Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Millhorn, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Millhorn, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 29, 20358-20365, July 16, 1999


Stimulation of Expression for the Adenosine A2A Receptor Gene by Hypoxia in PC12 Cells
A POTENTIAL ROLE IN CELL PROTECTION*

Shuichi Kobayashi and David E. MillhornDagger

From the Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-576

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The purpose of this study was to examine the regulation of adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) gene expression during hypoxia in pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells. Northern blot analysis revealed that the A2AR mRNA level was substantially increased after a 3-h exposure to hypoxia (5% O2), which reached a peak at 12 h. Immunoblot analysis showed that the A2AR protein level was also increased during hypoxia. Inhibition of de novo protein synthesis blocked A2AR induction by hypoxia. In addition, removal of extracellular free Ca2+, chelation of intracellular free Ca2+, and pretreatment with protein kinase C inhibitors prevented A2AR induction by hypoxia. Moreover, depletion of protein kinase C activity by prolonged treatment with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate significantly inhibited the hypoxic induction of A2AR. A2AR antagonists led to a significant enhancement of A2AR mRNA levels during hypoxia, whereas A2AR agonists caused down-regulation of A2AR expression during hypoxia. This suggests that A2AR regulates its own expression during hypoxia by feedback mechanisms. We further found that activation of A2AR enhances cell viability during hypoxia and also inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor expression in PC12 cells. Thus, increased expression of A2AR during hypoxia might protect cells against hypoxia and may act to inhibit hypoxia-induced angiogenic activity mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adenosine (Ado),1 the final metabolite in the stepwise dephosphorylation of ATP, is produced and released in the central nervous system in response to ischemia and hypoxia (1, 2). Once released, Ado acts locally to decrease pre- and postsynaptic excitability, which protects neurons against the metabolic stress associated with oxygen deprivation (3, 4). Ado mediates its effects on neuronal activity via specific membrane receptors, A1, A2, and A3, that are coupled to adenylate cyclase (AC) via G proteins (5, 6). The A1 and A3 receptors are coupled to Gi protein and cause inhibition of AC, whereas the A2 receptor, which consists of the A2A and A2B receptor subtypes, is coupled to Gs protein and causes an increase in AC activity (6).

There is growing evidence that Ado receptors mediate a protective function during hypoxia (7, 8). This is based largely on the finding that the A1 receptor inhibits excitatory synaptic neurotransmission in the brain during hypoxia (7, 8). The role of the A2 receptor in modulating neuronal activity is less clear. However, the observation that A2 receptors are concentrated in brain regions that are rich in dopamine-containing cells (9, 10) suggests that the A2 receptors are involved in regulating the activity of these cells during hypoxic stress. To test this possibility, we studied the effect of A2 receptor stimulation on membrane excitability in the dopaminergic pheochromocytoma (PC12) cell line (11). PC12 cells express the Ado A2A and A2B receptors but not the A1 and A3 receptors (12, 13). We found that activation of the A2A receptor in PC12 cells attenuated membrane excitability by activation of an outward K+ current and inhibition of an inward voltage-dependent Ca2+ current (13). Thus, the A2 receptor attenuates membrane excitability during hypoxia.

Because of the potential importance of the A2AR in mediating the cellular protection during hypoxia, we wondered if A2AR gene expression is regulated by hypoxia. The current study was undertaken to examine this possibility and to characterize further the role of the A2 receptor in regulating the cellular response to hypoxia. Briefly, we found that A2AR expression is increased during hypoxia by a mechanism that involves increased intracellular free Ca2+, protein kinase C (PKC) and de novo protein synthesis. We also found that A2AR regulates its own expression during hypoxia via a feedback-like mechanism. An important finding was that activation of A2AR increased cell viability during exposure to 1% O2 and that activation of A2AR inhibited expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- PC12 cells were purchased from the American Tissue Culture Collection and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 (Life Technologies, Inc.) that contains 15 mM HEPES buffer, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin (100 units/ml, 100 µg/ml) in an incubator in which the environment (21% O2 and 5% CO2, remainder N2, 37 °C) was strictly maintained. Medium was changed twice a week. When cells reached 70% confluence, they were either exposed to continued normoxia or placed in a hypoxic incubator (Forma Scientific, Marietta, OH) that maintained a constant environment (10% O2 or 5% O2, 5% CO2, balanced with N2) for the specified exposure periods. PKA-deficient PC12 cells (A123.7) (14) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with high glucose with 15 mM HEPES, 10% fetal bovine serum, 5% horse serum, and gentamycin (100 µg/ml) and an environment of 21% O2 and 10% CO2 at 37 °C.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Total cellular RNA was extracted from PC12 cells using TRI-REAGENT (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) according to instructions. The RNA pellets were resuspended in formamide, and the RNA concentration and purity were determined by measurement of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm with a spectrophotometer. An aliquot (20 µg) of total RNA was taken, and the volumes were equilibrated with formamide. An equal volume of denaturation mixture (2× MOPS, 0.8 M formaldehyde) was added to each sample. The samples were then heated to 65 °C for 15 min to ensure complete denaturation and then electrophoresed in a 1% formaldehyde gel (1 × MOPS buffer, 0.4 M formaldehyde, 1% agarose) at 100 V constant voltage using 1× MOPS (0.02 M MOPS, 8 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EGTA) as the running buffer. Following electrophoresis, the RNA was transferred onto a nylon membrane (HybondTM-N+, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by capillary transfer using 20× SCC (3 mM sodium chloride, 0.3 M sodium citrate) as the transfer buffer. The membranes were then UV cross-linked (Fisher) and stained with methylene blue for the purpose of total RNA quantification. The membrane was prehybridized for 2-4 h in a buffer (0.05 M sodium phosphate, 10× SCC, 10× Denhardt's reagent, 0.1 µg/ml denaturated salmon sperm DNA, 50% formamide) and then hybridized overnight in a buffer (same as prehybridization buffer but with 10% dextran sulfate) and 1.0 × 106 cpm/ml radiolabeled probe. Following hybridization, the membranes were washed three times at 55 °C in 2× SCC, 0.1% SDS and then exposed on a storage phosphor screen (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) for 4-5 h. The screen was scanned, and the signals were quantified (StormTM, Molecular Dynamics).

