![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21575-21580, July 30, 1999
From the Boston Biomedical Research Institute, Boston,
Massachusetts 02114 and the The 130-kDa myosin I (MI130),
product of the myr-1 gene, is one member of the
mammalian class I myosins, a group of small, calmodulin-binding mechanochemical molecules of the myosin superfamily that translocate actin filaments. Roles for MI130 are unknown. Our
hypothesis is that, as with all myosins, MI130 is designed
for a particular function and hence possesses specific biochemical
attributes. To test this hypothesis we have characterized the enzymatic
properties of MI130 using steady-state and stopped-flow
kinetic analyses. Our results indicate that: (i) the
Mg2+-ATPase activity is activated in proportion to actin
concentration in the absence of Ca2+; (ii) the ATP-induced
dissociation of actin-MI130 is much slower for
MI130 than has been observed for other myosins
( The myosin superfamily has no fewer than 15 members that share
sequence homology in the amino-terminal, so-called "motor," domain, which contains the ATP- and actin-binding sites (1-3). Although qualitatively myosins appear to share the same basic mechanism
of coupling ATP hydrolysis to the movement of actin filaments, studies
indicate that the ways in which they interact with actin and nucleotide
are quantitatively different (4-6). These differences allow for
myosins to function in a variety of situations including muscle
contraction, vesicle transport, cytokinesis, and mediation of cell
surface changes that accompany cell locomotion.
The class I myosins are small, single-headed, nonfilamentous ATPases
(see Ref. 7). In lower eukaryotes, class I myosins are involved in cell
migration, vesicle transport, and polarity determination, which are
processes required for normal cell growth and development (8-12).
Biochemical and molecular biological studies show that a myosin I
family exists in higher cells (see Ref. 7); one member of this family
is the 130-kDa myosin I from rat liver (13), referred to here simply as
MI130.1 Partial
peptide sequence analysis (14) indicates that the 130-kDa polypeptide
is a product of the myr-1 gene cloned from rat
brain (15); MM1 Roles for MI130 are unknown. In NRK cells, MYR-1 localizes
to the plasma membrane and to cell structures involved in movement, such as lamellipodia and membrane ruffles (18). Analyses of subcellular
fractions of rat liver suggest that the majority of membrane-associated
MI130 is found with the plasma membrane and microsomal
fractions, but it appears that most of the MI130 is
associated with the
cytoskeleton.2
Divergence in sequence of the carboxyl termini among the mammalian
class I myosins might indicate that they are designed to bind different
loads and perhaps to perform different functions. Similarly, although
homology in the motor domain among the 130-kDa polypeptide and two
other mammalian isoforms, namely MM1 This report on MI130 is the first detailed kinetic analysis
of a mammalian myosin I and represents the first step in a long-range plan designed ultimately to compare and contrast the kinetic properties of mammalian class I myosins. The study is made possible by adapting established transient kinetic methods to use the small quantities of
myosin I that are available from rat liver. Our analysis shows that
MI130 interacts with nucleotide and actin in much the same
way as other myosins that have been studied. However, it is much slower
than any other myosin II, the two Acanthamoeba class I
myosins, and avian brush border myosin I (BBMI). Our results suggest
that in addition to being very slow kinetically, this myosin I may be designed for efficient tension maintenance.
Preparation of Proteins and Reagents--
MI130 was
isolated from rat liver by gel filtration, anion, and cation exchange
chromatography as described previously (13). Fractions containing
purified MI130 were pooled and, in some cases, concentrated
in a Centricon 10 microconcentrator (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA).
After protein determination by colorimetry (Bio-Rad protein assay)
using serum albumin as a standard, sucrose was added to 3 mg/ml, and
the samples were frozen in liquid N2 prior to storage at
Enzyme Kinetics--
All kinetic experiments were performed at
19 °C in 20 mM MOPS, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol at pH 7.0 with a Hi-Tech Scientific SF-61
single mixing stopped-flow system using a 100-watt Xe/Hg lamp and a
monochromator for wavelength selection. Pyrene and mant-ADP
fluorescences were excited at 365 nm, and emission was detected after
passing through a Schott (Mainz, Germany) KV 389 nm cut-off. The stated
concentrations of reactants are those present after mixing in the
stopped-flow observation cell. Stopped-flow data were fitted to
exponentials by a nonlinear least-squares curve fit using software
provided by Hi-Tech Scientific.
ATP Hydrolysis--
The release of Pi was measured
for 2-3 µg of myosin I using a colorimetric assay described by
Pollard (26). The Ca2+-ATPase activity of myosin I was
measured in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 5 mM CaCl2, and KCl
concentrations ranging from 30 to 500 mM. The
K+-EDTA-ATPase activity was measured in 10 mM
Tris, pH 7.0, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA,
and KCl ranging from 30 to 500 mM. The actin-activated
Mg2+-ATPase activity was determined in 10 mM
Tris, pH 7.0, 30 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM MgCl2, either 1 mM EGTA or 1 mM EGTA and 1.1 mM CaCl2, and
F-actin from 0-30 µM. All reactions were done at
37 °C. Standard curves were generated with known amounts of
phosphate. Controls included samples containing no myosin I. For
actin-activated ATPase measurements, the reported values were corrected
for activity because of the presence of actin. Data are expressed as
s Data Interpretation--
As shown in Scheme
1, we interpret the kinetics of myosin I
(M) interacting with nucleotide (T, ATP; D, ADP) in terms of the model
described by Bagshaw et al. (27), where
k+i and
k ATPase Measurements--
The Mg2+-ATPase activity of
MI130 was very low and difficult to quantify with
precision, but estimates suggest a kcat of < 0.01 s
The ATPase activity was also determined in K+-EDTA and
Ca2+, two nonphysiological conditions used historically to
characterize conventional myosin II. At 30 mM KCl the
kcat in EDTA of MI130 was 1.43 ± 0.021 s Transient Kinetics--
The ATP-induced dissociation of
MI130-actin complexes can be conveniently followed by
monitoring the fluorescence of a pyrene label covalently attached to
Cys-373 of actin. Fig. 1A
shows the resulting change in the fluorescence signal upon mixing 200 µM ATP with 25 nM MI130 and 25 nM phalloidin-stabilized pyrene-actin. At this
concentration of ATP the change in the fluorescence can be described by
a single exponential with kobs = 1.6 s
The influence of ADP on the ATP-induced dissociation of
actin-MI130 is shown in Fig.
2. Addition of 2.5 mM ATP to
apyrase-treated 25 nM pyrene-labeled
actin-MI130 results in a rapid change in fluorescence. The
data for this preparation of protein fit a single exponential with
kobs = 22.5 s
The amplitude of the ATP-induced dissociation reaction can be used to
estimate the affinity of pyrene-actin for a myosin as shown by Kurzawa
and Geeves (31). However, such a titration experiment requires a
considerable amount of MI130, which is limiting because it
is present in cells in only small amounts. We therefore used a
competition experiment with the well characterized rabbit skeletal
muscle myosin S1 to provide an estimate of the affinity of
MI130 for actin. The addition of 50 µM ATP to
25 nM pyrene-actin and 50 nM MI130
in the stopped-flow spectrofluorometer led to a dissociation reaction
with a kobs of 0.74 s
Mixing 2.5 µM mant-ATP with 250 nM
MI130 led to a 3.3% increase in fluorescence when the
reaction was monitored by exciting the intrinsic protein fluorescence
at 295 nm and measuring the energy transfer to the mant group (Fig.
4A). The observed reaction
occurred at 0.28 s The ATPase activity and transient kinetics data presented here
show that MI130 interacts with both ATP and actin in a
manner similar to that of other well characterized myosins, with the
exception that many of the events are much slower. Although restricted
in the quantity of available purified myosin I, the current studies
were possible because of (i) the high sensitivity of pyrene-labeled
actin to interactions between actin and myosin I complexes and (ii) the use of phalloidin to stabilize F-actin, thereby allowing many transient
measurements using only microgram quantities of protein (31).
A major observation resulting from these studies is that the
ATP-induced dissociation of actin-MI130
(K1k+2 = 0.023 × 106 M What is responsible for the slow phase observed in the ATP dissociation
of actin-MI130 is unknown. Although the rate is similar to
that of ADP dissociation, it could not be eliminated with extensive
treatment with apyrase. Indeed, actin-MI130 treated with 40 µM ADP to eliminate the fast phase, then treated with
apyrase, resulted in restoration of the original fast phase, showing
that the ADP had been removed; however, the slow phase remained. This
slow component may represent a contaminating myosin in the preparation,
damaged MI130, MI130 without a full complement
of calmodulin, or an alternately spliced version of MI130.
The examination of the kinetic properties of MI130
expressed in baculovirus will soon allow us to rule out some of these possibilities.
The affinity of MI130 for actin is similar to that observed
for all myosins examined so far. Interestingly, the affinity of
MI130 for actin is reduced 5-7-fold in the presence of
ADP. This behavior is similar to that displayed by smooth muscle myosin
S1 (6) and differs markedly from skeletal muscle (30) and cardiac
muscle myosins (29). Thus, coupling between the ADP and actin binding sites resembles that found with smooth muscle myosin II and
Dictyostelium cytoplasmic myosin II (<10-fold (5)) and
differs from that of skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle myosin II
(>20-fold). It has been proposed that this low level of coupling
between actin and ADP binding is a property of myosins designed for
more efficient bearing of tension rather than fast contraction (6), and
so it may not be surprising that members of the myosin I family should have more in common with smooth muscle and cytoplasmic myosin IIs than
with fast skeletal muscle myosin II (see Fig.
5 and below).
The ATPase results described here are consistent with those from an
earlier look at the ATPase activity of MI130 (13). Also,
although performed under slightly different buffer conditions, the rate
of ATP hydrolysis of MI130 resembles qualitatively and
quantitatively that previously observed for BBMI. Conzelman and
Mooseker (34) reported rates of 0.644 s In contrast to the inhibitory effect on both the actin activation of
the steady state Mg2+-ATPase activity and motility, the
transient kinetic parameters measured show no major sensitivity to
Ca2+ (2-3-fold maximum) and, in fact, both
K1k+2 and
k Another feature that MI130 shares with smooth muscle myosin
II and BBMI is that the molecules produce movement in two steps, as
revealed by an optical tweezers transducer (40, 41). The second step is
significantly greater for MI130 and BBMI (5.5 nm) than for
smooth muscle myosin II (2-3 nm). It has been proposed that the first
step in the power stroke is associated with Pi release,
whereas the second step represents ADP release. As expected, the time
between the mechanical steps (300 ms, MI130; 120 ms, BBMI)
is in good agreement with 1/k Cremo and Geeves (6) proposed that the high affinity of ADP for A·M,
the structural change accompanying ADP release, and the weak coupling
between actin and ADP affinities for smooth muscle myosin S1 could be
indicative of a strain-sensing ADP release mechanism rather than the
source of an additional power stroke in vivo (Fig. 5). These
features of smooth muscle myosin II are common to MI130.
Because the free energy of ADP release from actin-MI130 is
small (KAD < 10 µM) and may even
be positive at cellular ADP concentrations, a large input of energy
would be required to remove ADP from a myosin head bearing positive strain if the cross-bridge displacement is to be large (Fig. 5).
The amount of energy required to dissociate ADP can be estimated
assuming the elastic energy of the MI130 cross-bridges is
similar to that of skeletal muscle myosin II (0.5 milli-Newton
m The large displacement of the head and the tight affinity of ADP for
actin-MI130 may indicate that MI130 is designed
primarily to bear a load rather than to shorten. ADP would effectively
remain trapped on MI130 cross-bridges bearing a significant
load. This role would be also consistent with the slow kinetics of
MI130. The hypothesis outlined here and in Fig. 5, namely
that the slow release of ADP from myosin is a strain-sensing mechanism, is entirely consistent with the data and represents a testable hypothesis. The prediction is that the time between the two steps of
the mechanical event observed with the laser trap for the interaction of MI130 with actin (40) will increase with the stiffness
of the trap.
Previous studies show that MI130 is present at the plasma
membrane and in association with cell protrusions such as lamellipodia and cell ruffles (15). In rat liver, 30% of the MI130 is
membrane-bound with 70% presumably in association with the cytoskeleton.2 Additionally, in vitro studies
have shown that MI130 cross-links actin filaments (13).
Given the kinetic and structural properties of this isoform, it is
plausible to believe that MI130 is involved in the
maintenance of tension within the cytoplasm. Other evidence for a
similar role of a myosin I comes from studies in
Dictyostelium in which over-expression of MyoB results in a decrease in the fluidity of pseudopodia (12).
The hospitality extended to L. M. C. by
Max-Planck-Institut-Dortmund is greatly appreciated. We are grateful to
Dr. Justin Molloy, University of York, for helpful discussion.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM56130 and a grant from the March of Dimes (to L. M. C.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Current address and to whom correspondence should be addressed:
Dept. of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ UK.
Tel: 44-1227-827597; Fax: 44-1227-763912; E-mail: m.a.geeves@ukc.ac.uk.
2
M. F. Balish, E. F. Moeller III & L. M. Coluccio, submitted for publication.
The abbreviations used are:
MI130, 130-kDa myosin I;
BBMI, brush border myosin I;
S1, subfragment 1;
mant, 2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl);
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
A, actin;
M, myosin;
D, ADP.
Transient Kinetic Analysis of the 130-kDa Myosin I (MYR-1 Gene
Product) from Rat Liver
A MYOSIN I DESIGNED FOR MAINTENANCE OF TENSION?*
§
Max-Planck-Institut für
Molekulare Physiologie, D-44026 Dortmund, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Ca2+, second order rate constant of ATP binding,
1.7 × 104 M
1
s
1; maximal rate constant, 32 s
1); (iii)
ADP binds to actin-MI130 with an affinity of ~10
µM and competes with ATP-induced dissociation of
actin-MI130; the rate constant of ADP release from
actin-MI130 is 2 s
1; (iv) the rates of the
ATP-induced dissociation of actin-MI and ADP release are 2-3 times
greater in the presence of CaCl2, indicating a sensitivity
of motor activity to Ca2+; and (v) the affinity of
MI130 for actin (15 nM) is typical of that
observed for other myosins. Together, these results indicate that
although MI130 shares some characteristics with other
myosins, it is well adapted for maintenance of cortical tension.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
is its orthologue from mouse (16).
Purified MI130 has six associated calmodulins (14) as
predicted by the DNA sequence (15). MI130 binds F-actin in
an ATP-regulated manner (13) and translocates actin filaments in
vitro (17). Inhibition of motility observed at high
[Ca2+] is overcome upon the addition of exogenous
calmodulin (17).
(20) or the 110-kDa
myosin I (13) and MYR-4 (21) or the 105-kDa myosin I (14), is 70%, the
amino acid differences in the motor domain might reflect distinct
properties and hence disparate cellular roles for these myosins. As a
result, detailed mechanistic analyses may assist in defining the
cellular functions of these isoforms.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C. Rabbit skeletal myosin subfragment 1 (S1) was prepared by
chymotryptic digestion as described by Weeds and Taylor (22). Actin was
prepared according to Spudich and Watt (23) and, in some cases, labeled
with pyrene at Cys-374 according to Criddle et al. (24). The
2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl) derivatives of
ADP (mant-ADP) and ATP (mant-ATP) were prepared according to Hiratsuka
(25).
1 assuming a molecular weight of 232,000 for the myosin
I heavy chain and its six associated calmodulins.
i are the forward and
reverse rate constants, respectively, and Ki
(k+i
/k
i ) represents the equilibrium
constant of the ith reaction. Normal characters are used to
indicate reactions involving MI130, and bold characters
refer to reactions involving actin-MI130. ATP binds rapidly
to myosin in a two-step reaction before ATP is reversibly hydrolyzed on
the protein. This results in a conformational change that limits
phosphate release and the faster ADP release. The ATP-induced
dissociation of actin-MI130 and the inhibition of the
reaction by ADP have been interpreted in terms of the models developed
by Millar and Geeves (28) and Siemankowski and White (29). As shown in
Scheme 1B, ATP binds rapidly and reversibly to
actin-MI130 and is followed by a rate-limiting
isomerization (k+2) of the complex, which leads
to rapid dissociation of actin. ADP competes with ATP for the
nucleotide binding site. The dissociation constants of actin for
MI130, actin for MI130.ADP, and ADP for
actin-MI130 are KA,
KDA, and KAD,
respectively.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Scheme 1.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 in both the presence and absence of
Ca2+. The Mg2+-ATPase activity was
significantly activated by actin only in the absence of
Ca2+. In 30 mM KCl the ATPase rate was
approximately linearly related to the actin concentration over the
range of 0-30 µM with a steady-state ATPase rate of
0.247 ± 0.003 s
1 at 30 µM actin.
1 and was inhibited at higher KCl
concentrations. At 500 mM the activity was decreased to
25%. In contrast, the Ca2+-ATPase activity was 0.4 ± 0.02 s
1 and almost independent of KCl concentration up to
500 mM.
1 and an amplitude of +4%. At concentrations above 500 µM, the reaction is biphasic with both phases having
similar amplitudes (Fig. 1B, 1 mM ATP). The low
concentrations of MI130 used allowed the reaction to be
followed over a wide range of ATP concentrations from 25 µM to 10 mM using only a few micrograms of
protein. The dependence of the kobs for both
phases of the reaction on ATP concentration is shown in Fig.
1C in both the presence and absence of calcium. The fast
phase of both data sets shows a hyperbolic dependence on [ATP] with a
maximal observed rate (k+2) of 74 and 32 s
1 and 3.2 and 1.9 mM ATP required for half
maximal saturation (1/K1) with and without
Ca2+, respectively. The values of
1/K1 are of the order measured for all other
myosins studied, but k+2 is much slower than any
other myosin characterized so far (Table
I). The slow phase saturates at a
kobs of 6 and 2 s
1 with and
without Ca2+, respectively. The kobs
corresponds to the rate constant of ADP dissociation from
actin-MI130 in each case (see below) and led us to believe
that the protein was purified with ADP bound in the nucleotide pocket.
The amplitude of the slow phase varied among preparations and was
normally in the range of 10-60% of the total amplitude. Extensive
treatment with apyrase only partially reduced the amplitude of the slow phase, raising the possibility that the slow phase may have two components (see "Discussion").

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
ATP-induced dissociation of pyrene-labeled
actin-MI130. A and B, 25 nM MI130 was incubated with 25 nM
phalloidin-stabilized pyrene-labeled actin, and pyrene fluorescence was
measured immediately following the addition of ATP. A,
dissociation of actin-MI130 by 0.2 mM ATP
resulted in an increase in fluorescence, and the best fit to a single
exponential is superimposed with kobs = 3.1 s
1 and an amplitude of 4%. B, increasing the
ATP to 1.0 mM gave a biphasic reaction with
kobs = 1.8 and 12.9 s
1 with
amplitudes of 1.7 and 2.8%, respectively. C, the dependence
of kobs on [ATP] and Ca2+. The
measurements were repeated in either 1 mM EGTA
(
Ca2+, circles) or 0.1 mM free Ca2+ (+Ca2+,
squares) and kobs plotted as a
function of [ATP]. The best fits to kobs = K1k+2[ATP]/(1 + K1[ATP]) for the fast phase (closed
symbols) are superimposed. The data were well described by
hyperbolas with maximal observed rates (k+2) of
74 and 32 s
1 and 3.2 and 1.9 mM ATP required
for half-maximal saturation (1/K1)
with and without Ca2+, respectively. The values for
kobs for the slow phase (open
symbols) are not fitted.
Transient kinetic analysis of rat 130-kDa myosin I
1. If, in place of
apyrase, 25 µM ADP was added, the
kobs was reduced to 5.8 s
1.
Increasing either ADP or ATP concentration did not change the kobs (data not shown), suggesting that it is the
ADP release rate (k
AD) that is being
monitored. At lower ADP concentrations, a biphasic reaction was
observed with kobs of 22 and 6 s
1.
Preliminary analysis of the amplitude dependence on ADP concentration suggests an affinity of <10 µM. Establishing the
conditions under which the ADP concentration was less than 10 µM was difficult because of the presence of an unknown
level of ADP contamination. Repeating the experiment in the absence of
Ca2+ gave a slower rate of ADP release of 2 s
1 with a similar affinity of <10 µM. This
affinity is much tighter than observed for skeletal muscle myosin II
and amoeboid myosin Ia (29, 30) but similar to that observed for smooth
muscle myosin II (6) and BBMI (Table I). The observation that the total
amplitude of the dissociation reaction was almost independent of ADP
suggests that the affinity of actin for MI130.ADP is much
less than 1 µM.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Influence of ADP on the ATP-induced
dissociation of actin-MI130. Addition of 2.5 mM ATP to 25 nM pyrene-labeled
actin-MI130 in the absence of ADP (i.e.
apyrase-treated) resulted in a rapid change in fluorescence. The data
fit a single exponential with a kobs = 22.5 s
1. Addition of 25 µM ADP reduced the
kobs to 5.8 s
1.
1 (Fig.
3). The addition of 50 µM
ATP to 25 nM pyrene-actin and 50 nM S1 gave a
kobs of 80 s
1. Both reactions had
a similar amplitude of 3.8%, suggesting a comparable affinity if both
myosins quench the pyrene fluorescence to a similar extent. When 25 nM actin was mixed with 50 nM MI130
and 200 nM S1 before mixing with ATP, a biphasic reaction
was observed with 68% of the reaction occurring at 80 s
1
(the kobs for A·S1 dissociation) and 32% at
0.79 s
1 (the kobs for
A·MI130 dissociation). The amplitudes of the dissociation
reaction were dependent upon the S1 concentration as shown in Fig.
3B. It is important to note that in Fig. 3B it is
the concentration of the proteins in the syringe that is plotted,
because the system is at equilibrium before the ATP is added. This
usage is the opposite of the normal convention used for all of the
other figures. When the fast and slow reactions have the same amplitude
(i.e. the two myosins bind the same amount of actin in the
mixture), then KdS1/KdMI130 = [S1]/[MI130] = ([S1]0
0.5[A]0)/([MI130]0
0.5[A]0). This equation was valid at 100 nM
S1 in the absence of ADP and at approximately 300 nM S1 in
the presence of 30 µM ADP. Under the experimental
conditions, the affinity of S1 for actin is 30 nM in the
absence of ADP (31) and 600 nM in the presence of ADP,
leading to an affinity of pyrene-actin for MI130 of 13 nM (
ADP) and 60-110 nM (+ADP). The presence
of Ca2+ had little influence on the measured affinities
(data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
ATP-induced dissociation of
actin-MI130 and actin-S1. A, the addition
of 50 µM ATP to 25 nM pyrene-actin and 50 nM MI130 resulted in a dissociation reaction
with kobs of 0.74 s
1. The addition
of 50 µM ATP to 25 nM pyrene-actin and 50 nM S1 gave a kobs of 80 s
1. Both reactions had a similar amplitude of 3.8%. When
25 nM pyrene-actin was premixed with 50 nM
MI130 and 200 nM S1, a biphasic reaction was
observed with 68% of the reaction occurring at 80 s
1 and
32% at 0.79 s
1. B, dependence of the fast and
slow amplitudes of the dissociation reaction on [S1] in the syringe
(see "Results") and ADP. The fast and slow reactions have the same
amplitudes at 100 nM S1 in the absence of ADP and at
approximately 300 nM S1 in the presence of 30 µM ADP, leading to an affinity of pyrene-actin for
MI130 of 13 nM (
ADP;
KA) and 60-110 nM (+ADP;
KDA) (see "Results").
1, but it could only be followed over
the concentration range of 1-2.5 µM mant-ATP. No
reaction could be seen by monitoring the mant fluorescence directly. We
could detect no reaction when monitoring mant-ADP binding over a
similar concentration range. Addition of 5 µM ATP to 100 nM MI130 resulted in a 1.2% increase in
intrinsic protein fluorescence at 0.56 s
1 (Fig.
4B). The reaction could be observed over the ATP
concentration range of 1-15 µM (Fig. 4B,
inset), and the data were consistent with a second order
rate constant, K1k+2, of
0.1 × 106 M
1
s
1. Thus, both ATP and mant-ATP bind with a similar rate
constant and five times faster than the apparent rate of binding to
actin-MI130. No calcium dependence of the reaction was
detected (data not shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Rate of mant-ATP binding to
MI130. A, mixing 2.5 µM
mant-ATP with 250 nM MI130 led to a 3.3%
increase in fluorescence when the reaction was monitored by exciting
the intrinsic protein fluorescence at 295 nm and monitoring the energy
transfer to the mant group. The observed reaction occurred at 0.28 s
1, but it could only be followed over the concentration
range of 1-2.5 µM. No reaction could be seen by
monitoring the mant fluorescence directly. B, rate of ATP
binding to MI130. The addition of 5 µM ATP to
100 nM MI130 resulted in a 1.2% increase in
intrinsic protein fluorescence with kobs = 0.56 s
1. Inset, the plot of
kobs versus [ATP] with a best-fit
straight line superimposed. The intercept is undefined because of the
errors on the data, but the slope defines the second order rate
constant, K1k+2, of
0.1 × 106 M1
s
1.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 s
1) is
slower than has been determined for other myosins. As compared with
BBMI, the closest known relative to MI130 (15), the rate of
ATP-induced dissociation of the actin-MI130 complex is 10%
in the absence of Ca2+ (32). This is largely attributable
to a smaller value of k+2, as the
1/K1 is comparable with that observed
for BBMI. Across the range of myosins listed in Table I,
k+2 for BBMI is similar to amoeboid myosin Ia
(33) and Dictyostelium myosin II (5) and much slower than
the muscle myosins (30). Thus, MI130 is by far the slowest
myosin so far characterized. Similarly, the rate of ATP binding to
MI130 in the absence of actin is 10% that of BBMI, which
in this regard more closely resembles all of the other myosins listed
in Table I. In contrast, both the dissociation rate constant for ADP
from A·M·D (k
AD) and the affinity of ADP
for A·M (KAD) are comparable for
MI130 and BBMI, suggesting that these differences are an
intrinsic property of the protein and not caused by the method of preparation.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Proposed free energy diagram of attached
MI130 cross-bridges. The diagram shows the parabolic
free energy diagrams for elastically distorted myosin cross-bridges
based on those of Hill (19) and Cremo and Geeves (6). The following
biochemically defined pathway is illustrated: A-M·D·Pi
(the pre-force attached or A-state); loss of phosphate to form
A·M·D (more strongly attached, rotated, or rigor-like, R-state);
and loss of ADP to form A·M (also an R-state). The position of the
minimum
G value for the preforce generating, attached or A-state
(A-M·D·Pi) is arbitrarily set to zero, and the minimum
for the postforce R-state (A·M·D) is displaced by +5 nm, the
cross-bridge throw. This produces a positive strain on the
cross-bridge. Loss of ADP from A·M·D to A·M results in a higher
minimum
G value (i.e. work is done to displace ADP at
cellular ADP concentrations of 10-20 µM) and displaced
to the right by 3 nm in the case of smooth muscle myosin II
or 5 nm for MI130. Note that the displacement of ADP from
A·M·D is energetically prohibited unless its cross-bridge loses its
strain. Assuming a similar elasticity, this strain inhibition is more
pronounced for MI130 than for smooth muscle myosin II
because of the larger displacement but similar change in the minimum
G.
1 in
K+-EDTA (575 mM KCl), 1.07 s
1 in
Ca2+, and 0.1 s
1 in Mg2+, with a
2.5-3.5-fold activation in Mg2+ in the presence of actin
(Ca2+- and Mg2+-ATPases in 75 mM
KCl), similar to those reported by Krizek et al. (35) (1.3 s
1 in K+-EDTA, 0.96 s
1 in
Ca2+, and 0.04 s
1 in Mg2+ and a
2-fold activation of the Mg2+-ATPase in the presence of
actin; all in 50 mM KCl). On the other hand, ATP hydrolysis
by the amoeboid myosin I family is significantly faster than
MI130 and more closely resembles that of skeletal muscle
myosin II (33). This resemblance is not surprising because there is
significant diversion in sequence between the mammalian and amoeboid
class I myosins. One particularly noteworthy point is that the presence of Ca2+ eliminates the actin-activated
Mg2+-ATPase activity of MI130. The motor
activities of BBMI and MI130 have been shown to be
inhibited by increasing Ca2+, which causes dissociation of
calmodulin (17, 36), although there is evidence that it is the binding
of Ca2+ to calmodulin that inhibits motility of a related
mammalian myosin I, MM1
(37).
AD are slightly accelerated by
Ca2+. MI130 appears similar to smooth muscle
myosin II (Ref. 38; regulated by phosphophorylation) or the scallop
muscle myosins (Ref. 39; regulated by Ca2+ binding to the
light chains) in that the rate of Pi release from M·D·Pi or A·M·D·Pi is primarily
affected, although effects on ADP release are also reported. Other
events such as ATP binding, actin binding, or ATP hydrolysis on the
protein are relatively little affected.
AD (500 ms MI130, 125 ms, BBMI) given the differences in
experimental conditions. The ADP release step corresponds to the
ADP-dependent structural changes observed in
three-dimensional reconstructions of smooth muscle actomyosin II (42)
and actin-BBMI (43, 44) generated by cryoelectron microscopy and
helical image analysis and by spectroscopy for smooth muscle myosin S1
(45, 46). This argument predicts that a similar or greater structural
change should be observed for MI130; studies to address
this issue are in progress.
1). The energy (E) in the elastic element is
related to the stiffness (k') and the imposed stretch
(x) by E = k'x2/2. If the cross-bridge is
already stretched by 5 nm (the size of the cross-bridge throw
corresponding to the crossover of the A-M·D·Pi and
A·M·D parabolas), then an extra 3- or 5-nm stretch is required to
release ADP for the smooth and MI130 cross-bridges,
respectively. The ratio of the extra spring energy, k'
(x2)/2, to the thermal energy,
RT, then defines the extent of the strain-induced change in
KAD. K'AD = KAD exp(
k'
(x2)/2RT),
where KAD is the equilibrium constant in the
absence of strain, R is Boltzman's constant, and
T is absolute temperature (47). This equation predicts that
ADP would bind approximately 10-fold more tightly for an isometric
smooth muscle cross-bridge bearing maximum tension and 100-fold more
tightly for MI130. If this change in equilibrium constant
can be assigned to a strain-dependent inhibition of the
rate of ADP release (the simplest assumption), then
k
AD is slowed from 20 to 2 s
1
for an isometric smooth muscle cross-bridge and from 2 to 0.02 s
1 for MI130, giving an average lifetime for
the isometric cross-bridge of 0.5 and 50 s, respectively. If such
a mechanism is contributing to the slow turnover of the myosin, then a
Ca2+-induced change in conformation of calmodulin, leading
to a reduction in the stiffness of the calmodulin binding domain or
lever arm, could provide a simple way to reduce the strain in the
cross-bridge without sliding. This strain reduction would lead to
faster release of ADP and cross-bridge detachment by ATP.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Mooseker, M. S.,
and Cheney, R. E.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
11,
633-675[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Sellers, J. R.,
Goodson, H. V.,
and Wang, F.
(1996)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
17,
7-22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Cope, M. J. T V.,
Whisstock, J.,
Rayment, I.,
and Kendricks-Jones, J.
(1996)
Structure
4,
969-987 4.
Marston, S. B.,
and Taylor, E. W.
(1980)
J. Mol. Biol.
139,
573-600[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Kurzawa, S. E.,
Manstein, D. J.,
and Geeves, M. A.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
317-323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Cremo, C. R.,
and Geeves, M. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
1969-1978[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Coluccio, L. M.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C347-C359 8.
Adams, R. J.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1986)
Nature
322,
754-756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Jung, G.,
Wu, X.,
and Hammer, J. A., III.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
305-323 10.
McGoldrick, C. A.,
Gruver, C.,
and May, G. S.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
577-587 11.
Novak, K. D.,
Peterson, M. D.,
Reedy, M. C.,
and Titus, M. A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1205-1221 12.
Novak, K. D.,
and Titus, M. A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
633-647 13.
Coluccio, L. M.,
and Conaty, C.
(1993)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
24,
189-199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Coluccio, L. M.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
2279-2284[Abstract]
15.
Ruppert, C.,
Kroschewski, R.,
and Bähler, M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1393-1403 16.
Sherr, E.,
Joyce, M.,
and Greene, L.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1405-1416 17.
Williams, R.,
and Coluccio, L. M.
(1994)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
27,
41-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Ruppert, C.,
Godel, J.,
Müller, R. T.,
Kroschewski, R.,
Reinhard, J.,
and Bähler, M.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
3775-3786[Abstract]
19.
Hill, T. L.
(1974)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
28,
267-340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Reizes, O.,
Barylko, B.,
Li, C.,
Südhof, T. C.,
and Albanesi, J. P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6349-6353 21.
Bähler, M.,
Kroschewski, R.,
Stöffler, H.-E.,
and Behrmann, T.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
375-389 22.
Weeds, A.,
and Taylor, R. S.
(1975)
Nature
257,
54-57[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Spudich, J. A.,
and Watt, S.
(1971)
J. Biol. Chem.
246,
4866-4871 24.
Criddle, A. H.,
Geeves, M. A.,
and Jeffries, T.
(1985)
Biochem. J.
232,
343-349[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Hiratsuka, T.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
72,
496-508
26.
Pollard, T. D.
(1982)
Methods Cell Biol.
24,
333-371[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Bagshaw, C. R.,
Eccleston, J. E.,
Eckstein, F.,
Goody, R. S.,
Gutfrend, H.,
and Trentham, D. R.
(1974)
Biochem. J.
141,
351-364[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Millar, N. C.,
and Geeves, M. A.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
249,
735-743[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Siemankowski, R. F.,
and White, H. D.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
5045-5053 30.
Ritchie, M. D.,
Geeves, M. A.,
Woodward, S. K. A.,
and Manstein, D. J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8619-8623 31.
Kurzawa, S. E.,
and Geeves, M. A.
(1996)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
17,
669-676[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Jontes, J. D.,
Milligan, R. A.,
Pollard, T. D.,
and Ostap, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14332-14337 33.
Ostap, E. M.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
1053-1060 34.
Conzelman, K. A.,
and Mooseker, M. S.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
313-324 35.
Krizek, J.,
Coluccio, L. M.,
and Bretscher, A.
(1987)
FEBS Lett.
225,
269-272[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Collins, K.,
Sellers, J. R.,
and Matsudaira, P.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
1137-1147 37.
Zhu, T.,
Beckingham, K.,
and Ikebe, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20481-20486 38.
Adelstein, R. S.,
and Eisenberg, E.
(1980)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
49,
921-956[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Szent-Györgyi, A. G.,
and Chantler, P. D.
(1994)
in
Myology
(Engel, A. G.
, and Franzini-Armstrong, C., eds)
, pp. 506-528, McGraw-Hill, New York
40.
Veigel, C.,
Coluccio, L. M.,
Jontes, J. D.,
Milligan, R. A.,
and Molloy, J. E.
(1999)
Nature
398,
530-533[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Veigel, C., J.,
Kendricks-Jones, J. R.,
Sellers, J. C.,
Sparrow,
and Molloy, J. E.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
76,
A145
42.
Whittaker, M.,
Wilson-Kubalek, E. M.,
Smith, J. E.,
Faust, L.,
Milligan, R. A.,
and Sweeney, H. L.
(1995)
Nature
378,
748-751[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Jontes, J. D.,
Wilson-Kubalek, E. M.,
and Milligan, R. A.
(1995)
Nature
378,
751-753[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Jontes, J. D.,
and Milligan, R. A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
683-693 45.
Gollub, J.,
Cremo, C. R.,
and Cooke, R.
(1996)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
3,
737-739[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Poole, K. I. V.,
Lorenz, M.,
Ellison, P.,
Evans, G.,
Rosenbaum, G.,
Boesecke, P.,
Holmes, K. C.,
and Cremo, C. R.
(1997)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
18,
264 (abstr.)
47.
Smith, D. A.,
and Geeves, M. A.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
69,
524-537
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Adamek, L. M. Coluccio, and M. A. Geeves Calcium sensitivity of the cross-bridge cycle of Myo1c, the adaptation motor in the inner ear PNAS, April 15, 2008; 105(15): 5710 - 5715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takagi, Y. Yang, I. Fujiwara, D. Jacobs, R. E. Cheney, J. R. Sellers, and M. Kovacs Human Myosin Vc Is a Low Duty Ratio, Nonprocessive Molecular Motor J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2008; 283(13): 8527 - 8537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ito, M. Ikebe, T. Kashiyama, T. Mogami, T. Kon, and K. Yamamoto Kinetic Mechanism of the Fastest Motor Protein, Chara Myosin J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2007; 282(27): 19534 - 19545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Durrwang, S. Fujita-Becker, M. Erent, F. J. Kull, G. Tsiavaliaris, M. A. Geeves, and D. J. Manstein Dictyostelium myosin-IE is a fast molecular motor involved in phagocytosis J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2006; 119(3): 550 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Nalavadi, M. Nyitrai, C. Bertolini, N. Adamek, M. A. Geeves, and M. Bahler Kinetic Mechanism of Myosin IXB and the Contributions of Two Class IX-specific Regions J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 38957 - 38968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Clark, M. A. Ansari, S. Dash, M. A. Geeves, and L. M. Coluccio Loop 1 of Transducer Region in Mammalian Class I Myosin, Myo1b, Modulates Actin Affinity, ATPase Activity, and Nucleotide Access J. Biol. Chem., September 2, 2005; 280(35): 30935 - 30942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kovacs, F. Wang, and J. R. Sellers Mechanism of Action of Myosin X, a Membrane-associated Molecular Motor J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 15071 - 15083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|