J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 9, 4928-4936, February 27, 1998
Microtubule-interfering Agents Activate c-Jun N-terminal
Kinase/Stress-activated Protein Kinase through Both Ras and
Apoptosis Signal-regulating Kinase Pathways*
Tzu-Hao
Wang
,
Hsin-Shih
Wang§,
Hidenori
Ichijo¶,
Paraskevi
Giannakakou
,
James S.
Foster
,
Tito
Fojo
, and
Jay
Wimalasena
**
From the
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center,
Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, the § Department of Obstetrics
and Gynecology, Chang-Gung Medical School, Chang-Gung Memorial
Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, the ¶ Department of Biochemistry, the
Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 170, Japan, and the
Medicine Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences,
NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
 |
ABSTRACT |
The essential cellular functions associated with
microtubules have led to a wide use of microtubule-interfering agents
in cancer chemotherapy with promising results. Although the most well
studied action of microtubule-interfering agents is an arrest of cells
at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, other effects
may also exist. We have observed that paclitaxel (Taxol), docetaxel (Taxotere), vinblastine, vincristine, nocodazole, and colchicine activate the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase
(JNK/SAPK) signaling pathway in a variety of human cells. Activation of
JNK/SAPK by microtubule-interfering agents is
dose-dependent and time-dependent and requires
interactions with microtubules. Functional activation of the
JNKK/SEK1-JNK/SAPK-c-Jun cascade (where JNKK/SEK1 is JNK kinase/SAPK
kinase) was demonstrated by activation of a
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response element (TRE) reporter construct in a c-Jun dependent
fashion. Microtubule-interfering agents also activated both Ras and
apoptosis signal-regulating kinase (ASK1) and coexpression of dominant
negative Ras and dominant negative apoptosis signal-regulating kinase
exerted individual and additive inhibition of JNK/SAPK activation by
microtubule-interfering agents. These findings suggest that multiple
signal transduction pathways are involved with cellular detection of
microtubular disarray and subsequent activation of JNK/SAPK.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
c-Jun N-terminal kinases
(JNKs),1 also known as
stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs), are involved in a signal
transduction pathway parallel to that of mitogen-activated protein
kinases (MAPKs) (1-6). This highly conserved cascade is responsive to stress-related stimuli such as UV irradiation, ionizing radiation, ischemia and reperfusion, and inflammatory cytokines, eliciting phosphorylation and activation of JNK/SAPKs (7-12). Activated JNK/SAPKs phosphorylate a variety of transcription factors including c-Jun, leading to transcriptional activation through interactions with
c-Jun responsive DNA elements such as TPA response element (TRE). In
addition to responding to extracellular stimuli (13), the
JNK/SAPK pathway is also activated by intracellular stresses including
inhibition of protein synthesis, treatment with antimetabolites, or DNA
damage (8, 10, 14). No association has been shown, however, between
microtubule disruption and JNK/SAPK activation.
Microtubule-interfering agents (MIAs) utilized in the present study
include paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, vincristine, nocodazole,
and colchicine. Through differential binding to microtubule polymers
(paclitaxel, docetaxel) or tubulin monomer and dimers (vinblastine,
vincristine, nocodazole, colchicine), MIAs interfere with the dynamic
process of microtubule assembly (15). Effects of MIAs include an arrest
of cells at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle and initiation
of apoptosis (16-21). It has been proposed, however, that
G2/M arrest may not be sufficient to induce apoptosis and
that additional phosphoregulatory pathways may be required (17, 22,
23). On the other hand, evidence is also accumulating to indicate that
JNK/SAPK activation may regulate the cell cycle (12, 24) and apoptosis
(11, 25-27). In this report, we identify that treatment with MIAs
activated JNK/SAPK in a variety of human cells, suggesting activation
of JNK/SAPK to be a common cellular response to MIA-induced
microtubular disarray.
Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase (ASK1) is a recently characterized
MAPK kinase kinase (28). Overexpression of ASK1 induces apoptosis in
mink lung epithelial cells, and ASK1 is activated in cells treated with
tumor necrosis factor-
, suggesting a role of ASK1 in stress- and
cytokine-induced apoptosis (28). Here we report that
microtubule-interfering agents activate JNK/SAPK through signal
transduction by both Ras and ASK1, indicating that multiple signal
transduction pathways may be required for this type of cellular stress
response. These results, for the first time, demonstrate involvement of
Ras, ASK1, and JNK/SAPK in signal transduction pathways initiated by
microtubular disarray.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
Human fibroblasts (CRL1502), breast cancer
cells MCF-7 and T47D, choriocarcinoma JEG-3, and osteosarcoma SAOS-2
were obtained from ATCC (Rockville, MD). Ovarian carcinoma cells BR
(29), 67R (30), 1A9, and the tubulin mutant, paclitaxel-resistant derivatives of 1A9 cells, PTX10 and PTX22 (31, 32), were described previously, as was isolation of primary trophoblast from term placentae
(33). All cell lines were cultured in DMEM/F-12 (Sigma) supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, and streptomycin except
that primary trophoblasts were cultured in DMEM-HG (Sigma) supplemented
with 20% FBS. Both PTX10 and PTX22 cells were maintained in 15 ng/ml
paclitaxel and 5 µg/ml verapamil continuously but were cultured in
drug-free medium for 5 days prior to each experiment.
Chemicals and Cell Treatment--
Unless noted, all chemicals
were purchased from Sigma. Docetaxel (Taxotere) was kindly provided by
S. A. Coughlin (Rhone-Poulenc Pharmaceutic Inc., Collegeville,
PA), and lovastatin was a gift from W. L. Henckler (Merck and Co.,
Rahway, NJ). All stock solutions of MIAs were prepared with
Me2SO at a concentration of 10 mM except that
colchicine (10 mM) was dissolved in absolute ethanol and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (2 mg/ml) was dissolved in water. Lovastatin (10 mM) was prepared with 10% ethanol (34).
Cell treatments were performed in serum-containing culture medium when cells were approximately 80% confluent. As reviewed by Rowinsky (35),
peak plasma concentrations of paclitaxel (Taxol) in patients are
0.21-13.0 µM. Thus, we treated cells with 1 µM paclitaxel in most experiments. For comparison, other
MIAs were used at similar concentrations. UV irradiation was performed
by exposing cells to a germicidal ultraviolet lamp (254 nm, 38 watts,
76-cm distance between plates and the UV lamp) in a tissue culture hood
for 2 min. The UV dose was approximately 40 J/m2 (36).
Cells were then incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 1 h before preparing cell lysates.
Immunocomplex Kinase Activity Assays--
Anti-JNK1 or anti-MAPK
(ERK2) antibodies, purified GST-c-Jun (amino acids 1-79), and protein
A-agarose beads were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa
Cruz, CA). The procedure for the immunocomplex kinase assay of JNK was
modified from Derijard et al. (2). Whole cell lysates were
prepared with lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
Na3VO4, and 10 mM NaF), and 100 µg was immunoprecipitated with antibody in excess and protein
A-agarose beads at 4 °C overnight. The precipitates were washed with
lysis buffer and kinase buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 25 mM MgCl2, and 25 mM
-glycerophosphate) and the kinase reactions for JNK/SAPK were
performed by incubating immunoprecipitated proteins with kinase mixture
(1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM
Na3VO4, 10 µM ATP, 5 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP, and 0.2 µg of GST-c-Jun in kinase buffer)
at room temperature for 30 min. Laemmli's loading buffer was added to
stop the reaction, and samples were resolved on SDS-PAGE. The procedure
for the immunocomplex MAPK assay was identical to the JNK/SAPK assay
except an anti-ERK2 antibody was used for immunoprecipitation and
myelin basic protein (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) was
the substrate. GST-c-Jun or myelin basic protein (MBP) bands on
autoradiograms were analyzed with a Lynx4000 video densitometer
(Applied Imaging, Santa Clara, CA).
Western Blotting Analysis--
Aliquots of cell lysates resolved
on SDS-PAGE were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and probed
with antibodies as specified, followed by second antibody conjugated
with horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After washing,
proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce).
Plasmid Constructs and Transfection--
A reporter construct
for the TPA response element, p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT (37), was from Z. Culig
(University of Innsbruck, Austria). An expression vector for
-galactosidase (pCMV-lacZ), hemagglutinin (HA)-epitope tagged
expression vectors pSR
-HA-JNK1 and pSR
-HA-ERK2 (38), and
dominant-negative (dn) expression vectors pSR
-dn Ras (17N) and
pSR
-dn Rac (17N) (39) were from M. Karin (University of California
at San Diego). An expression vector for dn c-Jun (pCMV-TAM67) was from
M. Birrer (NCI, NIH) (40). Dominant-negative expression vectors for
JNK/SAPK (pSR
-APF) and for JNKK/SEK1 (pSR
-K116R) were from
G. L. Johnson (National Jewish Center for Immunology and
Respiratory Medicine, Denver, CO) (41). Expression vectors for wild
type ASK1 (pcDNA3-ASK1-HA) and dn ASK1 (pcDNA3-dn ASK1-HA) were
described recently (28). Liposome-mediated transfections were performed
by using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.) on MCF-7 cells, and
using Tfx-50 (Promega, Madison, WI) on BR cells.
Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase (CAT) Assay and Statistical
Analyses--
Cells in six-well plates were cotransfected with
p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT (1.5 µg/well for MCF-7 and 2.5 µg/well for BR), 0.5 µg/well pCMV-lacZ, and 0.5 µg/well either control DNA or dn
expression vectors. At 24 h after transfection, cells were treated
with 1 µM MIA for 16 h. The liquid scintillation CAT
assay was modified from a standard protocol (42). Expression of
-galactosidase was measured with a kit purchased from Promega
(Madison, WI). Data for CAT activities were normalized with levels of
-galactosidase. Statistical analysis of CAT assay values was
performed by analysis of variance and Student's t-test.
Activated Ras Interaction Assay (ARIA)--
Activated Ras
(Ras-GTP) was precipitated from whole cell lysates with the Ras-binding
domain (RBD) of Raf-1 as a GST-RBD fusion protein immobilized on
glutathione beads, followed by detection of precipitated Ras by Western
blot with anti-Ras antibodies (43, 44). The bacterial expression vector
for GST-RBD, pGEX-RBD, was provided by D. Shalloway (Cornell
University) (43). BR cells growing to 90% confluence in 10-cm dishes
were serum-starved (0.1% fetal calf serum) for 48 h, then treated
with 1 µM paclitaxel or vinblastine for 30 or 120 min.
Cells treated with 50 ng/ml epidermal growth factor for 10 min were
used as positive controls. Treated cells were rinsed with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline twice and lysed with 0.4 ml/dish of
Mg-containing lysis buffer (MLB: 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 10%
glycerol, 25 mM NaF, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin). Activated Ras was precipitated by
GST-RBD in excess. After three washes with MLB, activated Ras was
eluted from beads by boiling in Laemmli's loading buffer, subjected to
14% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and detected
using anti-Ras antibody (Santa Cruz, SC-035).
Immunocomplex Kinase Assays of HA-JNK1, HA-ERK2, and
ASK1-HA--
Since efficiencies of transient transfection in both BR
and MCF-7 cells were limited (20% and 15%, respectively), we were not
able to accurately evaluate the effects of transfected expression vectors on regulation of JNK/SAPK by direct measurement of endogenous JNK/SAPK activities in the whole population of cells. Therefore, we
cotransfected expression vectors for HA-JNK1 with vectors expressing its potential upstream regulators, then assayed activities of epitope-tagged HA-JNK1. Since we had determined in pilot experiments that transfected HA-JNK1 was optimally activated by 4-h treatment with
MIAs in BR cells (data not shown), we treated with MIAs for 4 h
before measuring HA-JNK1 activity.
BR cells in 60-mm Petri dishes were cotransfected with 4 µg of
pSR
-HA-JNK1 and 2 µg of each expression vector. The total amount
of DNA per dish was brought to 8 µg by adding control vectors (pSR
or pcDNA3). At 24 h after transfection, cells were treated with 1 µM MIAs, cell lysates were prepared and subjected
to immunocomplex kinase assay using excess anti-HA monoclonal antibody,
clone 12CA5 (Boehringer Mannheim), to immunoprecipitate expressed
HA-JNK1. The same amounts of lysates were probed with either anti-HA or anti-JNK1 monoclonal antibodies (PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Since coexpression of some dominant negative upstream regulators inhibited HA-JNK1 expression, HA-JNK1 activities were normalized by the levels of
HA-JNK1 measured in Western blot (38). Identical procedures were
performed for HA-ERK2 except that MBP was the substrate and an anti-ERK
antibody (Santa Cruz) was used in Western blots.
When pcDNA3-ASK1-HA was cotransfected with other expression vectors
into cells, expressed ASK1-HA was immunoprecipitated with excess
anti-HA antibody, extensively washed, and subjected to identical kinase
reactions as for the JNK/SAPK assay. Equivalent increases in
autophosphorylation of ASK1 were observed in parallel to increased
phosphorylation of ATF2 in the coupled-kinase assay for ASK1 using
GST-MKK6, GST-p38, and ATF2 as sequential
substrates.2 Therefore, in
the present study, activities of ASK1 were measured by levels of
in vitro autophosphorylation in ASK1-HA bands that migrated
in SDS-PAGE at approximately 160 kDa.
 |
RESULTS |
MIAs Activate JNK/SAPK in a Variety of Human Cells--
Activities
of JNK/SAPK and MAPK in MIA-treated cells were measured by
immunocomplex kinase assays using GST-c-Jun and MBP as substrates,
respectively. Treatment with 1 µM paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, nocodazole, or colchicine for 2 h activated JNK/SAPK in BR ovarian cancer cells and in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Activation of JNK/SAPK was not accompanied by alterations in JNK/SAPK protein levels as measured by Western blotting of whole cell extracts (Fig.
1A). In contrast, treatment
with MIAs did not significantly activate MAPK/ERK activities. Since BR
cells had higher basal MAPK activities which could obscure modest MAPK
activation by MIAs, HA-ERK2 activity was measured following 1 µM paclitaxel or vinblastine, but no significant
activation was detected (data not shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Microtubule-interfering agents activate
JNK/SAPK in a variety of human cells. A, ovarian cancer
cells (BR) and breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were
treated with 1 µM paclitaxel (P), docetaxel (D), vinblastine (V), nocodazole (N),
colchicine (C), or Me2SO alone ( ) for 2 h
before JNK/SAPK and MAPK (ERK2) activities were analyzed by
immunocomplex kinase assays. GST-c-Jun and MBP were used as substrates
for JNK/SAPK and MAPK, respectively. Equal amounts of whole cell
lysates were also analyzed by Western blot (W.B.) with the
same anti-JNK1 antibody. B, human fibroblasts (CRL), choriocarcinoma (JEG-3), ovarian cancer
cells (67R), osteosarcoma (SAOS-2), breast cancer
cells (T47D), and primary trophoblasts (Tropho.)
were treated with 1 µM MIA (P, D,
V, N, and C) or Me2SO alone ( ) for 2 h before JNK/SAPK activities were analyzed by immunocomplex kinase assay. Numbers under the corresponding
bands indicate the -fold activation of JNK/SAPK or MAPK as based on video densitometry. Autoradiograms shown are from a representative experiment, which was repeated twice with comparable results.
|
|
To test whether activation of JNK/SAPK by MIA is a general response, we
measured JNK/SAPK activities in other cell lines and primary cells.
MIAs activated JNK/SAPK in all tested cell types (Fig. 1B);
the varying magnitude (1.8-15-fold) in different cell types suggests
sensitivity to MIAs may be cell type-specific. It is noteworthy that
MIAs activated JNK/SAPK in both proliferating cancer cell lines and
non-proliferating trophoblasts (33), suggesting that activation is
independent of cell cycle progression.
MIA-induced Activation of JNK/SAPK Is Dose-dependent
and Time-dependent--
In both BR and MCF-7 cells, MIAs
activation of JNK/SAPK was dose-dependent over a range of
0.01-10 µM (Table I). MIAs
activated JNK/SAPK within 30 min of treatment and the JNK/SAPK response peaked between 2 and 8 h, declining to basal levels by 12 h
(Fig. 2). BR cells (Fig. 2A)
appeared to respond more rapidly than MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2B),
suggesting cell type-specific differences.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Dose-dependent activation of JNK/SAPK in BR and MCF-7 cells
by microtubule-interfering agents
Cells were treated with MIAs at designated concentrations for 2 h.
JNK/SAPK activities were assayed by immunocomplex kinase assays and
quantitated by analyzing autoradiograms with a video densitometer.
-Fold activation shown represent the mean ± S.E. from two or
three independent experiments as indicated in parentheses.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Time course of JNK/SAPK activation in BR and
MCF-7 cells by microtubule-interfering agents. BR cells
(A) and MCF-7 cells (B) were treated with 1 µM paclitaxel ( , PTX), vinblastine ( ,
VBL), nocodazole ( , NOC), or colchicine ( ,
COL) for 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, and
12 h, after which JNK/SAPK activities were analyzed by
immunocomplex kinase assays. The -fold activation of JNK/SAPK was
calculated by comparison to basal JNK/SAPK activities. Data shown
represent the means from two independent experiments. Average S.E. for
each time point were about 24% and 22% of mean values of BR and
MCF-7, respectively (S.E. bars are not shown for clear presentation of
all points).
|
|
Interactions with Microtubules Are Required for Activation of
JNK/SAPK by MIAs--
To elucidate whether interactions between MIAs
and tubulin/microtubules are required for activation of JNK/SAPK, we
measured JNK/SAPK activities in BR and MCF-7 cells treated with an
inactive precursor of paclitaxel, 10-deacetylbaccatin III, or an
inactive form of colchicine,
-lumicolchicine. Both agents at
concentrations up to 10 µM failed to activate JNK/SAPK
(Fig. 3A). Since paclitaxel exerts lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-like effects (45) and activates JNK/SAPK in macrophages and monocytes (46), we assayed JNK/SAPK activities in BR and MCF-7 cells treated with purified bacterial LPS.
No significant activation of JNK/SAPK was observed in BR cells, while
in MCF-7 cells, JNK/SAPK activities fell 10-70% below basal
activities in two independent experiments (Fig. 3A). These data do not suggest a role for LPS-like activity of paclitaxel in
JNK/SAPK activation in cancer cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Interactions with microtubules are required
for activation of JNK/SAPK by MIAs. A, BR (upper
panel) and MCF-7 cells (lower panel) were treated for
2 h with Me2SO alone ( ), 10-deacetylbaccatin-III (DAB-III), -lumicolchicine (lumiCOL), or
purified bacterial LPS at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 µM (DAB-III and lumiCOL) or µg/ml
(LPS) (concentrations A-D, respectively), then
JNK/SAPK activities were measured by immunocomplex kinase assays using GST-c-Jun as substrate. B, paclitaxel-sensitive ovarian
cancer 1A9 cells and the paclitaxel-resistant derivatives PTX10 and
PTX22 cells were treated with 40 J/m2 UV, 1 µM paclitaxel, or 1 µM vinblastine for 1 or
8 h, after which JNK/SAPK activities were measured. The
numbers under the corresponding bands indicate -fold
activation of JNK/SAPK as determined by densitometry. Autoradiograms
shown are from a representative experiment, which was repeated twice
with comparable results.
|
|
To further confirm the requirement for microtubular interactions with
MIAs in the activation of JNK/SAPK, we compared JNK/SAPK activation by
paclitaxel in two paclitaxel-resistant cell lines, PTX10 and PTX22
(which express mutant
-tubulins), with that in parental 1A9 cells
(31). Both paclitaxel and vinblastine activated JNK/SAPK in parental
1A9 cells, but only vinblastine was able to activate JNK/SAPK in the
paclitaxel-resistant cell lines (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, UV
irradiation activated JNK/SAPK equally in all three cell lines,
demonstrating a functional JNK/SAPK signaling cascade in these cells,
and indicating the lack of JNK/SAPK activation in paclitaxel-treated
PTX10 and PTX22 cells is a result of the failure of paclitaxel to bind
tubulin (32, 47).
The MIA-activated, JNKK/SEK1-JNK/SAPK Signaling Cascade Activates
Transcription through c-Jun--
To identify possible downstream
effectors of MIA-activated JNK/SAPK, we measured AP-1 transcription
factor activity by transfecting BR and MCF-7 cells with a
p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT reporter construct for 24 h, followed by treatment
with MIAs for 16 h and CAT assays. Fig.
4A shows statistically
significant activation of the TRE reporter by MIAs (p < 0.01 when compared with basal TRE activities). Consistent with the
immunocomplex JNK/SAPK assays in Fig. 3A, 10-deacetylbaccatin III,
-lumicolchicine, and LPS did not activate the TRE reporter (data not shown). In cells cotransfected with p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT and the dn c-Jun expression vector (pCMV-TAM67), both
basal and MIA-activated TRE activity were lower than
Me2SO-treated controls (p < 0.01, Fig.
4B), confirming c-Jun was required for activation of the TRE
reporter construct.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The MIA-activated, JNKK/SEK1-JNK/SAPK
signaling cascade activates transcription through c-Jun. A,
BR cells (solid bars) and MCF-7 cells (shaded
bars) were transiently cotransfected with the p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT
reporter construct and pCMV-lacZ using liposomes. Twenty-four hours
after transfection, cells were treated with 1 µM
paclitaxel (PTX), docetaxel (DTX), vinblastine
(VBL), vincristine (VCR), nocodazole
(NOC), or colchicine (COL) for 16 h. CAT
activity was measured by liquid scintillation counting and normalized
by levels of -galactosidase. The data given are percent activation of CAT activities compared with Me2SO-treated controls
(100 ± 6% for BR and 100 ± 5% for MCF-7, not shown in the graph). B, BR cells were
cotransfected with p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT and control vector (gray
bars) or dn c-Jun expression vector, pCMV-TAM67 (empty
bars), then treated with 1 µM paclitaxel
(PTX), vinblastine (VBL), vincristine (VCR), colchicine (COL), or Me2SO
only. C, activation of transiently transfected
p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT by vinblastine was measured in BR (solid
bars) and MCF-7 (shaded bars) cells that were
cotransfected with control pSR vectors (Control Vector),
dn JNKK/SEK1 expression vector (dn JNKK), or dn JNK/SAPK
expression vector (dn JNK). Data of BR cells shown are the
means ± S.E. of four readings from duplicate samples in two
independent experiments. Data of MCF-7 cells shown are the means ± S.E. of triplicate samples in a representative experiment that was
repeated twice with comparable results.
|
|
To verify that the JNKK/SEK1-JNK/SAPK signaling cascade is activated by
MIAs, we cotransfected BR and MCF-7 cells with p(TRE)x5-TK-CAT and one
of two dn expression vectors before treatment with MIAs. Coexpression
of either dn JNKK/SEK1 or dn JNK/SAPK significantly (p < 0.01, Fig. 4C) reduced activation of the TRE reporter by vinblastine in both BR and MCF-7 cells. Similar inhibition of the TRE
response by coexpressed dn JNKK/SEK1 or dn JNK/SAPK was found with
other MIAs (data not shown). The inhibition of MIA-activated TRE
reporter by dn JNKK/SEK1 suggests that MIAs activate JNK/SAPK upstream
rather than by directly interacting with JNK/SAPK.
Multiple Signal Transduction Pathways, Including Ras and ASK1,
Regulate JNK/SAPK Activation Induced by MIAs--
Lovastatin inhibits
lipidation of Ras (48), which is essential for anchorage to the inner
cell membrane and for Ras activation of the Raf-MAPKK-MAPK signaling
cascade. Pretreatment of BR cells with 100 µM lovastatin
for 24 h partially (about 50%) inhibited JNK/SAPK activation by
MIAs (Fig. 5A). Using ARIA
(43, 44), we identified activation of Ras in serum-starved BR cells
treated with paclitaxel or vinblastine (Fig. 5B) and
confirmed the inhibitory effect of lovastatin on Ras (data not shown).
These results suggest a role for Ras in JNK/SAPK activation by MIAs and
that additional signaling pathways independent of Ras may function as
well.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
A role of Ras in activation of JNK/SAPK by
MIAs. A, lovastatin, an inhibitor of both farnesylation of
Ras and geranylgeranylation of Rac, partially inhibits activation of
JNK/SAPK by MIAs. BR cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium containing
10% FBS without or with 100 µM lovastatin for 24 h,
then treated with 1 µM paclitaxel, docetaxel,
vinblastine, or vincristine for 2 h. JNK/SAPK activities were
measured by immunocomplex kinase assay and densitometry. B,
treatment with paclitaxel or vinblastine activates Ras in serum-starved BR cells. BR cells were serum-starved (0.1% fetal calf serum) for
48 h, then treated with 1 µM paclitaxel or
vinblastine for 30 or 120 min, or treated with 50 ng/ml epidermal
growth factor for 10 min as positive control. ARIA was described under
"Experimental Procedures." Active Ras (upper panel) in
each lane was affinity-purified by GST-RBD from 1200 µg of protein
from BR cell lysates, while total Ras (lower panel) in each
lane were detected from 84 µg of protein from the same whole cell
lysates. Autoradiograms and Western blots shown are from a
representative experiment, which was repeated twice with comparable
results.
|
|
To further elucidate upstream regulators of JNK/SAPK activities, BR
cells cotransfected with expression vectors for HA-epitope-tagged JNK1
and with vectors expressing mutant, dominant-negative forms of
potential upstream regulators, were treated with MIAs. Kinase assays
for exogenously expressed HA-JNK1 were performed to evaluate JNK/SAPK
activation. In these experiments, treatment of BR cells with 1 µM paclitaxel (Fig.
6A) or vinblastine (Fig.
6B) for 4 h resulted in 6.5-6.8-fold activation of
HA-JNK1, respectively. Coexpression of either dn Ras
(17N)3 or dn ASK1 (K709R)
inhibited HA-JNK1 activation, although neither inhibited as efficiently
as dn JNKK/SEK1. However, coexpression of dn Ras and dn ASK1 exerted
additive inhibition on HA-JNK1 activation elicited by either paclitaxel
or vinblastine. In contrast, coexpression of dn ASK1 and dn JNKK/SEK1
did not inhibit HA-JNK1 activity more than dn JNKK/SEK1 alone. These
results suggest that ASK1 and JNKK/SEK1 are in the same signal
transduction pathway, in agreement with studies indicating JNKK/SEK1 is
a downstream effector of ASK1 (28).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Activation of transiently transfected HA-JNK1
by paclitaxel or vinblastine was inhibited by coexpression of dn Ras,
dn ASK1, or dn JNKK/SEK1. BR cells in 60-mm dishes were
transiently transfected with 4 µg of pSR -HA-JNK1 and 2 µg of
each dominant negative expression vector (or combinations as indicated)
for 24 h, then treated with 1 µM paclitaxel
(A) or vinblastine (B) for 4 h. HA-JNK1
activities were measured by immunocomplex kinase assay using an anti-HA
antibody (12CA5) to immunoprecipitate HA-JNK1 from cell lysates and
GST-c-Jun as substrate. Activities of HA-JNK1 were normalized to levels
of HA-JNK1 protein. A nonspecific band recognized by the 12CA5 antibody
is labeled with an asterisk (*, n.s.).
Autoradiogram and Western blot shown are from a representative experiment, which was repeated three times with comparable
results.
|
|
Treatment with MIAs also activated transfected ASK1-HA, as shown by
induced autophosphorylation of ASK1-HA and activation of cotransfected
HA-JNK1 (Fig. 7A). Similarly,
in cells transfected with ASK1-HA alone, treatment with MIAs induced
comparable levels of autophosphorylation of ASK1-HA without
phosphorylation of GST-c-Jun, which was present in the kinase reaction
mixture (data not shown). Furthermore, coexpressed HA-dn JNK did not
phosphorylate GST-c-Jun and did not interfere with autophosphorylation
of ASK1-HA (Fig. 7A). Taken together, these results indicate
that: (i) ASK1-HA does not itself phosphorylate GST-c-Jun, and (ii) the
co-immunoprecipitated HA-JNK1 is unlikely to phosphorylate
ASK1-HA.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
MIAs activate the ASK1-JNKK/SEK1-JNK/SAPK
signaling cascade. A, BR cells in 60-mm dishes were
transiently cotransfected with 4 µg of pcDNA3-ASK1-HA and 4 µg
of either pSR -HA-JNK1 or pSR -HA-dn JNK for 24 h, then
treated with 1 µM paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinblastine, or
vincristine for 4 h. ASK1-HA and HA-JNK1 or HA-dn JNK were
coimmunoprecipitated by anti-HA antibody and used in a kinase reaction
containing GST-c-Jun. Activities of ASK1-HA and HA-JNK1 were measured by levels of autophosphorylation of ASK1-HA
and phosphorylation of GST-c-Jun, respectively. B, BR cells
were cotransfected with 4 µg of pSR -HA-JNK1, 2 µg of
pcDNA3-ASK1-HA, and 2 µg of dominant negative expression vectors
as indicated, then treated with 1 µM paclitaxel for
4 h. For comparison, BR cells that were cotransfected with 4 µg
of pSR -HA-JNK1 and 4 µg of control vectors were treated with UV
irradiation. Activities of HA-JNK1 measured by immunocomplex kinase
assay were normalized to levels of HA-JNK1. A nonspecific band
recognized by the 12CA5 antibody is labeled with an asterisk
(*, n.s.). C, BR cells were cotransfected for
24 h with 3 µg of pSR -HA-JNK1, 1 µg of pcDNA3-ASK1-HA, and
increasing amounts (1, 2, and 4 µg) of each dominant negative expression vector as indicated. Transfected cells were then treated with 1 µM paclitaxel for 4 h and assayed for
activities of ASK1-HA and HA-JNK1. The numbers under the
corresponding bands of GST-c-Jun in the autoradiogram indicate the
-fold activation of HA-JNK1 as based on video densitometry. Data shown
are from a representative experiment, which was repeated twice with
comparable results.
|
|
Overexpression of ASK1-HA enhanced paclitaxel activation of HA-JNK1 to
16-fold over control levels, comparable to the 15-fold activation
induced by UV irradiation (Fig. 7B). The augmentation of
paclitaxel-induced HA-JNK1 activation by ASK1-HA was inhibited by
coexpression of dn Ras, dn Rac, or dn JNKK/SEK1. As shown in Fig.
7B, a 1:1 ratio of the expression vectors for dn JNKK/SEK1 and wild type ASK1 did not completely inhibit the ASK1-enhanced activation of HA-JNK1. However, increasing levels of dn JNKK/SEK1 completely blocked the enhanced HA-JNK1 activation by overexpressed ASK1 without decreasing the levels of MIA-induced activation of ASK1-HA
(Fig. 7C). In agreement with the partial inhibition of HA-JNK1 by dn Ras of dn Rac (Fig. 6), overexpression of either dn Ras
or dn Rac partially inhibited ASK1-augmented activation of HA-JNK1
(Fig. 7C).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Microtubules serve as an intracellular scaffold, and their unique
polymerization dynamics are critical for many cellular functions (15,
49, 50). It is conceivable that cytoskeletal dysfunction, manifested as
either a disrupted microtubule network or a stabilized, "rigid"
microtubule cytoskeleton, is an intracellular stress. In the present
study, we report that disruption of the equilibrium between tubulin
monomer/dimers and microtubule polymers with microtubule stabilizing
(paclitaxel, docetaxel) or destabilizing (vinblastine, vincristine,
nocodazole, colchicine) agents activated the stress-activated protein
kinase (JNK/SAPK) signaling cascade. In both BR and MCF-7 cells,
JNK/SAPK remained activated for up to 8 h after treatment with
MIAs (Fig. 2). Since induction of JNK/SAPK in T-cell activation and
apoptosis can occur in a transient or persistent pattern, respectively
(51), the sustained activation of JNK/SAPK following MIA treatment may
reflect the apoptosis-inducing nature of these drugs.
For the MIAs used in this study, no membrane-associated receptor or
target has been identified (15, 45). Our data indicate that binding to
tubulin and/or microtubules was required for MIA activation of
JNK/SAPK. First, inactive structural derivatives of some MIAs
(10-deacetylbaccatin III and
-lumicolchicine), which do not bind
tubulin/microtubules did not activate JNK/SAPK (Fig. 3). Second,
paclitaxel did not activate JNK/SAPK in the paclitaxel-resistant cell
lines, PTX10 (F270V) and PTX22 (A364T), where single amino acid
mutations in
-tubulin abolish binding of paclitaxel to microtubule and result in paclitaxel resistance (32, 47). The notion that microtubular interactions are required for MIA-activated JNK/SAPK is
strengthened by the observation that, although both paclitaxel and
vinblastine activated JNK/SAPK in the parental 1A9 cells, only
vinblastine, but not paclitaxel, activated JNK/SAPK in the paclitaxel-resistant PTX10 and PTX22 cell lines (Fig.
3B).
We have verified that the JNKK/SEK1-JNK/SAPK-c-Jun signaling cascade
was activated by MIAs with the following evidence. First, MIA treatment
activated transcription from a TRE-CAT reporter construct and this
activation was inhibited by coexpressed dn c-Jun (Fig. 4, A
and B), indicating c-Jun was a downstream effector responsive to treatment with MIAs. Second, coexpression of dn JNK/SAPK
or dn JNKK/SEK1 inhibited MIA-induced TRE reporter activity (Fig.
4C). These results suggest that MIA-activated JNK/SAPK may regulate transcription by activation of c-Jun and formation of functional c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers (AP-1).
Multiple signal transduction pathways are required for activation of
the JNK/SAPK cascade when a cell is perturbed by physical stress (52)
and activation of the JNK/SAPK pathway by environmental stress can
occur via Ras-dependent or Ras-independent pathways (53).
Farnesylation and geranylgeranylation, the major posttranslational modifications of Ras and Rac, respectively, are essential for membrane
anchoring and physiological functions (54). Our observations that
lovastatin at concentrations that block farnesylation and geranylgeranylation (48) was unable to completely block JNK/SAPK activation by MIAs suggest involvement of other pathways, independent of the Ras-Rac cascade.
Indeed, we demonstrated a requirement for both Ras and ASK1 signaling
for full activation of JNK/SAPK by MIAs. First, treatment with
paclitaxel or vinblastine activated Ras (Fig. 5B). Second, dn Ras and dn ASK1 exerted individual and additive inhibition of
HA-JNK1 activation by MIAs (Fig. 6). Third, MIAs activated ASK1-HA with
corresponding activation of HA-JNK1 (Fig. 7A). Finally, overexpression of ASK1-HA augmented MIA-induced activation of HA-JNK1
(Fig. 7B), and this augmentation could be completely blocked by high levels of dn JNKK/SEK1, but not by dn Ras or dn Rac (Fig. 7C). Collectively, these data suggest that both Ras and ASK1
are involved in optimal activation of JNK/SAPK after microtubular disruption and that both may regulate JNK/SAPK activity through the
same downstream transducer, JNKK/SEK1.
Unlike treatment with epidermal growth factor, which activates Ras with
an amplified activation of MAPK, treatment with MIAs induced a more
sustained activation of Ras (Fig. 5B) with negligible activation of MAPK (Fig. 1A). Explanations for this
discrepancy might be twofold. First, the effects of MIAs on the cell
cycle might dissociate the sequential activation in the
Ras-Raf1-MEK-MAPK cascade. This is supported by a report that, during
progression of the cell cycle, there is a temporal dissociation between
Ras and MAPK activation, suggesting Ras may target alternate effector pathways (43). Second, in addition to activation of Ras and ASK1,
microtubular disarray might also activate phosphatase(s) that attenuate
MAPK activation. Several phosphatases that might target MAPK have been
identified (55-59).
Based on these results, we propose that activation of the JNK/SAPK
pathway may be a stress response to the disruption of microtubule dynamics (Fig. 8). In this model,
microtubule-interfering agents enter the cell and disrupt the dynamics
of microtubule assembly. Through a yet-to-be defined mechanism,
microtubular disarray activates both Ras and ASK1. Activated Ras may
activate the JNK/SAPK through activation of Rac (60, 61), activation of
MEKK1 (62), or through direct activation of JNK/SAPK by formation of
the Ras-JNK complex (63). On the other hand, the signal from activated
ASK1 may involve autophosphorylation followed by sequential activation of JNKK/SEK1 and JNK/SAPK. JNK/SAPK in turn activates downstream effectors, including c-Jun and other transcription factors, mediating cellular responses to this stress. Furthermore, disruption of microtubule integrity has been shown to result in phosphorylation of an
anti-apoptosis regulator, Bcl-2 (31, 64), and Bcl-2 can be
phosphorylated by JNK/SAPK in the presence of Rac1 (65). Since the
protective effects of Bcl-2 may be regulated by its phosphorylation
status (66), these studies collectively suggest a potential role of
activated JNK/SAPK in apoptotic regulation of cancer cells after
chemotherapy with MIAs.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Interaction of signal transduction pathways
activated by microtubule-interfering agents. Intracellular stress
caused by microtubule-interfering agents activates both Ras and ASK1 signaling cascades, resulting in activation of JNK/SAPK. Activated JNK/SAPK in turn activates transcription factors, including AP-1, to
mediate cellular responses to the stress. Activated JNK/SAPK may also
regulate apoptosis through phosphoregulation on Bcl-2.
|
|
It is intriguing that MIAs with stabilizing or destabilizing effects on
microtubules elicit similar activation of JNK/SAPK. These observations
suggest a surveillance mechanism exists that signals the functional
integrity of microtubules to nuclear transcription factors.
Interestingly, tubulin itself exhibits GTPase activity and acts as a
nucleotide-binding protein (67), implying that tubulin may function in
a fashion similar to Cdc42/Rac in the JNK/SAPK signal transduction
pathway (10, 13). The mechanism(s) by which microtubular disarray
activates both Ras and ASK1 remains to be elucidated.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. A. T. Ichiki, J. Merryman,
D. S. Torry and W. D. Wicks of the University of Tennessee
for critically reading the manuscript. We are indebted to Drs. M. Birrer, S. A. Coughlin, Z. Culig, W. L. Henckler, G. L. Johnson, M. Karin, and D. Shalloway for reagents and expression
vectors. We appreciate Dr. Z. G. Liu's advice on the
details of HA-JNK1 assays and thank Dr. K. Miyazona of the Cancer
Institute (Tokyo) for valuable discussion. Preparation of trophoblast
from term placentae by V. H. Shore and Dr. P. P. McKenzie is
gratefully acknowledged. T.-H. W. is also grateful to Dr. M. R. Caudle, Dean of the Graduate School of Medicine, University of
Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, for encouragement and support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants AA-08328 and CA-68538 (to J. W.) and Chang-Gung Memorial
Hospital Research Grant CMRP-0426 (to H.-S. W.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Hwy.,
Knoxville, TN 37920. Tel.: 423-544-8960; Fax: 423-544-6863; E-mail:
mcf7{at}msn.com.
1
The abbreviations used are: JNK, c-Jun
N-terminal kinase; MIA, microtubule-interfering agent; SAPK,
stress-activated protein kinase; ASK1, apoptosis signal-regulating
kinase; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; TRE, TPA
response element; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; dn,
dominant-negative; JNKK/SEK1, JNK kinase/SAPK or ERK kinase; MAPK,
mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; HA, hemagglutinin epitope of influenza
virus; GST, glutathione S-transferase; RBD, Ras-binding domain of Raf-1; FBS, fetal bovine serum; DMEM, Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium; MBP, myelin basic protein; ARIA,
activated Ras interaction assay; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
2
H. Ichijo, unpublished data.
3
The inhibitory efficacy of the expression vector
for dn Ras used in this study was verified by cotransfection
experiments with HA-tagged ERK2, where the dn Ras completely blocked
activation of HA-ERK2 by treatment with epidermal growth factor (T.-H.
Wang, unpublished data).
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Banerjee, P.,
Nikolakakii, E.,
Dai, T.,
Rubie, E. A.,
Ahmad, M. F.,
Avruch, J.,
Woodgett, J. R.
(1994)
Nature
369,
156-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Derijard, B.,
Hibi, M.,
Wu, I.-H.,
Barrett, T.,
Su, B.,
Deng, T.,
Karin, M.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1994)
Cell
76,
1025-1037[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kallunki, T.,
Su, B.,
Tsigelny, I.,
Sluss, H. K.,
Derijard, B.,
Moore, G.,
Davis, R.,
Karin, M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2996-3007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dent, P.,
Chow, Y. H.,
Morrison, D. K.,
Jove, R.,
Sturgill, T. W.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
303,
105-112
-
Wu, X.,
Noh, S. J.,
Zhou, G.,
Dixon, J. E.,
Guan, K.-L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3265-3271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jelinek, T.,
Dent, P.,
Sturgill, T. W.,
Weber, M. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1027-1034[Abstract]
-
Morooka, H.,
Bonventre, J. V.,
Pombo, C. M.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Force, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30084-30092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Karin, M.
(1996)
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci.
351,
127-134[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Woodgett, J. R.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Avruch, J.,
Zon, L. I.,
Zanke, B.,
Templeton, D. J.
(1996)
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci.
351,
135-141[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kyriakis, J. M.,
and Avruch, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24313-24316[Free Full Text]
-
Karin, M.,
Liu, Z.,
and Zandi, E.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
240-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Robinson, M. J.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
180-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Coso, O. A.,
Chiariello, M.,
Yu, J. C.,
Teramoto, H.,
Crespo, P.,
Xu, N.,
Miki, T.,
Gutkind, J. S.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1137-1146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, Y.-R.,
Meyer, C. F.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
631-634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wilson, L.,
and Jordan, M. A.
(1994)
in
Microtubules (Hyams, J. S., and Lloyd, C. W., eds), Vol. 13, pp. 59-83, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
-
Bonfoco, E.,
Ceccatelli, S.,
Manzo, L.,
and Nicotera, P.
(1995)
Exp. Cell Res.
218,
189-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tishler, R. B.,
Lamppu, D. M.,
Park, S.,
and Price, B. D.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
6021-6025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Huschtscha, L. I.,
Bartier, W. A.,
Ross, C. E.,
Tattersall, M. H.
(1996)
Br. J. Cancer
73,
54-60[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kawamura, K. I.,
Grabowski, D.,
Weizer, K.,
Bukowski, R.,
and Ganapathi, R.
(1996)
Br. J. Cancer
73,
183-188[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McGuire, M. P.,
Hoskins, W. J.,
Brady, M. F.,
Kucera, P. R.,
Partridge, E. E.,
Look, K. Y.,
Clarke-Pearson, D. L.,
Davidson, M.
(1996)
N. Engl. J. Med.
334,
1-6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wahl, A. F.,
Donaldson, K. L.,
Fairchild, C.,
Lee, F. Y.,
Foster, S. A.,
Demers, G. W.,
Galloway, D. A.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
72-79[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Blagosklonny, M. V.,
Schulte, T. W.,
Nguyen, P.,
Mimnaugh, E. G.,
Trepel, J.,
Neckers, L.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
4623-4626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haldar, S.,
Chintapalli, J.,
and Croce, C. M.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
1253-1255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shim, J.,
Lee, H.,
Park, J.,
Kim, H.,
and Choi, E. J.
(1996)
Nature
381,
804-806[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Davis, R. J.,
Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Science
270,
1326-1331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cuvillier, O.,
Pirianov, G.,
Kleuser, B.,
Vanek, P. G.,
Coso, O. A.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
Speigel, S.
(1996)
Nature
381,
800-803[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Seimiya, H.,
Mashima, T.,
Toho, M.,
and Tsuruo, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4631-4636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ichijo, H.,
Nishida, E.,
Irie, K.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Saitoh, M.,
Moriguchi, T.,
Takagi, M.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Miyazono, K.,
Gotoh, Y.
(1997)
Science
275,
90-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wimalasena, J.,
Cavallo, C.,
and Meehan, D.
(1991)
Gynecol. Oncol.
41,
56-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cameron, M. R.,
Caudle, M. R.,
Sullivan, W. R., Jr.,
Peluso, J. J.,
Wimalasena, J.
(1995)
Oncol. Res.
7,
145-156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Blagosklonny, M. V.,
Giannakakou, P.,
el-Deiry, W. S.,
Kingston, D. G.,
Higgs, P. I.,
Neckers, L.,
Fojo, T.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
130-135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Giannakakou, P.,
Sackett, D. L.,
Kang, Y.-K.,
Zhan, Z.,
Buters, J. T. M.,
Fojo, T.,
Poruchynsky, M. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17118-17125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shore, V. H.,
Wang, T.-H.,
Wang, C.-L.,
Torry, R. J.,
Caudle, M. R.,
Torry, D. S.
(1997)
Placenta
18,
657-665[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Keyomarsi, K.,
Sandoval, L.,
Band, V.,
and Pardee, A. B.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
3602-3609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rowinsky, E. K.
(1993)
Monogr. Natl. Cancer Inst.
15,
25-37
-
Gujuluva, C. N.,
Baek, J.-H.,
Shin, K.-H.,
Cherrick, H. M.,
Park, N.-H.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1819-1827[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Culig, Z.,
Hobisch, A.,
Hittmair, A.,
Widschwendter, M.,
Radmayr, C.,
Bartsch, G.,
and Klocker, H.
(1996)
Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Vol. 37, p. 233, American Association for Cancer Research, Washington, DC
-
Liu, Z. G.,
Hsu, H.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
Karin, M.
(1996)
Cell
87,
565-76[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Liu, Z. G.,
Baskaran, R.,
Lea-Chou, E. T.,
Wood, L. D.,
Chen, Y.,
Karin, M.,
Wang, J. Y.
(1996)
Nature
384,
273-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rapp, U. R.,
Troppmair, J.,
Beck, T.,
and Birrer, M. J.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
3493-3498[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Johnson, N. L.,
Gardner, A. M.,
Diener, K. M.,
Lange-Carter, C. A.,
Gleavy, J.,
Jarpe, M. B.,
Minden, A.,
Karin, M.,
Zon, L. I.,
Johnson, G. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3229-3237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kingston, R. E.,
and Sheen, J.
(1995)
in
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K., eds), pp. 9.7.1-9.7.11, John Wiley & Sons, New York
-
Taylor, S. J.,
and Shalloway, D.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
1621-1627[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
de Rooij, J.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
623-625[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Suffness, M.
(1994)
In Vivo
8,
867-878[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hambleton, J.,
Weinstein, S. L.,
Lem, L.,
and DeFranco, A. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2774-2778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nicolaou, K. C.,
Winssinger, N.,
Pastor, J.,
Ninkovic, S.,
Sarabia, F.,
He, Y.,
Vourloumis, D.,
Yang, Z.,
Li, T.,
Giannakakou, P.,
and Hamel, E.
(1997)
Nautre
387,
268-272
-
Garcia, A. M.,
Rowell, C.,
Ackermann, K.,
Kowalczyk, J. J.,
Lewis, M. D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18415-18418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McNally, F. J.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
23-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Saunders, C.,
and Limbird, L. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19035-19045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, Y.-R.,
Wang, X.,
Templeton, D.,
Davis, R. J.,
Tan, T.-H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31929-31936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rosette, C.,
and Karin, M.
(1996)
Science
274,
1194-1197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kawasaki, H.,
Moriguchi, T.,
Matsuda, S.,
Li, H. Z.,
Nakamura, S.,
Shimohama, S.,
Kimura, J.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Nishida, E.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
241,
315-321[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hall, A.,
and Zerial, M.
(1995)
in
Guidebook to the small GTPases (Zerial, M., and Huber, L. A., eds), pp. 3-11, Oxford University Press, Oxford
-
Chajry, N.,
Martin, P. M.,
Cochet, C.,
and Berthois, Y.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
235,
97-102[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Brondello, J.-M.,
Brunet, A.,
Pouyssegur, J.,
and McKenzie, F. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1368-1376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Groom, L. A.,
Sneddon, A. A.,
Alessi, D. R.,
Dowd, S.,
Keyse, S. M.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3621-3632[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Muda, M.,
Theodosiou, A.,
Rodrigues, N.,
Boschert, U.,
Camps, M.,
Gillieron, C.,
Davies, K.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27205-27208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Muda, M.,
Boschert, U.,
Smith, A.,
Antonsson, B.,
Gillieron, C.,
Chabert, C.,
Camps, M.,
Martinou, I.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5141-5151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Minden, A.,
Lin, A.,
Claret, F. X.,
Abo, A.,
Karin, M.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1147-1157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rausch, O.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1170-1179[Abstract]
-
Minden, A.,
Lin, A.,
McMahon, M.,
Lange-Carter, C.,
Derijard, B.,
Davis, R. J.,
Johnson, G. L.,
Karin, M.
(1994)
Science
266,
1719-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Adler, V.,
Pincus, M. R.,
Brandt-Rauf, P. W.,
Ronai, Z.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10585-10589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haldar, S.,
Basu, A.,
and Croce, C. M.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
229-233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maundrell, K.,
Antonsson, B.,
Magnenat, E.,
Camps, M.,
Muda, M.,
Chabert, C.,
Gillieron, C.,
Boschert, U.,
Vial-Knecht, E.,
Martinou, J.-C.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25238-25242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jacobson, M. D.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
R277-R281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Burns, R. G.,
and Surridge, C. D.
(1994)
in
Microtubules (Hyams, J. S., and Lloyd, C. W., eds), Vol. 13, pp. 3-31, John Wiley & Sons, New York
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike