Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinman, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinman, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 52, 34691-34695, December 25, 1998


Bile Acid Uptake via the Human Apical Sodium-Bile Acid Cotransporter Is Electrogenic*

Steven A. WeinmanDagger §, Michael W. CarruthDagger , and Paul A. Dawsonparallel **

From the Dagger  Department of Physiology and Biophysics and § Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555 and the parallel  Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Intestinal absorption of bile acids depends on a sodium-bile acid cotransport protein in the apical membrane of the ileal epithelial cell. Transport is Na+-dependent, but the Na+-bile acid stoichiometry and electrogenicity of transport are not known. Studies in whole intestine, isolated cells, and ileal membrane vesicles have been unable to resolve this issue because transport currents are small and can be obscured by other ionic conductances and transport proteins present in these membranes. In this study, the human apical sodium-bile acid transporter was expressed in stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells that lack other bile acid transporters. The Na+-dependent transport of a fluorescent bile acid analog, chenodeoxycholyl-Nepsilon -nitrobenzoxadiazol-lysine, was monitored by fluorescence microscopy in single, voltage-clamped cells. Bile acid movement was bidirectional and voltage-dependent with negative intracellular voltage-stimulating influx. A 3-fold reduction in extracellular Na+ produced a negative 52 mV shift of the flux-voltage relationship, consistent with a 2:1 Na+:bile acid coupling stoichiometry. No Na+- or voltage-dependent uptake was observed in nontransfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. These results indicate that the cotransport of bile acids and Na+ by human apical sodium-bile acid transporter is electrogenic and bidirectional and is best explained by a 2:1 Na+:bile acid coupling stoichiometry. These results suggest that membrane potential may regulate bile acid transport rates under physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Enterohepatic circulation of bile acids requires efficient bile acid absorption by the ileum. The first step in ileal bile acid transport is mediated by a Na+-bile acid transporter (ASBT)1 located at the epithelial cell apical brush border membrane (1). After uptake, the bile acids are transported transcellularly to the basolateral membrane (2) and secreted into the portal circulation by a sodium-independent anion exchange mechanism (3). The apical sodium-bile acid transporter cDNA has been isolated from the hamster (4), rat (5), and human (6) and is homologous to the hepatic Na+-coupled bile acid transporter (7). Analysis of mRNA and protein expression revealed that ASBT is also expressed on the apical brush border membrane of renal proximal tubule cells (8) and apical membranes of cholangiocytes lining the large bile duct units (9, 10). Whereas ASBT is known to transport both Na+ and bile acid, the Na+-bile acid stoichiometry and electrogenicity of transport are unknown (2), and previous studies testing for electrogenic transport have produced conflicting results (11-15), although the tentative consensus was that ileal Na+-bile acid cotransport is electroneutral (2). Electrogenicity of other transporters, particularly Na+-glucose and Na+-amino acid, has been definitively demonstrated by measuring the currents associated with transport (16-18). This has not been possible for the bile acid transporters because next flux is small and the detergent properties of the bile acids may activate ion channels (19). We have therefore taken an alternative approach, directly monitoring the movement of a fluorescent bile acid analog in single, voltage-clamped CHO cells transfected with human ASBT. We have for the first time been able to definitively demonstrate electrogenicity and assess Na+:bile acid stoichiometry for a Na+-bile acid transporter.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cell Culture and Bile Acid Uptake Assays-- CHO-K1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in medium A that consisted of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 4500 mg/liter D-glucose and Ham's F-12 medium, 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc.). Stable overexpression of the hASBT was achieved by cotransfecting the cells with pCMV5-hASBT (6) and pSV3Neo using the calcium phosphate procedure as described (20). Individual colonies were expanded in 24-well plates and screened for hASBT expression using [3H]taurocholate uptake assays. Functional expression of the hASBT protein in these cells has been previously demonstrated (21).

[3H]Taurocholic acid (2.0-2.6 Ci/mmol) and [2,4-3H]cholic acid (27.5 Ci/mmol) were purchased from NEN Life Science Products. Unlabeled taurocholate and cholate were purchased from Sigma. For [3H]bile acid uptake assays, CHO-hASBT cells were incubated in medium B, which consisted of a modified Hanks' balanced salt solution containing 137 mM NaCl or 137 mM choline chloride (6).

Measurement of Fluorescent Bile Acid Analog Accumulation-- The fluorescent bile acid analogs cholylglycylamidofluorescein (CGamF), cholyl-Nepsilon -nitrobenzoxadiazol-lysine (C-NBD-L), and chenodeoxycholyl-Nepsilon -nitrobenzoxadiazol-lysine (CDC-NBD-L) were generous gifts of Drs. A. Hofmann and C. Schteingart. Uptake specificity and time course of uptake were measured in individual cells with a quantitative fluorescence imaging system, as described previously (22). Cells were superfused at 37 °C with FBA-containing HEPES-buffered Na+-Ringer solution (144 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM NaH2PO4, 1.25 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4), and cell fluorescence was measured at 5-10-s intervals. The total Na+ concentration was approximately 150 mM. Where indicated, Na+ was quantitatively replaced with tetramethylammonium.

Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy and Whole Cell Patch Clamp-- Simultaneous whole cell patch clamp and fluorescence microscopy were performed with a photometer-based quantitative fluorescence system as described previously (23). CHO-hASBT cells were grown in medium A on 5 × 5-mm glass coverslips and exposed to sodium butyrate (5 mM) for 16 h. Cells were pre-equilibrated with 1 µM CDC-NBD-L in HEPES-buffered Na+-Ringer solution for 30 min. Fluorescent cells were then subjected to whole cell patch clamp in the continued presence of CDC-NBD-L at 37 °C. From an initial holding potential of -30 mV, intracellular (pipette) voltage was changed at 1-2-min intervals to -90, or +30 mV as indicated. Cell fluorescence was measured at 10-s intervals during these voltage steps. The patch pipette was filled with a solution containing 115 mM potassium gluconate, 30 mM KCl, 0.47 mM CaCl2, 2.1 mM MgSO4, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, and 3 mM Na2ATP, pH 7.2. The total Na+ concentration was approximately 12 mM. In some experiments the bath solution Na+ concentration was reduced by substitution of NaCl with tetramethylammonium chloride.

Analysis of Stoichiometry-- Stoichiometry was determined by comparing the effects of Na+ gradients and voltage on transport. For a cotransport process with n mol of Na+ transported for each mol of univalent negatively charged bile acid, the free energy change associated with transport (Delta G) depends on the Na+ gradient, the bile acid gradient, and the voltage according to the following relationship.
&Dgr;G=nRT <UP>ln</UP> (<UP>Na</UP><SUB>i</SUB>/<UP>Na</UP><SUB>o</SUB>)+RT <UP>ln</UP> (<UP>B</UP><SUB>i</SUB>/<UP>B</UP><SUB>o</SUB>)+nFV−FV (Eq. 1)
where n is the number of moles of Na+ transported per mol of bile acid, R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, Nai and Nao are the Na+ concentrations inside and outside the cell, Bi and Bo are the bile acid concentrations inside and outside the cell, F is the Faraday constant, and V is the transmembrane voltage. The reversal potential, Vrev, is that voltage at which Delta G is zero and is simply as follows.
V<SUB><UP>rev</UP></SUB>=RT/F(1−n) · (n <UP>ln</UP> (<UP>Na</UP><SUB>i</SUB>/<UP>Na</UP><SUB>o</SUB>)+<UP>ln</UP> (<UP>B</UP><SUB>i</SUB>/<UP>B</UP><SUB>o</SUB>)) (Eq. 2)
If Nao is suddenly reduced by a factor of x and assuming that all other parameters initially remain constant, we would predict a change in Vrev according to Equation 3.
&Dgr;V<SUB><UP>rev</UP></SUB>=RT/F(1−n) · (n <UP>ln</UP>(x)) (Eq. 3)


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Expression of the Human ASBT in CHO Cells-- The expression plasmid pCMV5-hASBT was stably transfected into CHO cells, and clonal cell lines were selected. As seen in Fig. 1A, the uptake of taurocholate and cholate were saturable and Na+-dependent. There was little appreciable bile acid uptake in the absence of Na+ or in the parental CHO cells (data not shown). At 137 mM Na+, analysis of the concentration dependence of bile acid transport revealed apparent Km values of 12 and 37 µM for taurocholate and cholate, respectively. Fig. 1B shows that these data fit the Hill equation well with Hill coefficients near 1.0 for both taurocholate and cholate, suggesting that bile acid binding sites are either single or noninteracting in the transporter complex.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, expression and bile acid uptake in human ASBT transfected CHO cells. Taurocholate (filled symbols) and cholate (open symbols) uptake in human ASBT transfected CHO cells. On day 0, 3.8 × 105 cells/35-mm dish were plated in medium A. On day 1, the cells were refed medium A containing 10 mM sodium butyrate. After 20 h, the dishes were washed and incubated with 200 µl of Hanks' balanced salt solution containing either 137 mM NaCl (circles) or 137 mM choline chloride (squares) and the indicated concentration of taurocholate (0.7 Ci/mmol) or cholate (1.4 Ci/mmol) for 10 s at 37 °C. The cell monolayers were then washed and processed to determine cell-associated protein and radioactivity. The uptake assays were performed in duplicate. Na+-dependent uptake was calculated by subtracting the background uptake in the presence of choline (squares) from the total uptake in the presence of sodium (circles). Eadie-Hofstee analysis revealed Km values of 12 and 37 µM for taurocholate and cholate, respectively. The apparent Vmax values were 2740 and 2815 pmol min-1 mg cell protein-1 for taurocholate and cholate, respectively. B, Hill transformation of the Na+-dependent uptake rates for taurocholate (filled symbols) and cholate (open symbols). The best fit Hill coefficient was 1.05 for taurocholate and 1.09 for cholate.

Fluorescent Bile Acid Uptake-- Previous studies of the FBA, CGamF, C-NBD-L, and CDC-NBD-L have shown that uptake is specific for bile acid transporting cells such as hepatocytes and displays Michaelis-Menten kinetics (22). To determine whether these FBA are also substrates for the hASBT, we measured accumulation of these analogs after a 5-min incubation in either parental CHO-K1 or transfected CHO-hASBT cells. As shown in Fig. 2A, CHO-hASBT cells efficiently transported both NBD-labeled bile acids, C-NBD-L and CDC-NBD-L, but failed to take up the fluorescein-labeled bile acid, CGamF. There was no appreciable uptake of any FBA in the parental CHO-K1 cells, and uptake was entirely Na+-dependent (data not shown). Initial uptake rates of CDC-NBD-L were saturable with a Km of 13.1 µM (Fig. 2B) and a Hill coefficient of 1.07 (Fig. 2C). These kinetic constants were close to those observed for taurocholate.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Fluorescent bile acid uptake by the hASBT. A, accumulation of fluorescent bile acid analogs by CHO K1 and CHO-hASBT cells. Cells were exposed to the indicated FBA (2 µM) for 5 min, and single cell fluorescence was measured with a quantitative imaging system. Each bar represents mean ± S.E. for 74-104 cells. B, concentration dependence of CDC-NBD-L uptake. Initial uptake rate was measured in individual cells during the first 30 s of exposure to bile acid at the indicated concentration. Nonlinear least square fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation is represented by the curve (Km 13.1 µM, Vmax 319.7 fluorescence units·min-1 cell-1). Each point represents the mean initial uptake rate in 10 cells. C, Hill transformation of CDC-NBD-L uptake. The best fit Hill coefficient was 1.07.

Transport during Voltage Clamp-- CHO-hASBT cells were pre-equilibrated for 30 min with 1 µM CDC-NBD-L and subjected to whole cell patch clamp in the continued presence of the FBA. The cells were clamped at three different voltages, cell fluorescence was measured at 10-s intervals, and the rate of change of fluorescence with time was compared at the different clamp voltages. Fig. 3A demonstrates an example of cell fluorescence changes in one cell during this protocol. At -30 mV, fluorescence was relatively constant, but at -90 mV the cell fluorescence increased over time and at +30 mV fluorescence decreased. Control experiments were performed to exclude the possibility that fluorescence changes were due to other voltage-dependent phenomena such as increasing cell volume or fluorophore leak. No voltage-dependent fluorescence changes were observed with either a nontransported fluorescent dye, carboxyfluorescein, or with CDC-NBD-L when the bath temperature was cooled to 10 °C to inhibit activity of the membrane transporter (data not shown). These results demonstrate that voltage-induced fluorescence changes result from either inward or outward transport of CDC-NBD-L. Fig. 3B shows the results from 10 cells clamped under this protocol. CDC-NBD-L movement was bidirectional and voltage-dependent. Increasing inside negative voltage stimulated uptake and inside positive voltage resulted in net efflux. The direction of change was not affected by the order in which the voltage clamps were performed.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Voltage dependence of CDC-NBD-L uptake. A, an example of voltage-induced changes in cell fluorescence in a single cell. The cell was pre-equilibrated with 1 µM CDC-NBD-L for 30 min, patch-clamped, and held at the voltages indicated. Cellular fluorescence changes result from transmembrane CDC-NBD-L movement. B, data from 10 cells measured as in A. For each voltage the transport rate is presented as the percentage of change in cell fluorescence per min. It was calculated as 100 × slope (units/min)/starting fluorescence (units).

To assess stoichiometry of voltage-dependent Na+-bile acid cotransport, we examined the relationship between the electrical and chemical driving forces for transport. Voltage dependence was first determined in control bath solution and then again while maintaining the patch clamp configuration in the same cells after reduction of bath Na+ concentration. The shift in the voltage dependence produced by this maneuver results from the additional inward electrical driving force necessary to balance the reduction in the inwardly directed Na+ gradient. Fig. 4 demonstrates this relationship. The voltage at which cell fluorescence remained constant shifted by -52 mV after a 3-fold Na+ dilution and by -62 mV after a 10-fold dilution.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of Na+ concentration changes on the flux-voltage relationship. After determining voltage dependence as in Fig. 3, the bath Na+ concentration was reduced, and voltage dependence was again determined in the same cells. bullet , control; open circle , reduced Na+. A, 3-fold Na+ reduction, n = 5. Reversal potential shifted by -52.3 ± 11.2 mV. B, 10-fold Na+ reduction, n = 4. Reversal potential shifted by -61.7 ± 13.4 mV.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

This study has shown that transport of fluorescent bile acid derivatives by CHO cells stably transfected with hASBT is electrogenic. Previous studies of electrogenicity of ileal bile acid transport reached conflicting conclusions. Authors using similar vesicle techniques reported that Na+-bile acid cotransport was either electrogenic (11, 12) or electroneutral (13-15). A major limitation of these prior studies was the need to use an indirect approach to change membrane potential of vesicles. In most cases addition of valinomycin was assumed to hyperpolarize the vesicle interior, but these studies did not validate that the expected voltage changes actually occurred.

In this study we used several approaches to circumvent these problems. We performed whole cell patch clamp to directly voltage clamp and measure the cell membrane potential and used a fluorescent bile acid derivative rather than naturally occurring bile acids. This allowed us to measure transport rates without having to directly measure transport currents. Unlike the case with more hydrophilic substrates such as glucose and amino acids (16-18), bile acid transport currents are extremely difficult to measure because the electrical currents resulting from bile acid transport are small. For the CHO-hASBT cells, the average Vmax was about 2 nmol/min/mg protein, which predicts transport currents of only 1.5 pA/cell. This compares with greater than 100 nA/cell for the Na+-glucose cotransporter in oocytes (16). A second difficulty is that external bile acids have been shown to affect other conductive pathways (19), and bile acid-induced currents therefore do not necessarily represent current carried by the cotransport proteins.

The hASBT-transfected CHO cells efficiently transported two NBD-labeled bile acids, C-NBD-L and CDC-NBD-L, but not a fluorescein-labeled bile acid, CGamF. Kinetic parameters for CDC-NBD-L transport were similar to that of taurocholate and uptake followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Earlier studies of hepatocytes (22) and Ntcp-transfected COS cells (24) had shown specific transport of both CDC-NBD-L and CGamF, and these differences reflect the more restricted substrate specificity of ASBT compared with that of the homologous Ntcp (21). These findings complement a recent report describing the in vivo transport properties of the fluorescent bile acid analogs (25). In that study as well, C-NBD-L but not CGamF was transported by ileum.

Our results clearly demonstrate that transport via the human ASBT is electrogenic and carries positive charge into the cell. The basic principal underlying these measurements is that once a steady-state concentration in a patched cell is reached, changes in cell fluorescence induced by voltage clamping the cell/pipette system result from flux of substrate between the cell and the bath. For this to be the case, there must be no voltage-dependent changes in cell fluorescence such as could result from voltage-dependent changes of the dye quantum yield or cell volume. We examined these possibilities under conditions in which transmembrane transport was abolished either with a nontransported dye or by low temperature. In both of these cases voltage changes had no effect on cell fluorescence.

Another consideration is the possibility that appreciable amounts of dye diffuse from the cell to the pipette, confounding our analysis. Our previous studies have determined that diffusion of bile acids from cell to pipette is small and alters apparent uptake rates by only about 5% (23). The small magnitude of the effect is due to the high degree of intracellular binding of this hydrophobic substrate as well as the relatively small surface area of the pipette (26). Intracellular diffusion coefficients of bile acids are approximately 1000-fold lower than that predicted for simple aqueous diffusion (27). Although diffusion into the pipette is small, it can still affect the voltage at which cell fluorescence is constant. However, there is no voltage gradient between cell and pipette, and therefore changes in cell fluorescence that occur immediately after voltage shift reflect changes in transmembrane transport and not changes in cell to pipette diffusion.

The stoichiometry of Na+-bile acid cotransport was assessed by comparing the effects of voltage changes and Na+ gradient changes on the zero net flux voltage (Vrev). Provided that only transmembrane flux is changed by voltage clamp, the immediate change in Vrev after sudden reduction of extracellular Na+ is described by Equation 3. It predicts that for any given Na+ gradient change, the magnitude of Delta Vrev is greatest for n = 2 and decreases as n increases. This can be understood because at higher coupling stoichiometry the transported complex has a greater charge and thus requires less of a voltage change to balance the chemical free energy component of the altered Na+ gradient.

The observed Delta Vrev for a 3-fold reduction in bath Na+ was -52 mV. The theoretical value predicted from Equation 3 is -58.7 mV for n = 2 and -44 mV for n = 3. These theoretical values are expected to be upper limits for the observed change because the internal bile acid concentrations (Bi) may have decreased as a result of outward transport resulting from the reduction of bath Na+ concentration. A slight reduction of Bi during the period of low Na+ exposure increases the inward bile acid gradient and thus reduces the magnitude of the negative voltage required to re-establish the zero flux condition. Such non-ideal effects would tend to decrease the observed Delta Vrev. Because the observed value is greater than the upper limit for an n = 3 coupling and only slightly less than that for n = 2, we conclude that the most likely coupling ratio is 2 Na+ per 1 bile acid, but we cannot definitively exclude a 3:1 ratio. This finding is consistent with kinetic measurements of the Hill coefficient for Na+ in these cells of approximately 2 (21) and the Hill coefficient for bile acid of approximately 1 (Figs. 1 and 2).

The apical Na+-bile acid cotransporter cDNA encodes a polytopic membrane glycoprotein that shares considerable amino acid identity and remarkable structural similarity to Ntcp, the major Na+-dependent liver bile acid transporter (28). Considerable evidence has now accumulated suggesting that Ntcp is also electrogenic including direct measurements of bile acid transport currents (29, 30) as well as voltage dependence of fluorescent bile acid transport in hepatocytes (23). Kinetic analysis of the Ntcp transporter also shows a Hill coefficient of 1.9 for Na+ and 1.0 for bile acid (28). Considering the similarities in sequence and predicted structure for the Na+-bile acid transporters, it is likely that they share a common electrogenic mechanism.

Previous ileal bile acid transporter modeling studies relied upon substrate binding properties and assumed an electroneutral transport mechanism. Based in part on this assumption, a model for the substrate binding site was proposed that encompassed a closely positioned negatively charged group for interaction with a single sodium ion (31, 32). The previous model will have to be re-evaluated in light of the present study demonstrating electrogenicity.

Electrogenicity confers two significant advantages for ileal bile acid transport. First, as described by Kimmich (33), the driving force for uptake sets the upper limit for the concentrating ability of the system, but in practice gradients achieved are significantly lower due to leak pathways. In the case of intestinal bile acid transport, basolateral exit occurs by a passive transporter. Therefore, electrogenic uptake with a high Na+:bile acid coupling ratio at the apical membrane results in a much higher intracellular bile acid concentration and thus increases net transcellular transport. Secondly, electrogenicity of uptake provides a means for regulation of transport. Fasting (34), aldosterone (34), and 5-hydroxytryptamine (35) have all been shown to alter intestinal electrical gradients in the direction of hyperpolarization of the brush border membrane. These physiologic changes may provide the ileal intestinal cells with a mechanism to regulate bile acid uptake rates for optimal bile acid recycling and cytoprotection.

In summary, this study is the first unequivocal demonstration of an electrogenic mechanism for a cloned Na+-bile acid transport protein. These results will be critical in modeling the structure-function relationship for this important but poorly understood class of Na+-coupled transport proteins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. A. Hofmann and C. Schteingart for kindly providing the fluorescent bile acid analogs and Drs. L. Reuss and S. King for helpful comments. We also acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Lori Showalter and Ann L. Craddock.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported grants DK42917 (to S. A. W.) and DK47987 (to P. A. D.) from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0641. Tel.: 409-772-4286; Fax: 409-772-3381; E-mail: sweinman{at}utmb.edu.

** American Heart Association Established Investigator.

The abbreviations used are: ASBT, apical Na+-bile acid transporter; hASBT, human ASBT; FBA, fluorescent bile acid(s); CGamF, cholylglycylamidofluorescein; C-NBD-L, cholyl-Nepsilon -nitrobenzoxadiazol-lysine; CDC-NBD-L, chenodeoxycholyl-Nepsilon -nitrobenzoxadiazol-lysine; Ntcp, Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Wilson, F. (1981) Am. J. Physiol. 241, G83-G92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wilson, F. A. (1991) in Handbook of Physiology: The Gastrointestinal System IV (Schultz, T., and Stanley, S., eds), pp. 389-404, Waverly Press, Baltimore, MD
  3. Weinberg, S. L., Burckhardt, G., and Wilson, F. A. (1986) J. Clin. Invest. 78, 44-50
  4. Wong, M. H., Oelkers, P., Craddock, A. L., and Dawson, P. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1340-1347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Shneider, B. L., Dawson, P. A., Christie, D.-M., Hardikar, W., Wong, M. H., and Suchy, F. J. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 745-754
  6. Wong, M. H., Oelkers, P., and Dawson, P. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27228-27234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hagenbuch, B., and Meier, P. J. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 1326-1331
  8. Christie, D. M., Dawson, P. A., Thevananther, S., and Shneider, B. L. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, G377-G385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lazaridis, K. N., Pham, L., Tietz, P., Marinelli, R. A., deGroen, P. C., Levine, S., Dawson, P. A., and LaRusso, N. F. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 2714-2721[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Alpini, G., Glaser, S. S., Rodgers, R., Phinizy, J. L., Robertson, W. E., Lasater, J., Caligiuri, A., Tretjak, Z., and LeSage, G. D. (1997) Gastroenterology 113, 1734-1740[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Lücke, H., Gertraud, S., Kinne, R., and Murer, H. (1978) Biochem. J. 174, 951-958[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wilson, F. A., and Treanor, L. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 554, 430-440[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Rouse, D. J., and Lack, L. (1979) Life Sci. 25, 45-52[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Barnard, J. A., Ghishan, F. K., and Wilson, F. A. (1985) J. Clin. Invest. 75, 869-873
  15. Barnard, J. A., and Ghishan, F. K. (1987) Gastroenterology 93, 925-933[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Parent, L., Supplisson, S., Loo, D. D. F., and Wright, E. M. (1992) J. Membr. Biol. 125, 49-62[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Jauch, P., Petersen, O. H., and Lauger, P. (1986) J. Membr. Biol. 94, 99-115[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Bergman, J., Zaafani, M., and Bergman, C. (1989) J. Membr. Biol. 111, 241-251[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Wehner, F. (1993) Eur. J. Physiol. 424, 145-151[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Ridgway, N. D., Dawson, P. A., Ho, Y. K., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, G. L. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 307-319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Craddock, A. L., Love, M. W., Daniel, R. W., Kirby, L. C., Walter, H. C., Wong, M., and Dawson, P. A. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, G157-G169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Maglova, L. M., Jackson, A. M., Meng, X.-J., Carruth, M. W., Schteingart, C. D., Ton-Nu, H.-T., Hofmann, A. F., and Weinman, S. A. (1995) Hepatology 22, 637-647[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Grüne, S., Meng, X.-J., and Weinman, S. A. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, G339-G346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Boyer, J. L., Ng, O.-C., Ananthanarayanan, M., Hofmann, A. F., Schteingart, C. D., Hagenbuch, B., Stieger, B., and Meier, P. J. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 266, G382-G387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Holzinger, F., Schteingart, C. D., Ton-Nu, H., Eming, S. A., Monte, M. J., Hagey, L. R., and Hofmann, A. F. (1997) Hepatology 26, 1263-1271[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Weinman, S. A., and Maglova, L. M. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 267, G922-G931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. LeSage, G. D., Phinizy, J. L., Robertson, W. E., Schteingart, C. D., and Hofmann, A. F. (1993) Gastroenterology 104, 937 (abstr.)
  28. Hagenbuch, B., and Meier, P. J. (1996) Semin. Liver Dis. 16, 129-136[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Lidofsky, S. D., Fitz, J. G., Weisiger, R. A., and Scharschmidt, B. F. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, G478-G485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Weinman, S. A., and Weeks, R. P. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 265, G73-G80[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lack, L. (1979) Environ. Health Perspect. 33, 79-90[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Kramer, W., Nicol, S. B., Girbig, F., Gutjahr, U., Kowalewski, S., and Fasold, H. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1111, 93-102[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Kimmich, G. A. (1990) J. Membr. Biol. 114, 1-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Debnam, E. S., and Thompson, C. S. (1984) J. Physiol. 355, 449-456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Grubb, B. R., and Bentley, P. J. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 253, G211-G216[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Hussainzada, T. C. Da Silva, E. Y. Zhang, and P. W. Swaan
Conserved Aspartic Acid Residues Lining the Extracellular Loop I of Sodium-coupled Bile Acid Transporter ASBT Interact with Na+ and 7{alpha}-OH Moieties on the Ligand Cholestane Skeleton
J. Biol. Chem., July 25, 2008; 283(30): 20653 - 20663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
N. Hussainzada, A. Khandewal, and P. W. Swaan
Conformational Flexibility of Helix VI Is Essential for Substrate Permeation of the Human Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2008; 73(2): 305 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Reinehr, A. Sommerfeld, V. Keitel, S. Grether-Beck, and D. Haussinger
Amplification of CD95 Activation by Caspase 8-induced Endosomal Acidification in Rat Hepatocytes
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2211 - 2222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Geyer, B. Doring, K. Meerkamp, B. Ugele, N. Bakhiya, C. F. Fernandes, J. R. Godoy, H. Glatt, and E. Petzinger
Cloning and Functional Characterization of Human Sodium-dependent Organic Anion Transporter (SLC10A6)
J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2007; 282(27): 19728 - 19741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
N. Hussainzada, A. Banerjee, and P. W. Swaan
Transmembrane Domain VII of the Human Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter ASBT (SLC10A2) Lines the Substrate Translocation Pathway
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1565 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A.-Q. Sun, N. Balasubramaniyan, H. Chen, M. Shahid, and F. J. Suchy
Identification of Functionally Relevant Residues of the Rat Ileal Apical Sodium-dependent Bile Acid Cotransporter
J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16410 - 16418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. J. C. Bijvelds, H. Jorna, H. J. Verkade, A. G. M. Bot, F. Hofmann, L. B. Agellon, M. Sinaasappel, and H. R. de Jonge
Activation of CFTR by ASBT-mediated bile salt absorption
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): G870 - G879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
W. A. Alrefai, Z. Sarwar, S. Tyagi, S. Saksena, P. K. Dudeja, and R. K. Gill
Cholesterol modulates human intestinal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): G978 - G985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. G. Voronina, O. V. Gryshchenko, O. V. Gerasimenko, A. K. Green, O. H. Petersen, and A. V. Tepikin
Bile Acids Induce a Cationic Current, Depolarizing Pancreatic Acinar Cells and Increasing the Intracellular Na+ Concentration
J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 1764 - 1770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
H. C. Walters, A. L. Craddock, H. Fusegawa, M. C. Willingham, and P. A. Dawson
Expression, transport properties, and chromosomal location of organic anion transporter subtype 3
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): G1188 - G1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. Shimada, X. Li, G. Xu, D. E. Nowak, L. A. Showalter, and S. A. Weinman
Expression and canalicular localization of two isoforms of the ClC-3 chloride channel from rat hepatocytes
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): G268 - G276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. N. Izzat, M. E. Deshazer, and D. S. Loose-Mitchell
New Molecular Targets for Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2000; 293(2): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Li, K. Shimada, L. A. Showalter, and S. A. Weinman
Biophysical Properties of ClC-3 Differentiate It from Swelling-activated Chloride Channels in Chinese Hamster Ovary-K1 Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2000; 275(46): 35994 - 35998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinman, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinman, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement