![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 29, 20139-20143, July 16, 1999
,
,
¶
From the
Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute
for Liver Research, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi 570-8506, Japan and the § Department of Genetics, The Institute of
Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 108-0071, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two adaptor molecules, Grb2 and Shc, have been
implicated in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)
activation by receptor tyrosine kinases such as the epidermal growth
factor receptor (EGFR). Here we show that the EGF-mediated ERK
activation is abolished by loss of Grb2, whereas this response is not
affected by loss of Shc. Conversely, the EGF-mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation is dependent on Shc, but not Grb2. These findings strongly support distinct roles for Grb2 and Shc in
controlling ERK and JNK activation after EGF stimulation.
Tyrosine autophosphorylation plays a crucial role in determining
the selectivity of signaling pathways activated by growth factor
receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor
(EGF)1 and platelet-derived
growth factor (PDGF) receptors (EGFR and PDGFR). Receptor activation
leads to tyrosine autophosphorylation, resulting in the association of
the receptor with cytoplasmic target proteins containing SH2 domain and
phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain such as Grb2 and Shc (1, 2).
Grb2 is composed of one SH2 domain and two SH3 domains (3, 4). The two
SH3 domains of Grb2 bind to proline-rich residues near the C terminus
of Sos, a Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor. Upon stimulation with
growth factors, Grb2 binds the autophosphorylated tail of growth factor
receptors through its SH2 domain. This leads to translocation of Sos to
the plasma membrane where Ras is located, thus increasing the exchange
of GDP for GTP on Ras (5-10). The GTP-bound active form of Ras then
triggers the activation of ERK cascade, leading to phosphorylation of
nuclear proteins involved in transcriptional control (11-13).
In addition to the ERK pathway, EGF has been reported to activate the
JNK pathway (14-16), also leading to transcriptional changes by
phosphorylating Jun family transcription factors (11-13). The
EGF-mediated JNK activation is thought to be mediated by the small G
proteins Ras and Rac as well as through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.
Indeed, it has been shown that EGF-induced JNK activation can be
inhibited by dominant negative Ras (RasN17), dominant negative Rac1
(Rac1N17), and a dominant negative form of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (14, 15, 17).
Shc is an adaptor molecule that possesses no intrinsic enzymatic
activity but does have an SH2 domain and a PTB domain (18). Shc becomes
tyrosine phosphorylated upon stimulation with a number of growth
factors including EGF (18, 19). When the EGFR tyrosine kinase
phosphorylates Shc, binding of its PTB domain to the autophosphorylated EGFR appears to play a key role for efficient phosphorylation of Shc
(20-23). Then, tyrosine-phosphorylated Shc forms a complex with
Grb2-Sos at the phosphorylated tyrosine residues (Tyr239,
Tyr240, and Tyr317) via the SH2 domain of Grb2
(24, 25). Thus, EGFR has two potential routes to activate Ras; one is
through the direct binding of the Grb2-Sos complex to the
autophosphorylated EGFR at Tyr1068 (7-10, 20), and the
other is through the phosphorylated Shc·Grb2-Sos complex (22, 26).
However, the relative contribution of these two routes to EGF-mediated
Ras activation in vivo still remains unresolved. By
utilizing Grb2 and Shc knock-out chicken DT40 B cell lines, we now
provide genetic evidence for the two distinct functions of Grb2 and
Shc. Grb2 is required for EGF-mediated ERK activation, whereas the JNK
activation is dependent on Shc.
Cells, Expression Constructs, and Antibodies--
Wild-type and
its derivative mutant DT40 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1% chicken serum, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM
L-glutamine, and antibiotics. Various DT40 mutant cells
(Grb2-negative, Shc-negative, DT40 expressing RasN17, and DT40 expressing Myc-tagged Rac1N17) have been described already (27). Human EGFR cDNA was transfected by electroporation (550 V, 25 microfarad) and selected in the presence of 1.7 mg/ml of
hygromycin (Wako Pure Chemical). Expression of the transfected EGFR was
confirmed by flow cytometric analysis. Mouse EGF (TOYOBO) was used for
the stimulation of human EGFR (19). Parental chicken DT40 cells did not
respond to mouse EGF, judged by activation of ERK2 and JNK. The
anti-ERK2 Ab, anti-JNK1 Ab, anti-Myc Ab, and anti-Ras Ab were purchased
as previously (27). The following Abs were purchased: anti-human EGFR
from Amersham; anti-Grb2 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; and anti-Shc
and anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) from Upstate Biotechnology.
