observed in other studies involving CNBr degradation of fibrinogen (28, 37), and are most likely due to the presence of oxidized methionine residues that are resistant to CNBr cleavage thus resulting in incomplete cleavage at the C termini of the fragments (37). The N-terminal residues, however, remain completely intact as demonstrated by N-terminal sequence analysis of fibrinogen NDSK, fibrin NDSK I, and fibrin NDSK II (37, 38). Thus, as the N-terminal residues of fibrinogen-derived NDSK are cleaved with either thrombin (Fig. 1, lane 2), Atroxin (Fig. 1, lane 3), or protease III (Fig. 1, lane 4), the entire group of bands migrates at their new lower molecular weights compared with the untreated fibrinogen NDSK (Fig. 1, lane 1). The major bands of NDSK, NDSK II, NDSK I, and thrombin-treated NDSK 325 migrate at 63.7, 58, 61, and 54 kDa, respectively (Fig. 1A).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Generation and biochemical structure of NDSK derivatives


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   . SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of NDSK fragments. The NDSK of human fibrinogen was generated by chemical degradation with CNBr and was purified by Sephadex G-100 chromatography. The purified fibrinogen NDSK was treated for 3 h at 37 °C with thrombin, Atroxin, or protease III followed by thrombin to generate NDSK II, NDSK I, or thrombin-treated NDSK 325, respectively. The NDSK fragments were run on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and visualized either by Coomassie staining (A) or by Western blotting with the monoclonal antibody T2G1 against the human fibrin beta 15-21 sequence (B). Positions of molecular markers are indicated in the margin. Lane 1, NDSK at 63.7 kDa; lane 2, NDSK II at 58 kDa; lane 3, NDSK I at 61 kDa; lane 4, thrombin-treated NDSK 325 at 54 kDa.

The same NDSK fragments were transferred to nitrocellulose after running on SDS-PAGE and Western blots were performed using a monoclonal antibody (T2G1) to the beta 15-21 sequence in order to identify the antigenic exposure of this sequence (36). As shown in Fig. 1B, although present in NDSK (lane 1), NDSK II (lane 2), and NDSK I (lane 3), the beta 15-21 sequence is available as an antigenic epitope only in NDSK II (lane 2), which was generated by cleavage of fibrinopeptide B with thrombin.

Characterization of NDSK Binding to HUVEC-- Because fibrin II, but not fibrin I or fibrin 325, can induce endothelial cell capillary tube formation (7) which can be inhibited by antibodies to VE-cadherin (9), we hypothesized that fibrin II may bind specifically to endothelial cell receptors, possibly VE-cadherin. However, because our preliminary binding studies were complicated by the problem of fibrin polymerization,2 we chose to study the binding of various NDSKs to HUVEC, eliminating the binding of fibrin polymers since the NDSKs are soluble. Furthermore, since the purified NDSKs do not contain the RGD sequences present in the native molecule, potential RGD-dependent interactions are likely eliminated. This approach also afforded us the opportunity to characterize the binding determinants expressed at the N terminus of fibrin and to aid in the identification of an endothelial cell fibrin receptor.

Time-course binding studies conducted over 3 h revealed that the total binding of 125I-NDSK II (20 nM) to HUVEC suspensions at 4 °C or monolayers at 37 °C reached a plateau level in 10 min (Fig. 2). Therefore, in subsequent experiments, incubations were carried out for 20 min prior to determination of particular binding parameters. Fig. 2 also demonstrates that total binding in monolayer saturates at a lower number of molecules per cell than in suspension (5,000 versus 40,000, respectively).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time course of 125I-NDSK II total binding to HUVEC. HUVEC suspensions (250,000 cells/ml) at 4 °C or monolayers (500,000 cells/ml) at 37 °C were incubated with 125I-NDSK II (20 nM). At the indicated time points, duplicate aliquots were collected and the bound ligand was separated from free by centrifugation of cells through silicone oil, followed by gamma  scintillation counting of cell pellets. The ordinate to the left represents the scale of total 125I-NDSK II bound to HUVEC suspensions (bullet ); the ordinate to the right represents the scale of total 125I-NDSK II bound to HUVEC monolayers (open circle ).

Specific binding of 125I-NDSK II by dilution was observed to be reversible, reaching a maximum of 70% displacement after 2.5 h (Fig. 3). Reversibility by competition, using excess unlabeled NDSK II, gave identical results (data not shown). Moreover, the 125I-NDSK II recovered from bound cells ran predominantly as a 58-kDa band, unchanged from the appearance of the starting material (data not shown) indicating that the radioactivity bound to HUVEC in these studies was NDSK II which did not undergo significant degradation or polymerization.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Reversibility of 125I-NDSK II binding to HUVEC by dilution. HUVEC suspensions (250,000 cells/ml) were incubated at 4 °C with 125I-NDSK II (20 nM) in two separate samples, one without and one with prior addition of 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled NDSK II. After 20 min, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed, and resuspended in the same volume of buffer without added NDSK II. At sequential time points, aliquots in duplicate were collected from each sample and bound ligand was separated from free by centrifugation of cells through silicone oil, followed by gamma  scintillation counting of cell pellets. Binding of 125I-NDSK II in the absence of unlabeled NDSK II (Total Bound); binding of 125I-NDSK II in the presence of 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled NDSK II (Nonspecific). Binding was expressed as percentage of the total 125I-NDSK II bound at time 0. The data shown is a representative example of three separate experiments.

The relative affinities of the 125I-labeled and unlabeled NDSK II were compared by conducting isotope dilution experiments in which the concentration of total NDSK II was kept constant at 25 nM while the proportion of unlabeled NDSK II to 125I-NDSK II was progressively increased. This type of analysis revealed that the affinities of the two ligands were very similar, as evidenced by a linear decrease in bound 125I-NDSK II as its proportion decreased (data not shown).

Saturability of NDSK II Binding to HUVEC-- Binding isotherms of 125I-NDSK II from 2.5 to 25 nM to HUVEC suspensions were performed and analyzed by the LIGAND computer program (34). The data defined a single population of receptors that saturated near 20 nM (Fig. 4), and Scatchard data of five separate experiments revealed an apparent dissociation constant (KD) of 7.7 ± 1.6 nM with approximately 21,000 ± 7000 binding sites/cell (Fig. 4, inset).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Saturation isotherm and Scatchard analysis of 125I-NDSK II binding to HUVEC. Increasing concentrations of 125I-NDSK II were incubated, without or with prior addition of 100-fold excess unlabeled NDSK II, at 4 °C with HUVEC (250,000 cells/ml) suspensions. Bound ligand was separated from free by centrifugation of cells through silicone oil, followed by gamma  scintillation counting of cell pellets. Specific binding (bullet ) was calculated by subtracting nonspecific binding (black-triangle), measured as the residual binding in the presence of 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled NDSK II at each concentration, from the total binding (black-square). The data shown are a representative of five separate experiments. Inset, Scatchard plot of NDSK II binding to HUVEC. Analysis of the results using the nonlinear curve-fitting program, LIGAND (34), defined a one-site binding isotherm for NDSK II with a KD of 7.5 nM and Bmax = 29,000 molecules/cell.

The specific binding of 125I-NDSK II to HUVEC monolayers reached a saturation between 10 and 20 nM (data not shown), similar to that of the suspension studies (Fig. 4). However, the extent of binding was much less than in suspension and the accuracy of binding at subsaturating concentrations was limited by the low number of counts bound. Therefore, binding specificity was determined at saturating concentrations as described below.

Specificity of NDSK II Binding to HUVEC-- To establish the specificity of NDSK binding to HUVEC, the binding of each radiolabeled NDSK fragment (20 nM) was measured in the absence or presence of a 100-fold molar excess of its corresponding unlabeled fragment. As demonstrated in Fig. 5A, only the binding of the thrombin-cleaved 125I-NDSK II was significantly inhibited by its cold fragment, revealing specific binding of 51 ± 6%. Similar results were obtained with confluent HUVEC monolayers at 37 °C as shown in Fig. 5B, which demonstrates that the specific binding of NDSK II was 69 ± 5%, but that the number of molecules bound per cell was 10-fold less than in suspension, as previously noted for the time-course experiments (Fig. 2). The decreased number of NDSK II molecules in monolayer compared with suspension is possibly attributable to a decrease in the number of VE-cadherin molecules available for heterophilic binding as a result of strong homophilic binding to other VE-cadherin molecules present at intercellular contact sites.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Specific binding of various 125I-NDSK derivatives to HUVEC. Specific binding of each 125I-NDSK derivative was determined by incubation for 20 min at 4 °C with HUVEC suspensions (A) or at 37 °C with HUVEC monolayers (B), with (Nonspecific) or without (Total Bound) a prior 20-min incubation with a 100-fold molar excess of each respective unlabeled NDSK fragment. 125I- NDSKs were added to a final concentration of 20 nM. Binding of 125I-NDSKs was determined following centrifugation of cells through silicone oil. NDSK II, thrombin-treated; NDSK, untreated; NDSK I, Atroxin-treated; NDSK 325, protease III-treated. Values for total and nonspecific binding represent the means ± S.D. of duplicate measurements from three to six separate binding experiments; *, p < 0.05.

Since neither NDSK nor NDSK I (which contain beta 15-42 masked either by fibrinopeptides A and B or fibrinopeptide A alone, respectively), or NDSK 325 (which lacks Bbeta 15-42) manifest specific binding, these results suggest that the association of the N terminus of fibrin II with the endothelial cell is most likely mediated by the beta 15-42 sequence, which becomes functionally unmasked only upon cleavage of fibrinopeptide B (see Fig. 1B). To assess this possibility more directly, we conducted binding studies with excess beta 15-42 peptide as an inhibitor. When the beta 15-42 sequence was cross-linked to ovalbumin and preincubated with HUVEC suspensions, binding of 125I-NDSK II was inhibited to the level observed with 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled NDSK II, whereas inhibition with ovalbumin alone was insignificant (Fig. 6). These data support the concept that beta 15-42 mediates specific binding of NDSK II to HUVEC.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibition of 125I-NDSK II binding to HUVEC by a beta 15-42-ovalbumin conjugate. HUVEC suspensions were preincubated with either unlabeled NDSK II (2 µM), the beta 15-42 peptide coupled to ovalbumin (25 µg/ml) or ovalbumin alone (25 µg/ml) for 20 min at 4 °C. 125I- NDSK II was added to a final concentration of 20 nM and allowed to proceed for 20 min at 4 °C. Binding of 125I-NDSK II was then determined following centrifugation of cells through silicone oil. 125I-labeled NDSK II in the absence of inhibitor (CONT), unlabeled NDSK II (100X), beta 15-42 coupled to ovalbumin (beta 15-42-OVA), and ovalbumin (OVA). Binding was expressed as counts per minute (CPM) of 125I-NDSK II bound to HUVEC. The data shown are means ± S.D. of duplicate measurements from four experiments. *, p < 0.05.

Divalent Cation Influence on NDSK II Binding to HUVEC-- Calcium and manganese have been reported to influence fibrinogen binding to beta 1 and beta 3 integrins (16, 39); therefore, we considered whether these cations might also influence the binding of NDSK II to HUVEC. In these experiments, 125I-NDSK II (20 nM) was incubated with HUVEC suspensions with added CaCl2, MgCl2, MnCl2, or EDTA, and total binding was measured after 20 min of incubation at 4 °C. The addition of divalent cations or EDTA failed to either stimulate or inhibit 125I-NDSK II binding (data not shown), establishing that NDSK II binding to HUVEC is a divalent cation-independent process.

NDSK II Binds to VE-cadherin on HUVEC-- In order to elucidate the receptor to which NDSK II binds, several agents were tested for their ability to inhibit the binding of 125I-NDSK II to HUVEC. These included antibodies to the various cell adhesion molecules known to be present on endothelial cells, specific peptides present within fibrin(ogen), and heparin, which has recently been shown to inhibit binding of fibrin fragments to HUVEC (33). The results of these experiments revealed that binding of 125I-NDSK II to HUVEC could not be inhibited by the antibodies 7E3 or LM 609 (data not shown), both of which are directed against the integrin alpha vbeta 3 (15, 40). In agreement with these findings, the RGDS peptide, which corresponds to the integrin-binding domain of fibrinogen, also failed to inhibit NDSK II binding to HUVEC (data not shown). Taken together, these data support the conclusion that integrins did not mediate NDSK II binding to HUVEC under the conditions tested. Unlike previous studies of fibrin N-terminal fragment binding to HUVEC (33), heparin (5-500 µg/ml) did not inhibit the binding of NDSK II to HUVEC in our system, suggesting that the fibrin receptor is not a heparan proteoglycan and that binding of heparin to the heparin-binding domain (beta 15-42) did not interfere with NDSK II binding to the fibrin receptor of endothelial cells.

As depicted in Fig. 7, of the antibodies tested, only a monoclonal antibody directed against the first two extracellular domains of VE-cadherin was capable of inhibiting 125I-NDSK II binding to HUVEC. In contrast, antibodies against the extracellular domain of N-cadherin did not significantly inhibit NDSK II binding (Fig. 7). Similarly, the binding of NDSK II to HUVEC was not influenced by monoclonal antibodies against PECAM-1 or ICAM-1 (data not shown), indicating that these two members of the Ig superfamily do not serve as receptors for the N terminus of fibrin II.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of anti-cadherin monoclonal antibodies on 125I-NDSK II binding to HUVEC. HUVEC suspensions were preincubated with unlabeled NDSK II (2 µM), or monoclonal antibodies (5-10 µg/ml) against N-cadherin (clone NCAD2) or VE-cadherin (clone 75) for 20 min prior to addition of 125I-NDSK II (20 nM) and further incubation for 20 min at 4 °C. Binding of 125I-NDSK II was determined following centrifugation of cells through silicone oil. 125I-labeled NDSK II in the absence of antibody (CONT), unlabeled NDSK II (100X), anti-VE-cadherin (VE-CAD), anti-N-cadherin (N-CAD). Binding was expressed as counts per minute (CPM) of 125I-NDSK II bound to HUVEC. The data shown are means ± S.D. of duplicate measurements from four experiments. *p < 0.05.

Because the VE-cadherin antibody inhibited NDSK II binding, we further analyzed the role of VE-cadherin in fibrin binding by studying the association of NDSK II with cells that do not express VE-cadherin. For these experiments, cultured vascular human smooth muscle cells were lysed, run in SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted using the VE-cadherin antibody. These experiments showed that VE-cadherin was not expressed by these cells (data not shown), as previously shown by other investigators (9, 22). More importantly, these venous smooth muscle cells did not show specific binding of 125I-NDSK II whether in suspension at 4 °C or as monolayers at 37 °C (data not shown).

NDSK II Co-immunoprecipitates with HUVEC Cadherins-- To further establish the role of VE-cadherin as the NDSK II receptor of endothelial cells, we used a polyclonal pan-cadherin antibody to assess whether 125I-NDSK II would co-immunoprecipitate from HUVEC lysates along with VE-cadherin. The pan-cadherin antibody was used since it is directed at the conserved cytoplasmic domain of the cadherins and should therefore not interfere with the extracellular NDSK II binding site, as would be expected for the monoclonal antibody which inhibited NDSK II binding (Fig. 7) and which is directed against the extracellular domain of VE-cadherin. The Western blots of the immunoprecipitated 130-kDa HUVEC cadherin are demonstrated in Fig. 8 (panels A and B), using the polyclonal pan-cadherin and monoclonal VE-cadherin antibodies, respectively. The large bands at the bottom of lanes 2 and 3 in panel B migrate at a molecular mass of 50 kDa and likely represent the IgG of the immune complexes after being run under reducing conditions. Panel C demonstrates that the pan-cadherin antibody immunoprecipitated 59 ± 18% more radioactive NDSK II than did a nonimmune IgG. Therefore, just as in the binding studies (Fig. 5), the amount of specific binding of 125I-NDSK II to isolated endothelial cell cadherins is approximately 50-60%.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Co-immunoprecipitation of 125I-NDSK II with HUVEC cadherins. Confluent HUVEC monolayers (~40 × 10 6 cells) were lysed in a buffer containing 0.5% SDS and 1% Nonidet P-40 and brought to a final detergent concentration of 0.1% SDS and 1% Nonidet P-40. The particulate fraction was separated by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min, and the soluble fraction was incubated with 125I-NDSK II (30 nM) for 30 min at 25 °C. Immunoprecipitations were carried out with 50 µg/ml of either an anti-pan cadherin IgG (Pan-Cad IgG) or a control rabbit IgG (Rabbit IgG). The immune complexes were collected by precipitation with Protein A-Sepharose, subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions on a 7.5% gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with either the pan-cadherin polyclonal antibody (A) or the VE-cadherin monoclonal antibody (B). Lane numbers in both A and B correspond to the following: lane 1, control HUVEC lysate; lane 2, pan-cadherin IgG immunoprecipitate; lane 3, rabbit IgG immunoprecipitate. Co-immunoprecipitated 125I-NDSK II was quantitated by gamma  scintillation counting of 10-µl aliquots of the precipitated immune complexes (C). The data show the means ± S.D. of four separate experiments expressed as percentage of total 125I-NDSK II immunoprecipitated with a pan-cadherin IgG.

Isolated HUVEC Cadherins Specifically Bind NDSK II-- To further establish the identity of VE-cadherin as the NDSK II receptor of HUVEC, we used a modified antigen capture assay in which HUVEC cadherins were immobilized in wells coated with the polyclonal pan-cadherin antibody. The Western blots of the immunocaptured 130-kDa HUVEC cadherin is demonstrated in Fig. 9A using the monoclonal VE-cadherin antibody. The results shown in Fig. 9B illustrate that the binding of 125I-NDSK II to captured cadherins reached a plateau at 20 nM and that specific binding, as determined by preincubation of wells with a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled NDSK II, was 89 ± 5% (Fig. 9C). Fig. 9C also shows that the binding of 125I-NDSK and 125I-NDSK 325 to captured cadherins was negligible, and that the binding of 125I-NDSK II by material captured by nonimmune IgG was only 11 ± 8%, similar to the level of nonspecific binding of NDSK II. Thrombin-treated 125I-NDSK 325 also failed to bind to captured cadherins (data not shown), indicating that exposure of the neo-N terminus of the alpha  chain was not involved in binding to VE-cadherin. The higher level of specific binding of 125I-NDSK II in this system, as compared with the binding suspension experiments and immunoprecipitations, is probably due to the capacity of the immunocapture method to reduce nonspecific binding by removal of other cell surface molecules that are washed away after immunocapture.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Saturation isotherm and specificity of 125I-NDSK II binding to captured HUVEC cadherins. Multiwell dishes were coated with either a pan-cadherin or a nonimmune IgG and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with HUVEC lysates solubilized in 0.5% SDS and 1% Nonidet P-40, as described under "Experimental Procedures." The wells were washed, incubated with 20 nM 125I-NDSK II for 20 min at 25 °C, washed again, and scraped into Laemmli sample buffer, followed by SDS-PAGE (under reducing conditions on a 7.5% gel), and Western blotted with the VE-cadherin monoclonal antibody (A). Lane numbers correspond to the following: lane 1, control HUVEC lysate; lane 2, pan-cadherin IgG immunocaptured material; lane 3, rabbit IgG immunocaptured material. The pan-cadherin-coated wells were incubated with increasing concentrations of 125I-NDSK II for 20 min at 25 °C, the wells were washed, scraped into 1 M NaOH, and the amount of bound 125I-NDSK II analyzed by gamma  scintillation counting (B). HUVEC were lysed and incubated in antibody-coated wells, followed by the addition of 20 nM each of 125I-labeled NDSK II, NDSK, or NDSK 325 for 20 min at 25 °C (C). For determination of nonspecific binding, preincubation with 100-fold excess of the unlabeled NDSK II (Nonspecific) was carried out, for 20 min at 25 °C, prior to the addition of 125I-NDSK II. The wells were washed, scraped into 1 M NaOH, and analyzed by gamma  scintillation counting. Values represent the means ± S.D. of duplicate measurements from three to five experiments and are expressed as counts per minute (CPM) of 125I-NDSK II bound to HUVEC captured in wells coated with a polyclonal pan-cadherin IgG (black-square, ) or rabbit IgG (, ). *, p < 0.05.

The conclusion that the 125I-NDSK II was in fact bound to captured endothelial cell VE-cadherin is supported by the observation that Western blot analysis of material scraped from the capture assay plate coated with the pancadherin antibody revealed VE-cadherin that was not detected from the plate coated with control rabbit IgG (Fig. 9A, lanes 2 and 3, respectively). Although it is also likely that N-cadherin was captured using the polyclonal pan-caderin antibody, captured N-cadherin could not be demonstrated by Western blots possibly due to the low sensitivity of the N-cadherin antibody as revealed by Western blot analysis with HUVEC lysates (data not shown).

As a final demonstration of the role of VE-cadherin in binding of NDSK II, an immortalized line of endothelial cells, known as HADMEC (41), which are negative for VE-cadherin by immunoblot (Fig. 10A, lane 2) and immunofluorescence (data not shown), positive by immunofluorescence for von Willebrand factor and N-cadherin (data not shown), did not specifically bind 125I-NDSK II (Fig. 10B). These data firmly establish VE-cadherin as the NDSK II receptor of endothelial cells.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Western blot and cadherin capture assays of HUVEC and HADMEC. Confluent monolayers (~3 × 106 cells) of HUVEC and HADMEC were extracted into boiling Laemmli sample buffer and run on 7.5% polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose paper, and Western blots were performed (A) using the monoclonal antibody against human VE-cadherin at a concentration of 10 µg/ml to visualize VE-cadherin in HUVEC (lane 1) or HADMEC (lane 2). For the capture assays (B), confluent HUVEC and HADMEC monolayers were lysed in a buffer containing 0.5% SDS and 1% Nonidet P-40 (250,000-500,000 cells/ml), as described under "Experimental Procedures," and incubated in wells coated with pan-cadherin IgG for 2 h at 37 °C. The wells were washed and incubated with 20 nM 125I-NDSK II for 20 min 25 °C (Total Bound). Preincubation with 100-fold molar excess of the unlabeled NDSK II (Nonspecific) was carried out in certain wells prior to the addition of 125I-NDSK II for 20 min at 25 °C. The wells were washed, scraped into 1 M NaOH, and analyzed by gamma  scintillation counting. Values represent the means ± S.D. of duplicate measurements from four separate experiments and are expressed as counts per minute (CPM) of 125I-NDSK II bound to HUVEC or HADMEC captured in wells coated with pan-cadherin IgG. *, p < 0.05.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The present paper focuses on the binding of soluble fibrin derivatives to HUVEC. The analysis of binding of fibrin itself to endothelial cells is difficult to quantitate since fibrin forms insoluble polymers after release of fibrinopeptides from fibrinogen (1). In order to circumvent the binding of polymerized fibrin, the soluble NDSK of fibrin, which lacks the polymerization sites at the C terminus of the fibrin molecule, was used to explore the structural requirements of fibrin binding to endothelial cells in vitro. NDSK is a fragment of fibrinogen, generated by cleavage with cyanogen bromide, which retains the N-terminal structural features of each of the fibrin chains consisting of the dimeric fragment of Aalpha 1-51, Bbeta 1-118, and gamma  1-78 (27, 38). Various forms of the NDSK lacking either fibrinopeptides A and B (NDSK II), fibrinopeptide A only (NDSK I), or the sequence Bbeta 1-42 (NDSK 325) can be prepared by treatment of the NDSK of fibrinogen with either thrombin, Atroxin, or protease III, respectively.

The results of our investigation clearly demonstrate that NDSK II, which contains the neo-N-terminal beta 15-42 sequence, specifically binds with high affinity to HUVEC suspensions in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, which is saturable, reversible, and cation-independent. In contrast, the derivatives in which beta 15-42 is not exposed (NDSK and NDSK I) or is absent (NDSK 325) did not specifically bind to HUVEC. Furthermore, binding of NDSK II was inhibited by a beta 15-42/ovalbumin conjugate, indicating that this sequence is responsible for mediating the fibrin-endothelial cell interaction. The free peptide itself possesses low functional activity (5, 12), perhaps because it differs in conformation from its native dimeric form in the fibrin molecule. NDSK II also specifically bound to HUVEC monolayers in a time-dependent matter, which demonstrated less nonspecific binding than in suspension, although the total number of molecules bound per cell was lower. This may be due to the participation of a portion of the available VE-cadherin molecules in the formation of intercellular contacts. It should be emphasized that the binding of NDSK II to HUVEC is clearly distinct from our previous report (26) of fibrinogen binding to HUVEC, which requires 2 h to plateau, is only partially reversible, and requires divalent cations. Binding is also distinct from that of NDSK fragment binding to macrophages (28), which occurs predominantly through the neo-N terminus of the alpha  chain.

Because several members of the endothelial cell integrin family are known to bind fibrinogen (15, 16), and because the association of matrix proteins with integrins plays an important role in the development of new blood vessels (42-46), we initially evaluated the potential of integrins to bind NDSK II. The NDSK II fragment used in this study lacks the RGD sequences through which fibrinogen and many other ligands bind to integrins (15, 16, 47, 48). Our results show that none of the anti-integrin antibodies tested had any inhibitory effect on NDSK II binding. Furthermore, the RGDS peptide, which inhibits fibrinogen binding to integrins (15, 48), also failed to inhibit NDSK II binding, suggesting that integrins did not directly participate in NDSK II binding in our system.

Of the Ig superfamily molecules, PECAM-1 and ICAM-1 are known to play important roles in endothelial cell function, with PECAM-1 mediating cell-cell adhesion and leukocyte migration across interendothelial cell junctions (17) and recently reported to play a role in angiogenesis (10, 11), and ICAM -1 serving as a fibrinogen receptor that binds the gamma 117-133 sequence at the C terminus of fibrinogen (18, 19). In our present study, however, we found that antibodies against PECAM-1 or ICAM-1 did not inhibit the binding of NDSK II to endothelial cells, in agreement with our previous report of the failure of anti-PECAM-1 antibodies to inhibit fibrin II-induced capillary tube formation (9). Of note, the gamma 117-133 sequence that binds to ICAM-1 is lost upon cleavage of fibrinogen with cyanogen bromide, thus eliminating the possibility of its interference in the binding of NDSK II to endothelial cells.

It has been recently demonstrated that CNBr-cleaved N-terminal fragments of fibrin bind to HUVEC and that preincubation of the N-terminal fragments with heparin inhibits the binding (33). These findings suggest that the heparin binding domain, previously identified as beta 15-42 (49), is likely involved in mediating the observed binding of fibrin fragments, potentially to a heparan sulfate-containing proteoglycan (33). In contrast, in our system, preincubation of purified NDSK II with heparin did not have any appreciable effect on the binding of NDSK II. These differences may be due to differences in the experimental systems. Alternatively, it may be that the binding of NDSK II to HUVEC VE-cadherin has a higher affinity than does the putative proteoglycan-like receptor, and so is preferentially active in our studies.

Cadherins are adhesive molecules present at adherens junctions, which mediate cell-cell contacts via their extracellular domains while anchoring to cytoskeletal structures via their cytoplasmic tails (24, 50-52). They play a major role in morphogenesis (50, 53, 54) and development of blood vessels during embryogenesis (25). Vascular endothelial cells express two different cadherins (20, 22), N-cadherin and VE-cadherin. While N-cadherin appears to be diffusely distributed over the plasma membrane (20), VE-cadherin is known to be located at intercellular junctions of essentially all types of endothelium (23, 24) and has recently been shown to mediate endothelial cell capillary tube formation in vitro either on its own (9) or in conjunction with PECAM-1 (10).

We have recently demonstrated that a monoclonal antibody against VE-cadherin, but not N-cadherin, prevents formation of endothelial cell capillary tubes induced by sandwiching HUVEC between fibrin-fibrin or collagen-collagen gels (9). Moreover, the VE-cadherin monoclonal antibody also produced disruption of preformed capillary tubes. These data indicate that fibrin may function as a heterophilic ligand for VE-cadherin on the endothelial cell surface. Indeed, the monoclonal antibody that inhibited or disrupted tube formation (9) also inhibited binding of NDSK II to endothelial cell suspensions or monolayers. Although two monoclonal antibodies to N-cadherin failed to significantly inhibit NDSK II binding to HUVEC, it is possible that they recognize epitopes of the extracellular domain that do not participate in this heterophilic interaction.

The VE-cadherin monoclonal antibody used in this investigation recognizes amino acids 26-194, which bridge the first two extracellular domains (EC1 and EC2) that are thought to contain the region that may participate in homophilic interactions of VE-cadherin at cell-cell junctions (24). To our knowledge, our finding of fibrin binding to VE-cadherin describes the first heterophilic interaction for VE-cadherin. However, it should be noted that E-cadherin has recently been shown to participate in heterophilic interactions with internalin, a surface protein that mediates entry of Listeria monocytogenes into epithelial cells (55), and also with the alpha Ebeta 7 integrin of mucosal T lymphocytes (56). Based on our present evidence, the EC1 and/or EC2 domains of VE-cadherin participate in a heterophilic interaction with the beta 15-42 sequence of fibrin. This conclusion is based on the findings that (a) binding of NDSK II to HUVEC was inhibited by a monoclonal antibody against VE-cadherin, (b) immunoprecipitation experiments with a pan-cadherin antibody co-immunoprecipitated NDSK II with HUVEC cadherins, and (c) NDSK II bound with high specificity to isolated HUVEC cadherins that had been captured by a pan-cadherin antibody. It is important to note that the degree of specific NDSK II binding to captured cadherins was 89% compared with 51% for NDSK II binding to whole cells. Perhaps, by isolating the cadherins, potential interference from cellular components that participate in nonspecific interactions with NDSK II was removed. Finally, NDSK II did not bind to cadherins captured from HADMEC, which contain N-cadherin but not VE-cadherin as assessed by Western blot and immunofluorescence experiments, thus demonstrating indirectly that NDSK II functions specifically as a heterophilic ligand for VE-cadherin. The results of our investigation are consistent with the report of the isolation of an unidentified 130-kDa protein from HUVEC lysates, which is clearly not PECAM-1, by affinity chromatography over fibrin beta 15-42/Sepharose (12).

The phosphorylation and intracellular protein associations of VE-cadherin seem to influence the biology of endothelial cell monolayers (24). In our system, it is feasible that intracellular phosphorylation events influence the conformation of the extracellular domains of VE-cadherin to favor a heterophilic interaction with fibrin as opposed to homophilic interactions with VE-cadherin molecules present on adjacent cells. Such a switch in binding specificity has been demonstrated with PECAM-1, where either the absence or phosphorylation of a particular tyrosine residue within the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 changes its ligand specificity, possibly by promoting dimerization, from heterophilic to homophilic binding (57). It is also conceivable that dimerization of VE-cadherin may influence its ligand specificity. Evidence to support this has been demonstrated with C-cadherin, in which dimers of C-cadherin exhibit substantially greater homophilic binding activity than do monomers, and the presence of calcium in this system favors C-cadherin dimerization (58). We speculate that a similar type of interaction may be occurring with VE-cadherin, and thus postulate that the phosphorylation of VE-cadherin or proteins associated with its cytoplasmic domain, allows a conformational change that favors the formation of VE-cadherin monomers, and thus promotes its heterophilic, calcium-independent binding to the N terminus of fibrin.

The mechanisms involved in the interaction of fibrin with VE-cadherin, which results in the formation of capillaries, have not been fully elucidated. It is possible that the N-terminal region of fibrin associates with apically expressed VE-cadherin molecules, which are not present in intercellular junctions, and that this association induces intracellular signals directly associated with endothelial cell morphogenesis. It is also possible that the initial disruption of endothelial cell monolayers, which occurs with overlying polymerized fibrin (4), permits the interaction of fibrin with VE-cadherin molecules present in the intercellular junctions, and that it is these topographically restricted associations which are responsible for the assembly of endothelial cells into capillary tubes.

In this investigation we have identified endothelial cell VE-cadherin as a receptor for the beta 15-42 sequence at the neo-N terminus of the fibrin beta  chain exposed upon thrombin-mediated cleavage of fibrinopeptide B. Thus, we have identified both a new fibrin-specific receptor as well as the first heterophilic ligand for VE-cadherin that demonstrates binding independent of divalent cations. Because of the central role of fibrin in blood coagulation, wound healing, and tumor growth and of VE-cadherin in endothelial cell function, these findings have broad implications in the understanding of the fibrin association with vascular endothelium in processes such as hemostasis and thrombosis, as well as in signaling cascades which may play a role in a variety of endothelial cell functions including the induction of capillary-tube formation during the angiogenic process.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Andrew S. Likens for the artwork, Rosemarie Silvano for preparation of the manuscript, and Bonny Lightner and Heather Ryan for their experience in cell culture.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-20092 (to J. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Dunglison M.D./Ph.D. candidate; recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association, Southeastern Pennsylvania Affiliate.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19107. Tel.: 215-955-8458; Fax: 215-923-3836; E-mail: jos.martinez{at}mail.tju.edu.

The abbreviations used are: HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; VE-cadherin, vascular endothelial cadherin; PECAM-1, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1; Ig, immunoglobulin family of cell adhesion molecules; ICAM-1, intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1; HADMEC, human adipose-derived microvascular endothelial cells; NDSK, N-terminal disulfide knot of fibrinogen; TBS, Tris-buffered saline.

2 T. L. Bach, C. Barsigian, C. H. Yaen, and J. Martinez, unpublished observations.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Mosesson, M. W. (1992) Semin. Hematol. 29, 177-188[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Dvorak, H. F. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 1650-1658[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Arnold, F., and West, D. C. (1991) Pharmacol. Ther. 52, 407-422[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Weimer, B., and Delvos, U. (1986) Arteriosclerosis 6, 139-145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ribes, J. A., Ni, F., Wagner, D., and Francis, C. W. (1989) J. Clin. Invest. 84, 435-442
  6. Dvorak, H. F., Harvey, S., Estrella, P., Brown, L. F., McDonagh, J., and Dvorak, A. M. (1987) Lab. Invest. 57, 673-686[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Chalupowicz, D. G., Chowdhury, Z. A., Bach, T. L., Barsigian, C., and Martinez, J. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 207-215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Suzuki, S., Sano, K., and Tanihara, H. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 261-270[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Bach, T. L., Barsigian, C., Chalupowicz, D. G., Busler, D., Yaen, C. H., Grant, D. S., and Martinez, J. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 238, 324-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Matsumura, T., Wolff, K., and Petzelbauer, P. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 3408-3416[Abstract]
  11. DeLisser, H. M., Christofidou-Solomidou, M., Strieter, R. M., Burdick, M. D., Robinson, C. S., Wexler, R. S., Kerr, J. S., Garlanda, C., Merwin, J. R., Madri, J. A., and Albelda, S. M. (1997) Am. J. Pathol. 151, 671-677[Abstract]
  12. Erban, J. K., and Wagner, D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2451-2458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bischoff, J. (1995) Trends Cell Biol. 5, 69-74[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Stromblad, S., and Cheresh, D. A. (1996) Trends Cell Biol. 6, 462-467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Cheresh, D. A., Berliner, S. A., Vicente, V., and Ruggeri, Z. M. (1989) Cell 58, 945-953[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Suehiro, K., Gailit, J., and Plow, E. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5360-5366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Newman, P. J. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, S25-S29
  18. Languino, L. R., Plescia, J., Duperray, A., Brian, A. A., Plow, E., Geltosky, J. E., and Altieri, D. C. (1993) Cell 73, 1423-1434[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Altieri, D. C., Duperray, A., Plescia, J., Thornton, G. B., and Languino, L. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 696-699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Salomon, D., Ayalon, O., Patel-King, R., Hynes, R. O., and Geiger, B. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 102, 7-17[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lampugnani, M. G., Resnati, M., Raiteri, M., Pigott, R., Pisacane, A., Houen, G., Ruco, L. P, and Dejana, E. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 118, 1511-1522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Breviario, F., Caveda, L., Corada, M., Martin-Padura, I., Navarro, P., Golay, J., Introna, M., Gulino, D., Lampugnani, M. G., and Dejana, E. (1995) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15, 1229-1239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Dejana, E., Corada, M., and Lampugnani, M. G. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 910-918[Abstract]
  24. Dejana, E. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, S7-S10
  25. Vittet, D., Buchou, T., Schweitzer, A., Dejana, E., and Huber, P. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U. S. A. 94, 6273-6278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Martinez, J., Rich, E., and Barsigian, C. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 20502-20508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Blomback, B., Blomback, M., Hessel, B., and Iwanaga, S. (1967) Nature 215, 1445-1448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Shainoff, J. R., Stearns, D. J., DiBello, P. M., and Hishikawa-Itoh, Y. (1990) Thromb. Haemostasis 63, 193-203[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Pandya, B. V., and Budzynski, A. Z. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 460-470[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fraker, P. M., and Speck, J. C. (1978) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 80, 849-857[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Chang, C. D., and Meienhofer, J. (1978) Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 11, 246-249[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Odrljin, T. M., Francis, C. W., Sporn, L. A., Bunce, L. A., Marder, V. J., and Simpson-Haidaris, P. J. (1996) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 16, 1544-1551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Munson, P. J., and Rodbard, D. (1980) Ann. Biochem. 107, 220-239
  35. Lampugnani, M. G., Corada, M., Caveda, L., Breviario, F., Ayalon, O., Geiger, B., and Dejana, E. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 203-217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Procyk, R., and Kudryk, B. (1991) Blood 77, 1469-1475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Meh, D. A., Siebenlist, K. R., Bergtrom, G., and Mosesson, M. W. (1995) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 125, 384-391[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Blomback, B., Blomback, M., Henschen, A., Hessel, B., Iwanga, S., and Woods, K. R. (1968) Nature 218, 130-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Smith, J. W., Piotrowicz, R. S., and Mathis, D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 960-967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Oster, Z. H., Srivastava, S. C., Som, P., Meinken, G. E, Scudder, L. E., Yamamoto, K., Atkins, H. L., Brill, A. B., and Coller, B. S. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 3465-3468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Flynn, J. T., Westbrooks, M., and Lucas, K. A. (1997) Shock 7, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Madri, J. A., and Pratt, B. M. (1986) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 34, 5-91[Abstract]
  43. Grant, D. S., Tashiro, K-I, Segui-Real, B., Yamada, Y., Martin, G. R., and Kleinman, H. K. (1989) Cell 58, 933-943[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Brooks, P. C., Clark, R. A. F., and Cheresh, D. A. (1994) Science 264, 569-571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Friedlander, M., Brooks, P. C., Shaffer, R. W., Kincaid, C. M., Varner, J. A., and Cheresh, D. A. (1995) Science 270, 1500-1502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Vernon, R. B., and Sage, E. H. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 147, 873-883[Abstract]
  47. Ruoslahti, E., and Pierschbacher, M. D. (1986) Cell 44, 517-518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Languino, L. R., Colella, S., Zanetti, A., Andrieux, A., Ryckewaert, J. J., Charon, M. H., Marchisio, P. C., Plow, E. F., Ginsberg, M. H., Marguerie, G., and Dejana, E. (1989) Blood 73, 734-742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Odrljin, T. M., Shainoff, J. R., Laurence, S. O., and Simpson-Haidaris, P. J. (1996) Blood 88, 2050-2061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Geiger, B., and Ayalon, O. (1992) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8, 307-332[CrossRef]
  51. Grunwald, G. B. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 797-805[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Suzuki, S. T. (1996) J. Cell. Biochem. 61, 531-542[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Takeichi, M. (1991) Science 251, 1451-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Gumbiner, B. M. (1996) Cell 84, 345-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Mengaud, J., Ohayon, H., Gounon, P., Mege, R.-M., and Cossart, P. (1996) Cell 84, 923-932[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Karecla, P. I., Green, S. J., Bowden, S. J., Coadwell, J., and Kilshaw, P. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30909-30915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Famiglietti, J., Sun, J., DeLisser, H. M., and Albelda, S. M. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 1425-1435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Brieher, W. M., Yap, A. S., and Gumbiner, B. M. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 487-496[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Kisucka, A. K. Chauhan, B.-Q. Zhao, I. S. Patten, A. Yesilaltay, M. Krieger, and D. D. Wagner
Elevated levels of soluble P-selectin in mice alter blood-brain barrier function, exacerbate stroke, and promote atherosclerosis
Blood, June 4, 2009; 113(23): 6015 - 6022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y.-H. Guo, I. Hernandez, B. Isermann, T.-b. Kang, L. Medved, R. Sood, E. J. Kerschen, T. Holyst, M. W. Mosesson, and H. Weiler
Caveolin-1-dependent apoptosis induced by fibrin degradation products
Blood, April 30, 2009; 113(18): 4431 - 4439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Guo, D. Daines, J. Tang, Q. Shen, R. M. Perrin, Y. Takada, S. Y. Yuan, and M. H. Wu
Fibrinogen-{gamma} C-Terminal Fragments Induce Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction and Microvascular Leak via Integrin-Mediated and RhoA-Dependent Mechanism
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2009; 29(3): 394 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. A. Campbell, K. A. Overmyer, C. R. Bagnell, and A. S. Wolberg
Cellular Procoagulant Activity Dictates Clot Structure and Stability as a Function of Distance From the Cell Surface
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2008; 28(12): 2247 - 2254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
D. Vestweber
VE-Cadherin: The Major Endothelial Adhesion Molecule Controlling Cellular Junctions and Blood Vessel Formation
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2008; 28(2): 223 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Cho, J. L. Degen, B. S. Coller, and D. F. Mosher
Fibrin but Not Adsorbed Fibrinogen Supports Fibronectin Assembly by Spread Platelets: EFFECTS OF THE INTERACTION OF {alpha}IIb{beta}3 WITH THE C TERMINUS OF THE FIBRINOGEN {gamma}-CHAIN
J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35490 - 35498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. M. Belkin, G. Tsurupa, E. Zemskov, Y. Veklich, J. W. Weisel, and L. Medved
Transglutaminase-mediated oligomerization of the fibrin(ogen) {alpha}C domains promotes integrin-dependent cell adhesion and signaling
Blood, May 1, 2005; 105(9): 3561 - 3568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. P. Michael, G. Sotiropoulou, G. Pampalakis, A. Magklara, M. Ghosh, G. Wasney, and E. P. Diamandis
Biochemical and Enzymatic Characterization of Human Kallikrein 5 (hK5), a Novel Serine Protease Potentially Involved in Cancer Progression
J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14628 - 14635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. Bazzoni and E. Dejana
Endothelial Cell-to-Cell Junctions: Molecular Organization and Role in Vascular Homeostasis
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2004; 84(3): 869 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
R. A. Adams, M. Passino, B. D. Sachs, T. Nuriel, and K. Akassoglou
Fibrin Mechanisms and Functions in Nervous System Pathology
Mol. Interv., June 1, 2004; 4(3): 163 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
V. Fontaine, Z. Touat, E. M. Mtairag, R. Vranckx, L. Louedec, X. Houard, B. Andreassian, U. Sebbag, T. Palombi, M.-P. Jacob, et al.
Role of Leukocyte Elastase in Preventing Cellular Re-Colonization of the Mural Thrombus
Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2004; 164(6): 2077 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Zhang, J. Cheng, N. R. Hackett, G. Lam, K. Shido, R. Pergolizzi, D. K. Jin, R. G. Crystal, and S. Rafii
Adenovirus E4 Gene Promotes Selective Endothelial Cell Survival and Angiogenesis via Activation of the Vascular Endothelial-Cadherin/Akt Signaling Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11760 - 11766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Cieslak, J. Niewiarowska, M. Nawrot, M. Koziolkiewicz, W. J. Stec, and C. S. Cierniewski
DNAzymes to beta 1 and beta 3 mRNA Down-regulate Expression of the Targeted Integrins and Inhibit Endothelial Cell Capillary Tube Formation in Fibrin and Matrigel
J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 6779 - 6787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Corada, F. Liao, M. Lindgren, M. G. Lampugnani, F. Breviario, R. Frank, W. A. Muller, D. J. Hicklin, P. Bohlen, and E. Dejana
Monoclonal antibodies directed to different regions of vascular endothelial cadherin extracellular domain affect adhesion and clustering of the protein and modulate endothelial permeability
Blood, March 15, 2001; 97(6): 1679 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
B. Angst, C Marcozzi, and A. Magee
The cadherin superfamily: diversity in form and function
J. Cell Sci., January 2, 2001; 114(4): 629 - 641.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. L. Harley, J. Sturge, and J. T. Powell
Regulation by Fibrinogen and Its Products of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression in Human Saphenous Vein Endothelial Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2000; 20(3): 652 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. M. Dallabrida, M. A. De Sousa, and D. H. Farrell
Expression of Antisense to Integrin Subunit beta 3 Inhibits Microvascular Endothelial Cell Capillary Tube Formation in Fibrin
J. Biol. Chem., October 6, 2000; 275(41): 32281 - 32288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bach, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bach, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement