Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 50, 33610-33618, December 11, 1998


The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SOP1 and SOP2 Genes, Which Act in Cation Homeostasis, Can Be Functionally Substituted by the Drosophila lethal(2)giant larvae Tumor Suppressor Gene*

Katrin LarssonDagger , Florian Böhl§, Ingrid SjöströmDagger , Noreen AkhtarDagger , Dieter Strand§, Bernard M. Mechler§, Reiner GrabowskiDagger , and Lennart AdlerDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Microbiology, Göteborg University, Box 462, SE 40530 Göteborg, Sweden and the § Department of Developmental Genetics, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

By complementation of a salt-sensitive mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we cloned the SOP1 gene, encoding a 114.5-kDa protein of 1033 amino acids. Cells deleted for SOP1 exhibited sensitivity to sodium stress, but showed no sensitivity to general osmotic stress. Following exposure of sop1Delta cells to NaCl stress, the intracellular Na+ level and the Na+/K+ ratio rose to values significantly higher than in wild type cells. Deletion of SOP2, encoding a protein sharing 54% amino acid identity with Sop1p, produced only slight Na+ sensitivity. Cells carrying a sop1Delta sop2Delta double deletion became, however, hypersensitive to Na+ and exhibited increased sensitivity also to Li+ and K+, suggesting involvement of both SOP1 and SOP2 in cation homeostasis. The predicted amino acid sequences of Sop1p and Sop2p show significant homologies with the cytoskeletal-associated protein encoded by the Drosophila lethal(2)giant larvae tumor suppressor gene. Immunolocalization of Sop1p revealed a cytoplasmic distribution and cell fractionation studies showed that a significant fraction of Sop1p was recovered in a sedimentable fraction of the cytosolic material. Expression of a Drosophila l(2)gl cDNA in the sop1Delta sop2Delta strain partially restored the Na+ tolerance of the cells, indicating a functional relationship between the Sop proteins and the tumor suppressor protein, and a novel function in cell homeostasis for this family of proteins extending from yeast to human.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Ions are continuously transported across the cell membrane, the net flux being adjusted to satisfy the requirement for a cytosol rich in potassium and scarce in sodium. Control of the intracellular concentration of these major monovalent cations is crucial to generate a biochemically-functional intracellular milieu. Since in natural environments Na+ is generally abundant and K+ scarce, transport must occur against concentration gradients. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has identified a number of cation transporters which interact with multiple regulatory components in a largely unidentified fashion (1). In particular, a major system involved in K+ uptake is constituted by the TRK1- and TRK2-encoded membrane proteins (2-4), which appear to contribute to the uptake of K+ in symport with protons (1). The proton gradient providing the driving force for secondary transport is generated by the PMA1-encoded plasma membrane ATPase, a major membrane protein whose activity shows little sensitivity to high extracellular NaCl concentration (5). The TRK1/TRK2-dependent transport system also permits influx of Na+, while under NaCl stress, the uptake system has the capacity of increasing its selectivity for K+ over Na+ (6).

In yeast cells, influx of Na+ is counteracted by Na+ efflux, the primary pathway being mediated by the P-type ATPase encoded by the PMR2A gene (also known as ENA1) (6, 7). The PMR2A gene is part of a gene cluster, containing tandem repeats of 2-5 nearly identical genes (8). However, only PMR2A appears to be significantly expressed (7, 8), and transcription of this gene is induced in cells subjected to Na+ or Li+ stress or cells exposed to alkaline pH (7). An additional sodium transporter encoded by the NHA1 gene and acting as a putative Na+/H+ antiporter was recently identified in S. cerevisiae (9). Disruption of the NHA1 gene displays only minor effects in wild type cells but elicits increased Na+ sensitivity in S. cerevisiae cells lacking the PMR2 genes.

To identify components that are crucial for salt tolerance, the isolation of recessive, salt-sensitive mutations is an obvious approach. However, the only S. cerevisiae mutant characterized so far by this procedure is the calcineurin-defective strain isolated by Mendoza et al. (10). These authors demonstrated that the protein phosphatase calcineurin, is involved in Na+ tolerance and is required for (i) induced expression of the PMR2A gene and (ii) modulating the K+ uptake system to display increased K+ versus Na+ discrimination. Further evidence that protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation regulate Na+ tolerance in S. cerevisiae is provided by the increased cellular tolerance to sodium ions following inactivation of the PPZ1 and PPZ2 encoded serine-threonine phosphatases (11). In addition, increased dosage of the YCK1 or YCK2 gene, encoding yeast homologues of casein kinase I, enhances sodium tolerance (12), while cells defective in either of the a or b subunits of the yeast casein kinase II homologue become specifically sensitive to high concentrations of Na+ (13).

By isolation and functional complementation a NaCl-sensitive mutant, we cloned the SOP1 gene. Here we report the initial characterization of the gene product and show that the predicted sequence of Sop1p lacks apparent membrane spanning regions or other characteristics of previously isolated determinants for Na+ tolerance, and displays significant homology with the Drosophila p127 protein encoded by the lethal(2)giant larvae (l(2)gl) tumor suppressor gene and its homologues in mouse and man. Our results demonstrate that SOP1 and a second related gene, designated as SOP2, are involved in regulating cation homeostasis in S. cerevisiae. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the expression of a Drosophila l(2)gl cDNA sequence in the S. cerevisiae sop1Delta sop2Delta double mutant can partially restore Na+ tolerance. Our data provide evidence for functional conservation between the Drosophila p127 protein and its yeast homologues, and reveal involvement of l(2)gl proteins in a new aspect of cell homeostasis.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Strains, Media, and Yeast Genetic Methods-- S. cerevisiae strains and genotypes are listed in Table I. Cells were routinely grown at 30 °C in either YEPD medium supplemented with 120 µg/ml adenine or in a synthetic yeast nitrogen base (YNB) medium (Difco) supplemented with 2% glucose and necessary amino acids and nucleotides, to a final concentration of 120 µg/ml for each. The procedure used to isolate the osg4 mutant has been described previously (14). Cell density was estimated by measuring optical density at 610 nm in 1-cm cuvettes (OD610). Standard yeast genetic methods were used throughout (15, 16).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Yeast strains

Escherichia coli DH5alpha (17) was used for cloning and amplification of DNA. Bacterial cultures were grown in 2× LB medium (18).

Plasmids-- The YCp50-based yeast genomic library (19) was used for complementation of the osg4 mutant. Transformants were screened on YNB agar plates containing 1.4 M NaCl, and plasmids from complemented cells were amplified in E. coli. Restriction fragments of a 7.5-kb1 insert of a YCp50 plasmid complementing the osg4 salt sensitivity were subcloned in the 2µ-based shuttle vector pRS326 (20). A 4.7-kb HindIII/BamHI fragment retaining the complementing capacity was subcloned into pRS316 to generate the pH/B316 plasmid. Overexpression of the SOP1 gene was achieved by subcloning the 4.7-kb HindIII/BamHI fragment into the YEplac195 multicopy vector (21), yielding the YEpH/B vector.

To construct a plasmid that expresses a c-Myc-tagged SOP1, an XmaI-SalI fragment containing three copies of the 11-amino acid human c-Myc epitope was removed from the pBsMYC plasmid. This product was subcloned into pBSH/B (pBluescript KS+ containing the HindIII/BamHI fragment) at the Bst11071 site, 190 bp upstream the stop codon of the SOP1 ORF, generating an in-frame fusion. The final construct was verified by sequencing. A 2.0-kb HindIII/SphI fragment containing the c-Myc-tagged carboxyl-terminal half of the SOP1 gene was then excised and subcloned into the multicopy plasmid YEpH/B, or the single-copy plasmid pH/B316, generating the YEpH/Bmyc and pH/B316myc plasmids, respectively.

To express the Drosophila l(2)gl gene in S. cerevisiae, a construct for the constitutive expression of the l(2)gl gene was generated as follows. A 5269-bp EcoRI fragment of the cDNA Ec173 inserted in pGEM4 (22) was subcloned into the polylinker of the pYX212 and pYX112 plasmids (R&D Systems Inc.), and constructs were controlled by restriction analysis and sequencing.

Disruption of SOP1 and SOP2-- The 4.7-kb HindIII/BamHI fragment harboring the SOP1 gene subcloned into pBluescriptKS+ was cut with BglII and NheI, and the resulting 2.3-kb internal fragment of SOP1 was replaced with the URA3 or LEU2 selectable marker. The resulting constructs were amplified, and the HindIII/BamHI fragment was used to transform S. cerevisiae W303-1A and W303-1B by the LiAc method (23) to generate sop1::URA3 and sop1::LEU2 null mutants.

Deletion of the SOP2 gene was accomplished by the long flanking homology PCR-targeting technique (24, 25). In the first step, a set of primers (5'-TTCCGCTTCATAGGAGGAGA-3' and 5'-GGGGATCCGTCGACCTGCAGCGTACCATTTATAAAATTTTTGTAT -3') was used to amplify 300 bp of genomic DNA from S. cerevisiae W303, immediately upstream of the second codon of the SOP2 ORF. A second set (5'-AACGAGCTCGAATTCATCGATGATATAGTCCATAAATAGTTTTTA-3' and 5'-ACGGTTCATCATTCGGAAAA-3') was used to amplify a 377-bp fragment immediately downstream of the SOP2 ORF stop codon. The 5' end of the primers adjacent to the insertion site carried 25 nucleotide extensions homologous to the 5' and 3' region of the his5MX6 disruption cassette of plasmid pFA6a-his5MX6 (26). In the second PCR reaction, pFA6a-his5MX6 was used as template and the 5'- and 3'-homologous regions of the first PCR reaction were fused to the disruption cassette by serving as primers, together with the upstream forward and downstream reverse primers of the flanking regions, thus producing the ORF targeting cassette. This cassette was transformed into a diploid S. cerevisiae W303 strain, and independent transformants were selected for sporulation and verification of SOP2 replacement. Diploid transformants able to grow on his- plates were sporulated, and the progeny from a complete tetrad was examined by PCR for correct integration of the disruption cassette into one of the SOP2 alleles. A set of primers (forward, 5'-GGGGTACCCTCTGCGCCACCCACAC TTA-3'; reverse, 5'-TTCTGCAGATTCCGTATTTGCCAGTT-3') hybridizing upstream and downstream, respectively, of the disruption cassette was used to amplify chromosomal DNA. The length of the PCR products was verified by agarose-gel electrophoresis, as was the length of the SphI and XbaI restriction fragments of the PCR product.

Determination of Stress Tolerance-- Tolerance to salt or osmotic stress was examined by spotting 10-fold dilutions (10 µl) of an overnight culture diluted to OD610 ~1.0 onto YEPD plates (pH 6.9, unless otherwise stated) supplemented with NaCl, LiCl, KCl, sorbitol, or glycerol, as indicated in the text. Tolerance to heat stress and N-starvation was performed as described by Sass et al. (27). To monitor tolerance to oxidative stress, cells grown overnight in YEPD medium were diluted into fresh YEPD medium to yield an OD610 of approximately 0.2. The cells were left to adjust to the new environment for 2 h, whereupon H2O2 was added to a final concentration of 5 mM. Cultures were then incubated at 30 °C and growth monitored. To determine tolerance to acidic or alkaline conditions, 10-fold dilutions of exponentially growing cells were spotted onto YEPD agar plates buffered at pH 4.8 or 8.6, and growth was assessed after incubation at 30 °C for 24 h.

Determination of Intracellular Na+ and K+-- Cells were grown overnight at 30 °C in 500 ml of YEPD medium to mid-exponential phase. The culture was divided into three portions that were diluted with fresh medium to a cell density of 5 × 107 cells. These cultures were centrifuged at 3500 × g for 5 min and then re-suspended in 40 ml of YEPD medium supplemented with 0, 0.7, or 1.0 M NaCl. After incubation for 6 h, triplicate samples of 5 ml of cell suspension were filtered through 0.22-µm filters and washed with three volumes of iso-osmotic CaCl2. The filters were transferred to 5 ml of 20 µM Ca(OH)2 and extracted by heating for 10 min at 95 °C. The cell suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant stored at -20 °C until analyzed. Na+ and K+ concentrations of the supernatants were measured with K+ or Na+ specific electrodes (F2312K potassium selectrode and G502Na sodium selectrode; Radiometer Denmark).

Northern Blot Analysis-- Exponentially growing cells were transferred to fresh YEPD medium and the same medium supplemented with 1.0 M NaCl or 1.5 M sorbitol, and incubated for 4 h before isolation and blotting of RNA, as described previously (28). The SOP1 probe used was the 1.1-kb NheI fragment labeled by random priming (29), using hexanucleotides and Klenow fragment from Boehringer Mannheim and [32P]ATP from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. An actin probe was used for loading control (28).

Subcellular Fractionation of Sop1p-- Strains harboring plasmid YEpH/Bmyc or pH/B316myc and control plasmids without insert were grown to OD610 0.5-1.0 in YEPD medium. Cells were washed by centrifugation and resuspended in twice the pellet volume of resuspension buffer (R-buffer), containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, complete protease inhibitor mixture (Boehringer Mannheim; 1 tablet/50 ml of cell extract), and either 0.1 M or 1 M KCl. Four volumes of glass beads were added, and each suspension was vortexed four times consecutively for 30 s at 4 °C, with incubation on ice between each vortex. Unlyzed cells were removed by centrifugation at 500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The lysate was then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h in a Beckman TL-100 ultracentrifuge. The pellets were resuspended in 100 mM KCl R-buffer and the lysate desalted by gel filtration (Microcolumns, Bio-Rad). Aliquots containing equal amounts of cell material were boiled for 1 min in Laemmli SDS buffer (16).

Western Blot Analysis-- Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE in 10% acrylamide gels at 125 V for 1.5 h using a Mini-PROTEAN II electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad) and transferred overnight to Hybond membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), according to the manufacturers' protocols. The membranes were first incubated for 1 h at room temperature in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 0.9% NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 (Buffer A), supplemented with 1% milk powder and then for 2 h with mouse anti-c-Myc antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) diluted 1:5000 in Buffer A with 1% milk powder. The anti-p127 C39 antibodies were as described by Strand et al. (30). Membranes were washed once for 5 min in Buffer A, twice for 5 min in 0.2% SDS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.9% NaCl (Buffer B), and twice for 5 min again in Buffer A. The membranes were probed for 1 h with 1:20,000 dilution of anti-mouse peroxidase-linked antibodies (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in Buffer A containing 5% milk powder. The blots were washed as before, and antibody detection was performed using ECL labeling system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Immunofluorescence-- Cells were fixed in growth media by the addition of formaldehyde to a final concentration of 3.7%, and cells were prepared for immunofluorescence according to Rose et al. (31). Mouse anti-c-Myc antibodies and sheep anti-mouse Ig-fluorescein, F(ab')2 fragment secondary antibodies were from Boehringer Mannheim. Glass slides were coated with poly-L-lysine, Mr >300,000 (Sigma), to promote cell adhesion. Anti-c-Myc antibody concentration was 0.1 mg/ml, and the concentration of anti-mouse Ig-fluorescein was 0.02 mg/ml. Cells were stained with diamidinophenylindole (1 mg/ml) for 1 min and covered by mounting medium (50 mg of p-phenylenediamine in 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 9) and 45 ml of glycerol). Coverslips were then applied and sealed with nail polish.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Complementation of a Salt-sensitive Yeast Mutant Identifies the SOP1 Gene-- We previously reported the isolation of a set of osmosensitive (osg) mutants of S. cerevisiae (14). Among these mutants we also identified a strain (osg4) that proved specifically sensitive to sodium chloride rather than being generally osmosensitive. Transformation of this mutant with a YCp50-based yeast genomic library (19) resulted in the isolation of clones that restored growth of the mutant at high salinity (Fig. 1A), and restriction endonuclease analysis identified a 4.7-kb HindIII/BamHI DNA fragment, which fully complemented the mutation. Subcloning, partial sequencing, and searching of DNA data bases tentatively identified a single large open reading frame, assigned YPR032W by the Yeast Genome Sequencing Project (EMBL accession no. Z49274). The 3102-bp open reading frame is localized to the left arm of chromosome XVI and encodes a putative protein of 1033 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 114.5 kDa. The codon bias (0.054) predicts a low expression of the gene, as indicated by the weak signal observed on a Northern blot (data not shown). Since this gene restored the salt sensitivity of the mutant, it was named SOP1 for sodium protection.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, complementation of the salt sensitivity of the osg4 mutation by SOP1 in the YCp50 centromeric vector. Growth on YPED medium containing 1.4 M NaCl is illustrated for the wild type W 303-1A strain, the mutant (osg4), and the mutant cells transformed with an empty vector or a SOP1-containing vector. B, I, partial restriction map of the 4.7-kb DNA of the genomic SOP1 locus showing the SOP1-coding region (arrow). II, replacement construct using the LEU2 selectable marker. III, the SOP1::myc construct, which contains an insert encoding three tandem repeats of the c-Myc epitope (black box) in the Bst11071 site, 190 bp upstream the SOP1 stop codon.

The Predicted Sop1p Shows Homology to Another S. cerevisiae Protein and to the p127 Protein Encoded by the l(2)gl Tumor Suppressor Gene of Drosophila-- Homology searches revealed that Sop1p possesses 54% amino acid identity with another S. cerevisiae protein, encoded by the open reading frame YBL106C (EMBL accession no. Z35867). We designated this gene SOP2, since it shows structural and functional (see below) similarities to SOP1. Significant similarity scores were also recovered (Fig. 2) between the yeast proteins and the p127 protein encoded by the Drosophila l(2)gl tumor suppressor gene (22, 32), and its homologues from mouse (MGL) (33) and man (HUGL) (34). A well conserved feature in this family of proteins is the presence of WD-40-like motifs in the NH2-terminal half of the proteins (Fig. 2). These motifs were first described for the beta  subunit of trimeric GTP-binding proteins (35, 36), and might represent domains for protein-protein interactions.


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Alignment of the SOP1 and SOP2 predicted amino acid sequences with the sequence of the p127 protein encoded by the Drosophila l(2)gl gene (DLGL) as well as the mouse (MGL1) and human (HUGL) homologues. The comparison was generated by the BestFit and Gap programs of the GCG Wisconsin package. Two WD-40-like motifs are indicated by solid bars.

The sop1Delta Mutant Displays No General Stress Sensitivity but Is Specifically Sensitive to Na+ Stress-- To determine the phenotype of a cell lacking the SOP1 gene, null alleles were constructed by one-step gene disruption (37). A BglII/NheI fragment of the SOP1 open reading frame was replaced by the LEU2 (Fig. 1B) or URA3 marker gene, and the HindIII/SpeI fragment of the resulting constructs was used to disrupt the SOP1 locus of the W303-1A and W303-1B strains. Southern blot analysis of the genomic DNA prepared from the putative disruptants confirmed the correct replacement of the SOP1 gene with the marker gene constructs (data not shown).

The sop1Delta mutant was screened for osmotic sensitivity on agar plates supplemented with NaCl, KCl, LiCl, or sorbitol. Of these solutes, only NaCl strongly restricted the growth of the null mutant (Fig. 3), whereas KCl and the non-ionic agent sorbitol caused no significant decrease in the growth of the mutant compared with that of the wild type. Since Li+ and Na+ ions are relatively similar, it is generally believed that these ions share the same uptake and efflux systems in the cell (6). Interestingly, we found that SOP1 inactivation conferred only minor changes in Li+ tolerance (Fig. 3), suggesting that SOP1 is highly specific for Na+ ion homeostasis of S. cerevisiae.


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Growth of the wild type, W303-1A strain, the sop1Delta , sop2Delta , and sop1Delta sop2Delta mutants at various solute concentrations. Cells were grown overnight in YEPD medium, adjusted to OD610 = 1, and serial 10-fold dilutions spotted onto YEPD plates (pH 6.9), without solute addition (YEPD) or supplemented with 0.3 M NaCl, 0.7 M NaCl, 0.7 M NaCl (pH 4.5), 1 M sorbitol, 0.7 M KCl, or 150 mM LiCl, as indicated. Plates were incubated for 3 days at 30 °C prior to photography.

To examine whether the sop1Delta strain was sensitive to other forms of stress, we compared the response of mutant and wild type cells to heat stress, nitrogen starvation, oxidative stress, and high and low pH. None of these conditions produced any growth difference between wild type and mutant cells, indicating that a loss of the SOP1 gene causes no general stress response defect (data not shown). However, the Na+ sensitivity of the sop1Delta mutant proved strongly pH-dependent, as indicated by a considerably stronger tolerance to Na+ at pH 4.5 than at 6.9 (Fig. 3A).

SOP1 Expression Is Not Controlled by Environmental Salinity, and Na+ Tolerance Is Not Enhanced by Increased Gene Dosage-- As SOP1 inactivation confers sensitivity to NaCl, it was of interest to examine whether the expression of the gene is controlled by environmental salinity. Northern blot analysis revealed a low abundance of SOP1 transcript in cells grown in basal medium and no increased amount of transcript under salt stress conditions (data not shown). We also observed that overexpression of SOP1 gene from its own promoter on a YEplac195 multicopy vector caused no increase in Na+ tolerance by comparison to control cells, carrying a vector without insert (data not shown). Likewise, overexpression of SOP1 exerted no effect on the Na+ tolerance of a pmr2A null mutant lacking the Na+ extruding ATPase activity, or could not bypass the salt sensitivity of either cnb1 cells (10) lacking calcineurin or cmd1-5 cells (38) carrying a mutant form of calmodulin unable to bind Ca2+.

Na+ Accumulates in sop1Delta Cells at High Extracellular NaCl Concentrations-- To examine the effect of SOP1 inactivation on Na+ and K+ homeostasis, the intracellular levels of these ions were measured in mutant and wild type cells after conditioning the cells for 6 h in basal medium or in the same medium containing either 0.7 M or 1.0 M NaCl. The intracellular Na+ concentration in the mutant cells increased strongly with salinity to become about 3 times higher (0.4 M) than in wild type cells maintained in medium containing 1 M NaCl (Fig. 4). The K+ concentration in sop1Delta cells decreased proportionally so that the internal K+ level reached 40% (0.06 M) of the wild type level at the highest salinity. Thus, under these conditions, not only the Na+ concentration but also the Na+/K+ ratio became unfavorably high, reaching a ratio of 5 in the mutant cells, while staying at about 1 in wild type cells. These observations suggest a defective ion transporting potential of the mutant at high salinity.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Intracellular concentration of Na+ (open bars) and K+ (shaded bars) in the sop1Delta mutant and the W303-1A wild type strain after conditioning for 6 h in YEPD or YEPD plus 0.7 M or 1.0 M NaCl. Triplicate samples taken from each culture varied within ±10%.

Possible Genetic Interaction between SOP1 and PMR2A-- Since the PMR2A gene is reported to be the most important determinant of Na+ tolerance in S. cerevisiae (1, 6, 39), we examined whether we could detect a genetic interaction between SOP1 and PMR2A. For this purpose, a sop1Delta ::LEU2 strain was mated to a pmr2A::HIS3 strain and the resultant diploid cells were sporulated and dissected. Half of the 36 tetrads dissected produced four viable spore clones, including double null mutant segregants. The NaCl sensitivity of the sop1Delta ::LEU2 pmr2A::HIS3 clones proved identical to that of a pmr2A single mutant strain (Fig. 5). The absence of enhancement of the NaCl sensitivity of a pmr2A strain by a simultaneous inactivation of SOP1 indicates that SOP1 may contribute to the same transport mechanisms as PMR2.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Genetic interaction between SOP1 and PMR2A. A wild type CRY1 strain, a pmr2-2 mutant, a sop1Delta mutant, and a sop1Delta pmr2-2 double mutant were cultured overnight in liquid YEPD medium. The OD610 was adjusted to 1 and serial 10-fold dilutions spotted onto YEPD plates supplemented with 0.1 M NaCl or 0.3 M NaCl, as indicated. Plates were incubated for 2 days at 30 °C prior to photography.

Cytoplasmic Distribution of Sop1p-- To determine the subcellular localization of Sop1p, three tandem repeats encoding the c-Myc epitope were fused in frame near the COOH terminus of Sop1p and expressed from a single-copy (pH/B316myc) or a multicopy plasmid (YEpH/Bmyc). The SOP1::myc derivative fully complemented the salt sensitivity of the sop1Delta null mutant, indicating that the c-Myc-tagged Sop1p is functional. Immunofluorescence staining of cells expressing Myc-tagged Sop1p from pH/B316myc showed that Sop1p is present in the cytoplasm of the yeast cells (Fig. 6A), and as revealed by diamidinophenylindole staining absent from the nucleus (data not shown). When examining the stronger signal obtained from the YEpH/Bmyc plasmid, the protein appeared to be preferentially distributed toward the periphery of the cell (data not shown). In all cases the detected cytoplasmic staining was much stronger than in control cells, lacking the Myc epitope.


View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Immunofluorescence localization of epitope-tagged Sop1p. The sop1Delta strain transformed with a SOP1::myc centromeric vector (A, left) and the wild type W303-1A harboring a vector without insert (A, right) were grown to early exponential phase in YEPD medium, harvested, fixed with formaldehyde, and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy using anti-c-Myc and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies. B, subcellular localization of Sop1p. Cleared cell lysates of the sop1Delta mutant, transformed with YEpH/Bmyc, containing 100 mM or 1 M KCl were centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. Samples from the resulting supernatant and pellet were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to Hybond membranes, and the blot incubated with anti-c-Myc antibody and visualized by ECL. A sop1Delta mutant transformed with an empty vector gave no band at the SOP1::myc position (data not shown). Pellet and supernatant refer to the two fractions obtained after the 100,000 × g centrifugation.

We also used subcellular fractionation to determine the intracellular localization of Sop1p expressed from YEpH/Bmyc. The distribution of Sop1p between the supernatant and the 100,000 × g pellet fraction was semiquantitatively assessed by immunoblotting (Fig. 6B), demonstrating that the protein was present in both the supernatant and the high speed pellet fraction. The nature of the association of Sop1p with the pelletable structures was further analyzed by increasing the ion strength. Treatment with M KCl readily solubilized most of the Sop1p contained in the particulate fraction, suggesting that Sop1p is non-covalently associated with other components present in the pelleted material. Experiments expressing SOP1::myc from a single-copy plasmid (pH/B316myc) gave qualitatively similar results, although with a marked background staining due to the much weaker signal (data not shown).

Deletion of the SOP2 Gene and Characterization of sop2Delta and sop1Delta sop2Delta Mutants-- To obtain further clues as to the role of SOP1 in cation homeostasis we deleted its homologue SOP2 (YBL106C), using homology-directed replacement by PCR (25). Isolated sop2Delta ::HIS3 clones were verified by PCR and examined for sensitivity to high concentrations of Na+, Li+, K+, sorbitol, or glycerol. This examination revealed a slight Na+-specific sensitivity of the sop2Delta mutant that was much less pronounced than for the sop1Delta strain (Fig. 3). However, unlike sop1Delta cells, mutants lacking SOP2 displayed obvious sensitivity to Li+.

To produce a sop1Delta sop2Delta double null mutant strain, a sop1Delta ::LEU2 mutant was mated with a sop2Delta ::HIS3 strain and the resultant diploid sporulated and subjected to tetrad dissection. His+ Leu+ segregants were isolated and the expected deletion of the SOP1 and SOP2 loci verified by PCR. All of the confirmed sop1Delta sop2Delta mutated cells grew more slowly than wild type cells in basal YEPD medium and showed hypersensitivity toward Na+ (Fig. 3). The double mutant also exhibited sensitivity toward solutes other than NaCl, as demonstrated by the attenuated growth at increased concentrations of LiCl and KCl. However, the tolerance toward the non-ionic osmoticum sorbitol of sop1Delta sop2Delta was identical to that of wild type cells. These observations clearly indicate that both SOP1 and SOP2 play a role in cation homeostasis in S. cerevisiae.

Complementation of the sop1Delta and the sop1Delta sop2Delta Phenotype by the Drosophila l(2)gl Gene-- The strong salt sensitivity of the sop1Delta and the sop1Delta sop2Delta strains provided an assay to explore the functional relationship between the SOP1 and SOP2 gene products and the p127 protein encoded by the l(2)gl tumor suppressor gene of Drosophila. To this end we introduced the cDNA Ec173 encoding the p127 protein (22) in the multicopy pYX212 plasmid under control of the constitutive yeast TPI promoter, and determined whether the l(2)gl cDNA would complement the sop1 or sop1sop2 mutations. As shown in Fig. 7A, Western blot analysis confirmed that p127 is expressed by the l(2)gl+-transformed sop1Delta sop2Delta S. cerevisiae cells. Only slight complementation by p127 of the yeast sop1Delta mutation was obtained (data not shown), whereas p127 clearly decreased the Na+ sensitivity of the sop1Delta sop2Delta cells (Fig. 7, B and C). Three independently isolated sop1Delta sop2Delta clones were transformed with the l(2)gl cDNA, all being complemented to a similar extent, while mutants transformed with an empty vector showed no improved salt tolerance. The complementation of the yeast double mutant by the Drosophila l(2)gl gene indicates functional conservation of this family of proteins across species borders.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   A, immunoblot showing expression of the Drosophila p127 protein in the S. cerevisiae transformants. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to Hybond membranes, and the blot was incubated with anti-p127 antisera and immunoreactive species detected by ECL. B, complementation of the NaCl sensitivity of the sop1Delta sop2Delta double mutant. The W303-1A wild type strain and the sop1Delta sop2Delta mutant were transformed with the Drosophila l(2)gl cDNA inserted in the multicopy pYX212 plasmid, or the same plasmid without insert. Serial dilutions was produced as described in Fig. 3 and spotted onto YEPD plates of 0 M and 0.3 M NaCl. C, complementation shown in liquid medium. The transformed W303-1A wild type strain and sop1Delta sop2Delta mutant were grown overnight in YNB medium. Sidearm flasks containing 25 ml of YEPD medium plus 0.1 M NaCl were inoculated with overnight cultures to give a final OD610 of 0.1. The flasks were incubated with agitation at 30 °C. Growth was monitored by sidearm measurement of OD610 of W303-1A + pYX212 (bullet ), sop1Delta sop2Delta plus pYX212 containing the l(2)gl cDNA construct (), and sop1Delta sop2Delta plus pYX212 (triangle ).


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Role of Sop1p in Cellular Tolerance toward Na+-- By complementing the NaCl sensitivity of a previously isolated mutant, we cloned the SOP1 gene, encoding a 114.5-kDa cytosolic protein that is required for growth at high Na+ concentrations. Although deletion of SOP1 strongly decreases Na+ tolerance, SOP1 overexpression results in no protection toward increased concentration of Na+. In this respect, SOP1 differs from the series of HAL genes (1, 40, 41), which improve Na+ tolerance in a dose-dependent fashion. SOP1 differs also from the genes involved in the general osmoregulatory response. The sop1Delta cells remain osmoresistant, and the production and accumulation of the compatible solute, glycerol, is similar to that of wild type cells at high salinity (data not shown).

The strict Na+ sensitivity of sop1Delta cells and the enhanced Na+ levels detected in a null mutant subjected to exogenous NaCl stress suggest that inactivation of SOP1 leads to an increased influx and/or a decreased efflux of Na+, due to defective transporter function(s). Considering the drastic effect on cellular Na+ sensitivity caused by the SOP1 deletion, it is possible that that Sop1p may contribute to the transporter system controlled by the major determinant for Na+ tolerance in S. cerevisiae, the PMR2-encoded system. This conjecture agrees with the observation that deletion of SOP1 in an pmr2A background does not aggravate the Na+ tolerance profile of the pmr2A mutant (Fig. 5), suggesting direct or indirect interactions of Sop1p with the Na+ pumping ATPase. Furthermore, the strong pH dependence of the Na+ sensitivity of sop1Delta mutants indicates that the cells might have become dependent upon the alternative Na+ exporting system, the NHA1-encoded Na+/H+ antiporter (9). Since the activity of this system becomes gradually inhibited by increasing pH, cells with an defective PMR2A function will display a drastic decrease of the Na+ tolerance at high pH.

The coordinate regulation of both PMR2A-encoded Na+ efflux system and TRK1-encoded Na+/K+ influx system is controlled by a signaling pathway involving Ca2+/calmodulin and the protein phosphatase, calcineurin (8, 10). This signaling system appears to play a crucial role in modulating intracellular Na+ and K+ concentrations following exposure of cells to NaCl stress, and it is conceivable that Sop1p may interact with components of this signaling system. However, overexpression of SOP1 was unable to rescue the Na+ sensitivity of cmd1-5 or cnb1 mutants, indicating that Sop1p does not operate downstream from these components in the salt stress signaling system controlled by these genes.

Relationship between the Yeast SOP Encoded Proteins and the Drosophila p127 Protein Encoded by the l(2)gl Tumor Suppressor Gene-- The deduced amino acid sequences of Sop1p and its close yeast homologue Sop2p show a significant about 50% similarity, extending over the entire coding sequence, with the p127 protein encoded by the l(2)gl tumor suppressor gene of Drosophila and its homologues from mouse (MGL) and man (HUGL). Biochemical investigations and cell fractionation studies have previously shown that both p127 and HUGL are intracellular proteins diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm and associated with the cytoskeletal matrix underlying the plasma membrane (30, 34, 42). Neoplastic transformation of Drosophila larvae resulting from the inactivation of the l(2)gl gene may stem from a partial disruption of the cytoskeletal network, leading to reduced potential for signal processing and alteration in the maintenance of cell polarity and cell architecture (43). Biochemical and immunological evidence show that p127 forms high molecular mass complexes made of homo-oligomers (44) with which are associated other proteins. Among the proteins interacting with p127, a few have been identified, including non-muscle myosin II (45) and a putative serine kinase, whose activation leads to a specific phosphorylatation of p127, resulting in the dissociation of myosin II from p127 without affecting p127 oligomerization (46). Several potential motifs for protein-protein interaction, such as repeated heptad units of hydrophobic amino acids (42) and motifs showing partial homology to the WD-40 repeats are evolutionary conserved among the members of the l(2)gl protein family. The conservation of two putative WD-40 motifs in p127, as well as in the other homologues, suggests that the Sop1p, like p127 and HUGL, may be a component of large protein complexes. Our subcellular fractionation studies revealing that a significant fraction of Sop1p is associated with a particulate fraction of the yeast cells support this contention. In particular, the sedimentable Sop1p proteins could be readily solubilized by treatment with 1 M KCl, suggesting that Sop1p association within this material is dependent upon electrostatic interactions.

Additional information on possible functional overlaps between Sop1p and p127 was provided by the immunolocalization studies, which indicated a predominantly cytoplasmic localization of Sop1p, with a preferential distribution to the periphery of the cell. The overall intracellular distribution of Sop1p is highly reminiscent to that previously described for p127 (30) and HUGL (34). Indication for a true functional relationship between the yeast and Drosophila proteins derives, however, from the results obtained by analyzing double mutant cells in which SOP1 was deleted together with its isogene SOP2. While deletion of SOP2 alone produced only slight Na+/Li+ sensitivity, the sop1Delta sop2Delta mutant exhibited a dramatic salt sensitivity, which was partly restored by expressing the Drosophila l(2)gl gene in the double mutant cells. In addition, the much stronger phenotype of the double mutant, as compared with the single mutants, indicates synergistic effects and functional relationships in cation homeostasis between Sop1p and Sop2p. Plausibly, SOP1 and SOP2 are involved in different but overlapping functions in ion homeostasis; SOP1 is able to compensate well for loss of SOP2, while SOP2 is unable to adequately correct for a loss of SOP1.

A Link between Cytoskeletal Organization and Cation Homeostasis-- A possible relationship between the Sop proteins and the yeast cytoskeleton is suggested by a recent entry in the SGD data base of the SRO7 gene, which corresponds to SOP1. The SRO7 gene is one of the nine different isolated multicopy suppressors of a rho3 cell polarity defect (47). The GTP-binding Rho proteins are implicated in regulating various actin-based events that are involved in cytoskeletal polarity (48). At non-permissive temperature, conditional rho3 mutants lose cell polarity during bud formation and display randomized actin and delocalized chitin (49). These findings were interpreted as an involvement of Rho3p in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton for proper surface growth of the yeast bud. A plausible mechanism for explaining the suppression of the rho3 defect by increased dosage of SRO7/SOP1 would be that Sop1p acts downstream of Rho3 by stabilizing the polarized actin skeleton. Among additional genes that were also identified as rho3 multicopy suppressors (47), the CDC42 and BEM1 genes deserve special mention because BEM1 encodes a bud site assembly protein that binds to Cdc24p, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor of the CDC42 encoded GTPase (48). A further indication of a possible link between the polar organization of the cytoskeletal elements and ion homeostasis stems from the recent observation that certain temperature-sensitive alleles of CDC24 exhibit specific sensitivity to Na+ and Li+ (50). Interestingly, there are precedents in higher eukaryotes for a close relationship between ion transporters and the underlying cytoskeleton. In particular, the gastric parietal cell H+/K+ ATPase (51) and the anion exchanger of the red cell (52) are associated with the membrane cytoskeleton via ankyrin, a component of the plasma membrane cytoskeleton. There is also evidence that interaction between the cadherin-catenin complex and the membrane cytoskeleton is required for localization of Na+/K+ ATPases to sites of cell adhesion in epithelial cells (53, 54). In addition, Na+/K+ exchangers of the NHE1 subtype are reported to be downstream targets of Cdc42p in fibroblasts (55), and, interestingly, neoplastic transformation of these cells is correlated with an increased Na+/K+ exchange activity (56). Although the consequences of the establishment of cell polarity may be different in yeast and metazoan cells, the general mechanisms controlling cell polarity and cell architecture may be highly conserved among eukaryotes, even for phylogenetically distant cells (48). Our results showing a functional complementation of the sop1Delta sop2Delta defect by the Drosophila l(2)gl tumor suppressor gene provide evidence for phylogenetic conservation of a previously unrecognized function of a family of proteins linked to maintenance of the cytoskeletal architecture. The Na+ sensitivity of strains lacking SOP1, or both SOP1 and SOP2, provides an avenue for further exploring the physiological role of these molecules and uncovering new biological functions.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. P. Sunnerhagen for providing the pFA6a-hisGMX6 plasmid, Dr. H. Rudolph for the cmd1-3 and pmr2-2 strains, Dr. G. Fink for the Ycp50 library and the cnb1 strain, and Dr. C. Schüller for the pBsMYC plasmid. We acknowledge the help of C. Carlsson in subcloning and disruption of the SOP1 gene and Drs. S. Hohmann and R. Bill for valuable comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Swedish National Science Research Council, the Swedish Council for Forestry and Agricultural Research, the Swedish Research Council for Engineering Sciences, and by EU Programs BIOL-CT 950161, ERB4061 PL95-0014, and BMH1-CT94-1572.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 46-31-7732500; Fax: 46-31-7732599; E-mail: Lennart.Adler{at}gmm.gu.se.

The abbreviations used are: kb, kilobase pair(s); bp, base pair(s); ORF, open reading frame; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Serrano, R., Marquez, J. A., and Rios, G. (1997) in Yeast Stress Responses (Hohmann, S., and Mager, W. H., eds), pp. 147-169, Landes Co., Heidelberg, Germany
  2. Gaber, R. F., Styles, C. A., and Fink, G. R. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 2848-2859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ko, C. H., Buckley, A. M., and Gaber, R. F. (1990) Genetics 125, 305-312[Abstract]
  4. Ramos, J., Alijo, R., Haro, R., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 249-252[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Serrano, R. (1991) The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Genome Dynamics, Protein Synthesis, and Energetics, Vol. 1, pp. 523-585, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  6. Haro, R., Banuelos, M. A., Quintero, F. J., Rubio, F., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (1993) Physiol. Plant. 89, 868-874[CrossRef]
  7. Garciadeblas, B., Rubio, F., Quintero, F. J., Banuelos, M. A., Haro, R., and Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 236, 363-368[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Wieland, J., Nietsche, A. M., Strayle, J., Steiner, H., and Rudolph, H. K. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3870-3882[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Prior, C., Potier, S., Souciet, J.-L., and Sychrova, H. (1996) FEBS Lett. 387, 89-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mendoza, I., Rubio, F., Rodriguez-Navarro, A., and Pardo, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8792-8796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Posas, F., Camps, M., and Arino, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13036-13041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Robinson, L., Hubbard, E., Graves, P., DePaoli-Roach, A., Roach, P., Kung, C., Haas, D., Hagedorn, C., Goebl, M., Culbertson, M. R., and Carlson, M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 28-32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bidwai, A. P., Reed, C. J., and Glover, C. V. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10395-10404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Larsson, K., Eriksson, P., Ansell, R., and Adler, L. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 10, 1101-1111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Sherman, F., Fink, G. R., and Hicks, J. B. (1983) Methods in Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  16. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  17. Hanahan, D. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 166, 577-580
  18. Miller, J. (1973) Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  19. Rose, M. D., Novick, P., Thomas, J. H., Botstein, D., and Fink, G. R. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 60, 237-243[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sikorski, R. S., and Hieter, P. (1989) Genetics 122, 19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gietz, R. D., and Sugino, A. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 74, 527-534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Jacob, L., Opper, M., Metzroth, B., Phannavong, B., and Mechler, B. M. (1987) Cell 50, 215-225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Ito, H., Funkuda, Y., Murata, K., and Kimura, A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 153, 163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Amberg, D. C., Botstein, D., and Beasley, E. M. (1995) Yeast 11, 1275-1280[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Wach, A. (1996) Yeast 15, 259-265
  26. Wach, A., Brachat, A., Alberti-Segui, C., Rebischung, C., and Philippsen, P. (1997) Yeast 13, 1065-1075[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Sass, P., Field, J., Nikawa, J., Toda, T., and Wigler, M. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 9303-9307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Eriksson, P., Andre, L., Ansell, R., Blomberg, A., and Adler, L. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 17, 95-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1989) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  30. Strand, D., Raska, I., and Mechler, B. M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 1345-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rose, M. D., Winston, F., and Hieter, P. (1990) Methods in Yeast Genetics. A Laboratory Course Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  32. Mechler, B. M., McGinnis, W., and Gehring, W. J. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 1551-1557[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Tomutsune, D., Shoji, H., Wakamutsu, Y., Kondoh, H., and Takahashi, N. (1993) Nature 365, 69-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Strand, D., Unger, S., Corvi, R., Hartenstein, K., Schenkel, H., Kalmers, A., Merdes, G., Neumann, B., Krieg-Schneider, F., Coy, J. F., Poutska, A., Schwab, M., and Mechler, B. M. (1995) Oncogene 11, 291-301[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. van de Voorn, L., and Ploegh, H. L. (1992) FEBS Lett. 307, 131-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripad, R., and Smith, T. F. (1994) Nature 371, 297-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Rothstein, R. J. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101, 202-211[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Davis, T. N., Urdea, M. S., Masiarz, F. R., and Thorner, J. (1986) Cell 47, 423-431[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Haro, R., Garciadeblas, B., and Rodriguéz-Navarro, A. (1991) FEBS Lett. 291, 189-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Serrano, R. (1994) in Biochemical and Cellular Mechanisms of Stress Tolerance in Plants (Cherry, J. H., ed), Vol. H86, pp. 371-380, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  41. Ferrando, A., Kron, S. J., Rios, G., Fink, G. F., and Serrano, R. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5470-5481[Abstract]
  42. Török, I., Hartenstein, K., Kalmes, A., Schmitt, R., Strand, D., and Mechler, B. (1993) Oncogene 8, 1537-1549[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Mechler, B. M. (1994) J. Biosci. 19, 537-556
  44. Jakobs, R., deLorenzo, C., Spiess, E., Strand, D., and Mechler, B. M. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 264, 484-496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Strand, D., Jakobs, R., Merdes, G., Neumann, B., Kalmes, A., Heid, H. W., Husmann, I., and Mechler, B. M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 1361-1373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kalmes, A., Merdes, G., Neumann, B., Strand, D., and Mechler, B. M. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 1359-1368[Abstract]
  47. Matsui, Y., and Toh-e, A. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5690-5699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Drubin, D., and Nelson, J. (1996) Cell 84, 335-344[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Imai, J., Toh-e, A., and Matsui, Y. (1996) Genetics 142, 359-369[Abstract]
  50. White, W. H., and Johnson, D. I. (1997) Genetics 147, 43-55[Abstract]
  51. Smith, P. R., Bradford, A. L., Joe, E. H., Angelides, K. J., Benos, D. J., and Saccomani, G. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C63-C70[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Luna, E. J., and Hitt, A. L. (1992) Nature 258, 955-964
  53. Hu, R.-J., Moorthy, S., and Bennett, V. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 1069-1080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Hammerton, R. W., Krzeminski, K. A., Mays, R. W., Wollner, D. A., and Nelson, W. J. (1991) Science 254, 847-850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Hooley, R., Yu, C.-Y., Symons, M., and Barber, D. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6152-6158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Kaplan, D. L., and Boron, W. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4116-4124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Cunningham, K. W., and Fink, G. R. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 351-363[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
A. Ruiz and J. Arino
Function and Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ENA Sodium ATPase System
Eukaryot. Cell, December 1, 2007; 6(12): 2175 - 2183.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
H.-O. Park and E. Bi
Central Roles of Small GTPases in the Development of Cell Polarity in Yeast and Beyond
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2007; 71(1): 48 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
I. Wadskog, A. Forsmark, G. Rossi, C. Konopka, M. Oyen, M. Goksor, H. Ronne, P. Brennwald, and L. Adler
The Yeast Tumor Suppressor Homologue Sro7p Is Required for Targeting of the Sodium Pumping ATPase to the Cell Surface
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2006; 17(12): 4988 - 5003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
B. L. Grosshans, A. Andreeva, A. Gangar, S. Niessen, J. R. Yates III, P. Brennwald, and P. Novick
The yeast lgl family member Sro7p is an effector of the secretory Rab GTPase Sec4p
J. Cell Biol., January 3, 2006; 172(1): 55 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
X. Zhang, P. Wang, A. Gangar, J. Zhang, P. Brennwald, D. TerBush, and W. Guo
Lethal giant larvae proteins interact with the exocyst complex and are involved in polarized exocytosis
J. Cell Biol., July 18, 2005; 170(2): 273 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
I. Wadskog, C. Maldener, A. Proksch, F. Madeo, and L. Adler
Yeast Lacking the SRO7/SOP1-encoded Tumor Suppressor Homologue Show Increased Susceptibility to Apoptosis-like Cell Death on Exposure to NaCl Stress
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 1436 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
E. de Nadal, F. Calero, J. Ramos, and J. Ariño
Biochemical and Genetic Analyses of the Role of Yeast Casein Kinase 2 in Salt Tolerance
J. Bacteriol., October 15, 1999; 181(20): 6456 - 6462.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement