![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21707-21713, July 30, 1999
,From the Section on Clinical Pharmacology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, DuCane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Material on the surface of activated T-cells was
displaced following incubation with a sulfated polysaccharide, dextrin
2-sulfate (D2S), and purified by anion-exchange chromatography. This
revealed a complex comprising histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 and DNA
fragmented into 180-base pair units characteristic of mono-, di-, tri,
and polynucleosomes, a pattern of fragmentation similar to that found in apoptotic cells. An antibody raised against the purified nucleosome preparation bound to the plasma membrane of activated T-cells confirming the surface location of nucleosomes. The interaction of
sulfated polysaccharides with nucleosomes was investigated using a
biotinylated derivative of D2S. It was found that sulfated polysaccharides bound to nucleosomes via the N termini of histones, especially H2A and H2B. Treatment of T-cells with either heparinase or
heparitinase abolished nucleosome binding to plasma membranes. This
suggests that nucleosomes are anchored to the surface of T-cells by
heparan sulfate proteoglycans through an ionic interaction with the
basic N-terminal residues in the histones. Furthermore, nucleosomes
bound to the cell surface in this manner are then able to bind other
sulfated polysaccharides, such as D2S, heparin, or dextran sulfate,
through unoccupied histone N termini forming a complex comprising cell
surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans, nucleosomes, and sulfated polysaccharides.
There is increasing evidence that nuclear material, including
histones, DNA, and nucleosomes, may under certain conditions become
located on the surface of cells (1-4). These observations are likely
to have relevance to autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE),1 where
antibodies against nuclear material are found (5-8).
The presence of histones on the cell surface of various cell types has
been documented in a number of previous publications. For instance,
Rekvig et al. (9) reported that a subset of anti-nuclear antibodies with affinity for mononucleosomes bound to histone H2B
present in the plasma membrane of viable leukocytes. Also, when
investigating the resistance of cytotoxic T-cells to perforin-mediated hemolysis, Ojcius et al. (10) fractionated plasma membrane
proteins from cytotoxic T-cells using high pressure liquid
chromatography and showed that histones H2A and H2B were present, an
observation that was further supported by fluorescence-activated cell
sorter analysis. Histone H2B has also shown to be present on the cell surface of B-cells by Mecheri et al. (11), who used a
monoclonal antibody produced by immunizing mice with purified B-cells
to immunoprecipitate a polypeptide from the surface of a B-cell line that had 100% homology with histone H2B. Interestingly, this antibody was also able to interact with B-cells from human peripheral blood. Bilozur and Biswas (12) demonstrated that [3H]heparin
bound to four proteins present in the plasma membrane of the human lung
carcinoma cell line LX-1, and when sequenced two were found to be
histones H2A and H2B.
In our own work, we have found that dextrin 2-sulfate (D2S), a
synthetically sulfated polysaccharide, binds in a specific, saturable
manner to the surface of activated T-cells. This compound also inhibits
the infection of T-cells by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in vitro (13), although its mechanism of action has not been
elucidated. Nevertheless, we have demonstrated that D2S binds to
histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, all of which are located on the plasma
membrane of activated T-cells (14). By incubation of activated T-cells
with a relatively high concentration of D2S, these histones can be
displaced from the cell surface (14). Here, D2S-eluted cell surface
histones were purified and characterized with respect to their
composition and interactions with D2S, other sulfated polysaccharides,
and the cell surface. From the results of the study we are able to
demonstrate that cell surface histones are in the form of nucleosomes,
and we propose a mechanism by which nucleosomes and sulfated
polysaccharides, such as heparan sulfate, heparin, and D2S, interact at
the cell surface.
Cell Culture--
HPB-ALL cells (15) were maintained in RPMI
1640 medium containing 20 mM HEPES buffer that was
supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM
glutamine, 250 IU/ml penicillin, and 250 µg/ml streptomycin.
Purification of D2S-eluted Cell Surface Material--
HPB-ALL
cells were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using
repetitive centrifugation and then resuspended in 5-20 ml (as
appropriate) of ice-cold PBS containing 0.2 mg/ml D2S (ML Laboratories,
Wavertree, UK) for 1 h at 4 °C. The cells were pelleted, and
the supernatant was passed through a 0.2-µm filter to remove any
residual cells. Analytical anion-exchange chromatography was performed
with a MonoQ column using a fast protein liquid chromatography system
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with a
continuous gradient of 0-3 M NaCl in 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, over 40 min, and the absorbance was monitored at 280 nm. Preparative anion-exchange chromatography was performed using a
5.5 × 1 cm (inner diameter) Q fast flow column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) at a flow rate of 2 ml/min and a step gradient of
0.15, 0.5, 0.9, and 2.5 M NaCl in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. Eluted fractions were either dialyzed against PBS
overnight in preparation for SDS-PAGE or dialyzed overnight against 0.1 M sodium borate, pH 8.4, in preparation for DNA extraction.
SDS-PAGE--
Purified cell surface material or purified calf
thymus histones were separated using 15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels as
described previously by Watson et al. (14).
Quantification of DNA--
The amount of DNA present in the
purified D2S-eluted material was determined fluorimetrically using the
fluorophore Hoescht H33258 and compared with purified calf thymus
standards. Samples of the material (0.1 ml) and calf thymus DNA
standards (0.1 ml of 0-50 µg/ml) diluted in TNE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2 M NaCl, pH
7.4) were mixed with 2.9 ml of 0.1 µg/ml H33258 in TNE buffer, and
the fluorescence was measured using excitation and emission wavelengths
of 360 and 450 nm, respectively.
DNA Extraction and Agarose Gel Electrophoresis--
Samples were
treated with 50 µg/ml proteinase K for 1 h at 37 °C, and DNA
was extracted by addition of 1.5 volumes of 50% (w/v) phenol, 48%
(v/v) chloroform, and 2% (v/v) isoamyl alcohol solution. The solution
was allowed to gently rotate for 5 min; the layers were separated by
centrifugation (900 × g for 10 min), and the aqueous
layer was removed. DNA in the aqueous fraction was precipitated by
addition of 0.2 volumes of 3 M potassium acetate, pH 9.95, and 2.5 volumes of ice-cold 95% (v/v) ethanol. The precipitate was
collected after centrifugation at 900 × g for 10 min
and then dissolved in 100 µl of 45 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and 20 µl
of 0.05 mg/ml xylene cyanol containing 8% (w/v) sucrose. Samples were
electrophoresed on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel in 45 mM Tris,
45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide at 100 V for 1 h. DNA present in the gel
was visualized under long wavelength (366 nm) UV light.
Nucleosome Preparation from HPB-ALL Nuclear
Fraction--
Mononucleosomes were prepared from HPB-ALL cell nuclei
using micrococcal nuclease digestion as described by Kornberg et
al. (16).
Antibody Production--
New Zealand White rabbits were
immunized with purified D2S-eluted cell surface material as described
by Edwards et al. (17) except that 40 µg of purified
protein was administered on each occasion.
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay--
This was performed
according to Edwards et al. (17) using wells of microtiter
plates coated with either 2 µg/ml purified cell surface material,
nucleosomes from micrococcal nuclease digestion, or purified calf
thymus histones. All antigens were diluted in PBS.
Immunocytochemistry--
HPB-ALL cells were washed three times
in PBS by repetitive centrifugation. The cells were counted on a
hemocytometer, and approximately 1 × 106 cells were
fixed for 10 min in 4% (v/v) formaldehyde in PBS. The cells were then
applied to a poly-L-lysine-coated microscope slide using a
Shandon Cytospin 3 set at 400 rpm for 3 min. The preparation was washed
briefly in PBS before endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by
incubation for 30 min in 70% (v/v) methanol containing 0.03% (v/v)
hydrogen peroxide. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by the
addition of 100 µl of a 1/20 dilution of normal goat serum in PBS for
20 min at room temperature. The slides were air-dried and incubated
with 100 µl of a 1/2000 dilution of antiserum for 1 h at room
temperature. The slides were washed three times in PBS and then
incubated with 100 µl of a 1/100 dilution of goat anti-rabbit
horseradish peroxidase in 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS
for 30 min at room temperature. After three washes in PBS, the slides
were incubated with 100 µl of a 1/300 dilution of peroxidase
anti-peroxidase antibody in 0.1% (w/v) BSA in PBS for 30 min at room
temperature. Finally, the slides were washed three times in PBS, and
peroxidase activity was developed by incubation at room temperature
with 100 µl of 0.025% (w/v) diaminobenzidine in 0.033% (v/v)
hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 5 min or until a clear dark brown stain
was noted. The cells were then dehydrated in graduated alcohol
(70-100%) and xylene and fixed under coverslips.
Chemical Modification of D2S with Biotin Hydrazide and
[1-3H]Ethan-1-ol-2-amine--
The incorporation of
biotin hydrazide (Pierce, Warrington, UK) into D2S was undertaken using
the conditions described in Watson et al. (18). For the
production of radiolabeled D2S, 5 µmol of ethanolamine containing 20 nmol of [1-3H]ethan-1-ol-2-amine (specific activity 29 Ci/mmol) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was substituted for biotin
hydrazide. The specific activity of the radiolabeled D2S product was
1.14 × 106 dpm/mg D2S.
Measurement of the Binding of Biotinylated-D2S to
Macromolecules--
The binding of D2S to either purified
protein, nucleosome, or membrane preparations was determined as
described in Watson et al. (18). From the curves produced,
an EC50 value (effective concentration that produced 50%
of the maximum binding of biotinylated D2S) was calculated. The
interaction of 8 kDa dextran sulfate, 500 kDa dextran sulfate,
fucoidan, heparan sulfate, glucose 6-sulfate (Sigma, Poole, UK),
dextrin dextrin 2,3,6-sulfate (ML Laboratories, Wavertree, UK), and
heparin (Leo Laboratories, High Wycombe, UK) with nucleosomes was
determined by competition binding. This was achieved by mixing 0.2 µg/ml biotinylated D2S with 0-30 µg/ml competitor before addition
to coated microtiter wells. Binding of biotinylated D2S was measured as
described above. From the data produced, an IC50 value
(inhibitory concentration resulting in a 50% decrease in biotinylated
D2S binding) for each compound studied was determined.
Trypsinization of D2S-eluted Material--
Nucleosomes (10 µg/ml) prepared from the cell surface were dialyzed against PBS to
remove the residual salt and then warmed to 37 °C. Trypsin digestion
was undertaken for 30 min at 37 °C with 50 µg/ml porcine pancreas
trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4) (Sigma, Poole, UK). The trypsinized nucleosomes
were separated from other components by gel filtration using a Sephadex
G-25 column (2 cm inner diameter × 20 cm) at a flow rate of 2 ml/min equilibrated in 0.2 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.0.
Membrane Preparation by Ultracentrifugation--
Between 5 and
10 × 107 HPB-ALL cells were suspended in 10 ml of PBS
and washed three times with PBS by repetitive resuspension and
centrifugation at 200 × g for 5 min. A cell membrane
fraction was then prepared by the method described by Blair and
MacDermot (19) except that the homogenization buffers also contained
0.2 mg/ml D2S to remove cell surface nucleosomes. Typically this
yielded between 1 and 3 mg of protein, as determined by the method of Lowry et al. (20). In some experiments cells were treated
with 1 unit/ml heparitinase I or 5 units/ml heparinase I (Sigma, Poole, UK) for 1 h at 37 °C prior to homogenization.
Purification and Analysis of D2S-eluted Cell Surface
Material--
Preliminary analysis using analytical anion-exchange
chromatography with a continuous salt gradient showed that material
eluted from the surface of HPB-ALL cells by incubation with 0.2 mg/ml D2S contained only one major UV-absorbing peak that was eluted in 0.9 M NaCl (Fig. 1a).
This material was purified using a preparative anion-exchange column,
employing a step gradient of 0.15, 0.5, 0.9, and 2.5 M
NaCl. The major UV-absorbing peak was eluted with 0.9 M
NaCl (Fig. 2a). D2S was eluted
with 2.5 M NaCl (Fig. 2a). Analysis of the 0.9 M NaCl fraction by SDS-PAGE revealed the presence of
histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 in the preparation (Fig. 2b). The DNA content of the 0.9 M NaCl fraction was measured
using Hoescht stain H33258 and was shown to be 0.56 mg of DNA/mg of protein, and following extraction and analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis, it was found that the DNA was fragmented into a
regular pattern of 180-base pair units typical of mono-, di-, tri-, and
polynucleosomes (Fig. 2c). Analysis of a mononucleosome preparation by analytical anion-exchange chromatography (Fig. 1b) showed an identical elution to the major UV-absorbing
peak in the D2S-eluted cell surface material (Fig. 1a),
whereas all of the individual histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 were eluted
with a very short retention time (Fig. 1c). An antibody
raised against purified D2S-eluted cell surface material bound equally
to a mononucleosome preparation as it did to the purified D2S-eluted
cell surface material (Fig. 3). The
antibody also bound to histones H2A and H2B, albeit less strongly than
to mononucleosomes and more weakly to histones H3 and H4 (Fig. 3). All
together these results strongly suggest that the purified D2S-eluted
cell surface material is comprised of nucleosome particles.
Localization of Nucleosomes on HPB-ALL Cells--
The antibody was
used to determine the location of nucleosomes on HPB-ALL cells that had
been cultured for 5 days. Immunocytochemistry showed that the antibody
bound strongly to the plasma membrane of most of these cells (Fig.
4). However, cells that had been incubated with preimmune serum had no detectable staining (Fig. 4).
D2S Binds to the N-terminal Regions of Histones--
A
biotinylated derivative of D2S was synthesized and used to measure the
binding of D2S to cell surface nucleosomes and purified histones. D2S
bound strongest to purified cell surface nucleosomes (EC50 = 0.12 µg/ml, n = 5), although binding to histones
H2B and H2A was only slightly lower (Fig.
5). D2S also bound to histones H3 and H4,
although both the maximum binding and the binding affinities were
reduced (Fig. 5). However, D2S was unable to bind to trypsin-treated purified cell surface nucleosomes (Fig. 5). In competition studies, various sulfated polysaccharides were also able to bind to purified nucleosomes, although dextrin and glucose 6-sulfate did not (Table I).
Effect of Heparinase or Heparitinase Treatment--
D2S bound only
very poorly to an HPB-ALL cell membrane preparation from which cell
surface nucleosomes had been removed. However, after addition of
purified cell surface nucleosomes to the membrane preparation, D2S
bound extensively. In contrast, when the membrane preparation was
treated with either heparitinase I or heparinase I, D2S binding was
poor, even after the addition of purified cell surface nucleosomes
(Fig. 6a). Similarly, the
anti-nucleosome antibody bound poorly to the nucleosome-depleted
membrane preparation, although when purified cell surface nucleosomes
were added to the membrane preparation extensive antibody binding was
found. However, after treatment of the membrane preparation with either heparitinase I or heparinase I, little antibody binding was detected even when purified cell surface nucleosomes were added to the membrane
preparation (Fig. 6b).
The results from this study show that histones, previously
identified to be present on the surface of activated T-cells (14), are
in the form of nucleosomes, comprising histones H2A, H2B, H3, H4, and
DNA fragmented into 180-base pair units. It is also shown that cell
surface nucleosomes are attached to the plasma membrane through an
interaction with cell surface proteoglycans.
In a previous study it was found that histones could be eluted from the
cell surface by incubation of cells with the sulfated polysaccharide,
D2S (14). Here, purification of material eluted from the surface of
activated T-cells by anion-exchange chromatography performed at pH 7.4 revealed that it comprised a single major UV-absorbing peak that was
eluted with 0.9 M NaCl. The relatively high salt
concentration needed to elute the material indicated that it carried a
predominantly negative charge at pH 7.4; however, analysis of the
composition of the proteins in this material by SDS-PAGE revealed that
it comprised histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, which are all basic
proteins. The negative charge of the material was not due to D2S, as
this was clearly separated during anion-exchange chromatography.
However, reactivity of the purified preparation with the fluorophore
Hoeschst H33258 indicated that the material contained a substantial
quantity of DNA, and analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis revealed
that the DNA was fragmented into regular 180-base pair units. These
results strongly suggested that the material eluted from the cell
surface was a mixture of mono-, di-, tri-, and polynucleosomes. This
assertion was supported by analytical anion-exchange chromatography of
mononucleosomes, which produced an identical elution profile to the
cell surface-derived material, in contrast to the elution of each of
the individual histones, which did not bind to the anion-exchange
chromatography column. Furthermore, an antibody raised against the cell
surface-eluted material bound as strongly to mononucleosomes as it did
to the cell surface material. Thus, the cell surface-eluted material is
indistinguishable from nucleosomes. The surface location of nucleosomes
in activated cells was confirmed by immunocytochemistry, as the
antibody bound strongly to the cell surface of 5-day-old HPB-ALL cells.
The pattern of fragmentation of DNA obtained from the purified
nucleosome sample was similar to that observed in the nuclei of cells
undergoing apoptosis. Apoptosis is a mode of cell death that is defined
morphologically; chromatin undergoes condensation, the cytoplasmic
organelles become compacted together, and the cell surface undergoes
blebbing (21, 22). Furthermore, apoptotic cell death is accompanied by
the activation of a nuclear endonuclease that cleaves chromatin at
internucleosomal sites (23) and the release of intact mono-, di- and
polynucleosomes (24). Since the vast majority of cells were
morphologically normal, it appears that the appearance of nucleosomes
on the cell surface of activated T-cells is the result of a small
proportion of apoptotic cells releasing their contents into the
extracellular space and the consequent binding of this nuclear material
on the surface of viable cells.
It was demonstrated, using a solid-phase binding assay, that D2S bound
strongly to nucleosomes, and although binding to purified histones H2A
and H2B was only slightly lower, binding to histones H3 and H4 was
relatively poor. However, whereas the binding of D2S (and other
sulfated polysaccharides) to histones is readily explained by an ionic
interaction between oppositely charged molecules, the interaction
between D2S and nucleosomes, which are both negatively charged, is less
obvious. The explanation for this lies in the structure of the
nucleosome core particle. Luger et al. (25) have shown using
x-ray crystallography that although the histone octomer, comprising 2 molecules of histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, is surrounded by negatively
charged DNA, the positively charged N termini of the histones extend
out of core particle and past the DNA superhelix to allow contact with
other macromolecules, normally other nucleosome particles. Here, we
suggest that negatively charged D2S binds to the positively charged
N-terminal regions of the histones that protrude from the nucleosome
core (Fig. 7a). It has been
shown previously that as a result of their accessibility the N-terminal
regions of histones in a nucleosome particle can be digested with
trypsin, leaving the rest of the complex intact (26). Under these
conditions D2S binding to nucleosomes was completely attenuated, thus
supporting the notion that binding is through these regions.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Analytical anion-exchange
chromatography. Chromatography was carried out using a MonoQ
column as described under "Experimental Procedures." Chromatograms
depicting the elution of (a) D2S-eluted cell surface
material from 1 × 107 HPB-ALL cells, (b)
100 µg of purified mononucleosomes, and (c) 50 µg of
purified calf thymus histone H2A are shown. Purified histones H2B, H3,
and H4 produced identical chromatograms to that found for histone
H2A.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Purification of D2S-eluted cell surface
material. Material on the surface of 5 × 108
HPB-ALL cells was eluted by incubating with 20 ml of 0.2 mg/ml D2S
containing [1-3H]ethan-1-ol-2-amine-labeled D2S added to
a final specific activity of 3,000 dpm/mg D2S as described under
"Experimental Procedures." a, the supernatant was
applied to a Q fast flow anion-exchange column (5.5 × 1 cm inner
diameter) at a flow rate of 2 ml/min, and bound material was eluted
using a step gradient of NaCl in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The eluate was
continuously monitored at 280 nm, and the radioactivity of each
fraction was determined by scintillation counting. b,
analysis of the 0.9 M NaCl fraction by SDS-PAGE. The gel
was stained for protein using Coomassie Blue. The identification of the
bands was by comparison with the migration of purified calf thymus
histones. c, analysis of the 0.9 M NaCl fraction
by agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA was extracted using
phenol/chloroform, separated by electrophoresis on a 1% (w/v) agarose
gel in Tris/boric acid/EDTA buffer and stained with ethidium bromide as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane S
contains approximately 0.5 µg of a 100-base pair marker. Lanes
1-3 contain approximately 0.5, 1, and 1.5 µg of the extracted
DNA.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Relative binding of antibody. The wells
of microtiter plates were coated with purified cell surface material
(
), mononucleosomes (
), purified calf thymus histones H2A (
),
H2B (
), H3 (
), H4 (
), or BSA (
), and antibody binding was
determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Each value is the mean of duplicate
determinations, and the data shown are representative of two
experiments with similar results.

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Localization of nucleosomes on the cell
surface. HPB-ALL cells were cultured for 5 days and then fixed in
4% (v/v) formaldehyde, cytospun onto slides, and then incubated with
either (a) anti-nucleosome antibody or (b)
preimmune serum as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Strong surface staining was found on almost all cells. There was no
surface staining to any of the cells incubated with preimmune serum
(magnification × 400).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Binding of D2S to purified histones. The
wells of microtiter plates were coated with purified nucleosomes (
),
trypsin-treated nucleosomes (
), purified histone H1 (
), H2A
(
), H2B (
), H3 (
), H4 (
), or BSA (
) in PBS, blocked by
the addition of 2% (w/v) BSA, and then incubated with 0.03-30 µg/ml
biotinylated D2S (B-D2S). Binding of biotinylated-D2S to histones,
represented as the absorbance at 490 nm, was determined as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Each point is the mean of
duplicate determinations, and the data shown are representative of
either 5 experiments for purified nucleosomes or 2 experiments for the
remaining samples tested, with similar results.
Comparison of IC50 values of sulfated polysaccharides
determined from competition with biotinylated D2S for binding to
nucleosomes

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Heparinase and heparitinase treatment of
HPB-ALL cells. a, HPB-ALL cells were grown for 5 days, and
cell surface nucleosomes were removed with 0.2 mg/ml D2S. The cells
were washed liberally with PBS and then incubated with either 1 unit/ml
of heparitinase or 5 units/ml of heparinase for 30 min at 37 °C.
Cell membrane fractions were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Membrane protein was coated on to the
wells of microtiter plates and incubated with 10 µg/ml exogenous
purified nucleosomes in PBS (hatched bars) or PBS alone
(open bars), followed by incubation with 10 µg/ml
biotinylated D2S. Each value is the mean of quadruplicate
determinations, and the data shown are representative of two
experiments with similar results. b, cell membrane fractions
described above were coated onto the wells of microtiter plates
and incubated with a 1/300 dilution of anti-nucleosome antibody in the
presence of 10 µg/ml exogenous purified nucleosomes in PBS
(hatched bars) or PBS alone (open bars). Bound
antibody was detected as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Each value is the mean of duplicate determinations.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Proposed interaction between nucleosomes, the
cell surface, and sulfated polysaccharides. a, the
positively charged N termini of histones protrude out from the core of
the nucleosome particles and bind to the negatively charged heparan
sulfate regions of cell surface proteoglycans. Although nucleosomes
also have strongly, negatively charged regions, due to phosphate groups
of DNA, this does not interfere with this interaction. Nucleosomes
bound to the cell surface are then able to bind to exogenous negatively
charged sulfated polysaccharides with the protruding N termini of
histones that are not involved in the binding with heparan sulfate. The
number of nucleosome particles that the sulfated polysaccharides bind
is dependent on the length of the carbohydrate backbone. Here, for
simplicity, an interaction of just one nucleosome particle with each
chain of heparan sulfate and three nucleosome particles with one
molecule of an exogenous sulfated polysaccharide is shown for
illustration, although it is likely that several nucleosome particles
will bind to each chain of sulfated polysaccharide. b, the
interaction between nucleosomes and sulfated polysaccharides are in
equilibrium, and in the presence of excess exogenous sulfated
polysaccharide bound nucleosomes are displaced from the cell surface.
c, in the absence of cell surface nucleosomes exogenous
sulfated polysaccharides cannot bind to the cell surface.
A similar interaction with nucleosomes has been described previously for heparin (27). Indeed, competition binding studies performed here indicate that this interaction is common to a number of sulfated polysaccharides. Analysis of the competition binding data suggests that larger sulfated polysaccharides are better competitors. For example, high molecular weight dextran sulfate and fucoidan, the two largest compounds, are much better competitors than the smaller compounds such as D2S, heparin, and low molecular weight dextran sulfate, suggesting that the interaction between sulfated polysaccharides and nucleosomes is multimeric, with each molecule of sulfated polysaccharide binding to several nucleosome particles (Fig. 7). The data suggest that the binding of D2S to activated T-cells observed previously (13) is due to an interaction with nucleosomes that have adhered to the cell surface.
The binding of nucleosomes to the cell surface also appears to be due
to an interaction with sulfated polysaccharides. Heparan sulfate
proteoglycans (HSPG) are large macromolecules that are present in the
extracellular matrix and have been implicated in various biological
roles such as presentation and localization of growth factors (28-31).
In competition binding studies, heparan sulfate, the sugar component of
these large macromolecules, competed with D2S for binding to
nucleosomes. Our data would suggest that HSPG are important for
anchoring nucleosomes to the cell surface, since untreated cell
membranes bound nucleosomes, whereas incubation of membranes with
either heparitinase I or heparinase I abolished this binding.
Heparitinase I cleaves heparan sulfate in areas of low sulfation, where
N-acetylated disaccharides (GlcNAc-
-1,4-GlcUA (N-acetylglucosaminyl-
1,4-glucuronic acid) are the
predominant structural unit (32). Heparinase I cleaves highly sulfated
disaccharides of structure GlcNSO3
(+/
6S)-
1,4IdceA(2S) (N-sulfated
glucosamine (6-sulfate)-
1,4-iduronic acid 2-sulfate (32). Recently,
van Bruggen et al. (33) showed that HSPG in the glomerular
basement membrane can bind circulating nucleosomes through an ionic
interaction between HSPG and histones, although they suggested that for
this to occur in vivo it would be necessary for autoimmune
antibodies to bind to DNA in order to mask its negative charge.
However, our work suggests that the negative charge of DNA does not
interfere with the binding of sulfated polysaccharides for the reason
discussed above.
Various workers (1, 34, 35) have tried to characterize a nucleosome receptor using SDS-PAGE and ligand blotting in an attempt to elucidate the molecular weight of the receptor, and several putative receptors with markedly different molecular weights have been reported. A 94-kDa protein that is present on the surface of Raji cells, fibroblasts, and a cell line derived from an islet tumor has been described as a nucleosome receptor by Jacob et al. (34). Hefeneider et al. (1) reported that DNA and nucleosomes bound to 29- and 69-kDa proteins present on a murine T-cell line, S49. Gasparro et al. (35) also reported multiple DNA-binding proteins expressed on human lymphocytes that had molecular masses of 28, 59, and 79 kDa. Interestingly, none of the putative receptors outlined above have been sequenced, and in most of the studies the protein bands identified were quite broad and diffuse, suggesting that the proteins are highly glycosylated. It is possible that these putative receptors are in fact all various HSPG, and in each case nucleosomes bind to the heparan sulfate component of the glycoproteins.
The function of cell surface nucleosomes is unclear at present, but
several authors have suggested that they have some immunomodulatory role (1, 36-39). Bell et al. (36) showed that nucleosomes released from murine T-cells stimulate immunoglobulin synthesis in
normal lymphocytes and, in a later publication (37), showed that
nucleosomes from human tonsil lymphoid cells stimulate cell growth of
both murine and human T-cells. Subsequently, Hefeneider et
al. (1) reported that the binding of nucleosomes to the surface of
murine T-cells results in antibody production and the release of
interleukin-6, an important mediator of B-cell differentiation (38).
Furthermore, Emlen et al. (39) have shown that
interleukin-1
and lipopolysaccharide stimulate cell surface binding
of nucleosomes on monocytes, and this in turn leads to further
secretion of interleukin-1
.
Additionally, there is increasing evidence that cell surface nucleosomes may be involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases such as SLE. Burlingame et al. (40) and Amoura et al. (41) have shown that the onset of the autoimmune response in murine models of SLE is characterized by the early emergence of antibodies that recognize conformational epitopes of the nucleosome particle but not its individual components, i.e. double-stranded DNA or histones. In addition, Mohan et al. (6) have demonstrated that nucleosomes are the major immunogen for pathogenic autoantibody-inducing T-helper cells in lupus mice, and accordingly, the (H2A-H2B)-DNA subnucleosome complex appear to be a potent immunogenic stimulus for autoimmune responses to histones and DNA in human SLE (40). There is also evidence that nucleosomes play a role in the pathogenicity of anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies. Nucleosomes perfused into mice bind to the glomerulus (33, 42), and Termaat et al. (43) reported that nucleosomes mediate the binding of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in the glomerulus.
This study has revealed that nucleosomes are anchored to the cell
surface of activated T-cells through an interaction with HSPG. It
appears that this interaction is mediated through the sulfate regions
found in the heparan sulfate component of the proteoglycan and the
lysine and arginine residues present in the N-terminal region of
histones. D2S, like other sulfated polysaccharides, is able to bind to
cell surface nucleosomes (Fig. 7a) and, at high
concentrations, displace them from the HSPG (Fig. 7b). In the absence of nucleosomes, as found in inactivated T-cells, sulfated polysaccharides are unable to bind to the cell surface (Fig.
7c). Thus, the binding of sulfated polysaccharides,
including D2S, to the surface of activated T-cells is explained by the
presence of cell surface nucleosomes.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was funded by ML Laboratories, Liverpool, UK.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Section on Clinical
Pharmacology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, DuCane Rd., London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. Tel.: 44 181 383 2043; Fax: 44 181 383 2066; E-mail: kwatson@rpms.ac.uk.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; D2S, dextrin 2-sulfate; HSPG, heparan sulfate proteoglycans; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; BSA, bovine serum albumin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hefeneider, S. H., Cornell, K. A., Brown, L. E., Bakke, A. C., McCoy, S. L., and Bennett, R. M. (1992) Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 63, 245-251[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Kubota, T., Kanai, Y., and Miyasaka, N. (1990) Immunol. Lett. 23, 187-193[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Koutouzov, S., Cabrespines, A., Amoura, Z., Chabre, H., Lotton, C., and Bach, J. F. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol. 26, 472-486[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Bennett, R. M., Gabor, G. T., and Merritt, M. M. (1985) J. Clin. Invest. 76, 2182-2190 |
| 5. | Raz, E., Ben Bassat, H., Davidi, T., Shlomai, Z., and Eilat, D. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 383-390[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Mohan, C.,
Adams, S.,
Stanik, V.,
and Datta, S. K.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
1367-1381 |
| 7. | Bennett, R. M., Cornell, K. A., Merritt, M. J., Bakke, A. C., Hsu, P. H., and Hefeneider, S. H. (1991) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 86, 374-379[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Hefeneider, S. H., Brown, L. E., McCoy, S. L., Bakke, A. C., Cornell, K. A., and Bennett, R. M. (1993) Autoimmunity 15, 187-194[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Rekvig, O. P., Muller, S., Briand, J. P., Skogen, B., and Van Regenmortel, M. H. (1987) Immunol. Invest. 16, 535-547[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Ojcius, D. M., Muller, S., Hasselkus Light, C. S., Young, J. D., and Jiang, S. (1991) Immunol. Lett. 28, 101-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Mecheri, S., Dannecker, G., Dennig, D., Poncet, P., and Hoffmann, M. K. (1993) Mol. Immunol. 30, 549-557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Bilozur, M. E.,
and Biswas, C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
19697-19703 |
| 13. | Shaunak, S., Gooderham, N. J., Edwards, R. J., Payvandi, N., Javan, C. M., Baggett, N., MacDermot, J., Weber, J. N., and Davies, D. S. (1994) Br. J. Pharmacol. 113, 151-158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Watson, K., Edwards, R. J., Shaunak, S., Parmelee, D. C., Sarraf, C., Gooderham, N. J., and Davies, D. S. (1995) Biochem. Pharmacol. 50, 299-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Morikawa, S., Tatsumi, E., Baba, M., Harada, T., and Yasuhira, K. (1978) Int. J. Cancer 21, 166-170[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Kornberg, R. D., LaPointe, J. W., and Lorch, Y. (1989) Methods Enzymol. 170, 3-14[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Edwards, R. J., Singleton, A. M., Sesardic, D., Boobis, A. R., and Davies, D. S. (1988) Biochem. Pharmacol. 37, 3735-3741[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Watson, K., Gooderham, N. J., Davies, D. S., and Edwards, R. J. (1999) Biochem. Pharmacol. 57, 775-783[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Blair, I. A., and MacDermot, J. (1981) Br. J. Pharmacol. 72, 435-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275 |
| 21. | Kerr, J. F., Wyllie, A. H., and Currie, A. R. (1972) Br. J. Cancer 26, 239-257[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Wyllie, A. H., Kerr, J. F., and Currie, A. R. (1980) Int. Rev. Cytol. 68, 251-306[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Duke, R. C.,
Chervenak, R.,
and Cohen, J. J.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
6361-6365 |
| 24. | Searle, J., Kerr, J. F., and Bishop, C. J. (1982) Pathol. Annu. 17, 229-259 |
| 25. | Luger, K., Mader, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F., and Richmond, T. J. (1997) Nature 389, 251-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Bohm, L., and Crane Robinson, C. (1984) Biosci. Rep. 4, 365-386[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Villeponteau, B. (1992) Biochem. J. 288, 953-958 |
| 28. | Gordon, M. Y., Riley, G. P., Watt, S. M., and Greaves, M. F. (1987) Nature 326, 403-405[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Roberts, R., Gallagher, J., Spooncer, E., Allen, T. D., Bloomfield, F., and Dexter, T. M. (1988) Nature 332, 376-378[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Yayon, A., Klagsbrun, M., Esko, J. D., Leder, P., and Ornitz, D. M. (1991) Cell 64, 841-848[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Turnbull, J. E.,
Fernig, D. G.,
Ke, Y.,
Wilkinson, M. C.,
and Gallagher, J. T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10337-10341 |
| 32. | Turnbull, J. E., and Gallagher, J. T. (1991) Biochem. J. 273, 553-559 |
| 33. | van Bruggen, M. C., Walgreen, B., Rijke, T. P., Tamboer, W., Kramers, K., Smeenk, R. J., Monestier, M., Fournie, G. J., and Berden, J. H. (1997) Eur. J. Immunol. 27, 1564-1569[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Jacob, L.,
Viard, J. P.,
Allenet, B.,
Anin, M. F.,
Slama, F. B.,
Vandekerckhove, J.,
Primo, J.,
Markovits, J.,
Jacob, F.,
Bach, J. F.,
Le Pecq, J.-B.,
and Louvard, D.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
4669-4673 |
| 35. | Gasparro, F. P., Dall'Amico, R., O'Malley, M., Heald, P. W., and Edelson, R. L. (1990) Photochem. Photobiol. 52, 315-321[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Bell, D. A., Morrison, B., and VandenBygaart, P. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 85, 1487-1496 |
| 37. | Bell, D. A., and Morrison, B. (1991) Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 60, 13-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Rieckmann, P., D'Alessandro, F., Nordan, R. P., Fauci, A. S., and Kehrl, J. H. (1991) J. Immunol. 146, 3462-3468[Abstract] |
| 39. | Emlen, W., Holers, V. M., Arend, W. P., and Kotzin, B. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 3042-3048[Abstract] |
| 40. | Burlingame, R. W., Boey, M. L., Starkebaum, G., and Rubin, R. L. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 184-192 |
| 41. | Amoura, Z., Chabre, H., Koutouzov, S., Lotton, C., Cabrespines, A., Bach, J. F., and Jacob, L. (1994) Arthritis & Rheum. 37, 1684-1688[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Coritsidis, G. N., Beers, P. C., and Rumore, P. M. (1995) Kidney Int. 47, 1258-1265[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Termaat, R. M., Assmann, K. J., Dijkman, H. B., van Gompel, F., Smeenk, R. J., and Berden, J. H. (1992) Kidney Int. 42, 1363-1371[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Jacob, L. Todd, M. F. Sampson, and E. Pure Dual role of Cbl links critical events in BCR endocytosis Int. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 485 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wittrup, S. Sandgren, J. Lilja, C. Bratt, N. Gustavsson, M. Morgelin, and M. Belting Identification of Proteins Released by Mammalian Cells That Mediate DNA Internalization through Proteoglycan-dependent Macropinocytosis J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 27897 - 27904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nunomura, K. Nagano, C. Itagaki, M. Taoka, N. Okamura, Y. Yamauchi, S. Sugano, N. Takahashi, T. Izumi, and T. Isobe Cell Surface Labeling and Mass Spectrometry Reveal Diversity of Cell Surface Markers and Signaling Molecules Expressed in Undifferentiated Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1968 - 1976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zhu, H. Chen, B.-K. Choi, F. Del Piero, and D. M. Schifferli Histone H1 Proteins Act As Receptors for the 987P Fimbriae of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 23057 - 23065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Trinkaus-Randall, M. T. Walsh, S. Steeves, G. Monis, L. H. Connors, and M. Skinner Cellular Response of Cardiac Fibroblasts to Amyloidogenic Light Chains Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2005; 166(1): 197 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tamura, K. Natori, M. Kobayashi, T. Miyamura, and N. Takeda Genogroup II Noroviruses Efficiently Bind to Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Associated with the Cellular Membrane J. Virol., April 15, 2004; 78(8): 3817 - 3826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Henriquez, J. C. Casar, L. Fuentealba, D. J. Carey, and E. Brandan Extracellular matrix histone H1 binds to perlecan, is present in regenerating skeletal muscle and stimulates myoblast proliferation J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2002; 115(10): 2041 - 2051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Richardson, V Trinkaus-Randall, and M. Nugent Regulation of heparan sulfate proteoglycan nuclear localization by fibronectin J. Cell Sci., January 5, 2001; 114(9): 1613 - 1623. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |