![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21645-21650, July 30, 1999
,From the Department of Biological Responses, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent works have shown the importance of
reduction/oxidation (redox) regulation in various biological phenomena.
Thioredoxin (TRX) is one of the major components of the thiol reducing
system and plays multiple roles in cellular processes such as
proliferation, apoptosis, and gene expression. To investigate the
molecular mechanism of TRX action, we used a yeast two-hybrid system to
identify TRX-binding proteins. One of the candidates, designated as
thioredoxin-binding protein-2 (TBP-2), was identical to vitamin
D3 up-regulated protein 1 (VDUP1). The association of
TRX with TBP-2/VDUP1 was observed in vitro and in
vivo. TBP-2/VDUP1 bound to reduced TRX but not to oxidized TRX
nor to mutant TRX, in which two redox active cysteine residues are
substituted by serine. Thus, the catalytic center of TRX seems to be
important for the interaction. Insulin reducing activity of TRX was
inhibited by the addition of recombinant TBP-2/VDUP1 protein in
vitro. In COS-7 and HEK293 cells transiently transfected with
TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector, decrease of insulin reducing activity of
TRX and diminishment of TRX expression was observed. These results
suggested that TBP-2/VDUP1 serves as a negative regulator of the
biological function and expression of TRX. Treatment of HL-60 cells
with 1 Thioredoxin (TRX)1 is a
12-kDa ubiquitous protein that has disulfide reducing activity (1, 2).
TRX has two redox-active cysteine residues in its consensus sequence
(Trp-Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys) and serves as a general disulfide
oxido-reductase. The two cysteine residues can be reversibly oxidized
to form a disulfide bond and reduced by the action of TRX reductase and
NADPH (3). TRX catalyzes the reduction of disulfide bonds in multiple
substrate proteins.
The TRX system (TRX, TRX reductase, and NADPH) is widely conserved in
almost all species from bacteria to higher eukaryotes and has a wide
variety of biological functions. TRX was originally identified as a
hydrogen donor of ribonucleotide reductase in Escherichia
coli (4) and is an essential protein subunit of the phage T7 DNA
polymerase complex (5). The simultaneous deletion of two TRX genes of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae prolonged the cell cycle (6). The
TRX homologue gene of Drosophila was identified as a gene in
the deadhead locus, which is required for female meiosis and
early embryonic development (7). In the human system, TRX has been
cloned as adult T-cell leukemia-derived factor, produced by human
T-cell leukemia virus-I-transformed T-cells, or as interleukin-1-like factor from Epstein-Barr virus transformed cells (8, 9). Human TRX has
been reported to be involved in cell activation (10, 11) and cell
growth promotion (12, 13). TRX expression seems essential for early
development of the mouse embryo, because targeted disruption of the
mouse TRX gene caused early embryonic lethality (14).
Accumulating evidence has indicated the importance of the regulation of
reduction and oxidation (redox regulation) in various biological
phenomena (15). The TRX system and the glutathione system constitute
major thiol reducing systems (16). The reduced condition is preferable
for DNA binding activity of various transcriptional factors such as
AP-1 (17), NF- In order to investigate the molecular mechanism of
TRX-dependent redox regulation in mammalian cells, we have
identified TRX-binding proteins. A TRX-binding protein designated as
thioredoxin-binding protein-2 (TBP-2) is identical to vitamin
D3 up-regulated protein 1 (VDUP1). VDUP1 was originally
reported as an up-regulated gene in HL-60 cells treated with
1 Plasmids--
Standard methods were used for DNA and RNA
manipulations (29). TRX mutant C32S/C35S, which lacks reducing
activity, was made by substituting two redox-active cysteine residues
for serine residues (24, 30). A cDNA of TRX or TRX C32S/C35S was
fused in-frame to pGBT9 (CLONTECH) or pGEX4T-2
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). TRX cDNA fragment was excised by
EcoRI from Yeast Two-hybrid System--
The two-hybrid library screening
was performed using the yeast MATCHMAKER two-hybrid system
(CLONTECH) and human lymphocyte MATCHMAKER cDNA
library (B-cell population of Epstein-Barr virus-transformed peripheral
blood lymphocytes, CLONTECH) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. pGBT9-TRX was used as the bait plasmid.
Plasmids were introduced to yeast strains HF7c or SFY526 by a
polyethylene glycol/lithium acetate method (31, 32). Colonies were
grown on selective synthetic medium and were tested for histidine
prototrophy or Cloning of TBP-2 cDNA--
The Preparation of Recombinant Proteins--
In vitro
translated proteins were prepared using a TNT-coupled rabbit
reticulocyte translation system (Promega) and
[35S]methionine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Bacterially
expressed His6-tagged recombinant protein was prepared
under denaturing conditions according to the instructions provided in
the QIAexpressionist booklet (Qiagen). E. coli strain BL21
(DE3) pLysS transformed with pRSET-TBP-2/VDUP1 was treated for 4 h
with 1 mM isopropyl- Antibodies--
Anti-TBP-2/VDUP1 antibody was prepared by
immunization of bacterially expressed His6-TBP-2/VDUP1
protein as described before (14). The immune serum was further purified
by affinity columns coupled with the GST-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein and
protein A Sepharose CL-6B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (34). Anti-human
TRX monoclonal antibodies (TRX-11 mAb and 21 mAb) were produced and
provided by Fujirebio (Tokyo, Japan). These antibodies recognize
different sites of TRX, respectively (35). Anti-Xpress antibody
(Invitrogen) is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the amino acid
sequence Asp-Leu-Tyr-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys, which is contained in the N
terminus of His6-tagged protein that was expressed with
pcDNA3.1/His.
Cell Culture--
COS-7 and HEK293 cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Nissui Pharmaceutical) with
heat-inactivated 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.); HL-60
and Jurkat cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies,
Inc.) with heat-inactivated 10% fetal calf serum. COS-7 and HEK293
cells were transfected with Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instruction. After 24 h of
transfection, cells were harvested and used for further studies. For
the HL-60 differentiation, cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/ml and treated with 100 nM calcitriol
(1 In Vitro Binding Assay and Immunoaffinity
Purification--
In vitro translated proteins were diluted
with Nonidet P-40 buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 1.0%
Nonidet P-40, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. For
immunoprecipitation, after preclearing by use of protein G-Sepharose
(Zymed Laboratories Inc.), samples were incubated with
antibody for 2 h and with protein G-Sepharose for an additional 20 min at 4 °C. For in vitro binding assay using GST fusion
protein, samples were incubated with GST fusion protein. Then samples
were centrifuged and washed five times with Nonidet P-40 buffer. The precipitated proteins were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography.
The anti-human TRX monoclonal antibody (TRX-11 mAb) and mouse IgG1
(MOPC21, Sigma) were covalently coupled to Affi-Gel 10 beads (Bio-Rad),
according to the manufacturer's instruction. Cells were washed and
lysed with Nonidet P-40 buffer containing protease inhibitors (2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and
5 µg/ml aprotinin). Then 10 mg of lysate was applied to each antibody
column. Proteins were eluted with 100 mM glycine-HCl, pH
2.5. Eluted samples were neutralized with Reducing/Oxidizing Reagent Treatment--
GST-TRX was treated
with reducing/oxidizing reagents according to previous report (27).
Breifly, GST-TRX immobilized on the beads was treated with Nonidet P-40
buffer containing reducing/oxidizing reagents for 15 min at room
temperature. Treated beads were centrifuged and washed five times with
degassed Nonidet P-40 buffer by batch method. Then in vitro
translated TBP-2/VDUP1 protein was diluted with Nonidet P-40 buffer and
added to the treated beads. After incubation for 2 h, samples were
centrifuged and washed five times with Nonidet P-40 buffer. The
precipitated proteins were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography.
Western Blotting and Northern Blotting--
Cell extracts were
prepared with lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1.0% Nonidet
P-40, 1.0% sodium deoxycolate, 0.1% SDS, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 5 µg/ml aprotinin).
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting were
performed as described previously (36).
Total RNA from cultured cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life
Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instruction.
Electrophoresis and Northern blotting were performed as described
previously (37).
Insulin Reducing Assay--
To estimate the reducing activity of
TRX, insulin reducing assay was performed according to a previous
report (36) with slight modifications. In our assay, yeast TRX
reductase was used and was able to reduce recombinant human TRX. Yeast
TRX reductase was provided by Oriental Yeast Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).
The decrease in absorbance at 340 nm was recorded by use of a THERMOMAX
micro plate reader (Molecular Devices) to detect maximal NADPH
consumption rate (Vmax, millioptical density at
340 nm/min). As a control, samples were incubated with the reaction
mixture without insulin. Each value was calculated according to a
method previously reported (36).
Screening of Genes Encoding TRX-binding Protein by Yeast Two-hybrid
System--
We used the yeast two-hybrid system to clone genes
encoding TRX-binding protein using a cDNA library of B cell
population of Epstein-Barr virus-transformed human peripheral blood
lymphocyte. Among approximately 1.8 × 106 yeast
transformants screened, nine colonies showed histidine prototrophy and
Isolation of TBP-2 cDNA--
To isolate the full-length
cDNA of TBP-2, a human placenta cDNA library was screened,
using probes derived from the insert DNA of pACT-cl.29. DNA sequencing
analysis of isolated 2.9-kilobase pair cDNA revealed that TBP-2 was
identical to VDUP1.
Interaction between TRX Protein and TBP-2/VDUP1 Protein--
To
examine the interaction between TRX protein and TBP-2/VDUP1 protein, an
in vitro binding assay was performed.
35S-Labeled proteins were prepared by in vitro
translation. 35S-Labeled His6-TBP-2/VDUP1
protein was co-immunoprecipitated with TRX by anti-TRX monoclonal
antibodies (Fig. 2A,
lane 1) but not by control mouse IgG1 (Fig. 2A,
lane 2). 35S-Labeled
His6-
We then analyzed whether TRX interacts with TBP-2/VDUP1 in
vivo. Cell lysates from human Jurkat cells were applied to an
affinity column of either anti-TRX monoclonal antibody or control IgG1. Eluted proteins were subjected to Western blotting analysis with affinity purified anti-TBP-2/VDUP1 antibody. TBP-2/VDUP1 was detected in eluates from the anti-TRX antibody column (Fig. 2C,
lane 1) but not from the control IgG1 column (lane
2). Therefore, these results demonstrated the interaction of TRX
with TBP-2/VDUP1 in vitro and in vivo.
Effect of Redox Status of TRX on TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1
Interaction--
Because TRX is a redox active protein, we next tested
whether TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction is influenced by the redox status of TRX. GST-fused TRX was pretreated with reducing/oxidizing reagent, dithiothreitol, hydrogen peroxide, or diamide (a sulfhydryl-specific oxidant) and subjected to an in vitro binding assay. Whereas
the TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction was unaffected by treatment with
dithiothreitol, the interaction was markedly inhibited by treatment
with hydrogen peroxide or diamide, suggesting that the reduced form of
TRX is critically important for the interaction (Fig.
3).
Analysis of Association between TRX and TBP-2/VDUP1 Using Mutant
TRX--
To examine whether TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction requires
intact redox active sites of TRX, we used mutant TRX C32S/C35S in which
redox active cysteine residues are substituted to serine residues. In
an in vitro binding assay, 35S-labeled
His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein was co-precipitated with GST-TRX but not with GST-TRX C32S/C35S (Fig.
4A). Using a yeast two-hybrid system to test the interaction in vivo, S. cerevisiae strain HF7c was transformed with pGADGH-TBP-2/VDUP1 and
either pGBT9-TRX or pGBT9-TRX C32S/C35S. Transformed colonies of
pGBT9-TRX grew well on synthetic medium lacking histidine, whereas
transformed colonies of pGBT9-TRX C32S/C35S failed to grow (Fig.
4B). These data showed that these redox active cysteine
residues are required for the TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction.
Effects of TBP-2/VDUP1 on TRX Reducing Activity--
TRX has a
disulfide reducing activity and cleaves a disulfide bond in substrates
such as insulin. We examined the effect of TBP-2/VDUP1 on TRX activity
by the insulin reducing assay (36, 40). In our experiments, yeast TRX
reductase was used and was able to reduce recombinant human TRX (data
not shown). As shown in Fig. 5, a
significant decrease of the reducing activity of TRX was observed in
cellular extracts of COS-7 or HEK293 cells transiently transfected with
a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-fused TBP-2/VDUP1 protein expression
vector (Fig. 5A), in comparison with those of cells
transfected with a GFP expression vector (Fig. 5A,
lane 1). Similar results were obtained in experiments using His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector (data not shown).
To confirm the inhibitory effect of TBP-2/VDUP1 on the reducing
activity of TRX, we tested recombinant GST-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein in the
insulin reducing assay. The reducing activity of TRX was repressed to
less than 50% by the addition of 1 µM GST-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein, indicating that TBP-2/VDUP1 protein inhibits the disulfide reducing activity of TRX in vitro (Fig. 5B).
Effects of TBP-2/VDUP1 on TRX Expression--
We examined the
effect of TBP-2/VDUP1 on TRX expression. As shown in Fig.
6, Western blotting analysis demonstrated
that expression of TRX protein was significantly down-regulated in
COS-7 cells transiently transfected with GFP-TBP-2/VDUP1 expression
vector (Fig. 6). Similar results were obtained in experiments using
His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector (data not shown). Thus,
TBP-2/VDUP1 protein down-regulated TRX protein expression as well.
TRX and TBP-2/VDUP1 expression in HL-60 cells differentiated
with 1 In our search for interacting molecules with TRX, we isolated
VDUP1 as a TBP-2 using a yeast two-hybrid system. We characterized TBP-2/VDUP1 as a TRX-binding protein. The interaction was dependent on
the redox status of TRX. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of TBP-2/VDUP1
on the reducing activity of TRX and the expression was observed in
TBP-2/VDUP1-overexpressed cells as well as HL-60 cells treated with
1 VDUP1 was originally reported as an up-regulated gene in HL-60 cells
stimulated by 1 The interaction of TRX with TBP-2/VDUP1 was demonstrated both in
vitro and in vivo. TRX treated with oxidizing reagents
was incapable of binding with TBP-2/VDUP1. It should be noted that the
effect of oxidizing reagents was detectable at a low concentration (10 µM), in which aggregation of TRX was avoided (42). Thus, only the reduced form of TRX appears to interact with TBP-2/VDUP1. There is a possibility that the presence of unreacted reagents has
effects on the interaction between TRX and TBP-2/VDUP1. However, it
seems unlikely because the GST-TRX beads used in the experiments were
intensively washed after treatment with reducing/oxidizing reagents. In
addition, the interaction was hardly inhibited by direct addition of
the low concentration (10 µM) of reducing/oxidizing reagents to the TRX and TBP-2/VDUP1 reaction
mixture.2 Therefore,
TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction appears highly dependent on the redox
status of TRX. In addition, we used substituted TRX to analyze the
involvement of the active site of TRX in the interaction with
TBP-2/VDUP1. TRX C32S/C35S was not able to interact with TBP-2/VDUP1
either in the in vitro binding assay or the yeast two-hybrid
system. These results strongly suggest that the TRX active site is
important for the TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction. Analysis of the crystal
structure of TRX has indicated that the active-site conformation of TRX
C32S/C35S is very similar to that of oxidized TRX (43). Thus, the
incapability of the TRX C32S/C35S and oxidized TRX to interact with
TBP-2/VDUP1 does not seem to be caused by a large scale conformational
change. In addition, TBP-2/VDUP1 inhibited TRX activity in insulin
reducing assay. If TBP-2/VDUP1 is a substrate for TRX, inhibitory
effect was not observed in insulin reducing assay. Our result suggests
that TBP-2/VDUP1 is not a substrate for TRX. Therefore, interaction of
TRX with TBP-2/VDUP1 may be a direct protein-protein interaction
manner. Physical interactions of TRX with other proteins have been
reported. TRX has been isolated as an ASK1-binding protein using a
yeast two-hybrid system (27). TRX directly binds to ASK1 and inhibits the apoptosis signal conducted by ASK1. These results suggest that the
direct protein-protein interaction of TRX with its binding protein may
be a basic mechanism of the redox regulation of cellular processes.
In the TBP-2/VDUP1-overexpressed cells, decrease of the reducing
activity of TRX was observed. This result raised the possibility that
TBP-2/VDUP1 affects enzymatic action of TRX or TRX expression. Therefore, we examined the effect of TBP-2/VDUP1 on insulin reducing activity of TRX and TRX protein expression. The insulin reducing assay
using recombinant GST-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein clearly demonstrated the
inhibitory effect of TBP-2/VDUP1 on the reducing activity of TRX.
Structural interference caused by GST seems unlikely, because
experiments using cell lysates transfected with
His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector also showed the
decreased TRX activity. Although recombinant TBP-2/VDUP1 protein
demonstrated an inhibitory effect, the effect was not complete,
probably because the TBP-2/VDUP1 protein concentration was
insufficient. Additionally, suppression of TRX protein expression was
observed in cells transiently transfected with TBP-2/VDUP1 expression
vector. In addition to its inhibitory effect, TBP-2/VDUP1 may be
involved in TRX protein expression, and the interaction of TBP-2/VDUP1
with TRX might be required for the suppression mechanism of TRX
expression. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that TBP-2/VDUP1
inhibits the redox-regulatory action of TRX.
We observed the decrease of TRX expression and the reducing activity in
HL-60 cells treated with 1 1 In conclusion, we identified TBP-2/VDUP1 as a new TRX-binding protein.
Stable interaction of TRX with TBP-2/VDUP1 was detected in
vitro and in vivo. TBP-2/VDUP1 had an inhibitory effect
on TRX-dependent reducing activity. Suppression of TRX
protein expression also was observed in cells transfected with
TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector. Our results suggest the possibility that
TBP-2/VDUP1 acts as an endogenous negative regulator of TRX, although
the precise mechanism of this regulation is not clear yet.
TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction may play an important role in the redox
regulation of various cellular processes such as growth and
differentiation of the cells sensitive to a variety of inducers,
including 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 caused an increase of
TBP-2/VDUP1 expression and down-regulation of the expression and the
reducing activity of TRX. Therefore, the TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 interaction
may be an important redox regulatory mechanism in cellular processes,
including differentiation of myeloid and macrophage lineages.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (18), polyomavirus enhancer-binding protein 2/AML1
(19), glucocorticoid receptor (20), and estrogen receptor (21). TRX
plays an important role in the regulation of protein-nucleic acid
interactions through the redox regulation of cysteine residue(s) (22,
23). The direct physical association between TRX and redox
factor-1/AP-endonuclease has been demonstrated to play a key role in
the AP-1 transcriptional activity (23, 24). Cellular redox status is
also important in the regulation of apoptosis (25, 26). Recently, TRX
has been isolated using a yeast two-hybrid system as a binding protein
of a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase, apoptosis
signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) (27).
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (28). Although several
homologous sequences of VDUP1 from mammalian species have been
reported, the function of VDUP1 remains unclear. In this paper, we
report how TBP-2/VDUP1 interacts with TRX and modulates the function
and the expression of TRX in vitro and in
vivo.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
gt10-TRX vector and ligated into pcDNA3
(Invitrogen) (9). pACT-cl.13 and pACT-cl.29 were isolated from positive
colonies of yeast two-hybrid screening and contained partial coding
sequences of TBP-2. The open reading frame of the TBP-2/VDUP1 was
amplified by polymerase chain reaction using the following
oligonucleotide primers: 5'-GGAATTCGATGGTGATGTTCAAGAAGATC-3' and
5'-CCGCTCGAGTCACTGACAATTGTTGTTGA-3'. To prepare protein expression vectors, the TBP-2/VDUP1 open reading frame was ligated in-frame to
pGADGH (CLONTECH), pcDNA3.1/His B (Invitrogen),
pGEX4T-3, pRSET B (Invitrogen), or pEGFP-C1
(CLONTECH). pcDNA3.1/His B-lacZ was purchased
from Invitrogen.
-galactosidase activity using
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside.
ZAP II human placenta
cDNA library (Stratagene) was screened with
[
-32P]dCTP-labeled DNA probes derived from the
XhoI fragment of pACT-cl.29. Positive plaques were
phagemid-rescued by VCSM13 helper phage (Stratagene) according to the
manufacturer's instruction. A 2.9-kilobase pair cDNA in
pBluescript was sequenced on both strands.
-D-thiogalactoside. His6-tagged protein was purified by use of a
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose column. Glutathione
S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins were prepared as
follows: E. coli strain XL1 Blue MRF' transformed with each
pGEX expression vector was treated for 4 h with 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactoside. Pelleted cells were lysed
in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and protease inhibitors (2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 5 µg/ml
aprotinin) by sonication. After centrifugation, supernatants were
applied to glutathione Sepharose CL-6B columns (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). GST fusion proteins were either eluted with the above buffer
containing 10 mM reduced glutathione or immobilized on the
beads and stored at
80 °C. Recombinant TRX was produced and
provided by Ajinomoto Co. Inc. (Basic Research Laboratory, Kawasaki,
Japan) (33).
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, Wako Pure Chemical Ind.) for
3 days.
volume of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and dialyzed with 50 mM
ammonium acetate, pH 7.5. Samples were concentrated by evaporation and subjected to Western blotting analysis.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase activity. Isolated plasmids were classified by
restriction enzyme excision or DNA sequencing into three groups that
were designated as thioredoxin-binding proteins. Because double
transformants with pGBT-TRX and each plasmid belonging to one group,
TBP-2, showed strongly positive phenotypes of histidine prototrophy and
-galactosidase activity, we chose TBP-2 for further study (Fig.
1). Data base searching of pACT-cl.29
revealed that TBP-2 has homology with TRT407-2 and vitamin
D3 up-regulated protein 1 (VDUP1). TRT407-2 was reported
as a gene screened by an RNA fingerprinting method in mink Mv1Lu cells
(38), and VDUP1 was reported as an up-regulated gene in HL-60 cells
treated with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (28). Another
candidate (TBP-1) was identical to human p40phox, a cytosolic
phagocyte oxidase component (39). We attempted to clone the full-length
cDNA of TBP-2 for further study.

View larger version (83K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Screening of TRX-binding protein by yeast
two-hybrid system. pGBT9-TRX was co-transfected to yeast strain
HF7c with the indicated plasmid. The growth of yeast transformants
with pGBT9-TRX on selective synthetic medium without histidine
(upper panel) or with histidine (lower panel) is
shown. pACT-cl.13 and pACT-cl.29 each have an insert of 2.2- and
1.4-kilobase pair cDNA that belonged to TBP-2, respectively.
-galactosidase protein was not
co-immunoprecipitated with TRX (Fig. 2A, lane 3).
In addition, 35S-labeled TRX was co-immunoprecipitated with
in vitro translated His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein by
anti-Xpress antibody but not by control mouse IgG1 (Fig.
2B).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Interaction between TRX and TBP-2/VDUP1.
A, 35S-labeled His6-TBP-2/VDUP1
protein was mixed with cold recombinant human TRX and
immunoprecipitated using anti-TRX antibodies (mixture of TRX-11 mAb and
21 mAb) (lane 1) or control IgG1 (lane 2).
35S-Labeled His6-
-galactosidase was used for
immunoprecipitation with anti-TRX antibodies (lane 3).
In vitro translation products,
35S-His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 (lane 4) and
35S-His6-
-galactosidase (lane 5)
are shown. 35S-His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 and
35S-His6-
-galactosidase were prepared by use
of an in vitro translation method. lacZ,
-galactosidase. B, 35S-labeled human TRX was
mixed with cold His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 and immunoprecipitated
using anti-Xpress antibody (lane 1) or control IgG1
(lane 2). In vitro translation product of TRX is
shown in lane 3. 35S-Labeled human TRX and
His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 were prepared by use of an in
vitro translation method. 4 µg of each antibody was used for
each sample. Precipitated samples were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis and visualized by means of autoradiography.
C, detection of TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 complex from Jurkat cell
lysate. Jurkat cell lysate was prepared with Nonidet P-40 buffer, and
TRX-TBP-2/VDUP1 complex was purified using each immunoaffinity column.
Lane 1, anti-TRX antibody (TRX-11 mAb); lane 2,
control IgG1. Eluted samples were concentrated and analyzed by Western
blotting using the affinity purified anti-TBP-2/VDUP1 antibody. Jurkat
cell lysate (50 µg/lane, lane 3) are shown as a positive
control.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effects of redox status of TRX on interaction
with TBP-2/VDUP1. GST-TRX immobilized on the beads was treated
with Nonidet P-40 buffer containing each concentration of
reducing/oxidizing reagents for 15 min at room temperature and washed
with degassed Nonidet P-40 buffer and subjected to a binding assay with
35S-labeled His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein as
described under "Materials and Methods." DTT,
dithiothreitol.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Interaction of TBP-2/VDUP1 with mutant
TRX. A, GST fusion proteins immobilized on the beads
were used for an in vitro binding assay with
35S-labeled His6-TBP-2/VDUP1 protein. The assay
was performed as described under "Materials and Methods."
Lane 1, GST; lane 2, GST-TRX; lane 3,
GST-TRX C32S/C35S. B, yeast two-hybrid analysis using TRX
mutant. pGBT9-TRX or pGBT-TRX C32S/C35S was co-transformed with pGADGH
or pGADGH-TBP-2/VDUP1. The growth of yeast transformants on selective
synthetic medium without histidine (upper panel) or with
histidine (lower panel) is shown. Yeast strain HF7c was used
in this experiment.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of TBP-2/VDUP1 for the reducing
activity of TRX. A, TRX activity in cells transiently
transfected with TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector. TRX activity of the
cell extract (10 µg) of COS-7 (left panel) or HEK293 cells
(right panel) transiently transfected with the indicated
amount of GFP-TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector was determined by use of an
insulin reducing assay. Plasmids (total 10 µg/plate) were introduced
to cells cultured in 10-cm dishes. Total amount of plasmid was adjusted
to 10 µg with pEGFP-C1. Activities for samples are shown relative to
Vmax of control (pEGFP-TBP-2/VDUP1 0 µg,
lane 1), which is assigned as 100%. Data shown are
representative of two-independent experiments. The results are the
means ± S.D. of three samples. B, the effect of
recombinant TBP-2/VDUP1 protein on TRX reducing activity. TRX
activities of each sample were determined by use of an insulin reducing
assay. Reduced TRX (0.5 µM) was incubated with the
indicated concentration of GST (open bar) or GST-TBP-2/VDUP1
protein (closed bar) for 15 min at 25 °C. The reducing
activity of TRX was measured in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM NADPH, 9.9 units/ml yeast TRX
reductase, 140 µM insulin, 1 mM glutathione
at 25 °C. Activities for samples are shown relative to
Vmax of control (lane 1), which is
assigned as 100%. Data shown are representative of two independent
experiments. The results are the means ± S.D. of three
samples.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Expression of TRX protein in TBP-2/VDUP1
overexpressed cells. Each lane contains 10 µg of cell lysate
that was isolated from cells transfected with the indicated amount of
GFP-TBP-2/VDUP1 expression vector. Plasmids (total 2 µg/well) were
introduced to cells cultured in a 6-well plate. The total amount of
plasmid was adjusted to 2 µg with pEGFP-C1. Western blotting was
performed using a monoclonal anti-TRX antibody (TRX-11 mAb).
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3--
Because TBP-2/VDUP1
was originally reported as an up-regulated gene in
1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment in HL-60 cells (28),
we analyzed TBP-2/VDUP1 and TRX expression in the differentiation of
1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced HL-60 cells. There was
a gradual increase of TBP-2/VDUP1 mRNA after treatment with
1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (Fig.
7A). After 72 h, the
TBP-2/VDUP1 mRNA was enhanced 9-fold over that before the
treatment. In contrast, 72 h after the treatment, the TRX mRNA
level markedly declined to less than 20% compared with that before the
treatment. This inverted expression pattern was also observed in
protein expression. The expression of TBP-2/VDUP1 protein was enhanced
after treatment of 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (Fig.
7B). In contrast, 48 h after the treatment, the amount of TRX protein was reduced to half of that before treatment (Fig. 7B). We then analyzed the reducing activity of TRX in HL-60
cells treated with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Insulin
reducing activity of the cell lysates decreased to 70% of the control
value within 24 h and to 60% by 72 h (Fig.
8). Thus, TRX expression and its reducing
activity were down-regulated in HL-60 cells treated with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, whereas TBP-2/VDUP1 expression
was up-regulated.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Expression of TBP-2/VDUP1 and TRX in
1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D3-stimulated HL-60 cells. A, Northern
blotting analysis of TBP-2/VDUP1 and TRX expression. Each lane contains
20 µg of total RNA that was isolated from cells treated with
1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. The blot was hybridized with
32P-labeled probes for TBP-2/VDUP1, TRX or
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
B, Western blotting analysis of TBP-2/VDUP1 and TRX
expression. Each lane contains 20 µg of cell lysate from cells
treated with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Western blotting
was performed using an anti-TBP-2/VDUP1 antibody or a monoclonal
anti-TRX antibody (TRX-11 mAb).

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The reducing activity of TRX in HL-60 cells
treated with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D3. Cell extracts (10 µg) of HL-60 cells treated
with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 were collected at
indicated hours. The TRX activities were determined by use of the
insulin reducing assay. Activities for samples are shown relative to
Vmax of control (0 h), which is assigned as
100%. Data shown are representative of two-independent experiments.
The results are the means ± S.D. of three samples.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (28). The
function of VDUP1 is still unclear, although several homologous
sequences from mammalian species have been reported. The rat VDUP1
homologue was isolated as a down-regulated gene by
N-methyl-N-nitrosourea in rat mammary tumor (41).
There are two transcripts homologous to VDUP1, TRT407-2 and TRT407-9,
whose expressions were induced by cycloheximide and repressed by
transforming growth factor-
in mink Mv1Lu cells (38).
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 whose
TBP-2/VDUP1 expression was enhanced as described in a previous report
(28). An intriguing possibility is that up-regulation of TBP-2/VDUP1
expression is involved in the decrease of TRX expression and reducing
activity. The decrease of TRX mRNA also was observed in HL-60 cells
treated with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.
1
,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment or action of
TBP-2/VDUP1 may be involved in the decrease of TRX mRNA. This
inverted pattern of TRX and TBP-2/VDUP1 expression also was observed in
cell cycle-synchronized cells.2 The suppression mechanism
of TRX expression in HL-60 cells treated with 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D3 and the involvement of TBP-2/VDUP1 should be further analyzed.
,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 is an essential biologically
active molecule and is important for regulation of calcium homeostasis and secretion of hormone (44, 45). 1
,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 also is a potent inducer of myeloid leukemic cell
differentiation (46, 47) and can inhibit the growth of cancer cells
from several different tissues (48, 49). TRX has been reported to have cell-growth promoting effects (12, 13), although TRX is involved in
growth inhibitory mechanism in some system (50). Human TRX was
discovered as adult T-cell leukemia-derived factor from human T-cell
lymphotropic virus-I transformed T-cells (9). Elevated levels of TRX
expression has been observed in some human tumors (51, 52). In
addition, TRX transfected cells exhibited severalfold increased colony
formation in soft agarose, whereas a redox-inactive mutant TRX
C32S/C35S acts in a dominant negative manner to inhibit proliferation
(53). Accordingly, the decrease of TRX function due to the
TRX-TBP2/VDUP1 interaction may be one of the mechanisms through which
1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 exerts its growth inhibitory effect (54).
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 responses.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank S. Toyama for helpful technical advice, W. Brown for review of the manuscript, H. Takei and H. Yamanaka for communicating their results before publication, Y. Yamaguchi for technical assistance, and Y. Kanekiyo for secretarial help.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and a Grant-in-Aid of Research for the Future from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Lab. of Biomedical Genetics, Graduate School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
113-0033, Japan.
§ Present address: Dept. of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biological Responses, Inst. for Virus Research, Kyoto University, 53, Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. Tel.: 81-75-751-4024; Fax: 81-75-761-5766; E-mail: yodoi@virus.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
2 A. Nishiyama and J. Yodoi, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TRX, thioredoxin; ASK1, apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1; TBP, thioredoxin-binding protein; VDUP1, vitamin D3 up-regulated protein 1; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; mAb, monoclonal antibody.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Holmgren, A. (1985) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 237-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Holmgren, A. (1995) Structure 3, 239-243[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Holmgren, A.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
9113-9119 |
| 4. |
Laurent, T. C.,
Moore, E. C.,
and Reichard, P.
(1964)
J. Biol. Chem.
239,
3436-3444 |
| 5. |
Mark, D. F.,
and Richardson, C. C.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
780-784 |
| 6. |
Muller, E. G. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
9194-9202 |
| 7. | Salz, H. K., Flickinger, T. W., Mittendorf, E., Pellicena-Palle, A., Petschek, J. P., and Albrecht, E. B. (1994) Genetics 136, 1075-1086[Abstract] |
| 8. |
Wollman, E. E.,
d'Auriol, L.,
Rimsky, L.,
Shaw, A.,
Jacquot, J. P.,
Wingfield, P.,
Graber, P.,
Dessarps, F.,
Robin, P.,
Galibert, F.,
Bertoglio, J.,
and Fradeliz, D.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
15506-15512 |
| 9. | Tagaya, Y., Maeda, Y., Mitsui, A., Kondo, N., Matsui, H., Hamuro, J ., Brown, N., Arai, K., Yokota, T., Wakasugi, H., and Yodoi, J. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 757-764[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Yodoi, J., and Uchiyama, T. (1992) Immunol. Today 13, 405-411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Nakamura, H., Nakamura, K., and Yodoi, J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 351-369[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Wakasugi, N.,
Tagaya, Y.,
Wakasugi, H.,
Mitsui, A.,
Maeda, M.,
Yodoi, J.,
and Tursz, T.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8282-8286 |
| 13. | Gasdaska, J. R., Berggren, M., and Powis, G. (1995) Cell Growth Differ. 6, 1643-1650[Abstract] |
| 14. | Matsui, M., Oshima, M., Oshima, H., Takaku, K., Maruyama, T., Yodoi, J., and Taketo, M. M. (1996) Dev. Biol. 178, 179-185[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Pahl, H. L., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1994) Bioessays 16, 497-502[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Holmgren, A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13963-13966 |
| 17. |
Abate, C.,
Patel, L.,
Rauscher, F. J., III,
and Curran, T.
(1990)
Science
249,
1157-1161 |
| 18. |
Toledano, M. B.,
and Leonard, W. J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
4328-4332 |
| 19. |
Kagoshima, H.,
Akamatsu, Y.,
Ito, Y.,
and Shigesada, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33074-33082 |
| 20. | Makino, Y., Okamoto, K., Yoshikawa, N., Aoshima, M., Hirota, K., Yodoi, J., Umesono, K., Makino, I., and Tanaka, H. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 2469-2477[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Hayashi, S.,
Hajiro-Nakanishi, K.,
Makino, Y.,
Eguchi, H.,
Yodoi, J.,
and Tanaka, H.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4035-4040 |
| 22. |
Matthews, J. R.,
Wakasugi, N.,
Virelizier, J. L.,
Yodoi, J.,
and Hay, R. T.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
3821-3830 |
| 23. | Xanthoudakis, S., Miao, G., Wang, F., Pan, Y. C., and Curran, T. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3323-3335[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Hirota, K.,
Matsui, M.,
Iwata, S.,
Nishiyama, A.,
Mori, K.,
and Yodoi, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3633-3638 |
| 25. | Kroemer, G., Zamzami, N., and Susin, S. A. (1997) Immunol. Today 18, 44-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Ueda, S.,
Nakamura, H.,
Masutani, H.,
Sasada, T.,
Yonehara, S.,
Takabayashi, A.,
Yamaoka, Y.,
and Yodoi, J.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
6689-6695 |
| 27. | Saitoh, M., Nishitoh, H., Fujii, M., Takeda, K., Tobiume, K., Sawada, Y., Kawabata, M., Miyazono, K., and Ichijo, H. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2596-2606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Chen, K. S., and DeLuca, H. F. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1219, 26-32[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 30. |
Kallis, G. B.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
10261-10265 |
| 31. | Bartel, P., Chien, C. T., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1993) BioTechniques 14, 920-924[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Feilotter, H. E.,
Hannon, G. J.,
Ruddell, C. J.,
and Beach, D.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
1502-1503 |
| 33. | Mitsui, A., Hirakawa, T., and Yodoi, J. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 186, 1220-1226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 35. | Kogaki, H., Fujiwara, Y., Yoshiki, A., Kitajima, S., Tanimoto, T., Mitsui, A., Shimamura, T., Hamuro, J., and Ashihara, Y. (1996) J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 10, 257-261[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Sasada, T., Iwata, S., Sato, N., Kitaoka, Y., Hirota, K., Nakamura, K., Nishiyama, A., Taniguchi, Y., Takabayashi, A., and Yodoi, J. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 2268-2276[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Maruyama, T.,
Kitaoka, Y.,
Sachi, Y.,
Nakanoin, K.,
Hirota, K.,
Shiozawa, T.,
Yoshimura, Y.,
Fujii, S.,
and Yodoi, J.
(1997)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
3,
989-993 |
| 38. |
McClelland, M.,
Ralph, D.,
Cheng, R.,
and Welsh, J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4419-4431 |
| 39. | Nishiyama, A., Ohno, T., Iwata, S., Matsui, M., Hirota, K., Masutani, H., Nakamura, H., and Yodoi, J. (1999) Immunol. Lett. 68, 155-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Holmgren, A., and Björnstedt, M. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 252, 199-208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Young, L. H., Yang, X., and Voigt, J. M. (1996) Mol. Carcinogen. 15, 251-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Sato, N., Iwata, S., Nakamura, K., Hori, T., Mori, K., and Yodoi, J. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 3194-3203[Abstract] |
| 43. | Weichsel, A., Gasdaska, J. R., Powis, G., and Montfort, W. R. (1996) Structure 4, 735-751[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Suda, T., Shinki, T., and Takahashi, N. (1990) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 10, 195-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | Darwish, H., and DeLuca, H. F. (1993) Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expression 3, 89-116[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. | Miyaura, C., Abe, E., Kuribayashi, T., Tanaka, H., Konno, K., Nishii, Y., and Suda, T. (1981) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 102, 937-943[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. |
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
Koeffler, H. P.,
Donaldson, C. A.,
Pike, J. W.,
and Haussler, M. R.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
98,
391-398 |
| 48. |
Frampton, R. J.,
Omond, S. A.,
and Eisman, J. A.
(1983)
Cancer Res.
43,
4443-4447 |
| 49. |
Dokoh, S.,
Donaldson, C. A.,
and Haussler, M. R.
(1984)
Cancer Res.
44,
2103-2109 |
| 50. |
Deiss, L. P.,
and Kimchi, A.
(1991)
Science
252,
117-120 |
| 51. | Fujii, S., Nanbu, Y., Nonogaki, H., Konishi, I., Mori, T., Masutani, H., and Yodoi, J. (1991) Cancer 68, 1583-1591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. | Nakamura, H., Masutani, H., Tagaya, Y., Yamauchi, A., Inamoto, T., Nanbu, Y., Fujii, S., Ozawa, K., and Yodoi, J. (1992) Cancer 69, 2091-2097[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. |
Gallegos, A.,
Gasdaska, J. R.,
Taylor, C. W.,
Paine-Murrieta, G. D.,
Goodman, D.,
Gasdaska, P. Y.,
Berggren, M.,
Briehl, M. M.,
and Powis, G.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
5765-5770 |
| 54. | Yang, X., Young, L. H., and Voigt, J. M. (1998) Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 48, 33-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-L. Chen, C.-F. Lin, W.-T. Chang, W.-C. Huang, C.-F. Teng, and Y.-S. Lin Ceramide induces p38 MAPK and JNK activation through a mechanism involving a thioredoxin-interacting protein-mediated pathway Blood, April 15, 2008; 111(8): 4365 - 4374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Corbett Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein Is Killing My {beta}-cells! Diabetes, April 1, 2008; 57(4): 797 - 798. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chen, G. Saxena, I. N. Mungrue, A. J. Lusis, and A. Shalev Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein: A Critical Link Between Glucose Toxicity and {beta}-Cell Apoptosis Diabetes, April 1, 2008; 57(4): 938 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Y. Hui, A. M. Andres, A. K. Miller, N. J. Spann, D. W. Potter, N. M. Post, A. Z. Chen, S. Sachithanantham, D. Y. Jung, J. K. Kim, et al. Txnip balances metabolic and growth signaling via PTEN disulfide reduction PNAS, March 11, 2008; 105(10): 3921 - 3926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Chutkow, P. Patwari, J. Yoshioka, and R. T. Lee Thioredoxin-interacting Protein (Txnip) Is a Critical Regulator of Hepatic Glucose Production J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2397 - 2406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Davis Searching for Causality of Knocking Out Txnip: Is Txnip Missing in Action? Circ. Res., December 7, 2007; 101(12): 1216 - 1218. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Qi, X. Chen, R. E. Gilbert, Y. Zhang, M. Waltham, M. Schache, D. J. Kelly, and C. A. Pollock High Glucose-Induced Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein in Renal Proximal Tubule Cells Is Independent of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 171(3): 744 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Turturro, G. Von Burton, and E. Friday Hyperglycemia-Induced Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein Expression Differs in Breast Cancer-Derived Cells and Regulates Paclitaxel IC50 Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3724 - 3730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hamada, S. Miyata, T. Nii-Kono, R. Kitazawa, S. Kitazawa, S. Higo, M. Fukunaga, S. Ueyama, H. Nakamura, J. Yodoi, et al. Overexpression of thioredoxin1 in transgenic mice suppresses development of diabetic nephropathy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1547 - 1557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|