|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 5, 3076-3081, January 30, 1998
Human Small Intestinal Maltase-glucoamylase cDNA Cloning
HOMOLOGY TO SUCRASE-ISOMALTASE*
Buford L.
Nichols §,
Joyce
Eldering¶,
Stephen
Avery ,
Dagmar
Hahn¶,
Andrea
Quaroni , and
Erwin
Sterchi¶
From the United States Department of Agriculture
Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, Texas 77030-2600, Department of Physiology, School of
Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
14853-6401, and ¶ Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Berne, Büehlstrasse 28, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland
 |
ABSTRACT |
It has been hypothesized that human mucosal
glucoamylase (EC 3.2.1.20 and 3.2.1.3) activity serves as an alternate
pathway for starch digestion when luminal -amylase activity is
reduced because of immaturity or malnutrition and that
maltase-glucoamylase plays a unique role in the digestion of malted
dietary oligosaccharides used in food manufacturing. As a first step
toward the testing of this hypothesis, we have cloned human small
intestinal maltase-glucoamylase cDNA to permit study of the
individual catalytic and binding sites for maltose and starch enzyme
hydrolase activities in subsequent expression experiments. Human
maltase-glucoamylase was purified by immunoisolation and partially
sequenced. Maltase-glucoamylase cDNA was amplified from human
intestinal RNA using degenerate and gene-specific primers with the
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The 6,513-base pair
cDNA contains an open reading frame that encodes a 1,857-amino acid
protein (molecular mass 209,702 Da). Maltase-glucoamylase has two
catalytic sites identical to those of sucrase-isomaltase, but the
proteins are only 59% homologous. Both are members of glycosyl
hydrolase family 31, which has a variety of substrate specificities.
Our findings suggest that divergences in the carbohydrate binding
sequences must determine the substrate specificities for the four
different enzyme activities that share a conserved catalytic site.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Starches are a mixture of two structurally different
polysaccharides: amylose, a linear
[4-O- -D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucose]n polymer, and amylopectin, with additional
6-O- -D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucose links (about 4% of total), which result in a branched configuration. Dietary starches are a mixture of approximately 25% amylose in amylopectin, a fact of nutritional significance because of the multienzyme complexity of the mammalian starch digestion pathway (1).
-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) is the endoenzyme found in mature human
salivary and pancreatic secretions that produces linear maltose
oligosaccharides by hydrolysis of 1 4 linkages of amylose (2, 3).
-amylase bypasses the 1 6 linkages of amylopectin and
produces branched isomaltose oligosaccharides. The starch-derived oligosaccharides are not fermentable by yeast without further processing by -amylase (EC 3.1.1.2), which hydrolyzes the
nonreducing ends at 1 4 and 1 6 linkages (2). In mammals,
hydrolysis of the nonreducing ends is carried out by small intestinal
mucosal brush border-anchored sucrase-isomaltase
(SIM)1 (EC 3.2.1.48 and
3.2.1.10) and maltase-glucoamylase (MGA) (EC 3.2.1.20 and 3.2.1.3)
complexes (1). Enzyme substrate specificities of SIM overlap with those
of MGA. In vivo, SIM accounts for 80% of maltase
(1,4-O- -D-glucanohydrolase) activity, all
sucrase (D-glucopyranosyl- -D-fructohydrolase)
activity, and almost all isomaltase (1, 6-O- -D-glucanohydrolase) activity (1). MGA accounts for all glucoamylase exoenzyme
(1,4-O- -D-glucanohydrolase) activity for
amylose and amylopectin substrates, 1% of isomaltase activity, and
20% of maltase activity (1, 4). Some have hypothesized that human
mucosal glucoamylase exoenzyme activity is an alternate pathway for
starch digestion when luminal -amylase endoenzyme activity is
reduced because of immaturity and malnutrition and that MGA plays a
unique role in the digestion of malted dietary oligosaccharides used in
food and beverage manufacturing (5-8). The objective of this study was
the cloning and sequencing of the human small intestinal MGA cDNA
to allow subsequent testing of this hypothesis by analysis of the
individual catalytic and binding sites for maltose and starch by
expression and mutation experiments. In this paper, we describe the
cloning of cDNA for MGA from human intestinal RNA. The identity of
the isolated cDNA clone was confirmed by expression of a
recombinant protein in Escherichia coli transformed by the
cDNA coding for the N-terminal domain.
MGA activities associated with proteins of the same size as the
intestinal enzyme have been reported from human kidney and granulocytes
(9, 10). A clinical deficiency of intestinal glucoamylase has been
reported that consisted of chronic diarrhea responding to a starch
elimination diet in children with normal mucosal morphology and low
starch hydrolyzing activity (11). A genetic form of glucoamylase
deficiency has been reported in mice (12). In rats and rabbits, SIM
activity is undetectable until weaning but MGA is present from birth
(1). In pigs and humans, both SIM and MGA activities are present from
birth. In malnourished human infants, SIM and MGA activities are
reduced (13, 14), but SIM and MGA activities are increased in
malnourished rats (15). There have been characterizations of MGA
activity, synthesis, and processing in chickens, mice, rats, rabbits,
and pigs (12, 16-24). There were two mature MGA protein subunits in
all of these species. Studies of pig MGA peptide sequence demonstrated that it is anchored to the membrane by the N terminus (16-18). Rat
studies found that maltase activity was associated with the membrane,
and glucoamylase was associated with the luminal ends (1, 19).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Human small intestine from organ donors was used
for the preparation of antibodies and isolation, and characterization
of MGA (25-27). The usage of this tissue was approved by the ethical committees of all involved hospitals and institutions (25-27). All
chemicals and biologicals used for protein isolation and
characterization were purchased from Sigma unless otherwise noted (27).
All molecular reagent and kit suppliers are indicated and were used
according to manufacturer's instructions.
Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting Procedures--
The
procedures used for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
immunoblots were previously reported (27, 28). Molecular mass standards
were run with all gels and ranged from 43 to 202 kDa (27).
Antibody Reagents--
Monoclonal mouse HBB 2/143/17 (25) and
HMA (26) anti-human maltase-glucoamylase antibodies have been
previously described by the authors. HBB 2/143/17 mAb
immunoprecipitated MGA proteins of about 210, 285, and 335 kDa, which
were characterized in studies of human small intestinal explants (27).
Protein identification was carried out on immunoblots with three mAbs
against human MGA, HMA-5, -6, and -7 (26). Each stained all bands of
the proteins isolated with HBB 2/143/17.
Immunoisolation--
Human small intestinal epithelial cells
were obtained from frozen and thawed organ donor tissue, and brush
border membranes were isolated from a 2% mucosal homogenate containing
protease and bacterial inhibitors (27, 28). After removal of cellular debris (P1) at 1,000 × g, the supernatant was pelleted
by centrifugation at 100,000 × g. The pellet was
solubilized in Triton X-100 and deoxycholate (P2). HBB 2/143/17 was
used to immunoisolate MGA (27). The HBB-MGA complexes were isolated
with protein A (28). Replicate MGA protein isolates were pooled,
separated on SDS gels, and blotted onto a membrane. The proteins were
stained with Coomassie blue, and their identity was confirmed by
immunoblots stained with pooled HMA mAb. The individual 335- and
285-kDa protein bands were subjected to direct gas-phase N-terminal
microsequencing. Additional 335- or 285-kDa isolate pools were
hydrolyzed with CNBr, extracted, dried, and washed. The pellet was
dissolved in electrophoresis buffer with dithiothreitol. The two
hydrolyzed proteins were run on a Tricine gel and then were blotted and
stained with Coomassie Blue. The hydrolysate bands were sequenced.
PCR Primers--
Degenerate 19-20 oligonucleotide primers were
designed from areas of the sequenced MGA peptides with lowest homology
with SIM and from SIM catalytic site sequence WIDMNE (29, 30). These
primers were synthesized by Microsynth (Windisch, Switzerland). Gene-specific primers were designed from sequenced clones. These primers were synthesized with an Applied Biosystems 394 DNA/RNA Synthesizer (Foster City, CA) or by Genosys (The Woodlands, TX).
RT/PCR Procedures--
Reverse transcription (RT) was carried
out using 100 ng of total human small intestine RNA
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). The RT reaction used
random nonamer primers (RT/PCR kit; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The RT
product was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that used
degenerate primers (1 µM), Taq polymerase, and
RT reaction product in a thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer 480). Amplicons
were separated on agarose gel, purified using QIAquick gel extraction
kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), ligated into pT7-blue T-vector, and
transformed into NovaBlue E. coli (Novagen, Madison, WI).
Clones were screened by PCR with vector primers, and QIApreps plasmid
isolations (Qiagen) were carried out. DNA was subsequently sequenced
(Applied Biosystems 373A automated sequencer, Foster City, CA).
PCR Extension Procedures--
Rapid amplification of cDNA
ends (Life Technologies, Inc.) was used to extend the 3 and 5 ends of
the sequences. The 3 reactants were amplified using rTth
polymerase kit (GeneAmp XL PCR kit, Perkin-Elmer). The forward primer
was gene-specific, and the reverse primer was the abridged universal
amplification primer (AUAP; Life Technologies). The amplicons were
ligated with a PCR-script (GeneAmp XL PCR kit, Perkin-Elmer). The 5
reverse primer was gene-specific, and the first forward primer was the anchor primer (Life Technologies). This was followed by a second round
of amplification with primer AUAP. Clones were screened using vector
and nested gene-specific primers.
Tissue Specificity--
Equal amounts of total RNA from human
small intestine, kidney, salivary gland, pancreas
(CLONTECH), and isolated granulocytes (a gift of
Dr. C. W. Smith, Baylor College of Medicine) were subjected to
RT/PCR with primers producing MGA amplimers from small intestinal RNA
(intestinal sequence locations 3660-4451, 1669-2031, and 5911-6231). -actin was used as an amplification control for RNA quality (see Fig. 4A). The gel was transferred to a membrane (MSI;
Westboro, MA) and cross-linked. The probe was prepared from the
full-length MGA-P1 cDNA using random labeling. The
32P-labeled probe was purified by column isolation. The
hybridization (ExpressHyb; CLONTECH) was at
68 °C, the membrane was washed at 50 °C, and the image was
developed.
Southern Blot Analysis--
Species specificity and genomic
complexity were evaluated with the Zoo blot and Geno blot
(CLONTECH). The Zoo blot contained 4 µg of
EcoRI-digested genomic DNA from nine eukaryotic species (human, monkey, rat, mouse, dog, cow, rabbit, chicken, yeast). The Geno
blot contained 4 µg of human genomic DNA cut with EcoRI, HindIII, BamHI, PstI, and
BglII. The probe was prepared by PCR from the MGA-P1
template with primers encompassing 1669-2049 in the intestinal MGA
sequence. The amplimer was random-labeled with [32P]dCTP.
The hybridization (CLONTECH) was at 60 °C, the
membrane was then washed under high stringency conditions at 50 °C,
and the image was developed (Fig. 4, B and
C).
Expression in E. coli--
A full-length construct was assembled
by cutting clones K3, 13-13, and T46 with HaeII,
SacI, and SpeI. The DNA fragments were purified
and ligated. The assembled construct was then column- and gel-purified.
pBlueScript SK (Stratagene) vector was digested with SpeI,
and the construct was ligated into the vector. The construct was used
to transform XL1 Blue MRF cells. The full-length clone, MGA-P1, was
completely resequenced.
For the purpose of expressing independent active sites, two sets of
gene-specific primers were designed that contained a SalI (on the 5 end) or NotI (on the 3 end) restriction site. By
using these primer pairs and MGA-P1 as a template, an N-terminal
2,584-bp fragment encoding residues 295-2838 and C-terminal 2,687-bp
fragment encoding 2893-5550 were amplified by PCR with rTth
polymerase. The amplicons were ligated into pET22b (Novagen) and
transformed into NovaBlue cells for plasmid production. These clones,
MGA-P1a (N-terminal domain) and MGA-P1b (C-terminal domain), were
sequenced to confirm the orientations before transforming into
BL21(DE3) E. coli (Novagen). Expression was induced by 1 mM IPTG, and proteins were harvested by osmotic shock and
sonication. The induced and uninduced proteins were separated on a 6%
gel and stained with Coomassie Blue or immunoblotted with HMA mAbs.
Computer Analysis of Sequences--
The software from the
Genetics Computer Group, Inc. (31) was accessed via the Baylor College
of Medicine molecular biology computation resource. Sequence analysis
was performed with the GCG programs (32). GenBankTM data
were searched using the BLAST Service (33) or FastA and TFastA (34)
programs. Primer design used the PRIMER (35) program. The
PROSITE analysis accessed the patterns section (36) and Blocks data
base (37). Chromosomal assignment was made by searching the
Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) data base (38).
 |
RESULTS |
MGA Peptide Sequences--
The HBB 2/143/17-immunoisolated
proteins had the predicted 335- and 285-kDa forms of MGA when separated
on SDS gels (25-27). In experiments with a heavier P2 immunoisolate,
an additional band of about 210 kDa, similar in size to those
previously reported in higher resolution human explant (27) and
immunoblot (26) experiments, was visualized. All HBB
2/143/17-immunoisolated MGA bands reacted to individual HMA-5-7 mAbs
on immunoblots.
The 335- and 285-kDa MGA bands were separately excised from blots, and
N-terminal amino acids were sequenced. The human MGA N-terminal
sequence had 82% homology with hog MGA (18) and 52% with human SIM
(29, 30). The initiator methionine was missing from the peptide
sequences of the human MGA and human, rabbit, and porcine SIM N termini
(16-18, 29, 30). Five identical bands were visualized on
electrophoretic separation after independent CNBr hydrolysis of the
335- and 285-kDa forms. The polypeptide fragment bands were
individually excised and sequenced. Band 2 could not be successfully
sequenced. Band 4 was only sequenced from the 335-kDa digest. The N
terminus and internal peptide sequences from the 335-kDa band were
identical to those from the 285-kDa band. The locations of these
peptide sequences are underlined in the amino acid sequence
in Fig. 2.
Clones and Sequences--
Four overlapping clones were obtained
from the degenerate primer amplifications, and a 2,461-bp consensus was
determined (Fig. 1). The N terminus, two
internal peptides, and a WIDMNE catalytic site sequences were
recognized from a single open reading frame (Fig.
2). Gene-specific primers were used to
extend the sequence by 5 and 3 rapid amplification of cDNA ends
RT/PCR. The open reading frame of the consensus was continued, and two
additional internal peptides and a WIDMNE catalytic site sequences were
recognized (Fig. 2). The nucleotide sequence has been listed as
GenBankTM accession number AF016833.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cloning strategy used to develop a consensus
sequence of MGA cDNA. The names and locations of the
sequencing clones are diagramed (5 end on the left). The
full-length clone MGA-P1 was assembled from clones 13-13, K3, and T46.
The bars in black indicate the areas sequenced
from the clones.
|
|

View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Deduced MGA peptide sequence. The MGA
peptide sequence is 1,857 amino acids long and has a molecular mass of
209,705 Da. The locations of the peptide sequences used for the
construction of degenerate primers are underlined. Note the
duplication of the bold glycosyl hydrolase family 31 signature 1 (WIDMNE) and signature 2 sequences in the N- and C-terminal
domains.
|
|
Chromosomal Location--
A search of the EST chromosomal data
bank with the MGA nucleotide sequence revealed that the 3 end of the
untranscribed cDNA had 100% identity with a 147-base cDNA EST
GS1365 (38). There were no other EST identified.
Expression of Cloned cDNA in E. coli--
Because of the
length of the cDNA, 2,584- and 2,687-bp fragments of the cDNA
(MGA-P1a, N-terminal domain; MGA-P1b, C-terminal domain), each of which
included one catalytic site, were ligated into expression vectors and
induced in E. coli. Proteins with the expected molecular
mass of about 100 kDa were induced by IPTG in these E. coli
cells from both constructs (Fig.
3A). When the bacterial
proteins were immunoblotted to confirm expressed MGA protein identity,
the induced 100-kDa band from MGA-P1a was stained by three HMA mAb
(Fig. 3B), but neither the uninduced bacterial nor the
induced MGA-P1b proteins were stained.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Recombinant expression of two MGA cDNA
constructs. Expression of MGA-P1a (N-terminal domain) and MGA-P1b
(C-terminal domain) was carried out in E. coli. A, The
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel was stained with Coomassie
Blue. Note that lanes 3 and 6 were not used.
Lanes 2, 5, and 8 are of proteins obtained from
organisms induced with 1 mM IPTG, lanes 1 and
2 are from a control construct with the pET vector alone,
lanes 4 and 5 are from the MGA-P1a (N-terminal
domain) construct, and lanes 7 and 8 are from the
MGA-P1b (C-terminal domain) construct. The molecular mass
(Mr) markers are shown on the right.
Note that IPTG induces expression of a protein of ~100 kDa in
lanes 5 and 8. U, uninduced;
I, induced. B, immunoblot of the proteins in lane 5 of the gel in panel A, demonstrating that
the 100-kDa-induced protein MGA-P1a (N-terminal domain) was recognized
by all three HMA mAbs used for identification of the isolated MGA
protein. The MGA-P1b (C-terminal domain)-induced protein was unstained (not shown).
|
|
Tissue Distribution--
The same amplimer patterns were
visualized after RT/PCR from small intestine, granulocyte, or
kidney total RNA. No MGA amplimers were detected from salivary or
pancreatic RNA, although control actin amplimers were present. The
amplimer pattern suggested that MGA mRNA was expressed in small
intestine, granulocyte, and kidney but not in salivary gland or
pancreas (Fig. 4A). A Southern
blot from this gel revealed that all the MGA amplimers from small
intestine, granulocyte, and kidney were stained by the MGA-P1 probe
(data not shown).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Human tissue specificity, species
specificity, and genomic complexity of MGA. A, RT/PCR
examining tissue specificity of human small intestinal MGA gene
expression. One hundred ng each of small intestinal, granulocyte,
kidney, pancreas, and salivary gland total RNA (left to
right) were used for RT, and 8% of each product was used
for PCR. The sets of primers used for PCR (left to
right for each tissue) were MGA C terminus (C),
MGA N terminus (N), MGA 3 -untranslated region
(3 ), and -actin ( ). The MGA amplimers are further
described in the text. Three MGA amplimers were visualized from small
intestine, kidney, and granulocyte RNA (the kidney C amplimer was faint
in the original). No MGA amplimers were detected from pancreas or
salivary gland, although -actin was amplified from all tissue RNA.
MGA amplifications from human kidney and granulocyte RNA are consistent
with reported enzyme activities of these tissues (see the
Introduction). Molecular weight markers are on both sides.
B, Zoo blot Southern of EcoRI-cut genomic DNA from 9 eukaryotic species. The lanes, left to
right, contained human, rhesus monkey, Sprague-Dawley rat,
BALB/c mouse, dog, cow, rabbit, chicken, and Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. Human, monkey, rat, mouse, dog, cow, and rabbit were
positive, but chicken and yeast lanes were negative.
Mr markers are indicated on the left.
C, the Southern Geno blot, made with five different restriction enzyme digestions. Except for EcoRI, this Southern revealed
only one band per restriction enzyme. A restriction map of
the MGA probe revealed no internal restriction sites for
EcoRI; thus these cuts are in introns.
Mr standards are on the left.
|
|
Southern Blots--
Zoo blot Southern lanes were
positive for human, monkey, rat, mouse, dog, cow, and rabbit genomic
DNA cut with EcoRI (Fig. 4B). Chicken and yeast
lanes were negative. Except for EcoRI, the
Southern Geno blot revealed only one band per restriction enzyme from
human genomic DNA (Fig. 4C). A map of the MGA probe revealed
no internal restriction sites for EcoRI; thus the
restriction sites are contained in two introns within the coding 380-bp
length of the probe.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Two major studies have addressed isolation and synthesis of human
MGA proteins (27, 39). The first study isolated human MGA by
chromatography after treatment with papain and found a single band of
about 312 kDa with 32-38% glycosylation. This isolated protein had
substrate specificities for maltose and whole starch (39). The second
study utilized in vitro organ culture followed by
immunoisolation (27). Electrophoresis of the precipitate revealed a
major band of about 335 kDa (27). In metabolically labeled explants, a
polypeptide of about 285 kDa was visualized at 30 min, and the 335-kDa
form was visualized at 60 min. The 335-kDa isoform was found to be a
complex glycosylated form of the high mannose 285-kDa form. Treatment
of both 335- and 285-kDa forms with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid
resulted in a single unglycosylated protein (described as ~210 kDa in
this paper) and revealed that the 335-kDa form was heavily
glycosylated. Because of reports of two ~100 kDa MGA proteins in rats
and pigs (18, 22), the human explants were treated with trypsin, but
MGA was not cleaved (27).
Cloned cDNA--
We have isolated cDNA for human MGA that
codes for a single open reading frame of 6,513 nucleotides and includes
58 nucleotide 5 - and 885 nucleotide 3 -untranslated regions. There is
a single polyadenylation signal AATAAA at nucleotide 6,404. There is a 174 nucleotide sequence in the 3 -untranslated region that is homologous with a cDNA 3 EST that has been mapped to chromosome 7 (38). Consistent with the reported distribution of enzyme activity, MGA
mRNA was expressed in human small intestine, kidney, and
granulocytes (Fig. 4A). Based upon the pattern obtained on Southern analysis with five different restriction digests, we conclude
that a single gene produces this cDNA (Fig. 4C). As
evidenced on another Southern analysis with nine different eukaryotic
genomic digests, an MGA gene was detectable in all other mammalian
species tested (Fig. 4B) but not in chicken, known to have
maltase and glucoamylase activities (20).
Peptide Sequence--
There was 92% identity between the five MGA
peptides and deduced sequences. The coding region of the cDNA of
human MGA reveals a protein of 1,857 amino acids with a calculated
molecular mass of 209,702 Da (Fig. 2). This protein is similar in
molecular mass to the smallest band visualized on overloaded lanes and
previously identified as a unglycosylated MGA (27). There was 59%
sequence identity between human MGA and SIM proteins.
Recombinant Expression--
N-terminal and C-terminal halves (each
including one catalytic site) of MGA cDNA were expressed in
E. coli. The induced proteins were of the expected size,
~100 kDa (Fig. 3A), and the N-terminal-expressed bacterial
protein selectively reacted with mAbs used to characterize the human
MGA starting material (Fig. 3B). The expression and peptide
sequence data support the conclusion that we have cloned the authentic
human intestinal MGA cDNA.
N-terminal Domains--
In the cytoplasmic tail domain, MGA has 26 amino acids with 5 lysines. The N-terminal domain has a hydrophobic
segment, a putative type II membrane anchor, with 16 branched chains in
this 21-amino acid sequence. The anchoring domain is followed by
threonine- and serine-rich regions that have been termed the
O-glycosylated stalk in SIM (29) and human intestinal
aminopeptidase (41). The region is 52-amino acids long, and there are
20 possible O-glycosylation sites in this MGA sequence.
Disulfide Bonds--
MGA has 24 cysteines; it is reported that all
the cysteines of MGA are joined in disulfide linkages (29, 39). Of
these cysteines, 11 are in homologous regions in the N-terminal and C-terminal domains (Fig. 2). These have been described as trefoil-type domains (37). There are three additional conserved cysteines that
bracket the N-terminal and two that follow the C-terminal signature 1 WIDMNE sites. There are also paired, conserved cysteines within each of
the signature 2 sequences (discussed below).
Glycosylation--
MGA has 19 potential N-glycosylation
sites. There is a total of 253 sites of potential
O-glycosylation in MGA. It is reported that mature MGA has a
total of 28 carbohydrate residues with a total oligosaccharide
molecular mass of 50,400 kDa (41). Carbohydrates were found to make up
about a third of the molecular mass of mature MGA, and no sialic acid
could be detected (27, 39).
Dimer Formation--
All isolated bands were recognized by eight
different mAbs specific for hMGA (25-27). The CNBr fragment patterns
and the peptide sequences were identical from the 335- and 285-kDa
proteins. The complete removal of all glycosylation from either the
335- or 285-kDa form resulted in a single protein band of ~210 kDa
(27), which was consistent with the molecular mass as determined by sedimentation equilibrium (39, 40, 42) and cloning. These observations
suggest the presence of a single protein structure in the 335- and
285-kDa forms of human MGA. Only differences in type of glycosylation
and molecular mass distinguished the human 335- from 285-kDa bands
(27). Parallel glycosylation differences were found in uncleaved MGA
bands immunoisolated from pig or rat intestine (17, 19). It has been
reported that the largest band in the rat (similar to human 335 kDa) is
a dimer formed by noncovalent adhesion between complex glycosylation
sites whose selective removal resulted in a high mannose monomer
(similar to human 285 kDa) (19). Identical results were reported after selective removal of the complex glycosylated chains of human 335-kDa
MGA (27). Is the human 335 band a dimer of the 285-kDa band? High
resolution electron microscopic examination of reconstituted vesicles
suggested a dimeric structure for pig MGA (43). Attempts to chemically
cross-link the human 335-kDa band failed to document a dimeric
structure (27) on 4% SDS gels; however, a noncovalently linked dimeric
structure of pig MGA was found on 1% SDS gels (44). These observations
suggest that the 335-kDa band is a complex glycosylation-linked dimeric
form of the 285-kDa band.
Catalytic Sites--
The N-terminal MGA catalytic site is
duplicated in the C-terminal. This type of catalytic site (WIDMNE) has
an aspartic acid (D) catalytic site (45, 46). This catalytic site is
conserved in other carbohydrate hydrolases including human, rabbit, and rat SIM (29, 30, 47); mouse and human (36, 48) lysosomal maltase;
fungal maltases from Aspergillus niger, Mucor
javanicus, Schwanniomyces occidentalis (49, 50, 51);
and plant maltase from sugar beets and barley (52, 53).
Enzyme Family--
MGA has two glycosyl hydrolase family 31 signature sequences (37): 562-567 and 698-730, which are duplicated
(bold in Figs. 2 and 5).

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of internal homologies of MGA and
SIM. The internal alignments were constructed with the PileUp
program (31) with settings of gap weight 3 and gap length 0.1. The SIM and MGA C termini were aligned by consensus at PileUp position 90, well
ahead of the SIM trypsin site at PileUp 177. The numeration is based
upon a PileUp length of about 1,000 amino acids. Only the PileUp
portion from amino acid 451 to 750 is shown. This alignment finds
conserved amino acid sequences in 33% of the four entire enzyme
domains and 31% in the portion shown. The two glycosyl hydrolase
family 31 signature sequences are in bold. Three loops that
are unique to the C terminus of MGA and/or SIM are noted by
brackets.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
Technical assistance was provided by Gary
Cook, Elizabeth Mandac, and Ursula Luginbuehl. Jestina Mason of the
NIH-supported Child Health Research Core Laboratory (Baylor College of
Medicine) carried out primer synthesis and amplimer sequencing. Dr.
Johann Schaller, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Berne, carried out amino acid sequencing. Adam Gillum provided photographic assistance, Jane Schoppe provided secretarial support, and Leslie Loddeke provided editorial assistance. Dr. Kazumi
Ishimura-Oka and Dr. Darryl Hadsell at the Children's
Nutrition Research Center provided valuable reviews of the first
draft.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This project has been funded in part by the United States
Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Cooperative Agreement 58-6250-1-003 (to B. L. N. and A. Q.) and by Swiss
National Research Foundation Grant 32-40571.94 (to E. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF016833.
§
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
Children's Nutrition Research Center, Dept. of Pediatrics, Baylor
College of Medicine, 1100 Bates St., Houston, TX, 77030-2600.
1
The abbreviations used are: SIM,
sucrase-isomaltase; MGA, maltase-glucoamylase; IPTG, isopropyl
-D-thiogalactopyranoside; RT, reverse transcription;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; mAB, monoclonal antibody; bp, base
pair; EST, Expressed Sequence Tag.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Semenza, G.,
and Auricchio, S.
(1989)
in
The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease II (Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S., Valle, D., Stanbury, J. B., Wyngaarden, J. B., and Fredrickson, D. S., eds), pp. 2975-2997, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
-
Hassid, W. Z.,
and Ball, C. E.
(1957)
in
The Carbohydrates, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Physiology (Pigman, W., ed), pp. 501-506, Academic Press, Inc., New York
-
Whistler, R. L.,
and Corbet, W. M.
(1957)
in
The Carbohydrates, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Physiology (Pigman, W., ed), pp. 644-646, Academic Press, Inc., New York
-
Auricchio, S.,
Semenza, G.,
and Rubino, A.
(1965)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
96,
498-507[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shulman, R. D.,
Wong, W. W.,
Irving, C. S.,
Nichols, B. L.,
Klein, P. D.
(1983)
J. Pediatr.
103,
23-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rossiter, M. A.,
Barrowman, J. A.,
Dand, A.,
and Wharton, B. A.
(1974)
Acta Paediatr. Scand.
63,
389-392[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Danus, O.,
Urbina, A. M.,
Valenzuela, I.,
and Solimano, G.
(1970)
J. Pediatr.
77,
334-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Azad, M. A. K.,
and Lebenthal, E.
(1990)
Pediatr. Res.
28,
166-170[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Reiss, U.,
and Saktor, B.
(1981)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
209,
342-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bayer, D. P.,
Vittori, C.,
Sudaka, P.,
and Giudicelli, J.
(1989)
Biochem. J.
263,
647-652[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lebenthal, E., U, K. M.,
Zheng, B. Y.,
Lu, R. B.,
Lerner, A.
(1994)
J. Pediatr.
124,
541-546[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Quezada-Calvillo, R,
Senchyna, M.,
and Underdown, B. J.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
G1150-G1157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
James, W. P. T.
(1971)
Arch. Dis. Child.
46,
218-220
-
Prinsloo, J. G.,
Wittmann, W.,
Kruger, H.,
and Freier, E.
(1971)
Arch. Dis. Child.
46,
474-478
-
Galluser, M.,
Belkhou, R.,
Freund, J-N.,
Duluc, I.,
Torp, N.,
Danielsen, M.,
and Raul, F.
(1991)
J. Comp. Physiol. B Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol.
161,
357-361[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sørensen, S. H.,
Norén, O.,
Sjöström, H.,
and Danielsen, E. M.
(1982)
Eur. J. Biochem.
126,
559-568[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Danielsen, E. M.,
Sjöström, H.,
and Norén, O.
(1983)
Biochem. J.
210,
389-393[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Norén, O.,
Sjöström, H.,
Cowell, G. M.,
Tranum-Jensen, J.,
Hansen, O. C.,
Welinder, K. G.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
12306-12309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lee, L.,
and Fostner, G.
(1990)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
68,
1103-1111[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hu, C. B.,
Spiess, M.,
and Semenza, G.
(1987)
Biochem. Biophys. Acta
896,
275-286[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Galand, G.
(1986)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
85,
109-115
-
Forstner, G.,
Salvatore, A.,
Lee, L.,
and Forstner, J.
(1982)
Can. J. Biochem.
60,
1007-1013[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lee, L.,
and Forstner, G.
(1983)
Can. J. Biochem.
62,
36-43[CrossRef]
-
Forstner, G.,
and Forstner, J.
(1979)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
586,
250-257[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hauri, H. P.,
Sterchi, E. E.,
Bienz, D.,
Fransen, J. A. M.,
Marxer, A.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
838-851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Quaroni, A.,
Nichols, B. L.,
Quaroni, E.,
Hurst, K.,
Herrera, L.,
Weiser, M. M.,
Hamilton, S. R.
(1992)
Int. J. Cancer
51,
404-411[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Naim, H. Y.,
Sterchi, E. E.,
and Lentze, M. J.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
19709-19717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Naim, H. Y.,
Sterchi, E. E.,
and Lentze, M. J.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
7242-7253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hunziker, W.,
Spiess, M.,
Semenza, G.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1986)
Cell
46,
227-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chantret, I.,
Lacasa, M.,
Chevalier, G.,
Ruf, J.,
Islam, I.,
Mantei, N.,
Edwards, Y.,
Swallow, D.,
and Rousset, M.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
285,
915-923
-
Genetics Computer Group.
(1994)
Program Manual for the Wisconsin Package, Version 9, Genetics Computer Group, Inc., Madison, WI
-
Lawrence, C. B., Shalom, T. Y., and Honda, S. (1989)
SAM: A Software Package for Sequence Assembly Management for UNIX
Systems, Molecular Biology Information Resource, Department of
Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
-
Altschul, S. F.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5509-5513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pearson, W. R.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2444-2448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wolf, H.,
Modrow, S.,
Motz, M.,
Jameson, B. A.,
Herrmann, G.,
Fertsch, B.
(1988)
Comput. Appl. Biosci.
4,
187-191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bairoch, A. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19 (suppl.)
2241-2245
-
Henikoff, S.,
and Henikoff, J. G.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
243,
574-578[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schuler, G. D.,
Boguski, M. S.,
Stewart, E. A.,
Stein, L. D.,
Gyapay, G.,
Rice, K.,
White, R. E.,
Rodriguez-Tome, P.,
Aggarwal, A.,
Bajorek, E.,
Bentolila, S.,
Birren, B. B.,
Butler, A.,
Castle, A. B.,
Chiannilkulchai, N.,
et al..
(1996)
Science
274,
540-546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kelly, J. J.,
and Alpers, D. H.
(1973)
Biochem. Biophys. Acta
315,
113-120[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Olsen, J.,
Cowell, G. M.,
Konigshofer, E.,
Danielsen, E. M.,
Moller, J.,
Lausten, L.,
Hansen, O. C.,
Welinder, K. G.,
Engberg, J.,
Hunziker, W.,
Spiess, M.,
Sjöström, H.,
Norén, O.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
238,
307-314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kelly, J. J.,
and Alpers, D. H.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
8216-8221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Eggermont, E.
(1981)
Textbook of Gasteroenterology and Nutrition in Infancy, pp. 966-968, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
-
Cowell, G. M.,
Tranum-Jensen, J.,
Sjöström, H.,
and Norén, O.
(1986)
Biochem. J.
237,
455-461[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Danielsen, E. M.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
1599-1605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Quaroni, A.,
Gershon, E.,
and Semenza, G.
(1974)
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
6424-6433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hermans, M. M. P.,
Kroos, M. A.,
van Beeumen, J.,
Oostra, B. A.,
Reuser, A. J. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13507-13512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chandrasena, G.,
Osterholm, D. E.,
Sunitha, I.,
and Henning, S. J.
(1994)
Gene
150,
355-360[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hoefsloot, L. H.,
Hoogeveen-Westerveld, M.,
Kroos, M. A,
von Beeumen, J.,
Reuser, A. J. J.,
Oostra, B. A.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
1697-1704[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kimura, A.,
Takata, M.,
Sakai, O.,
Matsui, H.,
Takai, N.,
Takayanagi, T.,
Nishimura, I.,
Uozumi, T.,
and Chiba, S.
(1992)
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
56,
1368-1370[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sugimoto, M.,
and Suzuki, Y.
(1996)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
119,
500-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dohmen, R. J.,
Strasser, A. W. M.,
Dahlems, U. M.,
Hollenberg, C. P.
(1990)
Gene
95,
111-121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Iwanami, S.,
Matsui, H.,
Kimura, A.,
Ito, H.,
Mori, H.,
Honma, M.,
and Chiba, S.
(1995)
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.
59,
459-463[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tibbot, B. K.,
and Skadsen, R. W.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
30,
229-241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Quezada-Calvillo, L. Sim, Z. Ao, B. R. Hamaker, A. Quaroni, G. D. Brayer, E. E. Sterchi, C. C. Robayo-Torres, D. R. Rose, and B. L. Nichols
Luminal Starch Substrate "Brake" on Maltase-Glucoamylase Activity Is Located within the Glucoamylase Subunit
J. Nutr.,
April 1, 2008;
138(4):
685 - 692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Quezada-Calvillo, C. C. Robayo-Torres, A. R. Opekun, P. Sen, Z. Ao, B. R. Hamaker, A. Quaroni, G. D. Brayer, S. Wattler, M. C. Nehls, et al.
Contribution of Mucosal Maltase-Glucoamylase Activities to Mouse Small Intestinal Starch {alpha}-Glucogenesis
J. Nutr.,
July 1, 2007;
137(7):
1725 - 1733.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Nichols, S. Avery, P. Sen, D. M. Swallow, D. Hahn, and E. Sterchi
The maltase-glucoamylase gene: Common ancestry to sucrase-isomaltase with complementary starch digestion activities
PNAS,
February 4, 2003;
100(3):
1432 - 1437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hirschhorn, M. L. Huie, and J. S. Kasper
Computer assisted cloning of human neutral alpha -glucosidase C (GANC): A new paralog in the glycosyl hydrolase gene family 31
PNAS,
October 15, 2002;
99(21):
13642 - 13646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Jacob, B. Purschel, and H. Y. Naim
Sucrase Is an Intramolecular Chaperone Located at the C-terminal End of the Sucrase-Isomaltase Enzyme Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 23, 2002;
277(35):
32141 - 32148.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Matsushita, M. Takenaka, and H. Ogawa
Porcine Pancreatic alpha -Amylase Shows Binding Activity toward N-Linked Oligosaccharides of Glycoproteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 8, 2002;
277(7):
4680 - 4686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Monroe, C. M. Gough, L. E. Chandler, C. M. Loch, J. E. Ferrante, and P. W. Wright
Structure, Properties, and Tissue Localization of Apoplastic alpha -Glucosidase in Crucifers
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 1999;
119(2):
385 - 398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zheng, D. Lu, and J. E. Sadler
Apical Sorting of Bovine Enteropeptidase Does Not Involve Detergent-resistant Association with Sphingolipid-Cholesterol Rafts
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 15, 1999;
274(3):
1596 - 1605.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Spodsberg, R. Jacob, M. Alfalah, K.-P. Zimmer, and H. Y. Naim
Molecular Basis of Aberrant Apical Protein Transport in an Intestinal Enzyme Disorder
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 22, 2001;
276(26):
23506 - 23510.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|