![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21885-21892, July 30, 1999
From the The structurally defined sea anemone peptide
toxins ShK and BgK potently block the intermediate conductance,
Ca2+-activated potassium channel IKCa1, a
well recognized therapeutic target present in erythrocytes, human
T-lymphocytes, and the colon. The well characterized voltage-gated
Kv1.3 channel in human T-lymphocytes is also blocked by
both peptides, although ShK has a ~1,000-fold greater affinity for
Kv1.3 than IKCa1. To gain insight into the architecture of the toxin receptor in IKCa1, we used
alanine-scanning in combination with mutant cycle analyses to map the
ShK-IKCa1 interface, and compared it with the
ShK-Kv1.3 interaction surface. ShK uses the same five core
residues, all clustered around the critical Lys22, to
interact with IKCa1 and Kv1.3, although it
relies on a larger number of contacts to stabilize its weaker
interactions with IKCa1 than with Kv1.3. The
toxin binds to IKCa1 in a region corresponding to the
external vestibule of Kv1.3, and the turret and outer pore of the structurally defined bacterial potassium channel, KcsA. Based on
the NMR structure of ShK, we deduce the toxin receptor in
IKCa1 to have x-y dimensions of
~22 Å, a diameter of ~31 Å, and a depth of ~8 Å; we estimate
that the ion selectivity lies ~13 Å below the outer lip of the toxin
receptor. These dimensions are in good agreement with those of the KcsA
channel determined from its crystal structure, and the inferred
structure of Kv1.3 based on mapping with scorpion toxins.
Thus, these distantly related channels exhibit architectural
similarities in the outer pore region. This information could
facilitate development of specific and potent modulators of the
therapeutically important IKCa1 channel.
The intermediate conductance, calcium-activated potassium channel,
IKCa1, plays a role in regulating membrane potential
and in modulating the calcium signal in many different peripheral tissues (1-12), including human T-lymphocytes (3, 4), B-lymphocytes (EST accession no. AA937083), erythrocytes (AF042487, AF053403, AF072884), hemopoietic stem cells (AA558247), colonic epithelia (AA887697, T24528), pancreatic islets (AA076338, AA076337, AA122017),
fibroblasts (AI034286), prostate (AA603035, AA65228), ovary (AA424836,
AA443903, AA425636), testis (AI081834), and platelets (10).
IKCa1 is activated by intracellular calcium via a
calmodulin-dependent mechanism (13), and its amino acid
sequence exhibits ~40% identity with the sub-family of small conductance calcium-activated potassium channels (1-6). Clotrimazole, a potent but nonselective inhibitor of this channel, is currently being
evaluated in the therapy of sickle cell disease and secretory diarrheas. Although initial results have been encouraging (5, 14-16),
there is clearly a need for more specific inhibitors of IKCa1, and architectural information on this channel may
facilitate drug development.
The use of peptide toxins to obtain insight into the topology of the
external vestibule of potassium channels has a long and successful
history. Structurally defined peptides from scorpion venom and sea
anemone have been used as molecular yardsticks to gauge the dimensions
and shape of the external vestibules of the voltage-gated
Shaker and Kv1.3 channels (17-23). The deduced
dimensions are in good agreement with the recently published structure
of the outer pore region of the bacterial potassium channel, KcsA, based on crystallographic data (24, 25). Therefore, the use of peptide
toxins as mapping tools, set in the context of the known KcsA crystal
structure, can facilitate the architectural mapping of the outer pore
regions of pharmacologically important mammalian potassium channels in
the absence of direct structural data for these channels.
Although IKCa1 is only distantly related to the
Shaker and Kv1.3 voltage-gated channels, it is
potently blocked by some of the same scorpion and sea anemone peptides
that inhibit these channels. It might therefore be feasible to use the
peptide-mapping approach to gain insight into the dimensions and shape
of the toxin receptor on IKCa1 and to compare this topology
with the external vestibules of Kv1.3 and KcsA.
For this purpose, we have used the structurally defined 35-amino acid
peptide toxin, ShK,1 from the
sea anemone Stichodactyla helianthus. We used the alanine scanning method, coupled with mutant cycle analyses, to map the interactive surface between ShK and IKCa1 and compared this
with the ShK:Kv1.3 interface. Our studies indicate that ShK
binds to IKCa1 in an external vestibule that is
architecturally similar to that of Shaker, Kv1.3,
and KcsA, although ShK uses a significantly wider surface to
interact with IKCa1 compared with its interaction with
Kv1.3. Such structural differences might be exploited to guide the design of novel peptides that specifically target
IKCa1.
Peptide Synthesis--
Fmoc-amino acid derivatives were obtained
from Bachem A.G. (CH-4416 Bubendorf, Switzerland). Solid-phase assembly
was initiated with an Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-2-chlorotrityl resin to minimize
potential racemization of the C-terminal Cys residue. Automated
stepwise assembly was carried out entirely on an ABI-431A peptide
synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The ShK analogues
were solubilized, oxidized, and purified by reverse phase-high pressure liquid chromatography using the method described previously (23, 26),
and high pressure liquid chromatography-pure fractions were pooled and
lyophilized. The structure and purity of the peptides were confirmed by
reverse phase-high pressure liquid chromatography, amino acid analysis,
and electrospray ionization-mass spectroscopy analysis. Samples were
weighed and adjusted to account for peptide content before bioassay.
Reagents--
A cell line stably expressing mKv1.3
(27) was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing
10% fetal calf serum and 1 mg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.). The
Kv1.3-Val404 (His Expression and Electrophysiological Analysis--
The human
wild-type IKCa1 and IKCa1-Lys239
constructs were linearized with NotI, the
Kv1.3-Val404 mutant with EcoRI, and
these constructs were transcribed in vitro (20, 28). The
cRNA along with a marker dye was injected into rat basophilic leukemia
cells as described previously (13, 28). After 2-6 h, dye-containing
cells with specific currents could be characterized using the
patch-clamp method. Cell lines stably expressing Kv1.3-wild
type (27) were trypsinized and plated onto glass coverslips at least
3 h before measurement. All cells were measured in the whole-cell
configuration and bathed in mammalian Ringer solution with 0.1% bovine
serum albumin (Sigma) containing (in mM): 160 NaCl, 4.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, adjusted to pH
7.4 with NaOH, with an osmolarity of 290-320 mOsm. In the K+-Ringer solution, NaCl was replaced with KCl. A simple
syringe-driven perfusion system was used to exchange the bath solutions
in the recording chamber. The internal pipette solution for the
Kv1.3 channel recordings contained (in mM): 134 potassium fluoride, 1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES,
10 EGTA, pH 7.2 (with KOH), 290-310 mOsm. The internal pipette
solution for the IKCa1 channel expressed in rat basophilic
leukemia cells contained (in mM): 135 potassium aspartate,
2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 EGTA, 8.7 CaCl2, pH 7.2 (with KOH), 290-310 mOsm (free [Ca2+]i = 1 µM). The holding potential in all experiments was Free Energy Difference of Binding [ Double Mutant Cycle Analysis--
This method evaluates the
strength of the interaction between any pair of channel and toxin
residues. For each mutant cycle, we measured the potency
(Kd) of ShK and its analogues on IKCa1
and its mutants. The change in coupling energy, The Sea Anemone Toxins, ShK and BgK, Block IKCa1 and Kv1.3
Channels--
We compared the toxin sensitivities of the two
K+ channels, present in activated human T lymphocytes,
IKCa1 and Kv1.3. Two potent peptide inhibitors,
ShK and BgK, from the sea anemones S. helianthus and
B. granulifera, were chosen for analysis (30, 31). These
peptides share 31% sequence identity (Fig.
1A). Both contain six
conserved cysteines that form three disulfide bonds, a feature common
to many channel-blocking peptide inhibitors from scorpion venom as well
as many defensins (32). However, the structures of ShK and BgK are
significantly different from that of the scorpion toxins and defensins
(23, 33, 34).
The cloned IKCa1 and Kv1.3 genes were expressed
in mammalian cells, and representative currents are shown in Fig.
1B. IKCa1 currents were elicited by 1 µM
calcium in the pipette following break-in, whereas depolarizing pulses
were used to generate Kv1.3 currents. ShK and BgK, when
applied externally, block the IKCa1 channel in the low
nanomolar range with Kd values of 30 ± 7 nM and 172 ± 43 nM, respectively (Fig.
1B, left top panel). BgK blocks
Kv1.3 with comparable potency (Kd = 39 ± 4 nM; Fig. 1B, right top
panel). In contrast, ShK exhibits a markedly greater affinity for
Kv1.3 channels (Kd = 0.016 ± 0.003 nM) compared with IKCa1 (Fig. 1B,
top panel), indicating that this peptide has an exquisite
ability to discriminate between the two T lymphocyte K+ channels.
Determining the IKCa1 Channel-binding Surface of ShK--
To
elucidate the molecular basis for the ability of ShK to discriminate
between IKCa1 and Kv1.3, we used alanine-scanning mutagenesis to identify ShK residues essential for binding to both
these channels. A series of monosubstituted peptide analogues, in which
each residue is substituted with alanine, was tested for their ability
to block the IKCa1 and Kv1.3 channels. The only exception is His19, which was replaced by a lysine.
Structurally critical ShK residues that were not substituted included
the six half-cysteine residues, as well as Asp5,
Ala14, and Gly33. Kd values
measured in this "Ala-scan" were used to calculate the free energy
difference of binding,
In the representative example shown in Fig. 1B
(left), an alanine substitution at ShK position 20 significantly reduces the affinity of the toxin for IKCa1
(Kd = 2,450 nM) compared with that of
the wild-type toxin (Kd = 30 nM). The
change in free energy of binding, caused by this substitution, is 2.5 kcal mol
Fig. 3 (left) shows the
positions of the ShK residues (bottom and side view) that contribute to
its interaction with IKCa1, color coordinated with the
histograms in Fig. 2A. All the highly critical residues
( Comparison of the ShK Toxin-binding Surfaces in IKCa1 and
Kv1.3--
All ShK analogues were tested on the Kv1.3
channel to define the ShK-binding surface for this structurally well
defined channel (20, 21, 23). Fig. 1B, bottom
panel, compares the effect of one ShK alanine substitution (at
ShK20) on currents through Kv1.3 and
IKCa1, whereas Fig. 2A compares the
ShK-Lys22 protrudes into the Kv1.3 pore and lies
in close proximity to Tyr400 and Asp402 in the
selectivity filter, and is critical for the interaction of the toxin
with this channel (23). To determine the contribution of
Lys22 to the interaction of the toxin with
IKCa1, we compared the affinity of IKCa1 and
Kv1.3 for four ShK-Lys22 analogues (Fig.
2B); we also examined the effect of these analogues on the
Kv1.3-His404
Fig. 3 highlights the residues that ShK uses to interact with
IKCa1 (left) compared with those for
Kv1.3 (right). The residues are color-coordinated
with the histogram in Fig. 2, A and B. ShK residues required for binding to both channels are clustered together on one surface (colored), whereas white residues
not required for the interaction are located on the opposite toxin
surface. ShK uses eight essential residues, Arg11,
His19, Ser20, Met21,
Lys22, Tyr23, Arg24, and
Phe27 to interact with IKCa1, whereas the toxin
interaction with Kv1.3 relies on only five essential
contacts (His19, Ser20, Lys22,
Tyr23, and Arg24). Alanine substitutions at any
of these five critical positions in the binding core domain severely
disrupt the ShK-channel interaction in both channels
( Interactions of ShK with Residues in the External Vestibule of
IKCa1--
Peptides from scorpion and snake venom, as well as from sea
anemone, bind to residues in the external vestibule of the ion conduction pathway of eukaryotic voltage-gated potassium channels and
occlude their pores (17-23, 34). This vestibule corresponds to the
outer pore and turret region in the structurally defined bacterial
K+ channel, KcsA (24), and mutations in the turret region
of KcsA greatly enhance the ability of this channel to bind peptide
inhibitors (25). We therefore undertook a series of mutational analyses to define the interactions of ShK with residues in the external vestibule of IKCa1.
Charge-reversal Mutation at IKCa1-Asp239 Dramatically
Reduces Sensitivity to ShK--
We first aligned the turret and pore
regions of KcsA, Kv1.3, and IKCa1 (Fig.
4A). All three channels are
remarkably similar in the pore region with absolute conservation of the
GYGD motif (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, IKCa1
contains an aspartate (Asp239) at the position homologous
to Asp386 in the turret of Kv1.3 that is
essential for the interaction of Kv1.3 with ShK and various
scorpion toxins (20, 23). A charge-reversal mutation involving
Asp386 in Kv1.3 (Asp IKCa1-Asp239 Interacts with ShK-Arg11 and
ShK-Arg,sup>29--
Asp386 in Kv1.3 and
the corresponding Arg64 in KcsA are positioned at the
periphery of the base of the external vestibule, and Asp239
might therefore be expected to occupy an equivalent position in
IKCa1. Because ShK-Arg29 interacts with
Asp386 in Kv1.3 (23), we used mutant cycle
analysis to determine whether this peptide residue is close to
Asp239 in IKCa1. Two additional ShK residues
were evaluated for their ability to interact with Asp239.
ShK-Arg11 is ~21 Å from Arg29 on the
channel-binding surface, whereas ShK-Lys9 is on the
nonbinding surface of ShK (Fig. 3). Fig. 4C shows the three
mutant cycles that were used to analyze the ShK interactions with
IKCa1-Asp239. ShK-Arg29 and
ShK-Arg11 couple tightly with
IKCa1-Asp239 ( ShK-Lys22 Protrudes into the IKCa1 Pore and This
Interaction Is Dependent on the K+ Ion Concentration in the
Pore--
Because Lys22 is located at the lowest and
central point in the channel-binding surface of ShK (Fig. 3), there is
a good likelihood that it lies close to or within the pore of
IKCa1, as has been reported for Kv1.3 (23). To
test this idea, we examined whether the terminal amine of
ShK-Lys22 lies close to a potassium-binding site in the ion
selectively filter. Earlier studies have shown that Lys22
in ShK, and the homologous Lys27 in the scorpion toxins,
agitoxin-2 and kaliotoxin, lie in close proximity to a
potassium-binding site in the ion selectivity filter of the
Kv1.3 and Shaker channels (21, 22). Occupancy of
this site by a K+ ion appears to destabilize the
interaction of the native toxins with these channels via electrostatic
repulsion of Lys27, because it has little effect on toxin
analogues containing neutral substitutions at position 27 (21, 22).
Similarly, potassium ions were shown to inhibit the interaction between
Lys27 (but not Asn27) in charybdotoxin and
residues in the pore of the large conductance, calcium-activated
K+ channel, BK (35). We have used a similar approach to
determine whether ShK-Lys22 lies in the vicinity of a
potassium-binding site in the IKCa1 pore. We compared the
effect of changing the external K+ concentration from 4.5 to 164.5 mM on the affinity of the IKCa1 channel
for ShK-Lys22 and ShK-Ala22. Consistent with
earlier reports, increasing external [K+] also reduces
the potency of ShK-Lys22 on the IKCa1 channel
(7.7-fold), whereas block by ShK-Ala22 is minimally
affected (1.6-fold). We assessed the strength of this interaction using
mutant cycle analysis (Fig. 4D). The
Since ShK-Lys22 protrudes into the pores of both
IKCa1 and Kv1.3, why is the IKCa1 pore
more sensitive to ShK-Lys22 substitutions than the
Kv1.3 pore, especially those involving shorter
positive charged residues (Orn22 and Dap22)? A
comparison of the sequences of the outer pore regions of the two
channels suggests an explanation (Fig. 4A). Kv1.3
contains a histidine (His404) at the entrance to its pore
that is positioned just above the selectivity filter, whereas
IKCa1 contains a hydrophobic residue (Val257) at
the corresponding position. Might the difference in the nature of the
residue at the pore entrance account for the differential sensitivity
to Shk-Dap22 and Shk-Orn22? To test this
possibility, we replaced Kv1.3-His404 with
valine, a mutation that makes the outer pore of Kv1.3 more closely resemble that of IKCa1, and tested the sensitivity
of this channel to the ShK22 analogues. In keeping with our
hypothesis, the Kv1.3-Val404 mutant behaves more
like IKCa1 with respect to all ShK-Lys22
substitutions (Fig. 2B). We were unable to determine the
effect of the reverse mutation (Val257 Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis, we have compared the surface
that ShK, a 35-amino acid peptide toxin from the sea anemone S. helianthus, uses to interact with two distinct potassium channels present in activated human T-lymphocytes: the intermediate conductance, Ca2+-activated K+ channel IKCa1, and
the voltage-gated K+ channel Kv1.3. Although
using the same core domain, the IKCa1-binding surface of ShK
is more extensive than its Kv1.3-binding surface, and yet
ShK blocks Kv1.3 with ~1,000-fold greater potency than IKCa1. A few tight Kv1.3-ShK contacts appear to
underlie the picomolar affinity of ShK for Kv1.3, whereas
the IKCa1-ShK interface is stabilized by a greater number of
weaker interactions.
Because ShK interacts with IKCa1 and Kv1.3 using
the same core domain involving His19, Ser20,
Lys22, Tyr23, and Arg24 (Fig. 3),
this toxin is likely to sit in both channels with a similar geometry.
Several lines of evidence support this idea. First, charge-reversal
mutations at homologous positions in IKCa1 (Asp239 Knowing the NMR structure of ShK (33) and its approximate docking
configuration in IKCa1, we used this peptide as a structural template to estimate the dimensions of the toxin receptor in the external vestibule of IKCa1. We have obtained two
independent estimates of the diameter of the toxin receptor in the
IKCa1 external vestibule. First, we estimate the width of
the IKCa1 toxin receptor to be ~31 Å (Fig. 5) based on
the width of the IKCa1-binding surface of ShK (distance from
Arg1 to Phe15). Second, the
x-y dimension of the toxin receptor is estimated to be ~22 Å (Fig. 5, left), based on the distance between
the two toxin residues, ShK-Arg11 and ShK-Arg29
(Fig. 5, right), that interact with Asp239
residues in adjacent IKCa1 subunits. This value implies (by
Pythagorean triangulation) a distance of ~31 Å between
Asp239 residues in opposite subunits (Fig. 5). We estimate
that the toxin receptor is approximately ~8-9 Å deep, based on the
vertical distance between one horizontal line joining Arg1
and Phe15, and a second horizontal line connecting the
terminal amines of Arg11 and Arg29 (Fig. 5,
right). The selectivity filter is estimated to lie ~12-13 Å below the outer edge of the toxin receptor in the vestibule based on
the vertical distance between the terminal amine of Lys22
and the horizontal line joining Arg1 and Phe15
(Fig. 5, right). Our deduced dimensions of the toxin
receptor in the IKCa1 vestibule are in good agreement with
those obtained by crystallography for the KcsA vestibule (24, 25), and
by toxin-mapping for Kv1.3 (20, 21, 23) and
Shaker (17-19, 22).
Thus, the IKCa1 external vestibule appears to be
topologically similar to those of the distantly related Kv1.3,
Shaker, and KcsA channels, a result that provides
support for the development of homology models of the IKCa1
outer pore based on the KcsA crystal structure. The experimentally
determined differences in the ShK-IKCa1 and
ShK-Kv1.3 binding interfaces raises the possibility of
designing novel peptides and small molecule inhibitors that selectively target the IKCa1 channel. Such reagents might be useful in
elucidating the role of the IKCa1 channel in diverse cell
types and may also have therapeutic value.
We appreciate the expert technical assistance
of Luette Forrest and Annabelle Chia-ling Wu, as well as valuable
discussions with George A. Gutman, Stephan Grissmer, Ray Norton, and
William Kem. We thank Dr. A. Menez (Saclay, France) for the kind gift of BgK and Dr. J. Aiyar (Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) for
the hIKCa1-Lys239 construct.
*
This study was supported from funds from National Institutes
of Health Grants MH59222 (to K. G. C.), NS14609 (to M. D. C.), GM54221 (to K. G. C. and M. P.), and by a
fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (to H. R.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology
and Biophysics, University of California Medical School, Joan Irvine
Smith Hall, Rm. 291, Irvine, CA 92697. Tel.: 949-824-2133; Fax:
949-824-3143; E-mail: gchandy@uci.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
ShK, Stichodactyla helianthus toxin;
BgK, Bunodosoma
granulifera toxin;
Dap, diaminopropionic acid;
Nle, norleucine;
Fmoc, N-(-9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl.
Structural Conservation of the Pores of Calcium-activated and
Voltage-gated Potassium Channels Determined by a Sea Anemone
Toxin*
,
, and
¶
Department of Physiology and Biophysics,
University of California, Irvine, California 92697 and
§ Bachem Bioscience Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
19406
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Val) mutant has been
described previously (20). The human IKCa1 expression
construct has previously been described (3, 4, 13), and the
IKCa1-Lys239 mutant was a gift from Dr. J. Aiyar
(Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE). The BgK peptide from
Bunodosoma granulifera was a gift from Dr. A. Menez (Saclay, France).
80
mV. IKCa1 currents were activated with 1 µM
internal Ca2+ and 200-ms voltage ramps from
150 to 50 mV
applied every 5 s. Kv1.3 currents were measured
following 200-ms depolarizing pulses to 40 mV from the holding
potential, applied every 30 s. Series resistance compensation
(80%) was used if the current exceeded 2 nA. Capacitative and leak
currents were subtracted using the P/8 procedure for Kv1.3
currents. Kd values were calculated using the
equation Kd = ([toxin]/((1/y)
1)) with y = unblocked fraction; shown as mean ± S.D. where n
3 for all experiments.
F]--
The free energy
difference of binding was calculated as
F = RT ln(Kd
ShK-analogue/Kd ShK-wild type), where R = 1.987 cal/mol and T = 295o K (30).
F (in kcal mol
1)
is a measure of the difference in free energy between the interaction of an ShK analogue with the channel, compared with that of wild-type ShK (26).

G, for
a given pair of ShK-IKCa1 residues and their mutants was
calculated using the formula 
G = kT ln
, as
described earlier (20, 23). Based on the studies of Schreiber and
Fersht (29) and Hidalgo and MacKinnon (19), 
G
values
0.5 kcal mol
1 indicate that a particular
pair of ShK and IKCa1 residues are likely to lie within 5 Å of each other.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The sea anemone toxins, ShK and BgK, are
potent inhibitors of IKCa1 and Kv1.3
channels. A, alignment of the ShK and BgK amino
acid sequence. Identical residues are shaded, conservative
changes are connected with a line, the six conserved cysteines are
shown in bold. B, IKCa1 and Kv1.3 currents in the
presence and absence of ShK and BgK toxins. Top panel,
wild-type ShK and BgK toxins block IKCa1 (left)
and Kv1.3 (right) currents at low nanomolar to
picomolar concentrations. Bottom panel, effect of two
ShK analogues, ShK-Ala20 and ShK-Dap22, on
IKCa1 (left) and Kv1.3
(right) currents. The Kd-values for ShK,
BgK, and the ShK analogues are indicated.
F (see "Materials and
Methods"). The greater the change in free energy (
F),
the greater the influence of a particular ShK residue for channel binding.
1. Using this approach, we determined
F for each alanine substitution. The ShK residues most
critical for IKCa1 binding, with
F values greater than or equal to 2.5, are shown in red in Fig.
2A and include
Arg11, His19, Ser20,
Lys22, Tyr23, Arg24, and
Phe27. Alanine substitution at ShK position 21 (Met21) also significantly disrupts the toxin-channel
interaction (
F = 1.8; orange).
Arg1, Ile7, Thr13,
Leu25, and Ser26 (shown in yellow,
where
F = 0.75-1.5), and Thr6,
Phe15, Lys18, and Arg29 (shown in
blue,
F = 0.5-0.75), are only moderately
important for binding, whereas Ala substitutions at the remaining ShK
positions (shown in white,
F < 0.5) have
minimal effects (Fig. 2A).

View larger version (92K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Free energy difference of binding
(
F) due to specific substitutions in
ShK. A,
F values for ShK-Ala analogues on
IKCa1 and Kv1.3. Color code for
F values (in kcal mol
1): red,
F
2.5 (values >2.8 are shown as 2.8);
orange,
F = 1.5-2.5; yellow,
F = 0.75-1.5; blue,
F = 0.5-0.75; white,
F < 0.5. B, effect of ShK-Lys22 substitutions on binding
to Kv1.3, Kv1.3-His404
Val404
and IKCa1 channels. Comparison of
F
values for specific substitutions at ShK22 (color code as
in A).
F
2.5) cluster together on one surface of the
ShK peptide (red), and Met21 (orange)
lies immediately adjacent. Residues with moderate influence (yellow and blue) form the margins of the
ShK:IKCa1-binding surface. In general, nonessential residues
cluster together on the opposite surface of the peptide (Fig. 3,
left). Thus, the surface of ShK that binds IKCa1
extends in its greatest distance from Arg1 on one side to
Phe15 on the other (Fig. 3, left, bottom
view). Lys22 lies at the lowest point in the
channel-binding surface (Fig. 3, left, side
view).

View larger version (65K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Channel-binding surface of ShK.
Left panel, surface of ShK that interacts with
IKCa1; right panel, ShK surface that interacts
with Kv1.3. ShK-binding surface is shown above (bottom
view), and side view of the toxin is shown below. The
residues are color coordinated to the histograms (
F
values) in Fig. 2 (for color code, see Fig. 2A). The models
were generated with the RasMol program.
F values for all ShK substitutions on these channels.
Replacements of His19, Ser20,
Lys22, Tyr23, and Arg24
significantly disrupt the interaction of ShK with Kv1.3
(
F values >1.5, orange and red),
although to a lesser extent than with IKCa1 (
F
2.5; Fig. 2A, and see Fig.
1B, bottom panel). Alanine
substitutions at ShK positions 11, 21, and 27 (
F = 0.75-1.5) and positions 1, 6, 7, 15, and 26 (
F <0.75)
are also substantially less disruptive on Kv1.3 compared
with IKCa1 (Fig. 2B). The only exception is ShK-Arg29, which seems to be slightly more important for
binding to Kv1.3 than for IKCa1
(
F = 0.88 and 0.56, respectively). Our results thus
suggest that ShK uses a larger number of residues to stabilize its
interaction with IKCa1 than with Kv1.3, although
it uses the same core domain of five clustered residues for binding to
both channels.
Val404 mutant, and
these data are presented in a subsequent section. In two analogues, the
positively charged lysine is replaced with the shorter, positively
charged amino acids, ornithine (Orn) and diaminopropionic acid (Dap),
whereas the other two analogues have the neutral residues norleucine
(Nle) and alanine (Ala) at position 22. These residues differ in their
side chain lengths (Dap, 2.5 Å; Ala, 2 Å; Orn, 5.0 Å; Nle, 5.0 Å;
lysine, 6.3Å). Our results show that Ala22 and
Nle22 substitutions significantly decrease the affinity of
the toxin for both channels (Fig. 2B;
F
2.1), suggesting that the presence of these bulky neutral residues
in the pore of either channel destabilizes the toxin-channel
interaction. In contrast, the positively charged ShK-Dap22
and ShK-Orn22 exhibit different affinities for the two
channels. The Dap22 substitution severely abrogates the
affinity of the toxin for IKCa1 (
F >2.5), but
does not significantly alter the affinity of ShK for Kv1.3
(Fig. 1B, bottom left and Fig. 2B).
The longer ShK-Orn22 substitution also significantly
disrupts the affinity of the toxin for IKCa1
(
F = 1.7), although to a lesser extent than
Dap22, possibly because it is better anchored in the
channel pore, whereas this analogue blocks Kv1.3 with
potency equivalent to wild-type ShK (Fig. 2B).
F > 1.5, Fig. 3, red and
orange). ShK residues that surround this critical core
domain (ShK-positions 1, 6, 7, 11, 13, 15, 21, 26, and 27) exhibit a
lower influence on binding to Kv1.3 compared with
IKCa1. Thus, the overall binding surface of ShK for
IKCa1 is larger and contains more essential interacting residues than its binding surface for Kv1.3 (Fig. 3).
Nevertheless, the affinity of the toxin for Kv1.3 is
significantly greater than for IKCa1 (Fig. 1B),
suggesting that the picomolar affinity of ShK for Kv1.3 is
dependent on a few very tight toxin-channel contacts, whereas its
~1,000-fold lower nanomolar affinity for IKCa1 is because
of a greater number of weaker interactions.
Lys) substantially
reduces the channel sensitivity to ShK (
F = 1.9),
kaliotoxin (
F > 2.5), and charybdotoxin
(
F > 2.5) (20, 23). The converse charge-reversal
mutation at the homologous position in KcsA (Arg64
Asp64) enhances this channels sensitivity for agitoxin-2
(25). We therefore replaced IKCa1 Asp239 with
the positively charged Lys, and examined the sensitivity of the mutant
channel to ShK. The IKCa1-Lys239 mutant was
expressed in rat basophilic leukemia cells, and representative currents, elicited by 1 µM calcium in the pipette
solution, are shown in Fig. 4B. The mutant channel is
~18-fold less sensitive to ShK (Kd = 548 ± 37 nM) than wild-type IKCa1, suggesting that the
Asp
Lys charge-reversal mutation at position 239 in IKCa1 has the same consequences on ShK binding as the
identical mutation at the homologous position in Kv1.3 (23).
The change in free energy for this channel mutant (
F = 1.7 kcal mol
1) is equivalent to severe Ala
substitutions (
F >1.5 kcal mol
1) in ShK
(compare with Fig. 2A), indicating that this channel residue
is a critical contact point at the toxin-channel interface.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
ShK binds in the external vestibule of
IKCa1. A, amino acid sequence alignment of the
turret and pore region of KcsA, Kv1.3, and IKCa1. Kv1.3
residues critical for toxin binding (Asp386,
His404) and the corresponding residues in KcsA
(Arg64, Tyr82) and IKCa1
(Asp239, Val257) are highlighted. The
selectivity filter motif (GYGD) is conserved (dotted line).
B, IKCa1-Lys239 currents in the absence or
presence of ShK. Typical IKCa1-Lys239 currents
are about half-blocked by 500 nM ShK (Kd = 548 ± 37 nM). C, mutant cycles of
IKCa1-Asp239 with
ShK-Arg11, ShK-Arg29, and
ShK-Lys9. The differences in free coupling
energy, 
G, show strong coupling between
IKCa1-Asp239 and Shk-Arg29 and
ShK-Arg11, whereas ShK-Lys9 is not
coupled. D, mutant cycle showing proximity of
ShK-Lys22 to a potassium-binding site in the channel pore.
Mutant cycle with ShK and ShK-Ala22 on IKCa1
using external solutions with 4.5 and 164.5 mM
K+ showed a strong coupling (
G = 0.91 kcal mol
1) of ShK-Lys22 to a
potassium-binding site in the selectivity filter of the
IKCa1 pore.

G values = 0.79 and 1.56 kcal mol
1, respectively), suggesting that
these toxin residues are within ~5 Å of Asp239 in
different IKCa1 subunits, Arg11 being closer to
Asp239 than Arg29. As expected, because of its
position on the opposite site of the interactive toxin surface,
ShK-Lys9 does not couple with
IKCa1-Asp239 (
G = 0.06 kcal mol
1). Because Arg11 and
Arg29 lie ~21 Å apart and are oriented at an angle of
~105o from the center of the toxin, they most likely
interact with Asp239 residues in adjacent subunits (Fig.
5, left), as has been reported for Kv1.3 (23) rather than with Asp239 in
opposite IKCa1 subunits.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Topology of the ShK-binding site.
Dimensions of the external vestibule of IKCa1 were
determined using the NMR-derived ShK structure as a molecular caliper.
Left, schematic representation of the external vestibule
with Asp239 residues highlighted (derived from the KcsA
structure) with ShK (gray) docked. ShK-Arg11 and
Arg29 are ~21 Å apart, interacting with
Asp239 residues in adjacent channel subunits.
ShK-Lys22 is shown at the geometric center of the tetramer,
protruding into the pore. In this geometry Arg1 and
Phe15 (at opposing ends of the ShK:IKCa1-binding
surface) are located at opposite channel subunits. The diameter of the
tetramer based on the distance between ShK-Arg1 to
Phe15 and the Asp239 x-y
triangulation is approximately 31 Å. Right, schematic side
view of the ShK toxin (compare Fig. 3, bottom) with the
channel-binding surface highlighted. The distances between key toxin
residues are indicated and correspond approximately to dimensions of
the IKCa1 external vestibule (see "Discussion").

G value for this cycle (0.91 kcal mol
1) indicates that
ShK-Lys22 lies within 5 Å of a K+-binding site
located in the IKCa1 pore, as has been reported for
Kv1.3 (23).
His) on the
sensitivity of IKCa1 to the Lys22 analogues,
because this channel mutant is nonfunctional. These results are
consistent with the notion that the differential responsiveness of the
Kv1.3 and IKCa1 pores to ShK22
substitutions is due, in part, to the residue at the channel mouth of
Kv1.3 (His404) and the homologous position in
IKCa1. In summary, ShK binds residues in the external
vestibule of IKCa1, with ShK-Arg11 and
Arg29 interacting with Asp239 residues in
adjacent subunits of IKCa1 and with ShK-Lys22
projecting into the pore.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Lys239) and Kv1.3
(Asp386
Lys386) reduce the sensitivity of
these channels to ShK block in a similar fashion. Second,
ShK-Arg29 shows energetic coupling with Asp239
in IKCa1, as well as with the homologous
Kv1.3-Asp386 (Fig. 4C) (23). Third,
ShK-Arg11 and ShK-Arg29 appear to couple with
residues in adjacent subunits of IKCa1 as has been reported
for Kv1.3 (23). Fourth, the critical ShK-Lys22
lies close to a potassium-binding site in the selectivity filter of the
Kv1.3 pore (23), and mutant cycle analyses suggests the same
is true for IKCa1 (Fig. 4D). Last, replacement of
the critical ShK-Lys22 with bulky neutral residues (Nle and
Ala) substantially reduces the affinity of the toxin for both channels,
possibly because such residues are not tolerated in the channel pore.
These results indicate that ShK binds to IKCa1 in a region
corresponding to the external vestibules of Kv1.3 and uses a
comparable docking geometry. Such a docking configuration would place
Arg1 and Phe15, the two residues at opposite
margins of the IKCa1-binding surface (Fig. 3A),
in close proximity to channel residues in opposite subunits in the
IKCa1 tetramer (Fig. 5).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Joiner, W. J.,
Wang, L. Y.,
Tang, M. D.,
and Kaczmarek, L. K.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11013-11018 2.
Ishii, T. M.,
Silvia, C.,
Hirschberg, B.,
Bond, C. T.,
Adelman, J. P.,
and Maylie, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11651-11656 3.
Logsdon, N. J.,
Kang, J.,
Togo, J. A.,
Christian, E. P.,
and Aiyar, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32723-32726 4.
Ghanshani, S.,
Coleman, M.,
Gustavsson, P.,
Wu, C.-L.,
Gutman, G. A.,
Dahl, N.,
Mohrenweiser, H.,
and Chandy, K. G.
(1998)
Genomics
51,
160-161[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Vandorpe, D. H.,
Shmukler, B. E.,
Jiang, L.,
Lim, B.,
Maylie, J.,
Adelman, J. P.,
de Franceschi, L.,
Cappellini, M. D.,
Brugnara, C.,
and Alper, S. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21542-21553 6.
Jensen, B. S.,
Stroebaek, D.,
Christophersen, P.,
Joergensen, D. T.,
Hansen, C.,
Silahtaroglu, A.,
Olesen, S.-P.,
and Ahring, P. K.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C848-C856 7.
Gardos, G.
(1958)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
30,
653-654[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Brugnara, C.,
Armsby, C. C.,
De Franceschi, L.,
Crest, M.,
Euclaire, M. F.,
and Alper, S. L.
(1995)
J. Membr. Biol.
147,
71-82[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Grissmer, S.,
Nguyen, A. N.,
and Cahalan, M. D.
(1993)
J. Gen. Physiol.
102,
601-630 10.
Mahaut-Smith, M. P.
(1995)
J. Physiol.
484,
15-24[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Cahalan, M. D.,
and Chandy, K. G.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
8,
749-756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Verheugen, J. A. H.
(1998)
J. Physiol.
508,
167-177 13.
Fanger, C. M.,
Ghanshani, S.,
Logsdon, N. J.,
Rauer, H.,
Kalman, K.,
Zhou, J.,
Beckingham, K.,
Chandy, K. G.,
Cahalan, M. D.,
and Aiyar, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5746-5754 14.
Rufo, P. A.,
Jiang, L.,
Moe, S. J.,
Brugnara, C.,
Alper, S. L.,
and Lencer, W. I.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
2066-2075[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Brugnara, C.,
Gee, B.,
Armsby, C. C.,
Kurth, S.,
Sakamoto, M.,
Rifai, N.,
Alper, S. L.,
and Platt, O. S.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
1227-1234[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Rufo, P. A.,
Merlin, D.,
Riegler, M.,
Ferguson-Maltzman, M. H.,
Dickinson, B. L.,
Brugnara, C.,
Alper, S. L.,
and Lencer, W. I.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
3111-3120[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Stocker, M.,
and Miller, C.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9509-9513 18.
Goldstein, S. A.,
Pheasant, D. J.,
and Miller, C.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
1377-1388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Hidalgo, P.,
and MacKinnon, R.
(1995)
Science
268,
307-310 20.
Aiyar, J.,
Withka, J. M.,
Rizzi, J. P.,
Singleton, D. H.,
Andrews, G. C.,
Lin, W.,
Boyd, J.,
Hanson, D.,
Simon, M.,
Dethlefs, B.,
Lee, C.-L.,
Hall, J. E.,
Gutman, G. A.,
and Chandy, K. G.
(1995)
Neuron
15,
1169-1181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Aiyar, J.,
Rizzi, J. P.,
Gutman, G. A.,
and Chandy, K. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31013-31016 22.
Ranganathan, R.,
Lewis, J. H.,
and MacKinnon, R.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
131-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Kalman, K.,
Pennington, M.,
Lanigan, M. D.,
Nguyen, A.,
Rauer, H.,
Mahnir, V.,
Paschetto, K.,
Kem, R.,
Grissmer, S.,
Gutman, G. A.,
Christian, E. P.,
Cahalan, M. D.,
Norton, R. S.,
and Chandy, K. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32697-32707 24.
Doyle, D. A.,
Cabral, J. M.,
Pfuetzner, R. A.,
Kuo, A.,
Gulbis, J. M.,
Cohen, S. L.,
Chait, B. T.,
and MacKinnon, R.
(1998)
Science
280,
69-77 25.
MacKinnon, R.,
Cohen, S. L.,
Kuo, A.,
Lee, A.,
and Chait, B. T.
(1998)
Science
280,
106-109 26.
Pennington, M. W.,
Mahnir, V. M.,
Khaytin, I.,
Zaydenberg, I.,
Byrnes, M. E.,
and Kem, W. R.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
16407-16411[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Grissmer, S.,
Nguyen, A.,
Aiyar, J.,
Hanson, D.,
Mather, R. J.,
Gutman, G. A.,
Karmilowicz, M. J.,
Auperin, D. D.,
and Chandy, K. G.
(1994)
Mol. Pharm.
45,
1227-1234[Abstract]
28.
Rauer, H.,
and Grissmer, S.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
50,
1625-1634[Abstract]
29.
Schreiber, G.,
and Fersht, A. R.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
248,
478-486[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Castaneda, O.,
Sotolongo, V.,
Amor, A. M.,
Stocklin, R.,
Anderson, A. J.,
Harvey, A. L.,
Engstrom, A.,
Wernstedt, C.,
and Karlsson, E.
(1995)
Toxicon
33,
603-613[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Aneiros, A.,
Garcia, I.,
Martinez, J. R.,
Harvey, A. L.,
Anderson, A. J.,
Marshall, D. L.,
Engstrom, A.,
Hellman, U.,
and Karlsson, E.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1157,
86-92[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Bontems, F.,
Roumestand, C.,
Gilquin, B.,
Menez, A.,
and Toma, F.
(1991)
Science
254,
1521-1523 33.
Tudor, J. E.,
Pallaghy, P. K.,
Pennington, M.,
and Norton, R. S.
(1996)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
3,
317-320[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Dauplais, M.,
Leqoc, A.,
Song, J.,
Cotton, J.,
Jamin, N.,
Gilquin, B.,
Roumestand, C.,
Vita, C.,
de Medeiros, C. L. C.,
Rowan, E. G.,
Harvey, A. L.,
and Menez, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4302-4309 35.
Naini, A. A.,
Shimony, E.,
Kozlowski, E.,
Shaikh, T.,
Dang, W.,
and Miller, C.
(1996)
Neuropharmacology
35,
915-921[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Szabo, J. Bock, H. Grassme, M. Soddemann, B. Wilker, F. Lang, M. Zoratti, and E. Gulbins Mitochondrial potassium channel Kv1.3 mediates Bax-induced apoptosis in lymphocytes PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14861 - 14866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Beeton, B. J. Smith, J. K. Sabo, G. Crossley, D. Nugent, I. Khaytin, V. Chi, K. G. Chandy, M. W. Pennington, and R. S. Norton The D-Diastereomer of ShK Toxin Selectively Blocks Voltage-gated K+ Channels and Inhibits T Lymphocyte Proliferation J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2008; 283(2): 988 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pimentel, S. M'Barek, V. Visan, S. Grissmer, F. Sampieri, J.-M. Sabatier, H. Darbon, and Z. Fajloun Chemical synthesis and 1H-NMR 3D structure determination of AgTx2-MTX chimera, a new potential blocker for Kv1.2 channel, derived from MTX and AgTx2 scorpion toxins Protein Sci., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 107 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Szabo, J. Bock, A. Jekle, M. Soddemann, C. Adams, F. Lang, M. Zoratti, and E. Gulbins A Novel Potassium Channel in Lymphocyte Mitochondria J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12790 - 12798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Diochot, E. Loret, T. Bruhn, L. Beress, and M. Lazdunski APETx1, a New Toxin from the Sea Anemone Anthopleura elegantissima, Blocks Voltage-Gated Human Ether-a-go-go-Related Gene Potassium Channels Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2003; 64(1): 59 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Beeton, H. Wulff, S. Singh, S. Botsko, G. Crossley, G. A. Gutman, M. D. Cahalan, M. Pennington, and K. G. Chandy A Novel Fluorescent Toxin to Detect and Investigate Kv1.3 Channel Up-regulation in Chronically Activated T Lymphocytes J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9928 - 9937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. V. Korolkova, E. V. Bocharov, K. Angelo, I. V. Maslennikov, O. V. Grinenko, A. V. Lipkin, E. D. Nosyreva, K. A. Pluzhnikov, S.-P. Olesen, A. S. Arseniev, et al. New Binding Site on Common Molecular Scaffold Provides HERG Channel Specificity of Scorpion Toxin BeKm-1 J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 43104 - 43109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gilquin, J. Racape, A. Wrisch, V. Visan, A. Lecoq, S. Grissmer, A. Menez, and S. Gasparini Structure of the BgK-Kv1.1 Complex Based on Distance Restraints Identified by Double Mutant Cycles. MOLECULAR BASIS FOR CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF Kv1 CHANNEL BLOCKERS J. Biol. Chem., September 27, 2002; 277(40): 37406 - 37413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |