![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 21387-21394, July 23, 1999
From Third Wave Technologies, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin 53719
The
5'-exonuclease domains of the DNA polymerase I proteins of Eubacteria
and the FEN1 proteins of Eukarya and Archaea are members of a family of
structure-specific 5'-exonucleases with similar function but limited
sequence similarity. Their physiological role is to remove the
displaced 5' strands created by DNA polymerase during displacement
synthesis, thereby creating a substrate for DNA ligase. In this paper,
we define the substrate requirements for the 5'-exonuclease enzymes
from Thermus aquaticus, Thermus thermophilus,
Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Pyrococcus furiosus,
Methanococcus jannaschii, and Methanobacterium
thermoautotrophicum. The optimal substrate of these enzymes
resembles DNA undergoing strand displacement synthesis and consists of
a bifurcated downstream duplex with a directly abutted upstream duplex
that overlaps the downstream duplex by one base pair. That single base
of overlap causes the enzymes to leave a nick after cleavage and to
cleave several orders of magnitude faster than a substrate that lacks
overlap. The downstream duplex needs to be 10 base pairs long or
greater for most of the enzymes to cut efficiently. The upstream duplex
needs to be only 2 or 3 base pairs long for most enzymes, and there
appears to be interaction with the last base of the primer strand.
Overall, the enzymes display very similar substrate specificities,
despite their limited level of sequence similarity.
The 5' nuclease domains of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia
coli and Thermus aquaticus were the first extensively
characterized members of a large class of structure-specific
5'-exonucleases (1, 2). Initially it was proposed that these enzymes
work as true exonucleases removing predominantly mono- or dinucleotides from the 5' end of double-stranded DNA (3). More detailed studies have
shown that 5' nucleases of this type specifically recognize bifurcated
ends of double-stranded regions and remove single-stranded 5' arms by
cutting the phosphodiester bond after the first base pair of the
duplex, leaving a 3' hydroxyl end (2). A mammalian enzyme with
functional similarity to the 5'-exonuclease domain of E. coli polymerase I was isolated nearly 30 years ago (4). Later,
additional members of this group of enzymes called flap endonucleases
(FEN1) from Eukarya and Archaea were shown to possess a nearly
identical structure-specific activity (5-8), although they have
limited sequence similarity to the bacterial 5'-exonuclease proteins.
The substrate specificities of the FEN1 enzymes and the eubacterial and
related bacteriophage enzymes have been examined and found to be
similar for all enzymes (2, 5, 6, 8-11). The minimal requirement for
cleavage is a bifurcated duplex with a free 5' end. The presence of an
upstream primer that directly abuts the downstream strand stimulates
cleavage, but its precise effect on the site of cleavage remains
unclear. In the majority of studies that were done with the flap
substrate described in Harrington et al. (5), the enzymes
leave predominately a 1-nucleotide gap or 1-nucleotide overlap between
the upstream primer and cleaved downstream DNA strand (5, 8, 10-13).
When this substrate is modified to contain G-C base pairs at the
cleavage site, human FEN1 and Methanococcus jannaschii FEN1
change the cleavage site and cleavage by Archaeoglobus
fulgidus and Pyrococcus furiosus FEN1s is very poor
(8). These results clearly demonstrate enzyme- and sequence-specific
cleavage of the flap substrate, despite the classification of the
5'-exonucleases as structure-specific enzymes.
The heterogeneity in cleavage position exhibited by the FEN1 enzymes
seems inconsistent with their proposed role in DNA replication. The
role of human FEN1 in DNA replication (14, 15) has been examined, and
FEN1 has been found to be necessary to complete Okazaki fragment
processing in vitro. But these studies cannot answer the
question of whether it is the FEN1 or the DNA polymerase that generates
ligatable nicks, because both enzymes are required, along with RNase H
and DNA ligase, to process Okazaki fragments in vitro.
The 5' nuclease activity of E. coli DNA polymerase I is
essential for both the synthesis and the repair of DNA (3). An early
study reported that cleavage of displaced strands by E. coli
DNA polymerase I creates a nick between the upstream and downstream
strands (1). However, this result was contradicted by a study (13)
showing that the cleavage of the flap substrate (5) by E. coli DNA polymerase I leaves a 1-nucleotide gap that would have to
be filled by polymerase before ligation could occur.
In this paper we present analyses of the substrate requirements for
cleavage by seven structure-specific 5'-exonuclease enzymes from
Archaea and Eubacteria that we purified in order to understand clearly
the substrate requirements at the site of cleavage. In particular, we
focus on the consequences of changes in the 3' end of the upstream
primer strand. The minimal substrate for cleavage is a bifurcated
double-stranded DNA, but cleavage is greatly stimulated by an upstream
primer annealed adjacent to the bifurcation. In addition, efficient
cleavage requires at least one base of overlap between the two
duplexes. Such an overlap increases the cleavage several orders of
magnitude over the rate reported for these enzymes using a
nonoverlapping flap substrate (8). Cleavage by most enzymes is reduced
by modifications of the 3' end of the upstream primer implying
recognition of the end of the upstream primer duplex. All enzymes leave
a ligatable nick upon cleavage, contrary to published data on identical
and related 5'-exonucleases. These data demonstrate that the 5'
structure-specific nucleases are able to carry out the final step of
DNA replication prior to ligation.
Materials--
PCR
amplification was done with the Advantage
cDNA PCR kit (CLONTECH). Mutagenesis was done
with the Transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit
(CLONTECH). Restriction enzymes were purchased from
New England Biolabs. Chemicals and buffers were from Fisher unless
otherwise noted.
Cloning, Expression, and Purification of Enzymes--
T.
thermophilus strain HB-8 (ATCC 27634) and T. aquaticus
strain YT-1 (ATCC 25104) genomic DNAs were used as templates to amplify
by PCR the corresponding DNA polymerase I genes, TthPol and TaqPol, as
well as the 5' nuclease domain of TaqPol, TaqExo (31). A. fulgidus (DSMZ 4304),
M. jannaschii (DSMZ 2661), and M. thermoautotrophicum (ATCC 29096) genomic DNAs were used for PCR
amplification of archaeal FEN1 genes, AfuFEN, MjaFEN, and MthFEN,
respectively. The P. furiosus FEN1 gene, PfuFEN, was PCR amplified from a genomic clone generously supplied by Dr. Frank Robb
(University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD).
The amplified genes were cloned into the expression vector pTrc99a
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by standard techniques. Six-amino acid
histidine tags were added onto the carboxyl termini of all enzymes by
site-directed mutagenesis (TaqPol, TthPol, TaqExo, and PfuFEN) or by
including the His tag sequence in the oligonucleotide used for PCR
(Mja, Mth, and Afu FEN1 genes). A conserved aspartic acid at position
785 of TaqPol and position 787 of TthPol was mutated to an asparagine
to create polymerase-deficient versions of the enzymes used in this study.
For expression, plasmids were transformed into the E. coli
strain BL21 (Novagen), which is deficient in the lon and
ompT proteases. Log phase cultures of BL21 were induced with
0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio- Substrate Preparation--
All
oligonucleotides substrates were synthesized on a PerSeptive Biosystems
instrument using standard phosphoramidite chemistries (Glen Research).
The oligonucleotide with the d-spacer modification at the 3' end was
synthesized using 3'-phosphate CPG (Glen Research) followed by
phosphate removal using calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Promega).
The oligonucleotides were purified by separating the primary synthesis
products on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and by excision and
elution of the major band. The oligonucleotides labeled on their 5'
ends with 5'-fluorescein (6-FAM, Glen Research) were further purified
by reverse phase HPLC using a Dionex DX 500 instrument and a
Microsorb-MV C-18 column (Rainin).
Activity Assays--
Unless otherwise indicated, 10-µl
reactions contained 10 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 10 µg/ml tRNA, and 200 mM KCl for
TaqPol and TthPol or 50 mM KCl for all other enzymes.
Reactions with the hairpin substrates contained no KCl and 4 mM MnCl2. Substrates (2 µM) and
varying amounts of enzyme were mixed with the indicated (above)
reaction buffer and overlaid with Chill-out (MJ Research) liquid wax.
Substrates were heat denatured at 90 °C for 20 s and cooled to
50 °C, then reactions were started by addition of MgCl2
or MnCl2 and incubated at 50 °C for the specified length
of time. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 10 µl of 95%
formamide containing 10 mM EDTA and 0.02% methyl violet
(Sigma). Samples were heated to 90 °C for 1 min immediately before
electrophoresis on a 20% denaturing acrylamide gel (19:1
cross-linked), with 7 M urea, and in a buffer of 45 mM Tris borate, pH 8.3, 1.4 mM EDTA. Unless
otherwise indicated, 1 µl of each stopped reaction was loaded per
lane. Gels were then scanned on an FMBIO-100 fluorescent gel scanner
(Hitachi) using a 505-nm filter. The fraction of cleaved product was
determined from intensities of bands corresponding to uncut and cut
substrate with FMBIO Analysis software (version 6.0, Hitachi). The
fraction of cut product did not exceed 20% to ensure that measurements approximated initial cleavage rates. The cleavage rate was defined as
the concentration of cut product divided by the enzyme concentration and the time of the reaction (in minutes). For each enzyme three data
points were used to determine the rate and experimental error.
Ligation Experiments--
The ligation experiment was done using
three separate oligonucleotides that anneal to form an overlapping flap
substrate. The oligonucleotides have the following sequences:
template oligonucleotide, 5'-GAAAGCGAGACAGCGAAAGACGCTCGTGAA; upstream
primer oligonucleotide, 5'-ACGAGCGTCTTTC; and downstream
oligonucleotide, 5'-AAACGCTGTCTCGCT. The downstream oligonucleotide and
the mock product oligonucleotide (5'-ACGAGCGTCTTTCGCTGTCTCGCT)
were labeled with fluorescein at the 3' ends (Glen Research). All
oligonucleotides were gel purified as described above. 10-µl
reactions contained 10 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 2 mM
MgCl2, 20 µg/ml tRNA, 1 mM ATP, DNA
substrate, and 5' nuclease and were incubated for 5 min at 50 °C,
after which the temperature was shifted to 23 °C, and 1 unit of T4
DNA ligase (Promega) was added and incubated for an additional 15 min.
The reactions were stopped, and the samples were analyzed as described
above except that samples were electrophoresed on a 15% polyacrylamide gel.
Cloning and Purification of Seven Structure-specific 5'
Nucleases--
Four archaeal FEN1 enzymes from A. fulgidus
(AfuFEN), P. furiosus (PfuFEN), M. jannaschii
(MjaFEN), and M. thermoautotrophicum (MthFEN),
two eubacterial polymerase I enzymes from T. aquaticus (TaqPol) and T. thermophilus (TthPol) and the 5' nuclease
domain of TaqPol (TaqExo) (31) were cloned, expressed in E. coli, and extensively purified to study their substrate
specificity (Fig. 1). All enzymes used in
this study have six-histidine tags on their carboxyl termini to
facilitate purification. To determine whether this modification affects
enzyme specificity, five of the enzymes studied here (except TaqExo and
MthFEN) were cloned without the histidine tags and were purified by
heparin affinity chromatography to a similar level of purity. These
enzymes have no measurable differences in specificity compared with
their His tag containing counterparts (data not shown). TaqPol and
TthPol each contain a single amino acid substitution of aspartic acid to asparagine (D785N for TaqPol and D787N for TthPol) in their polymerase domain, which eliminates polymerization activity; the equivalent mutation in E. coli DNA polymerase I has been
shown to have no effect on DNA binding (19) and also has no effect on
the cleavage rate or substrate specificity of TaqPol or TthPol (data
not shown).
Optimal Substrate for the Structure-specific 5' Nucleases--
The
presence of an upstream primer is known to be important in stimulating
cleavage of 5' arm containing substrates by the structure-specific
nucleases (2). Furthermore, overlap between the upstream and downstream
duplexes stimulates cleavage of some nucleases even further (17, 20).
The identity of the 3' of the upstream primer may also play a role in
the stimulation of cleavage (31). To investigate the role of the
3'-terminal nucleotide of the upstream primer in substrate recognition,
we created substrates that differed in the identity at that position.
In all substrates, the downstream oligonucleotide was labeled with
fluorescein at its 5' end and connected to the template strand via the
exceptionally stable GAA hairpin loop (21). Quantitative HPLC analysis
of the products of cleavage reactions indicates that the presence of
fluoroscein at the 5' end of substrates increases slightly the cleavage
rate compared with unlabeled substrates for the enzymes used in this
study (data not shown). The 3' arm of the hairpin is free to anneal to
an upstream primer to form the flap structures shown in Fig.
2A. The upstream primer had
dA, dC, dG, dT, dC with a 3' phosphate, dideoxy C, or a d-spacer
mimicking a deoxyribose sugar moiety at its 3' end to create an overlap
with the downstream duplex. We refer to the duplexes formed by the
template strand and the downstream or upstream primers as downstream or
upstream duplexes, respectively. Also, we created a shorter version of the upstream primer that forms an upstream duplex that abuts the downstream duplex to form a flap substrate that lacks overlap between
the two duplexes, like those previously described in the literature
(5).
Reactions with all seven enzymes were performed in the presence of an
excess of substrate (2 µM) over enzyme (0.35 nM for TaqExo and FENs and 2.8 nM for TaqPol
and TthPol). These substrate concentrations are much higher than the
Km value for all studied substrates (data not shown)
assuming that the cleavage rates measured as described under
"Experimental Procedures" are close to Vmax
for each enzyme. For all substrate enzyme combinations, the one major
product observed corresponded to the product generated by cleavage
after the first base pair of the downstream duplex. Cleavage generated
five-nucleotide fragments, as shown in Fig. 2B for AfuFEN
and TthPol. Release of a five-nucleotide arm should create a nick
between the upstream and downstream primers rather than a gap or an
overlap. Cleavage rates for all enzymes are summarized in Table
I.
For all enzymes a natural base at the 3' end of the upstream primer
supported the highest rate of cleavage (Fig. 2B, lanes 5-8 and 17-20). The archaeal FEN1 enzymes used all
four natural bases with approximately equal efficiency, but the
cleavage rates of the eubacterial enzymes were clearly dependent on the
nature of the 3'-terminal nucleotide. For TaqPol and TaqExo, dT
inhibited cleavage, whereas dA supported the highest level of cleavage
among the natural bases; for TthPol, dA and dG inhibited cleavage
compared with dT and dC. A 3' phosphate or d-spacer group largely
eliminated cleavage for all enzymes. The dideoxy C greatly inhibited
the activity of all archaeal enzymes, whereas it reduced the level of
cleavage for the eubacterial enzymes by only 10-30% relative to a
substrate with dC at the end of the primer strand (Table I). Under
these conditions, no cleavage was observed in the absence of an
upstream primer (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and
15).
For all enzymes the substrates with a nonoverlapping flap had a lower
rate of cleavage than the substrate with an overlapping natural 3'
nucleotide. Surprisingly, the observed cleavage rate was higher than
that reported for cleavage of a similar nonoverlapping type of
substrate (17). We hypothesize, as previously suggested (31), that
alternative flap structures can be generated to produce substrates with
an overlap. In particular, one of the three consecutive As of the
template strand could be bulged out to create overlapping structures by
slippage (Fig. 2C). To test this hypothesis the sequence of
the template strand was modified to prevent the potential slippage by
substituting a G-C for an A-T in the middle of the AAA track as shown
in Fig. 3A, and the
overlapping and nonoverlapping flap substrates were incubated with each
of the seven enzymes in reaction conditions identical to those in Fig.
2B. As shown in Fig. 3B, cleavage of the
nonoverlapping flap substrate was almost undetectable over the
background level (no enzyme control) for all enzymes except AfuFEN,
which had only 5% of the activity observed for the overlapping
substrate (Fig. 3B, lanes 9 and 13). We conclude that overlap is required for efficient cleavage and that
slippage can occur to create overlaps. It is unclear whether this
slippage is induced by the enzyme itself.
Overlapping and Hairpin Substrates and the Effect of Mg and Mn Ions
on Enzyme Activity--
After establishing the key features of
substrate recognition we designed two substrates to further investigate
the specificity of the seven nucleases. The first (overlapping flap
substrate, Fig. 4A) has
upstream and downstream strands connected to the template strand by two
GAA loops to form a "dumbbell" structure. The upstream and
downstream duplexes overlap by 3 base pairs. The second substrate
(hairpin substrate, Fig. 4B) was designed to study cleavage
in the absence of the upstream primer; it has the same 5' arm and
substrate duplex region connected to the short 3'TTT arm. To obtain
similar levels of cleavage, the incubation time and enzyme
concentration were varied as shown in Fig. 4.
The cleavage patterns for all enzymes are shown in Fig. 4, and the
corresponding cleavage rates are summarized in Table
II for both the overlapping and hairpin
substrates in MgCl2 and MnCl2. The most
striking aspect of these data is the increase in cleavage rate and
cleavage accuracy conferred by the presence of the upstream primer
duplex. For instance, in MgCl2, the presence of the
upstream primer duplex caused the cleavage rate of TaqExo to increase 4 orders of magnitude. An even greater increase is seen for AfuFEN and
PfuFEN, because cleavage of the hairpin substrate cannot be detected in
MgCl2. Using the background signal as the upper limit of
hairpin cleavage, we estimate that the difference in cleavage rate of
two substrates for these enzymes is at least 60,000-fold. Substitution
of MnCl2 for MgCl2 stimulated cleavage of the
hairpin by about 1 or 2 orders of magnitude, depending on the enzyme, whereas it decreased the rate of cleavage of the overlapping flap by
about 0.5 order of magnitude. Although the stimulatory effect of the
upstream duplex is not as great in the presence of MnCl2, it is still significant, averaging 1.5-2 orders of magnitude. The
differences between Tables I and II in cleavage rates for the
overlapping substrates can be explained by differences in the
MgCl2 and KCl concentrations as well as by subtle
differences in the structures of the substrates (compare Figs.
2A and 4A).
The products of cleavage of the hairpin substrate differed between
enzymes, although the major product of most enzymes is 5 nucleotides
long, indicating that cleavage occurs after the first base pair of the
substrate duplex. The exception is MthFEN, whose major product was 6 nucleotides long. In addition to significantly increasing the cleavage
rate, the presence of the upstream primer duplex also made the cleavage
pattern nearly identical for all enzymes. For both the overlapping flap
and hairpin substrates, the positions of cleavage were not affected by
the choice of divalent cation. The major cleavage product of the
overlapping flap substrate is produced by cleavage at the position
expected if the upstream primer is fully base paired. The appearance of
a small amount of 3- and 4-nucleotide products indicates branch
migration (known as a three-stranded branch migration) occurs between
the upstream and downstream duplexes, and the enzymes are able to
cleave the substrate inefficiently when it has two or even three of the
3'-terminal nucleotides of the upstream primer unpaired.
pH, Salt, Divalent Ion, and Temperature Effects--
The effects
of pH, KCl concentration, and divalent cation concentration were
investigated for the overlapping flap and hairpin substrates (Fig. 4)
for each of seven enzymes. In the range from 0.2 to 7 mM of
MnCl2 and MgCl2 concentrations, the rates of
cleavage of the overlapping flap substrate by most enzymes increased
3-10 times reaching a plateau in the range from 4 to 7 mM
MgCl2 and MnCl2. In the presence of
MgCl2, the optimal KCl concentration was 200 mM
for the polymerase enzymes TaqPol and TthPol, 100 mM for
MthFEN and MjaFEN, and 20-50 mM for the others (data not
shown). The higher optimal salt concentration for the eubacterial
polymerases suggest that they bind more strongly than archaeal enzymes
to the overlapping substrate and that at low salt concentration, product release is slow for the polymerase enzymes. Interestingly, in
the presence of MnCl2, the optimal KCl concentration for
the overlapping substrate increased 2-3 times for all enzymes (data not shown). KCl at concentrations above 10-30 mM was found
to inhibit cleavage of the hairpin substrate by all enzymes (data not shown).
The cleavage reaction was highly dependent on the pH of the buffer,
varying as much as 2 orders of magnitude in the range from pH 6 to 10. Most enzymes had optimal activity between pH 8 and 9, with the
exceptions of MthFEN and TthPol, which reach maximum activity at pH 10 (Table III).
With the overlapping flap substrate in MgCl2, archaeal
enzymes had fairly sharp temperature optima between 70 and 85 °C,
TaqExo and TaqPol enzymes had optimal activity between 65 and 70 °C, respectively, and TthPol was most active at 85 °C (Table
IV). All enzymes were able to cut the
overlapping flap substrate at both 40 and 90 °C and survived
incubation at 90 °C for 15 min, except MthFEN, which is not
thermostable above 75 °C (Table IV and data not shown). All enzymes
had lower temperature optima in MnCl2 than
MgCl2 except for TaqPol and TaqExo, for which the optima
were increased by 5-10 °C (data not shown).
The Effect of Substrate Structure on Cleavage
Efficiencies--
Having established a standard set of reaction
conditions, we undertook a comparison of how structural elements of the
hairpin and overlapping flap substrates affected cleavage by the seven nucleases. The effect of the 3' arm length in the hairpin substrate was
determined with a series of hairpin substrates like the substrate in
Fig. 4B but having 3' arms of 0, 3, 8, or 15 dT nucleotides. Surprisingly, the 3' arm length can have as great as a 10-fold effect
on the cleavage rate. The archaeal FEN1 enzymes cleaved at the highest
rate when the 3' arm was 8 nucleotides long, whereas the eubacterial
enzymes were most active on substrates lacking a 3' arm (Table
V).
To determine the minimal length of upstream duplex required for
stimulation of cleavage, we used a set of overlapping flap substrates
like the one shown in Fig. 4A, but with progressively shorter upstream duplexes generated by removing base pairs from their
loop side. All enzymes were able to cleave at maximal or nearly maximal
rates when the primer duplex was at least 5 base pairs long (data not
shown). Because primer duplexes shorter then 5 base pairs consisted
mainly of A-T base pairs, they were unstable at 50 °C, so we
synthesized a series of substrates with only G-C base pairs in the
upstream duplex (Fig. 5A). To
simplify the preparation of substrates, the labeled downstream strand
was synthesized as a separate oligonucleotide, whereas the remainder of
the substrate containing the upstream primer and template strand was on
a separate single oligonucleotide. AfuFEN, MjaFEN, and TthPol cleaved
these G-C-rich substrates at rates close to maximal even when the
substrate had only a 3-base pair upstream duplex (Fig. 5B).
But with the 2-base pair upstream duplex substrate, the rates decreased
6-fold for PfuFEN and 2-fold for AfuFEN, TaqPol, TthPol, and TaqExo; surprisingly, the cleavage rate increased for MjaFEN and MthFEN (Fig.
5B and data not shown). The activity of all enzymes dropped more then 10-fold when the upstream duplex length was reduced to 1 base
pair, with the exception of MjaFEN, for which only a 30% decrease was
observed. No significant cleavage was observed when the 3' arm could
not form a duplex (Fig. 5, lanes 3, 9, and 15).
The effect of downstream duplex length on cleavage efficiency was
determined using substrates with downstream duplex lengths of between 8 and 16 base pairs for the hairpin substrate and 6 and 16 base pairs for
the overlapping flap substrate (Fig.
6A), in which the upstream
duplex was 6 base pairs. All enzymes, except TaqPol, cleaved the
overlapping flap substrates at rates independent of downstream duplex
length in the range from 10 to 16 base pairs; TaqPol cleaved the 10 base pair substrate approximately five times slower than the 12 base
pair substrate (Fig. 6B). For most enzymes, cleavage
activities decreased for the 8 base pair downstream duplex substrate
and significantly dropped when the duplex length was reduced to 6 bp.
Only MjaFEN and MthFEN were able to cleave the substrate with the
6-base pair downstream duplex. For the hairpin substrates, cleavage
rates decreased nearly linearly with decreasing duplex length and were
only 5-10% of maximal (data not shown) with an 8-base pair hairpin
for TthPol and the FEN enzymes. TaqPol and TaqExo had essentially no
activity on that substrate.
Ligation after Cleavage by the Structure-specific
5'-Exonucleases--
In vivo, strand displacement to remove
RNA primers or damaged DNA should ultimately generate a structure that
can be sealed by ligation. To determine whether the enzymes studied
here are capable of generating such nicked duplexes, we determined
whether the upstream and downstream primers could be ligated after
cleavage in the absence of any polymerase activity. Ligation would also confirm that the deduced site of cleavage is juxtaposed to the 3' end
of the upstream primer. In these experiments, the substrate was
generated by annealing 3 oligonucleotides and cleaving the resulting
substrate with each of the enzymes followed by the addition of T4 DNA
ligase. The oligonucleotide that was to be cleaved was labeled at its
3' end to permit monitoring of its ligation to the upstream primer
oligonucleotide (Fig. 7). The 3' labeled
substrate was cleaved at approximately the same rate as the 5' labeled
substrate for all seven enzymes within experimental error (data not
shown), further supporting the conclusion that the 5' fluoroscein has little effect on the cleavage rate. For all seven nucleases, DNA ligase
converted essentially all the cleaved 11-nucleotide product to a
24-nucleotide product that comigrated with a synthetic 24-nucleotide oligonucleotide with the same sequence. These data clearly demonstrate the ability of the structure-specific 5'-exonucleases to create a
substrate for DNA ligase and strongly indicate that they carry out that
same function in vivo.
During DNA replication, a large number of RNA primers must be
removed, and the Okazaki fragments generated by those RNA primers must
be joined by DNA ligase. The literature regarding the question of which
enzyme acts immediately prior to DNA ligase is contradictory. The work
by Lundquist and Oliviera (1) demonstrated the ability of E. coli DNA polymerase I to leave a nick between the upstream and
downstream strands after cleavage of displaced single-stranded overhangs generated during nick translation. However, studies with the
whole DNA polymerase I or its isolated 5' nuclease domain only gave a
different result (13). Using a preformed substrate, the nuclease leaves
a gap, leading the authors to speculate that the DNA polymerase must
then act to fill in that gap to generate a ligatable nick. A number of
other 5' nucleases have been shown to leave a gap or overlap after
cleavage of the same or similar flap substrates (5, 8, 22, 23).
The principal finding of this work is that all the structure-specific
5'-exonucleases leave a nick after cleavage of a substrate that has the
overlap between the upstream and downstream duplexes (Figs. 2 and 3).
When overlap exists, there can be branch migration of the two duplexes
resulting in the 3' end of the upstream primer being alternately paired
and unpaired (1, 17). Our data show that cleavage occurs on the
substrate having the conformation where the last nucleotide at the 3'
end of the upstream strand is unpaired because the cleavage rate is
essentially the same whether the end of the upstream primer is A, C, G,
or T (Fig. 2). Thus, it is positional overlap between the 3' end of the
upstream primer and downstream duplex rather then sequence overlap that is required for optimal cleavage. The fact that the 3' end of the
upstream primer is unpaired indicates that, as in the case of the
hairpin substrates (2), the cleavage occurs between the first two base
pairs of the downstream duplex. Its also explains why nonoverlapping
flap substrates, such as described (5), generate gaps. When the
upstream duplex abuts the downstream duplex with no overlap, cleavage
after the first base pair of the downstream duplex (described as
proximal in Ref. 5) will create a gap.
Comparing the results from Figs. 2 and 3, it appears that the enzymes
are able to tolerate slippage of the two strands of the upstream duplex
to generate overlap and thus a more cleavable substrate (Fig.
2C), even when such slippage would cause a distortion in the
DNA duplex. Alternative structures of the downstream duplex that create
overlap with the upstream primer have been proposed to explain cleavage
of nonoverlapping substrates by TaqPol and TaqExo.2 We
believe the ability of the 5' nucleases to support cleavage of the
nonoverlapping flap structure used by Harrington and Lieber (5) may be
due to a similar rearrangements of the downstream duplex (distal
cutting in Ref. 5). The fact that mutations that stabilize the 3' end
of the downstream duplex significantly reduce cleavage for some enzymes
supports that idea (8).
Another aspect of cleavage affected by overlap is the cleavage rate. We
can directly compare our results for PfuFEN, AfuFEN, and MjaFEN with
data from the literature because cleavage rate data for these enzymes
are available (8). We observe cleavage rates of ~100
cleavages/minute/enzyme with the overlapping flap substrate for all
three enzymes at 50 °C (Table I). When the same three enzymes were
examined at 55 °C with a nonoverlapping flap substrate (8),
Vmax values of 0.3, 0.1, and 0.04 nM/s combined for all products (19 and 21-mer) were
observed for MjaFEN, AfuFEN, and PfuFEN, respectively. When converted
to the cleavage rates as described under "Experimental Procedures,"
those numbers are equivalent to 0.032, 0.015, and 0.003 cleavages/minute for MjaFEN, AfuFEN, and Pfu FEN, respectively. These
rates are more then 3 orders of magnitude slower than the rates we
observe for the same enzymes with the overlapping flap substrate. Part
of the difference may be explained by differences in methodology and in
the particular substrate used. However, a cleavage rate decrease of
several orders of magnitude is consistent with what we observe for most
enzymes except AfuFEN. The cleavage rate of AfuFEN only decreases a
single order of magnitude when overlap is eliminated for the substrate
used in Fig. 3. Further experimentation will be required to determine
whether this result is reproducible with different substrates. The
stimulatory effect of overlap has been reported for human FEN1 (20),
PfuFEN and AfuFEN (17), and TaqPol (31), but quantitative analysis of
this effect has not been done. Interestingly, length of the overlap
between the two duplexes seems to not effect the cleavage rate (Refs.
17 and 20 and data not shown), which indicates that branch migration is
fast compared with enzyme binding and cleavage.
Although the upstream primer stimulates and focuses cleavage by the 5'
nucleases, the downstream duplex alone is sufficient to support
cleavage by the 5' nucleases (Fig. 4B). The
three-dimensional structures for five members of the 5' nuclease family
have been solved (24-28), and all five show two divalent metal binding
sites. It has been proposed for human FEN1 (29) and for T4 RNase H (30)
that one metal ion is involved primarily in binding to the DNA
substrate. It has also been proposed that the structure-specific 5-nucleases contain the helix-hairpin-helix motif, which is thought to
bind to double-stranded DNA in a nonspecific manner (16). When we
examined the three-dimensional structure of Taq polymerase determined by x-ray diffraction (24), we noted that the distance between the metal ion binding site and the helix-hairpin-helix motif
(aspartic acid 142 to lysine 197) is about 30 Å or roughly 9 base
pairs of B-form helix. A contact length of 12 base pairs between PfuFEN
and a DNA substrate was recently proposed based on the length of a
prominent groove on the surface of that enzyme (28). It is interesting
to note that cleavage by TaqExo drops 10-fold going from a 10- to an
8-base pair downstream duplex length (Fig. 6). We hypothesize that one
of the bound divalent cations and the helix-hairpin-helix motif are the
primary binding sites for the downstream duplex of DNA substrates on
the 5' nucleases.
The presence of the upstream duplex is important for both activating
and positioning cleavage by the structure-specific 5'-exonucleases (Fig. 2), but only a small portion of that duplex is recognized by the
enzymes (Fig. 5). Most enzymes still show a significant amount of
cleavage when the upstream duplex is as small as two base pairs,
although the stability of this duplex at 50 °C is questionable. In
particular, recognition of the last nucleotide of the upstream primer
strand appears to be important. Removal of a single oxygen atom by
substitution of a deoxy-ribose with a dideoxy-ribose at the 3' end of
the primer duplex significantly reduces cleavage by archaeal enzymes,
and substitution of a 3' OH with a 3' phosphate affects all enzymes
(Fig. 2 and Table I). Coupled with the fact that the 3' nucleotide of
the upstream primer is unpaired during cleavage, this leads us to
propose that there is a region or pocket in the enzymes that
specifically recognizes that nucleotide. Co-crystallization or other
structure determination studies will be needed to the identify this
region and to elucidate the molecular basis of enzyme recognition.
Many of the aspects of substrate recognition are identical or very
similar between the enzymes examined here. We have observed the
cleavage rate increase caused by overlap between the upstream and
downstream duplexes of the flap substrate for all enzymes examined and
using many different substrate sequences (Ref. 17 and data not shown).
Furthermore, the cleavage rate does not depend on the GC or AT content
of the substrates and is remarkably constant between different
substrates (data not shown). We have also found that all enzymes leave
a nick after cleavage when overlap exists. We expect these conclusions
to be true for all other 5' structure-specific exonucleases because the
members of the group examined here are evolutionarily distant from one
another, spanning two kingdoms. Further studies will be needed to
determine whether in fact that is true.
We thank Frank Robb for providing us with a
clone containing the Pfu FEN1 gene. We also thank Jim Dahlberg and Mary
Ann Brow for critically reading the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by the Cooperative Agreements
70NANB5H1030 and 70NANB7H3015 from the Department of Commerce Advanced Technology Program (to L. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Nanogen, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121.
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
bp, base pair(s).
A Comparison of Eubacterial and Archaeal Structure-specific
5'-Exonucleases*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranoside (Promega) and grown for an additional 16 h prior to harvest.
Enzymes were purified as described (17, 31) using His Bind resin metal chelation chromatography (Novagen) as a final step. Enzyme
concentration was determined by measuring absorption at 279 nm as
described (18). All enzymes were dialyzed and stored in 50% glycerol, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 50 mM KCl, 0.5% Tween
20, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (114K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purity of isolated structure-specific
5'-exonucleases. Approximately 1 µg of indicated protein was
electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and stained with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R. Lanes 1 and 9,
molecular mass markers (Promega); lanes 2-8, TaqExo,
TaqPol, TthPol, AfuFEN, PfuFEN, MjaFEN, and MthFEN, respectively.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effect of 3' end of primer
modifications. A, sequence and proposed structure of
substrates with different 3' end modifications. X represents
dA, dT, dG, dC, dideoxy C, dC-PO4, or d-spacer.
B, substrates (2 µM) shown in A
were cut with 0.35 nM AfuFEN (lanes 3-11) for 8 min or 2.8 nM TthPol (lanes 15-23) for 5 min in
4 mM MgCl2 as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Lanes 1, 12, 13, and
24, mixture of labeled 5'-AAAACG, 5'-AAAAC, and 5'-AAAA size
markers; lanes 2 and 14, no enzyme control;
lanes 3 and 15, no upstream primer control;
lanes 4 and 16, nonoverlapping structure (moiety
X is absent). The 3' X moieties dA, dT, dG, dC,
dideoxy C, dC-PO4, or d-spacer are shown in lanes
5-11, respectively, for AfuFEN and lanes 17-23 for
TthPol. C, proposed structures of the nonoverlapping
substrate and its slippage conformations with overlap.
Effect of the 3' terminal moiety of the upstream primer on cleavage
rates of seven structure-specific 5' nucleases

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Overlap is required for efficient cleavage by
all enzymes. A, sequence and proposed structures of
nonoverlapping and 1-nucleotide overlapping flap substrates. Sequence
changes designed to prevent formation of slippage structures (Fig.
2C) are shown in bold. B, cleavage of
nonoverlapping (lanes 2, 4, 6,
8, 10, 12, 14, and
16) and overlapping (lanes 1, 3,
5, 7, 9, 11, 13,
and 15) substrates. N and O stand for
nonoverlapping and overlapping substrates, respectively. Reactions were
done in 4 mM MgCl2 as described under
"Experimental Procedures": Lanes 2 and 3, no
enzyme control; lanes 4 and 5, 0.35 nM TaqExo, 8 min; lanes 6 and 7, 2.8 nM TaqPol, 5 min; lanes 8 and 9, 2.8 nM TthPol, 5 min; lanes 10 and 11,
0.35 nM AfuFEN, 8 min; lanes 12 and
13, 0.35 nM AfuFEN, 8 min; lanes 14 and 15, 0.35 nM MjaFEN, 4 min; lanes
16 and 17, 0.35 nM MthFEN, 4 min.
Lanes 1 and 18, size markers with sequences
identical to the 5'-terminal sequence of the substrates.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Activity of 5'-exonucleases on overlapping
flap and hairpin substrates in MgCl2 and
MnCl2. A, the overlapping flap substrate
was cut with each of the seven enzymes with 2 mM
MgCl2 or 2 mM MnCl2 in the absence
of KCl at 50 °C as described under "Experimental Procedures."
The incubation time and enzyme concentrations are indicated.
Lanes 1, 10, 11 and 20,
labeled size markers with sequences identical to the 5'-terminal
sequence of the substrate (the 2- and 3-nucleotide markers run as a
single band); lanes 2 and 12, no enzyme control;
lanes 3-9, cleavage with TaqExo, TaqPol, TthPol, PfuFEN,
AfuFEN, MjaFEN, and MthFEN, respectively, in the presence of
MgCl2; lanes 13-19, cleavage with the same
enzymes in the presence of MnCl2. B, cleavage of
hairpin substrate was done as described in A. The incubation
time and enzyme concentrations are indicated.
Effect of magnesium and manganese ions on cleavage activities of seven
structure-specific 5' nucleases with overlap flap (Fig. 4A) and hairpin
substrates
Effect of pH on activity of seven structure-specific 5' nucleases
Effect of temperature on activity of seven structure-specific 5'
nucleases
Effect of 3' arm length of hairpin substrate on relative cleavage
activities of seven 5' nucleases

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of upstream duplex length.
A, sequence and proposed structures of overlapping flap
substrates with 5- and 0-bp upstream duplexes. Upstream duplexes
shorter than 5 bp were generated by removing base pairs from the loop
side of the duplex. B, substrates with 0-bp (lanes
3, 9, and 15), 1-bp (lanes 4,
10, and 16), 2-bp (lanes 5,
11, and 17) 3-bp (lanes 6,
12, and 18), 4-bp (lanes 7,
13, and 19), and 5-bp (lanes 8,
14, and 20) upstream duplex were cleaved with
0.35 nM AfuFEN for 8 min (lanes 3-8), 0.35 nM MjaFEN (lanes 9-14) for 4 min, or 2.8 nM TthPol (lanes 15-20) for 4 min with 4 mM MgCl2 as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Lanes 1 and 21, size markers with
sequences identical to the 5'-terminal sequence of the primer;
lane 2, no enzyme control.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of downstream duplex length on
cleavage of overlapping substrate. A, sequence and
proposed structure of overlapping flap substrate with 16-bp downstream
duplex. Substrates with shorter downstream duplexes were generated by
removing base pairs from the loop side of the duplex. B,
substrates described in A were cut with 0.35 nM
TaqExo for 8 min, 2.8 nM TaqPol for 3 min, 2.8 nM TthPol for 2 min, 0.35 nM AfuFEN for 8 min,
0.35 nM PfuFEN for 6 min, 0.35 nM MjaFEN for 4 min, or 0.35 nM MthFEN for 4 min with 4 mM
MgCl2 as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
cleavage rates are plotted versus the downstream duplex
length, each point represents the average of three data points, and
errors are shown by vertical lines.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Ligation of cleaved products. Cleavage
reactions were carried out for 5 min at 50 °C on a substrate
comprised of three separate oligonucleotides that form an overlapping
flap substrate as described under "Experimental Procedures." After
cleavage, the reactions were incubated at 23 °C with or without T4
DNA ligase for 15 min, and the products were resolved on a 15%
polyacrylamide gel. The following 5' nucleases were used; lanes
1 and 2, no 5' nuclease; lanes 3 and
4, AfuFEN; lanes 5 and 6, PfuFEN;
lanes 7 and 8, MjaFEN; lanes 9 and
10, MthFEN; lanes 11 and 12, TaqExo;
lanes 13 and 14, TaqPol; lanes 15 and
16, TthPol. Even-numbered lanes contained 1 unit
of T4 DNA ligase. Lane 17 contains an oligonucleotide with
the expected sequence of the ligation product.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Third Wave
Technologies, Inc., 502 S. Rosa Rd., Madison, WI 53719. Tel.:
608-273-8933; Fax: 608-273-8618; E-mail: mkaiser@twt.com.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Lundquist, R. C.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1982)
Cell
31,
53-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Lyamichev, V.,
Brow, M. A.,
and Dahlberg, J. E.
(1993)
Science
260,
778-783 3.
Kornberg, A.,
and Baker, A.
(1992)
DNA Replication
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. 403-437, Freeman, New York
4.
Lindahl, T.,
Gally, J. A.,
and Edelman, G. M.
(1969)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
62,
597-603 5.
Harrington, J. J.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1235-1246[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Murante, R. S.,
Huang, L.,
Turchi, J. J.,
and Bambara, R. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1191-1196 7.
Robins, P.,
Pappin, D. J.,
Wood, R. D.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
28535-28538 8.
Hosfield, D. J.,
Frank, G.,
Weng, Y.,
Tainer, J. A.,
and Shen, B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27154-27161 9.
Rao, H. G.,
Rosenfeld, A.,
and Wetmur, J. G.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5406-5412 10.
Bhagwat, M.,
Hobbs, L. J.,
and Nossal, N. G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28523-28530 11.
Garforth, S. J.,
and Sayers, J. R.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3801-3807 12.
Harrington, J. J.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1344-1355 13.
Xu, Y.,
Derbyshire, V.,
Ng, K.,
Sun, X. C.,
Grindley, N. D.,
and Joyce, C. M.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
268,
284-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Bambara, R. A.,
Murante, R. S.,
and Henricksen, L. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4647-4650 15.
Turchi, J. J.,
Huang, L.,
Murante, R. S.,
Kim, Y.,
and Bambara, R. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9803-9807 16.
Doherty, A. J.,
Serpell, L. C.,
and Ponting, C. P.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
2488-2497 17.
Lyamichev, V.,
Mast, A. L.,
Hall, J. G.,
Prudent, J. R.,
Kaiser, M. W.,
Takova, T.,
Kwiatkowski, R.,
Sander, T.,
de Arruda, M.,
Arco, D.,
Neri, B. P.,
and Brow, M. A. D.
(1999)
Nature BioTechnology
17,
292-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Gill, S. C.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
182,
319-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Polesky, A. H.,
Steitz, T. A.,
Grindley, N. D.,
and Joyce, C. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
14579-14591 20.
DeMott, M. S.,
Shen, B.,
Park, M. S.,
Bambara, R. A.,
and Zigman, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30068-30076 21.
Hirao, I.,
Nishimura, Y.,
Tagawa, Y.,
Watanabe, K.,
and Miura, K.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
3891-3896 22.
Murante, R. S.,
Rust, L.,
and Bambara, R. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30377-30383 23.
Pickering, T. J.,
Garforth, S. J.,
Thorpe, S. J.,
Sayers, J. R.,
and Grasby, J. A.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
730-735 24.
Kim, Y.,
Eom, S. H.,
Wang, J.,
Lee, D. S.,
Suh, S. W.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1995)
Nature
376,
612-616[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Ceska, T. A.,
Sayers, J. R.,
Stier, G.,
and Suck, D.
(1996)
Nature
382,
90-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Mueser, T. C.,
Nossal, N. G.,
and Hyde, C. C.
(1996)
Cell
85,
1101-1112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Hwang, K. Y.,
Baek, K.,
Kim, H. Y.,
and Cho, Y.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
707-713[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Hosfield, D. J.,
Mol, C. D.,
Shen, B.,
and Tainer, J. A.
(1998)
Cell
95,
135-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Shen, B.,
Nolan, J. P.,
Sklar, L. A.,
and Park, M. S.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3332-3338 30.
Bhagwat, M.,
Meara, D.,
and Nossal, N. G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28531-28538 31.
Lyamichev, V.,
Brow, M. A.,
Varvel, V. E.,
and Dahlberg, J. E.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6143-6148
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Hutton, J. A. Roberts, J. C. Penedo, and M. F. White PCNA stimulates catalysis by structure-specific nucleases using two distinct mechanisms: substrate targeting and catalytic step Nucleic Acids Res., October 23, 2008; (2008) gkn745v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Guo, L. Qian, R. Liu, H. Dai, M. Zhou, L. Zheng, and B. Shen Nucleolar Localization and Dynamic Roles of Flap Endonuclease 1 in Ribosomal DNA Replication and Damage Repair Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2008; 28(13): 4310 - 4319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Devos, S. J. Tomanicek, C. E. Jones, N. G. Nossal, and T. C. Mueser Crystal Structure of Bacteriophage T4 5' Nuclease in Complex with a Branched DNA Reveals How Flap Endonuclease-1 Family Nucleases Bind Their Substrates J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2007; 282(43): 31713 - 31724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ivanov, B. R. Chapados, J. A. McCammon, and J. A. Tainer Proliferating cell nuclear antigen loaded onto double-stranded DNA: dynamics, minor groove interactions and functional implications Nucleic Acids Res., November 6, 2006; 34(20): 6023 - 6033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Rossi and R. A. Bambara Reconstituted Okazaki Fragment Processing Indicates Two Pathways of Primer Removal J. Biol. Chem., September 8, 2006; 281(36): 26051 - 26061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|