|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 8, 4497-4505, February 20, 1998
A State-independent Interaction between Ligand and a Conserved
Arginine Residue in Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Channels Reveals a
Functional Polarity of the Cyclic Nucleotide Binding Site*
Gareth R.
Tibbs ,
David T.
Liu,
Bradley G.
Leypold, and
Steven A.
Siegelbaum§¶
From the Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, the
§ Department of Pharmacology, and the ¶ Howard Hughes
Medical Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
 |
ABSTRACT |
Activation of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels is
thought to involve two distinct steps: a recognition event in which a
ligand binds to the channel and a conformational change that both opens the channel and increases the affinity of the channel for an agonist. Sequence similarity with the cyclic nucleotide-binding sites of cAMP-
and cGMP-dependent protein kinases and the bacterial
catabolite activating protein (CAP) suggests that the channel ligand
binding site consists of a -roll and three -helices. Recent
evidence has demonstrated that the third (or C) -helix moves
relative to the agonist upon channel activation, forming additional
favorable contacts with the purine ring. Here we ask if channel
activation also involves structural changes in the -roll by
investigating the contribution of a conserved arginine residue that, in
CAP and the kinases, forms an important ionic interaction with the cyclized phosphate of the bound ligand. Mutations that conserve, neutralize, or reverse the charge on this arginine decreased the apparent affinity for ligand over four orders of magnitude but had
little effect on the ability of bound ligand to open the channel. These
data indicate that the cyclized phosphate of the nucleotide approaches
to within 2-4 Å of the arginine, forming a favorable ionic bond that
is largely unaltered upon activation. Thus, the binding site appears to
be polarized into two distinct structural and functional domains: the
-roll stabilizes the ligand in a state-independent manner, whereas
the C-helix selectively stabilizes the ligand in the open state of the
channel. It is likely that these distinct contributions of the
nucleotide/C-helix and nucleotide/ -roll interactions may also be a
general feature of the mechanism of activation of other cyclic
nucleotide-binding proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cyclic nucleotides regulate the activity of a diverse family of
proteins involved in cellular signaling. These include a transcription factor (the bacterial catabolite activating protein, CAP), the cAMP-
(PKA)1 and
cGMP-dependent protein kinases (PKG) and the cyclic
nucleotide-gated (CNG) ion channels involved in visual and olfactory
signal transduction (1, 2). Despite obvious divergence among the
effector domains of these proteins, the cyclic nucleotide binding (CNB)
sites appear to share a common architecture. Solution of the crystal
structures of CAP (3) and a recombinant bovine PKA RI subunit (4) has demonstrated that their CNB sites are formed from an -helix (A
helix), an 8-stranded -roll, and two more -helices (B and C),
with the C-helix forming the back of the binding pocket. Six residues
are invariant among all members of the CAP and kinase families: three
glycines involved in turns between strands of the -roll, an arginine
and a glutamate, each of which contact the cyclic nucleotide, and an
alanine whose function is uncertain (1) (see also Fig. 1). Strikingly,
these six residues are conserved in the CNG channels. Thus, it has been
suggested that the invariant residues play important and conserved
roles in the folding/function of the CNB sites of these diverse
proteins (1-6). Interestingly, only three of these residues (two
glycines and the arginine) appear to be conserved among the more
distantly related voltage-gated channels that bear the CNB site motif
and whose gating may be modulated by direct binding of cyclic
nucleotide (KAT1 (7, 8), AKT1 (9, 10), and dEAG (11, 12) see Fig.
1).
Surprisingly, this structural similarity of the CNB site does not
appear to be reflected in the conformation of the bound agonist. Thus,
the crystal structures reveal cAMP binds in an anti conformation to CAP
(3) but in a syn conformation to PKA RI (4), although this may not
reflect the conformation of the ligand bound to the proteins in
solution (1, 2, 19). While experiments with cyclic nucleotide analogs
and modeling, based upon the CAP and PKA R1 structures, have been
used to investigate the conformation adopted by agonists in other CNB
sites, this issue is unresolved (1-6). This uncertainty, coupled with
the lack of a crystal structure for any of the CNB proteins, in either the absence of bound agonist or presence of antagonist, leaves an
important question unresolved: what are the structural changes that
take place within these binding sites that result in the activation of
each of the CNB proteins?
By employing site-directed mutagenesis and patch clamp recording of CNG
ion channels, it is possible to separate the coupled processes of
ligand binding from activation, permitting a dissection of the
molecular contributions of protein-ligand interactions to each of these
events. Such studies have demonstrated that residues within the C-helix
selectively contribute to channel activation (20, 21). Indeed, an
aspartic acid residue (Asp604) in the bovine rod subunit 1 (bRET1 (16)) C-helix appears to interact with the purine ring of cGMP
selectively when the channel is open (21). That is, the binding energy
of this interaction predominantly serves to stabilize ligand binding in
the active conformation of the binding site, thereby leading to
stabilization of the active (open) state of the channel. However, the
state dependence of interactions between the cyclic nucleotide and
other residues in the binding site are less well defined.
Here we ask whether regions other than the C-helix of the CNB site are
likely to be altered upon channel activation and thereby contribute to
the increased affinity of the open channel for agonist. Studies of
cyclic nucleotide analogs bearing sulfur substitutions on one or
another of the exocyclic oxygens of the cyclized phosphate raise the
possibility that residues in the -roll may also contribute to
activation gating. These data show that, in the kinases, the equatorial
sulfur-substituted derivative (Rp-cAMPS) is an antagonist, whereas the
axial sulfur-substituted compound (Sp-cAMPS) is an agonist (22-24), a
profile that appears to be reversed in CAP (4, 25). CNG channels formed
from the catfish olfactory neuron subunit 1 (fOLF1 (17)) show an
identical pharmacological profile to that of the kinases (26). By
contrast, in CNG channels formed from bRET1, both cGMP derivatives are
agonists and both cAMP derivatives are antagonists (26). Since the
exocyclic oxygen atoms interact with residues in the -roll, these
data raise the possibility that large and possibly divergent structural
changes may take place in the -roll of each of the CNB proteins upon
activation (1-6).
We have focused upon the conserved arginine residue in the
-roll (Arg559 in bRET1, Arg529 in fOLF1, see
Fig. 1). The homologous residue forms an ionic bond with the cyclized
phosphate of the nucleotide in both CAP and the RI subunit of PKA
(1-4), which suggests that this residue is well placed to detect any
significant rearrangement between the ligand and the -roll upon
activation. We have previously reported that substitution of this
conserved arginine with the polar but uncharged glutamine residue leads
to a 27-fold increase in the K1/2 (agonist
concentration producing half-maximal activation) in a chimeric channel
(ROON-S2, see "Experimental Procedures" and Fig. 1). Despite this
reduction in sensitivity to ligand, there is no apparent change in the
ability of bound ligand to activate the ROON-S2 channel, as determined
from the maximum open probability (Pmax) of the
channel in the presence of a saturating concentration of ligand (27).
These data suggest that either the conserved arginine contacts the
bound agonist in a state-independent manner (that is, it interacts
equally well with ligand in the open and closed states of the channel)
or that the polar glutamine residue is able to substitute effectively
for the arginine to maintain any state-dependent contacts.
Here we explore further the role of Arg559 by studying a
wide range of mutations that conserve, neutralize, or reverse the
charge of this residue. Such mutations are tolerated and cause a
progressive decrease in the affinity for agonist with little or no
detectable change in the ability of bound agonist to activate the
channel. These data are consistent with the formation of a
state-independent, electrostatic interaction between this arginine and
the cyclized phosphate of the ligand, although they also reveal an
unexpected steric influence of chain length.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Molecular Biology--
Point mutations were made by a polymerase
chain reaction/subcloning strategy, and the resulting cDNA was
verified by dideoxy chain termination sequencing of the polymerase
chain reaction fragment (17, 20). The amino acids swapped in the
construction of the chimeras are given in the legend to
Fig. 1. The majority of these experiments
were performed in the background of two chimeric channels for technical
reasons. The chimera RO133 is comprised of bRET1 whose pore-forming
P-region has been replaced with the corresponding amino acids from
fOLF1 (28). Channels formed from this chimera have cyclic
nucleotide-gating properties identical to those of bRET1 but have the
large single channel conductance of fOLF1 channels, facilitating
measurements of single channel currents and, hence,
Pmax (28). The other construct we utilized was a
double chimera, ROON-S2 (27), in which we replaced both the P-region
and amino-terminal N-S2 domain of bRET1 with sequences from fOLF1. This
construct has both a large single channel conductance and a very high
sensitivity to cGMP (due to the presence of the fOLF1 N-S2 domain and
the bRET1 CNB domain (20, 27)). The high apparent affinity of this
parent chimera permitted us to study ligand-dependent
gating of CNB-site point mutants whose apparent affinities for cGMP
were shifted by up to 4 orders of magnitude. In the parent bRET1 and
fOLF1 backgrounds, such mutations shift the dose-response curve of the
channel into a cGMP concentration range that is greater than 100 mM and thus unmeasurable. We have previously shown that the
only effect of introducing the fOLF1 N-S2 domain in the bRET1
background is to increase the efficacy with which bound ligands
activate this construct; the selectivity of the bRET1 CNB site for
ligand is not compromised (20, 27). Throughout the text, the invariant
arginine in 7 is identified according to the numbering sequence of
either bRET1 (Arg559) for those constructs that contain the
bRET1 CNB site (bRET1, RO133, and ROON-S2) or of fOLF1
(Arg529). In constructs where this residue is mutated, the
identity of amino acids substituted for the arginine is shown by a
letter after a slash mark in the construct name (single letter amino acid code); constructs with no slash mark and letter contain an arginine.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic representations of the double
chimera ROON-S2, the cyclic nucleotide binding site, and the activation
gating model of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. A, diagram
of the double chimera ROON-S2 showing the replacement of the bRET1 N-S2 domain (Asn91-Ser240) and P-region
(Ala344-Ala378) by the homologous sequences
from fOLF1 (Glu89-Arg215 and
Ser314-Phe348, respectively). bRET1 sequences
are portrayed as light lines and hollow boxes,
and fOLF1 sequences are dark lines and filled boxes. The first six boxes correspond to the S1-S6 transmembrane segments. The seventh open box, in
the carboxyl terminus, corresponds to the C-helix of the CNB site. The
CNB site extends from the hashed line in the carboxyl terminus to the
end of the C-helix box. In RO133, only the P domain of bRET1
(Ala344-Ala378) is replaced by that of fOLF1
(Ser314-Phe348). The position of
Arg559 is indicated. B, comparison of the amino
acid sequences of homologous cyclic nucleotide binding sites from CAP
(residues 9-133) (13, 14), bPKA R1 (residues 141-258, A site;
259-379 B site) (15), bRET1 (residues 483-609) (16), fOLF1 (residues
453-579) (17), dEAG (residues 577-702) (11), and KAT1 (residues
383-510) (7). We have aligned all presently deposited CAP, PKA, and
PKG sequences and confirmed that the six invariant residues identified
by Shabb and Corbin (1) (marked by asterisks) are retained
(not shown). Bars above the sequence indicate the positions
of the -helices and -strands identified in the CAP crystal
structure (3). The invariant arginine in 7 is identified throughout
the text on the basis of the numbering sequence of bRET1
(Arg559) or fOLF1 (Arg529) (see "Experimental
Procedures"). C, model of the bRET1 CNB site showing the
state-independent interaction of the -roll residue Arg559 with the cyclized phosphate and the open
state-dependent interaction of the C -helix residue
Asp604 with the purine ring of cGMP (from Zagotta and
Siegelbaum (2) adopted from Kumar and Weber (5)). D, the
cyclic allosteric model of Monod, Wyman, and Changeux (18). See
"Experimental Procedures" for definition of constants.
|
|
Electrophysiological Recordings--
Inside-out patches were
obtained from Xenopus oocytes 1-7 days after injection with
cRNA (Message Machine, Ambion). In most experiments, recordings were
performed with symmetrical solutions (67 mM KCl, 30 mM NaCl, 10 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH). Na-cGMP was
included in the intracellular solution by iso-osmolar replacement of
NaCl. In some experiments, we completely replaced the KCl and NaCl with
100 mM Na-cGMP. Data were acquired using an Axopatch 200A
patch clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments) and then digitized (Macintosh
Centris 650 personal computer; ITC-16 interface and PULSE software,
Instrutech Corp.) following low pass filtering (8 pole Bessel filter,
Frequency Devices 902). Single channel recordings were filtered at 4 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz. Macroscopic currents were filtered at 1 kHz and digitized at 2 kHz. All data were acquired at a holding potential of 80 mV.
Data Analysis--
K1/2 was estimated from
fits to the Hill equation, Popen = Pmax/[1 + (K1/2/[A])h], where
K1/2 is the apparent affinity, [A] is
the agonist concentration, h is the Hill coefficient, and
Popen is the observed open probability at a
given concentration of cGMP. For all constructs except ROON-S2/D, this
was determined from patches containing many channels and calculated
according to Popen = (IcGMP/Imax)Pmax,
where IcGMP is the macroscopic current at a
given concentration of cGMP and Imax is the
maximal current at a saturating concentration of cGMP, measured in the
same patch. As such macroscopic recordings were never obtained for
ROON-S2/D, all open probabilities were determined from single channel
recordings, as described below. For the following constructs,
Pmax was determined from single channel patches
in the presence of a saturating concentration of cGMP (given in
parentheses): ROON-S2 (0.3 mM), ROON-S2/K (3 mM), ROON-S2/Q (3 mM), ROON-S2/N (30 mM), RO133 (3 mM), fOLF1 (3 mM),
and fOLF1/Q (30 mM). For each patch, 20-40 s of continuous
recording was accumulated into an all points amplitude histogram, such
as those shown in Fig. 2. As these histograms included all open and
closed events, the area of the closed peak represents the closed
probability (Pclosed) and
Pmax is equal to 1 Pclosed. However, for ROON-S2/L, ROON-S2/E, ROON-S2/D, and RO133/Q, 30 mM cGMP was not saturating.
Higher concentrations of cGMP caused the maximal current to decrease, possibly due to desensitization. Accordingly for these four constructs, we first normalized the dose-response data by the open probability directly measured with 30 mM cGMP.
Pmax was then obtained by fitting the Hill
equation to the normalized data. This introduced only a minor
correction for ROON-S2/L, ROON-S2/E, and RO133/Q. The correction was
larger for ROON-S2/D, which had the most displaced dose-response curve.
For ROON-S2/L and ROON-S2/D, this procedure can lead to
Pmax values that are slightly larger than 1, reflecting the error inherent in this procedure given that the observed
open probabilities are so close to 1 originally. Where appropriate, the
values for Popen (with 30 mM cGMP)
are reported in the legends to Figs. 4 and 6, in addition to the
estimated value of Pmax. This small error will
not significantly affect our estimates of K1/2.
Throughout the manuscript, data are given as mean ± S.E. or mean ± range for those cases in which n = 2. Fits
are weighted to the reciprocal of the standard deviation of the mean
data.
Determination of Electrostatic Distance--
Our goal in these
experiments is to dissect out the contribution of the conserved
arginine in 7 to ligand binding and channel activation. Although
K1/2 values depend, in general, on both ligand affinity and the coupled gating reaction, for those mutations that do
not alter channel gating (Pmax), changes in
K1/2 must reflect a selective change in ligand
affinity. Since the Arg559 mutations studied here do not
alter Pmax, we have used the observed changes in
K1/2 with the various Arg559 point
mutants to calculate the change in free energy of the actual binding
reactions. Thus, the change in free energy of binding, ( G), upon changing charge at Arg559 is
given by,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where K1 and K2 are
the K1/2 values for the wild-type and mutant
channels, respectively. Assuming that the change in free energy reflects a simple coulombic interaction between the residue at position
559 and the cyclized phosphate of cGMP, it follows that,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
and from Equations 1 and 2, we obtain the electrical distance
r,
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where R is the gas constant, T is the
temperature, q1 is the change in charge at
position 559 between wild-type and mutant channels,
q2 is the charge on the cyclized phosphate of
the ligand, N is Avogadro's number, and and
0 are the dielectric constant of the binding site
environment and the vacuum permittivity, respectively. As this is a
solvent-accessible part of the binding site, we assume that the charged
groups are fully ionized and that the dielectric constant equals that
of water.
Fits of the Monod-Wyman-Changeux Gating Model--
We have
previously shown (20, 27) that the simplest kinetic scheme that
describes the equilibrium gating properties of CNG channels is the
cyclical allosteric model of Monod, Wyman, and Changeux (18) (Fig.
1D). According to the model, the channel undergoes an
allosteric transition between the closed (C) and open
(O) state in the absence of ligand, with an equilibrium
constant L0 (equal to [C]/[O]).
Agonists activate the channel by binding more tightly to the open state
than to the closed state (dissociation constants KO
and KC, respectively), thereby shifting the
equilibrium from the closed state to the open state by the term
(KO/KC)n (where
n is the number of agonists bound to the channel). To partition the effects of mutating the conserved arginine between ligand-binding reactions and the channel-opening reaction, the increase
in channel open probability as a function of ligand concentration was
fit to the MWC model.
|
(Eq. 4)
|
In these fits, the only free parameter was
KO. Pmax was constrained to
the value determined from single channel recording (see above), and the
number of ligand-binding sites was assumed to be four (29).
KC was determined from the relation:
KC = KO/[(1 Pmax)/(Pmax·L0)]1/n.
L0 for RO133 (7999) and fOLF1 (443) were constrained to the values previously determined from the unliganded open probability, Psp, measured for each of these channels (27).
The values of L0 for RO133/Q and fOLF1/Q were assumed to be
equal to those of the parent channel. This assumption seems reasonable
since we have previously shown that mutation of Arg559 to a
glutamine had no effect on the value of L0 in the ROON-S2 background (27). For fits of the MWC equation, open probabilities were
corrected for subtraction of the unliganded open probability (Psp) according to Popen = (IcGMP/Imax)(Pmax Psp) + Psp.
 |
RESULTS |
The fundamental effects on single channel function of replacing
Arg559 of the chimeric CNG channel, ROON-S2, with either a
neutral (ROON-S2/Q) or acidic (ROON-S2/E) amino acid residue are
illustrated in Fig. 2. ROON-S2,
ROON-S2/Q, and ROON-S2/E require progressively greater concentrations
of cGMP to open. Whereas 0.003 mM cGMP is sufficient to
cause ROON-S2 to be open for more than half the time, even a 10-fold
higher concentration of cGMP (0.03 mM) activates ROON-S2/Q to only a relatively low extent. ROON-S2/E exhibits almost no openings,
even at 0.3 mM cGMP. Despite this >1000-fold reduction in
sensitivity to ligand, the open probability obtained at saturating concentrations of cGMP (Pmax) for all three
constructs is very close to 1 (top traces). These data thus
suggest that neutralization and reversal of the charge at position 559 leads to a progressive decrease in the sensitivity of the channel to
cGMP. A concern in all mutagenesis experiments is that the observed
effects are due to a global disruption of the structure and function of
the protein. As the ion conducting pore of the CNG channels is largely formed from the loop between the 5th and 6th transmembrane domains (28), with no detectable contribution from the carboxyl terminus, we
determined the single channel conductance properties of each of these
mutants. Despite the large change in ligand sensitivity, the
representative single channel traces (Fig. 2) reveal that the current
flow through the open channel for the two point mutants is
indistinguishable from that of ROON-S2. The open states of all three
channels are characterized by pronounced open channel noise, which is
readily seen by comparison with the base-line noise when the channels
are closed (lower traces of each pair). This excess noise is
due to the rapid, partial block and unblock of the open channel by
external protons (28, 30).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Single channel properties of ROON-S2,
ROON-S2/Q, and ROON-S2/E. A, representative records of the
three channels at the indicated high (top sweep) and low
(bottom sweep) concentrations of cGMP. The dashed
lines indicate the mean current flow through the patch during the
closed (C) and open (O) states of the channels. B, all points amplitude histograms constructed from 20-40 s
of data. To enable the closed channel base line to be clearly resolved in the Gaussian fitting routine, an arbitrary duration of base line was
accumulated into the histograms along with each opening. Accordingly,
the area of the Gaussian representing the closed component is also
arbitrary and does not reflect the closed probability. The relative
areas of the three Gaussian components fit to the open channel current
does, however, determine the fractional occupancy of the open channel
in each of its three conducting states.
|
|
The similarity of the open channel current properties among the
constructs is confirmed from the all-points current amplitude histograms (Fig. 2, right panels). These data are well
fitted by four Gaussian functions. The Gaussian function near 0 pA
reflects the closed state of the channel. The other three Gaussian
components reflect current flow through the open channel, with the
largest current component corresponding to the fully open channel (no proton block), the intermediate component corresponding to channels occupied by a single proton, and the small component corresponding to
channels occupied by two protons (28, 30). Neither the amplitude (the
current value at the peak of each of the fitted Gaussian functions) nor
the occupancy (the relative areas under the three open state Gaussian
functions) of these open channel current states were significantly
affected by the mutations at Arg559 (see also Fig. 5). The
small variations in the shapes of the amplitude histograms probably
reflect small variations in pH or temperature, and hence the proton
block, among the recordings. The fact that the open channel
characteristics are unchanged by the point mutations suggests that they
do not cause a generalized disruption in channel structure.
To interpret the effect of these mutations quantitatively, we measured
Popen over a broad range of cGMP concentrations
and fit the dose-response relationships by the Hill equation. As is seen in Fig. 3, the effect of these
mutations was to cause essentially parallel shifts in the dose-response
curves toward greater concentrations of ligand. Thus, the slope of the
relationships and the Pmax values were largely
unaltered while the K1/2 for activation of ROON-S2, ROON-S2/Q, and ROON-S2/E by cGMP increased from 1.8 ± 0.3 µM (n = 10) to 50 ± 8 µM (n = 8) and 3379 ± 1005 µM (n = 5), respectively. That is,
neutralization of Arg559 resulted in a 28-fold increase in
the K1/2 value, whereas charge reversal increased
further the K1/2 value by 68-fold.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Progressive decrease in the apparent affinity
of cGMP-dependent activation upon neutralization and charge
reversal of Arg559 of ROON-S2. Observed open
probabilities of ROON-S2 ( , n = 10), ROON-S2/Q ( ,
n = 8), and ROON-S2/E ( , n = 5) are
plotted against cGMP concentration and fit with the Hill equation.
Values for Pmax, K1/2, and
the Hill coefficient are given in the legend to Fig. 4.
|
|
We next asked if the chemical identity of the residue at position 559 was important or if the altered activation of the mutant channels was
simply a consequence of the change in charge on the side chain. To
investigate this, we constructed a more extensive series of mutations
in the ROON-S2 background, generating channels with basic (arginine or
lysine), neutral (glutamine, asparagine, or leucine), or acidic
(glutamate or aspartate) residues at position 559. The gating
properties of each construct were then determined.
Fig. 4A shows that
Pmax for all of the constructs was 0.98, indistinguishable from the parent chimera ROON-S2. Together, the data
in Figs. 2, 3, and 4A show that neither the charge nor chemical identity of the side chain of residue 559 has a detectable influence upon the ability of bound ligand to open the channel.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effects of mutation of Arg559 in
ROON-S2. A, plot of Pmax
versus charge at position Arg559 for
ROON-S2 ( , Pmax = 0.999 ± 0.001, n = 5), ROON-S2/K ( , Pmax = 0.999 ± 0.001, n = 2), ROON-S2/Q ( ,
Pmax = 0.999 ± 0.001, n = 3), ROON-S2/N ( , Pmax = 0.999 ± 0.001, n = 4), ROON-S2/L ( , Popen = 0.976 ± 0.014, Pmax = 1.005 ± 0.014, n = 4), ROON-S2/E ( , Popen = 0.951 ± 0.024, Pmax = 0.976 ± 0.025, n = 5), and ROON-S2/D ( ,
Popen = 0.868 ± 0.090, Pmax = 1.021 ± 0.060, n = 3). Note that the Pmax for ROON-S2/L, ROON-S2/D,
and ROON-S2/E are estimated from the open probability at 30 mM cGMP corrected by the maximal response obtained from the
fits of dose-response data to the Hill equation (see "Experimental
Procedures"). B, a plot of the log of the apparent
affinity (K1/2) versus charge at position
Arg559 in the ROON-S2 background. Values of the
K1/2 and the Hill coefficient derived from fits of
the Hill equation are: ROON-S2, 1.8 ± 0.3 µM,
1.9 ± 0.1, n = 10; ROON-S2/K, 126 ± 21 µM, 1.6 ± 0.2, n = 3; ROON-S2/Q,
50 ± 8 µM, 1.7 ± 0.2, n = 8;
ROON-S2/N, 706 ± 101 µM, 1.9 ± 0.3, n = 4; ROON-S2/L, 1588 ± 93 µM,
1.5 ± 0.1, n = 5; ROON-S2/E, 3379 ± 1005 µM, 2.0 ± 0.4, n = 5; and
ROON-S2/D, 9881 ± 6359 µM, 2.7 ± 1.1, n = 3. Symbols have the same meaning as in panel
A. The solid line is a linear regression fit to all of
the data. The slope of this relationship is 19.5-fold for an elementary
change in charge, r = 0.828. The dashed
lines are linear regressions between ROON-S2/Q-ROON-S2/E and
ROON-S2/N-ROON-S2/D as indicated. The slopes of these relationships are
68- and 14-fold for an elementary change in charge, respectively.
|
|
In contrast, a plot of K1/2 versus charge
on the side chain of residue 559 reveals that there are both
electrostatic and steric effects of side chain substituents upon the
apparent affinity for ligand (Fig. 4B). Thus, introducing
the charge-conserving lysine (ROON-S2/K) residue resulted in a decrease
in apparent affinity. Surprisingly, the 70-fold increase in
K1/2 was larger than the 28-fold increase seen upon
neutralization with glutamine. Lysine has two important differences
when compared with arginine. First, it is the equivalent of one
methylene bridge shorter, and second, it has a point charge on a
primary amine, whereas arginine has the charge delocalized over the
guanidinium group. As there are no other amino acids with basic side
chains, it is not possible to distinguish between the steric effect of
shortening the side chain from an effect of alteration in local field
strength.
Mutation of Arg559 to neutral and acidic amino acids does
permit us to address this question further. Replacement of
Arg559 with an asparagine (which is one methylene bridge
shorter than glutamine, but otherwise identical), to generate the
ROON-S2/N mutant, gives rise to a far more pronounced increase in
K1/2 (392-fold) than does replacement with glutamine
(ROON-S2/Q). This result suggests that chain length or the exact
location of the polar groups, in addition to charge, is an important
determinant of ligand affinity. The importance of side chain polarity
is demonstrated upon introduction of the non-polar residue leucine,
which increased the K1/2 by 882-fold, a more
pronounced modification than that seen with either of the polar
substitutions or with lysine. Leucine is effectively an asparagine in
which the carbonyl oxygen and amino group of the side chain have been
replaced by methyl groups and which has a volume intermediate between
that of glutamine and arginine.
The importance of charge at position 559 was further explored by
reversing the sign of the charge by introduction of either glutamic or
aspartic acid. The K1/2 values of these two mutants was increased by 1877 and 5489 fold, respectively. The magnitudes of
these increases in K1/2 are consistent with the
generation of a repulsive interaction between the acidic side chain of
the amino acid and the cyclized phosphate of the cyclic nucleotide.
However, here again we see that amino acid residue with shorter side
chain produced a more pronounced increase in
K1/2.
A linear regression through the plot of log(K1/2)
values versus charge at position 559 (solid line
in Fig. 4B) yields a slope corresponding to a 19.5-fold
increase in K1/2 for an elementary change in charge
(the mean value of
K2/K1, Equations 1
and 3 under "Experimental Procedures"). Assuming a coulombic
interaction between the residue at position 559 and a single negative
charge on cGMP, this relationship yields an approximate distance of 2.4 Å between the ligand and the charge at position 559 (determined from
Equation 3, under "Experimental Procedures"). Approximate upper and
lower bounds for this value are obtained from the largest and smallest changes in K1/2 observed upon reversal of charge.
The 5489-fold increase in K1/2 upon replacing
arginine by aspartate is equivalent to a distance of 1.7 Å, whereas
the 27-fold increase in K1/2 upon replacing lysine
by glutamate indicates a slightly longer distance of 4.4 Å. The
electrostatic nature of this interaction is supported by the roughly
similar fold increase in K1/2 seen upon changing the
residue at position 559 either from a glutamine to a glutamate or from
an asparagine to an aspartate. In each case, chain length is held
essentially constant while a negative charge is introduced by
conversion of the amide to the acid (Fig. 4B). Taken
together, the data in Fig. 4 are consistent with the formation of a
state-independent ionic bond between the side chain of residue 559 and
the cyclized phosphate of the nucleotide.
Despite the pronounced effect of these point mutations on cGMP
sensitivity, the conductance properties of the mutant channels are
essentially identical to the parent chimera, ROON-S2. This is evident
in Fig. 5, a two-dimensional plot of
conductance versus fractional occupancy of the three open
channel conductance states (unprotonated, singly and doubly protonated,
see Fig. 2). The variability in the amplitude of the largest
conductance state among the different mutants is not correlated with
ionic charge at position 559. Rather, it is likely to reflect a
technical difficulty in fitting this infrequently occupied conductance
level next to the two dominant conductance levels, which represent the
partially and fully protonated states. Taken together, the lack of an
effect of the mutations upon either the single channel conductance or Pmax indicate that the mutations of
Arg559 result in a discrete disruption of the binding site
that selectively lowers the apparent affinity for ligand.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Two-dimensional scatter plot of conductance
versus conductance state occupancy for ROON-S2
Arg559 mutants. The amplitude and relative occupancy
of the three conductance levels of each of the channels (ROON-S2,
n = 6; ROON-S2/K, n = 2; ROON-S2/Q,
n = 4; ROON-S2/N, n = 4; ROON-S2/L,
n = 4; ROON-S2/E, n = 5; and ROON-S2/D,
n = 3) are plotted using the same symbols as in Fig. 4.
Data were obtained from records such as those shown in Fig. 2. The two
clusters at approximately 25 and 50 pS account for 95% of the open
time of the channel with the smallest conductance having the largest
fractional occupancy.
|
|
As these experiments were performed in the background of ROON-S2, a
chimeric channel with unusually high apparent affinity, we were
concerned that the introduction of either the fOLF1 P-region or N-S2
domains may have altered the normal interaction between Arg559 and the ligand. To address these concerns, we tested
the effect of one of the Arg559 point mutations in the
backgrounds of both bRET1 and the chimera RO133 (bRET1 with the fOLF1
P-region). Fig. 6A shows that
the mutation R559Q in the R0133 background increased the
K1/2 of the resulting construct (RO133/Q) 42-fold
with no change in Pmax. A similar decrease in
the apparent affinity was observed upon introduction of the R559Q
mutation in bRET1 (52 ± 6 µM, n = 9 to 2793 ± 368 µM, n = 2; data not
shown). The qualitative and quantitative similarity of the R559Q
mutation in bRET1, RO133, and ROON-S2 demonstrate that the selective
change in apparent affinity upon mutation of Arg559 is an
intrinsic property of the bRET1 CNB site.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The effect of an arginine to glutamine
mutation in RO133 and fOLF1. A, open probabilities of RO133
( , ) and RO133/Q ( , ). Squares represent the
observed open probabilities while the circles are the open
probabilities corrected for subtraction of ligand-independent
activation. This correction is significant only at very low open
probabilities. The solid lines represent fits of the Hill
equation while the dashed lines are the fits of the MWC
model assuming four binding events (see "Experimental Procedures").
From the fits to the Hill equation, we determined values for the
K1/2 and Hill coefficient (RO133, 41 ± 3 µM, 1.9 ± 0.1, n = 7; RO133/Q,
1712 ± 334 µM, 2.2 ± 0.1, n = 5) while Pmax was determined from single channel
recordings (RO133, 0.948 ± 0.015, n = 6; RO133/Q,
0.964 ± 0.043, n = 3, corrected from the
Popen value at 30 mM cGMP of
0.953 ± 0.042, see "Experimental Procedures"). The non-zero
asymptote for Popen at low concentrations of
cGMP reflects the value for the spontaneous open probability of the
channel (see "Experimental Procedures"). B, open
probabilities of fOLF1 ( , ) and fOLF1/Q ( , ).
Symbols and lines have the same meaning as in
panel A. From the fits to the Hill equation, we determined
values for the K1/2 (fOLF1, 45 ± 11 µM, 1.6 ± 0.1, n = 7; fOLF1/Q,
342 ± 60 µM, 1.9 ± 0.1, n = 7) while Pmax was determined from single channel
recordings (fOLF1, 0.421 ± 0.128, n = 6; fOLF1/Q,
0.877 ± 0.069, n = 7).
|
|
What is the basis for this selective increase in
K1/2? To address this, we have utilized the cyclic
allosteric model of Monod, Wyman, and Changeux (18) (Fig.
1D), which we have previously demonstrated to be the
simplest kinetic scheme that adequately describes CNG channel
activation (20, 27). Based upon this model, an increase in
K1/2 can be produced either by a reduction in
affinity for ligand (increase in KO or
KC) or from an increase in the allosteric
equilibrium constant, L0, between the open and closed state
of the channel (L0 = [C]/[O]). However, we have previously shown,
using measurements of agonist-free openings, that the arginine to
glutamine mutation does not alter L0 in ROON-S2 (27).
Moreover, a change in L0 in any of the mutants would not
only increase K1/2 but would also significantly
reduce Pmax, which was not observed (Figs.
2A, 4A, and 6A). Rather, these data
suggest that mutation of Arg559 lowers the apparent
affinity by specifically decreasing the absolute affinity of the CNB
site for ligand.
To investigate the effect of the arginine to glutamine mutation
quantitatively, we fit cGMP dose-response curves with the MWC model to
determine KO and KC for RO133 and RO133/Q (Fig. 6A), constructs that allow us to determine
Pmax with a high degree of accuracy. Plotting
these equilibrium constants as free energy terms ( G = RT ln(1/K)) shows that the mutation reduces the absolute
binding affinities of both the open (KO) and closed
(KC) states of the channel
(Fig. 7A). Indeed, the change
in free energy of cGMP binding between the wild-type channel and the
glutamine mutant ( ( G), filled circles in
each plot) shows that KO and KC
are destabilized equivalently, by 2.21 and 2.27 kcal
mol 1, respectively. These amounts are consistent with the
disruption of an ionic bond.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Free energy plot of cGMP dissociation
constants for binding to bRET1 and fOLF1 cyclic nucleotide binding
sites and the destabilization of binding by the arginine to glutamine
mutation. A, values of the dissociation constants of MWC
model for RO133 ( , KO = 2.0 ± 0.2 µM and KC = 39 µM) and
RO133/Q ( , KO = 86 ± 11 µM
and KC = 1852 µM) were determined from
fits in Fig. 6 and are plotted as free energy terms according to
G = RT ln(1/K). The change in free
energy, ( G), upon mutation of the arginine to
glutamine is shown as a filled circle ( ) in each plot. B,
values of the dissociation constants of MWC model for fOLF1 ( ,
KO = 3.0 ± 0.6 µM and
KC = 12.7 µM) and fOLF1/Q ( ,
KO = 43 ± 9 µM and
KC = 322 µM) were determined and
plotted as described above. No error is reported for
KC since this was constrained as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The errors in KO are smaller than the symbols.
|
|
Is this state-independent interaction between the conserved arginine in
7 and the cyclic nucleotide a common characteristic of all CNB
domains or do marked structural rearrangements occur around the
homologous arginine in the -roll of other binding domains? To
address this, we have investigated the effects of mutation of the
homologous arginine to a glutamine in fOLF1. This comparison is
particularly interesting given the differential handling of the Rp- and
Sp-cyclic nucleotide analogs by bRET1 and fOLF1 (26), which suggests
that the -roll portion of the binding site of fOLF1 may differ
significantly from that of bRET1. Fig. 6B compares
dose-response curves for fOLF1 and fOLF1/Q. Although there is a shift
in the fOLF1/Q dose-response curve to higher concentrations, this
effect is less marked (7.6-fold) than is seen in the bRET1 CNB site
(28-54-fold, depending upon the channel background). Surprisingly, the
fOLF1/Q mutant shows a higher Pmax compared with
wild-type fOLF1, despite the decrease in cGMP sensitivity.
These data raise two questions. First, to what extent do these
differences in gating properties between bRET1 and fOLF1 result from a
fundamental difference in the mechanistic behavior of their binding
sites? Second, how can a mutation destabilize binding but increase
efficacy? To investigate these questions, we fit the dose-response data
for fOLF1 and fOLF1/Q with the MWC model and determined
KO and KC for these two channels. This analysis reveals that the impact of the R to Q mutation on ligand
binding in fOLF1 is, in fact, very similar to the effect observed in
the bRET1 CNB site. Thus, the destabilization of KO (1.57 kcal mol 1) and KC (1.90 kcal
mol 1) in fOLF1/Q are similar in sign and magnitude to the
changes seen in the bRET1 background. The less marked shift in the
dose-response curve and the increase in Pmax
seen with the arginine to glutamine mutation in fOLF1 arise from small
quantitative differences in the magnitude of the effect of the mutation
upon binding of agonist to the open and the closed states of the
channel, not from a qualitatively different utilization of the binding
energy.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Here we have investigated which regions of CNB sites contribute to
activation and, in particular, whether there is likely to be a
significant change in the interaction between the -roll of the CNB
site and the ligand upon activation. Our studies focused on an arginine
residue in the -roll that is conserved among diverse CNB proteins
and that makes an ionic interaction with the cyclized phosphate of
cyclic nucleotides in both the bacterial CNB protein CAP as well as in
the regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (1-4) (see also Fig. 1).
Mutations of this conserved arginine, in the background of the chimeric
CNG channel ROON-S2, to a series of residues that conserve, neutralize,
or reverse its charge, caused a progressive decrease in apparent
affinity of the channel for ligand. Although an unexplained steric
effect of chain length contributed to this decrease, the clear
dependence of the K1/2 values on charge at position 559 strongly supports the formation of an ion pair between
Arg559 and the cyclized phosphate. This result is
consistent with the x-ray crystallographic structural studies of PKA
RI and CAP (1-4). Indeed, the estimate of the electrostatic
distance between Arg559 and the cyclized phosphate from
these experiments (1.7-4.4 Å) is close to that predicted from the
crystal structures of CAP (3.1-3.5 Å, (3)) and PKA RI (<3.3 Å,
(4)). Despite the large changes in ligand sensitivity with the
Arg559 mutants (spanning nearly four orders of magnitude),
the ability of the bound ligand to activate the channel (as determined
from Pmax) was virtually unaltered. These data
suggest that Arg559 plays an important role in stabilizing
cyclic nucleotide and that these interactions do not contribute to
channel activation. The absence of an effect of the mutations on the
single channel conductance or on Pmax shows that
these mutations are unlikely to cause a global disruption of the
protein.
This surprising result, that the Arg559 point mutants have
large effects on ligand sensitivity but little effect on activation gating, can be readily explained within the context of the MWC allosteric reaction scheme (18). According to this scheme, a concerted
allosteric conformational change in the channel both opens the channel
pore and alters the binding site, causing the ligand affinity of the
open state to be considerably higher than the ligand affinity of the
closed state (dissociation constants KO and
KC, respectively). By measuring ligand-independent openings, we previously determined the allosteric equilibrium constant
between closed and open channels in the absence of agonist, L0, for both bRET1 and fOLF1 (27). We found that a 20-fold
difference in L0 between bRET1 and fOLF1, which contributes
to physiologically important differences in ligand gating (20, 27, 31),
was localized to the amino-terminal N-S2 domain (27). Since this region
of the channel interacts with the carboxyl terminus (32, 33) and is
involved in subunit assembly in the homologous voltage-gated K channels
(34-38), we have postulated that channel activation involves a change
in quaternary structure.
Whereas the difference in the allosteric transition between fOLF1 and
bRET1 is localized to the amino terminus of the channel, the postulated
increase in ligand affinity of the open state of these channels is
mediated, at least in part, by interactions of the cyclic nucleotide
with the C-helix of the carboxyl terminus CNB domain (20, 21). In
particular, an aspartate residue in the C-helix of bRET1,
Asp604, has been shown to make important contacts with cGMP
in the open state, but not closed state, of the channel (21). These
results suggested a model of channel gating in which the allosteric
transition that opens the channel is coupled to a change in the
orientation of the C-helix relative to the roll, leading to an
enhancement of C-helix/ligand contacts. According to this model, the
-roll would provide a relatively stable structure that is involved
in the initial binding of ligand, which orients the nucleotide within the binding pocket. The lack of effect of mutation of
Arg559 on ligand-dependent gating is consistent
with this hypothesis.
A quantitative analysis of the effect of mutating arginine 559 to
glutamine was performed by fitting the MWC model to the cGMP
dose-response data. This was done in the background of a chimeric
channel, RO133 (bRET1 with the fOLF1 P region), because the gating
properties and large single channel conductance of this construct
facilitated accurate determination of Pmax, and hence, the channel activation parameters (28). This analysis shows that
the R559Q mutation decreases the affinity of the open (KO) and closed (KC) state of the
channel for ligand by an identical amount. From these data we can
conclude that there is no significant structural rearrangements between this deep part of the -roll and the ligand upon channel activation. Conversely, we can also conclude that all bonds between the protein and
the ligand that are made more favorable when the channel goes from the
closed to the open state, and stabilize the latter, are unaffected by
the electrostatic and steric effects of substitutions at position
559.
Does this analysis of the interaction between Arg559 in
bRET1 and the cyclic phosphate hold true for other cyclic nucleotide binding pockets? Although mutation of the conserved arginine in CAP (to
lysine, histidine, glutamine, or leucine) and PKA (to either lysine or
tryptophan) has been shown to interfere with ligand-dependent activation, it has been difficult in these
molecules to separate out effects of binding from activation (1, 25, 39-43). To address this question, we therefore constructed the homologous mutation in the fOLF1 CNB domain. This is particularly interesting given the different actions of Rp- and Sp-substituted ligands in fOLF1 and bRET1 (26). In the background of the olfactory channel, mutation of the homologous arginine (Arg529)
actually enhanced Pmax despite a decrease in
ligand sensitivity. This result suggested that there might be a
qualitatively different interaction between cGMP and the -roll of
the fOLF1 binding site compared with the cGMP/bRET1 -roll
interaction. However, a fit of the MWC model showed that these
differences can be explained by relatively small quantitative changes,
amounting to only an ~0.3 kcal mol 1 difference between
the effects of the R529Q substitution on KO and
KC, in which closed state binding is decreased to a
slightly greater extent than open state binding. Such small changes
(equivalent to a fraction of a hydrogen bond) may readily be explained
by indirect effects of the R529Q mutation on the orientation of the
bound ligand rather than a large scale change in the structure of the
fOLF1 -roll during channel activation.
The state-independent interaction with the conserved arginine in 7
in the CNG channels is in contrast to results suggesting that the
neighboring residue, Thr560 in bRET1, may contribute to
activation gating (21, 44). Thus, the mutation T560A produces a
somewhat greater decrease in binding to the open state compared with
the closed state, resulting in a 6-7-fold decrease in
Pmax. Although this suggests that there might be
a state-dependent interaction between Thr560
and ligand, this effect on gating could also be due to an indirect effect of the mutation, either by altering the conformation of the
binding pocket or the orientation of the ligand in the binding site.
For example, the T560A mutation might slightly decrease the ability of
bound ligand to form optimal contacts with the C-helix in the open
state. Although there are many possible interpretations for mutations
that alter gating, only one interpretation is consistent with the
profound state-independent changes in ligand binding seen with the wide
range of Arg559 mutations, that this region of the channel
does not alter its contacts with ligand during gating.
The data presented here, taken together with previous results, suggest
that the CNB site of both fOLF1 and bRET1 CNG channels comprises two
distinct structural and functional domains. The -roll forms
state-independent contacts with ligand that are important for
stabilizing the ligand in the binding pocket, whereas the C-helix makes
state-dependent contacts that increase ligand affinity upon
channel activation and stabilize the channel in its open state (1-4,
20, 21). Based on the qualitatively similar effects of the mutation in
bRET1 (R559Q) and fOLF1 (R529Q), our data suggest that these proteins
undergo a common structural change upon activation despite their
different patterns of activation with Rp- and Sp-cyclic nucleotide
analogs (26). The distinct pharmacology of these two proteins probably
reflects relatively small variations in the conformation of the binding
pockets or the bound ligand rather than qualitatively different
mechanisms of activation. Given the sequence similarity among CAP, the
kinases, and the CNG channels and the similar effects seen in each upon
mutation of the conserved arginine residue, we expect that the CNB
sites of these diverse proteins share a similar functional organization
that underlies the mechanism of ligand activation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Jose Ramirez-Latorre, Pierre
Paoletti, and Edgar Young for insightful and critical help in
preparation of this manuscript and Huan Yau and John Riley for expert
technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Columbia University,
722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-543-5259; Fax:
212-795-7997; E-mail: grt1{at}columbia.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: PKA,
cAMP-dependent protein kinase; PKG,
cGMP-dependent protein kinase; CNG, cyclic nucleotide gated; CNB, cyclic nucleotide binding; CAP, catabolite activating protein; Rp- and Sp-, phosphorothioate derivatives of cyclic
nucleotides; MWC model, model of Monod, Wyman, and Changeux.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Shabb, J. B.,
and Corbin, J. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5723-5726[Free Full Text]
-
Zagotta, W. N.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
19,
235-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Weber, I. T.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1987)
J. Mol. Biol.
198,
311-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Su, Y.,
Dostmann, W. R. G.,
Herberg, F. W.,
Durick, K.,
Xuong, N-h.,
Ten Eyck, L.,
Taylor, S. S.,
Varughese, K. I.
(1995)
Science
269,
807-813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kumar, V. D.,
and Weber, I. T.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
4643-4649[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Scott, S.-P.,
Harrison, R. W.,
Weber, I. T.,
Tanaka, J. C.
(1996)
Protein Eng.
9,
333-344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anderson, J. A.,
Huprikar, S. S.,
Kochian, L. V.,
Lucas, W. J.,
Gaber, R. F.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3736-3740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hoshi, T.
(1995)
J. Gen. Physiol.
105,
309-328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sentenac, H.,
Bonneaud, N.,
Minet, M.,
Lacroute, F.,
Salmon, J.-M.,
Gaymard, F.,
and Grignon, C.
(1992)
Science
256,
663-665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gaymard, F.,
Cerutti, M.,
Horeau, C.,
Lemaillet, G.,
Urbach, S.,
Ravallec, M.,
Devauchelle, G.,
Sentenac, H.,
and Thibaud, J.-B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22863-22870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Warmke, J.,
Drysdale, R.,
and Ganetzky, B.
(1991)
Science
252,
1560-1562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brüggemann, A.,
Pardo, L. A.,
Stühmer, W.,
and Pongs, O.
(1993)
Nature
365,
445-448[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Aiba, H.,
Fujimoto, S.,
and Ozaki, N.
(1982)
Nucleic Acids Res.
10,
1345-1361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cossart, P.,
and Gicquel-Sanzey, B.
(1982)
Nucleic Acids Res.
10,
1363-1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Titani, K.,
Sasagawa, T.,
Ericsson, L. H.,
Kumar, S.,
Smith, S. B.,
Krebs, E. G.,
Walsh, K. A.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
4193-4199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kaupp, U. B.,
Niidome, T.,
Tanabe, T.,
Terada, S.,
Bönigk, W.,
Stühmer, W.,
Cook, N. J.,
Kangawa, K.,
Matsuo, H.,
Hirose, T.,
Miyata, T.,
Numa, S.
(1989)
Nature
342,
762-766[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Goulding, E. H.,
Ngai, J.,
Kramer, R. H.,
Colicos, S.,
Axel, R.,
Siegelbaum, S. A.,
Chess, A.
(1992)
Neuron
8,
45-58[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Monod, J.,
Wyman, J.,
and Changeux, J.-P.
(1965)
J. Mol. Biol.
12,
88-118[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
4040-4048[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Goulding, E. H.,
Tibbs, G. R.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1994)
Nature
372,
369-374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Varnum, M. D.,
Black, K. D.,
and Zagotta, W. N.
(1995)
Neuron
15,
619-625[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
De Wit, R. J. W.,
Hekstra, D.,
Jastorff, B.,
Stec, W. J.,
Baraniak, J.,
Van Driel, R.,
Van Haastert, J. M.
(1984)
Eur. J. Biochem.
142,
255-260[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dostmann, W. R. G.,
and Taylor, S. S.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
8710-8716[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Butt, E.,
van Bemmelen, M.,
Fischer, L.,
Walter, U.,
and Jastorff, B.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
263,
47-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gronenborn, A. M.,
Sandulache, R.,
Gärtner, S.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
253,
801-807[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kramer, R. H.,
and Tibbs, G. R.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
1285-1293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tibbs, G. R.,
Goulding, E. H.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1997)
Nature
386,
612-615[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Goulding, E. H.,
Tibbs, G. R.,
Liu, D.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1993)
Nature
364,
61-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Liu, D. T.,
Tibbs, G. R.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
983-990[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Root, M. J.,
and MacKinnon, R.
(1994)
Science
265,
1852-1856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gordon, S. E.,
and Zagotta, W. N.
(1995)
Neuron
14,
857-864[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gordon, S. E.,
Varnum, M. D.,
and Zagotta, W. N.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
431-441[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Varnum, M. D.,
and Zagotta, W. N.
(1997)
Science
278,
110-113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li, M.,
Jan, Y. N.,
and Jan, L. Y.
(1992)
Science
257,
1225-1230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shen, N. V.,
Chen, X.,
Boyer, M. M.,
Paffinger, P. J.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
67-76[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Babila, T.,
Moscucci, A.,
Wang, H.,
Weaver, F. E.,
Koren, G.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
615-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tu, L. W.,
Santarelli, V.,
and Deutsch, C.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
68,
147-156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tu, L.,
Santarelli, V.,
Sheng, Z.,
Skach, W.,
Pain, D.,
and Deutsch, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
18904-18911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bubis, J.,
Neitzel, J. J.,
Saraswat, L. D.,
Taylor, S. S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
9668-9673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Øgreid, D.,
Døskeland, S. O.,
Gorman, K. B.,
Steinberg, R. A.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
17397-17404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Steinberg, R. A.,
Gorman, K. B.,
Øgreid, D.,
Døskeland, S. O.,
Weber, I. T.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3547-3553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moore, J.,
Kantorow, M.,
Vanderzwaag, D.,
and McKenney, K.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
8030-8035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Belduz, A. O.,
Lee, E. J.,
and Harman, J. G.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
1827-1835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Altenhofen, W.,
Ludwig, J.,
Eismann, E.,
Kraus, W.,
Bönigk, W.,
and Kaupp, U. B.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
88,
9868-9872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Joyce, C. Levy, K. Gabor, S. M. Pop, B. D. Biehl, T. I. Doukov, J. M. Ryter, H. Mazon, H. Smidt, R. H. H. van den Heuvel, et al.
CprK Crystal Structures Reveal Mechanism for Transcriptional Control of Halorespiration
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 22, 2006;
281(38):
28318 - 28325.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Young and N. Krougliak
Distinct Structural Determinants of Efficacy and Sensitivity in the Ligand-binding Domain of Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Channels
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 30, 2004;
279(5):
3553 - 3562.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Chen and J. C. Lee
Functional Roles of Loops 3 and 4 in the Cyclic Nucleotide Binding Domain of Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein from Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 4, 2003;
278(15):
13235 - 13243.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. B. Kaupp and R. Seifert
Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Ion Channels
Physiol Rev,
July 1, 2002;
82(3):
769 - 824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. G. Ochoa de Alda and J. Houmard
Genomic survey of cAMP and cGMP signalling components in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803
Microbiology,
December 1, 2000;
146(12):
3183 - 3194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Barbuti, M Baruscotti, C Altomare, A Moroni, and D DiFrancesco
Action of internal pronase on the f-channel kinetics in the rabbit SA node
J. Physiol.,
November 1, 1999;
520(3):
737 - 744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li and H. A. Lester
Functional Roles of Aromatic Residues in the Ligand-Binding Domain of Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels
Mol. Pharmacol.,
May 1, 1999;
55(5):
873 - 882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|