A full-length cDNA encoding the Ado A2A receptor was provided by Dr. J. S. Fink (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA). After bacterial amplification of the plasmid, the EcoRI and XbaI fragment of purified A2A receptor was isolated by electrophoresis on a low melting point agarose gel. The 3'-terminal region, which included both coding and noncoding sequence (1192 base pairs), was used as a probe for A2AR Northern blot analysis. The cDNA probe for VEGF was prepared by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and subsequent ligation of the products into a plasmid vector, pCRTM2.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Primers were constructed based on the reported rat VEGF cDNA sequence (15). The sequences of primers was 5'-CCA TGA ACT TTC TGC TCT CTT-3' and 5'-GGT GAG AGG TCT AGT TCC CGA-3' (predicted length of the amplified DNA fragment is 630 base pairs). The polymerase chain reaction product was sequenced and confirmed to be 100% homology with the reported cDNA sequences. After bacterial amplification of the cloned VEGF cDNA in plasmid pCRTM2.1, a VEGF cDNA fragment was excised using ECORI and isolated by electrophoresis on low melting point agarose gel.

The probes were labeled using a random-primed DNA labeling kit (Prime-A-GeneTM, Promega, Madison, WI) and 2-[alpha -32P]desoxycytidine 5'-trisphosphate (NEN Life Science Products) and then purified on a Sephadex G-50 column (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).

Immunoblotting of A2AR Protein-- The effect of hypoxia on A2AR protein level was determined by Western immunoblot analysis. Cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and harvested by scraping the cells into 400 µl of a solution containing 0.25 M sucrose, 25 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 25 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl2. Cells were concentrated by centrifugation for 5 min at 3000 × g at 4 °C and sonicated at 4 °C for 2 s with a microultrasonic cell disrupter (Kontes, Vineland, NJ) in 200 µl of solution containing 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, freshly added leupeptin (2 µg/ml), aprotinin (2 µg/ml), and dithiothreitol (1 mM). The sample was centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was resuspended in 250 µl of 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM EDTA, freshly added leupeptin (2 µg/ml), aprotinin (2 µg/ml), and dithiothreitol (1 mM) as crude membrane fraction.

Membrane preparations were boiled for 3 min in buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 6.7, 2% SDS, 2% beta -mercaptoethanol, and bromphenol blue as a marker. Samples containing 40 µg of protein were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell) using standard electrophoresis and electroblotting procedures. Prestained molecular weight markers were obtained from Sigma. To reduce nonspecific binding, blots were preincubated for 1 h in a blocking mixture (3% nonfat dry milk, 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.2), 140 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20). Membranes were then incubated with an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody directed against the fourth C-terminal intracellular domain (30 amino acids) of Ado A2A receptor (5 µg/ml; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were then washed three times in a buffer containing 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.2), 140 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature and incubated with a donkey anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; 1:2000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed three times over 1 h in the same buffer. Immunolabeling was detected by ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and quantified using densitometric analysis with an ImagePro digital analysis system (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD). Ado A2AR immunoreactivity was linear over a 10-fold range of protein concentrations.

Cell Viability Assays-- Cell viability was measured as the ability of cells to exclude trypan blue (16). PC12 cells were initially grown in 35-mm dishes and then exposed to normoxia or 1% O2 in the presence or absence of an A2R agonist NECA or an Ado receptor antagonist 8-PT for various times. Cells were then detached by trypsinization, and resuspended in 1 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were further dispersed by passing through a 27-gauge needle. Cells were resuspended in 1 ml of 1 × PBS, and equal volumes of cell suspension and 0.4% trypan blue (Sigma) were mixed and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then counted using a hemocytometer. Cell viability was determined as the ratio of total viable cells (unstained)/total cell (unstained and stained) × 100%.

Data Analysis-- The results were expressed as the mean ± S.E. (n represents the number of observations). The analysis of variance was used for evaluating the significance of the obtained data. Statistical significance was accepted at the conventional p < 0.05 level by two-tail evaluation.

Materials-- Ado, NECA, 8-PT, diltiazem, cyclohexamide, and actinomycin D were obtained from Sigma. BAPTA/AM, chelerythrine chloride, and calmidazolium chloride were purchased from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Effect of Hypoxia on Expression of Ado A2A Receptor mRNA and Protein in PC12 Cells-- Northern blot analyses were performed to determine the effect of hypoxia on A2AR gene expression in PC12 cells. PC12 cells were exposed to a reduced O2 level (10 or 5% O2 in 5% CO2) for 3, 6, 12, or 18 h. The upper panel of Fig. 1A shows the temporal profile of Ado A2AR mRNA expression during hypoxia. It can be seen that exposure to 10 and 5% O2 led to a time-dependent increase in A2AR mRNA, which reached a peak at 12 h. The averaged results from six separate experiments for each level of hypoxia are shown in the lower panel. The increase in A2AR mRNA in cells exposed to 5% O2 was greater at all time points than that measured in cells exposed to 10% O2. These results show clearly that A2AR gene expression is stimulated in a time- and dose-dependent manner by hypoxia in PC12 cells.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of hypoxia on expression of adenosine A2A receptor mRNA and protein in PC12 cells. A, time profiles of Ado A2A receptor mRNA expression during exposure to hypoxia. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points after exposure to 10% O2 or 5% O2, and RNAs were analyzed by Northern blot. The lower panel shows the averaged data from six separate experiments for each time point and O2 level. During exposure to 10% O2, the expression of A2A receptor increased gradually with hypoxia and peaked at 12 h. The change from the prehypoxia base line was significant at 12 h (*, p < 0.05). The A2A receptor mRNA was significantly increased at 6, 12, and 18 h of exposure to 5% O2 (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 from base line). The increase in A2AR mRNA in cells exposed to 5% O2 was greater at all time points than that measured during exposure to 10% O2 (dagger dagger , p < 0.01 from 10% O2). Each bar represents the mean ± S.E. B, representative immunoblot showing the temporal profile of Ado A2A receptor protein during increasing durations of hypoxia (5% O2) in PC12 cells. The amount of A2A receptor protein gradually increased with hypoxia and peaked at 12 h. The averaged results from four separate experiments are provided in the lower panel. A significant increase in A2A receptor protein was measured at 3, 6, 12, and 18 h (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 from base line). Each bar shows the mean ± S.E.

We next performed immunoblot analyses to investigate the effect of hypoxia on the level of A2AR protein in PC12 cells. Fig. 1B shows the profile of A2AR during increasing duration of hypoxia (5% O2) in PC12 cells. It can be seen that the amount of A2AR protein gradually increased with hypoxia and peaked at 12 h, which is a similar time profile to that found for A2AR mRNA. The averaged results from four separate experiments are provided in the lower panel. A significant increase in A2A receptor protein was measured at 3, 6, 12, and 18 h. Thus, hypoxia up-regulates both the A2AR mRNA and protein levels.

Extracelluar Ca2+ Is Essential for Up-regulation of A2A Receptor mRNA during Hypoxia-- Our laboratory has previously shown that an increase in intracellular free Ca2+ is involved in the induction of tyrosine hydroxylase gene expression during hypoxia in PC12 cells (17). We wondered therefore if increased intracellular Ca2+ is involved in regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. To test this possibility, PC12 cells were exposed to hypoxia in the presence and absence of Ca2+ in the extracellular media. In control experiments (normal extracellular Ca2+ levels), exposure to 5% O2 for 6 and 12 h led to a 2-4-fold increase in A2AR mRNA (Fig. 2). This increase in A2AR mRNA was markedly attenuated when the cells were tested in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ (Ca2+-free medium plus 1 mM EGTA) or chelation of intracellular free Ca2+ with BAPTA/AM (100 µM) (Fig. 2, A and B). Thus, an increase in intracellular free Ca2+ is required for induction of A2AR gene expression by hypoxia. In addition, we also found that the induction of A2AR mRNA during hypoxia was significantly reduced in the presence of diltiazem (3 µM), an L-type Ca2+ channel blocker. These findings suggest that the Ca2+ influx from the extracellular space via L-type Ca2+ channels is involved in regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Role of Ca2+ in regulation of A2A receptor mRNA during hypoxia in PC12 cells. A, representative Northern blots showing the role of Ca2+ in regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. The induction of A2AR mRNA during hypoxia was measured in PC12 cells that were incubated in normal medium (Ca2+-free medium that included 1 mM EGTA) (upper panel); in cells that had been pretreated with BAPTA/AM (100 µM), an intracellular Ca2+ chelator (middle panel); and in cells incubated in the presence of diltiazem (DZM; 3 µM), an L-type Ca2+ channel blocker (lower panel). B, the averaged data from five separate experiments in each group. In control experiments (normal Ca2+ levels), 12-h exposure to hypoxia caused a 3-4-fold increase in A2AR mRNA levels (**, p < 0.01). The induction of A2AR mRNA was markedly attenuated in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ (dagger dagger , p < 0.01 from hypoxia without drug). The induction was also markedly reduced by chelation of intracellular free Ca2+ with BAPTA/AM (dagger dagger , p < 0.01 from hypoxia without drug). Incubation with 3 µM diltiazem remarkably prevented the induction of A2AR expression during hypoxia (dagger dagger , p < 0.01 from hypoxia without drug). Each bar shows the mean ± S.E. from five separate experiments.

Activation of PKC Is Required for Up-regulation of A2A Receptor mRNA during Hypoxia-- Experiments were next performed to identify the intracellular signaling pathways that mediate the Ca2+-dependent induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. The two major Ca2+-mediated signal transduction pathways that are activated by increased cytosolic free Ca2+ are the calmodulin (CaM) and PKC systems (18, 19). Pharmacological studies were performed to evaluate the possible contribution of these two Ca2+-activated pathways on hypoxic induction of A2AR gene expression. We found that blockade of PKC activity using chelerythrine chloride (CHL) (20 µM) reduced significantly the induction of A2AR gene during hypoxia (Fig. 3A). CHL is a potent and selective inhibitor of the catalytic domain of Ca2+-dependent PKC isoforms (20). This finding was supported by an additional result that showed that RO-31-8220, another potent selective inhibitor of PKC (21), completely blocked the hypoxic induction of A2AR gene expression (Fig. 3A). In contrast, inhibition of CaM with calmidazolium chloride (CMZ, 20 µM) had no effect on the induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia (Fig. 3B). CMZ has been widely used to determine the role of CaM in mediating specific biological responses (22, 23). The dose of CMZ used in our experiment was sufficient to block the effect of CaM (22). We also found that a higher dose of CMZ (40 µM) had no effect on the hypoxia-induced up-regulation of A2AR mRNA (data not shown). These data indicate that the CaM/Ca2+ pathways are not involved in regulating the hypoxia-induced regulation of A2AR gene expression.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Role of PKC and calmodulin in regulation of A2A receptor mRNA during hypoxia. A, Northern analyses showed that blockade of PKC reduces the induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. Representative blots are shown in the upper panel. PC12 cells were incubated under 5% O2 for 6 and 12 h in the presence of a membrane-permeable PKC inhibitor, CHL (20 µM) or RO-31-8220 (RO) (3 µM). Both CHL and RO-31-8220 inhibited activation of A2AR by hypoxia. The averaged data from these experiments are shown in the lower panel. The induction of the A2AR gene during hypoxia at 12 h was markedly inhibited in the presence of CHL (dagger dagger , p < 0.01 from hypoxia without drug; *, p < 0.05 from normoxic base line). The induction was abolished in the presence of RO (dagger dagger , p < 0.01 from hypoxia without CHL). B, inhibition of calmodulin by CMZ (20 µM) had no effect on the induction of A2AR mRNA during hypoxia. C, effect of PMA treatment on A2AR mRNA under normoxic conditions. Cells were incubated with 100 nM PMA for 1, 3, 6, and 12 h under normoxia. A representative blot (upper panel) shows that the A2AR levels increased initially and then declined to below base line at 12 h. The averaged data from these experiments (n = 4) are shown in the lower panel (means ± S.E.; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 from base line). D, effect of depletion of PKC activity by prolonged pretreatment with PMA on the hypoxia-induced up-regulation of A2AR mRNA. PC12 cells were pretreated with 100 nM PMA for 12 h under normoxia and then incubated in 5% O2 for 6 and 12 h in the presence of PMA. It can be seen that prolonged pretreatment with PMA abolished the hypoxic induction of A2AR gene expression (upper panel). The averaged data from four separate experiments are shown in the lower panel (dagger dagger , p < 0.01 from hypoxia without PMA).

The role of PKC in hypoxia-induced enhancement of A2AR mRNA was further examined by incubating cells with 100 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), an activator of PKC. Fig. 3C shows the effect of PMA on A2AR mRNA. The A2AR mRNA level initially increased and peaked at 3 h but then declined to a level below the original base-line level at 12 h. It is well known that prolonged incubation of cells with PMA leads to down-regulation of PKC (24). We next examined the effect of long term (6 and 12 h) incubation of PC12 cells in PMA on hypoxic activation of A2AR gene expression. Our findings show that depletion of PKC activity by prolonged PMA treatment abolished the hypoxia-induced up-regulation of A2AR message (Fig. 3D). These findings further support the involvement of PKC in hypoxia-induced regulation of A2AR gene expression. We therefore conclude that the induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia requires increased intracellular free Ca2+ and activation of PKC.

Role of PKA Pathway in Regulation of Ado A2A Receptor Gene Expression during Normoxia and Hypoxia-- Because the PKA is activated by depolarization and because hypoxia causes depolarization in PC12 cells (25), we tested the possibility that PKA is involved in the regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. Our strategy was to use a clonal cell line (A123.7) that was derived from PC12 cells and deficient in PKA enzyme activities (14). The induction of A2AR gene during 12-h exposure to 5% O2 was slightly greater in A123.7 cells than in the wild type PC12 cells (Fig. 4A). These results indicate that PKA is not responsible for the up-regulation of A2AR during hypoxia and that PKA might actually have an inhibitory effect on induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Role of PKA on regulation of Ado A2A receptor expression during normoxia and hypoxia. A, representative Northern blots showing the role of PKA on the regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. Analyses were performed in mutant PC12 cells that are deficient in PKA activity (A123.7) and in wild type PC12 cells that were cultured under the same conditions as A123.7 cells. The lower panel shows the averaged data (± S.E.) from these experiments. In A123.7 cells, the induction of the A2AR gene during 12-h hypoxia was significantly greater than that measured in wild type PC12 cells (dagger , p < 0.05 from wild type cells; n = 6 for each group). B, effect of activation of PKA on A2AR mRNA expression during normoxia. Cells were incubated with 2 mM 8-bromo-cAMP, and the A2AR mRNA level was measured. Results show that direct activation of PKA with 8-bromo-cAMP reduces the basal levels of A2AR at both 3 and 6 h (**, p < 0.01; n = 4 for each group).

We also examined the possibility that activation of PKA by 8-bromo-cAMP induces down-regulation of A2AR mRNA under normoxic conditions. This was accomplished by incubation of cells with 2 mM of 8-bromo-cAMP under normoxic conditions (21% O2) for 3 and 6 h. Our results show that activation of PKA caused down-regulation of A2AR (Fig. 4B). We conclude therefore that PKA inhibits the expression of A2AR gene under normoxic conditions and that PKA is not involved in mediating increased A2AR gene expression during hypoxia.

Role of the Ado Receptor in Regulation of A2AR Gene Expression during Normoxia and Hypoxia-- PC12 cells produce and secrete Ado (26, 27). It is generally thought that the A2 receptor is coupled to Gs protein and the activation causes stimulation of adenylate cyclase (5). We therefore tested the possibility that activation of the A2A receptor during hypoxia might modulate the expression of A2AR mRNA in a feedback-like manner. We found that adenosine receptor antagonist 8-PT (10 µM) enhanced the induction of the A2AR gene expression above the level of expression measured in nontreated control PC12 cells (Fig. 5A). In addition, we found that A2AR gene expression was significantly reduced during normoxia (Fig. 5B) and hypoxia (Fig. 5C) in PC12 cells that had been incubated with Ado A2 receptor-selective agonist NECA (10 µM). The enhancement of A2AR mRNA during hypoxia (12 h) in the presence of NECA was 284.0 ± 24.4%, whereas the enhancement was only 186.0 ± 17.3% in the untreated cells. The interaction of A2AR activation and hypoxia is likely to be synergistic. These findings indicate that stimulation of the A2AR has a negative effect on hypoxia-induced A2AR gene expression. In contrast, A2AR antagonists facilitate A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. These results provide strong evidence that A2AR modulates its own expression via a feedback-like mechanism.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of Ado receptor stimulation on expression of Ado A2A receptor mRNA during normoxia and hypoxia. A, the regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia was examined in the presence of 10 µM 8-PT, an Ado receptor antagonist. The upper panel shows a representative blot. The induction of A2AR mRNA during 12-h hypoxia was significantly enhanced in the presence of 8-PT (dagger , p < 0.05; n = 5 for each group). B, PC12 cells were incubated with 10 µM NECA, an Ado A2 receptor-selective agonist, for 6 and 12 h during normoxia. The levels of A2AR mRNA were significantly reduced from base line (**, p < 0.01; n = 4). 30 µg of total RNA was used in this experiment. C, effect of Ado receptor activation by NECA on A2AR mRNA expression during hypoxia. Activation of Ado receptor with NECA significantly attenuated the induction of Ado receptor mRNA during hypoxia (dagger , p < 0.05; n = 4). Means ± S.E. are shown.

Protein Synthesis Is Required for Up-regulation of A2A Receptor mRNA during Hypoxia-- Experiments were performed to determine if de novo protein synthesis is required for the induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. PC12 cells were pretreated with cyclohexamide (CHX; 5 µM), an inhibitor of translation, for 30 min prior to exposure to hypoxia (5% O2; 6 or 12 h). We found that the hypoxic induction of A2AR gene expression was totally abolished in the presence of CHX (Fig. 6A). Thus, the regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia requires de novo protein synthesis, which may include known and unknown transcription factors.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Translation and transcription dependence of regulation of A2A receptor mRNA during hypoxia in PC12 cells. A, a representative blot showing the effect of de novo protein synthesis inhibition on regulation of A2AR expression during hypoxia. PC12 cells were pretreated with cyclohexamide (CHX; 5 µM), an inhibitor of protein translation, under normoxia for 30 min and then transferred to a hypoxic chamber (5% O2) in the presence of the same dose of CHX for 6 and 12 h. The averaged data (± S.E.) from four separate experiments are shown in the lower panel. The induction of the A2AR gene during hypoxia was totally inhibited in the presence of CHX. B, effect of hypoxia on stability of A2A receptor mRNA. PC12 cells were pretreated with actinomycin D (5 µM), a RNA polymerase inhibitor, for 15 min prior to incubation in either normoxia or 5% O2 for 1, 3, 6, and 12 h. A 40-µg aliquot of total RNA was used in these experiments. There was no difference in the time course for decay of A2AR mRNA between normoxia and hypoxia. Means ± S.E. are shown (n = 3).

Lack of Effect of Hypoxia on Stability of A2A Receptor mRNA-- Alterations in the levels of an mRNA may result from changes in gene transcription or mRNA stability or a combination of both. We examined the effect of hypoxia on the stability of A2AR mRNA. Transcription was blocked pharmacologically by pretreatment of PC12 cells with actinomycin D (3 µg/ml), a nonspecific blocker of RNA polymerase (28), and the time course for the decay of A2AR mRNAs was measured. In this experiment, 30 µg of total RNA was used for analysis. The results showed that there was no difference in the degradation time course in A2A receptor mRNA in cells exposed to either normoxia or hypoxia (Fig. 6B). Thus, hypoxic regulation of A2AR gene expression does not appear to involve an increase in A2AR mRNA stability.

Role of A2R Stimulation in Modulating VEGF Gene Expression during Hypoxia-- We next examined the role of A2R stimulation in regulating the expression of VEGF, another hypoxia-inducible gene, which is induced by hypoxia in PC12 cells (29). We found that the A2R agonist, NECA (10 µM), caused an initial increase in VEGF gene expression during normoxia, which was followed by a progressive inhibition of VEGF mRNA levels (Fig. 7A). We also examined the hypoxia-induced regulation of VEGF gene expression in the presence of an Ado receptor antagonist (8-PT) during hypoxia. VEGF gene expression was examined in cells exposed to hypoxia (5% O2) in the presence or absence of the Ado receptor antagonist, 8-PT (10 µM). Our results revealed that the level of VEGF mRNA was significantly higher in the presence of 8-PT during hypoxia lasting 6 h or longer (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that activation of A2R by Ado inhibits the expression of VEGF gene expression during prolonged exposure to hypoxia in PC12 cells.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Role of A2 receptor stimulation in modulating VEGF gene expression during normoxia and hypoxia. A, effect of A2 receptor stimulation on VEGF mRNA levels under normoxia in PC12 cells. The level of VEGF mRNA increased temporally at 1 h and then decreased below the base-line level at 3 h and after. The averaged data (± S.E.) from four separate experiments are shown in the lower panel (**, p < 0.01 from base line). B, the regulation of VEGF gene expression during hypoxia was examined in the presence or absence of 10 µM 8-PT, an Ado receptor antagonist. The upper panel shows a representative blot for each group. Exposure to 5% O2 induced up-regulation of VEGF mRNA, which reached a peak at 6 h and then declined at 12 and 18 h. The decline in the VEGF mRNA levels at 12 h and after was smaller in cells incubated with 8-PT. The averaged data were shown in the lower panel. The induction of VEGF mRNA during 12- and 18-h hypoxia was significantly enhanced in the presence of 8-PT (dagger , p < 0.05 from hypoxia without 8-PT; n = 4 for each group).

Effect of A2R Stimulation on Cellular Viability during Hypoxia-- We examined the effect of A2AR stimulation on cell viability during severe hypoxic exposure (1% O2), which was measured in the presence of NECA (10 µM) or 8-PT (10 µM) at various time points. We found that 12-h exposure to 1% O2 caused a 30% reduction in cell viability (Fig. 8). Cell viability was significantly enhanced in the presence of NECA, while it was significantly reduced in the presence of 8-PT. These results suggest that activation of A2R plays a significant role in maintaining the cellular viability during severe hypoxia and that endogenously produced Ado during hypoxia may be involved in this regulation.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of A2R stimulation on cell viability during severe hypoxia in PC12 cells. Cell viability was measured as the ability of cells to exclude trypan blue dye. It was evaluated as the ratio of total viable cells (unstained) to total cells (unstained and stained) × 100. PC12 cells were exposed to 1% O2 in the presence or absence of an A2 receptor agonist (10 µM NECA) or an Ado receptor antagonist (10 µM 8-PT) for 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 h. Exposure to 1% O2 significantly reduced the cell viability at 3 h and more (**, p < 0.01). The viability was significantly enhanced in the presence of A2R activation (NECA) at 12 h (dagger , p < 0.05), while it was reduced by the blockade of Ado receptor with 8-PT (dagger , p < 0.05). Data are expressed as means ± S.E. Three separate dishes of cells were used for each experiment.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adenosine is a potent modulator of cellular activity during hypoxia (30). We showed previously that activation of the A2AR inhibits membrane excitability during hypoxia by enhancing an outward K+ current and inhibiting an inward Ca2+ current (13). These are among the first results to show that the A2AR regulates cellular activity during hypoxia. A primary finding in the current study was that hypoxia causes a time-dependent increase in A2AR gene expression in PC12 cells. A number of enzymes, cytokines, and growth factors are inducible by hypoxia (31, 32). However, there have been few reports that show that gene expression for cell surface receptors is regulated by hypoxia. One of the few examples was that alpha - and beta -adrenergic receptor mRNAs is increased in cardiac cells during hypoxia (33, 34). Interestingly, the A1 type Ado receptor is down-regulated in rat cardiac myocytes during long term hypobaric hypoxia (35). It was also reported that A2AR mRNA levels are decreased in neonatal brain during cerebral ischemia following carotid artery ligation (36). In this study, the ischemic hemisphere developed an infarction. Therefore, it is possible that cell death in the region of the infarction was responsible for the reduction in A2AR expression. Here we present the first direct evidence that A2AR mRNA and protein levels are enhanced by hypoxia. The mild hypoxia used in the current study indicates that the regulation of A2AR may be involved not only in severe hypoxic events such as ischemic trauma but also in more physiologic processes like high altitude adaptation.

The signal transduction systems that are activated by hypoxia and eventually culminate in altered expression of O2-responsive genes are largely unknown. Previous papers from our laboratory have shown that hypoxia causes membrane depolarization and an increase in intracellular Ca2+ in PC12 cells (17, 25). Thus, activation of a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel and a subsequent increase in intracellular free Ca2+ might be critical regulatory events in the cellular response to hypoxia in PC12 cells. An elevation of intracellular Ca2+ ion can influence a wide variety of biological processes during hypoxia. For example, we reported previously that increased cytosolic Ca2+ is required for the regulation of certain hypoxia-responsive genes (e.g. c-fos, junB, and tyrosine hydroxylase), and neurotransmitter release during hypoxia (17, 37). In the present study, we found that an increase in intracellular free Ca2+ is also involved in regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. An influx of extracellular Ca2+ through L-type Ca2+ channels is likely to be responsible, since induction of A2AR gene expression was markedly reduced by removal of extracellular free Ca2+ and by inhibition of the L-type Ca2+ channel. Moreover, chelation of intracellular free Ca2+ with BAPTA/AM also prevented activation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. These results strongly indicate that an increase in cytosolic Ca2+, from the extracellular space, is the trigger that mediates the induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia in PC12 cells.

Several laboratories have reported alterations in second messenger systems during hypoxia (16, 38). Many eukaryotic genes are regulated in a Ca2+-dependent manner through Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of gene promotor response element-binding proteins that act as transcription factors (39, 40). The two major intracellular Ca2+-regulated signaling pathways are PKC and CaM (41, 42). In the present study, we have found that inhibition of PKC with two different agents, chelerythrine chloride and RO 31-8220, resulted in marked inhibition of hypoxia-induced A2AR gene expression. We also found that transient activation of PKC by PMA led to increased A2AR mRNA, whereas depletion of PKC activity by prolonged PMA treatment abolished the hypoxic induction of A2AR mRNA. These results suggest that activation of PKC pathways mediate the hypoxia-induced expression of A2AR genes. Interestingly, it was reported recently that activation of PKC by tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate enhances transcription of the A2A receptor gene in SH-SY5Y cells (43). PKC is a Ca2+- and phospholipid-dependent kinase that is known to be involved in the control of a wide variety of cellular processes including secretion, contraction, growth, and differentiation as well as modulation of membrane-receptor functions (18, 19). PKC is the major cellular target for the action of tumor-enhancing agents such as PMA, which mimic diacylglycerol by directly binding to and activating PKC at the cell membrane (19). Through activation of PKC, tumor-enhancing agents have been shown to induce an altered pattern of gene expression, leading to their various effects (45-47). Among the genes whose expression is modulated by PMA are the immediate early genes, members of the fos and jun families, which modulate the expression of other genes that modulate change in cell functions (45-47). It also has been shown that the proteins that bind to the AP1 element on DNA are regulated by the PKC pathway (48, 49). Inhibition of CaM failed to prevent activation of A2AR gene expression by hypoxia.

We found that de novo protein synthesis is required for the increase in A2AR receptor mRNA during hypoxia. This finding indicates that protein factors required for regulation of A2AR gene expression are synthesized in response to hypoxia. The rat A2AR gene includes AP1, AP2, and NFkappa B sites in its 5'-flanking region (50). The promotor sequence does not include a HIF-1 binding site, which is generally accepted as being responsible for the regulation of many O2-sensitive genes including erythropoietin (51). Our present study did not determine which transcription factors are involved in the up-regulation of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia. It is possible that the AP1 complex mediates the hypoxic induction of A2AR mRNA through activation of PKC and immediate early genes such as fos and jun. A previous paper from our laboratory found evidence for the interaction of c-fos and junB with the AP1 element in hypoxia-induced increases in tyrosine hydroxylase gene transcription in PC12 cells (52). Another recent paper has shown that c-fos is essential for functional activation of AP1 and subsequent activation of tyrosine hydroxylase transcription during hypoxia (53). Further studies are required to identify the molecular mechanisms by which PKC modulates the transcription of A2AR message during hypoxia.

One of the most interesting and potentially most important findings was that A2AR plays a role in the regulation of its own gene expression during hypoxia. We found that activation of A2AR with the A2 receptor agonist NECA caused down-regulation of the basal level of A2AR expression and prevented enhancement of A2AR expression during hypoxia. It was reported previously that the A2A receptor gene is regulated by A2 agonist stimulation (54). A novel finding in the present study is that the induction of A2AR gene expression during hypoxia was enhanced by the Ado receptor antagonist, 8-PT, which is known to act primarily as an Ado receptor blocker. The phophodiesterase inhibitor activity of this drug is minimal at the concentration used in this study (55). Our results suggest that expression of the A2AR gene might be inhibited by activation of A2AR in a negative feedback manner. Support for this comes from findings that showed that the A2 receptor in PC12 cells is functionally activated by endogenously released Ado (26, 27). We also found that PC12 cells release Ado during hypoxia in an O2 level-dependent manner.2 We propose that Ado feedback regulation of A2AR gene expression might be an important component of the cellular responses to hypoxia, which serves to coordinate the metabolic demand with functional activities during hypoxia.

Our results also show that Ado A2 receptors play a role in protecting cells against the harmful effects of hypoxia. We showed previously that Ado attenuates the hypoxia-induced elevation of intracellular free Ca2+ in PC12 cells (13). It is generally thought that one of the most important pathophysiological factors underlying the cellular damage during ischemia is a failure to regulate intracellular Ca2+ concentration (56). We found that activation of A2R enhances cell viability during exposure to severe hypoxia. Although the role of the A2 receptor in protection against ischemia is still controversial (57, 58), our results suggest that the protective effect of Ado receptors is mediated via modulating intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis.

Finally, we examined the possibility that Ado modulates the expression of other hypoxia-inducible genes. We found that prolonged activation of A2R caused an inhibition of VEGF gene expression during normoxia in PC12 cells. More importantly, we found that increased VEGF expression during hypoxia was enhanced by the Ado receptor antagonist, 8-PT. The role of Ado in mediating the induction of the VEGF gene remains controversial, but it is likely to be Ado receptor subtype-dependent (59, 60). It has been shown that Ado decreases the VEGF mRNA expression via stimulation of the A2 receptor, whereas it stimulates VEGF expression via the A1 receptor (60). Our study also reveals that Ado may modulate the hypoxic induction of VEGF mRNA. Therefore, Ado may have common roles in modulating the regulation of O2-sensitive genes including its own receptors during hypoxia. Since we have shown that hypoxia up-regulates the expression of A2AR gene and protein, it is most likely that increased A2AR during hypoxia has significant roles in mediating cellular functions such as protection of cell viability and modulation of O2-sensitive gene expression.

    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R37 HL 33831 (to D .E. M.) and HL 59945 (to D. E. M.).

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, University of Cincinnati, 231 Bethesda Ave., P.O. Box 670576, Cincinnati, OH 45267-576. Tel.: 513-558-2602; Fax: 513-558-5738; E-mail: David.Millhorn@UC.Edu.

2 S. Kobayashi and D. E. Millhorn, unpublished observation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Ado, adenosine; A2AR, A2A receptor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; NECA, 5'-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine; 8-PT, 8-phenyltheophylline; CHL, chelerythrine chloride; CaM, calmodulin; CHX, cyclohexamide; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; BAPTA/AM, 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetracetic acid tetra(acetoxymethyl)ester.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Winn, H. R., Rubio, R., and Berne, R. (1981) Am. J. Physiol. 241, H235-H242
2. Zetterstrom, T., Vernet, L., Ungerstedt, U., Tossman, U., and Johzon, B. (1982) Neurosci. Lett. 29, 111-115[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Higgins, M., Hosseinzadah, H., McGregor, D., Ogilvy, H., and Stone, T. (1994) Purine Pyrimidine Metab. 16, 62-68
4. Brundege, J. M., and Dunwiddie, T. V. (1997) Adv. Pharmacol. 39, 353-390
5. Fredholm, B. B. (1995) Phamacol. Toxicol. 76, 228-239
6. Olah, M. E., and Stiles, G. L. (1995) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 35, 581-606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Scanziani, M., Capogna, M., Gahwiler, B. H., and Thompson, S. M. (1992) Neuron 9, 917-927
8. Lupica, C., Proctor, W., and Dunwiddie, T. V. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 3753-3764[Abstract]
9. Fink, J. S., Weaver, D. R., Rivkees, S. A., Peterfreund, R. A., Pollack, A. E., Adler, E. M., and Reppert, S. M. (1992) Mol. Brain Res. 14, 186-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Johansson, B., and Fredholm, B. B. (1995) Neuropharmacology 34, 393-403[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Green, S. H. (1995) Methods Companion Methods Enzymol. 7, 222-237 [CrossRef]
12. Williams, M., Abreu, M., Jarvis, M. F., and Norohna-Blob, L. (1987) J. Neurochem. 48, 498-502[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Kobayashi, S., Conforti, L., Pun, Y. K., and Millhorn, D. E. (1998) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 508, 95-107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Ginty, D. D., Glowacka, D., DeFranco, C., and Wagner, J. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15325-15333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Conn, G., Batne, M. L., Soderman, D. D., Kwok, P. W., Sullivan, K. A., Palisi, T. M., Hope, D. A., and Thomas, K. A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2628-2632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Beitner-Johnson, D., Leibold, J., and Millhorn, D. E. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 241, 61-66
17. Raymond, R., and Millhorn, D. E. (1997) Kidney Int. 51, 536-541[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Nishizuka, Y. (1989) J. Am. Med. Assoc. 262, 1826-1833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Farago, A., and Nishizuka, Y. (1990) FEBS Lett. 268, 350-354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Herbert, J. M., Angreeau, J. M., Gleye, J., and Maffrand, J. P. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 172, 993-999[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Davis, P. D., Elliott, L. H., Harris, W., Hill, C. H., Hurst, S. A., Keech, E., Kumar, M. K., Lawton, G., Nixon, J. S., and Wilkinson, S. E. (1992) J. Med. Chem. 35, 994-1001[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Silver, P. J., Pinto, P. B., and Dachiw, J. (1986) Biochem. Pharmacol. 35, 2545-2551[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Nakazawa, K., Higo, K., Tanaka, Y., Saito, H., and Matsuki, N. (1993) Br. J. Pharmacol. 109, 137-141[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Huang, F. L., Yoshida, Y., Cunha-Melo, J. R., Beaven, M. A., and Huang, K. P. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 4238-4243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Zhu, W. H., Conforti, L., Czyzyk-Krzeska, M. F., and Millhorn, D. E. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, C657-C665
26. Erny, R. E., Berezo, M. W., and Perlman, R. L. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 1335-1339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Roskosky, R., Jr., and Roskosky, L. M. (1987) J. Neurochem. 48, 236-242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Tamm, I., and Sehgal, P. B. (1978) Adv. Virus Res. 22, 187-258[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Levy, A. P., Levy, N. S., Wegner, S., and Goldberg, M. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13333-13340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Bruns, R. F. (1990) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 603, 211-226[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Helfman, T., and Falanga, V. (1993) Am. J. Med. Sci. 306, 37-41[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Fandrey, T. (1995) Resp. Physiol. 101, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Li, H. T., Long, C. S., Rokosh, D. G., Honbo, N. Y., and Karliner, J. S. (1995) Circulation 92, 918-925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Li, H. T., Honbo, N. Y., and Karliner, J. S. (1996) Circulation 94, 3303-3310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Kacimi, R., Moalic, J. M., Aldashev, A., Vatner, D. E., Richalet, J. P., and Crozatier, B. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, H1865-H1873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Aden, U., Lindstrom, K., Bona, E., Hagberg, H., and Fredholm, B. B. (1994) Mol. Brain Res. 23, 354-358[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Zhu, W. H., Conforti, L., and Millhorn, D. E. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1143-C1150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Hochachka, P. W., Buck, L. T., Doll, C. J., and Land, S. C. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9493-9498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Ghose, A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1995) Science 268, 239-247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Ginty, D. D. (1997) Neuron 18, 183-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. MacNicol, M., and Schulman, H. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12197-12201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Hanson, P., and Schulman, H. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 559-601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Peterfreund, R. A., Gies, E. K., and Fink, J. S. (1997) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 336, 71-80[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Berridge, M. J. (1984) Biochem. J. 220, 345-360[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Greeneberg, M., and Ziff, E. (1984) Nature 311, 433-435[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Angel, P., Imagawa, M., Chiu, R., Stein, B., Imbra, R. J., Rahmsdorf, H. J., Jonat, C., Herrlich, P., and Karin, M. (1987) Cell 49, 729-739[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Lee, W., Mitchell, P., and Tjian, R. (1987) Cell 49, 741-750[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Ohtani, K., Sakurai, H., Oh, E., Iwata, E., Tsuchiya, T., and Tsuda, M. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 605-614[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Passegue, E., Richard, J. L., Boulla, G., and Goutdji, D. (1995) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 107, 29-40[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Chu, Y. Y., Tu, K. H., Lee, Y. C., Kuo, Z. J., Lai, H. L., and Chern, Y. (1996) DNA Cell Biol. 15, 329-337[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Wang, G. L., and Semenza, G. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21513-21518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Norris, M. L., and Millhorn, D. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23774-23779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Mishra, R. R., Adhikary, G., Simonson, M. S., Cherniack, N. S., and Prabhakar, N. R. (1998) Mol. Brain Res. 59, 74-83[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Saitoh, O., Saitoh, Y., and Nakata, H. (1994) Neuroreport 5, 1317-1320[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Smellie, F. W., Davis, C. W., Daly, J. W., and Wells, J. N. (1979) Life Sci. 24, 2475-2481[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Tymianski, M. T., and Tator, C. H. (1996) Neurosurgery 38, 1176-1196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Gao, Y., and Phillis, J. W. (1994) Life Sci. 55, 61-65
58. Von Lubitz, D. K., Lin, R. C., and Jaconbson, K. A. (1995) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 287, 295-302[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Takagi, H., King, G. L., Robinson, G. S., Ferrata, N., and Aiello, L. P. (1996) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 37, 2165-2176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Fisher, S., Sharma, H. S., Karliczek, G. F., and Schaper, W. (1995) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 28, 141-148[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
O. Frobert, G. Haink, U. Simonsen, C. H. Gravholt, M. Levin, and A. Deussen
Adenosine concentration in the porcine coronary artery wall and A2A receptor involvement in hypoxia-induced vasodilatation
J. Physiol., January 15, 2006; 570(2): 375 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. M. Lappas, J. M. Rieger, and J. Linden
A2A Adenosine Receptor Induction Inhibits IFN-{gamma} Production in Murine CD4+ T Cells
J. Immunol., January 15, 2005; 174(2): 1073 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
W. A. Sands, A. F. Martin, E. W. Strong, and T. M. Palmer
Specific Inhibition of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-Dependent Inflammatory Responses by Cell Type-Specific Mechanisms upon A2A Adenosine Receptor Gene Transfer
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 66(5): 1147 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. Feoktistov, S. Ryzhov, H. Zhong, A. E. Goldstein, A. Matafonov, D. Zeng, and I. Biaggioni
Hypoxia Modulates Adenosine Receptors in Human Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells Toward an A2B Angiogenic Phenotype
Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Yip, H. C. H. Leung, and Y. N. Kwok
Effect of Omeprazole on Gastric Adenosine A1 and A2A Receptor Gene Expression and Function
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2004; 311(1): 180 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. A. Seta and D. E. Millhorn
Functional genomics approach to hypoxia signaling
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2004; 96(2): 765 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
S. K. Banerjee, H. W. J. Young, A. Barczak, D. J. Erle, and M. R. Blackburn
Abnormal Alveolar Development Associated with Elevated Adenine Nucleosides
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2004; 30(1): 38 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
M. E. Olah and C. C. Caldwell
Adenosine Receptors and Mammalian Toll-Like Receptors: Synergism in Macrophages
Mol. Interv., October 1, 2003; 3(7): 370 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Gardner and M. E. Olah
Distinct Protein Kinase C Isoforms Mediate Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression by A2A Adenosine Receptor Activation and Phorbol Esters in Pheochromocytoma PC12 Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 15421 - 15428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. W. Fisher
Erythropoietin: Physiology and Pharmacology Update
Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2003; 228(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
H. T. Lee and C. W. Emala
Preconditioning and Adenosine Protect Human Proximal Tubule Cells in an In Vitro Model of Ischemic Injury
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2002; 13(11): 2753 - 2761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. C. Cassada, C. G. Tribble, S. M. Long, A. K. Kaza, J. Linden, J. M. Rieger, D. Rosin, I. L. Kron, and J. A. Kern
Adenosine A2A agonist reduces paralysis after spinal cord ischemia: correlation with A2A receptor expression on motor neurons
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 846 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. Feoktistov, A. E. Goldstein, S. Ryzhov, D. Zeng, L. Belardinelli, T. Voyno-Yasenetskaya, and I. Biaggioni
Differential Expression of Adenosine Receptors in Human Endothelial Cells: Role of A2B Receptors in Angiogenic Factor Regulation
Circ. Res., March 22, 2002; 90(5): 531 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. W. Fisher and J. Brookins
Adenosine A2A and A2B receptor activation of erythropoietin production
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): F826 - F832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. M. Horn and T. G. Waldrop
Hypoxic Augmentation of Fast-Inactivating and Persistent Sodium Currents in Rat Caudal Hypothalamic Neurons
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2572 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. Kobayashi, L. Conforti, and D. E. Millhorn
Gene expression and function of adenosine A2A receptor in the rat carotid body
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): L273 - L282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. E. Olah and F. L. Roudabush
Down-Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression after A2A Adenosine Receptor Activation in PC12 Pheochromocytoma Cells
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2000; 293(3): 779 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Kimura, Y. Mizukami, T. Miura, K. Fujimoto, S. Kobayashi, and M. Matsuzaki
Orphan G Protein-coupled Receptor, GPR41, Induces Apoptosis via a p53/Bax Pathway during Ischemic Hypoxia and Reoxygenation
J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2001; 276(28): 26453 - 26460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H. T. Lee and C. W. Emala
Adenosine attenuates oxidant injury in human proximal tubular cells via A1 and A2a adenosine receptors
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): F844 - F852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. Feoktistov, A. E. Goldstein, S. Ryzhov, D. Zeng, L. Belardinelli, T. Voyno-Yasenetskaya, and I. Biaggioni
Differential Expression of Adenosine Receptors in Human Endothelial Cells: Role of A2B Receptors in Angiogenic Factor Regulation
Circ. Res., March 22, 2002; 90(5): 531 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Millhorn, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Millhorn, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement