J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 47, 30888-30896, November 20, 1998
Molecular Cloning, Overexpression, and Characterization of
Steroid-inducible 3
-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase/Carbonyl Reductase
from Comamonas testosteroni
A NOVEL MEMBER OF THE SHORT-CHAIN DEHYDROGENASE/REDUCTASE
SUPERFAMILY*
Eric
Möbus and
Edmund
Maser
From the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of
Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse
1, D-35033 Marburg, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
3
-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/carbonyl
reductase (3
-HSD/CR) from Comamonas testosteroni, a
bacterium that is able to grow on steroids as the sole carbon source,
catalyzes the oxidoreduction at position 3 of a variety of
C19-27 steroids and the carbonyl reduction of a variety of
nonsteroidal aldehydes and ketones. The gene of this steroid-inducible
3
-HSD/CR was cloned by screening a C. testosteroni gene
bank with a homologous DNA probe that was obtained by polymerase chain
reaction with two degenerative primers based on the N-terminal sequence
of the purified enzyme. The 3
-HSD/CR gene is 774 base pairs long,
and the deduced amino acid sequence comprises 258 residues with a
calculated molecular mass of 26.4 kDa. A homology search revealed that
amino acid sequences highly conserved in the short-chain
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily are present in 3
-HSD/CR.
Two consensus sequences of the SDR superfamily were found, an
N-terminal
Gly-X-X-X-Gly-X-Gly
cofactor-binding motif and a
Tyr-X-X-X-Lys segment (residues
155-159 in the 3
-HSD/CR sequence) essential for catalytic activity
of SDR proteins. 3
-HSD/CR was overexpressed and purified to
homogeneity, and its activity was determined for steroid and
nonsteroidal carbonyl substrates. These results suggest that inducible
3
-HSD/CR from C. testosteroni is a novel member of the
SDR superfamily.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Enzymatic modification of steroids by hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenases has an important role in the regulation of
steroid-mediated gene transcription since the balance between active
and inactive steroids determines the amount of the signal that reaches
the receptor in the target tissue. 3
-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3
-HSD)1 catalyzes the
reversible interconversion of hydroxy and oxo groups at position 3 of
the steroid nucleus. In mammalian tissues, 3
-HSD works in concert
with 5
- and 5
-reductases to generate the 3
,5
- and
3
,5
-tetrahydroxysteroids, respectively, thereby acting as molecular switch in steroid hormone receptor activation (1, 2).
In bacteria, however, the role of steroid dehydrogenases remains
obscure, although there is increasing evidence that much of the
machinery needed for steroid hormone action found in vertebrates is
also present in unicellular organisms. For instance, steroid hormone-binding proteins have been found in yeast (3-5) and
procaryotes (6, 7), and mammalian steroid receptors function in a
hormone-dependent manner when expressed in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (8-10). Moreover, certain
hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (such as Streptomyces
hydrogenans 3
,20
-HSD and Comamonas testosteroni
3
,17
-HSD) that show similarities to mammalian steroid
dehydrogenases involved in steroid activation/inactivation are present
in procaryotes (11, 12). It thus appears that the elements for
transcriptional activation of genes by steroids were present in
organisms that evolved ~2 billion years ago.
On the other hand, certain bacteria are able to grow on steroids as the
sole carbon source by the expression of a set of steroid-catabolizing enzymes, including hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, in the presence of
the steroid substrate (13-15). C. testosteroni (formerly
Pseudomonas testosteroni (16)) is a Gram-negative bacterium
that belongs to the
group of the Proteobacteria, corresponding to
rRNA superfamily III. Comamonas strains have been isolated
from soil, mud, and water, but also from various samples from the
clinical environment. These strictly aerobic, nonfermentative,
chemoorganotrophic bacteria rarely attack sugars, but grow well on
organic acids and amino acids (17). Moreover, C. testosteroni strains are able to use steroids as the sole carbon
source and thus may represent an important component in the
mineralization of these stable compounds. Interestingly, catabolic
genes for steroid degradation are not constitutively expressed, but are
induced by their respective steroid substrates (13, 14, 18). Hence,
steroids play a particularly important role in certain procaryotes, as
they may simultaneously serve both as signal molecules and carbon source.
The same applies for procaryotic hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, such as
3
-HSD from C. testosteroni. On the one hand, these enzymes have their role in procaryotic steroid hormone signal transduction and, on the other hand, participate in steroid degradation.
Procaryotic 3
-HSDs have been described in Eubacterium sp.
(19) and C. (P.) testosteroni (20,
21). Interestingly, 3
-HSD from C. testosteroni is not a
constitutive enzyme, but its expression is induced by steroids such as
testosterone and progesterone (13, 14, 18, 22). In a previous
investigation, steroid-inducible 3
-HSD has been purified from
C. testosteroni and shown to mediate the oxidoreduction at
position 3 of the steroid nucleus of a great variety of
C19-27 steroids (14). This reaction is of significance in
the initiation of the complete degradation of these relatively inert
substrates (18). Surprisingly, this enzyme was also capable of
catalyzing the carbonyl reduction of nonsteroidal xenobiotic aldehydes
and ketones (14). Based on this pluripotent substrate specificity, the
enzyme was named 3
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/carbonyl reductase
(3
-HSD/CR). Further studies revealed that the substrate pluripotency
of 3
-HSD/CR, as well as its inducibility, not only increases the
resistance of C. testosteroni to the steroid antibiotic fusidic acid, but also enhances the metabolic capacity of insecticide degradation in this organism (22).
To further the knowledge about the enzymology of steroid hormone
metabolism and steroid hormone-regulated gene expression in bacteria,
we have identified and characterized, on the molecular level, 3
-HSD
from C. testosteroni strain ATCC 11996. In this paper, we
present the gene isolation, gene cloning, sequencing, overexpression,
purification, and biochemical characterization of this
steroid-inducible enzyme. Primary structure analysis revealed that this
enzyme is a novel member of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily. Important structural features that are found in
3
-HSD/CR and that are inferred from three-dimensional structures of
other SDR enzymes are discussed. Finally, our studies could serve as a
model system for future investigations on the
steroid-dependent molecular regulation of hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase expression in procaryotes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Restriction enzymes, antibiotics (ampicillin,
carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, and tetracycline), and
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside were purchased
from Angewandte Gentechnologie Systeme GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany).
Deoxyribonucleotides were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, and steroids
and metyrapone (2-methyl-1,2-di-(3-pyridyl)-1-propanone) were from
Sigma. The insecticide NKI 42255 (2-(1-imidazolyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methyl-1-propanone) and its
reduced alcohol metabolite NKI 42455 (2-(1-imidazolyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methyl-1-propanol) were kindly
provided by I. Bélai (Plant Protection Institute, Hungarian
Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary). Metyrapol
(2-methyl-1,2-di-(3-pyridyl)-1-propanol) was a kind gift of G. F. Kahl (Department of Toxicology, University of Göttingen,
Göttingen, Germany). C. testosteroni strain ATCC 11996 was from the Deutsche Sammlung für Mikroorganismen.
All other chemicals were of the highest commercially available quality.
Strains and Growth Conditions--
C. testosteroni
strain ATCC 11996 was grown at 30 °C in LB medium under the
conditions described previously (20). Escherichia coli
strains XL1-Blue MRF', INF
F', and BL21(DE3) pLysS were grown in LB
medium at 37 °C. When necessary, the following antibiotics were
added to the growth medium: ampicillin (50 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (34 µg/ml), kanamycin (50 µg/ml), tetracycline (12.5 µg/ml), and carbenicillin (50 µg/ml).
Construction of PCR Primers and Cloning of a 75-Base Pair PCR
Product for 3
-HSD/CR--
Based on the N-terminal sequence of
3
-HSD (13) and according to C. testosteroni codon
usage, two primers were synthesized: forward primer (amino
acids 1-10), 5'-ATGGACATCATCGTCAT(C/T)(A/G/C)(G/C)(G/C)GGCGGCGC-3'; and reverse primer (amino acids 19-25),
5'-GGC(G/C)GC(G/C)GC(C/T)TCCAG(G/C)ACCTT-3'. A series of 4 × 10 cycles of PCR using different annealing temperatures was run
against a preparation of wild-type C. testosteroni strain ATCC 11996 genomic DNA (denaturation at 96 °C for 30 s;
annealing at 65, 60, 55, and 50 °C, respectively, for 10 s; and
extension at 72 °C for 30 s). The amplified 75-bp PCR product
was subcloned into pCRTM2.1 vector in
one-shotTM-competent INV
F' cells (Invitrogen) and
sequenced. The fragment containing the 5'-sequence of the 3
-HSD gene
was digoxigenin end-labeled and used as a homologous probe for Southern
hybridization and C. testosteroni gene bank screening.
Southern Hybridization--
Total DNA from C. testosteroni (ATCC 11996) was isolated by standard methods (23).
For Southern blot analysis, DNA was digested with different restriction
enzymes. After agarose gel electrophoresis and capillary transfer onto
Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), the
DNA was hybridized with the digoxigenin-labeled homologous probe of the
3
-HSD/CR gene. For detection of the hybridizing fragments, the
standard protocol of Boehringer Mannheim was followed, finally
resulting in the identification of a hybridizing 5.2-kilobase
EcoRI fragment.
Construction of a C. testosteroni EcoRI Gene Bank--
Total DNA
from C. testosteroni (ATCC 11996) was digested with
EcoRI restriction enzyme, and the fragments were ligated
with the
ZAP Express system (Stratagene) according to the
manufacturer's instruction. The resulting DNA was packaged using
Gigapack Gold III (Stratagene) and amplified in E. coli
strain XL1-Blue MRF', finally yielding an EcoRI gene bank of
1.7 × 108 plaque-forming units/ml.
Cloning and Sequencing of the 3
-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase
Gene--
Screening of the EcoRI bank was carried out as
follows. After transferring 12,000 plaques onto Hybond-N+
nylon membranes, plaques containing the 3
-HSD/CR gene were detected by the homologous probe described above. Positive clones were converted
to pBK-CMV phagemids carrying DNA inserts between the EcoRI
sites by helper phage superinfection as described in the
ZAP Express
system manual. Nucleotide sequences of both strands were determined by
the dideoxy chain termination method (24) using Sequenase Version 2.0 and Thermo Sequenase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Overexpression and Purification of 3
-Hydroxysteroid
Dehydrogenase/Carbonyl Reductase--
The 3
-HSD/CR gene was cloned
into the NdeI/BamHI restriction sites of the
pET15b vector (Novagen), which additionally codes for an N-terminal His
tag sequence with an integrated thrombin cleavage site. The
corresponding primers for PCR were constructed as follows. The ATG
start codon sequence was modified to yield the forward primer
containing a NdeI site: 5'-GAGACAACATATGTCCATCATCGTGATA. The
TGA stop codon sequence was modified to yield the reverse primer
containing a BamHI site: 5'-GCCGGATCCGAGGTCAGAACTGTGTCGG. A
25-cycle PCR was run against plasmid DNA from pBK-E52 under the
following conditions: 95 °C for 45 s, 60 °C for 45 s,
and 72 °C for 2 min. The resulting PCR product was digested with
NdeI and BamHI restriction enzymes to give a
787-bp fragment, which was inserted into the pET15b vector. The insert
was sequenced to confirm the correct in-frame DNA sequence and the
absence of any mutations.
Transformation of E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS cells (Stratagene)
was performed by heat shock according to the supplier's instruction. Overnight cultures harboring the recombinant pET15b vector were diluted
1:50 into fresh LB medium containing the appropriate antibiotics. Cells
were grown to an absorbance of 0.6 at 600 nm, and then recombinant 3
-HSD/CR overexpression was induced by addition of
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside to a final
concentration of 1 mM. After 5 h of induction, cells were harvested and lysed by freezing and ultrasonication (3 × 10 s), and the debris was removed by spinning at 16,000 × g for 10 min. The histidine-tagged enzyme was purified on a
Ni2+-Sepharose column (His-Trap kit, Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) with a Amersham Pharmacia ÄKTA Protein Purifier system.
Pure protein was eluted by applying a linear gradient of imidazole
(0-0.5 M) in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, and 0.5 M NaCl. Fractions containing purified 3
-HSD/CR
were pooled and desalted, and the buffer was exchanged with 0.5 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, using a Vivaspin concentrator (Vivascience).
Enzyme Assays--
Enzyme assays were carried out as
described previously (14).
Protein Determination--
Protein concentration was determined
by the method of Bradford (25) with Roti-Quant solution (Roth) using
bovine serum albumin as a standard. Protein analysis by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out according to
Laemmli (26).
Homology Search, Sequence Alignment, and Phylogenetic
Analysis--
The BLAST program (27) was used to screen protein and
DNA data bases for proteins that shared sequence similarity. Multiple sequence alignments were made according to the CLUSTAL W method (28),
and the similarity relationships were calculated applying bootstrap
analysis (29).
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning and Sequencing of the 3
-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase
Gene--
The amino acid sequence for the 29 N-terminal residues of
3
-HSD/CR was determined previously (13). Based on this sequence and
according to C. testosteroni codon usage, primers were
designed that, following PCR, resulted in the generation of a 75-bp
product containing the 5'-sequence of the 3
-HSD gene. The 75-bp PCR
product was used as a homologous probe in Southern hybridization and
gene bank screening.
A C. testosteroni EcoRI gene bank was constructed based on
the hybridization of the labeled PCR probe with a 5.2-kilobase EcoRI fragment in Southern analysis. By screening 12,000 plaques of the EcoRI gene bank, three positive clones were
obtained. The results from the sequence analysis of one of these clones
is shown in Fig. 1. The 3
-HSD/CR gene
has 774 base pairs coding for a novel protein of 258 amino acids with a
predicted molecular mass of 26.4 kDa. The deduced amino acid sequence
(Fig. 1) was in agreement with the available N-terminal amino acid
sequence derived from the Edman degradation of the isolated 3
-HSD/CR
protein (13). A consensus ribosomal binding site (AGGAGA) is located 7 bp upstream of the ATG start codon.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid
sequence of the 3 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/carbonyl reductase
gene from C. testosteroni. Numbers to the
left correspond to the nucleotide sequence, and numbers to
the right refer to the amino acid sequence. Residues corresponding
to the N-terminal amino acid sequence obtained from the isolated
protein by Edman degradation (13) are underlined. The
ribosomal binding site (AGGAGA), 7 bases upstream of the ATG start
codon ( 7 to 12), is indicated by boldface underlining.
The stop codon is indicated by an asterisk.
|
|
Sequence Alignments--
Sequence alignment of 3
-HSD/CR with
other members of the SDR superfamily showed very little homology and
identities (Fig. 2), which is a known
phenomenon for these proteins (30, 31). However, some consensus
sequences of the SDR enzymes are present in the 3
-HSD/CR primary
structure. The N-terminal
Gly-X-X-X-Gly-X-Gly sequence (Gly-8, Gly-12, and Gly-14; numbering according to the 3
-HSD/CR sequence of C. testosteroni) (Fig. 2) is one of
the amino acid "fingerprints" of the SDR superfamily that
characterizes the dinucleotide-binding motif. In addition, it has been
proposed that there are three highly conserved residues in the
substrate-binding site of the SDR enzymes: Ser, Tyr, and Lys (the
catalytic active "Ser-Tyr-Lys triad") (32). Whereas the conserved
Tyr-X-X-X-Lys catalytic motif is
present in 3
-HSD from C. testosteroni (at amino acids
155-159 in the 3
-HSD sequence), Ala is at position 144 instead of
Ser as in most other SDRs. In Klebsiella aerogenes ribitol
dehydrogenase, which serves as one of the model SDR enzymes, and in
dihydropteridine reductase, Val and Ala are at this position, respectively (Fig. 2).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sequence alignment of 3 -HSD/CR from
C. testosteroni and selected SDR proteins. SDR
proteins were searched with the BLAST (27) and FASTA (61) programs and
aligned with the CLUSTAL W method (28). Gaps (shown as
dashes) were introduced in the sequences where necessary to
give better alignment. The residues that are identical to one another
in the sequences are boxed. Numbers refer to
amino acid residues. Accession numbers are given in parentheses (see
below). 3/17beta-HSD, 3 ,17 -hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase from C. testosteroni (Protein Identification
Resource S62216); 20beta-HSD, 3 ,20 -hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase from S. hydrogenans (Swiss-Prot P19992);
7alpha-HSD, 7 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from E. coli (Swiss-Prot P25529); CR, carbonyl reductase from
mouse lung (Protein Identification Resource S69141); NodG,
NodG protein from Rhizobium meliloti (Swiss-Prot P06234);
FixR, FixR protein from B. japonicum (Swiss-Prot
P05406); 3alpha-HSD, 3 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from
C. testosteroni (this study); PDH,
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase from human placenta (Swiss-Prot
P15428); RDH, ribitol dehydrogenase from K. aerogenes (Swiss-Prot P00335); 17beta-HSD,
17 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from human placenta (Protein Data Bank 1BHS);
11beta-HSD, 11 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from mouse
liver (Swiss-Prot P50172); ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase from
Drosophila lebanonensis (Swiss-Prot P10807); DR,
dihydropteridine reductase from rat liver (Swiss-Prot P11348).
|
|
A comparison of the confirmations of five SDR primary structures
(bacterial 3
,20
-HSD (33), human type 1 17
-HSD (32), rat liver
dihydropteridine reductase (34), bacterial 7
-HSD (35), and mouse
lung carbonyl reductase (36)) for which x-ray coordinates have been
reported revealed that although there are only some fully conserved
residues common to the five structures, the three-dimensional
conformation is highly conserved (37). Some of these residues are also
found in the 3
-HSD sequence (Gly-8, Gly-12, Gly-14, Val-85, Asn-86,
Gly-89, Tyr-155, Ser-158, Lys-159, Ala-170, Pro-185, Gly-186, and
Thr-190), and in some cases, the variant residues in 3
-HSD/CR are
conservative substitutions, i.e. Ser-7 for Thr-7. Two
members of the catalytic triad proposed for the mechanism of action of
SDR enzymes (Tyr-155 and Lys-159) are included in all five, and Ser-138
(numbering according to 3
,17
-HSD) is present in four of the five
structures (replaced by Ala in dihydropteridine reductase and
3
-HSD/CR from this study) (Fig. 2).
Phylogenetic Analysis--
Calculations based upon the alignment
in Fig. 2 give an evolutionary tree as depicted in Fig.
3. According to the bootstrap analysis,
3
-HSD/CR from C. testosteroni is seemingly related to
FixR protein from Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Interestingly, this procaryotic nodulation protein serves as signal molecule in the
communication between bacteria and plants.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic tree of selected SDR
proteins. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method
using the CLUSTAL W program (28). Bootstrap analysis (29) was performed
by generating 1000 reiterations. Branch lengths are arbitrary, and
bootstrap values are indicated for each node. DH,
dehydrogenase; Red, reductase. For other abbreviations of
protein names, see legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
Overexpression--
Cloning of the 3
-HSD gene from C. testosteroni strain ATCC 11996 into the vector pET15b and
subsequent overexpression resulted in a fusion protein with an
N-terminal His tag sequence. Recombinant 3
-HSD/CR could be purified
in one step using metal chelate chromatography, and the purity of the
protein was >98% pure as judged by Coomassie Blue staining of an
SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 4). After
cleavage of the thrombin site, the molecular mass of the recombinant
protein as seen on the SDS gel was identical to that predicted from the genomic sequence. However, in our previous study (14), we proposed a
molecular mass of 28 kDa rather than the correct value of 26.4 kDa.

View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Overexpression and purification of
3 -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/carbonyl reductase from C. testosteroni. The state of purity of overexpressed
3 -HSD/CR is shown on a reducing 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel.
First lane, molecular mass markers; second
lane, total cell lysate supernatant; third
lane, sample load flow-through fraction; fourth
lane, column wash; fifth lane, 3 -HSD/CR eluted from
a nickel-Sepharose column; sixth lane, molecular mass
markers. The amount of protein loaded per lane was 20 µg for the
total cell lysate supernatants and 10 µg for the purified 3 -HSD/CR
preparation.
|
|
Kinetic Analysis--
The expressed 3
-HSD/CR was active when
tested with a variety of C19-27 steroid substrates. Enzyme
kinetic constants (Km and
Vmax) for 3-oxosteroid reduction and
3
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenation were determined with the
recombinant protein and compared with the values obtained with native
3
-HSD from C. testosteroni in a previous study (14). The
recombinant 3
-HSD enzyme efficiently catalyzed the 3-oxo reduction
and 3
-hydroxy dehydrogenation of steroids of the androstane and bile
acid series with Km values in the low micromolar
range (18-42 µM) under the conditions employed.
Moreover, the steroid antibiotic fusidic acid turned out to be a
substrate of 3
-HSD with a Km value of only 6.1 µM. Interestingly, testosterone and progesterone, which
are potent inducers of 3
-HSD/CR from C. testosteroni,
were not substrates of this enzyme.
On the other hand, the recombinant enzyme catalyzed the carbonyl
reduction of nonsteroidal aldehyde and ketone compounds. Although the
Km values for the model substrates of the carbonyl-reducing enzymes (metyrapone and
p-nitrobenzaldehyde as well as the insecticide NKI 42255)
are relatively high (1.8-3.3 µM), their intrinsic
clearance values are comparable to those of the steroid substrates. No
reverse oxidation of the formed hydroxy derivatives
p-nitrobenzalcohol and NKI 42455 could be observed.
Overall, the substrate specificity of the recombinant enzyme is similar
to that of native 3
-HSD. Moreover, the kinetic constants for the
substrates are essentially identical (14).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this work, we have identified and characterized 3
-HSD/CR
from C. testosteroni as a new member of the SDR superfamily. The SDR proteins are a growing superfamily of
NAD(P)(H)-dependent non-metallo-oxidoreductases that are
~250-350 amino acids in length and that bind NAD(P)(H) with a
Rossman fold motif (30, 31). Found in mammals, amphibians, plants,
yeast, protozoans, and bacteria, SDRs metabolize a range of substrates
including aliphatic aldehydes and ketones, monosaccharides, steroids,
prostaglandins, flavonoids, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and
retinoids (30, 31, 38). Several of these SDR substrates are known to
serve as important intra- or intercellular signal molecules in pro- and
eucaryotes, which is especially true for steroids, retinoids, and
flavonoids (38-40). Despite a residue identity level of only 20-30%
between different SDR members, the three-dimensional structures so far analyzed (32, 33, 35, 36) reveal a highly similar architecture with a
one-domain folding pattern. In addition, sequence alignments, chemical
modifications, site-directed mutagenesis, and crystallographic analyses
revealed two mainly conserved patterns, an N-terminal Gly-X-X-X-Gly-X-Gly motif
related to the binding of the cosubstrate NAD(H) or NADP(H) and a
highly conserved Tyr-X-X-X-Lys segment (residues 155-159) assigned to the catalytic center (31, 41, 42). The
highly similar overall fold and the conserved
Tyr-X-X-X-Lys motif found in almost
all SDR structures thus far determined suggest a similar reaction
mechanism for the individual proteins (30, 31).
In the reaction mechanism proposed on the basis of these findings, the
conserved Tyr residue acts as catalytic base, facilitated by the
adjacent protonated Lys residue, which lowers the
pKa of the phenolic Tyr OH group, whereas the
nicotinamide ring of the cofactor is oriented for
pro-S-hydrogen transfer (31, 36, 37, 43). The mutation of
the Tyr residue in this motif in SDRs led to inactive enzymes (44-46).
However, the exact roles of the active-site residues have not yet
clarified, especially concerning the function of the conserved Ser
residue, which is located in the vicinity of the conserved Tyr and Lys
residues. In most SDR proteins, the Ser hydroxyl group appears to be
able to form hydrogen bonds with the reaction product (as in mouse lung
carbonyl reductase (36)) and/or with the hydroxyl group of the
conserved Tyr residue (47). The role of this Ser residue most likely
might derive from a stabilization by hydrogen bonding with the
substrate, reaction intermediate, and product. This concept is
supported by the work of Oppermann et al. (43), in which replacement of Ser-138 with Thr in 3
,17
-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase from C. testosteroni yielded an active protein
with identical catalytic constants. However, some SDR proteins, like
C. testosteroni 3
-HSD from this study, rat
dihydropteridine reductase, or K. aerogenes ribitol
dehydrogenase, contain neither Ser nor Thr, but contain Ala or Val at
this position. Obviously, a hydroxyl is important for the reaction to
take place in some SDR proteins, whereas in other SDR proteins,
including 3
-HSD from this study, a modified reaction mechanism is
involved in catalysis since Ser is not conserved in the latter
subgroup. Therefore, the concept of adding Ser to the previously
recognized Tyr and Lys residues to form a catalytic triad in the SDR
superfamily is not supported by our findings with 3
-HSD from
C. testosteroni.
Glycine is the most conserved residue in the SDR superfamily. In the
enzymes with known tertiary structure, the unaltered glycine positions
largely correspond to bands in the tertiary structure and therefore
also support overall conserved conformational properties in the SDR
superfamily. In the N-terminal part of 3
-HSD/CR, three highly
conserved glycine residues (Gly-8, Gly-12, and Gly-14) correspond to
the spacing expected for Gly residues at the NAD-binding site of many
dehydrogenases. Adjacent portions of most SDRs reveal further
conservative replacements and similar secondary structure predictions
for alternating
/
-structures in most enzymes (Fig. 2) (30,
31).
Mutations carried out with Thr-13 and Asn-87 of 3
,17
-HSD from
C. testosteroni (numbering according to the 3
,17
-HSD
sequence) reveal differential effects on the reaction direction in this SDR protein. A Thr
Ala exchange results in a complete loss of the
dehydrogenase reaction, whereas the activity in the reductive direction
remains unaffected (43). A Thr
Ser substitution at this position
yields a protein with properties indistinguishable from those of the
wild type (43). A similar effect was observed with an Asn-87
Ala
replacement in 3
,17
-HSD from C. testosteroni, where
the dehydrogenase activity was decreased by >80%, again with
unchanged reductase properties (43). Interestingly, 3
-HSD/CR from
C. testosteroni of this study has Ser here (Ser-7 in the 3
-HSD/CR sequence) instead of Thr, confirming the importance of the
hydroxyl side chain at this position to form hydrogen bonds. On the
other hand, the role of Asn-87 in SDR proteins is questionable since
wild-type 3
-HSD from C. testosteroni has Tyr at this position.
The presence of a charged amino acid in certain positions is important
in regulating specificity for NADP(H) or NAD(H) in enzymes that are
otherwise very similar in their primary structure. In
NAD(P)H-dependent SDR enzymes, basic residues at position
17 (e.g. Lys-17 in mouse lung carbonyl reductase and Lys-44
in mouse type 1 11
-HSD) confer specificity to NADPH by forming
electrostatic interactions with the ribose 2'-phosphate (36). Moreover,
an adjacent arginine, such as Arg-39 in mouse lung carbonyl reductase and Arg-66 in type 1 11
-HSD (48-50), may give an attractive
coulombic interaction with the 2'-phosphate of NADP(H), promoting the
binding of this molecule (36).
In NAD(H)-dependent enzymes such as 3
,17
-HSD (51),
these basic residues (Ser-17 and Ile-39) are not strictly conserved and
are preceded at position 38 by an aspartic acid residue. This configuration, Asp and Ile (Asp-32 and Ile-33 in the 3
-HSD/CR sequence), is also found in 3
-HSD/CR from C. testosteroni
(Fig. 2). The Asp-32 carboxylate might result in electrostatic
repulsion of the 2'-phosphate moiety, thereby conferring specificity to NAD(H) (52, 53). Chen et al. (52) converted this Asp in Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase (Asp-37) to Asn and found
that the mutated enzyme had a 60-fold increase in affinity for
NADP+, presumably because the negative repulsion between
the carboxylate of Asp-37 and the 2'-phosphate group of adenosine was
removed. This has been confirmed with mouse lung carbonyl reductase,
where a Thr
Asp mutation at this position resulted in increases of >200-fold in the Km values for NADP(H) and
decreases of >7-fold in those for NAD(H) (54).
In all members of the SDR superfamily, the N-terminal cofactor-binding
motif and the Tyr-X-X-X-Lys motif are
well conserved, which is remarkable considering that the bacterial and
mammalian proteins diverged at least 2 billion years from a common
ancestor. The SDR superfamily may thus represent a case of divergent
evolution from a multifunctional ancestor protein. Too little is known
about the gene structures of SDRs to assess the mechanism of
divergence, but the common constellation of active-site residues and
the highly conserved NAD(P)(H)-binding pocket imply gene duplication
and subsequent evolution of substrate specificity. On the other hand, it is not surprising that, other than Tyr-155 and Lys-159 (numbering according to 3
-HSD/CR from C. testosteroni), there are no
conserved residues in the catalytic cleft since each member of the SDR
family has selectivity for its individual steroid, prostaglandin,
sugar, or alcohol substrate. Residues in the C-terminal end display a large degree of sequence variation among the SDR proteins, with no
clear pattern relating to substrate specificity (30). Interestingly, the Tyr-X-X-X-Lys motif can also be
present in proteins of the aldo/keto-reductase superfamily (55). For
example, this motif is found in rat liver 3
-HSD, in which Tyr-205
and Lys-209 are the corresponding residues, although these residues do
not have any role in catalysis.
The hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases that belong to the SDR superfamily
catalyze the (under certain circumstances reversible) interconversion
of potent steroid hormones into their inactive metabolites, thereby
regulating the amount of hormone that can bind and activate nuclear
steroid receptors. This role has been well documented for type 2 11
-HSD (EC 1.1.1.146) (56) and type 1 17
-HSD (EC 1.1.1.62) (32),
which regulate the occupancy of mineralocorticoid and estrogen
receptors, respectively, and which belong to the SDR protein
superfamily. Therefore, like other SDR proteins, 3
-HSD from C. testosteroni may also have an important function in the conversion
of signaling molecules (steroids) to either the active or inactive
state. The fact that testosterone and progesterone do not appear to be
substrates of 3
-HSD is intriguing since it turned out in previous
investigations that both steroids strongly induce the expression of
3
-HSD in C. testosteroni. On the other hand, C. testosteroni has been described to use testosterone as the sole
carbon source. It is therefore hypothesized that testosterone and
progesterone require (a rate-limiting) enzymatic conversion before they
can enter the steroid catabolic pathway. This metabolic delay may
provide enough time for these steroids to serve as positive regulators
in the expression of the involved steroid catabolic enzymes. This idea
is supported by the fact that it is difficult to isolate
steroid-derived intermediates since they are so rapidly further
metabolized and mineralized (57, 58).
On the other hand, it was shown previously that testosterone induction
leads to a 5-6-fold elevation of resistance of C. testosteroni against the steroid antibiotic fusidic acid
(=ramycin) (59), a secretion product of the fungus Fusidium
coccineum. Furthermore, testosterone-induced bacterial cells
exhibit a significantly faster uptake and metabolism of NKI 42255 (59),
a synthetic compound that is derived from the cytochrome P450 inhibitor
metyrapone. In the present study, we have demonstrated that
steroid-inducible 3
-HSD/CR mediates both the 3
-hydroxyl oxidation
of fusidic acid and the carbonyl reduction of several nonsteroidal
xenobiotics, including the novel heteroaromatic insecticide NKI 42255 (60). We therefore suggest that 3
-HSD/CR may act as an initiating
enzyme of steroid-inducible metabolic pathways that constitute
important defense strategies of certain bacteria against natural and
synthetic toxicants.
In conclusion, we have identified and characterized, on the molecular
level, 3
-HSD from C. testosteroni, revealing this enzyme to be a novel member of the SDR superfamily. The SDR superfamily represents an interesting challenge to understanding structure/function relationships. Although the catalytic mechanism and mode of NAD(P)(H) binding in SDRs are understood, it remains to be elucidated how these
proteins discriminate between steroids and other substrates, and how
positional selectivity and stereoselectivity between different steroids
are achieved. In addition, the architecture of these proteins may prove
useful for studying the evolution of substrate specificity and how a
common scaffold can catalyze a similar reaction with a broad range of
substrates. Further studies of SDR sequences from phylogenetically
diverse organisms should help to identify the structural features that
determine substrate and cosubstrate specificity and that favor
oxidative or reductive direction of enzyme function and to explore the
role of multimeric assembly in the action of the SDR enzymes. In view
of the central role that these enzymes have in regulating the action of
their cognate substrates, such information is important for
understanding and treating many steroid hormone-dependent
processes in eucaryotes and procaryotes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The excellent technical assistance of Jutta
Friebertshäuser and Eva Braun is gratefully acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by European Community Program
Biotech 2 under Contract BIO4-97-2123 and by Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB 395.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF092031.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-6421-28-5465;
Fax: 49-6421-28-5600; E-mail: maser{at}mailer.uni-marburg.de.
The abbreviations used are:
HSD, hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase; 3
-HSD/CR, 3
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/carbonyl
reductase; SDR, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase; PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Liao, S.,
Liang, T.,
Fang, S.,
Castanedo, E.,
and Shao, T. C.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
6154-6162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Khanna, M.,
Qin, K. N.,
Wang, R. W.,
and Cheng, K. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20162-20168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Burshell, A.,
Stathis, P. A.,
Do, Y.,
Miller, S. C.,
and Feldman, D.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
3450-3456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Loose, D. S.,
and Feldman, D.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
4925-4930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Skowronski, R.,
and Feldman, D.
(1989)
Endocrinology
124,
1965-1972[Abstract]
-
Thomas, J. E.,
Carroll, R.,
Sy, L. P.,
and Watanabe, M.
(1989)
J. Steroid Biochem.
32,
27-34[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rowland, S. S.,
Falkler, W. A.,
and Bashirelahi, N.
(1992)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
42,
721-727[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Metzger, D.,
White, J. H.,
and Chambon, P.
(1988)
Nature
334,
31-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schena, M.,
and Yamamoto, K. R.
(1988)
Science
241,
965-967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Privalsky, M. L.,
Sharif, M.,
and Yamamoto, K. R.
(1990)
Cell
63,
1277-1286[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Marekov, L.,
Krook, M.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
266,
51-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Genti Raimondi, S.,
Tolmasky, M. E.,
Patrito, L. C.,
Flury, A.,
and Actis, L. A.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
105,
43-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Möbus, E.,
Jahn, M.,
Schmid, R.,
Jahn, D.,
and Maser, E.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
5951-5955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Oppermann, U. C. T.,
and Maser, E.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
241,
744-749[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Talalay, P.,
Dobson, M. M.,
and Tapley, D. F.
(1952)
Nature
170,
620-621[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tamaoka, J.,
Ha, D. M.,
and Komagata, K.
(1987)
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
37,
52-59
-
Willems, A.,
de Vos, P.,
and de Ley, J.
(1992)
in
The Procaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria, Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification and Applications (Balows, A., Trueper, H. G., and Dworkin, M., eds), pp. 2583-2590, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
-
Marcus, P. I.,
and Talalay, P.
(1956)
J. Biol. Chem.
218,
661-674[Free Full Text]
-
Mallonee, D. H.,
Lijewski, M. A.,
and Hylemon, P. B.
(1995)
Curr. Microbiol.
30,
259-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Boyer, J.,
Baron, D. N.,
and Talalay, P.
(1965)
Biochemistry
4,
1825-1833
-
Suzuki, K.,
Ueda, S.,
Sugiyama, M.,
and Imamura, S.
(1993)
Gene (Amst.)
130,
137-140[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Oppermann, U. C. T.,
Netter, K. J.,
and Maser, E.
(1993)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
328,
379-390[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Maniatis, T.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1982)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
and Coulson, A. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Higgins, D.,
Thompson, J.,
Gibson, T.,
Thompson, J. D.,
and Gibson, J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Felsenstein, J.
(1985)
Evolution
39,
783-791[CrossRef]
-
Persson, B.,
Krook, M.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
200,
537-543[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jörnvall, H.,
Persson, B.,
Krook, M.,
Atrian, S.,
Gonzalez-Duarte, R.,
Jeffery, J.,
and Ghosh, D.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
6003-6013[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ghosh, D.,
Plentnev, V. Z.,
Zhu, D. W.,
Wawrzak, Z.,
Duax, W. L.,
Pangborn, W.,
Labrie, F.,
and Lin, S. X.
(1995)
Structure
3,
503-513[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ghosh, D.,
Weeks, C. M.,
Grochulski, P.,
Duax, W. L.,
Erman, M.,
Rimsay, R. L.,
and Orr, J. C.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10064-10068[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Varughese, K. I.,
Skinner, M. M.,
Whiteley, J. M.,
Matthews, D. A.,
and Xuong, N. H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6080-6084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tanaka, N.,
Nonaka, T.,
Tanabe, T.,
Yashimoto, T.,
Tsuru, D.,
and Mitsui, Y.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
7715-7730[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tanaka, N.,
Nonaka, T.,
Nakanishi, M.,
Deyashiki, Y.,
Hara, A.,
and Mitsui, Y.
(1996)
Structure
4,
33-45[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Duax, W. L.,
and Ghosh, D.
(1997)
Steroids
62,
95-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Duester, G.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
12221-12227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Baker, M. E.
(1995)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
208,
131-138[Abstract]
-
Baker, M. E.
(1996)
Bioessays
18,
63-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Krook, M.,
Prozorovski, V.,
Atrian, S.,
Gonzalez-Duarte, R.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
209,
233-239[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Krook, M.,
Marekov, L.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
738-743[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Oppermann, U. C. T.,
Filling, C.,
Berndt, K. D.,
Persson, B.,
Benach, J.,
Ladenstein, R.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
34-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ensor, C. M.,
and Tai, H. H.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
176,
840-845[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Obeid, J.,
and White, P. C.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
188,
222-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, Z.,
Jiang, J. C.,
Lin, G. Z.,
Lee, W. R.,
Baker, M. E.,
and Chang, S. H.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
3342-3346[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ghosh, D.,
Wawrzak, Z.,
Weeks, C. M.,
Duax, W. L.,
and Erman, M.
(1994)
Structure
2,
629-640[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Oppermann, U. C. T.,
Netter, K. J.,
and Maser, E.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
227,
202-208[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Agarwal, A. K.,
Monder, C.,
Eckstein, B.,
and White, P. C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
18939-18943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tannin, G. M.,
Agarwal, A. K.,
Monder, C.,
New, M. I.,
and White, P. C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
16653-16658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Abalain, J. H.,
Di Stefano, S.,
Amet, Y.,
Quemener, E.,
Abalain Colloc, M. L.,
and Floch, H. H.
(1993)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol
44,
133-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, Z. L.,
Lee, W. R.,
and Chang, S. H.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
202,
263-267[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Baker, M. E.
(1994)
Steroids
59,
248-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nakanishi, M.,
Matsuura, K.,
Kaibe, H.,
Tanaka, N.,
Nonaka, T.,
Mitsui, Y.,
and Hara, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2218-2222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bohren, K. M.,
Bullock, B.,
Wermuth, B.,
and Gabbay, K. H.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
9547-9551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stewart, P. M.,
Whorwood, C. B.,
and Mason, J. I.
(1995)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
55,
465-471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Levy, H. R.,
and Talalay, P.
(1959)
J. Biol. Chem.
234,
2009-2013[Free Full Text]
-
Watanabe, M.,
Phillips, K.,
and Watanabe, H.
(1973)
J. Steroid Biochem.
4,
623-632[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Oppermann, U. C. T.,
Belai, I.,
and Maser, E.
(1996)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
58,
217-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Belai, I.,
Darvas, B.,
Bauer, K.,
and Tag El-Din, M. H.
(1995)
Pestic. Sci.
44,
225-232
-
Pearson, W. R.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2444-2448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gohler, G. Xiong, S. Paulsen, G. Trentmann, and E. Maser
Testosterone-inducible Regulator Is a Kinase That Drives Steroid Sensing and Metabolism in Comamonas testosteroni
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2008;
283(25):
17380 - 17390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-R. Chiang, W. Ismail, D. Heintz, C. Schaeffer, A. Van Dorsselaer, and G. Fuchs
Study of Anoxic and Oxic Cholesterol Metabolism by Sterolibacterium denitrificans
J. Bacteriol.,
February 1, 2008;
190(3):
905 - 914.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]() |