J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 26, 18644-18650, June 25, 1999
Does Prothymosin
Affect the Phosphorylation of Elongation
Factor 2?*
Steven A.
Enkemann
,
Karen S.
Pavur§,
Alexey G.
Ryazanov§, and
Shelby L.
Berger
¶
From the
Section on Genes and Gene Products, NCI,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and the
§ Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine and Cancer
Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School,
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey,
Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
 |
ABSTRACT |
Prothymosin
is a small, acidic, essential
nuclear protein that plays a poorly defined role in the proliferation
and survival of mammalian cells. Recently, Vega et al.
proposed that exogenous prothymosin
can specifically increase the
phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF-2) in
extracts of NIH3T3 cells (Vega, F. V., Vidal, A., Hellman, U.,
Wernstedt, C., and Domínguez, F. (1998) J. Biol.
Chem. 273, 10147-10152). Using similar lysates prepared by four
methods (detergent lysis, Dounce homogenization, digitonin
permeabilization, and sonication) and three preparations of prothymosin
, one of which was purified by gentle means (the native protein, and
a histidine-tagged recombinant prothymosin
expressed either in
bacteria or in COS cells), we failed to find a response. A
reconstituted system composed of eEF-2, recombinant eEF-2 kinase,
calmodulin, and calcium was also unaffected by prothymosin
.
However, unlike our optimized buffer, Vega's system included a
phosphatase inhibitor, 50 mM fluoride, which when evaluated in our laboratories severely reduced phosphorylation of all species. Under these conditions, any procedure that decreases the effective fluoride concentration will relieve the inhibition and appear to
activate. Our data do not support a direct relationship between the
function of prothymosin
and the phosphorylation of eEF-2.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The detailed function of prothymosin
remains cryptic and
controversial. The protein is not, as its name intimates, a precursor for much smaller, processed, thymic hormones (1-5). Rather,
prothymosin
is exclusively mammalian (see Refs. 6 and 7, and
references therein), extremely abundant (8, 9), probably unfolded (10), and highly acidic throughout its length of 109-110 amino acids (1, 11,
12). It localizes to the nucleus in intact form in all tissues
(13-15). An overview of the prothymosin
literature strongly
suggests that the protein plays an essential, but nevertheless undefined, role in the growth and survival of virtually all cells (1,
16-19). Several laboratories have noted (i) that an increase of
greater than 10-fold in the mRNA and the protein occurs when quiescent cells proliferate, (ii) that the amount of prothymosin
in
a tissue mirrors its inherent growth rate, and (iii) that prothymosin
is expressed in a chronologically contemporaneous manner with other
growth related molecules such as Myc, histone H3, and proliferating
cell nuclear antigen (1, 3, 8, 20-24). However, the most compelling
evidence comes from synchronized human myeloma cells, which, when
exposed to antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides directed toward
prothymosin
mRNA at several locations, undergo growth arrest
(25).
The particulars of prothymosin
's function are contested. The amino
acid sequence, which should provide clues, is essentially unique.
Except for a "classical" bipartite nuclear localization signal
included in many otherwise unrelated nuclear proteins, the only shared
featured is a reiterated region of glutamic acid residues found also in
the Xenopus chromatin remodeling protein, nucleoplasmin (26,
27). Binding studies in vitro have targeted various histones
as binding partners, including core histones or histones H1, H3, and H4
depending on the conditions (28), whereas an examination of a single
clone of HL-60 cells permanently transfected with the prothymosin
gene suggested that excess prothymosin
might deplete and sequester
nucleosomal histone H1 (29). In contrast, prothymosin
did not bind
to histone H1-containing chromatin or to mononucleosomes in related
studies (30, 31).
Kubota et al. demonstrated the binding of prothymosin
to
the activation domain of the human immunodeficiency virus protein, rev,
and the human T-cell leukemia virus protein, rex, in vitro (32). Since rev is involved in the export of incompletely spliced viral
RNA from the nucleus, it is tempting to speculate that prothymosin
interacts with a rev-like protein produced in normal cells and that its
role is to assist in the export of RNA or protein from the mammalian
nucleus. This view of prothymosin
as a facilitator of nuclear
export is entirely distinct from the previous view of the protein as a
histone-binding factor involved with chromatin.
Studies performed in vivo provide yet another perspective.
The Berger group has shown that prothymosin
is phosphorylated in vivo on glutamic acid residues in the region homologous
with nucleoplasmin (33). These acyl phosphates are unstable in
vivo and energy rich (33, 34). Upon cell lysis, most hydrolyze almost instantaneously, while a tiny fraction migrate to more stable
positions on nearby serine or threonine residues (33, 35). By observing
the changes in stability of prothymosin
's phosphates in
vivo in cells overexpressing prothymosin
, in synchronized cells at different stages of the cell cycle, and in cells treated with
metabolic inhibitors, the group concluded that prothymosin
's
phosphates become stabilized and inactive during mitosis and in
transcriptionally compromised cells (36). These experiments did not
identify the prothymosin
-requiring process, but imply that
prothymosin
's phosphates participate in some aspect of RNA
biosynthesis. This idea is compatible with all of the binding partners
noted above, but is also consistent with a catalytic function involving
transfer of high energy phosphate.
Yet another unrelated function has been proposed. Vega et
al. (37) assert that prothymosin
stimulates
Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation
factor 2 (eEF-2)1 in cellular
extracts. eEF-2 catalyzes translocation of the ribosome along mRNA
during translation. Phosphorylation, which renders eEF-2 inactive (38),
could play a role in the regulation of the rate of protein synthesis
(reviewed in Refs. 39 and 40). Vega et al. surmise that
prothymosin
exerts its effect on eEF-2 phosphorylation at mitosis
when the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments are no longer distinct.
Hence, they have implicated prothymosin
in the down-regulation of
translation during M phase. We take issue with this proposal and with
the observations on which it is based.
Here, we show that prothymosin
has no effect on the ability
of extracts to phosphorylate eEF-2. We found that Vega and co-workers studied the reaction under conditions of severe, nonspecific inhibition and that in our hands even in inhibited extracts, prothymosin
is
ineffective. Finally, we studied the phosphorylation of eEF-2 by eEF-2
kinase with purified components in the presence and absence of
prothymosin
and found no effect. Therefore, we conclude that prothymosin
has no role to play in the regulation of eEF-2 phosphorylation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Growth and Transfection of Mammalian Cells--
NIH3T3 cells
from the American Type Culture Collection (CRL 1658) were cultivated in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% calf serum from
Life Technologies, Inc., antibiotic-antimycotic, and 2 mM
glutamine as described by Tao et al. (36). COS 1 cells (ATCC, CRL 1650) were cultured in the same medium containing the same
additives, but with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone). The cells were
transiently transfected with a prothymosin
gene containing six
histidine codons inserted immediately upstream of the stop codon (33)
using the DEAE-dextran procedure (41). Cultures were maintained at
37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. HeLa S-3 cells in
liter quantities were a kind gift of Dr. Bernard Moss (NIAID, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Bacteria--
In some experiments, Escherichia coli
strain BL21(DE3) transformed with pET3a containing the prothymosin
cDNA coding region similarly tagged with six histidine codons (33)
was grown and induced to overexpress histidine-tagged prothymosin
using a kit and instructions provided by Stratagene.
Purification of Prothymosin
from HeLa Cells, Transfected COS
Cells, and from Bacteria--
Native prothymosin
was isolated from
HeLa cells as described by Trumbore et al. (33), Wang
et al. (34), and Sburlati et al. (9). Briefly,
washed cells were lysed in the presence of a detergent, nuclei were
removed by centrifugation, and prothymosin
, which leaks out
quantitatively, was recovered from the supernatant fluids by means of a
phenol extraction. However, because such preparations contain RNA and
other unknown contaminants as well as prothymosin
in the aqueous
phase, the protein was further purified by ion exchange chromatography
on a Bioscale Q2 column run with a Biologics (Bio-Rad) medium pressure
chromatography system. The Q2 column replaced the TSK-gel DEAE-5PW
column used in earlier studies (33). Samples were also subjected to
reverse phase chromatography on a C-18 column to remove predominantly non-macromolecular contaminants (8). Histidine-tagged prothymosin
from COS cells was isolated from lysates with the aid of metal chelate
chromatography on nickel nitrilotriacetic resin (Qiagen) and purified
further on the aforementioned Q2 column. Procedures and reagents that
might inactivate or denature globular proteins such as heat, acid,
phenol, or reverse phase chromatography were rigorously eschewed.
Recombinant prothymosin
tagged with six histidine residues (tagged
prothymosin
) was obtained using the methods detailed in the
Stratagene instruction manual entitled pET System Vectors and
Hosts. Further purification was effected with the Bioscale Q2 and
C-18 columns noted above.
The concentration of purified prothymosin
was determined from the
absorbance at 214 nm and validated by amino acid analysis; in lysates,
the amount in arbitrary units was obtained by densitometric scanning of
bands in the identical stained gel (33).
Purification of eEF-2 and eEF-2 Kinase--
Eukaryotic EF-2 was
purified from rabbit reticulocytes essentially as described by Ryazanov
and Davydova (42). DNA coding for eEF-2 kinase was obtained from a
cDNA library (CLONTECH) derived from human
glioma cell line T98G, subcloned into pGEX-2T (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), and expressed in Escherichia coli, BL21(DE3)pLysS. A portion of the resultant glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-linked kinase was purified as an active enzyme from the soluble
fraction, whereas the majority was recovered from inclusion bodies
after denaturation in urea and renaturation by dialysis. Our methods were modifications of published procedures (43). The use of the
GST-linked eEF-2 kinase made it possible to distinguish phosphorylation of eEF-2 from autophosphorylation of the kinase. Without the adduct, the kinase at ~105 kDa and eEF-2 at ~100 kDa would have comigrated during gel electrophoresis.
Preparation of Lysates of NIH3T3 Cells--
Lysates for analysis
of eEF-2 phosphorylation were prepared by four methods: detergent
lysis; Dounce homogenization; sonication; and digitonin
permeabilization. The preliminary steps performed in all cases were
identical: NIH3T3 cells were trypsinized, suspended in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, recovered
by centrifugation, and washed once in phosphate-buffered saline. They
were then resuspended in homogenization buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 250 mM sucrose, and protease inhibitors: 5 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and stored on ice at a
concentration of 40 × 106/ml in preparation for
lysis. Detergent lysis was carried out by making the homogenization
buffer 1% in Triton X-100 and incubating the sample for 10 min on ice.
Nuclei and debris were removed by brief centrifugation in a Tomy Tech
USA refrigerated microcentrifuge at top speed (15,000 rpm) for 5 min,
and the supernatant fluids were recovered and stored frozen. Cell
lysates were prepared by Dounce homogenization by subjecting the cell
suspension in homogenization buffer to 10 strokes of the tight pestle.
Nuclei and debris were eliminated centrifugally as noted above, and the
supernatant fluids were collected and stored frozen in aliquots. Cells
were disrupted by sonication by treating them in homogenization buffer
with a Sonic Dismembrator 550 (Fisher Scientific) equipped with a
microtip probe at a power setting of 2 with a 1-s pulse and a 1-s delay between pulses. Sonication was continued on ice until froth formed in
the sample, ~15 s. Debris was removed by brief centrifugation. The
supernatant fluids were collected and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min in a Sw55Ti rotor. The soluble material was
dispersed into several tubes and frozen. The gentlest procedure was
permeabilization in homogenization buffer containing 40 µg/ml
digitonin. After incubation at 37 °C for 10 min, the perforated
cells and debris were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant
fluids were recovered and stored frozen. In all cases, samples were
desalted by two successive passes through G-50 spin columns that had
previously been equilibrated with homogenization buffer without
sucrose. In some cases, the lysates were freshly prepared, desalted,
and used immediately without undergoing a freeze-thaw cycle.
Phosphorylation of Lysates and Purified Components in
Vitro--
Reactions were performed in the presence and absence of
fluoride. In the absence of fluoride, reactions were carried out in a
volume of 25 µl in optimized buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH at
pH 6.6, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 5 mM
dithiothreitol, and 0.1 mM CaCl2) with 50 µM ATP, 0.04 µCi of [
-32P]ATP
(American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc., St. Louis, MO; 4500 Ci/mmol)
and lysate containing 10-20 µg of protein dispersed in a volume of
2-10 µl. The concentration of protein was determined with the aid of
the Bio-Rad protein assay. Phosphorylation of purified eEF-2 by its
purified kinase was accomplished in a volume of 25 or 50 µl with
1-1.5 µg of partially purified eEF-2,
1 µg of GST-EF-2
kinase, 0.5 µg of calmodulin, 50 µM ATP, and either 0.04 µCi of [
-32P]ATP or 2 µCi of
[
-33P]ATP (NEN Life Science Products; 2000 Ci/mmol) in
optimized buffer. Where indicated, fluoride was added to the optimized
buffer. The effect of fluoride was also ascertained in an assay mix
identical with that of Vega et al. (37), namely 2-10 µl
of cell extract containing 10-20 µg of protein, reaction buffer (40 mM HEPES at pH 7.0, 2.5 mM MgCl2,
0.1 mM CaCl2, and 50 mM NaF), and 5 µCi of [32P]ATP in a total of 25µl. Where noted, 8 µM prothymosin
was included. Reactions were carried
out for 5 min at 30 or 37 °C for lysates and for the purified
components as specified in the figure legends.
Sample Preparation and Analysis--
Reactions were stopped by a
combination of rapid cooling to 4 °C, dilution with 5× SDS
electrophoresis sample buffer, and boiling for 5 min. Proteins were
resolved electrophoretically in 8, 10, or 18% polyacrylamide SDS gels
run in Tris-glycine buffer. The gels were either prepared in the
laboratory or purchased from Novex, and stained with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue. We used SeeBlueTM prestained standards from Novex
according to the enclosed directions. After destaining, gels were dried
and exposed to X-AR film (Eastman Kodak Corp.) in the presence or
absence of intensifying screens.
 |
RESULTS |
Phosphorylation of Sonicated Extracts--
Cytoplasmic extracts
from mammalian tissues, when incubated with [
-32P]ATP
incorporate radioactivity into proteins. In the presence of
Ca2+, a band at ~100 kDa, which can be identified as
eEF-2, acquires label rapidly and dominates the electrophoretic pattern
(39). Accordingly, we examined the ability of sonicated lysates of
NIH3T3 cells to phosphorylate a ~100-kDa protein in a series of
incubations extending from 1 to 20 min. When the products were resolved
electrophoretically (Fig. 1), the
expected band at ~100 kDa appeared after the shortest incubation
period, and gained a modicum of additional radioactivity with increased
reaction times. Although the putative eEF-2 remained prominent
throughout the study, by 20 min many other radioactive proteins had
appeared.

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Time course of the phosphorylation of eEF-2
with [ -32P]ATP in sonicated
extracts. The phosphorylation reactions were carried out in the
presence and absence of native prothymosin or histidine-tagged,
recombinant prothymosin for the intervals indicated in optimized
buffer. Proteins were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 10%
polyacrylamide SDS gel. The data are presented as an autoradiograph of
the dried gel. Lanes 1-3 are 1-min reactions
with no additions (------), with prothymosin (lanes
marked P), and with tagged prothymosin (lanes
marked T), respectively, whereas lanes
4-6 and 7-9 in the same order display the
products appearing in 5 and 20 min, respectively. Arrow
(E) indicates the position of eEF-2.
|
|
The literature states that prothymosin
stimulates the rapid
phosphorylation of eEF-2 (37). In order to corroborate these findings,
we tested two different kinds of prothymosin
; the first was native
prothymosin
purified to homogeneity from HeLa cells, whereas the
second was a recombinant human prothymosin
with six histidines
affixed to the carboxyl terminus. The results (Fig. 1) were
inconsistent with the published record (37). Neither type of
prothymosin
stimulated the phosphorylation of the ~100-kDa band.
Indeed, the incorporation of radioactivity into any band, at any period
of incubation, was not enhanced by the presence of prothymosin
. In
these experiments, the Coomassie Blue-stained gels of all samples were
identical regardless of the nature of the addition or the time of
incubation (data not shown). Clearly under these conditions,
prothymosin
appeared to be inert.
Effect of Lysate Preparation on the Phosphorylation of
eEF-2--
Sonicated extracts of cells prepared with separate
instruments differ. Therefore, in order to test widely differing
lysates, we prepared cell extracts using four methods: detergent lysis, Dounce homogenization, sonication, and permeabilization with digitonin. From inspection of Coomassie Blue-stained gels (Fig.
2A), it is obvious that the
compositions of the extracts vary and that each extract contains an
array of prominent bands of similar size. It is not obvious that the
entire cell complement of endogenous prothymosin
is also present in
these lysates (Fig. 2A, lanes labeled
). In
order to obtain sufficient prothymosin
to be visible in a stained
gel, it would have been necessary to load 1.5 mg of total protein, an
amount ~100-fold higher than that in Fig. 2A. We have
found that Triton lysis quantitatively releases the prothymosin
in
a cell into the supernatant fluids (9) and that electrophoretic
analysis followed by densitometry of the extracted materials from
5 × 106 NIH3T3 cells resulted in 710 arbitrary units
of prothymosin
. Within an error of less than 5%, the identical
amount of prothymosin
was recovered from sonicated and
digitonin-permeabilized extracts, but lesser amounts were obtained from
Dounce-homogenized cells owing to the failure of the method to rupture
all of the cells. In contrast, the exogenous prothymosin
at 8 µM in the assay was easily viewed as an intense, stained
band near the bottom of the 18% polyacrylamide gel (lanes
labeled P), with the more slowly migrating histidine-tagged
prothymosin
located immediately above it (lanes labeled
T).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the phosphorylation of eEF-2 in
lysates prepared by detergent lysis, Dounce homogenization, sonication,
and permeabilization with digitonin in the presence and absence of
prothymosin . Lysates of NIH3T3 cells were prepared as
described under "Experimental Procedures" and incubated in
optimized buffer with [ -32P]ATP at 37 °C in the
absence (-) and presence of native prothymosin (lanes
marked P) or recombinant, histidine-tagged prothymosin (lanes marked T) as noted. A,
approximately 10-20 µg of protein from each lysate was resolved
electrophoretically in an 18% polyacrylamide SDS gel, which was
subsequently stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue and dried.
B, autoradiographs of the dried gels were obtained by
exposure to x-ray film. The gel with the Dounce-homogenized samples was
exposed to film longer than the other samples. Arrows mark
protein positions in the sonicated extracts as follows: E,
eEF-2; P, prothymosin ; T, the
histidine-tagged recombinant prothymosin . The eight markers
(lanes marked M) are, in order of increasing
mobility, 250, 98, 64, 50, 36, 30, 16, and 6 kDa.
|
|
The products of the phosphorylation reactions catalyzed by these
lysates in the presence of [
-32P]ATP are exhibited in
Fig. 2B. Here, it is apparent that the intensities of the
~100-kDa bands of eEF-2 are a function of the composition of the
lysate, but it is equally clear that neither prothymosin
from HeLa
cells nor its histidine-tagged recombinant counterpart affect the
reaction. The phosphorylation of eEF-2 remained independent of
prothymosin
regardless of the quality or the quantity of
cytoplasmic components in the lysate. Although there is no certainty
that any of these extracts is identical to those of Vega et
al. (37), it is also unlikely that the reported stimulatory effect
of prothymosin
was obliterated in all of them by the acquisition of
inhibitors or the loss of cofactors during preparation.
Effect of Distinct Preparations of Prothymosin
and ATP on the
Phosphorylation of eEF-2 in Crude and Purified Systems--
In a
reconstituted system, it is possible to study the effect of prothymosin
on the phosphorylation of eEF-2 by its specific kinase in the
absence of complicating factors. Differences in the levels of eEF-2, or
kinase, or phosphatases in the lysates, as well as variations in the
amount of nonradioactive ATP remaining after desalting all have the
potential to influence the results. To avoid these pitfalls, we
examined the effect of prothymosin
on the reaction using purified
enzyme and substrate. We focused, first, on the reconstituted system
using [
-33P]ATP as the source of radioactivity. In
Fig. 3, it can be seen that both eEF-2
and the kinase had to be present, together with calmodulin, for
phosphorylation of eEF-2 to occur (Fig. 3, lane 3) and that the separated components were inactive (Fig. 3,
lanes 1 and 2). Fig. 3
(lane 3) also revealed a band of lesser mobility and intensity, which represents autophosphorylation of the GST-linked kinase. When the effect of native prothymosin
on the reaction was
examined, the results (lane 6) reinforced those
in Fig. 1; prothymosin
did not influence the phosphorylation of
eEF-2 by its kinase in the reconstituted system.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of prothymosin on the
phosphorylation of eEF-2 by
[ -33P]ATP in a crude lysate and
in a reconstituted system. Phosphorylation was carried out in
optimized buffer as described under "Experimental Procedures" at
30 °C using 20 µg of lysate prepared with Triton X-100, or in the
same buffer enriched with calmodulin using elements of the
reconstituted system. Purified components in the reaction are as
follows: eEF-2, lane 1; eEF-2 kinase,
lane 2; eEF-2 and eEF-2 kinase, lane
3; and eEF-2, eEF-2 kinase, and native prothymosin ,
lane 6. Lysates were assayed in the absence
(lane 4) and presence (lane
5) of native prothymosin . Products were resolved in an
8% polyacrylamide SDS gel.
|
|
The 33P-labeled ATP was then tested in sonicated lysates.
Once again, prothymosin
did not improve phosphate acquisition by eEF-2 in a crude system (lanes 4 and
5), but with the less energetic [33P]ATP, the
broad band of radioactivity at ~100 kDa in Figs. 1 and 2B
was resolved into two discrete bands, the more mobile of which
comigrated with genuine, phosphorylated eEF-2.
Because the activity of prothymosin
is unknown and cannot be
assayed in vitro, there is no guarantee that functional
prothymosin
was used in either these or the published experiments
(37). Therefore, we avoided all harsh steps in the purification by
isolating histidine-tagged prothymosin
from overexpressing COS
cells using only methods that would not denature a sensitive globular
protein. The data show that the gently handled, tagged prothymosin
,
which is clearly visible as a band in the stained gel (Fig.
4A, lane 5), did not significantly enhance the phosphorylation of
purified eEF-2 by its purified kinase (Fig. 4B,
lanes 4 and 5). In the same
experiment, we demonstrate that the gently treated, tagged prothymosin
(Fig. 4A, lane 1) also had no
effect on the ability of eEF-2 to acquire phosphate in lysates (Fig.
4B, lanes 1 and 2).
Moreover, in order to prove without question that the prominent labeled
band in lysates is eEF-2, we mixed the purified and crude samples after
the phosphorylation reaction had taken place and analyzed them
together. As shown in Fig. 4B (lane
3), the mixing experiment clearly distinguished eEF-2 as the
labeled band with increased intensity. Similarly, in the stained gel in
Fig. 4A (lane 3) eEF-2 is less
conspicuous but nevertheless recognizable as a darker band among a
cluster near 100 kDa (see arrow). Furthermore, when the
stained and labeled gels in Fig. 4 were superimposed, it became evident
that phosphorylated (labeled) eEF-2 comigrated with bulk eEF-2 and that
the protein does not undergo a change in mobility upon acquiring
phosphate.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of tagged, prothymosin from COS
cells on the phosphorylation of eEF-2 with
[ -32P]ATP in a crude lysate and
in a reconstituted system. Phosphorylation was carried out in
optimized buffer as described under "Experimental Procedures" at
37 °C using 20 µg of sonicated lysate, or the reconstituted system
containing eEF-2, recombinant eEF-2 kinase, calmodulin, and calcium.
A, a Coomassie Blue-stained 18% polyacrylamide SDS gel
displays the samples as follows: markers, at left; lysate in
the presence of prothymosin , lane 1; lysate
alone, lane 2; reconstituted system,
lane 4; and reconstituted system with prothymosin
, lane 5. Lane 3 displays the contents of a sample equivalent to that in lane
2 mixed with a sample equivalent to that in lane
4. B, the autoradiogram of the gel in
A is displayed. The position of eEF-2 (E) and
tagged prothymosin purified from COS cells by gentle methods
(T) are indicated with arrows. The markers are
described in Fig. 2.
|
|
Effect of Fluoride on the Phosphorylation of eEF-2--
Our
studies, which focused on the phosphorylation of eEF-2 from the outset,
were quite different from those of Vega et al. (37), which
sought prothymosin
-induced effects on the phosphorylation state of
any physiologically relevant protein. In particular, our system did not
contain fluoride, presumably added as a nonspecific phosphatase
inhibitor. The ability of fluoride to form complexes with magnesium and
phosphate was recognized as early as 1941 (45) and reported thereafter
in a rich literature encompassing the inhibitory effects of fluoride on
systems such as adenylate cyclase (46, 47), DNA polymerase (48), and
ATPase (49), to mention only a few. We, therefore, tested sonicated
lysates of NIH3T3 cells for their ability to phosphorylate eEF-2 in the
optimized buffer in the presence and absence of fluoride. Our data
(Fig. 5) clearly confirm the older
fluoride literature; 50 mM fluoride, the amount used by
Domínguez and co-workers (37), when added to the reaction
mixture virtually eliminated the phosphorylation of every band in the
gel (Fig. 5B), although both extracts contained an identical
array of stained proteins (Fig. 5A). In order to quantify
the effect of graded doses of fluoride on the phosphorylation of eEF-2,
we made use of the reconstituted system. The results in Fig.
5B show that low doses of fluoride were tolerated, but that
a marked inhibition occurred at doses higher than 30 mM. When the fluoride concentration was increased to 50 mM, the
ability of the kinase to phosphorylate eEF-2 was virtually abolished. There are two conclusions to be drawn from these experiments. (i)
Fluoride is a potent nonspecific inhibitor of the phosphorylation reactions in both the crude and purified systems; and (ii) in a
severely compromised system, relief of the inhibition of
phosphorylation by any agent can readily be construed as
activation.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of fluoride on the phosphorylation of
eEF-2 in crude lysates and in a reconstituted system.
Phosphorylation of protein by [ -32P]ATP was carried
out at 37 °C in optimized buffer with the stated concentration of
fluoride using sonicated cell extracts (at left) and the
reconstituted system (remaining lanes and inset).
Products were evaluated by electrophoresis in a 10% polyacrylamide SDS
gel. The Coomassie Blue-stained gel (A) and the
autoradiograph of the dried gel (B) are shown. The location
of eEF-2, which migrates slightly slower than the stained 98-kDa bovine
serum albumin marker, is indicated. The lane denoted
M displays the five largest markers described in Fig. 2. The
labeled band at ~125 kDa is autophosphorylated GST-eEF-2
kinase.
|
|
Effect of Prothymosin
on the Phosphorylation of eEF-2 in
Lysates under Conditions used by Vega et al--
To reproduce the
conditions used in the previously published report (37), we replaced
the optimized buffer with the fluoride-containing buffer used by Vega
et al. (37), and reduced the ATP concentration by
eliminating the nonradioactive ATP from the assay. When the phosphorylation reaction was examined in Vega's buffer in cell extracts prepared by detergent lysis and by sonication, there was a
dramatic transformation in the nature of the radioactive products with
no substantive effect on the array of stained protein (Fig.
6). There are several important points to
consider. (i) Although the specific activity of the radioactive ATP was
much higher, under these conditions, the autoradiograms had to be
exposed for several days, rather than hours to discern a signal. (ii) The location of the major bands shifted. Despite superficial
similarities with the autoradiograms in Fig. 2, namely a cluster of
radioactive high molecular weight products as well as low molecular
weight material of comparable intensity, the high intensity cluster did not include eEF-2. As shown on the right side of
Fig. 6, which also displays the stained reconstituted system, genuine
eEF-2 is substantially smaller than any of the intensely labeled large products and migrates in a region of the gel which contains no perceptible labeled protein. (iii) Reactions performed in the presence
of fluoride, unlike those in its absence (Fig. 2) generated qualitatively different patterns of radioactive products depending on
the nature of the lysate. And most important, (iv) the addition of
native prothymosin
(lanes denoted P) to the
phosphorylation assay had no effect on eEF-2, which was not labeled; it
had no effect on the labeling of most other proteins; and when an
effect could be discerned, it was an inhibitory one (Triton lysis,
lane denoted P). Furthermore, prothymosin
also failed to influence the phosphorylation of eEF-2 at pH values from
6.7 to 7.5 in buffers otherwise identical to that of Vega et
al. (37) whether or not 50 µM ATP was added to the
tracer (data not shown). The same negative results were obtained in the
presence of fluoride with recombinant prothymosin
and with lysates
obtained by Dounce homogenization or digitonin permeabilization (data
not shown). Our attempts to reproduce the published results were
unsuccessful despite alterations in the buffer, the ATP concentration,
the components of the lysate, and the nature of the prothymosin
used as an effector.

View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of prothymosin on the
phosphorylation of eEF-2 in crude lysates in the presence of
fluoride. Lysates containing 20 µg of protein were obtained by
Triton X-100 lysis and sonication and incubated at 37 °C with
[ -32P]ATP in the buffer used by Vega et al.
(37) in the absence (-) and in the presence (P) of native
prothymosin . Samples, which were evaluated in 10% polyacrylamide
SDS gels, are displayed in pairs as follows from left to
right: radioactive products obtained with Triton-lysed cell
extracts; the corresponding Coomassie Blue-stained gel; radioactive
products obtained with sonicated lysates, the corresponding stained
gel. Far right, the Coomassie-Blue stained electropherogram
of the reconstituted system containing genuine eEF-2 (E) is
displayed as a marker (lane marked C). The
control and sonicated samples were analyzed in the same gel.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our study was prompted by the work of Domínguez and
co-workers who found that the addition of prothymosin
augmented the ability of 100,000 × g supernatants prepared from
NIH3T3 cells to phosphorylate eEF-2 (37). Since prothymosin
is a
nuclear protein (13-15), and the translation factor, eEF-2, is
exclusively cytoplasmic, it was not immediately clear how and where the
two proteins might interact in a physiologically relevant manner. The
dilemma was resolved by considering M phase. During mitosis, cells
curtail translation and accumulate phosphorylated eEF-2 (50). They also
release nuclear proteins into the cytoplasm upon destruction of the
nuclear membrane. Hence, conceptually, an interaction between
prothymosin
and eEF-2 could be envisaged. Nevertheless, we remained
dubious. The proposed function required prothymosin
to be active in
the cytoplasm only at mitosis, whereas Wang et al. (34) and
Tao et al. (36), assessing prothymosin
's activity by
observing its unstable glutamyl phosphates, found phosphate turnover
throughout the cell cycle except during mitosis. If prothymosin
were to function transiently in the cytoplasm, why was it continuously
consuming high energy phosphate in the nucleus throughout most of the
cell cycle? Could the known connection between prothymosin
and cell
proliferation be reconciled with prothymosin
as an inhibitor of
translation? We set out to evaluate the relationship between
prothymosin
and the phosphates of eEF-2 anew.
A series of suggestions has been made (37): that mitotic lysates have
the ability to phosphorylate eEF-2 maximally, without the need for
exogenous prothymosin
; that cell lysates become refractory and
require exogenous prothymosin
to facilitate the reaction at the
termination of M phase when prothymosin
is sequestered in the
nucleus; and that lysates from synchronized cells exhibit intermediate,
graded behavior as they progress through the cell cycle. Hence,
prothymosin
is thought to regulate eEF-2 phosphorylation and
presumably influence translation. We do not wish to challenge these
observations, but we disagree with their interpretation for two reasons.
First, we have shown that all lysates under discussion, here, contain
prothymosin
. We found that prothymosin
was recovered virtually
quantitatively in sonicated lysates, and from the post-nuclear supernatant fluids of ruptured cells after Dounce homogenization and
detergent lysis, methods that preserve the nucleus as a microscopically identifiable entity. Even when cells were permeabilized with digitonin, the washed cells lost virtually all of their prothymosin
to the
supernatant fluids with little or no apparent damage to the nuclei. We
have also studied synchronized or mitotically arrested NIH3T3 cells
extensively (36) and found quantitative discharge of prothymosin
into the soluble fraction regardless of when in the cell cycle samples
were prepared. Furthermore, several groups agree (2, 51, 52) that
prothymosin
will remain in extracts that have lost other small
molecules during the process of desalting. Our point is that all of the
cellular prothymosin
will be recovered in the supernatant fluids of
all samples. Therefore, we believe that prothymosin
has no role to
play. Since Vega et al. (37) achieved cell synchronization
by serum starvation and since new proteins are synthesized during the
first cell cycle of the recovery, there are a plethora of candidate proteins available to explain differences in eEF-2 phosphorylation.
Second, prothymosin
from a quantitative point of view is
unconvincing as an effector of eEF-2 kinase activity. In a rapidly growing myeloma cell, we have shown that prothymosin
is about 0.02% of total protein (9). Thus, in a sonicated extract containing 20 µg of protein, the maximum amount used by the Domínguez group (37) and here, there would be about 4 ng of prothymosin
. When dispersed into a volume of 50 µl as required by the published procedure (37), the maximum prothymosin
concentration would be
~0.08 mg/liter or 0.007 µM. Yet, in Fig. 1B
of Vega et al. (37), exogenous prothymosin
had no effect
on eEF-2 phosphorylation until the concentration approached 1 µM. Hence, if synchronized cells contributed graded
amounts of endogenous prothymosin
to the assay and if the entire
cellular complement of prothymosin
were available in lysates of
cells arrested in mitosis, the maximal concentration of 0.007 µM prothymosin
would still have been grossly
suboptimal. The optimal dose of 8 µM prothymosin
used
by these investigators to promote phosphorylation of eEF-2 in
vitro exceeds the physiological amount by about 1000-fold.
Our study examined the phosphorylation of eEF-2 in crude cell lysates
and in a reconstituted system consisting of purified eEF-2, recombinant
enzyme, calcium, and calmodulin. In no case were we able to corroborate
the previously published results (37). Because we had failed, we
scrutinized every component of the system looking for contaminants that
might either activate or inhibit the reaction. We showed, first, that
sonicated lysates tested in a buffer optimized for eEF-2 kinase
activity did not exceed the dynamic range of the assay; eEF-2 could
have been phosphorylated further (Fig. 1). We also considered the
lysates themselves. Lysates are a source of salt, phosphatases that
attack phosphoproteins and nucleotides such as ATP, and a host of
enzymes and substrates that compete for the reagents. They are poorly
defined and difficult to reproduce, particularly when prepared by
sonication. Although our results indicated that lysates differed
considerably, both in their total protein and in the relative intensity
of the radioactive phosphorylated proteins generated by the reaction,
the phosphorylation of eEF-2 was not dependent on prothymosin
. Nor
were substantive changes in the reaction or in prothymosin
's
effect on it introduced by replacing [32P]ATP with
[33P]ATP, or by adopting conditions in which the sole
source of the reagent was [32P]ATP at a specific activity
of 4500 Ci/mmol.
Since prothymosin
itself is obviously a key component of the
system, we used several versions: a native protein, a recombinant, tagged protein, and the tagged protein produced in transiently transfected COS cells expressing an ectopic prothymosin
gene. In
the last case, the protein was isolated using the gentle methods of
nickel chelate chromatography and column chromatography on Q2 resin
without exposing it to denaturing agents such as perchloric acid, used
by Vega et al. (37), phenol, used by both our laboratories (9), and reverse phase chromatography, known to inactivate many
proteins. All of these preparations behaved similarly in our hands.
Because none of them stimulated the phosphorylation of eEF-2, we
believe that our result is correct. However, we do not think that the
differences between our results and theirs reflect the integrity of
prothymosin
; the protein is apparently unfolded (10) and
consequently should be unaffected by the harsh conditions of
purification. In contrast, the components of the solutions in which
prothymosin
was introduced into the reactions are highly suspect.
It may be important to reiterate that prothymosin
can be obtained
as a homogeneous protein yielding a single band on a Coomassie
Blue-stained gel while retaining large amounts of RNA, carbohydrate,
and small molecules (9, 33). Any of these might modulate the activity
of eEF-2 kinase.
Finally, the buffer must be considered. When we were unsuccessful in
reproducing the published data with a system optimized for eEF-2 kinase
activity, we examined the reaction in the same system use by Vega
et al. and found that fluoride, included at high
concentration in the buffer, is inhibitory. Since the effect is
nonspecific and mediated through complexes of small ions (44-48), it
was not surprising that the phosphorylation of eEF-2 by its kinase was affected.
We suspect that relief of fluoride inhibition probably played a part in
the published results. In Fig. 1 of Vega et al. (37), which
shows a gel of [32P]proteins phosphorylated in the
presence and absence of prothymosin
, all of the bands became more
intense in the presence of prothymosin
, a result most consistent
with a nonspecific effect. Furthermore, it is important to point out
that eEF-2 is an abundant protein and that it is rapidly phosphorylated
(39). Therefore, in short incubations with labeled ATP it is the most
prominent labeled product. Then, when autoradiograms are not
overexposed, eEF-2 will dominate the pattern regardless of whether
additions to the system specifically affected eEF-2, or its kinase, or
influenced phosphorylation reactions in general. The very prevalence of
eEF-2 in lysates complicates the identification of specific effects. In
contrast, using the reconstituted system, we had difficulty phosphorylating eEF-2 in 50 mM fluoride regardless of the
presence or absence of prothymosin
and found a severe increase in
inhibition at doses of fluoride between 30 and 50 mM.
Our data strongly suggest that prothymosin
does not modulate the
phosphorylation of eEF-2. With the evidence accumulated to date, there
is no reason to connect prothymosin
to the phosphates of eEF-2 and
every reason to seek its function elsewhere.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 37, Rm.
5D-10, 37 Convent Dr., NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-496-2886; E-mail: bergers{at}pop.nci.nih.gov.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
eEF-2, eukaryotic
elongation factor 2;
GST, glutathione S-transferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Eschenfeldt, W. H.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9403-9407[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haritos, A. A.,
Goodall, G. J.,
and Horecker, B. L.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
1008-1011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haritos, A. A.,
Tsolas, O.,
and Horecker, B. L.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
1391-1393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Szabo, P.,
and Weksler, M.
(1992)
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
65,
195-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hannappel, E.,
Davoust, S.,
and Horecker, B. L.
(1982)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
104,
266-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Trumbore, M. W.,
Manrow, R. E.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1998)
Protein Exp. Purif.
13,
383-388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Frillingos, S.,
Frangou-Lazaridis, M.,
Seferiadis, K.,
Hulmes, J. D.,
Pan, Y.-C. E.,
and Tsolas, O.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
108,
85-94[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sburlati, A. R.,
De La Rosa, A.,
Batey, D. W.,
Kurys, G. L.,
Manrow, R. E.,
Pannell, L. K.,
Martin, B. M.,
Sheeley, D. M.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
4587-4596[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sburlati, A. R.,
Manrow, R. E.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1990)
Protein Exp. Purif.
1,
184-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gast, K.,
Damaschun, H.,
Eckert, K.,
Schulze-Forster, K.,
Maurer, H. R.,
Müller-Frohne, M.,
Zirwer, D.,
Czarnecki, J.,
and Damaschun, G.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
13211-13218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Haritos, A. A.,
Blacher, R.,
Stein, S.,
Caldarella, J.,
and Horecker, B. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
343-346
-
Eschenfeldt, W. H.,
Manrow, R. E.,
Krug, M. S.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7546-7555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Manrow, R. E.,
Sburlati, A. R.,
Hanover, J. A.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1991)
J. Biol Chem.
266,
3916-3924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Clinton, M.,
Graeve, L.,
El-Dorry, H.,
Rodriguez-Boulan, E.,
and Horecker, B. L.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6608-6612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Watts, J. D.,
Cary, P. D.,
and Crane-Robinson, C.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
245,
17-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gómez-Márquez, J.,
Segade, F.,
Dosil, M.,
Pichel, J. G.,
Bustelo, X. R.,
and Freire, M.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8451-8454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bustelo, X. R.,
Otero, A.,
Gómez-Márquez, J.,
and Freire, M.
(1991)
J. Biol Chem
266,
1443-1447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith, M. R.,
Al-Katib, A.,
Mohammad, R.,
Silverman, A.,
Szabo, P.,
Khilnani, S.,
Kohler, W.,
Nath, R.,
and Mutchnick, M. G.
(1993)
Blood
82,
1127-1132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Conteas, C. N.,
Mutchnick, M. G.,
Palmer, K. C.,
Weller, F. E.,
Luk, G. D.,
Naylor, P. H.,
Erdos, M. R.,
Goldstein, A. L.,
Panneerselvam, C.,
and Horecker, B. L.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
3269-3273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dosil, M.,
Freire, M.,
and Gómez-Márquez, J.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
269,
373-376[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rosón, E.,
Gallego, R.,
Garcia-Caballero, R T.,
Fraga, M.,
Dominguez, F.,
and Beiras, A.
(1993)
Histochem. J.
25,
497-501[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mori, M.,
Barnard, G. F.,
Staniunas, R. J.,
Jessup, J. M.,
Steele, G. D., Jr.,
and Chen, L. B.
(1993)
Oncogene
8,
2821-2826[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Eilers, M.,
Schirm, S.,
and Bishop, J. M.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
133-141[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gaubatz, S.,
Meichle, A.,
and Eilers, M.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
3853-3862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sburlati, A. R.,
Manrow, R. E.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
253-257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bürglin, T. R.,
Mattaj, I. W.,
Newmeyer, D. D.,
Zeller, R.,
and De Robertis, E. M.
(1987)
Genes Dev.
1,
97-107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dingwall, C.,
Dilworth, S. M.,
Black, S. J.,
Kearsey, S. E.,
Cox, L. S.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
69-74[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Díaz-Jullien, C.,
Pérez-Éstez, A.,
Covelo, G.,
and Freire, M.
(1996)
Biochim. et Biophys. Acta
1296,
219-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rodríguez, P.,
Viñuela, J. E.,
Alvarez-Fernández, L.,
Buceta, M.,
Vidal, A.,
Domínguez, F.,
and Gómez-Márquez, J.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
331,
753-761
-
Papamarcaki, T.,
and Tsolas, O.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
345,
71-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Karetsou, Z.,
Sandaltzopoulos, R.,
Frangou-Lazaridis, M.,
Lai, C. Y.,
Tsolas, O.,
Becker, P. B.,
and Papamarcaki, T.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
3111-3118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kubota, S.,
Adachi, Y.,
Copeland, T. D.,
and Oroszlan, S.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
233,
48-54[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Trumbore, M. W.,
Wang, R.-H.,
Enkemann, S. A.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26394-26404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang, R.-H.,
Tao, L.,
Trumbore, M. W.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26405-26412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Barcia, M. G.,
Castro, J. M.,
Jullien, C. D.,
Gonzalez, C. G.,
and Freire, M.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
312,
152-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tao, L.,
Wang, R.-H.,
Enkemann, S. A.,
Trumbore, M. W.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1999)
J. Cell. Physiol.
178,
154-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vega, F. V.,
Vidal, A.,
Hellman, U.,
Wernstedt, C.,
and Domínguez, F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10147-10152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ryazanov, A. G.,
Shestakova, E. A.,
and Natapov, P. G.
(1988)
Nature
334,
170-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ryazanov, A. G.,
and Spirin, A. S.
(1993)
in
Translational Regulation of Gene Expression
(Ilan, J., ed), Vol. 2
, pp. 433-455, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
-
Nairn, A. C.,
and Palfrey, H. C.
(1996)
in
Translational Control
(Hershey, J. W. B.
, Matthews, M. B.
, and Sonenberg, N., eds)
, pp. 295-318, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY
-
Cullen, B. R.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
152,
684-704[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ryazanov, A. G.,
and Davydova, E. K.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
251,
187-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Marston, F. A. O.,
and Hartley, D. L.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
182,
264-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ryazanov, A. G.,
Ward, M. D.,
Mendola, C. E.,
Pavur, K. S.,
Dorovkov, M. V.,
Wiedmann, M.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
Parmer, T. G.,
Prostko, C. R.,
Germino, F. J.,
and Hait, W. N.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4884-4889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Warburg, O.,
and Christian, W.
(1942)
Biochem. Z.
310,
384-421
-
Johnson, R. A.,
and Sutherland, E. W.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
5114-5121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Harwood, J. P.,
and Rodbell, M.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
4901-4904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hellung-Larsen, P. H.,
and Klenow, H.
(1969)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
190,
434-441[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Goldemberg, A. L.,
Farias, R. N.,
and Trucco, R. E.
(1973)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
291,
489-493[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Celis, J. E.,
Madsen, P.,
and Ryazanov, A. G.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4231-4235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haritos, A. A.,
Yialouris, P. P.,
Heimer, E. P.,
Felix, A. M.,
and Rosemeyer, M. A.
(1987)
FEBS Lett.
218,
107-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cordero, O. J.,
Sarandeses, C. S.,
Lopez, J. L.,
and Nogueira, M.
(1992)
Biochem. Int.
28,
1117-1124[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us