Flow Cytometric Analysis for Surface Expression of
EGFR--
Cell surface expression of EGFR was analyzed by FACScan
(Becton-Dickinson & Co., Mountain View, CA) using anti-human EGFR mAb
and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-mouse IgG (Cappel).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
DT40 cells
were solubilized in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 2% Triton X-100, 100 µM sodium vanadate, 10 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/µl leupeptin, and 2 µg/µl aprotinin). Precleared lysates
were sequentially incubated with Abs and protein G-Sepharose (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) or protein A-agarose (Pierce). Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane,
and detected by appropriate Abs and ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Grb2 Binding Assay--
DT40 cells were lysed in 60 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0 containing 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2 mM sodium vanadate,
25 mM NaF, 10 µg/µl leupeptin, 10 µg/µl aprotinin,
and 1% Triton X-100. Cleared lysates were precipitated with GST or
GST-SH2 (Grb2 SH2 domain: amino acid 50-161 of human Grb2 fused to
GST) bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads (20 µl of packed beads, 20 µg of protein). Washed precipitates were eluted with SDS-PAGE sample
buffer and resolved on 8% SDS-PAGE gel and subjected to Western
blotting analysis.
In Vitro Kinase Assay--
The assay conditions were described
previously (27). Briefly, cells (2-5 × 106)
stimulated with EGF were lysed in lysis buffer. Precleared lysates were
immunoprecipitated by 1 µg of anti-ERK2 Ab or 1 µg of anti-JNK1 Ab,
followed by incubating with 40 µl of protein G-Sepharose. No
cross-reactivity of these two Abs was already demonstrated (27). The
ERK2 Ab does not recognize JNK and p38. Similarly, the JNK Ab does not
recognize ERK2 and p38. The beads were washed three times with lysis
buffer and two times with washing buffer. Immunoprecipitates were
divided, and half of them were used for Western blotting analysis. The
remaining half were washed once with kinase assay buffer and
resuspended in kinase assay buffer containing
[ Ras-GTP Assay--
Bacterially expressed GST-RBD (Ras-binding
domain: amino acid 1-149 of human cRaf-1 fused to GST) pre-bounded
glutathione-Sepharose beads (15 µl of packed beads, 20 µg of
protein) were prepared as described (28). Human H-Ras cDNA was
transfected into wild-type, Grb2-deficient, and Shc-deficient DT40
cells. Wild-type and mutant cells expressing similar levels of Ras were
selected and used for this assay. Stimulated cell lysates in
Mg2+-containing lysis buffer (28) were incubated with the
beads for 30 min at 4 °C. Bound proteins were eluted with SDS-PAGE
sample buffer and resolved on 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel and subjected to
Western blotting analysis with anti-Ras Ab (Transduction Laboratories).
To examine the necessity or redundancy of Grb2 and Shc in
ERK and JNK activation upon EGF stimulation, we took a genetic
strategy. Human EGFR was transfected into wild-type, Grb2-deficient,
and Shc-deficient chicken DT40 cells to obtain stable transformants. Clones expressing similar levels of EGFR in wild-type and these deficient DT40 cells, assessed by flow cytometric analysis using anti-human EGFR mAb, were selected (Fig.
1) and further characterized. EGF
stimulated the EGFR autophosphorylation, and its phosphorylation extent
in Grb2- or Shc-deficient DT40 cells was almost the same as that in
wild-type cells (Fig. 1). These observations suggest that EGFR kinase
activity is not affected by loss of Grb2 or Shc.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP (>3,000 Ci/mmol; NENTM) and 5 µM cold ATP. GST-Elk or GST-c-Jun fusion protein (5 µg each) was added as a substrate for ERK2 or JNK1, respectively. After
20-min incubation at 30 °C, the reaction was terminated by the
addition of SDS sample buffer followed by boiling for 5 min. The
samples were separated by SDS-PAGE gel, dried, and subjected to
autoradiography. Phosphorylation of the fusion protein bands was
quantified using a phosphoimager (Fuji BAS 2,000).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Expression and autophosphorylation of
EGFR. Cell surface expression of human EGFR on wild-type and
mutant DT40 cells. Unstained cells were used as negative controls
(dotted lines). Autophosphorylation of EGFR is shown in the
insets. At the indicated time points after stimulation with
EGF (50 ng/ml), the cells were immunoprecipitated by anti-EGFR mAb.
These immunoprecipitates were separated by 7% SDS-PAGE gels,
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with
anti-phosphotyrosine mAb (4G10).
We next examined the capacity of EGFR to stimulate phosphorylation of
cellular proteins in wild-type, Grb2-deficient, and Shc-deficient
cells. As shown in Fig. 2A,
comparison of the overall tyrosine phosphorylation between wild-type
and Shc-deficient DT40 cells did not exhibit significant changes,
except that the band corresponding to Shc itself was absent in the
mutant cells. Although the overall tyrosine phosphorylation pattern
upon EGF stimulation was not significantly affected by loss of Grb2,
phosphorylation of some proteins (indicated by arrows) was
inhibited in the mutant cells. Moreover, the tyrosine phosphorylation
extent of Shc was decreased by loss of Grb2 (Fig. 2, A and
B). These observations suggest that Grb2 modulates tyrosine
phosphorylation on some of the cellular substrates, one of which is
Shc.
|
To formally demonstrate that Grb2 associates with phosphorylated EGFR
via its SH2 domain in DT40 B cells, we examined the associated
molecules with Grb2 SH2 domain. As observed in fibroblasts (3, 4, 19,
26), both autophosphorylated EGFR and phosphorylated Shc were
associated with the Grb2 SH2 fusion protein (Fig.
3A). Supporting this
observation, the immunoprecipitates with anti-Grb2 Ab contained both of
these molecules (Fig. 3B).
|
After EGF stimulation, DT40 cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated
with anti-ERK2 Ab. The immunoprecipitates were assayed for in
vitro kinase activity by the ability to phosphorylate Elk-1. EGF-induced ERK2 activation in DT40 cells was maximal at 1 min, after
which activity declined (Fig.
4A). This ERK2 response was profoundly reduced in Grb2-deficient DT40 cells, whereas Shc-deficient cells showed the normal ERK2 response upon EGF stimulation (Fig. 4A), indicating that Grb2 is required for EGF-induced ERK2
activation.
|
To further demonstrate that the ERK2 defect in Grb2-deficient cells is
because of loss of Ras activation, we employed a binding assay
developed by Taylor and Shalloway (28). This assay is based on the
observation that Raf protein has high affinity for active Ras-GTP but
does not bind the inactive GDP-bound form of Ras. Thus, we used a GST
fusion protein containing the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of Raf to
selectively precipitate activated Ras. The recovery of activated Ras
was monitored by immunoblotting with anti-Ras Ab. As shown in Fig.
5, EGF stimulation of wild-type and
Shc-deficient cells both resulted in increased Ras-GTP, whereas this
increase was completely abolished by loss of Grb2.
|
Since the slight ERK2 activation in Grb2-deficient DT40 cells was
observed despite no increased Ras-GTP, this remaining ERK2 activation
in the mutant cells could be explained by Ras-independent mechanism. To
examine this possibility, we transfected a dominant-negative form of
Ras, RasN17, into DT40 cells expressing EGFR. As shown in Fig.
6B, expression of RasN17
inhibited the EGF-induced ERK2 activation, but the residual ERK2
response was still observed like that in Grb2-deficient DT40 cells
(Figs. 4A and 6B). Thus, these results suggest
that Ras-independent pathway, at least to some extent, contributes to
full ERK2 activity upon EGF stimulation in DT40 cells.
|
As reported previously, EGF stimulated JNK activity in wild-type DT40
cells expressing EGFR. The JNK activity was determined in an
immunocomplex kinase assay with c-Jun as a substrate. The kinetics of
JNK activation were distinct from those of ERK2, being marked at 30 min
and declined by 60 min (Fig. 4B, and data not shown).
Grb2-deficient cells showed the normal JNK response upon EGF
stimulation, whereas this JNK response was abolished by loss of Shc
(Fig. 4B). These results indicate that Shc, but not Grb2, is
involved in EGF-mediated JNK activation. Previous results have shown
that EGF-induced JNK activation can be completely inhibited by RasN17
and inhibited approximately 50% by a dominant negative form of Rac1,
Rac1N17, in fibroblasts (14, 15). To examine this possibility in DT40 B
cells, we transfected Rac1N17 into wild-type cells expressing EGFR
(Fig. 6A). As shown in Fig. 6C, expression of
Rac1N17 in DT40 cells almost completely abolished the EGF-mediated JNK
activation, whereas this response was not affected by expression of RasN17.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results support the previous contention that Grb2 plays a
critical role in a highly conserved process for the control of Ras
signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases (3, 5-10). The slight
EGF-mediated ERK2 activation by loss of Grb2 or expression of RasN17
(Figs. 4A and 6B) suggests that EGF utilizes an
additional signaling pathway, leading to the ERK response. Given the
evidence that PKC
phosphorylates Raf-1, thereby leading to
stimulation of its catalytic activity (29, 30), PKC activation may be involved in Ras-independent ERK activation through phosphorylation of
Raf-1. In fact, EGF was able to induce phospholipase C-
activation, leading to PKC activation in DT40 cells expressing EGFR (data not shown).
Stimulation of PC12 cells with nerve growth factor (NGF) activates the NGF receptor (NGFR) Trk, and thereby induces neurite extension, in a response that is dependent on the Ras pathway (31). Overexpression of Shc in PC12 cells induces neurite extension; furthermore, this extension is blocked by expression of a dominant negative Ras (RasN17) (26). Based on these data, it has been proposed that Shc·Grb2 complex is involved in Ras pathway. However, the data presented here demonstrate that Shc does not participate in EGF-mediated Ras activation in DT40 B cells (Fig. 5). Since a recent report has shown that EGFR and NGFR can utilize Shc in different ways to promote their activation (25), one explanation for this disparity is that EGFR utilizes more dominantly through the direct binding of Grb2-Sos complex to the autophosphorylated EGFR, whereas NGFR utilizes Shc·Grb2-Sos complex for Ras activation. It is also possible that this difference may reflect the difference in these cell types (lymphoid cells versus neuronal cells).
In contrast to no effect of disruption of Shc on EGF-mediated ERK response, Shc-deficient cells failed to induce EGF-mediated JNK response (Fig. 4B). The effect of Shc on the JNK pathway is presumably mediated by Rho family GTPases because Rac1N17, but not RasN17, inhibited the EGF-mediated JNK response completely (Fig. 6C). Although Rho family GTPases mainly contribute to the JNK signaling pathway, previous results using fibroblasts have shown that the EGF-mediated JNK pathway is inhibited by expression of not only Rac1N17 but also RasN17 (14, 15), suggesting a cross-talk between these GTPases (32). These somewhat inconsistent findings might reflect the fact that the existence of this cross-talk between Rho family and Ras varies depending on different cell types. Indeed, RasN17 inhibited only the ERK pathway without affecting the JNK pathway in DT40 B cells (Fig. 6, B and C).
Analogous to the mechanism by which Grb2 activates Ras, Shc might
bring members of the family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors
(GEFs) for the Rho family GTPases (of which Vav is a member) to the
plasma membrane where these GTPases are located. Assuming that Vav is a
sole target, one would predict that the EGF-mediated JNK response is
transient like the ERK response. However, as shown in this study, the
EGF-mediated JNK response in DT40 B cells was marked at 30 min although
the activation was observed at 10 min. Thus, our data suggest that two
distinct GTPases might be involved in the initial phase and the
sustained JNK activation, respectively. Reminiscent of this type of
regulation is NGFR-mediated ERK activation; the early phase of the ERK
activation is mediated by Ras, but sustained activation of this pathway
is because of activation of Rap1 (33). Because Rac1N17 is able to
inhibit not only Rac1, but also other Rho family GTPases, an almost
complete block of the EGF-mediated JNK response by introduction of
Rac1N17 could be accounted for by simultaneous blockade of two distinct
GTPases by Rac1N17.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. D. Cantrell for providing the GST-RBD expression plasmid and thank K. Gotoh for technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan (to T. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-6-6993-9445; Fax: 81-6-6994-6099; E-mail: kurosaki@mxr.mesh.ne.jp.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; SH, Src homology; PTB, phosphotyrosine binding domain; Ab, antibody; mAb, monoclonal Ab; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PKC, protein kinase C; NGFR, nerve growth factor receptor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1992) Neuron 9, 383-391[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Lowenstein, E. J., Daly, R. J., Batzer, A. G., Li, W., Margolis, B., Lammers, R., Ullrich, A., Skolnik, E. Y., Bar-Sagi, D., and Schlessinger, J. (1992) Cell 70, 431-442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Matsuoka, K.,
Shibata, M.,
Yamakawa, A.,
and Takenawa, T.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
9015-9019 |
| 5. |
Chardin, P.,
Camonis, J.,
Gale, W. L.,
Van Alest, L.,
Schlessinger, J.,
Wigler, M. H.,
and Bar-Sagi, D.
(1993)
Science
260,
1338-1343 |
| 6. | Egan, S. E., Giddings, B. W., Brooks, M. W., Buday, L., Sizeland, A. M., and Weinberg, R. A. (1993) Nature 363, 45-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Gale, N. W., Kaplan, S., Lowenstein, E. J., Schlessinger, J., and Bar-Sagi, D. (1993) Nature 363, 88-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Li, N., Batzer, A., Daly, R., Yajnik, V., Skolnik, E., Chardin, P., Bar-Sagi, D., Margolis, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1993) Nature 363, 85-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Rozakis-Adcock, M., Fernley, R., Wade, J., Pawson, T., and Bowtell, D. (1993) Nature 363, 83-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Buday, L., and Downward, J. (1993) Cell 73, 611-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Hill, C. S., and Treisman, R. (1995) Cell 80, 199-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Su, B., and Karin, M. (1996) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 402-411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Cohen, P. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 353-361 |
| 14. | Coso, O. A., Chiariello, M., Yu, J.-C., Teramoto, H., Crespo, P., Xu, N., Miki, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1995) Cell 81, 1137-1146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Minden, A., Lin, A., Claret, F.-X., Abo, A., and Karin, M. (1995) Cell 81, 1147-1157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Antonyak, M. A.,
Moscatello, D. K.,
and Wong, A. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2817-2822 |
| 17. | Logan, S. K., Falasca, M., Hu, P., and Schlessinger, J. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5784-5790[Abstract] |
| 18. | Pelicci, G., Lanfrancone, L., Grignani, F., McGlade, J., Cavallo, F., Forni, G., Nicoletti, I., Grignani, F., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1992) Cell 70, 93-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Gotoh, N.,
Tojo, A.,
Muroya, K.,
Hashimoto, Y.,
Hattori, S.,
Nakamura, S.,
Takenawa, T.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Shibuya, M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
167-171 |
| 20. |
Bazter, A. G.,
Rotin, D.,
Urena, J. M.,
Skolnik, E. Y.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5192-5201 |
| 21. | Bazter, A. G., Blaikie, P., Nelson, K., Schlessinger, J., and Margolis, B. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4403-4409[Abstract] |
| 22. | Gotoh, N., Muroya, K., Hattori, S., Nakamura, S., Chida, K., and Shibuya, M. (1995) Oncogene 11, 2525-2533[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Sakaguchi, K.,
Okabayashi, Y.,
Kido, Y.,
Kimura, S.,
Matsumura, Y.,
Inushima, K.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
536-543 |
| 24. | Salcini, A. E., McGlade, J., Pelicci, G., Nicoletti, I., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2827-2836[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Thomas, D.,
and Bradshaw, R. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22293-22299 |
| 26. | Rozakis-Adcock, M., McGlade, J., Mbamalu, G., Pelicci, G., Daly, R., Li, W., Batzer, A., Thomas, S., Brugge, J., Pelicci, P. G., Schressinger, J., and Pawson, T. (1992) Nature 360, 689-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Hashimoto, A.,
Okada, H.,
Jiang, A.,
Kurosaki, M.,
Greenberg, S.,
Clark, E. A.,
and Kurosaki, T.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
1287-1295 |
| 28. | Taylor, S. J., and Shalloway, D. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1621-1627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Sözeri, O., Vollmer, K., Liyanage, M., Frith, D., Kour, G., Mark III, G. E., and Stabel, S. (1992) Oncogene 7, 2259-2262[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Kolch, W., Heidecker, G., Kochs, G., Hummel, R., Vahidi, H., Mischak, H., Finkenzeller, G., D., M., and Rapp, U. R. (1993) Nature 364, 249-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Segal, R. A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1996) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 463-489[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Denhardt, D. T. (1996) Biochem. J. 318, 729-747 |
| 33. | York, R. D., Yao, H., Dillon, T., Ellig, C. L., Eckert, S. P., McCleskey, E. W., and Stork, P. J. S. (1998) Nature 392, 622-626[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Honma, O. Higuchi, M. Shirakata, T. Yasuda, H. Shibuya, S.-i. Iemura, T. Natsume, and Y. Yamanashi Dok-3 sequesters Grb2 and inhibits the Ras-Erk pathway downstream of protein-tyrosine kinases Genes Cells, February 1, 2006; 11(2): 143 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Kendrick, R. J. Lipscombe, O. Rausch, S. E. Nicholson, J. E. Layton, L. C. Goldie-Cregan, and M. A. Bogoyevitch Contribution of the Membrane-distal Tyrosine in Intracellular Signaling by the Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor Receptor J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 2004; 279(1): 326 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Oh-hora, S. Johmura, A. Hashimoto, M. Hikida, and T. Kurosaki Requirement for Ras Guanine Nucleotide Releasing Protein 3 in Coupling Phospholipase C-{gamma}2 to Ras in B Cell Receptor Signaling J. Exp. Med., December 15, 2003; 198(12): 1841 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Davol, R. Bagdasaryan, G. J. Elfenbein, A. L. Maizel, and A. R. Frackelton Jr. Shc Proteins Are Strong, Independent Prognostic Markers for Both Node-Negative and Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 63(20): 6772 - 6783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vandeput, S. Perpete, K. Coulonval, F. Lamy, and J. E. Dumont Role of the Different Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Subfamilies in the Stimulation of Dog and Human Thyroid Epithelial Cell Proliferation by Cyclic Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate and Growth Factors Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1341 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lutz, J. Nimpf, M. Jenny, K. Boecklinger, C. Enzinger, G. Utermann, G. Baier-Bitterlich, and G. Baier Evidence of Functional Modulation of the MEKK/JNK/cJun Signaling Cascade by the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein (LRP) J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 43143 - 43151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dehez, C. Bierkamp, A. Kowalski-Chauvel, L. Daulhac, C. Escrieut, C. Susini, L. Pradayrol, D. Fourmy, and C. Seva c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase Pathway in Growth-promoting Effect of the G Protein-coupled Receptor Cholecystokinin B Receptor: A Protein Kinase C/Src-dependent-Mechanism Cell Growth Differ., August 1, 2002; 13(8): 375 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chakravarti, A. Chakladar, M. A. Delaney, D. E. Latham, and J. S. Loeffler The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway Mediates Resistance to Sequential Administration of Radiation and Chemotherapy in Primary Human Glioblastoma Cells in a RAS-dependent Manner Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4307 - 4315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chakravarti, J. S. Loeffler, and N. J. Dyson Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor I Mediates Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy in Primary Human Glioblastoma Cells through Continued Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(1): 200 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yoshizumi, K. Tsuchiya, K. Kirima, M. Kyaw, Y. Suzaki, and T. Tamaki Quercetin Inhibits Shc- and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Mediated c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Activation by Angiotensin II in Cultured Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 656 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ushio-Fukai, K. K. Griendling, P. L. Becker, L. Hilenski, S. Halleran, and R. W. Alexander Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation by Angiotensin II Requires Reactive Oxygen Species in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2001; 21(4): 489 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bobe, J. I. Wilde, P. Maschberger, K. Venkateswarlu, P. J. Cullen, W. Siess, and S. P. Watson Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent translocation of phospholipase C{gamma}2 in mouse megakaryocytes is independent of Bruton tyrosine kinase translocation Blood, February 1, 2001; 97(3): 678 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Roberson, M. Ban, T. Zhang, and J. M. Mulvaney Role of the Cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Complex and Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Synergistic Activation of the Glycoprotein Hormone alpha Subunit Gene by Epidermal Growth Factor and Forskolin Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2000; 20(10): 3331 - 3344. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K.-M. V. Lai and T. Pawson The ShcA phosphotyrosine docking protein sensitizes cardiovascular signaling in the mouse embryo Genes & Dev., May 1, 2000; 14(9): 1132 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Rauh, V. Blackmore, E. R. Andrechek, C. G. Tortorice, R. Daly, V. K.-M. Lai, T. Pawson, R. D. Cardiff, P. M. Siegel, and W. J. Muller Accelerated Mammary Tumor Development in Mutant Polyomavirus Middle T Transgenic Mice Expressing Elevated Levels of Either the Shc or Grb2 Adapter Protein Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 1999; 19(12): 8169 - 8179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Cheng, I. Zhizhin, R. L. Perlman, and D. Mangoura Prolactin-induced Cell Proliferation in PC12 Cells Depends on JNK but Not ERK Activation J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2000; 275(30): 23326 - 23332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |