![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 20756-20758, July 23, 1999
,
¶
From the Departments of
Biological Chemistry and
§ Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of
Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chaperonin GroEL, consisting of two seven-subunit
rings stacked back-to-back, is disassembled by interaction of
4,4'-dithiodipyridine (DTP) with Cys458 located close
to the intersubunit contacts within and between the rings. The thiol
group of Cys458 is inaccessible to the probe being buried
into the pocket locked by segment
Asn475-Asn487. Flexibility of this segment is
proposed to induce the "open" state of the pocket and accommodate
the bulky probe inside so that the consequential irreversible shifts in
the pocket constituents disassemble GroEL. This scheme is supported by
the finding that DTP-induced disassembly of GroEL is facilitated by
ATP, which specifically stimulates a local shift of the segment
Asn475-Asn487 into solution.
The Escherichia coli heat-shock protein GroEL belongs
to the Hsp60 (cpn60, chaperonin) family of molecular chaperones
mediating the correct folding and assembly of newly synthesized
proteins (1, 2). The crystal structure of GroEL (3, 4) shows a porous
cylinder (137 Å in diameter and 146 Å in height) of 14 subunits made
of two heptameric rings stacked back-to-back. Stability of the GroEL
assembly is determined primarily by the equatorial domains, which
provide most of the side-side contacts between subunits within the
rings and all of the contacts across the equatorial plane that hold the
two rings together (5). We report here that attack of thiol-specific
probe DTP1 at the
Cys458 triggers disassembly of GroEL via irreversible
stepwise and local conformational shifts.
Wild type and mutant GroELs were prepared as described by us
earlier (6-8). AMPPNP and DTP were obtained from Sigma. Disassembly of
GroEL was started by mixing 5 µl of 1.25 µM GroEL
oligomers (0.052 mM cysteine residues) in the buffer,
containing 45 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 120 mM KCl,
and 0.15 mM EDTA, with 2.5 µl of 15 mM DTP in
10% acetonitrile. After incubation for 40 min at 25 °C, the GroEL
forms were separated by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described earlier (6, 7). The effect of AMPPNP was
tested using the same protocol, except that 1 mM DTP was
used and the buffer contained 10 mM MgCl2 (in
order to promote the nucleotide binding to GroEL) plus or minus 2 mM AMPPNP. At different time periods of incubation at
25 °C, the reaction was stopped by addition of equal volume of the
buffer containing 50 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM
EDTA/Tris, pH 7.5, and 30% sucrose. After electrophoresis and
Coomassie Blue staining, the GroEL bands were quantitated by scanning
densitometry (model GS-690 Imaging Densitometer, Bio-Rad). Notes: (i)
3% acetonitrile and DTP pretreated with dithiothreitol have no effect
on stability of GroEL oligomeric structure (data not shown); (ii)
AMPPNP is used instead of ATP Each subunit of GroEL contains three cysteines
(Cys138, Cys458, and Cys519), which
are nonessential for assembly of GroEL, although the replacement of
them by serine slightly destabilizes the GroEL oligomeric state (6,
10). All of cysteines react with the relatively small thiol-directed
probe N-ethylmaleimide, whereas only two of them are
titrated by minute incubation with the larger probe DTP (11). Here we
show that longer (0.5-1 h) incubation with DTP (5 mM)
leads to a complete disassembly of GroEL (Fig. 1). This result depends evidently on the
reaction of DTP with a low reactive thiol and not with other groups
because, as reviewed by Brocklehurst (12), DTP possesses essentially
absolute specificity for thiols reacting via the disulfide-thiol
interchange reaction.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
S (9), because the latter contains the
thiol group interacting with DTP.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of 5 mM DTP on disassembly
of the wild type (wt), C138S, C458S, and C519S single
mutants and C138S,C519S double mutant of GroEL at 25 °C as
determined by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
GroELp and GroELm are GroEL particle and monomer, respectively. Note:
the monomeric form of the GroEL (C138S) mutant shows a lower mobility
compared with that for other mutants (see also Ref. 6).
In order to identify the cysteine residue modification of which by DTP
results in disassembly of GroEL, all three cysteines in GroEL have been
individually replaced by serine and tested. Fig. 1 shows that the
Cys138
Ser and Cys519
Ser mutants
(C138S and C519S, respectively) and also the Cys138
Ser,Cys519
Ser double mutant (C138S,C519S) of GroEL are
disassembled by DTP similarly to that for the wild type GroEL. In
contrast, the Cys458
Ser mutant (C458S) is stable to
the action of DTP. This result demonstrates that disassembly of GroEL
is caused by the attack of DTP at the Cys458.
As it follows from the crystal structure of GroEL (3, 4), the
Cys458 belongs to equatorial domain of GroEL and is located
at the intersubunit interface within the rings and close to the
ring-ring contact area. The carbonyl group of Cys458, via
hydrogen bond, stabilizes the intersubunit contacts within the rings
(3), whereas the thiol group is inaccessible, being buried into the
pocket (Fig. 2). The bottom of the pocket
incorporates the small helix Pro462-Gly471
(H17, ref. 4), which is the site of interaction between
rings. In addition, a hydrogen bond between Glu461,
adjacent to this helix, and Arg452 is the major bond
stabilizing the ring-ring association. In other words, via
Glu461 the underface of the pocket is in direct contact
with another ring and affects the stability of the assembly. The walls
of the pocket are constructed from the side chains of
Glu460, Glu483, Tyr485, and
Val464 exposed to the solvent (at the left) and from the
-turn fragment Leu31-Arg36 (at the right).
The side chain of Lys34 blocks the entrance into the pocket
from the side of its right-handed neighboring subunit within the ring.
The
-loop Val37-Thr50 adjacent to the
-turn fragment is the constituent of the interface that provides
most of the contacts between equatorial domains within the ring.
Finally, the pocket is covered by the segment Asn475-Asn487 projected to solvent from outer
surface of GroEL.
|
Thus, Cys458 is located in a focus of the GroEL quaternary structure, where nearly all structural elements surrounding its thiol group are involved in formation of intersubunit contacts within and between the rings and contribute dominantly to stability of the assembly. The thiol group of Cys458 is buried into the pocket and a priori inaccessible for the bulky external probe. However, the results of the biochemical experiments presented here indicate the accessibility of the thiol group to DTP, raising the possibility of the "open pocket" conformation. It is the primary suggestion that the displacement of the flexible segment Asn475-Asn487, which covers the pocket, can provide the penetration of DTP inside.
Comparison of the overall size of the DTP molecule (~12 Å)
with the distances between the thiol group of Cys458 and
the proximal residues (Table I) shows
clearly that the interior of the pocket is too small to accommodate the
probe. Consequently, the placement of DTP within the pocket will be
accompanied by the essential conformational changes in the vicinity of
the thiol group. Specifically, the sterical hindrance in this area will lead to the DTP-induced shift of the
-turn fragment
Leu31-Arg36 forming one of the pocket's wall.
This, in turn, will trigger the violation of the intersubunit
interaction, namely the parallel-type
-strands interaction between
the antiparallel loop Asn37-Ile49 and
-strand Cys519-Asp523 (S17, Ref. 4) from
the neighboring subunits. The contacts in the equatorial plane between
the rings may be also disrupted since the helix 17 and adjacent residue
Glu461, which play a central role in the ring-ring
interaction, are located at the bottom of the pocket. The shift of the
helix H17 is also intimately related to the movement of the
pocket-covering segment Asn475-Asn487, since
these structural fragments operate as an integral whole (3, 4).
|
Based on this scheme, it is interesting to check the effect of ATP on
the DTP-induced disassembly of GroEL. According to Boisvert et
al. (9), ATP binds to the equatorial domain of GroEL close the
thiol-containing pocket. In particular, the distance between the thiol
group and the amide of Ala480, donating a hydrogen bond to
adenine-N1 of the ATP molecule, is only 3.6 Å (Table I). The binding
of ATP
S (nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP) is shown to induce
conformational changes limited by equatorial domain of GroEL,
specifically including a noticeable shift of the segment
Gly472-Gly492 (9). Since this segment covers
the thiol-containing pocket, we expected that the ATP binding will make
the thiol group more accessible to the chemical probe. To examine this
version, we have tested the effect of AMPPNP (nonhydrolyzable analog of
ATP similar to ATP
S) on the DTP-induced disassembly of GroEL. As seen in Fig. 3, the action of the
nucleotide is crucial: under the described conditions, the 40-min
incubation with 1 mM DTP alone shows a slight disassembling
effect (~10%), whereas the addition of AMPPNP results in ~80-90%
disassembly of GroEL (the wild type and double mutant GroEL are
tested). An ability of the adenine nucleotide to facilitate the
DTP-promoted disassembly of GroEL argues in favor of the proposed
disassembly mechanism.
|
To summarize, our data show that disassembly of GroEL is caused by the
attack of DTP at Cys458, the thiol group of which a
priori seems sterically inaccessible to the external probe. From
here, the requirements of flexibility in the constituents surrounding
the thiol group and ability of them to move outward are the key
determinants for the DTP attack to take a place. A well known high
internal cooperativity in the GroEL assembly makes these motions,
although local, to occur in a concerted manner for all of the GroEL
subunits within and between the rings with dramatic affecting the
overall GroEL assembly.
| |
Note Added in Proof |
|---|
The related paper of E. A. Jai and P. M. Horowitz ((1999) J. Protein Chem. 18, 387-396) has been published recently.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the MINERVA Foundation, Germany.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-9342125; Fax: 972-8-9344118; E-mail: csgirsh@weizmann.weizmann.ac.il.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
DTP, 4,4'-dithiodipyridine;
AMPPNP, adenosine 5'-(
,
-imino)triphosphte;
ATP
S, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ellis, R. J. (1994) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4, 117-122 |
| 2. | Fenton, W. A., and Horwich, A. L. (1997) Protein Sci. 6, 743-760[Abstract] |
| 3. | Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hedge, R., Boisvert, D. C., Joachimiak, A., Horwich, A. L., and Sigler, P. B. (1994) Nature 371, 578-586[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Braig, K., Adams, P. D., and Brunger, A. T. (1995) Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 1083-1094[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Sigler, P. B., and Horwich, A. L. (1995) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 348, 113-119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Horovitz, A., Bochkareva, E. S., Yifrach, O., and Girshovich, A. S. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 238, 133-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Horovitz, A.,
Bochkareva, E. S.,
and Girshovich, A. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
9957-9959 |
| 8. |
Bochkareva, E. S.,
Horovitz, A.,
and Girshovich, A. S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
44-46 |
| 9. | Boisvert, D. C., Wang, J., Otwinowski, Z., Horwich, A. L., and Sigler, P. B. (1996) Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 170-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Luo, G.-X.,
and Horowitz, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32151-32154 |
| 11. | Mendoza, J. A., and Horowitz, P. M. (1992) J. Protein Chem. 11, 589-594[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Brocklehurst, K. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 87, 427-469[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Nicholls, A., Bharadwaj, R., and Honig, B. (1993) Biophys. J. 64, 166-169 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. K. Khor, M. T. Fisher, and C. Schoneich Potential Role of Methionine Sulfoxide in the Inactivation of the Chaperone GroEL by Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl) and Peroxynitrite (ONOO-) J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 19486 - 19493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hammarstrom, M. Persson, R. Owenius, M. Lindgren, and U. Carlsson Protein Substrate Binding Induces Conformational Changes in the Chaperonin GroEL. A SUGGESTED MECHANISM FOR UNFOLDASE ACTIVITY J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2000; 275(30): 22832 - 22838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Panda, J. Ybarra, and P. M. Horowitz High Hydrostatic Pressure Can Probe the Effects of Functionally Related Ligands on the Quaternary Structures of the Chaperonins GroEL and GroES J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2001; 276(9): 6253 - 6259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |