J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 29, 20215-20222, July 16, 1999
Peptide Specificity Determinants at P
7 and P
6 Enhance the
Catalytic Efficiency of
Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent Protein Kinase I
in the Absence of Activation Loop Phosphorylation*
Sara S.
Hook,
Bruce E.
Kemp
§, and
Anthony R.
Means¶
From the Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke
University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 and
St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy,
Victoria 3065, Australia
 |
ABSTRACT |
Phosphorylation of
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
I (CaM KI) at Thr-177 by recombinant rat
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase B (CaM KKB)
modulates the kinetics of synapsin-(4-13) peptide phosphorylation by
reducing the Km 44-fold and decreasing the
KCaM 4-fold. There is also a slight decrease in
Km for ATP and increase in enzyme
Vmax. A synthetic peptide substrate from the
yeast transcription factor, ADR1-(222-234)G233 is a 15-fold better
substrate for the Thr-177 dephospho-form of CaM KI than
synapsin-(4-13). The Thr-177 dephospho-enzyme has a
Km and Vmax for
ADR1-(222-234)G233 similar to the values with synapsin-(4-13) using
the Thr-177 phosphorylated enzyme. Likewise, with ADR1-(222-234)G233
as substrate, phosphorylation of Thr-177 or substitution of T177A had
very little effect on the kinetic values. Using chimeric peptides
between synapsin-(4-13) and ADR1-(222-234)G233 we found that
N-terminal basic residues at P
7 and P
6 positions were sufficient to
allow efficient phosphorylation by the Thr-177 dephospho-form of CaM
KI. Phosphorylation of Thr-177 expands the substrate specificity of CaM
KI and is not merely an "on-off" switch for kinase activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protein phosphorylation plays a regulatory role in signal
transduction for many physiological processes in eukaryotic cells. Frequently, both receptor and nonreceptor kinases not only
phosphorylate cellular proteins to elicit biological responses, but are
also phosphoproteins themselves. Phosphorylation of kinases by either autophosphorylation in response to ligand binding, in the case of
receptor kinases, or by an upstream kinase, in the case of nonreceptor
kinases, is an important step in the signal transduction cascade. The
regulatory phosphorylation event(s) usually occur on a single (or
multiple) residue(s) located in a region termed the activation loop
between kinase subdomains VII and VIII.
Virtually every kinase family, including the mitogen-activated protein
kinases (1-4), CDKs1 (5),
protein kinase Cs (6-10), Janus kinases (11-13), nonreceptor tyrosine
kinases such as the Src kinases (14), and receptor tyrosine kinases
such as the insulin (15, 16) and Trk (17-20) receptors, contains
members regulated by activation loop phosphorylation. In all of these
cases, activation loop phosphorylation markedly activates the protein
kinase, and the phosphorylated form of the kinase is thought to be
physiologically relevant. For example, mutation of Tyr-1007 to Ala in
the Janus 2 kinase eliminated activity, and the mutant could not
restore erythropoietin signaling in cells lacking Janus 2 kinase (12).
A second example of the biological significance of activation loop
phosphorylation is the phosphorylation of I
-B kinase
by the
NF-
B-inducing kinase. A mutated I
-B kinase
in which the
activating Ser-176 was changed to Ala acts as a dominant negative
inhibitor of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-induced NF-
B
activation (21). These data are illustrative of the biological
importance of phosphorylatable residues that reside in the activation
loop of kinases.
The most extensively characterized kinase that is regulated by
activation loop phosphorylation is the cAMP-dependent
protein kinase, PKA. In the crystal structure of PKA, Thr-197 is
phosphorylated, and the phosphate makes electrostatic contacts with the
small and large lobes of the kinase. These contacts were proposed to facilitate both ATP and peptide substrate binding (22-24). Biochemical analysis of PKA confirmed that the phosphate of Thr-197 is required for
both ATP binding as well as efficient phosphate transfer to the peptide
substrate (25, 26). When PKA is expressed in bacteria, Thr-197
phosphorylation occurs by autophosphorylation, but in mammalian cells
Thr-197 may be phosphorylated by another protein kinase.
Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 can
phosphorylate and activate PKA in vitro (27) favoring the
idea that PKA is a downstream target of a protein kinase cascade.
Two members of the Ca2+/calmodulin
(CaM)-dependent family of protein kinases, CaM KI and IV,
are activated by upstream kinases (28, 29). Activation loop
phosphorylation of CaM KI and CaM KIV by CaM kinase kinase A and CaM
KKB, both of which are also members of the CaM kinase family, increases
enzyme activity 10-50-fold (30). Both CaM KKs contain phosphorylatable
residues within their activation loops and also may be targets of
upstream kinases, although to date, no kinases have been identified.
Activation loop phosphorylation of CaM KI and IV has been shown to
occur in intact cells. Aletta et al. (31) has shown that
elevated intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, resulting from
either ionomycin or KCl treatment of PC12 cells, lead to
phosphorylation of CaM KI on Thr-177. CaM KI immunoprecipitated from
cells treated with either agent was significantly more active than CaM
KI immunoprecipitated from unstimulated cells and showed decreased
responsiveness to purified CaM KK in vitro. In addition,
anti-IgM treatment of the B cell line, BJAB (32), as well as T cell
receptor stimulation of Jurkat cells (33) have been shown to activate
CaM KIV. CaM KIV induction of AP-1 (34) and cAMP response
element-binding protein-mediated transcription (35) is inhibited by a
T200A mutation in human CaM KIV. These data provide compelling evidence
that phosphorylation of CaM KI and IV is a physiological response to
signals that increase intracellular Ca2+ with these kinases
serving as intermediates in signal transduction cascades.
Recent data from Chin et al. (36) revealed that
Thr-177-dephosphorylated CaM KI has one of the highest specific
activities reported for any protein kinase, and peptide substrates
could show greater than 400-fold differences in specificities. These surprising observations raised the possibility that activation loop
phosphorylation of CaM KI may not be essential for kinase activity but
could modulate substrate specificity. Here we demonstrate that
phosphorylation is not an absolute requirement for CaM KI activity but,
indeed, serves to expand the peptide substrate specificity of the
enzyme. We have also found that CaM KIV is regulated in a similar
manner. CaM KI and IV, therefore, represent the first kinases whose
peptide substrate specificity has been shown to be regulated by
activation loop phosphorylation and raises the possibility that such
control may be extended to members of other protein kinase families.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents--
[
-32P]ATP was from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. Tween 20, isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside, glutathione,
dithiothreitol, bovine serum albumin, and Tris were all obtained from
Sigma. Glutathione-Sepharose 4B was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Calcium chloride and magnesium chloride were purchased from Fisher. P81
phosphocellulose filter paper was from Whatman. CaM KIV was purified
from Sf-9 cells as described previously (37).
Protein Expression and Purification--
The human CaM KI clone
was isolated from a differentiated HL-60 cDNA library as described
previously (28). The T177A mutant was generated by PCR using a
5'-oligonucleotide primer containing the appropriate base change. The
PCR product was digested with SmaI and EcoRI, gel
purified, and used to replace the wild-type sequence in the CaM KI
clone. The entire PCR fragment was sequenced to ensure no secondary
mutations had occurred (28).
BL21 (DE3) Escherichia coli strains were
transformed with the appropriate CaM KI clones. Overnight starter
cultures were used to inoculate 1-liter large scale cultures. These
were grown to an A600 of 0.7 at 37 °C;
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside was then added to
a final concentration of 0.4 mM, and the cultures were
allowed to grow for another 2-3 h to induce CaM KI expression. Cells
were then harvested by centrifugation at low speed at 4 °C for 10 min. Cells were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline containing 20 µg/ml trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin,
2 µg/ml pepstatin, 100 µg/ml Pefabloc, and 100 µM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and lysed by mild sonication at 4 °C.
The cell debris was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatants were loaded onto
glutathione-Sepharose columns, extensively washed with
phosphate-buffered saline, and eluted with 10 mM
glutathione, 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. Purity of
enzyme preparations was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Enzymes were aliquoted in 40% glycerol, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
70 °C. Enzymes were thawed and
used once only.
The rat CaM KKB gene was isolated and subcloned into the pMAL-c2X
vector (New England Biolabs) as described (35). The KKB 1-487 mutant
was generated by by PCR by placing a stop codon immediately after amino
acid residue 487. The PCR product was subcloned into the pMAL-c2X
vector and sequenced in its entirety. Protein was induced as above.
Cells were resuspended in 10 mM phosphate, 30 mM NaCl, 0.25% Tween 20, 10 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM EDTA, and 10 mM EGTA.
Lysates were loaded onto an amylose column and washed with 12-15
column volumes of buffer containing 10 mM phosphate, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.25% Tween 20, 10 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EGTA. The fusion protein was eluted
with 10 mM maltose in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6. The
MBP-KKB was analyzed and handled as described for CaM KI.
Protein Determinations--
The concentrations of KKB and CaM KI
were determined using the Lowry assay with some modifications (38).
Bovine serum albumin was used as the standard. Bovine CaM
concentrations were determined by amino acid analysis.
Peptide Synthesis--
Synapsin-(4-13) and the alcohol
dehydrogenase repressor peptides (ADR1)-(222-234)G233 peptides were
synthesized by Dr. David Klapper at the University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill and quantified by amino acid analysis. (Dr. William Abrams,
University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine). All other
peptides were quantified by phenylalanine absorption at 257 nm
and standardized to the known concentrations of synapsin-(4-13) and
ADR1-(222-234)G233.
Peptide Kinase Assays--
CaM KI or IV activity was assayed in
a buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 10 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 0.1% Tween 20, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and
varying concentrations of CaM, ATP, and peptide substrate in a volume
of 40-50 µl. Assays were initiated by the addition of enzyme or, in
the cases of pre-incubation, by the addition of
[
-32P]ATP (10 mCi/mmol) and substrate. Pre-incubation
and assay times varied and are described in the figure legends.
Reactions were terminated by spotting the mixture on P81
phosphocellulose filter papers (39). P81 filters were washed 3 times
for 1 h in either 75 mM phosphoric acid for peptide
kinase assays or in 20% trichloroacidic acid (Fig. 1), rinsed in 100%
acetone, and air dried. Incorporation of 32Pi
into peptide or enzyme was quantified using a Beckman LS 6000 scintillation spectrometer. For kinetic analyses the 5 or 6 ATP concentrations ranged from 400 to 5000 µM.
ADR1-(222-234)G233, peptides containing variations of ADR1, and the
LKK and LRR-synapsin-(4-13) peptides were assayed at 5 concentrations
ranging from 50 to 1000 µM for 10 min with 1 ng of
Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI or for 5 min with 1 ng of Thr-177 phospho-CaM
KI. The synapsin-(4-13) peptide and variants other than the LKK and
LRR peptides were assayed at 5 concentrations ranging from 50 to 1200 µM for 15 min with 1 ng of Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI and
for 5 min with 1 ng of Thr-177 phospho-CaM KI. The CaM concentration
for all kinetic studies was 1 µM. KKB did not
phosphorylate any of the peptides used for these studies. Kinetic
constants were determined by using the KaleidaGraph program. The
general curve fit option of this program was used to apply
Michaelis-Menten equations to directly fit the raw data using the
Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm.
Gel Quantitation of Phosphorylated Peptides--
Peptides (200 µM) were phosphorylated in the standard assay buffer
containing 500 µM ATP for 5 min using 5 ng of Thr-177
dephospho-CaM KI. Reactions were stopped by the addition of protein
sample buffer to a final concentration of 2X 100 mM Tris,
pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 0.2% bromphenol blue, and 20% glycerol. An eighth of
the reaction mixture was electrophoresed on 20% Laemmli gels in a
buffer containing 25 mM Tris, 200 mM tricine,
and 0.1% SDS. After electrophoresis, gels were dried and exposed to
film. The radioactive bands were carefully excised and counted by
liquid scintillation spectrometry.
Anion Exchange Chromatography--
The procedure was similar to
Kemp et al. (40). Bio-Rad anion exchange resin AG1 × 8 (acetate form) was equilibrated in water, and the buffer was then
changed to 30% acetic acid. Prior to the experiments, the ATP binding
capacity of the resin was monitored by absorbance at 259 nm so >95%
of the ATP bound. Chimeric peptides were phosphorylated by 5 ng of CaM
KI for 5 min in the presence of 500 µM ATP and 5 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP in a volume of 40 µl. Reactions were
stopped by adding 360 µl of 30% acetic acid. The reactions were
loaded onto individual AG1 × 8 columns at 4 °C. The flow
through and 6-ml 30% acetic acid washes were counted by a Beckman LS
6000 scintillation spectrometer in the 3H channel
(Cherenkov radiation).
 |
RESULTS |
Mechanism of Activation of CaM KI by KKB--
CaM KI has been
shown to be activated by phosphorylation on Thr-177, a residue residing
in the activation loop (28), by two distinct
Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinases. The smaller
kinase (64 kDa), designated CaM kinase kinase A, was identical to the
reported CaM KIV kinase (41), whereas CaM KKB (68 kDa) was a novel CaM
KK (30, 42). We have isolated a cDNA encoding CaM KKB from both
human and rat brain libraries, expressed the rat kinase as a
maltose-binding fusion protein, and examined its properties (35). Here
we asked whether recombinant CaM KKB can phosphorylate CaM KI as does
its tissue-purified counterpart (28, 30). Recombinant CaM KKB catalyzes
a time-dependent phosphorylation of CaM KI to approximately 0.8 mol of phosphate/mol of enzyme (Fig.
1). The extent of phosphate incorporation
at Thr-177 directly correlates with the degree of CaM KI kinase
activity.2 In the presence of
Ca2+/CaM, KKB also autophosphorylates to a stoichiometry of
0.2 mol of phosphate/mol of enzyme (Fig. 1), but this
autophosphorylation does not alter KKB activity (35).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Time course of recombinant CaM KKB
autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of CaM KI by KKB. 20 ng of
GST-CaM KI and 563 ng of MBP-KKB fusion protein were incubated alone or
together for the indicated time periods at 30 °C in the standard
assay buffer (see "Experimental Procedures") in the presence of 1 µM CaM and 500 µM ATP. Reactions were
stopped by spotting the mixture on P81 filter paper and precipitation
with 20% trichloroacidic acid. Filters were washed 3 times for 1 h or more in 20% trichloroacidic acid, rinsed briefly in 100%
acetone, and air-dried. KKB autophosphorylation was subtracted to
determine stoichiometry of CaM KI phosphorylation. CaM KI
autophosphorylation was not above background. Open circles
denote phosphorylation of CaM KI by KKB. Open squares denote
KKB autophosphorylation. Wt, wild type.
|
|
To determine the effect of Thr-177 phosphorylation on the kinetics of
peptide phosphorylation, we stoichiometrically phosphorylated CaM KI
using recombinant KKB and examined changes in its ability to
phosphorylate the most extensively studied CaM KI peptide substrate, synapsin-(4-13). This peptide, LRRRLS9DANF, is derived
from the sequence surrounding site 1, LRRRLS9DSNF, of
synapsin. We determined that Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI has a
Km for the synapsin-(4-13) peptide of 209 µM and a Vmax of 26.1 µmol/min/mg (Table I). After CaM KI
phosphorylation by recombinant KKB, the Km for
synapsin-(4-13) decreases 44-fold (209 to 4.7 µM) and
the Vmax increases to 65.5 µmol/min/mg. After
Thr-177 phosphorylation, the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme, as
indicated by Vmax/Km,
increases 107-fold.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Kinetic analysis of synapsin-(4-13), ADR1-(222-234)G233, and chimeric
peptides
The underlined type represents the sequences from synapsin, and the
bold type represents the sequences from ADR1.
|
|
Phosphorylation within the autoinhibitory and CaM binding domains of
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
(43) and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) (44) is known to affect
enzyme activation by CaM. To address whether activation loop
phosphorylation of CaM KI affects its sensitivity to CaM, we determined
the concentration of CaM required to produce 50% maximal enzyme
activity (KCaM) with Thr-177 dephospho- and
phospho-CaM KI. CaM KI (10 ng) was phosphorylated for 20 min by 400 ng
of 1-487 KKB in the presence of 20 nM CaM. The 1-487 KKB
is a constitutively active truncation mutant from which the C-terminal
autoinhibitory and CaM binding domains were removed. Thus, the CaM
included in the preincubation mixture served only to bind CaM KI and
expose Thr-177 to KKB (28). After the 20 min preincubation, the
reaction mixture was diluted 200-fold in the presence of EGTA. This
effectively decreased the concentration of CaM. The CaM activation
curve was then generated by assaying CaM KI activity toward
synapsin-(4-13) in the presence of 2 mM CaCl2
and CaM concentrations ranging from 100 pM to 1 µM (Fig. 2). In this
experiment, representative of five, the KCaM for
Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI was 14.0 ± 0.95 nM. The CaM
curve for Thr-177 phospho-CaM KI was left-shifted from that of the
Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI and the KCaM 4-fold lower or
3.7 ± 0.39 nM. Thus, Thr-177 phosphorylation causes a
decrease not only in the peptide Km but also in the
KCaM of CaM KI.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
CaM activation curve for the Thr-177
dephospho- and Thr-177 phospho-CaM KI. 10 ng of CaM KI was
pre-incubated for 20 min with 400 ng of MBP-KKB 1-487, a
Ca2+/CaM-independent form of the kinase kinase. The
preincubation mixture contained 20 nM CaM because CaM
binding to the full-length CaM KI is required in order for KKB to
phosphorylate CaM KI (28). The activated CaM KI and CaM were then
diluted in the presence of EGTA and assayed for activity (3 min) using
the synapsin-(4-13) peptide (200 µM) in an excess of 2 mM CaCl2 and CaM concentrations ranging from
100 pM to 1 µM. Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI was
assayed for 5 min with CaM concentrations ranging from 250 pM to 1 µM. The results shown here are
representative of five experiments. Plus symbols denote
dephospho-CaM KI. Open circles denote phospho-CaM KI.
|
|
Substrate Specificity of Dephospho-CaM KI--
ADR1 is
phosphorylated by PKA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (45). A
peptide surrounding the PKA phosphorylation site has also been shown to
be a good substrate for
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II,
CaM KIV (45), and CaM KI (36). We have tested 10 variants of ADR1 and
found that substitutions at positions within the synapsin-(4-13)
peptide, which were shown to be critical or dispensable for
phosphorylated CaM KI by Lee et al. (46), showed similar
importance in the context of ADR1 using unphosphorylated CaM
KI.2 For example, changing Arg at
3 to Leu completely
abolished the ability of CaM KI to phosphorylate the ADR1-(222-234)
peptide, a result consistent with the observation of Lee et
al. (46) that substitution of Arg at
3 in synapsin-(4-13)
caused a 240-fold decrease in
Vmax/Km. On the other hand,
changes in P
2 and P
1 had only very modest effects on CaM KI
activity. The best variant of ADR1-(222-234), the ADR1-(222-234)G233
(substitution of Ala with Gly at the P+3 position) was an approximately
14-fold better substrate at a concentration of 100 µM
than was the synapsin-(4-13) peptide. Amino acid requirements at the
P+3 position have not been analyzed for CaM KI previously, and because
substitutions at this position can change CaM KI activity at least
17-fold, it appears to be very important in substrate
recognition.2 The best peptide, ADR1-(222-234)G233, was
chosen for further studies.
Efficient Peptide Phosphorylation in the Absence of Activation Loop
Phosphorylation--
Because ADR1 was such an effective substrate for
Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI, we were interested in determining whether
phosphorylation of CaM KI on Thr-177 would further increase enzyme
activity. Our control substrate for these studies was the
synapsin-(4-13) peptide. Phosphorylation of CaM KI by KKB causes a
large increase in specific activity toward synapsin-(4-13) (Fig.
3A). The activity of CaM KI
T177A (a mutant with the activation loop Thr changed to Ala) is not
enhanced by KKB. Thus, the activity of CaM KI toward the synapsin-(4-13) peptide is dependent on Thr-177 phosphorylation. When
using the ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide as the substrate, however, phosphorylation of wild type CaM KI by KKB results in only a 25% increase in specific activity (Fig. 3A). In addition, the
T177A mutant, in the presence or absence of KKB, shows similar specific activities to the native CaM KI. Hence, KKB causes only a small increase in CaM KI activity, which is independent of Thr-177
phosphorylation. This was not due to phosphorylation of
ADR1-(222-234)G233 by KKB because no peptide tested with recombinant
KKB was appreciably phosphorylated.2 Thus, these data
suggest that the activity of CaM KI toward synapsin-(4-13) depends on
Thr-177 phosphorylation, whereas the activity toward ADR1-(222-234)G233 is largely Thr-177 phosphorylation-independent.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Specific activities of CaM KI and CaM KIV in
the absence and presence of KKB. A, specific activities of
Thr-177 dephospho, Thr-177 phospho, and T177A CaM KI using
synapsin-(4-13) and ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide substrates. CaM KI (10 ng) was preincubated with 563 ng of KKB for 20 min and assayed as
described under "Experimental Procedures" for 3 min. CaM KI without
KKB was not pre-incubated alone because the enzyme lost activity during
the pre-incubation. Instead, the kinase was assayed for 3 min without
prior pre-incubation. The final concentration of peptide was 200 µM and ATP was 500 µM. The results here are
a single representative experiment repeated three times in duplicate.
Gray bars denote CaM KI activity in the absence of KKB.
Black bars denote CaM KI activity in the presence of KKB.
Wt, wild type. B, specific activities of Thr-196
dephospho and phospho-CaM KIV using GS-(1-10)A9,10 and
ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptides. CaM KIV (250 ng) was preincubated with
563 ng of KKB for 20 min and assayed as in A. Final
concentration of the peptides was 75 µM and ATP was 500 µM. The results here are a single representative
experiment repeated four times in duplicate. Gray bars
denote CaM KIV activity in the absence of KKB. Black bars
denote CaM KIV activity in the presence of KKB.
|
|
Because CaM KIV is also regulated by activation loop phosphorylation,
we tested if this kinase, like CaM KI, could efficiently phosphorylate
ADR1-(222-234)G233 without Thr-196 being phosphorylated. In Fig.
3B, we have used as our positive control the GS-(1-10)A9,10 peptide, a variation of the glycogen synthase sequence, which has
previously been used to assay CaM KIV activation (29). CaM KIV has very
low activity toward GS-(1-10)A9,10 that is enhanced 7-fold by KKB.
When using ADR1-(222-234)G233, however, the specific activity was 13 times that of GS-(1-10)A9,10, and phosphorylation of CaM KIV by KKB
causes only a 50% increase in activity. Thus, CaM KIV is a second
example where activation loop phosphorylation serves to expand its
substrate specificity range.
We synthesized chimeric peptides between synapsin-(4-13) and
ADR1-(222-234)G233 to determine which residues in ADR1-(222-234)G233 are responsible for the Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI activity. The synapsin-(4-13) and ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide sequences differ in
three ways. First, synapsin-(4-13) is 10 amino acids in length, whereas the ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide is 13 residues. Second, the
most striking differences in sequence are C-terminal to the phosphorylation site (P+ residues). Finally, subtle amino acid variations are found N-terminal to the phosphoacceptor (P
residues). Because smooth muscle MLCK activity has been shown to be dramatically affected by P+ residues (47), we first analyzed these positions as well
as the length dependence of the peptides. Replacing positions P+1
through P+4 of ADR1-(222-234)G233 with those from synapsin-(4-13) reduces CaM KI activity to approximately 60% of the
ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide (Fig. 4).
Conversely, both extending the N terminus of the synapsin-(4-13)
peptide with the native MYN and substituting P+1 through P+4 with the
corresponding ADR1-(222-234)G233 sequence did not result in high CaM
KI activity in the absence of Thr-177 phosphorylation. Based on these
results, neither peptide length nor the residues at positions P+1
through P+4 dictate Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI activity.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Specific activities of chimeric peptides (P+1
through P+4 and P 8 through P 6) between synapsin-(4-13) and
ADR1-(222-234)G233. Sequences from ADR1-(222-234)G233 are in
bold. Sequences from synapsin-(4-13) are
underlined. 5 ng of dephospho-CaM KI were assayed for 5 min
in the presence of 200 µM peptide and 500 µM ATP. The results here are an average of three separate
experiments performed in duplicate.
|
|
Previously, Lee et al. (46) had shown for phospho-CaM KI
that substitutions at P
2 and P
4 had minimal effects on CaM KI activity. Accordingly, we chose to focus on the N terminus of the
peptides and added LKK at positions P
8 through P
6 onto
synapsin-(4-13). As seen in Fig. 4, either LKK or LRR at these
positions transforms synapsin-(4-13) into a substrate as good as
ADR1-(222-234)G233. Moreover, Thr-177 phosphorylation no longer has a
dramatic effect on CaM KI kinetics if the LKK or LRR-synapsin-(4-13)
peptides are used (Table I). These data indicate that a peptide
containing an aliphatic hydrophobic amino acid at P
8 with two basic
residues at P
7 and P
6 is an excellent substrate for Thr-177
dephospho-CaM KI.
Kinetic analysis with the synapsin-(4-13) peptide revealed that
activation involves primarily a decrease in the peptide
Km. We determined that the Km
peptide values for ADR1-(222-234)G233 and the LKK and
LRR-synapsin-(4-13) chimeric peptides using dephospho-CaM KI were
similar to values seen with Thr-177 phospho-CaM KI using the
synapsin-(4-13) substrate (Table I). Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI has a
Km for ADR1-(222-234)G233 of 17.4 µM
and it decreases to 7.1 µM after activation. As seen with
synapsin-(4-13), the Vmax for
ADR1-(222-234)G233 increases a similar magnitude from 39.4 µmol/min/mg for the dephospho-kinase to 87 µmol/min/mg for the
Thr-177 phospho-CaM KI. The Km for ATP when using either synapsin-(4-13) or ADR1-(222-234)G233 decreases approximately 40% after activation (110 to 68 µM). Thus, the
Vmax and Km ATP is increased
or decreased, respectively, independent of the peptide substrate. These
results indicate that the primary effect of CaM KI activation is to
lower the Km for peptide substrate. ADR1-(222-234)G233 is a much better substrate for Thr-177
dephospho-CaM KI than synapsin-(4-13) because of its low
Km. The kinetic data obtained using the chimeric
peptides also support this conclusion. The addition of LKK at P
8
through P
6 in synapsin-(4-13) creates a substrate with a
Km of 6.7 and Vmax of 40.4 µmol/min/mg, a Km lower and
Vmax even higher than ADR1-(222-234)G233. Remarkably, the catalytic efficiency
(Vmax/Km) of dephospho-CaM KI
for synapsin-(4-13) increases over 45-fold by the addition of LKK at
P
8 through P
6. Phosphorylation of CaM KI results in an increase in
Vmax/Km using
synapsin-(4-13) of 107-fold, whereas the
Vmax/Km of
LKK-synapsin-(4-13) increases a mere 3.6-fold. Thus, the addition of
LKK onto the synapsin-(4-13) peptide creates a substrate that is
largely independent of activation loop phosphorylation in that it is
30-fold less responsive to CaM KI Thr-177 phosphorylation.
Our data also suggest that CaM KI phosphorylation serves to broaden its
substrate specificity. The relative specificity
(Vmax/Km) for
ADR1-(222-234)G233 over synapsin-(4-13) using dephospho-CaM KI is
15.2-fold (Table I). Thus, ADR1-(222-234)G233 is strongly preferred by
dephospho-CaM KI. However, with phospho-CaM KI, the specificity for
ADR1-(222-234)G233 relative to synapsin-(4-13) is very close to unity
(0.88). So, whereas phospho-CaM KI can phosphorylate both
ADR1-(222-234)G233 and synapsin-(4-13), synapsin-(4-13) is slightly
preferred as a peptide substrate.
Because the substitution of LKK at positions P
8 through P
6 in the
synapsin-(4-13) peptide markedly increased catalytic efficiency in the
absence of Thr-177 phosphorylation, we tested the effect of Ala
substitutions at these positions. We found that the AAA and LAA
variants did not bind to P81 phosphocellulose filters (Fig.
5A). This result was
surprising because previous work had demonstrated that two basic
residues with a free amino group within a peptide were sufficient for
P81 phosphocellulose filter binding (48, 49). CaM KI activity toward
the peptides was quantified following electrophoresis in 20% Laemmli
gels, which were immediately dried and visualized by autoradiography.
The bands were excised and counted by liquid scintillation
spectrometry. The results are shown in Fig. 5B. The
AAALTRRASFSGQ peptide phosphorylation is 50% greater than the
synapsin-(4-13) peptide. The LAALTRRASFSGQ peptide is only a slightly
better substrate than the AAALTRRASFSGQ peptide, and the AKKLTRRASFSGQ
peptide is phosphorylated as well as the ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide.
These results indicate that Leu at P
8 is not a critical determinant
for dephospho-CaM KI activity. Individual mutation of each Lys
indicates that both P
7 and P
6 contribute to the efficiency of
phosphorylation by dephospho-CaM KI, with Lys at P
7 having the
dominant effect. The results obtained in these experiments were also
confirmed by anion exchange chromatography (40). In this assay, the
peptides are passed over a positively charged resin and the free ATP
binds, whereas the phosphorylated peptides are not retained. The
results of this assay are consistent with those of the gel
assay.2 Thus, the most important determinates for efficient
peptide phosphorylation by dephospho-CaM KI are the Lys residues at
P
7 and P
6, with the Lys at P
7 being most critical.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Dephospho-CaM KI activity toward
ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptides with substitutions at P 8 through P 6.
A, P81 filter assays. ADR1-(222-234)G233 sequences are
shown in bold. Synapsin-(4-13) sequences are
underlined. Changes within the ADR1-(222-234)G233 sequence
at P 8, P 7, and P 6 are shown with an asterisk. Assay
conditions are as described in Fig. 4. The results here are an average
of three separate experiments performed in duplicate. B, gel
quantitation. Assay conditions are as described in A. The results shown
here are from a single representative experiment repeated three times
in triplicate.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A large number of protein kinases have Ser/Thr or Tyr within their
activation loops, and many of these kinases are phosphorylated on these
residues. In all cases examined thus far, phosphorylation is thought to
be required for appreciable kinase activity (24). It was previously
thought that CaM KI also required phosphorylation on Thr-177 in order
for the enzyme to be active (28, 30, 39, 50-52). However, in analyzing
the substrate specificity of Thr-177 dephospho-CaM KI, data that agree
with studies done with the phosphorylated kinase (46), we were
surprised to find that ADR1-(222-234)G233 was phosphorylated 15-fold
better than the best CaM KI substrate, synapsin-(4-13). We then asked
whether the specific activity toward ADR1-(222-234)G233 could further
be enhanced by Thr-177 phosphorylation. Because phosphorylation had
only modest effects on CaM KI activity toward ADR1-(222-234)G233,
kinetic analysis was undertaken to determine the mechanism of
activation and why certain substrates could apparently diminish the
need for Thr-177 phosphorylation. Using the synapsin-(4-13) substrate,
we found that Thr-177 phosphorylation modulates virtually every
enzymatic parameter, Vmax, Km for substrate, Km for ATP, and
KCaM. The largest effect is a 44-fold decrease
in Km for substrate. These data are in contrast to
Inoue et al. (51) who used an inefficient substrate for CaM
KI, syntide-2, to show that Km for peptide decreases
7-fold and Km ATP decreases 3-fold after CaM KI phosphorylation.
Our finding that phospho-CaM KI has an increased affinity for CaM as
compared with dephospho-CaM KI may have important physiological implications. Previously, Meyer et al. (43) have shown that autophosphorylation of another CaM-dependent kinase,
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II,
markedly decreases the KCaM of the enzyme,
resulting in a sensitization to repetitive Ca2+ spikes.
Sensitization of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II to changes in intracellular Ca2+
concentration is important in such a neuronal process as long term
potentiation and long term depression. CaM KI is also expressed in
neurons (53) and becomes phosphorylated on Thr-177 in response to KCl
depolarization of PC12 cells (31). CaM KI phosphorylation and the
accompanying left-shift in the CaM activation curve may also be
important in regulation of the neuronal processes of long term
potentiation and long term depression.
Our kinetic analysis of dephospho- and phospho-CaM KI using both the
synapsin-(4-13) and ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide substrates revealed
that CaM KI has an extremely high activity in the absence of Thr-177
phosphorylation toward substrates with very low
Km values. Substrates that have high
Km values are phosphorylated quite poorly unless
Thr-177 is phosphorylated. Poor substrates for Thr-177 dephospho-CaM
KI, however, can be efficiently phosphorylated by this form of the
enzyme by introducing Lys or Arg residues at P
7 and P
6 relative to
the phosphoacceptor site. The literature contains several examples of
protein kinases that have substrate specificity determinates at P
7 or
P
6. Earlier studies on PKA showed that high affinity binding of the
inhibitor peptide PKI depended on: 1) the presence of a basic residue
at the P
6 position, 2) dibasic residues at P
2 and P
3, and 3) an
aromatic residue at the P
11 position. The importance of the P
6
position is illustrated by the kinetics of PKA phosphorylation of the
PKI(14-22)S21 peptide, GRTGRRASAI, which has a Km
of 0.11 µM, 40-fold lower than Kemptide
(Km 4.7 µM), LRRASLG, a substrate that does not contain a basic residue at P
6 (54). Substrate specificity requirements seven residues away from the phosphoacceptor are also
reported for smooth muscle MLCK (55, 56). Recent work by Millward
et al. (57) demonstrated that basic residues at P
7 and
P
6 might also be important substrate determinants for the
S100-regulated kinase, Ndr. The peptide sequence AARNRTLSVA in which
the Lys residues at P
7 and P
6 were changed to Ala was not
phosphorylated by this kinase. These authors used the P81 phosphocellulose binding assay but did not report whether the Ala
analog peptides bound to the P81 paper quantitatively. We have shown
here that the ADR1 peptide, AAALTRRASFSGQ, containing substitutions at
P
8 through P
6, although having two positively charged residues and
a free N terminus, does not bind quantitatively to P81 phosphocellulose filters.
The kinetic mechanism of CaM KI activation is similar to that of PKA in
that Km for peptide is dramatically affected in both
cases. Phosphorylation of PKA also significantly decreases its
Km ATP, whereas phosphorylation of CaM KI only
slightly affects Km ATP. Mutation of the equivalent
Thr in PKA, Thr-197, to either Ala or Asp results in a 25-100-fold
increase in Km substrate and Km
ATP (26). In addition, Steinberg et al. (25) demonstrated
that the unphosphorylated PKA also has elevated Km
values for substrate and ATP similar to those seen with the mutant
catalytic subunits (26). The increased Km for ATP
was because of a decreased binding affinity, but the
Km substrate increases were not because of peptide
binding affinities, but rather a reduced rate of phosphoryl transfer.
The catalytic subunit of PKA was crystallized as an "active" kinase
with Thr-197 phosphorylated and Mg2+/ATP present. The
structures of CaM KI (58), CDK2 (59), and extracellular
signal-regulated kinase 2 (60) all reflect inactive kinases, where the
activating residue(s) within the activation loop were not
phosphorylated. It is thought that the conformation of the activation
loops of both dephosphorylated CDK2 and extracellular signal-regulated
kinase 2 precludes substrate binding. However, mutagenesis data from
PKA reveal that the loss of Thr-197 phosphate has no effect on peptide
binding; the changes in Km peptide are because of
phosphate transfer. Based on our data, the nonphosphorylated activation
loop of CaM KI, like the nonphosphorylated activation loop of PKA, does
not preclude substrate binding, as was proposed for CDK2 and
extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2. The crystal structure of the
CaM KI 1-320 enzyme contains a disordered activation loop providing us
with no information about the conformation of the unphosphorylated
loop. Our studies suggest that the change in peptide
Km, in response to Thr-177 phosphorylation, whether
because of peptide binding or rate of phosphoryl transfer, can be
overcome by the sequence of the substrate. It seems reasonable to
suggest that the unphosphorylated loop of CaM KI does not adopt a
conformation that prevents substrate binding because unphosphorylated CaM KI efficiently phosphorylates the ADR1-(222-234)G233 substrate.
The crystal structures of CaM KI and PKA provide some insight as to how
kinases recognize their substrate. CaM KI contains an autoinhibitory
domain that, in the absence of Ca2+/CaM, lies within the
substrate binding groove. When CaM KI is autoinhibited, its
autoinhibitory domain is predicted to make similar contacts with the
catalytic domain as would a substrate. Ca2+/CaM binding to
the enzyme results in the removal of the autoinhibitory domain from the
catalytic pocket and allows substrate binding. The CaM KI fragment
(1-320) was crystallized in the absence of Ca2+/CaM and
Thr-177 phosphorylation. Hence, the structure reflects the
autoinhibited kinase. The catalytic subunit of PKA does not contain an
autoinhibitory domain but the kinase was crystallized in the presence
of the inhibitory protein, PKI. PKI binds to PKA in a manner
competitive with substrate. In addition, a variant of PKI that contains
a PKA autophosphorylation site in its C terminus is no longer an
inhibitor but a substrate (54). Thus, by inspecting the contacts of PKI
and the autoinhibitory domain of CaM KI with the catalytic domain of
PKA or CaM KI, respectively, we can predict how CaM KI recognizes
individual residues surrounding the substrate phosphoacceptor site. CaM
KI has a strict requirement for a basic residue at P
3. Glu-102 of CaM
KI is in the equivalent position of Glu-127 in PKA, a residue that
makes contacts with the basic Arg at P
3 within the substrate (Fig.
6). Lys-300 within the autoinhibitory domain of CaM KI mimics Arg at P
3 by interacting with Glu-102. Mutation of Glu-102 alters the enzyme specificity at P
3 (58). Likewise, the preference of CaM KI for a hydrophobic residue at P
5
within the substrate is illustrated by the autoinhibitory domain
residue Phe-298 being buried within a deep hydrophobic pocket formed by
Phe-104, Ile-210, and Pro-216.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Alignment of the residues within the
autoinhibitory domain of CaM KI with residues from the
ADR1-(222-234)G233 substrate. The arrows indicate
residues within the catalytic core of the enzyme that have been
demonstrated to interact with either the autoinhibitory domain or the
peptide substrate. The boxed amino acids are predicted to
interact with Lys at P 7 in ADR1-(222-234)G233.
|
|
We can structurally rationalize how the addition of basic residues at
P
7 and P
6 onto a CaM KI substrate substantially decreases its
Km. Our chimeric peptide studies indicated that the most crucial factor for efficient phosphorylation of
ADR1-(222-234)G233 (a low Km value) by
dephospho-CaM KI was Lys at P
7. It seems reasonable that Lys at P
7
is interacting with Glu-221, a residue residing at the end of the loop
preceding the G
-helix within the catalytic core. Alternatively,
depending on how the Lys side chain at P
7 lies, it may be interacting
with Val-108, a residue that interacts with P
8 within the
autoinhibitory domain. Interestingly, CaM KIV, another enzyme that
displays similar substrate phosphorylation properties to CaM KI in the
absence and presence of activation loop phosphorylation, has conserved
Glu and Val residues at these same positions. In PKA, the P
6 site
represented by the positively charged Arg-15 in PKI, interacts with the
negatively charged Glu-203 within the catalytic core (22). The
equivalent residue to Glu-203 in CaM KI is Gly-183. It seems reasonable
that if Gly-183 were a negatively charged Glu, as in PKA, the
positively charged Lys at P
6 in ADR1-(222-234)G233 peptide may
contribute more significantly to the "independence" of
ADR1-(222-234)G233 for Thr-177 phosphorylation. Other enzymes shown to
be regulated by activation loop phosphorylation such as protein kinase
C, PKA, and CDK2 have a Glu (in the case of protein kinase C) or an Asp (in the cases of PKA and CDK2) at the equivalent position as Glu-221 in
CaM KI, raising the possibility that they may also have peptide substrates that are efficiently phosphorylated in the absence of
activation loop phosphorylation.
Our data reveal that Thr-177 phosphorylation expands the substrate
specificity of CaM KI. What structural role does Thr-177 phosphorylation play with substrates, like synapsin-(4-13), whose Vmax/Km is dramatically
influenced by activation loop phosphorylation? The answer to this
question may be partially explained by small angle x-ray and neutron
scattering with another CaM-dependent enzyme, skeletal (sk)
muscle MLCK. Krueger et al. (61) have reported that CaM
binding to skMLCK causes the autoinhibitory sequences to swing away
from the catalytic core. The addition of either the nonhydrolyzable ATP
analogue, AMPPNP, or a peptide substrate from the myosin light chain to
this CaM·MLCK complex causes a compaction of the catalytic domain
(62). The closure between the small and large lobes of the kinase and
the accompanying shift in the CaM and skMLCK centers of mass toward one
another, however, require both Mg2+/ATP and peptide
substrate binding. Although the activity of skMLCK is not regulated by
activation loop phosphorylation, its activity is stimulated by CaM in a
manner similar to CaM KI. The crystal structure of CaM KI in the
absence of CaM, Mg2+/ATP, peptide substrate, and Thr-177
phosphorylation is in the open conformation. If we extend the findings
with skMLCK to CaM KI, we predict that the ability of peptide substrate
to induce conformational changes may be influenced by Thr-177
phosphorylation. Peptide substrates that are phosphorylated efficiently
in the absence of Thr-177 bind to dephospho-CaM KI with high affinity and induce the requisite conformational change associated with substrate binding, whereas other "activation-dependent"
substrates would require Thr-177 phosphorylation in order for them to
induce the conformational change. Alternatively, Thr-177
phosphorylation may induce conformational changes in the kinase that
can be mimicked by binding of a high affinity substrate.
Regardless of the molecular mechanism, our results identify the
possibility that substrates directly regulate kinase activity. Previously, Walsh et al. (63) have pointed out that
different substrate affinities may be important in regulating the order of substrate phosphorylation events within cells to coordinate different metabolic events. Our results highlight the possibility that
phosphorylation of protein kinase activation loops may add a further
regulatory dimension to the timing of phosphorylation events within cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank David Chin and other members of the
Means laboratory for helpful discussions, Maddalena Illario for the
1-487 KKB construct, and Qihui Huang for the CaM KIV protein. Special
thanks goes to Ethan E. Corcoran for help with the direct fit of the kinetic data.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Department of Defense Grant
DAMD 17-97-1-7101 (to S. S. H.), the National Heart Foundation Grant
G97M4923 (to B. E. K.), and National Institutes of Health Grant
GM-33976 (to A. R. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
National Health and Medical Research Council Fellow.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, P. O. Box 3813, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Tel.: 919-681-6209; Fax:
919-681-7767; E-mail: means001@mc.duke.edu.
2
S. S. Hook and A. R. Means,
unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase;
CaM KI, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I;
CaM, calmodulin;
KKB, kinase kinase B;
CaM KKB, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase
B;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase;
CaM KIV, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
GST, glutathione S-
transferase;
ADR1, alcohol dehydrogenase repressor protein 1;
MBP, maltose-binding protein. SKMLCK, skeletal muscle myosin light chain
kinase;
PKI, protein kinase inhibitor;
LKK-synapsin-(4-13), LKK
LRRRLSDANF;
LRR-synapsin-(4-13), LRRLRRRLSDANF.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Payne, D. M.,
Rossomando, A. J.,
Martino, P.,
Erickson, A. K.,
Her, J. H.,
Shabanowitz, J.,
Hunt, D. F.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
885-892[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Alessandrini, A.,
Crews, C. M.,
and Erikson, R. L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
8200-8204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Her, J. H.,
Lakhani, S.,
Zu, K.,
Vila, J.,
Dent, P.,
Sturgill, T. W.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
296,
25-31
|
| 4.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
Saito, Y.,
Campbell, D. G.,
Cohen, P.,
Sithanandam, G.,
Rapp, U.,
Ashworth, A.,
Marshall, C. J.,
and Cowley, S.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1610-1619[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Solomon, M. J.,
Harper, J. W.,
and Shuttleworth, J.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
3133-3142[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Cazaubon, S. M.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
17559-17563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Cazaubon, S.,
Bornancin, F.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
301,
443-448
|
| 8.
|
Orr, J. W.,
and Newton, A. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27715-27718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Keranen, L. M.,
Dutil, E. M.,
and Newton, A. C.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
1394-1403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Le Good, J. A.,
Ziegler, W. H.,
Parekh, D. B.,
Alessi, D. R.,
Cohen, P.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1998)
Science
281,
2042-2045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Gauzzi, M. C.,
Velazquez, L.,
McKendry, R.,
Mogensen, K. E.,
Fellous, M.,
and Pellegrini, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20494-20500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Feng, J.,
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Matsuda, T.,
Kohlhuber, F.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
2497-2501[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Liu, K. D.,
Gaffen, S. L.,
Goldsmith, M. A.,
and Greene, W. C.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
817-826[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Hardwick, J. S.,
and Sefton, B. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25429-25432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Rosen, O. M.,
Herrera, R.,
Olowe, Y.,
Petruzzelli, L. M.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
3237-3240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Ellis, L.,
Clauser, E.,
Morgan, D. O.,
Edery, M.,
Roth, R. A.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1986)
Cell
45,
721-732[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Mitra, G.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
2237-2241[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Guiton, M.,
Gunn-Moore, F. J.,
Stitt, T. N.,
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
and Tavare, J. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30370-30377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Cunningham, M. E.,
Stephens, R. M.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
and Greene, L. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10957-10967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
McCarty, J. H.,
and Feinstein, S. C.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1691-1700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Ling, L.,
Cao, Z.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
3792-3797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Knighton, D. R.,
Zheng, J. H.,
Ten Eyck, L. F.,
Ashford, V. A.,
Xuong, N. H.,
Taylor, S. S.,
and Sowadski, J. M.
(1991)
Science
253,
407-414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Knighton, D. R.,
Zheng, J. H.,
Ten Eyck, L. F.,
Xuong, N. H.,
Taylor, S. S.,
and Sowadski, J. M.
(1991)
Science
253,
414-420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Taylor, S. S.,
and Radzio-Andzelm, E.
(1994)
Structure
2,
345-355[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Steinberg, R. A.,
Cauthron, R. D.,
Symcox, M. M.,
and Shuntoh, H.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2332-2341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Adams, J. A.,
McGlone, M. L.,
Gibson, R.,
and Taylor, S. S.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
2447-2454[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Cheng, X.,
Ma, Y.,
Moore, M.,
Hemmings, B. A.,
and Taylor, S. S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9849-9854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Haribabu, B.,
Hook, S. S.,
Selbert, M. A.,
Goldstein, E. G.,
Tomhave, E. D.,
Edelman, A. M.,
Snyderman, R.,
and Means, A. R.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
3679-3686[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Selbert, M. A.,
Anderson, K. A.,
Huang, Q. H.,
Goldstein, E. G.,
Means, A. R.,
and Edelman, A. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17616-17621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Edelman, A. M.,
Mitchelhill, K. I.,
Selbert, M. A.,
Anderson, K. A.,
Hook, S. S.,
Stapleton, D.,
Goldstein, E. G.,
Means, A. R.,
and Kemp, B. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10806-10810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Aletta, J. M.,
Selbert, M. A.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Edelman, A. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20930-20934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Chatila, T.,
Anderson, K. A.,
Ho, N.,
and Means, A. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21542-21548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Park, I. K.,
and Soderling, T. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30464-30469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Ho, N.,
Gullberg, M.,
and Chatila, T.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
101-112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Anderson, K. A.,
Means, R. L.,
Huang, Q.-H.,
Kemp, B. E.,
Goldstein, E. G.,
Selbert, M. A.,
Edelman, A. M.,
Fremeau, R. T.,
and Means, A. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31880-31889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Chin, D.,
Winkler, K. E.,
and Means, A. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31235-31240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Cruzalegui, F. H.,
and Means, A. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26171-26178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Peterson, G. L.
(1977)
Anal. Biochem.
83,
346-356[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
DeRemer, M. F.,
Saeli, R. J.,
Brautigan, D. L.,
and Edelman, A. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13466-13471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Kemp, B. E.,
Benjamini, E.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
1038-1042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Tokumitsu, H.,
Enslen, H.,
and Soderling, T. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19320-19324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Kitani, T.,
Okuno, S.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1997)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
122,
243-250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Meyer, T.,
Hanson, P. I.,
Stryer, L.,
and Schulman, H.
(1992)
Science
256,
1199-1202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Conti, M. A.,
and Adelstein, R. S.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
3178-3181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Denis, C. L.,
Fontaine, S. C.,
Chase, D.,
Kemp, B. E.,
and Bemis, L. T.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1507-1514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Lee, J. C.,
Kwon, Y. G.,
Lawrence, D. S.,
and Edelman, A. M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6413-6417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Pearson, R. B.,
Misconi, L. Y.,
and Kemp, B. E.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
25-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Glass, D. B.,
Masaracchia, R. A.,
Feramisco, J. R.,
and Kemp, B. E.
(1978)
Anal. Biochem.
87,
566-575[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Casnellie, J. E.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
200,
115-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Lee, J. C.,
and Edelman, A. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2158-2164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Inoue, S.,
Mizutani, A.,
Sugita, R.,
Sugita, K.,
and Hidaka, H.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
215,
861-867[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Lee, J. C.,
and Edelman, A. M.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
210,
631-637[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Picciotto, M. R.,
Zoli, M.,
Bertuzzi, G.,
and Nairn, A. C.
(1995)
Synapse
20,
75-84[CrossRef] |