![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 29, 20643-20649, July 16, 1999
,
¶
From the
Calcium Regulation Section, Laboratory of
Signal Transduction, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 and the § Biological
Research Laboratories, Sankyo Company, Limited, Tokyo 140, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The activation of intracellular calcium release
and calcium entry across the plasmalemma in response to intracellular
application of inositol 2,4,5-trisphosphate and adenophostin A, two
metabolically stable agonists for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
receptors, was investigated using Xenopus laevis oocytes
and confocal imaging. Intracellular injection of inositol
2,4,5-trisphosphate induced a rapidly spreading calcium signal
associated with regenerative calcium waves; the calcium signal filled
the peripheral regions of the cell in 1-5 min. Injection of high
concentrations of adenophostin A (250 nM) similarly induced
rapidly spreading calcium signals. Injection of low concentrations of
adenophostin A resulted in calcium signals that spread slowly (>1 h).
With extremely low concentrations of adenophostin A (~10
pM), stable regions of Ca2+ release were
observed that did not expand to peripheral regions. When the
adenophostin A-induced calcium signal was restricted to central
regions, compartmentalized calcium oscillations were sometimes
observed. Restoration of extracellular calcium caused a rise in
cytoplasmic calcium restricted to the region of adenophostin A-induced
calcium mobilization. The limited diffusion of adenophostin A provides
an opportunity to examine calcium signaling processes under spatially
restricted conditions and provides insights into mechanisms of
intracellular calcium oscillations and capacitative calcium entry.
Xenopus laevis oocytes have proven a useful model
system for studying the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
((1,4,5)IP3)1-mediated
calcium signaling system, providing insights into mechanisms of calcium
oscillations (1) and capacitative Ca2+ entry (2, 3). In
many cell types, including Xenopus oocytes, activation of
surface membrane receptors results in a biphasic Ca2+
response composed of an initial mobilization of internally stored Ca2+, followed by entry of extracellular Ca2+
(4). Much is known about the role of (1,4,5)IP3 in
mobilizing intracellular Ca2+, and a working model for the
Ca2+ entry process is described by the capacitative model
(5, 6) according to which the depletion of intracellular
(1,4,5)IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores signals the
activation of plasma membrane calcium channels.
Recently, a metabolite of Penicillium brevicompactum,
adenophostin A, has been isolated and demonstrated to be an agonist for
the (1,4,5)IP3 receptor and to have a potency ~100-fold
greater than that of (1,4,5)IP3 (7). Interestingly, two
studies performed in Xenopus oocytes (8, 9) suggested a site
of action for adenophostin A in addition to that on intracellular
Ca2+ stores. In both studies, low concentrations of
adenophostin A (<10 nM) appeared to preferentially
activate the Ca2+ entry process, although Hartzell et
al. (9), unlike DeLisle et al. (8), could not find a
clear dissociation between Ca2+ release and
Ca2+ entry. In a subsequent report, Machaca and Hartzell
(10) found that the diffusion of adenophostin A throughout the oocyte
was considerably slower than that of IP3 and concluded that
this might explain the apparently diminished Ca2+ release signal.
In this study, we have used confocal microscopy to monitor directly
spatial as well as temporal aspects of the effects of adenophostin A on
intracellular Ca2+ in Xenopus oocytes using the
calcium-sensitive dye Calcium Green. Our results confirm that diffusion
of adenophostin A throughout the oocytes is slower than that of
IP3 and additionally indicate that low concentrations of
adenophostin A cause a confined mobilization of intracellular
Ca2+ that is capable of supporting spatially restricted
Ca2+ oscillations and spatially restricted Ca2+
entry. This unique action of adenophostin A provides new insights into
the role of IP3 receptor binding in
[Ca2+]i oscillations and also into the spatial
relationships between intracellular Ca2+ release and
activation of capacitative calcium entry.
Isolation of Xenopus Oocytes
Adult albino female X. laevis (Xenopus
One, Ann Arbor, MI) were anesthetized by hypothermia and decapitated.
The ovaries were then removed and stored in ND96 buffer (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.6)). Stage V and VI oocytes were manually
dissected free from the ovaries and follicles and maintained in ND96
buffer at 18 °C until used.
Oocyte Microinjection
Various solutions (described below) were injected into oocytes
via an oil-filled glass micropipette attached to a nanoliter injector
(World Precision Instruments, Inc., Sarasota, FL). The injection volume
could be varied from 4.6 to 50.6 nl, and final concentrations were
calculated on the basis of an oocyte volume of 1 µl.
Calcium Measurement
Calcium Green Loading--
Prior to the experiment,
defolliculated oocytes were microinjected with the Ca2+
indicator Calcium Green (~12.5 µM final concentration;
Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene OR). The oocytes were then incubated for at least 30-40 min at room temperature to allow equilibration of the
dye throughout the cytoplasm. Oocytes were placed in a glass-bottomed
microscope chamber (Bionique Testing Laboratories, Inc.) containing 1 ml of ND96 buffer and placed on the stage of an inverted Zeiss confocal
microscope (LSM 410, Carl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY). Oocytes were held
in position by a microinjection pipette, and modifications of the
bathing solution were made by dilution into the bath.
Fluorescence Measurements--
Measurements of intracellular
calcium were performed with the inverted Zeiss LSM 410 confocal
microscope equipped with a 10× objective (0.5 numerical aperture). The
calcium-sensitive dye Calcium Green was excited by the 488-nm line from
a krypton-argon laser (Omnichrome Model 643, Melles Griot, Carlsbad,
CA), and the emission fluorescence monitored at 515 nm was selected by a band-pass filter. The pinhole aperture of the confocal microscope was
set such that the fluorescence image represented an optical slice of
~10 µm (if not otherwise specified) at the bottom of the oocyte,
i.e. just above the coverslip and just under the plasma membrane (Fig. 1). All fluorescence
images (256 intensity levels, 256 × 256 pixels) were detected
with an analog photomultiplier tube, and the resulting images were
recorded directly onto videotape. Simultaneously, up to 10 regions of
interest (ROIs) distributed across the image provided an intensity
versus time graphic output. Subsequently, these fluorescence
values were expressed as a fraction of the initial fluorescence
intensity (F/F0). During fluorescence data collection, each scan of a 256 × 256 image took 0.35 s,
and the interval between each image scan was ~1.3 s.
Photolysis of Caged Compounds--
In some experiments, oocytes
were co-injected with caged (1,4,5)IP3 (~50
µM final concentration; Calbiochem) along with the calcium dye. Photocleavage of caged (1,4,5)IP3 was achieved
using the 351/364-nm lines of an argon ion laser (Coherent Enterprise Model 652, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA), liberating
(1,4,5)IP3 into the cytoplasm. The area in which photolysis
occurred was defined by use of a fast gated Uniblitz shutter (Vincent
Associates, Rochester, NY) placed between the argon ion laser and the
confocal microscope. By varying the duration the shutter was open
(typically 5-10 ms), the area of photolysis could be varied in the
xy plane.
In earlier studies (8-10), the actions of adenophostin A were
compared with those of the physiological agonist for the
IP3 receptor, (1,4,5)IP3. However, adenophostin
A differs from (1,4,5)IP3 in being resistant to
inactivation by the 5-phosphatase and 3-kinase (7). Thus, for the
majority of our studies, we chose to utilize a metabolism-resistant
analog of (1,4,5)IP3, (2,4,5)IP3 (11), for
comparison with adenophostin A. Fig. 2
shows the pattern of [Ca2+]i signaling seen
following injection of (2,4,5)IP3 at a concentration of 1 µM (final estimated cytoplasmic concentration). This
somewhat intermediate concentration of (2,4,5)IP3 caused a
spreading [Ca2+]i signal that filled the field of
view generally within 5 min. At this concentration, the
[Ca2+]i signal was usually associated with
regenerative waves and spirals, as originally described by Lechleiter
et al. (1).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Typical confocal images of Xenopus
oocytes for detection of Calcium Green fluorescence.
Xenopus oocytes, injected with Calcium Green (12.5 µM final concentration), were scanned by the confocal
microscope in both the xy and z directions. The
pinhole settings for collection of the emission fluorescence were set
so that the resolution in the z direction, or "optical
slice," was ~10 µm (10× objective, 0.5 numerical aperture).
Upper panel, typical image of an oocyte used in experiments
to collect spatial information in an xy plane. This
xy image was obtained when focusing at the bottom of the
oocyte, closest to the coverslip. Middle panel, with
conditions optimal for detecting calcium-dependent changes
in fluorescence in the xy plane, this image shows a typical
confocal image collected in the z direction. Lower
panel, the same z plane viewed in the middle
panel was viewed again here, but under greater magnification
(achieved with an electronic zoom function). Detection of fluorescence
intensity in the z direction rapidly decreased toward the
interior of the oocyte. Under optimal conditions for monitoring calcium
changes in the xy images, signals were detectable to a
maximum depth of ~20 µm into an oocyte that had a diameter of
~1000 µm.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (96K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of (2,4,5)IP3 (1 µM) microinjected into an oocyte in the
presence of extracellular calcium (10 mM). Oocytes,
previously injected with Calcium Green (12.5 µM final
concentration), were subsequently microinjected with a volume of a
(2,4,5)IP3 solution so that its final concentration would
be ~1 µM when diluted throughout the oocyte. These
injections were performed in the presence of 10 mM
Ca2+o. The panel of four images represents the time
course of calcium changes in the oocyte following injection at
t = 0, with the time indicated for each image. The
boxes depicted in the bottom right panel
illustrate selected ROIs, described in subsequent figures as central
(black) or peripheral (white), information from
which was used to generate graphs of the time-dependent
fluorescence changes. Although the point of injection occurs at the top
of the oocyte, distal to the xy image plane, calcium
responses were observed in ~1 min. Within 5 min, calcium responses
were observed throughout the oocyte, exhibiting characteristic calcium
waves and spirals. This experiment is typical of 10 similar
experiments.
Also shown in Fig. 2 is a typical arrangement of ROIs used for
assessing the time course of [Ca2+]i changes in
the central and peripheral regions of the field of view. Fig.
3 illustrates examples of the time course of [Ca2+]i changes in the peripheral and central
regions of oocytes following the injection of four different
concentrations of (2,4,5)IP3. In these experiments, the
oocytes were initially incubated in a Ca2+-deficient
medium, and extracellular Ca2+ was subsequently restored to
10 mM to assess [Ca2+]i signals due
to influx. At the highest concentration (5 µM), diffusion
throughout the oocyte was very rapid such that a rapid release occurred
in the peripheral regions of the field of view seconds after appearing
in the center. With 1 µM (2,4,5)IP3, a
somewhat greater delay was observed before the peripheral regions were
activated, and as shown in Fig. 2, regenerative
[Ca2+]i oscillations were seen. With both 5 and 1 µM (2,4,5)IP3, re-addition of
Ca2+ externally resulted in a rapid increase in
[Ca2+]i indicative of Ca2+ entry,
presumably due to the depletion of intracellular stores. With lower
concentrations of (2,4,5)IP3 (250 and 100 nM),
release was seen only near the center of the field of view, and with
these concentrations, the signal was seen only when the injection
pipette was brought deep into the oocyte, close to the coverslip and
the field of view. These smaller signals did not propagate to the periphery, and restoration of extracellular Ca2+ did not
result in the activation of significant entry. The simplest interpretation of this result is that the lower concentrations of
(2,4,5)IP3 are insufficient to activate significant
Ca2+ mobilization when finally diluted by diffusion
throughout the cytoplasm. This is as not unexpected since the
Kd for (2,4,5)IP3 action on the
IP3 receptor is >1 µM (12).
|
A noticeable different picture was seen with adenophostin A. Fig.
4 illustrates a series of images
depicting the spread of the [Ca2+]i signal in an
oocyte injected with adenophostin A to give a final concentration of 10 nM. This concentration of adenophostin A should, if
anything, be somewhat more potent than 1 µM
(2,4,5)IP3, yet between 30 and 60 min was required for the
[Ca2+]i signal to fill the field of view. The
full time courses of four peripheral and four central ROIs from this
experiment and the experiment shown in Fig. 2 are given in Fig.
5.
|
|
Although somewhat larger than (2,4,5)IP3, adenophostin A
would not be expected to diffuse at such a relatively slow rate unless some structure specifically impedes its rate of diffusion. It seems
likely that this structure is the IP3 receptor itself.
Thus, the concentrations of adenophostin A injected into the oocytes may be lower than the concentration of IP3 receptors, and
when adenophostin A molecules bind to these receptors with high
affinity, their rate of diffusion through the cell is dependent to a
large extent on the rather slow rate of receptor
dissociation.2 A prediction
then is that higher concentrations of adenophostin A would diffuse much
faster throughout the cell. Fig. 6 shows that with concentrations of 250 and 100 nM adenophostin A,
the [Ca2+]i signal reached the peripheral regions
of the field of view much faster than with 10 nM (within 1 min or so). As for (2,4,5)IP3, once the signal had filled
the field of view, restoration of extracellular Ca2+
resulted in rapid influx of Ca2+. Fig.
7 summarizes the data on the influx of
Ca2+ in oocytes activated by relatively high concentrations
of (2,4,5)IP3 (10 µM) and adenophostin A (250 nM). Under these conditions, the magnitude of the influx
and its sensitivity to extracellular Ca2+ were
indistinguishable with these two IP3 receptor ligands.
|
|
We next investigated the effects of injecting very low concentrations
of adenophostin A into oocytes. When injections were carried out with
quantities of adenophostin A that would give cytoplasmic concentrations
of ~10 pM, we saw no changes in
[Ca2+]i. However, when the pipette was brought
very close to the coverslip and the field of view, a localized area of
elevated [Ca2+]i was observed. In contrast to the
findings with low concentrations of (2,4,5)IP3, this
elevated region was relatively stable; the size of the region did not
grow appreciably, and the elevated [Ca2+]i level
was maintained for up to 30 min. In some oocytes, [Ca2+]i waves and spirals developed within this
region (Fig. 8). These waves were similar
in appearance to those seen in oocytes injected with 1 µM
(2,4,5)IP3, but the waves always extinguished when reaching
the limiting periphery of the region of activation. The average wave
velocities were 27.3 ± 2.5 µm/s (n = 3) for
(2,4,5)IP3 and 8.5 ± 0.6 µm/s (n = 7) for adenophostin A. The value for (2,4,5)IP3 is within
and that for adenophostin A is just below the range reported for
agonist-dependent waves first described by Lechleiter et al. (1). Since wave velocity is dependent on the
diffusional distance between release sites, the lower value for
adenophostin A may indicate that the concentration of adenophostin
A-bound receptors is lower than for (2,4,5)IP3. We presume
that the limited size of this activated region is determined by the
limits of diffusion and action of adenophostin A. Thus, the restricted
area of [Ca2+]i waves underscores the absolute
requirement for activated IP3 receptors for propagation to
continue. The presence of such waves under conditions whereby
adenophostin appears essentially irreversibly affixed to the
IP3 receptor indicates that the affinity of the ligand for
the IP3 receptor, and specifically the rate of dissociation
of the ligand from the IP3 receptor, is not a determinant
of wave generation or propagation.
|
We examined the activation of Ca2+ entry in oocytes
injected with low concentrations of adenophostin A. Fig.
9 illustrates a result with an oocyte
injected with 10 nM adenophostin A. With this
concentration, spread of [Ca2+]i was slow, but
eventually filled the entire cell. Addition of external
Ca2+ at a time when [Ca2+]i was
elevated in the central regions, but not yet in the peripheral regions,
of the cell resulted in a further rise in [Ca2+]i
in the central regions, but no increase in the periphery. Thus, these
localized responses to adenophostin A are apparently capable of
activating Ca2+ entry.
|
There is considerable evidence that the endoplasmic reticulum of cells
is at least somewhat continuous throughout the cell (13). Thus, we
considered the possibility that despite the restricted localization of
the sites of Ca2+ release within the oocyte,
Ca2+ may become depleted from the lumen of the endoplasmic
reticulum in the cellular periphery and that this depleted endoplasmic
reticulum may contribute to the signaling of Ca2+ entry. To
investigate this possibility, we injected an oocyte with caged
(1,4,5)IP3 along with Calcium Green. In the experiment shown in Fig. 10, after insertion of
the microinjection pipette, the oocyte was briefly (5 ms) exposed to
the UV laser, liberating (1,4,5)IP3 in a small area of the
cytoplasm (in the xy plane). This resulted in a rapid and
transient release of intracellular Ca2+. Subsequently, the
same oocyte was injected with adenophostin A to give a final
concentration (if fully diluted) of ~10 pM. This quantity
of adenophostin A gave a relatively stable localized region of elevated
[Ca2+]i. Exposure to the UV laser revealed that
the release of Ca2+ in the peripheral regions appeared
similar to that seen prior to adenophostin A injection. Following the
discharge of Ca2+ by the photolytic release of
(1,4,5)IP3, the liberated Ca2+ was
re-accumulated presumably following the time course of diffusion and
metabolism of (1,4,5)IP3. This indicates that when the
action of adenophostin A is restricted to specific cellular regions, the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ stores outside of that
region remain fully charged and functional.
|
Fig. 11 illustrates an experiment in
which Ca2+ entry was assessed in an oocyte injected with
the lowest concentration of adenophostin A used (10 pM). In
this particular cell, an initial central release of Ca2+
was followed by the appearance of [Ca2+]i
oscillations. Addition of 10 mM extracellular
Ca2+ resulted in a sustained rise in
[Ca2+]i restricted to the region of the cell
influenced by the adenophostin A injection. Elevation in
[Ca2+]i was seen in the cell periphery only in
response to liberation of (1,4,5)IP3 from its caged
precursor.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of this study demonstrate that adenophostin A has the unique ability to activate and regulate [Ca2+]i signaling in precise, spatially restricted regions of the cell. The reason for this behavior is likely due to the high affinity of adenophostin A for the IP3 receptor and its presumed slow rate of dissociation from the receptor. In a previous report on the binding of IP3 to its receptor, Spät et al. (12) pointed out that the (1,4,5)IP3 signaling system worked efficiently because the concentration of cellular receptors was less than the Kd of (1,4,5)IP3 for its receptor. When the concentration of receptor is higher than the Kd of its ligand, nonlinear behavior can result, and the receptor becomes a reservoir for ligand, reducing its free concentration (14). This is likely the situation with low concentrations of adenophostin A, although adenophostin A at higher concentrations functions as a full and potent activator of the (1,4,5)IP3 pathway (15, 16).
Utilizing Ca2+-dependent chloride currents as an indirect assay of [Ca2+]i changes, both DeLisle et al. (8) and Hartzell et al. (9) observed activation of Ca2+ entry with low concentrations of adenophostin A (~100 pM (8) and ~50 pM (9)). DeLisle et al. saw no evidence of Ca2+ release with these concentrations, whereas Hartzell et al. observed small chloride currents attributable to intracellular release. Both groups of investigators concluded that an IP3 receptor was involved in the action of adenophostin A, possibly through releasing from a small subset of the intracellular stores. In a more recent publication, Machaca and Hartzell (10) also observed that the spread of adenophostin A-induced [Ca2+]i signals was somewhat slower than for (1,4,5)IP3 and concluded that the slow release might diminish the magnitude of the associated chloride current. Our findings suggest an alternative explanation for the inability of adenophostin A to efficiently activate chloride currents associated with release. When chloride current is used as a measure of [Ca2+]i, only changes in [Ca2+]i immediately under the plasma membrane can be observed. Clearly, any influx of Ca2+ must occur across the plasma membrane, and thus, the use of a plasma membrane-associated marker, such as Ca2+-dependent chloride channels, will be a sensitive indicator of this mode of Ca2+ signaling. From the current results, it is clear that injections of small quantities of adenophostin A can induce a substantial degree of intracellular release of Ca2+, but that this release can occur at some distance from the plasma membrane and thus would not be seen by plasma membrane chloride channels. The opacity of the ooplasm, due to high concentrations of yolk proteins, makes it difficult to image deeply into the oocyte. Thus, to observe this spatially restricted action of adenophostin A, we injected close to the plasma membrane just above the coverslip. These regions of release presumably make contact with the plasma membrane where it sits on the coverslip. The Ca2+ influx observed in this situation may be derived from Ca2+ in the limited aqueous space between the oocyte and coverslip. Presumably with injections in more central regions of the cell, such as in the previous electrophysiological experiments, it would be possible to activate regions of Ca2+ release that make minimal contact with the plasma membrane of the oocyte. Such spatially restricted regions of Ca2+ depletion might signal to the plasma membrane to activate entry that would be detected as chloride current. In any event, it is obvious from the unusual behavior of adenophostin A that assessment of [Ca2+]i changes near the plasma membrane may severely underestimate the extent of cellular Ca2+ discharge by this agent, and this may result in the apparent dissociation between release and entry observed in earlier studies.
In a recent report, the activity of a putative diffusible calcium influx factor, CIF, was described (17). This material was capable of diffusing through and activating calcium influx in regions associated with intact endoplasmic reticulum stores. In the current studies, if such a factor had been released from the regions of adenophostin A action, it would be expected to diffuse into and activate entry in the peripheral regions of the oocyte; however, no such signal was observed. Thus, the coupling of intracellular calcium release to calcium entry in the oocyte appears to depend more intimately on the proximity of IP3-depleted calcium stores, perhaps because of the involvement of IP3 receptors in conveying the signal to the plasma membrane (18).
Although adenophostin A may not have unique actions on the calcium
entry pathway, its unusual kinetic behavior affords an opportunity to
control experimentally the extent of Ca2+ signaling
spatially within a single cell. For example, the spatially restricted
calcium waves, such as those shown in Fig. 8, make it clear that wave
propagation cannot extend beyond the region of action of an
IP3 receptor agonist. Since regenerative waves were
frequently observed within this restricted region, it is clear that
agonist affinity, and specifically the dissociation rate from the
receptor, is not a factor in the propagation mechanism. This is
somewhat surprising given the well documented inhibitory effect of
Ca2+ on IP3 receptor affinity and specifically
the dissociation rate (19, 20). This unusual ability of adenophostin A
to produce spatially restricted regions of activated calcium signaling
may prove useful in other ways in future studies of the spatial and temporal aspects of Ca2+ signaling.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are indebted to Dr. James Lechleiter for advice on the techniques for injection of oocytes with inositol phosphates and confocal calcium imaging and to Jeff Reece for excellent technical support of the confocal facility. Useful critiques of this work were given by Drs. Lisa Broad and David Miller.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: NIEHS, NIH, P. O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Tel.: 919-541-1420; Fax: 919-541-1898; E-mail: putney@niehs.nih.gov.
2 Machaca and Hartzell (10) came to a somewhat similar conclusion based on a reduction of the effective concentration of adenophostin A as a result of its binding to IP3 receptors.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: (1,4,5)IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; (2,4,5)IP3, inositol 2,4,5-trisphosphate; IP3, inositol trisphosphate; ROI, region of interest.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Lechleiter, J.,
Girard, S.,
Peralta, E.,
and Clapham, D.
(1991)
Science
252,
123-126 |
| 2. | Petersen, C. C. H., and Berridge, M. J. (1996) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 432, 286-292[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Yao, Y.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
109,
703-715 |
| 4. | Berridge, M. J. (1993) Nature 361, 315-325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Putney, J. W., Jr. (1986) Cell Calcium 7, 1-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Putney, J. W., Jr. (1990) Cell Calcium 11, 611-624[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Takahashi, M.,
Tanzawa, K.,
and Takahashi, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
369-372 |
| 8. |
DeLisle, S.,
Marksberry, E. W.,
Bonnett, C.,
Jenkins, D. J.,
Potter, B. V. L.,
Takahashi, M.,
and Tanzawa, K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9956-9961 |
| 9. |
Hartzell, H. C.,
Machaca, K.,
and Hirayama, Y.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
51,
683-692 |
| 10. |
Machaca, K.,
and Hartzell, H. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4824-4831 |
| 11. | Bird, G., St, J., Rossier, M. F., Hughes, A. R., Shears, S. B., Armstrong, D. L., and Putney, J. W., Jr. (1991) Nature 352, 162-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Spät, A., Bradford, P. G., McKinney, J. S., Rubin, R. P., and Putney, J. W., Jr. (1986) Nature 319, 514-516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Meldolesi, J., and Pozzan, T. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 10-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Chang, K.-J., Jacobs, S., and Cuatrecasas, P. (1975) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 406, 294-303[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Hirota, J., Michikawa, T., Miyawaki, A., Takahashi, M., Tanzawa, K., Okura, I., Furuichi, T., and Mikoshiba, K. (1995) FEBS Lett. 368, 248-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Sato, Y.,
Miyazaki, S.,
Shikano, T.,
Mitsuhashi, N.,
Takeuchi, H.,
Mikoshiba, K.,
and Kuwabara, Y.
(1998)
Biol. Reprod.
58,
867-873 |
| 17. |
Csutora, P.,
Su, Z.,
Kim, H. Y.,
Bugrim, A.,
Cunningham, K. W.,
Nuccitelli, R.,
Keizer, J. E.,
Hanley, M. R.,
Blalock, J. E.,
and Marchase, R. B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
121-126 |
| 18. | Kiselyov, K., Xu, X., Mozhayeva, G., Kuo, T., Pessah, I., Mignery, G., Zhu, X., Birnbaumer, L., and Muallem, S. (1998) Nature 396, 478-482[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Worley, P. F.,
Baraban, J. M.,
Supattapone, S.,
Wilson, V. S.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
12132-12136 |
| 20. |
Hannaert-Merah, Z.,
Coquil, J.-F.,
Combettes, L.,
Claret, M.,
Mauger, J.-P.,
and Champeil, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29642-29649 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. Foskett, C. White, K.-H. Cheung, and D.-O. D. Mak Inositol Trisphosphate Receptor Ca2+ Release Channels Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 593 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Csordas, C. Renken, P. Varnai, L. Walter, D. Weaver, K. F. Buttle, T. Balla, C. A. Mannella, and G. Hajnoczky Structural and functional features and significance of the physical linkage between ER and mitochondria J. Cell Biol., September 25, 2006; 174(7): 915 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Correa, A. M. Riley, S. Shuto, G. Horne, E. P. Nerou, R. D. Marwood, B. V. L. Potter, and C. W. Taylor Structural Determinants of Adenophostin A Activity at Inositol Trisphosphate Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., April 16, 2001; 59(5): 1206 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Churchill and A. Galione Spatial Control of Ca2+ Signaling by Nicotinic Acid Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Diffusion and Gradients J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2000; 275(49): 38687 - 38692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Broad, F.-J. Braun, J.-P. Lievremont, G. St. J. Bird, T. Kurosaki, and J. W. Putney Jr. Role of the Phospholipase C-Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Pathway in Calcium Release-activated Calcium Current and Capacitative Calcium Entry J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 15945 - 15952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |