![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 21217-21222, July 23, 1999
§,
,
,

From the
Molecular/Cancer Biology Laboratory,
Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki,
Finland, the ¶ Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Stockholm
Branch, Box 240, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden, the
Ludwig
Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala Branch, Box 595, SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden, and the ** Department of Pathology, Children's
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B) is
expressed in various tissues, especially strongly in the heart, and
binds selectively to one of the VEGF receptors, VEGFR-1. The two splice isoforms, VEGF-B167 and VEGF-B186, have
identical NH2-terminal cystine knot growth factor domains
but differ in their COOH-terminal domains which give these forms their
distinct biochemical properties. In this study, we show that both
splice isoforms of VEGF-B bind specifically to Neuropilin-1 (NRP1), a
receptor for collapsins/semaphorins and for the VEGF165
isoform. The NRP1 binding of VEGF-B could be competed by an excess of
VEGF165. The binding of VEGF-B167 was mediated
by the heparin binding domain, whereas the binding of
VEGF-B186 to NRP1 was regulated by exposure of a short
COOH-terminal proline-rich peptide upon its proteolytic processing. In
immunohistochemistry, NRP1 distribution was found to be overlapping or
adjacent to known sites of VEGF-B expression in several tissues, in
particular in the developing heart, suggesting the involvement of
VEGF-B in NRP1-mediated signaling.
Vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF)1 is a prime regulator
of endothelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, and
vascular permeability (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). The effects of
VEGF are mediated by two high affinity receptor tyrosine kinases
VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk-1), mainly expressed on
endothelial cells. Five different VEGF transcripts encoding
polypeptides of 121, 145, 165, 189, and 206 amino acid residues are
generated by alternative splicing from a single human VEGF gene (3-5).
VEGF121 is secreted as a soluble protein, whereas VEGF165 has affinity for heparan sulfates and is partially
sequestered into the pericellular matrix. Recently, a third receptor
for the VEGF165 isoform was identified from nonendothelial
tumor cells, which bound a sequence encoded by exon 7 of the VEGF gene
(6). This receptor was identical to Neuropilin-1 (NRP1), a type I
transmembrane receptor for semaphorins/collapsins (7, 8). Coexpression of NRP1 with VEGFR-2 in transfected cells resulted in increased VEGF165 binding and enhanced chemotaxis and mitogenicity in
response to VEGF165 (6). The NRP1 binding may explain why
VEGF165 is more potent than VEGF121 as a
mitogen for endothelial cells (9).
NRP1 is expressed in the tips of actively growing axons of particular
classes of neurons, and studies of it have concentrated on its
important role in axon growth and guidance in the developing embryo
(10-12). NRP1 is, however, expressed in the developing embryo ubiquitously in endothelial cells of capillaries and blood vessels and
in mesenchymal cells surrounding the blood vessels as well as in
certain other nonneuronal tissues including the endocardial cells of
the embryonic heart (6, 13). Furthermore, homozygous NRP1 knock-out
embryos die of cardiovascular failure at embryonic day 10.5-12.5, and
overexpression of NRP1 under the At present, the VEGF-family of growth factors contains four other known
members, namely placenta growth factor (PlGF), VEGF-B/VRF, VEGF-C/VRP,
and VEGF-D/FIGF (14). PlGF and VEGF-B bind selectively to VEGFR-1 and
resemble most closely VEGF in sequence and in genomic structure (15,
16). Alternatively spliced PlGF and VEGF-B mRNAs each give rise to
two protein isoforms, PlGF-1 and PlGF-2 and VEGF-B167 and
VEGF-B186, respectively (16-18). The PlGF-2 and VEGF-B167 isoforms have basic COOH-terminal domains
responsible for binding heparan sulfate proteoglycans and a
sequence homologous to the NRP1 binding exon 7-encoded peptide of
VEGF.
PlGF-2 was recently shown to bind NRP1 (19), but it is not known
whether NRP1 also binds other angiogenic growth factors of the VEGF
family and whether it thus might have a more general role in the
regulation of angiogenesis. The sequence homology between the
COOH-terminal parts of VEGF165 and VEGF-B167
and the observation that VEGF-B167 is sequestered into the
pericellular matrix upon its secretion from cells suggested that, like
VEGF165 and PlGF-2, also VEGF-B might interact with NRP1.
In this study we have carried out binding experiments using both
soluble extracellular and transmembrane NRP1 proteins and show that
NRP1 provides a receptor for VEGF167 and for the
proteolytically processed, but not for the full-length, form of
VEGF186.
Cell Culture and Materials--
Drosophila Schneider
2 (S2) cells were grown in DESTM medium according to the supplier
(Invitrogen). 293-T, 293-EBNA, and COS cells were grown in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. PAE
(a kind gift from Dr. Lena Claesson-Welsh) and PAE-NRP1 cells were
grown in Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
Anti-VEGF (mAb 293), rhVEGF165, and rhVEGF121
were purchased from R&D systems, anti-Myc antibodies (mAb 9E10) were
from BABCO, and recombinant mVEGF164 was kindly provided by
Dr. Herbert Weich (Braunschweig, Germany). The affinity purified
polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse NRP1 antibodies were a kind gift from Dr.
Hajime Fujisawa (Nagoya, Japan). VEGF-B antibodies were affinity
purified from rabbit antisera made against an NH2-terminal peptide of mVEGF-B (20).
Construction of NRP1-Ig and NRP1-Myc Expression Vectors--
The
extracellular domain of mouse NRP1 (248-2914 bp of mNRP1 cDNA,
GenBankTM accession number D50086, a kind gift from Dr.
Fujisawa) was cloned into the pIgplus expression vector (Ingenius). A
fragment encoding the COOH-terminal part (2738-2914 bp) of the
extracellular domain was first ligated into the vector as an
EcoRV-BamHI fragment and the 5' part (248-2738
bp) was then added as an EcoRV fragment (the
5'-EcoRV site derived from the pBluescript KS II vector). The sequence of the EC domain was thus in-frame with the sequences encoding the human IgG Fc part to allow the production of a dimeric NRP1-Ig fusion protein. Oligonucleotide
5'-TACAGGATCCCGAACAAAAACTCATCTCAGAAGAGGATCTGAATAGCTAAGAATTCACTT-3' and its complementary strand oligonucleotide encoding the
Myc-peptide EQKLISEEDL followed by a stop-codon were annealed and
ligated as a BamHI-EcoRI fragment into the
pcDNA3.1(+)zeo vector (Invitrogen). A
HindIII-BamHI fragment from NRP1/pIgplus
(248-2738 bp of NRP1 cDNA) was then ligated into pcDNA3.1-Myc
in frame with the sequence encoding the Myc-peptide.
Generation of VEGF-B Mutants--
The VEGF-B186
mutants having a stop codon after every 15 nucleotides downstream of
the exon 1-5 encoding sequence (nucleotides 1-502) and the single
amino acid substitution mutant Arg-127 Transfections, Immunoprecipitation, and Soluble Receptor
Binding--
293-T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the
fusion proteins VEGFR-1-Ig, VEGFR-3-Ig or NRP1-Ig, or the NRP1-Myc protein, by using the calcium phosphate precipitation method, and
conditioned medium was collected after a 24-32-h serum starvation. 293-T, COS, or 293-EBNA cells were similarly transfected with plasmids
encoding the hVEGF165, mVEGF-B167,
mVEGF-B186, mVEGF-BEx1-5, or hVEGF-C Production and Purification of GST-Fusion Proteins--
Exon 6B
(encoding amino acids 117-161) of mVEGF-B167 was amplified from the
cDNA by polymerase chain reaction using the following primers:
5'-ACGTAGATCTAGCCCCAGGATCCTC-3' and 5'-ACGTGAATTCTCACCTACAGGTTGCTGG-3'. The amplified fragments were digested with the appropriate enzymes and
ligated into the BamHI- and EcoRI-sites of
pGEX-2T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The construct was verified by
sequencing and transformed into the Escherichia coli strain
BL-21, and the GST fusion proteins were produced and purified according
to the instructions of the manufacturer and dialyzed against PBS
overnight. Glutathione-agarose-purified GST-exon 6B fusion protein was
applied to a Hi-TrapTM heparin-Sepharose affinity column (5 ml, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), washed extensively, and eluted using a
linear salt gradient of 0.15-1.5 M NaCl in 20 mM sodium-phosphate buffer, pH 7.2.
Production and Partial Purification of
VEGF-B167--
Full-length human VEGF-B167 was
amplified by polymerase chain reaction using the primers
5'-CGCCAGATCTCCTGTCTCCCAGCCTGAT-3' and
5'-GCGAATTCTCACCTTCGCAGCTTCCGGC-3' and subcloned into the BglII-EcoRI sites downstream of the
signal sequence of the pMT/Bip/V5-HisC vector (Invitrogen). S2 cells
were transfected with the resulting plasmid, and stable clones were
selected according to the instructions of the manufacturer
(Invitrogen). The expression of VEGF-B167 was induced with
500 µM CuSO4, and the medium was harvested 6 days thereafter. 100 ml of medium, centrifuged for 15 min at 10000 rpm
and passed through a 0.45-µm Millipore filter, was chromatographed on
a Resource S (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column equilibrated in 15 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and eluted with a
linear salt gradient (0-1 M NaCl) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The fractions containing VEGF-B were pooled and diluted to a
final salt concentration of 0.3 M NaCl and then passed
through a heparin-Sepharose column (1 ml of Hi-Trap heparin) and eluted
using a linear salt gradient 0.6-1.5 M NaCl. The fractions
were analyzed by Western blotting using specific antisera against human
VEGF-B.
Competition of 125I-hVEGF165 Binding to
NRP1 by GST-VEGF-B167 Exon 6B--
Human recombinant
VEGF165 was radiolabeled to a specific activity of 2.5 × 105 cpm 125I/ng using the Iodogen reagent,
as described earlier (20). Confluent PAE- and PAE/NRP1 cells seeded in
24-well plates were washed once with ice-cold binding buffer (F-12
medium, 0.5 mg/ml BSA, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) and 0.5 ng/ml
of labeled VEGF165 with or without rhVEGF165
(250 ng/ml), rhVEGF121 (200 ng/ml), GST (25 mg/ml), or
GST-exon6B (25 mg/ml) proteins were added in binding buffer. The cells
were washed and lysed as described (20), and the radioactivity was
measured in a Purification of NRP1-Ig and Binding of Soluble NRP1-Ig to
GST-exon6B--
NRP1-Ig was purified from the conditioned medium of
transfected 293-T cells using protein A-Sepharose. The Ig fusion
protein was eluted from the Sepharose using 0.1 M glycine,
pH 3.0, neutralized with 1 M Tris, pH 8.0, and dialyzed
against PBS overnight. 10 µg of purified GST or GST-exon6B was coated
onto enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates (Nunc Maxisorp surface)
for 90 min at room temperature. The protein solution was removed, and
the coated wells were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS for 30 min. The
plates were then washed three times with 0.5 mg/ml BSA in PBS and
incubated with soluble NRP1-Ig (or VEGFR-3-Ig) at a concentration of 1 µg/ml. The binding was allowed for 2 h at room temperature. The
plates were washed three times as above before addition of anti-human Ig conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (dilution 1:500). The anti-human Ig antibody was left for 40 min in the wells after which the
plates were washed as above, including one additional wash with PBS.
Then the substrate 1,2-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride was added
according to the supplier (DAKO), and the reaction was stopped by
addition of an equal volume of 0.5 M
H2SO4, followed by the reading of the
absorbance at 450 nm.
Mass Spectrometric Analysis of the Processed
VEGF-B186--
The VEGF-B186 was isolated by
SDS-PAGE and visualized by modified silver staining (21). After in-gel
digestion using endoproteinase LysC from Achromobacter
lyticus (Wako Chemicals GmbH, Neuss, Germany) (22), the peptide
mixture was desalted and concentrated on a reversed phase support
packed in a thin pipette tip. Analysis by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
was done on a Bruker Biflex III instrument, using
Immunohistochemical Detection of NRP1--
Immunohistochemical
detection of the NRP1 protein was performed on cryostat sections of day
12.5 embryos using the polyclonal affinity purified anti-mouse NRP1
antibodies. The staining was carried out as described previously (11,
13) except for the fixation of the sections, which was done in 2%
paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Negative controls were done by omitting
the primary antibodies.
VEGF-B167 and the Processed Form of
VEGF-B186 Bind to Soluble NRP1 Extracellular
Domain--
To analyze VEGF-B binding to NRP1, we used expression
vectors encoding the NRP1 extracellular domain fused to the IgG Fc
domain or to the Myc epitope. Metabolically labeled media from
transfected 293-T cells containing hVEGF165,
mVEGF-B167, mVEGF-B186, or
mVEGF-BEx1-5 were incubated with protein A-Sepharose-bound
NRP1-, VEGFR-1-, or VEGFR-3-Ig fusion proteins. VEGF-B167
was precipitated by both NRP1-Ig and VEGFR-1-Ig (Fig.
1A). Interestingly, only the
proteolytically cleaved form of VEGF-B186 was bound to
NRP1-Ig, whereas both the full-length and the processed forms were
precipitated by VEGFR-1-Ig. VEGF-BEx1-5, consisting of the
sequences encoded by exons 1-5 of the VEGF-B gene, which are present
in both VEGF-B isoforms, was precipitated selectively by VEGFR-1-Ig but
not by NRP1-Ig. This indicated that the NRP1-binding sites are
different from the VEGFR-1 binding epitopes and that the former are
located in the COOH termini of the two splice isoforms. Also, monomeric
Myc-tagged NRP1 bound VEGF165, VEGF-B167, and
the processed VEGF-B186 fragment in a specific manner. When
approximately equal amounts of NRP1-Ig and NRP1-Myc were compared for
their ability to bind to and to precipitate labeled VEGFs, no
significant differences could be detected (data not shown). This
suggests that NRP1 does not need to be a preformed dimer for binding,
or alternatively NRP1 extracellular domains can by themselves form
dimers before ligand binding.
Analysis of the bound proteins in nonreducing conditions revealed that
dimers of full-length VEGF-B186 polypeptides did not bind
to NRP1, in contrast to the dimers between full-length and processed
forms of VEGF-B186 (Fig. 1B). However, on the
basis of the band intensities, heterodimer binding appeared much weaker than the binding of homodimers of the processed forms. The binding of
both VEGF-B167 and processed VEGF-B186 to NRP1
was competed with an excess of recombinant human VEGF165
(Fig. 1B), indicating that the interaction sites of VEGF and
VEGF-B on NRP1 are at least overlapping, if not identical.
VEGF-B167 Interacts with NRP1 through the Exon
6B-encoded Heparin Binding Domain--
The exon 6B encoded sequence of
VEGF-B167 resembles the heparin and NRP1-binding domain of
VEGF165, encoded by exon 7. To test the involvement of exon
6B in heparin and NRP1 binding, a fusion protein between glutathione
S-transferase and mouse VEGF-B exon 6B-encoded sequence
(GST-exon6B) was constructed. The fusion protein eluted from
heparin-Sepharose at around 0.8 M NaCl, similarly to the
wild type full-length human VEGF-B167, indicating that the
sequence encoded by this exon is probably responsible for the heparin
binding ability in VEGF-B (Fig. 2,
A and B). Furthermore, the GST-exon6B, but not
GST or VEGF121, competed for iodinated VEGF165
binding on PAE-NRP1 cells (Fig. 2C). Also, immobilized GST-exon6B and VEGF165 interacted with the soluble NRP1-Ig
protein (Fig. 2D and data not shown).
Proteolytic Processing Regulates the Ability of
VEGF-B186 to Bind NRP1--
Plasmin cleavage of either
VEGF or VEGF-B yields an NH2-terminal cystine knot domain
which contains the VEGFR binding epitopes, but plasmin-treated
VEGF-B186 expressed in COS-cells did not bind NRP1 (Fig.
3A). In addition, neither
VEGF-BEx1-5 encoded by exons 1-5 nor the full-length
VEGF-B186 bound to NRP1 although the proteolytically
processed VEGF-B186 did. Because of the small size
difference between VEGF-BEx1-5 and processed
VEGF-B186, the proteolytic cleavage site in
VEGF-B186 apparently occurred in the beginning of the exon
6A-encoded sequence (20). To map the cleavage site and the NRP1
interaction sites, a number of mutants were generated, introducing stop
codons at every fifth amino acid residue after the common
NH2-terminal domain of 115 amino acid residues (Fig.
3B). Careful analysis of the metabolically labeled,
immunoprecipitated VEGF-B mutants revealed that proteolytic processing
first occurred in the Pro-130 mutant that contains an additional 15 residues after the exon 5-encoded sequence, and evidence of processing
was even more visible in the longer mutants (Fig. 3B,
left panel). All of the mutants were able to bind VEGFR-1 (data not shown), but NRP1 binding occurred only for the Pro-130 and
longer mutants, and only the proteolytically cleaved forms of these
mutants seemed to bind NRP1 (Fig. 3B, right
panel). This suggested that the cleavage site is between residues
125-130 and that the binding to NRP1 requires 10-15 residues COOH
terminal of the common, exon 1-5-encoded domain.
Identification of the Proteolytic Cleavage Site in
VEGF-B186--
To more accurately define the site of
proteolytic cleavage, VEGF-B186 expressed in 293-T cells
was purified from the conditioned medium using affinity chromatography
employing NH2-terminal VEGF-B antibodies cross-linked to
protein A-Sepharose. The bound VEGF-B fragment was eluted by boiling in
electrophoresis sample buffer. The proteolytically processed form was
isolated from a silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel and treated with
LysC endoproteinase, and the digest was subjected to MALDI-TOF mass
spectrometry analysis. Among other peptide masses found, one was
1676.02 Da (M+H+, monoisotopic), which corresponds to
(K)PDRVAIPHHRPQPR (theoretical mass 1675.92 Da). This peptide would not
appear in proteolytic digests with the highly specific LysC
endopeptidase unless Arg-127 was the COOH-terminal amino acid in the
processed VEGF-B186. When the Arg-127 was mutated into a
Ser residue and the mutant was expressed in 293-T cells, proteolytic
processing as well as NRP1 binding were abolished, indicating that the
NRP1 binding site is masked in the full-length VEGF-B186
form but is accessible in the processed form (Fig.
4A). The reason for the slower
mobility of the mutant polypeptide in comparison with the wild type
VEGF-B186 is not known, but it might be caused by
additional glycosylation. Furthermore, when only the
VEGF-B127 polypeptide corresponding to the processed form
was expressed as a recombinant protein, it was found to bind NRP1 (Fig.
4B). This data confirms the cleavage site at position
Arg-127 and the requirement of a cleaved accessible COOH terminus for
NRP1 interaction.
The masking of the NRP1 epitope in the full-length
VEGF-B186 could be because of protein folding or because of
a sterical hindrance by the O-linked glycans of the COOH
terminus. On the basis of the heterogeneous mobility of the mutant
polypeptides of increasing length, the first indication of
O-glycosylation was detected in the Ser-140 polypeptide
(Fig. 3C). To test the effect of the O-linked
glycans on NRP1 binding, full-length VEGF-B186 was
deglycosylated by neuraminidase or with a combination of neuraminidase and O-glycosidase. However, the resulting deglycosylated
polypeptides did not acquire NRP1 binding ability (data not shown),
which suggests that the glycans are not responsible for the masking of
the NRP1 binding epitope in the full-length VEGF-B186.
Paracrine and Autocrine Expression Patterns of NRP1 and VEGF-B
during Development--
To study the relationship of NRP1 and VEGF-B
expression in embryonic cells and tissues, we used specific polyclonal
antibodies in immunoperoxidase staining of sections of day 12.5 mouse
embryos. As shown in Fig. 5, A
and B, the anti-NRP1 antibodies stained developing
myocardial cells originating from the mesoderm in the developing heart,
but gave no staining of the epicardium or of the endocardial cushion
tissue, which is derived from the embryonic neural crest.
Interestingly, the endothelia and the surrounding smooth muscle cell
layer of several major and minor vessels such as the cerebral artery
and its branches (Fig. 5D), intersomitic vessels, and the
vasculature of the choroid plexus (Fig. 5E) gave very strong
immunostaining with the anti-NRP1 antibodies. As is evident from
previously published papers, NRP1 was also expressed in the neural
tissues of the developing brain, for example in the cerebellum and in
the hippocampus and along the developing spinal cord (data not shown;
for review, see Ref. 11). Overlapping expression patterns thus exist
with VEGF-B, which is especially abundant in cardiac myocytes of the
developing heart, in the choroid plexus, and in the smooth muscle cells
of large arteries as well as in developing muscle, bone, and
cartilaginous structures (23).
In this study we demonstrate that VEGF-B binds to NRP1, a receptor
for collapsins/semaphorins, which has been shown to function in guiding
neuronal growth cones and as an isoform-specific receptor for two
angiogenic factors of the VEGF-family, VEGF165 and PlGF-2. Both VEGF-B splice variants, the heparin-binding VEGF-B167
and soluble VEGF-B186 forms, were able to bind to NRP1, but
the binding of VEGF-B186 was regulated by proteolytic
processing. Only the processed form lacking the
O-glycosylated COOH terminus was able to bind NRP1, whereas
in VEGF-B167 the heparin binding domain encoded by exon 6B
was responsible for binding. The exon 6B-encoded domain of
VEGF-B167 is highly homologous to the NRP1 binding epitopes of the VEGF165 and PlGF-2 isoforms, which also bind
heparin. In contrast, in VEGF-B186 an alternative splice
acceptor site in exon 6 generates an insertion and a frameshift in the
coding sequence; therefore the COOH terminus of VEGF-B186
differs from the heparin binding domain of VEGF-B167 (16).
In the processed form of VEGF-B186, the peptide encoded by
the NH2 terminus of exon 6A thus constitutes a novel NRP1
binding epitope. VEGF-B186 does not seem to have affinity
for heparin and the binding to NRP1 was not
heparin-dependent, yet in the presence of heparin the
binding appeared stronger.2
Because the processing site was mapped to Arg-127, the specific NRP1
binding epitope constitutes minimally only 12 amino acid residues, with
the COOH-terminal Arg residue probably being important for efficient binding.
Proteolytic processing is commonly used to regulate the bioavailability
and activity of members of the platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF)/VEGF family. Both PDGF isoforms, PDGF-A and -B, are
proteolytically processed after biosynthesis (24). Also VEGF-C and
VEGF-D are sequentially processed at sites flanking the cystine knot
growth factor domain. Furthermore, proteolytic processing of VEGF-C
regulates its affinity to the VEGFR-3 and VEGFR-2 receptors (25). Also,
proteolytic cleavage of VEGF-B186 appeared to result in an
increased VEGFR-1 affinity (20). Activation of NRP1 binding by
proteolytic cleavage could further increase the VEGFR-1 binding
affinity and thus modulate VEGF-B186-induced biological
effects, including regulation of protease activities in endothelial
cells (20). The glycans of the COOH terminus were not responsible for
the masking of the NRP1 binding epitopes in the full-length
VEGF-B186, as deglycosylation of the COOH terminus did not
lead to acquisition of NRP1 binding ability. It should be noted that
the NRP1 binding domains of VEGF165, PlGF-2, and Sema III
are highly basic (7). The exposure of a basic peptide sequence
(RVAIPHHRPQPR) in VEGF-B186 upon proteolytic cleavage might
be enough to give the protein an ability to bind NRP1. The binding of
the processed form of VEGF-B186 by NRP1 was, however, weaker than that of VEGF-B167 or VEGF165.
Approximately 20% of the immunoprecipitated proteolytically processed
VEGF-B186 protein was precipitated with NRP1 in the absence
of heparin. In contrast, both specific antibodies and soluble NRP1-Ig
fusion protein precipitated approximately equal amounts of
VEGF-B167 or VEGF165.
NRP1 and VEGF-B were prominently co-expressed for instance in the
myocardial cells of the developing heart and in the smooth muscle cell
layers surrounding larger blood vessels (13, 23, and the this paper).
In addition, NRP1 detected in endothelial cells of large vessels is
located in juxtacrine relationship with the smooth muscle cell layer
producing VEGF-B (23). It has been reported that NRP1 and the related
NP-2 can form homo- and hetero-oligomers through the interaction
between MAM domains, they bind different but overlapping subset of
semaphorins, and they mediate chemorepulsion of axons of different
classes of neurons (26-29). However, although NP-2 also binds
VEGF165, the expression pattern of NP-2 is different from
that of NRP1 or VEGFR-1, e.g. being absent from endothelial cells of capillaries (26, 28).
The exact role of NRP1 binding in the biology of VEGFs is unknown, but
NRP1 has been reported to enhance the mitogenic effects of VEGFR-2 upon
VEGF165 stimulation when the two receptors are coexpressed
in transfected endothelial cells (6). In addition to VEGFR-2, NRP1 has
been suggested to function as a ligand binding subunit of a
transmembrane receptor(s) that mediate specific signals for different
semaphorins (29, 30). Thus, NRP1 appears to regulate other
signal-transducing receptors, and no intrinsic signaling may occur via
NRP1 itself. Although the high conservation of the short cytoplasmic
domain of NRP1 suggests importance of this part to NRP1 function, no
binding partners or obvious protein homology domains have been reported
within this portion. In fact, the cytoplasmic tail was shown to be
unnecessary for the Sema III-induced biological responses via NRP1. The
presence of Sema III binding a1/a2 (CUB) domain and the MAM domain
responsible for NRP1 oligomerization and possible interaction with
other transmembrane signal-transducing proteins were sufficient for
Sema III-induced growth cone collapse (27, 29). It is not known whether
VEGF binding is sufficient for signal transduction via a
NRP1-associated hypothetical signal-transducing polypeptide chain
although the enhanced mitogenic signaling of VEGFR-2 in
NRP1-overexpressing cells suggests such a possibility.
According to the present results, VEGF-B, in analogy to the Sema III,
could therefore induce biological responses in cells which express
NRP1, but no VEGFRs. In addition, NRP1 might potentiate the effects of
VEGF-B in cells where VEGFR-1 is expressed. Furthermore, as VEGF and
Sema III have been shown to compete for NRP1 binding (28), and as we
here show competition between VEGF and VEGF-B, there could be a more
extensive cross-regulation of cellular signals between the two families
of growth factors.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin promoter is lethal because
of severe anomalies of the nervous and cardiovascular systems (13). The
cardiovascular defects may result from modulation of VEGF bioactivity
and VEGF-induced angiogenesis by abnormal NRP1 levels.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Ser were generated using
single-stranded mutagenesis as described previously (20). A vector
producing only the proteolytically processed cystine knot fragment of
mVEGF-B186 (1-127 amino acids) was amplified polymerase
chain reaction by using primers 5'-TACAGGATCCGGCACCATGAGCCCC-3' and
5'-TACAGAATTCTTAGCGGGGCTGGGGAC-3', digested with BamHI and EcoRI, and ligated into pcDNA3.1(+)zeo vector (Invitrogen).
N
C
proteins and metabolically labeled with 100 µCi/ml Pro-mixTM L-35S (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
for 3-7 h beginning 24 h after transfection. Ten µg/ml heparin
was added to the labeling medium to facilitate the release of heparan
sulfate-binding growth factors (VEGF165 and
VEGF-B167) from the cell surface and pericellular matrix.
Metabolically labeled media (except from the VEGF transfection) were
immunodepleted of endogenous VEGF and possible heterodimers by
immunoprecipitating with monoclonal anti-VEGF antibodies. Equal aliquots of media containing the metabolically labeled growth factors
were then used for immunoprecipitation or for receptor binding
analysis. Growth factors were incubated for 3 h at room temperature with protein A-Sepharose bound receptor Igs in the binding
buffer (0.5% BSA, 0.02% Tween 20). For competition studies, 2 µg of
recombinant human VEGF165 was added to the binding
reaction. The Sepharose beads were then washed three times with
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 1% Triton X-100 and twice
with PBS, and the bound proteins were analyzed in 15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing or nonreducing conditions.
-counter.
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as matrix to prepare the sample as a
"dried droplet." Calibration was done externally with a known
peptide mixture.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Precipitation of VEGF-B using soluble NRP1-Ig
and VEGFR-Ig fusion proteins. A, schematic exon
structures of the two VEGF-B cDNA variants encoding the 167- and
186-amino acid residue isoforms. Shown below are results of gel
electrophoresis in reducing conditions of the metabolically labeled
VEGF-B167, VEGF-B186, or
VEGF-BEX1-5 proteins precipitated using the indicated
fusion proteins or specific antibodies (IP).
VEGF-B186 undergoes proteolytic processing, and only the
processed NH2-terminal cystine knot growth factor fragment
(arrow, see Ref. 20) binds to both NRP1 and VEGFR-1. In
contrast, VEGF-BEx1-5, the fragment common for both
isoforms, binds VEGFR-1 but not NRP1. B, gel electrophoresis
in nonreducing conditions indicates weak NRP1 binding of the
heterodimers between the processed and full-length forms of
VEGF-B186 (FL+PF). The binding of
both VEGF-B167 and VEGF-B186 is inhibited in
the presence of 2 µg of recombinant human VEGF165. The
presence of the two bands in VEGF-B167 (*) has been
discussed elsewhere (20).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
VEGF-B167 interacts
with NRP1 through the heparin binding domain. A, ion
exchange chromatography of the GST-exon 6B fusion protein in a
heparin-Sepharose column. An aliquot from the peak fraction of eluted
GST-exon 6B was analyzed by silver staining (inset).
B, elution at around 0.8 M NaCl was similar to
the wild type full-length VEGF-B167. C,
competition of iodinated VEGF165 binding to NRP1 expressing
PAE-cells by GST, GST-exon 6B, mVEGF164, or
hVEGF121 proteins. D, binding of NRP1-Ig by
immobilized GST or GST-exon 6B.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Proteolytic processing regulates
VEGF-B186 binding to NRP1. A,
binding of a plasmin digest of radiolabeled VEGF-B186 to
soluble NRP1-Ig and VEGFR-1-Ig fusion proteins. B, schematic
drawing of the VEGF-B186 mutants which were used to map the
proteolytic cleavage site and the NRP1 interaction site. Metabolically
labeled VEGF-B186 mutants expressed in 293-T cells were
precipitated using specific antibodies (IP) or with NRP1-Ig
fusion protein (NRP1) and analyzed under reducing (R) or
nonreducing (NR) conditions. Proteolytic processing was seen
in the mutants Pro-130 through Ile-145, and the proteolytically cleaved
form of the same mutants showed also NRP1 binding.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Proteolytic processing of
VEGF-B186 occurs between Arg-127 and
Ser-128. A, the top part shows a schematic
drawing of the Arg-127 to Ser mutant (RS
SS).
Metabolically labeled wild-type, Ex1-5 and RS
SS mutant proteins and
the processed VEGF-B186 were precipitated with specific
antibodies (IP) or with NRP1-Ig or VEGFR-1-Ig fusion
proteins and analyzed under nonreducing conditions. B,
comparison of the mobilities and NRP1 binding properties of the
processed NH2-terminal fragment of
VEGF-B186 and the corresponding recombinant
VEGF-B127 form (1-127 amino acids). The unprocessed
RS
SS mutant does not bind NRP1 (panel A) whereas the
VEGF-B127 form does (panel B). In nonreducing
conditions, the mobility of the exon 1-5-encoded polypeptide dimer was
slower than that of proteolytically processed VEGF-B186,
probably because of differential folding. WT, wild
type.

View larger version (112K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Expression of NRP1 in day 12.5 embryos.
NRP1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry using polyclonal
affinity purified anti-NRP1 antibodies. A, NRP1 is expressed
in the developing heart. B, higher magnification of the
heart shows that NRP1 is expressed both in the developing myocardium
and in the endocardium, but not in the endocardial cushion tissue.
C, no staining was detected in the negative control done by
omitting the primary antibody. Strong NRP1 expression was also detected
in endothelial cells of capillaries and blood vessels, for example in
cerebral artery (D) and in vasculature of choroid plexus
(E). h, heart; lu, lung;
li, liver; a, atrium; v, ventricle;
ec, endocardiac cushion; my, myocardium.
Scale bar, 100 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Marko Hyytiäinen for help with the fast protein liquid chromatography and Tapio Tainola and Paula Hyvärinen for expert technical assistance. Dr. Hajime Fujisawa is kindly acknowledged for providing the mouse NRP1 cDNA and anti-NRP1 antibodies.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This study was supported by grants from the University of Helsinki, the Finnish Cancer Organizations, the Academy of Finland, the Helsinki University Hospital (TYH 8105), the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and the Swedish Medical Research Council (K99-03P-12070-03C) and by Karolinska Institutet.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ These authors contributed equally to the work.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Molecular/Cancer
Biology Laboratory, Haartman Institute, P. O. Box 21 (Haartmaninkatu 3), University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland. Fax: 358-9-1912 6448; E-mail: Kari.Alitalo@Helsinki.FI.
2 T. Makinen, B. Olofsson, U. Eriksson, and K. Alitalo, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; NRP1, Neuropilin-1; VEGFR,VEGF receptor, PlGF, placenta growth factor; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time of flight; mAb, monoclonal antibody; bp, base pair(s); mVEGF, mouse VEGF; rhVEGF, recombinant human VEGF; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PAE, porcine aortic endothelial (cell).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ferrara, N., Chen, H., Davis-Smyth, T., Gerber, H.-P., Nguyen, T.-N., Peers, D., Chisholm, V., Hillan, K. J., and Schwall, R. H. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 336-340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Klagsbrun, M., and D'Amore, P. (1996) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 7, 259-270[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Houck, K. A., Ferrara, N., Winer, J., Cachianes, G., Li, B., and Leung, D. W. (1991) Mol. Endocrinol. 5, 1806-1814[Abstract] |
| 4. |
Poltorak, Z.,
Cohen, T.,
Sivan, R.,
Kandelis, Y.,
Spira, G.,
Vlodavsky, I.,
Keshet, E.,
and Neufeld, G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7151-7158 |
| 5. |
Tischer, E.,
Mitchell, R.,
Hartman, T.,
Silva, M.,
Gospodarowicz, D.,
Fiddes, J. C.,
and Abraham, J. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
11947-11954 |
| 6. | Soker, S., Takashima, S., Miao, H. Q., Neufeld, G., and Klagsbrun, M. (1998) Cell 92, 735-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | He, Z., and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1997) Cell 90, 739-751[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Kolodkin, A. L., Levengood, D. V., Rowe, E. G., Tai, Y.-T., Giger, R. J., and Ginty, D. D. (1997) Cell 90, 753-762[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Keyt, B. A.,
Berleau, L. T.,
Nguyen, H. V.,
Chen, H.,
Heinsohn, H.,
Vandlen, R.,
and Ferrara, N.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7788-7795 |
| 10. | Takagi, S., Kasuya, Y., Shimizu, M., Matsuura, T., Tsuboi, M., Kawakami, A., and Fujisawa, H. (1995) Dev. Biol. 170, 207-222[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Kawakami, A., Kitsukawa, T., Takagi, S., and Fujisawa, H. (1996) J. Neurobiol. 29, 1-17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Fujisawa, H., Kitsukawa, T., Kawakami, A., Takagi, S., Shimizu, M., and Hirata, T. (1997) Cell Tissue Res. 290, 465-470[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Kitsukawa, T., Shimono, A., Kawakami, A., Kondoh, H., and Fujisawa, H. (1995) Development 121, 4309-4318[Abstract] |
| 14. | Korpelainen, E. I., and Alitalo, K. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 159-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Persico, M. G., Vincenti, V., and DiPalma, T. (1999) in Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology (Claesson-Welsh, L., ed), Vol. 237 , pp. 31-40, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg |
| 16. |
Olofsson, B.,
Pajusola, K.,
von Euler, G.,
Chilov, D.,
Alitalo, K.,
and Eriksson, U.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19310-19317 |
| 17. | Hauser, S., and Weich, H. A. (1993) Growth Factors 9, 259-268[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Maglione, D., Guerriero, V., Viglietto, G., Ferraro, M. G., Aprelikova, O., Alitalo, K., Del Vecchio, S., Lei, K.-J., Chou, J. Y., and Persico, M. G. (1993) Oncogene 8, 925-931[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Migdal, M.,
Huppertz, B.,
Tessler, S.,
Comforti, A.,
Shibuya, M.,
Reich, R.,
Baumann, H.,
and Neufeld, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22272-22278 |
| 20. |
Olofsson, B.,
Korpelainen, E.,
Pepper, M.,
Mandriota, S.,
Aase, K.,
Kumar, V.,
Gunji, Y.,
Jeltsch, M. M.,
Shibuya, M.,
Alitalo, K.,
and Eriksson, U.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11709-11714 |
| 21. | Shevchenco, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O., and Mann, M. (1996) Anal. Chem. 68, 850-858[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Hellman, U. (1997) in Protein Structure Analysis (Kamp, R. M. , Choli-Papadopou, T. , and Wittmann-Liebold, B., eds) , pp. 97-104, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg |
| 23. | Aase, K., Lymboussaki, A., Kaipainen, A., Olofsson, B., Alitalo, K., and Eriksson, U. (1999) Dev. Dynamics 215, 12-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Heldin, C. H., Ostman, A., and Westermark, B. (1995) Growth Factors 8, 245-252 |
| 25. | Joukov, V., Sorsa, T., Kumar, V., Jetsch, M., Claesson-Welsh, L., Cao, Y., Saksela, O., Kalkkinen, N., and Alitalo, K. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3898-3911[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Chen, H., Chedotal, A., He, Z., Goodman, C. S., and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1997) Neuron 19, 547-559[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Chen, H., He, Z., Bagri, A., and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1998) Neuron 21, 1283-1290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Giger, R. J., Urquhart, E. R., Gillespie, S. K. H., Levengood, D. V., Ginty, D. D., and Kolodkin, A. L. (1998) Neuron 21, 1079-1092[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Nakamura, F., Tanaka, M., Takahashi, T., Kalb, R. G., and Strittmatter, S. M. (1998) Neuron 21, 1093-1100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Feiner, L., Koppel, A. M., Kobayashi, H., and Raper, J. A. (1997) Neuron 19, 539-545[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Jaalouk, M. G. Ozawa, J. Sun, J. Lahdenranta, R. O. Schlingemann, R. Pasqualini, and W. Arap The Original Pathologische Anatomie Leiden-Endothelium Monoclonal Antibody Recognizes a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Binding Site within Neuropilin-1 Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 67(20): 9623 - 9629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Krilleke, A. DeErkenez, W. Schubert, I. Giri, G. S. Robinson, Y.-S. Ng, and D. T. Shima Molecular Mapping and Functional Characterization of the VEGF164 Heparin-binding Domain J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 28045 - 28056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tammela, Y. He, J. Lyytikka, M. Jeltsch, J. Markkanen, K. Pajusola, S. Yla-Herttuala, and K. Alitalo Distinct Architecture of Lymphatic Vessels Induced by Chimeric Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Heparin-Binding Domain Fusion Proteins Circ. Res., May 25, 2007; 100(10): 1468 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hochman, A. Castiel, J. Jacob-Hirsch, N. Amariglio, and S. Izraeli Molecular Pathways Regulating Pro-migratory Effects of Hedgehog Signaling J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 33860 - 33870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Karpanen, C. A. Heckman, S. Keskitalo, M. Jeltsch, H. Ollila, G. Neufeld, L. Tamagnone, and K. Alitalo Functional interaction of VEGF-C and VEGF-D with neuropilin receptors FASEB J, July 1, 2006; 20(9): 1462 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Narazaki and G. Tosato Ligand-induced internalization selects use of common receptor neuropilin-1 by VEGF165 and semaphorin3A Blood, May 15, 2006; 107(10): 3892 - 3901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jia, A. Bagherzadeh, B. Hartzoulakis, A. Jarvis, M. Lohr, S. Shaikh, R. Aqil, L. Cheng, M. Tickner, D. Esposito, et al. Characterization of a Bicyclic Peptide Neuropilin-1 (NP-1) Antagonist (EG3287) Reveals Importance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Exon 8 for NP-1 Binding and Role of NP-1 in KDR Signaling J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2006; 281(19): 13493 - 13502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Ellis The role of neuropilins in cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2006; 5(5): 1099 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shibuya, K. Watanabe, H. Yamashita, K. Shimizu, H. Miyashita, M. Abe, T. Moriya, H. Ohta, H. Sonoda, T. Shimosegawa, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Vasohibin-2 as a Homologue of VEGF-Inducible Endothelium-Derived Angiogenesis Inhibitor Vasohibin Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2006; 26(5): 1051 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Bjorndahl, R. Cao, J. B. Burton, E. Brakenhielm, P. Religa, D. Galter, L. Wu, and Y. Cao Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Promotes Peritumoral Lymphangiogenesis and Lymphatic Metastasis Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9261 - 9268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Becker, J. Waltenberger, R. Yachechko, T. Mirzapoiazova, J. S.K. Sham, C. G. Lee, J. A. Elias, and A. D. Verin Neuropilin-1 Regulates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Mediated Endothelial Permeability Circ. Res., June 24, 2005; 96(12): 1257 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Mac Gabhann and A. S. Popel Differential binding of VEGF isoforms to VEGF receptor 2 in the presence of neuropilin-1: a computational model Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): H2851 - H2860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. West, C. G. Rees, L. Duchesne, S. J. Patey, C. J. Terry, J. E. Turnbull, M. Delehedde, C. W. Heegaard, F. Allain, C. Vanpouille, et al. Interactions of Multiple Heparin Binding Growth Factors with Neuropilin-1 and Potentiation of the Activity of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13457 - 13464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Germeyer, A. E. Hamilton, L. S. Laughlin, B. L. Lasley, R. M. Brenner, L. C. Giudice, and N. R. Nayak Cellular Expression and Hormonal Regulation of Neuropilin-1 and -2 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in the Human and Rhesus Macaque Endometrium J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1783 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
< |