![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 20982-20988, July 23, 1999
,
,
,
,
,
¶
From the Departments of
Molecular Neurobiology and
§ Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Small GTPase Rho has been thought to be important
for the formation and the maintenance of tight junction in epithelial
cells, but the role of Rho in the regulation of barrier function of
tight junction is not well understood. We here examined whether Rho was
involved in the barrier function of tight junction in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. The activation of prostaglandin EP3 Epithelia form barriers and regulate vectorial transport of ions
and solutes. Epithelial cells adhere to each other via three distinct
adhesion systems, called tight junction, adherens junction, and
desmosome. Of these, tight junction is the most apical component and is
localized to the interface between apical and basolateral membrane
domains (1-4). It forms not only a boundary in the plasma membrane
bilayer that separates the cell surface into biochemically and
functionally distinct apical and basolateral membrane domains but also
a barrier to the paracellular diffusion of ions and solutes. Recent
studies have identified several proteins localized at tight junctions,
including occludin (5), ZO-1 (6), ZO-2 (7, 8), ZO-3 (9), cingulin (10),
7H6 antigen (11), symplekin (12), and claudin (13). Occludin has four
transmembrane domains and has been shown to be the sealing protein of
tight junctions (14-16). ZO-1 is a peripheral membrane protein with a
molecular mass of 220 kDa and a member of the membrane-associated
guanylate kinase-containing family proteins, most of which may play key roles in clustering of proteins at synaptic and septate junctions, and
ZO-1 binds to the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of occludin
(17). ZO-2, which has been characterized as a binding partner of ZO-1,
is also a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase-containing
family (7). Many extracellular stimuli have been shown to regulate the
barrier function of tight junctions. For example, serum reduced ZO-1
protein levels and decreased transepithelial electrical resistance
(TER)1 in retinal epithelial
cells (18), and glucocorticoid caused ZO-1 to localize to the cell-cell
interaction site and increased TER in mammary epithelial cells (19).
However, intracellular signaling pathways, which regulate the tight
junction permeability, remain elusive.
Rho and Rac are members of a subfamily of small GTPase that are thought
to be involved in many cellular functions, including the regulation of
actin filament reorganization, cell shape change, and gene expression
(20, 21). In fibroblasts, Rho is responsible for regulating the
assembly of focal adhesion and stress fiber formation, although Rac is
involved in membrane ruffling and formation of lamellipodia (22, 23).
In neuronal cells, the activation of Rho induces neurite retraction
(24, 25), and Rac is involved in the neurite outgrowth (26). Besides,
both Rho and Rac have been shown to be involved in serum response
factor-mediated transcriptional activation (27). As for tight junction,
C3 transferase, which ADP-ribosylates Rho on amino acid Asn-41 and is
used as a specific inhibitor of Rho proteins (28, 29), was reported to
induce the displacement of ZO-1 protein from tight junction and the
increase in tight junction permeability, suggesting that Rho was
involved in the regulation of tight junction integrity in epithelial
cells (30).
Prostaglandin E2 exhibits a broad range of biological
actions in diverse tissues through its binding to specific receptors on
the plasma membrane (31). Prostaglandin E receptors are
pharmacologically divided into four subtypes, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4,
on the basis of their responses to various agonists and antagonists
(32, 33). Among the four subtypes, the EP3 receptor has been most well
characterized and is involved in such prostaglandin E2
actions as contraction of the uterus, modulation of neurotransmitter
release, inhibition of gastric acid secretion, and sodium and water
reabsorption in the kidney (34-37). We have cloned the mouse EP3
receptor and demonstrated that it is a G protein-coupled rhodopsin-type
receptor that engages in inhibition of adenylate cyclase (38). Although the well known EP3 receptor-mediated actions, mentioned above, are
believed to be mediated by Gi, coupling of EP3 receptor to other signal transduction pathways has been suggested (39, 40). We
recently found that the EP3 receptor activated Rho via a pertussis toxin (PT)-insensitive heterotrimeric G protein, inducing neurite retraction in differentiated PC12 cells (25) and stress fiber formation
in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, an epithelial cell line
derived from dog kidney, which are generally used as models of
polarized cells (41). In the present study, we examined roles of the
EP3 receptor and RhoA in the barrier function of tight junction in MDCK
cells, and we demonstrate that the EP3 receptor and the constitutively
active RhoA oppositely regulate TER and the paracellular flux rate of
mannitol in the preformed monolayer of MDCK cells, and in addition the
EP3 receptor suppresses the elevation of TER during the
Ca2+-induced tight junction formation.
Materials--
The MDCK strain II cell line and sulprostone were
generous gifts from Drs. Keith E. Mostov (University of California, San Francisco, CA) and K.-H. Thierauch (Schering), respectively. Agents obtained and commercial sources were as follows: PT, Seikagaku Co.,
Japan; 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (8-br-cAMP), Research Biochemicals International.; rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin, Molecular Probes, Inc.; rat anti-ZO-1 monoclonal antibody, Chemicon International Inc.;
rabbit anti-hemagglutinin (HA) polyclonal antibody, MBL International
Co.; rhodamine-conjugated goat F(ab')2 anti-rat IgG, ICN
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; horseradish peroxidase-conjugated swine
anti-rabbit IgG, DAKO; and Chemiluminescence ECL Western blotting
system, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
DNA Construction--
The cDNA for human RhoA was generated
as described previously (42). The coding region of human Rac1 was
generated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
from HL-60 cells using primers
5'-CGCGGATCCCCGCAGGCCATCAAGTGTGTGGTGGT-3' and
5'-CCGGAATTCTTACAACAGCAGGCATTTTCTCTT-3'. The polymerase chain
reaction product was digested with BamHI and
EcoRI, cloned into the pBluescript SK(+), and completely
sequenced. cDNAs for RhoAV14 and Rac1V12
were generated by polymerase chain reaction-mediated mutagenesis (43)
and subcloned into the BamHI/EcoRI sites of
pBluescript SK(+) containing the HA epitope at the 5' end. 0.75- or
0.65-kilobase pair NotI-NotI fragment containing
full-length human RhoAV14 or Rac1V12 cDNA
tagged at the amino terminus with HA epitope was introduced into the
mammalian expression vector pOPRSVICAT (Stratagene) at the site of
NotI (pOPRSVI/HA-RhoAV14 or
HA-Rac1V12).
Cell Culture and Transfection--
MDCK cells were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal
bovine serum, 4 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and
0.1 mg/ml streptomycin under humidified air containing 5%
CO2 at 37 °C. The MDCK cell line expressing the EP3 Immunofluorescence--
MDCK cells were seeded onto
poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips in 12-well plates at
a density of 2 × 104 cells/well, and cultured for 2 days. For localization of actin filaments or ZO-1, immunofluorescence
microscopy was performed as described previously (41). Briefly, the
cells were fixed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)
containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 3% sucrose for 1 h at
4 °C. They were then permeabilized with TPBS/HS (10 mM
PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0.1 M NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20),
containing 0.1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 10 min and washed
with TPBS/HS twice. They were blocked with 0.5% bovine serum albumin
in TPBS/LS (PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 h at room
temperature and rinsed with TPBS/HS. To identify the polymerized actin,
they were incubated with 1:1000 dilution of rhodamine-conjugated
phalloidin in TPBS/LS for 1 h at room temperature. Then, they were
washed with TPBS/HS three times and mounted onto a slide glass in
PBS/glycerol containing p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride. For localization of ZO-1, cells were incubated with antibody to ZO-1
(1:500 dilution) in TPBS/LS at 4 °C overnight. They were then washed
with TPBS/HS three times and incubated with rhodamine-conjugated anti-rat IgG antibody (1:200 dilution) in TPBS/LS at room temperature for 1 h. They were washed with TPBS/HS three times and mounted onto a slide glass in PBS/glycerol containing
p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride. Cells were photographed
at 200× magnification under the fluorescent microscope.
SDS Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting--
The cells were
serum-starved in serum-free DMEM for 1 h and stimulated with 5 mM IPTG for the time indicated. After the cells were rinsed
briefly with PBS, they were incubated with RIPA buffer (1% Triton
X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2% SDS, 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 25 mM NaF, 1 mM orthovanadate, 2 mM EDTA, 1 µg/ml
aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.1 µM benzamidine, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at 4 °C for 20 min.
The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 30,000 × g for
10 min. The supernatant was separated by a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel. The proteins were then transferred onto a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane (Millipore Corporation). The membrane was blocked
with 3% low fat milk in Tris-buffered saline and then incubated at
4 °C with anti-HA antibody (1:200 dilution) overnight. The anti-HA
antibody was detected using a chemiluminescence ECL Western blotting
system with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody.
Transepithelial Electrical Resistance--
For culture on
permeable support, MDCK cells were seeded on cell culture insert
(Falcon 3095) at a density of 3 × 104 cells/filter
and cultured for 5 days. After cells had been serum-starved in
serum-free DMEM for 1 h, they were stimulated with or without 1 µM sulprostone or 5 mM IPTG for the time
indicated. TER was measured with a Millicell-ERS apparatus (Millipore
Corporation). Calculations for ohm × cm2 were made by
subtracting values of blank inserts from all samples and multiplying by
the area of the monolayer (0.31 cm2).
Paracellular Flux of Mannitol--
MDCK cells were seeded on
cell culture insert at a density of 3 × 104
cells/filter and cultured for 5 days. After cells had been
serum-starved in serum-free DMEM for 1 h, they were stimulated
with or without 1 µM sulprostone or 5 mM IPTG
for the time indicated. To measure paracellular flux, DMEM containing 5 µCi of [3H]mannitol and 5 mM unlabeled
mannitol was added to the apical compartment, 5 mM
unlabeled mannitol was added to the basal compartment, and the cells
were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After the 1-h incubation, aliquots from the apical and basolateral compartments were collected, and the radioactivities were measured.
Effect of EP3 Receptor on the Barrier Function of Tight Junction in
the Preformed Monolayer of MDCK Cells--
We previously established
MDCK cell line expressing mouse EP3
We next examined the other parameter of tight junction permeability,
the paracellular flux rate of mannitol. As shown in Fig. 2, sulprostone stimulated the
paracellular flux of mannitol in a time-dependent manner in
the preformed monolayer of EP3 Effects of RhoAV14 and Rac1V12 on the
Barrier Function of Tight Junction in the Preformed Monolayer of MDCK
Cells--
EP3 receptor is coupled to Rho activation pathway via a
PT-insensitive G protein (25, 41). C3 transferase is a very useful tool
to verify the involvement of Rho in cellular functions, but C3
transferase is inadequate for application onto the regulation of
permeability by the EP3 receptor, because microinjected C3 transferase
and cell permeable C3 transferase have been shown to disrupt cell-cell
adhesion and tight junction, respectively (30, 46). We also observed
that the microinjection of C3 transferase induced the complete
disruption of the cell-cell adhesion in MDCK cells (data not shown).
Therefore, we next investigated the effect of constitutively active
RhoA on the permeability of tight junction in the preformed monolayer
of MDCK cells. We introduced HA-tagged GTPase-deficient constitutively
active RhoA (RhoAV14) and Rac1 (Rac1V12) into
MDCK cells using a Lac-inducible vector, and established MDCK cell
lines, which express RhoAV14 and Rac1V12 under
the control of IPTG (henceforth referred to as
"RhoAV14-" or "Rac1V12-inducible MDCK
cells," respectively). HA-RhoAV14 or
HA-Rac1V12 was expressed by the incubation with 5 mM IPTG for 3-6 h in RhoAV14- or
Rac1V12-inducible cells (Fig.
3). To verify the effects of
RhoAV14 and Rac1V12 on the distribution of
F-actin and ZO-1, we stained the cells by rhodamine-conjugated
phalloidin or anti-ZO-1 antibody. In parental MDCK cells expressing Lac
repressor alone, stress fiber was not apparently found. IPTG did not
show any alteration in F-actin distribution in these cells (Fig.
4, A-C). In
RhoAV14-inducible cells, although almost no stress fiber
was seen in the unstimulated cells, IPTG induced clear stress fiber
formation at 12 or 24 h (Fig. 4, G-I). In
Rac1V12-inducible cells, the incubation with IPTG induced
the marked increase in F-actin staining at the cell-cell adhesion sites
(Fig. 4, D-F). Therefore, RhoAV14 and
Rac1V12 expressed in the cells were functional. ZO-1 showed
discrete and continuous patterns of distribution in the unstimulated
parental and RhoAV14- and Rac1V12-inducible
cells. Although IPTG treatment did not affect the ZO-1 distribution in
parental and Rac1V12-inducible cells, this treatment
induced the redistribution of ZO-1, and ZO-1 showed the discontinuous
and fragmented staining pattern in RhoAV14-inducible cells
(Fig. 5).
We next investigated the effects of constitutively active RhoA and
active Rac1 on the barrier function of tight junction (Fig. 6). The induction of Rac1V12
affected neither TER nor paracellular flux in the preformed monolayer of Rac1V12-inducible cells. On the other hand, the
induction of RhoAV14 by IPTG progressively elevated the
level of TER up to 24 h with a lag period of 12 h in the
preformed monolayer of RhoAV14-inducible cells.
RhoAV14 induction also stimulated the mannitol flux. The
incubation with IPTG affected neither TER nor the paracellular flux of
mannitol in parental MDCK cells (data not shown). Thus, constitutively active RhoA oppositely regulated TER and the flux rate of mannitol in
the preformed monolayer of MDCK cells, whereas constitutively active
Rac1 had no ability to modulate the barrier function of tight junction.
The RhoAV14 induction did not affect the amount of
occludin, as assessed by immunoblot and Northern blot analyses,
indicating that the effect of RhoAV14 on the barrier
function is not due to fluctuation of cellular content of occludin
(data not shown).
Effect of cAMP on the EP3 Receptor- and RhoAV14-induced
Elevation of TER--
Cyclic AMP plays important roles in many aspects
of cellular functions, and protein kinase A has been shown to modulate
Rho-mediated function (47). We then examined the effect of cAMP on the
EP3 receptor- and active RhoA-induced regulation of barrier function. As shown in Fig. 7A, the
pretreatment with 8-br-cAMP, a stable cAMP analogue, suppressed by 72%
the TER increase induced by sulprostone without any change in the basal
TER level in the preformed monolayer of EP3 Effects of EP3 Receptor, RhoAV14, and
Rac1V12 on the Newly Formed Tight Junction in
Ca2+ Switch Experiment--
We next examined the effects
of the EP3 receptor, active RhoA, and active Rac1 on the
Ca2+-induced formation of tight junction using a
Ca2+ switch experiment. The elimination of Ca2+
in the medium induced the disruption of cell-cell adhesion, and the
following addition of Ca2+ induced the formation of tight
junctions (48). The 4-h incubation with a low Ca2+ medium
decreased the level of TER to almost zero. As shown in Fig.
8A, the addition of
Ca2+ induced the marked increase in TER in the unstimulated
EP3
We next examined the effects of active RhoA and Rac1 on the formation
of tight junction induced by Ca2+ switch. After
constitutively active RhoAV14 and Rac1V12 had
been expressed by the 8-h incubation with IPTG, we analyzed the pattern
of TER development after the Ca2+ switch. The IPTG
treatment clearly induced RhoAV14 and Rac1V12
proteins, the expression levels being maintained during the
Ca2+ switch-mediated TER elevation, and the
RhoAV14-induced stress fiber formation was observed,
indicating that the expressed RhoAV14 was functional (data
not shown). As shown in Fig.
9A, Rac1V12 did
not affect the profile of the Ca2+-induced elevation of TER
value. RhoAV14 also did not affect the
Ca2+-induced TER increase up to 6 h, but
RhoAV14 promoted it after 6 h (Fig. 9B).
This later promotion may be due to the stimulatory effect of
RhoAV14 on TER observed in the preformed monolayer of the
cells.
The tight junction is highly dynamic and regulated in response to
various extracellular stimuli and physiological needs, such as
glucocorticoids, histamine, and lysophosphatidic acid (19, 49, 50). We
have analyzed roles of the Rho activation pathway-coupled EP3 receptor
and the constitutively active RhoA in barrier function of tight
junction and demonstrated that the EP3 receptor and active RhoA
oppositely regulated the TER and paracellular permeability of mannitol
in the preformed monolayer of MDCK cells. Although we could not
directly indicate the involvement of Rho in this action of the EP3
receptor due to inadequacy of application of C3 transferase for
analysis of barrier function of preformed tight junction, the opposite
regulation of barrier function by the EP3 receptor appears to be
mediated by Rho activation because this regulation was insensitive to
PT treatment and mimicked by the constitutively active RhoA.
The barrier function of tight junctions is assessed by measuring the
TER and paracellular permeability of nonionic molecules, such as
mannitol. The EP3 receptor and constitutively active RhoA induced the
increase in TER, viz. the decrease in ionic permeability, while they oppositely promoted the permeability of the nonionic molecule in the preformed monolayer cells. Two parameters of tight junction permeability, TER and paracellular flux of mannitol, had
generally been considered to measure the same characteristics of tight
junctions. In fact, lysophosphatidic acid has been shown to induce not
only a decrease in TER but also an increase in sucrose permeability in
the brain endothelial monolayer (50). A synthetic peptide of
extracellular domain of occludin has been reported to suppress the
permeability of both ionic and nonionic molecules due in part to
decreasing the amount of occludin present at the tight junction (15).
However, it was recently reported that the overexpression of occludin
or carboxyl-terminally truncated occludin induced the elevation of TER
but promoted the increase in paracellular permeability of nonionic
molecules, showing functional dissociation of two ionic and nonionic
parameters of tight junction permeability (14, 51). Our results shown
here strongly support the notion that diffusion barriers for ionic and
nonionic molecules are functionally different, and we revealed that the
activation of Rho regulates these two parameters in opposite
directions. Characteristic of the EP3 receptor- and active RhoA-induced
regulation of the barrier functions is that there are lag periods for
the changes in these parameters. The EP3 receptor-induced increase in
TER was suppressed by the treatment with cycloheximide, indicating that
the regulation of barrier function by the EP3 receptor required protein
synthesis.2 In contrast, we
could not apply cycloheximide on the action of active RhoA because the
active RhoA itself was an inducible protein in our system, but some
gene expression might be involved in the regulation of barrier function
by the activation of Rho. Occludin is one of the sealing proteins of
tight junctions and an essential component for the permeability
(14-16), but this regulation by Rho is not due to a change in the
amount of occludin protein, because the EP3 receptor and constitutively
active RhoA affected neither the mRNA level nor the protein content
of occludin. Recently, it was suggested that claudins, newly identified
integral membrane proteins in tight junction, were mainly responsible
for tight junction strand formation, whereas occludin was an accessory
protein (52). Functions of claudins in tight junction permeability are still obscure, but Rho might regulate the expression or function of
claudins, leading to the changes in permeability.
Rho and Rac are believed to be important regulators in cell-cell
adhesion (53). Constitutively active Rac1 has been shown to accumulate
actin filaments, E-cadherin, and Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of Rho on tight junction biogenesis
induced by Ca2+ switch. In contrast to the preformed
monolayer cells, the expression of active RhoA and Rac1 did not
apparently affect the TER elevation during the formation of tight
junction induced by Ca2+ switch, even if active RhoA
induced stress fiber formation in this condition. However, recent
studies demonstrated that the treatment with cell-permeable C3
transferase or microinjection of C3 transferase displaced ZO-1 from
tight junction and induced disruption of the cell-cell adhesion,
suggesting that Rho is involved in maintenance of cell-cell interaction
(30, 46). In addition, C3 transferase has been reported to inhibit the
Ca2+- or
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced formation of tight junction, indicating that Rho is necessary for the formation of
tight junction (46). Considering these results, the activity of
endogenous Rho seems strong enough for formation and maintenance of
tight junction, and additional expression of constitutively active RhoA
may show no apparent effect on the formation. On the other hand, the
EP3 receptor suppressed the Ca2+ switch-induced decrease in
permeability of both ionic and nonionic molecules, indicating that the
EP3 receptor negatively regulates the formation of tight junction. In
view of the lack of the ability of active RhoA to suppress the TER
elevation, Rho may not be involved in the EP3 receptor-induced
suppression. However, the EP3 receptor was linked to the Rho activation
pathway in the Ca2+ switch-induced tight junction
formation, and we cannot exclude the possibility that the EP3 receptor
suppresses the TER elevation through Rho activation. The inhibitory
effect of the EP3 receptor was insensitive to the PT treatment,
suggesting that the receptor induced the inhibition of the tight
junction formation through a PT-insensitive heterotrimeric G protein.
The involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins in tight junction
formation has been suggested. Confocal studies have shown that
G
receptor, coupled to a Rho activation pathway, induced the increase in
transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) but the increase in
paracellular flux of mannitol in the preformed monolayer of the MDCK
cells expressing the EP3
receptor. This effect of the EP3 receptor
was mimicked by the expression of constitutively active RhoA but not by
active Rac1 in MDCK cells, using an
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactoside-inducible expression
system. On the other hand, the activation of EP3
receptor suppressed
the elevation of TER and the decrease in paracellular mannitol flux
during Ca2+ switch-induced tight junction formation,
whereas the expression of active RhoA or Rac1 did not apparently affect
the TER development in the Ca2+ switch. These results
demonstrate that the EP3 receptor and active RhoA regulate
permeabilities of ionic and nonionic molecules in opposite directions
in the preformed monolayer, and the EP3 receptor suppresses the
elevation of TER during the tight junction formation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
receptor has been previously described (41). To establish the MDCK cell
line, expressing RhoAV14 or Rac1V12 under the
control of isopropyl-
-D thiogalactoside (IPTG), MDCK cells were
first transfected with a Lac repressor vector, p3'SS (Stratagene), by
CellPhect Transfection Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Stable
transformants were cloned by selection with hygromycin (Wako Corp.,
Osaka, Japan), and the expression of Lac repressor was confirmed by
immunoblotting using a Lac repressor protein anti-serum. Lac
repressor-positive cells were further transfected with the
pOPRSVI/HA-RhoAV14 or HA-Rac1V12 construct as
described above. Stable transformants were cloned by selection with
hygromycin and G-418 (Life Technologies, Inc.). For the
Ca2+ switch experiments, the cells were cultured in
serum-free DMEM containing 1.9 mM EGTA (low
Ca2+ medium; estimated free Ca2+ concentration,
1-2 µM) for 4 h. They were then transferred to serum-free DMEM containing 1.8 mM Ca2+ (normal
Ca2+ medium).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
receptor, which is coupled to
Rho activation via a PT-insensitive heterotrimeric G protein (41). To
examine a role of the EP3 receptor in the barrier function of tight
junction in MDCK cells, we first investigated the effect of
sulprostone, an EP3 agonist, on TER and the paracellular flux rate of
mannitol. TER is thought to be a parameter of tight junction ionic
permeability in MDCK strain II cells (44). Fig.
1 shows the time course of the effect of
sulprostone on TER in the preformed monolayer of the EP3
-expressing MDCK cells. Sulprostone at 1 µM induced the increase in
TER with a lag period of 6 h, reaching a maximum level by 18 h. The sulprostone-induced TER increase was not observed in wild-type
MDCK cells (data not shown). We previously showed that the EP3 receptor
was linked to two signal transduction pathways, Gi-mediated
adenylate cyclase inhibition and Rho activation pathway via a
PT-insensitive G protein (41, 45). We then examined the effect of PT on
the EP3 receptor-mediated increase in TER. Sulprostone markedly induced
the increase in TER in the PT-pretreated cells, the maximum level being
slightly lower than that in the untreated cells, indicating that the
EP3
receptor-induced increase in TER is mediated by the
PT-insensitive pathway.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of sulprostone on TER in the preformed
monolayer of EP3
-expressing MDCK cells.
After MDCK cells expressing the EP3
receptor had been treated with
(B) or without (A) 10 ng/ml PT for 5 h and
serum-starved for the last 1 h, they were incubated in the
presence (
) or absence (
) of 1 µM sulprostone
throughout the 24-h time course. The TER was monitored at the indicated
times, and the ohm × cm2 was calculated as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The results shown are the
means ± S.E. for triplicate determinations.
-expressing cells, and this increase
in the flux was not affected by the PT treatment. Thus, the EP3
receptor oppositely regulated TER and paracellular mannitol flux via
the PT-insensitive pathway. Sulprostone failed to affect the amount of
occludin, as assessed by immunoblot and Northern blot analyses,
indicating that the effect of the EP3 receptor on the barrier function
is not due to fluctuation of cellular content of occludin (data not
shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of sulprostone on the paracellular
flux of mannitol in the preformed monolayer of
EP3
-expressing MDCK cells. A,
serum-starved MDCK cells expressing the EP3
receptor were treated
with 1 µM sulprostone for the times indicated.
B, after the cells had been treated with or without 10 ng/ml
PT for 5 h and serum-starved for the last 1 h, they were
incubated with (closed column) or without (open
column) 1 µM sulprostone for 24 h. The
paracellular flux of mannitol was monitored as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The results shown are the means ± S.E. for triplicate determinations and are expressed as a percentage of
control obtained with the cells in the absence of agonist (23.9 ± 0.04 nmol/h/cm2).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Expression of Rac1V12 or
RhoAV14 induced by IPTG in Rac1V12- or
RhoAV14-inducible MDCK cells. Serum-starved
Rac1V12-inducible (A) or
RhoAV14-inducible (B) cells were left untreated
(lane 1) or treated with 5 mM IPTG for 1 (lane 2), 3 (lane 3), 6 (lane 4), 9 (lane 5), 12 (lane 6), 18 (lane 7), or
24 h (lane 8). The cell lysate was separated by a
12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and followed by immunoblotting with
anti-HA antibody, as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
results shown are representative of three independent experiments that
yielded similar results.

View larger version (95K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
F-actin distribution in Rac1V12-
and RhoAV14-inducible MDCK cells. Serum-starved
parental (A-C), Rac1V12-inducible
(D-F), and RhoAV14-inducible (G-I)
MDCK cells were incubated as follows: no addition (A,
D, and G), 5 mM IPTG for 12 (B, E, and H), and 24 h
(C, F, and I). The cells were fixed,
and F-actin was stained with rhodamine-phalloidin, as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The results shown are representative of
three independent experiments that yielded similar results. The
bar represents 10 µm.

View larger version (79K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
ZO-1 distribution in Rac1V12- and
RhoAV14-inducible MDCK cells. Serum-starved parental
(A-C), Rac1V12-inducible (D-F), and
RhoAV14-inducible (G-I) MDCK cells were
incubated as follows: no addition (A, D, and
G), 5 mM IPTG for 12 (B,
E, and H), and 24 h (C,
F, and I). The cells were fixed, and ZO-1 was
stained with anti-ZO-1 antibody, as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The results shown are representative of three
independent experiments that yielded similar results. The
bar represents 10 µm.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of Rac1V12 and
RhoAV14 on TER and the paracellular flux of mannitol in the
preformed monolayer of MDCK cells. A and B,
serum-starved Rac1V12-inducible (A) or
RhoAV14-inducible (B) MDCK cells were incubated
in the presence (
) or absence (
) of 5 mM IPTG
throughout the 24-h time course. The TER was monitored at the indicated
times, and the ohm × cm2 was calculated as described
under "Experimental Procedures." C, after serum-starved
cells had been incubated with (closed column) or without
(open column) 5 mM IPTG for 24 h, the
paracellular flux of mannitol for 1 h was determined as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The results shown are the
means ± S.E. for triplicate determinations and are expressed as a
percentage of control obtained with the Rac1V12-inducible
cells in the absence of IPTG (13.7 ± 1.1 nmol/h/cm2).
-expressing cells. This
treatment also suppressed the RhoAV14-induced TER increase
by 65% in the preformed monolayer of RhoAV14-inducible
cells (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that protein kinase
A is a negative regulator for the RhoA-induced TER increase.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of 8-br-cAMP on the
EP3
receptor- and RhoAV14-induced
elevation of TER. A, after serum-starved MDCK cells
expressing the EP3
receptor had been pretreated with or without 500 µM 8-br-cAMP for 30 min, they were incubated in the
presence or absence of 1 µM sulprostone for 24 h.
TER was monitored, and the ohm × cm2 was calculated
as described under "Experimental Procedures." B,
RhoAV14-inducible MDCK cells were incubated for 24 h
with vehicle, 500 µM 8-br-cAMP, 5 mM IPTG, or
both. After the 24-h incubation, TER was monitored, and the ohm × cm2 was calculated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The results shown are the means ± S.E. for
triplicate determinations.
-expressing MDCK cells, the level reaching the maximum at 6 h. The stimulation with sulprostone suppressed this
Ca2+-induced increase in TER, the maximum level decreasing
by 60% (Fig. 8A). We next examined the PT sensitivity of
the inhibition by EP3 receptor. The pretreatment with PT by itself
reinforced the Ca2+-induced elevation of TER, as reported
previously (48), but this pretreatment did not inhibit the suppression
by sulprostone of Ca2+-induced TER elevation (Fig.
8B). At this condition, sulprostone-induced stress fiber
formation was observed, indicating that the EP3 receptor was linked to
Rho activation pathway (data not shown). We further investigated the
effect of EP3 receptor on the Ca2+-induced decrease in
paracellular flux of mannitol. The Ca2+ switch induced the
tight junction formation and eventually decreased the paracellular flux
of mannitol to the low level of flux (30.1 ± 6.3 nmol/h/cm2). Sulprostone elevated this value decreased by
the Ca2+ switch (Fig. 8C). These results
indicate that the activation of EP3 receptor suppressed the
Ca2+-induced tight junction formation and that this
inhibitory action of EP3 receptor was mediated by a PT-insensitive G
protein.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Effect of sulprostone on the
Ca2+-induced formation of tight junction in
EP3
-expressing MDCK cells. A
and B, after MDCK cells expressing the EP3
receptor had
been treated with (B) or without (A) 10 ng/ml PT
for 5 h, they were incubated with low Ca2+ medium for
4 h. They were then switched to normal Ca2+ medium and
incubated in the presence (
) or absence (
) of 1 µM
sulprostone throughout the following 8-h time course. The TER was
monitored at the indicated times, and the ohm × cm2
was calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures."
C, after MDCK cells expressing the EP3
receptor had been
incubated with low Ca2+ medium for 4 h, they were
switched to normal Ca2+ medium and incubated for 9 h
in the presence (closed column) or absence (open
column) of 1 µM sulprostone. After the 9-h
incubation, the paracellular flux of mannitol for 1 h was
monitored as described under "Experimental Procedures." The results
shown are the means ± S.E. for triplicate determinations and are
expressed as a percentage of control obtained with the cells switched
to normal Ca2+ medium in the absence of agonist (30.1 ± 6.3 nmol/h/cm2).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Effects of Rac1V12 and
RhoAV14 on the Ca2+-induced formation of tight
junction in MDCK cells. After Rac1V12-inducible
(A) or RhoAV14-inducible (B) MDCK
cells had been treated with (
) or without (
) 5 mM
IPTG for 8 h, they were incubated with low Ca2+ medium
for 4 h and then switched to normal Ca2+ medium. The
TER was monitored at the indicated times after the normal
Ca2+ medium switch, and the ohm × cm2 was
calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
results shown are the means ± S.E. for triplicate
determinations.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-catenin at the cell-cell adhesion
sites without any effect on the distribution of ZO-1 in MDCK cells,
suggesting that Rac regulates the formation of the cadherin-based
cell-cell adhesion (46). In contrast, constitutively active RhoA was
shown to induce stress fiber formation on the basal membrane and
discontinuous redistribution of ZO-1 in tight junction without any
change in E-cadherin distribution in MDCK cells (54, 55), and we also
observed the active RhoA-induced discontinuous redistribution of ZO-1.
As for tight junction permeability, active RhoA but not Rac1 induced
the changes in the permeability in the preformed monolayer cells. Thus,
Rho is a key regulator for the barrier function of tight junction.
Protein kinase A has been reported to modulate Rho-mediated function
(47). We examined the sensitivity to 8-br-cAMP of regulation of the
permeability by Rho and revealed that 8-br-cAMP inhibited the
regulation of the permeability by activation of Rho, indicating that
protein kinase A is a negative regulator for the Rho activity in the
barrier function. However, 8-br-cAMP treatment caused partial
inhibition. There might be cAMP-independent mechanisms of TER regulation.
i2, G
i3, and G
12 were
localized in the vicinity of the tight junction (56-58). Recently, it
was reported that the constitutively active forms of PT-sensitive G
proteins, G
i2 and G
o, were localized to
tight junction and accelerated tight junction formation, indicating
that PT-sensitive G proteins act as an accelerator for tight junction
biogenesis (37, 59). Although involvement of PT-insensitive G proteins in tight junction biogenesis remains unclear, the EP3 receptor may
modulate the tight junction formation via a PT-insensitive G protein.
In summary, we showed here that the EP3 receptor and active RhoA
oppositely regulated TER and the paracellular flux in the preformed
monolayer MDCK cells.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. K. E. Mostov of University of California and K.-H. Thierauch of Schering for supplying the MDCK II cell line and sulprostone, respectively.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by a Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and grants from the Asahi Glass Research Foundation and the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Neurobiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. Tel.: 81-75-753-4547; Fax: 81-75-753-4557; E-mail: mnegishi@pharm.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
2 H. Hasegawa, H. Fujita, and M. Negishi, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
TER, transepithelial
electrical resistance;
PT, pertussis toxin;
MDCK, Madin-Darby canine
kidney;
8-br-cAMP, 8-bromo-cyclic AMP;
HA, hemagglutinin;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
IPTG, isopropyl-
-D
thiogalactoside;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Gumbiner, B.
(1987)
Am. J. Physiol.
253,
C749-C758 |
| 2. |
Gumbiner, B. M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1631-1633 |
| 3. | Balda, M. S., and Matter, K. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 541-547[Abstract] |
| 4. | Mitic, L. L., and Anderson, J. M. (1998) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 60, 121-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Furuse, M.,
Hirase, T.,
Itoh, M.,
Nagafuchi, A.,
Yonemura, S.,
Tsukita, S.,
and Tsukita, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1777-1788 |
| 6. |
Stevenson, B. R.,
Siliciano, J. D.,
Mooseker, M. S.,
and Goodenough, D. A.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
103,
755-766 |
| 7. |
Gumbiner, B.,
Lowenkopf, T.,
and Apatira, D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3460-3464 |
| 8. |
Jesaitis, L. A.,
and Goodenough, D. A.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
949-961 |
| 9. |
Haskins, J.,
Gu, L.,
Wittchen, E. S.,
Hibbard, J.,
and Stevenson, B. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
199-208 |
| 10. | Citi, S., Sabanay, H., Jakes, R., Geiger, B., and Kendrick-Jones, J. (1988) Nature. 333, 272-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Zhong, Y.,
Saitoh, T.,
Minase, T.,
Sawada, N.,
Enomoto, K.,
and Mori, M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
477-483 |
| 12. |
Keon, B. H.,
Schäfer, S.,
Kuhn, C.,
Grund, C.,
and Franke, W. W.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
1003-1018 |
| 13. |
Furuse, M.,
Fujita, K.,
Hiiragi, T.,
Fujimoto, K.,
and Tsukita, S.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
1539-1550 |
| 14. | McCarthy, K. M., Skare, I. B., Stankewich, M. C., Furuse, M., Tsukita, S., Rogers, R. A., Lynch, R. D., and Schneeberger, E. E. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 2287-2298[Abstract] |
| 15. |
Wong, V.,
and Gumbiner, B. M.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
399-409 |
| 16. | Hirase, T., Staddon, J. M., Saitou, M., Ando-Akatsuka, Y., Itoh, M., Furuse, M., Fujimoto, K., Tsukita, S., and Rubin, L. L. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 1603-1613[Abstract] |
| 17. |
Furuse, M.,
Itoh, M.,
Hirase, T.,
Nagafuchi, A.,
Yonemura, S.,
Tsukita, Sa.,
and Tsukita, Sh.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1617-1626 |
| 18. | Chang, C., Wang, X., and Caldwell, R. B. (1997) J. Neurochem. 69, 859-867[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Buse, P.,
Woo, P. L.,
Alexander, D. B.,
Reza, A.,
and Firestone, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28223-28227 |
| 20. | Hall, A. (1994) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 31-54[CrossRef] |
| 21. |
Narumiya, S.
(1996)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
120,
215-228 |
| 22. | Ridley, A. J., and Hall, A. (1992) Cell 70, 389-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Ridley, A. J., Paterson, H. F., Johnston, C. L., Diekmann, D., and Hall, A. (1992) Cell 70, 401-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Jalink, K.,
van Corven, E. J.,
Hengeveld, T.,
Morii, N.,
Narumiya, S.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
801-810 |
| 25. |
Katoh, H.,
Negishi, M.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29780-29784 |
| 26. | Kozma, R., Sarner, S., Ahmed, S., and Lim, L. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1201-1211[Abstract] |
| 27. | Hill, C. S., Wynne, J., and Treisman, R. (1995) Cell 81, 1159-1170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Aktories, K., Weller, U., and Chhatwal, G. S. (1987) FEBS Lett. 212, 109-113[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Sekine, A.,
Fujiwara, M.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8602-8605 |
| 30. |
Nusrat, A.,
Giry, M.,
Turner, J. R.,
Colgan, S. P.,
Parkos, C. A.,
Carnes, D.,
Lemichez, E.,
Boquet, P.,
and Madara, J. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10629-10633 |
| 31. | Negishi, M., Sugimoto, Y., and Ichikawa, A. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1259, 109-120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Coleman, R. A., Kennedy, I., Humphrey, P. P. A., Bunce, K., and Lumley, P. (1990) in Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry (Hansch, C. , Sammes, P. G. , Taylor, J. B. , and Emmett, J. C., eds), Vol. 3 , pp. 643-714, Pergamon Press, Oxford |
| 33. | Coleman, R. A., Grix, S. P., Head, S. A., Louttit, J. B., Mallett, A., and Shldrick, R. L. J. (1994) Prostaglandins 47, 151-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Krall, J. F., Barrett, J. D., Jamgotchian, N., and Korenman, S. G. (1984) J. Endocrinol. 102, 329-336[Abstract] |
| 35. |
Ohia, S. E.,
and Jumblatt, J. E.
(1990)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
255,
11-16 |
| 36. | Chen, M. C. Y., Amiran, D. A., Toomey, M., Sanders, M. J., and Soll, A. H. (1988) Gastroenterology 94, 1121-1129[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Saha, C.,
Nigam, S. K.,
and Denker, B. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21629-21633 |
| 38. |
Sugimoto, Y.,
Namba, T.,
Honda, A.,
Hayashi, Y.,
Negishi, M.,
Ichikawa, A.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6463-6466 |
| 39. |
Negishi, M.,
Ito, S.,
and Hayaishi, O.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
3916-3923 |
| 40. | Namba, T., Sugimoto, Y., Negishi, M., Irie, A., Ushikubi, F., Kakizuka, A., Ito, S., Ichikawa, A., and Narumiya, S. (1993) Nature 365, 166-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Hasegawa, H., Negishi, M., Katoh, H., and Ichikawa, A. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 234, 631-636[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Katoh, H.,
Aoki, J.,
Ichikawa, A.,
and Negishi, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2489-2492 |
| 43. | Ito, W., Ishiguro, H., and Kurosawa, Y. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 102, 67-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | González-Mariscal, L., Chávez de Ramirez, B., Lázaro, A., and Cereijido, M. (1989) J. Membr. Biol. 107, 43-56[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Hasegawa, H.,
Negishi, M.,
and Ichikawa, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1857-1860 |
| 46. |
Takaishi, K.,
Sasaki, T.,
Kotani, H.,
Nishioka, H.,
and Takai, Y.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1047-1059 |
| 47. | Lang, P., Gesbert, F., Delespine-Carmagnat, M., Stancou, R., Pouchelet, M., and Bertoglio, J. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 510-519[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Balda, M. S., González-Mariscal, L., Contreras, R. G., Macias-Silva, M., Torres-Marquez, M. E., Garcia-Sainz, J. A., and Cereijido, M. (1991) J. Membr. Biol. 122, 193-202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Gardner, T. W., Lesher, T., Khin, S., Vu, C., Barber, A. J., and Brennan, W. A., Jr. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 717-721 |
| 50. | Schulze, C., Smales, C., Rubin, L. L., and Staddon, J. M. (1997) J. Neurochem. 68, 991-1000[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. |
Balda, M. S.,
Whitney, J. A.,
Flores, C.,
González, S.,
Cereijido, M.,
and Matter, K.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
1031-1049 |
| 52. |
Furuse, M.,
Sasaki, H.,
Fujimoto, K.,
and Tsukita, S.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
391-401 |
| 53. |
Hall, A.
(1998)
Science
279,
509-514 |
| 54. |
Jou, T.-S.,
Schneeberger, E. E.,
and Nelson, W. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
101-115 |
| 55. | Ridley, A. J., and Hall, A. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2600-2610[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 56. | Dodane, V., and Kachar, B. (1996) J. Membr. Biol. 149, 199-209[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 57. | de Almeida, J. B., Holtzman, E. J., Peters, P., Ercolani, L., Ausiello, D. A., and Stow, J. L. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 507-515[Abstract] |
| 58. | Hamilton, S. E., and Nathanson, N. M. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 234, 1-7[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 59. |
Denker, B. M.,
Saha, C.,
Khawaja, S.,
and Nigam, S. K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25750-25753 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Van Itallie, J. Holmes, A. Bridges, J. L. Gookin, M. R. Coccaro, W. Proctor, O. R. Colegio, and J. M. Anderson The density of small tight junction pores varies among cell types and is increased by expression of claudin-2 J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2008; 121(3): 298 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ogawa, H. Wada, N. Okada, I. Harada, T. Nakajima, E. B. Pasquale, and S. Tsuyama EphB2 and ephrin-B1 expressed in the adult kidney regulate the cytoarchitecture of medullary tubule cells through Rho family GTPases J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2006; 119(3): 559 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Matsuzawa, A. Kuwae, and A. Abe Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Type III Effectors EspG and EspG2 Alter Epithelial Paracellular Permeability Infect. Immun., October 1, 2005; 73(10): 6283 - 6289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||