![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 20791-20795, July 23, 1999
§,
¶,
,
,
,
, and
**
From the
Research Division and
Howard Hughes
Medical Institute, Joslin Diabetes Center, Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02215
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Insulin receptor substrate-2-deficient
(IRS2 Conditions of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes are
characterized by defects in glucose handling by skeletal muscle, liver,
and adipose tissue and an increase in pancreatic insulin secretion to
compensate for the impaired insulin action in the periphery (1). Overt
type 2 diabetes typically occurs when insulin secretion becomes
insufficient to fully compensate for decreased insulin action in the
peripheral tissues (1). Since impaired insulin action in peripheral
tissues has been associated with defects in insulin signaling molecules
leading to glucose transport (2-5), there has been an intensive
investigation of these signaling proteins (6, 7). It is now well
established that activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase
(PI1 3-kinase) is necessary
to elicit insulin effects on glucose transport (8, 9), and the major
mechanism activating PI 3-kinase appears to be via the insulin receptor
substrate (IRS) proteins (10, 11). IRS1-deficient mice have normal
blood glucose concentrations despite peripheral insulin resistance,
suggesting adequate Glucose transport is the rate-limiting step for glucose disposal in
skeletal muscle under most condition (15). Insulin stimulation and
physical exercise are the most physiologically relevant stimulators of
transport in muscle, and both stimuli increase transport through the
translocation of the GLUT4 glucose transporters to the cell surface
(16, 17). The activation of PI 3-kinase is necessary for
insulin-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle, whereas exercise stimulates GLUT4 translocation through a PI
3-kinase-independent mechanism (18-21). It is not known if IRS2 is
necessary for insulin- or exercise-stimulated glucose transport in
skeletal muscle, although one report has suggested that IRS2 functions
as a signaling mechanism leading to contraction-stimulated glucose
transport in cardiac myocytes (22).
In the current study we determined if skeletal muscles from
IRS2-deficient mice have altered rates of glucose transport under basal
conditions and in response to submaximal and maximal insulin stimulation. We also investigated whether IRS2 is required for exercise
to increase glucose transport in skeletal muscle. Our results show that
IRS2 is not necessary for increases in glucose transport in response to
insulin or exercise and suggest that it is the onset of hyperglycemia
that results in skeletal muscle insulin resistance in IRS2-deficient mice.
Experimental Animals--
Male insulin receptor
substrate-2-deficient (IRS2 Insulin Experiments--
Following a 15-h fast, mice were killed
by decapitation, and blood was collected for the measurement of blood
glucose and plasma insulin concentrations. The soleus muscles were
rapidly dissected, and both ends of each muscle were tied with suture (silk 4-0) and mounted on an incubation apparatus as described previously (23). Muscles were preincubated in 6 ml of Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (KRB) (117 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM
KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM
KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4,
24.6 mM NaHCO3) containing 8 mM
D-glucose at 37 °C for 20 min. The muscles were then
incubated for 20 min in KRB containing 8 mM
D-glucose in the absence or presence of 0.9, 1.8, or 120 nM insulin. After this incubation period, muscles were
rinsed in 7.5 ml of KRB containing 8 mM
D-mannitol at 30 °C for 10 min, and 2DG uptake was
measured in 2 ml of KRB containing 1 mM
2-deoxy-D-[1,2-3H]glucose (1.5 µCi/ml) and
7 mM D-[14C]mannitol (0.45 mCi/ml)(NEN Life Science Products) at 30 °C for 20 min. Insulin was
added to the buffer if present during the previous incubation period.
The buffers were continuously gassed with 95% O2, 5%
CO2. Muscles were processed, radioactivity determined by liquid scintillation counting for dual labels, and 2DG uptake was
calculated as described previously (24).
Exercise Experiments--
IRS2 GLUT4 Immunoblotting--
Gastrocnemius muscles were homogenized
in lysis buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, 2 mM
EGTA, 50 mM Blood Glucose, Plasma Insulin, and Muscle Glycogen--
Blood
glucose concentrations were measured using a ONE TOUCH PROFILE blood
glucose meter (Lifescan, Milpitas, CA). Plasma insulin concentrations
were measured by radio immunoassay using rat insulin as a standard
(Linco, Charles, MO). For measurement of muscle glycogen, gastrocnemius
muscles were dissolved in 30% KOH and 5%
Na2SO4 at 70 °C for 15 min. Glycogen was
then precipitated by mixing with 3 × volume of absolute alcohol
and stored at Statistical Analysis--
Data are expressed as means ± S.E. Comparisons between WT and IRS2 Glucose and Insulin Concentrations and Body Weights--
Blood
glucose concentrations in the IRS2 Insulin-stimulated Glucose Transport--
To determine
whether there is a defect in basal and insulin-stimulated glucose
transport in skeletal muscle from IRS2 Glucose, Insulin, and Muscle Glycogen Levels before and after
Exercise--
Blood glucose concentrations in the WT and
IRS2 Exercise-stimulated Glucose Transport--
We next determined if
IRS2 is necessary for the effects of exercise per se to
increase glucose transport and to determine whether IRS2 is required
for the additive effects of exercise plus insulin on glucose transport
in skeletal muscle. 2DG uptake following exercise in the absence of
insulin was not statistically decreased in the IRS2 GLUT4 Protein in Muscle--
To determine whether IRS2 deficiency
alters GLUT4 expression in skeletal muscle, we measured GLUT4 protein
in WT and IRS2 Of the four members of the IRS family that have now been
identified, IRS1 (26) and IRS2 (27) have the widest tissue
distribution, including expression in skeletal muscle, liver, and
adipose tissue. In contrast, neither IRS3 (28) nor IRS4 (29) are
expressed in adult skeletal muscle. Both IRS1 and IRS2 are
tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to insulin, and binding of
tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS1 to the p85 regulatory subunit of PI
3-kinase and subsequent activation of the enzyme are thought to be
important for insulin-stimulated glucose transport (8, 9). Recent
studies using "knockout" mouse models have advanced our
understanding of the role of the insulin receptor and IRS proteins in
insulin-stimulated glucose transport. Muscle-specific insulin receptor
knockout mice have a dramatic impairment in insulin-stimulated glucose
uptake in skeletal muscle, demonstrating that the receptor is necessary for insulin-stimulated glucose transport (24). IRS1-deficient mice have
normal blood glucose concentrations despite peripheral insulin
resistance (13). In the current study, we observed that IRS2 There is good evidence that the first detectable defect in human
patients predisposed to type 2 diabetes is insulin resistance in
skeletal muscle (30). IRS2 Both hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia typically accompany the
development of type 2 diabetes, and it is difficult to determine their
priority. In the IRS2 Although 6-8-week-old IRS2 It has been suggested recently that contraction-induced signaling
leading to glucose transport in isolated rat cardiac myocytes involves
IRS2 (22). Therefore, we investigated whether IRS2 is necessary for the
effects of exercise to increase glucose transport in skeletal muscle
and if the protein is necessary for the post-exercise increase in
insulin-stimulated glucose transport. Similar to the effects of
insulin, only the hyperglycemic IRS2 Given that hyperinsulinemia may be the precursor leading to insulin
resistance in the IRS2 In summary, the current study demonstrates that expression of the IRS2
protein is not necessary for the stimulation of glucose transport in
skeletal muscle in response to insulin or exercise. The initial onset
of diabetes in IRS2
/
) mice develop type 2 diabetes. The purpose
of this study was to determine whether there is a defect in basal,
insulin-, and exercise-stimulated glucose transport in the skeletal
muscle of these animals. IRS2
/
and wild-type (WT) mice
(male, 8-10 weeks) exercised on a treadmill for 1 h or remained
sedentary. 2-Deoxyglucose (2DG) uptake was measured in isolated soleus
muscles incubated in vitro in the presence or absence of
insulin. Resting blood glucose concentration in IRS2
/
mice (10.3 mM) was higher than WT animals (4.1 mM), but there was a wide range among the
IRS2
/
mice (3-25 mM). Therefore,
IRS2
/
mice were divided into two subgroups based on
blood glucose concentrations (IRS2
/
L < 7.2 mM, IRS2
/
H > 7.2 mM).
Only IRS2
/
H had lower basal, exercise-, and
submaximally insulin-stimulated 2DG uptake, while maximal
insulin-stimulated 2DG uptake was similar among the three groups. The
ED50 for insulin to stimulate 2DG uptake above basal in
IRS2
/
H was higher than WT and IRS2
/
L
mice, suggesting insulin resistance in the skeletal muscle from the
IRS2
/
mice with high blood glucose concentrations.
Furthermore, resting blood glucose concentrations from all groups were
negatively correlated to submaximally insulin-stimulated 2DG uptake
(r2 = 0.33, p < 0.01). Muscle
GLUT4 content was significantly lower in IRS2
/
H mice
compared with WT and IRS2
/
L mice. These results
demonstrate that the IRS2 protein in muscle is not necessary for
insulin- or exercise-stimulated glucose transport, suggesting that the
onset of diabetes in the IRS2
/
mice is not due to a
defect in skeletal muscle glucose transport; hyperglycemia may cause
insulin resistance in the muscle of IRS2
/
mice.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-cell compensation (12, 13). On the other hand,
IRS2-deficient mice exhibit both peripheral insulin resistance and
impaired pancreatic
-cell function and develop severe diabetes (14).
It is not known if insulin resistance in skeletal muscle is the primary factor leading to the development of diabetes in the IRS2-deficient animals.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
, n = 55)
and wild-type (WT, n = 46) mice aged 8-10 weeks were
studied. The generation of these animals and many of the physiological
characteristics of the mice have been described in detail (14). Animals
were housed in an animal room maintained at 23 °C with a 12-h
light/12-h dark cycle and fed standard laboratory chow and water
ad libitum.
/
and WT mice were
fasted for 15 h. Blood glucose concentrations were measured in
blood taken from the tail prior to the exercise. Mice ran on a rodent
treadmill (Quinton Instruments Co., Seattle, WA) for 1 h at 0.7 mph up a 10% incline. Animals were killed immediately after exercise,
and blood was collected for the measurement of blood glucose and plasma
insulin concentrations. The soleus muscles were rapidly dissected and
mounted on the incubation apparatus. The muscles were incubated for 20 min in KRB containing 8 mM D-mannitol at
30 °C in the absence or presence of insulin (1.8 or 120 nM), and 2DG uptake was measured as described above.
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1%
Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 µM leupeptin, 3 mM benzamidine, 5 µM pepstatin A, 10 µg/ml
aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 200 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, pH 7.4. Homogenates were mixed for
1 h at 4 °C and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for
1 h at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and stored at
80 °C until analyzed. Aliquots of protein (100 µg) were
separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for GLUT4 as described
previously (25).
20 °C overnight. The precipitates were collected by
centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 5 min. The glycogen was
hydrolyzed in 6 N H2SO4 at
100 °C for 45 min and cooled. Samples were neutralized with 1 N NaOH, and glucose was measured using the glucose (HK)
reagent (Sigma).
/
mice were
performed by an unpaired Student's t test. Comparisons of
parameters before and after exercise were performed by Student's t test (paired and unpaired as appropriate) or Mann-Whitney
U test. Comparisons among WT, IRS2
/
L, and
IRS2
/
H mice were performed by a one-way analysis of
variance with Fisher's protected least significant difference test.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
mice were
significantly higher compared with WT mice (Table
I). Since IRS2
/
mice had
such a wide range of blood glucose concentrations (3.1-24.8 mM), we divided these mice into two subgroups: mice from
one group had blood glucose concentrations within a 2 S.D. distribution of the WT mice (<7.2 mM, IRS2
/
L), and mice
from the other group had blood glucose concentrations greater than 2 S.D. of WT mice (>7.2 mM, IRS2
/
H). Plasma
insulin concentrations were elevated in IRS2
/
mice
compared with WT, but were not different between the
IRS2
/
L and IRS2
/
H mice. Body weight was
approximately 10% lower in IRS2
/
mice compared with WT
and was not statistically different between the IRS2
/
L
and IRS2
/
H mice.
Body weight, blood glucose, and plasma insulin concentrations
/
mice, isolated
soleus muscles were incubated in KRB buffer in the absence or the
presence of insulin. IRS2
/
mice in the absence of
hyperglycemia had normal 2DG uptake under basal conditions (Fig.
1). However, in the
IRS2
/
H mice, where mean blood glucose concentration was
16.1 mM, there was a significant reduction in basal 2DG
uptake. 2DG uptake in response to two different submaximal insulin
concentrations was also significantly lower in the
IRS2
/
H mice, but not the IRS2
/
L mice
(Fig. 1). In contrast, incubation with a maximal dose of insulin
induced similar rates of 2DG uptake in all three groups (Fig. 1). Using
the data shown in Fig. 1, we calculated the insulin dose that results
in 50% of the maximal insulin-stimulated 2DG uptake
(ED50). Since basal 2DG uptake in IRS2
/
H
mice was lower than those of WT and IRS2
/
L mice, we
calculated the ED50 with and without subtraction of basal
2DG uptake for each individual group. The ED50 without
subtraction of basal 2DG uptake in IRS2
/
H mice (1.5 nM) was greater than WT (0.8 nM) and
IRS2
/
L mice (0.7 nM). Similarly, the
ED50 with subtraction of basal 2DG uptake in
IRS2
/
H mice (1.9 nM) was greater than WT
(1.4 nM) and IRS2
/
L mice (1.3 nM), suggesting that only the IRS2
/
H mice
are insulin-resistant in skeletal muscle. Fasting blood glucose
concentrations from all groups were negatively correlated with basal
2DG uptake (r2 = 0.21, p < 0.05) and submaximally insulin-stimulated (1.8 nM) 2DG
uptake (r2 = 0.33, p < 0.01).

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Insulin stimulated glucose transport in
isolated soleus muscle from WT (open bars),
IRS2
/
L (shaded bars), and
IRS2
/
H mice (filled bars). 2DG
uptake was measured in the absence or presence of 0.9, 1.8, or 120 nM insulin as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Data are means ± S.E.; n = 6-20
per group.
/
H mice did not change in response to exercise,
while there was a slight, but statistically significant, decrease in
blood glucose in the IRS2
/
L mice (Fig.
2A). Interestingly, plasma
insulin concentrations dramatically decreased with exercise in both
groups of IRS2
/
mice, resulting in similar insulin
levels compared with the WT (Fig. 2B). Since blood glucose
concentrations among the three groups were significantly difference,
the alcohol precipitation method for glycogen was used in order to
avoid measuring glucose associated with blood and tissue. Muscle
glycogen content at rest was similar among the WT,
IRS2
/
L, and IRS2
/
H groups and was
significantly decreased after exercise in all three groups (Fig.
2C). However, the percent decrease in glycogen after
exercise was lower in IRS2
/
H mice compared with
IRS2
/
L mice (47.7 versus 68.2%,
respectively, p < 0.05), suggesting less reliance on
muscle glycogen as a fuel source during exercise in the
IRS2
/
H mice.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effects of 1-h treadmill exercise on blood
glucose and plasma insulin concentrations and muscle glycogen content
in WT (open bars), IRS2
/
L
(shaded bars), and IRS2
/
H mice
(filled bars). A, blood glucose
concentrations; B, plasma insulin concentrations;
C, muscle glycogen content (left panel) and the
percent decrease in glycogen content (right panel).
B, basal condition. Ex, exercised condition. Data
are means ± S.E. *, p < 0.05 versus
basal condition; n = 5-35 per group.
/
L
mice, but was lower in the IRS2
/
H mice (Fig.
3). The -fold increase above basal in
IRS2
/
H mice (2.4-fold) was similar to the WT mice
(2.1-fold), suggesting that the lower exercise-induced increase in 2 DG
uptake may be due to impaired basal rates of glucose transport in the
IRS2
/
H mice. 2DG uptake with the combination of
exercise and insulin was not altered in the IRS2
/
L
mice, while 2DG uptake in the IRS2
/
H mice was lower
compared with the WT and IRS2
/
L mice (Fig. 3). The
partially or fully additive effects of exercise plus insulin
(submaximal and maximal insulin dose) on 2DG uptake in the WT and
IRS2
/
L animals was not present in the hyperglycemic
IRS2
/
H mice.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effects of 1-h treadmill exercise on glucose
transport in isolated soleus muscle from the WT (open
bars), IRS2
/
L (shaded
bars), and IRS2
/
H mice (filled
bars). 2DG uptake was measured in the absence or
presence of 1.8 or 120 nM insulin as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Data are means ± S.E.;
n = 3-20 per group.
/
mice. Fig.
4 shows that GLUT4 content in the
gastrocnemius muscles was not different between the
IRS2
/
L and the WT mice. However, the hyperglycemic
IRS2
/
H mice had 18 and 28% less GLUT4 compared with
the WT and IRS2
/
L mice, respectively.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Muscle GLUT4 content in the WT (open
bars), IRS2
/
L (shaded
bars), and IRS2
/
H mice (filled
bars). The results are expressed as arbitrary units of
a reference standard for comparisons among different blots. Data are
means ± S.E.; n = 8 per group.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
mice with near normal glycemia have normal rates
of basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle.
These findings demonstrate that IRS2 is not necessary for glucose
transport in skeletal muscle and suggest that signaling through other
molecules such as IRS1 are sufficient to mediate insulin's effects on
glucose transport in this tissue.
/
mice develop overt type 2 diabetes, usually by the age of 10 weeks, and these animals are
characterized by impaired
-cell function and peripheral insulin
resistance as measured by the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (14).
In the current study, only the IRS2
/
mice that had
developed severe hyperglycemia had impaired glucose uptake in isolated
skeletal muscles. Furthermore, fasting blood glucose concentrations
were negatively correlated to submaximally insulin-stimulated glucose
uptake in the muscle. Thus, hyperglycemia resulting from hepatic
insulin resistance and
-cell failure, and not the lack of IRS2 in
muscle, is likely to cause insulin resistance in the skeletal muscle of
IRS2
/
mice.
/
mice the precursor leading to
insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes may be hyperinsulinemia, since
IRS2
/
mice with near normal glycemia and normal
insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle were already
hyperinsulinemic. Furthermore, there is the wide range of fasting
insulin concentrations in IRS2
/
L mice with near normal
glycemia (Table I). These findings also suggest that insulin resistance
in skeletal muscle is not causing the hyperinsulinemia in these animals.
/
mice are hyperinsulinemic,
the rate of hepatic glucose production in the fasted state is similar to WT mice (14). However, low dose insulin infusion during an insulin-glucose clamp does not suppress hepatic glucose production in
IRS2
/
mice (14), and these animals also display
decreased levels of liver
glycogen.2 These findings
suggest that the liver is insulin-resistant for the suppression of
glucose production and/or that there is impairment in glycogenesis. In
contrast, in skeletal muscle, glycogen levels in the basal state were
not altered in either group of IRS2
/
mice. The
difference between these tissues provides further evidence that IRS2
plays a more limited role in regulating carbohydrate metabolism in
skeletal muscle compared with other tissues and that insulin resistance
in skeletal muscle occurs secondary to defects in glucose homeostasis
in other tissues such as the liver and pancreas.
/
mice had impaired
glucose uptake in response to exercise. For the effects of exercise
"per se," the lower rate of glucose uptake in the
hyperglycemic IRS2
/
mice was probably due to lower
basal rates of transport, since the -fold increment above basal was
normal in these animals. The fact that the defect in insulin-stimulated
glucose uptake in the post-exercise state only occurred in the
IRS2
/
H mice is consistent with our hypothesis that
hyperglycemia is the cause of defects in glucose transport in the
muscle from IRS2
/
mice animals. Impaired
insulin-stimulated glucose uptake after exercise in hyperglycemic
IRS2
/
mice could be due to decreased glycogenolysis
during exercise, since post-exercise glycogen concentrations are
negatively correlated with glucose transport in rat epitrochlearis
muscle (31). The decrease in GLUT4 content in skeletal muscle from
hyperglycemic IRS2
/
mice could also be a factor leading
to an impaired insulin-stimulated glucose transport after exercise.
However, the decrease in GLUT4 content in skeletal muscle did not
result in impaired maximal insulin-stimulated glucose transport.
/
mice, it is of interest that
there was a dramatic decrease in plasma insulin concentrations
following exercise in both the IRS2
/
L and
IRS2
/
H mice, regardless of prevailing blood glucose
concentrations. In addition, IRS2
/
L mice with near
normal glycemia had a significant decrease in blood glucose
concentrations after 1 h of exercise. Although 4-week-old IRS2
/
mice were already hyperinsulinemic, the insulin
response to a glucose load is nearly normal (14). Interestingly,
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion deteriorates with aging, and then
hyperglycemia results in impaired
-cell function. Given that
IRS2
/
mice with near normal glycemia showed normal
glucose transport and insulin response, it is possible that performance
of regular exercise from an early age may have a beneficial effect on
glucose homeostasis in these animals.
/
mice is not due to a defect in
skeletal muscle glucose transport, and prolonged hyperglycemia may be a
primary mechanism leading to insulin resistance in skeletal muscle of
IRS2
/
mice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Grants AR-45670 and AR-42238 (to L. J. G.) and by National Institutes of Health Grant DK-43808 (to M. F. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (Saga Medical School).
¶ Supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Alfred Benzon's Foundation of Denmark.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-732-2597; Fax: 617-732-2650; E-mail: laurie.goodyear@joslin.harvard.edu.
2 M. F. White, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PI, phosphoinositide; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; WT, wild-type; KRB, Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | DeFronzo, R. (1988) Diabetes 37, 667-687[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Saad, M. J. A., Eraki, E., Miralpeix, M., White, M. F., and Kahn, C. R. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 1839-1849 |
| 3. | Goodyear, L. J., Giorgino, F., Sherman, L. A., Carey, J., Smith, R. J., and Dohm, G. L. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 2195-2204 |
| 4. | Heydrick, S. J., Jullien, D., Gautier, N., Tanti, J.-F., Giorgetti, S., Van Obberghen, E., Le Marchand-Brustel, Y., and Tanti, J. F. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 1358-1366 |
| 5. | Bjornholm, M., Kawano, Y., Lehtihet, M., and Zierath, J. R. (1997) Diabetes 46, 524-527[Abstract] |
| 6. | Shepherd, P. R., Withers, D. J., and Siddle, K. (1998) Biochem. J. 333, 471-490 |
| 7. |
Czech, M. P.,
and Corvera, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1865-1868 |
| 8. |
Cheatham, B.,
Vlahos, C. J.,
Cheatham, L.,
Wang, L.,
Blenis, J.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4902-4911 |
| 9. | Clarke, J. F., Young, P. W., Yonezawa, K., Kasuga, M., and Holman, G. D. (1994) Biochem. J. 300, 631-635 |
| 10. |
White, M. F.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1-4 |
| 11. | Cheatham, B., and Kahn, C. R. (1995) Endocr. Rev. 16, 117-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Araki, E., Lipes, M. A., Patti, M., Bruning, J. C., Haag, B., III, Johnson, R. S., and Kahn, C. (1994) Nature 372, 186-190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Tamemoto, H., Kadowaki, T., Tobe, K., Yagi, T., Sakura, H., Hayakawa, T., Terauchi, Y., Ueki, K., Kaburagi, Y., and Satoh, S. (1994) Nature 372, 182-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Withers, D. J., Gutierrez, J. S., Towery, H., Burks, D. J., Ren, J. M., Previs, S., Zhang, Y., Bernal, D., Pons, S., Shulman, G. I., Bonner-Weir, S., and White, M. F. (1998) Nature 391, 900-904[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Kubo, K.,
and Foley, J. E.
(1986)
Am. J. Physiol.
250,
E100-E102 |
| 16. |
Goodyear, L. J.,
King, P. A.,
Hirshman, M. F.,
Thompson, C. M.,
Horton, E. D.,
and Horton, E. S.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
258,
E667-E672 |
| 17. | Douen, A. G., Ramlal, T., Cartee, G. D., and Klip, A. (1990) FEBS Lett. 261, 256-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Goodyear, L. J.,
Giorgino, F.,
Balon, T. W.,
Condorelli, G.,
and Smith, R. J.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
E987-E995 |
| 19. | Lee, A. D., Hansen, P. A., and Holloszy, J. O. (1995) FEBS Lett. 361, 51-54[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Yeh, J. I.,
Gulve, E. A.,
Rameh, L.,
and Birnbaum, M. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2107-2111 |
| 21. |
Lund, S.,
Holman, G. D.,
Schmitz, O.,
and Pedersen, O.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5817-5821 |
| 22. | Till, M., Kolter, T., and Eckel, J. (1997) Am. J. Cardiol. 80, 85A-89A[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Hayashi, T., Hirshman, M. F., Kurth, E. J., Winder, W. W., and Goodyear, L. J. (1998) Diabetes 47, 1369-1373[Abstract] |
| 24. | Bruning, J. C., Michael, M. D., Winnay, J. N., Hayashi, T., Horsch, D., Accili, D., Goodyear, L. J., and Kahn, C. R. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 559-569[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Sherman, L. A., Hirshman, M. F., Cormont, M., Le Marchand-Brustel, Y., and Goodyear, L. J. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 266-273[Abstract] |
| 26. | Sun, X. J., Rothenberg, P., Kahn, R. C., Backer, J. M., Araki, E., Wilden, P. A., Cahill, D. A., Goldstein, B. J., White, M. F., and Kahn, C. R. (1991) Nature 352, 73-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Sun, X. J., Wang, L. M., Zhang, Y., Yenush, L., Myers, M. G., Jr., Glasheen, E. M., Lane, W. S., Pierce, J. H., and White, M. F. (1995) Nature 377, 173-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Lavan, B. E.,
Lane, W. S.,
and Lienhard, G. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11439-11443 |
| 29. |
Lavan, B. E.,
Fantin, V. R.,
Chang, E. T.,
Lane, W. S.,
Keller, S. R.,
and Lienhard, G. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21403-21407 |
| 30. |
Lillioja, S.,
Mott, D. M.,
Spraul, M.,
Ferraro, R.,
Foley, J. E.,
Ravussin, E.,
Knowler, W. C.,
Bennett, P. H.,
and Bogardus, C.
(1993)
N. Engl. J. Med.
329,
1988-1992 |
| 31. |
Kawanaka, K.,
Tabata, I.,
Tanaka, A.,
and Higuchi, M.
(1998)
J. Appl. Physiol.
84,
1852-1857 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Sharfi and H. Eldar-Finkelman Sequential phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-2 by glycogen synthase kinase-3 and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase plays a role in hepatic insulin signaling Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2008; 294(2): E307 - E315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hamada, E. B. Arias, and G. D. Cartee Increased submaximal insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in mouse skeletal muscle after treadmill exercise J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1368 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yu, M. F. Hirshman, N. Fujii, J. M. Pomerleau, L. E. Peter, and L. J. Goodyear Muscle-specific overexpression of wild type and R225Q mutant AMP-activated protein kinase {gamma}3-subunit differentially regulates glycogen accumulation Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2006; 291(3): E557 - E565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Ciaraldi, S. A. Phillips, L. Carter, V. Aroda, S. Mudaliar, and R. R. Henry Effects of the Rapid-Acting Insulin Analog Glulisine on Cultured Human Skeletal Muscle Cells: Comparisons with Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor I J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5551 - 5558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Huang, A. C. P. Thirone, X. Huang, and A. Klip Differential Contribution of Insulin Receptor Substrates 1 Versus 2 to Insulin Signaling and Glucose Uptake in L6 Myotubes J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 19426 - 19435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sadagurski, G. Weingarten, C. J. Rhodes, M. F. White, and E. Wertheimer Insulin Receptor Substrate 2 Plays Diverse Cell-specific Roles in the Regulation of Glucose Transport J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14536 - 14544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Park, G. H. Choi, H. I. Choi, J. Ryu, C. Y. Jung, and W. Lee Depletion of Mitochondrial DNA Causes Impaired Glucose Utilization and Insulin Resistance in L6 GLUT4myc Myocytes J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 9855 - 9864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Peres, S. M. F. de Moraes, C. E. M. Costa, L. C. Brito, J. Takada, S. Andreotti, M. A. Machado, M. I. C. Alonso-Vale, C. N. Borges-Silva, and F. B. Lima Endurance exercise training increases insulin responsiveness in isolated adipocytes through IRS/PI3-kinase/Akt pathway J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2005; 98(3): 1037 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Sajan, M. L. Standaert, A. Miura, C. R. Kahn, and R. V. Farese Tissue-Specific Differences in Activation of Atypical Protein Kinase C and Protein Kinase B in Muscle, Liver, and Adipocytes of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Knockout Mice Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 18(10): 2513 - 2521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Suzuki, K. Tobe, Y. Terauchi, K. Komeda, N. Kubota, K. Eto, T. Yamauchi, K. Azuma, H. Kaneto, T. Taguchi, et al. Pdx1 Expression in Irs2-deficient Mouse {beta}-Cells Is Regulated in a Strain-dependent Manner J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43691 - 43698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Valverde, D. J. Burks, I. Fabregat, T. L. Fisher, J. Carretero, M. F. White, and M. Benito Molecular Mechanisms of Insulin Resistance in IRS-2-Deficient Hepatocytes Diabetes, September 1, 2003; 52(9): 2239 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kumar and C. S. Dey Gliclazide increases insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation but not p38 phosphorylation in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle cells J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 205(23): 3739 - 3746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kido, J. Nakae, M. L. Hribal, S. Xuan, A. Efstratiadis, and D. Accili Effects of Mutations in the Insulin-like Growth Factor Signaling System on Embryonic Pancreas Development and beta -Cell Compensation to Insulin Resistance J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36740 - 36747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Hribal, F. Oriente, and D. Accili Mouse models of insulin resistance Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2002; 282(5): E977 - E981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vollenweider, B. Menard, and P. Nicod Insulin Resistance, Defective Insulin Receptor Substrate 2--Associated Phosphatidylinositol-3' Kinase Activation, and Impaired Atypical Protein Kinase C ({zeta}/{lambda}) Activation in Myotubes From Obese Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance Diabetes, April 1, 2002; 51(4): 1052 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Howlett, K. Sakamoto, M. F. Hirshman, W. G. Aschenbach, M. Dow, M. F. White, and L. J. Goodyear Insulin Signaling After Exercise in Insulin Receptor Substrate-2-Deficient Mice Diabetes, February 1, 2002; 51(2): 479 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. SESTI, M. FEDERICI, M. L. HRIBAL, D. LAURO, P. SBRACCIA, and R. LAURO Defects of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) system in human metabolic disorders FASEB J, October 1, 2001; 15(12): 2099 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Dumke, J. S. Rhodes, T. Garland Jr, E. Maslowski, J. G. Swallow, A. C. Wetter, and G. D. Cartee Genetic selection of mice for high voluntary wheel running: effect on skeletal muscle glucose uptake J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2001; 91(3): 1289 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dunaif, X. Wu, A. Lee, and E. Diamanti-Kandarakis Defects in insulin receptor signaling in vivo in the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2001; 281(2): E392 - E399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tremblay, C. Lavigne, H. Jacques, and A. Marette Defective Insulin-Induced GLUT4 Translocation in Skeletal Muscle of High Fat-Fed Rats Is Associated With Alterations in Both Akt/Protein Kinase B and Atypical Protein Kinase C ({zeta}/{ |