JBC Ideal method for primary cell transfection

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, A.
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, A.
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, D. F.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 20745-20748, July 23, 1999

MINIREVIEW
Proteolytic Processing in the Secretory Pathway*

An ZhouDagger §, Gene Webb§, Xiaorong Zhu§, and Donald F. SteinerDagger §

From the Dagger  Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the § Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
The Subtilisin-like Proprotein...
Two Major Functional Branches
Effects of Mutations and/or...
Perspective
REFERENCES

Many cellular processes, including embryogenesis (1-4), gene expression (5), cell cycle (6), programmed cell death (7), intracellular protein targeting (8) and endocrine/neural functions (9-13) are regulated by limited proteolysis of precursor proteins (14, 15). These functions are carried out by proteolytic enzyme families that are strategically localized within cells or on cell surfaces (3, 5-7, 9, 10). This review focuses on the serine proteases that process protein precursors (proproteins) traversing the secretory pathway (for recent reviews, see Refs. 9, 11-13, 16-19, 62). The early development of this field is reviewed in Ref. 14.

    The Subtilisin-like Proprotein Convertases
TOP
INTRODUCTION
The Subtilisin-like Proprotein...
Two Major Functional Branches
Effects of Mutations and/or...
Perspective
REFERENCES

The secretory pathway processing enzymes are calcium-dependent serine endoproteases related to subtilisin and the yeast processing protease Kex2p, or kexin (9, 10, 16), and hence have been called subtilisin-like proprotein convertases (SPCs)1 or more simply PCs. Seven members of this family in mammals have now been identified and characterized (Fig. 1). Although a three-dimensional structure is not yet available, their catalytic modules have been modeled on the basis of the x-ray structure of subtilisin (20, 21). Like subtilisin, these proteases become active by autocatalytic cleavage of an N-terminal propeptide, which is required for folding of the proenzymes (12, 13, 22). A downstream domain of about 150 amino acids, called the P- or Homo B-domain (Fig. 1) (9, 10), is also required for folding and activity. This domain plays a regulatory role, influencing both the calcium dependence and pH optima (23). The variable C-terminal regions of the PCs (Fig. 1) are less conserved and play a role in their subcellular routing (12, 13, 18).


View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of the structural features of the mammalian family of subtilisin-like proprotein convertases (SPCs). All seven members have well conserved signal peptides, proregions (Pro), catalytic domains (CAT), and P domains (P) but differ in their C-terminal domains (VAR), as indicated. Autocatalytic cleavage and release of the prodomain result in activation (see "Autoactivation Mechanism" for details). Modeling studies predict that the P domain folds to form an eight-stranded beta barrel that interacts with the catalytic domain through a hydrophobic patch (24). A note on alternative terminology: furin, SPC1/PACE; PC2, SPC2; PC1/PC3, SPC3; PACE4, SPC4; PC4, SPC5; PC6, SPC6; PC7, SPC7/PC8/LPC (see Refs. 9, 59, 60, and 61).

The classical motif for processing by the PCs is KRdown-arrow or RRdown-arrow (9, 13). However, upstream basic residues at the P4 and/or P6 position also contribute to substrate recognition (16, 21, 25). Furin preferentially recognizes the motif RXK/RRdown-arrow but also is known to cleave RXXRdown-arrow sites in some precursors (11, 26). Endoproteolytic cleavage is followed by exoproteolytic removal of the exposed C-terminal basic residues (14) by CPE in neuroendocrine and some other tissues, as well as by other recently discovered carboxypeptidases such as CPD (27, 28), CPZ (29, 30), and/or CPM (31).

Autoactivation Mechanism-- The autoactivation of furin (11, 32) serves as a model for the other PCs, with the exception of PC2 (discussed below). Intramolecular cleavage of the prodomain allows furin to exit the ER (33). However, the prodomain remains attached noncovalently until the cleaved inactive proenzyme reaches the TGN where the more acidic (pH ~6.5) and calcium-enriched environment facilitates dissociation of the prodomain (32). A second cleavage within the prodomain then precludes further inhibitory interactions, resulting in full activation (32). A similar mechanism of activation has been demonstrated for PC1/PC3 (9), PC4 (13), PC5 (34), and PC7 (35, 36). Pro-PACE4 autocleavage is slow but probably also occurs prior to exit from the ER (37).

The Neuroendocrine Protein 7B2 Is Essential for the Activation of Pro-PC2-- PC2 is unique in that it requires the acidic conditions of a late post-Golgi compartment for its autoactivation (38). In the ER pro-PC2 interacts with 7B2, a 27-kDa neuroendocrine secretory protein that is coexpressed with PC2 in many neuroendocrine tissues (39, 40). In the absence of 7B2, autocleavage of the PC2 prodomain will occur but gives rise only to inactive enzyme (41). Biosynthetic studies show that 7B2 binds to pro-PC2 after it has folded and then facilitates its intracellular transport and activation (42). During its transport 7B2 undergoes cleavage at a polybasic site toward the C terminus, most likely by furin or related TGN proteases (43), resulting in the release of an N-terminal 21-kDa form and an inhibitory C-terminal fragment (44, 45). A KKdown-arrow site in this fragment is required for its specific inhibitory action on PC2 (42, 44) but also is slowly cleaved by PC2 (46). Whether the C-terminal peptide normally retards PC2 activity is unclear (47).

The 21-kDa N-terminal domain of 7B2 is capable of both generating and stabilizing active PC2 (48). It contains a polyproline helix-like segment that interacts with pro-PC2 via structural determinants that appear to reside mainly within the catalytic domain (49); site-directed mutagenesis studies indicate that mutation of Tyr194 of pro-PC2 to Asp (as in PC1/PC3) blocks its binding to 7B2 and subsequent activation (50). Interestingly, mutation of the unusual oxyanion residue, Asp-309, to Asn in pro-PC2 also inhibits binding to pro-7B2 (51).

Both PC2 and 7B2 are highly conserved in evolution; homologues of 7B2 have recently been described in the molluscan Lymnaea stagnalis (52) and in Caenorhabditis elegans (53). Recently, mice with a disruption of the 7B2 gene have been produced and, as expected, they lack active PC2 but have other defects (54). The nature of the 7B2-induced structural alterations that facilitate pro-PC2 autoactivation are of great interest as a topic for further study.

    Two Major Functional Branches
TOP
INTRODUCTION
The Subtilisin-like Proprotein...
Two Major Functional Branches
Effects of Mutations and/or...
Perspective
REFERENCES

The mammalian SPCs function in either the regulated or constitutive branches of the secretory pathway. The convertases PC2 and PC1/PC3 (Fig. 1) are the major forms expressed in the neuroendocrine system and brain, where they act on prohormone and neuropeptide precursors within dense core vesicles of the regulated secretory pathway (9, 13). PC4, which is expressed only in the testis (55), and an isoform of PC6 that lacks a TM domain, PC6A, also belong to this group (34). The differential expression of PC2 and PC1/PC3 in various endocrine cells and neurons gives rise to varied mixtures of peptide products with divergent or opposing activities, sometimes derived from the same precursor (Fig. 2). Both the transcription and translation of PC2 and PC1/PC3 mRNA are regulated in neuroendocrine cells by glucose, second messengers, and other factors (9, 56-58), usually in parallel with regulatory changes in prohormone expression.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Structural organization of three well studied peptide hormone precursors, proinsulin, proglucagon, and POMC. The convertase(s) identified as responsible for processing at each cleavage site are indicated. Note that KR and RR are the most frequently occurring sites. Under normal conditions, proglucagon is differentially processed in the pancreatic islet alpha cells and the intestinal mucosal L cells. In the alpha cells, PC2 acting alone releases only active glucagon, whereas in the intestinal L cells, PC1/PC3 is the predominant convertase and acts to release only active forms of glucagon-like peptides GLP-1 and GLP-2 (9, 89-91). Similarly, in the pituitary gland in the pituitary anterior lobe corticotrophs, PC1/PC3 is the predominant convertase, and its action results in the release of intact ACTH and small amounts of beta -endorphin. In the pituitary middle lobe, both PC2 and PC3 are expressed, resulting in the further processing of ACTH to alpha -MSH with increased production of beta -endorphin. Thus, PC2 and PC1/PC3 have an absolute specificity for some sites in precursor proteins, although at others both enzymes may act, as indicated above. A recent report indicates that PC6A may also be involved in the processing of some precursors, e.g. proneurotensin (110). tGLP1, N-terminally truncated GLP-1.

The other major convertase family branch includes furin, PACE4, PC6B, and the more recently discovered PC7 (59-61) (Fig. 1). These convertases are expressed in many tissues, including the neuroendocrine system, liver, gut, and brain, where their active forms are localized in the TGN and small secretory vesicles of the constitutive pathway (11, 13, 62, 63). Because of alternative splicing, some of these exist in multiple forms, e.g. PACE4 (64) and PC5/PC6 (34). All of these convertases more closely resemble the yeast homologue, kexin, which also is localized in the TGN by a TM/cytosolic tail and functions analogously (65). The convertase genes share intron/exon structure (9, 13), implying their origin in early metazoans from an ancestral kexin/subtilisin-like protease gene via duplication and divergence into TGN-localized and non-anchored secretory granule-localized forms (9, 13, 17).

Furin, PC6B, and PC7 are retained in the TGN by virtue of their TM domains and cytosolic tails (Fig. 1). This strategic location provides access to the many precursors that move to the cell surface via constitutive vesicles (11). In addition to many serum proteins produced in the liver (16), they participate in processing precursors of a wide variety of tissue growth factors, such as TGF-beta (2), BMP-4 (1), and the insulin-like growth factors, IGF-I and -II (66), as well as a number of growth factor receptors such as the insulin, IGF-I, and hepatocyte growth factor receptor proteins (67, 68). Furin and PC7 also play a major role in the processing of the envelope glycoproteins of many viruses (69, 70), including the human immunodeficiency virus (71-73) and Ebola virus (74).

The TGN localization of kexin involves interactions of its cytosolic tail with clathrin (75). In yeast mutants lacking the clathrin heavy chain, kexin moves to the cell surface where it is ineffective in processing substrates. On the other hand, mutations in its cytosolic tail at Tyr713, which is part of a TGN localization signal (TLS-1) normally result in its missorting to the vacuole (76). A novel 3144-residue protein (SOI1) has been identified as a suppressor of TLS-1 mutants (65). It is proposed to promote cycling of kexin between TGN and prevacuolar compartments.

The cytosolic tail of furin contains motifs that direct its intracellular trafficking (11). These include tyrosine-based endocytotic signal sequences (77), a dileucine-like sequence, as well as an acidic casein kinase II site (78, 79). Similar motifs have been found in the cytosolic tail of PC6B (34). Dephosphorylation of the casein kinase II site by protein phosphatase 2 isoforms containing beta  regulatory subunits promotes the return of furin to the TGN from the plasma membrane via endocytotic recycling pathways (80), whereas phosphorylation causes it to exit the TGN (78). Binding of PACS-1 (81) to the phosphorylated cytosolic domain promotes cycling between early endosomes and the cell surface. An actin filament cross-linking protein, ABP-280, interacts directly with the cytosolic domain and tethers furin to the cell surface (82). Although PC7 is also localized in the TGN, its cytosolic tail differs significantly from those of furin and PC6B in that it undergoes palmitoylation (35). It also lacks the retrieval motif YXXL and is not phosphorylated but contains two dileucine motifs that might be involved in its retrieval from the plasma membrane.

The cytosolic tail of furin associates with clathrin in a phosphorylation-dependent manner via the AP-1 adapter complex (83). A role for the clathrin coating on immature regulated secretory vesicles in neuroendocrine cells appears to be the retrieval of proteins such as furin and mannose-6-P receptors from these vesicles via a constitutive-like pathway (83-85). The presence of this pathway is evidenced by an early burst of secretion of pulse-labeled procathepsin B and proinsulin from beta cells (86). Both procathepsin-B and furin appear to be very efficiently recovered from early secretory granules, whereas only a low proportion of proinsulin and C-peptide exits immature secretory granules via this pathway (86). Some shedding of furin from cells also can occur (87).

PACE4 differs from the above constitutive pathway convertases in having a relatively large cysteine-rich domain but lacking a transmembrane anchor (Fig. 1). Its cleavage specificity, altered sensitivity to inhibitors, and relative insensitivity to calcium chelators suggest that it plays a unique, but as yet unknown, role in processing in the constitutive pathway (37).

    Effects of Mutations and/or Disruptions in Convertase Genes
TOP
INTRODUCTION
The Subtilisin-like Proprotein...
Two Major Functional Branches
Effects of Mutations and/or...
Perspective
REFERENCES

A Furin Null Mutation Results in Embryonic Lethality-- Null embryos appear normal until day 8.5 but then fail to undergo axial rotation. Consequent disruption of the development of many systems, but especially of the heart and vascular systems, results in embryonic death between days 10.5 and 11.5 (4).

PC4 Null Mice Have Impaired Fertility-- PC4 transcripts have been found only in the male gonad in spermatocytes and round spermatids (55). Disruption of the gene encoding PC4 leads to severe impairment of fertility in homozygous males (88). The fertility of the PC4 null spermatozoa is reduced, and fertilized ova fail to develop. The results suggest that PC4 is required for the production of fertile and developmentally competent spermatozoa.

Multiple Effects of a PC2 Null Mutation-- Mice lacking active PC2 because of deletion of exon 3 survive and reproduce but with reduced litter size and a slightly subnormal growth rate (89). Homozygous null mice exhibit a complex polyendocrine phenotype, whereas heterozygotes are normal. Pancreatic proinsulin stores are elevated to 35-40% of total insulin-like material (normal levels are below 5%), and these are the source of elevated circulating proinsulin. In biosynthetic labeling experiments half-times for the conversion of both mouse proinsulins I and II are prolonged approximately 3-fold (25). Larger than normal amounts of des-31,32-proinsulin, an intermediate cleaved at the B chain-C-peptide junction (the preferential site of action of PC1/PC3), are also generated (see Fig. 2).

Despite the defective processing of proinsulin the PC2 nulls have no tendency to develop diabetes. Instead, their blood glucose level is lower than normal, and the rise in response to glucose is reduced (89). Rouillé et al. (90, 91) have demonstrated that PC2 acts alone to generate the characteristic alpha cell pattern of processing of the multifunctional proglucagon molecule, resulting in the selective release of only glucagon (see Fig. 2). Accordingly, mature glucagon is not detectable in the plasma, although large amounts of proglucagon and some partially processed larger forms are present in the alpha cells and the circulation (89). The chronic hypoglycemia confirms the major role of glucagon in physiology as a tonic antagonist of insulin.

Prosomatostatin also is not processed normally to somatostatin 14 in the islet delta cells (89) or in the brain.2 Because PC2 is the predominant convertase in all the non-beta islet cells (92), it is likely that the biosynthesis of all of the other islet hormones is adversely affected. Lack of PC2 in the beta cells may also impair IAPP/amylin production (93). The metabolic consequences of these defects are not known.

The PC2 null islets are enlarged and show marked hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the alpha, delta, and gamma cells in the periphery of the islets, whereas the central beta cell mass appears to be diminished significantly (89). Hyperplasia in the alpha and delta cell populations presumably represents an attempt to compensate for the lack of their normal processed hormonal products. Preliminary results indicate that long term administration of glucagon to PC2 null mice results in normalization of blood sugar levels and reversal of alpha cell hyperplasia.3 These results demonstrate that the lack of glucagon in the PC2 null animals accounts for at least two of the major phenotypes and dramatically illustrates the existence of dynamic feedback mechanisms that regulate the growth and relative size of these islet cellular compartments.

The PC2-deficient mice also have multiple defects in neuropeptide production. Recent studies have shown marked reductions in neuropeptide-EI (94) and opioid peptides (95, 96)4 as well as in alpha -MSH, which is generated in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary by the conjoint action of PC2 and PC1/PC3 on POMC (see Fig. 2).5

7B2 Null Mice Lack Active PC2 and Develop Cushing's Disease-- These animals have a pattern of prohormone processing defects like that of the PC2 null mice. However, they develop a fulminant form of Cushing's disease because of excessive secretion of ACTH from the pituitary intermediate lobe. ACTH accumulates in this lobe because of the lack of PC2 to convert it to alpha -MSH (see Fig. 2), and 7B2 may play a role in regulating its secretion (54).

PC1/PC3 Deficiency in Man-- Although a mouse model of PC1/PC3 deficiency is not yet available, an adult subject with severe obesity and hyperproinsulinemia (97) has been found to be a compound heterozygote for inactivating PC1/PC3 gene mutations (98). Multiple endocrine deficits include elevated proinsulin and ACTH precursors (POMC and intermediates) in the plasma (97); PC1/PC3 is the major convertase that cleaves ACTH from POMC in the anterior pituitary corticotrophs (16) (see Fig. 2). Increased amounts of des-64,65-proinsulin intermediates accompany elevated intact proinsulin, as would be expected from a lack of PC1/PC3-mediated cleavage at the B chain-C-peptide junction to generate des-31,32-proinsulin (Fig. 2), an intermediate that is more readily cleaved by PC2 than is intact proinsulin (99). The absence of detectable insulin in the blood suggests that PC1/PC3 plays a major role in proinsulin processing.

The early and marked obesity probably is the result of defective processing of neuropeptides involved in hypothalamic regulation of food intake (100). Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in this subject (97) suggests that PC1/PC3 may also be involved in processing gonadotropin-releasing hormone.

CPE Deficiency Syndrome-- CPEfat mice are obese, hyperglycemic, and hyper(pro)-insulinemic because of an inactivating point mutation in the CPE gene (Ser-202 right-arrow Pro) (101, 102). Other processing carboxypeptidases such as CPD (27) and CPZ (29) partially offset this defect in brain and some tissues. Pancreatic extracts contain 40-50% proinsulin and arginine-extended forms of insulin. The rapid buildup of such C-terminally extended intermediates may inhibit the SPC endoproteases in various neuroendocrine tissues (96, 103, 104).

A recent proposal that CPE is a sorting receptor for the regulated secretory pathway (105, 106) is not supported by studies directly measuring the efficiency of proinsulin sorting in islets of CPEfat mice (107). Moreover, large amounts of proinsulin and POMC are found in abundant secretory granules in islet and pituitary cells, respectively, of the CPEfat mice, consistent with normal sorting.

    Perspective
TOP
INTRODUCTION
The Subtilisin-like Proprotein...
Two Major Functional Branches
Effects of Mutations and/or...
Perspective
REFERENCES

Although a large body of data strongly supports the notion that the SPC family of enzymes plays a central role in the processing of most precursor proteins in the secretory pathway, other as yet unidentified enzymes may participate in some cleavages at single basic residues and other unusual cleavage sites. For example, a recently discovered ER-localized protease with a subtilisin-like catalytic domain is distantly related to the SPCs and cleaves at sites having the sequence RSVL down-arrow  (5, 111). This enzyme cleaves the precursor of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein and may well represent the first member of a novel subfamily of ER-active processing enzymes (5), i.e. similar cleavage sites have been noted in prorelaxin and several other precursor proteins (see Ref. 13). Efforts to identify other types of processing proteases, such as thiol, aspartic, or metalloproteases (reviewed in Refs. 108 and 109), have yet to lead to definitive genetic evidence to support their participation in neuroendocrine precursor processing. Much remains to be done to elucidate the structural features of the SPCs that lead to their great selectivity, sorting behavior, pH sensitivity, and calcium activation and to define more fully their normal substrates and the regulation of their tissue-specific expression.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to many colleagues who shared work in press with us for this review. We thank Will Chutkow for assistance with figures and Rosie Ricks for preparation of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This minireview will be reprinted in the 1999 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in December, 1999. This is the second of four articles in the "Proteases in Cellular Regulation Minireview Series." Work from this laboratory is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-13914 and DK-20595.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Howard Hughes Medical Inst., Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 1028, Rm. N-216, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-702-1334; Fax: 773-702-4292; E-mail: dfsteine@midway.uchicago.edu.

2 G. Chiu and D. F. Steiner, unpublished results.

3 G. Webb and D. F. Steiner, unpublished data.

4 L. Devi, personal communication.

5 A. Zhou and D. F. Steiner, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SPC, subtilisin-like proprotein convertase; PC, proprotein convertase; CPE, carboxypeptidase E; CPD, carboxypeptidase D; CPZ, carboxypeptidase Z; CPM, carboxypeptidase M; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; TGN, trans-Golgi network; TM, transmembrane; MSH, melanocyte-stimulating hormone; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; TGF, transforming growth factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
INTRODUCTION
The Subtilisin-like Proprotein...
Two Major Functional Branches
Effects of Mutations and/or...
Perspective
REFERENCES

1. Cui, Y., Jean, F., Thomas, G., and Christian, J. L. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4735-4743[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Dubois, C. M., Laprise, M.-H., Blanchette, F., Gentry, L. E., and Leduc, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10618-10624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Peschon, J., Slack, J. L., Reddy, P., Stocking, K. L., Sunnarborg, S. W., Lee, D. C., Russell, W. E., Castner, B. J., Johnson, R. S., Fitzner, J. N., Boyce, R. W., Nelson, N., Kozlosky, C. J., Wolfson, M. F., Rauch, C. T., Cerretti, D. P., Paxton, R. J., March, C. J., and Black, R. A. (1998) Science 282, 1281-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Roebroek, A. J., Umans, L., Pauli, I. G., Robertson, E. J., van Leuven, F., Van de Ven, W. J., and Constam, D. B. (1998) Development 125, 4863-4876[Abstract]
5. Sakai, J., Rawson, R. B., Espenshade, P. J., Cheng, D., Seegmiller, A. C., Goldstein, J. L., and Brown, M. S. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 505-514[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Wilkinson, K. (1995) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 15, 161-189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Thornberry, N. A., and Lazebnik, Y. (1998) Science 281, 1312-1316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Martoglio, B., and Dobberstein, B. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 410-415 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Rouillé, Y., Duguay, S., Lund, K., Furuta, M., Gong, Q., Lipkind, G., Oliva, A., Jr., Chan, S., and Steiner, D. (1995) Front. Neuroendocrinol. 16, 322-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Seidah, N., Chrétien, M., and Day, R. (1994) Biochimie (Paris) 76, 197-209[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Nakayama, K. (1997) Biochem. J. 327, 625-635
12. Creemers, J. W., Jackson, R. S., and Hutton, J. C. (1998) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 3-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Seidah, N., Mbikay, M., Marcinkiewicz, M., and Chrétien, M. (1998) in Proteolytic and Cellular Mechanisms in Prohormone Processing (Hook, V., ed) , pp. 49-76, RG Landes, Georgetown
14. Steiner, D., Kemmler, W., Tager, H., and Peterson, J. (1974) Fed. Proc. 33, 2105-2115[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Neurath, H. (1998) J. Cell. Biochem. 32, 35-49
16. Steiner, D. F., Smeekens, S. P., Ohagi, S., and Chan, S. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23435-23438[Free Full Text]
17. Seidah, N. G., Day, R., Marcinkiewicz, M., and Chrétien, M. (1998) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 839, 9-24[Free Full Text]
18. Steiner, D. F. (1998) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 31-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Muller, L., and Lindberg, I. (1999) in Progress in Nucleic Acids Research (Moldave, L., ed) , Academic Press, San Diego, in press
20. Siezen, R. J., de Vos, W. M., Leunissen, J. A., and Dijkstra, B. W. (1991) Protein Eng. 4, 719-737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Lipkind, G., Gong, Q., and Steiner, D. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13277-13284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Hu, Z., Zhu, X., Jordan, F., and Inouye, M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 562-569[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Zhou, A., Martin, S., Lipkind, G., LaMendola, J., and Steiner, D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11107-11114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Lipkind, G., Zhou, A., and Steiner, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7310-7315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Furuta, M., Carroll, R., Martin, S., Swift, H., Ravazzola, M., Orci, L., and Steiner, D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3431-3437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Molloy, S. S., Bresnahan, P. A., Leppla, S. H., Klimpel, K. R., and Thomas, G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16396-16402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Varlamov, O., and Fricker, L. D. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 877-885[Abstract]
28. Dong, W., Fricker, L. D., and Day, R. (1999) Neuroscience 89, 1301-1317[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Song, L., and Fricker, L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10543-10550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Xin, X., Day, R., Dong, W., Lei, Y., and Fricker, L. D. (1998) DNA Cell Biol. 17, 311-319[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. McGwire, G., and Skidgel, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17154-17158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Anderson, E., VanSlyke, J., Thulin, C., Jean, F., and Thomas, G. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1508-1518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Vey, M., Schafer, W., Berghofer, S., Klenk, H.-D., and Garten, W. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 1829-1842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. De Bie, I., Marcinkiewicz, M., Malide, D., Lazure, C., Nakayama, K., Bendayan, M., and Seidah, N. G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 1261-1275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. van de Loo, J.-W. H., Creemers, J. W., Bright, N. A., Young, B. D., Roebroek, A. J., and Van de Ven, W. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27116-27123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Munzer, J., Basak, A., Zhong, M., Mamarbachi, A., Hamelin, J., Savaria, D., Lazure, C., Benjannet, S., Chrétien, M., and Seidah, N. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19672-19681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Mains, R. E., Berard, C. A., Denault, J.-B., Zhou, A., Johnson, R. C., and Leduc, R. (1997) Biochem. J. 321, 587-593
38. Lamango, N. S., Apletalina, E., Liu, J., and Lindberg, I. (1999) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 362, 275-282[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Seidel, B., Dong, W., Savaria, D., Zheng, M., Pintar, J. E., and Day, R. (1998) DNA Cell Biol. 17, 1017-1029[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Braks, J., and Martens, G. (1994) Cell 78, 263-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Zhu, X., and Lindberg, I. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 1641-1650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Muller, L., Zhu, X., and Lindberg, I. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 625-638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Benjannet, S., Savaria, D., Chrétien, M., and Seidah, N. (1995) J. Neurochem. 64, 2303-2311[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Van Horssen, A., Van den Hurk, W., Bailyes, E., Hutton, J., Martens, G., and Lindberg, I. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14292-14296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Lindberg, I., van den Hurk, W., Bui, C., and Batie, C. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 5486-5493[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Zhu, X., Rouille, Y., Lamango, N., Steiner, D., and Lindberg, I. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 4919-4924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Braks, J., Van Horssen, A., and Martens, G. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 505-510[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Lamango, N., Zhu, X., and Lindberg, I. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 330, 238-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Zhu, X., Lamango, N., and Lindberg, I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23582-23587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Zhu, X., Muller, L., Mains, R., and Lindberg, I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1158-1164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Benjannet, S., Mamarbachi, A., Hamelin, J., Savaria, D., Munzer, J., Chrétien, M., and Seidah, N. (1998) FEBS Lett. 428, 37-42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Spijker, S., Smit, A., Martens, G., and Geraerts, W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4116-4120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Lindberg, I., Tu, B., Muller, L., and Dickerson, I. (1998) DNA Cell Biol. 17, 727-734[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Westphal, C., Muller, L., Zhou, A., Zhu, X., Bonner-Weir, S., Steiner, D., Lindberg, I., and Leder, P. (1999) Cell 96, 689-700[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Mbikay, M., Raffin-Sanson, M.-L., Tadros, H., Sirois, F., Seidah, N., and Chrétien, M. (1994) Genomics 20, 231-237[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Schuppin, G. T., and Rhodes, C. J. (1996) Biochem. J. 313, 259-268
57. Mania-Farnell, B. L., Botros, I., Day, R., and Davis, T. P. (1996) Peptides 17, 47-54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Jansen, E., Ayoubi, T. A., Meulemans, S. M., and Van de Ven, W. J. (1997) Biochem. J. 328, 69-74
59. Meerabux, J., Yaspo, M.-L., Roebroek, A., Van de Ven, W., Lister, T., and Young, B. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 448-454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Seidah, N., Hamelin, J., Mamarbachi, M., Dong, W., Tadros, H., Mbikay, M., Chrétien, M., and Day, R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 3388-3393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Bruzzaniti, A., Goodge, K., Jay, P., Taviaux, S., Lam, M., Berta, P., Martin, T., Moseley, J., and Gillespie, M. (1996) Biochem. J. 314, 727-731
62. Molloy, S. S., Anderson, E. D., Jean, F., and Thomas, G. (1999) Trends Cell Biol. 9, 28-35 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Denault, J.-B., and Leduc, R. (1996) FEBS Lett. 379, 113-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Zhong, M., Benjannett, S., Lazure, C., Munzer, S., and Seidah, N. G. (1996) FEBS Lett. 396, 31-36[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Brickner, J. H., and Fuller, R. S. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 23-36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Duguay, S., Milewski, W., Young, B., Nakayama, K., and Steiner, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6663-6670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67. Bravo, D. A., Gleason, J. B., Sanchez, R. I., Roth, R. A., and Fuller, R. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25830-25837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. Takahashi, S., Nakagawa, T., Kasai, K., Banno, T., Duguay, S., Van de Ven, W., Murakami, K., and Nakayama, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26565-26569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69. Stieneke-Grober, A., Vey, M., Angliker, H., Shaw, E., Thomas, G., Roberts, C., Klenk, H., and Garten, W. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2407-2414[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
70. Richt, J. A., Fürbringer, T., Koch, A., Pfeuffer, I., Herden, C., Bause-Biedrig, I., and Garten, W. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 4528-4533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71. Inocencio, N. M., Sucic, J. F., Moehring, J. M., Spence, M. J., and Moehring, T. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1344-1348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
72. Decroly, E., Benjannet, S., Savaria, D., and Seidah, N. G. (1997) FEBS Lett. 405, 68-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Hallenberger, S., Moulard, M., Sorden, M., Klenk, H.-D., and Garten, W. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 1036-1045[Abstract]
74. Volchkov, V. E., Feldmann, H., Volchkova, V. A., and Klenk, H.-D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5762-5767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
75. Redding, K., Seeger, M., Payne, G., and Fuller, R. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1667-1677[Abstract]
76. Redding, K., Brickner, J., Marschall, L., Nichols, J., and Fuller, R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6208-6217[Abstract]
77. Owen, D. J., and Evans, P. R. (1998) Science 282, 1327-1332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
78. Jones, B., Thomas, L., Molloy, S., Thulin, C., Fry, M., Walsh, K., and Thomas, G. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5869-5883[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
79. Schäfer, W., Stroh, A., Berghofer, S., Seiler, J., Vey, M., Kruse, M.-L., Hern, H., Klenk, H.-D., and Garten, W. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2424-2435[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
80. Molloy, S. S., Thomas, L., Kamibayashi, C., Mumby, M. C., and Thomas, G. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 1399-1411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
81. Wan, L., Molloy, S. S., Thomas, L., Liu, G., Xiang, Y., Rybak, S. L., and Thomas, G. (1998) Cell 94, 205-216[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
82. Liu, G., Thomas, L., Warren, R. A., Enns, C. A., Cunningham, C. C., Hartwig, J. H., and Thomas, G. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1719-1733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
83. Dittie, A. S., Thomas, L., Thomas, G., and Tooze, S. A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 4859-4879[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
84. Klumperman, J., Kuliawat, R., Griffith, J. M., Geuze, H. J., and Arvan, P. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 359-371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
85. Arvan, P., and Castle, D. (1998) Biochem. J. 332, 593-610
86. Kuliawat, R., Klumperman, J., Ludwig, T., and Arvan, P. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 595-608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
87. Vidricaire, G., Denault, J.-B., and Leduc, R. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195, 1011-1018[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
88. Mbikay, M., Tadros, H., Ishida, N., Lerner, C., De Lamirande, E., Chen, E., El-Alfy, M., Clermont, Y., Seidah, N., Chrétien, M., Gagnon, C., and Simpson, E. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 6842-6846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
89. Furuta, M., Yano, H., Zhou, A., Rouille, Y., Holst, J., Carroll, R., Ravazzola, M., Orci, L., Furuta, H., and Steiner, D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 6646-6651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
90. Rouillé, Y., Martin, S., and Steiner, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26488-26496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
91. Rouillé, Y., Bianchi, M., Irminger, J.-C., and Halban, P. (1997) FEBS Lett. 413, 119-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
92. Tanaka, S., Kurabuchi, S., Mochida, H., Kato, T., Takahashi, S., Watanabe, T., and Nakayama, K. (1996) Arch. Histol. Cytol. 59, 261-271[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
93. Badman, M. K., Shennan, K. I., Jermany, J. L., Docherty, K., and Clark, A. (1996) FEBS Lett. 378, 227-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Viale, A., Ortola, C., Hervieu, G., Furuta, M., Barbero, P., Steiner, D. F., Seidah, N. G., and Nahon, J.-L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6536-6545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
95. Johanning, K., Juliano, M. A., Juliano, L., Lazure, C., Lamango, N. S., Steiner, D. F., and Lindberg, I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22672-22680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
96. Day, R., Lazure, C., Basak, A., Boudreault, A., Limperis, P., and Dong, W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 829-836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
97. O'Rahilly, S., Gray, H., Humphreys, P., Krook, A., Polonsky, K., White, A., Gibson, S., Taylor, K., and Carr, C. (1995) N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 1386-1390[Free Full Text]
98. Jackson, R., Creemers, J., Ohagi, S., Raffin-Sanson, M.-L., Sanders, L., Montague, C., Hutton, J., and O'Rahilly, S. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 303-306[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
99. Rhodes, C., Lincoln, B., and Shoelson, S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 22719-22727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
100. Friedman, J. M., and Halaas, J. L. (1998) Nature 395, 763-770[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
101. Naggert, J., Fricker, L., Varlamov, O., Nishina, P., Rouille, Y., Steiner, D., Carroll, R., Paigen, B., and Leiter, E. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 135-142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
102. Varlamov, O., Leiter, E. H., and Fricker, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13981-13986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
103. Rovere, C., Viale, A., Nahon, J.-L., and Kitabgi, P. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 2954-2958[Abstract]
104. Udupi, V., Gomez, P., Song, L., Varlamov, O., Reed, J. T., Leiter, E. H., Fricker, L. D., and Greeley, G. H. J. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 1959-1963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
105. Cool, D., Normant, E., Shen, F.-S., Chen, H.-C., Pannell, L., Zhang, Y., and Loh, Y. (1997) Cell 88, 73-83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
106. Shen, F.-S., and Loh, Y. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5314-5319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
107. Irminger, J.-C., Verchere, C. B., Meyer, K., and Halban, P. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27532-27534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
108. Hook, V. Y. (1998) in Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes (Barrett, A. J., ed) , pp. 779-782, Academic Press, San Diego
109. Loh, Y. P., and Cawley, N. X. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 248, 136-146[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
110. Barbero, P., Rovère, C., DeBie, I., Seidah, N., Beaudet, A., and Kitabgi, P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25339-25346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
111. Seidah, N. G., Mowla, S. J., Hamelin, J., Mamarbachi, A. M., Benjannet, S., Touré, B. B., Basak, A., Munzer, J. S., Marcinkeiwicz, J., Zhong, M., Barale, J.-C., Lazure, C., Murphy, R. A., Chrétien, M., and Marcinkiewicz, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 1321-1326[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Yamaguchi, K. Sasaki, Y. Satomi, T. Shimbara, H. Kageyama, M. S. Mondal, K. Toshinai, Y. Date, L. J. Gonzalez, S. Shioda, et al.
Peptidomic Identification and Biological Validation of Neuroendocrine Regulatory Peptide-1 and -2
J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26354 - 26360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
M. Falth, K. Skold, M. Svensson, A. Nilsson, D. Fenyo, and P. E. Andren
Neuropeptidomics Strategies for Specific and Sensitive Identification of Endogenous Peptides
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2007; 6(7): 1188 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-R. Hwang, C. Garza, C. Mosier, T. Toneff, E. Wunderlich, P. Goldsmith, and V. Hook
Cathepsin L Expression Is Directed to Secretory Vesicles for Enkephalin Neuropeptide Biosynthesis and Secretion
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9556 - 9563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Zhu, Y. Cao, K. Voodg, and D. F. Steiner
On the Processing of Proghrelin to Ghrelin
J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38867 - 38870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
T. Yakovleva, I. Bazov, G. Cebers, Z. Marinova, Y. Hara, A. Ahmed, M. Vlaskovska, B. Johansson, U. Hochgeschwender, I. N. Singh, et al.
Prodynorphin storage and processing in axon terminals and dendrites
FASEB J, October 1, 2006; 20(12): 2124 - 2126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Kato, C. Jeanneau, M. A. Tarp, A. Benet-Pages, B. Lorenz-Depiereux, E. P. Bennett, U. Mandel, T. M. Strom, and H. Clausen
Polypeptide GalNAc-transferase T3 and Familial Tumoral Calcinosis: SECRETION OF FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 23 REQUIRES O-GLYCOSYLATION
J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18370 - 18377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. F. Feliciangeli, L. Thomas, G. K. Scott, E. Subbian, C.-H. Hung, S. S. Molloy, F. Jean, U. Shinde, and G. Thomas
Identification of a pH Sensor in the Furin Propeptide That Regulates Enzyme Activation
J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2006; 281(23): 16108 - 16116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B.-H. Koo, J.-M. Longpre, R. P. T. Somerville, J. P. Alexander, R. Leduc, and S. S. Apte
Cell-surface Processing of Pro-ADAMTS9 by Furin
J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2006; 281(18): 12485 - 12494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
M. Ahras, G. P. Otto, and S. A. Tooze
Synaptotagmin IV is necessary for the maturation of secretory granules in PC12 cells
J. Cell Biol., April 24, 2006; 173(2): 241 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Ugleholdt, M.-L. H. Poulsen, P. J. Holst, J.-C. Irminger, C. Orskov, J. Pedersen, M. M. Rosenkilde, X. Zhu, D. F. Steiner, and J. J. Holst
Prohormone Convertase 1/3 Is Essential for Processing of the Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Precursor
J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11050 - 11057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]