J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 29, 20271-20280, July 16, 1999
Protein Adducts of Iso[4]levuglandin E2, a Product
of the Isoprostane Pathway, in Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein*
Robert G.
Salomon
§,
Wei
Sha
,
Cynthia
Brame¶,
Kamaljit
Kaur
,
Ganesamoorthy
Subbanagounder
,
June
O'Neil
,
Henry F.
Hoff
, and
L. Jackson
Roberts II¶
From the
Department of Chemistry, Case Western
Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7078, the ¶ Departments
of Pharmacology and Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville,
Tennessee 37232-6602, and the
Department of Cell Biology, The
Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
 |
ABSTRACT |
Levuglandin (LG) E2, a
cytotoxic seco prostanoic acid co-generated with prostaglandins by
nonenzymatic rearrangements of the cyclooxygenase-derived endoperoxide,
prostaglandin H2, avidly binds to proteins. That
LGE2-protein adducts can also be generated nonenzymatically
is demonstrated by their production during free radical-induced
oxidation of low density lipoprotein (LDL). Like oxidized LDL,
LGE2-LDL, but not native LDL, undergoes receptor-mediated uptake and impaired processing by macrophage cells. Since
radical-induced lipid oxidation produces isomers of
prostaglandins, isoprostanes (isoPs), via endoperoxide
intermediates, we postulated previously that a similar family of
LG isomers, isoLGs, is cogenerated with isoPs. Now
iso[4]LGE2-protein epitopes produced by radical-induced oxidation of arachidonic acid in the presence of protein were detected
with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Iso[4]LGE2-protein epitopes are also generated during
free radical-induced oxidation of LDL. All of the LGE2
isomers generated upon oxidation of LDL are efficiently sequestered by
covalent adduction with LDL-based amino groups. The potent
electrophilic reactivity of iso-LGs can be anticipated to have
biological consequences beyond their obvious potential as markers for
specific arachidonate-derived protein modifications that may be of
value for the quantitative assessment of oxidative injury.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein
(LDL)1 is considered a key
step in the etiology of atherosclerosis (1, 2). Free radical-induced
oxidation of LDL consumes polyunsaturated fatty esters and concomitanty
generates lipid-derived electrophiles which modify LDL by covalent
adduction with protein-based nucleophiles (3-5). Receptor recognition
of the resulting protein modifications leads to uptake of the oxidized
(ox) LDL by macrophages (6-8). Because uptake is unregulated and
processing of oxLDL is inefficient, the macrophages become lipid-laden
foam cells, progenitors of atherosclerotic plaques (9). To acquire a
fundamental molecular level understanding of atherogenesis and other
biological sequelae of oxidative injury, we are identifying the
chemical structures of lipid oxidation products that bind with proteins.
Previously, we discovered derivatives of levulinaldehyde with
prostaglandin side chains appended at the carbons
and
to the
aldehyde group. Named levuglandins (10), e.g.
LGE2 (Fig. 1), these seco prostanoic acids are cogenerated
with prostaglandins (PGs) (11-13) by rearrangements of the
endoperoxide PGH2 which occur readily
(t1/2 = 5 min at 37 °C) under the conditions of
its cyclooxygenase (COX)-promoted biosynthesis from arachidonic acid
(AA). LGE2 binds avidly with proteins (14) forming a
protein-bound pyrrole, LGE2-pyrrole (15), as well as
protein-protein (16, 17) and DNA-protein (18) cross-links. We recently
reported mass spectral characterization of several lysine-based
modifications that are generated by covalent adduction of
LGE2 with proteins
(19).2 Levels of
LGE2-protein adducts are markedly elevated in the blood of
atherosclerosis and end stage renal disease patients versus healthy controls (21). Furthermore, LGE2-modified LDL is
recognized by macrophages, taken up, and inefficiently processed in
close analogy and competition with oxLDL (8). In effect,
LGE2-modified LDL may function as a Trojan horse, fostering
uptake but then compromising the ability of macrophage proteases to
hydrolyze oxidatively damaged LDL protein.
Because COX only converts free AA into PGH2, this pathway
is regulated by enzymatic release of AA from AA-PC (22, 23). In
contrast, a free radical pathway oxidizes AA-PC directly to produce
phospholipid endoperoxides (24-26). We previously showed that
LGE2-protein adducts are also produced during free
radical-induced oxidation of LDL (27). While the enzymatic pathway
generates a single stereoisomer with trans disposed side
chains, peroxy radical cyclization generates an isomeric mixture in
which stereoisomers with cis disposed side chains
predominate (28) as, for example, in the 2-lysophosphatidylcholine (PC)
ester 8-epi-PGH2-PC (Fig. 1). Rearrangement of
8-epi-PGH2-PC would deliver
8-epi-LGE2-PC. However, because the
stereocenters at positions 8 and 9 are lost during Paal-Knorr
condensation (29) of this LG-phospholipid with lysyl amino groups of
LDL protein, formation of a pyrrole adduct in conjunction with
enzyme-catalyzed hydrolytic release of lysophosphatidylcholine (30-32)
generates the same LGE2-pyrrole as that formed by the
cyclooxygenase pathway (Fig. 1).
Mouse peritoneal macrophages internalize and degrade
LGE2-LDL if the molar ratio of LGE2 to LDL
protein (apoB) exceeds a threshold somewhere between 10:1 and 38:1 by a
receptor mediated uptake that is completely inhibited by oxLDL (8).
Furthermore, uptake of oxLDL is inhibited by LGE2-LDL,
supporting the conclusion that both LGE2-LDL and oxLDL are
recognized by the same receptor. However, the ratio of LGE2
to apoB in oxLDL does not exceed 2:1. Nevertheless, the total
modification of apoB by all of the isomeric levulinaldehyde derivatives
produced by oxidation of AA might suffice to account for receptor
recognition, uptake, and inefficient processing of oxLDL. Thus, because
hydrogen atom abstraction readily occurs nonregioselectively at any
doubly allylic methylene, we postulated that the free radical pathway
not only can produce a stereoisomeric mixture of levulinaldehyde
derivatives with PG side chains, i.e. iso-LGs, but also
structurally isomeric levulinaldehyde derivatives with nonprostanoid
side chains, i.e. iso[n]LGs. For example,
hydrogen atom abstraction from the 10-position of AA-PC followed
by cyclization of an intermediate 8-peroxyeicosatetraenoyl radical
could lead to iso[4]PGH2-PC and then
iso[4]LGE2-PC (Fig. 1), where the number in brackets
signifies the length of the carboxylic side chain appended to a common
2,3-dioxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane or levulinaldehyde core. The
generation of phospholipid endoperoxides that are structural isomers of
PGH2 by free radical-induced oxidation was postulated previously to account for the formation of isoprostanes (24, 25). Thus,
iso[4]PGH2-PC (12-H2-IsoP) is also the
putative precursor of isoprostanes that have been designated
12-F2-IsoP, 12-E2-IsoP, and
12-D2-IsoP (33). In analogy with the chemistry of
LGE2, we expected that iso[4]LGE2-PC would
form iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole by covalent adduction to proteins
and concomitant phospholipolysis (Fig.
1). We now report confirmation of this
hypothesis. Thus, the generation of iso[4]LGE2-protein
epitopes during in vitro nonenzymatic free radical-induced
oxidation of LDL was detected with an immunoassay using antibodies
raised against an iso[4]LGE2-protein adduct. Since
iso[4]LGE2 is formed by the isoprostane pathway but not
by the COX pathway, the new antibody allows unambiguous assessment of
the formation of iso-LGs from the isoprostane pathway. In a companion
paper (19), we report mass spectral characterization of the covalent
iso-LG-derived protein modifications that are generated during
free-radical induced oxidation of LDL.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cyclooxygenase (enzymatic) pathway and free
radical-induced (nonenzymatic) route to LGs and iso-LGs via
rearrangements of endoperoxide intermediates.
|
|
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
General Methods
Centrifugation was done on a Sorvall centrifuge at 5 °C and
2000 rpm. Absorbance values of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were measured on a Bio-Rad Microplate Reader using dual wavelength (405 nm to read the plate and 650 nm as a reference).
Materials
Spectrapor membrane tubing (Mr cutoff
14,000 number 2) for dialysis was obtained from Fisher Scientific Co.
The following commercially available materials were used as received:
AA, docosahexaenioc acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA),
eicosatrienoic acid (ETA),
-linolenic acid (
-LA), linoleic acid
(LA), chicken egg ovalbumin (CEO, grade V, 99%), bovine serum albumin
(BSA, fraction V, 96-99%), human serum albumin (HSA, fraction V), and
disodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate, were from Sigma;
keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH, ICN Biochemicals); goat anti-rabbit
IgG-alkaline phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals):
p-(N,N-dimethylamino)benzaldehyde (DMAB, Aldrich,
WI). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was prepared from a pH 7.4 stock
solution containing 0.2 M
NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, 3.0 M NaCl, and 0.02% NaN3 (w/w). This solution
was diluted 20 times as needed. LGE2 (34),
iso[4]LGE2 (35), and 4-oxopentanal-BSA (36) were prepared
as described previously. LDL was isolated (37) from human plasma and
oxidized in vitro to give oxLDL as described previously
(27). HNE-HSA, NaCNBH3-reduced HNE-HSA, and MDA-HSA were
prepared as described previously (38). ON-KLH antibodies (36) and
LGE2-KLH antibodies (27) were prepared as described previously.
Iso[4]LGE2-KLH Antigen
A PBS solution containing 3.1 mM
iso[4]LGE2 (1.3 mg, 3.69 µmol) and 1.5 µM
KLH (9.84 mg, 7.96 mg/ml, 4.92 µmol of lysyl residues) was incubated
at room temperature for 1 h. The solution was then dialyzed
against PBS (3 × 1 liters over 60 h) at room temperature. After dialysis, the final volume of the solution was adjusted to 5 ml.
The final protein concentration, 1.25 mg/ml, was determined by the
Pierce bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay (39) using solutions of
BSA as standards.
Ehrlich Pyrrole Assay of Iso[4]LGE2-Protein
Adducts
An Ehrlich pyrrole assay (40, 41) was performed to determine the
concentration of protein-bound iso[4]LGE2-derived
pyrroles as described previously for determining the concentration of
LGE2-derived pyrroles (15, 27). Tritium-labeled
LGE2-HSA and LGE2-BSA were used as a standards
for the assay. The amount of LGE2 bound to HSA or BSA was
determined by quantitative radiochemical analysis. The data for the
standards (Fig. 2) fits the equation:
[pyrrole (µmol)] = 2.22 (absorbance at 586 nm). The absorption
maximum (
max) for LGE2-HSA-derived and
iso[4]LGE2-BSA-derived Ehrlich pyrrole assay chromophores
were 586 and 584 nm, respectively. The concentration of pyrrole was
presumed to be equal to the concentration of LGE2 that is
bound to BSA or HSA. This assumes a quantitative yield of protein-bound
LGE2-derived pyrrole. Thus, the concentration of pyrrole
estimated by Ehrlich assay is an upper limit for protein-bound iso[4]LGE2-derived pyrrole. The pyrrole concentration in
the iso[4]LGE2-KLH solution is 0.52 mM
KLH-bound iso[4]LGE2.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The correlation between
LGE2-bound to absorbance at 586 nm for the Ehrlich pyrrole
assay, using DMAB and HCl, of LGE2-protein adducts:
LGE2-BSA ( ) and LGE2-HSA ( ).
|
|
Iso[4]LGE2-BSA Coating Agent
A PBS solution containing 4.54 mM
iso[4]LGE2 (1.6 mg, 4.54 µmol) and 0.2 mM
BSA (13.2 mg, 11.7 µmol of lysyl residues) was incubated at 37 °C
for 12 h. The solution was then dialyzed against PBS (4 × 500 ml) over 48 h at room temperature. After dialysis, the final
volume of the solution was adjusted to 6 ml. The final protein
concentration, determined using the Pierce BCA protein assay as
described above, was 1.85 mg/ml. The pyrrole concentration, 0.59 mM BSA-bound iso[4]LGE2, was determined by an
Ehrlich assay using LGE2-BSA and LGE2-HSA as standards.
Iso[4]LGE2-HSA Standard
A PBS solution containing 3.55 mM
iso[4]LGE2 (2.5 mg, 7.10 µmol) and 0.16 mM
HSA (20.6 mg, 18.30 µmol of lysyl residues) was incubated at 37 °C
for 16 h. The solution was then dialyzed against PBS (3 × 1 liters) for 48 h at room temperature. The final volume of the
solution was adjusted to 10 ml. The final protein concentration, determined using Pierce BCA protein assay as described above, was 1.81 mg/ml. The pyrrole concentration, 0.52 mM HSA-bound
iso[4]LGE2, was determined by Ehrlich assay using
LGE2-BSA and LGE2-HSA as standards.
Immunization
The immunogen, iso[4]LGE2-KLH (5.0 mg) containing
0.75 µmol of iso[4]LGE2 per mg of KLH, was diluted to 5 ml with pH 7.4 PBS. An aliquot (500 µl) was emulsified in Freund's
complete adjuvant (500 µl). Each of two Pasturella free, New Zealand
White rabbits (Hazelton) were inoculated intradermally into several
sites on the back (200 µl) and rear leg (200 µl). Booster
injections of iso[4]LGE2-KLH with Freund's incomplete
adjuvant were given every 21 days. Antibody titer was monitored 10 days
after each inoculation by ELISA as described below.
Antibody Purification
The iso[4]LGE2-KLH immune serum from the 73 day
bleeding of rabbit 1, containing 34.4 mg/ml protein, as determined by
absorbance at 280 nm (A280 = 1.35 for 1.0 mg/ml), was purified using a protein G column as described previously
(21). The resulting antibody solution (8.75 ml) contained 1.47 mg/ml
purified IgGs. This corresponded to 13.3% of the total protein in the
immune serum.
ELISA
For all ELISAs, unless otherwise noted, duplicates of each
sample were run on the same plate.
Antibody Titers--
For determination of antibody levels in
rabbit blood serum, iso[4]LGE2-BSA containing 10 mol of
pyrrole/mol of protein, was used as coating agent. The
iso[4]LGE2-BSA conjugate (100 µl of a solution
containing 4.4 mg/ml in pH 7.4 PBS) was added to each well of a
sterilized Baxter ELISA plate. The plate was then incubated at 37 °C
for 1 h in a moist chamber. After discarding the coating solution,
each well was washed with PBS (3 × 300 µl), then filled with
1.0% CEO in PBS (300 µl), and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h to
block remaining active sites on the plastic phase. Each well was washed
with 0.1% CEO in PBS (300 µL) and then 100 µl of rabbit serum from
each bleeding diluted 1:10,000 with 0.2% CEO in PBS, or 0.2% CEO in
PBS without serum for a blank, was dispensed into the sample wells.
Normal rabbit, i.e. prior to inoculation with antigen, serum
diluted as above was employed as a negative response control. The ELISA
was completed as described previously (21). The antibody titer rose
abruptly after 3 weeks, reaching a plateau within about 30 days (Fig.
3).
Competitive Antibody Binding Inhibition Studies--
For
antibody binding inhibition studies to measure cross-reactivities, an
iso[4]LGE2-BSA adduct was used as coating agent and
iso[4]LGE2-HSA was used as a standard. On each ELISA
plate, a blank, a positive control containing no inhibitor, and up to 10 serial dilutions of each inhibitor and the
iso[4]LGE2-HSA standard were run. The standard was
prepared by diluting a 1.04 mM HSA-bound iso[4]LGE2 solution in PBS to 104 µM with
pH 7.4 PBS. A serial dilution of factor 0.2 was used. Each well of the
plate was coated with iso[4]LGE2-BSA solution (100 µl),
prepared by diluting a solution containing 1.08 mM
BSA-bound iso[4]LGE2 in PBS to 432 nM with pH
7.4 PBS. The plate was covered with a plastic lid and placed in
incubator at 37 °C for 1 h, and then allowed to come to room
temperature. After discarding the supernatant, each well was washed
with pH 7.4 PBS (3 × 300 µl) and then blocked by incubating 1 h at 37 °C with 300 µl of 1% CEO in pH 7.4 PBS. After
coming to room temperature, the supernatant was discarded and the wells rinsed with 0.1% CEO in pH 7.4 PBS (300 µl). For each sample and the
iso[4]LGE2-HSA standard, the undiluted sample solution
(150 µl) and aliquots (150 µl) of up to nine 1:10 serial dilutions with 5 mM pH 7.4 PBS were incubated in test tubes at
37 °C for 1 h with antibody solution (150 µl) that was
prepared by adding the required amount of protein G column purified
antibody (0.294 µg/ml) in pH 7.4 PBS to 0.2% CEO in pH 7.4 PBS (2.8 µl/14 ml of 2% CEO). The remaining ELISA procedure and similar
antibody binding inhibition studies with LGE2-KLH antibody,
LGE2-BSA adduct as coating agent, and LGE2-HSA
as standard were performed as described previously (21).
Cross-reactivity of LGE2-Lysine Lactam and
Hydroxylactam--
A mixture of LGE2-lysine lactam and
hydroxylactam adducts was obtained by incubating LGE2 with
[3H]lysine (27,00 cpm/µg) under argon overnight at
37 °C. The mixture was applied to a C18 SepPak cartridge
(Waters) that had been preconditioned with methanol (5 ml) and water
(10 ml). The SepPak was washed with heptane (10 ml) and heptane/ethyl
acetate (1:1, v/v, 10 ml) before elution with methanol/ethyl acetate
(2:3, v/v, 10 ml). The eluate was dried, resuspended in 10% aqueous
methanol, and subjected to HPLC (4.6 × 250 mm Macrosphere 300 C18 column from Alltech; 10 min in 0.1% aqueous acetic
acid, then 30% acetonitrile in 0.1% aqueous acetic acid; 1 ml/min).
Fractions (1 ml) were collected and aliquots subjected to scintillation
counting. Aliquots of fractions exhibiting UV absorbance at 205 nm
(Fig. 4A) and containing
radioactivity, which indicates the incorporation of lysine, were
assessed by LC/MS (Fig. 4, B and C) by direct
infusion using a Finnigan TSQ7000 spectrometer with the sheath gas held at 70 p.s.i., auxiliary gas at 10 p.s.i., and with 25 volts
on the capillary, a capillary temperature of 220 °C, and the tube lens voltage at 90 V. Fractions deemed to contain only compounds with
the molecular ion of the lactam (m/z 479.4) or hydroxylactam (m/z 495.4) adducts and were combined. None of these
fractions contained detectable amounts of the LGE2-derived
pyrrole which would show [MH]+ = 463, [M + H
H2O]+ = 445, or [M + Na]+ = 485. The resulting mixture of lactam and hydroxylactam adducts was again
analyzed by LC/MS, revealing no contamination by compounds with the
molecular ion of the pyrrole adduct (m/z 463). The putative lactam and hydroxylactam adducts were also subjected to
collision-induced dissociation, which resulted in fragmentation
patterns consistent with the structures assigned to the compounds (19).
A sample containing 50 ng each of LGE2-lysine lactam and
hydroxylactam was dissolved in PBS/EtOH (75 µl, 4:1, v/v) to give 140 pmol/well as final concentration. LGE2-BSA was used as
coating agent and LGE2-HSA was used as standard to measure
cross-reactivity. The ELISA was done as under "Competitive Antibody
Binding Inhibition Studies."

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of LGE2-lysine lactam
and hydroxylactam adducts. A, LGE2-lysine
adducts collected from solid phase extraction on a C18
Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters) were subjected to reverse phase HPLC.
Compounds exhibiting absorbance at 205 nm were analyzed by LC/MS. Peaks
corresponding to hydroxylactam adducts are labeled H and
those corresponding to lactam adducts are labeled L. A
typical mass spectrum of a hydroxylactam adduct is shown in
B and contains the protonated molecular ion as well as ions
resulting from sodium adduction and dehydration that occurs in the mass
spectrometer. A typical spectrum of a lactam adduct is shown in
C; it also displays ions corresponding to the molecular ion
of the LGE2-lysine lactam as well as ions resulting from
sodium adduction and dehydration.
|
|
Autoxidation of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) in the
Presence of HSA--
Fatty acid (2 mg) and HSA (30 mg, 0.45 µmol)
were dissolved in 0.1 M PBS (10 ml). Autoxidation was
started by addition of 20 mM sodium ascorbate (510 µl)
and 0.8 mM FeSO4·7H2O (510 µl) (42). The solutions were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h under air. After incubation the reaction was quenched by adding 1 mM EDTA (200 µl) to each solution which then was dialyzed
against pH 7.4 PBS (2 × 2 liters) for 40 h at room
temperature. Samples of PUFAs that had been oxidized in the presence of
HSA were analyzed for LGE2-, iso[4]LGE2-, and
HNE-derived epitopes by ELISAs using LGE2-KLH (27),
iso[4]LGE2-KLH, or ON-KLH (36) antibodies, respectively, in pH 7.4 PBS containing 0.001% TweenTM 20 and 0.2%
CEO.
LGE2- and Iso[4]LGE2-Protein
Immunoreactivity in OxLDL--
ELISA of oxLDL was performed the same
as the inhibition assays, except a dilution factor of 0.3 was employed.
The starting concentration was the undiluted samples. The time
dependence of appearance of protein-bound LGE2- and
iso[4]LGE2-derived epitopes during oxidation of LDL was
determined as described in our previous study of
LGE2-pyrrole generation during oxidation of LDL (27).
Trapping ELISA Detection of Free LGE2--
To detect
any free LGE2 that may be released upon oxidation of LDL, a
trapping ELISA was done on the ultrafiltrate from oxLDL. Thus, LDL (0.5 mg/ml) was dialyzed at 5 °C for 5 h against pH 7.4 PBS (4 liters), and then for 12 h against fresh buffer (4 liters). The
LDL was then incubated at 37 °C with 10 µM
CuSO4. The reaction product mixture was then filtered using
an Ultrafree-CL filter unit (NMWL: 10,000) for 3 h in a Beckmann
centrifuge at 5 °C and 4,000 rpm. Each well of a microtiter plate
was coated with 100 µl of BSA (1 mg/ml) in pH 7.4 PBS and was
incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Following washing once with PBS,
samples for a standard curve containing LGE2 (0-35
pmol/well), or the filtrate from oxLDL were added to the wells (100 µl/well). After incubation for 3 h at 37 °C followed by
washing once with PBS, each well was filled with 300 µl of 1% CEO
for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing once with 0.1% CEO, 100 µl
of KLH-LGE2 antibody was added to each well and the plate
was gently shaken for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes
with 0.1% CEO, 100 µl/well of goat anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline
phosphatase (1:1,000) was added and the mixture was incubated for
1 h at room temperature. After washing three times with 0.1% CEO,
100 µl of disodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate (10 mg) in
water (11 ml, pH adjusted to 9.6 using NaOH) containing glycine (50 mM) and MgCl2 (1 mM) were added and
the resulting mixture was incubated for about 20 min at room
temperature. The reaction was terminated by adding 3 M NaOH
(50 µl) to each well, and the absorbance was read at 405 nm on a
micro-ELISA plate reader. A standard curve, constructed from absorbance
data for solutions containing 0-35 pmol/well of LGE2 (Fig.
5) showed a linear increase in absorbance
with LGE2 concentration in the standard solutions. No
absorbance was observed for any of the wells treated with ultrafiltrate from oxLDL.
 |
RESULTS |
Synthesis of Iso[4]LGE2-protein
Adducts--
Iso[4]LGE2 is a chemically sensitive
vinylogous
-hydroxy aldehyde that was freshly prepared for reaction
with proteins (BSA, HSA, and KLH) to afford
iso[4]LGE2-protein adducts. We previously showed that for
high LGE2/protein ratios, Paal-Knorr condensation of
LGE2 with
-amino groups of lysyl residues of proteins
gives mainly LGE2-derived protein-bound pyrrole (21).
Earlier studies also demonstrated that quantitative analysis of
LGE2-derived protein-bound pyrroles can be accomplished
using the Ehrlich assay that measures the absorbance of a blue-green
chromophore generated by the condensation of LGE2-pyrrole
with DMAB (15).
For the present study, iso[4]LGE2-protein adducts, rich
in iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole, were prepared by exposing various
proteins to an excess of iso[4]LGE2. The levels of
protein-bound iso[4]LGE2-derived pyrrole in these adducts
were determined by Ehrlich assays (40, 41) using
LGE2-protein adducts as standards since the availability of
radiolabeled LGE2 allowed an accurate independent
assessment of LGE2 content in these standard samples. As
expected, the chromophore generated by the condensation of
iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole with DMAB is very similar to that from
LGE2-pyrrole. Thus, the absorption maxima
(
max) observed for the LGE2-HSA-DMAB and
iso[4]LGE2-BSA-DMAB chromophores are 586 and 584 nm,
respectively. It is reasonable to presume that the structurally similar
Ehrlich chromophore derived from an iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole
has the same extinction coefficient as that derived from an
LGE2-pyrrole.
A linear correlation was obtained for a plot of pyrrole concentration
verses absorbance at 586 nm for the DMAB chromophore of
LGE2-derived protein-bound pyrroles in LGE2-BSA
and LGE2-HSA (see Fig. 2). The concentration of
LGE2-derived protein-bound pyrrole in LGE2-HSA
was taken to be equal to the total amount of protein-bound
LGE2 (0-500 nmol/sample) as determined by quantitative radiochemical analysis. This assumes a quantitative yield for pyrrole
formation. Therefore, the use of LGE2-protein-derived pyrrole as a standard for the Ehrlich assay provides an upper limit for
the concentration of iso[4]LGE2-protein-derived pyrrole. The final protein concentrations in iso[4]LGE2-protein
adducts were determined by BCA protein assay (39) and the ratios of iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole to protein were calculated (Table
I).
Lactam, and Hydroxylactam Epitopes in LGE2-Protein
Adducts--
Studies detailed elsewhere (19), employing mass spectral
detection of lipid-modified lysine to characterize epitopes generated by covalent adduction of LGE2 with proteins, uncovered
oxidative modifications that append one or two atoms of oxygen to
protein-bound LGE2-derived pyrroles. Thus, while
LGE2-lysine adduct containing the expected
lysine-LGE2-pyrrole could be prepared if oxygen is rigorously excluded, exposure to air or enzymatic proteolysis of
LGE2-protein adduct produced only mono- and dioxygenated
lysine-LGE2-pyrrole. These oxidized pyrroles almost
certainly are lactams and hydroxylactams (Fig.
6) generated by well known free
radical-initiated reactions of molecular oxygen with electron-rich
pyrroles (45, 46).
These oxidized derivatives of LGE2-pyrrole cross-react
strongly with LGE2-KLH antibodies. Thus, a sample
containing a mixture of lysine-LGE2-lactam and
lysine-LGE2-hydroxylactam was isolated by HPLC from a
Paal-Knorr condensation of LGE2 with radiolabeled lysine
and subsequent oxidation by adventitous oxygen. Quantitative radiochemical analysis in conjunction with an ELISA comparison of
binding with LGE2-KLH antibodies, showed 256%
cross-reactivity for the hydroxylactam-lactam mixture relative to the
LGE2-HSA standard.
Specificity of LGE2- and Iso[4]LGE2-KLH
Antibodies--
Structural specificities were also examined for the
LGE2-KLH and iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibodies to
selectively recognize the LGE2-HSA and
iso[4]LGE2-HSA standards, respectively. ELISA
binding inhibition studies for
cross-reactivity of iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibody (Fig. 7) and
LGE2-KLH antibody (Fig. 8)
with various haptens demonstrated excellent specificity for both
antibodies. Thus, neither antibody recognizes a protein-bound
2-methylpyrrole, 4-oxopentanal-BSA (36), that lacks prostanoid or
isoprostanoid side chains. The data presented in Table
II establish that each of these
antibodies shows outstandingly low cross-reactivity toward protein
adducts of the structurally isomeric levulinaldehyde derivative. Thus, the LGE2-KLH antibodies bind LGE2-HSA 200 times
more strongly than they bind iso[4]LGE2-HSA, while the
iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibodies bind
iso[4]LGE2-HSA at least 2000 times more strongly than
they bind LGE2-HSA. Furthermore, cross-reactivity of either
antibody toward HSA, native LDL, or HSA adducts of
(E)-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) or malondialdehyde (MDA) was
not detected.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Inhibition curves showing cross-reactivity of
iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibody for iso[4]LGE2-HSA
( ), 4-oxopentanal-BSA ( ), LGE2-HSA ( ), LDL ( ),
and HSA ( ) against iso[4]LGE2-BSA as coating
agent.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Inhibition curves showing cross-reactivity of
LGE2-KLH antibody for iso[4]LGE2-HSA ( ),
4-oxopentanal-BSA ( ), LGE2-HSA ( ), LDL ( ), and HSA
( ) against LGE2-BSA as coating agent.
|
|
Generation of LGE2-HSA and Iso[4]LGE2-HSA
Immunoreactivity by Fe2+-catalyzed Oxidation of AA but Not
Linoleic Acid (LA) or Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)--
In
vitro free radical oxidations of a variety of PUFAs with iron and
ascorbate were performed in the presence of HSA. Immunoreactive protein-bound epitopes were detected by
ELISAs with LGE2-KLH (Fig. 9) and
iso[4]LGE2-KLH (Fig. 10)
antibodies in the reaction product mixture from AA but not in the
reaction product mixture from LA. Similar experiments with
-linolenic (
-LA), DHA, ETA, and EPA acids revealed the generation
of protein epitopes that cross-react with LGE2-KLH and
iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibodies from
-LA, ETA, and EPA, but
not DHA (see below).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Inhibition curves for binding of
anti-LGE2-KLH to LGE2-BSA by
LGE2-HSA standard ( ), LGE2-HSA generated
during the oxidation of AA ( ), but not LA ( ), in the presence of
HSA.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Inhibition curves for binding of
anti-iso[4]LGE2-KLH to iso[4]LGE2-BSA by
iso[4]LGE2-HSA standard ( ),
iso[4]LGE2-HSA generated during the oxidation of AA
( ), but not LA ( ), in the presence of HSA.
|
|
LGE2-Protein and Iso[4]LGE2-Protein
Adduct Immunoreactivity in OxLDL--
LDL was oxidized by dialyzing an
aqueous solution of LDL in air against a buffer containing
Cu2+, an in vitro model (2) for physiological
oxidation of LDL. Oxidation was halted after various time periods by
sequestration of Cu2+ with Na2EDTA added to an
aliquot of the reaction mixture. After an induction period, during
which the endogenous antioxidants presumably were consumed, immunoreactivity toward both
LGE2-KLH (Fig. 11) and iso[4]LGE2-KLH (Fig.
12) antibodies increased rapidly, reaching a plateau after several hours. The immunoreactivity detected for LGE2-protein and iso[4]LGE2-protein
epitopes in the oxLDL corresponded to a final ratio of 1:4,
respectively.
Free LGE2 Is Not Present in OxLDL--
A trapping
ELISA was used detect any free LGE2 that might be present
in the reaction product mixture generated by in vitro oxidation of LDL in the presence of Cu2+. Free
LGE2 can be trapped by the protein coating agent (BSA) to
give immunoreactive LGE2-pyrrole epitope. Thus, a linear
increase in absorbance was found for increasing concentrations of free LGE2 (see Fig. 5). However, the wells treated with
ultrafiltrate from oxLDL showed no absorbance, indicating that they
contained no free LGE2.
 |
DISCUSSION |
IsoLGs--
The chemistry of LDL oxidation is quite complex. A
plethora of lipid oxidation products is generated, and some of these
covalently modify LDL protein, apolipoprotein (apo) B (3, 4). Two
aldehydic fragmentation products, MDA and HNE, have been studied
extensively because they form adducts with apoB, and because the
MDA-LDL (47) and HNE-LDL (48) adducts could be atherogenic, in contrast
with native LDL. Besides protein-bound HNE, free HNE is detectable in
oxLDL. In a recent study, free HNE was quantitatively analyzed by an
"HNE-trapping ELISA" based on the detection of epitopes generated
when HNE is trapped by a protein that has been coated onto an
immunoplate (49). This study demonstrated that a considerable amount of
free HNE is released from human plasma LDL upon
Cu2+-promoted oxidation. In contrast, employing an
analogous LGE2-trapping-ELISA, we now find no
evidence for the presence of free LGE2 in LDL that has
undergone Cu2+-promoted oxidation. This is expected
because, as we have noted elsewhere (8, 19), LGE2 binds
with proteins far more avidly than HNE. There is a physiological
steady-state concentration of free HNE in human venous blood plasma
(50, 51). In contrast, the generation of LGs and iso[n]LGs
in vivo must be inferred from detection of protein-bound
derivatives. Studies employing the new iso[4]LGE2-KLH
antibodies to detect iso[4]LGE2-derived protein epitopes
in vivo are in progress. Preliminary results show that these
protein modifications are present in human blood plasma, confirming the
hypothesis that a family of levulinaldehyde derivatives is generated
in vivo by a free radical-induced oxidation of AA-PC (Fig.
13). Thus, non-regioselective hydrogen
atom abstraction from the 7, 10, and 13 positions of an arachidonyl
ester produces three regioisomeric pentadienyl radicals. These then
react with molecular oxygen to afford four regioisomeric
peroxyeicosatetraenoyl radicals that undergo peroxy radical cyclization
(28, 52) to deliver four structurally isomeric endoperoxides. Besides
the geometrically enforced cis relationship of the
endoperoxide oxygens and a preference for peroxy radical cyclization to
produce stereoisomers with cis disposed side chains (28),
each structurally isomeric endoperoxide is expected to be generated as
a mixture of 16 stereoisomers that are referred to collectively as
isoPGH2 or iso[n]PGH2 where
[n] specifies the number of carbon atoms in the carboxyl
side chain of the non-prostanoid structural isomers. Each endoperoxide
rearranges to form two structurally isomeric isoLGs or
iso[n]LGs, designated as E series if the acetyl
substituent is nearer than the formyl substituent to the carboxyl group
or as D series if the formyl is nearer than the acetyl to the
carboxyl.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 13.
The iso[n]LG cascade of
levulinaldehyde derivatives generated by free radical-induced oxidation
of AA-PC.
|
|
Paal-Knorr condensation of the eight structurally isomeric isoLGs and
iso[n]LGs with protein primary amino groups produces eight
different pyrrole epitopes. We previously reported chemical evidence
for the initial formation of pyrroles that incorporate the
-amino
group of protein lysyl residues (15). Our recent studies employing mass
spectral detection of lipid-modified lysine uncovered the facile
oxidation of LGE2-derived pyrroles leading to lactam and
hydroxylactam derivatives, and confirmed that isoLG-derived lysyl group
modifications are present in oxLDL (19). Those studies also
demonstrated the formation of LGD2 epimers in the free
radical-induced oxidation of AA. Since LGD2-protein and
LGE2-protein adducts can be produced by the enzymatic COX
pathway, only detection of iso[n]LG-protein adducts,
i.e. with nonprostanoid side chains, can provide unambiguous evidence for the operation in vivo of the free
radical-promoted oxidative pathway summarized in Fig. 13. We now have
two orthogonal polyclonal rabbit antibodies, i.e. that
recognize and strongly discriminate between, LGE2-protein
and iso[4]LGE2-protein adducts.
As expected, LGE2-protein and
iso[4]LGE2-protein immunoreactivity are produced by free
radical oxidation of AA but not LA, the most abundant polyunsaturated
fatty acid in LDL. We now have a panel of five antibodies that
specifically detect epitopes produced by the adduction of different
lipid oxidation products with proteins (Table
III). In the reaction product mixture
from in vitro oxidation of AA in the presence of HSA,
pyrrole epitopes derived from HNE and 5-hydroxy-8-oxo-6-octenoic acid
(HOOA) were detected previously. HNE-pyrrole was also detected in the
reaction product mixture from in vitro oxidation of LA in
the presence of HSA. On the other hand, pyrrole epitopes derived from
9-hydroxy-12-oxo-10-dodecenoic acid (HODA) are a selective marker for
LA oxidation in the presence of protein.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Oxidation of LA or AA in the presence of HSA
LA (7.13 mmol) or AA (6.6 mmol) and HSA (0.45 mmol) in pH 7.4 PBS (0.1 M) were incubated at 37 °C in the presence of ascorbate
(0.9 mM) and FeSO4 (37 µM) for
24 h under air.
|
|
HNE-pyrrole epitope (detected with ON-KLH antibody) was generated in
the oxidation of
-6 but not
-3 PUFAs in the presence of HSA.
Thus, the
-6 acids LA,
-LA, AA, and ETA all afforded immunoreactivity detectable with ON-KLH antibodies while the
-3 acids DHA and EPA did not (Table IV).
Although LA and AA are the major PUFAs in normal human serum
phospholipids, oxidative cleavage of ETA in vivo may produce
significant amounts of HNE.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Immunoreactivity (% of value for AA) generated by oxidation of PUFAs
in the presence of HSA
PUFA (2.0 mg) and HSA (0.45 µmol) in pH 7.4 PBS (0.1 M,
10 ml) were incubated 24 h at 37 °C in the presence of
FeSO4 (37 µM) and ascorbate (0.9 mM)
under air. Immunoreactivity is relative to HSA-iso[4]LGE2,
HSA-LGE2, and HSA-ON standards.
|
|
Oxidation of
-LA, ETA, and EPA in the presence of HSA produces
protein epitopes that cross-react with LGE2-KLH and
iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibodies. The levels of ETA and EPA in
human LDL vary greatly with diet (Table IV) and, therefore, the LDL
from some individuals can contain levels of these PUFAs that may
contribute significantly to the generation of LGE2-KLH or
iso[4]LGE2-KLH immunoreactivity. The selective generation
of iso[4]LGE2-KLH immunoreactivity from
-LA,
LGE2-KLH immunoreactivity from ETA, and both
LGE2-KLH and iso[4]LGE2-KLH immunoreactivity
from EPA (Table IV) is a reasonable consequence of the fact that only a
close structural analogue of iso[4]LGE2 is expected to be
generated upon oxidation of
-LA, a LGE2 analogue upon
oxidation of ETA, and analogues of both iso[4]LGE2 and
LGE2 upon oxidation of EPA (Fig.
14).
LGE2 and Iso[4]LGE2 Epitope
Families--
Owing to concerns that LG-derived protein-bound pyrroles
would be readily modified by oxidation, our earliest efforts to detect LGE2-derived protein epitopes immunologically relied upon
cross-reactivity of those epitopes with antibodies raised against a
stable pyrazole isostere-derived antigen (53). Quite unexpectedly, the
immunoreactivity generated by the reaction of LGE2 with
proteins showed no decrease over several weeks. While this could be the
result of some stabilizing influence of the protein matrix on an
otherwise readily oxidizable pyrrole hapten, we recognized the
possibility of an alternative explanation. Thus, if the molecular
fragment responsible for antibody recognition is preserved in secondary
products derived from the initially formed pyrroles, e.g.
the corresponding lactam or hydroxylactam (Fig. 6), in particular two
prostanoid side chains appended to neighboring
sp2 carbons on a five-membered ring, then large
changes in antibody binding need not accompany transformations of the
LGE2-pyrrole into these secondary products. Thus, in
contrast with the excellent discrimination for variations in the side
chains appended to the pyrrole ring at positions 3 and 4, both the
LGE2-KLH and iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibodies could
show a high tolerance for modifications at the 2 and 5 positions of the
pyrrole ring. Furthermore, the LGE2-pyrrole and
iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole antigens most probably were oxidized
after administration to rabbits, and therefore, some or all of the
LGE2-KLH and iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibodies in the
polyclonal mixtures were raised against lactam or hydroxylactam
epitopes. Since the side chains on the pyrrole, lactam, and
hydroxylactam epitopes are appended to coplanar
sp2-hybridized carbons, they are restricted to
the same coplanar geometry. This conformational rigidity is probably
responsible for the excellent discrimination by LGE2-KLH
and iso[4]LGE2-KLH antibodies for LGE2- and
iso[4]LGE2-derived haptens, respectively. Thus, although
the functionality in the side chains of LGE2-
and iso[4]LGE2-protein adducts is the same, the different
lengths of the side chains and restriction of conformational
possibilities for their disposition results in strong but geometrically
different interactions of the polar functional groups in each side
chain with the respective antibodies.
Quantitative Analysis of LGE2 and
Iso[4]LGE2--
Previously, we used quantitative
radiochemical analysis to accurately determine the amount of
LGE2 contained in protein adduct standards. Because
radiolabeled iso[4]LGE2 is not presently available, we
had to employ a less direct method to determine the amount of
iso[4]LGE2-derived pyrrole present in the
iso[4]LGE2-KLH antigen, iso[4]LGE2-BSA
coating agent, and iso[4]LGE2-HSA standard. While the
Ehrlich assay is not sensitive enough to detect the low concentrations of iso[4]LGE2-derived pyrroles present in human blood or
generated upon oxidation of LDL, it was feasible to use this assay to
compare the concentrations of LGE2-derived and
iso[4]LGE2-derived pyrroles in the protein adducts
prepared as standards. The iso[4]LGE2 to protein ratios,
i.e. 21, 30 and 1257 mol/mol, calculated for the BSA, HSA,
and KLH adducts, are higher than found previously for analogous
LGE2-protein adducts, i.e. 10.5, 11.9, and 951 mol/mol of BSA, HSA, and KLH (21). Furthermore, in an earlier study, when BSA was exposed to a large excess (125 equivalents) of
tritium-labeled LGE2, one molecule of BSA was found to bind
a maximum of about 16 molecules of LGE2 (14). It seems
reasonable to expect that a similar limit would apply to binding of
iso[4]LGE2, Especially important is the concentration of
iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole determined for
iso[4]LGE2-HSA because this standard was used to
calculate the amount of iso[4]LGE2-pyrrole in oxLDL
samples. The 30:1 ratio determined indirectly by Ehrlich assay for
iso[4]LGE2-HSA seems to overestimate the actual levels by
factor of two. The concentrations of iso[4]LGE2-protein
adduct indicated in the figures and tables must be interpreted in light
of this caveat.
Possible Etiological Importance of LGs and Iso[n]LGs in
Artheriosclerosis--
With mouse peritoneal macrophages, we
previously showed that the covalent adduct of LGE2 with
human LDL (LGE2-LDL) is internalized and degraded if the
molar ratio of LGE2 to LDL protein, apoB, exceeds a
threshold somewhere between 10:1 and 38:1 (8). OxLDL, but not
acetyl-LDL that is recognized by the prototypical scavenger receptor,
efficiently competed for receptor binding and uptake of
LGE2-LDL. This result suggests that LGE2-LDL
was recognized by a class of scavenger receptor that demonstrated
ligand specificity for oxLDL but not for acetyl-LDL. However, our
previous study of LDL oxidation found that only 1-2 mol of
LGE2-protein adduct are generated per mole of apoB
(27). Nevertheless, it is reasonable to anticipate that macrophage
recognition of iso[n]LG-LDLs will be similar to that
of LGE2-LDL, and that total levels of LG and iso[n]LG protein adducts in oxLDL are sufficient to
account for the recognition and uptake of oxLDL by human
monocyte-macrophages in the arterial wall, a key step in the etiology
of atherosclerosis. Thus, substantial evidence now suggests that
atherosclerotic plaques form when monocytes are recruited into the
arterial intima to become macrophages where they grow into bloated,
lipid-laden foam cells by accumulating large amounts of oxLDL (1, 9,
54).
Studies on the localization of immunoreactive LG-protein and
iso[4]LG-protein epitopes in human atherosclerotic plaques are in
progress in our laboratories. The details of these studies will be
reported in due course. Since deficient processing of oxLDL in
macrophages leads to foam cell formation, it is especially noteworthy
that processing of LGE2-LDL exhibits an inefficiency similar to that found for oxLDL and, therefore, that incompletely processed LGE2-LDL accumulates in macrophages (8). The
resistance to lysozomal degradation of oxLDL which accumulates in
macrophages may be a consequence of continued oxidative modification or
aggregation of the particles which occurs following uptake
(55). In this regard, it is especially pertinent that LGE2
binds avidly (within minutes) with proteins (14), and the reaction of
LGE2 with proteins generates reactive electrophilic
intermediates that are responsible for a slower process,
protein-protein cross-linking (14, 17). In other words, LG- and
iso[n]LG-protein adducts are expected to be "sticky,"
readily forming protein-protein cross-links by binding to additional
protein-based nucleophiles. It is tempting to speculate that such
cross-links with proteolytic enzymes interfere with processing of
oxLDL.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Eugenia Baytreva for helpful suggestions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the National Institute of General
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of the Health, Grants GM21249 (to
R. G. S.), GM42056 and GM15431 (to L. J. R.), and
HL52012 (to H. F. H).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry,
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7078. Tel.:
216-368-2592; Fax: 216-368-3006; E-mail: rgs@po.cwru.edu.
2
O. Boutaud, C. J. Brame, R. G. Salomon, L. J. Roberts, II, and J. A. Oates, submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LDL, low density
lipoprotein;
apo, apolipoprotein B;
AA, arachidonic acid;
BCA, bicinchoninic acid;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
CEO, chicken egg
ovalbumin;
COX, cyclooxygenase;
DMAB, p-(N,N-dimethylamino)benzaldehyde);
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid;
ETA, eicosatrienoic acid;
-LA,
-linolenic acid;
HNE, (E)-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal;
HODA, 9-hydroxy-12-oxo-10-dodecenoic acid;
HOHA, 5-hydroxy-8-oxo-6-octenoic
acid;
HSA, human serum albumin;
iso-LGs, isolevuglandins;
isoPs, isoprostanes;
KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin;
LG, levuglandin;
LA, linoleic acid;
MDA, malondialdehyde;
ON, 4-oxononanal;
oxLDL, oxidized LDL;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PC, 2-lysophosphatidylcholine;
PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid;
PG, prostaglandins;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography;
LC/MS, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Steinberg, D.,
Parthasarathy, S.,
Carew, T. E.,
Khoo, J. C.,
and Witztum, J. L.
(1989)
N. Eng. J. Med.
320,
915-924[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Parthasarathy, S.,
Steinberg, D.,
and Witztum, J. L.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Med.
43,
219-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Esterbauer, H.,
Jürgens, G.,
Quehenberger, O.,
and Koller, E.
(1987)
J. Lipid Res.
28,
495-509[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Esterbauer, H.,
Gebicki, J.,
Puhl, H.,
and Jürgens, G.
(1992)
Free Rad. Biol. Med.
13,
341-390[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Steinbrecher, U. P.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
3603-3608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Hoff, H. F.,
Whitaker, T. E.,
and O'Neil, J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
602-609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Haberland, M. E.,
Fogelman, A. M.,
and Edwards, P. A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
1712-1716
|
| 8.
|
Hoppe, G.,
Subbanagounder, G.,
O'Neil, J.,
Salomon, R. G.,
and Hoff, H. F.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1344,
1-5[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Berliner, J. A.,
and Heinecke, J. W.
(1996)
Free Radical Biol. & Med.
20,
707-727[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Salomon, R. G.,
Miller, D. B.,
Zagorski, M. G.,
and Coughlin, D. J.
(1984)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
106,
6049-6060[CrossRef]
|
| 11.
|
Nugteren, D. H.,
and Christ-Hazelhof, E.
(1980)
Adv. Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res.
6,
129-137[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Hamberg, M.,
Svensson, J.,
Wakabayashi, T.,
and Samuelsson, B.
(1974)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
71,
345-349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Nugteren, D. H.,
and Hazelhof, E.
(1973)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
326,
448-461[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Salomon, R. G.,
Jirousek, M. B.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Sharma, R. B.
(1987)
Prostaglandins
34,
643-656[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Iyer, R.,
Kobierski, M. E.,
and Salomon, R. G.
(1994)
J. Org. Chem.
59,
6038-6043[CrossRef]
|
| 16.
|
Iyer, R. S.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Salomon, R. G.
(1989)
Prostaglandins
37,
471-480[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Jirousek, M. R.,
Murthi, K. K.,
and Salomon, R. G.
(1990)
Prostaglandins
40,
611-622
|
| 18.
|
Murthi, K. K.,
Friedman, L. R.,
Oleinick, N. L.,
and Salomon, R. G.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
4090-4097[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Brame, C. J.,
Salomon, R. G.,
Morrow, J. D.,
and Roberts, L. J., II.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13139-13146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Edelstein, C.
(1986)
in
Biochemistry and Biology of Plasma Lipoproteins
(Scanu, A. M.
, and Spector, A. A., eds), Vol. 11
, pp. 495-505, Marcel Dekker, New York
|
| 21.
|
Salomon, R. G.,
Subbanagounder, G.,
O'Neil, J.,
Kaur, K.,
Smith, M. A.,
Hoff, H. F.,
Perry, G.,
and Monnier, V. M.
(1997)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
10,
536-545[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Siesjö, B. K.,
and Wieloch, T.
(1983)
in
Cerebrovascular Diseases
(Reivich, M.
, and Hurtig, H., eds)
, pp. 251-274, Raven Press, New York
|
| 23.
|
Fishman, R. A.,
and Chen, P. H.
(1981)
Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc.
106,
58-61[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Morrow, J. D.,
Hill, K. E.,
Burk, R. F.,
Nammour, T. M.,
Badr, K. F.,
and Roberts, L. J., II
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9383-9387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Morrow, J. D.,
Awad, J. A.,
Boss, H. J.,
Blair, I. A.,
and Roberts, L. J., II
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10721-10725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Lynch, S. M.,
Morrow, J. D.,
Roberts, L. J., II,
and Frei, B.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
93,
998-1004
|
| 27.
|
Salomon, R. G.,
Subbanagounder, G.,
Singh, U.,
O'Neil, J.,
and Hoff, H. F.
(1997)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
10,
750-759[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Porter, N. A.,
and Funk, M. O.
(1975)
J. Org. Chem.
40,
3614-3615[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Jackson, A. H.
(1980)
in
Comprehensive Organic Chemistry
(Barton, D.
, and Ollis, D. W., eds), Vol. 4
, pp. 275-320, Pergamon Press, New York
|
| 30.
|
Steinbrecher, U. P.,
and Pritchard, P. H.
(1989)
J. Lipid Res.
30,
305-315[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Parthasarathy, S.,
and Barnett, J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9741-9745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Reisfeld, N.,
Lichtenberg, D.,
Dagan, A.,
and Yedgar, S.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
315,
267-270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
| Taber, D. F., Morrow, J. D., and Roberts, L. J., II
(1997) 53, 63-67
|
| 34.
|
Miller, D. B.,
Raychaudhuri, S. R.,
Avasthi, K.,
Lal, K.,
Levison, B.,
and Salomon, R. G.
(1990)
J. Org. Chem.
55,
3164-3175[CrossRef]
|
| 35.
|
Salomon, R. G.
(1997)
J. Org. Chem.
62,
7658-7666[CrossRef]
|
| 36.
|
Sayre, L. M.,
Sha, W.,
Xu, G.,
Kaur, K.,
Nadkarni, D.,
Subbanagounder, G.,
and Salomon, R. G.
(1996)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
9,
1194-1201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Hatch, F. T.,
and Lees, R. S.
(1968)
Adv. Lipid Res.
6,
1-68[Medline]
|