JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurosaki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurosaki, T.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 29, 20139-20143, July 16, 1999


Shc Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor-induced Activation of the JNK Signaling Pathway*

Ari HashimotoDagger , Mari KurosakiDagger , Noriko Gotoh§, Masabumi Shibuya§, and Tomohiro KurosakiDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Liver Research, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi 570-8506, Japan and the § Department of Genetics, The Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0071, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Two adaptor molecules, Grb2 and Shc, have been implicated in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation by receptor tyrosine kinases such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Here we show that the EGF-mediated ERK activation is abolished by loss of Grb2, whereas this response is not affected by loss of Shc. Conversely, the EGF-mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation is dependent on Shc, but not Grb2. These findings strongly support distinct roles for Grb2 and Shc in controlling ERK and JNK activation after EGF stimulation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Tyrosine autophosphorylation plays a crucial role in determining the selectivity of signaling pathways activated by growth factor receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor (EGF)1 and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors (EGFR and PDGFR). Receptor activation leads to tyrosine autophosphorylation, resulting in the association of the receptor with cytoplasmic target proteins containing SH2 domain and phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain such as Grb2 and Shc (1, 2).

Grb2 is composed of one SH2 domain and two SH3 domains (3, 4). The two SH3 domains of Grb2 bind to proline-rich residues near the C terminus of Sos, a Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor. Upon stimulation with growth factors, Grb2 binds the autophosphorylated tail of growth factor receptors through its SH2 domain. This leads to translocation of Sos to the plasma membrane where Ras is located, thus increasing the exchange of GDP for GTP on Ras (5-10). The GTP-bound active form of Ras then triggers the activation of ERK cascade, leading to phosphorylation of nuclear proteins involved in transcriptional control (11-13).

In addition to the ERK pathway, EGF has been reported to activate the JNK pathway (14-16), also leading to transcriptional changes by phosphorylating Jun family transcription factors (11-13). The EGF-mediated JNK activation is thought to be mediated by the small G proteins Ras and Rac as well as through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Indeed, it has been shown that EGF-induced JNK activation can be inhibited by dominant negative Ras (RasN17), dominant negative Rac1 (Rac1N17), and a dominant negative form of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (14, 15, 17).

Shc is an adaptor molecule that possesses no intrinsic enzymatic activity but does have an SH2 domain and a PTB domain (18). Shc becomes tyrosine phosphorylated upon stimulation with a number of growth factors including EGF (18, 19). When the EGFR tyrosine kinase phosphorylates Shc, binding of its PTB domain to the autophosphorylated EGFR appears to play a key role for efficient phosphorylation of Shc (20-23). Then, tyrosine-phosphorylated Shc forms a complex with Grb2-Sos at the phosphorylated tyrosine residues (Tyr239, Tyr240, and Tyr317) via the SH2 domain of Grb2 (24, 25). Thus, EGFR has two potential routes to activate Ras; one is through the direct binding of the Grb2-Sos complex to the autophosphorylated EGFR at Tyr1068 (7-10, 20), and the other is through the phosphorylated Shc·Grb2-Sos complex (22, 26). However, the relative contribution of these two routes to EGF-mediated Ras activation in vivo still remains unresolved. By utilizing Grb2 and Shc knock-out chicken DT40 B cell lines, we now provide genetic evidence for the two distinct functions of Grb2 and Shc. Grb2 is required for EGF-mediated ERK activation, whereas the JNK activation is dependent on Shc.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells, Expression Constructs, and Antibodies-- Wild-type and its derivative mutant DT40 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1% chicken serum, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM L-glutamine, and antibiotics. Various DT40 mutant cells (Grb2-negative, Shc-negative, DT40 expressing RasN17, and DT40 expressing Myc-tagged Rac1N17) have been described already (27). Human EGFR cDNA was transfected by electroporation (550 V, 25 microfarad) and selected in the presence of 1.7 mg/ml of hygromycin (Wako Pure Chemical). Expression of the transfected EGFR was confirmed by flow cytometric analysis. Mouse EGF (TOYOBO) was used for the stimulation of human EGFR (19). Parental chicken DT40 cells did not respond to mouse EGF, judged by activation of ERK2 and JNK. The anti-ERK2 Ab, anti-JNK1 Ab, anti-Myc Ab, and anti-Ras Ab were purchased as previously (27). The following Abs were purchased: anti-human EGFR from Amersham; anti-Grb2 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; and anti-Shc and anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) from Upstate Biotechnology.

Flow Cytometric Analysis for Surface Expression of EGFR-- Cell surface expression of EGFR was analyzed by FACScan (Becton-Dickinson & Co., Mountain View, CA) using anti-human EGFR mAb and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-mouse IgG (Cappel).

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis-- DT40 cells were solubilized in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 2% Triton X-100, 100 µM sodium vanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/µl leupeptin, and 2 µg/µl aprotinin). Precleared lysates were sequentially incubated with Abs and protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or protein A-agarose (Pierce). Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and detected by appropriate Abs and ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Grb2 Binding Assay-- DT40 cells were lysed in 60 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0 containing 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2 mM sodium vanadate, 25 mM NaF, 10 µg/µl leupeptin, 10 µg/µl aprotinin, and 1% Triton X-100. Cleared lysates were precipitated with GST or GST-SH2 (Grb2 SH2 domain: amino acid 50-161 of human Grb2 fused to GST) bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads (20 µl of packed beads, 20 µg of protein). Washed precipitates were eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer and resolved on 8% SDS-PAGE gel and subjected to Western blotting analysis.

In Vitro Kinase Assay-- The assay conditions were described previously (27). Briefly, cells (2-5 × 106) stimulated with EGF were lysed in lysis buffer. Precleared lysates were immunoprecipitated by 1 µg of anti-ERK2 Ab or 1 µg of anti-JNK1 Ab, followed by incubating with 40 µl of protein G-Sepharose. No cross-reactivity of these two Abs was already demonstrated (27). The ERK2 Ab does not recognize JNK and p38. Similarly, the JNK Ab does not recognize ERK2 and p38. The beads were washed three times with lysis buffer and two times with washing buffer. Immunoprecipitates were divided, and half of them were used for Western blotting analysis. The remaining half were washed once with kinase assay buffer and resuspended in kinase assay buffer containing [gamma -32P]ATP (>3,000 Ci/mmol; NENTM) and 5 µM cold ATP. GST-Elk or GST-c-Jun fusion protein (5 µg each) was added as a substrate for ERK2 or JNK1, respectively. After 20-min incubation at 30 °C, the reaction was terminated by the addition of SDS sample buffer followed by boiling for 5 min. The samples were separated by SDS-PAGE gel, dried, and subjected to autoradiography. Phosphorylation of the fusion protein bands was quantified using a phosphoimager (Fuji BAS 2,000).

Ras-GTP Assay-- Bacterially expressed GST-RBD (Ras-binding domain: amino acid 1-149 of human cRaf-1 fused to GST) pre-bounded glutathione-Sepharose beads (15 µl of packed beads, 20 µg of protein) were prepared as described (28). Human H-Ras cDNA was transfected into wild-type, Grb2-deficient, and Shc-deficient DT40 cells. Wild-type and mutant cells expressing similar levels of Ras were selected and used for this assay. Stimulated cell lysates in Mg2+-containing lysis buffer (28) were incubated with the beads for 30 min at 4 °C. Bound proteins were eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer and resolved on 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel and subjected to Western blotting analysis with anti-Ras Ab (Transduction Laboratories).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To examine the necessity or redundancy of Grb2 and Shc in ERK and JNK activation upon EGF stimulation, we took a genetic strategy. Human EGFR was transfected into wild-type, Grb2-deficient, and Shc-deficient chicken DT40 cells to obtain stable transformants. Clones expressing similar levels of EGFR in wild-type and these deficient DT40 cells, assessed by flow cytometric analysis using anti-human EGFR mAb, were selected (Fig. 1) and further characterized. EGF stimulated the EGFR autophosphorylation, and its phosphorylation extent in Grb2- or Shc-deficient DT40 cells was almost the same as that in wild-type cells (Fig. 1). These observations suggest that EGFR kinase activity is not affected by loss of Grb2 or Shc.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Expression and autophosphorylation of EGFR. Cell surface expression of human EGFR on wild-type and mutant DT40 cells. Unstained cells were used as negative controls (dotted lines). Autophosphorylation of EGFR is shown in the insets. At the indicated time points after stimulation with EGF (50 ng/ml), the cells were immunoprecipitated by anti-EGFR mAb. These immunoprecipitates were separated by 7% SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with anti-phosphotyrosine mAb (4G10).

We next examined the capacity of EGFR to stimulate phosphorylation of cellular proteins in wild-type, Grb2-deficient, and Shc-deficient cells. As shown in Fig. 2A, comparison of the overall tyrosine phosphorylation between wild-type and Shc-deficient DT40 cells did not exhibit significant changes, except that the band corresponding to Shc itself was absent in the mutant cells. Although the overall tyrosine phosphorylation pattern upon EGF stimulation was not significantly affected by loss of Grb2, phosphorylation of some proteins (indicated by arrows) was inhibited in the mutant cells. Moreover, the tyrosine phosphorylation extent of Shc was decreased by loss of Grb2 (Fig. 2, A and B). These observations suggest that Grb2 modulates tyrosine phosphorylation on some of the cellular substrates, one of which is Shc.


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and association of Shc with EGFR in wild-type, Grb2-, and Shc-deficient DT40 cells. A, at the indicated times following the addition of EGF (50 ng/ml), whole-cell lysates prepared from 2 × 106 were loaded onto an 8% SDS-PAGE gel. After transfer to nitrocellulose, the filter was incubated with anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-PY) mAb (4G10). B, after cells were treated with EGF for 3 min, cells were solubilized and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Shc Ab. Associated proteins of Shc were detected by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-PY) mAb (upper panel). The amount of immunoprecipitated Shc was determined using half of the anti-Shc immunoprecipitates (bottom panel).

To formally demonstrate that Grb2 associates with phosphorylated EGFR via its SH2 domain in DT40 B cells, we examined the associated molecules with Grb2 SH2 domain. As observed in fibroblasts (3, 4, 19, 26), both autophosphorylated EGFR and phosphorylated Shc were associated with the Grb2 SH2 fusion protein (Fig. 3A). Supporting this observation, the immunoprecipitates with anti-Grb2 Ab contained both of these molecules (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Binding of Grb2 to EGFR and Shc. After cells were treated with EGF for 3 min, cells were solubilized and precipitated with GST or GST-fusion protein containing Grb2-SH2 (A) or immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Grb2 Ab (B, upper panel). Binding proteins of Grb2 were detected by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-PY) mAb. The amount of immunoprecipitated Grb2 was determined using half of the anti-Grb2 immunoprecipitates (B, bottom panel).

After EGF stimulation, DT40 cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-ERK2 Ab. The immunoprecipitates were assayed for in vitro kinase activity by the ability to phosphorylate Elk-1. EGF-induced ERK2 activation in DT40 cells was maximal at 1 min, after which activity declined (Fig. 4A). This ERK2 response was profoundly reduced in Grb2-deficient DT40 cells, whereas Shc-deficient cells showed the normal ERK2 response upon EGF stimulation (Fig. 4A), indicating that Grb2 is required for EGF-induced ERK2 activation.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   EGF-induced ERK2 and JNK activation in Grb2- and Shc-deficient DT40 cells. Cells were stimulated with EGF (50 ng/ml) for indicated times. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-ERK2 Ab (A) or anti-JNK Ab (B), and kinase activities were assayed using GST-Elk1 or GST-c-Jun as a substrate, respectively. After electrophoresis, the labeled GST-Elk1 and GST-c-Jun were visualized by autoradiography.

To further demonstrate that the ERK2 defect in Grb2-deficient cells is because of loss of Ras activation, we employed a binding assay developed by Taylor and Shalloway (28). This assay is based on the observation that Raf protein has high affinity for active Ras-GTP but does not bind the inactive GDP-bound form of Ras. Thus, we used a GST fusion protein containing the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of Raf to selectively precipitate activated Ras. The recovery of activated Ras was monitored by immunoblotting with anti-Ras Ab. As shown in Fig. 5, EGF stimulation of wild-type and Shc-deficient cells both resulted in increased Ras-GTP, whereas this increase was completely abolished by loss of Grb2.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Analysis of Ras activation. EGF-stimulated cell lysates were subjected to affinity precipitation with GST-RBD. Activated Ras proteins were detected by Western blotting with anti-Ras Ab (upper). Similarly, total amount of Ras protein was determined using the cell lysates (bottom).

Since the slight ERK2 activation in Grb2-deficient DT40 cells was observed despite no increased Ras-GTP, this remaining ERK2 activation in the mutant cells could be explained by Ras-independent mechanism. To examine this possibility, we transfected a dominant-negative form of Ras, RasN17, into DT40 cells expressing EGFR. As shown in Fig. 6B, expression of RasN17 inhibited the EGF-induced ERK2 activation, but the residual ERK2 response was still observed like that in Grb2-deficient DT40 cells (Figs. 4A and 6B). Thus, these results suggest that Ras-independent pathway, at least to some extent, contributes to full ERK2 activity upon EGF stimulation in DT40 cells.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of RasN17 and Rac1N17 on ERK2 and JNK responses. Expression of dominant-negative Ras and dominant-negative Rac1 (A). EGF-stimulated cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-ERK2 Ab (B) or anti-JNK Ab (C). Stimulation conditions and in vitro kinase assay were described as in Fig. 4.

As reported previously, EGF stimulated JNK activity in wild-type DT40 cells expressing EGFR. The JNK activity was determined in an immunocomplex kinase assay with c-Jun as a substrate. The kinetics of JNK activation were distinct from those of ERK2, being marked at 30 min and declined by 60 min (Fig. 4B, and data not shown). Grb2-deficient cells showed the normal JNK response upon EGF stimulation, whereas this JNK response was abolished by loss of Shc (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that Shc, but not Grb2, is involved in EGF-mediated JNK activation. Previous results have shown that EGF-induced JNK activation can be completely inhibited by RasN17 and inhibited approximately 50% by a dominant negative form of Rac1, Rac1N17, in fibroblasts (14, 15). To examine this possibility in DT40 B cells, we transfected Rac1N17 into wild-type cells expressing EGFR (Fig. 6A). As shown in Fig. 6C, expression of Rac1N17 in DT40 cells almost completely abolished the EGF-mediated JNK activation, whereas this response was not affected by expression of RasN17.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our results support the previous contention that Grb2 plays a critical role in a highly conserved process for the control of Ras signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases (3, 5-10). The slight EGF-mediated ERK2 activation by loss of Grb2 or expression of RasN17 (Figs. 4A and 6B) suggests that EGF utilizes an additional signaling pathway, leading to the ERK response. Given the evidence that PKCalpha phosphorylates Raf-1, thereby leading to stimulation of its catalytic activity (29, 30), PKC activation may be involved in Ras-independent ERK activation through phosphorylation of Raf-1. In fact, EGF was able to induce phospholipase C-gamma activation, leading to PKC activation in DT40 cells expressing EGFR (data not shown).

Stimulation of PC12 cells with nerve growth factor (NGF) activates the NGF receptor (NGFR) Trk, and thereby induces neurite extension, in a response that is dependent on the Ras pathway (31). Overexpression of Shc in PC12 cells induces neurite extension; furthermore, this extension is blocked by expression of a dominant negative Ras (RasN17) (26). Based on these data, it has been proposed that Shc·Grb2 complex is involved in Ras pathway. However, the data presented here demonstrate that Shc does not participate in EGF-mediated Ras activation in DT40 B cells (Fig. 5). Since a recent report has shown that EGFR and NGFR can utilize Shc in different ways to promote their activation (25), one explanation for this disparity is that EGFR utilizes more dominantly through the direct binding of Grb2-Sos complex to the autophosphorylated EGFR, whereas NGFR utilizes Shc·Grb2-Sos complex for Ras activation. It is also possible that this difference may reflect the difference in these cell types (lymphoid cells versus neuronal cells).

In contrast to no effect of disruption of Shc on EGF-mediated ERK response, Shc-deficient cells failed to induce EGF-mediated JNK response (Fig. 4B). The effect of Shc on the JNK pathway is presumably mediated by Rho family GTPases because Rac1N17, but not RasN17, inhibited the EGF-mediated JNK response completely (Fig. 6C). Although Rho family GTPases mainly contribute to the JNK signaling pathway, previous results using fibroblasts have shown that the EGF-mediated JNK pathway is inhibited by expression of not only Rac1N17 but also RasN17 (14, 15), suggesting a cross-talk between these GTPases (32). These somewhat inconsistent findings might reflect the fact that the existence of this cross-talk between Rho family and Ras varies depending on different cell types. Indeed, RasN17 inhibited only the ERK pathway without affecting the JNK pathway in DT40 B cells (Fig. 6, B and C).

Analogous to the mechanism by which Grb2 activates Ras, Shc might bring members of the family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rho family GTPases (of which Vav is a member) to the plasma membrane where these GTPases are located. Assuming that Vav is a sole target, one would predict that the EGF-mediated JNK response is transient like the ERK response. However, as shown in this study, the EGF-mediated JNK response in DT40 B cells was marked at 30 min although the activation was observed at 10 min. Thus, our data suggest that two distinct GTPases might be involved in the initial phase and the sustained JNK activation, respectively. Reminiscent of this type of regulation is NGFR-mediated ERK activation; the early phase of the ERK activation is mediated by Ras, but sustained activation of this pathway is because of activation of Rap1 (33). Because Rac1N17 is able to inhibit not only Rac1, but also other Rho family GTPases, an almost complete block of the EGF-mediated JNK response by introduction of Rac1N17 could be accounted for by simultaneous blockade of two distinct GTPases by Rac1N17.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. D. Cantrell for providing the GST-RBD expression plasmid and thank K. Gotoh for technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan (to T. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-6-6993-9445; Fax: 81-6-6994-6099; E-mail: kurosaki@mxr.mesh.ne.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; SH, Src homology; PTB, phosphotyrosine binding domain; Ab, antibody; mAb, monoclonal Ab; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PKC, protein kinase C; NGFR, nerve growth factor receptor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1992) Neuron 9, 383-391[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Lowenstein, E. J., Daly, R. J., Batzer, A. G., Li, W., Margolis, B., Lammers, R., Ullrich, A., Skolnik, E. Y., Bar-Sagi, D., and Schlessinger, J. (1992) Cell 70, 431-442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Matsuoka, K., Shibata, M., Yamakawa, A., and Takenawa, T. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9015-9019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Chardin, P., Camonis, J., Gale, W. L., Van Alest, L., Schlessinger, J., Wigler, M. H., and Bar-Sagi, D. (1993) Science 260, 1338-1343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Egan, S. E., Giddings, B. W., Brooks, M. W., Buday, L., Sizeland, A. M., and Weinberg, R. A. (1993) Nature 363, 45-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Gale, N. W., Kaplan, S., Lowenstein, E. J., Schlessinger, J., and Bar-Sagi, D. (1993) Nature 363, 88-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Li, N., Batzer, A., Daly, R., Yajnik, V., Skolnik, E., Chardin, P., Bar-Sagi, D., Margolis, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1993) Nature 363, 85-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Rozakis-Adcock, M., Fernley, R., Wade, J., Pawson, T., and Bowtell, D. (1993) Nature 363, 83-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Buday, L., and Downward, J. (1993) Cell 73, 611-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Hill, C. S., and Treisman, R. (1995) Cell 80, 199-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Su, B., and Karin, M. (1996) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 402-411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Cohen, P. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 353-361
14. Coso, O. A., Chiariello, M., Yu, J.-C., Teramoto, H., Crespo, P., Xu, N., Miki, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1995) Cell 81, 1137-1146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Minden, A., Lin, A., Claret, F.-X., Abo, A., and Karin, M. (1995) Cell 81, 1147-1157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Antonyak, M. A., Moscatello, D. K., and Wong, A. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2817-2822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Logan, S. K., Falasca, M., Hu, P., and Schlessinger, J. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5784-5790[Abstract]
18. Pelicci, G., Lanfrancone, L., Grignani, F., McGlade, J., Cavallo, F., Forni, G., Nicoletti, I., Grignani, F., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1992) Cell 70, 93-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Gotoh, N., Tojo, A., Muroya, K., Hashimoto, Y., Hattori, S., Nakamura, S., Takenawa, T., Yazaki, Y., and Shibuya, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 167-171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Bazter, A. G., Rotin, D., Urena, J. M., Skolnik, E. Y., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5192-5201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Bazter, A. G., Blaikie, P., Nelson, K., Schlessinger, J., and Margolis, B. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4403-4409[Abstract]
22. Gotoh, N., Muroya, K., Hattori, S., Nakamura, S., Chida, K., and Shibuya, M. (1995) Oncogene 11, 2525-2533[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Sakaguchi, K., Okabayashi, Y., Kido, Y., Kimura, S., Matsumura, Y., Inushima, K., and Kasuga, M. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 536-543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Salcini, A. E., McGlade, J., Pelicci, G., Nicoletti, I., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, P. G. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2827-2836[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Thomas, D., and Bradshaw, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22293-22299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Rozakis-Adcock, M., McGlade, J., Mbamalu, G., Pelicci, G., Daly, R., Li, W., Batzer, A., Thomas, S., Brugge, J., Pelicci, P. G., Schressinger, J., and Pawson, T. (1992) Nature 360, 689-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Hashimoto, A., Okada, H., Jiang, A., Kurosaki, M., Greenberg, S., Clark, E. A., and Kurosaki, T. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 188, 1287-1295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Taylor, S. J., and Shalloway, D. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1621-1627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Sözeri, O., Vollmer, K., Liyanage, M., Frith, D., Kour, G., Mark III, G. E., and Stabel, S. (1992) Oncogene 7, 2259-2262[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kolch, W., Heidecker, G., Kochs, G., Hummel, R., Vahidi, H., Mischak, H., Finkenzeller, G., D., M., and Rapp, U. R. (1993) Nature 364, 249-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Segal, R. A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1996) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 463-489[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Denhardt, D. T. (1996) Biochem. J. 318, 729-747
33. York, R. D., Yao, H., Dillon, T., Ellig, C. L., Eckert, S. P., McCleskey, E. W., and Stork, P. J. S. (1998) Nature 392, 622-626[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
M. Honma, O. Higuchi, M. Shirakata, T. Yasuda, H. Shibuya, S.-i. Iemura, T. Natsume, and Y. Yamanashi
Dok-3 sequesters Grb2 and inhibits the Ras-Erk pathway downstream of protein-tyrosine kinases
Genes Cells, February 1, 2006; 11(2): 143 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. S. Kendrick, R. J. Lipscombe, O. Rausch, S. E. Nicholson, J. E. Layton, L. C. Goldie-Cregan, and M. A. Bogoyevitch
Contribution of the Membrane-distal Tyrosine in Intracellular Signaling by the Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 2004; 279(1): 326 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
M. Oh-hora, S. Johmura, A. Hashimoto, M. Hikida, and T. Kurosaki
Requirement for Ras Guanine Nucleotide Releasing Protein 3 in Coupling Phospholipase C-{gamma}2 to Ras in B Cell Receptor Signaling
J. Exp. Med., December 15, 2003; 198(12): 1841 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. A. Davol, R. Bagdasaryan, G. J. Elfenbein, A. L. Maizel, and A. R. Frackelton Jr.
Shc Proteins Are Strong, Independent Prognostic Markers for Both Node-Negative and Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 63(20): 6772 - 6783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. Vandeput, S. Perpete, K. Coulonval, F. Lamy, and J. E. Dumont
Role of the Different Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Subfamilies in the Stimulation of Dog and Human Thyroid Epithelial Cell Proliferation by Cyclic Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate and Growth Factors
Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1341 - 1349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Lutz, J. Nimpf, M. Jenny, K. Boecklinger, C. Enzinger, G. Utermann, G. Baier-Bitterlich, and G. Baier
Evidence of Functional Modulation of the MEKK/JNK/cJun Signaling Cascade by the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein (LRP)
J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 43143 - 43151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
S. Dehez, C. Bierkamp, A. Kowalski-Chauvel, L. Daulhac, C. Escrieut, C. Susini, L. Pradayrol, D. Fourmy, and C. Seva
c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase Pathway in Growth-promoting Effect of the G Protein-coupled Receptor Cholecystokinin B Receptor: A Protein Kinase C/Src-dependent-Mechanism
Cell Growth Differ., August 1, 2002; 13(8): 375 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Chakravarti, A. Chakladar, M. A. Delaney, D. E. Latham, and J. S. Loeffler
The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway Mediates Resistance to Sequential Administration of Radiation and Chemotherapy in Primary Human Glioblastoma Cells in a RAS-dependent Manner
Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4307 - 4315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Chakravarti, J. S. Loeffler, and N. J. Dyson
Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor I Mediates Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy in Primary Human Glioblastoma Cells through Continued Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling
Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(1): 200 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Yoshizumi, K. Tsuchiya, K. Kirima, M. Kyaw, Y. Suzaki, and T. Tamaki
Quercetin Inhibits Shc- and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Mediated c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Activation by Angiotensin II in Cultured Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 656 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Ushio-Fukai, K. K. Griendling, P. L. Becker, L. Hilenski, S. Halleran, and R. W. Alexander
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation by Angiotensin II Requires Reactive Oxygen Species in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2001; 21(4): 489 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. Bobe, J. I. Wilde, P. Maschberger, K. Venkateswarlu, P. J. Cullen, W. Siess, and S. P. Watson
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent translocation of phospholipase C{gamma}2 in mouse megakaryocytes is independent of Bruton tyrosine kinase translocation
Blood, February 1, 2001; 97(3): 678 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. S. Roberson, M. Ban, T. Zhang, and J. M. Mulvaney
Role of the Cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Complex and Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Synergistic Activation of the Glycoprotein Hormone alpha Subunit Gene by Epidermal Growth Factor and Forskolin
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2000; 20(10): 3331 - 3344.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
K.-M. V. Lai and T. Pawson
The ShcA phosphotyrosine docking protein sensitizes cardiovascular signaling in the mouse embryo
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2000; 14(9): 1132 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. J. Rauh, V. Blackmore, E. R. Andrechek, C. G. Tortorice, R. Daly, V. K.-M. Lai, T. Pawson, R. D. Cardiff, P. M. Siegel, and W. J. Muller
Accelerated Mammary Tumor Development in Mutant Polyomavirus Middle T Transgenic Mice Expressing Elevated Levels of Either the Shc or Grb2 Adapter Protein
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 1999; 19(12): 8169 - 8179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Cheng, I. Zhizhin, R. L. Perlman, and D. Mangoura
Prolactin-induced Cell Proliferation in PC12 Cells Depends on JNK but Not ERK Activation
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2000; 275(30): 23326 - 23332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurosaki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurosaki, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.