J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 20763-20771, July 23, 1999
Sphingolipid Depletion Increases Formation of the Scrapie Prion
Protein in Neuroblastoma Cells Infected with Prions*
Naava
Naslavsky
§,
Hilary
Shmeeda¶,
Gilgi
Friedlander
,
Anat
Yanai
,
Anthony H.
Futerman
,
Yechezkel
Barenholz¶, and
Albert
Taraboulos
**
From the Departments of
Molecular Biology and
¶ Biochemistry, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School,
P. O. Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120 and the
Department of
Biological Chemistry, The Weizmann Institute of Sciences,
Rehovot 76100, Israel
 |
ABSTRACT |
Sphingolipid-rich rafts play an essential role in
the posttranslational (Borchelt, D. R., Scott, M., Taraboulos, A.,
Stahl, N., and Prusiner, S. B. (1990) J. Cell
Biol. 110, 743-752)) formation of the scrapie prion protein
PrPSc from its normal conformer PrPC
(Taraboulos, A., Scott, M., Semenov, A., Avrahami, D., Laszlo, L.,
Prusiner, S. B., and Avraham, D. (1995) J. Cell
Biol. 129, 121-132). We investigated the importance of
sphingolipids in the metabolism of the PrP isoforms in scrapie-infected
ScN2a cells. The ceramide synthase inhibitor fumonisin B1
(FB1) reduced both sphingomyelin (SM) and ganglioside GM1
in cells by up to 50%, whereas PrPSc increased by
3-4-fold. Whereas FB1 profoundly altered the cell lipid
composition, the raft residents PrPC, PrPSc,
caveolin 1, and GM1 remained insoluble in Triton X-100. Metabolic radiolabeling demonstrated that PrPC production was either
unchanged or slightly reduced in FB1-treated cells, whereas
PrPSc formation was augmented by 3-4-fold. To identify the
sphingolipid species the decrease of which correlates with increased
PrPSc, we used two other reagents. When cells were
incubated with sphingomyelinase for 3 days, SM levels decreased, GM1
was unaltered, and PrPSc increased by 3-4-fold. In
contrast, the glycosphingolipid inhibitor PDMP reduced
PrPSc while increasing SM. Thus, PrPSc seems to
correlate inversely with SM levels. The effects of SM depletion
contrasted with those previously obtained with the cholesterol inhibitor lovastatin, which reduced PrPSc and removed it
from detergent-insoluble complexes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The transmissible spongiform encephalopathies such as scrapie of
sheep and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease of humans are caused by prions
(Ref. 1 and reviewed in Ref. 2). Mouse neuroblastoma N2a cells infected
with prions produce two distinct isoforms of the prion protein: the
normal prion protein PrPC, and its pathological isoform
PrPSc (3-5). PrPSc, which is the only known
component of the infectious prion (6, 7), is formed posttranslationally
in the host cell (3, 8), perhaps by the refolding of normal
PrPC into a
-sheet-rich abnormal conformation (9-14).
Although the PrP isoforms appear to be chemically identical (15), their
properties are very different: PrPC is readily soluble in
most detergents and is completely degraded by proteinase K, whereas
PrPSc is insoluble in detergents and possesses a
protease-resistant core termed PrP27-30 (16, 17). In suitable
experimental conditions, PrPSc can polymerize into
amyloidic structures, the prion rods (18, 19). The relationship between
rods and scrapie-associated fibrils (20) has not been absolutely established.
The molecular and cellular details of PrPSc formation in
the host cell are not well understood. In particular, the subcellular sites where PrPSc is formed remain obscure.
PrPC is found on the surface of neurons and other cells
(21), and is expressed by many cell lines. Both PrP isoforms possess a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)1 moiety (22).
PrPC is anchored to cellular membranes through its GPI tail
and can be removed from the cell surface by the
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (22). In contrast, the
membrane topology of PrPSc remains unknown (23, 24). In
prion-infected cells in culture, PrPSc accumulates mainly,
but not exclusively, in secondary lysosomes (25). Previous studies
suggested that PrPSc may acquire its protease-resistant
core either on the cell surface or in the endocytic pathway (26-28).
Like many GPI proteins, both PrP isoforms seem to reside within Triton
X-100-insoluble, cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich "rafts"
(29-34), and rafts appear to play a central role in the metabolism of PrP.
The concept of membrane rafts (Ref. 35 and reviewed in Ref. 36)
attracted renewed interest when it was found that GPI proteins owe
their insolubility in a variety of detergents to their association with
membrane areas that are enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids (34).
Brown and Rose (34) introduced the use of flotation gradients to
analyze these assemblies and showed that cold Triton X-100
(TX-100)-insoluble rafts buoy toward low density fractions in these
gradients. Raft "residents," such as GPI proteins, gangliosides,
and caveolin, also migrate to the lighter fractions of these gradients.
The relationship between rafts and the structurally defined caveolae
has not been entirely elucidated. Because many caveolar components are
also insoluble in cold TX-100, and because caveolae are also enriched
in cholesterol and sphingolipids (SLs), it seems reasonable
to postulate that caveolae are related in some way to membranal rafts.
Although rafts and caveolae were first observed on the plasma membrane and the trans-Golgi network (37), it is possible that
membranal structures of similar properties exist in the endocytic
compartments as well. Indeed, the abnormal PrP isoform
PrPSc, which accumulates mainly in secondary lysosomes, is
attached to raft-like domains (32, 33). We have previously shown that, in scrapie-infected ScN2a cells, most PrPSc is attached to
"heavy" rafts that can be differentiated from PrPC-containing "light" rafts in Nycodenz density
gradients, particularly when TX-100 cell lysates are incubated at
37 °C prior to the flotation procedure (33).
Many studies have shown that cholesterol and sphingolipids intervene in
various functions assigned to caveolae and rafts, as well as in the
physical properties of these domains. In MA104 cells, depleting
cellular cholesterol impaired the endocytosis of folate (38), a
caveolae-related process called potocytosis (reviewed in Ref. 39).
Depletion of cholesterol also prevented the clustering of the
GPI-linked folate receptor on the surface of MA104 cells (40) and
decreased the association of GPI proteins with detergent-insoluble
fractions (41). Comparable results were obtained when cells were
incubated with agents that complex with cholesterol. Treating
epithelial cells with filipin revealed a caveolae-mediated transcytotic
transport pathway (42). Preventing synthesis of sphingolipids using
fumonisin B1 (FB1) also disrupted folate
endocytosis in MA104 cells (43). The importance of sphingolipids was
also demonstrated for the transport of newly synthesized GPI-anchored proteins to the Golgi in yeast (44), for their sorting to the appropriate membrane surface in polarized epithelial cells (Ref. 45 and
reviewed in Ref. 46), as well as for their segregation into
TX-100-insoluble domains in Chinese hamster ovary cells (47).
Several lines of evidence suggest that the metabolism of the PrP
isoforms in general and the formation of PrPSc in
particular are regulated by rafts: (i) both the substrate (PrPC) of the putative reaction PrPC + PrPSc
2PrPSc and its product
(PrPSc) are found within rafts (32, 33); (ii) depleting
cellular cholesterol rendered most PrPC soluble in cold
TX-100, markedly decreased PrPSc synthesis, and slowed the
rate of PrPC degradation (29); and (iii) removing PrP from
rafts by replacing its GPI moiety with any of several transmembrane
sequences (29, 48) completely prevented the formation of
protease-resistant PrP in ScN2a cells. How rafts support
PrPSc formation (and thus prion replication) remains
uncertain. We have proposed (33) that rafts may function by locally
crowding the prion "seed" (PrPSc) and the
"substrate" (PrPC) on membranes, thereby promoting
their interaction and facilitating the formation of
PrPSc.
In this study, we have investigated the importance of SLs for the
metabolism of the PrP isoforms and the formation of PrPSc.
Our findings suggest that SM and glycosphingolipids play disparate roles in the regulation of PrPSc formation by rafts.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Cell culture reagents were purchased from
Biological Industries (Bet Haemek, Israel). Tissue culture plates were
obtained from Miniplast (Ein Shemer, Israel) or Nunc (Roskilde,
Denmark). G418 was purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Cholera toxin subunit B (CTXB) (C9903) and n-octyl
-D-glucopyranoside (494459) were from Calbiochem (San
Diego, CA). Fumonisin B1 was from either Sigma (F1147),
Calbiochem (San Diego, CA) (344850), or Alexis Biochemicals (350-017).
Sphingomyelinase (nSMase) from Staphylococcus aureus (S7651), bovine
brain sphingomyelin (S7004), and GM1 (G7641) were all from Sigma.
Lysamine rhodamine C12-ceramide and glucosyl-ceramide, which were used
as markers, were a kind gift from Prof. Shimon Gat (Jerusalem, Israel).
D-Threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol (PDMP) was from Matreya Inc. (Pleasant Gap, PA). Other chemicals were
from Sigma, unless otherwise stated. Secondary antibodies were from
Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA). Protein A-Sepharose was from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Protein concentration was determined using
a BCA kit (Pierce). [methyl-3H]Choline chloride (60-85
Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
[4,5-3H]Dihydrosphingosine was synthesized as described
in Ref. 49. [35S]Methionine (1000 Ci/mmol, NEG-072) was
purchased from NEN Life Science Products.
Cell Cultures--
Mouse neuroblastoma N2a cells and the
persistently scrapie-infected subclone ScN2a were obtained as described
(4, 33). In our hands, cultures of the persistently ScN2a cells often
undergo crises during which their PrPSc production is
reduced to undetectable levels. On these occasions, we either thaw
fresh cells or clone the ScN2a population to isolate sublines that are
better producers of PrPSc. N2a-C10 and ScN2a-C10 cells (33)
stably express the MHM2-PrP chimeric gene (50) that carries the 3F4
epitope. N2a-c and ScN2a-c express human caveolin 1/VIP21 from an
expression vector kindly supplied by Dr. Richard Anderson (Dallas, TX).
Expression of caveolin does not seem to alter the metabolism of the PrP
isoforms in these cells,2 but
the PrPSc production by these clones appears to be more
stable than that of the original ScN2a cells. ScN2a sublines and
subclones somewhat vary in their sensitivity to various pharmacological
agents, as well as in the detergent insolubility of their rafts (33).
Cells were usually grown at 37 °C in DMEM16 supplemented with 8%
fetal calf serum. In some experiments, we used delipidated fetal calf serum, which was prepared as described (51).
Antibodies--
Rabbit antiserum R073 binds to both mouse PrP
and to MHM2-PrP (5, 52). mAb 3F4 (53) binds to residues
Met109 and Met112 (54) in chimeric MHM2-PrP but
does not recognize the wild type mouse PrP endogenous to N2a cells
(50). Both antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:5000 (of the serum
or the ascitic fluid, respectively). Rabbit antiserum against caveolin
1 was purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).
Anti-PKC and anti-cholera toxin subunit B was purchased from Sigma.
PrP Isoforms and PrP Analysis--
The PrP isoforms were
characterized and separated as described (18). PrPSc was
defined as the PrP fraction resistant to proteolysis by proteinase K
(20 µg/ml, 37 °C, 50 min). Fractions from flotation gradients were
made 1% with n-octyl
-D-glucopyranoside to
solubilize rafts prior to incubation with proteinase K (31, 34)).
SDS-PAGE, Western immunoblotting, metabolic labeling of cells with
[35S]methionine, and immunoprecipitation of the PrP
isoforms were all carried out as described (29, 33).
Flotation Assays--
Detergent-insoluble complexes were
analyzed on flotation gradients (34) as described (33). Briefly,
confluent cells growing in two 10-cm plates (about 3 × 107 cells) were incubated with 450 µl of lysis buffer
(150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM ETDA) supplemented with either 1% TX-100 or 1% CHAPS,
as specified in each experiment. Lysates were then adjusted to 35%
Nycodenz with ice-cold 70% Nycodenz prepared in TNE (25 mM
Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA) and loaded at the bottom of TLS-55 Beckman ultracentrifuge tubes. An 8-35% Nycodenz linear step gradient in TNE was overlaid above the lysate (200 µl each of 25, 22.5, 20, 18, 15, 12, and 8% Nycodenz). Tubes were
then spun at 55,000 rpm (gav = 200,000 × g) for 4 h at 4 °C in a TLS-55 rotor. Eleven
fractions of 180 µl each were collected from the top of the tube.
Manipulation of Cellular Sphingolipids--
In a typical
experiment, cells were seeded on day 0 in two 10-cm dishes
(approximately 5 × 105 cells, for the flotation
assay) or in one 6-cm dish (approximately 105 cells, for
the total lysate and lipid analysis), and cultured for 24 h at
37 °C. On day 1, 30 µM FB1 (from a 13.8 mM stock in Me2SO) or 70 µM PDMP
were added to the medium. A 5 mM PDMP stock was prepared as
follows: 10 mg were dissolved in 100 µl of ethanol, added to 4.6 ml
of DMEM, sonicated twice for 3 min, and then dialyzed against HEPES
buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 mM
CaCl2, pH 7.4) for 24 h at 4 °C. On day 4, cells
were treated with fresh medium supplemented with FB1 or
PDMP and were further incubated to day 7. Treatment with exogenous
nSMase was carried out in medium containing delipidated medium. Due to
its cytotoxicity, treatment with nSMase was usually limited to 3 days,
and therefore the enzyme was added on day 4.
Metabolic Radiolabeling and Analysis of Lipids--
Cells (about
107 cells for each treatment) were radiolabeled with either
[methyl-3H]choline chloride or with
[4,5-3H]dihydrosphingosine. For choline labeling, 1 µCi/ml [3H]choline (60-80 Ci/mmol) was added to the
cell medium 24 or 72 h (as indicated) before the end of the
experiment. Radiolabeling with [4,5-3H]dihydrosphingosine
(sphinganine) was performed as described for [3H]choline
labeling except that the pulse period was 48 h (3 × 106 cpm/107 cells).
Lipids were extracted either from cell suspensions or from low density
fractions of flotation gradients. To extract total lipids from cell
suspension, radiolabeled cells were washed three times with cold PBS, 1 ml of PBS was added to the plate, and cells were removed by scraping
and pelleted (3000 rpm, 5 min in an Eppendorf tabletop centrifuge).
Pellets were resuspended in PBS, 20 µl were taken for protein
quantification, and samples were adjusted to equivalent amounts of
protein in equal volume. Total lipids extraction from these cell
suspensions or from gradient fractions was carried out with
CHCl3:CH3OH:H2O (1:1:1, v/v/v)
(55). The lower phase was re-extracted with 3.8 vol. of
CH3OH: "acid saline" (0.9% NaCl in 10 mM
HCl) 2:1.8, v/v. In some experiments involving choline labeling, ester
phospholipids were digested by mild alkaline hydrolysis with 0.4 N KOH in CH3OH:H2O (9:1, v/v) for
4 h at 60 °C, prior to further analysis.
Lipid extracts were resolved by TLC on either glass or plastic sheets
Silica Gel 60 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The chromatographs were
developed in CHCl3:CH3OH:15 mM
CaCl2, (60:35:8) (49). The TLC plates were first stained
with Coomassie Blue, and the intensity of the staining was quantified
by densitometry (see below). The plates were then exposed to a
tritium-sensitive imaging plate. Thus, for each lipid species, newly
synthesized radiolabeled lipids could be compared with the total mass.
The doublet at the bottom of the TLC (Fig. 1B) was assigned
to SM because (i) it comigrates with SM markers, (ii) it is positive
for organic phosphorous and ninhydrin-negative, (iii) it resists
alkaline hydrolysis, and (iv) it labels with both radiolabeled choline
and sphinganine.
Coomassie Staining of Lipids--
TLC plates were stained with
Coomassie Blue as described (47, 56) to identify and quantify lipids
and to visualize lipid standards. In our hands, only plastic TLC sheets
(Merck 1.05748) resisted the procedure, whereas glass plates lost their
silica coating. After lipid separation, TLC sheets were air-dried,
soaked in 30% MeOH containing 0.03% Coomassie Blue, gently agitated
for 3-4 min, and then destained with 30% MeOH for 5 min. Densitometry was then used to quantify the total lipid mass in the Coomassie-stained bands. Because lipids differ in their affinity for the dye, we used
this method only to compare identical bands of the same lipid in
various experiments. In preliminary calibration experiments using
commercial lipid standards, we found that Coomassie staining was linear
in the range of 0.05-30 µg of lipid/band for SM and PC (data not
shown). In our hands, Glc-Cer was not stained by this method.
Detection of GM1 Using Cholera Toxin Subunit B--
We detected
and quantified cell surface GM1 using its ligand CTXB. Cells were
washed with PBS, cooled on ice, and incubated with 5 µg/ml CTXB (from
a 50 µg/ml stock solution in PBS) on ice for 30 min. After extensive
rinsing with ice-cold PBS to remove unbound CTXB, cells were lysed, and
lysate samples, normalized for protein content, were subjected to a
nondenaturing SDS-PAGE analysis (boiling of samples was omitted to
prevent dissociation of the pentameric structure of CTXB, which is
recognized by the antibody).
 |
RESULTS |
Fumonisin B1 Increases PrPSc but Not
PrPC in ScN2a Cells--
Because sphingolipids are
important structural (34) and functional (43) components of rafts, we
sought to evaluate their contribution to the formation of
PrPSc (29, 32, 33). We first used the mycotoxin
FB1 to deplete cellular sphingolipids in ScN2a cells.
FB1 inhibits sphingosine N-acyltransferase
(ceramide synthase) in a concentration-dependent manner and
thereby interferes with the biosynthesis of all sphingolipids beyond
the sphingoid base, in a variety of cells (57). Because PrPSc is very stable in ScN2a cells (3), several days of
treatment are necessary to detect changes in its steady state levels by Western immunoblotting. Scrapie-infected ScN2a cells were grown for
seven days in the presence of 0, 5, 20, 35, or 50 µM
FB1 (Fig. 1). FB1
treatment (50 µM) had only minor effects on the total cellular protein level (<15% for the maximal FB1
concentration, as determined by the BCA assay), and we observed no
cytopathic effects by microscopic examination. On day 7, the cells were
scraped off the dishes in PBS and then divided into two equal aliquots, which were used for analysis of PrPSc levels and of lipids,
respectively. To analyze the effect of FB1 on SM levels,
[3H]choline (2 µCi/ml) was added to the cell medium for
the last 24 h of the FB1 treatment to help assess the
influence of the inhibitor on choline incorporation into SM and
phosphatidylcholine.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Fumonisin B1 increases levels of
PrPSc but not PrPC in ScN2a cells.
A and B, ScN2a cells were grown in the presence
of FB1 at the indicated concentration for 7 days.
[3H]choline (2 µCi/ml) was included in the cell medium
for the last 24 h of the experiment. Cells were lysed, and
aliquots of cell lysates containing 0.3 mg of protein were analyzed.
A, samples were treated with proteinase K (20 µg/ml,
37 °C, 50 min) to selectively eliminate PrPC prior to
analysis in Western blots developed with the PrP antiserum R073.
B, lipids were separated by TLC developed with
CHCl3:CH3OH:15 mM CaCl2
(60:35:8). Lanes 1-5 are an autoradiogram of the TLC plate.
PC/SM is the ratio of radiolabeled PC to radiolabeled SM in each lanes.
In lanes 6 and 7, ester phospholipids were
digested by mild alkaline hydrolysis (0.4 N KOH in
CH3OH:H2O (9:1, v/v) for 4 h at 60 °C)
prior to thin layer chromatography and Coomassie staining.
C-E, cells were treated with 30 µM
FB1 for 7 days, or mock treated with Me2SO, and
then subjected to Western immunoblotting as indicated in each panel.
C, N2a-c (lanes 1 and 2) and ScN2a-c
(lanes 3 and 4) cells lysates were analyzed in
Western blots developed with R073. D, lanes 1-4,
expression of the chimeric transmembrane-anchored CD4-PrP in N2a-CD4
and ScN2a-CD4 cells analyzed in Western blots developed with the mAb
3F4; lanes 5-8, N2a-c and ScN2a-c cells. Protein kinase
C was detected utilizing a commercial antiserum. E, cell
surface GM1 was assessed utilizing its ligand CTXB on intact N2a,
ScN2a, and ScC10 cells. Following FB1 treatment, cells were
incubated on ice with CTXB (5 µg/ml, 30 min), rinsed, and lysed, and
cell lysates were analyzed by nondenaturing SDS-PAGE. Western blot was
developed with a CTXB antiserum. FB1 decreased cell surface
GM1.
|
|
To assess PrPSc levels, cell lysates were subjected to
limited proteolysis with proteinase K (20 µg/ml at 37 °C for 50 min), and protease-resistant PrPSc was detected in Western
blots. Unexpectedly, PrPSc increased in a
concentration-dependent manner as a result of the
FB1 treatment (Fig. 1A). This result was
surprising as it contrasts strikingly with the effect of the
hydroxmethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin, which depletes
cellular cholesterol and decreases PrPSc in ScN2a cells
(29). Short term (3-4 days) treatment with FB1 also
increased PrPSc (data not shown), but the optimal effect
was obtained after 6-8 days of treatment, and 30 µM
FB1 for 7 days was chosen as our "standard"
FB1 protocol. This rise in PrPSc was observed
in all other ScN2a clones treated with FB1, including ScN2a-C10 (not shown) and ScN2a-c cells, which express human caveolin 1 (see Figs. 1C and 5).
To analyze the effect of FB1 on the incorporation of
[3H]choline into lipids, parallel samples were normalized
for protein content, extracted, and analyzed by TLC and autoradiography
(see under "Experimental Procedures"). Increasing concentrations of FB1 decreased the amount of choline incorporation into
newly synthesized SM down to 10% of control levels (Fig. 1B,
lanes 1-5), whereas the amount of radiolabeled PC remained
essentially unchanged (except for the highest concentration of
FB1). Coomassie staining of the TLC plates showed that the
total amount of SM mass also significantly decreased in
FB1-treated cells (Fig. 1B, lanes 6 and
7).
The FB1-induced rise in PrPSc was not due to an
increase in the normal PrP precursor, because in uninfected N2a-c
cells, the amount of PrPC was unaltered by the inhibitor
(Fig. 1C, lanes 1 and 2), whereas in their
scrapie-infected ScN2a-c counterparts, the amount of proteinase
K-resistant PrPSc was once again greatly increased by
FB1 (lanes 3 and 4). Sarkosyl-soluble PrP, which consists primarily of PrPC (17), also remained
unaltered in scrapie-infected cells treated with FB1 (not
shown). Finally, FB1 treatment had no effect on the amount
of two proteins that do not reside in rafts, the transmembrane chimera
PrP-CD4 (29) (Fig. 1D, lanes 1-4) and the cytosolic protein
kinase C
(lanes 5-8). Taken together, these
results strongly suggest that the metabolism of the pathological PrP
isoform is specifically altered by the FB1 treatment.
Decreased Sphingolipids in FB1-treated ScN2a
Cells--
The results shown in Fig. 1 suggest a correlation between
decreased SM and enhanced PrPSc formation in ScN2a cells.
To see whether other sphingolipids also correlate with
PrPSc formation, we used the radiolabeled sphingoid base
[3H]sphinganine, a precursor of the ceramide backbone of
sphingolipids, to radiolabel the cells. In contrast to choline, this
precursor is expected to incorporate into all nascent SLs. ScN2a cells
were treated with FB1 (30 µM) for 7 days in
delipidated medium, and [3H]sphinganine (3 × 106 cpm/14 × 107 cells) was added to the
cells for the final 48 h. Results of the TLC analysis are
summarized in Table I. FB1
clearly reduced the incorporation of [3H]sphinganine into
ceramide, SM, and Glc-Cer (Table I). Coomassie Blue staining of the TLC
plate showed that the mass of ceramide and SM, was also reduced by
FB1 (Table I). Glc-Cer did not stain with Coomassie
Blue.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of SL effectors on total and newly synthesized sphingolipids
ScN2a cells were incubated with 30 µM FB1 for 7 days, nSMase (0.4 units/ml, 4 days) or PDMP (70 µM, 7 days). All treatments were performed with delipidated medium.
[4,5-3H]Sphinganine (3 × 106 cpm/14 × 107 cells) was added in the last 48 h of the experiment.
Lipids were extracted from cell lysates normalized by protein content
and were separated on a plastic TLC sheet, stained with Coomassie Blue,
and then analyzed by Phosphorimaging. Values of tritiated lipids are
expressed as percentage of untreated cells.
|
|
The ganglioside GM1 localizes to caveolae (58), buoys in density
gradients following extraction of cells with TX-100, and has served as
a marker of rafts in our previous studies (33). Because SM and GM1 are
metabolically related, it was important to see whether GM1 levels are
also altered by FB1. Cell surface GM1 was measured in a
variety of N2a subclones using its ligand, CTXB. Prior to lysis, cells
were cooled on ice, incubated with 5 µg/ml CTXB for 30 min, and then
rinsed thoroughly from the unbound toxoid. Cell lysates were then
subjected to nondenaturing SDS-PAGE, and cell surface-bound CTXB was
determined by Western immunoblotting developed with a CTXB antibody.
Treatment with FB1 significantly decreased the level of
cell-bound CTXB, and thus presumably of cell surface GM1, in both N2a
cells and ScN2a cells (Fig. 1E).
Increased PrPSc Correlates with Decreased SM in Cells
Treated with nSMase--
To further explore the relationship of
specific sphingolipids and PrPSc formation, we used two
pharmacological agents that selectively affect either SM or
glycosphingolipids, respectively. To directly reduce the level of SM,
we added a neutral bacterial sphingomyelinase (nSMase) to the cell
medium. Because the enzyme caused cytopathic effects when applied for
more than 4 days, we limited the experiments with this enzyme to 3 days. Because changes in PrPSc formation are usually
difficult to detect by Western analysis in short term experiments (due
to very large background signals contributed by preexisting
PrPSc), we used metabolic radiolabeling to follow the
formation of PrPSc in nSMase-treated cells.
ScN2a-C10 cells were incubated with or without nSMase (0.5 or 2 units/ml) for 3 days in medium supplemented with delipidated fetal calf
serum, pulsed with [35S]methionine for 1 h, and then
chased for another 6 h to permit the formation of
PrPSc (3). Newly formed PrPSc increased in the
cells treated with the higher concentration of nSMase (Fig.
2A), similar to the results
obtained with FB1 (Fig. 1). Other ScN2a sublines were more
sensitive than ScN2a-C10 to nSMase and displayed increased
PrPSc at lower enzyme levels.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of nSMase and PDMP on the formation of
PrPSc. A, ScC10 cells were incubated for 3 days with nSMase (0.5 and 2 units/ml) in 5% delipidated fetal calf
serum. On day 3, cells were pulse-radiolabeled for 1 h with
[35S]methionine and then chased in the presence of nSMase
for 6 h (to permit the formation of PrPSc), and lysed.
Cell lysates were treated with proteinase K (20 µg/ml, 37 °C, 50 min), and PrPSc was then immunoprecipitated with RO73 prior
to SDS-PAGE analysis and autoradiography. In B and
C, ScN2a cells were treated with PDMP (0-70
µM) for 7 days. [3H]Choline (2 µCi/ml)
was added to the cell medium for the last 24 h of the experiment.
B, proteinase K-resistant PrPSc (Western blots
developed with 3F4). C, TLC analysis of
[3H]choline incorporation into SM and PC.
PC/SM is the ratio of radiolabeled PC to radiolabeled SM in
each lane.
|
|
The influence of nSMase (0.4 units/ml, 3 days) on the level of SM,
Glc-Cer, and ceramide in ScN2a cells is summarized in Table I. ScN2a
cells were incubated in the presence or absence of nSMase for 3 days in
medium containing delipidated serum, and [3H]sphinganine
was added to the cell medium for the last 48 h of the experiment.
The nSMase treatment resulted in the almost complete loss of both
radiolabeled and Coomassie stained SM (to 10 and 20% of control
levels, respectively; see Table I). In contrast, nSMase significantly
increased newly synthesized Glc-Cer (155% of control level). Ceramide
remained essentially unchanged by this enzymatic treatment.
Thus, whereas nSMase reduced SM in the cells, its effect on Glc-Cer and
ceramide were distinctly different from that of FB1. Hence,
the results with nSMase suggest that elevated formation of
PrPSc correlates with a decrease in cellular SM but not
with changes in either ceramide or Glc-Cer.
PDMP Increases SM and Reduces PrPSc in ScN2a
Cells--
Several glycosphingolipids, and especially gangliosides,
are enriched in TX-100-insoluble fractions (34, 43, 58-60). To further
investigate the relationship between glycosphingolipids and
PrPSc formation, we utilized the ceramide analog PDMP,
which blocks glycosphingolipid synthesis by inhibiting the first step
in the pathway of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis, which is catalyzed by
UDP-glucose:ceramide glucosyl transferase (61-64). Although the
inhibition of cellular glycosphingolipids by PDMP is well documented,
its effect on SM seems to depend on the cell type examined (65), and in
some cases it has been shown to produce an increase in cellular SM (61,
62). We studied the effect of PDMP on SM in several ScN2a sublines.
ScN2a cells were treated with various concentrations of PDMP (0-70
µM) for 7 days, and radiolabeled choline was added for
the last 72 h of the treatment (Fig. 2, B and
C). Cell lysates were analyzed as described above. TLC
analysis revealed that [3H]choline incorporation into SM
increased in a dose-dependent manner reaching a maximum at
70 µM of PDMP (to 267% of control level). In another
experiment, both [3H]sphinganine incorporation into SM
and total SM mass were again increased in cells treated with PDMP
(Table I). Under these conditions, radiolabeled ceramide also
increased, but Glc-Cer decreased (Table I). SM mass also increased in
cells treated with PDMP (based on Coomassie Blue staining), but to a
smaller degree than the newly synthesized lipid (121% of control
levels, Table I). Cell surface GM1 was also reduced in PDMP treated
cells, based on CTXB binding (not shown).
Having established that PDMP increases SM while decreasing
glycosphingolipids such as Glc-Cer and GM1 in ScN2a cells, we examined the effect of this inhibitor on PrPSc levels. The level of
proteinase K-resistant PrPSc in aliquots from the
experiment described in Fig. 2C were assessed by Western
analysis (Fig. 2B). PDMP reduced the levels of
PrPSc in a dose-dependent manner (see also Fig.
5). This result further supports an inverse correlation between levels
of SM and PrPSc.
Increased Formation of Protease-resistant PrPSc in
Cells Treated with FB1--
The effect of FB1
on the steady state levels of PrPSc could be due either to
the increased formation of PrPSc or a decrease in the rate
of its clearance from the cells. To decide between these alternatives,
we performed kinetic (pulse-chase) experiments in N2a-C10 and ScN2a-C10
cells (Fig. 3). Eighteen hours prior to
the pulse radiolabeling, as well as during the pulse period,
tunicamycin (0.75 µg/ml) was added to the cell medium to reduce the
Mr heterogeneity of the PrP and permit a better electrophoretic resolution of its isoforms (N-linked
glycosylation is not necessary for the formation of protease-resistant
PrPSc (8)). N2a-C10 and ScN2a-C10 cells were treated with
FB1 (30 µM, Fig. 3, lanes 1, 3, and 6) for 12 h prior to radiolabeling, as well as
during the pulse and the chase periods. Cells were pulse-radiolabeled
with [35S]methionine for 1 h and then either chased
for 6 h in unlabeled medium, to permit the formation of
protease-resistant PrPSc (Fig. 3, lanes 5 and
6), or immediately lysed at the end of the pulse
(lanes 1-4), and cell lysates were then processed by PrP immunoprecipitation. In Fig. 3, lanes 3-6, lysates were
digested with proteinase K (20 µg/ml at 37 °C for 50 min) and then
treated with GdnSCN (3 M for 10 min at room temperature) to
permit PrPSc immunoprecipitation. The amount of
radiolabeled newly synthesized PrPC was either unchanged or
slightly decreased in cells treated with FB1 (Fig. 3,
lanes 1 and 2). In contrast, the formation of
PrPSc was enhanced, and it seemed to proceed at an
accelerated rate (lanes 3-6) in cells treated with
FB1. The accelerated metabolism of PrP under SM depletion
is the opposite of the effect observed in cells deprived of
cholesterol, in which both the degradation of PrPC and the
formation of proteinase K-resistant PrPSc were slowed
(29).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Increased synthesis of PrPSc in
cells treated with FB1. C10 (lanes 1 and
2) and ScC10 cells (lanes 3-6) were treated for
18 h with tunicamycin (0.75 µg/ml) to reduce the glycosylation
of PrP. Cells were then pulsed for 1 h with
[35S]methionine (0.3mCi/4 × 107 cells).
Radiolabeled cells were either immediately lysed (lanes
1-4) or chased for 6 h. FB1 (30 µM) or carrier Me2SO were added to the cell
medium for 12 h prior to the radiolabeling, and then maintained
throughout the pulse and the chase periods. PrPC
(lanes 1 and 2) or protease-resistant
PrPSc (lanes 3-6) was then immunoprecipitated
from the cell lysates with rabbit antiserum R073, followed by SDS-PAGE
and autoradiography.
|
|
FB1 and nSMase Decrease SM in Low Density Fractions but
Do Not Alter the Buoyancy of PrP and Several Other Raft Residents in
Flotation Gradients--
Next we set out to examine the effect of
FB1, nSMase, and PDMP on the properties of rafts in N2a,
ScN2a, and in a variety of their subclones. In particular, we used
N2a-c and ScN2a-c cells, which express human caveolin-1/VIP21, so that
we could assess the effects of these inhibitors on caveolin as well.
Expression of caveolin-1 in these cells appears to have no effect on
the formation of PrPSc.2 Results obtained with
these cells are presented in Figs. 4 and 5. Cells were treated with
FB1 (30 µM, 6 days), nSMase (2 units/ml, 3 days), or PDMP (70 µM, 6 days) as indicated.
[3H]Choline (2 µCi/ml) was added to the medium for the
last 72 h of the experiment. The cells were then lysed in either
cold TX-100 or cold CHAPS (see below) and then analyzed by a standard
flotation procedure in Nycodenz (33).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Both FB1 and nSMase reduce SM in
buoyant fractions. ScN2a-c cells were treated with the indicated
inhibitors in delipidated medium (FB1, 30 µM
for 6 days; nSMase, 2 units/ml for 4 days; or PDMP, 70 µM
for 7 days). [3H]choline (2 µCi/ml) was added to the
medium for the last 72 h of the experiment. The cells were then
lysed in a CHAPS lysis buffer, and the lysates were subjected to a
flotation assay. Radiolabeled lipids from the light fractions
(lanes 1-7) were extracted, and ester phospholipids were
digested by mild alkaline hydrolysis with 0.4 N KOH in
CH3OH:H2O (9:1, v/v) for 4 h at 60 °C
prior to separation by TLC developed in CHCl3:CH3OH:15
mM CaCl2 (60:35:8) and autoradiography.
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Flotation profiles of the PrP isoforms and of
caveolin unchanged by FB1 and nSMase. N2a
(A and B) and ScN2a-c (C-J) cells
were treated with the indicated inhibitors in delipidated medium
(FB1, 30 µM for 6 days; nSMase, 2 units/ml
for 4 days; or PDMP, 70 µM for 7 days). Cells were
extensively washed with cold PBS, cooled on ice and lysed with
flotation lysis buffer (containing 1% TX-100). Prior to flotation,
lysates from ScN2a-caveolin cells were incubated with 0.5 µg/ml CTXB
on a rotator at 4 °C (20 min) to allow binding of the toxoid to both
intracellular and plasma membrane ganglioside GM1. Lysates were then
subjected to the standard flotation procedure. Gradient fractions were
then subjected to various assays. One half of each fraction was used to
determine either PrPC (A and B) or
proteinase K-resistant PrPSc (C-F) in Western
immunoblots developed with the rabbit PrP antiserum R073. Fractions
from ScN2a-c cells were also assayed for their content in caveolin 1 in
Western blots (G-J). The protein content of fractions
depicted in C-E was determined by BCA (K), and the
distribution of CTXB in these gradients was determined by a Western
immunoblot (Fig. 4E).
|
|
To assess the effect of FB1, nSMase, and PDMP on the SM
content of rafts, we analyzed gradient fractions resolved on TLC. Because TX-100 interferes with the separation of lipids by TLC, we
replaced this detergent with CHAPS (1%) (34) in these experiments. PrP
flotation results obtained with CHAPS were similar to those obtained
with TX-100 (not shown). ScN2a-c cells treated with the lipid
modulators were radiolabeled with [3H]choline for the
last 72 h of the experiment. Under these conditions, the
radiospecific activity of the choline lipids reaches a steady state and
thus represents the mass of these molecules (66). Lipids were extracted
from the low density fractions (fractions 1-7) of the density
gradients, subjected to mild alkaline hydrolysis to eliminate
radiolabeled phosphatidylcholine, and separated on TLC plates, which
were then examined by autoradiography. FB1 and nSMase (Fig.
4, B and C) reduced the amount of
[3H]SM in low density fractions to 53 and 46% of control
levels (Fig. 4A), respectively. In contrast, PDMP increased
the amount of [3H]SM in these fractions to 127% of
control levels.
We next examined the flotation properties of the PrP isoforms in cells
treated with the various effectors (Fig. 5). In untreated N2a-c cells,
PrPC floated to the lightest fractions of the gradient,
confirming that PrPC is indeed attached to buoyant
TX-100-insoluble rafts in these cells (Fig. 5A). When the
cells were treated with FB1, the amount of PrPC
remained unaltered, and its migration pattern was unchanged (Fig. 5B). This result contrasts with that obtained with
lovastatin, which renders most PrPC soluble in TX-100 (29),
and correlates well with the opposing influence of these two
inhibitors, FB1 and lovastatin, on the formation of
PrPSc. We next analyzed PrPSc from ScN2a-c
cells in flotation experiments. Proteinase K-resistant PrPSc characteristically peaked around fractions 4-8 that
are denser than those containing PrPC (33). In cells
treated with FB1, the amount of PrPSc increased
substantially (compare Fig. 5, C and D), but its
flotation pattern remained unchanged. A similar pattern was obtained in experiments with nSMase (Fig. 5E). PDMP caused a dramatic
drop in PrPSc (Fig. 5F), although the remaining
PrPSc still migrated to fraction 5, where it usually peaks.
Interestingly, PDMP also somewhat reduced PrPC in some but
not all experiments (by up to 30%) but the distribution of
PrPC along the Nycodenz gradient remained unchanged. The
pronounced differences in PrPSc levels caused by the
effectors in flotation gradients stand in contrast to unchanged content
in total protein as measured in each fraction by BCA analysis (Fig.
5K).
Thus, a reduction of as much as 50% in the level of SM in the low
density fractions (Fig. 4) did not alter the buoyancy of either
PrPC or PrPSc in flotation gradients. However,
these changes did correlate with significant changes in the amount of
PrPSc formation. To determine the influence of changes in
SM on other raft residents, we chose to analyze the migration pattern
and the amount of two non-GPI raft-resident molecules, caveolin and GM1. For this purpose, we used fractions from the gradients depicted in
Fig. 5, C-F. Caveolin was detected in Western immunoblots
developed with a caveolin antiserum (Fig. 5, G-J). No
change in the flotation pattern or in the amount of caveolin was
recorded in cells treated with either FB1, nSMase, or PDMP.
Our results are in line with previous observations obtained by Hanada
et al. (47), who showed that depletion of cholesterol and/or
sphingolipids in Chinese hamster ovary cells did not alter the
expression levels on caveolin. Finally, we assessed the effect of
FB1 and nSMase on the buoyancy of cell surface GM1 (Fig.
4E). The vast majority of CTXB was found in the light
fractions of the gradient, and this distribution was undisturbed by
either FB1 or nSMase. However, FB1 reduced the
binding of CTXB to rafts by about 50%, whereas nSMase treatment did
not change CTXB binding significantly. PDMP caused a similar decrease
in CTXB binding, as seen with FB1, but its distribution along the gradient again remained unchanged (results not shown). It is
unlikely that CTXB itself could have influenced the clustering of GM1
within detergent-insoluble rafts, because this toxoid acts as a
monovalent ligand to GM1 and does not trigger its aggregation on the
plasma membrane (67).
Thus, the level of SM as well as that of GM1 within rafts can be
modified without altering the flotation characteristics of several raft
resident molecules, suggesting that these sphingolipids do not
significantly modulate the buoyant density of rafts in TX-100 (see
under "Discussion"). This contrasts with the critical role played
by cholesterol in maintaining the insolubility of PrP in TX-100
(29).
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data presented here support the view that cholesterol- and
sphingolipid-rich rafts regulate the formation of PrPSc,
and thus presumably the propagation of prions. Viewed through combining
information at the physicochemical and cell biology levels, these data
may also point to possible mechanisms by which rafts contribute to
PrPSc formation.
Increased PrPSc in SM-depleted Cells--
Comparison
of the results obtained with FB1, nSMase, and PDMP shows
that PrPSc formation correlates inversely with the amount
of SM in the cells, but is relatively insensitive to the amount of GM1
(Fig. 5), ceramide, and Glc-Cer (Table I). For instance, the levels of
GM1 (and presumably of other glycolipids as well) could be either
decreased (with FB1) or left unchanged with nSMase,
resulting in both cases in an increased formation of PrPSc.
Similarly, FB1 and nSMase both reduce SM but had an
opposite influence on ceramide levels, and yet both treatments led to
increased PrPSc. This difference between SM and other
sphingolipids could originate in disparate roles played by SM and
glycosphingolipids in regulating raft structure and function. Although
the detergent insolubility of rafts may be determined in part by the
acyl tails of sphingolipids (68, 69), it is certainly possible that
head groups could modulate essential aspects of rafts (70). We cannot
rule out, however, the possibility that the determining lipid parameter of PrPSc formation is the total level of sphingolipids in
rafts, rather than the identity of their head group.
The mechanisms by which rafts regulate the formation of
PrPSc in prion-producing cells are not yet understood, but
several models have been proposed (33). One possibility is that rafts
provide physical platforms that laterally concentrate PrPC
substrate and PrPSc seed within cellular membranes, thereby
enhancing the opportunity of these molecules to interact (29, 33).
Lateral phase separation and domain formation in membranes is known to
affect the rate of many reactions in membranes through the control of
crowdiness of interacting species. The crowding of raft residents on
the cell surface has been observed for other GPI proteins, such as the
folate receptor (40), and has now been substantiated both by
cross-linking experiments performed in live cells (71) and by measuring
energy transfer between GPI-linked folate receptor molecules loaded
with a fluorescently labeled ligand (72). Putative accessory molecules,
such as Protein X (73), that have been envisaged to play a role in the
formation of PrPSc, could also be made more available for
interaction with PrP if they reside within rafts.
Whether such a clustering might be amplified upon SM depletion remains
to be seen. Even when present in membranes in low molar fractions, SM
induces the formation of plane domains (Refs. 74 and 75 and references
therein). Reducing SM in cells causes the concomitant removal of
cholesterol from membranes, probably because the capacity of membranes
to solubilize cholesterol is impaired (76, 77). Conceivably, the
coordinate depletion of these two lipids would result in a diminution
in the total cell membrane area devoted to rafts and a further crowding
of interacting PrP species.
Another possibility is that SM depletion would alter other properties
of rafts that are relevant to the chances of interaction between their
resident molecules. For instance, interaction of PrPC with
PrPSc could be increased due to an altered fluidity of
these domains. Direct measurements of GPI protein mobility in cell
membranes support the notion that various physical properties of rafts
are altered by pharmacological intervention in sphingolipid metabolism. Hanada et al. (78) demonstrated recently that short term (16 h) incubation of cells with FB1 rendered a GPI-linked
protein (a CD14 chimera) more sensitive to
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C and that long chain SM
reversed this effect when administered to the cell medium. This again
suggests that depletion of sphingolipids may cause a spatial alteration
in the structure of rafts, hence affecting its interaction with
resident GPI-anchored proteins.
Finally, rafts could encourage the formation of PrPSc by
providing propitious trafficking and sorting pathways. The formation of
PrPSc seems to be restricted to specific subcellular
locations, as it appears to occur either on the cell surface or in the
endocytic pathway (26-28, 79), but does not happen in the ER-Golgi of
cells treated with brefeldin A (80). Thus, variations in either
exocytosis or endocytosis could modify the formation of
PrPSc. Results from many laboratories have shown that
altering sphingolipid synthesis often modifies vesicular traffic.
Transport of both SL and vesicular stomatitis virus G protein from the
Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane is retarded following treatment
of cells with PDMP (81). Export of SM is believed to proceed via
vesicles that contain raft-like, detergent-insoluble domains (37, 82). Endocytosis is also vastly modified by SL inhibitors. In J774 macrophages, as much as 30% of the plasma membrane was internalized within minutes of treatment with nSMase, through 400-nm vesicles lacking a distinguishable coat (83). These observations suggest that
large portions of bilayers may become unstable when cell surface SM is
hydrolyzed by exogenous nSMase. Whether rafts residents are involved in
this enhanced internalization has not been addressed by these
investigators. Increased recycling of PrPC could well be
accompanied by an augmentation of PrPSc formation, as well
as by the observed acceleration in the degradation of PrPC.
Finally, it is interesting to note that brefeldin A, which blocks the
formation of PrPSc (80), also alters the metabolism of SM
in cells (84).
Because ceramide and many of its metabolites play important roles in
signal transduction, it is also possible that the PrPSc
increase could be caused indirectly by altered levels of lipid second
messengers. Because ceramide could either be decreased (with
FB1) or increased (with nSMase), resulting in identical changes in PrPSc synthesis, it is unlikely that the total
amount of this lipid in the cell could directly regulate
PrPSc formation. However, the subcellular distribution of
ceramide was not addressed in our experiments and could play a crucial role in regulating PrPSc.
Contrasting Influence of FB1 and Lovastatin on PrP
Metabolism--
Several studies have shown that both SLs and
cholesterol are essential for the proper functioning of caveolae. For
instance, the potocytosis of folate was markedly decreased when MA104
cells were treated with compactin to inhibit the synthesis of
cholesterol (38). A similar effect on folate potocytosis was observed
when Caco-2 cells were treated with FB1 to decrease
cellular SLs (43). Because PrPSc formation drops
dramatically in cholesterol-depleted cells (29), we were expecting that
reducing SLs in ScN2a cells would also hamper the formation of this
pathological PrP isoform. That FB1 and nSMase both
enhance PrPSc formation thus stands in striking
contrast with results obtained in cells starved from cholesterol.
Indeed, depletion of cells from cholesterol or from SL had
diametrically opposed influence on two additional aspects of PrP
metabolism. First, the metabolic degradation of PrP was accelerated in
cells treated with either FB1 alone or with a combination
of FB1 and nSMase,2 whereas in cells treated
with lovastatin, PrP turnover was slowed (29). This result suggests
that PrPC degradation and PrPSc formation may
be coupled in ScN2a cells. Second, the opposing action of lovastatin
and of SL inhibitors on the formation of PrPSc also
correlates well with their contrasting influence on
PrPC-containing rafts. Whereas in cholesterol-starved
cells, most PrPC becomes soluble in TX-100 (29), both
PrPC and PrPSc remain attached to TX-100
buoyant rafts (Fig. 4) in ScN2a cells depleted from SLs (with
FB1 or nSMase). This correlation thus supports the thesis
that association of PrPC with rafts is essential for the
efficient pathological conversion of this protein into
PrPSc. Our results also indicate that cholesterol and SM
play entirely different roles in determining the properties of rafts.
That rafts support the formation of the abnormal PrPSc (and
thus the replication of prions) is perhaps the first example of their
involvement in a pathological process. Whether the lipid composition of
rafts could be a future therapeutic target in prion diseases remains to
be seen.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Ruth Gabizon and Steve Caplan for
critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by grants from the German-Israeli
Foundation for Scientific Research and Development and the Israel Center for the Study of Emerging Diseases (to A. T.) and from the
United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (to Y. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
A Sir Charles Clore fellow.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel. and Fax:
972-2-675-7086; E-mail: taraboul@cc.huji.ac.il.
2
N. Naslavsky and A. Taraboulos, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol;
CTXB, cholera toxoid B;
Glc-Cer, glucosyl
ceramide;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
SL, sphingolipid;
SM, sphingomyelin;
nSMase, sphingomyelinase;
PDMP, D-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol;
FB1, fumonisin B1;
TX-100, Triton X-100;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
(1982)
Science
216,
136-144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Prusiner, S. B.,
Scott, M. R.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
and Cohen, F. E.
(1998)
Cell
93,
337-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Borchelt, D. R.,
Scott, M.,
Taraboulos, A.,
Stahl, N.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
743-752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Butler, D. A.,
Scott, M. R. D.,
Bockman, J. M.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
Taraboulos, A.,
Hsiao, K. K.,
Kingsbury, D. T.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1988)
J. Virol.
62,
1558-1564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Taraboulos, A.,
Serban, D.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
2117-2132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
(1991)
Science
252,
1515-1522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Kellings, K.,
Meyer, N.,
Mirenda, C.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Riesner, D.
(1992)
J. Gen. Virol.
73,
1025-1029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Taraboulos, A.,
Rogers, M.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
McKinley, M. P.,
Scott, M.,
Serban, D.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8262-8266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Caughey, B. W.,
Dong, A.,
Bhat, K. S.,
Ernst, D.,
Hayes, S. F.,
and Caughey, W. S.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
7672-7680[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Gasset, M.,
Baldwin, M. A.,
Lloyd, D.,
Gabriel, J.-M.,
Holtzman, D. M.,
Cohen, F.,
Fletterick, R.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10940-10944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Pan, K. M.,
Baldwin, M.,
Nguyen, J.,
Gasset, M.,
Serban, A.,
Groth, D.,
Mehlhorn, I.,
Huang, Z.,
Fletterick, R. J.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10962-10966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Cohen, F. E.,
Pan, K. M.,
Huang, Z.,
Baldwin, M.,
Fletterick, R. J.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1994)
Science
264,
530-531[Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Gasset, M.,
Baldwin, M. A.,
Fletterick, R. J.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Huang, Z.,
Gabriel, J. M.,
Baldwin, M. A.,
Fletterick, R. J.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Cohen, F. E.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
7139-7143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Stahl, N.,
Baldwin, M. A.,
Teplow, D. B.,
Hood, L.,
Gibson, B. W.,
Burlingame, A. L.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
1991-2002[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Prusiner, S. B.,
McKinley, M. P.,
Bowman, K. A.,
Bolton, D. C.,
Bendheim, P. E.,
Groth, D. F.,
and Glenner, G. G.
(1983)
Cell
35,
349-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Meyer, R. K.,
McKinley, M. P.,
Bowman, K. A.,
Braunfeld, M. B.,
Barry, R. A.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
2310-2314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
McKinley, M. P.,
Bolton, D. C.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1983)
Proc. Electr. Microsc. Soc. Am.
41,
802-803
|
| 19.
|
McKinley, M. P.,
Meyer, R.,
Kenaga, L.,
Rahbar, F.,
Cotter, R.,
Serban, A.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
1440-1449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Merz, P. A.,
Somerville, R. A.,
Wisniewski, H. M.,
and Iqbal, K.
(1981)
Acta Neuropathol.
54,
63-74[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Oesch, B.,
Westaway, D.,
Wälchli, M.,
McKinley, M. P.,
Kent, S. B. H.,
Aebersold, R.,
Barry, R. A.,
Tempst, P.,
Teplow, D. B.,
Hood, L. E.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Weissmann, C.
(1985)
Cell
40,
735-746[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Stahl, N.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
Hsiao, K.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1987)
Cell
51,
229-240[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Hay, B.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Lingappa, V. R.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
8110-8115[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
Mastrianni, J. A.,
Scott, M. R.,
DeFea, K. A.,
Tremblay, P.,
Torchia, M.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Lingappa, V. R.
(1998)
Science
279,
827-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
McKinley, M. P.,
Taraboulos, A.,
Kenaga, L.,
Serban, D.,
Stieber, A.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Gonatas, N.
(1991)
Lab. Invest.
65,
622-630[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Caughey, B.,
and Raymond, G. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
18217-18223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Caughey, B.,
Raymond, G. J.,
Ernst, D.,
and Race, R. E.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
6597-6603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Borchelt, D. R.,
Taraboulos, A.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16188-16199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Taraboulos, A.,
Scott, M.,
Semenov, A.,
Avrahami, D.,
Laszlo, L.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
121-132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Gorodinsky, A.,
and Harris, D. A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
619-627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Harmey, J. H.,
Doyle, D.,
Brown, V.,
and Rogers, M. S.
(1995)
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
210,
753-759[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Vey, M.,
Pilkuhn, S.,
Wille, H.,
Nixon, R.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Smart, E. J.,
Anderson, R. G. W.,
Taraboulos, A.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14945-14949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Naslavsky, N.,
Stein, R.,
Yanai, A.,
Friedlander, G.,
and Taraboulos, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6324-6331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Brown, D. A.,
and Rose, J. K.
(1992)
Cell
68,
533-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Simons, K.,
and van Meer, G.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
6197-6202[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Simons, K.,
and Ikonen, E.
(1997)
Nature
387,
569-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Dupree, P.,
Parton, R. G.,
Raposo, G.,
Kurzchalia, T. V.,
and Simons, K.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
1597-1605[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Chang, W. J.,
Rothberg, K. G.,
Kamen, B. A.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
118,
63-69[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Anderson, R. G. W.,
Kamen, B. A.,
Rothberg, K. G.,
and Lacey, S. W.
(1992)
Science
255,
410-411[Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Rothberg, K. G.,
Ying, Y. S.,
Kamen, B. A.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
2931-2938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Cerneus, D. P.,
Ueffing, E.,
Posthuma, G.,
Strous, G. J.,
and van der Ende, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3150-3155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Schnitzer, J. E.,
Oh, P.,
Pinney, E.,
and Allard, J.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1217-1232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Stevens, V. L.,
and Tang, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18020-18025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Horvath, A.,
Sütterlin, C.,
Manning-Kreig, U.,
Movva, N. R.,
and Riezman, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3687-3695[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Mays, R. W.,
Siemers, K. A.,
Fritz, B. A.,
Lowe, A. W.,
van Meer, G.,
and Nelson, W. J.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
1105-1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Futerman, A. H.
(1995)
Trends Cell Biol.
5,
377-380
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47.
|
Hanada, K.,
Nishijima, M.,
Akamatsu, Y.,
and Pagano, R. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
6254-6260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Kaneko, K.,
Vey, M.,
Scott, M.,
Pilkuhn, S.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2333-2338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Hirschberg, K.,
Zisling, R.,
van Echten-Deckert, G.,
and Futerman, A. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14876-14882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Scott, M. R.,
Köhler, R.,
Foster, D.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1992)
Protein Sci.
1,
986-997[Abstract]
|
| 51.
|
Cham, B. E.,
and Knowles, B. R.
(1976)
J. Lipid Res.
17,
176-181[Abstract]
|
| 52.
|
Serban, D.,
Taraboulos, A.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1990)
Neurology
40,
110-117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Kascsak, R. J.,
Rubenstein, R.,
Merz, P. A.,
Tonna-DeMasi, M.,
Fersko, R.,
Carp, R. I.,
Wisniewski, H. M.,
and Diringer, H.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
3688-3693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Rogers, M.,
Taraboulos, A.,
Scott, M.,
Borchelt, D.,
Serban, D.,
Gyuris, T.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1992)
in
Prion Diseases of Humans and Animals
(Prusiner, S. B.
, Collinge, J.
, Powell, J.
, and Anderton, B., eds)
, pp. 457-469, Ellis Horwood, London
|
| 55.
|
Bligh, |