|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 7, 4119-4128, February 13, 1998
The Cell-surface Form of Colony-stimulating Factor-1 Is Regulated
by Osteotropic Agents and Supports Formation of Multinucleated
Osteoclast-like Cells*
Gang-Qing
Yao ,
Ben-hua
Sun§,
Elizabeth E.
Hammond ,
Elizabeth
N.
Spencer ,
Mark C.
Horowitz¶,
Karl L.
Insogna§, and
Eleanor
C.
Weir
From the Section of Comparative Medicine, the
§ Department of Internal Medicine, and the ¶ Department
of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut 06520
 |
ABSTRACT |
Colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) is a
hematopoietic growth factor that is released by osteoblasts and is
recognized to play a critical role in bone remodeling in
vivo and in vitro. CSF-1 is synthesized as a soluble
or cell-surface protein. It is unclear, however, whether human
osteoblasts express both molecular forms of CSF-1, and whether these
isoforms can independently mediate osteoclastogenesis. In the present
study, using a combination of quantitative reverse transcriptase
polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and Western immunoblot
analysis, we have demonstrated that human osteoblast-like cells as well
as primary human osteoblasts express the cell-surface form of CSF-1
both constitutively and in response to parathyroid hormone and tumor
necrosis factor. Furthermore, using an in vitro co-culture
system, we have shown that cell-surface CSF-1 alone is sufficient to
support osteoclast formation. These findings may be especially
significant in view of evidence that direct cell-to-cell contact is
critical for osteoclast formation, and suggest that differential
regulation of expression of the CSF-1 isoforms may influence osteoclast
function modulated by osteotropic hormones.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The precise mechanism whereby osteoblasts mediate osteoclastic
bone resorption is unclear. One widely held hypothesis is that activated osteoblasts secrete cytokines that directly or indirectly influence osteoclast formation or function (1). Although the exact
nature of all of these cytokines is unknown, compelling in
vivo and in vitro data have emerged to support a role
for colony-stimulating factor-1
(CSF-1)1 as an
osteoblast-derived factor involved in osteoclast formation. Thus,
in vivo, deficiency of CSF-1 in the op/op
osteopetrotic mouse causes a failure of osteoclast formation and bone
resorption (2-4), while in vitro studies have demonstrated
that CSF-1 is critical for the proliferation and differentiation of
osteoclast progenitors (5, 6), that CSF-1 stimulates bone resorption in
the fetal mouse metacarpal assay (7), and that CSF-1 receptors are
present on osteoclasts (8, 9). Additionally, we have reported that
CSF-1 is the principal colony-stimulating activity released from
osteoblasts constitutively and in response to PTH and parathyroid
hormone-related protein (8). In support of a role for CSF-1 in bone
remodeling in humans, Sarma et al. (10) have recently
reported that, consistent with studies in mice, recombinant human CSF-1
induces osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in human marrow
cultures.
Multiple human CSF-1 mRNA species (4.0, 3.0, 2.3, 1.9, and 1.6 kb)
are expressed by the CSF-1 gene (11-15), and molecular cloning of
cDNAs derived from these transcripts has demonstrated that the size
differences are due to alternative splicing in exon 6 and the
alternative use of the 3'-end exons 9 or 10 (11-13). A combination of
nucleotide sequence analysis and transfection studies indicates that
two distinct CSF-1 protein products are encoded by these transcripts.
Both primary translation products are membrane-bound glycoproteins that
are released by proteolysis (16). The 1.6- and 3.0-kb CSF-1 cDNAs,
however, give rise by alternative splicing to a short exon 6, yielding
a cell-surface or membrane-bound form of CSF-1, which lacks a
proteolytic cleavage site and is therefore slowly and inefficiently
released by extracellular proteolysis (15, 17), whereas the products of
the 1.9-, 2.3-, and 4.0-kb cDNAs are rapidly secreted as soluble
growth factors (16, 18). Both soluble and cell-surface CSF-1 support
macrophage proliferation in vitro (16, 19), and mRNAs
encoding both forms are expressed in human endometrial glands and
placenta (15, 20). Whether the molecular forms of CSF-1 differ in their
physiologic effects is, however, still unclear.
It is well recognized that osteoblasts synthesize and release the
soluble form of CSF-1 both constitutively and in response to
osteotropic agents, (9, 21-24) and that this form of CSF-1 stimulates
osteoclast formation in vivo and in vitro (5, 6, 25). Recent studies indicate that murine osteoblasts also express the
cell-surface form of CSF-1 (26, 27), but the physiologic relevance of
these observations is unclear. Specifically, it is unknown whether
primary human osteoblasts or osteoblast-like cells express cell-surface
CSF-1. Additionally, although PTH and TNF have been shown to increase
expression of the soluble form of CSF-1 in osteoblasts (9, 24), it is
unclear whether they regulate expression of the cell-surface form of
CSF-1. Finally, it is unknown whether cell-surface CSF-1 expressed in
osteoblasts has any physiologic role in bone remodeling.
In the present study, using a combination of quantitative reverse
transcriptase PCR and flow cytometry, we have shown that primary human
osteoblasts and osteoblast-like cells express mRNA and protein
species consistent with the cell-surface form of CSF-1, and that
expression is regulated by PTH and TNF. In addition, we report that the
cell-surface form of CSF-1 supports the formation of multinucleated
osteoclast-like cells in an in vitro co-culture system.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Hormones, Antibodies, and Reagents--
Human recombinant TNF
was purchased from Sigma. Human and bovine PTH-(1-34), PTH-(1-84),
and PTH-(7-34) were purchased from Bachem (Torrance, CA). A
neutralizing antibody against recombinant human CSF-1 was purchased
from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), and an antibody raised in rabbits
against partially purified human CSF-1 was kindly provided by Dr.
E. R. Stanley (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY).
Prostaglandin E2 was purchased from Sigma and
1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3
(1,25-(OH)2D3) from Wako, Richmond, VA.
Cell Culture--
Normal primary human osteoblasts were obtained
as described previously from patients who were undergoing surgery after
accidental injury or for spinal correction or hip replacement (28).
Primary human osteoblasts and the osteosarcoma cell line MG63 were
maintained in Eagle's -minimum essential medium (Sigma) containing
10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies, Inc.), penicillin (50 units/ml), and streptomycin (50 mg/ml). Saos-2 human osteosarcoma cells
were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) containing 10% FBS, penicillin, and streptomycin. Osteoblast cell lines were passaged with trypsin every week and studied at least 3 days post-confluence unless otherwise
indicated. Primary osteoblasts were passaged with trypsin when
confluent and were used after the second passage. NIH3T3 cells
transfected with the 1.6- and 4.0-kb cDNAs encoding the cell-surface and soluble forms of CSF-1, respectively (18), were kindly
provided by Dr. Carl Rettenmier (Childrens Hospital, Los Angeles, CA).
These cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 7% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, and
penicillin/streptomycin as above. All cells were cultured at 37 °C
in 95% air and 5% CO2.
RNA Preparation--
Cells were grown in T-25 tissue culture
flasks and treated with vehicle, PTH, or TNF at the indicated
concentrations for 24 h. The cells were washed twice with cold PBS
and harvested in guanidinium thiocyanate lysis buffer. Total RNA was
prepared by a modification of the guanidinium thiocyanate-cesium
chloride technique (29).
Oligonucleotides Used for Amplification--
Osteoblast
expression of CSF-1 transcripts encoding the cell-surface and soluble
forms of CSF-1 was examined by RT-PCR. For this purpose, three primers
were generated based on the published sequence of human CSF-1 cDNAs
(13) and on the primer sequences used to detect CSF-1 mRNA species
in human endometrium and placenta (15, 20). The 5' primer, P1,
hybridizes to nucleotides 567-588 in exon 5, and the 3' primers, P2
and P3, hybridize to nucleotides 1627-1647 and 1074-1095
respectively. Primer P3 is included in that segment of exon 6 which is
spliced out in the cell-surface form CSF-1 (Table I). Thus, primer pair
P1 and P2 gives rise to a 186-bp amplicon derived from mRNA species
expressing the cell-surface form of CSF-1, and primer pair P1 and P3
yields a 528-bp fragment derived from mRNA encoding the soluble
form (Table I). To control for quantity of RNA in untreated and treated
samples, endogenous glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
was co-amplified in each sample using primers P4 and P5 (Table
I), which generate a 256-bp amplicon.
Preparation of Competitive Templates--
To control for
differences in amplification efficiency between treated and untreated
samples, in each amplification reaction, we included a competitive
external standard that consisted of a shortened CSF-1 DNA fragment that
competes for and is amplified by the same primer pair as the target
sequence. This competitive template was prepared by amplifying the
target CSF-1 cDNA sequence with the same 5' primer but a
recombinant 3' primer to produce a shortened template (30). To prepare
a competitive template for the cell-surface form of CSF-1, a 42-bp
primer P6 was designed to include 21 bp of P2 sequence addended to the
5' end of a sequence corresponding to bases 666-686 of CSF-1 cDNA
(Fig. 1). Thus, using P1 as the 5' primer and P6 as the 3' primer, 121 bp of the CSF-1 sequence was amplified. With the appended 21 bp of
primer P2, this resulted in a 142-bp amplicon that included the P1 and
P2 binding sequences at its 5' and 3' ends, respectively (Fig. 1). To
prepare a competitor for the soluble form, primer P7 was designed to
include 21 bp of primer P3 sequence addended to the sequence corresponding to nucleotides 907-927. Thus, primers P1 and P7 generated a 383-bp competitor for the soluble form. Similarly, primers
P4 and P8 were used to generate a 205-bp competitive template for GAPDH
cDNA (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, scheme for the preparation of
competitive templates used as external standards in each amplification
reaction. The cell-surface form of CSF-1 is illustrated as an example.
This competitive template was prepared by amplifying the target CSF-1
cDNA sequence with the same 5' primer (P1) but a
recombinant 3' primer (P6), that included 21 bp of P2
sequence (P2 add.) addended to the binding sequence,
b. Thus, using P1 as the 5' primer and P6 as the 3' primer,
121 bp of the CSF-1 sequence was amplified, which, with the appended 21 bp of primer P2, resulted in a 142-bp amplicon that included the P1 and
P2 binding sequences at its 5' and 3' ends, respectively. Competitive
templates for the soluble form of CSF-1 and for GAPDH were prepared by
a similar strategy (see "Experimental Procedures"). B,
primers employed for preparation of competitive templates.
|
|
To prepare the competitive templates, total RNA prepared from MG63
cells was reverse-transcribed (RT) and amplified using the GeneAmp
RT-PCR kit from Perkin-Elmer according to the recommendations of the
manufacturer. Briefly, the reverse transcription reaction was performed
at 37 °C for 60 min. and reverse transcriptase was inactivated by
heating to 99 °C for 5 min, followed by cooling at 4 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.8%
agarose gel. The 142-, 205-, and 383-bp amplicons were excised from the
gel, purified with a QIAquick gel extraction kit (QIAGEN), and stored
in aliquots at 20 °C.
Competitive RT-PCR and Quantitation--
Total RNA prepared from
untreated or PTH/TNF-treated primary osteoblasts or osteoblast-like
cells was reverse-transcribed as described above, and, for each sample,
serial dilutions of competitive template were added to cDNA
prepared from 100 ng of total RNA. PCR was performed at a final
concentration of 1 × PCR buffer, 3 mM
MgCl2, 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase
(Perkin-Elmer), 5 mM dNTP, and 100 pmol each of
32P-end-labeled or unlabeled 5' and 3' primers in a total
volume of 50 µl. If unlabeled primers were used, 0.1 µl (10 µCi)
of a [32P]dCTP (6000 Ci/mmol, Amersham Life Science,
Inc.) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixtures were
heated for 2 min at 94 °C and amplified in a DNA Thermal Cycler
(Perkin-Elmer). The amplification profile included denaturation at
94 °C for 1 min, primer annealing at 60 °C for 2 min, and
extension at 72 °C for 3 min for 35 cycles, followed by a final 7 min of extension at 72 °C. The competitive PCR products were
separated by electrophoresis through 12% polyacrylamide gel.
Photographic copies were made by exposing the gel to Kodak film and
band intensity for target and competitor bands was determined by
densitometric scanning (Molecular Dynamics Personal Densitometer, SI).
For quantitative analysis of samples, the amount of competitive
template added to the sample before amplification was plotted against
the target to competitor ratio. An unknown amount of specific mRNA
can be calculated according to the equation: D0 = D/C × C0, where
D0 is the initial amount of target cDNA,
D is the amount of target DNA obtained from cPCR, and
C0 and C are, respectively, the
initial amount of competitor and the amount obtained from cPCR (31).
Thus, when D/C = 1, then D0 = C0, i.e. when target DNA and
competitor obtained from cPCR are equally amplified, as indicated by
equal band intensity, the initial amount of target cDNA in the
sample is equal to the amount of input competitor. Since a known amount
of competitor is added to each reaction, the amount of cDNA in each
sample can be calculated.
Flow Cytometric Analysis--
Cells grown in six-well plates
were treated with/without PTH or TNF for 24 h. The cells were
washed twice with cold PBS and harvested with a rubber policeman. After
incubation with anti-CSF-1 antiserum at a dilution of 1:100 (20 min at
4 °C) cells were washed twice with cold PBS and incubated for 20 min
at 4 °C in a 1:100 dilution of fluoresceinated secondary antibody.
Flow cytometry was performed using a fluorescence-activated cell
sorting Vantage flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry
Systems, San Jose, CA). The excitation wavelength was 488 nm, and the
fluorescence was collected through a 530/30-nm band pass filter. At
least 10,000 cells were analyzed for each sample.
Preparation of Plasma Membranes--
Plasma membranes for
immunoblot analysis were extracted as described previously (32).
Briefly, treated and untreated cells in the exponential phase of growth
were washed with cold PBS and incubated with lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 µg/ml pepstatin A,
and 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin) and allowed to swell for 15 min on ice. The
cells were disrupted using a ground glass homogenizer in an ice bath,
and the homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min to remove nuclear and cellular debris. The supernatant was overlaid
on a 35% sucrose solution and centrifuged for 60 min at 20,000 × g. The plasma membranes, which were found in a single band
at the interface of the supernatant and sucrose, were collected and
centrifuged for 60 min at 100,000 × g. The pellets
were resuspended and stored at 70 °C until used. The concentration
of plasma membrane protein was determined using a commercially
available kit by the manufacturer's recommended protocol (Bio-Rad
protein assay kit).
Western Blot Analysis--
Western analysis was performed as
described previously, with minor modifications (33). Briefly, 50-80
µg of plasma membrane protein in sample buffer were heated at
100 °C for 5 min in the presence of 100 mM
dithiothreitol to reduce homodimeric proteins, followed by separation
on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were then transferred to
nitrocellulose and incubated at 4 °C overnight with rabbit
anti-human CSF-1 antiserum (1:1000) in TBST buffer (20 mM
Tris, 137 mM sodium chloride, and 0.1% Tween 20) with 3%
nonfat milk. After washing three times with TBST, the blots were
incubated with peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit antiserum (1:20,000)
for 60 min. After washing three times, the blots were developed by
electrochemiluminescence (Amersham Corp.).
Co-culture System--
To examine whether the cell-surface form
of CSF-1 supports formation of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase
(TRAP)-positive multinucleated cells, an in vitro co-culture
system was established in which osteoblasts, prepared from
op/op mice, were co-cultured with murine bone marrow cells.
To supply the osteoblast-derived CSF-1 otherwise missing from these
co-cultures, unfixed or glutaraldehyde-fixed NIH 3T3 cells that had
been transfected with cDNAs encoding the various isoforms of CSF-1
were also added.
Preparation of Primary Murine Osteoblasts--
Heterozygous
op/+ male and female mice were obtained from the Jackson
Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and op/op progeny derived from
these matings were identified by radiographing long bones (Faxitron
cabinet x-ray system, Hewlett Packard, Norwalk, CT). Osteoblasts were
prepared from op/op and wild-type calvariae by collagenase-dispase digestion as described previously (1). Cells were
grown in -minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% FBS,
penicillin, streptomycin, L-glutamine, and 20 mM HEPES (co-culture medium). Five days later, these cells
were trypsinized and used for co-culture experiments.
Glutaraldehyde Fixation of Transfected NIH 3T3
Cells--
Nontransfected NIH 3T3 cells or cells transfected with
cDNA encoding the cell-surface form of CSF-1 or a truncated form of cell-surface CSF-1 were grown to 50% confluence in 12-well tissue culture plates. For glutaraldehyde fixation, cells were washed with
Hank's balanced salt solution, fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 1 min, followed by the addition of 1.5% glycine. Cells were washed with
Hank's solution and incubated overnight in co-culture medium. Medium
was aspirated and saved for CSF-1 assay, and fixed cells were used for
co-culture as indicated below.
Co-culture of Osteoblasts, Osteoclast Precursors, and Fixed
Cells--
In preliminary experiments, primary osteoblasts (4 × 104 cell/well) prepared as described above from
op/op mice were added to nonfixed parental NIH3T3 or
transfected cells (50% confluent) in 1 ml of co-culture medium in a
12-well tissue culture dish. In subsequent experiments,
op/op osteoblasts were added to glutaraldehyde-fixed parental or transfected cells. In both cases, osteoblasts were allowed
to attach overnight, followed by the addition of bone marrow cells
(2 × 106 cells/well) prepared from 6-8-week-old
Swiss mice. To each well was added 1 ml of co-culture medium containing
prostaglandin E2 (final concentration in well,
10 6 M) and
1,25-(OH)2D3 (final concentration, 10 8 M).
Characterization of Osteoclast-like Cells--
Cells in
co-culture were incubated for 7 days, and medium with additives was
changed every other day. Co-cultures were then fixed and stained for
TRAP as described previously (34), and TRAP-positive multinucleated
cells containing three or more nuclei were counted as osteoclast-like
cells (OCLs). In some experiments, expression of calcitonin receptors
was also assessed by autoradiography using 125I-labeled
salmon calcitonin as described previously (35). Briefly, co-cultures
were established as described above on eight-well Lab-tek chamber
slides (Nunc, Naperville, IL). After 10-14 days, cells were washed and
incubated in -minimum essential medium containing 0.1% bovine serum
albumin and 0.2 nM 125I-labeled salmon
calcitonin (Amersham) for 1 h. Cells were rinsed, fixed, dipped in
NTB-2 photoemulsion (Eastman Kodak Corp., Rochester, NY), and exposed
at 20 °C for 2 days. Slides were developed, stained for TRAP as
above, and examined by light microscopy. Approximately 98% of the
TRAP-positive multinuclear cells were positive for calcitonin
receptors. For each of these experiments, we included as controls
bone-marrow co-cultured with osteoblasts prepared from wild type mice
and bone marrow co-cultured with osteoblasts from op/op
mice, with and without added recombinant human CSF-1 (final
concentration in well, 6 nM).
 |
RESULTS |
Osteoblast Expression of mRNAs Encoding the Soluble and
Cell-surface Forms of CSF-1--
To examine whether osteoblast-like
cells express mRNAs encoding the cell-surface and soluble forms of
CSF-1, RT-PCR was performed on total RNA prepared from MG63 cells and
PCR products were examined on an agarose ethidium bromide gel. As shown
in Fig. 2, primer pair P1 and P3 resulted
in a 528-bp amplicon (lane 1), consistent with the soluble
form of CSF-1, and primer pair P1 and P2 yielded a 186-bp product
(lane 5), consistent with the cell-surface form. Although
theoretically P1 and P2 would also be expected to give rise to a
1026-bp amplicon encoding the soluble form, this was not detected under
these PCR conditions because of preferential amplification of the
shorter (186-bp) sequence (15, 20). GAPDH-specific primers P4 and P5
yielded a 256-bp amplicon (lane 3). As indicated above, to
control for differences in amplification efficiency, the same primer
pairs were used to amplify competitive templates, which were added to
target DNA in each PCR reaction. Amplification of these competitive
templates resulted in amplicons that represented shortened forms of
each target DNA. Thus, in Fig. 2, lanes 2 and 6
show 382- and 141-bp products resulting from the amplification of
competitor DNAs for the soluble and cell-surface forms of CSF-1, respectively, and lane 4 shows the 205-bp amplicon resulting
from amplification of the GAPDH competitor. The same experiment
performed on RNA prepared from Saos-2 cells yielded identical results
(data not shown). The sequence of each amplicon was confirmed by
performing at least two restriction digests (data not shown).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Amplification of the soluble and cell-surface
forms of CSF-1, GAPDH, and their competitors by RT-PCR. cDNA
was prepared from MG63 total RNA by RT and subjected to PCR using the
primers described in Table I and Fig. 1B. Lanes 1 and 2 show the 528-bp product derived from the soluble form,
and its 382-bp competitor, respectively, and lanes 5 and
6 show the 186-bp cell-surface form and its 141-bp
competitor. Amplification of GAPDH and competitor yield 256- and 205-bp
products, respectively (lanes 3 and 4). PCR
products were separated in a 1.8% agarose gel and stained with
ethidium bromide.
|
|
Effect of PTH and TNF on Soluble and Cell-surface CSF-1
mRNA--
We next examined whether PTH regulates osteoblast
expression of cell-surface and soluble forms of CSF-1 by competitive
RT-PCR analysis of total RNA prepared from untreated and PTH-treated Saos-2 cells. In these experiments, as decreasing amounts of competitor were added to a fixed amount of sample RNA, there was an increase in
amplification of the endogenous product because of diminished competition between the competitor DNA and the sample DNA. As shown in
Fig. 3A, for both soluble and
cell-surface forms, equal amplification, as indicated by equal band
intensity, was achieved at a higher concentration of competitor in the
PTH-treated osteoblasts than in the untreated cells, indicating that
expression of soluble and cell-surface CSF-1 mRNAs is higher in
PTH-treated osteoblasts than in untreated cells. While GAPDH expression
was slightly higher in PTH-treated than in untreated cells, indicating
slight inequality in RNA amount between treated and untreated samples,
this increase was substantially less than the PTH-induced up-regulation
of CSF-1 expression (Fig. 3A). Densitometric analysis of
these results and correction for RNA quantity by analysis of GAPDH
expression indicated that, as shown in a representative experiment
(Fig. 3B), PTH caused an approximately 12-fold increase in
expression of the soluble and cell-surface forms of CSF-1.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Competitive PCR of reverse-transcribed RNA
prepared from untreated and PTH-treated Saos-2 cells. A,
cells were treated with vehicle or hPTH-(1-84) (10 8
M) for 24 h and harvested for RNA. RNA was
reverse-transcribed, and, for each sample, serial 3-fold dilutions of
competitive template were added to cDNA prepared from 100 ng total
RNA. PCR was performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures," and products were separated on a 12% polyacrylamide
gel. As decreasing amounts of competitor were added to the fixed amount
of sample, there was an increase in amplification of the endogenous
product. B, densitometric analysis of a representative
experiment after correction for RNA quantity. Results are expressed as
percentage of soluble and cell-surface CSF-1 mRNA levels in
untreated cells. C, PTH causes a dose-dependent increase in cell-surface CSF-1 mRNA expression in Saos-2 cells. Cells were treated with vehicle alone, hPTH(1-84) (10 12
to 10 8 M) or hPTH (7-34) (10 8
M) for 24 h and harvested for RNA. Quantitative RT-PCR
and densitometry were performed as above. Results shown are the mean of
three independent experiments, and are expressed as percentage of
cell-surface CSF-1 mRNA levels in untreated cells. D,
effect of TNF on expression of soluble and cell-surface CSF-1 mRNA
levels in MG63 cells. Cells were treated with vehicle alone or TNF (20 ng/ml) for 24 h and harvested for RNA. Quantitative RT-PCR was
performed as described above. Densitometric analysis of a
representative experiment after correction for RNA quantity is shown.
Results are expressed as percentage of soluble and cell-surface CSF-1
mRNA levels in untreated cells.
|
|
To further examine PTH-induced expression of cell-surface CSF-1
mRNA, Saos-2 cells were treated with several concentrations of
either PTH-(1-84) or PTH-(7-34) (10 8 M),
and mRNA levels examined by quantitative RT-PCR as described above.
As shown in Fig. 3C, we found that PTH-(1-84) caused a dose-dependent increase in expression, whereas PTH-(7-34)
had no significant effect. Although PTH-(7-34) binds to the PTH
receptor with high affinity, it is a weak stimulator of adenylate
cyclase, thus suggesting that PTH-induced expression of cell-surface
CSF-1 is cyclic AMP-dependent (36).
Using the same techniques, we examined the effect of TNF on osteoblast
expression of both forms of CSF-1. As shown in a representative experiment (Fig. 3D), TNF treatment of MG63 cells caused an
approximately 7-fold increase in mRNA encoding both the soluble and
cell-surface forms of CSF-1.
Effect of PTH and TNF on Osteoblast Expression of Cell-surface
CSF-1 Protein--
To examine whether PTH and TNF regulate expression
of cell-surface CSF-1 protein, flow cytometry was performed on
untreated osteoblasts and osteoblasts treated with PTH or TNF. To
confirm that our antibody recognized the cell-surface form of CSF-1, we first examined NIH 3T3 cells transfected with cDNAs encoding the soluble and cell-surface forms of CSF-1 (16-18). As expected,
nontransfected NIH 3T3 cells showed no increase in fluorescence in the
presence of anti-CSF-1. Similarly, cells expressing the soluble form of CSF-1 or cells expressing a truncated form of cell-surface CSF-1, which
lacks the membrane spanning domain and is rapidly secreted, showed no
significant increase in fluorescence in the presence of anti-CSF-1 as
compared with the same cells in nonimmune serum (Fig.
4A). By contrast, NIH3T3 cells
expressing the cell-surface form of CSF-1 showed a significant increase
in fluorescence compared with nonimmune serum (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Flow cytometric analysis of CSF-1-transfected
NIH3T3 cells and of untreated PTH/TNF-treated osteoblasts.
A, parental NIH3T3 cells and the same cells transfected with
cDNA encoding the soluble form of CSF-1, a truncated form of
cell-surface CSF-1 that is rapidly secreted, and the cell-surface form
of CSF-1 were harvested and incubated with anti-CSF-1 (1:100), followed
by fluoresceinated secondary antibody (1:100). Only the cells
expressing the cell-surface form of CSF-1 showed a significant increase
in fluorescence compared with preimmune serum. B, MG63 cells
were treated with vehicle alone or TNF (20 ng/ml) for 24 h and
Saos-2 cells with vehicle or PTH (10 8 M) for
24 h. Cells were harvested and prepared for flow cytometric analysis as described above. Treatment with TNF and PTH was associated with an increase in fluorescence as compared with untreated
cells.
|
|
Having shown that cell-surface CSF-1 was detectable using this
technique, we examined untreated and PTH and TNF-treated osteoblasts by
flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 4B, untreated MG63 cells
had higher fluorescence in the presence of anti-CSF-1 as compared with
fluorescence in the presence of nonimmune serum, indicating constitutive expression of cell-surface CSF-1 in MG63 cells.
Furthermore, TNF resulted in a 1.8-fold increase in fluorescence
compared with untreated cells. While untreated Saos-2 cells showed only
modest constitutive expression of cell-surface CSF-1, treatment with PTH caused a 2.6-fold increase in fluorescence (Fig. 4B).
These findings indicate that, consistent with results of RT-PCR
analysis, TNF and PTH increase expression of cell-surface CSF-1 protein in osteoblasts.
Immunoblot Analysis--
To further examine expression of
cell-surface CSF-1 protein, cell membranes derived from untreated and
PTH- and TNF-treated osteoblasts were examined by immunoblot analysis.
Two protein species (32 and 35 kDa) were detected under reducing
conditions using anti-CSF-1 antibody. Consistent with results of flow
cytometry, these bands were significantly increased in intensity by
treatment with PTH and TNF (Fig. 5).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Western analysis of partially purified
osteoblast cell membranes. Plasma membranes from untreated and
PTH-treated Saos-2 cells and untreated and TNF-treated MG63 cells were
partially purified and used for immunoblotting with anti-CSF-1
antiserum as described under "Experimental Procedures." In both
cases, CSF-1 species of around 32-35 kDa were detected, which
increased in response to PTH/TNF treatment.
|
|
Regulated Expression of Soluble and Cell-surface CSF-1 in Primary
Human Osteoblasts--
Since MG63 and Saos-2 are transformed cell
lines, we next examined nontransformed primary human osteoblasts for
expression of soluble and cell-surface CSF-1. For these studies, we
used primary human osteoblasts that have been well characterized for their osteoblastic phenotype (28). Consistent with our findings in MG63
and Saos-2 cells, competitive RT-PCR analysis of mRNA prepared from
primary osteoblasts indicated that these cells constitutively express
both forms of CSF-1 (Fig. 6A).
Furthermore, RT-PCR analysis of untreated and TNF-treated cells
revealed that, after correction for RNA quantitation, TNF induced an 8- and 4-fold increase in expression of the soluble and cell-surface forms
of CSF-1, respectively. By contrast, PTH treatment of primary
osteoblasts cells resulted in no increase in expression of either form
(Fig. 6B).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Competitive PCR of reverse-transcribed RNA
prepared from untreated and PTH/TNF-treated primary human osteoblasts.
A, cells were treated with vehicle, hPTH-(1-84)
(10 8 M), or TNF (20 ng/ml) for 24 h and
harvested for RNA. RNA was reverse-transcribed and competitive PCR was
performed as described in Fig. 3. B, densitometric analysis
of a representative experiment after correction for RNA quantity.
Results are expressed as percentage of soluble and cell-surface CSF-1
mRNA levels in untreated cells.
|
|
Effect of Cell-surface CSF-1 on Formation of OCLs in Vitro--
In
preliminary experiments, we found that, after 7-14 days, bone marrow
cells co-cultured with osteoblasts from wild-type mice in the presence
of 1,25-(OH)2D3 and prostaglandin
E2 formed TRAP-positive multinucleated cells. Similarly, in
the same time period and under the same conditions, osteoblasts from
op/op mice supported formation of TRAP-positive cells in the
presence of recombinant human CSF-1 (6 nM) (data not
shown).
We then co-cultured NIH3T3 cells expressing the cell-surface form of
CSF-1 with mouse bone marrow cells, with and without 1,25-(OH)2D3 and prostaglandin E2,
and found that, after 7-14 days, these cells failed to support OCL
formation. We therefore reasoned that an osteoblast-derived moiety in
addition to CSF-1 might be necessary for OCL formation. Using
osteoblasts derived from op/op mice, which do not secrete
CSF-1, as a source of this osteoblast-derived moiety, we found that
NIH3T3 cells expressing the cell-surface form of CSF-1, when
co-cultured with op/op osteoblasts, caused a significant
enhancement in OCL formation, while parental (nontransfected) NIH3T3
cells did not (data not shown).
Since NIH3T3 cells transfected with the cell-surface form of CSF-1
still release CSF-1 into culture medium, albeit slowly and
inefficiently (17), we next examined whether cell-surface CSF-1
supports OCL formation while still integrated into the cell membrane.
NIH-3T3 fibroblasts expressing various isoforms of CSF-1 were
glutaraldehyde-fixed and examined for their ability to support formation of OCLs. Transfected cells were fixed to prevent the continued synthesis and processing of CSF-1, but to preserve structure and bioactivity of cell-surface CSF-1 already on the cell membrane (19). Conditioned medium harvested from fixed cells expressing all
isoforms of CSF-1 contained no detectable CSF-1 when measured by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D, Minneapolis, MN) (data not
shown), confirming that these fixed cells did not secrete CSF-1.
Following 7-14 days of co-culture with op/op osteoblasts and bone marrow cells, we found that fixed NIH3T3 cells transfected with the cell-surface form of CSF-1 consistently supported the formation of OCLs, whereas fixed parental cells did not (Fig. 7, A and B).
Likewise, fixed cells expressing a truncated, rapidly secreted form of
cell-surface CSF-1 (see above) (16) failed to support the formation of
OCLs (Fig. 7C). TRAP-positive multinucleated cells induced
by the cell-surface form of CSF-1 were further identified as OCLs by
demonstration of the calcitonin receptor in 98% of TRAP-positive
cells, whereas no calcitonin receptor-positive cells were induced by
fixed parental cells (Fig. 7, D and E).

View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of cell-surface CSF-1 on formation of
OCLs in vitro. A, TRAP staining of
multinucleated cells formed when glutaraldehyde-fixed NIH3T3 cells
transfected with the cell-surface form of CSF-1 were co-cultured for 7 days with op/op osteoblasts and mouse bone marrow cells.
Fixed parental cells (B) and NIH3T3 cells transfected with a
truncated form of cell-surface CSF-1 (C) failed to support
the formation of OCLs in the presence of op/op osteoblasts.
D, autoradiography of 125 salmon calcitonin
binding when fixed cell-surface CSF-1-transfected NIH3T3 cells were
co-cultured for 14 days with op/op osteoblasts and mouse
bone marrow cells (E). Using the same methods, no calcitonin receptor-positive cells were detected with fixed parental cells. In all
cases, co-cultures were performed in the presence of
1,25-(OH)2D3 and prostaglandin
E2.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although CSF-1 is derived from a single-copy gene, there is
considerable heterogeneity in protein size and structure due to a
combination of alternative mRNA splicing, glycosylation, and proteolytic processing (37). The multiple CSF-1 mRNA species identified in human and murine tissues arise as a result of alternative splicing in exon 6 and the alternative use of exons 9 and 10 in the
3'-untranslated region of the gene. The exon 9/10 splice variation gives rise to mRNA species that theoretically have varying
stability due to the inclusion or exclusion of AU instability motifs
(12). Alternative splicing in exon 6 yields membrane-bound precursors that differ in the rate and efficiency of cleavage from the cell membrane (16). Five CSF-1 cDNAs have been cloned, ranging in size
from 1.6 to 4.0 kb. All of these share the same exons 1-5, 7, and 8, whereas the 1.6- and 3.0-kb cDNAs have a short version of exon 6 in
which the site for proteolytic cleavage of the CSF-1 presursor has been
spliced out (11-15). Thus, the product of the 1.6- and 3.0-kb
cDNAs are membrane-bound glycoproteins that are slowly and
inefficiently cleaved from the cell surface (15, 17). By contrast, the
products of the 1.9-, 2.3-, and 4.0-kb cDNAs have intermediate or
long versions of exon 6 in which the proteolytic cleavage site is
intact, giving rise to a soluble, rapidly secreted growth factor (11,
14, 18). Several human and murine cell lines and tissues have been
shown to express a variety of CSF-1 mRNA species, consistent with
the soluble and cell-surface forms of CSF-1. Detailed analysis of these
transcripts, of the CSF-1 protein isoforms that they encode, and of the
factors that regulate their expression has, however, been limited, and their bioactivity and physiologic relevance is unclear.
We have reported previously that mouse and rat osteoblasts express a
major 4-kb CSF-1 mRNA species and several smaller, less abundant
transcripts (9, 24). While the 4-kb species is consistent with the
cDNA encoding the soluble form of CSF-1, the nature of the smaller
transcripts is unclear. In the present study, we have shown by RT-PCR
analysis that primary human osteoblasts and osteoblast-like cell lines
constitutively express mRNA species consistent with the soluble and
cell-surface forms of CSF-1. In addition, using quantitative RT-PCR, we
have demonstrated that treatment of osteoblastic cells with PTH and TNF
increases expression of both isoforms. Since PCR amplification is an
exponential process, sample to sample variation in quantity of input
RNA, in conversion of RNA to DNA, or in amplification efficiency can
affect the yield of the PCR product. We therefore chose a method for
quantitative PCR that attempted to deal with each of these potential
limitations (30). To control for variability in the amount of input RNA
and in the efficiency of its conversion to cDNA, we used human
GAPDH as an endogenous standard. To control for variability inherent in
the amplification process, we constructed external standards that shared with the target sequence the same primer sites and most of the
amplified sequence. Thus, the two templates competed for the same
primer pair and amplified at the same rate, ensuring accurate relative
quantitation. RT-PCR analysis appears to be required to detect
cell-surface CSF-1 mRNA, since Northern analysis using
region-specific probes was unable to identify RNA species for this form
of CSF-1 (data not shown), indicating that the cell-surface form is
present at lower levels than the soluble form. This finding is not
unexpected, since the turnover rate of cell-surface CSF-1 protein on
the cell membrane is slow, as compared with the soluble form, which is
rapidly secreted and thus likely requires a higher rate of
transcription (17). Furthermore, since the effector function of
cell-surface CSF-1 is mediated locally by direct interaction with
adjacent receptor-bearing cells, it is likely that the minimum concentration required for bioactivity is less than that of the soluble
form, which is secreted and mediates its effector function(s) at
distant sites.
In addition to demonstrating regulated expression of mRNA
transcripts encoding the cell-surface form of CSF-1, the present study
shows that osteoblasts express cell-surface CSF-1 protein. Thus, flow
cytometric analysis revealed that MG63 cells constitutively express
cell-surface CSF-1, and that expression is increased by TNF treatment.
While untreated Saos-2 cells showed only modest expression of
cell-surface CSF-1 protein, expression was enhanced by PTH. The low
constitutive expression of cell-surface CSF-1 protein in these cells
appears to conflict with the results of RT-PCR. This may, however,
represent differences in the sensitivity of the two techniques. Results
of Western analysis also confirmed that both MG63 and Saos-2 cells
produce the cell-surface form of CSF-1, both constitutively and in
response to PTH and TNF. The 32- and 35-kDa species that were detected
in partially purified human osteoblast cell membranes are consistent
with the 30-kDa species previously detected in membrane extracts from
murine osteoblasts (27), and with the 31- and 34-kDa species detected
in cell lysates prepared from NIH3T3 cells transfected with cDNA
encoding the cell-surface form of CSF-1 (17). As was shown in the
transfected cells, it is likely that the two protein species detected
in osteoblast membranes exhibit differing degrees of glycosylation.
Since the soluble form of CSF-1 is rapidly released from cell
membranes, protein species consistent with this form were not detected
in osteoblast membranes by Western analysis, further suggesting a role
for osteoblastic cell-surface CSF-1 in the immediate bone microenvironment. While the increase in CSF-1 protein levels associated with PTH and TNF treatment appears to be less than the induction of
CSF-1 mRNA expression, this is likely to reflect differences in
techniques used to evaluate levels of mRNA versus
protein. RT-PCR is an exquisitely sensitive technique with a large
dynamic range, whereas both flow cytometry and Western analysis are
less quantitative, primarily because they are highly dependent on such factors as the affinity and specificity of the antibody. Additionally, we cannot rule out induction of nontranslated mRNA or rapid
degradation of mRNA.
In support of the physiologic relevance of our observations in
osteoblastic cell lines, we also demonstrated that primary human
osteoblasts express mRNA species for cell-surface CSF-1 and that
TNF enhances its expression to a degree comparable to that seen in
TNF-treated MG63 cells. In contrast to Saos-2 cells, however, PTH
caused no up-regulation of cell-surface or soluble CSF-1 in primary
osteoblasts. While the cause of this apparent discrepancy is unclear,
other investigators have also reported differences in PTH-induced
cytokine production among osteoblast cell lines and primary osteoblasts
(28). In the present study, the primary reason for the difference in
PTH response between the Saos-2 cells and primary osteoblasts is most
likely the weak PTH-induced cAMP response in the latter. We have
performed adenylate cyclase assays using primary osteoblasts prepared
from a number of patients, and have found little induction of cAMP in
response to PTH-(1-34). Thus since, as shown in Fig. 3C,
PTH induction of CSF-1 expression in Saos-2 cells appears to be
cAMP-dependent, it is not surprising that osteoblasts that
exhibit a weak PTH-induced cAMP response fail to demonstrate
PTH-induced CSF-1 expression. While weak PTH-induced cyclase activity
in primary human osteoblasts has been reported previously (38, 39), the
precise reason is unclear. It is well recognized that the degree of
differentiation of osteoblasts influences expression of the PTH
receptor (40), and it is likely that the age of patients from which our
osteoblasts are prepared (i.e. adults), or the method of
cell preparation (i.e. explant culture) may affect the
degree of differentiation and PTH receptor expression. Additionally,
the osteoblast preparation is a mixed population of cells, most likely
representing cells at varying degree of differentiation and with
varying PTH receptor expression. Thus, the specific proportion of each
cell type in each preparation affects the PTH response.
While others have reported that mouse osteoblasts express the
cell-surface form of CSF-1 (27, 28), our observation that PTH and TNF
regulate its expression in human osteoblast-like cells suggests that
this isoform of CSF-1 may play a role in TNF-induced, and possibly
PTH-induced, bone resorption. We and others have suggested previously
that CSF-1 increases osteoclastogenesis in PTH- and TNF-induced
resorption (9, 23, 24), but it is unclear from previous studies whether
both the soluble and cell-surface forms are involved. Takahashi
et al. (41) observed that when osteoblasts from
op/op mice were co-cultured with splenocytes, pharmacologic
amounts of CSF-1 were required to support osteoclast formation, and
other studies have shown that much higher concentrations of soluble
CSF-1 are required to induce osteoclastogenesis in metatarsals from
op/op mice than in metatarsals/metacarpals from normal mice
(7, 42). These findings suggest that cell-surface CSF-1, either alone
or in addition to soluble CSF-1, might be required for
osteoclastogenesis. Takahashi also observed that, using an
osteoblast/splenocyte co-culture system, osteoblasts failed to support
osteoclast formation when separated from precursors by a membrane
filter, further suggesting that an osteoblast-derived cell-surface
moiety is necessary for target cell activation (1). Consistent with
these hypotheses, in the present study, we have shown that
glutaraldehyde-fixed NIH3T3 cells transfected with cDNA encoding
the cell-surface form of CSF-1 support formation of OCLs in an in
vitro co-culture system. By contrast, parental NIH3T3 cells, or
cells transfected with a truncated cDNA for cell-surface CSF-1 that
does not bind to the cell membrane, failed to support formation of
OCLs. Interestingly, we also demonstrated that NIH3T3 cells transfected
with cell-surface CSF-1 failed to support osteoclast formation in the
absence of op/op osteoblasts, indicating that cell-surface
CSF-1 alone does not support osteoclast formation, and that other
osteoblast-derived factors are required. Consistent with our results,
Stein et al. (19) showed that cell-surface CSF-1 supports
the proliferation of mouse mononuclear phagocytes in vitro.
Bioactivity of this form of CSF-1 in other tissues known to express it,
however, including human uterus and placenta, has not been
reported.
As in other tissues, the precise roles of the soluble and cell-surface
forms of CSF-1 in osteoblasts are unclear. While the absence of
osteoclasts in the op/op mouse indicates a key role for
CSF-1 in osteoclastogenesis, deficiency of osteoclasts and macrophages
reverses with age (43). Although the mechanism is unknown, it has been
hypothesized that other cytokines assume the osteoclastogenic function
of CSF-1 in mature mice, or that unique, tissue-specific splice
variants in the op/op mouse may lead to an incompletely
penetrant phenotype and delayed development of the mononuclear system
(44). Multiple CSF-1 splice variants are expressed in human and murine
tissues, and in many cases their function within a specific tissue is
unknown. Likewise, the functional significance of cell-surface CSF-1 in
osteoblasts is unclear. Our data, however, which demonstrate regulated
expression and bioactivity of cell-surface CSF-1 in bone, suggest that
this isoform of CSF-1 interacts via cell-cell contact with adjacent
receptor-bearing cells in the bone microenvironment to regulate
osteoclast formation or function.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Xiao-Dong Chen and Monica
Andreoli for technical assistance and advice.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants DK45228, DK50859, AR39571,
and AR/DE40073 from the National Institutes of Health and a grant from
the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom all all correspondence should be addressed: Section of
Comparative Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, P. O. Box
208016, New Haven, CT 06520-8016. Tel.: 203-785-2531; Fax: 203-785-7499; E-mail: eleanor.weir{at}yale.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: CSF-1,
colony-stimulating factor-1; PTH, parathyroid hormone; TNF, tumor
necrosis factor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR, reverse
transcriptase PCR; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; bp,
base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s); PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; OCL, osteoclast-like cell;
FBS, fetal bovine serum; 1,25-(OH)2D3,
1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Takahashi, N.,
Akatsu, T.,
Udagawa, N.,
Sasaki, T.,
Yamaguchi, A.,
Moseley, J. M.,
Martin, T. J.,
Suda, T.
(1988)
Endocrinology
123,
2600-2602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marks, S. C.,
and Lane, P. W.
(1976)
J. Hered.
67,
11-18[Free Full Text]
-
Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, W. A.,
Ahmed, A.,
Szcylik, C.,
and Skelly, R. R.
(1982)
J. Exp. Med.
156,
1516-1527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, W.,
Bartocci, A.,
Ferrante, A. W., Jr.,
Ahmed-Ansari, A.,
Sell, K. W.,
Pollard, J. W.,
Stanley, E. R.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4828-4832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takahashi, N.,
Udagawa, N.,
Akatsu, T.,
Tanaka, H.,
Shionome, M.,
and Suda, T.
(1991)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
6,
977-985[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tanaka, S.,
Takahashi, N.,
Udagawa, N.,
Tamura, T.,
Akatsu, T.,
Stanley, R. E.,
Kurokawa, T.,
Suda, T.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
91,
257-263
-
Antonioli-Corboz, V.,
Cecchini, M. G.,
Felix, R.,
Fleisch, H.,
van der Pluijm, G.,
Lowik, C. W. G. M.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
437-442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hofstetter, W.,
Wetterwald, A.,
Cecchini, M.,
Felix, R.,
Fleisch, H.,
and Mueller, C.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
9637-9641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weir, E.,
Horowitz, M.,
Baron, R.,
Centrella, M.,
Kacinski, B.,
and Insogna, K.
(1993)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
8,
1507-1517[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sarma, U.,
and Flanagan, A. M.
(1996)
Blood
88,
2531-2540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kawasaki, E. S.,
Ladner, M. B.,
Wang, A. M.,
Van Ardsell, J.,
Warren, M. K.,
Coyne, M. Y.,
Schweickart, V. L.,
Lee, M. T.,
Wilson, K. J.,
Boosman, A.,
Stanley, E. R.,
Ralph, P.,
Mark, D. F.
(1985)
Science
230,
291-296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ladner, M. B.,
Martin, G. A.,
Noble, J. A.,
Nikoloff, D. M.,
Tal, T.,
Kawasaki, E. S.,
White, T. J.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
2693-2698[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wong, G. G.,
Temple, P. A.,
Leary, A. C.,
Witek-Gianotti, J. S.,
Yang, Y. C.,
Ciarletta, A. B.,
Chung, M.,
Murtha, P.,
Kriz, R.,
Kaufman, R. J.,
Ferenz, C. R.,
Sibley, B. S.,
Turner, K. J.,
Hewick, R. M.,
Clark, S. C.,
Yanai, N.,
Yokota, H.,
Yamada, M.,
Saito, M.,
Motoyoshi, K.,
Takaku, F.
(1987)
Science
235,
1504-1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cerretti, D. P.,
Wignall, J.,
Anderson, D.,
Tushinski, R J.,
Gallis, B. M.,
Stya, M.,
Gillis, S.,
Usdal, D. L.,
Cosman, D.
(1988)
Mol. Immunol.
26,
761-770
-
Pampfer, S.,
Tabibzadeh, S.,
Chuan, F. C.,
Pollard, J. W.
(1991)
Mol. Endocrinol.
5,
1931-1938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rettenmier, C. W.
(1989)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
149,
129-141[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rettenmier, C. W.,
Roussel, M. F.,
Ashmun, R. A.,
Ralph, P.,
Price, K.,
Sherr, C. J.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2378-2387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rettenmier, C. W.,
and Roussel, M. F.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
5026-5034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stein, J.,
Borzillo, G. V.,
and Rettenmier, C. W.
(1990)
Blood
76,
1308-1314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Daiter, E.,
Pampfer, S.,
Yeung, Y. G.,
Barad, D.,
Stanley, R. E.,
Pollard, J. W.
(1992)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
74,
850-858[Abstract]
-
Shiina-Ishimi, Y.,
Abe, E.,
Tanaka, H.,
and Suda, T.
(1986)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
134,
400-406[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Elford, P. R.,
Felix, R.,
Cecchini, M.,
Trechsel, U.,
and Fleisch, H.
(1987)
Calcif. Tissue Int.
41,
151-156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Felix, R.,
Fleisch, H.,
and Elford, P. R.
(1989)
Calcif. Tissue Int.
44,
356-360[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kaplan, D. L.,
Eielson, C. M.,
Horowitz, M. C.,
Insogna, K. L.,
Weir, E. C.
(1996)
J. Cell. Physiol.
168,
199-208[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hattersley, G.,
Owens, J.,
Flanagan, A. M.,
Chambers, T. J.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
177,
526-531[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rubin, J.,
Fan, X.,
Thornton, D.,
Bryant, R.,
and Biskobing, D.
(1996)
Calcif. Tiss. Int.
59,
291-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Felix, R.,
Halasy-Nagy, J.,
Wetterwald, A.,
Cecchini, M. G.,
Fleisch, H.,
Hofstetter, W.
(1996)
J. Cell. Physiol.
166,
311-322[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Elias, J. A.,
Tang, W.,
and Horowitz, M. C.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
489-98[Abstract]
-
Chirgwin, J. M.,
Przybyla, A. E.,
MacDonald, J. R.,
Rutter, W. J.
(1979)
Biochemistry
18,
5294-5300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jin, C.-F.,
Mata, M.,
and Fink, D. J.
(1994)
PCR Methods Appl.
3,
252-255[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Diviacco, S.,
Norio, P.,
Zentilin, L.,
Menzo, S.,
Clementi, M.,
Biamonti, G.,
Riva, S.,
Falaschi, A.,
and Giacca, M.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
122,
3013-3020
-
Yao, G. Q.,
Corrias, S.,
and Cheng, Y. C.
(1996)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
51,
431-436[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yao, G. Q.,
Tsai, C. H.,
and Cheng, Y. C.
(1995)
Virus Genes
9,
247-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Baron, R.,
Vignery, A.,
Neff, L.,
Silvergate, A.,
and Santa Maria, A.
(1983)
in
Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation (Recker, R. R., ed), pp. 31-32, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
-
Perkins, S. L.,
and Kling, S. J.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
E1024-E1030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mahaffey, J. E.,
Rosenblatt, M.,
Shepard, G. L.,
Potts, J. T., Jr.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
6496-6498[Free Full Text]
-
Shadle, P. J.,
Aldwin, L.,
Nitecki, D. E.,
Koths, K.
(1989)
J. Cell. Biochem.
40,
91-107[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gehron Robey, P.,
and Termine, J. D.
(1985)
Calcif. Tissue Int.
37,
453-460[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Civitelli, R.,
Bacskai, B. J.,
Mahaut-Smith, M. P.,
Adams, S. R.,
Avioli, L. V.,
Tsien, R. Y.
(1994)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
9,
1407-1417[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rouleau, M. F.,
Mitchell, J.,
and Goltzman, D.
(1988)
Endocrinology
123,
187-191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takahashi, N.,
Udagawa, N.,
Akatsu, T.,
Tanaka, H.,
Isogai, Y.,
and Suda, T.
(1991)
Endocrinology
128,
1792-1796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Morohashi, T.,
Antonioli-Corboz, V.,
Fleisch, H.,
Cecchini, M. G.,
Felix, R.
(1994)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
9,
401-407[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Begg, S. K.,
Radley, J. M.,
Pollard, J. W.,
Chisolm, O. T.,
Stanley, E. R.,
Bertoncello, I.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
237-242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hume, D. A.,
and Favot, P.
(1995)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
15,
279-284[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-Q. Yao, J.-J. Wu, S. Ovadia, N. Troiano, B. H. Sun, and K. Insogna
Targeted overexpression of the two colony-stimulating factor-1 isoforms in osteoblasts differentially affects bone loss in ovariectomized mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
April 1, 2009;
296(4):
E714 - E720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lorenzo, M. Horowitz, and Y. Choi
Osteoimmunology: Interactions of the Bone and Immune System
Endocr. Rev.,
June 1, 2008;
29(4):
403 - 440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Horiuchi, T. Miyamoto, H. Takaishi, A. Hakozaki, N. Kosaki, Y. Miyauchi, M. Furukawa, J. Takito, H. Kaneko, K. Matsuzaki, et al.
Cell Surface Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Can Be Cleaved by TNF-{alpha} Converting Enzyme or Endocytosed in a Clathrin-Dependent Manner
J. Immunol.,
November 15, 2007;
179(10):
6715 - 6724.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bouyer, H. Sakai, T. Itokawa, T. Kawano, C. M. Fulton, W. F. Boron, and K. L. Insogna
Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 Increases Osteoclast Intracellular pH and Promotes Survival via the Electroneutral Na/HCO3 Cotransporter NBCn1
Endocrinology,
February 1, 2007;
148(2):
831 - 840.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ghosh-Choudhury, P. K. Singha, K. Woodruff, P. S. Clair, S. Bsoul, S. L. Werner, and G. G. Choudhury
Concerted Action of Smad and CREB-binding Protein Regulates Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-stimulated Osteoblastic Colony-stimulating Factor-1 Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 21, 2006;
281(29):
20160 - 20170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Bharti, Y. Takada, and B. B. Aggarwal
Curcumin (Diferuloylmethane) Inhibits Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B Ligand-Induced NF-{kappa}B Activation in Osteoclast Precursors and Suppresses Osteoclastogenesis
J. Immunol.,
May 15, 2004;
172(10):
5940 - 5947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-M. Dai, X.-H. Zong, V. Sylvestre, and E. R. Stanley
Incomplete restoration of colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) function in CSF-1-deficient Csf1op/Csf1op mice by transgenic expression of cell surface CSF-1
Blood,
February 1, 2004;
103(3):
1114 - 1123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-Q. Yao, J.-J. Wu, B.-H. Sun, N. Troiano, M. A. Mitnick, and K. Insogna
The Cell Surface Form of Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 Is Biologically Active in Bone in Vivo
Endocrinology,
August 1, 2003;
144(8):
3677 - 3682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Fan, D. Fan, H. Gewant, C. L. Royce, M. S. Nanes, and J. Rubin
Increasing membrane-bound MCSF does not enhance OPGL-driven osteoclastogenesis from marrow cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
January 1, 2001;
280(1):
E103 - E111.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Bost, J. L. Bento, J. K. Ellington, I. Marriott, and M. C. Hudson
Induction of Colony-Stimulating Factor Expression following Staphylococcus or Salmonella Interaction with Mouse or Human Osteoblasts
Infect. Immun.,
September 1, 2000;
68(9):
5075 - 5083.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-Q. Yao, B.-h. Sun, K. L. Insogna, and E. C. Weir
Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B p50 Is Required for Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}-Induced Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 Gene Expression in Osteoblasts
Endocrinology,
August 1, 2000;
141(8):
2914 - 2922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Grey, Y. Chen, I. Paliwal, K. Carlberg, and K. Insogna
Evidence for a Functional Association between Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and c-src in the Spreading Response of Osteoclasts to Colony-Stimulating Factor-1
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2000;
141(6):
2129 - 2138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rubin, T. Murphy, M. S. Nanes, and X. Fan
Mechanical strain inhibits expression of osteoclast differentiation factor by murine stromal cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
June 1, 2000;
278(6):
C1126 - C1132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Lea, U. Sarma, and A. M. Flanagan
Macrophage Colony Stimulating-Factor Transcripts Are Differentially Regulated in Rat Bone-Marrow by Gender Hormones
Endocrinology,
January 1, 1999;
140(1):
273 - 279.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Fuller, B. Wong, S. Fox, Y. Choi, and T. J. Chambers
TRANCE Is Necessary and Sufficient for Osteoblast-mediated Activation of Bone Resorption in Osteoclasts
J. Exp. Med.,
September 7, 1998;
188(5):
997 - 1001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|