![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21823-21829, July 30, 1999
,
¶
From the
Medical College of Wisconsin, Microbiology
and Molecular Genetics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226 and the
§ Medical University of South Carolina, Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,
Charleston, South Carolina 29425
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S
double ADP-ribosylates Ras at Arg41 and Arg128.
Since Arg41 is adjacent to the switch 1 region of Ras,
ADP-ribosylation could interfere with Ras-mediated signal transduction
via several mechanisms, including interaction with Raf, or guanine
nucleotide exchange factor-stimulated or intrinsic nucleotide exchange.
Initial experiments showed that ADP-ribosylated Ras (ADP-r-Ras) and
unmodified Ras (Ras) interacted with Raf with equal efficiencies,
indicating that ADP-ribosylation did not interfere with Ras-Raf
interactions. While ADP-r-Ras and Ras possessed equivalent intrinsic
nucleotide exchange rates, guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25)
stimulated the nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras at a 3-fold slower rate
than Ras. ADP-r-Ras did not affect the nucleotide exchange of Ras, indicating that the ADP-ribosylation of Ras was not a dominant negative
phenotype. Ras-R41K and ADP-r-Ras R41K possessed similar exchange rates
as Ras, indicating that ADP-ribosylation at Arg128 did not
inhibit Cdc25-stimulated nucleotide exchange. Consistent with the
slower nucleotide exchange rate of ADP-r-Ras as compared with Ras,
ADP-r-Ras bound its guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Cdc25) less
efficiently than Ras in direct binding experiments. Together, these
data indicate that ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg41 disrupts Ras-Cdc25 interactions, which
inhibits the rate-limiting step in Ras signal transduction, the
activation of Ras by its guanine nucleotide exchange factor.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a Gram-negative opportunistic
pathogen, can cause severe infections in immunocompromised individuals, cystic fibrosis patients, and burn wound victims (1). Exoenzyme S
(ExoS), a 49-kDa ADP-ribosyltransferase (2), plays an
undefined role in P. aeruginosa pathogenesis. ExoS is
secreted directly into the eukaryotic cell via the type III secretion
mechanism of P. aeruginosa (3), a mechanism which requires a
direct interaction between the bacterium and the eukaryotic cell.
Models of type III translocation predict that the effector protein
(ExoS) is translocated directly from the bacterial cytosol into the
eukaryotic cell cytoplasm (4). Once in the eukaryotic cytoplasm, ExoS can interact with the FAS protein, a eukaryotic protein of the 14-3-3 family which stimulates the ADP-ribosyltransferase activity of ExoS
(5). While ExoS ADP-ribosylates several targets in vitro
(vimentin (6), IgG3, and apolipoprotein A1 (7), and several
members of the Ras superfamily (8)), only Ras has been identified as an
in vivo target to date (9).
Ras, a small molecular weight GTP-binding protein, acts as a molecular
switch controlling cellular processes ranging from differentiation to
proliferation (10). Ras activation involves the exchange of GDP with
GTP, while inactivation proceeds through GTP hydrolysis, where bound
GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP (11). Growth factors, such as epidermal growth
factor, stimulate Ras activation through a signal transduction cascade,
involving the recruitment of the Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor
to the membrane where the guanine nucleotide exchange factor catalyzes
the exchange of GDP with GTP in Ras (12). Once activated, Ras can
interact with several downstream effectors including
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Ral GDS, and Raf (12). Upon interaction
with GTP bound Ras, Raf kinase is recruited to the membrane and
subsequently activated. Activated Raf initiates a MAP kinase cascade
which leads to phosphorylation of transcription factors and changes in
gene expression (12).
Recent studies showed that ExoS ADP-ribosylates Ras at two sites
in vitro: Arg41 and Arg128 (13).
Arg41 and Arg128 are located in two distinct
structural motifs, Materials--
Mammalian cell culture reagents were purchased
from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). All other chemicals
and reagents were purchased from Sigma except where indicated. c-Ha-Ras
and FAS were obtained from H. Fu. Plasmids encoding the catalytic domain (amino acid residues 976-1260) of the mammalian GDP/GTP exchange factor of Ras fused to GST, GST-Cdc25Mm (Cdc25),
was obtained from A. Wittinghofer and plasmids encoding the Ras-binding
domain of the Raf kinase (amino acids 1-149) fused to GST,
GST-Raf-RBD, was obtained from D. Shalloway.
Ras Nucleotide Loading and
ADP-ribosylation--
Histidine-tagged Ras (Ras) was purified in its
nucleotide free form as described previously (13). Ras nucleotide
loading and ADP-ribosylation were performed essentially as described
(13) with several modifications. For Ras-Raf interaction experiments, nucleotide loading reactions were prepared containing 30 µM Ras, 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), and 200 µM of the respective nucleotide for 30 min at 30 °C. Reactions were stopped by adding MgCl2 to a final concentration of 20 mM. For
analysis of Ras-Cdc25 interactions and Cdc25-catalyzed nucleotide
exchange, nucleotide loading reactions were prepared containing 30 µM Ras, 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 2 mM DTT, and 200 µM of the respective
nucleotide for 30 min at 30 °C and reactions were stopped by adding
MgCl2 to a final concentration of 20 mM. The
stoichiometry of nucleotide loading of Ras was monitored
radioanalytically using [35S]GTP Ras Interactions with Immobilized GST-Raf-RBD--
Ras-binding
domain (Raf-RBD) was purified as described previously (19) with minor
modifications. Raf-RBD was not eluted from the GST resin after
purification, but instead the resin was washed in 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 20 mM NaCl and stored at 4 °C
(GST-Raf-RBD). Ras-GTP Ras Interactions with GST-Cdc25--
Cdc25 was purified
essentially as described (20) with minor modifications. Cdc25 was not
eluted from the GST resin after purification, but instead the resin was
washed in 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM EDTA,
and 2 mM DTT and stored at 4 °C (GST-Cdc25). Nucleotide
loading and the ADP-ribosylation of Ras were performed as described
above. Ras or ADP-r-Ras (220 nM) was incubated with GST-Cdc25 (28 nM) for 1 h at 4 °C in the presence
of 0.2 mg/ml egg albumin in a total volume of 500 µl. Samples were
centrifuged and pelleted material was washed with 500 µl of 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM EDTA, and 2 mM DTT and pelleted material was subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, which was hybridized to a
poly-histidine-specific horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Pierce),
which was detected with ECL (Super Signal, Pierce).
Ras Nucleotide Exchange--
For the measurement of GTP
association rates, reaction mixtures contained 2.5 µM of
either Ras-GDP or ADP-r-Ras-GDP, 500 µM GTP Eukaryotic Cell Culture and Bacterial/Eukaryotic Cell Co-culture
System--
LNCaP cells (ATCC CRL 1740) or T24 cells (ATCC HTB4) were
grown in RPMI or McCoy's 5A media, respectively, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml
streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2, 95% air. The LNCaP
cell line, a human prostate adenocarcinoma, expresses normal
H-ras genes, while the T24 cell line, a bladder carcinoma,
has a homozygous mutation (G12V) in H-ras. Bacterial
translocation of ExoS and the examination of effects of ExoS on
cellular Ras function were performed, using a previously described
bacterial/eukaryotic co-culture system (16).3 Briefly, the effects
of ExoS on Ras-Raf association were examined by co-culturing LNCaP or
T24 cells for 4 h alone or with 108 colony forming
units/ml of the ExoS producing strain, 388 (22), or the isogenic
non-ExoS producing strain, 388 Ras-Raf Co-precipitations in Vivo--
Following co-culture with
bacteria, cells were lysed in 1 ml of ice-cold Co-IP buffer (30 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM sodium chloride, 1%
Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EGTA, 25 mM
sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM Previous experiments demonstrated that ExoS double ADP-ribosylated
Ras in vitro (17) and during the course of infection in
cultured cells (9). In addition, infection of PC12 cells with P. aeruginosa expressing ExoS inhibited Ras-mediated signal transduction (17). Several mechanisms could be responsible for ExoS-mediated inhibition of Ras signal transduction. ADP-ribosylation could inhibit Ras membrane localization, target Ras for degradation, inhibit Ras activation by inhibiting either guanine nucleotide exchange
factor-catalyzed or intrinsic nucleotide exchange, or inhibit the
interaction between Ras and its downstream effector Raf.
ADP-ribosylation Does Not Interfere with Ras-Raf
Interactions--
The co-crystal structure of Ras-GTP and Raf predicts
that Arg41 of Ras directly contacts Raf (24), suggesting
that ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg41 may disrupt Ras-Raf
interactions. Initial experiments determined the influence of
ADP-ribosylation on the binding of Ras to Raf. Ras was first loaded
with GTP, and then ADP-ribosylated by ADP-ribosylation Inhibits Guanine Nucleotide Exchange
Factor-mediated Nucleotide Exchange of Ras--
ADP-ribosylation could
interfere with Ras signal transduction indirectly by inhibiting Ras
activation. Ras possesses a slow intrinsic rate of nucleotide exchange,
which is stimulated by its guanine nucleotide exchange factor. Since
Raf interacts preferentially with Ras-GTP, ADP-ribosylation could
inhibit Ras-Raf interactions indirectly by inhibiting Ras nucleotide
exchange. Thus, the influence of ADP-ribosylation on intrinsic and
Cdc25-catalyzed nucleotide exchange, a guanine nucleotide exchange
factor for Ras, was measured. Ras-GDP was incubated alone or in the
presence of
Addition of Cdc25 at a 1:75 ratio of Cdc25:Ras stimulated the
nucleotide exchange of Ras-GDP by about 200-fold relative to the
intrinsic rate of nucleotide exchange (Table I). Cdc25-catalyzed guanine nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras-GDP was 3-fold slower than
Cdc25-catalyzed guanine nucleotide exchange of Ras-GDP (Fig. 2B, Table I). At the final time point of this experiment,
the amount of nucleotide exchange in ADP-r-Ras-GDP was less than the amount of nucleotide exchange in Ras-GDP. Next, Cdc25-catalyzed guanine
nucleotide exchange was measured at a higher ratio of Cdc25 to Ras
(1:10), respectively. If ADP-ribosylation increased the affinity of Ras
for Cdc25 but inhibited the turnover of the Ras-Cdc25 complex,
increasing the concentration of Cdc25 in the reaction would increase
the amount of nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras GDP, but the amount of
nucleotide exchange achieved should still not reach the level observed
for Ras-GDP. Alternatively, if ADP-ribosylation decreased the affinity
of Ras for Cdc25, increasing the concentration of Cdc25 in the reaction
would increase the amount of nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras-GDP to
levels comparable with Ras-GDP. The observation that ADP-r-Ras achieved
complete nucleotide exchange upon increasing the concentration of Cdc25
(Fig. 2C, Table I) suggested that ADP-ribosylation decreased
the affinity of Ras for Cdc25. To determine if ADP-r-Ras-GDP interfered
with the ability of Cdc25 to catalyze nucleotide exchange of Ras-GDP,
the rate of nucleotide exchange of Ras-GDP ADP-ribosylation of Arg41 Is Responsible for the
Inhibition of Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor-catalyzed Guanine
Nucleotide Exchange of Ras--
Exoenzyme S double ADP-ribosylates Ras
at Arg41 and Arg128. To determine whether
ADP-ribosylation at Arg41 or ADP-ribosylation at
Arg128 inhibited Cdc25-catalyzed guanine nucleotide
exchange of Ras, Cdc25-catalyzed guanine nucleotide exchange rates of
ADP-r-Ras-GDP, Ras-GDP, ADP-r-Ras R41K-GDP, and Ras R41K-GDP was
measured. The Cdc25-catalyzed guanine nucleotide exchange rate of
ADP-r-Ras R41K-GDP did not differ from the rate of exchange for Ras
R41K-GDP (Table I), which indicated that ADP-ribosylation at
Arg41 was responsible for the slower rate of nucleotide
exchange catalyzed by Cdc25. The exchange rates of Ras-GDP and Ras
R41K-GDP differed by about 20% (Table I), indicating that the Arg to
Lys mutation at residue 41 had some affect on Cdc25-catalyzed
nucleotide exchange. Together, these results indicate that ExoS
inhibits Cdc25-catalyzed nucleotide exchange by ADP-ribosylating Ras at
Arg41.
ADP-ribosylation Inhibits the Binding of Ras to Cdc25--
To
examine whether ADP-ribosylation decreased the affinity of Ras for
Cdc25, the ability of Ras and ADP-r-Ras to bind to immobilized GST-Cdc25 was measured in vitro. Others have demonstrated
that nucleotide-free GST-tagged Ras can bind SOS in transfected cell lysates (26). To examine whether Ras could bind to GST-Cdc25, the
binding of Ras to GST-Sepharose 4B (control) and GST-Cdc25 (test) was
examined. Control experiments showed detectable binding of Ras to
GST-Sepharose 4B, but the addition of competitor protein, 0.2 mg/ml egg
albumin, decreased this nonspecific binding of Ras (data not shown).
Subsequent experiments included 0.2 mg/ml egg albumin in the binding
assays. Analysis of coprecipitated material indicated that Ras bound to
GST-Cdc25 more efficiently than to GST-Sepharose 4B(Fig.
3A). Other controls showed
that nucleotide free Ras (Ras-NF) bound more efficiently to GST-Cdc25
than either Ras-GDP or Ras-GTP (Fig. 3A).
Next, the affect of ADP-ribosylation on the ability of nucleotide free
Ras to bind GST-Cdc25 was determined. ADP-r-Ras-NF interacted with
GST-Cdc25 less efficiently than Ras-NF, indicating that
ADP-ribosylation interferes with the binding of Cdc25 to Ras (Fig.
3A). A competition experiment utilizing equivalent amounts of Ras-NF and ADP-r-Ras-NF resulted in the binding of more Ras-NF than
ADP-r-Ras-NF, further indicating that Ras-NF has a higher affinity for
Cdc25 than ADP-r-Ras-NF (Fig. 3B). Other experiments showed
that the binding of Ras to Cdc25 was dose dependent (data not shown)
and that the immunoreactivity was proportional to Ras concentration
under the conditions tested (data not shown). We were not able to
interpret the binding properties of Ras-R41K since it showed sufficient
binding to GST-Sepharose 4B in the presence of 0.2 mg/ml egg albumin.
This limited the ability to resolve specific binding of Ras-R41K to
Cdc25. Together these data showed that Ras-NF interacted with Cdc25
more efficiently than ADP-r-Ras-NF, indicating that ADP-r-Ras has a
lower affinity for Cdc25 than unmodified Ras.
ADP-ribosylation of Ras Inhibits GTP Loading of Ras in
Vivo--
In vitro data indicated that Ras ADP-ribosylation
inhibited guanine nucleotide exchange factor-catalyzed nucleotide
exchange, which prompted an examination of the in vivo
effect of ADP-ribosylation on Ras-GTP loading. Growth factors stimulate
Ras-mediated signal transduction pathways (19). If Ras ADP-ribosylation
inhibited guanine nucleotide exchange factor-catalyzed nucleotide
exchange, ExoS should inhibit growth factor-stimulated GTP loading of
Ras, but not GTP loading of dominant active Ras mutants (Ras-V12) which do not require growth factor stimulation for GTP loading in
vivo. Since Raf-RBD interacts with Ras-GTP at a higher affinity
than Ras-GDP, the amount of Ras which bind to immobilized-RBD in cell lysates was used as a measurement of cellular Ras-GTP. Thus, the affect
of ExoS on the GTP loading of Ras and Ras-G12V in vivo was
measured. Two cell lines were analyzed, one which expressed Ras-G12V
(T24) and another which expressed Ras (LNCaP). T24 cells do not require
guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ras-GTP loading, since the
Val12 mutation increases the half-life and affinity of Ras
for GTP (27) (Fig. 4). Both cell lines were infected with isogenic
strains of P. aeruginosa that expressed ExoS (ExoS) or
lacked the ExoS gene ( Previous studies determined that exoenzyme S disrupted
Ras-mediated signal transduction pathways; infection of PC12 cells with
bacteria producing ExoS but not bacteria lacking ExoS disrupted Ras-mediated signal transduction (17) and inhibited EGF stimulated Raf
kinase activity in LNCaP
cells.4 Other studies
indicated that ExoS double ADP-ribosylates Ras at Arg41 and
Arg128 (13). Arg41 is adjacent to the switch I
domain of Ras, a domain that interacts with Ras's downstream effectors
and has been shown to be a contact residue in the Rap-Raf co-crystal
structure (24).
Since ExoS ADP-ribosylated Ras at one of the contact residues between
Rap and Raf (Arg41) (24), it was hypothesized that
ADP-ribosylation of Ras disrupted Ras-Raf interactions. In the
co-crystal structure of Rap and Raf, residues from the switch 1 domain
of Rap and the adjacent The ability of ADP-ribosylation to disrupt the interactions between Ras
and Raf in vivo was tested by examining the ability of
ADP-ribosylated Val12-Ras to interact with the Ras-binding
domain of Raf. Both ADP-ribosylated and unmodified
Val12-Ras appear to interact with Raf at similar
efficiencies in vivo. If ADP-ribosylation does inhibit
Ras-Raf interactions, the change in affinity does not appear to be
sufficient to disrupt Ras-Raf interactions in vivo. Others
have shown that G12V,R41A Ras binds Raf less efficiently than G12V-Ras
in vitro (29). While mutation of Arg41 to
alanine affects Ras-Raf interactions in vitro,
ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg41 does not appear to affect
Ras-Raf interactions in vitro. This is consistent with the
model that the non-ADP-ribosylated nitrogen of the arginine guanidinium
group still being able to bind with Raf.
The fact that ExoS disrupted Raf kinase activity, but did not disrupt
Ras's ability to interact with Raf directly indicated that ExoS
disrupts Ras signal transduction upstream of the Ras-Raf interaction.
The affect of ADP-ribosylation on Ras activation was studied by
measuring the affects of ADP-ribosylation on intrinsic Ras guanine
nucleotide exchange and Cdc25-stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange
in vitro. ADP-ribosylated Ras and unmodified Ras possessed similar intrinsic nucleotide exchange rates, indicating that
modification of Ras does not affect the ability of Ras to exchange
nucleotide. Previous data indicated that ExoS ADP-ribosylated Ras-GTP,
Ras-GDP, or Ras-Mg2+ (nucleotide free) at similar rates
(13). The fact that ExoS can ADP-ribosylate either nucleotide bound
form of Ras at similar rates indicates that ADP-ribosylation does not
interfere directly with binding of either GTP or GDP to Ras. This is
consistent with the observation that ADP-ribosylation did not affect
intrinsic nucleotide exchange. Others have also reported that
ADP-ribosylation does not interfere with Ras intrinsic nucleotide
exchange (8). In addition, the crystal structure of Ras predicts that
neither Arg41 nor Arg128 is involved in
nucleotide binding (14), which is also consistent with ADP-ribosylation
at Arg41 or Arg128 not affecting intrinsic
nucleotide exchange.
Cdc25 stimulated the guanine nucleotide exchange of ADP-r-Ras at a
3-fold lower rate than Ras. Addition of increasing amounts of Cdc25 to
the exchange reaction resulted in stoichiometric nucleotide exchange.
The fact that stoichiometric nucleotide exchange can be achieved after
manipulating the concentration of the exchange factor indicated that
Cdc25 is able to reversibly interact with double ADP-ribosylated Ras,
which was consistent with the observation that an excess of ADP-r-Ras
did not inhibit the nucleotide exchange of Ras. Together these data
indicated that ADP-ribosylated Ras did not inhibit the catalytic
mechanism of Cdc25 either by binding more tightly to Cdc25 or binding
irreversibly to Cdc25. ADP-r-Ras interacted with Cdc25 less efficiently
than Ras in direct binding experiments. Together these data indicate
that ExoS inhibits Cdc25 nucleotide exchange by inhibiting Ras-Cdc25
protein-protein interactions. ADP-ribosylation at Arg128
did not inhibit Cdc25-stimulated nucleotide exchange, which indicated that it was the ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg41 that
inhibited Ras-Cdc25 interactions. The fact that ADP-ribosylation at
Arg41 was required to inhibit Cdc25-stimulated nucleotide
exchange was consistent with structural data which predicted that
Arg41 is in a region of close contact in the Ras-SOS
crystal structure (30).
In vitro data suggested that ExoS inhibited Cdc25-stimulated
nucleotide exchange by 3-fold and that the effect was not dominant negative. To examine whether ExoS inhibited Ras signaling during the
course of infection in cultured cells, the activation of Ras was
measured in two cell lines, one expressing constitutively active Ras
and one expressing wild type Ras. Others have demonstrated that
constitutively active Ras can become activated independent of growth
factor (31). ExoS did not affect the activation of ADP-ribosylated
Val12-Ras, consistent with the fact that a guanine
nucleotide exchange factor-Ras interaction is not required for
activation of Val12-Ras. ExoS did inhibit the activation of
wild type ADP-ribosylated Ras. Since ADP-ribosylation of Ras is not
dominant negative, ExoS would be required to ADP-ribosylate a large
fraction of Ras in the cell in order to inhibit Ras signaling. The fact
that ExoS modified a large proportion of Ras during the course of
infection is consistent with previous data indicating that ExoS
disrupts Ras signaling.
In the current model of Ras activation, SOS exists in a complex with
Grb2 in the cytoplasm of the eukaryotic cell. Upon stimulation with a
growth factor a receptor tyrosine kinase is activated and the
Grb2·SOS complex is recruited to the membrane (12). Recruitment of
the Grb2·SOS complex to the membrane increases the local
concentration of SOS in the vicinity of Ras. This appears to be the
rate-limiting step in Ras activation, since overexpression of Cdc25 in
the cytoplasm of the eukaryotic cells increases the concentration of
SOS in the cell sufficiently such that Ras activation occurs
independent of growth factor (26). Stimulation of cells with growth
factor does not result in stoichiometric Ras nucleotide exchange. Both nucleotide binding studies (32) and studies using Ras-Raf interactions as a measure of Ras activation (31) indicate that the increase in
Ras-GTP is only severalfold after growth factor stimulation. Once Raf
is activated, Raf stimulates the MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK1), a dual
specificity kinase that subsequently activates p42 MAP kinase (ERK).
MAPKK1 phosphorylates ERK by a two-collision distributive mechanism
rather than a single collision processive mechanism (33). Therefore,
MAPKK1 converts the graded inputs derived through Ras activation into
the switch-like outputs which result from ERK activation. ExoS, by
inhibiting graded inputs into MAPKK via inhibition of Ras activation,
could significantly inhibit the switch like outputs generated by MAPK.
The facts that ExoS inhibits the rate-limiting step in Ras activation,
that the changes in Ras-GTP are only severalfold after growth factor
stimulation and that MAP kinase activation is non-linearly dependent on
Raf activation is consistent with the model that a 3-fold decrease in
Ras-SOS interactions is sufficient to inhibit Ras-mediated signal transduction.
Several toxins have been identified which modify small molecular weight
GTP-binding proteins and disrupt the signal transduction of Ras
superfamily members. Clostridium difficile
dificile toxA and toxB preferentially modify GDP bound RhoA
and glucosylate RhoA at threonine 37, locking Rho in its inactive GDP
bound conformation (34, 35). C. sordelii LT
monoglucosylates GDP-bound Ras at threonine 35, the residue analogous
to threonine 37 of Rho (36). This modification inhibits intrinsic
nucleotide exchange as well as Ras-Raf interactions. CNF deamidates
RhoA at glutamine 63, inhibiting its ability to hydrolyze GTP,
resulting in constitutively active RhoA (37). ExoS differs from the
toxins described thus far in several respects. First ExoS does not
enter eukaryotic cells directly, but is introduced by the contact
mediated type III secretion pathway of P. aeruginosa (3).
Second, ExoS does not have a preference for either GDP or GTP bound Ras
(13), whereas the other toxins have a preference for either GTP or GDP bound Ras. Finally, ExoS does not alter an intrinsic function of Ras.
Both the modifications of C. difficile toxA and toxB and C. sordelii LT alter the intrinsic rate of nucleotide
exchange of Ras while CNF inhibits RhoA intrinsic GTPase activity.
Modification of arginine 41 by ExoS is unique in that it does not
affect the function of Ras itself and only inhibits the ability of Ras
to interact with its activator.
Recent studies have shown ExoS to be a bifunctional cytotoxin.
Expression of the carboxyl-terminal domain of ExoS, which comprises the
ADP-ribosyltransferase domain, is cytotoxic when expressed in cultured
cells (18). Intracellular expression of the amino terminus of ExoS
(C234) in eukaryotic cells stimulates actin reorganization, without
cytotoxicity, which involves small molecular weight GTPases of the Rho
subfamily.5 The mechanism by
which Cys234 inhibits Rho signaling is currently under investigation.
Rho and Ras are molecular switches which control numerous cellular
processes. Recent signaling studies suggest that there is cross-talk
between Rho and Ras family members (39). Ras and Rho proteins also
contribute to wound healing processes and tissue regeneration. Recent
studies have shown that microinjection of endothelial cells with
activated Ras stimulated their motility while microinjection of Ras
blocking antibodies inhibited cellular motility that is a component of
the wound healing process (40). In addition, hepatocyte growth
factor/scatter factor and epidermal growth factor stimulate cellular
motility through the Ras signal transduction pathway (41). Rac and Rho
are also involved in motility and tissue regeneration, since dominant
negative Rac inhibited the cellular motility stimulated by HGF/SF (41)
and inhibition of Rho by either C. difficile toxA and toxB
or the C. botulinum C3 transferase inhibited
wound healing (42). Inhibition of tissue regeneration and wound healing
appear to play a role in the pathogenesis of C. difficile,
since treatment of gastrointestinal mucosa with C. difficile
toxA and toxB alone inhibit regeneration of the gastric mucosa (42).
Thus, ExoS may contribute to the establishment of P. aeruginosa infection by inhibiting wound healing and tissue
regeneration by two mechanisms. The amino terminus of ExoS could
inhibit Rho function and inhibit wound healing in a manner similar to
C. difficile. Alternatively, ExoS could inhibit the cellular
motility and angiogenesis required for wound healing by
ADP-ribosylating Ras. By inhibiting tissue regeneration and wound
healing, ExoS may play a pivotal role in chronic disease by maintaining
sites of colonization.
Inhibition of Ras or Rho signaling may also interfere with both innate
and acquired immunity. Small molecular weight GTP-binding proteins of
the Ras superfamily are also required for cellular processes, such as
phagocytosis, as Rho proteins contribute to phagocytosis (38). Since
Ras functions upstream of Rho in cellular signaling processes (39),
ADP-ribosylation of Ras by ExoS or the inhibition of Rho function by
C234 may inhibit phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa by
macrophage. Other studies indicate that Ras proteins play critical
roles in T cell activation (21). Thus, ExoS may inhibit acquired
immunity by inhibiting T-cell activation. Future studies will determine
what roles the ADP-ribosyltransferase and the cytoskeleton
rearrangement activity of ExoS play in the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix and
-sheet, respectively, and in two
distinct regions in the Ras molecule. Arg41 is located
adjacent to the switch 1 domain of Ras (14), a domain that changes
conformation upon Ras activation. Mutations within the switch 1 domain
affect Ras's ability to interact with the Ras guanine nucleotide
exchange factor and its downstream effectors (15). Arg128
is located in a C-terminal
-helix of Ras with no ascribed function. Analysis of a double mutant, Ras-R41K,R128K, showed that ExoS ADP-ribosylated this mutant at Arg135, an Arg that is
present within the same
-helix as Arg128. The ability of
exoenzyme S to ADP-ribosylate Ras within several structural motifs and
at several locations may explain how ExoS can modify several members of
the Ras superfamily (13). Intracellular expression of ExoS modulates
several cellular functions, including the inhibition of cellular DNA
synthesis (16), disruption of Ras-mediated signal transduction in PC12
cells (17), and inhibition of
EGF1 stimulated Raf kinase
activity in LNCaP cells.2 In
addition, intracellular expression of the ADP-ribosyltransferase domain
of ExoS is cytotoxic to cultured cells (18). In this study, the
mechanism by which ExoS disrupts Ras signal transduction was shown to
occur by inhibiting guanine nucleotide exchange factor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
S. Nucleotide loaded
Ras (Ras-GTP or Ras-GDP) was then diluted to a final concentration of
20 µM into ADP-ribosylation reactions containing 100 µM NAD, 0.4 µM
N222 ExoS, and 1.6 µM FAS.
S or ADP-r-Ras-GTP
S (3 µM)
was added to GST-Raf-RBD (3 µM) for 30 min at 4 °C in
a total volume of 75 µl. Samples were centrifuged and pelleted
material was washed with 100 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.6), 20 mM NaCl. Pelleted material was subjected to
SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, which was then
hybridized to a poly-histidine-specific horseradish peroxidase
conjugate (Pierce) which was detected with ECL (Super Signal, Pierce).
Hybridization followed the manufacturer's protocol.
35S, 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 in the
presence and absence of GST-Cdc25 at the ratios indicated in a total
volume of 225 µl. For the measurement of GDP dissociation rates,
reaction mixtures contained: 0.5 µM
Ras-GDP
35S, 5 µM Ras-GDP or 5 µM ADP-r-Ras-GDP, 500 µM GTP
S, 250 nM Cdc25, 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 in a total volume of 225 µl. At each of the indicated times, 25 µl of the reaction mixtures was spotted on nitrocellulose filters, which were
then washed twice with 5 ml of 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 to remove
free radiolabel. Filter bound radioactivity was determined by
scintillation counting to quantitate the amount of radiolabeled
nucleotide bound to Ras. GDP dissociation or GTP association rates were
determined by linear regression analysis, using Sigma Plot (Jandel Scientific).
exoS(388
S) (23). After
removal of bacteria, LNCaP cells, but not T24 cells, were stimulated
with 50 ng/ml EGF for 5 min. Ras-Raf association was examined in a
co-precipitation reaction described below.
-glycerolphosphate, 10 mM benzamidine,
0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin,
10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml trypsin inhibitor). Ras was
co-precipitated for 2 h at 4 °C with GST/Raf-1 (AA 51-131) (GST-RBD) which had been pre-conjugated to glutathione-agarose beads.
Complexes were washed four times in Co-IP wash buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mM sodium chloride,
0.1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 20 mM sodium fluoride).
Ras co-precipitated with GST-RBD mutated at Arg89
(GST-R89D), served as a negative control. To recover unbound Ras
following co-precipitation with GST beads, supernatants were immunoprecipitated for 2 h at 4 °C with 1.5 µg of rat
monoclonal Y13-259 (ATCC CRL 1741) anti-Ras antibody and 10 µl of a
50% slurry of Protein G conjugated to agarose. Precipitates were
washed four times in Co-IP wash buffer and resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE,
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and blotted with
LA069 anti-H-Ras antibody (Quality Biotech) and detected by ECL.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
N222 ExoS, a catalytic
deletion peptide of ExoS containing the ADP-ribosyltransferase domain
(25), using conditions which achieved double ADP-ribosylation of Ras
(13). Ras-GTP, ADP-r-Ras-GTP, or a mixture of Ras-GTP and ADP-r-Ras-GTP
was then added to an immobilized GST fusion protein containing the
entire Ras-binding domain of Raf-1 (GST-Raf-RBD). Hybridization
analysis of the material that bound to immobilized GST-Raf-RBD showed
that similar amounts of Ras-GTP or ADP-r-Ras-GTP bound GST-Raf-RBD
(Fig. 1). Analysis of standard amounts of
Ras indicated that the ECL signal was proportional to Ras
concentration. When either Ras-GTP or ADP-r-Ras-GTP was incubated with
the resin alone, no interaction was detected (data not shown). A
competition experiment with equivalent amounts of Ras-GTP and
ADP-r-Ras-GTP resulted in the binding of equivalent amounts of both
proteins to GST-Raf-RBD, which indicated that Ras-GTP and ADP-r-Ras-GTP competed equally well for the Ras-binding domain of Raf (Fig. 1). Other
experiments demonstrated that the binding of Ras-GTP and ADP-r-Ras-GTP
to Raf was dose-dependent (data not shown).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
ADP-ribosylation does not inhibit the ability
of Ras to bind Raf. 3 µM ADP-r-Ras-GTP
S or 3 µM Ras-GTP
S was incubated alone or with 3 µM immobilized-RBD. Protein mixtures were centrifuged and
pelleted material was subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and probed with a His probe (Pierce). Lanes marked
Raf RBD (+) show components of each reaction above the
respective lane. Lanes marked Raf RBD (
) show the initial
amount of Ras or ADP-ribosylated Ras used in the experiment. The
three lanes on the right show a standard curve
that was generated by loading the indicated amount of histidine-tagged
Ras protein.
N222 to ADP-ribosylate Ras at conditions which achieved
double ADP-ribosylation, and then incubated in a solution containing
GTP
35S alone or in the presence of Cdc25. Guanine
nucleotide exchange rates were determined by measuring the amount of
GTP
35S bound to Ras, using a filter binding assay.
ADP-r-Ras-GDP and Ras-GDP possessed similar rates of intrinsic
nucleotide exchange (Fig. 2A,
Table I), indicating that
ADP-ribosylation did not affect the ability of the Ras protein to
undergo nucleotide exchange. These results are consistent with
structural data, which predicted that neither Arg41 nor
Arg128 interacted directly with the guanine nucleotide.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
ADP-ribosylation interferes with Cdc25
catalyzed but not intrinsic Ras nucleotide exchange. A,
the intrinsic rate of nucleotide exchange of unmodified Ras and
ADP-r-Ras was measured as described. Reaction mixtures contained 2.5 µM Ras-GDP or ADP-r-Ras-GDP, 500 µM
GTP
35S, 40 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 and
nucleotide exchange was measured over the course of 45 min. Nucleotide
exchange rates are reported in Table I. B, Cdc25-catalyzed
guanine nucleotide exchange of unmodified Ras and ADP-r-Ras was
measured as described. Reaction mixtures contained 2.5 µM
Ras-GDP or ADP-r Ras-GDP, 500 µM GTP
35S,
33 nM Cdc25, 40 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 and
nucleotide exchange was measured over the course of 10 min.
C, Cdc25-stimulated nucleotide exchange of unmodified Ras
and ADP-r-Ras was measured as in B using a concentration of
250 nM Cdc25. D, the rate of Cdc25-catalyzed
GDP-dissociation of unmodified Ras in the presence of excess unmodified
Ras or ADP-r-Ras was measured as described. Reaction mixtures contained
either 0.5 µM GDP
35S-loaded unmodified Ras
in the presence of either 5 µM Ras-GDP or ADP-r-Ras-GDP,
500 µM GTP
S, 250 nM Cdc25, 40 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 and nucleotide exchange was measured
over the course of 10 min.
Intrinsic and Cdc25-catalyzed guanine nucleotide exchange rates for
wild type and ADP-ribosylated Ras
35S was
measured in the presence of an excess nonradiolabeled ADP-r-Ras-GDP or
Ras-GDP. The Cdc25-catalyzed nucleotide exchange rate of Ras-GDP did
not differ significantly in the presence of excess Ras-GDP or
ADP-r-Ras-GDP (Fig. 2D, Table I), which indicated that
ADP-ribosylation of Ras did not result in a dominant negative phenotype.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
ADP-ribosylation decreases the affinity of
Ras for Cdc25. A, the ability of Ras-GTP
S, Ras-GDP,
Ras-NF, and ADP-r-Ras-NF to bind to GST-Cdc25 was measured. Reaction
mixtures contained 220 nM Ras-GTP
S, Ras-GDP, Ras-NF or
ADP-r-Ras-NF, 28 nM GST-Cdc25, and 0.2 mg/ml egg albumin.
Reaction mixtures were centrifuged and pelleted material was subjected
to SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with a His-probe
(Pierce). Reaction components added are listed above the respective
lane. B, the ability of ADP-r-Ras-NF and Ras-NF to compete
for binding to GST-Cdc25 was measured. Reaction mixtures contained 600 nM Ras (ADP-r-Ras-NF, Ras-NF or both), 84 nM
Cdc25, and 0.2 mg/ml egg albumin. For lanes marked Cdc25 (+)
reaction components added are listed above the respective lane. 110 pmol of ADP-ribosylated Ras or unmodified Ras were loaded to indicate
the electrophoretic mobility of ADP-ribosylated and unmodified Ras. The
results of duplicate experiments are shown.
ExoS). Following infection, LNCaP cells were
stimulated with EGF and Ras-GTP was measured as the amount of Ras bound
to immobilized RBD in cell lysates. Infection of LNCaP cells with P. aeruginosa expressing ExoS resulted in a decrease in
EGF-stimulated GTP loading of Ras, while infection of LNCaP cells with
P. aeruginosa
ExoS did not decrease GTP loading of Ras
(Fig. 4). These results indicate that
ExoS inhibits growth factor-stimulated Ras-GTP loading in
vivo. In contrast, infection of T24 cells with P. aeruginosa expressing ExoS did not change the amount of GTP
loading of Ras relative to uninfected cells, indicating that ExoS does
not affect growth factor-independent GTP loading of Ras (Fig. 4).
Analysis of a GST fusion containing the R89D mutant of the Ras-binding domain of Raf, a mutant that does not interact with Ras, showed that
Ras did not bind to these resins, indicating that Ras does not interact
nonspecifically with the GST resin under these conditions (Fig. 4).
Together, these data indicate that the ADP-ribosylation of Ras by ExoS
inhibits guanine nucleotide exchange factor stimulated, but not
intrinsic Ras nucleotide exchange both in vivo and in vitro.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Suppression of EGF activation of Ras by
ExoS. LNCaP (LN) and T24 cells were exposed to no
bacteria (0), 108 colony forming units/ml 388
S
(
S), or 388 bacteria for 4 h. Bacteria were removed
and LNCaP cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml EGF for 5 min, while T24
cells, which express oncogenic H-Ras, were not stimulated. Cells were
lysed with Co-IP buffer, and Ras was co-precipitated with GST-RBD or
GST-R89D which had been pre-conjugated to glutathione-agarose beads.
Following precipitation with GST beads, the supernatants were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Ras antibody Y13-259 and Protein G
conjugated to agarose to recover unbound Ras (259). Precipitated
proteins and Ras were resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and blotted with LA069 anti-H-Ras
antibody and detected by ECL. Positions of unmodified (U)
and modified (M) Ras are indicated.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-sheet, which contains Arg41,
are involved in hydrogen bonding interactions with Raf (24). However,
both ADP-r-Ras-GTP and Ras-GTP interacted with Raf at similar
affinities. Thus, the ADP-ribosylation of one of the contact residues
did not appreciably affect the affinity of Ras for Raf. One of the
electron pairs from the nitrogen atoms in the Arg41
guanidinium side chain of Rap is involved in a hydrogen bonding interaction with Raf. Arginine possesses two nitrogen groups in its
side chain and ADP-ribosylation is postulated to occur at one of the
two nitrogens in a stereospecific manner (28). Thus, after
ADP-ribosylation, the alternate nitrogen in the side chain of arginine
still may be able to hydrogen bond with Raf. This may explain how
ADP-ribosylation of Ras at Arg41 may not inhibit Ras-Raf
interactions. Alternatively, ADP-ribosylation may contribute to the
binding of Ras to Raf through other polar or hydrophobic interactions
between ADP-ribose and Raf.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 414-456-8412; Fax: 414-456-6535; E-mail: toxin@mcw.edu.
2 T. S. Vincent and J. C. Olson, unpublished data.
3 J. Olson, J. Fraylick, E. McGuffie, K. Dolan, T. Yahr, D. Frank, and T. Vincent, submitted for publication.
4 J. C. Olson and T. S. Vincent, unpublished data.
5 Pederson, K. J., Vallis, A., Aktories, K., Frank, D. W., and Barbieri, J. T. (1999) Mol. Microbiol., in press.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
EGF, epidermal
growth factor;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
GPT
S, guanosin
5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate;
GDP
S, guanyl-5'-yl
thiophosphate.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bodey, G. P., Bolivar, R., Fainstein, V., and Jadeja, L. (1983) Rev. Infect. Dis. 5, 279-313[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Kulich, S. M.,
Yahr, T. L.,
Mende-Mueller, L. M.,
Barbieri, J. T.,
and Frank, D. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10431-10437 |
| 3. | Yahr, T. L., Goranson, J., and Frank, D. W. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 22, 991-1003[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Hueck, C. J.
(1998)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62,
379-433 |
| 5. |
Coburn, J.,
Kane, A. V.,
Feig, L.,
and Gill, D. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
6438-6446 |
| 6. |
Coburn, J.,
Dillon, S. T.,
Iglewski, B. H.,
and Gill, D. M.
(1989)
Infect. Immun.
57,
996-998 |
| 7. | Knight, D. A., and Barbieri, J. T. (1997) Infect. Immun. 65, 3304-3309[Abstract] |
| 8. |
Coburn, J.,
Wyatt, R. T.,
Iglewski, B. H.,
and Gill, D. M.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
9004-9008 |
| 9. |
McGuffie, E. M.,
Frank, D. W.,
Vincent, T. S.,
and Olson, J. C.
(1998)
Infect. Immun.
66,
2607-2613 |
| 10. | Marshall, C. J. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 197-204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Wittinghofer, A., and Pai, E. F. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 382-387[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Joneson, T., and Bar-Sagi, D. (1997) J. Mol. Med. 75, 587-593[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Ganesan, A. K.,
Mende-Mueller, L.,
Seltzer, J.,
and Barbieri, J. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9503-9508 |
| 14. | Tong, L. A., de Vos, A. M., Milburn, M. V., and Kim, S. H. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 217, 503-516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Wittinghofer, A., and Nassar, N. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 488-491[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Olson, J. C., McGuffie, E. M., and Frank, D. W. (1997) Infect. Immun. 65, 248-256[Abstract] |
| 17. |
Ganesan, A. K.,
Frank, D. W.,
Misra, R. P.,
Schmidt, G.,
and Barbieri, J. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7332-7337 |
| 18. | Pederson, K., and Barbieri, J. (1998) Mol. Microbiol., in press |
| 19. | Foschi, M., Chari, S., Dunn, M. J., and Sorokin, A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6439-6451[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Lenzen, C., Cool, R. H., and Wittinghofer, A. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 255, 95-109[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Caron, E.,
and Hall, A.
(1998)
Science
282,
1717-1721 |
| 22. |
Bjorn, M. J.,
Pavlovskis, O. R.,
Thompson, M. R.,
and Iglewski, B. H.
(1979)
Infect. Immun.
24,
837-842 |
| 23. | Kulich, S. M., Frank, D. W., and Barbieri, J. T. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 1-8[Abstract] |
| 24. | Nassar, N., Horn, G., Herrmann, C., Scherer, A., McCormick, F., and Wittinghofer, A. (1995) Nature 375, 554-560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Knight, D. A., Finck-Barbancon, V., Kulich, S. M., and Barbieri, J. T. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 3182-3186[Abstract] |
| 26. |
Corbalan-Garcia, S.,
Margarit, S. M.,
Galron, D.,
Yang, S. S.,
and Bar-Sagi, D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
880-886 |
| 27. | Frech, M., Darden, T. A., Pedersen, L. G., Foley, C. K., Charifson, P. S., Anderson, M. W., and Wittinghofer, A. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 3237-3244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Oppenheimer, N. J.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
4907-4910 |
| 29. | Shirouzu, M., Koide, H., Fujita-Yoshigaki, J., Oshio, H., Toyama, Y., Yamasaki, K., Fuhrman, S. A., Villafranca, E., Kaziro, Y., and Yokoyama, S. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2153-2157[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Boriack-Sjodin, P. A., Margarit, S. M., Bar-Sagi, D., and Kuriyan, J. (1998) Nature 394, 337-343[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | de Rooij, J., and Bos, J. L. (1997) Oncogene 14, 623-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Corbalan-Garcia, S., Degenhardt, K. R., and Bar-Sagi, D. (1996) Oncogene 12, 1063-1068[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Ferrell, J. E., Jr.,
and Bhatt, R. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19008-19016 |
| 34. |
Just, I.,
Wilm, M.,
Selzer, J.,
Rex, G.,
von Eichel-Streiber, C.,
Mann, M.,
and Aktories, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13932-13936 |
| 35. | Just, I., Selzer, J., Wilm, M., von Eichel-Streiber, C., Mann, M., and Aktories, K. (1995) Nature 375, 500-503[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Just, I.,
Selzer, J.,
Hofmann, F.,
Green, G. A.,
and Aktories, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10149-10153 |
| 37. |
Schmidt, G.,
Selzer, J.,
Lerm, M.,
and Aktories, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13669-13674 |
| 38. | Cantrell, D. (1994) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6, 380-384[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Zohn, I. M., Campbell, S. L., Khosravi-Far, R., Rossman, K. L., and Der, C. J. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1415-1438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Fox, P. L., Sa, G., Dobrowolski, S. F., and Stacey, D. W. (1994) Oncogene 9, 3519-3526[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Ridley, A. J., Comoglio, P. M., and Hall, A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1110-1122[Abstract] |
| 42. | Santos, M. F., McCormack, S. A., Guo, Z., Okolicany, J., Zheng, Y., Johnson, L. R., and Tigyi, G. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 216-225[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Fehr, S. E. Burr, M. Gibert, J. d'Alayer, J. Frey, and M. R. Popoff Aeromonas Exoenzyme T of Aeromonas salmonicida Is a Bifunctional Protein That Targets the Host Cytoskeleton J. Biol. Chem., September 28, 2007; 282(39): 28843 - 28852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jia, Y. Wang, L. Zhou, and S. Jin Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Toxin ExoS Effectively Induces Apoptosis in Host Cells Infect. Immun., December 1, 2006; 74(12): 6557 - 6570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dasgupta, A. Ashare, G. W. Hunninghake, and T. L. Yahr Transcriptional Induction of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System by Low Ca2+ and Host Cell Contact Proceeds through Two Distinct Signaling Pathways. Infect. Immun., June 1, 2006; 74(6): 3334 - 3341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kierbel, A. Gassama-Diagne, K. Mostov, and J. N. Engel The Phosphoinositol-3-Kinase-Protein Kinase B/Akt Pathway Is Critical for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain PAK Internalization Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2005; 16(5): 2577 - 2585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Maresso, M. R. Baldwin, and J. T. Barbieri Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin Proteins Are High Affinity Targets for ADP-ribosylation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38402 - 38408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Garrity-Ryan, S. Shafikhani, P. Balachandran, L. Nguyen, J. Oza, T. Jakobsen, J. Sargent, X. Fang, S. Cordwell, M. A. Matthay, et al. The ADP Ribosyltransferase Domain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoT Contributes to Its Biological Activities Infect. Immun., January 1, 2004; 72(1): 546 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Rocha, J. Coburn, E. A. Rucks, and J. C. Olson Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exoenzyme S as a Bifunctional Enzyme in J774A.1 Macrophages Infect. Immun., September 1, 2003; 71(9): 5296 - 5305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Rucks, J. E. Fraylick, L. M. Brandt, T. S. Vincent, and J. C. Olson Cell line differences in bacterially translocated ExoS ADP-ribosyltransferase substrate specificity Microbiology, February 1, 2003; 149(2): 319 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Riese and J. T. Barbieri Membrane Localization Contributes to the In Vivo ADP-Ribosylation of Ras by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS Infect. Immun., April 1, 2002; 70(4): 2230 - 2232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Riese, U.-M. Goehring, M. E. Ehrmantraut, J. Moss, J. T. Barbieri, K. Aktories, and G. Schmidt Auto-ADP-ribosylation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 2002; 277(14): 12082 - 12088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Fraylick, J. R. La Rocque, T. S. Vincent, and J. C. Olson Independent and Coordinate Effects of ADP-Ribosyltransferase and GTPase-Activating Activities of Exoenzyme S on HT-29 Epithelial Cell Function Infect. Immun., September 1, 2001; 69(9): 5318 - 5328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|