![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 21913-21919, July 30, 1999
From the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the
skeletal muscle plasmalemma functions as both voltage-gated
Ca2+ channel and voltage sensor for
excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. As voltage sensor, the DHPR
regulates intracellular Ca2+ release via the skeletal
isoform of the ryanodine receptor (RyR-1). Interaction with RyR-1 also
feeds back to increase the Ca2+ current mediated by the
DHPR. To identify regions of the DHPR important for receiving this
signal from RyR-1, we expressed in dysgenic myotubes a chimera (SkLC)
having skeletal (Sk) DHPR sequence except for a cardiac (C) II-III loop
(L). Tagging with green fluorescent protein (GFP) enabled
identification of expressing myotubes. Dysgenic myotubes expressing
GFP-SkLC or SkLC lacked EC coupling and had very small Ca2+
currents. Introducing a short skeletal segment ( Excitation-contraction
(EC)1 coupling in skeletal
muscle depends upon a functional interaction between dihydropyridine
receptors (DHPRs) in the plasmalemma and ryanodine receptors (RyRs) in
the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). In skeletal muscle, the DHPR functions both as an L-type Ca2+ channel and as the voltage sensor,
which in response to plasmalemmal depolarization, transmits a signal
that causes RyR-1 (the skeletal RyR isoform) to release
Ca2+ from the SR (1-3). The nature of the signal
transmitted from the skeletal DHPR to RyR-1 is not yet understood,
although there is strong evidence that skeletal-type EC coupling does
not rely upon the entry of external Ca2+ (4).
An approach to identifying regions of the skeletal DHPR that are
important for EC coupling has been to express cDNAs encoding chimeric DHPRs in dysgenic myotubes, which lack endogenous skeletal DHPRs. This work has shown that a purely cardiac DHPR expressed in
dysgenic myotubes results in EC coupling which is cardiac type (dependent on entry of Ca2+) (5), whereas skeletal-type EC
coupling results from expression of a chimeric DHPR having cardiac
sequence except for a skeletal II-III loop (6). More recently, it was
shown that strong skeletal-type coupling could be produced by a
chimeric DHPR that contained only a 46-amino acid skeletal segment
within the II-III loop and weak skeletal-type coupling by a chimera
containing only an 18-amino acid skeletal segment (7).
Analysis of myotubes from dyspedic mice, which lack RyR-1, has revealed
that in addition to the orthograde (EC coupling) signal transmitted
from the skeletal DHPR to RyR-1, there also appears to be a retrograde
signal whereby RyR-1 increases the magnitude of the L-type
Ca2+ current mediated by the DHPR. In particular,
Ca2+ current density is very low in dyspedic myotubes even
though the surface density of DHPRs appears to be essentially normal (8, 9). Expression of cDNA encoding RyR-1 causes the density of
L-type current in dyspedic myotubes to increase toward normal (8).
However, these experiments did not reveal whether the region of the
skeletal DHPR that is crucial for orthograde coupling is also important
for the RyR-1-mediated enhancement of DHPR Ca2+ current.
Here we describe experiments to identify regions of the skeletal DHPR
that are critical for the ability of the DHPR to receive the retrograde
(current-enhancing) signal from RyR-1. The results demonstrate that the
II-III loop is critical for both orthograde and retrograde signaling.
Within the II-III loop, the 46-amino acid segment found to be important
for skeletal-type EC coupling is also important for transducing the
retrograde signal from RyR-1.
Construction of Chimeric DHPRs
Chimeras between the SkLC: Sk (1-654), C (777-927), Sk (797-1873).
SkLCS46: Sk (1-654), C (777-850), Sk (720-765), C
(897-927), Sk (797-1873).
SkLCS18: Sk (1-654), C (777-855), Sk (725-742), C
(874-927), Sk (797-1873). The chimeras were constructed and
inserted into mammalian expression vectors as described below
(nucleotide numbers (nt) indicated in parentheses):
SkLC--
The EcoRI-XmnI fragment of Sk (nt 1007-1964) was
coligated with the ligation product from the
XmnI-HincII fragment of C (nt 2330-2782) plus
the HincII-XhoI fragment of Sk (nt 2389-2654) into the corresponding EcoRI/XhoI restriction
sites of a SacII-XhoI subclone of Sk (nt
86-2654) in pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene). Finally, the
SacII-XhoI insert of the modified subclone (now
carrying the cardiac II-III loop sequence) was ligated into the
corresponding SacII/XhoI restriction sites of
plasmid pCAC6, which contains the complete skeletal DHPR coding region
in the mammalian expression vector pKCRH2 (6).
SkLCS46--
The EcoRI-XmnI
fragment of Sk (nt 1007-1964) was coligated with the
XmnI-AflII* fragment (nt C2330-Sk2297) (partial
cut) of clone CSk53 (7) which is C (1-850), Sk (720-765), C
(897-2171) into the corresponding EcoRI/AflII
restriction sites (nt Sk1007/C2690) of the modified (the cardiac II-III
loop carrying) SacII-XhoI subclone of Sk (nt
86-2654) in pBluescript SK+. To yield SkLCS46, the
SacII-XhoI insert was ligated into the
corresponding SacII/XhoI restriction sites of
plasmid pCAC6 (see above). The asterisks here and below indicate
restriction sites generated by polymerase chain reaction.
SkLCS18--
The EcoRI-XmnI
fragment of Sk (nt 1007-1964) was coligated with the
XmnI-AflII fragment (nt C2330-C2690) of clone
CSk58 (7), which is C (1-855), Sk (725-742), C (874-2171), into the
corresponding EcoRI/AflII restriction sites (nt
Sk1007/C2690) of the modified (with the cardiac II-III loop inserted)
SacII-XhoI subclone of Sk (nt 86-2654) in
pBluescript SK+. Finally, the SacII-XhoI insert was ligated into the corresponding SacII/XhoI
restriction sites of plasmid pCAC6 (see above) to yield
SkLCS18.
GFP- GFP-SkLC, GFP-SkLCS46,
GFP-SkLCS18--
The SalI*-EcoRI fragment of
GFP- Expression of cDNA
Primary cultures of myotubes isolated from newborn dysgenic mice
were prepared as described previously (13). Approximately 1 week after
plating, myotubes were microinjected (2) into a single nucleus with
solutions of expression plasmids (300-600 ng/µl) carrying cDNAs
for either GFP- Electrophysiological Characterization
Macroscopic Ca2+ currents were measured using the
whole-cell patch clamp technique (15). The patch pipettes (borosilicate glass) had resistances of 1.5-1.9 M Laser-scanning Confocal Microscopy
GFP-SkLC-expressing dysgenic myotubes cultured on 35-mm culture
dishes were superfused with a normal rodent Ringer solution (145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 with NaOH) and mounted under a glass
coverslip. The culture dish was subsequently fastened upside-down on
the stage of a Nikon inverted microscope. Fluorescing cells were
analyzed using a Sarastro 2000 confocal laser-scanning microscope
(Molecular Dynamics) with a Nikon 60× PlanApo oil immersion objective
(numerical aperture 1.40) and the ImageSpaceTM software (Silicon
Graphics Inc., Mt. View, CA). GFP excitation/emission was achieved with
a filter set (488 nm/510 nm) designed for fluorescein detection. Images were 1024 × 1024 pixels with a pixel size of 0.11 µm. Step size between confocal sections was 2 µm. Images were processed using the
Adobe Photoshop software (ADOBE Systems, Mountain View, CA).
The Skeletal Muscle DHPR II-III Loop Is Essential for Receiving the
Retrograde (Current-enhancing) Signal--
Previous work showed that
the cardiac DHPR expressed in dysgenic (DHPR-deficient) myotubes was
unable to mediate orthograde signaling (i.e. skeletal EC
coupling). However, a chimera with cardiac sequence except for a
skeletal II-III loop (CSk3 (5)) could mediate orthograde signaling.
More recently, it was found that the expression of RyR-1 in dyspedic
(RyR-deficient) myotubes increased the amplitude of slow L-type
Ca2+ current produced by the skeletal DHPR (8). To
determine whether the II-III loop plays an important role in
"receiving" this current-enhancing signal from RyR-1, we
constructed a chimeric DHPR (SkLC) that was the "inverse" of CSk3:
a skeletal DHPR except for a cardiac II-III loop. Electrically evoked
contractions were never observed in dysgenic myotubes that had been
injected with SkLC, consistent either with the possibility that the
chimera was nonfunctional or that a cardiac II-III loop abolished
orthograde signaling. Because electrically evoked contraction could not
be used to identify myotubes expressing SkLC, we constructed a cDNA
that fused GFP to the amino terminus of SkLC (Fig.
1a) to allow definitive
identification by means of in situ fluorescence. Fusion
proteins of this sort were shown previously not to affect the function
of either muscle or brain Ca2+ channels (12). Myotubes
expressing GFP-SkLC displayed slowly activating Ca2+
currents (Fig. 2b), which were
much smaller in amplitude than those present in
GFP- Identification of a Skeletal Segment in the II-III Loop Sufficient
to Restore Both Skeletal-type EC Coupling and Enhancement of
Ca2+ Current--
Nakai et al. (7) previously
showed that substitution of a 46-amino acid segment of skeletal
sequence into the II-III loop of an otherwise cardiac DHPR produced a
chimera (CSk53;
Nakai et al. (7) also showed that an otherwise cardiac
chimera containing an even shorter (18-residue) skeletal segment (CSk58, Skeletal-type EC Coupling Is Very Weak for
SkLCS18--
The measurement of
Gmax/Qmax'
provides a quantitative assessment of the strength of retrograde
coupling (current enhancement from RyR-1). To obtain a similarly
quantitative assessment of the strength of orthograde (EC) coupling to
RyR-1, we measured depolarization-induced Ca2+ transients.
Depolarization-induced Ca2+ transients were never observed
with SkLC (Fig. 3a, 0 of 13 cells tested) but were routinely observed for SkLCS46 (Fig.
3b, 16 of 16 cells tested). The transients support the
conclusion that SkLCS46 mediates skeletal-type EC coupling
because they were of similar magnitude for test pulses to +30 mV (where
Ca2+ current is near maximal) and +80 mV (where
Ca2+ current is small as a result of reduced driving
force). By the same logic, SkLCS18 was also able to mediate
skeletal-type coupling because the Ca2+ transients were
again similar at +30 and +80 mV (Fig. 3c). However, the
maximal rate of increase of the
It is possible to calculate the enhancement of Ca2+ current
that might have been expected for SkLCS18 relative to that
measured for SkLCS46 under the assumption that there is a
linear relationship between the strengths of retrograde and orthograde
signaling. The enhancement of current for SkLCS46 can be
defined as (G/Q46' Ca2+ Release Is Not Responsible for Enhancement of
Ca2+ Current--
As described above, the chimeric DHPR
constructs able to "receive" the Ca2+ current-enhancing
signal from RyR-1 were exactly the same as those able to "transmit"
the EC coupling signal to RyR-1. Thus, it seemed possible that
Ca2+ released from RyR-1 (in response to the EC coupling
signal) represented the feedback signal, causing the enhancement of
Ca2+ current. As a way of testing this possibility, we
carried out simultaneous measurements of Ca2+ currents and
Ca2+ transients in normal myotubes using two different
pipette-filling solutions. One of these solutions (10 EGTA) contained
10 mM EGTA (to mimic the standard solution we used for
measuring Ca2+ currents) plus ATP to support
Ca2+ re-uptake into the SR. The other solution (40 BAPTA)
contained 40 mM BAPTA (to buffer myoplasmic
Ca2+ strongly) and lacked ATP so as to hinder
Ca2+ re-uptake into the SR. To ensure thorough dialysis, we
selected only small myotubes (232 ± 76 pF, n = 9)
with compact geometry and used low resistance patch pipettes (0.9 to
1.4 M
As is evident in Figs. 4, a and b,
Ca2+ current amplitude ran down as a function of time after
breaking into the cell with either 10 EGTA or 40 BAPTA. In fact, the
rundown in these experiments (with small cells and low access
resistance) was faster than that observed under the conditions we
normally used for measurements of Ca2+ currents (larger
cells, higher access resistance). Several factors may have contributed
to the more rapid rundown with the 40 BAPTA, including the much lower
level of resting free Ca2+ and the absence of ATP. However,
because large Ca2+ currents were still present at times
when junctional Ca2+ transients were effectively
suppressed, it seems unlikely that Ca2+ release represents
the critical feedback signal whereby RyR-1 enhanced Ca2+ current.
GFP-SkLC Ca2+ Channels Cluster in Punctate
Foci--
By means of immunostaining, skeletal DHPRs in normal
myotubes were shown to cluster in foci that colocalize with RyR
clusters (21). Confocal microscopy also reveals focal clusters in
living, dysgenic myotubes expressing GFP-tagged DHPRs (12). To
determine whether the absence of either orthograde or retrograde
signaling by GFP-SkLC (Figs. 2a and 3a,
respectively) was a consequence of failure to co-localize with RyRs, we
used confocal microscopy to determine whether or not focal clusters
were present in dysgenic myotubes expressing this chimeric construct.
As shown in Fig. 5, focal clusters were
present in GFP-SkLC-expressing dysgenic myotubes. The pattern of
distribution of these clusters does not appear qualitatively different
from that of GFP-tagged DHPRs (12), which are capable of interacting
with the RyRs of the SR.
We have found that replacing the II-III loop of the skeletal DHPR
with the corresponding region of the cardiac DHPR causes the loss of
two functions. This skeletal DHPR with a cardiac II-III loop (SkLC) can
neither transmit the orthograde (EC coupling) signal to the skeletal
ryanodine receptor (RyR-1) nor receive the retrograde (current
enhancing signal) from RyR-1. Substitution of a 46-amino acid segment
of skeletal sequence into the cardiac loop of SkLC restores both
orthograde and retrograde signaling.
A Role for the What is the Mechanism of Enhancement of Current?--
The
mechanisms of orthograde and retrograde signaling between the skeletal
DHPR and RyR-1 remain to be established. One possible explanation of
retrograde signaling is that the Ca2+ released during EC
coupling feeds back onto the DHPR to enhance current. This hypothesis
is compatible with the observation that precisely those chimeras that
did not show enhancement of current were those that also lacked
(SkLC) or had only weak (SkLCS18) EC coupling.
Furthermore, Feldmeyer et al. (24) have presented evidence that Ca2+ release may modulate the
Ca2+ current in cut fibers from frog skeletal muscle,
including the demonstration that prolonged exposure (>2.5 h) of the
cut ends to 20 mM BAPTA or 1.8 mM ruthenium red
caused the complete loss of current. Interestingly, the records showing
the loss of Ca2+ current (Figs. 2 and 3 of Ref. 24) appear
to show a parallel loss of the nonlinear capacitative transients
(charge movements), suggesting that there may have been disruption of
the t-tubular system or a loss of the ability of the DHPR to undergo
the voltage-driven conformational changes producing charge movement.
Either of these kinds of changes would not have affected our analysis,
which indicates that functional coupling of the DHPR to RyR-1 is
associated with large differences in
Gmax/Qmax',
the ratio of Ca2+ conductance to charge movement.
Furthermore, in contrast to the results on frog skeletal muscle (24),
our experiments showed that large Ca2+ currents were
present in mouse myotubes in which Ca2+ transients near
release sites should have been largely suppressed by dialysis with 40 mM BAPTA (Fig. 4). Negligible effects on maximal Ca2+ conductance have also been previously reported for
dialysis of mouse myotubes with 1 mM ryanodine, 200 µM ruthenium red, or 20 mM BAPTA (25).
Results from work on DHPR chimeras (14) also argue against an essential
role of Ca2+ release in enhancement of current. In that
study it was found that
Gmax/Qmax'
was 55 nS/pC for CARD1 (the cardiac DHPR) and 157 nS/pC for CSk3 (the
cardiac DHPR with a skeletal II-III loop). Thus, it appears that the
presence of a skeletal II-III loop enhanced the current via a mechanism
not strongly dependent on Ca2+ release, because both CARD1
and CSk3 support depolarization-induced Ca2+ release under
the conditions used for measurement of Ca2+ currents (7).
Data from RyR-1/RyR-2 chimeras provide another argument that
Ca2+ released via skeletal-type EC coupling is not required
for enhancement of current. In particular, expression in dyspedic
(RyR-1 lacking) myotubes of the chimera R9 produced enhancement of
Ca2+ current but not restoration of skeletal-type EC
coupling (26). Finally, recent experiments show that Ca2+
currents are enhanced in dyspedic myotubes after expression of a
mutated ryanodine receptor, which releases almost no Ca2+
in response to depolarization (27).
An alternative to the idea that the release of Ca2+ from
RyR-1 causes enhancement of current is to suppose that protein-protein interactions are responsible. Fig. 6
illustrates a model in which EC coupling involves transmission of a
signal from the skeletal DHPR to RyR-1 via the II-III loop, and
enhancement of current involves transmission of a retrograde signal
from RyR-1 to the DHPR, again via the II-III loop (an intermediary
protein coupling between the II-III loop and RyR-1 is another
possibility). The nature of both the orthograde and retrograde signals
remains unknown (for example, the retrograde signal might correspond to
a covalent modification of the DHPR). However, in the illustrated
model, interaction of RyR-1 with the II-III loop stabilizes the DHPR in
a conformation (Fig. 6a), which increases single channel
current and/or Po (channel open probability) compared with the
conformation of the DHPR found in the absence of this interaction (Fig.
6b, no RyR-1; Fig. 6c, cardiac II-III loop). Both
skeletal-type EC coupling and the enhancement of current are restored
by introduction of a small segment of the skeletal II-III loop (Fig.
6d).
The importance of the II-III loop is emphasized by complementary
gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments. A gain of function
(skeletal-type EC coupling) was shown with CSk3 in which the skeletal
II-III loop was transplanted into the cardiac DHPR (5). As discussed
above, these same experiments also suggest a second gain of function
(enhancement of current) because
Gmax/Qmax'
was ~3-fold larger for CSk3 than for CARD1 (14). The experiments reported here now demonstrate a loss of both functions (skeletal-type EC coupling, enhancement of current) when the cardiac II-III loop is
transplanted into the skeletal DHPR (i.e. SkLC) and a
restoration of both functions with SkLCS46.
For a model like the one in Fig. 6, how would one interpret the
observation that orthograde and retrograde coupling are weak for
SkLCS18? One possibility is that the great majority of
SkLCS18 DHPRs and RyRs are simply not in physical contact
because SkLCS18 lacks part of the required sequence.
However, it seems very likely that SkLCS18 clusters into
foci at sites where the plasmalemma forms junctions with RyR-containing
regions of the SR, because even SkLC clusters into foci (Fig. 5). Of
course, a demonstration of co-localization of DHPRs and RyRs at the
light microscopic level does not imply direct physical contact.
Suggestive evidence for direct physical contact between DHPRs and RyRs
in skeletal muscle has been provided by freeze-fracture analysis. This
analysis has shown that skeletal DHPRs appear to be organized in
characteristic tetrads (thought to be four DHPRs, each of which is in
contact with one of the four subunits of a RyR) (28). By contrast,
cardiac DHPRs appear to be located close to, but not in contact with, RyRs, because tetrads are not observed in cardiac muscle (29). Thus, it
will be important to carry out freeze-fracture analysis to determine
whether or not tetrads are formed upon expression of CSk3, SkLC,
SkLCS46, and SkLCS18. If very few tetrads are
observed for SkLCS18, it would suggest that the weak
coupling for this construct was a result of loss of physical contact
with RyR-1. If tetrad formation is comparable for SkLCS18
and SkLCS46, it would suggest that tetrads of
SkLCS18 induce a lower channel activity of a RyR-1 tetramer
than do tetrads of SkLCS46.
1S
residues 720-765) into the cardiac II-III loop (replacing
1C residues 851-896) of GFP-SkLC restored both EC
coupling and Ca2+ current densities like those of the wild
type skeletal DHPR. This 46-amino acid stretch of skeletal sequence was
recently shown to be capable of transferring strong, skeletal-type EC
coupling to an otherwise cardiac DHPR (Nakai, J., Tanabe, T., Konno,
T., Adams, B., and Beam, K.G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem.
273, 24983-24986). Thus, this segment of the skeletal II-III loop
contains a motif required for both skeletal-type EC coupling and
RyR-1-mediated enhancement of Ca2+ current.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 subunits of the skeletal
muscle DHPR (Sk (10)) and the cardiac muscle DHPR (C (11)) had amino acid composition (numbers in parentheses) as follows.
1S--
The coding sequence of the
1 subunit of the skeletal muscle DHPR (10) was inserted
in-frame and downstream of the coding region of a modified green
fluorescence protein (GFP), cloned in a proprietary mammalian
expression vector (kindly provided by P. Seeburg) as described in
detail elsewhere (12).
1S (nt 5' polylinker-Sk1007) was coligated with the
EcoRI-BglII fragments of clones SkLC, SkLCS46, and SkLCS18 (nt Sk1007-Sk4488) into
the corresponding SalI*/BglII restriction sites
of plasmid GFP-
1S.
1b--
The Ca2+ channel
1b subunit cDNA (kindly provided by K. Campbell) was
cloned as a SacI-HindIII fragment (5' and 3'
polylinker, respectively) into the SacI/HindIII
polylinker sites of the mammalian expression vector pSV-SPORT1
(LifeTechnologies, Inc.). The integrity of all the chimeric DHPRs was
confirmed by sequence analysis using an ABI 377 automatic sequencer.
1S, GFP-SkLC, GFP-SkLCS46, or
GFP-SkLCS18. Injected myotubes were subsequently examined
for the development of green fluorescence. Expressing cells were
evaluated for contraction (2) in response to electrical stimulation (80 V, 10-30 ms), macroscopic Ca2+ currents,
immobilization-resistant intramembrane charge movement (14), and
subcellular channel distribution (only for GFP-SkLC). In a separate set
of experiments examining the role of the
1b subunit for
Ca2+ channel enhancement, dysgenic myotubes were coinjected
with GFP-SkLC cDNA (600 ng/µl) and 350 ng/µl
1b-carrying mammalian expression plasmid. Additionally,
dyspedic myotubes were grown in primary culture as described for
dysgenic myotubes (13) and mononuclearly injected (2) with 350 ng/µl
1b-carrying mammalian expression plasmid together with
pure GFP vector (25 ng/µl) to enable the identification of expressing cells.
when filled with an internal solution containing 140 mM cesium aspartate, 10 mM Cs2-EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2,
and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4 with CsOH). The composition of the
external bath solution was 10 mM CaCl2, 145 mM tetraethylammonium chloride, 3 µM
tetrodotoxin, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4 with
tetraethylammonium hydroxide). Test pulses were preceded by a 1-s
prepulse to
30 mV to inactivate endogenous T-type Ca2+
currents (14). Test currents were corrected for linear components of
leakage and capacitative currents by digitally scaling and subtracting
the average of 10 preceding control currents, elicited by
hyperpolarizing voltage steps (20-40 mV amplitude) applied from the
holding potential of
80 mV. Ca2+ currents were normalized
by linear cell capacitance (expressed in pA/pF). After the recording of
whole-cell Ca2+ currents, 0.5 mM
Cd2+, and 0.1 mM La3+ were added to
the external bath solution to enable the recording of
immobilization-resistant intramembrane charge movement (gating currents). The procedure for recording and calculating maximum charge
movement densities and the prepulse protocol used was described in
detail elsewhere (14, 16). To examine the effect of Ca2+
release on sarcolemmal Ca2+ current, Ca2+
current and Ca2+ transients were measured (17) in normal
myotubes with the external solution described above for
Ca2+ currents and patch pipettes containing an internal
solution composed either of 145 mM cesium glutamate, 8 mM MgATP, 0.5 mM K5-Fluo-3 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), 2 mM CsCl, 10 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, with CsOH (10 EGTA solution) or 65 mM cesium glutamate, 5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM K5-Fluo-3, 40 mM BAPTA, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 with CsOH (40 BAPTA solution). For the measurement of Ca2+ transients in
dysgenic myotubes expressing chimeric DHPRs, the pipette contained 145 mM cesium glutamate, 8 mM MgATP, 0.5 mM K5-Fluo-3, 0.1 mM EGTA, 2 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.2 with CsOH), and
the external solutions was 150 mM tetraethylammonium
chloride, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM CaCl2,
1 mM MgCl2, 1 µM tetrodotoxin (pH
7.2 with tetraethylammonium hydroxide). For the measurements of
Ca2+ transients, it was not suitable to use the GFP-tagged
constructs that had fluorescence excitation and emission wavelengths
close to those of Fluo-3. Thus, cDNAs coding for SkLC,
SkLCS46, and SkLCS18 were inserted into the
expression plasmid pKCRH2 (18) and were coinjected with cDNA
encoding the
subunit of the human surface antigen CD8 (19).
Myotubes expressing the mutant channels were identified using
polystyrene beads coated with CD8 antibodies as described previously
(20). Transient changes in fluorescence (
F) were normalized by the
resting fluorescence (F). The maximum rate of change of
F/F was
determined by fitting a line segment to the steepest portion of the
transient. All recordings were made at room temperature (~20 °C)
and data are reported as mean ± S.D.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1S-expressing myotubes (Fig. 2a). To
allow comparisons between cells, peak current-voltage relationships were fitted (14) to yield a value of maximal Ca2+
conductance (Gmax). The value of
Gmax for GFP-SkLC was significantly (p < 0.005) smaller than for GFP-
1S
(Table I). This decrease in
Gmax for GFP-SkLC did not appear to be a
consequence of a reduced number of DHPRs expressed in the surface
membrane because values for maximal charge movement
(Qmax) were similar (p > 0.05)
for GFP-SkLC and GFP-
1S (Fig. 2, d and
e; Table I). The ratio of Gmax to
Qmax'
(Qmax' equals
Qmax minus the average, endogenous charge in
dysgenic myotubes; Ref. 14) for GFP-SkLC was less than half that for GFP-
1S (Table I). Thus, it appears that the presence of
a cardiac II-III loop prevents GFP-SkLC from receiving the
current-enhancing signal from RyR-1. Indeed, the value of
Gmax/Qmax' for
GFP-SkLC was very close to the value found for dyspedic myotubes (8),
which have
1S but lack RyR-1.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic representations of the skeletal
DHPR and of skeletal/cardiac II-III loop DHPR chimeras N-terminally
fused to GFP (a) and alignment of the skeletal
(
1S) and the cardiac
(
1C) sequences interchanged in
these chimeras (b). Roman numerals
indicate the four homologous repeats; black cylinders
(symbolizing transmembrane segments) and bold lines
(symbolizing linking regions) represent the skeletal
(
1S) sequence; thin lines indicate cardiac
(
1C) sequence. Sequences of
1S and
1C are aligned in b with arrows
indicating the segments of
1S substituted into the
cardiac II-III loop of GFP-SkLC to yield GFP-SkLCS46 or
GFP-SkLCS18. Asterisks indicate identical amino
acid residues, and dots show residues carrying the same
(negative) charge.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Representative whole-cell Ca2+
currents recorded from dysgenic myotubes expressing
GFP-
1S (a),
GFP-SkLC (b), and GFP-SkLCS46
(c). Macroscopic Ca2+ currents were
elicited by 200-ms step depolarizations from a holding potential of
80 mV to the test potentials indicated on the left (in mV). Current
amplitudes were normalized by linear cell capacitance and are expressed
as pA/pF. d-f, immobilization-resistant intramembrane
charge movements were recorded in response to a depolarization to +40
mV following a prepulse protocol (14). Recordings of charge movement
were obtained from the same myotubes as shown above under
a-c after blocking Ca2+ currents with a test
solution containing 0.5 mM Cd2+ and 0.1 mM La3+. The linear cell capacitance
(C) for each cell was as follows: a and
d, cell b67, C = 436 pF; b and e,
cell b48, C = 520 pF; c and f, cell c08,
C = 588 pF.
Ca2+ conductance and charge movement in dyspedic myotubes
and in dysgenic myotubes expressing
1S,
GFP-
1S, and the GFP-SkLC clone family
Vrev)/(1 + exp[
(V
VG)/kG]) (14); I,
peak current activated at test potential V;
Vrev, extrapolated reversal potential;
VG, potential for activation of half-maximal
conductance; kG, slope factor. Values of
immobilization-resistant QON were determined as
described previously (14) and were fitted according to
QON = Qmax /(1 + exp[
(V
VQ)/kQ]);
Qmax, maximum immobilization-resistant charge
movement; V, test potential; VQ,
potential at which half the charge has moved; kQ,
slope factor. Q'max is the difference between
Qmax and the average, endogenous charge movement
Qdys(max) found in dysgenic myotubes
(Qdys(max) = 2.5 nC/µF; (14)). For all the data
given, the estimated series resistance error was <10 mV. Brackets
indicate two data sets compared statistically by an unpaired two-sample
t test. Asterisks indicate statistically significant
differences (p < 0.005), whereas no asterisk
indicates p > 0.05. Values for dyspedic myotubes and
for
1S-expressing dysgenic myotubes were listed for
comparison and were published previously (8, 14).
1S residues 720-765) capable of
mediating strong, skeletal-type EC coupling upon expression in dysgenic
myotubes. To determine whether this motif (Fig. 1b) is also
sufficient to allow reception of the Ca2+ current-enhancing
signal from RyR-1, we substituted this 46-residue segment into the
cardiac II-III loop of the otherwise skeletal chimera GFP-SkLC. The
resulting chimera, GFP-SkLCS46 (Fig. 1a), not
only mediated skeletal-type EC coupling (electrically evoked contraction of more than half of the fluorescent cells tested in
Cd2+/La3+, n > 50; data not
shown) but also produced large Ca2+ current densities (Fig.
2c) with a
Gmax/Qmax'
ratio (>30 nS/pC) like those of GFP-
1S or
1S (Table I).
1S residues 725-742) was still able to mediate
skeletal-type EC coupling; however, this coupling was weak (7). To test
if this 18-amino acid segment allows reception of the channel-enhancing signal from RyR-1, we constructed chimera GFP-SkLCS18 (Fig.
1, a and b). The value of
Gmax for GFP-SkLCS18 was not
significantly different from that of GFP-SkLC (Table I;
p > 0.05). Additionally, the
Gmax/Qmax'
ratio for GFP-SkLCS18 was similar to that found for
GFP-SkLC expressed in dysgenic myotubes or that of endogenous
1S in dyspedic myotubes that lack RyR-1 (Table I).
Therefore, the minimal DHPR sequence that allows strong enhancement of
Ca2+ current by RyR-1 is incomplete in, or missing from,
the 18-residue skeletal segment in the II-III loop of
GFP-SkLCS18. However, this minimal sequence is contained
within the 46-residue skeletal segment of the GFP-SkLCS46
II-III loop.
F/F signal (at +80 mV) was only
0.023 ± 0.012 ms
1 (n = 12) for
SkLCS18, which is almost 5-fold lower than the value of
0.112 ± 0.025 ms
1 (n = 16) for
SkLCS46. Thus, skeletal-type coupling is much weaker for
SkLCS18 than for SkLCS46.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Depolarization-induced Ca2+
transients in dysgenic myotubes expressing DHPR chimeras SkLC
(a), SkLCS46 (b) and
SkLCS18 (c). The holding potential
was
90 mV, and cells were depolarized to the indicated test
potentials following a prepulse protocol (14). Note that both the rate
of change and maximal increase of
F/F are much smaller for
SkLCS18 than for SkLCS46. The vertical
calibration bar (
F/F) corresponds to 5.0 for
SkLCS46 and 1.0 for SkLCS18 and SkLC. For the
illustrated data, cell identity, linear cell capacitance (C), and
immobilization-resistant charge movement (Q) at +70mV were:
a, cell C50, C = 524 pF, Q = 12.4 nC/µF;
b, cell C69, C = 479 pF, Q = 10.2 nC/µF;
c, cell C59, C = 363 pF, Q = 8.5 nC/µF.
G/Q')
Q46', where
G/Q46' and G/Q' are the values of
Gmax/Qmax'
for GFP-SkLCS46 and GFP-SkLC, respectively. With the values
from Table I, the enhancement of current for SkLCS46 was
~1.5. If the enhancement of current for SkLCS18 was, like
orthograde signaling, 5-fold smaller than for SkLCS46 (see
above), it would yield a predicted enhancement of only ~0.3, a value
probably too small to have been detectable.
). For the cells analyzed, the uncompensated access resistance
remained low (1.85 ± 0.33 M
, n = 9) after
entry into whole-cell mode. Fig. 4
illustrates Ca2+ currents and Ca2+ transients
evoked by constant amplitude depolarizations applied at the indicated
times after breaking into a normal myotube with either 10 EGTA
(a) or 40 BAPTA (b). Similar results were
obtained for a total of 5 cells studied with 40 BAPTA and 4 cells with 10 EGTA. With 10 EGTA in the pipette, depolarization-evoked
Ca2+ release was sufficient to cause a transient increase
in the fluorescence (
F) of the indicator dye Fluo-3. Note
that both
F and the base-line fluorescence (F)
increased between 2.5 and 7.5 min after break-in with 10 EGTA,
suggesting that during this time Fluo-3 was diffusing into the cell.
Because both
F and F remained stable at longer times, it appeared that 7.5 min was sufficient for equilibration between the pipette solution and the myoplasm. With 40 BAPTA in the
pipette, depolarization failed to elicit a transient increase in
fluorescence, and the base-line fluorescence remained very low,
presumably because Ca2+ was buffered so strongly that
virtually all of the Fluo-3 entering the cell remained in the
Ca2+-free form. The absence of evoked fluorescence
increases with 40 BAPTA indicates that there was effective buffering of
Ca2+ released from the SR (where Ca2+ stores
had likely been depleted). Therefore, the measurements with 40 BAPTA
should give an indication of the behavior of Ca2+ currents
in myotubes where Ca2+ transients near release sites were
substantially suppressed.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Ca2+ currents in normal myotubes
are only modestly affected by strong Ca2+ buffering.
Whole-cell Ca2+ currents (upper set of traces)
and Ca2+ transients (lower set of traces) were
measured at the indicated times (min) after breaking into normal
myotubes with a patch pipette that contained either 10 mM
EGTA (a) or 40 mM BAPTA (b) as the
predominant Ca2+ buffer. The illustrated traces were
obtained in response to a 200-ms depolarization to 40 mV (cell E21,
C = 210 pF, access resistance 2.2 M
(a)) or to 20 mV
(cell D93, C = 174 pF, access resistance 2.3 M
(b)).
The time calibration applies to all the currents and transients, the
current calibration applies to both a and b, and
the vertical scale for the Ca2+ transients is in arbitrary
fluorescence units that are identical for a and
b.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
GFP-SkLC clusters in a punctate distribution
upon expression in dysgenic skeletal myotubes. Representative
laser-scanning confocal images of a dysgenic myotube (in
vivo) performed 3 days after mononuclear injection of GFP-SkLC
cDNA are shown. GFP-SkLC clusters are indistinguishable from those
seen for GFP-
1S and GFP-
1C (12).
a, topmost confocal section of the myotube; b,
optical section of a more central slice (midlevel section), 8-µm
deeper than in a; c, calculated three-dimensional
projection (maximum intensity) of 9 confocal sections (2 µm
distances) of the myotube. Scale bar = 10 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1b Subunit?--
Because
Ca2+ currents are of small amplitude in skeletal muscle
cells lacking RyR-1, we suggested in an earlier study that the small
Ca2+ currents observed after heterologous expression of
skeletal DHPRs in nonmuscle cells might be a consequence of the absence
of RyR-1 in these cells (8). Recently, however, it was shown that large Ca2+ currents could be produced with skeletal DHPRs
expressed in Xenopus oocytes if the
1b
subunit was used instead of
1a (22), the predominant
isoform in skeletal muscle (23). This work did not establish whether
the
1b subunit simply increased expression of DHPRs in
the oocyte plasmalemma or actually increased the current without
changing the number of plasmalemmal DHPRs (as we have shown is likely
the case for enhancement of current by RyR-1). Our preliminary
experiments suggest that for DHPRs in their normal environment (muscle
cells), expression of
1b does not overcome the loss of
interaction with RyR-1. In particular, neither expression of
1b in dyspedic myotubes
(Gmax/Qmax'
ratio: 14 nS/pC; n = 6) nor co-expression of
1b together with GFP-SkLC in dysgenic myotubes
(Gmax/Qmax'
ratio: 12 nS/pC; n = 4) yielded values that were much
different from the corresponding values obtained without
1b co-expression (Gmax/Qmax'
ratios of 12 nS/pC and 15 nS/pC, respectively; see Table I).

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Model of DHPR-RyR-1 interactions
incorporating results of the present and of previous (5, 8)
studies. Panel a shows the hypothetical DHPR-RyR-1
interaction that occurs in normal myotubes, in dysgenic myotubes
injected with
1S cDNA (5), or in dyspedic myotubes
injected with RyR-1 cDNA (8). The cytoplasmic II-III loop of the
skeletal DHPR is critical for transmitting the signal controlling the
release of Ca2+ ions via RyR-1 (5) in the SR membrane. This
skeletal-type EC coupling (Skeletal ECC) is not dependent on
influx of extracellular Ca2+. The II-III loop is also
essential for receiving the current-enhancing signal from RyR-1
(Channel enhancement). Panel b depicts the
situation as found in dyspedic muscle. Dyspedic myotubes lack RyR-1 but
have intact DHPRs at a density comparable with normal myotubes (8).
Dyspedic myotubes display no EC coupling and also show significantly
reduced slow Ca2+ current densities through the DHPR (8).
In the absence of contact with RyR-1, the skeletal DHPR assumes a
conformation (symbolized by the tilted cylinders representing
homologous repeats I-IV) that produces reduced Ca2+ current
(symbolized by the smaller arrow). Panel c models
the behavior of chimera GFP-SkLC expressed in dysgenic myotubes. The
cardiac II-III loop (Cardiac loop) in an otherwise skeletal
DHPR prevents the DHPR-RyR-1 interaction so that there is neither EC
coupling nor appreciable Ca2+ current. Panel d
shows that the introduction of a short skeletal segment
(
1S residues 720-765, symbolized by a bold
line), which sufficed to transfer strong skeletal-type EC coupling
to the cardiac DHPR (as in CSk53 described in Ref. 7), is also
sufficient to restore wild-type Ca2+ current densities (as
in chimera SkLCS46). Together, these observations suggest
that these 46 amino acids of the skeletal II-III loop contain residues
that are required for both strong skeletal-type EC coupling and
RyR-1-mediated enhancement of skeletal Ca2+ current.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank P. Seeburg (ZMBH, Germany) for the
gift of an earlier version of the GFP expression vector, K. Campbell
for the
1b subunit, P. Allen for dyspedic mice, and
Katherine Parsons for expert technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by a Schrödinger scholarship from the Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Austria (J01242-GEN) (to M. G.), by the Muscular Dystrophy Association (to R. T. D.), by a long term fellowship from the Human Frontier Science Program (to N. S.), and by National Institutes of Health Grants NS 24444 and AR 44750 (to K. G. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed.
Tel.: 970-491-5277; Fax: 970-491-7907; E-mail:
kbeam@lamar.colostate.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
EC, excitation-contraction;
DHPR, dihydropyridine receptor;
RyR-1, skeletal
ryanodine receptor;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
SR, sarcoplasmic
reticulum;
nt, nucleotide number;
, ohms;
F, farads;
S, siemens;
C, coulombs.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Rios, E., and Brum, G. (1987) Nature 325, 717-720[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Tanabe, T., Beam, K. G., Powell, J. A., and Numa, S. (1988) Nature 336, 134-139[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Takeshima, H., Iino, M., Takekura, H., Nishi, M., Kuno, J., Minowa, O., Takano, H., and Noda, T. (1994) Nature 369, 556-559[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Armstrong, C. M., Bezanilla, F. M., and Horowicz, P. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 267, 605-608[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Tanabe, T., Mikami, A., Numa, S., and Beam, K. G. (1990) Nature 344, 451-453[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Tanabe, T., Beam, K. G., Adams, B. A., Niidome, T., and Numa, S. (1990) Nature 346, 567-569[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Nakai, J., Tanabe, T., Konno, T., Adams, B., and Beam, K. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24893-24896 |
| 8. | Nakai, J., Dirksen, R. T., Nguyen, H. T., Pessah, I. N., Beam, K. G., and Allen, P. D. (1996) Nature 380, 72-75[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Fleig, A., Takeshima, H., and Penner, R. (1996) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 496, 339-345[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Tanabe, T., Takeshima, H., Mikami, A., Flockerzi, V., Takahashi, H., Kangawa, K., Kojima, M., Matsuo, H., Hirose, T., and Numa, S. (1987) Nature 328, 313-318[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Mikami, A., Imoto, K., Tanabe, T., Niidome, T., Mori, Y., Takeshima, H., Narumiya, S., and Numa, S. (1989) Nature 340, 230-233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Grabner, M.,
Dirksen, R. T.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1903-1908 |
| 13. |
Adams, B. A.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1989)
J. Gen. Physiol.
94,
429-444 |
| 14. | Adams, B. A., Tanabe, T., Mikami, A., Numa, S., and Beam, K. G. (1990) Nature 346, 569-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., and Sigworth, F. J. (1981) Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 391, 85-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Adams, B. A.,
Mori, Y.,
Kim, M. S.,
Tanabe, T.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1994)
J. Gen. Physiol.
104,
985-996 |
| 17. |
Garcia, J.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1994)
J. Gen. Physiol.
103,
107-123 |
| 18. | Mishina, M., Kurosaki, T., Tobimatsu, T., Morimoto, Y., Noda, M., Yamamoto, T., Terao, M., Lindstrom, J., Takahashi, T., Kuno, M., and Numa, S. (1984) Nature 307, 604-608[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Jurman, M. E., Boland, L. M., Liu, Y., and Yellen, G. (1994) Biotechniques 17, 876-880[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Garcia, J.,
Nakai, J.,
Imoto, K.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
72,
2515-2523 |
| 21. |
Flucher, B. E.,
Andrews, S. B.,
Fleischer, S.,
Marks, A. R.,
Caswell, A.,
and Powell, J. A.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1161-1174 |
| 22. |
Ren, D.,
and Hall, L. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22393-22396 |
| 23. | Hofmann, F., Biel, M., and Flockerzi, V. (1994) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 399-418[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Feldmeyer, D. K., Melzer, W., Pohl, B., and Zöllner, P. (1993) Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 425, 54-61[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Balog, E. M.,
and Gallant, E. M.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
C128-C135 |
| 26. |
Nakai, J.,
Sekiguchi, N.,
Rando, T. A.,
Allen, P. D.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13403-13406 |
| 27. | O'Brien, J. J., Allen, P. D., Beam, K. G., and Chen, S. R. W. (1999) Biophys. J. 76, 302 (abstr.) |
| 28. |
Block, B. A.,
Leung, A.,
Campbell, K. P.,
and Franzini-Armstrong, C.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
2587-2600 |
| 29. |
Sun, X-H.,
Protasi, F.,
Takahashi, M.,
Takeshima, H.,
Ferguson, D. G.,
and Franzini-Armstrong, C.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
659-673 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. P. Gach, G. Cherednichenko, C. Haarmann, J. R. Lopez, K. G. Beam, I. N. Pessah, C. Franzini-Armstrong, and P. D. Allen {alpha}2{delta}1 Dihydropyridine Receptor Subunit Is a Critical Element for Excitation-Coupled Calcium Entry but Not for Formation of Tetrads in Skeletal Myotubes Biophys. J., April 15, 2008; 94(8): 3023 - 3034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yang, P. D. Allen, I. N. Pessah, and J. R. Lopez Enhanced Excitation-coupled Calcium Entry in Myotubes Is Associated with Expression of RyR1 Malignant Hyperthermia Mutations J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37471 - 37478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Delbono, J. Xia, S. Treves, Z.-M. Wang, R. Jimenez-Moreno, A. M. Payne, M. L. Messi, A. Briguet, F. Schaerer, M. Nishi, et al. Loss of skeletal muscle strength by ablation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum protein JP45 PNAS, December 11, 2007; 104(50): 20108 - 20113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Zvaritch, F. Depreux, N. Kraeva, R. E. Loy, S. A. Goonasekera, S. Boncompagni, A. Kraev, A. O. Gramolini, R. T. Dirksen, C. Franzini-Armstrong, et al. An Ryr1I4895T mutation abolishes Ca2+ release channel function and delays development in homozygous offspring of a mutant mouse line PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18537 - 18542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Essin, A. Welling, F. Hofmann, F. C. Luft, M. Gollasch, and S. Moosmang Indirect coupling between Cav1.2 channels and ryanodine receptors to generate Ca2+ sparks in murine arterial smooth muscle cells J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 205 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Lorenzon and K. G. Beam Accessibility of Targeted DHPR Sites to Streptavidin and Functional Effects of Binding on EC Coupling J. Gen. Physiol., September 24, 2007; 130(4): 379 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] |