![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 29, 20103-20109, July 16, 1999
,
,
,
,
, and
§
From the
Functional Genomics Group, Division of
Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University
of Sheffield, Glossop Rd., Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom, the
§ Department of Pathology, University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington, and the ¶ Wellcome Trust Center for
Cell-Matrix Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of
Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we identified an adhesion-regulated subunit of the interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor complex. Transfection of fibroblasts with an IL-1 receptor-EGFP construct showed that the fusion protein was located at focal adhesions in cells attaching to fibronectin.
Fibronectin attachment caused enhancement in endogenous IL-1 type I
receptor levels from on average 2500 to 4300 receptors/cell. In
addition, matrix attachment resulted in a decrease in binding affinity
(Ka) from 1.0 × 109
(M
1) to 5.6 × 108
(M
1), due to a 2-fold reduction in
association rate constant.
The adhesion-mediated effects were reversed by soluble heparin. Cross-linking experiments showed that in cells attached to fibronectin, 50-70% of the radiolabeled IL-1 was associated with a heparinase sensitive, high molecular mass component of about 300 kDa, with a core protein of 80-90 kDa. Formation of the complex was dependent on cell interaction with the heparin binding region in fibronectin and required IL-1/type I IL-1 receptor binding.
This report demonstrates the recruitment of a heparan sulfate to the
IL-1 receptor complex, following attachment to fibronectin, which
correlates with alterations in receptor function. The data suggest that
the heparan sulfate constitutes an attachment regulated component of
the IL-1 receptor complex with the role of mediating matrix regulation
of IL-1 responses.
Regulation of a number of cytokine and growth factor receptors is
mediated in part through accessory proteins, recruited before or
following ligand binding. In several instances, such as modulation of
fibroblast growth factor-receptor interaction and IL-6 signaling, regulation involves interactions with glycoproteins and proteoglycans (1, 2).
IL-1 responses are regulated through a receptor complex to which an
increasing number of components have been found to belong. The receptor
uses a well conserved mechanism for regulating immune and inflammatory
responses (3-7) but which is still not completely understood.
Initiation of the signal occurs through a heterodimeric receptor
complex, composed of the interleukin type I receptor (IL-1RI)1 (8) and the
accessory protein (AcP) (9), both 80-90 kDa glycoproteins. The type I
receptor complex is present on T cells and connective tissue derived
cells (8, 10) characteristically at low levels (11). The receptor binds
both forms of IL-1 (12, 13), with active forms of 17 kDa, and is
responsible for IL-1 induced activation of both NF- In adherent cells, such as fibroblasts, IL-1 receptors are located at
focal adhesions (27, 28), and IL-1 binding to the type I receptor has
rapid effects on cell structure (29). IL-1 signal transduction is
regulated by cell attachment and spreading (30), and fibronectin
attachment is permissive in IL-1 responses in adherent cells (31).
In this report we demonstrate the presence of a novel,
attachment-regulated component of the IL-1 receptor complex at focal adhesions that constitutes a heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Recruitment of this component affects receptor function, both in terms of the level
of type I IL-1 receptors and their affinity for ligand, and correlates
with IL-1-mediated, attachment-regulated signaling and biological responses.
Transfection--
Cells grown in 10-cm dishes (3 × 106cells/dish) were transfected with a construct derived
from pEGFP-N2 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), in which
the full-length IL-1RI was introduced into the vector mcs upstream of
the EGFP sequence. The receptor portion, a chimera (HinMext) containing
the mouse extracellular domain linked to the human intracellular domain
(32), was excised from the vector pDC406 using XhoI and
BsaAI. The vector p-EGFP-N2 was digested with
XhoI and SmaI, and the IL-1 receptor, lacking the
C-terminal 4 residues (VPLG), was inserted in frame in front of a
sequence encoding the linker (GIHRPVAT). Transfection was carried out
by calcium phosphate precipitation (4 µg of plasmid/10-cm dish for 4 h at 37 °C, followed by 25% Glycerol shock for 1 min).
Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were detached using EDTA (5 mM), replated on tissue culture treated multiwell chambered
coverglasses (Labtek, Nunc) coated with fibronectin (10 µg/ml) as
below, and allowed to attach for 4 h.
Immunostaining--
Transfected cells, replated on fibronectin
for 4 h, as below, were fixed for 10 min in PBS + 4%
paraformaldehyde, washed three times with PBS, and
blocked/permeabilized by incubation in PBS + 5% goat serum + 0.1%
Triton X-100. Primary mouse anti-vinculin antibody (V9131, Sigma)
(overnight at 4 °C) and secondary biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG
antisera (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) (30 min at
room temperature) were applied sequentially at 2 µg/ml in
blocking/permeabilization buffer followed by Texas Red-conjugated
streptavidin (Molecular Probes) (20 min at room temperature) at 0.2 µg/ml in PBS. After extensive washing, images of vinculin staining
(red fluorescence) and IL-1RI-EGFP (green fluorescence) were obtained
by confocal microscopy.
Confocal Microscopy--
Data were acquired with a Multiprobe
CLSM 2010 laser scanning confocal microscope (Molecular Dynamics)
interfaced to a Silicon Graphics workstation, using the 488 nM line (excitation for green fluoresence) and the 565 nM line (excitation for red fluorescence) of a
krypton/argon mixed gas laser and a 50-µm pinhole aperture, generating a 0.5-µm-thick optical section from a planApo × 60 oil lens (NA 1.40). Data were collected using a 530 nM band
pass filter (green) and a 590 nM long pass filter (red) and
at a photo multiplier tube voltage in the range of 550-800 V and 10%
laser attenuation. After acquisition, data files were exported to a Power Macintosh, and converted to 8 bit TIFF images using NIH Image
(Wayne Rasband at the National Institutes of Health and available from
the Internet) for printing and analysis.
Tissue Culture--
Human dermal or gingival fibroblasts (six
strains, transfer 9-14) were used. Both types of fibroblasts were
tested in all assays, and they consistently showed the same effects.
Cells were plated in 6-well (2 × 105 cells/well) or
24-well (5 × 104 cells/well) tissue culture plates,
on bare tissue culture plastic, or in wells coated with fibronectin (10 µg/ml) (Life Technologies, Inc.) or on poly-L-lysine
(0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/ml) (Sigma) (33, 16) following detachment using
EDTA (5 mM), as described (31), and allowed to attach for
3-4 h in 10% fetal calf serum. Using poly-L-lysine
resulted in the same responses as those seen in cells on bare tissue
culture plastic, shown in all experiments together with fibronectin. In
some experiments, cells were incubated prior to plating (5 min) and
plated in the presence of heparin (10 Radiolabeling of Human IL-1--
Recombinant human IL-1 Receptor Binding--
For binding experiments, monolayer
cultures plated on fibronectin coated plates or on bare plastic, as
described above, were washed twice with fresh medium. Subsequently,
binding medium (RPMI 1640 medium with 1% bovine serum albumin, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, and 0.1% sodium azide; 1 ml/105 cells) containing the appropriate concentration of
125I-IL-1
where A is Avogadros number, B is the
specific activity of the radiolabeled IL-1 (cpm/mol), and C
is the number of cells determined in duplicate by hemocytometer.
Values for specific binding (molecules/cell) were analyzed by nonlinear
least squares fitting using the equation,
Cross-linking and Gel Electrophoresis--
For cross-linking
experiments, cells were incubated with radiolabeled ligand and rinsed,
as above. Prior to harvesting, cultures were incubated with the
amine-directed cross-linking agent BS3 (0.1 mg/ml, Pierce)
for 30 min at room temperature (36).
Following harvesting by EDTA (5 mM) and centrifugation
(1000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C), the cell pellet was resuspended in
extraction buffer (1% Triton X-100, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µM pepstatin, 1 µM leupeptin; 50 µl/106cells) and incubated
for 15 min on ice. Following centrifugation (10,000 rpm for 5 min),
supernatant from samples was mixed with an equal volume of 2× sample
buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1% SDS, 10% glycerol,
0.0025% bromphenol blue, and 0.25% 2-mercaptoethanol) and boiled for
5 min. Extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE (3-12% or 4-12%), using
the stacking gel procedure of Laemmli (37). Dried gels were
allowed to expose film (X-Omat, Eastman Kodak Co.) with intensifying
screens (Hypercassette, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 3-7 days at
Cell Surface Iodination--
Cells plated on fibronectin coated
plates, as above (six to ten 10-cm plates at 2 × 106cells/plate) were surface-labeled using the glucose
oxidase-lactoperoxidase method (38). Briefly, cultures were incubated
(15 min at room temperature) with 2.5 mCi/ml125I-NaI (NEN
Life Science Products, low pH) in iodination buffer (PBS containing
lactoperoxidase (20 µg/ml), glucose oxidase (0.25 µg/ml), and
glucose (20.00 mM)). After washing (0.15 M NaI
in PBS, 1:1), incubation with unlabeled IL-1 (2 × 10 Heparinase Digestion--
After cross-linking, samples (50 µl)
were digested with heparinase (0.2 units/ml, 6 h at 37 °C) (EC
4.2.2.7) (Sigma) in a Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0)
containing 10 mM CaCl2, (39) and in the
presence of 0.01 mM leupeptin and 0.01 mM
pepstatin, with equal amounts of fresh enzyme added at 3 h.
Following digestion, samples were analyzed using gel electrophoresis,
as above.
Immunoprecipitation--
Cells plated on fibronectin were
incubated with radiolabeled IL-1 for 2 h, as described previously.
In some experiments, cells were instead biosynthetically labeled using
[35S]sulfate (300 µCi/ml, overnight at 37 °C),
re-plated on fibronectin following detachment using EDTA, as above, and
incubated in the cold (4 °C) with unlabeled IL-1.
Following either protocol, cells were incubated with cross-linking
agent, harvested, and extracted, as above.
Following preclearing with secondary antibody (rabbit anti-rat, 290 µg/ml) and protein A-agarose beads (12.5 µl/ml, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc.), samples (20 µl/106 cells) were
subjected to immunoprecipitation by adding a nonblocking anti-human
type I IL-1 receptor rat monoclonal antibody (M8, 5 µg/ml, 1 h
at 4 °C) (35). Subsequently, secondary antibody (rabbit anti-rat,
Capell) (1:20,290 µg/ml) and prewashed protein A-agarose beads (12.5 µl/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) were added to each sample,
followed by incubation for an additional 1 h at 4 °C.
Samples were spun in a microcentrifuge (10,000 rpm for 1 min at
4 °C) and washed three times with RIPA buffer (150 mM
NaCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5%
deoxycholate, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 and 0.1% SDS) and once with HEPES,
(10 mM, pH 7.5). After the final wash, the pellet was
resuspended in electrophoresis sample buffer (50 µl/106
cells) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, as above.
Confocal microscopy of human fibroblasts transfected with a
5'IL-1RI-EGFP 3' receptor construct showed that 24 h after
transfection, the receptor fusion protein was located at the cell
membrane. Serial observations of single cells replated on fibronectin
demonstrated a high degree of accumulation of the GFP-tagged fusion
protein at extended processes following cell attachment and spreading (Fig. 1a), in agreement with
earlier data on localization of the endogenous receptor protein.
Immunocytochemical staining of transfected cells showed co-localization
of the receptor fusion protein with the transmembrane linkage protein
vinculin at these sites, and at occasional sites along the cell
membrane (Fig. 1).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B and stress
kinase pathways (14-17). In addition, a 67-kDa, nonsignaling receptor
(type II) is expressed on B cells, monocytes, and T cells (18-22). The
receptor proximal stages of signal activation involve the adapter
proteins TRAF 6 (23) and MyD88 (24-26) and two related kinases, IRAK-1
and IRAK-2 (7, 24).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
9-10
5
M) or with the same concentration of chondroitin sulfate,
as control, or in the presence of an RGD containing peptide (GRGDSP, 10
8-10
4 M, Life Technologies,
Inc.) or a nonspecific, RGE-containing peptide (GRGESP,
10
8-10
4 M, Life Technologies,
Inc.) used as a control. Furthermore, in some experiments, cells were
plated on a wild type or a mutant version of the H/95 recombinant
fibronectin fragment containing the HepII/IIICS region (34). The mutant
protein was altered in the main heparin binding region in HepII
(PPRRARVT to PPSSASVT) and in an additional site in IIICS (HGFRRTTP to
PPSSASVT and IRHRPRPY to
ISHSPSPY).2
(kind
gift of Immunex Corp) was radiolabeled with 125I by a
modified chloramine-T method as described previously (12, 27). Briefly,
30 ng of IL-1
(1.71nmol) in 10 µl of PBS were incubated with 5mCi
(2.0nmol) of sodium 125I-iodide (NEN Life Science Products)
in 25 µl of 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7, and 30 µl of
1.4 × 10
4 M chloramine-T (4.2 nmol) for
30 min on ice. The reaction mixture was fractionated and the reaction
terminated by rapid filtration on a 1-ml bed volume Biogel P6 column
(Bio-Rad) preblocked with bovine serum albumin (1% (w/v) in PBS).
Following elution with PBS, fractions 2-4 (100 µl each), containing
the labeled protein, were pooled. The labeled protein had a specific
activity in the range 3-6 × 1015 dpm/mmol.
was added to the wells. Nonspecific binding
was measured using 100-fold higher concentration of unlabeled IL-1.
Cultures were incubated at 4 °C for 2 h using a gyrorotary
shaker to ensure continuous mixing of the supernatant. The incubation
time chosen was based on previous kinetic studies (27). The binding
experiments were carried out in binding medium alone or in the presence
of heparin (10
5 M) or chondroitin
(10
5 M) sulfate, used as control, or in the
presence of an RGD containing peptide (GRGDSP, 10
4
M, Life Technologies, Inc.) or a nonspecific, RGE
containing, peptide (GRGESP, 10
4 M, Life
Technologies, Inc.) used as a control. In addition, binding was
measured in the presence of a blocking anti-IL-1RI monoclonal antibody
(M4, 10
7 M) (35). Association kinetics
experiments were performed at four IL-1 concentrations (0.1, 0.75, 1, and 1.5 nM). Following incubation, 60 µl of supernatant
was withdrawn to measure free 125I-IL-1 concentrations. The
monolayers were washed rapidly (5×) with ice-cold binding medium to
remove unbound ligand and harvested following incubation at 37 °C
for 15 min in trypsin (0.05%)/EDTA (0.02%). Bound
125I-IL-1 was measured in a gamma or beta counter.
Nonspecific binding data were analyzed by curve fitting using the
following equation: Bound (molecules/cell) = A × C, where C is the free IL-1 concentration (M), and A (molecules/cell/M)
(determined using one or two IL-1 concentrations) is the slope of a
line passing through the origin. Nonspecific binding for all
experimental points was subsequently calculated by interpolation and
subtracted from the specific binding data. Molecules/cell was
calculated using the formula,
(Eq. 1)
where K (M
(Eq. 2)
1) is the
affinity of IL-1 for its receptor, Ro is the total
receptor concentration (sites/cell), and C (M)
is the IL-1 concentration. Parameter values were estimated by nonlinear
least squares fitting of this equation to equilibrium binding data.
Association kinetics data were analyzed using a pseudo-first-order
treatment as described (27). All calculations were done using MLAB for
Macintosh (Civilized Software, Silver Spring, MD). For illustration
purposes, in some cases the data were converted to Scatchard format.
70 °C. For quantitation, autoradiograms were scanned with a
ScanJet IIcx (Hewlett-Packard, Boise, Idaho) connected to a power
Macintosh and analyzed using NIH Image, as above.
9 M for 2 h at 4 °C), and
cross-linking (BS3, 0.1 mg/ml), cells were detached (EDTA,
5 mM). The cell pellet, obtained by centrifugation (1000 rpm for 5 min) was resuspended in extraction buffer containing 1%
Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors, as above, and incubated for 30 min on ice. The supernatant after centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 5 min)
was removed and proteins separated using SDS-PAGE, as above.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Co-localization of IL-1 receptors with the
transmembrane linkage protein vinculin in attached fibroblasts.
Immunocytochemical staining of fibroblasts transfected with an
EGFP-IL-1 receptor construct, and following attachment and spreading on
fibronectin, shows accumulation of the fusion protein at extended
processes (arrowheads) and at occasional sites along the
membrane (arrows) (a) and co-localization with
endogenous vinculin at these sites (b). Bar, 10 µm.
Binding studies showed that attachment to fibronectin caused an
increase in endogenous cell surface receptor levels (Fig. 2a). As reported earlier (11),
there was a significant variation in receptor number between
experiments (fibronectin, 2.3-11 × 103
receptors/cell; tissue culture, 1.1-7.3 × 103
receptors/cell). However, in parallel experiments, cells attached to
fibronectin consistently showed a higher level of cell surface binding
(4.3 ± 0.85 × 103 receptors/cell) than cells on
bare tissue culture plastic (2.6 ± 0.6 × 103
receptors/cell), an average increase of 1.8 ± 0.17-fold.
Similarly, attachment to collagen and vitronectin resulted in an
increase in IL-1 receptor levels, which was, however, less pronounced
(1.3-1.5-fold) (data not shown).
|
Scatchard analyses revealed that fibronectin attachment, in addition,
caused a decrease in IL-1 receptor affinity (Ka) for
ligand, from 1.0 × 109
(M
1), in cells plated on tissue culture
plastic, to 5.6 × 108 (M
1)
in fibronectin-attached cultures (Fig. 2a). Furthermore,
incubation with a blocking monoclonal antibody to the type I IL-1
receptor resulted in total inhibition of receptor binding under both
conditions, showing that the attachment-induced enhancement in specific
cell surface IL-1 binding was absolutely dependent on binding to the type I IL-1 receptor (Fig. 2b). Additional analyses of
binding kinetics at a range of IL-1 concentrations revealed a 2-fold
reduction in association rate constant in cells attached to fibronectin (kon, 2.42 × 107
M
1 min
1) compared with control
(kon, 4.77 × 107
M
1 min
1) (Fig.
3), demonstrating that the effect on the
affinity constant shown in Fig. 2a could be accounted for
totally by an effect on the on-rate (kon).
|
The effects of fibronectin attachment on IL-1 receptor binding could be
reversed by the addition of heparin. This effect was concentration-dependent and saturable, resulting in about a
40% reduction in IL-1 receptor binding at
10
6-10
5 M soluble heparin (data
not shown). Thus, in cells plated on fibronectin, cell surface binding
of radiolabeled IL-1, measured in the presence of soluble heparin was
similar to that measured in cells on bare plastic, whereas addition of
chondroitin sulfate had no effect (Fig.
4a). In comparison, in cells
plated on bare plastic, addition of soluble heparin had no effect on
receptor binding (Fig. 4b). In contrast, inhibiting integrin
aggregation by the use of an RGD peptide (10
4
M) or adding a control peptide (RGE, 10
4
M) had no effect on cells plated under either condition
(data not shown). The effect of fibronectin attachment on the kinetics of IL-1/IL-1 receptor interaction was also inhibited by addition of
heparin (Fig. 5). Thus, the association
rate constant for cells attaching to fibronectin
(kon, 2.4 × 107
M
1 min
1) was increased in the
presence of heparin (kon, 5.9 × 107 M
1 min
1),
reaching a value similar to that for cells on tissue plastic (kon, 4.8 × 107
M
1 min
1).
|
|
Chemical cross-linking after incubation with radiolabeled ligand
generated a band at 97 kDa, either comprising an IL-1/IL-1 type I
receptor complex or resulting from a ligand/accessory protein (AcP)
interaction (9, 11). This was present in cells plated either in the
presence or absence of fibronectin. In addition, in cells attached to
fibronectin, a broad, high molecular mass complex of 300-350 kDa was
present that contained between 50 and 70% of the cross-linked IL-1
(Fig. 6). This complex was barely detectable in cells on tissue culture plastic. The presence of 100-fold
excess cold ligand resulted in complete blocking of cross-linking of
radiolabeled IL-1 to both the 97-kDa band and to the high molecular mass band, demonstrating specificity of both interactions.
|
Enzyme digestion of cell extracts from 125I-IL-1
cross-linking experiments showed that incubation with heparinase
resulted in loss of the high molecular mass complex, with no effect on
the intensity of the ligand/receptor complex at 97 kDa (Fig.
7a). Furthermore, in cells
plated on a mutant fibronectin fragment with altered heparin binding
sites, no IL-1 cross-linking to the high molecular mass component could
be detected. Instead, 100% of the cross-linked IL-1 was present in the
97-kDa band, as in cells on tissue culture plastic (Fig.
7b).
|
An interaction between the IL-1 receptor and the high molecular mass
component was demonstrated by immunoprecipitation, following IL-1
binding and cross-linking. Thus, a nonblocking monoclonal antibody to
the type I IL-1 receptor immunoprecipitated both the 97-kDa and the
300-350-kDa complexes from fibronectin plated cells to which IL-1 had
been cross-linked (Fig. 8a).
This procedure, after cell surface iodination and cross-linking,
followed by heparinase treatment, revealed a core protein of the
recruited proteoglycan of 80-90 kDa (Fig. 8b). Furthermore,
immunoprecipitation following sulfate labeling of the glycosaminoglycan
chains after incubation with or without IL-1 showed that the appearance
of the high molecular mass band was dependent on ligand binding to the
type I receptor (Fig. 8c).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glycosylated proteins have been shown to play an important role in cytokine and growth factor regulation of biological responses (40, 41). The effects involve control of signaling (2, 42), as well as receptor function (1, 43-45). Transfection experiments showed the IL-1 receptor protein in adherent cells to be located at sites of focal adhesion, in agreement with earlier reports using radiolabeled ligand (27). Fibronectin attachment through these sites induced formation of a high molecular mass IL-1 receptor complex containing cell surface heparan sulfate, resulting in effects on IL-1 receptor expression and affinity. Induction of these effects was mediated through attachment via the heparin binding domain in fibronectin and stabilized by IL-1/receptor interaction.
The increase in type I IL-1 receptor expression induced by fibronectin may reflect an increase in the rate of translocation of receptor protein to the cell surface. It is, however, known that translocation of receptor protein is rapid and that over 95% is normally expressed at the cell surface (46). Alternatively, the increase in steady state surface expression could result from retardation in the basal internalization rate, by stabilization in focal adhesions at the cell surface. Such a mechanism, involving masking or immobilization of the receptor protein, is suggested by the slower association rate of the ligand. In addition, this is consistent with the recruitment of the additional high molecular mass component to the IL-1 receptor complex. Finally, the lack of effect using the RGD peptide demonstrated that integrin mediated signaling was not involved and supports the notion that the changes were induced as a direct consequence of alterations in the ligand or in the receptor complex.
Involvement of heparan sulfate proteoglycan in matrix regulation of IL-1 receptor function was suggested by inhibition of the fibronectin induced effects by soluble heparin and confirmed by digestion of the high molecular mass complex with heparinase. In contrast to heparin regulation of fibroblast growth factor-receptor binding (1), in which the ligand binds the proteoglycan with detectable affinity, no interaction occurs initially between IL-1 and the proteoglycan, as suggested by binding studies on cells attached to bare plastic. The effect involves a cell surface component in close proximity to the IL-1 receptor as demonstrated by cell surface labeling, cross-linking and immunoprecipitation. Furthermore, the heparan sulfate is recruited secondary to IL-1/IL-1 receptor binding, as demonstrated by blocking experiments using a monoclonal antibody or excess cold ligand. The effect involves an increase in a single class of IL-1 binding sites, as judged by affinity constant, again indicating that the IL-1 affinity for the heparan sulfate is low and nondetectable in conventional binding assays. Interfering with IL-1/IL-1 receptor binding required a 10,000-fold higher concentration of the glycosaminoglycan, suggesting an interaction with a Ka in the range of 105 M similar to that of integrin/matrix interaction and about 100-fold lower than that of heparan-fibroblast growth factor interaction (1).
The requirement for ligand/IL-1 receptor binding, prior to association of the heparan sulfate suggests a mechanism similar to that in the LIF/oncostatin M system, in which recruitment of gp130 to the receptor complex follows LIF binding (2, 42). Digestion experiments suggested the ligand/heparan sulfate interaction to be due to protein/glycosaminoglycan binding, the most common type of growth factor/proteoglycan interaction. Similar to the heparin-glycosminoglycan-fibroblast growth factor interaction (47-49), it is likely also dependent on sulfation (50) and could involve a conformational change of the IL-1 protein following interaction with the glycosaminoglycan (51). Effects of heparan sulfate on the receptor protein are likely indirect, because the only species appearing following sulfate labeling and cross-linking was of the same size as that containing the heparan sulfate and the ligand, observed using radiolabeled IL-1. Thus, the simplest model suggested by this data is that following binding to fibronectin, cell surface heparan sulfate is recruited to the IL-1 receptor complex by IL-1 and that IL-1 functions as a bridge between the receptor and heparan sulfate. Furthermore, the data show that effects of the heparan sulfate binding are induced indirectly through the ligand and that no direct interaction occurs between the two membrane components during complex formation.
The role of the proteoglycan in this system may be similar to that of
-glycan, the nonsignaling type III TGF-
receptor, affecting
biological responses in an indirect manner by regulating binding
affinity of the signaling type I receptor (43, 52). The relative level
of IL-1 bound to the heparan sulfate was estimated as 50-70%,
correlating well with the fraction of receptors located at focal
adhesions (27) and supporting the notion that this interaction is an
adhesion regulated event. The heparan sulfate in this system may thus
function like the accessory protein (AcP) (9), although specifically
responding to cell attachment. This is further supported by the
dependence on heparan sulfate/fibronectin interaction, as demonstrated
by the negligible levels of the high molecular mass complex observed in
cells on bare plastic as well as using the mutant fibronectin lacking
the heparin binding site.
These types of alterations in IL-1 receptor/ligand interaction
correlate well with attachment-mediated effects on IL-1 signal transduction (16, 30). For example, in the presence of an increasing
concentration of soluble heparin, NF-
B activation by IL-1 in cells
plated on fibronectin is progressively inhibited. In addition,
attachment-mediated effects could be a direct consequence of matrix or
IL-1 binding the cell surface heparan sulfate. Cell surface HSPGs, such
as members of the syndecan family (53-55), can induce signal
transduction through effects on PKC dependent pathways (56-59). Both
mechanisms of inducing alterations in signaling could be in part
responsible for matrix regulation of IL-1 biological responses (31).
Regulation of heparan sulfate proteoglycans by cytokines (60-62) and
their simultaneous influence on cytokine and growth factor action
(63-67) suggest that this interaction could mediate feedback
inhibition of IL-1 activity. Thus, release of soluble heparin at sites
of injury could inhibit IL-1 release of matrix degrading enzymes and
favor matrix regeneration during later stages of wound healing in inflammation.
In summary, our data show an effect of fibronectin attachment on IL-1
receptor function, involving a cell surface heparan sulfate. The effect
appears to be proximally mediated by the recruitment of an HSPG to the
receptor complex following IL-1/IL-1 receptor binding in the presence
of fibronectin. The presence of the attachment-induced component,
recruited to the IL-1 receptor complex, correlates with structural
effects on IL-1 signaling and gene regulation. Ongoing experiments aim
to identify this cell surface heparan sulfate and to determine how the
alterations induced in receptor binding affect recruitment of other
components of the complex, such as the transmembrane accessory protein
(AcP) component (9, 68); intracellular components TRAF 6 (23), IIp 1 (69), and MyD 88 (24, 25, 26); and kinases of the IRAK/Pelle family (7,
24).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
IL-1
and IL-1
were a generous gift from
Immunex Corp. (Seattle, WA). Autoradiographic analysis was carried out
in part by the PhosphorImager Facility of the Markey Molecular Medicine
Center at the University of Washington, Seattle. The confocal
microscopy analysis was carried out using the facility in the
Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, University of Sheffield.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grants DE-10363 and DE-11251 from the National Institutes of Health, Grant Q0502 from the Arthritis and Rheumatism Council, Grant PG97 112 from the British Heart Foundation (to E. E. Q.), a grant from the Wellcome Trust (to M. J. H.), and grants from the Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council (to S. K. D.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
44-114-271-3181; Fax: 44-114-271-3846; E-mail:
E.Qwarnstrom@Sheffield.ac.uk.
2 J. A. Askari and M. J. Humphries, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: IL-1RI, interleukin type I receptor; IL, interleukin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Yayon, A., Klagburn, M., Esko, J. D., Leder, P., and Ornitz, D. M. (1992) Cell 64, 841-848 |
| 2. |
Kishimoto, T.,
Akira, S.,
Nrazaki, M.,
and Taga, T
(1995)
Blood
86,
1243-1254 |
| 3. | Letsou, A., Alexander, S., and Waserman, S. A. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3449-3458[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Grosshans, J., Bergman, A., Haffter, P., and Nussein-Vollhard. (1994) Nature 372, 563-566[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Galindo, R. L., Edwards, D. N., Gillespie, S. K., and Wasserman, S. A. (1995) Development 121, 2209-2218[Abstract] |
| 6. |
Norris, J. L.,
and Manley, J. L.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
862-872 |
| 7. | Cao, Z. D., Henzel, W. J., and Gao, X. O. (1996) Science 271, 1128-1131[Abstract] |
| 8. |
Sims, J. E.,
March, C. J.,
Cosman, D.,
Widmer, M. B.,
MacDonald, H. R.,
McMahan, C. J.,
Grubin, C. E.,
Wignall, J. M.,
Jackson, J. L.,
Call, S. M.,
Friend, D.,
Alpert, A. R.,
Gillis, S.,
Urdal, D. L.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1988)
Science
241,
585-589 |
| 9. |
Greenfeder, S. A.,
Nunes, P.,
Kwee, L.,
Labow, M.,
Chizzonite, R. A.,
and Ju, G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13757-13765 |
| 10. |
Sims, J. E.,
Acres, R. B.,
Grubin, C. E.,
McMahan, C. J.,
Wignall, J. M.,
March, C. J.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8946-8950 |
| 11. |
Dower, S. K.,
Kronheim, S. R.,
March, C. J.,
Conlon, P. J.,
Hopp, T.,
Gillis, S.,
and Urdal, D. L.
(1985)
J. Exp. Med.
162,
501-515 |
| 12. | Dower, S. K., Kronheim, S. R., Hopp, T. P., Cantrell, M., Deeley, M., Gillis, S., Henney, C. S., and Urdal, D. L. (1986) Nature 324, 266-268[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Eisenberg, S. P., Evans, R. J., Arend, W. P., Verderber, E., Brewer, M. T., Hannum, C. H., and Thompson, R. C. (1990) Nature 343, 341-346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Bomsztyk, K.,
Toivola, B.,
Emery, D. W.,
Rooney, J. W.,
Dower, S. K.,
Rachie, N.,
and Hopkins Sibley, C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem
265,
9413-9417 |
| 15. | Liou, H.-C., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 477-487[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Qwarnström, E. E.,
Ostberg,
Carl, O.,
Turk, G. L.,
Richardson, C. A.,
and Bomsztyk, K.
(1994)
J Biol. Chem.
269,
30765-30768 |
| 17. | Freshney, N. W., Rawlinson, L., Guesdon, F., Jones, E., Cowley, S., Hsuan, J., and Saklatvala, J. (1994) Cell 78, 1039-1049[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Horuk, R.,
Huang, J. J.,
Covington, M.,
and Newton, R. C.
(1987)
J. Biol Chem.
262,
16275-16278 |
| 19. |
Bomsztyk, K.,
Sims, J. E.,
Stanton, T. H.,
Slack, J.,
McMahan, C. J.,
Valentine, M. A.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8034-8038 |
| 20. |
Chizzonite, R. A.,
Truitt, T.,
Kilian, P. L.,
Stern, A. S.,
Nunes, P.,
Parker, K. P.,
Kaffka, K. L.,
Chua, A. O.,
Luggm, D, K.,
and Gubler, U.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8029-8033 |
| 21. |
Spriggs, M. K.,
Lioubin, P. J.,
Slack, J.,
Dower, S. K.,
Jonas, U.,
Cosman, D.,
Sims, J. E.,
and Bauer, J.
(1990)
J. Biol Chem.
265,
22499-224505 |
| 22. | McMahan, C. J., Slack, J. L., Mosley, B., Cosman, D., Lupton, S. D., Brunton, L. L., Grubin, C. E., Wignall, J. M., Jenkins, N. A., Brannan, C. I., Copeland, N. G., Huebner, K., Croce, C. M., Cannizzaro, L. A., Benjamin, D., Dower, S. K., Spriggs, M. K., and Sims, J. E. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 2821-2832[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Cao, Z., Xiong, J., Takeuchi, M., Kurama, T., and Goedell, D. V. (1996) Nature 383, 443-446[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Muzio, M,
Ni, J.,
Feng, P.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1997)
Science
278,
1612-1615 |
| 25. | Wesche, H., Henzel, W. J., Shillinglaw, W., Li, S., and Cao, Z. (1997) Immunity 7, 837-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Burns, K.,
Martinon, F.,
Essinger, G.,
Pahl, H.,
Schneider, P.,
Bodmer, J.-L.,
Di Marco, F.,
French, L.,
and Tschopp, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12203-12209 |
| 27. |
Qwarnström, E. E.,
Page, R. C.,
Gillis, S.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
8261-8269 |
| 28. | Dower, S. K., Qwarnström, E. E., Page, R. C., Blanton, R. A., Kupper, T. S., Raines, E., Ross, R., and Sims, J. E. (1990) J. Invest. Dermatol. 94, 68S-73S[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Qwarnström, E. E.,
MacFarlane, S. A.,
Page, R. C.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1232-1236 |
| 30. | Zhu, P., Xiong, W., Rodgers, G., and Qwarnström, E., E. (1998) Biochem. J. 330, 975-981 |
| 31. | Ostberg, C. O., Zhu, P., Wight, T. N., and Qwarnström, E. E. (1995) FEBS Lett. 367, 93-97[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Mitcham, J. L.,
Parnett, P.,
Bonnet, T. P.,
Garka, K. E.,
Gerhart, M. J.,
Slack, J. L.,
Gayle, M.,
Dower, S. K.,
and Sims, J. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5777-5783 |
| 33. |
Brown, P. J.,
and Juliano, R. L.
(1985)
Science
228,
1448-1451 |
| 34. |
Makarem, R.,
Newham, P.,
Askari, J. A.,
Green, L. J.,
Clements, J.,
Edwards, M.,
Humphries, M. J.,
and Mould, A. P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
4005-4011 |
| 35. |
Slack, J.,
McMahan,
Waugh, S.,
Schooley, K.,
Spriggs, M. K.,
Sims, J. E.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem
268,
2513-2524 |
| 36. |
Park, L. S.,
Friend, D.,
Sassenfeld, H. M.,
and Urdal, D. L.
(1987)
J. Exp. Med.
166,
476-488 |
| 37. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Cosman, D., Wignall, J., Lewis, A., Alpert, A., Ceretti, D. P., Park, L., Dower, S. K., Gillis, S., and Urdal, D. L. (1986) Mol. Immunol. 23, 935-941[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. |
Carey, D. J.,
and Stahl, R. C.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
2053-2062 |
| 40. | Yamaguchi, Yu., Mann, D., and Ruoslahti, E. (1990) Nature 346, 281-284[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Wight, T. N., Kinsella, M. G., and Qwarnström, E. E. (1992) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 4, 793-801[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Gearing, D. P.,
Comeau, M. R.,
Friend, D. J.,
Gimpel, S. D.,
Thut, C. J.,
McGourty, J.,
Brasher, K. K.,
King, J. A.,
Gillis, S.,
Mosely, B.,
Ziegler, S. F.,
and Cosman, D.
(1992)
Science
255,
1434-1437 |
| 43. |
Chiefertz, S.,
Andres, J. L.,
and Massague, J.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
16984-16991 |
| 44. | Spivak-Kroitzman, T., Lemmon, M. A., Dikic, I., Ladbury, J. E., Pinchasi, D., Huang, J., Jaye, M., Crumley, G., Schlessinger, J., and Lax, I. (1994) Cell 79, 1015-1024[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | DiGabrielle, A. D., Lax, I., Chen, I., Svahn, C. M., Jayes, M., Schlessinger, J., and Hendrickson, W. A. (1998) Nature 393, 812-816[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Urdal, D. L.,
Call, S. M.,
Jackson, J. L.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2870-2877 |
| 47. | Zhu, X., Hsu, B., and Rees, D. C. (1993) Structure 1, 27-34[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. |
Ornitz, D. M.,
Herr, A. B.,
Nilsson, M.,
Westman, J.,
Svahn, C. M.,
and Waksman, G.
(1995)
Science
268,
432-436 |
| 49. | Faham, S., Hileman, R. E., Fromm, J. R., and Rees, D. C. (1996) Science 271, 1116-1120[Abstract] |
| 50. |
Sudhalter, J.,
Folkman, J.,
Svahn, C. M.,
Bergendal, K.,
and DAmore, P. A.
(1989)
J. Biol Chem.
264,
6892-6897 |
| 51. | Lindahl, U., and Hook, M. (1978) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47, 385-417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. | Lopezcasillas, F., Wrana, J. L., and Massague, J. (1993) Cell 73, 1435-1444[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. |
Saunders, S.,
Jalkalinen, M.,
O' Farell, S.,
and Bernfield, M.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
1547-1556 |
| 54. |
David, G.,
Lories, V.,
Decock, B.,
Marynen, P.,
Cassiman, J. J.,
and Van den Berghe, H.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
3165-3176 |
| 55. |
David, G.,
van der Schueren, B.,
Marynen, P.,
Cassiman, J. J.,
and Van den Berghe, H.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
118,
961-969 |
| 56. |
Oh, E. S.,
Woods, A.,
and Couchman, J. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8133-8136 |
| 57. | Oh, E. S., Couchman, J. R., and Woods, A. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 344, 67-74[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 58. |
Oh, E. S.,
Woods, A.,
Lim, S. T.,
Theibert, A. W.,
and Couchman, J. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10624-10629 |
| 59. |
Horowitz, A.,
and Simons, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10914-10918 |
| 60. | Qwarnström, E., Jarvalainen, H. T., Kinsella, M. G., Ostberg, C. O., Sandell, L. J., Page, R. C., and Wight, T. N. (1993) Biochem,. J. 294, 613-620 |
| 61. |
Sharma, B.,
and Iozzo, R. V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4642-4646 |
| 62. | Tiedeman, K., Malmstrom, A., and WestergrenThorsson, G. (1997) Matrix Biol. 15, 469-478[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 63. | Aviezer, D., Iozzo, R. V., Noonan, D. M., and Yayon, A. (1997) Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 1938-1946[Abstract] |
| 64. |
Bonneh-Barkay, D.,
Shlissel, M.,
Berman, B.,
Shaoul, E.,
Admon, A.,
Vlodavsky, I.,
Carey, D. J.,
Asundi, V. K.,
Reich-Slotky, R.,
and Ron, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12415-12421 |
| 65. | LortatJacob, H., Garrone, P., Banchereau, J., and Grimaud, A. (1997) Cytokine 9, 101-105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 66. |
Feyzi, E.,
Lustig, F.,
Fager, G.,
Spillmann, D.,
Lindahl, U.,
and Salmivirta, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5518-5524 |
| 67. | Filla, M. S., Dam, P., and Rapraeger, A. C. (1998) J. Cell. Physiol. 174, 310-321[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 68. | Volpe, F., Clatworthy, J., Kaplain, A., Maschera, B., Griffin, A. M., and Ray, K. (1997) Febs. Lett. 419, 41-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 69. | Mitcham, J. L., and Sims, J. E. (1995) Cytokine 7, 595 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Slack, K. Schooley, T. P. Bonnert, J. L. Mitcham, E. E. Qwarnstrom, J. E. Sims, and S. K. Dower Identification of Two Major Sites in the Type I Interleukin-1 Receptor Cytoplasmic Region Responsible for Coupling to Pro-inflammatory Signaling Pathways J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2000; 275(7): 4670 - 4678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Caunt, E. Kiss-Toth, F. Carlotti, R. Chapman, and E. E. Qwarnstrom Ras Controls Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-associated Factor (TRAF)6-dependent Induction of Nuclear Factor-kappa B. SELECTIVE REGULATION THROUGH RECEPTOR SIGNALING COMPONENTS J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2001; 276(9): 6280 - 6288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||