![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 30, 21471-21477, July 23, 1999
From the The prohormone convertases (PCs) are serine
proteinases responsible for the processing of secretory protein
precursors. PC2 is the only member of this family whose activation
requires intracellular interaction with a helper protein, the
neuroendocrine protein 7B2. In order to gain a better understanding of
the mechanism of proPC2 activation, we have characterized the
structural determinants of 7B2 required for proPC2 activation. We had
already identified a proline-rich binding determinant in the 21-kDa
domain, the portion of 7B2 responsible for proPC2 activation. We have
now investigated the function of the weakly conserved amino-terminal
portion of 21-kDa 7B2 by sequential deletions. Mutant proteins were
analyzed in four assays: binding to proPC2, facilitation of proPC2
maturation, and activation of proPC2 in vivo and in
vitro. We found that the amino-terminal half of 7B2 is not
involved in proPC2 activation, and we identified an active 36-residue
peptide that contains the previously characterized proline-rich
sequence as well as an Endoproteolytic processing is one of the major post-translational
modifications that hormones and neuropeptides precursors must undergo
during their biosynthesis. A family of mammalian subtilisin-like
endoproteases responsible for these processing events has been recently
identified, the prohormone convertases (PCs)1 (reviewed in Refs. 1
and 2). PC1 and PC2 are the prohormone convertases specific for
neuroendocrine cells; both enzymes are active late in the secretory
pathway, i.e. the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and
the secretory granules. Precursors such as proinsulin or
proopiomelanocortin are processed sequentially, first by PC1, then by
PC2 (reviewed in Ref. 3). In agreement with the ordered activity of
these enzymes, PC1 and PC2 have different activation pathways (reviewed
in Ref. 4). Whereas the propeptide of proPC1 is first processed in the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (5-7), as are those of furin (8, 9), PC5
(10), and LPC/PC7/PC8 (11), the proPC2 propeptide is processed only in
the acidic compartments of the TGN/secretory granules. In addition,
proPC2 is the only PC that specifically interacts with a helper
protein, the neuroendocrine-specific protein 7B2 (12-14). We have
demonstrated that this interaction is absolutely required for proPC2
activation, both in vivo in transfected AtT-20 cells (14)
and in 7B2 null mice (16), as well as in vitro (17).
The neuroendocrine protein 7B2 was originally purified from pituitary
extracts (18). It is an 185-residue precursor that is cleaved at a
pentabasic site at residue 155 (Fig. 1), most probably by furin
(19-21). The two domains generated by this cleavage have distinct
functions; the amino-terminal domain of 21 kDa is sufficient for PC2
activation (14), and the COOH-terminal domain of 31 residues is a
potent inhibitor of PC2 activity (22, 23). Based on the homology
between the 90 amino-terminal residues with members of the chaperonin
60 family, 7B2 was originally proposed to act as a molecular chaperone
specific for proPC2 (12). We have already demonstrated that the 90 amino-terminal residues alone cannot bind to proPC2 (14); they could
nonetheless be involved in PC2 activation. Thus, the function of the
amino-terminal half of 7B2 is not yet known. In order to analyze the
role of the amino-terminal half of 7B2 and to better understand the
involvement of 7B2 in PC2 activation, we have investigated the effect
of amino-terminal sequential deletions. Deleted 7B2s were tested in
four functional assays: binding to proPC2; facilitation of its
maturation in stably transfected AtT-20 cells; and activation of PC2
both in vivo, by transient transfection in CHO cells, and
in vitro, using Golgi subcellular fractions enriched in
proPC2. As these experiments demonstrated that the 86 amino-terminal
residues of 7B2 are not required for PC2 activation, we further
investigated the minimum structural determinants of 7B2. We were able
to identify a 36-residue peptide that contains the PPNPCP motif, as
well as an Cell Culture--
AtT-20 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies Inc.) containing 10%
Nuserum (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA), 2.5% fetal calf serum
(Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA), and the appropriate selection
agents, 200 µg/ml G418 (Life Technologies Inc.) and/or 100 µg/ml
hygromycin (Sigma). The AtT-20 cells stably expressing PC2 (AtT-20/PC2)
were provided by R. E. Mains (Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine, Baltimore, MD) (24). The control AtT-20 cells that co-express
PC2 and 7B2 have already been described (14). CHO cells were maintained in Peptide Synthesis--
An automated bench-top simultaneous
multiple solid-phase peptide synthesizer (PSSM 8 system from Shimadzu)
was used for the synthesis of all the peptides by the Fmoc procedure in
NovaSyn TGR resin (Novabiochem, San Diego, CA). Therefore, all peptides were obtained with the carboxyl-terminal carboxyl group in amide form.
A trityl group was used as protection for the 7B2 Mutations and Transfection of Cell Lines--
Mutations were
generated in rat 7B2 cDNA by PCR-mediated methods as described
previously (14). For the cysteine mutation, the primers used for
generating the fragment were 5'- GGCGCAAGCTTCACCATGACCTCAAGGATGG-3' and
5'-CGGCCGGATCCTTATTCTGGCTCCTTCTC-3'; and the primers containing the
mutation were 5'-AGGAGCTCTAGAAAACGCCCCTGAC-3' and
5'-TAGAGCTCCGTCATCTGCAGTTTT-3'. The PCR fragment was cloned into pCEP4
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at the HindIII and
BamHI restriction sites. For the eukaryotic expression of
the amino-terminal deletions, a common carboxyl-terminal primer was
used: 5'-CCGGCGGGCCCGGATCCTTACTGTCCTCCCTTCATC-3', with the following
amino-terminal primers: 5'-GGCGCGCCTATAGTCCACGGACTCCT-3' for the 21-kDa
7B2; 5'-GGCGCGCCCCACGTGTGGAGTACCCA-3' for the 7B230-150
construct; 5'-GGCGCGCCATCGTGGCAGAGTTGACT-3' for the
7B268-150 construct; 5'-GGCGCGCCTACCCAGACCCTCCAAAT-3' for
the 7B286-150 construct. The primers containing the
Purification of Recombinant 7B2s--
Recombinant His-tagged
7B2s were prepared using the QIAexpress system (Qiagen Inc.,
Chatsworth, CA). The DNAs coding for the deleted 7B2s were generated by
PCR using the following primers: a common carboxyl-terminal primer
(5'-GCGGCAAGCTTCTACTGTCCTCCCTTCATCTT-3') and the following
amino-terminal primers: for the 30-150 construct, 5'-CGCGGATCCCCACGTGTGGAGTACCCA-3'; for the 68-150 construct,
5'-GCCGGATCCATCGTGGCAGAGTTG-3'; for the 86-150 construct,
5'-CGCGGATCCTACCCAGACCCTCCAAAT-3'. The PCR fragments were cloned in
pQE30 at the BamHI and HindIII restriction sites.
All sequences were verified by DNA sequencing. Proteins were expressed
in Escherichia coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and
purified with the guanidine HCl method as described previously for
21-kDa 7B2 (26). The formation of an actual disulfide bridge within
recombinant 7B2 was verified by performing SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis under reducing and non-reducing conditions. A distinct
molecular weight shift between these two conditions was detected,
indicating the presence of a disulfide bridge in recombinant 7B2.
Furthermore, the fact that we observed only one band under non-reducing
conditions indicates that 100% of the recombinant 7B2 contains this
disulfide bond.
Metabolic Labeling and Immunoprecipitation--
In order to
investigate the binding of 7B2 to PC2, AtT-20 cells were metabolically
labeled with 0.5 mCi/ml [35S]methionine/cysteine (Promix,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The cells were then lysed in 1% Triton
X-100 in 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 100 mM
NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
p-chloromercuriphenylsulfonic acid (Sigma) and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (Roche Molecular Biochemicals Corp.). 7B2 and PC2 were immunoprecipitated from clarified
extracts with LSU13 and LSU18 antisera as described previously
(17). Immune complexes were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer and
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 8.8% or 15% gels. Gels were
analyzed with a Storm PhosphorImager and ImageQuant software (Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
In Vitro Activation of PC2--
Golgi-enriched subcellular
fractions were prepared from CHO/PC2 cells as described previously
(17). Golgi fractions (1-3 µg of protein) were incubated in 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5, in the presence of 1% Triton
X-100, 5 mM CaCl2 and an inhibitor mixture
composed of 1 µM pepstatin, 0.28 mM
tosylphenylalanine chloromethyl ketone, 1 µM
trans-epoxysuccinic acid (E64), and 0.14 mM
tosyllysyl chloromethyl ketone. Incubations were conducted at 37 °C
for the indicated periods of time. PC2 activity was estimated using 200 µM Pyr-Glu-Arg-Thr-Lys-Arg-methylcoumarin amide as a substrate. Fluorescence was measured with a Cambridge Technology (Cambridge, MA) fluorometer and the amount of released
aminomethylcoumarin was calculated by reference to a free
aminomethylcoumarin standard. In some experiments the incubation was
performed in the presence of 1 µM CT-peptide, a
PC2-specific inhibitor that corresponds to the carboxyl terminus of 7B2
(22). Experiments were reproduced at least three times. The results
presented are the mean (± S.D.) of triplicate measurements of PC2
activity from a representative experiment.
PC2 Activity Determination--
For transient expression
experiments, overnight medium (Opti-MEM, Life Technologies, Inc.) was
collected 48 h after transfection and centrifuged in order to
pellet floating cells. PC2 activity from 25 µl of medium was measured
in 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5, in the presence of 5 mM CaCl2, 0.4% octyl glucoside, and the inhibitor mixture indicated above, using the same substrate. The identity of the enzymatic activity as PC2 was confirmed by measuring the extent of inhibition with 1 µM CT-peptide. Three
independent transfections were performed on duplicate wells, and PC2
activity was assayed in triplicate for each well. The results presented are the mean (± S.D.) of the six measurements of PC2 activity from a
representative experiment.
The 86 Amino-terminal Residues of 7B2 Are Not Involved in PC2
Activation--
We analyzed the role of the amino-terminal half of 7B2
in proPC2 activation by serial deletion (Fig.
1A). As we have already demonstrated that the capacity of 7B2 to activate proPC2 resides in the
150-residue amino-terminal domain referred to as 21-kDa 7B2 (14), we
terminated the constructs at residue 150. In order to target the
truncated 7B2s to the secretory pathway, we introduced cDNAs coding
for the various proteins lacking signal peptides into the pSecTag2
HygroA vector. This plasmid encodes the signal peptide from the murine
Ig
We first tested the interaction of the deleted 7B2s with proPC2 in
stably transfected AtT-20 cells by co-immunoprecipitation after
metabolic labeling. The three mutants bound to proPC2 as efficiently as
the 21-kDa 7B2 (Fig. 1B). In AtT-20 cells, 7B2 binds to
proPC2 in the ER, which increases the transport rate of proPC2 to the
TGN/secretory granules. This increased transport in turn generates a
higher processing rate of the propeptide (14, 17). We tested the
capacity of the truncated 7B2s to facilitate the maturation rate of
proPC2. Co-expression of 7B230-150 and
7B268-150 increased the proteolytic processing of proPC2
as efficiently as the wild type 7B2 (Fig. 1C). On the other
hand, processing of proPC2 in AtT-20 cells co-expressing PC2 and the
shortest 7B286-150 construct was identical to processing
of the propeptide in cells not cotransfected with 7B2 (Fig.
1C).
As these three truncated 7B2s were able to bind to proPC2, we tested
their capacity to activate proPC2 in vivo. For this purpose, we transiently expressed different 7B2 constructs in CHO/PC2 cells. These cells express very high levels of proPC2, as this gene has been
amplified using the dihydrofolate reductase method (25). In addition,
CHO/PC2 cells do not express 7B2 and therefore possess no endogenous
PC2 activity (25). After transient transfection of mutant 7B2
constructs, PC2 activity was tested in the overnight conditioned
medium. In line with their binding to proPC2, the three deleted 7B2s
were able to activate PC2 (Fig.
2A); however, 7B286-150 was not as efficient as 7B230-150
and 7B268-150.
The capacity of these deleted 7B2s to activate proPC2 was confirmed
using an in vitro activation assay, which is based upon the
use of purified Golgi membranes from the same CHO/PC2 cells described
above. We have already characterized this cell-free assay and have
demonstrated that addition of recombinant 21-kDa 7B2 to these membranes
is sufficient to achieve activation of proPC2 (17). The recombinant
7B230-150 and 7B268-150 proteins were able to
activate proPC2 in vitro (Fig. 2B). We were not
able to obtain the recombinant protein corresponding to the shortest of
the truncated 7B2s since it was not expressed in bacteria, perhaps due
to its short size (64 residues).
Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that the 86 amino-terminal residues of 7B2 are not required for 7B2 binding to
proPC2 or for activation of proPC2. In addition, the analysis of proPC2
conversion kinetics shows that the 68-87-residue segment of 7B2 is
required for the increase of proPC2 conversion rate generated by 7B2.
A Peptide Corresponding to Residues 86-121 Is Sufficient for
ProPC2 Activation--
We have previously demonstrated that
carboxyl-terminal deletion of the 21-kDa domain following residue 109 prevents its interaction with proPC2, whereas deletion after residue
121 does not prevent binding to proPC2 (26). We combined these results
with the results of the amino-terminal deletions described above, and
synthesized a set of peptides corresponding to residues 86-121 or to
shorter constructs. The 86-121 peptide contains the PPNPCP motif that we have already identified as a binding determinant (26), as well as
the only disulfide present in mammalian and Xenopus 7B2s, and a COOH-terminal putative The The Disulfide Bond Is Required for PC2 Activation--
Another
feature of the 86-121 peptide is the presence of the sole two cysteine
residues in mammalian 7B2s, which are also conserved in all of the
invertebrate 7B2s cloned thus far (27, 31).2 These
cysteines form a disulfide bond that is apparently not required for
correct processing and for secretion of 7B2 (17, 32). However, in
vivo reduction of the disulfides does prevent binding of 7B2 to
proPC2 (17). In order to determine whether this lack of binding is a
direct result of the reduction of the disulfide bond, we mutated
cysteine 104 into alanine (C104A). This mutant was unable to bind to
proPC2 (Fig. 5A) and was
unable to facilitate its maturation in AtT-20 cells (Fig.
5B). The C104A mutant was also not able to activate proPC2
in transiently transfected CHO/PC2 cells (Fig. 5C). Finally,
the requirement for the 7B2 disulfide bond in proPC2 activation was
confirmed with synthetic peptides in which the cysteines were blocked
by methylation. Our data clearly show that, whereas the 86-121 peptide
could activate PC2 in vitro, the peptide containing
methylated cysteines could not (Fig. 5D). Thus four
different assays demonstrate the necessity for the 7B2 disulfide bond
for binding to proPC2 as well as for activating proPC2.
The production of enzymatically active PC2 requires the
interaction of its proenzyme with the neuroendocrine protein 7B2 (14). Whereas we have been able to delineate the cellular mechanism of the
interaction between proPC2 and 7B2 (14, 17), the analysis at a
molecular level remains puzzling (reviewed in Ref. 4). Interestingly,
although intracellular encounter with 7B2 is required for proPC2
activation, the lack of interaction between these two proteins does not
prevent the cleavage of the PC2 propeptide. However, the mature enzyme
generated under these conditions (lack of intracellular interaction
with 7B2) exhibits absolutely no catalytic activity, and this
particular maturation process has thus been referred to as
"unproductive" propeptide cleavage (16, 17, 33). In order to gain a
better understanding of the molecular mechanism of 7B2-mediated
activation of proPC2, we have investigated the structural requirements
of 7B2. We were able to identify a 36-residue peptide that contains a
proline-rich motif, a disulfide bridge, and an In agreement with our previous study (26), our new peptide data show
that the P91PNPCP96 motif is required for
proPC2 activation. Furthermore, the fact that a peptide which begins at
cysteine 95 was unable to activate proPC2 is in agreement with the
essential role of proline 94 already demonstrated (26). In this
previous study, we had also shown the involvement of residues 109-121
in binding to proPC2. We have now demonstrated the essential role of
the helical structure of this section using mutations that either
disrupt the helix (R116P), or modify the distribution of the residues
on the surface of the helix (+A115) (Fig. 4B). In addition
to providing evidence for the role of the The third structural element required for binding to proPC2 and for PC2
activation is 7B2's only disulfide. This disulfide involves the
cysteine present in the PPNPCP motif. We had already shown that
exchanging the position of this cysteine with the fourth proline
residue of the motif prevented binding to proPC2 and PC2 activation. We
had thus proposed that this effect resulted from the disorganization of
the proline-rich motif. Further work had then demonstrated that, even
though the formation of 7B2 disulfide is not required for 7B2
maturation and secretion (17, 32), the in vivo reduction of
disulfide bridges in newly synthesized proteins prevents the
interaction between 7B2 and proPC2 (17). We have now demonstrated that
the presence of the 7B2 disulfide is required for effective interaction
with proPC2. The most probable hypothesis that explains the effect of
the cysteine 104 mutation is that the disulfide bridge stabilizes the
proline-rich motif in a conformation necessary for binding to proPC2.
We cannot, however, rule out the possibility that the 7B2 disulfide
bridge is more directly involved in the interaction with proPC2 or in PC2 activation, for example by providing a disulfide isomerase activity
to 7B2.
The presence of both the proline-rich motif and the ProPC2 exits from the ER as a proenzyme that is autocatalytically
processed in the acidic compartments of the TGN and secretory granules
(5, 7, 25, 43, 44), whereas the propeptides of the other PCs
are initially processed in the ER. A recent study demonstrated that
furin-cleaved propeptide remains associated with the mature enzyme
(15). These authors also suggested that this interaction could be
required for furin transport out of the ER. If such a hypothesis also
holds true for proPC2, it must occur without actual cleavage of the
propeptide. The binding of 7B2 to several proPC2 determinants could
thus provide an alternative for the formation of a transport-competent
propeptide/mature enzyme complex. 7B2 binding to the proenzyme could
protect proPC2 either from premature unproductive processing, or from
inactivation of the proenzyme due to exposure to an acidic pH. Indeed,
acidification of proPC2-enriched Golgi fractions prior to addition of
recombinant 7B2 completely blocks proPC2 activation (17). 7B2 could
fulfill such a passive role, or it could promote proPC2 activation more actively. In both cases, bringing together several domains of proPC2
through binding to different 7B2 determinants could constitute the
actual mechanism of 7B2-mediated activation of proPC2. Our new data
suggest that a productive interaction between proPC2 and 7B2 requires a
specific conformation not only for proPC2, as previously proposed, but
also for 7B2. The characterization of a 36-residue peptide that
contains this conformation and that is sufficient for effecting proPC2
activation in a cell-free system should prove helpful for the final
molecular analysis of the proPC2 activation mechanism.
We thank Joelle Finley for expert assistance
with cell culture, members of the Lindberg laboratory for helpful
comments, and R. E. Mains for AtT-20/PC2 cells.
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant DK49703 (to I. L.) and by the Fundacao de Amparo
Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo and Conselho Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Technologico-PADCT Project 620498/98-6.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by the Neuroscience Center of Excellence, Louisiana State
University Medical Center.
2
D. Siekhaus and I. Lindberg, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
PC, prohormone
convertase;
CT-peptide, 7B2155-186;
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
TGN, trans-Golgi network;
CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography;
Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl.
A 36-Residue Peptide Contains All of the Information Required for
7B2-mediated Activation of Prohormone Convertase 2*
,
§,
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70112 and the ¶ Department of Biophysics, Escola
Paulista de Medicina, Rua Tres de Maio 100, 04044-020 Sao Paulo, Brazil
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix and the only disulfide bond of 7B2.
Mutation of the
-helix and of the cysteines demonstrated that these
determinants are absolutely required for PC2 activation. Thus, the
186-residue full-length 7B2 rat protein can be functionally reduced to
an internal segment of only 36 residues.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix and a disulfide bridge, which are all absolutely
required for binding to proPC2 and for proPC2 activation.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-minimum essential medium without nucleosides, containing 10%
dialyzed fetal calf serum (Irvine Scientific) and 50 µM
methotrexate (Sigma). CHO cells stably expressing PC2 (CHO/PC2), which
have been amplified by the dihydrofolate reductase method, have already been characterized (25).
-thiol group of
cysteine, except for the synthesis of the peptide 7B2 (86-121) containing methylated cysteines. In this case we used Fmoc
Cys(S-Me)-OH. The final peptides were deprotected and
cleaved from the resin with trifluoroacetic acid containing 0.5%
triisopropylsilene, and purified by semipreparative HPLC on an Econosil
C-18 column (10 µm, 22.5 × 250 mm) using a two-solvent system:
A, trifluoroacetic acid/H2O (1:1000); and B,
trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile/H2O (1:900:100). The
column was eluted at a flow rate of 5 ml/min with a 10 (or 30) to 50 (or 60) % gradient of solvent B over 30 or 45 min. The molecular
weight and purity of synthesized peptides were verified by matrix
assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry
(TofSpec-E, Micromass). For formation of the disulfides, the peptides
were dissolved in water (at a final concentration of about 1 mM), the pH maintained at 7.5, and air oxidation was
allowed to proceed with slow stirring. Aliquots were collected at
different periods of time to monitor the oxidation of the two cysteines
by HPLC and by Ellman's assay.
-helix mutations were 5'-GAGTTCGCAAGCCGAGAATTC-3' and
5'-TCGGCTTGCGAACTCTGCAGTGTC-3' for the +A115 construct, and
5'-TTCAGCCCCGAATTCCAGTTAGAC-3' and 5'-GAATTCGGGGCTGAACTCTGCAGT-3' for
the R116P construct. The PCR fragments generated were cloned into
pSecTag2 HygroA (Invitrogen) at the AscI and
HindIII restriction sites. All cDNAs generated by PCR
were verified by DNA sequencing. Mutant 7B2s were transfected into
AtT-20/PC2 cells using 30 µg of plasmid and 30 µl of Lipofectin (Life Technologies Inc.) in a 10-cm dish. For each construct, three
high-expressing stable clones were selected in hygromycin and used in
the labeling experiments. For transient transfections, CHO/PC2 cells
were transfected using 2 µg of DNA and 5 µl of LipofectAMINE (Life
Technologies Inc.) in 1 ml/35-mm well.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
protein upstream of the multicloning site; the truncated 7B2s are
thus directed to the secretory pathway by a different signal peptide
than that of wild type 7B2. The efficiency of this plasmid in
delivering the truncated 7B2s to the secretory pathway was verified by
the detection of these proteins in the secretion medium (data not
shown).

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The amino-terminal half of 7B2 is not
required for binding to proPC2 but is involved in the facilitation of
its maturation. A, schematic representation of the 7B2
amino-terminal deletions. CT corresponds to the CT-peptide,
the carboxyl-terminal domain of 7B2 that specifically inhibits PC2
activity. The proline-rich sequence PPNPCP and the disulfide bond are
represented. The gray box corresponds to the
putative
-helix. The first residue of each 7B2 construct is
indicated. B and C, binding of 7B2s to
proPC2 and effects on proPC2 maturation. AtT-20 cells expressing PC2
alone (
) or co-expressing PC2 and wild type 7B2 (WT) or
7B230-150 (30), 7B268-150
(68), or 7B286-150 (86) were
radiolabeled for 20 min and chased for either 30 min (B) or
120 min (C). PC2 was immunoprecipitated under native
(B) or denaturing (C) conditions, and proteins
were separated by SDS-PAGE. The proPC2 and PC2 bands were quantitated
after a 120-min chase, and the ratio of proPC2/(proPC2 + PC2) was
calculated and shown on the bottom of the gel (C). Note that
the position of endogenous 7B2 is shown (21 kDa 7B2); this
protein is barely detectable in cells not expressing exogenous
constructs.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The amino-terminal half of 7B2 is not
required for PC2 activation. A, in vivo
activation of PC2. PC2 activity was assayed in the overnight medium of
CHO/PC2 cells transiently transfected with the control plasmid
(C), or with the plasmids expressing 21-kDa 7B2
(WT), 7B230-150 (30),
7B268-150 (68), or 7B286-150
(86). Activity was detected after a 60-min incubation, in
the absence (open bars) or presence
(filled bars) of 1 µM CT peptide, a
PC2-specific inhibitor. B, in vitro activation of
PC2. Golgi fractions from CHO/PC2 cells were incubated in the presence
of recombinant 21-kDa 7B2 (open circles),
7B230-150 (open squares), or
7B268-150 (open triangles).
Alternatively, incubations were performed in the presence of 1 µM CT peptide at the highest concentration for each
recombinant protein (filled symbols). PC2
activity was measured after a 120-min incubation under the conditions
described under "Materials and Methods."
-helix. The various deletions in the
86-121 peptide were thus designed to selectively remove these three
determinants (Fig. 3A). The
peptides were tested in the in vitro Golgi membrane proPC2
activation assay. The synthetic peptides (5 µM final
concentration) were added to CHO/PC2 cell Golgi membranes, and the pH
was lowered to 5 for measurement of PC2 activity. The 86-121 sequence
was the only peptide that could activate proPC2 (Fig. 3B).
All of the other peptides were not able to effect PC2 activation,
including those with deletions within the proline-rich sequence
(95-121) and those with deletions within the
-helix (86-112). On a
molar basis, the 86-121 peptide was almost as efficient as the entire
amino-terminal 7B2 domain in activating proPC2 in vitro
(Fig. 3C).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A 36-residue peptide is sufficient for proPC2
activation. A, schematic representation of the
synthetic peptides tested for in vitro activation of proPC2. The
proline-rich sequence PPNPCP and the disulfide bond are represented.
The gray box corresponds to the
-helix. The
peptides are named according to their position in the rat 7B2 sequence.
B, in vitro activation of PC2. Golgi fractions
from CHO/PC2 cells were incubated in the presence of 5 µM
(final concentration) of the various synthetic peptides. PC2 activity
was detected after a 120-min incubation, in the absence
(open bars) or presence (filled
bars) of 1 µM CT peptide. C,
dose-response curve. Golgi fractions were incubated with increasing
concentrations of recombinant 21-kDa 7B2 (filled
circles) or the 86-121 peptide (open
circles). PC2 activity was measured after a 120-min
incubation.
-Helix Present in the 86-121 Peptide Is Required for PC2
Activation--
We then investigated the involvement of the
-helix
in PC2 activation. The recent cloning of 7B2 from Caenorhabditis
elegans (27) and Drosophila
melanogaster2 showed
that this putative
-helix is conserved, even though the overall
conservation of 7B2 through evolution is quite poor. In order to test
the requirement for the
-helix, we introduced two mutations: the
replacement of an arginine by a proline (R116P), which should disrupt
the helical structure, and the insertion of an alanine at position 115 (+A115), which should preserve the helical structure but modify the
distribution of the residues on its surface (Fig.
4A). The helical wheel
projection of residues 108-121 shows that two conserved phenylalanines
(one of which is a tyrosine in Xenopus laevis and C. elegans) are located on the same face of the helix (Fig.
4B). Three negatively charged residues neighbor the
phenylalanines, but these negatively charged residues are not conserved
in other species. The insertion of an alanine between these two
phenylalanines (+A115) results in the shift of one of the two
phenylalanines on the other side of the helix (Fig. 4B). The
predicted effects of these mutations were confirmed by different
secondary structure prediction programs (28-30). Mutated 7B2s were
tested for their ability to promote PC2 activation in vivo
using transient transfection in CHO/PC2 cells (Fig. 4C).
Both
-helix mutations prevented PC2 activation, confirming that both
the
-helix structure and the distribution of the residues at the
surface of the helix are important. To confirm these results, we
synthesized a corresponding 86-121 peptide mutated in the helix by
insertion of an alanine at the same position (+A115). In addition, we
mutated either one (F114A) or both (F114A/F118A) phenylalanine residues
into alanine. As a positive control, we also replaced arginine-116 by
an alanine (R116A); this mutation, unlike R116P, is not predicted to
disrupt the helical structure (28-30). These synthetic peptides were
tested for their capacity to activate PC2 in vitro using the
Golgi membrane assay (Fig. 4D). The +A115 mutant and the two
phenylalanine mutants could only activate PC2 at 20-30% of the
activity of the control 86-121 peptide (Fig. 4D). This
result suggests that the presence of the two hydrophobic residues on
one face of the helix constitutes a determinant directly involved in
proPC2 binding or PC2 activation. The R116A mutation had no effect on
PC2 activation (Fig. 4D), thus confirming that the effect of
the R116P mutation was due to the disruption of the helical structure
and not to the role of the arginine residue itself.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The
-helix is
required for proPC2 activation. A, sequences of the
wild type (WT) and mutant
-helices. B, helical
wheel projections of residues 108-121. Schematic representation of the
putative
-helix in wild type 7B2 (WT) and in the +A115
mutant 7B2. C, in vivo activation of proPC2. PC2
activity was assayed in the overnight medium of CHO/PC2 cells
transiently transfected with the control plasmid (C), 21-kDa
7B2 (WT), or the +A115 or R116P 7B2 mutants. Enzyme activity
was detected in the absence (open bars) or
presence (filled bars) of 1 µM
CT-peptide after a 240-min incubation. D, in
vitro activation of proPC2. Golgi fractions were incubated in the
presence of 5 µM wild type 86-121 peptide
(open circles), the +A115 (crosses),
the F114A (open triangles), F114A/F118A
(inverted open triangles), or the
R116A (open squares) peptides. Alternatively,
incubations were performed with each peptide in the presence of 1 µM CT peptide (filled symbols). In
this case, the values are shown only for the 300-min incubation
periods.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The 7B2 disulfide bond is required for proPC2
binding, for the facilitation of proPC2 maturation, and for PC2
activation. A and B, binding of 7B2s to
proPC2 and proPC2 maturation kinetics. AtT-20 cells expressing PC2
alone (
) or co-expressing PC2 and wild type 7B2 (WT) or
the C104A mutant 7B2 (C/A) were radiolabeled for 20 min and
chased for 30 min (A) or 120 min (B). PC2 and 7B2
were immunoprecipitated under native (A) or denaturing
(B) conditions, and proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. The
proPC2 and PC2 bands were quantitated after a 120-min chase and the
ratio of proPC2/(proPC2 + PC2) was calculated and indicated on the
bottom of the gel (B). C, in
vivo activation of proPC2. PC2 activity was assayed in the
overnight medium of CHO/PC2 cells transiently transfected with the
control plasmid (C), 21-kDa 7B2 (WT) cDNA, or
the C104A mutant 7B2 (CA) cDNA. Activity was detected in
the absence (open bars) or presence
(filled bars) of 1 µM CT peptide
after a 60-min incubation period. D, in vitro
activation of proPC2. Golgi fractions were incubated in the presence of
5 µM wild type 86-121 peptide or cysteine-methylated
86-121 peptide. Incubations were performed with each peptide in the
absence (open bars) or presence
(filled bars) of 1 µM
CT-peptide.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix. These three
determinants are necessary and sufficient to generate a proPC2 species
capable of actual activation. This 36-residue peptide (position
86-121) is not localized in the amino-terminal half of 7B2, which is
homologous to the chaperonin 60 GroEL (12). The lack of importance of
this chaperone-like domain for proPC2 activation is in agreement with
its weak conservation through evolution. Whereas the sequences of
X. laevis (34) and mammalian 7B2s (35-37) share more than
90% homology, the recent cloning of invertebrate 7B2s, from
Lymnea stagnalis (31), C. elegans (27), and
D. melanogaster2 shows no significant
conservation in the amino-terminal half of these 7B2s. Whereas
7B286-150, which excludes the 7B2 chaperone-like domain,
could not facilitate proPC2 maturation, the 7B268-150
construct was active. These results support the idea that, even though
the 7B2 chaperone-like domain is not involved in PC2 activation, the
segment corresponding to residues 68-86 of this domain is involved in
the facilitation of proPC2 maturation. The role of the
NH2-terminal half of 7B2 therefore remains unclear. It is conceivable that, in addition to its role in proPC2 activation, 7B2 is
involved in another regulatory function. Our recent analysis of 7B2
null mice showing that this null exhibits a much more severe phenotype
than the PC2 null supports the notion that 7B2 may have non-PC2-related
roles, which relate to the regulation of either the development or the
secretory activity of the intermediate pituitary (16). Such roles could
potentially be carried out by the NH2-terminal portion of
the molecule, although this idea is purely speculative at present.
-helix, we have identified
important residues in this structure. The helical wheel projection of
residues 108-121 shows the presence of three negatively charged
residues next to two hydrophobic residues (phenylalanine), on the same
face of the helix. Whereas the charged residues are not conserved among species, the hydrophobic phenylalanines are, which suggests that they
could be functionally important. In agreement with this conservation, mutation of one or two phenylalanine residue(s) (F114A and F114A/F118A) demonstrates their essential role in activation of proPC2. We thus
propose that these two hydrophobic residues constitute an important
site of interaction between the 7B2
-helix and proPC2.
-helix in a
relatively short peptide suggests that these determinants are involved
in both binding to proPC2 and in activation of PC2. In order to test
the possibility that one determinant would be responsible for binding
only, we performed competition experiments using the control 86-121
peptide and the deleted peptides that contain either the proline-rich
motif alone (86-100), or this motif and the disulfide (86-107) or the
disulfide and the
-helix (95-121). None of these deleted peptides
was able to significantly reduce the PC2 activation induced by the
86-121 peptide, even when used at a concentration in 100-fold excess
(data not shown). These results suggest that the 86-121 peptide must
acquire a specific conformation that involves all three structural
determinants, or that these three determinants bind efficiently to
proPC2 when they interact with different sites on proPC2. The previous
studies that were aimed at identifying PC2 determinants responsible for binding 7B2 concluded that this interaction most probably involves several domains of proPC2 (33, 38, 39). The involvement of different
7B2 structural determinants is in agreement with such a conclusion.
There are, however, still no data available concerning the crystal
structure of any PC, and the structural study of these enzymes is based
on the model of the related enzyme subtilisin (40-42).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Supported by Grant RSDA00204 from the National Institute on Drug
Abuse. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical
Center, 1901 Perdido St., New Orleans, LA 70112. Tel.: 504-568-4799;
Fax: 504-568-6598; E-mail: ilindb@lsumc.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Seidah, N. G.,
and Chretien, M.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
244,
171-188
2.
Steiner, D. F.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2,
31-39[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Rouille, Y.,
Duguay, S. J.,
Lund, K.,
Furuta, M.,
Gong, Q.,
Lipkind, G.,
Oliva, A. A., Jr.,
Chan, S. J.,
and Steiner, D. F.
(1995)
Front. Neuroendocrinol.
16,
322-361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Muller, L., and Lindberg, I. (1999) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol.
Biol. 63, in press
5.
Benjannet, S.,
Rondeau, N.,
Paquet, L.,
Boudreault, A.,
Lazure, C.,
Chretien, M.,
and Seidah, N. G.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
294,
735-743
6.
Zhou, Y.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5615-5623 7.
Zhou, A.,
and Mains, R. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17440-17447 8.
Molloy, S. S.,
Thomas, L.,
VanSlyke, J. K.,
Stenberg, P. E.,
and Thomas, G.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
18-33[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Vey, M.,
Schafer, W.,
Berghofer, S.,
Klenk, H. D.,
and Garten, W.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1829-1842 10.
De Bie, I.,
Marcinkiewicz, M.,
Malide, D.,
Lazure, C.,
Nakayama, K.,
Bendayan, M.,
and Seidah, N. G.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
1261-1275 11.
Van de Loo, J.-W. H. P.,
Creemers, J. W. M.,
Bright, N. A.,
Young, B. D.,
Roebroek, A. J. M.,
and Van de Ven, W. J. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27116-27123 12.
Braks, J. A. M.,
and Martens, G. J. M.
(1994)
Cell
78,
263-273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Benjannet, S.,
Savaria, D.,
Chretien, M.,
and Seidah, N. G.
(1995)
J. Neurochem.
64,
2303-2311[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Zhu, X.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1641-1650 15.
Anderson, E. D.,
VanSlyke, J. K.,
Thulin, C. D.,
Jean, F.,
and Thomas, G.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1508-1518[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Westphal, C. H.,
Muller, L.,
Zhou, A.,
Bonner-Weir, S.,
Schambelan, M.,
Steiner, D. F.,
Lindberg, I.,
and Leder, P.
(1999)
Cell
96,
689-700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Muller, L.,
Zhu, X.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
625-638 18.
Hsi, K. L.,
Seidah, N. G.,
De Serres, G.,
and Chretien, M.
(1982)
FEBS Lett.
147,
261-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Ayoubi, T. A. Y.,
van Duijnhoven, H. L. P.,
van de Ven, W. J. M.,
Jenks, B. G.,
Roubos, E. W.,
and Martens, G. J. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
15644-15647 20.
Paquet, L.,
Rondeau, N.,
Seidah, N. G.,
Lazure, C.,
Chretien, M.,
and Mbikay, M.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
294,
23-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Paquet, L.,
Bergeron, F.,
Boudreault, A.,
Seidah, N. G.,
Chretien, M.,
Mbikay, M.,
and Lazure, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19279-19285 22.
Lindberg, I.,
Van den Hurk, W. H.,
Bui, C.,
and Batie, C. J.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
5486-5493[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Van Horssen, A. M.,
Van den Hurk, W. H.,
Bailyes, E. M.,
Hutton, J. C.,
Martens, G. J. M.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14292-14296 24.
Zhou, A.,
Bloomquist, B. T.,
and Mains, R. E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1763-1769 25.
Shen, F.-S.,
Seidah, N. G.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
24910-24915 26.
Zhu, X.,
Lamango, N. S.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23582-23587 27.
Lindberg, I.,
Tu, B.,
Muller, L.,
and Dickerson, I.
(1998)
DNA Cell Biol.
17,
727-734[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Geourjon, C.,
and Deleage, G.
(1994)
Protein Eng.
7,
157-164 29.
Frishman, D.,
and Argos, P.
(1996)
Protein Eng.
9,
133-142 30.
Kneller, D. G.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Langridge, R.
(1990)
J. Mol. Bio.l
214,
171-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Spijker, S.,
Smit, A. B.,
Martens, G. J. M.,
and Geraerts, W. P. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4116-4120 32.
Van Horssen, A. M.,
van Kuppeveld, F. J.,
and Martens, G. J.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
402-409[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Zhu, X.,
Muller, L.,
Mains, R. E.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1158-1164 34.
Martens, G. J.,
Bussemakers, M. J.,
and Jenks, B. G.
(1989)
Eur. J. Biochem.
181,
75-79[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Martens, G. J. M.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
234,
160-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Mbikay, M.,
Grant, S. G. N.,
Sirois, F.,
Tadros, H.,
Skowronski, J.,
Lazure, C.,
Seidah, N. G.,
Hanahan, D.,
and Chretien, M.
(1989)
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
33,
39-45[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Waldbieser, G. C.,
Aimi, J.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1991)
Endocrinology
128,
3228-3236[Abstract]
38.
Benjannet, S.,
Lusson, J.,
Savaria, D.,
Chretien, M.,
and Seidah, N. G.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
362,
151-155[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Benjannet, S.,
Mamarbachi, A. M.,
Hamelin, J.,
Savaria, D.,
Munzer, J. S.,
Chretien, M.,
and Seidah, N. S.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
428,
37-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Siezen, R.,
and Leunissen, J. A.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
501-523[Abstract]
41.
Lipkind, G.,
Gong, Q.,
and Steiner, D. F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13277-13284 42.
Lipkind, G. M.,
Zhou, A.,
and Steiner, D. F.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7310-7315 43.
Guest, P. C.,
Arden, S. D.,
Bennett, D. L.,
Clark, A.,
Rutherford, N. G.,
and Hutton, J. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
22401-22406 44.
Lamango, N. S.,
Apletalina, E.,
Liu, J.,
and Lindberg, I.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
362,
275-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-N. Lee and I. Lindberg 7B2 Prevents Unfolding and Aggregation of Prohormone Convertase 2 Endocrinology, August 1, 2008; 149(8): 4116 - 4127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-N. Lee, B. Peng, R. Desjardins, J. E Pintar, R. Day, and I. Lindberg Strain-specific steroidal control of pituitary function J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2007; 192(3): 515 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-N. Lee, J. R. Hwang, and I. Lindberg Neuroendocrine Protein 7B2 Can Be Inactivated by Phosphorylation within the Secretory Pathway J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3312 - 3320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Apletalina, L. Muller, and I. Lindberg Mutations in the Catalytic Domain of Prohormone Convertase 2 Result in Decreased Binding to 7B2 and Loss of Inhibition with 7B2 C-terminal Peptide J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2000; 275(19): 14667 - 14677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Oyarce and B. A. Eipper Cell Type-specific Storage of Dopamine beta -Monooxygenase J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2000; 275(5): 3270 - 3278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Hwang, D. E. Siekhaus, R. S. Fuller, P. H. Taghert, and I. Lindberg Interaction of Drosophila melanogaster Prohormone Convertase 2 and 7B2. INSECT CELL-SPECIFIC PROCESSING AND SECRETION J. Biol. Chem., June 2, 2000; 275(23): 17886 - 17893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||