JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sieradzki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tomasz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sieradzki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tomasz, A.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 27, 18942-18946, July 2, 1999


Inactivated pbp4 in Highly Glycopeptide-resistant Laboratory Mutants of Staphylococcus aureus*

Krzysztof Sieradzki, Mariana G. PinhoDagger , and Alexander Tomasz§

From The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Both vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant laboratory mutants of Staphylococcus aureus produce peptidoglycans of altered composition in which the proportion of highly cross-linked muropeptide species is drastically reduced with a parallel increase in the representation of muropeptide monomers and dimers (Sieradzki, K., and Tomasz, A. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 2557-2566; and Sieradzki, K., and Tomasz, A. (1998) Microb. Drug Resist. 4, 159-168). We now report that the distorted peptidoglycan composition is related to defects in penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4); no PBP4 was detectable by the fluorographic assay in membrane preparations from the mutants, and comparison of the sequence of pbp4 amplified from the mutants indicated disruption of the gene by two types of abnormalities, a 17-amino acid long duplication starting at position 305 of the pbp4 gene was detected in the vancomycin-resistant mutant, and a stop codon was found to be introduced into the pbp4 KTG motif at position 261 in the mutant selected for teicoplanin resistance. Additional common patterns of disturbances in the peptidoglycan metabolism of the mutants are indicated by the increased sensitivity of mutant cell walls to the M1 muramidase and decreased sensitivity to lysostaphin, which is a reversal of the susceptibility pattern of the parental cell walls. Furthermore, the results of high performance liquid chromatography analysis of lysostaphin digests of peptidoglycan suggest an increase in the average chain length of the glycan strands in the peptidoglycan of the glycopeptide-resistant mutants. The increased molar proportion of muropeptide monomers in the cell wall of the glycopeptide-resistant mutants should provide binding sites for the "capture" of vancomycin and teicoplanin molecules, which may be part of the mechanism of glycopeptide resistance in S. aureus.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Interest in the mode of action of glycopeptide antibiotics was rekindled by the emergence of glycopeptide resistance among enterococci (1) and, more recently, by reports on the appearance of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin and vancomycin (2-5). Vancomycin has been the antibiotic of choice in the therapy of infections by methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus, and it has become the last effective antibiotic left against multidrug-resistant strains of S. aureus.

In an attempt to obtain some insights into the mechanism of staphylococcal glycopeptide resistance, we isolated laboratory step mutants using either vancomycin (6) or teicoplanin (7) as the primary selective agent. Despite several differences in the properties of mutants selected by vancomycin as compared with those selected by teicoplanin, both types of highly glycopeptide-resistant mutants showed decreased cross-linking of muropeptides and several other properties, suggesting extensive perturbation of cell wall metabolism. In this communication we use a combination of biochemical and genetic techniques to further explore the mechanism that has led to the striking changes in cell wall structure and metabolism of these mutants.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions-- The parental strain for both of the independently isolated glycopeptide-resistant mutants was the methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain COL (8). Mutant VM was isolated by serial selection with vancomycin (6) and mutant TNM by selection for bacteria capable of growing on tryptic soy agar containing increasing concentrations of teicoplanin (final concentration, 100 µg/ml) (7). A third mutant, TM, was derived from mutant VM as a spontaneous, single step teicoplanin-resistant derivative, capable of growing on agar containing 800 µg/ml teicoplanin (6). The methicillin-susceptible strain RN450 (9) was also used in some of the experiments. The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of these strains are shown in Table I. All strains were grown in tryptic soy broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) at 37 °C with aeration. For each experiment, overnight cultures were diluted 10,000-fold into prewarmed tryptic soy broth and growth was followed by monitoring optical density (620 nm, using an LKB Spectrophotometer, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden) and by plating on tryptic soy agar to determine viable titers of the cultures. Antibiotic resistance levels were determined by plating diluted cultures on tryptic soy agar for population analysis, as described previously (10).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus strains used in the study

High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)1 Analysis of Peptidoglycan-- Cell wall peptidoglycan was prepared and enzymatic cell wall hydrolysates were analyzed with reversed-phase HPLC as described previously (11), except that the alkaline phosphatase step was omitted. Peptidoglycan prepared from the parental strain and from the three resistant mutants was analyzed after digestion with three different types of enzymes. In the first type of enzymatic hydrolysis, digestion by the M1 muramidase was used. In the second type of digestion, M1 was replaced by lysostaphin, and in the third type of digestion lysostaphin treatment was followed by a second digestion with the M1 muramidase.

Susceptibility of Cell Walls to Enzymatic Digestion in Vitro-- Purified cell walls were suspended in appropriate buffer (for lysostaphin, 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5; for muramidase, 25 mM phosphate buffer, pH 5.5) to initial A620 = 1.0. Lysis was measured as a decrease in A620 during incubation of the wall samples at 37 °C.

Membrane Purification and Analysis of Penicillin-binding Proteins (PBPs)-- Membranes were prepared from cells grown to the late exponential stage in the following way: harvested cells were washed once in 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2 buffer, pH 7.5, resuspended in the same buffer supplemented with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.5 mM) and beta -mercaptoethanol (10 mM). Lysostaphin, DNase, and RNase were added to the final concentration of 100, 20, and 10 µg/ml, respectively, and the suspensions were incubated on ice for 30 min, followed by sonication for 5 min with 2 min intervals on ice-water batch after each 1 min cycle. Partially lysed/broken cells were harvested by ultracentrifugation at 110,000 × g for 40 min at 4 °C, washed twice in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and membranes were solubilized by 2% Triton X-100. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. Membranes (80 µg/sample) were labeled with [3H]benzylpenicillin NEP salt (87.4 mCi/mg) (Merck) for 10 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by addition of an access of unlabeled benzylpenicillin. Separation of proteins was carried out by the technique of Laemmli (12) on 8% acrylamide gels at constant current of -20 mA until the blue dye reached the bottom of the separation gel. PBPs were visualized by fluorography (13).

Sequencing of pbp4-- DNA fragments including the pbp4 gene and its promoter region (2,076 base pairs) were amplified by PCR from chromosomal DNAs isolated from the parental strain COL and its mutants VM, TM and TNM. GeneAmp PCR reagent kit (Perkin Elmer) was used with 20 pmol of primers ATAAGACCCACTGGCCATGATAG and CTGGGGACAAAAAGAAGACGATG. The following conditions were used for amplification: 94 °C for 2 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 3 min; and one final extension step of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product was purified with Wizard PCR Preps (Promega), and DNA sequencing was done at the Rockefeller University Protein/DNA Technology Center with Taq fluorescent dye terminator sequencing method by using a PE/ABI 377 automated sequencer.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Evidence for Decreased Peptide Cross-linking and Increased Glycan Chain Lengths in the Peptidoglycan of Glycopeptide-resistant Mutants-- Fig. 1 shows the HPLC elution profiles of muropeptide species generated from the peptidoglycans of the parental strain COL and its vancomycin-resistant (VM) and teicoplanin-resistant (TNM) derivatives, and a third mutant, TM, selected from mutant VM as a highly teicoplanin-resistant derivative (6). The HPLC profiles in panels A show muropeptide species obtained after treatment of the peptidoglycans with the M1 muramidase, an enzyme that breaks glycosidic bonds between the disaccharide units in the peptidoglycan (14). Drastic reduction in the proportion of highly cross-linked muropeptide oligomers (i.e. muropeptide species eluting from the HPLC column with the retention time of muropeptide 17 and with retention times longer) is apparent in each one of the mutant cell walls (see Fig. 1).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   HPLC elution profiles of muropeptides isolated from the parental strain COL, vancomycin-resistant mutant VM, vancomycin- and highly teicoplanin-resistant mutant TM, and teicoplanin-resistant mutant TNM. Peptidoglycan was purified and digested with muramidase (A), lysostaphin (B), and lysostaphin followed by muramidase (C). Separation of muropeptides was performed as described previously (11).

Fig. 2 documents in quantitative terms the altered cell wall muropeptide composition in the glycopeptide-resistant mutants.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Muropeptide composition of parental strain COL and its glycopeptide-resistant mutants VM, TM, and TNM. Percentages are expressed as the fraction of the total area and were obtained from HPLC profiles shown in Fig. 1. Muropeptide numbers refer to the peaks in Fig. 1.

Panels B in Fig. 1 show HPLC profiles obtained after hydrolysis of parental and mutant peptidoglycan with lysostaphin, an enzyme that hydrolyzes the oligoglycine cross-bridges in the peptidoglycan (15, 16). A large increase in the proportion of muropeptide species eluting with long retention times from the reverse phase column is apparent in each one of the resistant mutants.

If one assumed that the lysostaphin digestion resulted in a quantitative breakage of all oligoglycine cross-bridges in the peptidoglycan, then the muropeptide species with the long retention time most likely represented muropeptide monomers attached to glycan chains of increased length as compared with glycan chains in the parental peptidoglycan. This interpretation was confirmed by the results of double digestion shown in panels C of Fig. 1. It may be seen that a subsequent treatment of the lysostaphin hydrolysates with the M1 muramidase generated a virtually identical set of muropeptides from both parental as well as from the mutant peptidoglycans, and these were identified on the basis of their elution patterns as a group of muropeptide monomers expected to be produced if the lysostaphin digestion preceding the treatment with M1 was complete (11). These observations suggest that the radically decreased peptide cross-linking of the peptidoglycan of the glycopeptide-resistant mutants was accompanied by increase in the average length of the glycan strands.

Expression of PBP4 in the Resistant Mutant-- Plasma membrane preparations isolated from the glycopeptide-resistant mutants were tested with the fluorographic assay using [3H]penicillin for the presence of staphylococcal penicillin-binding proteins in the membrane preparations. No PBP4 could be detected in any one of the three highly resistant bacterial mutants (Fig. 3).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   PBP patterns of parental strain COL (lane 1) and glycopeptide-resistant mutants VM (lane 2), TM (lane 3), and TNM (lane 4). The purified plasma membranes were incubated with [3H]benzylpenicillin and were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and fluorography, as described under "Experimental Procedures."

Alterations in the DNA Sequence of the PBP4 Determinant of Glycopeptide-resistant Mutants-- The pbp4 gene from the parental strain COL and from mutants VM, TM, and TNM was amplified and sequenced. The sequence of the pbp4 gene revealed that mutants VM and TM both carried a 17-amino acid duplication at position 305 of the parental gene. In the third mutant TNM, the alteration in the pbp4 gene involved introduction of a stop codon into the KTG motif at position 261 in the sequence (Fig. 4).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Amino acid sequence alignment of an internal fragment of PBP4 (amino acids 201-400) of the parental strain COL and glycopeptide-resistant derivatives VM, TM, and TNM. The KTG conserved motif of transpeptidase domain is shown in a box. In the TNM mutant, a point mutation converted the codon coding for Gly-261 into a stop codon while in VM and TM mutants there was a duplication of 17 amino acids (underlined).

Altered Susceptibility of Mutant Cell Walls to Lysostaphin and Muramidase Degradation in Vitro-- The decreased peptide cross-linkage and the apparent increase in the average glycan chain length in the peptidoglycan of the resistant mutants suggested that these alterations may have also caused an alteration in the relative susceptibilities of the mutant cell walls to lysostaphin and the M1 muramidase. This was in fact confirmed. Susceptibility of mutant cell walls to degradation by the M1 muramidase increased, whereas susceptibility to lysostaphin decreased, as compared with the properties of the parental cell wall (Fig. 5). Such a shift in sensitivity would be consistent with the documented decrease in the peptide cross-linking and with the proposed increase in the average glycan chain length in the mutants, because the structural integrity of the mutant cell walls would depend less on the peptide cross-linking network than on the glycan chains.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Cell wall hydrolysis in vitro. Cell walls prepared from penicillin-sensitive control strain RN450 from parental strain COL and its glycopeptide-resistant mutants VM, TM, and TNM were degraded by lysostaphin (panel A) and muramidase (panel B). Lysis was measured as a decrease in A620 (OD) during incubation of wall samples.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The observations described in this study confirm and extend our findings reported earlier (6, 7). The drastically reduced level of peptidoglycan cross-linking, both in the vancomycin-resistant and also in the independently selected teicoplanin-resistant mutants, strongly suggests that this change in peptidoglycan composition is related, directly or indirectly, to the mechanism of antibiotic resistance. Highly cross-linked muropeptides, representing nearly 60% of all muropeptide species in the parental strain, were reduced to about 30, 15, and 17% in mutants VM, TM, and TNM, respectively. Results described in this study strongly suggest that these cell wall alterations are caused by the disruption of pbp4 in the mutants, resulting in the inactivation or greatly reduced production of PBP4, as evidenced by the negative results of the fluorographic assay.

PBP4 has been shown to have both transpeptidase and D,D-carboxypeptidase activities (17), and this protein was postulated to act in vivo as a secondary transpeptidase required for the extensive cross-linking of peptidoglycan (18). A mutant of S. aureus lacking pbp4 (19) was reported to have a hypo-cross-linked peptidoglycan layer (18), as well as a slight increase in susceptibility to beta -lactam antibiotics. Other studies (20, 21) demonstrated that overproduction or modification of PBP4 leads to increase in peptidoglycan cross-linking and to increased resistance to methicillin.

Results described in this study indicate that a defect in PBP4 is also associated with the extensive reduction of peptidoglycan cross-linkage in glycopeptide-resistant S. aureus. That this abnormality may be related to the mechanism of resistance is suggested by disruption of pbp4 by two distinct modes of inactivation: the insertion of a 51-nucleotide sequence near the active site in the mutants with the primary selection for vancomycin resistance; and the introduction of a stop codon at the KTG motif in the mutant selected for by teicoplanin.

The drastic reduction in peptidoglycan cross-linking in the resistant mutants was accompanied by an increased representation of monomeric muropeptides carrying intact carboxyl-terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine residues (Fig. 2), which are known to be the recognition sites for glycopeptide antibiotics (22). It was also demonstrated earlier that during the growth of cultures of the glycopeptide-resistant staphylococcal mutants, the bacteria can remove teicoplanin and vancomycin from the medium, and subsequently the sequestered antibiotic can be recovered in biologically active form from the cell walls (6, 7). In the resistant staphylococci, the antibiotic molecules captured by the monomer-rich peptidoglycan may sterically block the porous channels in the cell wall through which incoming drug molecules normally reach sites of cell wall biosynthesis at the plasma membrane (Fig. 6). In this model the diffusion barrier by the captured antibiotic molecules is assumed to become part of the mechanism of resistance.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Model for the capture of vancomycin molecules in the cell wall of glycopeptide-resistant staphylococci. Glycopeptides are assumed to initiate their antibacterial activity by attachment to the D-alanyl-D-alanine termini of cell wall precursors emerging at biosynthetic sites on the bacterial plasma membrane (23-25). Diffusion of drug molecules to the plasma membrane is presumed to occur nearly unhindered through the cell wall of susceptible staphylococci. In contrast, the cell walls of resistant mutants enriched for the muropeptide monomers may slow down and prevent access to the cell wall synthetic sites by attachment of the antibiotic molecules to the D-alanyl-D-alanine termini of peptidoglycan monomers. The captured antibiotic molecules may then become part of the mechanism of resistance through the steric hindrance they pose to the penetration of free glycopeptide molecules. CW, cell wall; CM, ; PG, peptidoglycan.

Although the correlation between the structural abnormality of peptidoglycan and glycopeptide resistance is striking, genetic and biochemical experiments clearly indicate that this cell wall abnormality alone cannot be fully responsible for the mechanism of resistance (6). For instance, whereas cell walls purified from glycopeptide-resistant mutants have clearly increased (2-4-fold) drug binding capacities over that of the cell walls of the parental strain, this increase in binding capacity is much less than what would be expected for the disproportionately large increase in glycopeptide minimal inhibitory concentration value (6,7). Alterations in the secondary structure of the cell walls and/or changes in other cell surface polymers may also accompany acquisition of glycopeptide resistance (6, 7). Glycopeptide-resistant laboratory mutants carry multistep mutations and show extensive and diverse abnormalities in cell wall metabolism, and the relationship of these to the mechanism of antibiotic resistance remains to be elucidated. One of these unexplained anomalies is the decrease in the methicillin resistance level of mutant VM (6). The mechanism of this observation is not known. However, a similar inverse relationship between the methicillin and vancomycin resistance level was also detected in a set of clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibilities (26).

Another abnormality of wall metabolism was detected by in vitro testing of the susceptibility of mutant cell walls to degradation by lysostaphin and by the M1 muramidase, as described in this study. The tests showed that there was a reversal in the relative sensitivities of the cell walls to these enzymes as compared with the susceptibility of the parental cell walls. Cell walls from the mutants had an increased sensitivity to the M1 muramidase and a decreased sensitivity to lysostaphin, suggesting that the structural integrity of the mutant cell walls has become more dependent on the glycan strands as compared with the peptide cross-linking. The activity responsible for such a structural change is unknown. Nevertheless, this observation is consistent with the results of the experiments illustrated in panels B and C of Fig. 1, which we interpret as an apparent increase in the average glycan chain length in the peptidoglycan of the resistant mutants, perhaps "compensating" for the decrease in peptide cross-linkage.

    FOOTNOTES

* Partial support for these investigations was received from the Irene Diamond Fund.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by a grant from PRAXIS XXI/BD/9079/96.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Tel.: 212-327-8278; Fax: 212-327-8688.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HPLC. high performance liquid chromatography, PBP, penicillin-binding protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
  1. Leclercq, R., Derlot, E., Duval, J., and Courvalin, P. (1988) N. Engl. J. Med. 319, 157-161[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kaatz, G. W., Seo, S. M., Dorman, N. J., and Lerner, S. A. (1990) J. Infect. Dis. 162, 103-108[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Hiramatsu, K., Hanaki, H., Ino, T., Yabuta, K., Oguri, T., and Tenover, F. C. (1997) J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40, 135-136[Free Full Text]
  4. Centers for Disease Control. (1997) Morbid. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 46, 765-766[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Centers for Disease Control. (1997) Morbid. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 46, 813-815[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Sieradzki, K., and Tomasz, A. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 2557-2566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sieradzki, K., and Tomasz, A. (1998) Microb. Drug Resist. 4, 159-168[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Murakami, K., and Tomasz, A. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171, 874-879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Novick, R. (1967) Virology 33, 155-166[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Sieradzki, K., Villari, P., and Tomasz, A. (1998) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 100-107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. de Jonge, B. L. M., Chang, Y.-S., Gage, D., and Tomasz, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11248-11254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Laskey, R. A., and Mills, A. D. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem. 56, 335-341[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Lichenstein, H. S., Hastings, A. E., Langley, K. E., Mendiaz, E. A., Rohde, M. F., Elmore, R., and Zukowski, M. M. (1990) Gene 88, 81-86[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Browder, H. P., Zygmunt, W. A., Young, J. R., and Tavormina, P. A. (1965) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 19, 2-8
  16. Xu, N., Huang, Z.-H., de Jonge, B. L. M., and Gage, D. A. (1997) Anal. Biochem. 248, 7-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kozarich, J. W., and Strominger, J. L. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 1272-1278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wyke, A. W., Ward, J. B., Hayes, M. V., and Curtis, N. A. C. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 119, 389-393[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Curtis, N. A. C., Hayes, M. V., Wyke, A. W., and Ward, J. B. (1980) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 9, 263-266[CrossRef]
  20. Henze, U. U., and Berger-Bachi, B. (1996) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40, 2121-2125[Abstract]
  21. Domanski, T. L., de Jonge, B. L. M., and Bayles, K. W. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 2651-2657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Nieto, M., and Perkins, H. R. (1971) Biochem. J. 123, 789-803[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Reynolds, P. E. (1989) Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 8, 943-950[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Groves, P., Searle, M. S., Mackay, J. P., and Williams, D. H. (1994) Structure 2, 747-754[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Mackay, J. P., Gerhard, U., Beauregard, D. A., Westwell, M. S., Searle, M. S., and Williams, D. H. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 4581-4590[CrossRef]
  26. Sieradzki, K., Roberts, R. B., Haber, S. W., and Tomasz, A. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 517-523[Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
D. S. Burgess and R. P. Rapp
Bugs versus drugs: Addressing the pharmacist's challenge
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 1, 2008; 65(9_Supplement_2): S4 - S15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
Y. Zhou, A. Antignac, S. W. Wu, and A. Tomasz
Penicillin-Binding Proteins and Cell Wall Composition in -Lactam-Sensitive and -Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus sciuri
J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2008; 190(2): 508 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. McCallum, A. K. C. Brassinga, C. D. Sifri, and B. Berger-Bachi
Functional Characterization of TcaA: Minimal Requirement for Teicoplanin Susceptibility and Role in Caenorhabditis elegans Virulence
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2007; 51(11): 3836 - 3843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. M. Pereira, S. R. Filipe, A. Tomasz, and M. G. Pinho
Fluorescence Ratio Imaging Microscopy Shows Decreased Access of Vancomycin to Cell Wall Synthetic Sites in Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2007; 51(10): 3627 - 3633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Meehl, S. Herbert, F. Gotz, and A. Cheung
Interaction of the GraRS Two-Component System with the VraFG ABC Transporter To Support Vancomycin-Intermediate Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2007; 51(8): 2679 - 2689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
P. D. Stapleton, S. Shah, K. Ehlert, Y. Hara, and P. W. Taylor
The beta-lactam-resistance modifier (-)-epicatechin gallate alters the architecture of the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus
Microbiology, July 1, 2007; 153(7): 2093 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
I. Valera, A. G. Vigo, S. Alonso, L. Barbolla, M. S. Crespo, and N. Fernandez
Peptidoglycan and mannose-based molecular patterns trigger the arachidonic acid cascade in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes
J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2007; 81(4): 925 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. L. Nelson, K. C. Rice, S. R. Slater, P. M. Fox, G. L. Archer, K. W. Bayles, P. D. Fey, B. N. Kreiswirth, and G. A. Somerville
Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Strains Have Impaired Acetate Catabolism: Implications for Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin Synthesis and Autolysis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2007; 51(2): 616 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
S. Gardete, H. de Lencastre, and A. Tomasz
A link in transcription between the native pbpB and the acquired mecA gene in a strain of Staphylococcus aureus.
Microbiology, September 1, 2006; 152(Pt 9): 2549 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. McCallum, H. Karauzum, R. Getzmann, M. Bischoff, P. Majcherczyk, B. Berger-Bachi, and R. Landmann
In Vivo Survival of Teicoplanin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Fitness Cost of Teicoplanin Resistance.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2006; 50(7): 2352 - 2360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. Cui, A. Iwamoto, J.-Q. Lian, H.-m. Neoh, T. Maruyama, Y. Horikawa, and K. Hiramatsu
Novel Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance Originating in Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2006; 50(2): 428 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. Cui, J.-Q. Lian, H.-m. Neoh, E. Reyes, and K. Hiramatsu
DNA Microarray-Based Identification of Genes Associated with Glycopeptide Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2005; 49(8): 3404 - 3413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Wootton, P. M. Bennett, A. P. MacGowan, and T. R. Walsh
Strain-Specific Expression Levels of pbp4 Exist in Isolates of Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) and Heterogeneous GISA
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2005; 49(8): 3598 - 3599.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
T. A. Leski and A. Tomasz
Role of Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 (PBP2) in the Antibiotic Susceptibility and Cell Wall Cross-Linking of Staphylococcus aureus: Evidence for the Cooperative Functioning of PBP2, PBP4, and PBP2A
J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2005; 187(5): 1815 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
H. Nishi, H. Komatsuzawa, T. Fujiwara, N. McCallum, and M. Sugai
Reduced Content of Lysyl-Phosphatidylglycerol in the Cytoplasmic Membrane Affects Susceptibility to Moenomycin, as Well as Vancomycin, Gentamicin, and Antimicrobial Peptides, in Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2004; 48(12): 4800 - 4807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. L. Koehl, A. Muthaiyan, R. K. Jayaswal, K. Ehlert, H. Labischinski, and B. J. Wilkinson
Cell Wall Composition and Decreased Autolytic Activity and Lysostaphin Susceptibility of Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2004; 48(10): 3749 - 3757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. Gardete, A. M. Ludovice, R. G. Sobral, S. R. Filipe, H. de Lencastre, and A. Tomasz
Role of murE in the Expression of {beta}-Lactam Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2004; 186(6): 1705 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Muthaiyan, R. K. Jayaswal, and B. J. Wilkinson
Intact mutS in Laboratory-Derived and Clinical Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Strains
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2004; 48(2): 623 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
K. Sieradzki and A. Tomasz
Alterations of Cell Wall Structure and Metabolism Accompany Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin in an Isogenic Series of Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus
J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2003; 185(24): 7103 - 7110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. M. Weigel, D. B. Clewell, S. R. Gill, N. C. Clark, L. K. McDougal, S. E. Flannagan, J. F. Kolonay, J. Shetty, G. E. Killgore, and F. C. Tenover
Genetic Analysis of a High-Level Vancomycin-Resistant Isolate of Staphylococcus aureus
Science, November 28, 2003; 302(5650): 1569 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
E. Mongodin, J. Finan, M. W. Climo, A. Rosato, S. Gill, and G. L. Archer
Microarray Transcription Analysis of Clinical Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Resistant to Vancomycin
J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2003; 185(15): 4638 - 4643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
K. Sieradzki, T. Leski, J. Dick, L. Borio, and A. Tomasz
Evolution of a Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Strain In Vivo: Multiple Changes in the Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes of a Single Lineage of Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus under the Impact of Antibiotics Administered for Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2003; 41(4): 1687 - 1693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Boyle-Vavra, S. Yin, M. Challapalli, and R. S. Daum
Transcriptional Induction of the Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 Gene in Staphylococcus aureus by Cell Wall-Active Antibiotics Oxacillin and Vancomycin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2003; 47(3): 1028 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Reipert, K. Ehlert, T. Kast, and G. Bierbaum
Morphological and Genetic Differences in Two Isogenic Staphylococcus aureus Strains with Decreased Susceptibilities to Vancomycin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2003; 47(2): 568 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
I. Couto, S. W. Wu, A. Tomasz, and H. de Lencastre
Development of Methicillin Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus sciuri by Transcriptional Activation of the mecA Homologue Native to the Species
J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2003; 185(2): 645 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
L. Cui, X. Ma, K. Sato, K. Okuma, F. C. Tenover, E. M. Mamizuka, C. G. Gemmell, M.-N. Kim, M.-C. Ploy, N. El Solh, et al.
Cell Wall Thickening Is a Common Feature of Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 5 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
F. Schaaff, A. Reipert, and G. Bierbaum
An Elevated Mutation Frequency Favors Development of Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2002; 46(11): 3540 - 3548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
F. M. MacKenzie, P. Greig, D. Morrison, G. Edwards, and I. M. Gould
Identification and characterization of teicoplanin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus blood culture isolates in NE Scotland
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2002; 50(5): 689 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
A. Srinivasan, J. D. Dick, and T. M. Perl
Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococci
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2002; 15(3): 430 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
H. Komatsuzawa, K. Ohta, S. Yamada, K. Ehlert, H. Labischinski, J. Kajimura, T. Fujiwara, and M. Sugai
Increased Glycan Chain Length Distribution and Decreased Susceptibility to Moenomycin in a Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Mutant
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2002; 46(1): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. E. Finan, G. L. Archer, M. J. Pucci, and M. W. Climo
Role of Penicillin-Binding Protein 4 in Expression of Vancomycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2001; 45(11): 3070 - 3075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.