J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 32, 22387-22392, August 6, 1999
Kinase Activity and Phosphorylation of the Largest Subunit of
TFIIF Transcription Factor*
Mireille
Rossignol
,
Anne
Keriel,
Adrien
Staub, and
Jean-Marc
Egly§
From the Institut de Génétique et de Biologie
Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/ULP, B. P.163, 67404 Illkirch Cedex, Communaute Urbaine de Strasbourg, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
The largest subunit of the human basal
transcription factor TFIIF
(also called RAP74) was reported
previously to be the target of some phospho/dephosphorylation process.
We show that TFIIF
possesses a serine/threonine kinase activity,
allowing an autophosphorylation of the two residues at position serine
385 and threonine 389. Mutation analysis strongly suggests that
autophosphorylation of both sites regulates the transcription
elongation process. Moreover we also evidence three additional
phosphorylation sites located at positions 207-230, 271-283, and
335-344. These sites are phosphorylated by casein kinase II-like
kinases and TAFII250, a component of TFIID.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The eukaryotic transcription factor IIF
(TFIIF)1, purified as an RNA
polymerase II-associated protein (RAP) (1), is also characterized as an
integral component of RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) holoenzyme (2-4).
Human TFIIF is an
2
2 heterotetramer consisting of two 28-kDa (RAP30, TFIIF
) and two 58-kDa (RAP74, TFIIF
) subunits, which are required at different steps of the transcription reaction: formation of the preinitiation complex, promoter opening, initiation, elongation, and recycling (reviewed in
Refs. 5 and 6). TFIIF allows the integration of RNA pol II into the
preinitiation complex containing TFIIA, TFIIB, and TFIID, through its
subunit (7-10). TFIIF stabilizes the preinitiation complex by
interacting with the other transcription factors such as TFIIB
(11-13), TFIID (12-15), and TFIIE (16). Being associated with RNA pol
II during elongation (5, 6, 19), TFIIF prevents transient pausing and
therefore may stimulate the in vitro RNA synthesis by RNA
pol II to a rate corresponding to the rate observed in vivo
(17, 18, 20-22).
Structure-function studies have evidenced the domains devoted to
initiation and elongation functions. The carboxyl-terminal part of
TFIIF
binds to DNA (19, 20) and is required essentially for
initiation (21), whereas the central moity, which binds RNA pol II (22,
23), is devoted to an elongation function (21). TFIIF
contains three
domains: the amino-terminal part (amino acids 1-217) that contacts the
subunit and is necessary for single round initiation and
stimulation of elongation (17, 20, 24, 28); both the highly charged
central part (amino acids 218-358) and the carboxyl-terminal part
(amino acids 358-517) interact with TFIIB (11) and RNA pol II (25,
26). TFIIF
plays a role in multiple round transcription (24); it is
involved in RNA pol II recycling by stimulating the CTD phosphatase,
which uses the carboxyl-terminal domain of the RNA pol II largest
subunit as a substrate at the end of each transcription cycle (27,
28).
TFIIF activity could be regulated by several enzymes such as acetylases
(p300/CBP, p300/CBP-associated factor, and TAFII250) (29),
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (30), and kinases (12, 31-33). Several
studies have demonstrated that TAFII250 (12, 33) and
TFIIH-associated kinase (31, 32) used TFIIF
as subtrate in
vitro.
In the present study, we identify the various phosphorylation sites of
TFIIF
. We demonstrate that TFIIF
possesses a serine threonine
kinase activity, allowing an autophosphorylation of the two residues at
position serine 385 and threonine 389. Mutation analysis strongly
suggest that autophosphorylation of both sites regulate the
transcription elongation process. Moreover we also evidence three
phosphorylation sites located at positions 207-230, 271-283, and
335-344. These sites are phosphorylated by some CKII and
TAFII250 kinases.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Recombinant TFIIF--
The TFIIF
/pET15b and the
TFIIF
/pVL1392 vectors were described previously (14, 34). Either
serine 385 (TFIIF
S385A) or threonine 389 (TFIIF
T389A) or both
residues (TFIIF
S385A/T389A) of TFIIF
were mutated to alanine by
polymerase chain reaction amplification to generate
SacI/PstI fragments, which were further inserted
into the SacI/PstI-digested TFIIF
/pAcAB3
plasmid. The sequences of the 5' primers are: TFIIF
S385A,
5'-GGAGGGAGCTCAAGGGGCAACGCCCGCCCAGGCACGCCC-3'; TFIIF
T389A,
5'-GGAGGGAGCTCAAGGGGCAACAGCCGCCCAGGCGCCCCC-3'; TFIIF
S385A/T389A,
5'-GGAGGGAGCTCAAGGGGCAACGCCCGCCCAGGCGCCCCC3,
and the sequence of the 3' primer is 5'-GCCGCAACCGCTTGGCTGCAGGC-3'.
Spodoptera frugiperda 9 cells (typically 2.5 × 108) were then coinfected with either wild type TFIIF
or
TFIIF
-S385A, -T389A, or -S385A/T389A mutants and TFIIF
baculoviruses at a multiplicity of infection of 2 and 2 plaque-forming
units/cell. Cells were collected 48 h postinfection, washed with
20 ml of ice-cold buffer A (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and then
dounced in 15 ml of buffer A containing 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1 × protease inhibitor mixture
(35). The extract was centrifuged (20,000 × g, 1 h) at 4 °C and loaded onto a 15-ml phosphocellulose P11 column
(2.5 × 6 cm, flow rate: 0.25 ml/min) equilibrated in buffer A. Step gradient elutions were performed sequentially with 5 column
volumes of buffer A containing 0.3, 0.6, and 1 M KCl. TFIIF
eluted at 0.6 M KCl was dialyzed against buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM
EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol) containing 0.1 M
KCl before being applied onto a DEAE-5PW (Toso-Haas) (0.75 × 7.5 cm, flow rate: 0.6 ml/min). Proteins were eluted with a 12-ml linear
gradient from 0.1 to 0.6 M KCl in buffer B. The TFIIF
containing fractions of the DEAE-5PW column (0.3 ml, peak 0.25 M KCl) were pooled and used for subsequent experiments.
Kinase Assays--
Highly purified wild type (from HeLa cells or
recombinant) or mutated TFIIF either free or immunoprecipitated with
monoclonal antibodies designed against the
subunit are incubated at
30 °C for 30 min in 20 µl of kinase buffer (20 mM
Hepes, pH 7.9, 15 mM MgCl2, 30 mM
KCl) containing 1 µCi of [
-32P]ATP. The reactions
are stopped by the addition of protein loading buffer followed by
SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Phosphorylation of rTFIIF S385A/T389A and
Escherichia coli TFIIF was in some case performed in the
presence of 0.5 unit of casein kinase II (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)
or HeLa whole cell extract.
To evaluate the intrinsic kinase activity of TFIIF
, an in-gel kinase
assay was performed. In brief, rTFIIF (400 ng) is resolved by SDS-PAGE,
and proteins are renatured by successive washes at room temperature for
30 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, and 2.5% Triton X-100;
then in the kinase buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.9, and 2.5% Triton X-100; and finally in the kinase buffer. The
kinase reaction was then initiated by addition of 35 µCi/ml [
-32P]ATP for 90 min at 30 °C. The gel was washed
with 5% trichloroacetic acid and 1% sodium pyrophosphate, stained
with Coomassie Blue, dried, and autoradiographied.
When indicated, phosphoamino acid analysis and phosphopeptide mapping
by amino acid sequence analysis were performed on autophosphorylated rTFIIF (10 µg) or on rTFIIF S385A/T389A (10 µg) phosphorylated with
200 ng of HeLa WCE as described in Ref. 36.
Pulse Chase Assay of Transcription Elongation--
RNA
polymerase II (10 µg) purified from HeLa cells (37) is incubated for
15 min at 28 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 50 mM KCl, 7 mM MgCl2 in the presence of 250 ng of
oligo(dC)-tailed pGR220 (38), 3 units of recombinant RNasin (Promega),
50 µM ATP, 50 µM GTP, 2 µM
CTP, and 10 µCi of [
-32P]CTP. The reaction was
chased as indicated by addition of 100 µM cold CTP, 2 µM UTP, and 10 ng of either the wild type rTFIIF or
rTFIIF mutants. Transcripts were analyzed by electrophoresis on 5%
polyacrylamide, 7 M urea.
In vitro transcription assays using recombinant
transcription factors and RNA pol II were used as described earlier
(37).
 |
RESULTS |
A Serine/Threonine Kinase Is Associated with TFIIF--
Previous
studies have shown that TFIIF
is phosphorylated in vitro
as well as in vivo (12, 31, 32, 39, 40). On the other hand,
we noticed that highly purified TFIIF was phosphorylated even in the
absence of any additional kinase. To further analyze the potential
enzymatic activity of TFIIF, in vitro kinase assays were
performed with either purified endogenous TFIIF (hereafter referred to
as eTFIIF) or purified recombinant TFIIF (hereafter referred to as
rTFIIF). eTFIIF was purified from HeLa WCE on heparin-Ultrogel, DEAE-Spherodex, heparin-5PW and phenyl-5PW columns (37). The phenyl-5PW
eluted fraction (0.65 M ammonium sulfate) was used for all
subsequent experiments. rTFIIF was overexpressed in Sf9 insect
cells coinfected with baculoviruses encoding the
(TFIIF
) and the
(TFIIF
) subunits, respectively, and further purified from
cytoplasmic cell extract on phosphocellulose and DEAE columns (Fig.
1A). The baculovirus
expression system was preferred to expression in E. coli
because post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, are
similar to those observed in mammalian system.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A serine/threonine kinase is associated with
TFIIF. A, eTFIIF and rTFIIF purified from HeLa cells
whole cell extract (phenyl fraction (37)) or baculovirus-infected cells
(DEAE fraction), respectively, were immunoprecipitated with Ab-TFIIF
and subjected to an in vitro kinase assay. The reactions
were resolved on SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Blue staining
(Coomassie) and autoradiography of the same gel
(Autoradiogram). The position of the and subunits is
indicated. H, immunoglobulin heavy chain; L,
immunoglobulin light chain. B, phosphoamino acid analysis of
rTFIIF. The in vitro autophosphorylated
32P-rTFIIF was resolved on SDS-PAGE. The radiolabeled
TFIIF was subjected to phosphoamino acid analysis. The positions of
the standard phosphoamino acids (P-Ser, phosphoserine;
P-Thr, phosphothreonine; and P-Tyr,
phosphotyrosine) and free phosphate (Pi) are
indicated.
|
|
To further eliminate contaminating enzymatic activities, eTFIIF and
rTFIIF were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal antiboby raised against
the
subunit (Ab-TFIIF
) cross-linked to protein G-Sepharose
beads, and the immuno-adsorbed proteins were extensively washed at high
salt concentration (1 M KCl). The immobilized proteins were
assayed for kinase activity in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP and in the absence of any additional
substrate, before being resolved on SDS-PAGE (41). The antibody
directed toward the
subunit is able to precipitate not only
rTFIIF
, but also rTFIIF
in a stoichiometric amount
(Fig. 1A, compare lane 2 with lane 1).
This immunoprecipitation is highly specific, since no other additional
polypeptide, except the heavy and the light chain of immunoglobulin,
are present. Moreover as shown on the autoradiogram, a radiolabeled
polypeptide having the same electrophoretic mobility as TFIIF
is
observed, suggesting that TFIIF is phosphorylated (Fig. 1, compare
lanes 1 and 2 with lanes 3 and
4, respectively).
Phosphoamino acid analysis demonstrates that the phosphorylation occurs
at serine and threonine residues on both rTFIIF
and eTFIIF
(Fig.
1B and data not shown). In order to identify phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues, a phosphopeptide mapping analysis was
performed. In vitro phosphorylated 32P-rTFIIF
was trypsin-digested, and peptides were resolved by high performance
liquid chromatography. Microsequencing of the single radiolabeled
oligopeptide, encompassing residues 383-402 of TFIIF
, evidenced the
two autophosphorylation sites (Fig. 2, AuPS). A careful analysis of the dehydro-amino acid
derivative resulting from Edman degradation reaction reveals that
serine and threonine at position 385 (Ser-385) and 389 (Thr-389) are phosphorylated. Together, these experiments suggest that TFIIF
is
efficiently phosphorylated and that this phosphorylation is catalyzed
by either a serine/threonine protein kinase tightly associated with
TFIIF or by one of the subunits of TFIIF.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Diagram illustrating the organization and the
phosphorylation sites of TFIIF ; the
NH2-terminal domain has most of the functions required for
accurate initiation and elongation. The central region was shown
to be a serum responsive factor (SRF) activation sequence.
The COOH-terminal region is targeted by TFIIB and RNA pol II and is
required for CTD phosphatase stimulation and multiple round
transcription stimulation. Sequence alignments with the Xenopus
laevis TFIIF (XTFIIF ), the Drosophila
melanogaster factor 5a (df5a), and Saccharomyces
cerevisiae Ssu1p/Tfg1 (ySsu71) of the four
microsequenced phosphopeptides obtained are shown. Identical and
similar residues are in bold. The kinases consensus
sequences are boxed.
|
|
TFIIF
Is a Serine/Threonine Kinase--
To further demonstrate
the presence of some kinase activity associated with TFIIF, we
performed an in-gel kinase assay. This assay discriminates between
intrinsic TFIIF-mediated kinase activity versus
contaminating kinase copurifying with TFIIF. After SDS-PAGE, TFIIF
subunits were renatured by repeated washings of the gel and then
subjected to kinase reaction in the gel in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP (see "Experimental Procedures" and Fig.
3A). This allows detecting a
single radioactive polypeptide that possesses the same apparent
molecular weight as TFIIF
, revealing that TFIIF
autophosphorylates independently of the presence of TFIIF
. This latter result was further confirmed by measuring the in
vitro kinase activity of either rTFIIF (composed of
and
subunits) or the
subunit (rTFIIF
) overproduced in insect cells
and purified as described above. Under these conditions, TFIIF
is
phosphorylated regardless of the presence of TFIIF
(Fig.
3B, compare lane 3 with lane 4).
However, we consistently observed a higher autophosphorylation rate of
TFIIF
when TFIIF
was not present in the kinase reaction. Indeed,
quantification of the radioactive signals corresponding to TFIIF
reveals that in the absence of TFIIF
the kinase activity of TFIIF
is about 2.5 times greater.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
TFIIF is a kinase.
A, purified rTFIIF (400 ng) was immunoprecipitated with
Ab-TFIIF , resolved on SDS-PAGE, and renatured in the kinase buffer
before being submitted to an in-gel kinase assay in the presence of
[ -32P]ATP. The position of the TFIIF and TFIIF
is indicated. B, autophosphorylation of rTFIIF
immunoprecipitated with Ab-TFIIF in the presence or absence of
TFIIF as indicated at the top of each panel.
|
|
Characterization of TFIIF Kinase Activity--
To characterize the
autophosphorylation activity of TFIIF
, time course and dose-response
experiments were performed. The autophosphorylation activity is linear
between 1 and 30 min and reaches a plateau after 30 min (Fig.
4A). This activity exhibits a
linear dependence during 15-min reaction (Fig. 4B). We also found that ATP, dATP, and GTP all act as cofactors for the TFIIF
kinase in competition assays, while CTP or cAMP had no effect on the
phosphorylation of TFIIF
(data not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Characterization of TFIIF
kinase activity. A, in vitro kinase
reactions were performed for the indicated time point at 30 °C using
50 ng of highly purified rTFIIF. B, increasing amounts of
highly purified rTFIIF were used in a autophosphorylation assay for 15 min at 30 °C. The reactions were terminated by addition of Laemmli
buffer followed by SDS-PAGE. TFIIF autophosphorylation was
quantitated using a Fuji bas 2000 analyzer, and the activity is
represented in diagrams in the analyzer units. C, in
vitro kinase reactions were performed with 50 ng of highly
purified rTFIIF in the presence of 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, and 50 µM DRB. The result of one representative experiment is
presented. D, TFIIF autophosphorylation was quantitated,
and activity is represented as a percentage of the activity observed in
absence of DRB.
|
|
Next, we tested the potential transphosphorylation activity of TFIIF
by using either standard serine/threonine substrates such as histone H1
and casein or a variety of substrates involved in basal transcription
such as TFIIB, TBP, TFIID, TFIIE
, TFIIE
, TFIIH, and the
carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA pol II. Under our experimental
conditions, none of these substrates was phosphorylated by TFIIF
(data not shown).
Since the adenosine analogue
5,6-dichloro-1-
-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) is
known to inhibit RNA pol II elongation and several kinases such as
P-TEFb (42) and TFIIH-associated kinase (43), we tested whether it
could be used as an inhibitor of TFIIF kinase activity. Kinase assays
were carried out with highly purified rTFIIF in the presence of
increasing amounts of DRB (Fig. 4C, lanes 2-6).
The autophosphorylation activity of TFIIF is very sensitive to DRB,
with a 50% inhibition point (IC50) of 7 mM
(Fig. 4, C and D).
TFIIF Autophosphorylation Modulates the Elongation
Activity--
We have demonstrated that TFIIF
is phosphorylated on
Ser-385 and Thr-389; we next tested whether the phosphorylation of
these two residues has any effect on the transcriptional activity of TFIIF. Therefore Ser-385 and Thr-389 residues were, individually or
together, mutated to alanine, giving rise to three recombinant baculoviruses encoding rTFIIF
/S385A, rTFIIF
/T389A, and the double mutant rTFIIF
S385A/T389A. These three baculoviruses were coinfected separately with the baculovirus encoding TFIIF
. Wild type rTFIIF and
rTFIIF mutants were purified and tested in an in vitro
kinase assay as described above. None of the rTFIIF
mutants are
phosphorylated, whereas the wild type rTFIIF
is phosphorylated (Fig.
5A, compare lane 1 with lanes 2-4), demonstrating that phosphorylation
requires the presence of both Ser-385 and Thr-389 residues to
occur.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
TFIIF
autophosphorylation modulates elongation process.
A, in vitro autophosphorylation of rTFIIF (15 ng
of either wild type rTFIIF or rTFIIF mutants) were performed before
being subjected to SDS-PAGE, autoradiography (Autoradio),
and immunoblotting with Ab-TFIIF (WB). B,
transcription reactions were performed on AdML promoter-containing
template (run-off, 309 nt), in the presence of either wild type rTFIIF
(20 ng) or rTFIIF mutants (20 ng) or in the absence of TFIIF ( ) as
indicated at the top of the panel. The presence of the
specific transcripts (run-off, 309 nt) was detected by autoradiography.
The average and standard deviation (sd) of the
quantification of four independent RNA synthesis experiments are
indicated at the bottom of the panel. C,
transcription elongation assays were performed as designed (lower
panel) on oligo(dC)-tailed pGR220 template with RNA pol II either
alone or in the presence of wild type rTFIIF (10 ng) or rTFIIF
S385A/T389A mutant (10 ng). The chase phase was performed for the
indicated time.
|
|
The rTFIIF mutants were then tested in an in vitro run-off
transcription assay in the presence of the adenovirus major late promoter as a DNA template, RNA pol II, the basal transcription factors
TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIH, and either wild type rTFIIF or mutated rTFIIF
(as indicated at the top of Fig. 5B).
Transcriptions were performed in the presence of equal amounts of each
mutated protein in subsaturating concentration of wild type rTFIIF, as judged in titration experiments (data not shown). Neither the single
nor the double mutations at position Ser-385 and Thr-389 of TFIIF
appear to modify the transcription activity of TFIIF (Fig.
5B, compare lane 1 with lanes 2-4,
and see the quantification of three independent experiments at the
lowest part of the panel).
Since TFIIF is a basal transcription factor that functions in both
transcription initiation and elongation, we tested whether TFIIF
mutations affect its elongation activity, using a standard "tailed
template" assay (38). This assay allows the synthesis of defined RNA
transcripts in the absence of factors required for promoter-specific
initiation. The transcription template is a linearized double-stranded
plasmid that has been modified by addition of a 3' oligo(dC) tail to
one of its termini. RNA pol II binds the oligo(dC) tail and initiates
transcription rapidly and specifically within the first 6 (dC) residues
adjacent to the duplex DNA terminus (44). The increase in size of the
RNA transcripts is directly proportional to the rate of RNA chain elongation by RNA pol II. Transcription of the oligo(dC)-tailed plasmid
template was initiated by RNA pol II, in the absence of UTP, but in the
presence of ATP, GTP, and 2 µM
[
-32P]CTP. As diagrammed in Fig. 5C, the
first and second groups of nontemplate strand (dT) residues are ~135
and ~250 nt downstream of the oligo(dC) tail, respectively. During
the pulse phase, transcripts of ~135 nt accumulate, and after 15 min,
these transcripts were chased with 100 µM cold CTP and 2 µM UTP in the absence or the presence of subsaturating
amounts of wild type rTFIIF or equal amounts of rTFIIF mutants. In the
absence of TFIIF or in the presence of each of the TFIIF subunits (data
not shown), transcripts of ~250 nt are synthesized at a very slow
rate, starting at t = 16 min (Fig. 5, lane
7), whereas in the presence of wild type rTFIIF, transcripts are
accumulated more rapidly at t = 4 min (lane
12) and chased into longer products (lanes 15-28),
indicating that TFIIF increased the rate of RNA chain elongation by RNA
pol II through these sites. In the presence of wild type rTFIIF,
synthesis of 280 nt (lane 15) and 309 nt transcripts
(lane 17) occurs after 12 and 20 min chase, respectively,
whereas in the presence of rTFIIF S385A/T389A the 280-nt (lane
23) and the 309-nt transcripts (lane 25) appear earlier
at 8- and 16-min chase, respectively. In this case (that repeatedly was
reproduced), the rate of elongation by RNA pol II is slightly
increased, thus demonstrating that the autophosphorylation of TFIIF may
down-regulate the RNA pol II elongation activity.
TFIIF
Can Be Phosphorylated by CKII--
It was demonstrated
that the transcriptional activity of TFIIF can be regulated by
phosphorylation of the
subunit (40). We demonstrate here that
residues S385 and T389 of TFIIF
are the targets of a phosphorylation
event. To further evaluate whether the regulation of TFIIF
transcription activity involves other phosphorylation sites than the
two presently identified, in vitro kinase assays were
carried out in the presence or in the absence of HeLa WCE using the
mutated rTFIIF S385A/T389A as a substrate (which was previously
immunoprecipitated with Ab-TFIIF
). After 30 min of incubation, the
beads were extensively washed, and the immunoabsorbed proteins were
resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected by autoradiography. As shown in Fig.
6A, a radiolabeled polypeptide having the same electrophoretic mobility as TFIIF
is observed, indicating that in such conditions, TFIIF is efficiently phosphorylated (compare lanes 2 and 3). The radiolabeled
polypeptide does not correspond to endogenous TFIIF
present in HeLa
WCE, since it is not observed in the presence of HeLa WCE alone (Fig.
6A, compare lanes 1 and 3). In order
to identify these phosphorylation sites, a phosphopeptide mapping
analysis was performed on the radiolabeled rTFIIFaS385A/T389A after
digestion by either trypsin or Glu-C endoproteinase. Microsequencing
analysis shows that the 32P labeling is found within three
oligopeptides 207-230, 271-283, and 335-344 of TFIIF
(Fig. 2,
PS); each of them contains a CKII consensus phosphorylation
motif, which is well conserved among different species. Indeed, we
observed that CKII is able to phosphorylate both rTFIIF S385A/T389A
mutant (Fig. 6A, lane 4), as well as TFIIF
overexpressed in E. coli (Fig. 6B). Trypsin
digests of both radiolabeled polypeptides further confirm that the CKII
consensus motifs are effectively phosphorylated (data not shown).
Moreover, using partially purified TFIID (37), we observed a weak but
significant phosphorylation of TFIIF
(Fig. 6C, lane
2). This may be explained by the fact that TAFII250
selectively phosphorylates the PS1 site (33). It should be also noticed
that TFIIF
overproduced in E. coli is weakly
autophosphorylated (Fig. 6B, lane 1), thus
suggesting a potential cooperative effect between the various
phosphorylation processes.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
TFIIF is a substrate
for casein kinase II (CKII). A, purified rTFIIF
S385/T389 (DEAE fraction) was immunoprecipitated with Ab-TFIIF and
subjected to an in vitro kinase assay in the presence of
either HeLa whole cell extract (WCE) or casein kinase II
(CKII). Reaction were then resolved on SDS-PAGE, followed by
autoradiography of the gel. B, purified E. coli rTFIIF
(34) was immunoprecipitated with Ab-TFIIF and incubated with
radioactive ATP either alone or in the presence of HeLa WCE or CKII.
After extensive washing with a buffer containing 1 M KCl,
immunoprecipitated rTFIIFa was subjected to an in vitro
kinase assay with [ -32P].
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the course of this study, we have determined that the largest
subunit of the basal transcription factor TFIIF
is the target of
several phosphorylation processes. First, according to the in-gel
kinase assay and microsequencing analysis, TFIIF
, which possesses a
serine/threonine kinase activity, autophosphorylates at position
Ser-385 and Thr-389. Careful screening of the TFIIF
amino acid
sequence, however, did not reveal any known consensus kinase motifs.
Second, we identified three other additional phosphorylated domains of
TFIIF
. These oligopeptides at positions 207-230, 271-283, and
335-344 (Fig. 2), which contain the CKII consensus phosphorylation motif (SXXE/D), are indeed the target of the CKII kinase as
well as of kinases present in HeLa WCE, as shown by in vitro
kinase assays followed by microsequencing analysis. Interestingly,
using purified TFIID, we observed a weak but significant
phosphorylation of TFIIF
, likely due to the presence of
TAFII250 (12, 33, 35). TAFII250, the largest
component of the TFIID protein complex, and another component of the
basal transcription machinery, indeed possesses a kinase activity (45).
TAFII250 autophosphorylates and transphosphorylates
TFIIF
with which it interacts (12). Phosphorylation of
rTFIIF
S385A/T389A and E. coli TFIIF
by
TAFII250 is much weaker than by HeLa WCE (data not shown
and Fig. 6C, lane 1), thus likely explaining the
specific phosphorylation of the PS1 oligopeptide motif previously
identified (33). In this case, we failed to map the phosphorylated
site(s), since TFIIF
was weakly phosphorylated by both TFIID and
TAFII250.
We also show here that abrogation of the two autophosphorylation sites
of TFIIF
results in an up-regulation of the transcription reaction.
Compared with wild type TFIIF, addition of rTFIIF
S385A/T389A, which
cannot autophosphorylate, increased the rate of elongation of the
transcription and as such may participate to the initial burst of RNA
synthesis, further followed by a lower rate of synthesis likely
associated with RNA pol II recycling as hypothesized by Lei et
al. (24). Indeed, they have shown that the COOH-terminal domain of
TFIIF
(from amino acid 358 to 517) stimulates the CTD phosphatase
(which uses the CTD of RNA pol II as a substrate), upon TFIIF/RNA pol
II interaction (46). It thus is possible that TFIIF
autophosphorylation, which decreases the elongation rate, could be one
of the first steps implied in the RNA pol II recycling, through some
modification of RNA pol II/TFIIF interaction. In such hypothesis, the
fact that the autophosphorylation of TFIIF
occurs at the end of the
elongation remains to be further established. It cannot be excluded,
however, that the variations in the elongation rate (24) might be
related to some changes in the overall conformation of the
transcription complexes. Whether or not the other identified phosphorylation sites play some role in the transcription initiation step through TAFII250 and/or CKII-like kinases function is
still an open question. Indeed, TFIIF
is targeted by TFIIB another basal transcription factor and RNA pol II (27, 46).
Knowing that TFIIF
has distinct functions in bringing RNA pol II
through the various steps of the transcription process (29, 41, 47, and
this study), it will be of great interest to further characterize all
the components involved in the phospho/dephosphorylation process
orchestrating the formation of the preinitiation, the initiation, the
elongation, and the termination transcription complexes throughout the
gene expression regulatory cascade. Further investigations to
understand the connection between autophosphorylation and
phosphorylation of TFIIF
with consequence of some changes in the
elongation rate and/or in the activation of transcription (46) are also needed.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are thankful to J. Acker and C. Kedinger
for the gift of TFIIF
-pAcAB3 and TFIIF
-pVL1392 baculovirus
transfer vectors; to C. Rochette-Egly and to L. Tora for fruitful
discussion; and to J. W. Conaway, R. C. Conaway, and J. Bradsher and F. Tirode for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank
J. M. Chipoulet for expertise in protein purification, C. Braun
and A. Fery for excellent technical assistance, I. Kolb-Cheynel for
baculovirus expression, and P. Eberling for peptides synthesis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the INSERM, the CNRS,
the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement
Supérieur, the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, the Association
pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, and the Human Frontier Science
Program.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a CNRS/Région Alsace fellowship. Present
address: Surgical Research, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical
School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-3-88-65-34-47;
Fax: 33-3-88-65-32-01; E-mail: egly@igbmc.u-strasbg.fr.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TFIIF, transcription
factor IIF;
RAP, RNA polymerase II-associated protein;
pol II, polymerase II;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
WCE, whole
cell extract;
DRB, 5,6-dichloro-1-
-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole;
nt, nucleotide(s);
CKII, casein kinase II;
CTD, carboxyl-terminal domain of
RNA polymerase II.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Burton, Z. F.,
Killeen, M.,
Sopta, M.,
Ortolan, L. G.,
and Greenblatt, J.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
1602-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Kim, Y. J.,
Björklund, S.,
Li, Y.,
Sayre, M. H.,
and Kornberg, R. D.
(1994)
Cell
77,
599-608[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Koleske, A. J.,
and Young, R. A.
(1994)
Nature
368,
466-469[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Ossipow, V.,
Tassan, J. P.,
Nigg, E. A.,
and Schibler, U.
(1995)
Cell
83,
137-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Aso, T.,
Conaway, J. W.,
and Conaway, R. C.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
1419-1428[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Reines, D.,
Conaway, J. W.,
and Conaway, R. C.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
351-355[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Flores, O.,
Lu, H.,
Killeen, M.,
Greenblatt, J.,
Burton, Z. F.,
and Reinberg, D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Natl. U. S. A.
88,
9999-10003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Killeen, M.,
Coulombe, B.,
and Greenblatt, J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9463-9466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Tyree, C. M.,
Georges, C. P.,
Lira-De Vito, M.,
Wampler, S. L.,
Dahmus, M. E.,
Zawel, L.,
and Kadonaga, J. T.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1254-1265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Parvin, J. D.,
Shykind, B. M.,
Meyers, R. E.,
Kim, J.,
and Sharp, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18414-18421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Fang, S. M.,
and Burton, Z. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11703-11709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Dikstein, R.,
Ruppert, S.,
and Tjian, R.
(1996)
Cell
84,
781-790[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Ruppert, S.,
and Tjian, R.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2747-2755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Dubrovskaya, V.,
Lavigne, A. C.,
Davidson, I.,
Acker, J.,
Staub, A.,
and Tora, L.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3702-3712[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Hisatake, K.,
Ohta, T.,
Takada, R.,
Guermah, M.,
Horikoshi, M.,
Nakatani, Y.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8195-8199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Maxon, M. E.,
Goodrich, J. A.,
and Tjian, R.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
515-524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Kephart, D. D.,
Wang, B. Q.,
Burton, Z. F.,
and Price, D. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13536-13543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Izban, M. G.,
and Luse, D. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13647-13655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Coulombe, B.,
Li, J.,
and Greenblatt, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19962-19967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Tan, S.,
Garrett, K. P.,
Conaway, R. C.,
and Conaway, J. W.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Natl. U. S. A.
91,
9808-9812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Tan, S.,
Conaway, R. C.,
and Conaway, J. W.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6042-6046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
McCracken, S.,
and Greenblatt, J.
(1991)
Science
253,
900-902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Killeen, M.,
and Greenblatt, J.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
30-37[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Lei, L.,
Finkelstein, A.,
and Burton, Z. F.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2130-2142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Wang, B. Q.,
and Burton, Z. F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27035-27044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Ha, I.,
Roberts, S.,
Maldonado, E.,
Sun, X.,
Kim, L. U.,
Green, M.,
and Reinberg, D.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1021-1032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Chambers, R. S.,
Wang, B. Q.,
Burton, Z. F.,
and Dahmus, M. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14962-14969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Chambers, R. S.,
and Kane, C. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24498-24504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Imhof, A.,
Yang, X. J.,
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Wolffe, A.,
and Ge, H.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
689-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Rawling, J. M.,
and Alvarez-Gonzalez, R.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
342,
249-253[CrossRef]
|
| 31.
|
Ohkuma, Y.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1994)
Nature
368,
160-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Yankulov, K.,
and Bentley, D. L.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1638-1646[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Yonaha, M.,
Tsuchiya, T.,
and Yasukochi, Y.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
410,
477-480[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Chalut, C.,
Lang, C.,
and Egly, J. M.
(1994)
Protein Expression Purif.
5,
458-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Adamczewski, J. P.,
Rossignol, M.,
Tassan, J. P.,
Nigg, E. A.,
Moncollin, V.,
and Egly, J. M.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1877-1884[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Rochette-Egly, C.,
Oulad-Abdelghani, M.,
Staub, A.,
Pfister, V.,
Scheuer, I.,
Chambon, P.,
and Gaub, M. P.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
860-871[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Gerard, M.,
Fischer, L.,
Moncollin, V.,
Chipoulet, J. M.,
Chambon, P.,
and Egly, J. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem
266,
20940-20945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Tan, S.,
Aso, T.,
Conaway, R. C.,
and Conaway, J. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
25684-25691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Stopa, M.,
Carthew, R. W.,
and Greenblatt, J.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
10353-10360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Kitajima, S.,
Chibazakura, T.,
Yonaha, M.,
and Yasukochi, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29970-29977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Roy, R.,
Schaeffer, L.,
Humbert, S.,
Vermeulen, W.,
Weeda, G.,
and Egly, J. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9826-9832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Marshall, N. F.,
and Price, D. H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12335-12338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Yankulov, K.,
Yamashita, K.,
Roy, R.,
Egly, J. M.,
and Bentley, D. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23922-23925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Dedrick, R. L.,
and Chamberlin, M. J.
(1985)
Biochemistry
24,
2245-2253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
O'Brien, T.,
and Tjian, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
905-911[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Archambault, J.,
Pan, G.,
Dahmus, G. K.,
Cartier, M.,
Marshall, N.,
Zhang, S.,
Dhamus, M. E.,
and Greenblatt, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27593-27601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Goodrich, J. A.,
and Tjian, R.
(1994)
Cell
77,
145-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Sims III, R. Belotserkovskaya, and D. Reinberg
Elongation by RNA polymerase II: the short and long of it
Genes & Dev.,
October 15, 2004;
18(20):
2437 - 2468.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Palancade, M.-F. Dubois, and O. Bensaude
FCP1 Phosphorylation by Casein Kinase 2 Enhances Binding to TFIIF and RNA Polymerase II Carboxyl-terminal Domain Phosphatase Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 20, 2002;
277(39):
36061 - 36067.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Wassarman and F. Sauer
TAFII250: a transcription toolbox
J. Cell Sci.,
March 10, 2002;
114(16):
2895 - 2902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|