Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brattain, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brattain, M. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 47, 31471-31479, November 20, 1998


Autocrine Transforming Growth Factor alpha  Provides a Growth Advantage to Malignant Cells by Facilitating Re-entry into the Cell Cycle from Suboptimal Growth States*

Dianhua JiangDagger §, Haisu Yang§, James K. V. Willsonparallel , Jiurong LiangDagger , Lisa E. Humphrey, Elizabeth Zborowskaparallel , Degeng WangDagger , Jason Fosterparallel , Robert FanDagger , and Michael G. Brattain**

From the Dagger  Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio 43699, the  Department of Surgery and Biochemistry, the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78284-7840, and the parallel  CWRU/Ireland Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

CBS human colon carcinoma cells are poorly tumorigenic in athymic nude mice, whereas FET colon carcinoma cells are non-tumorigenic. Both cell lines have well differentiated properties in tissue culture. Transforming growth factor alpha  (TGF-alpha ) was ectopically expressed by stable transfection of a TGF-alpha cDNA under repressible tetracycline control. The TGF-alpha -transfected cells showed enhanced clonal initiation and shortened lag phase growth in tissue culture without an alteration in doubling time in exponential phase relative to untransfected cells. Furthermore, the TGF-alpha transfectants showed increased independence from exogenous growth factors in clonal growth assays and induction of DNA synthesis after release from quiescence. Growth factor independence was associated with sustained epidermal growth factor receptor activation in quiescent TGF-alpha -transfected cells and the requirement of exogenous insulin for stimulation of quiescent cells to re-enter the cell cycle. Higher cloning, reduced lag time in tissue, and the acquisition of growth factor independence for DNA synthesis without a change in doubling time of TGF-alpha -transfected cells indicate that autocrine TGF-alpha functions by facilitating re-entry into the cell cycle from sub-optimal growth states rather than promoting or controlling the proliferation of actively cycling cells. The modulation of growth regulation by autocrine TGF-alpha was associated with increased malignant properties as TGF-alpha transfectants showed increased tumorigenicity in athymic nude mice. The administration of tetracycline reversed the effects of TGF-alpha expression in these cells both in vivo and in vitro, indicating that the alterations of the biological properties were due to the expression of TGF-alpha . Since these cells are continuously grown in a completely chemically defined medium without serum supplementation, it was possible to assign the mechanism underlying the generation of growth factor independence to the replacement of a requirement for exogenous insulin in parental cells by autocrine TGF-alpha .

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Transforming growth factor alpha  (TGF-alpha )1 is a potent mitogen structurally and functionally related to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of proteins (1). It binds to the EGF receptor (EGFR) to produce a positive growth stimulus (2, 3). Elevated expression of TGF-alpha has been associated with neoplastic transformation (4, 5). Overexpression of TGF-alpha by stable transfection of a constitutive vector induced transformation of normal cultured fibroblasts (6). Co-infection with retroviruses encoding both TGF-alpha and EGFR produced NIH3T3 cell clones that grew efficiently in soft agar and formed tumors in nude mice (7). Transgenic mouse experiments revealed that the overexpression of TGF-alpha results in the appearance of malignant tumors in liver, mammary gland, and benign tumors in skin (8-10). Moreover, overexpression of TGF-alpha in vivo enhanced oncogene-induced carcinogenesis in pancreas, liver, and mammary gland (11-13) and accelerated chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis (14, 15).

The contribution of TGF-alpha in the malignant progression of human carcinomas has not been well studied. Moreover, although it is clear that TGF-alpha promotes tumorigenicity and malignant progression in a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays, it is not apparent what specific growth advantages it imparts to cells in the various contexts of proliferative function and what specific growth functions it replaces in generating the independence from exogenous growth factors associated with malignant progression. More specifically, it is not known whether autocrine TGF-alpha functions by driving exponential growth or whether it is more critical in other contexts of proliferation such as re-entry into the cell cycle from growth-arrested states. These gaps in our understanding of TGF-alpha function in malignancy reflect a general lack of understanding as to how autocrine-positive growth factors contribute a growth advantage to malignant cells, especially in light of the well documented autocrine activity of normal cells (34). Thus, an in depth understanding of how TGF-alpha works in malignancy will provide direction for the investigation of other autocrine factors. Moreover, the understanding of the pathological nature of growth regulatory disruptions associated with malignant progression may lead to new approaches for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of cancer.

We have addressed the issue of understanding the pathological disruption of growth regulation by autocrine TGF-alpha using growth factor-dependent cell line models (CBS and FET cells) grown in completely chemically defined medium. Consequently, specific exogenous growth factor requirements have been defined for exponential proliferation as well as re-entry into the cell cycle from growth-arrested states (16, 17). These growth factor-dependent cell lines were stably transfected with a human TGF-alpha cDNA under repressible control by tetracycline in order to generate a strong autocrine TGF-alpha loop so that specific growth requirements assumed by autocrine TGF-alpha could be determined and evaluated in the context of malignant progression as well. Repressible tetracycline control has permitted analysis of specific growth states in tissue culture and in vivo which are dependent upon autocrine TGF-alpha , whereas the completely chemically defined medium in which these cells are continuously maintained and grown permits the determination of specific exogenous growth factor requirements replaced by autocrine TGF-alpha activity.

Previously, we contrasted the biological properties of these early stage malignant cell models with those of highly progressed colon carcinoma cell lines (18-21). In contrast to early stage models, highly malignant colon carcinoma cells are completely growth factor-independent with respect to stimulation by exogenous growth factors, are anchorage-independent, and form tumors in 100% of athymic mice with as little as 106 cells. Importantly, these highly malignant cells express TGF-alpha and EGFR constitutively in growth-arrested states in contrast to CBS and FET cells in which TGF-alpha is down-regulated during the establishment of growth arrest. CBS and FET cells are well differentiated in tissue culture as indicated by retention of basolateral polarity, microvilli, and transport function (18-21). Moreover, they are weakly anchorage-independent and poorly tumorigenic in athymic mice (18, 20). These cells are dependent upon exogenous growth factors for DNA synthesis with a requirement for insulin to re-enter the cell cycle from a growth-arrested state.

TGF-alpha transfection using a tetracycline-repressible system permitted the generation of CBS and FET cells in which TGF-alpha was not down-regulated at growth arrest since the transgene was not under control of the TGF-alpha promoter. This created a model that could then be modulated to behave in the same manner as the highly malignant cells described above in which TGF-alpha was expressed in growth arrest or to behave like weakly malignant cells that down-regulate TGF-alpha in growth arrest when tetracycline was added. Comparison of wild type cells with TGF-alpha transfectants shows that autocrine TGF-alpha generates malignant progression in a tetracycline-repressible manner by the criteria of tumorigenicity in athymic mice and anchorage-independent growth. In addition, several lines of evidence indicate that autocrine TGF-alpha mitigates the requirements for exogenous insulin and EGF in this model system. Finally, we show that inappropriate TGF-alpha expression in transfected cells provides a growth advantage over wild type cells by enhancing the ability of growth-arrested cells to re-enter the cell cycle in association with inappropriate EGFR activation in growth arrest. Inappropriate EGFR activation resulted in the recruitment of other EGFR family members to form complexes with the activated EGFR in growth-arrested TGF-alpha -transfected cells. The recruitment of other EGFR family members expanded the potential for additional signal transduction pathways. The advantage of growth factor independence would be of particular importance to malignant cells under environmental conditions that are limiting to growth. Environmental restriction on growth appears to be common in solid tumors such as colon carcinoma in which labeling studies have shown that fewer than 1% of the malignant cells are cycling at any given time (41).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Culture-- The human colon carcinoma cell lines were originally isolated from primary tumors as described previously (18) and continuously maintained in a chemically defined serum-free medium consisting of McCoy's 5A medium (Sigma) supplemented with pyruvate, vitamins, amino acids, antibiotics, insulin (20 µg/ml, Sigma), transferrin (4 µg/ml, Sigma), and EGF (10 ng/ml, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) (20). Working cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and routinely checked for mycoplasma contamination. Limiting dilution clones were obtained by plating the parental cells into 96-well tissue culture plates at one cell per well. Typical limiting dilution clones (designated as CBS4 and FET6) were used for transfection to ensure the uniformity of the isolated transfectants. TGF-alpha transfectants and control cells were routinely maintained in serum-free medium containing 650 µg/ml active geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.).

Transfections-- A 930-bp fragment of full-length TGF-alpha cDNA (23) was inserted into the EcoRI site of the polycloning region in the tetracycline-repressible vector pUHD10-3 (22) in the sense orientation relative to the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) minimal promoter to create the expression plasmid pTET-TGF-alpha . Orientation of the insert was confirmed by restriction digestion. The hCMV minimal promoter requires a tetracycline-controlled transactivator (tTA) that is constitutively produced by another vector. The latter vector (pUHD15-1/NEO) also contains the neomycin-resistant gene which can be used for antibiotic selection (24). Because tetracycline prevents tTA from binding to tet operators placed upstream of the hCMV minimal promoter, it represses the tTA-dependent expression system. The expression vector (10 µg) and the tTA-expressing vector (1 µg) were co-transfected into cells by electroporation (Bio-Rad) at 250 V and 960 millifarads. The control cells were transfected with the tTA-NEO selection vector and the cloning vector without any insert. Selection of stable transfectants was carried out by addition of geneticin (650 µg/ml). After 3 weeks of selection, geneticin-resistant clones were isolated and expanded to screen for TGF-alpha expression.

Administration of Tetracycline-- Tetracycline (Sigma) was dissolved in 50% ethanol and stored at -20 °C. Tetracycline was added to the culture medium at a final concentration of 0.1 µg/ml. Fresh tetracycline was added when changing medium (2× weekly). Tetracycline was added to the drinking water of athymic nude mice at a concentration of 3 mg/ml on day 6 and 2 mg/ml on days 7 through 21 of the in vivo study.

RNA Isolation and Analysis-- Total RNA was isolated from confluent cell cultures by lysis in guanidine isothiocyanate and purified by ultracentrifugation through a cesium trifluoroacetic acid gradient as described previously (25). TGF-alpha RNase protection assays were performed as described previously (21). Briefly, a 306-bp high specific riboprobe was generated with the TGF-alpha riboprobe template in the presence of [alpha -32P]UTP (NEN Life Science Products) by Sp6 RNA polymerase. The riboprobe was hybridized with 20 µg of total RNA for 12-16 h. Following RNase digestion of excess riboprobe, the protected fragment was electrophoresed on a 6% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea sequencing gel. Loading was normalized by simultaneous hybridization of the RNA with an actin probe that yields a 145-bp protected fragment (21). The protected endogenous TGF-alpha fragment was 283 bp, whereas the protected, transfected TGF-alpha fragment was 306 bp, since the expression vector contained an additional 23 bp of vector sequence. This provided the ability to distinguish the expression of the transfected TGF-alpha mRNA from the endogenous mRNA. Quantitative analysis of the protected mRNA was performed with an Ambis Analysis System (Ambis, San Diego, CA).

Conditioned Medium and TGF-alpha Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay-- Cells were plated at 120,000 cells per well in 6-well plates in serum-free medium lacking EGF in the presence or absence of tetracycline at a final concentration of 0.1 µg/ml. On day 4, 48-h conditioned medium was collected and clarified by centrifugation. Cells were enumerated with a hemocytometer after trypsinization. TGF-alpha levels were measured with a TGF-alpha enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Oncogene Science) following the manufacturer's instructions. The TGF-alpha levels were normalized to cell numbers and expressed as TGF-alpha protein per 106 cells.

Growth Assays-- Cells were plated at a clonal density of 300 cells/well into 24-well tissue culture plates in serum-free medium in the presence or absence of EGF. Tetracycline was used at a final concentration of 0.1 µg/ml. Cells were grown for 13 days without changing the culture medium. The cells were stained by addition of 500 µl of 0.2% of 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (Sigma) to each well for 2 h. Following removal of the medium and staining solution, the colonies were solubilized in 800 µl of Me2SO. The plates were placed on a shaker for 5 min at room temperature after which they were read immediately at 595 nm. The absorbance of dissolved colonies is directly proportional to the number of cells in culture.

Proliferation Assays-- Cells were plated at different cell densities (30,000-360,000 cells/well) into 6-well tissue culture plates in serum-free medium lacking EGF. Every other day the medium was changed. The cells were pulse-labeled with methyl[3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h. DNA synthesis was measured by incorporation of methyl-[3H]thymidine into trichloroacetic acid-precipitable material.

The mitogenesis assays were performed as described previously (16). The cells were plated at a density of either 3.0 × 104 cells per well in 24-well tissue culture plates or 1.2 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates in medium containing transferrin, insulin, and EGF. The cells were rendered quiescent by growth factor and nutrient deprivation for 6 days in supplemental McCoy's medium after reaching saturation density (7 days). Previous work (16) showed that CBS and FET cells treated by this protocol had a labeling index of 5-10% as determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation followed by autoradiography. Cells were released from quiescence with supplemental McCoy's medium (nutrients alone) or serum-free medium (nutrients and growth factors). The cells were pulse-labeled with methyl[3H]thymidine for 1 h. DNA synthesis was measured by incorporation of methyl[3H]thymidine into trichloroacetic acid-precipitable material at the peak of DNA synthesis 18 h after release from quiescence (16).

Immunoprecipitation and Western Immunoblotting-- Cells was washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline and harvested in cold lysis buffer (0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl with protease inhibitors freshly added). Crude cell lysates were passed through a 21-gauge needle 4× to sheer DNA, incubated on ice for 30 min, and centrifuged for 20 min at 4 °C. Samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-EGFR antibody or anti-activated EGFR antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY). Immunoprecipitates were subsequently incubated with 50% protein A-agarose suspension (Life Technologies, Inc.) for 30 min at 4 °C and then were washed twice with cold lysis buffer 3 times followed by centrifugation. Pellets were resuspended in sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 10% glycerol, and 4% beta -mercaptoethanol), heated for 5 min at 95 °C, and resolved by 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by transfer to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with TTBS buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) containing 5% nonfat dried milk for 2 h at 4 °C with continuous rotation. The immunoprecipitates with anti-EGFR antibody were then detected with phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody (PY99) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The immunocomplexes with anti-activated EGFR antibody were then immunoblotted with anti-ErbB2 and anti-ErbB3 polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-SHC antibody (Upstate Biotechnology Inc.), respectively. The blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and then washed twice with water, 5 min with TTBS buffer, and 5 more times with water. The membrane was immersed in ECL for 1 min and exposed to ECL film. EGFR activation was also directly detected with an anti-activated EGFR antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY). This activated EGFR antibody is unique in that it reacts only with the tyrosine-phosphorylated (activated) EGF receptor (26). The cell lysates were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis gel followed by transfer to nitrocellulose membranes. Then the membrane was probed with the anti-activated EGFR antibody directly.

Anchorage-independent Growth-- Soft agarose assays were performed as described previously (18). Briefly, 3,000 cells suspended in serum-free growth medium minus EGF containing 0.4% agarose (Sigma) were plated per well into 6-well tissue culture plates containing 0.8% agarose underlayers. Colonies were allowed to grow for 2 weeks at 37 °C in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2, stained with 1 ml of p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (Sigma), and photographed.

Tumorigenicity-- NEO control and TGF-alpha transfectant cells were injected subcutaneously behind the anterior forelimb of 5-6-week-old Balb/c athymic mice. Mice were maintained in a genotobiotic environment before and during each experiment. Tetracycline was given to mice in drinking water at a concentration of 3 mg/ml on day 6 and 2 mg/ml on day 7 through day 21 of inoculation. Growth curves for xenografts were determined by externally measuring tumors in two dimensions using a caliper. Volume (V) was determined by the following equation, where L is length and W is the width of the tumor: V = (L × W2) × 0.5.

Flow Cytometry Analysis-- Flow cytometry was performed as described previously (43). Briefly, trypsinized cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline and resuspended in 0.4-0.6 ml of low salt propidium iodide stain (0.03 g/ml polyethylene glycol, 0.05 mg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 4 mM sodium citrate). The suspension was incubated with 10 µl of RNase A (2 mg/ml, DNase-free) at 37 °C for 20 min. An equal volume of high salt stain (0.03 g/ml polyethylene glycol, 0.05 mg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 400 mM sodium chloride) was then added. The mixture was vortexed gently and stored at 4 °C overnight. The cell cycle phase distribution was performed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA), and cell cycle parameters were obtained using a ModFit LT program (Verity Software House Inc.).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Expression of TGF-alpha -- Following transfection, geneticin-resistant clones were isolated and expanded for screening of TGF-alpha expression. Four clones (designated CBS4 alpha S2, alpha S3, alpha S5, and alpha S6) expressing high TGF-alpha mRNA and protein were identified. The CBS4 transfectants (Fig. 1, lanes 4, 6, 8, and 10) expressed 15-25-fold higher TGF-alpha mRNA levels relative to CBS4-NEO (lane 2). As described under "Experimental Procedures," the size of the protected transfected TGF-alpha mRNA fragment in RNase protection assays was larger than the protected endogenous TGF-alpha mRNA. Tetracycline (0.1 µg/ml) repressed the expression of transfected TGF-alpha mRNA (Fig. 1, lanes 3, 5, 7, and 9).


View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Expression of TGF-alpha mRNA in CBS4 transfectants. The CBS4 TGF-alpha transfectants (alpha S2, alpha S3, alpha S5, and alpha S6) and control cells (NEO) were plated in serum-free medium in the presence (+) or absence (-) of 0.1 µg/ml tetracycline. The endogenous and the transfected TGF-alpha mRNA levels in 20 µg of total RNA were determined by an RNase protection assay ("Experimental Procedures"). The protected endogenous and transfected TGF-alpha fragments as well as internal control actin are indicated on the right. The molecular weight markers are shown on the left.

TGF-alpha protein levels in conditioned medium also showed a marked increase of 15-25-fold as compared with CBS4-NEO (Fig. 2 and data not shown). Similarly, the TGF-alpha protein levels were repressed by the presence of 0.1 µg/ml tetracycline in the growth medium (Fig. 2). Therefore, the overexpression of TGF-alpha mRNA is reflected by increased expression of the amount of TGF-alpha released into culture medium. Similar results were obtained from FET-NEO and TGF-alpha -transfectant cells.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression of TGF-alpha protein. The CBS4 parental cells (SF), NEO, and TGF-alpha transfectants (alpha S2) were plated into 6-well plates at a density of 120,000 cells/well in serum-free medium minus EGF in the presence or absence of 0.1 µg/ml tetracycline (Tet). The 48-h conditioned media were collected on day 4, and the TGF-alpha levels were measured with a TGF-alpha enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. TGF-alpha levels were normalized to cell number and expressed as TGF-alpha protein per 106 cells (mean ± S.E. n = 3).

Cloning Efficiency of CBS4 TGF-alpha Transfectants-- The effects of expression of TGF-alpha on the clonal growth of CBS4 cells were determined. Our previous work has shown that CBS cells require exogenous growth factors for optimal growth (16, 20). We hypothesized that the overexpression of TGF-alpha would reduce the growth factor requirements of CBS4 cells and result in increased clonal formation in the absence of growth factors. As expected, the clonal initiation of CBS4 cells overexpressing TGF-alpha was markedly increased, as compared with the CBS4-NEO cells (Fig. 3). The control cells (NEO) showed an EGF-dependent phenotype in cloning efficiency experiments. The TGF-alpha transfectants showed an EGF-independent phenotype in the absence of tetracycline treatment (Fig. 3A). These findings suggested that overexpression of TGF-alpha could move more cells from the non-dividing, quiescent stage back into the cell cycle and drive more cells to initiate the clonal growth. However, in the presence of tetracycline which suppressed expression of TGF-alpha in the transfected cells, the clones revealed a growth factor-dependent phenotype similar to that of the NEO control cells (Fig. 3B). These data provide one line of evidence that autocrine TGF-alpha enhances re-entry into the cell cycle under environmental conditions that are not optimal for growth.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of TGF-alpha modulates cloning efficiency. CBS4 TGF-alpha transfectants (alpha S2, alpha S3, and alpha S5) and control cells (NEO) were plated at clonal density (300 cells per well) in 24-well plates in serum-free medium without EGF (TI) or with 10 ng/ml EGF (TIE). The cells were untreated (A) or treated with tetracycline (Tet) at a final concentration of 0.1 µg/ml (B). A 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was performed to stain colonies 13 days after plating. The absorbance of dissolved colonies in Me2SO was measured at 595 nm (mean ± S.E. n = 4).

Mitogenesis of TGF-alpha Transfectants-- Another line of evidence of increased growth factor independence of TGF-alpha transfectants was demonstrated by mitogenesis studies. Quiescent growth-arrested CBS cells require exogenous growth factors in addition to fresh nutrients for re-entry into the cell cycle and induction of DNA synthesis as described previously (16). CBS4 control cells required exogenous insulin for initiation of DNA synthesis (NEO in Fig. 4A). In contrast, DNA synthesis by quiescent TGF-alpha transfectants stimulated with fresh medium lacking any growth factors (nutrient replenishment alone) was comparable to that of cells released with insulin-containing medium or a medium containing insulin, transferrin, and EGF (Fig. 4A). Cell cycle distribution of wild type and TGF-alpha transfectant cells was determined by flow cytometry following the 6-day period of growth factor and nutrient deprivation to generate quiescence in order to ensure that growth arrest in TGF-alpha transfectants was comparable to control cells. Flow cytometry analysis of CBS NEO and CBS TGF-alpha transfectants indicated that 91 and 92% of cells were in G0/G1, respectively. When tetracycline was used to repress the expression of transfected TGF-alpha , the TGF-alpha transfectants regained the insulin-dependent phenotype for DNA synthesis (Fig. 4B). These data demonstrated that expression of TGF-alpha reduced the requirements for exogenous growth factors by these cells, thus providing growth factor independence for re-entry into the cell cycle from quiescence. These results provide a second line of evidence that autocrine TGF-alpha functions by enhancing growth and survival under stringent environmental conditions. Similar results were obtained for FET6 TGF-alpha transfectant cells (data not shown). Moreover, the acquisition of growth factor independence was reflected by the ability of TGF-alpha transfectants to proliferate in the absence of growth factor supplementation, whereas control cells could not sustain proliferation in the absence of exogenous growth factors added to the medium (Fig. 4C). Addition of tetracycline to the medium of TGF-alpha transfectants generated a revertant growth factor-dependent phenotype.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Mitogenesis of TGF-alpha transfectants. CBS4 TGF-alpha transfectants (alpha S2) and control cells (NEO) were plated at 120,000 cells/well in 6-well plates (A) or 30,000 cells/well in 24-well plates (B) in serum-free medium without EGF. After a 7-day cultivation period, the confluent cells were rendered quiescent by deprivation of growth factors for 6 days. Cells were stimulated to initiate DNA synthesis by treatment with either serum-free medium lacking any growth factors (SM), serum-free medium with insulin (I), serum-free medium with transferrin and insulin (TI), or serum-free medium with transferrin, insulin, and EGF (TIE). Some cells received 0.1 µg/ml tetracycline (B, lower panel). The DNA synthesis was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation assays. The data were plotted as fold increase of DNA synthesis stimulated by addition of fresh medium versus DNA synthesis with no medium change (mean ± S.E. n = 3). C, FET6 TGF-alpha transfectants (FET-alpha S) and NEO cells as well as TGF-alpha transfectants treated with 0.1 µg/ml tetracycline were plated at 120,000 cells/well in 6-well plates in medium without any growth factor supplements. Cell proliferation was then determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation as described above. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. (n = 3).

Activation of EGFR Family Members and SHC-- Previous work had shown that growth arrest induced by nutrient and growth factor deprivation was accompanied by reduced expression of endogenous TGF-alpha in poorly tumorigenic cells such as CBS and FET (27). Thus, it would be expected that autocrine TGF-alpha activity would also be reduced. Reduction of autocrine TGF-alpha activity should be reflected by reduced EGFR activation. Growth arrest of CBS4 cells is accompanied by reduced EGFR activation (NEO, Q in Fig. 5), thus reflecting reduced autocrine TGF-alpha activity in these quiescent cells. In contrast, TGF-alpha in transfected cells should not be under endogenous cellular control, and autocrine TGF-alpha should remain elevated in quiescent cells. Fig. 5 shows that quiescent TGF-alpha -transfected cells retain a high level of EGFR activation (alpha S2, Q) relative to NEO cells (NEO, Q). Activation of the EGFR was determined by direct immunoblotting with an antibody directed against activated EGFR in Fig. 5A or by immunoprecipitation with anti-EGFR antibody followed by Western blotting with PY99 antibody directed against phosphotyrosine (Fig. 5B). Normalization of protein loading was confirmed by reblotting with anti-EGFR antibody. Similarly, FET TGF-alpha transfectants also showed sustained EGFR activation (Fig. 5C). The sustained activation of EGFR in TGF-alpha -transfected cells is probably responsible for the abrogation of exogenous activation of the insulin receptor or, more likely, the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGFI-R) as a prerequisite for re-entry into the cell cycle and initiation of DNA synthesis.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Activation of EGFR family members and SHC. A, the cell lysates from exponential (L) and quiescent (Q) CBS4alpha S2 and NEO cells were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by transfer to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were probed with anti-activated EGFR antibody that is specific for activated EGF receptors and visualized by sequential incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. B, the total proteins (4 mg) were immunoprecipitated with anti-EGFR antibody. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY99). The same membrane was reblotted with EGFR antibody for normalization. C, EGFR activation of FET6 TGF-alpha transfectants and FET NEO cells was determined as described in A. D, the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-(activated) EGFR antibody. Immunoprecipitates were probed with anti-ErbB2, ErbB3, and SHC antibodies, respectively. WB, Western blot.

Sustained TGF-alpha binding and EGFR activation could lead to the recruitment of other EGFR family members to form complexes with EGFR and thus further augment the potential for enhanced signal transduction (28-30). The activated EGFR antibody was employed to immunoprecipitate activated EGFR followed by Western analysis to probe for ErbB2 and ErbB3 complex formation with the EGFR. Heterodimer formation between activated EGFR and ErbB2 or ErbB3 was observed in exponential CBS4 TGF-alpha cells as well as exponential CBS4 NEO (Fig. 5). When cells were rendered quiescent, the CBS4 TGF-alpha transfectants retained high levels of heterodimerization, whereas a significant reduction was seen in NEO control cells (Fig. 5D). Activated EGFR should also induce downstream components of signal transduction. The association of SHC SH2 domain proteins with activated EGFR was therefore examined. Results indicated that only the 52- and 46-kDa isoforms of SHC interacted with the activated EGFR in CBS cells. Quiescent TGF-alpha -transfected cells retained a high level of association with SHC relative to NEO cells. These results suggested that autocrine TGF-alpha activity in CBS4 cells not only induced higher EGFR phosphorylation and activated other EGFR family members but also stimulated the association of activated EGFR with downstream molecules.

Reduction of Lag Time in TGF-alpha Transfectants-- Lag phase of cell culture is the period of adaptation following subculture and reseeding during which cells demonstrate reduced proliferation. If increased autocrine TGF-alpha activity mitigates the effects of environmental conditions retarding growth, it would be expected that the time required for entering exponential growth by TGF-alpha transfected cells would be reduced relative to CBS4 NEO cells. CBS4 TGF-alpha transfectant cells (alpha S2) exhibited a shortened lag phase as compared with CBS4-NEO cells when cultures were inoculated at low cell density (Fig. 6, A-D). The effect of low cell density on the time to reach exponential growth in tissue cultures was abrogated by increasing the number of cells plated. The growth curves in Fig. 6 indicate that increasing the number of cells plated leads to a reduction in the difference between the TGF-alpha transfectants and CBS NEO cells. At high cell density the exponential growth rates of the transfectant and control cells were virtually identical. Thus, TGF-alpha expression appears to generate increased clonal initiation of cultures at a given inoculum resulting in shortened lag phase. The lack of effect on exponential growth indicates that autocrine TGF-alpha functions by allowing re-entry into the cell cycle rather than affecting cell cycle transit. The results in Fig. 6, A and E, were confirmed using flow cytometry (Table I). Flow cytometric data from day 11 at an inoculum of 104 cells (Fig. 6A) were compared for TGF-alpha transfectants and wild type cells. The percentages of cells from TGF-alpha transfectants in S or G2/M were approximately 1.5-fold higher than wild type cells, indicating earlier escape from lag phase by TGF-alpha transfectants. This is contrasted by comparison of TGF-alpha transfectants with wild type cells at day 2 and 4 after seeding at high density (3.6 × 105 cells) in order to abrogate lag phase where percentages of cells in S and G2/M were essentially equal for both cell types.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Growth curves. The CBS4 NEO and CBS4 TGF-alpha clone (alpha S2) were plated at different cell densities into 6-well tissue culture plates in serum-free medium lacking EGF. A, 10,000 cells/well; B, 30,000 cells/well; C, 60,000 cells/well; D, 120,000 cells/well; E, 360,000 cells/well. The culture medium was changed every other day. Starting at day 2, the DNA synthesis of the cells of triplicate wells was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation assays. The mean of the three determinations and standard errors are presented.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Flow cytometry analysis
Cell cycle distribution of CBS4 TGF-alpha transfectants and control cells plated at low and high density.

Expression of TGF-alpha Enhanced Malignant Properties-- CBS cells have previously been shown to have low cloning efficiency in soft agarose and to be poorly tumorigenic in athymic nude mice (18, 20). Consequently, we compared the ability of CBS TGF-alpha transfectants and control cells to form colonies in soft agarose because this property is considered to be reflective of malignancy (31, 32). TGF-alpha transfectants showed both increased colony number and colony size, compared with CBS4-NEO cells (Fig. 7). The number of colonies from TGF-alpha transfectants was increased more than 2-fold relative to NEO (Fig. 7A). Tetracycline treatment reversed these effects (Fig. 7B). These in vitro data demonstrated that expression of TGF-alpha increased the malignant properties of the transfectants.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Anchorage-independent growth. CBS4 NEO cells and TGF-alpha clones (alpha S2 and alpha S5) were plated at 3,000 cells per well in 6-well plates in soft agarose containing serum-free medium lacking EGF and tetracycline (A). Some cells were treated with (+) tetracycline at 0.1 µg/ml or remained untreated (-) (B). Colonies were allowed to grow for 2 weeks, stained with p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (Sigma), and photographed. Colonies were counted, and bar graphs were drawn (C and D).

We next examined the tumorigenic properties of CBS and FET transfectant cells in vivo. TGF-alpha transfectants and control NEO cells (5 × 106) were injected into athymic mice to determine whether increased expression of TGF-alpha would affect the tumorigenicity. Both CBS4 NEO cells and alpha S2 clone formed xenografts in 10/10 inoculations by day 6. However, the alpha S2 clone showed a marked increase in tumor growth, giving rise to a 4-fold increase in tumor volume as compared with CBS4-NEO (Fig. 8A). Repression of TGF-alpha by addition of tetracycline in the drinking water of mice from day 6 to day 21 of the inoculation resulted in reversion of the slope of the growth curve to that of the NEO control (Fig. 8A). After terminating tetracycline treatment, alpha S2 tumors regained a rapid growth rate similar to that of alpha S2 cells without tetracycline treatment. Thus, the overexpression of TGF-alpha in CBS4 cells is sufficient to enhance malignant properties of these cells in vivo. In contrast to CBS4 cells, FET6 cells do not form progressively growing tumors (42). FET6 cells form initial nodules of approximately 200 mm3 at a high subcutaneous inoculum (107 cells) which ultimately disappear. Therefore, it was of interest to determine whether TGF-alpha transfection could generate a progressively growing phenotype which would not regress after initial tumor nodule formation. Fig. 8B shows that TGF-alpha transfection of FET6 cells resulted in a fully tumorigenic phenotype in 10/10 inoculations, whereas tetracycline treatment of the animals from day 10 to day 24 resulted in complete loss of tumorigenicity.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   TGF-alpha -mediated enhanced tumorigenicity. A, CBS4 alpha S2 TGF-alpha transfectants and NEO cell lines were injected at inocula of 5 × 106 cells subcutaneously behind the anterior forelimb of athymic mice. One set of animals inoculated with TGF-alpha transfectants (alpha S2 + TET) was treated with tetracycline (3 mg/ml on day 6 and 2 mg/ml on days 7-21 in the drinking water), and a second set was left untreated. Tumors were measured externally on the indicated days in two dimensions using a caliper. B, FET6 TGF-alpha transfectants were characterized for tumorigenicity as described above for CBS cells except that tetracycline treatment was continued until day 24 in this experiment.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

We have demonstrated that high levels of autocrine TGF-alpha contribute to the progression of malignant properties in the CBS4 and FET6 human colon carcinoma cell lines. The CBS TGF-alpha -transfected cells formed larger tumors than control cells in athymic nude mice, and repression of TGF-alpha by tetracycline treatment in vivo resulted in the reacquisition of tumor growth at the same rate as control cells in the CBS model. TGF-alpha transfection was permissive for progressive tumor growth in the non-tumorigenic FET6 cell line, whereas tetracycline treatment led to the complete resolution of tumors. Moreover, the TGF-alpha transfectants showed decreased exogenous growth factor requirements for clonal initiation in tissue culture and the initiation of DNA synthesis, as well as increased cloning efficiency in soft agarose in vitro. These results demonstrated that autocrine TGF-alpha plays a role in the acquisition of properties associated with malignant progression of cells such as growth factor independence and tumorigenicity.

Moreover, these results address important issues regarding the mechanism whereby autocrine TGF-alpha activity can impart a growth advantage to malignant cells. One issue is whether autocrine TGF-alpha provides independence from other growth factors as well as the expected mitigation of any exogenous EGF family ligands required for EGFR activation to enhance cell cycle entry. The utilization of model systems in which cells are grown in completely defined medium permitted the recognition that autocrine TGF-alpha activation can free the cells from an exogenous source of IGFI receptor activation for re-entry into the cell cycle from quiescence. In addition, the present work provides three lines of evidence showing that autocrine TGF-alpha activity can enhance re-entry into the cell cycle under environmental conditions that are highly restrictive to parental CBS cells. These included increased growth factor-independent clonality, decreased lag time in tissue culture, and complete abrogation of exogenous growth factor requirements for DNA synthesis from a quiescent state. These effects were contrasted by the lack of difference of doubling times observed in cells plated at high cell density. Thus, it appears that the primary function of TGF-alpha does not involve actively cycling cells. Perhaps some other autocrine factors function in this growth state. It is important to note that demonstration of autocrine TGF-alpha in normal cells and nonmalignant adenoma cells has thus far been restricted to actively cycling cells (34-37).

The original autocrine hypothesis was formulated to account for the growth advantage of malignant cells over their normal counterparts (33). As with most hypotheses, the addition of new information over the course of time suggests the need for fine tuning of the hypothesis. One of the most important pieces of information pertinent to the autocrine hypothesis in recent years has been the recognition that normal cells demonstrate autocrine-positive activity (frequently in the form of TGF-alpha ) as an integral element of their growth regulation (34). The observation of autocrine TGF-alpha activity in normal cells indicates the need to re-examine how TGF-alpha imparts a growth regulatory advantage to malignant cells. Normal cells do not, in as far as we know now, exhibit independence from exogenous growth factors for re-entry into the cell cycle under the various conditions used in this study. Normal keratinocytes, for example, have an absolute requirement for exogenous growth factor activation of the EGFR at low cell densities but do not require exogenous EGF or TGF-alpha for clonal expansion (35, 36). Sensitivity to EGFR blockade during clonal expansion indicates the need for autocrine-mediated EGFR activation in actively cycling cells. Similarly, nonmalignant colon adenoma cells show autocrine TGF-alpha activity during exponential growth but are incapable of clonal growth without supplementation (37). Thus, in this regard, parental CBS cells appear to show many of the growth restrictions of non-malignant cells. Taken together, these lines of evidence and the results reported herein for TGF-alpha -transfected CBS cells imply that the principal advantage of autocrine TGF-alpha in the malignant cells may be the enhanced ability to re-enter the cell cycle from growth arrest in environments that are not conducive to proliferation. As such labeling studies have shown that less than 1% of malignant cells are actively cycling in colon cancers (41). Similar observations have been made with other solid tumors. These observations suggest the tumor environment is not particularly conducive to cell proliferation. Thus, an autocrine factor enabling re-entry of cells into the cell cycle could be highly advantageous to the malignant cells. A similar advantage could easily be envisioned for cells involved in seeding metastases since the number of cells initiating a metastatic deposit is generally regarded as being quite limited.

Most intriguing was the observation that high levels of autocrine TGF-alpha not only replaced requirements for exogenous EGF but for insulin as well. Insulin through activation of the IGFI receptor could enhance EGFR expression and/or activation in growth factor-dependent cells. Alternatively, insulin could supply a different array of signal transduction pathways from the EGFR. Independence from insulin is intriguing because it implies that signal transduction by inappropriate autocrine TGF-alpha differs qualitatively and/or quantitatively from the autocrine TGF-alpha demonstrated by CBS4 control cells.

It could be speculated that TGF-alpha transfectants generate higher levels of EGFR activation such that the increased magnitude encompasses insulin signal transduction. However, exponentially growing TGF-alpha transfectants and wild type cells show similar levels of EGFR activation. Thus, although large increases in TGF-alpha resulted from transfection, autocrine activation of EGFR in growth-arrested TGF-alpha transfectants was only about 3-fold over wild type cells. This suggests that it is the inappropriate activation of EGFR in the growth-arrested state by cells which normally down-regulate TGF-alpha and lower EGFR activation that provides independence from insulin. Inappropriate EGFR activation in growth-arrested states may generate signal transduction consequences that might not occur in the context of exponential cells. For example, EGFR activation in growth-arrested TGF-alpha transfectant cells could involve the modification of signal transduction pathways through the generation of new dimer interactions between EGFR and other EGFR family members that might themselves be differentially regulated in exponential and quiescent cells. Inappropriate expression of TGF-alpha and/or recruitment of other EGFR family members could similarly interact with cell cycle control molecules such that there is overlap with insulin function. Finally, autocrine TGF-alpha expression could cause autocrine activation of IGFI receptor through induction of IGFI and/or IGFII or might abrogate dependence on insulin for EGFR activation in cell cycle re-entry. Along this line we have noted that insulin induces re-expression of down-regulated TGF-alpha in the wild type CBS and FET models where these cells are stimulated by exogenous growth factor treatment to re-enter the cell cycle from quiescence.2 Inappropriate EGFR activation as seen in TGF-alpha transfectants could abrogate this type of requirement for insulin. Thus, our results raise an important issue regarding the mechanistic advantage of autocrine TGF-alpha in malignancy which remains to be resolved.

The use of a tetracycline-repressible transfection system provided a particularly powerful control for determining the alterations in biological properties resulting from TGF-alpha transfection. We have reported the use of this repressible vector in reversing growth properties in tissue culture (38). Although tetracycline-repressible systems have been utilized in transgenic mice (39, 40), this is the first example that we are aware in which this type of system has been used to control tumor growth in vivo. When mice harboring TGF-alpha transfectants were given tetracycline, tumor growth was minimal and was virtually identical to that of NEO control. Removal of tetracycline was effective in permitting a growth rate that was then the same as that of TGF-alpha transfectant cell inoculated mice that had not received tetracycline. This result is significant because it directly demonstrates that indolent tumor growth in an in vivo setting can be stimulated to undergo significant progressive changes by a single event, which in this case is aberrant TGF-alpha expression.

Although the levels of TGF-alpha expression were increased 15-25-fold in TGF-alpha transfectants, the level of EGFR activation in exponential transfected cells was only about 2-3-fold higher than NEO controls. A similar level was observed in quiescent TGF-alpha -transfected cells. Since autocrine TGF-alpha functions through the EGFR exclusively, this result implies that malignant progression could result from relatively small increments of TGF-alpha . This raises an important issue as to the role of autocrine TGF-alpha in the pathogenesis of growth regulation of highly progressed malignant cells. Is the level of autocrine TGF-alpha important or is it inappropriate continued expression during growth arrest that imparts an advantage? The results from this study cannot directly answer this question. However, they are consistent with the hypothesis that it is inappropriate expression since there is a relatively small change in endogenous EGFR activation of the TGF-alpha transfection as described above. The hypothesis that inappropriate expression of TGF-alpha at growth arrest is the important determinant of autocrine growth advantage is also consistent with a lack of effect on doubling time in TGF-alpha -transfected cells compared with CBS NEO controls. Along these lines, previous work has shown that highly progressed human colon carcinoma cell lines, such as HCT116, are independent of exogenous growth factors for re-entry into the cell cycle and show increased TGF-alpha expression in growth arrest similarly to the TGF-alpha CBS4 transfectants generated in this study (16, 27). Moreover, blockade of autocrine TGF-alpha in HCT116 cells results in the loss of growth factor independence for DNA synthesis (21).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. H. Bujard, University of Heidelberg, Germany, for kindly providing the tetracycline-controllable expression plasmids. We also thank Dr. Gillian M. Howell for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussion.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA34432, CA54807 (to M. G. B.), CA68316, and CA43703 (to J. K. V. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Both authors contributed equally to this work.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Surgery and Biochemistry, the University of Texas, Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78284-7840. Tel.: 210-567-4524; Fax: 210-567-3447.

The abbreviations used are: TGF-alpha , transforming growth factor alpha ; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; tTA, tetracycline controlled transactivator; NEO, neomycin; hCMV, human cytomegalovirus; bp, base pair; IGFI, insulin-like growth factor I.

2 D. Wang and M. G. Brattain, unpublished observations.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Lyons, R. M., and Moses, H. L. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 187, 467-473[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Carpenter, G., and Cohen, S. (1979) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 48, 193-216[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Derynck, R. (1988) Cell 54, 593-595[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Coffey, R. J., Goustin, A. S., Soderquist, A., Shipley, G. D., Wolfshohl, J., Carpenter, G., and Moses, H. L. (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 4590-4594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Liu, C., Woo, A., and Sao, M.-S. (1990) Br. J. Cancer 62, 425-429[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Rosenthal, A., Lindquist, P. B., Bringman, T. S., Goeddel, D. V., and Derynck, R. (1986) Cell 46, 301-3097[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Di Marco, E., Pierce, J. H., Fleming, T. P., Kraus, M. H., Molloy, C. J., Aaronson, S. A., and Di Fiore, P. P. (1989) Oncogene 4, 831-839[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Jhappan, C., Stahle, C., Harkins, R. N., Fausto, N., Smith, G. H., and Merlino, G. T. (1990) Cell 61, 1137-1146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Matsui, Y., Halter, S. A., Holt, J. T., Hogan, B. L. M., and Coffey, R. J. (1990) Cell 61, 1147-1155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Sandgren, E. P., Luetteke, N. C., Palmiter, R. D., Brinster, R. L., and Lee, D. C. (1990) Cell 61, 1121-1135[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Murakami, H., Sanderson, N. D., Nagy, P., Marino, P. A., Merlino, G., and Thorgeirsson, S. S. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 1719-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sandgren, E. P., Luetteke, N. C., Qin, T. H., Palmiter, R. D., Brinster, R. L., and Lee, D. C. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 320-330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sandgren, E. P., Schroeder, J. A., Qin, T. H., Palmiter, R. D., Brinster, R. L., and Lee, D. C. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 3915-3927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Takagi, H., Sharp, R., Takayama, H., Anver, M. R., Ward, J. M., and Merlino, G. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4329-4336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Coffey, R. J., Meise, K. S., Matsui, Y., Hogan, B. L. M., Dempsey, P. J., and Halter, S. A. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 1678-1283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mulder, K. M., and Brattain, M. G. (1989a) Mol. Endocrinol. 3, 1215-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wan, C. W., Mcknight, K. M., Brattain, D. E., Brattain, M. G., and Yeoman, L. C. (1988) Cancer Lett. 43, 139-145[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Brattain, M. G., Levine, A. E., Chakrabarty, S., Yeoman, L. C., Willson, J. K. V., and Long, B. H. (1984) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 3, 177-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Chantret, I., Barbat, E., Dussaulx, E., and Zweibaum, A. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 1936-1942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mulder, K. M., and Brattain, M. G. (1989b) in The Cell and Molecular Biology of Colon Cancer (Augenlicht, L., ed), pp. 45-67, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
  21. Howell, G. M., Ziober, B. L., Humphrey, L. E., Willson, J. K. V., Sun, L., Lynch, M., and Brattain, M. G. (1995) J. Cell. Physiol. 162, 256-265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Gossen, M., and Bujard, H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5547-5551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Derynck, R., Roberts, A. B., Eaton, D. H., Winkler, M. E., and Goeddel, D. V. (1985) Cancer Cells 3, 79-86
  24. Sun, L., Wu, G., Willson, J. K. V., Zborowska, E., Yang, J., Rajkarunanayake, I., Wang, J., Gentry, L. E., Wang, X. F., and Brattain, M. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26449-26455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Chirgwin, J. M., Przybala, A. E., MacKondla, R. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Campos-Gonzalez, R., and Glenney, J. R., Jr. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 663-673[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Mulder, K. M. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 2256-2262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Stern, D. F., and Kamps, M. P. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 995-1001[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wada, T., Qian, X., and Greene, M. (1990) Cell 61, 1339-1347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Soltoff, S. P., Carraway, K. L., III, Prigent, S. A., Guillick, W. J., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3550-3558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Cifone, M., and Fidler, J. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 1039-1043[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Boyd, D. D., Levine, A. E., Brattain, D. E., McKnight, M. K., and Brattain, M. G. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 2469-2474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sporn, M. B., and Todaro, G. J. (1980) N. Engl. J. Med. 308, 878-880
  34. Bates, S. E., Valverius, E. M., Ennis, B. W., Bronzert, D. A., Sheridan, J. P., Stampfer, M. R., Mendelsohn, J., Lippman, M. E., and Dickson, R. B. (1990) Endocrinology 126, 596-607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Pittlekow, M. R., Cook, P. W., Shiipley, G. D., Derynck, R., and Coffey, R. J. (1993) Cell Growth Differ. 4, 513-521[Abstract]
  36. Coffey, R. J., Graves-Deal, R., Dempsey, P. J., Whitehead, R. H., and Pittlekow, M. R. (1992) Cell Growth Differ. 3, 347-354[Abstract]
  37. Markowitz, S. D., Molkentin, K., Gerbgic, C., Jackson, J., Stellato, T., and And Willson, J. K. V. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 86, 356-362
  38. Wang, J., Han, W., Zborowska, E., Liang, J., Wang, X., Willson, J. K. V., Sun, L., and Brattain, M. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17366-17371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Furth, P. A., Onge, L. S., Boger, H., Gruss, P., Gossen, M., Kistner, A., Bujand, H., and Hennighausen, L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9302-9306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Efrat, S., Fusco-DeMane, D., Lemberg, H., Emtan, O. A., and Wang, X. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3576-3580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Goldie, J. H., and Coldman, A. J. (1979) Cancer Treat. Rep. 63, 1727-1733[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Wu, S. P., Theodorescu, D., Kerbel, R. S., Willson, J. K., Mulder, K. M., Humphrey, L. E., and Brattain, M. G. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 187-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Wu, G, Fan, R. S., Li, W, Ko, T. C., and Brattain, M. G. (1997) Oncogene 15, 1555-1563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. P. Hu, S. B. Patil, M. Panasiewicz, W. Li, J. Hauser, L. E. Humphrey, and M. G. Brattain
Heterogeneity of Receptor Function in Colon Carcinoma Cells Determined by Cross-talk between Type I Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 68(19): 8004 - 8013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. Sasaki, T. Nakamura, R. B. Rebhun, H. Cheng, K. S. Hale, R. Z. Tsan, I. J. Fidler, and R. R. Langley
Modification of the Primary Tumor Microenvironment by Transforming Growth Factor {alpha}-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Promotes Metastasis in an Orthotopic Colon Cancer Model
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2008; 173(1): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. Foster, J. Black, C. LeVea, T. Khoury, B. Kuvshinoff, M. Javle, and J. F. Gibbs
COX-2 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma is an Initiation Event; While EGF Receptor Expression with Downstream Pathway Activation is a Prognostic Predictor of Survival
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 752 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Rajput, A. P. Koterba, J. I. Kreisberg, J. M. Foster, J. K.V. Willson, and M. G. Brattain
A Novel Mechanism of Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonism In vivo
Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 665 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Zhou, S. Li, Y. P. Hu, J. Wang, J. Hauser, A. N. Conway, M. A. Vinci, L. Humphrey, E. Zborowska, J. K.V. Willson, et al.
Blockade of EGFR and ErbB2 by the Novel Dual EGFR and ErbB2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor GW572016 Sensitizes Human Colon Carcinoma GEO Cells to Apoptosis
Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 404 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Kiguchi, L. Ruffino, T. Kawamoto, T. Ajiki, and J. DiGiovanni
Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Efficacy of Orally Active Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Gallbladder Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 11(15): 5572 - 5580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. P. Hu, S. Venkateswarlu, N. Sergina, G. Howell, P. St. Clair, L. E. Humphrey, W. Li, J. Hauser, E. Zborowska, J. K. V. Willson, et al.
Reorganization of ErbB Family and Cell Survival Signaling after Knock-down of ErbB2 in Colon Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 27383 - 27392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Zhou and M. G. Brattain
Synergy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase Inhibitor AG1478 and ErbB2 Kinase Inhibitor AG879 in Human Colon Carcinoma Cells Is Associated with Induction of Apoptosis
Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 65(13): 5848 - 5856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Zucchi, E. Mento, V. A. Kuznetsov, M. Scotti, V. Valsecchi, B. Simionati, E. Vicinanza, G. Valle, S. Pilotti, R. Reinbold, et al.
Gene expression profiles of epithelial cells microscopically isolated from a breast-invasive ductal carcinoma and a nodal metastasis
PNAS, December 28, 2004; 101(52): 18147 - 18152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. G. Jackson, P. St. Clair, M. X. Sliwkowski, and M. G. Brattain
Blockade of Epidermal Growth Factor- or Heregulin-Dependent ErbB2 Activation with the Anti-ErbB2 Monoclonal Antibody 2C4 Has Divergent Downstream Signaling and Growth Effects
Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2601 - 2609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S.-C. Ye, J. M. Foster, W. Li, J. Liang, E. Zborowska, S. Venkateswarlu, J. Gong, M. G. Brattain, and J. K. V. Willson
Contextual Effects of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} on the Tumorigenicity of Human Colon Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., September 1, 1999; 59(18): 4725 - 4731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brattain, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Brattain, M. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement