![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21625-21630, July 30, 1999
From the Iron regulatory protein 1 (IRP1) regulates the
synthesis of proteins involved in iron homeostasis by binding to
iron-responsive elements (IREs) of messenger RNA. IRP1 is a cytoplasmic
aconitase when it contains a [4Fe-4S] cluster and an RNA-binding
protein after complete removal of the metal center by an unknown
mechanism. Human IRP1, obtained as the pure recombinant [4Fe-4S]
form, is an enzyme as efficient toward cis-aconitate as the
homologous mitochondrial aconitase. The aconitase activity of IRP1 is
rapidly lost by reaction with hydrogen peroxide as the [4Fe-4S]
cluster is quantitatively converted into the [3Fe-4S] form with
release of a single ferrous ion per molecule. The IRE binding capacity of IRP1 is not elicited with H2O2. Ferrous
sulfate (but not other more tightly coordinated ferrous ions, such as
the complex with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid) counteracts the
inhibitory action of hydrogen peroxide on cytoplasmic aconitase,
probably by replenishing iron at the active site. These results cast
doubt on the ability of reactive oxygen species to directly increase
IRP1 binding to IRE and support a signaling role for hydrogen peroxide
in the posttranscriptional control of proteins involved in iron
homeostasis in vivo.
Over the last 10 years, proteins known as iron regulatory proteins
(IRPs)1 have been recognized
as the major regulatory factors for iron uptake and storage in most
mammalian cells (1, 2). These proteins bind to specific stem-loop
structures (3), the iron-responsive elements (IREs), on the mRNA of
the target genes to repress translation or enhance mRNA stability.
Ferritin subunits, transferrin receptors, and erythroid
5-aminolevulinic acid synthetase are regulated by IRPs, but other
proteins, such as subunit b of Drosophila succinate dehydrogenase and mitochondrial aconitase, the involvement of which in
iron metabolism is less direct, display IREs on their mRNA. IRPs
may thus have more widespread regulatory functions, all the more so as
they have been shown to respond to stress mediators and signaling
agents, such as nitrogen monoxide, cytokines, and hydrogen peroxide, in
addition to iron concentration.
IRP1 belongs to an isomerase family of proteins containing one
[4Fe-4S] cluster and including mitochondrial aconitase (4). It
exhibits aconitase activity (5). Extensive disassembly of the cluster
is required to allow the protein to interact with IRE (6, 7). The
reciprocal control of both activities ("iron-sulfur switch")
appears as a key mechanism in the regulatory function of IRP1. Low
concentrations of H2O2 induce a fast and potent
activation of IRP1 in intact cells, but not in lysates (8-11). The
latter results seemingly contradict the notion that reactive oxygen
species (ROS)2 in general,
and H2O2 in particular, directly target and
destroy iron-sulfur clusters (12, 13). H2O2 is
a by-product of aerobic metabolism and serves as an effector molecule
in cell defense; it modulates cellular functions either as a direct
oxidation agent or as a signaling molecule (14), and the exact role of
H2O2 in the conversion of IRP1 activities needs
to be fully defined. The efficient heterologous production of human
IRP1 (rhIRP1) with its full content of [4Fe-4S] cluster has allowed
us to assess the consequences of reactions with oxygen derivatives on
the functional properties of the cytoplasmic aconitase.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
All experiments using
the IRE probe were carried out in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated
solutions. A human ferritin H-chain IRE probe was
33P-labeled as described (15) using T7 RNA polymerase
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and a mixture of ribonucleoside
triphosphates containing [
IRP1 binding to the probe was carried out in an anaerobic chamber
ensuring an oxygen concentration of less than 2 ppm (Jacomex, Livry-Gargan, France). 10-µl reactions were carried out for 20 min in
10 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 3 mM MgSO4, 40 mM KCl with 0.4 unit of human placental ribonuclease
inhibitor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). 5 mg/ml of heparin were then
added, and incubation was continued for 10 min. 1 µl of 50% glycerol
with 0.05% bromphenol blue was added to each reaction mixture. The
samples were separated (outside the anaerobic chamber in a cold room)
on a nondenaturing 5% acrylamide gel in 0.25× Tris borate-EDTA buffer
after 1 h of preelectrophoresis at 80 V. The gel was run for 75 min at a constant voltage of 80 V and dried under vacuum. The
radioactive bands were analyzed by quantitative autoradiography
(PhosphorImager, Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Heterologous Production of Human IRP1--
Plasmid pT7-His-hIRF
contains the complete cDNA for human IRP1 fused downstream of a
histidine anchor (16). The tag was removed as follows. A 283-base pair
DNA fragment corresponding to the intact 5'-coding sequence of hIRP1
was amplified with the NS1 (5'-ggatccatcagtacatatgagcaacccattcgc) and
NS3 (5'-cccgtaaagtcctgcaggatgacac) oligonucleotides. NS1 was designed
to introduce a NdeI recognition sequence (catatg)
overlapping the start codon. The amplified fragment was digested with
NdeI and PstI and cloned into
NdeI-PstI-cleaved pT7-7 (17). The resulting
plasmid was cleaved with HindIII and PstI and
ligated with the PstI-HindIII fragment from
pT7-His-hIRF. The sequence of the final plasmid was checked by
dideoxynucleotide termination sequencing and corresponded to the intact
coding sequence of the human IRP1 cDNA inserted into the multiple
cloning site of pT7-7.
The bacterial synthesis of human IRP1 was evidenced by
[35S]Cys labeling under different growth conditions, as
described (18). In addition, 5 µg of induced Escherichia
coli K38/pGP1-2 extracts containing the pT7-7-based plasmid with
the intact coding sequence of the human IRP1 displayed a strong
retarded band in the standard IRE binding assay similar in intensity to
that produced by 5 µg of E. coli BL21(DE3)/pT7-His-hIRF
extracts. E. coli K38/pGP1-2 extracts did not give rise to
any complex with labeled IRE (not shown). The large scale (20 l)
bacterial production of hIRP1 was carried out in Terrific broth (Life
Technologies, Inc.). The bacteria were grown at 30 °C until they
reached early stationary phase. Synthesis of T7 RNA polymerase was
induced for 1 h at 42 °C and the production of hIRP1 lasted for
3-5 h after cooling the medium back to 30 °C. Cells were harvested
by centrifugation and kept at Purification of hIRP1--
All purification steps and subsequent
experiments were carried out in 20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.0, 0.2 mM citrate, 0.05 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Buffer A) under strictly anaerobic conditions using argon
lines or an anaerobic chamber (19). Both activities of IRP1 (aconitase
and IRE binding) were measured. The lysate obtained by ultrasonic
treatment was fractionated by 25-65% saturation ammonium sulfate
precipitation at 4 °C. The 65%-pellet was dialyzed overnight and
loaded successively on two ion-exchange columns, 30 ml of CM52 followed
by 50 ml of DE52 (Whatman) equilibrated in Buffer A. The active
fraction did not bind and was chromatographed on a 200 ml
phenyl-Sepharose CL 4B column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) after adding
20% saturated ammonium sulfate. rhIRP1 was eluted by Buffer A and
loaded on a 150-ml hydroxyapatite column (Bio-Gel HTP, Bio-Rad). 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, with 0.2 mM
citrate were used to recover rhIRP1, which was gel-filtrated on a
500-ml column of Sephacryl S-200 HR (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in
Buffer A. A final purification step was carried out on a PL-SAX (Polymer Laboratories) high pressure liquid chromatography column equilibrated in Buffer A and developed with a 0-0.1 M
sodium chloride gradient to give the material characterized in Fig.
1.
Enzymatic and Other Assays--
Pig heart mitochondrial
aconitase was obtained from Sigma and further purified by a combination
of cation exchange and gel filtration steps. The partially active
fraction was activated by incubation with 5 mM
dithiothreitol, 25 µM FeSO4, and 12.5 µM Na2S, desalted, and quickly analyzed for
protein concentration and enzymatic activity. The aconitase activities
were measured either by monitoring NADPH production in the coupled
assay with isocitrate dehydrogenase (20) for partially purified
fractions or by recording the decrease of absorbance at 240 nm
corresponding to the decrease of cis-aconitate used as
substrate (21) with pure enzymes. Protein concentrations were measured
by established methods (22, 23) and agreed within 20%. Using an
extinction coefficient at 400 nm of 16000 M
For the experiments assessing the reactivity of rhIRP1 with
H2O2, a 30% H2O2
solution in water (Aldrich) was filtrated, right before use, through a
mixed bed AG 501-X8 resin (Bio-Rad) to remove any contaminating ionized
material. Caution: this procedure is potentially hasardous and
care has been taken to minimize the amounts of processed
reactants. After thorough removal of oxygen by sparging the
solution with argon, the H2O2 concentration was determined spectrophotometrically ( Molecular Properties of the rhIRP1
Identity of the Purified Protein--
Numerous reports have
previously described the production of IRP1 in many different systems
(7, 16, 24-27). None of the expression and purification strategies
were designed to recover the protein as pure cAcn with its full content
of [4Fe-4S] cluster. The scheme described under "Materials and
Methods" afforded a protein migrating as a single band of apparent
molecular weight around 95,000 on SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (Fig. 1A).
Amino acid sequencing of this material gave the first eleven residues
expected for human IRP1 starting with the serine following the initial
methionine.
Spectroscopic Properties--
Fig. 1B shows the
electronic absorption spectrum of rhIRP1. In addition to the protein
maximum at 280 nm, a broad band centered at about 400 nm gave a
yellow-brownish color to the sample and indicated the presence of a
chromophore. The visible band accounted for about one tenth of the
intensity at 280 nm. UV-visible spectra of cytoplasmic aconitases
purified from natural sources have not been reported, but the visible
absorbance of pure bovine mAcn (see, for example, Ref. 28) is very
similar to that of rhIRP1.
The EPR spectrum of rhIRP1 is axial and virtually identical to
previously reported spectra of bovine cAcn (5, 28) with the
characteristic [3Fe-4S]+ g values of 2.03 and 2.014 (Fig.
1C). EPR double integration, using a copper EDTA reference,
of several preparations yielded values of less than 0.1 spin/protein
molecule, indicating that only a minority of the rhIRP1 molecules binds
a [3Fe-4S] cluster. In contrast, purifications of mammalian mAcn were
designed to quantitatively recover the stable but inactive [3Fe-4S]
form that can be reactivated in vitro (29).
Enzymatic Properties of the rhIRP1--
The rhIRP1 molecules
devoid of metals do not contribute to the visible part of the spectrum
in Fig. 1B. The concentration of those displaying IRE
binding activity was assessed with increasing amounts of rhIRP1 assayed
under anaerobic conditions. The activity of 20 ng of the protein as
isolated was hardly detected, whereas addition of 2% 2ME, which fully
reveals the IRE binding activity (30), to as little as 2 ng gave a
clear retarded band on gels (not shown). Approximately 50-fold more
rhIRP1 in the absence of 2% 2ME was necessary to obtain as much
IRP1-IRE complex as formed in the presence of the reducing thiol. It
can therefore be estimated conservatively that the IRE-binding active
form of rhIRP1 as isolated represents less than 5% of the total preparation.
The high visible/UV absorbance ratio for a protein of this size
combined with the very small concentrations of molecules with [3Fe-4S] clusters or displaying IRE binding activity indicate that
rhIRP1 is mainly (>80%) isolated as cytoplasmic aconitase containing
one [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster. This conclusion is borne out by
the enzymatic properties of purified rhIRP1. The catalytic efficiency
of rhIRP1 measured as the
kcat/Km ratio in the
conversion of cis-aconitate was not significantly different
from that of reactivated mitochondrial aconitase and did not
change under conditions favoring the insertion of [4Fe-4S] clusters
(Table I).
Reactivity of the rhIRP1 toward Oxygen Derivatives
Superoxide Inactivates cAcn--
In addition to switch activities
as a function of the intracellular iron concentration, IRP1 has been
shown to respond to a variety of cellular conditions, many of them
contributed by ROS and referred to as oxidative stress (2, 31-33). In
contrast to many other Fe-S proteins (34), the aconitase activity of rhIRP1 was insensitive to exposure of the enzyme in air for more than
90 min. However, superoxide ion production aerobically (from the
xanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction) or anaerobically (from KO2) rapidly bleached the aconitase activity (Fig.
2A). Similar results have
already been reported for other aconitases (12, 35, 36), including IRP1
(28, 37-39) and, because of the efficient inhibition of aconitase
activity by superoxide anion, all other reactions reported herein have
been carried out under strictly anaerobic conditions.
Hydrogen Peroxide Inactivates cAcn, but Ferrous Ions Prevent the
Inactivation--
The reactivity of the aconitase form of IRP1 with
hydrogen peroxide was investigated. When 100 µM deionized
H2O2 was added to 20 µM rhIRP1 as
isolated, the aconitase activity decreased (Fig. 2). However, adding
ferrous sulfate to the medium inhibited the loss of activity until no
inactivation was detected for 90 min with 100 µM
FeSO4. Relatively low concentrations of ferrous sulfate decreased the rate of cAcn inactivation when added before H2O2 (Fig. 2) and the inhibition was stopped
when large concentrations of metal were added after some reaction with
hydrogen peroxide had already occurred (Fig. 2B).
Glutathione (1 mM) did not resume inhibition.
In contrast to ferrous sulfate, 100 µM ferric chloride,
sodium sulfate, or ferrozine could not protect rhIRP1 from the
inhibitory effect of 100 µM H2O2,
and 100 µM ferrous EDTA hardly interfered with the
reaction (Fig. 2A). These observations on aconitase activity in the presence of ferrous ions may well explain the inconsistency of
our initial measurements carried out with stainless steel needles (see
under "Materials and Methods"). The presence of 100 µM either citrate or trans-aconitate did not
afford protection of cAcn against inactivation by
H2O2.
Hydrogen Peroxide Does Not Activate IRE Binding of
rhIRP1--
Although rhIRP1 as isolated is marginally active in
binding IRE (Fig. 3, lane 2),
the protein can be efficiently activated to bind to IRE, for instance
by incubation with high concentrations of 2ME (Fig. 3, lane
1). In this respect, the recombinant preparation described herein
compares with previously reported ones for which high IRE binding
activities were obtained (7, 16, 24-27). The usual description of the
IRE-binding activation of IRP1 is that of the destruction of the
iron-sulfur cluster liberating its three cysteine ligands and exposing
other residues of the active site to interaction with IRE (6). Numerous
reports (8-11, 39) have shown activation of IRP1 by treatment of whole
cells with H2O2. H2O2
reaction with rhIRP1, under conditions that almost completely inhibit
aconitase activity (Fig. 2B), failed to reveal the IRE
binding activity (Fig. 3, lanes 3-6), although the
aconitase-inactive protein kept the ability to be activated for IRE
binding by 2ME (Fig. 3, lane 7). The presence of 100 µM FeSO4 in the reaction medium, which
prevents aconitase inhibition, did not change this pattern (Fig. 3,
lanes 8-14). Therefore, direct reaction of
H2O2 with rhIRP1 failed to convert the protein
into its IRE-binding form, even under conditions that suppress its
aconitase activity.
Hydrogen Peroxide Quantitatively Generates [3Fe-4S]
rhIRP1--
Besides its two (aconitase and IRE-binding) active forms,
other molecular species of IRP1 may occur, such as proteins with oxidized cysteines unable to interact with IRE (40-42) or proteins in
which the [4Fe-4S] cluster is converted into the inactive [3Fe-4S] cluster (28). The fate of metal ions during inactivation of rhIRP1 by
H2O2 has been monitored.
Under the conditions of Fig. 2, the inactivation of rhIRP1 was not
correlated with any changes of the visible absorbance at 400 nm.
However, the difference spectrum obtained by subtracting spectra before
reaction with H2O2 from those recorded after
displayed two maxima at 335 and 485 nm (not shown). This difference
spectrum is strikingly similar to that of Azotobacter
vinelandii ferredoxin I minus Clostridium pasteurianum
ferredoxin taken as representative examples of
[4Fe4S]2+ [3Fe-4S]+ and
2[4Fe-4S]2+ proteins, respectively. When the same
reaction was followed by EPR, the characteristic signal of
[3Fe-4S]+ clusters as in Fig. 1C built up to
reach a plateau at 1 spin/protein molecule as cAcn activity
disappeared. Only a minor increase of the high spin ferric EPR signal
at g = 4.3 was detected (Fig. 4B).
This conversion of [4Fe-4S]2+ into
[3Fe-4S]+ releases iron. The experiment between 20 µM rhIRP1 and 100 µM
H2O2 was carried out in the presence of
ferrozine, a strong chelator of ferrous ions. The calculated
concentration of Fe(Fz)32+ was slightly smaller
than that of the protein when aconitase activity was abolished, and it
slowly decreased afterward (Fig. 5),
probably as the result of oxidation by excess
H2O2. When ferrozine was replaced by desferal,
a strong chelator of ferric ions, the EPR spectra elicited a high spin
ferric signal at g = 4.3, the intensity of which was correlated
with that of the [3Fe-4S]+ signal in the g = 2 region (Figs. 4 and 5). The same correlation was found with the visible
absorbance due to ferrioxamine (Fig. 5). When desferal was added after
the reaction between the protein and hydrogen peroxide was completed,
the maximal g = 4.3 signal intensity was developed after a few
additional minutes (Fig. 4C). The presence of
cis-aconitate at the onset of the reaction also helped
developing the g = 4.3 signal, probably arising from ferric citrate in this case (Fig. 4D).
Increasing the H2O2 concentration did not
generate other EPR signals or any visible modification of the cluster
nuclearity. The [3Fe-4S] cluster signal was only bleached after
extensive reaction of the protein with 1000-fold (100 mM)
more H2O2. In a similar way, no other EPR
signals than that assigned to the [3Fe-4S]+ cluster were
detected by reaction of rhIRP1 with KO2, in agreement with
previously reported data (28).
Hydrogen Peroxide, Not Hydroxyl Radical, as the Reactive
Species--
Our experimental conditions with ferrous cations released
from rhIRP1 and H2O2 should produce other ROS,
such as hydroxyl radicals, in what is often called the Fenton reaction
(43). The generation of radicals in the reaction between cAcn and
H2O2 was evidenced by DEPMPO trapping (Fig.
6). The EPR spectra formed with this
pyrroline 1-oxide derivative are clearly different for superoxide and
hydroxyl spin adducts (44). Only DEPMPO-OH was detected in the reaction
between rhIRP1 and H2O2 (Fig. 6C)
and the radical species in frozen solutions (Fig. 6B)
coexisted with the [3Fe-4S]+ cluster (Fig. 6,
A and B). In agreement with the observations of
Fig. 2, adding 100 µM FeSO4 to the reaction
greatly decreased the amounts of [3Fe-4S]+ and of
DEPMPO-OH formed (not shown).
In order to probe the role of these hydroxyl radicals in the
inactivation of cAcn by H2O2, dimethyl
sulfoxide was used as a radical scavenger (45). 100 mM
dimethyl sulfoxide displayed no effect on the cAcn activity of rhIRP1.
When added to the reaction between rhIRP1 and
H2O2, dimethyl sulfoxide hardly decreased the rate and extent of inactivation of cAcn (Fig. 2A).
Furthermore, glutathione, which regenerates the ferrous ions needed to
produce hydroxyl radicals from hydrogen peroxide, had no effect on the rate of inactivation of cAcn (see above). It is thus likely that the
hydroxyl radicals are a product, rather than an active intermediate, of
the conversion of [4Fe-4S] into [3Fe-4S] rhIRP1.
Hydrogen Peroxide-reacted rhIRP1 Can Be Reactivated--
The
reversibility of the conversion of [4Fe-4S] rhIRP1 into the inactive
[3Fe-4S] form by H2O2 was assessed. The
enzyme was gel-filtrated to remove low molecular weight reactants after
interaction with hydrogen peroxide, and its aconitase activity was
assayed. Less than 10% of the initial (before reaction with
H2O2) specific activity was recovered by this
procedure, but incubation with molar excess of reductant
(dithiothreitol) and ferrous sulfate afforded an enzyme with about half
of the starting specific activity (data not shown).
Bacteria Can Produce Active Human cAcn--
The occurrence and
function of iron regulatory proteins have so far only been described
for metazoans (2, 31), although the presence of mRNA sequences
resembling IRE has been noticed in bacteria (46). No binding of
proteins from E. coli to the human H-ferritin IRE has been
evidenced under our experimental conditions. The bacteria were
perfectly able to insert the [4Fe-4S] cluster of human IRP1, because
more than 80% of the recombinant protein was recovered as active
aconitase. The suitability of bacteria to synthesize iron-sulfur
proteins of eukaryotic, including human, origin is not without
precedent (see, for example, Refs. 47 and 48), and some evidence from a
previous report (41) indicated the bacterial production of holo-IRP1.
Therefore, no specific cellular components in eukaryotes are needed to
posttranslationally convert hIRP1 into active cAcn.
The enzymatic properties of rhIRP1 have been compared with those of the
homologous mAcn (Table I). The endosymbiont hypothesis for the origin
of mitochondria (49) implies that IRP1 evolved from mAcn.
Significantly, the protein acquired the ability to bind to specific RNA
sequences but did not loose much of its enzymatic capabilities.
Role of H2O2 in IRP1 Activation--
As a
regulator of cellular iron metabolism, IRP1 can be considered as an
iron sensor, although the details of the interaction between the
protein and metals remain to be fully explored. The balance between
assembly and complete destruction of the [4Fe-4S] cluster appears to
be the main outcome of the regulatory effect (6, 7).
The results reported herein confirm, after other studies (28, 37), that
superoxide inhibits cAcn activity. Fig. 2 shows that the same is true
when H2O2 substitutes for superoxide. However, these two major intermediates of oxygen reduction, at molar excess likely to have biological significance, are unable to convert cAcn into
IRE-binding IRP1 (38) (Fig. 3). Therefore, the activation of IRP1
observed in whole cell studies probably obeys a more complex mechanism
leading to the complete disruption of the cluster, whereas maintaining
cysteines reduced to interact with the RNA recognition sequence. A
signal transduction cascade initiated by H2O2
has been proposed (10, 11, 50), but it remains to be fully
characterized. Links between production or action of ROS and
phosphorylating events have been evidenced in other instances (14). The
present results show that activation of IRP1 by
H2O2 requires a specific triggering system to
fully remove the [4Fe-4S] cluster. This could be achieved either by
providing a more specific destructing reactant for the iron-sulfur
cluster than superoxide ion or hydrogen peroxide, or by changing the
conformation of the protein, through phosphorylation, for instance, so
that a more readily access of the reactive species to the cluster may
be possible. Indeed, H2O2 activates isozymes of
protein kinase C (51). IRP1 is a substrate for the kinase, although the
[4Fe-4S] form of IRP1 does not seem to be efficiently phosphorylated
(52). The relevance, if any, of these observations to the
H2O2 activation of IRP1 will have to be demonstrated.
Mechanism of Human cAcn Inactivation by
H2O2--
In contrast to their inability to
activate IRE-binding IRP1, superoxide ions and
H2O2 are efficient inhibitors of cAcn (Fig. 2).
In the reaction with H2O2, the protecting role
of increasing concentrations of ferrous sulfate may seem surprising
when considering the largely documented reactivity of these ions with
H2O2 to generate highly oxidizing compounds
(see, for example, Refs. 43 and 53). The production of hydroxyl
radicals in our reaction conditions, even without exogenous iron, has
been demonstrated (Fig. 6), but these radicals do not change the
nuclearity of the cluster beyond the [3Fe-4S] form. Significantly,
strongly chelated iron compounds, such as Fe-EDTA, failed to afford the
same protection as ferrous sulfate, indicating that rapidly mobilized
ferrous ions are needed to interfere with the action of
H2O2.
The data in Fig. 5 show that a single iron atom is removed by
H2O2 from the cluster of rhIRP1. Several lines
of evidence point to that atom being a ferrous ion. First, no EPR
signal at g = 4.3 appears in the spectra after reaction (Fig.
4B), thus indicating that the released iron is either
ferrous or is part of a complex in which ferric ions are coupled
(e.g. ferric hydroxide polymers). Second, quantitative
UV-visible titration of the ferrous complex with ferrozine correlates
with the appearance of the [3Fe-4S]+ rhIRP1. Last, the
production of hydroxyl radicals (Fig. 6) from hydrogen peroxide needs a
reductant, and the most readily available sources of electrons under
our experimental conditions are ferrous ions originating from the
cluster. The resulting ferric ions can be quantitatively coordinated by
desferal to give the EPR active ferrioxamine B (Fig. 4C),
but the formation of the complex is delayed when the chelator is not
present at the onset of the reaction. Overall, these data agree with
the relevant part of the previously proposed scheme for the reaction of
several [4Fe-4S] dehydratases with superoxide ion (12). The change of
reactant (H2O2 versus O
In this framework, the effect of exogenous ferrous ions is probably to
replenish the labile iron atom of the cluster removed by the action of
hydrogen peroxide, as long as these ferrous ions can be readily
mobilized for this purpose (Fig. 2). Alternatively, adding more ferrous
ions may help reducing hydrogen peroxide and decrease its deleterious
effect. However, ferrous EDTA has the same ability to reduce
H2O2 but not the same protecting role against inactivation of cAcn (Fig. 2).
Physiological Implications--
The deleterious effects of oxygen
derivatives in the presence of reduced transition metals may be
mechanistically complex, as concluded by analyzing ROS induced DNA
oxidation (54, 55). The reaction of H2O2 with
rhIRP1 is far less destructive than would be anticipated from the
strong reactivity of the combination of H2O2
and ferrous sulfate (the original Fenton catalyst) and the usual
instability of iron-sulfur proteins (56). Iron-sulfur and other iron
containing proteins have often been suggested as the primary
intracellular targets of ROS (see, for example, Ref. 56), but the most
prominent cytoplasmic iron-sulfur protein studied herein only shows a
limited structural defect induced by hydrogen peroxide.
Previous studies have shown that the direct reaction of low
concentrations (e.g. 10 µM) of externally
applied hydrogen peroxide with IRP1 is unlikely, although these
conditions yield high IRE binding activation (8-11). This signaling
role of H2O2 must be contrasted with its
possible intracellular occurrence at high concentrations. Defective
mitochondrial respiratory chains are a major site of hydrogen peroxide
production (57, 58). H2O2 may diffuse out the
mitochondrial membrane and react with IRP1 as presented here, because
our observations qualitatively apply to a large range of
H2O2/IRP1 ratios. Therefore, an
H2O2 burst, in the absence of other
contributing factors, does not increase the IRE binding activity of
IRP1, it does rapidly inactivate its aconitase function, and it has the
ability to provide one, but not more, iron atom per molecule of IRP1 to
other cellular components or to amplify the oxidative stress condition
via production of hydroxyl radicals. This detailed mechanistic
information exemplifies the use of pure iron-replete rhIRP1 to unravel
the interferences between intracellular iron metabolism and ROS
action(s), including conditions, such as hypoxia, for which some
uncertainties remain (59, 60).
We thank Jean-Pierre Andrieu and Dr. Jean
Gagnon for amino acid sequencing.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-476885623;
Fax: 33-476885872; E-mail: jean-marc.moulis@cea.fr.
2
Throughout this paper, ROS refers to reduced
oxygen derivatives excluding those, such as nitrogen monoxide or
ONOO The abbreviations used are:
IRP, iron regulatory
protein;
rhIRP, recombinant human IRP;
mAcn, mitochondrial aconitase;
cAcn, cytoplasmic aconitase;
IRE, iron-responsive element;
ROS, reactive oxygen species;
2ME, 2-mercaptoethanol;
EPR, electron
paramagnetic resonance;
DEPMPO, 5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-methyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide.
Human Cytoplasmic Aconitase (Iron Regulatory Protein 1) Is
Converted into Its [3Fe-4S] Form by Hydrogen Peroxide in
Vitro but Is Not Activated for Iron-responsive Element
Binding*
,
,
**
Département de Biologie
Moléculaire et Structurale,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-33P]UTP synthesized from
the XbaI-linearized plasmid I12CAT (16). The reaction
mixture was separated by denaturing electrophoresis on a 20%
acrylamide gel containing 7 M urea in 0.5× Tris
borate-EDTA buffer, and the labeled probe was extracted in 0.5 M ammonium acetate, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS
before ethanol precipitation.
80 °C until use.
1
cm
1 for pure rhIRP1 gave similar values.
240 nm = 40 M
1 cm
1). These deionized
solutions could not reduce cytochrome c. The reactions
between 20 µM pure rhIRP1 and
H2O2 were in 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, in the absence of substrate; the aconitase activity was periodically
measured with 25 µg of protein and saturating amounts (200 µM) of cis-aconitate. The rates of
cis-aconitate conversion were initially irreproducible; it
was then realized that experimental conditions implementing argon lines
and liquid handling with stainless steel needles were prone to leak
uncontrolled amounts of metals in the presence of
H2O2. Consequently, kinetic experiments have all been carried out in an anaerobic chamber with disposable plastic dispensing equipment. As an example, this procedure yielded rate constants for inactivation of IRP1 by H2O2
agreeing within 20% for different experiments. The conditions for
recording UV-visible and EPR spectra were as described (19). The spin
trapping agent DEPMPO was obtained from Oxis International, Inc.
(Portland, OR).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Characterization of rhIRP1.
A, SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis of pure rhIRP1
(right lane) with molecular weight markers phosphorylase b
(97.4), bovine serum albumin (69), and ovalbumin (46). B,
electronic absorption spectrum. C, X-band EPR spectrum of 63 µM rhIRP1: microwave frequency, 9.653 GHz; power, 10 µW; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 1 millitesla; temperature, 10 K.
Compared kinetic parameters between cAcn and mAcn

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Stability of rhIRP1 aconitase activity.
A, rhIRP1 aconitase activity remaining after 90 min-reactions with oxygen (1), superoxide (2), or
100 µM H2O2 (3). The
reaction with 100 µM H2O2 was
supplemented with 100 mM dimethyl sulfoxide (4),
5 µM FeSO4 (5), 100 µM FeEDTA (6), 100 µM
trans-aconitate (7), or 100 µM
cis-aconitate (8). B, 20 µM rhIRP1
were incubated with 100 µM H2O2
containing 0 (filled circles), 20 (filled
diamonds), and 50 µM (filled triangles)
FeSO4. The arrow indicates the addition of 100 µM FeSO4 to a reaction between rhIRP1 and 100 µM H2O2 (open
circles). The activity of 25 µg of IRP1 was measured with 200 µM cis-aconitate.

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
IRE binding activity of rhIRP1 after
incubation with 100 µM
H2O2. Lane 1, rhIRP1 with 2%
2ME; lanes 2-6, H2O2-treated IRP1
after 0, 10, 20, 40, and 90 min; lane 7, as lane 6, with 2%
2ME; lanes 8-14, as lanes 1-7, but reaction
between rhIRP1 and H2O2 carried out in the
presence of 100 µM FeSO4. 50 ng of IRP1 were
loaded in each lane.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
EPR spectra of rhIRP1. A, 20 µM rhIRP1 as isolated. B, as A,
after 60 min reaction with 100 µM
H2O2. C, same as B after
30 min incubation with 0.5 mM added desferal. D,
as A after a 60-min reaction with 100 µM
H2O2 and 200 µM
cis-aconitate. X-band EPR conditions: low fields (left
panels), temperature, 4 K; microwave power, 1 mW; modulation
amplitude, 1 millitesla; high fields (right panels),
temperature, 10 K; microwave power, 0.1 mW; modulation amplitude, 1 millitesla. The low field spectra were recorded with a 2-fold higher
receiver gain than the high field region, but the same gain for a each
field region was used for all spectra.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Titration of the iron released from rhIRP1 by
100 µM
H2O2. 20 µM rhIRP1 were
incubated with 100 µM H2O2, and
the activity of 25 µg was measured with 200 µM
cis-aconitate (circles). The amount of iron
released was monitored by 0.5 mM ferrozine chelation at 562 nm (diamonds) or using 0.5 mM desferal. The
ferrioxamine B complex was measured either by the absorbance at 428 nm
(open triangles) or by the g = 4.3 (see Fig. 4) EPR
signal (filled triangles).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
EPR spectra of
H2O2-reacted rhIRP1 with DEPMPO. The
reaction conditions were as described in the legend of Fig.
4B with 100 mM DEPMPO. X-band EPR conditions
were as follows: A, temperature, 10 K; microwave power, 0.1 mW; modulation amplitude, 1 millitesla; B, temperature, 86 K; microwave power, 2 mW; modulation amplitude, 0.7 millitesla;
C, temperature, 295 K; microwave power, 20 mW; modulation
amplitude, 0.2 mT.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2)
did not reveal the involvement of a [4Fe-4S]3+
intermediate that should be, but has not been, detected by EPR. Furthermore, we did not find any evidence for the generation of hydroxyl radicals in the vicinity of the cluster after reaction with
H2O2: for instance, no obvious magnetic
interactions between the radical and the cluster signals in Fig. 6 were
detected. Because the reaction of rhIRP1 with
H2O2 quantitatively releases only one ferrous
ion (see above), H2O2 further generates
hydroxyl radicals with Fe2+ probably after some diffusion
of the metal ion away from the active site has occurred. This may not
be true in the reaction between [4Fe-4S] dehydratases and superoxide
ions as extensive destruction of the clusters, with more than 3 iron
atoms released by cluster, were monitored (12).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Current address: Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research,
Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Ste-Catherine, Montréal, Québec H3T 1E2, Canada.
, generated in the presence of nitrogen compounds
that have not been studied herein.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Klausner, R. D.,
Rouault, T. A.,
and Harford, J. B.
(1993)
Cell
72,
19-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Hentze, M. W.,
and Kühn, L. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8175-8182 3.
Theil, E. C.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
304,
1-11
4.
Frishman, D.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
239,
197-200[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Kennedy, M. C.,
Mende-Mueller, L.,
Blondin, G. A.,
and Beinert, H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
11730-11734 6.
Haile, D. J.,
Rouault, T. A.,
Harford, J. B.,
Kennedy, M.-C.,
Blondin, G. A.,
Beinert, H.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
11735-11739 7.
Emery-Goodman, A.,
Hirling, H.,
Scarpellino, L.,
Henderson, B.,
and Kühn, L. C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
1457-1461 8.
Pantopoulos, K.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2917-2924[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Martins, E. A. L.,
Robalinho, R. L.,
and Meneghini, R.
(1995)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
316,
128-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Pantopoulos, K.,
Mueller, S.,
Atzberger, A.,
Ansorge, W.,
Stremmel, W.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9802-9808 11.
Pantopoulos, K.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10559-10563 12.
Flint, D. H.,
Tuminello, J. F.,
and Emptage, M. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22369-22376 13.
Castro, L.,
Rodriguez, M.,
and Radi, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29409-29415 14.
Finkel, T.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
248-253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Pantopoulos, K.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1267-1271 16.
Gray, N. K.,
Quick, S.,
Constable, A.,
Hirling, H.,
Kühn, L. C.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
218,
657-667[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Tabor, S.
(1990)
in
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
(Ausubel, F. A.
, Brent, R.
, Kingston, R. E.
, Moore, D. D.
, Seidman, J. G.
, Smith, J. A.
, and Struhl, K., eds)
, pp. 16.2.1-16.2.11, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
18.
Moulis, J.-M.,
Davasse, V.,
and DeJésus, F.
(1994)
BioMetals
7,
272-278[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Quinkal, I.,
Davasse, V.,
Gaillard, J.,
and Moulis, J.-M.
(1994)
Protein Eng.
7,
681-687 20.
Rose, I. A.,
and O'Connell, E. L.
(1967)
J. Biol. Chem.
242,
1870-1879 21.
Henson, C. P.,
and Cleland, W. W.
(1967)
J. Biol. Chem.
242,
3833-3838 22.
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275 24.
Philpott, C. C.,
Rouault, T. A.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
6333 25.
Hirling, H.,
Emery-Goodman, A.,
Thompson, N.,
Neupert, B.,
Seiser, C.,
and Kühn, L. C.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
33-39 26.
Basilion, J. P.,
Kennedy, M. C.,
Beinert, H.,
Massinople, C. M.,
Klausner, R. D.,
and Rouault, T. A.
(1994)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
311,
517-522[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Phillips, J. D.,
Guo, B., Yu, Y.,
Brown, F. M.,
and Leibold, E. A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
15704-15714[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Kennedy, M. C.,
Antholine, W. E.,
and Beinert, H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20340-20347 29.
Beinert, H.,
Kennedy, M. C.,
and Stout, C. D.
(1996)
Chem. Rev.
96,
2335-2373[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Hentze, M. W.,
Rouault, T. A.,
Harford, J. B.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1989)
Science
244,
357-359 31.
Goldenberg, H. A.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.
34,
529-572[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Rouault, T. A.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1996)
Trends Biochem Sci.
21,
174-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Hentze, M. W.
(1996)
Trends Biochem Sci.
21,
282-283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Beinert, H.,
Holm, R. H.,
and Münck, E. M.
(1997)
Science
277,
653-659 35.
Gardner, P. R.,
and Fridovich, I.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19328-19333 36.
Gardner, P. R.,
Raineri, I.,
Epstein, L. B.,
and White, C. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13399-13405 37.
Hausladen, A.,
and Fridovich, I.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29405-29408 38.
Bouton, C.,
Raveau, M.,
and Drapier, J.-C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2300-2306 39.
Castro, L. A.,
Robalinho, R. L.,
Cayota, A.,
Meneghini, R.,
and Radi, R.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
359,
215-224[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Cairo, G.,
Castrusini, E.,
Minotti, G.,
and Bernelli-Zazzera, A.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
1326-1335[Abstract]
41.
Bouton, C.,
Hirling, H.,
and Drapier, J.-C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19969-19975 42.
Gehring, N. H.,
Hentze, M. W.,
and Pantopoulos, K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6219-6225 43.
Wardman, P.,
and Candeias, L. P.
(1996)
Radiat. Res.
145,
523-531[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Frejaville, C.,
Karoui, H.,
Tuccio, B.,
Le Moigne, F.,
Culcasi, M.,
Pietri, S.,
Lauricella, R.,
and Tordo, P.
(1995)
J. Med. Chem.
38,
258-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Babbs, C. F.,
and Steiner, M. G.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
186,
137-147[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Dandekar, T.,
Beyer, K.,
Bork, P.,
Kenealy, M.-R.,
Pantopoulos, K.,
Hentze, M.,
Sonntag-Buck, V.,
Flouriot, G.,
Gannon, F.,
Keller, W.,
and Schreiber, S.
(1998)
Bioinformatics
14,
271-278 47.
Dailey, H. A.,
Finnegan, M. G.,
and Johnson, M. K.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
403-407[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Aspinwall, R.,
Rothwell, D. G.,
Roldan-Arjona, T.,
Anselmino, C.,
Ward, C. J.,
Cheadle, J. P.,
Sampson, J. R.,
Lindahl, T.,
Harris, P. C.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
109-114 49.
Gray, M. W.,
Burger, G.,
and Lang, B. F.
(1999)
Science
283,
1476-1481 50.
Pantopoulos, K.,
Weiss, G.,
and Hentze, M. W.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3781-3788[Abstract]
51.
Konishi, H.,
Tanaka, M.,
Takemura, Y.,
Matsuzaki, H.,
Ono, Y.,
Kikkawa, U.,
and Nishizuka, Y.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11233-11237 52.
Schalinske, K. L.,
Anderson, S. A.,
Tuazon, P. T.,
Chen, O. S.,
Kennedy, M. C.,
and Eisenstein, R. S.
(1996)
Biochemistry
36,
3950-3958
53.
Halliwell, B.,
and Gutteridge, J. M. C.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
307,
108-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
54.
Henle, E. S.,
and Linn, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19095-19098 55.
Beckman, K. B.,
and Ames, B. N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19633-19636 56.
Keyer, K.,
and Imlay, J. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13635-13640 57.
Quillet-Mary, A.,
Jaffrézou, J.-P.,
Mansat, V.,
Bordier, C.,
Naval, J.,
and Laurent, G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21388-21395 58.
Degli Esposi, M.,
and McLennan, H.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
430,
338-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Hanson, E. S.,
and Leibold, E. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7588-7593 60.
Toth, I.,
Yuan, L.,
Rogers, J. T.,
Boyce, H.,
and Bridges, K. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4467-4473
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. V. Llorens, J. A. Navarro, M. J. Martinez-Sebastian, M. K. Baylies, S. Schneuwly, J. A. Botella, and M. D. Molto Causative role of oxidative stress in a Drosophila model of Friedreich ataxia FASEB J, February 1, 2007; 21(2): 333 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Lind, F. Missirlis, O. Melefors, H. Uhrigshardt, K. Kirby, J. P. Phillips, K. Soderhall, and T. A. Rouault Of Two Cytosolic Aconitases Expressed in Drosophila, Only One Functions as an Iron-regulatory Protein J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18707 - 18714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Banting and D. M. Glerum Mutational Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cytochrome c Oxidase Assembly Protein Cox11p Eukaryot. Cell, March 1, 2006; 5(3): 568 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Minotti, P. Menna, E. Salvatorelli, G. Cairo, and L. Gianni Anthracyclines: Molecular Advances and Pharmacologic Developments in Antitumor Activity and Cardiotoxicity Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2004; 56(2): 185 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|