![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 32, 22337-22344, August 6, 1999
,
,
¶
From the Departments of
Developmental and Molecular
Biology and § Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine,
Bronx, New York 10461
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To understand the role cAMP phosphodiesterases
(PDEs) play in the regulation of insulin secretion, we analyzed cyclic
nucleotide PDEs of a pancreatic The second messengers cAMP and cGMP mediate diverse physiological
responses to hormones, neurotransmitters, and light. Rates of cyclic
nucleotide synthesis by cyclases and of their degradation by
phosphodiesterases (PDEs)1
regulate their cellular concentrations (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2).
Cyclic nucleotide PDEs have been distinguished into nine families based
on their substrate affinity and specificity, and their selective
sensitivity to cofactors and inhibitory drugs. Cyclic nucleotide PDE
families are: 1) PDE1, Ca2+/calmodulin stimulated PDEs; 2)
PDE2, cGMP stimulated PDEs; 3) PDE3, cGMP inhibited PDEs; 4) PDE4,
cAMP-specific PDEs; 5) PDE5, cGMP-specific PDEs; 6) PDE6, photoreceptor
PDEs; 7) PDE7, higher affinity cAMP specific PDEs; 8) PDE8,
cAMP-specific IBMX-resistant PDEs (3-5); and 9) PDE9, cGMP-specific
IBMX-resistant PDEs (6, 7). All mammalian PDEs contain a related
C-terminal domain with ~30% sequence identity between families, and
N-terminal regulatory domains containing cofactor or cGMP-binding
sites, localization and other regulatory sequence motifs. Tissue- and
cell-specific gene expression, and a variable splicing pattern, all
contribute to the unique and complex composition of cyclic nucleotide
PDEs in mammalian cells that normally contain activities derived from several families of PDEs (1, 2). PDE inhibitors that do not affect
adenosine uptake and exhibit high selectivity between PDE families, and
in some cases between PDE isozymes, are powerful tools for
identification of PDEs involved in diverse physiological responses
(8-10).
Insulin secretion from pancreatic The involvement of cyclic nucleotide PDEs in the regulation of insulin
secretion is inferred from the stimulatory effects of the non-selective
PDE inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX) on insulin secretion from
insulin secreting cell lines, from islets, and from transgenic mice
expressing a constitutively activated G This study details the chromatographic, biochemical, and
pharmacological characterization of Preparation of Cell Extracts and Mono Q-FPLC
Fractionation--
Cells were washed twice with cold
phosphate-buffered saline, scraped, and homogenized in a buffer
containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 250 mM sucrose,
5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 µg/ml aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin, and 1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl
fluoride. Following a 30-min 150,000 × g
centrifugation, the supernatant was loaded onto a Pharmacia Mono-Q
anion exchange column and PDE activities were fractionated by FPLC
along a two-step salt gradient. Column buffers were: A) 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and B) 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl. The gradient consisted of a 10-min
increase to 0.1 M NaCl (20% B), and a 90-min increase to
0.5 M NaCl (100% B). One-ml fractions were collected.
PDE Assays and Kinetic Measurements--
PDE assays were
performed in duplicate as described (40). Briefly, 0.5-1 µg of
protein extract, or 10 µl of Mono-Q fractions, were incubated for 15 min at 30 °C with appropriate concentrations of either
2,8-[3H]cAMP or 8-[3H]cGMP in a buffer
containing 40 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM
MgCl2, and 0.1 unit of snake venome nucleotidase. Reactions
were terminated by the addition of EDTA, AMP, and cAMP to final
concentrations of 10, 1.25, and 1.25 mM, respectively, and
transfer to 4 °C. Reaction mixtures were applied to AG-1-X8 anion
exchange columns (Bio-Rad) and the hydrolyzed products were eluted with
50% ethanol. The 3H content of the eluate was determined
using a liquid scintillation counter. Analysis and plotting of kinetic
data was performed by using the computer program Kaleidagraph. The
contributions of the high and low affinities cGMP PDEs of peak I to
total PDE activity of this peak at a given substrate concentration were
calculated using the formula: V = V1 + V2 = Vm1·S/(Km1 + S) + Vm2·s(Km1 + S).
Cell Culture, Treatments, and Measurements of Insulin
Secretion--
PDE inhibitors used are: IBMX, a non-selective inhibitor;
8-methoxymethyl-isobutylmethylxanthine (8MM-IBMX), a PDE1 selective inhibitor; zaprinast, a PDE1/5/6 selective inhibitor; rolipram and
RO20-1724, PDE4 selective inhibitors; milrinone and trequinsin, PDE3
selective inhibitors (1, 41, 42). All inhibitors applied to Islet Preparations, Treatments, and Measurements of Insulin
Secretion--
Mouse pancreatic islets were prepared from normal C3H
male mice via collagenase digestion of pancreatic tissue, separation on
a Ficoll gradient and manual picking (43). Groups of 10 islets were
first preincubated in Hepes-buffered Krebs-Ringer solution containing
1.67 mM glucose for 1 h and subsequently for 2 h
in the presence of either 1.67 mM glucose alone or 16.7 mM glucose along with PDE inhibitors. Following the
incubation with glucose and various PDE inhibitors, insulin released to
the incubation media, and islet insulin content were measured by a radioimmunoassay.
Cyclic AMP Measurements--
Cells were washed twice with cold
phosphate-buffered saline, scraped after the addition of
butanol-saturated 1 M formic acid and incubated on ice for
10 min. After a 10-min spin at 10,000 × g, the
supernatant was harvested, dried by vacuum centrifugation, and
resuspended in water. Cyclic AMP content was measured by a radioimmunoassay after acetylation in the assay buffer (50 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.75). Samples and standards were
incubated overnight with 125I-cAMP (adenosine 3',5'-cyclic
phosphoric acid,
2'-O-succinyl-[125I]iodotyrosine methyl ester,
NEN Life Science Products Inc.), goat anti-cAMP antibodies and rabbit
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Analysis--
RT-PCR analysis was performed on 5 µg of RNA prepared
from
The following oligonucleotides were used for PCR amplification to
determine the expression of PDE4A, JWPDE4A-5,
5'-AGCCATGGAACAGTCAAAGGTCAA; and JWPDE4A-3,
5'-TCAGGAGGGCCAGGAGTCGT. To determine the expression of PDE4D,
JWPDE4D-5, 5'-GAGGGCCGGCAGGGACAGAC; and JWPDE4D-3,
5'-GGGGGTGGGGTGGGTGAGAGG. Amplification products 436 and 470 base pairs
long were obtained for PDE4A and D, respectively.
Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases of Kinetic and Pharmacologic Analyzes of PDE Activities of Peak
I--
To identify PDE1 isozymes and other PDE activities of peak I,
we examined the kinetic and pharmacological properties of PDEs present
in peak I (Fig. 2, Table
II). Kinetics of cAMP PDE activities of
peak I demonstrated the presence of a single high affinity cAMP PDE
activity possessing a Km of 0.47 µM
for cAMP (Fig. 2A). The kinetics of cGMP PDE activities of
peak I demonstrated the presence of two cGMP PDE activities (Fig.
2B). Two kinetic curves of cGMP PDE activities resolved as
the best fit for the obtained data included activities possessing
Km of 0.25 µM and of 57.5 µM for cGMP. Based on these kinetic parameters, it is
calculated that 95% (at 0.1 µM) and 50% (at 10 µM) of the cGMP PDE activity of peak I are derived from
the high affinity PDE of this peak (V = V1 + V2, see "Materials
and Methods"). Accordingly, 8MM-IBMX inhibited 82% of the cGMP PDE
activity of peak I at 0.1 µM substrate, and only 57% of
the cGMP PDE activity of peak I at 10 µM substrate. As
8MM-IBMX inhibition reflected the calculated content of the high
affinity cGMP PDE activity of peak I, it appears that the low affinity
cGMP PDE activity of peak I is 8MM-IBMX resistant and is not derived
from the PDE1 isozyme present in this peak (Table I). Taken together,
these observations indicate that peak I contains a high-affinity dual
specificity PDE1 activity that is stimulatable by calcium/calmodulin
and is sensitive to 8MM-IBMX, and a low affinity cGMP PDE activity.
Among the three known PDE1 genes, PDE1A-C, PDE1C
encoded isozymes possess high affinity cAMP and cGMP PDE activities
with Km values in the range of peak I, while
PDE1A and PDE1B encoded isozymes possess low
affinity cAMP PDE activity with Km values ranging
from 25 to 120 µM (1, 44, 45). RT-PCR analysis with
oligonucleotides derived from a region common to all five known
PDE1C splice variants, and determination of the DNA sequence of the amplified fragment, demonstrated the presence of
PDE1C mRNA in Cyclic Nucleotide PDEs That Counteract Glucose-induced Insulin
Secretion from
Inhibition of PDE4 by the selective inhibitor rolipram had partial
stimulatory effects on glucose-dependent insulin secretion. However, in contrast to the dose-dependent effects of the
PDE1 inhibitor 8MM-IBMX, the effects of rolipram were not stimulated by
a 103-fold increase in its concentrations. Maximal rolipram
concentrations reached a 300-fold inhibitor excess over the high
IC50 value we measured for rolipram and the PDE4 isozyme
present in peak II (50 nM). Thus, the effects of rolipram
on insulin secretion appear limited and restricted to the highly
rolipram-sensitive PDE4 isozyme present in peak IV (IC50 = 1.5 nM). As observed in cultured
As a measure for the effectiveness and selectivity of the inhibitors,
we assessed the intracellular cAMP concentrations 30 min following the
exposure of Cyclic Nucleotide PDEs That Counteract Glucose-induced Insulin
Secretion from Pancreatic Islets--
To identify PDEs involved in
counteracting insulin secretion from pancreatic islets, we examined the
effects of family selective PDE inhibitors on insulin secretion from
mouse pancreatic islets. Islet extracts contained 8MM-IBMX-sensitive
PDE1 activity, rolipram-sensitive PDE4 activity, and
milrinone-sensitive PDE3 activity, and selective inhibition of these
PDEs was used to assess their effects on insulin secretion from islets
(Fig. 4). For these purposes, islets were first incubated in low glucose, and subsequently the insulin secreted during a 2-h incubation in the presence of glucose and family-selective PDE inhibitors was measured. In islets, the PDE1 inhibitor 8MM-IBMX and
the PDE3 inhibitor milrinone had similar stimulatory effects on
glucose-induced insulin secretion. The PDE4 inhibitor rolipram, however, did not elicit a significant increase in insulin secretion. A
combination of all three selective inhibitors had strong synergistic effects on insulin secretion demonstrating the additive effects of
selective inhibition of PDEs 1, 3, and 4. Thus, it appears that PDE1
and PDE3, but not PDE4, inhibit glucose-dependent insulin secretion from islets. These observations suggest that islets and
PDE1 Activity Is Up-regulated by Glucose--
PDE1 activity is
regulated by intracellular calcium levels and by phosphorylation (1).
It was therefore of interest to determine whether feedback regulation
of glucose-induced insulin secretion involves the stimulation of PDE1C
activity by glucose. To determine whether PDE1C activity is elevated
upon glucose feeding, we compared the high affinity soluble cGMP PDE
activity of glucose fed cells to that of glucose-starved cells (Table
IV). As soluble The study details the characterization of cyclic nucleotide PDEs
of Fractionation of cellular PDE activities permits the identification of
active PDEs and provides an estimate of their relative contribution to
cellular PDE activity. While PDE isozymes can be identified by
molecular approaches such as RT-PCR, fractionation of cellular PDE
activities allows the determination of kinetic and pharmacological
properties of the specific isozymes expressed in the cells. The
fractionation of Unlike the limited effects of PDE4 inhibitors, inhibition of PDE1C
exhibits a dose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion that can account for the stimulatory effects of non-selective inhibition of PDEs in
-cell line and used family and
isozyme-specific PDE inhibitors to identify the PDEs that counteract
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. We demonstrate the presence of
soluble PDE1C, PDE4A and 4D, a cGMP-specific PDE, and of particulate
PDE3, activities in
TC3 insulinoma cells. Selective inhibition of
PDE1C, but not of PDE4, augmented glucose-stimulated insulin secretion
in a dose-dependent fashion thus demonstrating that PDE1C
is the major PDE counteracting glucose-dependent insulin
secretion from
TC3 cells. In pancreatic islets, inhibition of both
PDE1C and PDE3 augmented glucose-dependent insulin
secretion. The PDE1C of
TC3 cells is a novel isozyme possessing a
Km of 0.47 µM for cAMP and 0.25 µM for cGMP. The PDE1C isozyme of
TC3 cells is
sensitive to 8-methoxymethyl isobutylmethylxanthine and zaprinast
(IC50 = 7.5 and 4.5 µM, respectively) and
resistant to vinpocetine (IC50 > 100 µM).
Increased responsiveness of PDE1C activity to calcium/calmodulin is
evident upon exposure of cells to glucose. Enhanced cAMP degradation by
PDE1C, due to increases in its responsiveness to calcium/calmodulin and
in intracellular calcium, constitutes a glucose-dependent
feedback mechanism for the control of insulin secretion.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-cells is governed by the
interplay between nutritional secretagogues and regulatory hormonal or
neural stimuli (11-13). Glucose, the major insulin secretagogue, triggers insulin release, in part, through
calcium-dependent vesicular exocytosis (11, 12, 14-17).
The glucose signal cascade leads to membrane depolarization and a
calcium influx via the opening of L-type voltage-sensitive
calcium channels, and also to other effects that include release of
calcium from intracellular stores (13, 18, 19). Hormones and
insulinotropic gut factors that stimulate cAMP synthesis strongly
augment glucose-induced insulin secretion (11-14). Conversely,
hormonal inhibition of insulin secretion involves reductions in cAMP
levels (10, 20-23). In addition to the role cAMP plays in hormonal
modulation of insulin secretion, basal cAMP levels appear to be
required for glucose to induce insulin secretion (24). Potentiation of
glucose-induced insulin secretion is evident not only upon treatment of
insulin secreting cells with the insulinotropic gut factor GLP1
(glucagon-like peptide 1), but also upon treatment with reagents that
stimulate cAMP signaling including membrane permeable cAMP analogs,
activators of adenylyl cyclase, and PDE inhibitors (11, 20, 25, 26). Like GLP1, these cAMP elevating agents do not induce significant insulin secretion in the absence of glucose. Targets for cAMP action
are PKA substrates such as the voltage-sensitive calcium channel,
GLUT2, and potentially also ion channels to which cAMP binds directly
(13, 27-30). In addition to the potentiation of glucose and
calcium-dependent insulin secretion, cAMP-stimulated exocytosis via calcium-independent mechanisms is evident in patch clamped cells, and the contribution of this mechanism to insulin secretion under physiological conditions remains to be determined (29).
A requirement for the localization of PKA to specific sites within
pancreatic
-cells via anchor proteins has been demonstrated for
GLP-1 potentiation of insulin secretion (31).
s mutant in their
pancreatic
-cells (11, 20, 21, 25). Cyclic nucleotide PDEs present
in
-cells were thus far investigated as total PDE activities of
crude islet extracts and the presence of PDEs 3 and 4, and
calcium-sensitive PDEs, in
-cells has been inferred from these
studies (32-36). The involvement of PDE3 in glucose-induced insulin
secretion from pancreatic islets has been demonstrated in studies using
selective PDE3 inhibitors (32, 33, 37, 38). The presence of PDE3B in
pancreatic
-cells and its involvement in insulin-like growth
factor-1 and in leptin-mediated inhibition of insulin secretion has
been demonstrated recently (10, 39). However, in cultured pancreatic
-cells PDE3B does not appear to play a role in insulin secretion
induced by glucose in the absence of hormone regulation (10).
-cell PDEs, and the
identification of a subset of
-cell PDEs that are involved in
counteracting glucose-induced insulin secretion. We demonstrate the
presence of PDEs 1C, 4A, and 4D, and a cGMP-specific PDE, in soluble
cell lysates, and of PDE3 in particulate cell lysates, of
TC3
insulinoma cells. We also demonstrate the involvement of PDE1C in the
regulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion from
TC3 cells and pancreatic islets.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
TC3 cells were cultured as described and early
passages (22-40) were maintained (20). For measurements of insulin
secretion cells were plated onto 24-well culture dishes 3-4 days, and
refed 16 h prior to the assay. On the experiment day, cells were
washed in Hepes-buffered Krebs-Ringer solution, and incubated in this glucose-free solution for 1 h. Subsequently, either no glucose or
16.7 mM glucose and, when relevant, PDE inhibitors were
added to the cells in Hepes-buffered Krebs-Ringer solution and the
cells were incubated for 2 additional hours. Each condition was assayed in triplicate. Secreted insulin found in the supernatant after centrifugation, and endogenous insulin content of the cells after acid
extraction, were determined by a radioimmunoassay as described (20).
Average insulin content was 2% of total cellular protein.
TC3
cells in glucose-free Hepes-buffered Krebs-Ringer solution did not
induce significant insulin release.
-globulins. Following ammonium sulfate precipitation, the
antibody-125I-cAMP immune complexes were counted in a
-counter.
TC3 cells using Trizol (Life Technologies, Inc.). Controls
lacking reverse transcriptase were included in the reactions. To
determine expression of PDE1C the following oligonucleotides were used: for RT, oligo-dT; for PCR amplification, JWPDE1C-5
5'-ACAGGGCAGAGGAGATCAAGTTT; and JWPDE1C-3, 5'-CTTTTCGCCTGCCTTTTCTCCTT.
The 408-base pair PCR product was cloned and its DNA sequence was
determined to be identical to the published mouse PDE1C sequence.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
TC3 Cells--
To
identify
-cell PDEs involved in the regulation of insulin secretion,
we first set to identify the cyclic nucleotide PDE families and
isozymes expressed in
TC3 insulinoma cells. For these purposes, we
fractionated soluble
TC3 cell extracts by Mono-Q FPLC anion exchange
chromatography and analyzed their cyclic nucleotide PDE activities
profile (Fig. 1). The PDE profile was comprised of four peaks of PDE activities: a single peak (peak I)
containing both cAMP and cGMP PDE activities, and three cAMP-specific PDE activity peaks (peaks II-IV). Both cAMP and cGMP PDE activities of
peak I were stimulated by calcium and calmodulin at low substrate concentrations, demonstrating the presence of a high affinity isozyme
of the dual specificity, calcium/calmodulin-dependent PDE1
in this peak (Table I). However, while
the cAMP PDE activity of peak I was highly sensitive to the PDE1
selective inhibitor 8MM-IBMX, the cGMP PDE activity of peak I was
partially resistant to 8MM-IBMX, raising the possibility that
additional cGMP PDE activities are present in this peak. PDE activities
of peaks II-IV were abolished by 2.5 µM rolipram, a
highly selective PDE4 inhibitor, thus demonstrating the presence of
multiple PDE4 isozymes in
TC3 cells. Expression of both PDE4A and 4D
in these cells was demonstrated by RT-PCR analysis (see "Materials
and Methods"). Milrinone-sensitive PDE3 activity constituted the
majority of the particulate PDE activity (>70%, not shown). These
observations demonstrate the presence of soluble PDE1 and -4 isozymes,
of a soluble cGMP-specific PDE, and of a particulate PDE3, in
TC3
cells.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Fractionation of soluble cyclic nucleotide
PDE activities of
TC3 cells. Ten mg of
soluble extract of
TC3 cells were fractionated by Mono-Q FPLC. The
elution profile of cAMP PDE activities (large
circles) and cGMP PDE activities (small circles)
assayed at 1 µM substrate is presented. The 0-0.5
M NaCl gradient is depicted. Roman numbers
indicate PDE peak numbers.
Biochemical and pharmacologic properties of fractionated PDE activities
of
TC3 cells

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Kinetic analysis of PDE activities of peak
I. Double-reciprocal Lineweaver-Burk plots and Scatchard plots
(inset) derived from kinetic curves are shown. Cyclic AMP
and cGMP PDE assays were performed as described under "Materials and
Methods." Each data point represents measurements of initial rates at
a suitable enzyme dilution. A plot of a typical measurement out of
three determinations is depicted. A, cyclic AMP
concentrations ranging from 2 [times
]10
8-10
5 M were used to
determine the kinetic curve. The calculated Km is
0.47 µM cAMP, and the calculated
Vmax is 120 pmol/min·mg. B, cyclic
GMP concentrations ranging from 10
7 to 2 × 10
5 M were used to determine the kinetic
curve. Two independent kinetic curves were derived as the best fit for
the measured data using the computer program Kaleidagraph. The
derived Km values for the two cGMP PDE activities
are: 0.25 and 57.5 µM cGMP, and the derived
Vmax values are 60 and 400 pmol/min/mg,
respectively.
Inhibitor IC50 values for PDE1C activity
TC3 cells (see "Materials and
Methods"). The PDE1 activity of peak I is sensitive to zaprinast and
resistant to vinpocetine (Table II) as is the case for PDE1C but not
for PDE1A and -1B (44, 45). Thus, based on the kinetic and
pharmacological properties of the cAMP PDE and of the high affinity
cGMP PDE activities of peak I, and on RT-PCR analysis, the
calcium/calmodulin sensitive activity present in peak I is derived from PDE1C.
TC3 Cells--
To identify PDEs involved in
counteracting glucose-induced insulin secretion we used
membrane-permeable, family-selective PDE inhibitors. These inhibitors
do not affect adenosine uptake (1, 41, 42, 46). As inhibitor
IC50 values differ among isozymes and to minimize
nonspecific effects of high inhibitor concentrations, we determined
inhibitor IC50 values for
TC3 PDE isozymes and applied
the inhibitors to the cells at concentrations 10-100-fold above the
established IC50 values. IC50 values for peak I
(PDE1C) are presented in Table II, and for the PDE4 selective inhibitor, rolipram are: 50 nM (peak II) and 1.5 nM (peak IV). Insulin secretion was measured by a
radioimmunoassay following a 2-h incubation in the presence of glucose
and family-selective PDE inhibitors (Fig.
3). Controls included the addition of
each inhibitor and of the solvent, dimethyl sulfoxide, in the absence of glucose (not shown). These analyses demonstrated that the PDE1 selective inhibitor 8MM-IBMX strongly augmented insulin secretion in
the presence of glucose. Inhibition of PDE1 by 8MM-IBMX exhibited a
dose-dependent augmentation of insulin secretion that was
significant even at 20-fold excess over its IC50 value. In
this respect the effects of this PDE1-selective inhibitor were
equivalent to those of the non-selective inhibitor IBMX whose
IC50 values for the involved PDE families are in the low
micromolar range (1, 41, 47). An additional PDE1 inhibitor, zaprinast,
when applied at 0.5 and 1 mM, also had stimulatory effects
on insulin secretion equivalent to 64 and 84%, respectively, of the
effects of IBMX. Thus, it appears that PDE1 inhibits
glucose-dependent insulin secretion from
TC3 cells.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Stimulation of insulin release from
TC3 cells by glucose and cyclic nucleotide PDE
inhibitors. Insulin release was measured by a radioimmunoassay
after a 2-h incubation with 16.7 mM glucose and various
cyclic nucleotide PDE inhibitors at the depicted concentrations.
Control incubations with inhibitors in the absence of glucose did not
result in significant insulin secretion (see "Materials and
Methods"). Error bars represent S.E. Differences between
all measurements and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion were
statistically significant (p < 0.01). * indicates
p < 0.005 in comparison to 150 µM
8MM-IBMX. Assays were performed in triplicate. Experiments were
performed 7 times for no glucose, glucose, glucose + IBMX, and glucose + 8MM-IBMX; 4-7 times for glucose + rolipram; and 4 times for glucose + milrinone. IC50 values for the tested inhibitors are: 7.5 µM 8MM-IBMX for inhibition of PDE1C; 1.5 and 50 nM rolipram for inhibition of PDE4 isozymes; and 0.3 µM milrinone for inhibition of PDE3 (41). Average insulin
content was 2% of total cellular protein content.
-cells, inhibition of
PDE3 with the selective inhibitor milrinone did not augment
glucose-induced insulin secretion from
TC3 cells (10).
TC3 cells to glucose and PDE inhibitors (Table
III). Intracellular cAMP concentrations
were stimulated more than 12-fold by the non-selective inhibitor IBMX.
The PDE1 and PDE4 selective inhibitors, 8MM-IBMX and rolipram,
respectively, stimulated intracellular cAMP concentrations 2-3-fold.
As their stimulatory effects on cAMP content are limited in comparison to those of IBMX, 8MM-IBMX and rolipram appear to inhibit a subset of
TC3 cell PDEs. In agreement with selective inhibition of a subset of
TC3 cell PDEs, the combination of the three selective PDE inhibitors
stimulated intracellular cAMP to the levels stimulated by IBMX (not
shown). Milrinone did not stimulate cAMP concentrations significantly,
and consequently, the contribution of PDE3 to the regulation of insulin
secretion from
TC3 cells was not assessed. Thus, it appears that
although the inhibition of both PDE1 and PDE4 lead to similar increases
in intracellular cAMP concentrations, only the inhibition of PDE1 lead
to significant increases in insulin secretion. The selective effects of
PDE1 inhibition on insulin secretion were confirmed by use of
additional family-selective inhibitors for PDE1 (zaprinast), PDE3
(trequinsin), and PDE4 (RO20-1724). Taken together these observations
indicate that PDE1, but not PDE4, is an effective inhibitor of
glucose-dependent insulin secretion from
TC3 cells.
Glucose and PDE inhibitor effects on intracellular cAMP content in
TC3 cells
TC3 cells differ in their responses to PDE3 inhibitors, and that in
both systems PDE4 does not affect, while PDE1 inhibits, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Stimulation of insulin release from
pancreatic islets by glucose and cyclic nucleotide PDE inhibitors.
Groups of 10 islets were incubated with 1.67 mM glucose for
1 h prior to the addition of low or high glucose and the tested
PDE inhibitors. Insulin release was measured by a radioimmunoassay
after a 2-h incubation with 16.7 mM glucose and the
indicated PDE inhibitors at the depicted concentrations. Experiments
were performed two times in triplicate. Error bars represent
S.E. Differences between all measurements and glucose-stimulated
insulin secretion were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
TC3 cell extracts
contain several high affinity cAMP PDE activities of PDE1C and PDE4
isozymes and a single high affinity cGMP PDE activity of PDE1C, PDE1C
activity assays were performed with cGMP substrate at concentrations
calculated to be composed of >95% of the high affinity activity of
PDE1C (0.1 µM). This analysis demonstrated that the PDE1C
activity of glucose-starved cells was consistently less responsive to
the calcium/calmodulin provided in the assay mixture in comparison to
the PDE1C activity of glucose-fed cells. Thus, the calcium/calmodulin
stimulatable activity of PDE1C appeared to be elevated upon exposure to
glucose. The elevations in stimulatable PDE1C activity detected in
protein extracts of glucose-fed cells may reflect increased PDE1C
expression and/or post-translational modifications that sensitize its
response to calcium/calmodulin. In vivo, elevations in
intracellular calcium induced by glucose, as well as increased
responsiveness to calcium/calmodulin, simultaneously enhance PDE1C
activity upon exposure of cells to glucose.
Glucose effects on PDE1C activity
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
TC3 cells and the identification of PDE1C as a regulator of
glucose-induced insulin secretion. Chromatographic fractionation, coupled with biochemical and pharmacological characterization, and with
RT-PCR analysis, established the presence of PDEs 1C, 4A, 4D, and of a
cGMP-specific PDE, in soluble extracts of
TC3 cells. By use of
family selective PDE inhibitors in concentrations that do not exceed a
100-fold excess over IC50 values we determined for the
isozymes expressed in
TC3 cells, we observe the involvement of
PDE1C, and the limited involvement of PDE4 isozymes, in the regulation
of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from
TC3 cells and
pancreatic islets. As demonstrated previously, PDE3 inhibits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from pancreatic islets (32, 33).
PDE1C activity is elevated upon exposure of cells to glucose, constituting a feedback control mechanism of glucose-induced insulin secretion via increased cAMP degradation by PDE1C.
TC3 cell PDEs we undertook allowed the
identification not only of
TC3 cell PDE isozymes but also of
isozyme-effective inhibitors and the applicable range of concentrations
for specific inhibition of a given PDE isozyme within the cell. The
fractionation of
TC3 cell PDEs proved critical for detecting the
involvement of PDE1C in the regulation of insulin secretion, as its
inhibitor profile identified relevant and effective inhibitors that
were not examined in pancreatic
-cells (32, 33). Previous studies in
pancreatic islets suggest the involvement of PDE3, but not of PDE4, in
the regulation of insulin secretion (32, 33). However, perhaps due to
differences in its abundance or to its regulation in islets and in
cultured pancreatic
-cells, PDE3B does not appear to counteract
glucose-induced insulin secretion but to mediate the inhibitory effects
of insulin-like growth factor-1 and leptin on insulin secretion in
cultured
- and insulinoma cells (10, 39). Thus, our analysis is in
agreement with the currently held notion that in cultured pancreatic
-cells PDE3 and -4 are not major PDEs that counteract
glucose-induced insulin secretion. Our analysis, however, identifies
PDE1C as a PDE that counteracts glucose-induced insulin secretion both
in
TC3 cells and in mouse pancreatic islets.
TC3 cells. In pancreatic islets, PDE1C inhibition has strong stimulatory effects on insulin secretion though
not equivalent to effects of non-selective PDE inhibition. The combined
inhibition of PDEs 1, 3, and 4 was as potent as non-selective PDE
inhibition, suggesting that both PDE1 and PDE3 inhibit glucose-induced insulin secretion from islets. Differences in PDE abundance, or in
regulation patterns between pancreatic islets and cultured
-cells,
may account for the quantitative differences of PDE1C effects on
insulin secretion. The involvement of PDE1C in the regulation of
insulin secretion, and the stimulation of its activity by glucose,
suggest the existence of glucose-dependent feedback control
loop of insulin secretion (Fig. 5). Exposure of pancreatic
-cells to
glucose leads to increases in intracellular calcium concentrations and
in vesicular exocytosis of insulin. Calcium has been proposed to
activate the calcium/calmodulin-dependent adenylyl cyclase
of
-cells, a process that can potentiate insulin secretion. However,
calcium also stimulates the calcium/calmodulin-dependent PDE1C. While threshold calcium levels required for the activation of
adenylyl cyclase and PDE1C are not known, we demonstrate in this study
that the responsiveness of PDE1C to calcium is stimulated by glucose.
In the model depicted in Fig. 5 we
propose that the glucose and calcium-dependent stimulation
of PDE1C leads to reductions in intracellular cAMP concentrations that
limit insulin secretion, thus establishing a feedback mechanism that
down-regulates glucose-induced insulin secretion (48, 49).

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Model of glucose- and
calcium-dependent feedback regulation of cAMP in
TC3 cells. Glucose triggers signaling cascades
that lead to the activation of the voltage-sensitive calcium channel.
Cyclic AMP augments the glucose-induced calcium influx and the
exocytosis of vesicular insulin. PDE activity of the
calcium/calmodulin-dependent PDE1C is stimulated both by
elevations in calcium and by additional glucose-induced increases in
its responsiveness to calcium/calmodulin. Increased PDE1C activity
reduces intracellular cAMP concentrations and limits insulin
secretion.
The PDE1C of
TC3 cells appears to be a novel isozyme distinguished
by its predominant cAMP PDE activity and inhibitor sensitivity profile.
Five different splice variants of PDE1C have been identified thus far,
all sharing relatively high affinity and equipotent cAMP and cGMP PDE
activities (44, 45, 50). These PDE1C isozymes exhibit differential
sensitivity to several PDE inhibitors. Provided the tissue distribution
of the PDE1C splice variant expressed in pancreatic
-cells is
limited, it may prove to be a novel drug target for intervention with
the progression of non-insulin-dependent diabetes melittus.
As demonstrated in transgenic mice expressing a constitutively active
G
s mutant in their pancreatic
-cells, inhibition of
-cell PDE1C will be particularly powerful in conjunction with cAMP
elevating agents such as GLP1 (11, 20, 21, 25). Efforts to clone
cDNAs encoding the PDE1C isozyme of pancreatic
-cells and
determine its tissue distribution pattern are underway.
Our analysis indicates that
TC3 cells contain multiple high affinity
cAMP PDEs, that are both cAMP-specific (PDE4) and dual specificity PDEs
(PDE1C and 3), and a low affinity cGMP-specific PDE. Among these cAMP
PDEs, PDE1C appears to counteract glucose-induced insulin secretion
effectively as its selective inhibition leads to a
dose-dependent augmentation of insulin secretion equivalent to the one observed upon use of the non-selective PDE inhibitor IBMX.
In the absence of the intricate paracrine environment of pancreatic
islets, selective inhibition of PDE3B in cultured pancreatic
-cells
by milrinone does not augment glucose-induced insulin secretion but
counteracts insulin-like growth factor-1 and leptin inhibition of
insulin secretion (10, 39). Thus, while PDE3B mediates
hormone-dependent inhibition of insulin secretion in insulinomas, PDE1C appears to mediate feedback regulation
glucose-dependent insulin secretion in the absence of added
extracellular hormonal and neural signals. Thus, specific PDEs among
the multiple PDEs present in
TC3 cells appear to play different and
specialized roles in
-cell physiology and regulate insulin secretion
under different physiological conditions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank S. Efrat and C. Rubin for useful discussions and support of this work, G. Orr, R. Stanley, Y. G. Yeung for assistance with FPLC and Drs. Harper and Brooker for anti-cAMP antibodies.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Diabetes Research and Training Center Grant DK20541 and an American Diabetes Association Career Development Award (to T. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom reprint requests should be addressed. Tel.: 718-430-2138; Fax: 718-430-8696; E-mail: michaeli@aecom.yu.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PDE, phosphodiesterase; IBMX, isobutylmethylxanthine; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; 8MM-IBMX, 8-methoxymethyl isobutylmethylxanthine.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Beavo, J. A.
(1995)
Physiol. Rev.
75,
725-748 |
| 2. | Houslay, M. D., and Milligan, G. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 217-224 |
| 3. | Fisher, D. A., Smith, J. F., Pillar, J. S., St Denis, S. H., and Cheng, J. B. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 246, 570-577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Hayashi, M., Matsushima, K., Ohashi, H., Tsunoda, H., Murase, S., Kawarada, Y., and Tanaka, T. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 250, 751-756[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Soderling, S. H.,
Bayuga, S. J.,
and Beavo, J. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8991-8996 |
| 6. |
Fisher, D. A.,
Smith, J. F.,
Pillar, J. S.,
St Denis, S. H.,
and Cheng, J. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15559-15564 |
| 7. |
Soderling, S. H.,
Bayuga, S. J.,
and Beavo, J. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15553-15558 |
| 8. | Ballard, S. A., Gingell, C. J., Tang, K., Turner, L. A., Price, M. E., and Naylor, A. M. (1998) J. Urol. 159, 2164-2171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Giembycz, M. A., Corrigan, C. J., Seybold, J., Newton, R., and Barnes, P. J. (1996) J. Pharmocol. 118, 1945-1958 |
| 10. |
Zhao, A. Z.,
Zhao, H.,
Teague, J.,
Fujimoto, W.,
and Beavo, J. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3223-3228 |
| 11. | Rasmussen, H., Zawalich, K., Ganesan, S., Calle, R., and Zawalich, W. S. (1990) Diabetes 13, 655-665 |
| 12. | Holz, G. G., and Habener, J. F. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 388-393[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Liang, Y., and Matschinsky, F. M. (1994) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 14, 59-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Ashcroft, S. J., and Ashcroft, F. M. (1992) Insulin: Molecular Biology to Pathology , Oxford University Press, New York |
| 15. |
German, M. S.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1781-1785 |
| 16. | Newgard, C. B., and McGarry, J. D. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 689-719[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Efrat, S., Tal, M., and Lodish, H. F. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 535-538[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Takasawa, S.,
Akiyama, T.,
Nata, K.,
Kuroki, M.,
Tohgo, A.,
Noguchi, N.,
Kobayashi, S.,
Kato, I.,
Katada, T.,
and Okamoto, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2497-2500 |
| 19. | Kajimoto, Y., Miyagawa, J., Ishihara, K., Okuyama, Y., Fujitani, Y., Itoh, M., Yoshida, H., Kaisho, T., Matsuoka, T., Watada, H., Hanafusa, T., Yamasaki, Y., Kamada, T., Matsuzawa, Y., and Hirano, T. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 219, 941-946[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | D'Ambra, R., Surana, M., Efrat, S., Starr, R. G., and Fleischer, N. (1990) Endocrinology 126, 2815-2822[Abstract] |
| 21. | Ma, Y. H., Landis, C., Tchao, N., Wang, J., Rodd, G., Hanahan, D., Bourne, H. R., and Grodsky, G. M. (1994) Endocrinology 134, 42-47[Abstract] |
| 22. | Grodsky, G. M., and Bolaffi, J. L. (1992) J. Cell. Biochem. 48, 3-11[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Bolaffi, J. L., Rodd, G., Ma, Y. H., and Grodsky, G. M. (1990) Endocrinology 126, 1750-1755[Abstract] |
| 24. |
Serre, V.,
Dolci, W.,
Schaerer, E.,
Scrocchi, L.,
Drucker, D.,
Efrat, S.,
and Thorens, B.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
4448-4454 |
| 25. | Henquin, J. C., and Meissner, H. P. (1984) Endocrinology 115, 1125-1134[Abstract] |
| 26. |
Holz, G. G. IV,
Leech, C. A.,
and Habener, J. F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17749-17757 |
| 27. | Leiser, M., and Fleischer, N. (1996) Diabetes 45, 1412-1418[Abstract] |
| 28. | Rajan, A. S., Hill, R. S., and Boyd, A. E., III (1989) Diabetes 38, 874-880[Abstract] |
| 29. | Ammala, C., Ashcroft, F. M., and Rorsman, P. (1993) Nature 363, 356-358[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Thorens, B.,
Deriaz, N.,
Bosco, D.,
DeVos, A.,
Pipeleers, D.,
Schuit, F.,
Meda, P.,
and Porret, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8075-8081 |
| 31. |
Lester, L. B.,
Langerberg, L. K.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14942-14947 |
| 32. | Parker, J. C., VanVolkenburg, M. A., Ketchum, R. J., Brayman, K. L., and Andrews, K. M. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 217, 916-923[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Shafiee-Nick, R., Pyne, N. J., and Furman, B. L. (1995) Br. J. Pharmacol. 115, 1486-1492[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Sugden, M. C., and Ashcroft, S. J. (1981) Biochem. J. 197, 459-464[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Lipson, L. G., and Oldham, S. B. (1983) Life Sci. 32, 775-780[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Capito, K., Hedeskov, C. J., and Thams, P. (1986) Acta Endocrinol. 111, 533-538 |
| 37. | Leibowitz, M. D., Biswas, C., Brady, E. J., Conti, M., Cullinan, C. A., Hayes, N. S., Manganiello, V. C., Saperstein, R., Wang, L-h., Zafian, P. T., and Berger, J. (1995) Diabetes 46, 67-74 |
| 38. | El-Metwally, M., Shafiee-Nick, R., Pyne, N. J., and Furman, B. L. (1997) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 324, 227-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Zhao, A. Z., Bornfeldt, K. E., and Beavo, J. A. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 102, 869-873[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Han, P.,
Zhu, X.,
and Michaeli, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
16152-16157 |
| 41. | Beavo, J. (1988) Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res. 22, 1-38[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Wells, J. N., and Miller, J. R. (1988) Methods Enzymol. 159, 489-496[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Lacy, P. E., and Kostianovsky, M. (1967) Diabetes 16, 35-39[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Loughney, K.,
Martins, T. J.,
Harris, E. A. S.,
Sadhu, K.,
Hicks, J. B.,
Sonnenburg, W. K.,
Beavo, J. A.,
and Ferguson, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
796-806 |
| 45. |
Yan, C.,
Zhao, A. Z.,
Bentley, J. K.,
and Beavo, J. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25699-25706 |
| 46. | Bourguignon, J. J., Desaubry, L., Raboisson, P., Wermuth, C. G., and Lugnier, C. (1997) J. Med. Chem. 40, 1768-1770[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Beavo, J. A., and Reifsnyder, D. H. (1990) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 11, 150-155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Poitout, V., and Robertson, R. P. (1996) Annu. Rev. Med. 47, 69-83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Kilpatrick, E. D., and Robertson, R. P. (1998) Diabetes 47, 606-611[Abstract] |
| 50. |
Yan, C.,
Zhao, A. Z.,
Bentley, J. K.,
Loughney, K.,
Ferguson, K.,
and Beavo, J. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9677-9681 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Dov, E. Abramovitch, N. Warwar, and R. Nesher Diminished Phosphodiesterase-8B Potentiates Biphasic Insulin Response to Glucose Endocrinology, February 1, 2008; 149(2): 741 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Holz, E. Heart, and C. A. Leech Synchronizing Ca2+ and cAMP oscillations in pancreatic {beta}-cells: a role for glucose metabolism and GLP-1 receptors?Focus on "Regulation of cAMP dynamics by Ca2+ and G protein-coupled receptors in the pancreatic {beta}-cell: a computational approach" Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): C4 - C6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yan, C. L. Miller, and J.-i. Abe Regulation of Phosphodiesterase 3 and Inducible cAMP Early Repressor in the Heart Circ. Res., March 2, 2007; 100(4): 489 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A Walz, L. Harndahl, N. Wierup, E. Zmuda-Trzebiatowska, F. Svennelid, V. C Manganiello, T. Ploug, F. Sundler, E. Degerman, B. Ahren, et al. Early and rapid development of insulin resistance, islet dysfunction and glucose intolerance after high-fat feeding in mice overexpressing phosphodiesterase 3B. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 189(3): 629 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Seino and T. Shibasaki PKA-Dependent and PKA-Independent Pathways for cAMP-Regulated Exocytosis Physiol Rev, October 1, 2005; 85(4): 1303 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Goraya, N. Masada, A. Ciruela, and D. M. F. Cooper Sustained Entry of Ca2+ Is Required to Activate Ca2+-Calmodulin-dependent Phosphodiesterase 1A J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 2004; 279(39): 40494 - 40504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |