![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 31, 22114-22121, July 30, 1999
,
, and
From the
E. I. DuPont de Nemours Agricultural
Products, Stine-Haskell Research Center, Newark, Delaware 19714, the
§ E. I. DuPont de Nemours Life Sciences, Experimental
Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0402, ¶ E. I. DuPont de
Nemours Agricultural Products, Experimental Station,
Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0402, and the
Laboratory of
Structural Biology, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lumazine synthase, which catalyzes the
penultimate step of riboflavin biosynthesis, has been cloned from three
higher plants (spinach, tobacco, and arabidopsis) through functional
complementation of an Escherichia coli auxotroph. Whereas
the three plant proteins exhibit some structural similarities to known
microbial homologs, they uniquely possess N-terminal polypeptide
extensions that resemble typical chloroplast transit peptides. In
vitro protein import assays with intact chloroplasts and
immunolocalization experiments verify that higher plant lumazine
synthase is synthesized in the cytosol as a larger molecular weight
precursor protein, which is post-translationally imported into
chloroplasts where it is proteolytically cleaved to its mature size.
The authentic spinach enzyme is estimated to constitute <0.02% of the
total chloroplast protein. Recombinant "mature" spinach lumazine
synthase is expressed in E. coli at levels exceeding 30%
of the total soluble protein and is readily purified to homogeneity
using a simple two-step procedure. Apparent
Vmax and Km values obtained
with the purified plant protein are similar to those reported for
microbial lumazine synthases. Electron microscopy and hydrodynamic
studies reveal that native plant lumazine synthase is a hollow
capsid-like structure comprised of 60 identical 16.5-kDa subunits,
resembling its icosahedral counterparts in E. coli and
Bacillus subtilis.
Riboflavin, vitamin B2, is the precursor of flavin
mononucleotide and flavin adenine dinucleotide, essential cofactors for a multitude of mainstream metabolic enzymes that mediate hydride, oxygen, and electron transfer reactions. Consequently, critical cellular processes as diverse as the citric acid cycle, fatty acid
oxidation, photosynthesis, mitochondrial electron transport, and
de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis are fundamentally dependent on riboflavin availability. Despite its essentiality, however, only
plants and certain microorganisms can synthesize vitamin B2, whereas higher animals, including man, must obtain it
through their diet. In contrast, flavokinase and FAD pyrophosphorylase, the enzymes that convert riboflavin to FMN and FAD, respectively, are
widely distributed in nature. Our current knowledge of riboflavin biosynthesis is largely restricted to bacteria and yeast (reviewed in
Ref. 1). In both cases, the synthetic pathway consists of seven
distinct enzyme-catalyzed reactions, with GTP and ribulose 5-phosphate
the ultimate, noncommitted precursors. Although the sequence of events
that are catalyzed in the second and third steps occur in opposite
order in bacteria and fungi, the remaining pathway intermediates are
identical in both types of microorganisms.
The last two enzymes of riboflavin biosynthesis, lumazine synthase
(LS)1 and riboflavin synthase
(RS), are the best characterized, both structurally and
mechanistically. In Bacillus subtilis, these proteins
physically interact with each other to form a huge spherical particle
with a combined molecular mass of ~1 MDa (2); the x-ray structure of
this complex has been determined at 3.3 Å (3). Through an elegant
series of experiments, Bacher and co-workers (4, 5) have shown that the
outer shell of the B. subtilis LS-RS complex consists of 60 LS subunits that are organized as 12 densely packed pentamers to form a
hollow icosahedral capsid. Encaged within the central core of the
sphere resides a single molecule of RS, a trimer of three identical
subunits. It has been proposed that compartmentation of the two
terminal enzymes in the LS·RS complex improves the overall catalytic
efficiency of riboflavin production through "substrate channeling,"
especially at low substrate concentrations (6). Although a bifunctional LS·RS complex has only been reported for certain strains of
Bacillus and Clostridium (2), it is important to
note that Escherichia coli LS also exists in vivo
as a hollow icosahedral capsid of 60 identical subunits (7). The
functional significance of this single protein complex, if any, remains
to be elucidated.
LS catalyzes the penultimate step of riboflavin biosynthesis, namely
the condensation of 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate (DHBP) with
5-amino-6-ribitylamino-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione (ARAPD) to yield one molecule each of orthophosphate and
6,7-dimethyl-8-ribityllumazine (DMRL) (Fig.
1). The latter is the immediate precursor
of riboflavin. LS genes have been cloned from numerous microorganisms,
including E. coli (8), Actinobacillus
pleuropneumoniae (9), Photobacterium phosphoreum (10),
B. subtilis (7, 11), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(12). In all cases, the subunit molecular mass of the
encoded protein is small, ranging in size from ~16 to 17 kDa. Although the various microbial lumazine synthases share certain structural features, their overall homology is rather poor. For example, the proteins from yeast and E. coli are only 36%
identical at the amino acid sequence level.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The physiological reaction catalyzed by
LS.
The ultimate step of riboflavin biosynthesis is mediated by RS, which catalyzes the dismutation of two molecules of DMRL to yield one molecule of riboflavin and one molecule of ARAPD. RS has been cloned from yeast and bacteria, and all of the species examined thus far exhibit marked internal homology in their N-terminal and C-terminal domains (13, 14). Consequently, it has been proposed that the two "halves" of the RS protomer have arisen through gene duplication and that each contains a substrate-binding site for DMRL. Although the atomic structure of RS remains to be determined, it is known that the B. subtilis (2, 13) and S. cerevisiae (14, 15) homologs are both trimers in the native state, each consisting of three identical ~25-kDa subunits.
It is frequently stated in the literature that plants can synthesize riboflavin (1). However, virtually nothing is known about the metabolic machinery that is responsible for this process. Apart from an arabidopsis GTP cyclohydrolase II that was recently cloned (16), there are no reports of either homogeneous proteins or full-length cDNA sequences for any other enzyme that is involved in plant riboflavin biosynthesis. RS from spinach has been partially purified (17), but there is no information on its primary structure. The arabidopsis GTP cyclohydrolase II is only 39-58% identical to its counterparts in E. coli, B. subtilis, and P. phosphoreum at the amino acid sequence level. Assuming that the other pathway enzymes have diverged to a similar degree, it is extremely doubtful that strategies that only rely on structural similarities to the known microbial homologs will be very useful in cloning the corresponding plant genes.
In the present work, we have cloned LS genes from three plant species
(spinach, tobacco, and arabidopsis) through their abilities to rescue
an E. coli mutant whose endogenous LS gene was disrupted by
insertional inactivation. Since this strategy relies only on functional
similarities between the disrupted host gene and the target gene of
interest, it is ideally suited for cloning heterologous proteins that
catalyze the same reaction. Indeed, several bacterial (18, 19) and
fungal (12, 14) riboflavin biosynthetic enzymes, as well as plant GTP
cyclohydrolase II (16), were identified through functional
complementation of microbial riboflavin auxotrophs. Unexpectedly,
higher plant LS is synthesized as a precursor protein with a cleavable
N-terminal chloroplast targeting sequence. Upon post-translational
import into the chloroplast stroma, the transit peptide is removed
giving rise to the mature polypeptide. Mature spinach LS has been
expressed in E. coli, purified to homogeneity, and
characterized, both structurally and kinetically. Here we present the
results of these studies.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials--
The spinach, tobacco, and arabidopsis
cDNA expression libraries were obtained from Stratagene (catalog
numbers 936005, 936002, and 937010, respectively).
Cloning and Gene Disruption of E. coli LS--
The E. coli LS gene (GenBankTM accession number X64395) was
amplified from genomic DNA of strain W3110 (20) using two PCR primers.2 Primer 1 (5'-CGA
AGG AAG Acc atg gCC ATT ATT
GAA GCT AAC GTT GC-3') introduces an NcoI site at the initiation
codon, and primer 2 (5'-ATC TTA CTg tcg acT TCA
GGC CTT GAT GGC
TTT C-3') provides a SalI site just
past the stop codon. The PCR fragment was cut with NcoI and
SalI and ligated into similarly digested pGEM-5Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI). The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli DH5
, and growth was selected on LB media that
contained ampicillin (100 µg/ml). A representative plasmid with an
insert of the correct size (referred to below as "pGEM-LS") was
sequenced completely to confirm the absence of PCR errors.
Next, the E. coli LS gene was insertionally inactivated. Briefly, a unique NotI site was introduced into the middle of its coding region, and a DNA fragment conferring kanamycin resistance was ligated into the engineered site. The selectable marker was provided by the Kanr GenBlock cartridge (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), which was modified by PCR to add a NotI cleavage site to both of its ends. This was accomplished using primer 3 (5'-AAC TAG ATC Agc ggc cgc AGC CAC GTT GTG TCT CAA A-3') and primer 4 (5'-GAC AAA CAT Agc ggc cgc TGA GGT CTG CCT CGT GAA-3') in a standard PCR reaction. The resulting fragment was cleaved with NotI and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis.
A unique NotI site was also introduced into the middle of
the E. coli LS gene using "inverse PCR" (21). The target
for amplification was pGEM-LS, and the 100-µl reaction contained
~0.5 ng of plasmid DNA and primer 5 (5'-AAC TAG ATC Agc ggc cgc
GGT ACG GTT ATT
CGT GGT-3') and primer 6 (5'-GAC AAA CAT Agc
ggc cgc GTC GTA
TTT ACC GGT-3') each at 0.5 µM. The primers hybridize to the E. coli LS gene (GenBankTM accession number X64395) at nt 2273-2290
and nt 2243-2261, respectively, and each contains a NotI
cleavage site at its 5' end. The PCR product was cleaved with
NotI and subjected to a standard ligation reaction with the
modified Kanr GenBlock. The ligation mixture was used to
transform E. coli DH5
, and growth was selected on LB
media that contained ampicillin (100 µg/ml) and kanamycin (30 µg/ml). A plasmid harboring the disrupted E. coli LS gene
(referred to "pLSKan") was sequenced completely to confirm that the
selectable marker was inserted at the correct location.
Creation of an E. coli LS Knockout Mutant-- pLSKan was digested with NcoI and SalI to liberate the insertionally inactivated E. coli LS gene. The purified fragment was electroporated into E. coli JC7623, and growth was selected on LB media with riboflavin (400 µg/ml) (18) and kanamycin (30 µg/ml). JC7623 was chosen as the initial recipient for gene replacement since it undergoes double-crossover homologous recombination at high frequency (22-24). The correct chromosomal integration event was detected phenotypically. Mutants resulting from homologous recombination of the disrupted E. coli LS gene were resistant to kanamycin and could only grow in the presence of added riboflavin.
Due to mutations in the recBCD loci, E. coli JC7623 is unable to propagate ColE1-type plasmids (Ref. 24 and references therein). It was therefore necessary to move the disrupted E. coli LS gene from the chromosome of JC7623 to a suitable strain that could be used for screening cDNA libraries. This was accomplished through phage transduction using P1vir and well established methodologies (25). The recipient strain was E. coli W3110 (20), and growth was selected on LB media with sodium citrate (7.5 mM), magnesium sulfate (1.5 mM), kanamycin (35 µg/ml), and riboflavin (400 µg/ml). A stable transductant, in which the disrupted E. coli LS gene had replaced the normal chromosomal copy, was identified phenotypically and was used for complementation cloning as described below; the mutant was resistant to kanamycin and could only grow in the presence of added riboflavin.
Complementation Cloning--
cDNA expression libraries
were subjected to mass excision according to the vendor's protocol.
Upon excision, the cDNA inserts are contained in the plasmid
vector, pBluescript, which confers ampicillin resistance. The plasmid
mixture was then introduced into the E. coli LS null mutant
using electroporation, and transformants were plated on LB media that
contained sodium citrate (7.5 mM), magnesium sulfate (1.5 mM), kanamycin (35 µg/ml), ampicillin (100 µg/ml), and
0.6 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside. After a 48-h
growth period at 37 °C, plasmids were isolated from representative colonies, and their cDNA inserts were sequenced completely.
Overexpression of Mature Spinach LS--
PCR primers were used
to remove the chloroplast transit peptide from the cloned spinach LS
precursor. Primer 7 (5'-CTA CTC ATT Tca tat gAA
CGA GCT TGA AGG
TTA TGT CAC-3') hybridizes to nt
205-224 of the DNA sequence shown in Fig.
2 and replaces Val-67 (the predicted
start of the mature protein) with an initiator Met residue. It also
provides a unique NdeI site for cloning purposes and changes
the second residue of the mature protein from Arg to Asn. It was
anticipated that these changes would not affect enzyme activity and
might actually improve bacterial expression of spinach LS, since the
E. coli and B. subtilis homologs both start with
Met-Asn. Primer 8 (5'-CAT CTT ACT gga tcc ATC AGG
CCT TCA AAT GAT
GTT CG-3') hybridizes at the other end of the
gene to nt 648-667 (Fig. 2) and provides a unique BamHI
site just past the stop codon. The PCR fragment was digested with
NdeI and BamHI and ligated into the T7 expression
vector, pET-24a(+) (Novagen), cleaved with the same enzymes. The
construct was introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3), and plasmid
DNA from a selected transformant was sequenced completely to check for
PCR errors; none were found.
|
For protein production, the recombinant strain described above was
grown at 37 °C in LB media containing kanamycin (50 µg/ml). Induction was with isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside
(1 mM) at an A600 nm of 0.7, and
the cells were harvested 3 h later by centrifugation. A cell-free
extract was prepared as described previously (26), and stored at
80 °C at a protein concentration of 31 mg/ml (27).
Purification of Mature Spinach LS-- Aliquots (5 ml) of the E. coli cell-free extract were diluted 1:1 with water and applied to a Mono-Q HR 10/10 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) pre-equilibrated at 25 °C with Buffer Q (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM sodium sulfite, 1 mM EDTA). The column was developed at 4.0 ml/min with a linear gradient (120 ml) of 0-0.5 M NaCl (in Buffer Q). Four more aliquots of the extract were processed in the same manner, and fractions eluting between 0.35 and 0.38 M NaCl were pooled, supplemented with 5% glycerol, and concentrated to 22 mg/ml of protein; the recovery of protein was ~135 mg.
The entire sample was then fractionated on a TSK G3000SW gel filtration
column (21 × 600 mm) in 2-ml aliquots. The column was developed
at 4 ml/min with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 0.3 M
NaCl (25 °C). Purified mature spinach LS emerged from the column as a single peak immediately after the void volume. Fractions eluting between 19.6 and 20.7 min were supplemented with 5% glycerol, concentrated to ~20 mg of protein per ml, and stored at
80 °C. The final yield was ~73 mg of purified
protein.3
Chloroplast Import Assays--
The full-length spinach LS
precursor (original cDNA clone) was modified for insertion into the
MscI and BamHI sites of the in vitro
transcription/translation vector, pCITE-4a(+) (Novagen) using PCR
primers 8 and 9 (5'-TCA TTT CAT Atg gcc aGT TTT
GCA GCT TCT CAA
ACT TGT-3'). As noted above, the former adds a
unique BamHI site just after the stop codon, whereas the
latter introduces an MscI site at the initiator Met residue;
neither primer alters the primary sequence of the spinach LS precursor.
The resulting construct was subjected to in vitro
transcription/translation using [35S]methionine and the
"Single Tube Protein System 2, T7" kit (Novagen) according to the
vendor's protocol. Reactions were terminated with 2× import buffer
containing 60 mM unlabeled methionine (28) and stored at
80 °C for subsequent use.
Chloroplasts were isolated from 13-day-old pea seedlings (Pisum sativum) and subjected to in vitro import assays (28) using the radiolabeled spinach LS precursor. Protease post-treatment was used to distinguish between bound and imported polypeptides (28, 29). Intact plastids were then repurified by centrifugation through Percoll cushions, resuspended in 100 µl of 2× gel sample buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography as described previously (28).
Lumazine Synthase Activity--
Initial rates of lumazine
formation were monitored spectrophotometrically at 408 nm, using an
extinction coefficient of 10,000 M
1cm
1 (30). The 1-ml reactions
contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM ARAPD,
1.0 mM DHBP, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, and
purified mature spinach LS at 37 °C; reactions were initiated with
enzyme. Unless otherwise indicated, kinetic constants were obtained at 25 °C by holding ARAPD or DHBP at a fixed saturating concentration (0.5 mM), while varying the concentration of the other substrate.
DHBP was synthesized enzymatically in a reaction containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl2,
20 mM D-ribose 5-phosphate, 10 units/ml
phosphoriboisomerase, and 0.3 units/ml purified E. coli
DHBPS at 25 °C (18). ARAPD was prepared from
4-ribitylamino-5-nitroso-2,6-dihydroxypyrimidine (30) by catalytic
hydrogenation. The 40-ml reaction contained 0.4 mmol of the latter
compound (in 10 mM acetic acid) and 20 mg of 10% palladium
on carbon. After a 15-h incubation period at 25 °C (under 50 pounds/square inch H2), the catalyst was removed by
filtration and the ARAPD-containing filtrate was stored at
80 °C.
ARAPD and DHBP concentrations were determined by enzymatic conversion
to DMRL, with one of the substrates limiting and the other in excess.
Other Methods--
SDS-PAGE was performed with 15% gels (31)
that were aged overnight. For Western blots, proteins were transferred
to nitrocellulose, reacted with antisera against the purified
recombinant spinach LS, and sequentially probed with biotinylated
anti-rabbit IgG and streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase,
which were both from Vector Laboratories. Electrospray ionization mass
spectrometry was performed on a Fisons VG Quattro 11, calibrated with
myoglobin; the sample was analyzed at a concentration of 20 µM protomer in acetonitrile/water/formic acid
(50/50/0.5). PCR amplification was with the GeneAmp PCR Reagent kit
using a DNA Thermocycler 480 (Perkin-Elmer). Automated DNA sequencing
was performed on an Applied Biosystems Inc. 377 using custom-designed
primers. Amino acid sequence comparisons and alignments were performed using the GAP and PILEUP programs of the Genetics Computer Group (Wisconsin package, version 9, Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI).
For sedimentation equilibrium studies, spinach LS (33 µM protomer) in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 was placed into two separate sectors of a six-sectored cell and
centrifuged at 4 °C and 4500 rpm in an XL-A Optima (Beckman)
analytical centrifuge; the reference sectors contained the same buffer.
After 28, 47, and 72 h of centrifugation absorbances at 280 nm of
the six-sectored cell were scanned stepwise at 0.02-mm intervals with
10 readings per step. The absorbance data were fit to a model for an
ideal monodisperse system having a partial specific volume of 0.724 as
calculated from Ref. 32. For electron microscopy, purified recombinant
mature spinach LS was diluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 0.3 M NaCl, negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate, and
examined in a Zeiss 902 transmission electron microscope operating at
80 kV. Micrographs were recorded at a nominal magnification of 50,000;
bacteriophage T4 was used for calibration (33).
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cloning of the Spinach LS--
As detailed under "Experimental
Procedures," a spinach cDNA library was screened for functional
complementation of an E. coli LS knockout mutant. The
library was introduced by electroporation, and transformants were
plated in the absence of added riboflavin. Reversion to riboflavin
prototrophy occurred at a frequency of ~4 × 10
6,
and one of the complementing plasmids (designated pPVLS22) was selected
for further analysis; the latter contained a cDNA insert of ~1.3
kilobase pairs. Shown in Fig. 2 is the complete nucleotide sequence and
deduced amino acid sequence of the spinach protein that rescued the
E. coli LS null mutant. The open reading frame encodes a
protein of 222 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of
23,426.46 Da. Although there are unmistakable similarities between the
higher plant protein and known microbial LS homologs, there are also
some important differences. The most obvious discrepancy is that
spinach LS is a much larger protein (Fig.
3). Fused to its N terminus is a stretch
of ~65 additional amino acid residues that are not present in known
bacterial and fungal counterparts. That this polypeptide extension is
relatively basic and rich in Ser and Thr residues suggests that it
could be a chloroplast targeting sequence (34). According to this scenario, spinach LS is synthesized in the plant cytosol as a larger
molecular weight precursor and is subsequently taken up by chloroplasts
where it is cleaved to its mature size. Unfortunately, it is difficult
to predict with certainty the exact site where processing occurs, since
even among the known microbial LS homologs the first 15-20 N-terminal
amino acid residues are poorly conserved. However, based on the
sequence alignment shown in Fig. 3, it is likely that the critical
cleavage event occurs between Ala-66 and Val-67, giving rise to a
polypeptide with a protomer molecular mass of ~16.5 kDa for the
mature spinach LS. Note that even without its chloroplast targeting
sequence, spinach LS is only ~29-49% identical to its counterparts
in E. coli, B. subtilis, A. pleuropneumoniae, P. phosphoreum, and S. cerevisiae.
|
Chloroplast Localization--
To test the hypothesis that spinach
LS is a chloroplast protein, the cloned full-length precursor was
labeled with [35S]methionine and subjected to in
vitro import assays. Although the experiment shown in Fig.
4 A was performed with pea chloroplasts, virtually identical results have been obtained with spinach plastids. In vitro transcription/translation of the spinach LS
precursor resulted in the synthesis of a radioactive polypeptide with
an apparent molecular mass of ~23 kDa (lane T), consistent
with the value predicted from its DNA sequence. In the presence of ATP (lane 3), this polypeptide was efficiently taken up by
chloroplasts and processed to a smaller size. Classical protease
protection experiments (28, 29) established that the radioactive
polypeptide that was recovered with intact chloroplasts following
import assays had actually been internalized (lane 4). Based
on migration during SDS-PAGE, the subunit molecular mass of mature
spinach LS is ~15.5 kDa, similar to the value predicted above after
removal of the chloroplast transit peptide. Although not shown,
imported spinach LS is exclusively located in the chloroplast stroma
(e.g. the soluble fraction of chloroplasts).
|
When chloroplasts were incubated with the spinach LS precursor in the dark without ATP, uptake and processing were not observed (Fig. 4A). Under non-energized conditions, the only radioactive band recovered with intact plastids was the full-length precursor (lane 1). Moreover, the latter completely disappeared after treatment with protease (lane 2), demonstrating that it had not been imported but was merely bound to the outer membrane. Thus, translocation of the spinach LS precursor is an energy-dependent process similar to the situation reported for other nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins.
That plant LS is a chloroplast protein is also supported by immunological data (Fig. 4B). In these experiments, spinach plastids containing the authentic protein were osmotically lysed and subjected to centrifugation to yield membrane and soluble fractions. Following SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose, the proteins in both fractions were probed with antisera directed against recombinant spinach LS (see below). Consistent with the in vitro import experiments, spinach LS was only found in the soluble fraction (lane 3) and was not detected in membranes (lane 2). Moreover, the resident protein detected by the antibodies co-migrates precisely with recombinant mature spinach LS (e.g. compare lanes 3 and 4). Finally, it should be noted that spinach LS is not an abundant protein. Based on quantitative experiments with antibodies and authentic standards, it constitutes <0.02% of the total chloroplast protein.
Expression, Purification, and Characterization of Mature Spinach
LS--
In order to obtain chemical quantities of mature spinach LS
for kinetic and structural studies, the chloroplast targeting sequence
of the precursor protein was removed by PCR, and the modified gene was
cloned behind a T7 promoter. Assignment of the initiator Met residue
was based on the predicted cleavage site for precursor maturation (Fig.
3). As shown in Fig. 5A, the
recombinant protein is well expressed in E. coli
(lane 1), and easily purified to homogeneity
using anion exchange and gel filtration chromatography (lane
2). The nucleotide sequence of mature spinach LS predicts a
polypeptide of 16,534.71 Da, which is virtually identical to the value
that was determined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
(16,536.3 Da). Assuming that the higher plant protein forms an
icosahedral capsid of 60 identical subunits similar to the E. coli (7) and B. subtilis (2) homologs, its native molecular mass should be ~992 kDa. Consistent with this prediction, recombinant mature spinach LS emerged from an analytical gel filtration column as a huge complex with an apparent molecular mass of ~850 kDa
(Fig. 5B). Similar results were obtained when a spinach
chloroplast extract was applied to the same sizing column, and
fractions were subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-spinach LS
antisera to visualize the authentic chloroplast protein (data not
shown). A better estimate of the molecular mass of the spinach LS
complex was obtained through sedimentation equilibrium studies with the purified recombinant protein. The four values determined after 47 and
72 h of centrifugation (e.g. at equilibrium) ranged
from 973 ± 1 to 991 ± 1 kDa, very close to the value
predicted for a 60-mer.
|
Edman degradation of the purified recombinant protein confirmed that
the first two N-terminal amino acid residues had been correctly altered
through PCR from Val-Arg to Met-Asn as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Despite these substitutions and removal of the
chloroplast targeting sequence, the purified recombinant protein
exhibited significant catalytic activity. At 37 °C, in the presence
of saturating concentrations of DHBP and ARAPD, the apparent
Vmax of mature spinach LS was ~16,500 nmol
mg
1 h
1. This value compares favorably to
those reported for the homologous proteins from E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. cerevisiae (7), which range from
11,800 to 15,400 nmol mg
1 h
1. The low
turnover numbers that are observed for all four proteins (e.g. ~ 3 per min) suggests that the overall rate of
catalysis is hindered by a rather slow step or steps. The apparent
Km values for ARAPD and DHBP, determined with
purified recombinant spinach LS, were 20 ± 2 and 26 ± 3 µM, respectively. Although the authentic plant protein is
not available for comparison, the results suggest that purified
recombinant spinach LS is probably fully active and that processing of
the precursor protein in chloroplasts occurs at or very close to the
predicted cleavage site.
Quaternary Structure of Spinach LS-- The results above open up the possibility that native spinach LS is a spherical 60-mer similar to the E. coli and B. subtilis homologs. However, two independent groups have recently reported that the yeast enzyme is a pentamer in the native state (7, 12), which represents the minimal functional unit. To explain this anomaly, it was proposed that a small insertion (four amino acids) near the C terminus of yeast LS precludes the assembly of pentamers into 60-mers (7). The Brucella abortus homolog also contains a small insertion at the exact same position (three amino acids), and it too behaves like a pentamer in solution. However, preliminary crystallographic analysis of this protein indicates that it can assemble into icosahedral particles, at least under certain conditions (35). It was therefore of interest to examine in greater detail the quaternary structure of higher plant LS.
Shown in Fig. 6 is an electron micrograph
of purified recombinant spinach LS negatively stained with uranyl
acetate. The predominant images observed are spherical particles with
an average apparent diameter of about 17.5 nm. At this low level of
resolution they superficially resemble the 17-nm particles that were
obtained with recombinant E. coli LS, which were shown to be
icosahedral capsids of 60 subunits each through hydrodynamic studies
and metal decoration experiments (7). That the spinach LS particles are also hollow spheres is suggested by the accumulation of stain in the
central portion of the molecules. Although the size distribution of
spinach LS particles was fairly uniform, ranging from 17.5 to 18.5 nm
in diameter, a few larger particles were evident in certain electron
micrographs (data not shown). The latter could correspond to the
heterogeneous population of spherical aggregates that are observed when
B. subtilis LS is exposed to alkaline pH or its dissociated
subunits reassemble in the absence of ligands. The true nature of the
spinach LS complex remains to be determined by more exacting
methodologies. Taken together, however, the above results suggest that
the quaternary structure of lumazine synthase has been highly conserved
in the evolution from bacteria to plants.
|
Other Plant LS Genes--
During the present study, cDNAs for
tobacco and arabidopsis LS were also cloned by functional
complementation. The amino acid sequences of these proteins are shown
in Fig. 7 aligned to spinach LS. It is
clear that all three plant proteins are synthesized as larger
precursors with N-terminal chloroplast targeting sequences. Although
the transit peptides are of comparable length, they are highly
divergent and bear little resemblance to each other. Excluding the
transit peptides, however, the three plant proteins are 72-76% identical at the amino acid sequence level. This observation is reminiscent of other nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins that typically exhibit much greater plant-to-plant variation in the targeting sequence than in the mature portion of the molecule (36).
When the amino acid sequences of spinach, arabidopsis, and tobacco LS
were scanned against the data base, a large number of bacterial and
fungal counterparts were identified as being related. However, none of
these proteins exhibited >50% identity to any of the plant proteins.
The only plant LS homolog that was identified during this search was an
arabidopsis protein with accession number AC004005 whose sequence is
identical to the protein shown in Fig. 7.
|
Apart from their overall similarity to one another, the three plant LS homologs each possess a unique stretch of amino acids at their C terminus (i.e. ASLFEHHLK), a region of the protein that is not highly conserved in yeast or bacteria. That these nine residues are identical in three different species suggests that they have been selected for and that they might be of unique importance to the functionality of higher plant LS. According to the crystal structure of B. subtilis LS complexed with a substrate-like inhibitor (4), this region of the polypeptide is not directly involved with substrate binding or catalysis. Assuming this is also true for spinach LS, the nine plant-conserved residues must serve another function.
Conclusions-- Lumazine synthase from spinach, tobacco, and arabidopsis have been cloned as the first such examples from higher plants. Functional complementation was key to obtaining the cDNAs for these proteins, since they exhibit very little homology to known bacterial and fungal counterparts. Surprisingly, plant LS is a nuclear-encoded protein that is synthesized in the cytosol as a larger precursor with an N-terminal chloroplast targeting sequence. Following import into chloroplasts, the transit peptide is removed to yield "mature" LS, which assembles into a large spherical particle that superficially resembles the icosahedral 60-mers that have been described for E. coli and B. subtilis (5, 7). In contrast, fungal LS (the only other eucaryotic LS homologs for which sequence information is available) is synthesized in its mature form without an obvious organellar targeting sequence and upon folding does not assemble into a higher order structure larger than a pentamer (12).
That plant LS is a chloroplast protein opens up the possibility that other plant riboflavin biosynthetic enzymes might be similarly localized. A likely candidate is riboflavin synthase, the last enzyme in the pathway, which converts 2 mols of lumazine to 1 mol of riboflavin and 1 mol of ARAPD. Not only does this enzyme use lumazine, but one of its products, ARAPD, is recycled as a substrate by LS. As already noted, LS and RS are physically associated with each other in B. subtilis, to form a bifunctional "comparticle" that operates more efficiently than the sum of its parts (6). Whether a similar situation occurs in plants remains to be determined. However, given the above observations, it is difficult to imagine that plant LS and RS would physically be separated from each other in different cellular compartments.
Other considerations support the notion that riboflavin biosynthesis is largely, if not entirely, confined to chloroplasts. For example, GTP and ribulose 5-phosphate, the precursors for the two converging pathways that lead to riboflavin, are both abundant in this organelle. The enzymes that catalyze the formation of the first committed intermediates that result from these compounds are GTP-cyclohydrolase II (GTP-CHII) and DHBP synthase (DHBPS), respectively. In most bacteria and fungi, these two proteins are distinct enzymes that are encoded for by separate genes. However, other microorganisms, like B. subtilis and Photobacterium leiognathi, produce a single chimeric protein that appears to catalyze both enzyme activities (17, 18). In the bifunctional protein, DHBPS and GTP-CHII are literally linked together "head-to-tail" to form a species that resembles a fusion protein; the DHBPS moiety is at the N terminus.
Two sequences have recently appeared in the data base that clearly
indicate that tomato and arabidopsis also have a bifunctional DHBPS/GTP-CHII; the accession numbers of these proteins are AJ002298 and AJ000053, respectively. Compared with the B. subtilis
and P. leiognathi homologs, however, both plant proteins
have about 125 extra amino acids at their N terminus. That these
polypeptide extensions are rich in Ser and Thr residues suggests that
they could be chloroplast targeting sequences. Although additional experiments are required to test this hypothesis, with two DNA sequences now available for higher plant DHBPS/GTP-CHII, the cellular location and biochemical properties of this interesting protein will
soon be known.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Mike Picollelli, Rand Schwartz, Sylvia Stack, Tom Miller, and Mary Bailey for excellent technical assistance; Dana Smulski for providing bacterial strains and useful advice on the bacterial strains and P1 transduction; James Doughty for help in electrospray mass spectrometry measurements; and Daniel Camac and Joel Schneider for help with the analytical centrifugation studies.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF147203 (spinach), AF148648 (tobacco), and AF148649 (arabidopsis).
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: E. I. DuPont de Nemours Life Sciences, Experimental Station, Wilmington, DE 19880-0402. Tel.: 302-695-7032; Fax: 302-695-4509; E-mail: paul.v.viitanen@usa.dupont.com.
2 For all PCR primers that appear in the text, the underlined bases hybridize to the target gene, and the unique restriction sites that were added for subcloning purposes are indicated in lowercase letters.
3
An extinction coefficient at 280 nm of 12,270 M
1 cm
1 (as calculated from the
GCG Peptidesort program) was used to determine protein concentrations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: LS, lumazine synthase (6,7-dimethyl-8-ribityllumazine synthase); RS, riboflavin synthase; DHBP, 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate; ARAPD, 5-amino-6-ribitylamino-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione; DMRL, 6,7-dimethyl-8-ribityllumazine; GTP-CHII, GTP-cyclohydrolase II; DHBPS, 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate synthase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; nt, nucleotide(s).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bacher, A. (1991) in Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoproteins (Müller, F., ed), Vol. 1 , pp. 215-259, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL |
| 2. |
Bacher, A.,
Baur, R.,
Eggers, U.,
Harders, H.,
Otto, M. K.,
and Schnepple, H.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
632-637 |
| 3. | Ladenstein, R., Schneider, M., Huber, R., Bartunik, H. D., Wilson, K., Schott, K., and Bacher, A. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 203, 1045-1070[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Ritsert, K., Huber, R., Turk, D., Ladenstein, R., Schmidt-Bäse, K., and Bacher, A. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 253, 151-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Bacher, A., Fischer, M., Kis, K., Kugelbrey, K., Mörtl, S., Scheuring, J., Weinkauf, S., Eberhardt, S., Schmidt-Bäse, K., Hubert, R., Ritsert, K., Cushman, M., and Ladenstein, R. (1996) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24, 89-94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Kis, K.,
and Bacher, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16788-16795 |
| 7. |
Mörtl, S.,
Fischer, M.,
Richter, G.,
Tack, J.,
Weinkauf, S.,
and Bacher, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33201-33207 |
| 8. | Taura, T., Ueguchi, C., Shiba, K., and Ito, K. (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet. 234, 429-432[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Fuller, T. E.,
and Mulks, M. H.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
7265-7270 |
| 10. |
Lee, C. Y.,
O'Kane, D. J.,
and Meighen, E. A.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
2100-2104 |
| 11. | Mironov, V. N., Kraev, A. S., Chernov, B. K., Ulianov, A. V., Golova, U. B., Pozmogova, G. E., Simonova, M. L., Gordeev, V. K., Stepanov, A. I., and Skryabin, K. G. (1989) Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 305, 482-487[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Garcia-Ramirez, J. J.,
Santos, M. A.,
and Revuelta, J. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23801-23807 |
| 13. |
Schott, K.,
Kellermann, J.,
Lottspeich, F.,
and Bacher, A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
4204-4209 |
| 14. |
Santos, M. A.,
Garcia-Ramirez, J. J.,
and Revuelta, J. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
437-444 |
| 15. |
Harvey, R. A.,
and Plaut, G. W. E.
(1966)
J. Biol. Chem.
241,
2120-2136 |
| 16. | Kobayashi, M., Sugiyama, M., and Yamamoto, K. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 160, 303-304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Mitsuda, H., Kawai, F., and Suzuki, Y. (1971) Methods Enzymol. 18, 539-543 |
| 18. |
Richter, G.,
Volk, R.,
Krieger, C.,
Lahm, H.-W.,
Röthlisberger, U.,
and Bacher, A.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
4050-4056 |
| 19. |
Richter, G.,
Ritz, H.,
Katzenmeier, G.,
Volk, R.,
Kohnle, A.,
Lottspeich, F.,
Allendorf, D.,
and Bacher, A.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
4045-4051 |
| 20. |
Campbell, J.,
Richardson, C. C.,
and Studier, F. W.
(1978)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
75,
2276-2284 |
| 21. | Ochman, H., Medhora, M. M., Garza, D., and Hartl, D. L. (1990) in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis, M. A., ed) , pp. 219-227, Academic Press, San Diego |
| 22. |
Wyman, R. A.,
Wolfe, L. B.,
and Botstein, D.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
2880-2884 |
| 23. | Balbas, P., Alvarado, X., Bolivar, F., and Valle, F. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 136, 211-213[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Balbas, P., Alexeyev, M., Shokolenk, I., Bolivar, F., and Valle, F. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 172, 65-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Miller, J. H. (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics , pp. 201-205, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York |
| 26. |
Dickson, R.,
Larsen, B.,
Viitanen, P. V.,
Tormey, M. B.,
Geske, J.,
Strange, R.,
and Bemis, L. T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26858-26864 |
| 27. |
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275 |
| 28. |
Viitanen, P. V.,
Doran, E. R.,
and Dunsmuir, P.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
15000-15007 |
| 29. |
Cline, K.,
Werner-Washburne, M.,
Lubben, T. H.,
and Keegstra, K.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
3691-3696 |
| 30. | Plaut, G. W. E., and Harvey, R. A. (1971) Methods Enzymol. 18, 515-538 |
| 31. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Cohn, E. J., and Edsall, E. T. (1943) Proteins, Amino Acids, and Peptides as Ions and Dipolar Ions , pp. 374-377, Reinhold Publications Co., New York |
| 33. | Moody, M., and Makowski, L. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 150, 217-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Gavel, Y., and von Heijne, G. (1990) FEBS Lett. 261, 455-458[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Goldbaum, F. A., Polikarpov, I., Cauerhff, A. A., Velikovsky, C. A., Braden, B. C., and Poljak, R. J. (1998) J. Struct. Biol. 123, 175-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Mazur, B. J.,
and Chui, C. F.
(1985)
Nucleic Acids Res.
13,
2373-2386 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Zylberman, S. Klinke, I. Haase, A. Bacher, M. Fischer, and F. A. Goldbaum Evolution of vitamin b2 biosynthesis: 6,7-dimethyl-8-ribityllumazine synthases of Brucella. J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2006; 188(17): 6135 - 6142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. Peltier, Y. Cai, Q. Sun, V. Zabrouskov, L. Giacomelli, A. Rudella, A. J. Ytterberg, H. Rutschow, and K. J. van Wijk The Oligomeric Stromal Proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana Chloroplasts Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2006; 5(1): 114 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Sandoval and S. Roje An FMN Hydrolase Is Fused to a Riboflavin Kinase Homolog in Plants J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38337 - 38345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yoshimura-Suzuki, I. Sagami, N. Yokota, H. Kurokawa, and T. Shimizu DOSEc, a Heme-Regulated Phosphodiesterase, Plays an Important Role in the Regulation of the Cyclic AMP Level in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2005; 187(19): 6678 - 6682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fischer, W. Romisch, S. Saller, B. Illarionov, G. Richter, F. Rohdich, W. Eisenreich, and A. Bacher Evolution of Vitamin B2 Biosynthesis: STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL SIMILARITY BETWEEN PYRIMIDINE DEAMINASES OF EUBACTERIAL AND PLANT ORIGIN J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36299 - 36308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Xiao, L. Dai, F. Liu, Z. Wang, W. Peng, and D. Xie COS1: An Arabidopsis coronatine insensitive1 Suppressor Essential for Regulation of Jasmonate-Mediated Plant Defense and Senescence PLANT CELL, May 1, 2004; 16(5): 1132 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Fornasari, D. A. Laplagne, N. Frankel, A. A. Cauerhff, F. A. Goldbaum, and J. Echave Sequence Determinants of Quaternary Structure in Lumazine Synthase Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 97 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||