JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pauly, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pauly, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 50, 33107-33110, December 11, 1998

COMMUNICATION
Copper Stimulates Endocytosis of the Prion Protein*

Peter C. PaulyDagger and David A. Harris§

From the Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Prion diseases result from conformational alteration of PrPC, a cell surface glycoprotein expressed in brain, spinal cord, and several peripheral tissues, into PrPSc, a protease-resistant isoform that is the principal component of infectious prion particles. Although a great deal is known about the pathogenic role of PrPSc, the physiological function of PrPC has remained a mystery. Several lines of evidence have recently suggested the possibility that PrPC may play a role in the metabolism of copper. To further investigate the interaction of PrPC and copper, we have analyzed the effect of this metal ion on the endocytic trafficking of PrPC in cultured neuroblastoma cells. We report here that copper rapidly and reversibly stimulates endocytosis of PrPC from the cell surface. This effect may be physiologically relevant and suggests the hypothesis that PrPC could serve as a recycling receptor for uptake of copper ions from the extracellular milieu.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Prion diseases are neurodegenerative disorders that result from conformational conversion of a normal cell surface glycoprotein (PrPC)1 into a pathogenic isoform (PrPSc) that appears to be infectious in the absence of nucleic acid (1, 2). Although a wealth of information is now available about the role of PrPSc in the disease process, relatively little is known about the normal, physiological function of PrPC. PrPC is expressed in neurons and glia of the brain and spinal cord and at lower levels in several peripheral tissues and in leukocytes (3-7). Its localization on the cell surface would be consistent with roles in cell adhesion and recognition, ligand uptake, or transmembrane signaling. Mice in which the endogenous PrP gene has been ablated do not display any gross anatomical or developmental defects (8) but are reported in some studies to have electrophysiological and structural abnormalities in the hippocampus (9-12), loss of cerebellar Purkinje cells (13), or alterations in circadian rhythm and sleep pattern (14). How these abnormal phenotypes, when present, relate to the normal function of PrPC is unclear. Identifying the function of PrPC may be important in understanding the pathogenesis of prion diseases, because loss of this function as a result of conversion to PrPSc may explain some features of the disorders.

Several new pieces of data suggest that PrPC may play a role in the metabolism of copper. First, the N-terminal half of PrPC contains a series of histidine- and glycine-containing peptide repeats that are capable of binding copper ions. Synthetic peptides or recombinant PrP fragments encompassing the repeats bind copper with a Kd of 5-10 µM, and binding of the metal induces conformational alterations in the polypeptide chain (15-19). Copper also facilitates restoration of protease resistance and infectivity during refolding of guanidine-denatured PrPSc (20). Second, the total content of copper but not of several other metals is only 20% of normal in crude membranes, synaptosomes, and endosomes derived from the brains of Prn-p0/0 mice that contain a disrupted PrP gene (18). This result suggests that PrPC may be a major copper-binding protein in brain. Third, neuronal Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) from Prn-p0/0 mice is less enzymatically active and incorporates less radioactive copper than the enzyme from normal mice; the opposite is true for SOD from transgenic mice that over-express PrPC (21, 22). Neurons cultured from Prn-p0/0 mice are also more sensitive to oxidative insult, perhaps because of reduced SOD activity (21). These observations raise the possibility that PrPC could be involved in delivery of copper ions to SOD and perhaps other cuproenzymes. Finally, PC12 cells selected for resistance to copper toxicity have increased expression of PrPC, suggesting a role for the protein in removal or detoxification of copper (23).

Exactly how copper and PrPC are functionally related is unclear at present. One possibility is that bound copper serves as an essential cofactor for an as yet undetermined enzymatic activity of PrPC, as it does in cuproproteins such as SOD and cytochrome c oxidase (24). By virtue of its presence on the cell surface, PrPC could also function as a sink for chelation of extracellular copper ions or as a carrier protein for uptake and delivery of copper ions to intracellular targets. An important piece of information that may shed light on the functional interaction of PrPC and copper is how the metal affects the cellular localization and trafficking of PrPC. We have shown previously that PrPC is constitutively endocytosed from the plasma membrane via clathrin-coated pits and transits an early endosomal compartment before being recycled back to the cell surface (25-28). We report here that copper has a dramatic effect on this cycle.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Reagents and Antibodies-- Cell culture reagents were from the Tissue Culture Support Center at Washington University. Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC) was prepared as described previously (27). 125NaI was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. All other reagents were from Sigma. Wild-type, Delta 42-65, and Delta 66-91 chicken PrP (chPrP) were recognized with antiserum F35-96 (29); Delta 25-91 chPrP was recognized with antiserum F144-220 (29); and mouse PrP (moPrP) was recognized with antiserum P45-66 (30).

Cell Lines-- N2a mouse neuroblastoma cells stably transfected to express wild-type moPrP, wild-type chPrP, or N-terminally deleted forms of chPrP (Delta 25-91, Delta 42-65, or Delta 66-91) have been described previously (27). Cells were maintained in minimal essential media containing 10% fetal calf serum, nonessential amino acids, penicillin/streptomycin, and 300 µg/ml of geneticin in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air.

Quantitation of Total Cell Surface PrP-- Cells were incubated in Opti-MEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) for 90 min at 37 °C in the presence or absence of CuSO4 and were then labeled for 20 min at 4 °C using 250 µg/ml sulfo-biotin-X-NHS (Calbiochem) in 20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.2). Cell lysates were then subjected to SDS-PAGE, and blots of the gels were probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and developed using ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Endocytosis Assays-- Internalization of PrPC was measured using surface iodination or biotinylation, as described previously (25, 27). In the iodination assay, cells were incubated for 20 min on ice with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline containing 400 µg of glucose, 40 µg of lactoperoxidase, 20 µg of glucose oxidase, and 100 µCi of 125NaI. After the reaction was quenched with phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM tyrosine and 10 mM sodium metabisulfite, cells were incubated in Opti-MEM at 37 °C in the presence or absence of CuSO4 and were then treated with PIPLC (1 unit/ml in Opti-MEM) at 4 °C. PrP was immunoprecipitated from PIPLC incubation media (surface) and cell lysates (internal), analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and quantitated using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).

In the biotinylation assay, cells were labeled for 20 min at 4 °C using 250 µg/ml sulfo-biotin-X-NHS in 20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.2). After the reaction was quenched with 60 mM glycine in Opti-MEM, the cells were washed extensively with phosphate-buffered saline and were then incubated in Opti-MEM at 37 °C in the presence or absence of CuSO4 for various times. Cells were then treated with PIPLC (1 unit/ml in Opti-MEM) for 2 h at 4 °C, and PrP was immunoprecipitated from the PIPLC incubation media and cell lysates. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and blots of the gels were probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and developed using ECL. Films were digitized using an HP ScanJet II scanner, and the bands were quantitated using SigmaScan/Image (Jandel Scientific).

Reversibility and Recycling Assays-- One assay (see Fig. 3, A and B) was designed to measure readjustment of the steady-state distribution of PrP between the internal and external pools after removal of copper. Surface-iodinated PrP was first allowed to internalize for 20 min at 37 °C in the presence of 500 µM CuSO4. Cells were then washed and incubated a second time at 37 °C in Opti-MEM with or without 500 µM CuSO4 for various lengths of time. Surface and internal PrP was scored by PIPLC treatment as described above.

A second assay (see Fig. 3, C and D) was designed to monitor the recycling of internalized PrP molecules back to the cell surface after removal of copper. Surface-iodinated PrP was allowed to internalize for 20 min in the presence of 500 µM CuSO4 as in the first assay. Surface PrP was then stripped with PIPLC (2 h at 4 °C) prior to a second 37 °C incubation in Opti-MEM containing PIPLC with or without 500 µM CuSO4. Cells were then transferred to 4 °C and were incubated for a further 2 h to ensure complete removal of surface PrP. PrP was then immunoprecipitated from the medium and cell lysates as above.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

We have previously characterized the cellular trafficking of PrPC using lines of N2a mouse neuroblastoma cells that have been stably transfected to express either moPrP or chPrP (29, 25-27). We therefore used these cells to examine the effects of copper on the cellular distribution of PrPC. To determine whether copper altered the total amount of PrPC on the cell surface, we treated cells for 90 min with CuSO4 and then biotinylated them with a membrane-impermeable reagent. The amount of biotinylated PrP was then determined by immunoprecipitating PrP from cell lysates, running the immunoprecipitates on SDS-PAGE, and developing blots of the gel with horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin and ECL. We found that at concentrations of 200 µM and above, CuSO4 dramatically reduced the amounts of both moPrP and chPrP on the cell surface (Fig. 1). Similar results were obtained when the amount of surface PrP was assayed by sensitivity to externally applied trypsin (data not shown).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Copper reduces the amount of PrP on the cell surface. Transfected N2a cells expressing either chPrP or moPrP were incubated in Opti-MEM containing the indicated amounts of added CuSO4 for 90 min at 37 °C. The amount of surface PrP was determined by biotinylation of the cells, immunoprecipitation of PrP, and visualization of gel blots with horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin and ECL.

Because PrPC in N2a cells is constitutively endocytosed from the plasma membrane (25, 26), we tested whether the effect of copper on the total amount of surface PrPC could be explained by a stimulatory effect on endocytosis. To measure endocytosis, we surface-iodinated cells at 4 °C, warmed them to 37 °C to initiate internalization, and then scored the amount of iodinated PrP that became inaccessible to externally applied phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC), a bacterial enzyme that cleaves the glycolipid anchor responsible for attaching PrP to the membrane. Using this assay, we found that 500 µM CuSO4 rapidly stimulated internalization of both chPrP (Fig. 2, A and B) and moPrP (not shown). An increase in internalized PrP could be seen after as little as 5 min of incubation, and after 30 min 65% of the protein was internalized, compared with 15% in untreated cells. Stimulation of endocytosis could also be demonstrated using biotinylation rather than iodination to label surface PrP molecules. Using this procedure, the minimum concentration of CuSO4 required to produce an observable increase in internalization was ~100 µM (Fig. 2, C and D). At this concentration, ZnSO4 also stimulated endocytosis of chPrP, but no effect was seen with CoCl2, MnCl2, or FeSO4 at 500 µM (not shown). The effect of copper on PrP was not due to a generalized increased in endocytosis of surface proteins, because 500 µM CuSO4 did not significantly alter internalization of [125I]-transferrin (not shown).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Copper stimulates endocytosis of chPrP. A, N2a cells expressing chPrP were surface-iodinated at 4 °C and were then warmed to 37 °C for the indicated periods of time in the presence or absence of 500 µM CuSO4. Cells were then treated with PIPLC at 4 °C, and chPrP was immunoprecipitated from the PIPLC incubation media (surface, S lanes) and cell lysates (internal, I lanes) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. B, the amount of PrP was quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis of the gel lanes in panel A, and the amount of internal PrP was expressed as a percentage of the total amount of PrP (surface + internal) at each time point. (The time course of internalization in absence of copper is slower in these experiments than in previously published work (25), probably because of differences in the growth conditions of the cells). C, N2a cells expressing chPrP were surface-biotinylated at 4 °C and were then warmed to 37 °C for 5 min in the presence of the indicated concentrations of CuSO4. Cells were then treated with PIPLC at 4 °C, and chPrP was immunoprecipitated from the PIPLC incubation media (surface, S lanes) and cell lysates (internal, I lanes), separated by SDS-PAGE, and visualized by development of gel blots with horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin and ECL. D, the amount of PrP was quantitated by film densitometry of the gel lanes in panel C, and the amount of internal PrP was expressed as a percentage of the total amount of PrP (surface + internal) at each copper concentration. The experiments shown in this figure are representative of at least three similar ones.

We found that the effect of copper was rapidly reversible. Within 15 min of removal of the metal, PrP began to redistribute from the inside to the outside of the cell, as assayed by accessibility to PIPLC (Fig. 3, A and B). By 60 min, a new steady-state was reached at which about 40% of the protein was internal, about the same percentage that is reached after endocytosis in the absence of copper (25). This readjustment of the steady-state distribution is presumably due to the previously documented ability of PrPC molecules to recycle back to surface of N2a cells after they are internalized (25). To directly measure this recycling process, we first incubated surface-iodinated cells for 20 min at 37 °C in the presence of 500 µM CuSO4 to stimulate internalization of PrP and then stripped surface PrP by treatment with PIPLC at 4 °C and finally re-warmed the cells in the presence of PIPLC to release recycled molecules into the medium. Using this procedure (Fig. 3, C and D), we found that when copper was absent from the re-warming medium, almost all of the previously internalized PrP recycled to the surface with a t1/2 of 10 min, consistent with the results of Fig. 3B. Interestingly, when copper was present in the re-warming medium, PrP also returned to the surface, although somewhat more slowly than in the absence of metal (t1/2 = 20 min). This result implies that although copper markedly stimulates the rate of PrP internalization, it has much less effect on the rate of recycling.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Endocytosis of chPrP in response to copper is reversible, and internalized molecules recycle to the cell surface. A, N2a cells expressing chPrP were surface-iodinated on ice and then incubated at 37 °C for 20 min in Opti-MEM containing 500 µM CuSO4. Cells were then chased at 37 °C for the indicated times in Opti-MEM, either in the presence (+ lanes) or absence (- lanes) of 500 µM CuSO4. At the end of the chase period, cells were treated with PIPLC, and chPrP was immunoprecipitated from PIPLC incubation media (surface, S lanes) and cell lysates (internal, I lanes), followed by analysis by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. B, the amount of internal PrP was expressed as a percentage of the total amount of PrP (surface + internal) at each chase time. C, the experiment was the same as that described for panel A, except that surface PrP was stripped with PIPLC after the initial 20-min incubation with CuSO4, and PIPLC was included in the chase medium during the second 37 °C incubation to recover internalized molecules of PrP that returned to the cell surface. D, the amount of internal PrP was expressed as a percentage of the total amount of PrP (surface + internal) at each chase time. The t1/2 for return of internalized PrP to the cell surface is probably overestimated, particularly in the presence of copper, because PIPLC may not have sufficient time to cleave recycled molecules before they are re-internalized. The experiments shown in this figure are representative of at least three similar ones.

Previous studies have implicated the N-terminal peptide repeats of both mammalian and chicken PrP in copper binding (15, 16, 18, 19). We have also shown that this region of the polypeptide chain is essential for efficient endocytosis of PrP (27). We therefore tested the effect of copper on endocytosis of N-terminally deleted forms of chPrP using a surface biotinylation assay (Fig. 4). chPrP normally contains eight hexapeptide repeats (31). Deletion of the N-terminal one-third of the molecule (Delta 25-91), including all eight hexapeptide repeats, almost completely abolished the effect of copper, although the protein underwent some degradation during the course of the experiment (not shown). Deletion of the first four repeats (Delta 42-65) or the last four repeats (Delta 66-91) attenuated but did not eliminate copper-induced internalization of PrP, suggesting that the remaining repeats retain residual copper coordinating activity.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   N-terminally deleted forms of chPrP are endocytosed less efficiently in response to copper. Internalization of wild-type and deleted forms of chPrP expressed in N2a cells was assayed by surface biotinylation, as described in the legend to Fig. 2C. The amount of PrP internalized at 5 min in response to 500 µM CuSO4 was expressed as a percentage of the total amount of PrP (surface + internal). Bars represent the mean ± S.E. of two to six independent experiments.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Our previous studies have shown that PrPC is constitutively endocytosed from the cell surface via clathrin-coated pits and passes through an early endocytic compartment before being returned to the plasma membrane (29, 25-27). We demonstrate here that copper ions rapidly and reversibly stimulate the endocytic arm of this cycle.

It is attractive to speculate that this effect is attributable to binding of copper ions directly to PrPC, because purified, recombinant forms of PrP have been shown to bind copper ions, most likely via the peptide repeats (15, 16, 18, 19). Zinc also binds to PrPC, although less tightly than does copper (32). Consistent with a direct effect of copper on the internalization of PrPC, we find that N-terminally deleted forms of chPrP that are missing some or all of the peptide repeats are less efficiently endocytosed than the full-length protein in response to extracellular copper. One hypothesis to explain how binding of copper could stimulate endocytosis of PrPC is that the metal, by altering the conformation of PrPC, increases the affinity of the protein for a putative endocytic receptor that localizes PrPC in clathrin-coated pits. Because PrPC is attached to the cell surface by a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor, it lacks a cytoplasmic domain that could bind directly to the intracellular components of coated pits. We have therefore postulated the existence of a transmembrane receptor whose extracellular domain binds PrPC via its N-terminal region and whose cytoplasmic domain contains signals for interacting with adapter molecules and clathrin (27, 28).

Enhanced internalization of PrPC requires copper concentrations in the range of 100-500 µM, which is 10-50-fold greater than the estimated Kd for binding of copper to synthetic PrP peptides and recombinant PrP synthesized in bacteria (15, 16, 18, 19). This discrepancy may be due, in part, to binding of copper ions to other molecules such as amino acids that are present in the Opti-MEM medium used for our experiments, a phenomenon that would lower the concentration of free copper. It is also possible that the effect of copper on endocytosis occurs by binding to sites on cell-expressed PrPC that are distinct from the ones characterized on bacterially derived or synthetic PrP or to sites on other molecules involved in PrPC internalization. In any case, the average copper concentration in brain has been estimated to be ~100 µM and may be even higher in specific brain regions (19, 33). Therefore, the endocytic response we have described here is potentially relevant from a physiological standpoint.

One attractive hypothesis is that PrPC serves as a receptor for uptake of copper ions from the extracellular milieu. PrPC might bind copper ions on the cell surface and then deliver them to an endocytic compartment within which the bound ions dissociate from PrPC and are transferred to other copper-carrier proteins that move the ions into the cytosol. PrPC would then return to the cell surface to begin another cycle. This proposed function for PrPC is analogous to that of the transferrin receptor in uptake of iron (34), with the exception that the metal ions bind directly to the receptor in the case of PrPC rather than to a protein carrier comparable with transferrin. Although plasma membrane copper transporters and cytoplasmic copper chaperones have been identified in yeast and humans (35), the molecular mechanism of copper uptake by mammalian cells is still poorly understood (36). Further exploration of the interaction between PrPC and copper ions at the cellular level may shed important light on this subject.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Jonathan Gitlin for helpful discussions of copper metabolism and members of the Harris laboratory for comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants AG12925 and AG16462 from the National Institutes of Health (to D. A. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by Postdoctoral Training Grant 5T32NS07071 and NRSA Award 1F32NS10467, both from the National Institutes of Health, and by a fellowship from the McDonnell Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology at Washington University.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-4690; Fax: 314-362-7463; E-mail: dharris{at}cellbio.wustl.edu.

The abbreviations used are: PrPC, cellular isoform of the prion protein; PrPSc, scrapie isoform of the prion protein; PrP, prion protein; chPrP, chicken prion protein; moPrP, mouse prion protein; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PIPLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Prusiner, S. B. (1997) Science 278, 245-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Prusiner, S. B., Scott, M. R., DeArmond, S. J., and Cohen, F. E. (1998) Cell 93, 337-348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Bendheim, P. E., Brown, H. R., Rudelli, R. D., Scala, L. J., Goller, N. L., Wen, G. Y., Kascsak, R. J., Cashman, N. R., and Bolton, D. C. (1992) Neurology 42, 149-156[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Manson, J., West, J. D., Thomson, V., McBride, P., Kaufman, M. H., and Hope, J. (1992) Development 115, 117-122[Abstract]
  5. Harris, D. A., Lele, P., and Snider, W. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4309-4313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Moser, M., Colello, R. J., Pott, U., and Oesch, B. (1995) Neuron 14, 509-517[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Dodelet, V. C., and Cashman, N. R. (1998) Blood 91, 1556-1561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Büeler, H., Fischer, M., Lang, Y., Fluethmann, H., Lipp, H.-P., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B., Aguet, M., and Weissmann, C. (1992) Nature 356, 577-582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Collinge, J., Whittington, M. A., Sidle, K. C., Smith, C. J., Palmer, M. S., Clarke, A. R., and Jefferys, J. G. (1994) Nature 370, 295-297[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Manson, J. C., Hope, J., Clarke, A. R., Johnston, A., Black, C., and MacLeod, N. (1995) Neurodegen. 4, 113-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Colling, S. B., Collinge, J., and Jefferys, J. G. R. (1996) Neurosci. Lett. 209, 49-52[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Colling, S. B., Khana, M., Collinge, J., and Jefferys, J. G. R. (1997) Brain Res. 755, 28-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Sakaguchi, S., Katamine, S., Nishida, N., Moriuchi, R., Shigematsu, K., Sugimoto, T., Nakatani, A., Kataoka, Y., Houtani, T., Shirabe, S., Okada, H., Hasegawa, S., Miyamoto, T., and Noda, T. (1996) Nature 380, 528-531[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Tobler, I., Gaus, S. E., Deboer, T., Achermann, P., Fischer, M., Rulicke, T., Moser, M., Oesch, B., McBride, P. A., and Manson, J. C. (1996) Nature 380, 639-642[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Hornshaw, M. P., McDermott, J. R., and Candy, J. M. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 207, 621-629[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Hornshaw, M. P., McDermott, J. R., Candy, J. M., and Lakey, J. H. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 993-999[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Miura, T., Horii, A., and Takeuchi, H. (1996) FEBS Lett. 396, 248-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Brown, D. R., Qin, K. F., Herms, J. W., Madlung, A., Manson, J., Strome, R., Fraser, P. E., Kruck, T., Vonbohlen, A., Schulzschaeffer, W., Giese, A., Westaway, D., and Kretzschmar, H. (1997) Nature 390, 684-687[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Stöckel, J., Safar, J., Wallace, A. C., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 7185-7193[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. McKenzie, D., Bartz, J., Mirwald, J., D., O., Marsh, R., and Aiken, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25545-25547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Brown, D. R., Schulzschaeffer, W. J., Schmidt, B., and Kretzschmar, H. A. (1997) Exp. Neurol. 146, 104-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Brown, D. R., and Besinger, A. (1998) Biochem. J. 334, 423-429
  23. Brown, D. R., Schmidt, B., and Kretzschmar, H. A. (1998) J. Neurochem. 70, 1686-1693[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Linder, M. C., and Goode, C. A. (1991) Biochemistry of Copper, Plenum Press, New York
  25. Shyng, S. L., Huber, M. T., and Harris, D. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15922-15928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Shyng, S. L., Heuser, J. E., and Harris, D. A. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 1239-1250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Shyng, S. L., Moulder, K. L., Lesko, A., and Harris, D. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14793-14800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Harris, D. A., Gorodinsky, A., Lehmann, S., Moulder, K., and Shyng, S.-L. (1996) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 207, 77-93[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Harris, D. A., Huber, M. T., van Dijken, P., Shyng, S.-L., Chait, B. T., and Wang, R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1009-1016[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Lehmann, S., and Harris, D. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24589-24597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Harris, D. A., Falls, D. L., Johnson, F. A., and Fischbach, G. D. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7664-7668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Pan, K. M., Stahl, N., and Prusiner, S. B. (1992) Protein Sci. 1, 1343-1352[Abstract]
  33. Smith, R. M. (1983) in Neurobiology of the Trace Elements (Dreosti, I. E., and Smith, R. M., eds), Vol. 1, pp. 1-40, Human Press, Clifton, NJ
  34. Ciechanover, A., Schwartz, A. L., Dautry-Varsat, A., and Lodish, H. F. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 9681-9689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Valentine, J. S., and Gralla, E. B. (1997) Science 278, 817-818[Free Full Text]
  36. Vulpe, C. D., and Packman, S. (1995) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 15, 293-322[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. W. Brazier, P. Davies, E. Player, F. Marken, J. H. Viles, and D. R. Brown
Manganese Binding to the Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2008; 283(19): 12831 - 12839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. Linden, V. R. Martins, M. A. M. Prado, M. Cammarota, I. Izquierdo, and R. R. Brentani
Physiology of the Prion Protein
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 673 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Klewpatinond, P. Davies, S. Bowen, D. R. Brown, and J. H. Viles
Deconvoluting the Cu2+ Binding Modes of Full-length Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 1870 - 1881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. S. Lee, L. D. Raymond, B. Schoen, G. J. Raymond, L. Kett, R. A. Moore, L. M. Johnson, L. Taubner, J. O. Speare, H. A. Onwubiko, et al.
Hemin Interactions and Alterations of the Subcellular Localization of Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36525 - 36533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. M. Norstrom, M. F. Ciaccio, B. Rassbach, R. Wollmann, and J. A. Mastrianni
Cytosolic Prion Protein Toxicity Is Independent of Cellular Prion Protein Expression and Prion Propagation
J. Virol., March 15, 2007; 81(6): 2831 - 2837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Kalia, S. Kumari, R. Chadda, M. M. Hill, R. G. Parton, and S. Mayor
Arf6-independent GPI-anchored Protein-enriched Early Endosomal Compartments Fuse with Sorting Endosomes via a Rab5/Phosphatidylinositol-3'-Kinase-dependent Machinery
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2006; 17(8): 3689 - 3704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
U. Merle, W. Stremmel, and R. Gessner
Influence of Homozygosity for Methionine at Codon 129 of the Human Prion Gene on the Onset of Neurological and Hepatic Symptoms in Wilson Disease.
Arch Neurol, July 1, 2006; 63(7): 982 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
P. T. Schramm, C. J. Johnson, N. E. Mathews, D. McKenzie, J. M. Aiken, and J. A. Pedersen
Potential Role of Soil in the Transmission of Prion Disease
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 64(1): 135 - 152.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
L. Varela-Nallar, E. M. Toledo, L. F. Larrondo, A. L. B. Cabral, V. R. Martins, and N. C. Inestrosa
Induction of cellular prion protein gene expression by copper in neurons
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): C271 - C281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. R. Thompsett, S. R. Abdelraheim, M. Daniels, and D. R. Brown
High Affinity Binding between Copper and Full-length Prion Protein Identified by Two Different Techniques
J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 42750 - 42758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. R. Taylor, N. T. Watt, W. S. S. Perera, and N. M. Hooper
Assigning functions to distinct regions of the N-terminus of the prion protein that are involved in its copper-stimulated, clathrin-dependent endocytosis
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2005; 118(21): 5141 - 5153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. T. Watt, D. R. Taylor, A. Gillott, D. A. Thomas, W. S. S. Perera, and N. M. Hooper
Reactive Oxygen Species-mediated {beta}-Cleavage of the Prion Protein in the Cellular Response to Oxidative Stress
J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 35914 - 35921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Novakofski, M. S. Brewer, N. Mateus-Pinilla, J. Killefer, and R. H. McCusker
Prion biology relevant to bovine spongiform encephalopathy
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(6): 1455 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Li and D. A. Harris
Mammalian Prion Protein Suppresses Bax-induced Cell Death in Yeast
J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 17430 - 17434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Redecke, W. Meyer-Klaucke, M. Koker, J. Clos, D. Georgieva, N. Genov, H. Echner, H. Kalbacher, M. Perbandt, R. Bredehorst, et al.
Comparative Analysis of the Human and Chicken Prion Protein Copper Binding Regions at pH 6.5
J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13987 - 13992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Drisaldi, J. Coomaraswamy, P. Mastrangelo, B. Strome, J. Yang, J. C. Watts, M. A. Chishti, M. Marvi, O. Windl, R. Ahrens, et al.
Genetic Mapping of Activity Determinants within Cellular Prion Proteins: N-TERMINAL MODULES IN PrPC OFFSET PRO-APOPTOTIC ACTIVITY OF THE DOPPEL HELIX B/B' REGION
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55443 - 55454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
E. Langella, R. Improta, and V. Barone
Checking the pH-Induced Conformational Transition of Prion Protein by Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Effect of Protonation of Histidine Residues
Biophys. J., December 1, 2004; 87(6): 3623 - 3632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Nishina, S. Jenks, and S. Supattapone
Ionic Strength and Transition Metals Control PrPSc Protease Resistance and Conversion-inducing Activity
J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 2004; 279(39): 40788 - 40794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. M. Cereghetti, A. Negro, E. Vinck, M. L. Massimino, M. C. Sorgato, and S. Van Doorslaer
Copper(II) Binding to the Human Doppel Protein May Mark Its Functional Diversity from the Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36497 - 36503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. E. Jones, S. R. Abdelraheim, D. R. Brown, and J. H. Viles
Preferential Cu2+ Coordination by His96 and His111 Induces {beta}-Sheet Formation in the Unstructured Amyloidogenic Region of the Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32018 - 32027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Li, J. Dong, and D. A. Harris
Cell Surface Expression of the Prion Protein in Yeast Does Not Alter Copper Utilization Phenotypes
J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 29469 - 29477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. Gustiananda, J. R. Liggins, P. L. Cummins, and J. E. Gready
Conformation of Prion Protein Repeat Peptides Probed by FRET Measurements and Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Biophys. J., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 2467 - 2483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. T. Parkin, N. T. Watt, A. J. Turner, and N. M. Hooper
Dual Mechanisms for Shedding of the Cellular Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11170 - 11178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Morante, R. Gonzalez-Iglesias, C. Potrich, C. Meneghini, W. Meyer-Klaucke, G. Menestrina, and M. Gasset
Inter- and Intra-octarepeat Cu(II) Site Geometries in the Prion Protein: IMPLICATIONS IN Cu(II) BINDING COOPERATIVITY AND Cu(II)-MEDIATED ASSEMBLIES
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11753 - 11759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.