![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 32, 22586-22590, August 6, 1999
From the Service de Biochimie et Génétique
Moléculaire, CEA-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette
Cedex, France
Rpb4p and Rpb7p are two subunits of the yeast RNA
polymerase II, which form a subcomplex that can dissociate from the
enzyme in vitro. Whereas RPB7 is essential,
RPB4 is dispensable for cellular viability. However, the
rpb4 null mutant is heat-sensitive, and it has been
suggested that Rpb4p is an essential component for cellular stress
response. To examine this hypothesis, we used two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis to analyze the protein expression pattern of the
rpb4 null mutant in response to heat shock, oxidative stress, osmotic stress, and in the post-diauxic phase. We show that
this mutant is not impaired in stress induced transcriptional activation: the absence of heat shock response of the mutant is due to
a general defect in RNA polymerase II activity at high temperature.
Under this condition, Rpb4p is necessary to maintain the polymerase
activity in vivo. The heat growth defect of the rpb4
null mutant can be partially suppressed by overexpression of
RPB7, suggesting that Rpb4p maintains or stabilizes Rpb7p
in the RNA polymerase. We also demonstrate that rpb4 null
mutant is an appropriate tool to analyze the involvement of
transcriptional events in the survival and adaptation to heat shock or
other stresses.
The yeast RNA polymerase II (Pol
II),1 which catalyzes the
transcription of all protein-encoding genes, is composed of 12 subunits. Two of them, Rpb4p and Rpb7p, are closely associated in a
subcomplex denoted Rpb4/7 that can be dissociated from the polymerase
under nondenaturing conditions or by mild urea treatment (1). Rpb4/7 is
also lacking in Pol II enzymes purified from the rpo B1
mutant (1) and from the rpb4 null mutant (2). The physical
interaction between the two subunits was confirmed by two-hybrid
experiments (3). Structural data obtained by electron microscopy of the complete RNA polymerase and the enzyme devoid of the Rpb4/7 subcomplex have located these two subunits in the floor of the DNA-binding cleft
(4). The function of this subcomplex could be to induce a tight closure
of the arm domain surrounding the cleft and to favor the transition
from an "open" conformation of the polymerase during the initiation
step of transcription to a "closed" conformation during the
elongation step (5).
Whereas RPB7 is essential, RPB4 is not during
normal growth conditions. Strains carrying a deletion of
RPB4 are cold- and heat-sensitive and auxotrophic for
inositol (6). Rpb4 null mutant cells are unable to
transcribe HSP26 and SSA3 mRNA under heat
shock condition and when cells enter stationary phase (7). It has been
argued that this reflects specialized regulatory role of Rpb4p, which
would endow Pol II with the ability to respond to stress stimuli
in vivo (7). Alternatively, the role of Rpb4p may be to
prevent the inactivation of the polymerase under stress conditions.
This second hypothesis is supported by in vitro experiments showing that Rpb4p is required for Pol II activity at temperature extremes (10 and 35 °C) (8). This would imply that the growth pattern of rpb4 null mutants is due to a general Pol II
defect but not to a modification of its regulatory properties.
To settle the issue, we used the two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
approach and examined the protein expression profile of a rpb4
null mutant in response to various stress conditions. We show that
this mutant is not impaired in stress induced transcriptional activation but is globally defective in Pol II activity at high temperatures. Our data suggest that a role of Rpb4p would be to maintain or stabilize Rpb7p in the enzyme.
Bacteria and Yeast Strains--
The Escherichia coli
strain XL1blue (upE44, hsdR17, recA1,
endA1, gyrA46, thii, relA1,
lac Culture Conditions--
Cells were grown at 24 °C in 2.5 ml
of minimal medium containing 0.67% yeast nitrogen base minus amino
acids (Difco), 2% glucose, and buffered at pH 5.8 with 1% succinate
and 0. 6% NaOH. When needed, amino acids (30 mg/liter) were added to
the culture medium. To study the post-diauxic phase, cells were grown
at 24 °C in a supplemented minimal medium (YNBS) as described by
Boy-Marcotte et al. (10).
Cell Labeling and Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis--
2 ml
of mid-log cells (A600, 0.3) were exposed to 0.4 mM H2O2 (oxidative stress) or 0.7 M NaCl (osmotic stress) or 38 °C (heat shock) at
t = 0. Cells were then labeled with 350 µCi of
[35S]methionine at t = 15 min, collected
at t = 30 min, and processed for two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis. For post-diauxic phase study, log phase cultures were
monitored for growth and for glucose concentration in the medium, until
they entered the post-diauxic shift phase. Then, 2 ml of the culture
(A600, 6-7) were labeled for 45 min with 300 µCi of [35S]methionine and processed for
two-dimensional gel. Preparation of cell extracts and two-dimensional
gel electrophoresis were performed as described previously (11).
Sensitivity to Heat Shock and
H2O2--
Mid-log phase cultures grown in
minimal medium at 24 °C were subjected to: 1) a shift to 38 °C
for 60 min (mild heat shock) or 2) a shift to 50 °C for 15 min
(severe heat shock) or 3) a shift to 38 °C and after 5 min were
treated with 1 mM or 3 mM H2O2 for 60 min (oxidative stress) or 4) no
shift and no treatment (control). Aliquots were then removed and
shifted to 24 °C and serially diluted (10-fold at each step). Five
µl were spotted onto rich broth (YPD) plates and incubated at
25 °C to measure colony-forming units.
For adaptation studies, cells were subjected to a shift to 38 °C for
60 min and then to a shift to 50 °C for 15 min (thermotolerance assay) or to a treatment at 38 °C with 3 mM
H2O2 for 60 min (adaptation to
H2O2). Cells were then shifted to 24 °C and
processed as described above to determine colony-forming units.
Plasmid Construction--
pYX212 is a 2-µm URA3
vector with TPI promoter, one of the strongest
constitutive promoters in yeast (Ingenius). To construct pYX212-Rpb7,
oligonucleotides (Rpb7-U: 5' TTA CGG ATC CAT
GTT TTT TAT TAA AGA CCT TTC GCT TA 3' and Rpb7-L: 5' CAC
TCT CGA GTT AAA TAG CAC CCA AAT AAT CTT CTT T
3') were used to add a 5' BamHI site and a 3'
XhoI site (underlined) to the Rpb7 coding sequence amplified
from the genomic DNA of strain X2180. This fragment was directionally
cloned between the BamHI and XhoI sites of
pYX212. The initiator (ATG) and stop (TAA) codons
of the cloned RPB7 sequence are in italic. For suppression
experiments, strains MC11 and SUB62 were transformed by standard
methods (12) either with the vector pYX212 or with the plasmid
pYX212-Rpb7, streaked on rich broth (YPD) plates, and incubated at 24, 34, or 37 °C for 2-4 days.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Mid-log cells
(A600, 0.3) grown at 24 °C were shifted to
38 °C at t = 0 and collected for mRNA
preparation at t = 0, 15, and 60 min. For each time
point, 6 × 107 cells were collected by
centrifugation, and total mRNA was prepared by hot phenol
extraction method of Schmitt (13). RNA concentration was determined by
spectrophotometry at A260 and
A280. 20 µg RNA was mixed with 6 M
glyoxal, 0.1 M NaPO4, pH 7.0, and
Me2SO, denatured and subjected to electrophoresis in a
1.2% agarose gel containing 10 mM NaPO4. RNA
was blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) in 10 × SSC (1 × SSC is 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate) by using a vacuum blotter
(Appligene-Oncor). The membrane was dried at 65 °C, and RNA was
UV-cross-linked to the membrane (Stralinker 1800; Stratagene). The blot
was hybridized first with a mixture of ACT1 and
DED1 probes, second with STE2 probe and third
with the 25 S probe.
Probes were synthesized by polymerase chain reaction of genomic DNA
using oligonucleotide primers: for ACT1 probe, 5' TTG AGA
GTT GCC CCA GAA GAA CAC C 3' and 5' CAC CAT CAC CGG AAT CCA AAA CAA T
3'; for DED1 probe, 5' GCA AAA TTT AAG CAT CAA CGA CAA C 3'
and 5' AAG TCA TTC AAA CGA CCT GGA GTA G 3'; for STE2 probe, 5' CTC ACC GGA ATT TCC TCA GTT CAT CA 3' and 5' TCA AGA CAT CTG TTC CCT
GGT TTG G 3'.
25 ng of DNA probes were labeled with [
The synthetic oligonucleotide GGCACTTTACAAAGAACCGCACTC, used as a probe
for 25 S rRNA expression, was radioactively labeled using T4
polynucleotide kinase and [
The labeled and denatured probes were hybridized in 0.5 M
NaPO4, pH 7.2, 10 mM EDTA, and 7% SDS at
65 °C. After overnight hybridization, the membrane was washed five
times with buffer (40 mM NaPO4, pH 7.2, and 1%
SDS) initially at 65 °C for 5 min each time. The membranes were then
exposed for autoradiography on Kodak X-Omat MR films at Previous works have shown that the rpb4 null mutant
strain (devoid of the fourth subunit of Pol II) is
temperature-sensitive (14) and does not express HSP26 and
SSA3 mRNA under heat shock condition and when cells
enter stationary phase (7) suggesting that the rpb4 null
strain could be defective in general stress response. We used the
two-dimensional gel electrophoresis approach to analyze the expression
of heat shock proteins in the wild type (SUB62) and rpb4
null (MC11) strains. Cells were pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine for 15 min at 24 °C or after a
temperature shift from 24 to 38 °C, and protein extracts were
subjected to comparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The
protein expression pattern of the two strains grown at 24 °C was
identical (Fig. 1A and not shown), indicating that there is no expression defect of rpb4 null strain at 24 °C. In contrast, the two-dimensional maps
from the two heat shocked strains were very different. More than 50 heat shock proteins (for example, the aldehyde dehydrogenase Ald5p and
the heat shock proteins Hsp82p and Hsp104p) were strongly induced in
the wild type strain, and no significant induction was observed in the
mutant (compare Fig. 1, B and C). This
observation includes proteins whose expression is dependent on Hsf1p
and Msn2/4p transcription factors known to be involved in heat shock
response (31). Moreover, the proteins usually repressed under heat
shock conditions (for example the ribosomal proteins and translation factors like Yef3p) were no longer repressed in the mutant strain. These results extended previous results (7) showing that the rpb4
null mutant strain is impaired in the global heat shock
response.
We then analyzed the response of rpb4 null mutant to
oxidative stress, osmotic stress, and diauxic phase transition. When wild type cells were treated with 0.4 mM
H2O2, more than 100 oxidative stress-responsive
proteins were observed on two-dimensional gels as described previously
(15). No defect in H2O2 response was evidenced
in rpb4 null strain (Fig.
2A). For example, the
TRR1-encoded thioredoxin reductase, the
CCP1-encoded cytochrome c peroxidase, or YOL151W
were similarly induced in both strains. Similarly, the osmotic stress
response was identical in both the wild type and mutant strains (Fig.
2B). For example, enzymes of the glycerol biosynthesis
pathway (glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase Gpd1p and glycerol phosphate
phosphatases Gpp1p and Gpp2p), which are essential in the osmotic
stress response (16), were induced to the same level in both strains.
Finally, there was no significant difference in protein expression
between the two strains in post-diauxic phase condition (Fig.
2C): in both strains, the expression of the glycolytic
enzymes such as Eno2p and Fba1p were shut down and enzymes involved in
respiratory metabolism such as Ach1p and Mdh1p were normally induced.
Moreover, stress proteins such as the glutathione reductase Glr1p
and the catalase Ctt1p were similarly induced.
Rpb4p Is Necessary for RNA Polymerase II Activity at High
Temperature*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, F'(proAB+,
lacIq, lacZ
15,
Tn10(tetr))) was used as a host for the cloning
construction. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains RY260
(MATa ura3-52 rpb1-1), SUB62
(MATa lys 2-801 leu2-3,2-112 ura3-52
his3-
200 trp1-1(am)) and its isogenic derivative MC11
(MATa lys 2-801 leu2-3,2-112 ura3-52 his3-
200 trp1-1(am)
rpb4::HIS3) were described previously
(7, 9).
-32P]dNTP by
random priming using the Megaprime Labeling System RPN1606 (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
-32P]ATP.
80 °C.
Stripping was obtained by incubation in washing buffer at 75 °C for
at least 2 h and checked by autoradiography.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (137K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparative two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis of proteins extracted from the wild type,
rpb4, and rpb1-1 mutant
strains in heat shock condition. Autoradiograms of two-dimensional
gels performed with total yeast extracts from 35S-labeled
wild type (A, B), rpb4 (C),
and rpb1-1 (D) cells as described under
"Materials and Methods." Extracts were prepared from cells grown at
24 °C (A) or 30 min after a shift to 38 °C
(B, C, D). A region of the
autoradiograms (acidic pI and high Mr) were
blown up, and heat shock-responsive proteins of this area were
indicated by an arrow and their name (underlined
for repressed proteins and not for the induced ones). ACT1
(in italics) was used as internal standard to normalize for
the differences in labeling efficiency and sample loading on
two-dimensional gels.

View larger version (157K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Comparative two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis of proteins extracted from wild type and
rpb4 strains in stress conditions. Autoradiograms
of two-dimensional gels performed with total yeast
35S-labeled extracts from wild type in standard condition
(first column), wild type in stress condition (second
column), and rpb4 in stress condition (third
column). The standard condition is a log growth phase at 25 °C.
Stress conditions were: oxidative stress (0.4 mM
H2O2) (A), osmotic stress (0.7 M NaCl) (B) and post-diauxic phase
(C). For each condition, a representative region of the
autoradiograms were blown up, and induced proteins were indicated by
their name and an arrow. ACT1 was used as
internal standard to normalize for the differences in labeling
efficiency and loading on two-dimensional gels.
These results indicate that the rpb4 null strain, which is defective in heat shock response, is not impaired in other stress responses at 24 °C. To confirm this point, we tested whether the mutant showed a normal oxidative stress response at 38 °C. The cells were shifted from 24 to 38 °C and after 5 min were treated with 0.4 mM H2O2. When this treatment was applied to the wild type strain, a strong induction of both heat shock and oxidative stress proteins was observed. In sharp contrast, no induction of either the heat shock proteins or the oxidative stress proteins was evidenced in the rpb4 null mutant (data not shown). The fact that the oxidative stress response which was unaffected at 24 °C became defective at 38 °C suggested that the ability of the mutant to respond to stress was suppressed at high temperatures.
We reasoned that a thermosensitive Pol II mutant would probably have a deficiency in heat shock response similar to the defect observed in rpb4 null strain. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the heat shock response of a well characterized Pol II mutant, rpb1-1 (strain RY 260), which affects the largest Pol II subunit and stops rapidly mRNA synthesis when shifted to 37 °C (9). The relevant two-dimensional gel electrophoresis is shown in Fig. 1D. No heat shock protein was induced after the temperature shift, indicating that the defect in mRNA synthesis appears quickly after the shift to the restrictive temperature. Moreover, proteins like Yef3p, which are repressed in the wild type strain, were not repressed in rpb1-1 strain as in the case of the rpb4 null strain (Fig. 1C). Thus, the protein expression pattern of the two pol II mutants rpb4 null and rpb1-1 under heat shock condition are strikingly similar, suggesting that rpb4 null mutant, like rpb1-1 has a general transcriptional defect at the restrictive temperature.
A more direct method to test the functional defect of Pol II consists
to analyze the in vivo Pol II activity after transfer to
restrictive temperature. A mutant having a defective Pol II should
present a rapid shutdown of mRNA synthesis after the shift leading
to a decrease of mRNA levels (9). We examined by Northern blot
analysis, the level of three selected mRNAs (DED1,
STE2, and ACT1) in rpb4 null mutant
after a shift to 38 °C (Fig. 3). The
experiment was standardized with 25 S rRNA, which is a Pol I transcript
not immediately affected by a Pol II defect (9). The results showed
that DED1 and STE2 mRNAs decreased rapidly after the shift, consistent with their short half-lives (9, 17);
ACT1 mRNA levels decreased more slowly with a deduced
half-life of about 30 min. The rpb1-1 strain behaved
similarly. In contrast, in the wild type control experiment, mRNA
level decreased slightly 15 min after the temperature shift and resumed
to the basal level after 1 h. Thus, the rapid decrease of these
three individual mRNAs in the mutant strains demonstrates that
these mRNAs are no longer synthesized after the temperature shift.
This result can be extended to all mRNAs, since Choder and Young
(7) analyzed total poly(A)+ RNA and showed that the
rpb4 null mutant rapidly ceases global mRNA synthesis
after a shift to 37 °C. Altogether, these data showing arrest of
individual and global mRNA synthesis demonstrate that it is the
activity of Pol II that is temperature-sensitive in the rpb4
null mutant. This result is also consistent with experiments showing that Pol II activity of this mutant is temperature-sensitive in vitro (8).
|
The rpb4 null mutant is not impaired in stress response, but
has a Pol II defective at restrictive temperature. Usually, a mutation
in an essential gene can generate a conditional defect in the function
of the encoded protein. This general case is exemplified by the
rpb1-1 mutant. Paradoxically, in this work, the conditional defect of Pol II is due to the absence of a polymerase subunit. This
defect can be due either to the heat inactivation of the polymerase or
to the degradation of the polymerase devoid of Rpb4p when subjected to
high temperature. This last possibility can be excluded, since after
heat inactivation for 15 min, Pol II can regain full transcriptional
activity in less than 10 min after the temperature is shifted back to
24 °C as demonstrated by the rapid recovery of DED1
mRNA synthesis (data not shown). Rpb4p has then no role in
preventing Pol II degradation but is probably required to prevent the
inactivation of the enzyme or of one of its essential subunits. Rpb4p
has been shown to interact with Rpb7p by biochemical and two-hybrid
experiments (1, 3). Moreover, Edwards et al. (2) showed that
Rpb7p subunit dissociated from Pol II when the polymerase was purified
from rpb4 null extracts, suggesting that a role of Rpb4p is
to stabilize Rpb7p in the Pol II. According to this hypothesis, at
permissive temperature, Rpb7p would continue to interact weakly with
Pol II in the absence of Rpb4p; at restrictive temperatures, the
interaction between Rpb7p and Pol II would become too weak, leading to
the dissociation of Rbp7p and to the inactivation of the enzyme. In
that case, the overexpression of Rpb7p would compensate its weak
interaction with the defective Pol II and rescue its activity. To
examine this possibility, we overexpressed Rpb7p on a 2-µm plasmid in the rpb4 null strain and tested the temperature sensitivity
of this strain (Fig. 4): whereas the
rpb4 null strain was unable to grow at 33 and 34 °C, its
growth resumed at these temperatures when Rpb7p is overexpressed. The
suppression was partial, since Rpb7p overexpression did not allow
growth of rpb4 null strain at higher temperatures (data not
shown). These data are consistent with a role for Rpb4p in the
stabilization of Rpb7p-Pol II interactions. Thus, Rpb4p would play a
structural role in maintaining Rpb7p in the complex. Functionally,
Rpb4p may act as a specific chaperone for Pol II. However, whereas
chaperones are generally induced by heat shock condition,
RPB4 is neither induced in heat shock condition nor in any
other stress conditions tested (18, 19).
|
Due to its conditional defect in mRNA transcription, the rpb4 null mutant can be used, as rpb1-1, to measure mRNA half-lives (20-22). Interestingly, deleting RPB4 gene in a specific genetic background is much easier and less time consuming than the construction of the rpb1-1 mutation. Moreover, since the heat inactivation of Pol II from rpb4 null mutant is reversible in vivo, the mutant could be an interesting tool to analyze the cellular response to environmental modifications in absence of Pol II transcription and then in absence of synthesis of responsive proteins. This type of analysis usually requires the use of transcriptional or translational inhibitors that may interfere with the cellular response investigated (20, 23). For example, we analyzed the sensitivity of rpb4 null strain to a severe heat shock (shift from 24 to 50 °C for 15 min) and found no significant difference with the wild type strain (Table I). In the same way, the mutant transferred to 38 °C is as resistant to oxidative stress (1 or 3 mM H2O2 for 1 h) as the wild type strain. These data indicate that the cell survival to these stresses is not dependent upon transcription and induction of stress proteins. Concerning heat shock, this conclusion is in agreement with previous results obtained with cycloheximide, a translational inhibitor (24). However, in the case of oxidative stress, this finding seems inconsistent with the property of the strain deprived of the transcriptional factor Yap1p: this mutant is unable to induce a part of the H2O2 stimulon (25) and is sensitive to H2O2 (26), whereas the rpb4 null strain, which is impaired in the induction of the entire stimulon, is not sensitive. This paradox could be explained knowing that the basal amount of proteins with antioxidant and protective functions (Ahp1p, Sod1p, Ssa1p, Trr1p, Tsa1p, Zwf1p) is lower in the yap1 null mutant than in the wild type (27) and the rpb4 null strains. We also examined if the rpb4 null strain is able to acquire resistance to high temperature by pretreatment with a mild heat shock (thermotolerance). As shown in Table I, this property of the wild type strain is partly impaired in the rpb4 null strain, indicating that full thermotolerance requires the synthesis of a new set of proteins. Accordingly, previous reports have demonstrated that the expression of one protein, Hsp104p, is essential in this process (28-30). We also showed that a mild heat shock allowed wild type cells to survive to 3 mM H2O2 (23) but this adaptation property was lost in the mutant. Then, whereas resistance to H2O2 does not necessitate any transcriptional event, the process allowing cells to adapt to more severe oxidative stresses does require an adequate transcriptional response. This strongly suggests that the capacity of cells to survive stresses is mainly dependent upon the amount of protective proteins present in the cells before the stress and that the gene expression induced by the stress aims essentially at protecting the cells toward forseeable more adverse conditions.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank M. Choder for strains; E. Boy-Marcotte, P. Thuriaux, and M. Toledano for support and critical reading of the manuscript; M. Siaut, M. Goussot, M. Saraiva, A. M. Deschampesme, S. Labarre, and G. Lagniel for support and encouragements.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by a fellowship from the Région Ile de France (to I. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Service de Biochimie
et Génétique Moléculaire, Bât 142, CEA-Saclay,
F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France. Tel.: 33-1-69-08-22-31; Fax:
33-1-69-08-47-12; E-mail: labarre@jonas.saclay.cea.fr.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviation used is: Pol II, polymerase II.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ruet, A.,
Sentenac, A.,
Fromageot, P.,
Winsor, B.,
and Lacroute, F.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
6450-6455 |
| 2. |
Edwards, A. M.,
Kane, C. M.,
Young, R. A.,
and Kornberg, R. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
71-75 |
| 3. | Khazak, V., Sadhale, P. P., Woychik, N. A., Brent, R., and Golemis, E. A. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 759-775[Abstract] |
| 4. | Jensen, G. J., Meredith, G., Bushnell, D. A., and Kornberg, R. D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2353-2358[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Asturias, F. J., Meredith, G. D., Poglitsch, C. L., and Kornberg, R. D. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 272, 536-540[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Woychik, N. A., and Young, R. A. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 347-351[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Choder, M.,
and Young, R. A.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6984-6991 |
| 8. |
Rosenheck, S.,
and Choder, M.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
6187-6192 |
| 9. |
Nonet, M.,
Scafe, C.,
Sexton, J.,
and Young, R.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
1602-1611 |
| 10. | Boy-Marcotte, E., Tadi, D., Perrot, M., Boucherie, H., and Jacquet, M. (1996) Microbiology 142, 459-467[Abstract] |
| 11. |
Maillet, I.,
Lagniel, G.,
Perrot, M.,
Boucherie, H.,
and Labarre, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10263-10270 |
| 12. | Gietz, R. D., Schiestl, R. H., Willems, A. R., and Woods, R. A. (1995) Yeast 11, 355-360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Schmitt, M. E.,
Brown, T. A.,
and Trumpower, B. L.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
3091-3092 |
| 14. |
Woychik, N. A.,
and Young, R. A.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
2854-2859 |
| 15. |
Godon, C.,
Lagniel, G.,
Lee, J.,
Buhler, J. M.,
Kieffer, S.,
Perrot, M.,
Boucherie, H.,
Toledano, M. B.,
and Labarre, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22480-22489 |
| 16. | Norbeck, J., and Blomberg, A. (1995) Electrophoresis 16, 149-156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Herrick, D.,
Parker, R.,
and Jacobson, A.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
2269-2284 |
| 18. | Moskvina, E., Schuller, C., Maurer, C. T., Mager, W. H., and Ruis, H. (1998) Yeast 14, 1041-1050[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Treger, J. M.,
Schmitt, A. P.,
Simon, J. R.,
and McEntee, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26875-26879 |
| 20. |
Caponigro, G.,
and Parker, R.
(1996)
Microbiol. Rev.
60,
233-249 |
| 21. |
Thompson, C. M.,
and Young, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4587-4590 |
| 22. | Parker, R., Herrick, D., Peltz, S. W., and Jacobson, A. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194, 415-423[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Collinson, L. P., and Dawes, I. W. (1992) J. Gen. Microbiol. 138, 329-335[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | De Virgilio, C., Piper, P., Boller, T., and Wiemken, A. (1991) FEBS Lett. 288, 86-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Lee, J.,
Godon, C.,
Lagniel, G.,
Spector, D.,
Garin, J.,
Labarre, J.,
and Toledano, M. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16040-16046 |
| 26. | Schnell, N., Krems, B., and Entian, K. D. (1992) Curr. Genet. 21, 269-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Lee, D. H., Sherman, M. Y., and Goldberg, A. L. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4773-4781[Abstract] |
| 28. |
Sanchez, Y.,
and Lindquist, S. L.
(1990)
Science
248,
1112-1115 |
| 29. |
Lindquist, S.,
and Kim, G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5301-5306 |
| 30. | Elliott, B., Haltiwanger, R. S., and Futcher, B. (1996) Genetics 144, 923-933[Abstract] |
| 31. | Boy-Marcotte, E., Lagniel, G., Perrot, M., Bussereau, F., Boudsocq, A., Jacquet, M., and Labarre, J. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 33, in press |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Gibney, T. Fries, S. M. Bailer, and K. A. Morano Rtr1 Is the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homolog of a Novel Family of RNA Polymerase II-Binding Proteins Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2008; 7(6): 938 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Runner, V. Podolny, and S. Buratowski The Rpb4 Subunit of RNA Polymerase II Contributes to Cotranscriptional Recruitment of 3' Processing Factors Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2008; 28(6): 1883 - 1891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lotan, V. G. Bar-On, L. Harel-Sharvit, L. Duek, D. Melamed, and M. Choder The RNA polymerase II subunit Rpb4p mediates decay of a specific class of mRNAs Genes & Dev., December 15, 2005; 19(24): 3004 - 3016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Singh, N. Rekha, B. Pillai, V. Singh, A. Naorem, V. Sampath, N. Srinivasan, and P. P. Sadhale Domainal organization of the lower eukaryotic homologs of the yeast RNA polymerase II core subunit Rpb7 reflects functional conservation Nucleic Acids Res., January 2, 2004; 32(1): 201 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sampath, N. Rekha, N. Srinivasan, and P. Sadhale The Conserved and Non-conserved Regions of Rpb4 Are Involved in Multiple Phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51566 - 51576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mitsuzawa, E. Kanda, and A. Ishihama Rpb7 subunit of RNA polymerase II interacts with an RNA-binding protein involved in processing of transcripts Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2003; 31(16): 4696 - 4701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Farago, T. Nahari, C. Hammel, C. N. Cole, and M. Choder Rpb4p, a Subunit of RNA Polymerase II, Mediates mRNA Export during Stress Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2003; 14(7): 2744 - 2755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Armache, H. Kettenberger, and P. Cramer Architecture of initiation-competent 12-subunit RNA polymerase II PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 6964 - 6968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Tan, M. H. Prysak, and N. A. Woychik Loss of the Rpb4/Rpb7 Subcomplex in a Mutant Form of the Rpb6 Subunit Shared by RNA Polymerases I, II, and III Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2003; 23(9): 3329 - 3338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pillai, J. Verma, A. Abraham, P. Francis, Y. Kumar, U. Tatu, S. K. Brahmachari, and P. P. Sadhale Whole Genome Expression Profiles of Yeast RNA Polymerase II Core Subunit, Rpb4, in Stress and Nonstress Conditions J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3339 - 3346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Siaut, C. Zaros, E. Levivier, M.-L. Ferri, M. Court, M. Werner, I. Callebaut, P. Thuriaux, A. Sentenac, and C. Conesa An Rpb4/Rpb7-Like Complex in Yeast RNA Polymerase III Contains the Orthologue of Mammalian CGRP-RCP Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 195 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kimura, H. Suzuki, and A. Ishihama Formation of a Carboxy-Terminal Domain Phosphatase (Fcp1)/TFIIF/RNA Polymerase II (pol II) Complex in Schizosaccharomyces pombe Involves Direct Interaction between Fcp1 and the Rpb4 Subunit of pol II Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2002; 22(5): 1577 - 1588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Miyao, J. D. Barnett, and N. A. Woychik Deletion of the RNA Polymerase Subunit RPB4 Acts as a Global, Not Stress-specific, Shut-off Switch for RNA Polymerase II Transcription at High Temperatures J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 46408 - 46413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Tan, X. Li, P. P. Sadhale, T. Miyao, and N. A. Woychik Multiple Mechanisms of Suppression Circumvent Transcription Defects in an RNA Polymerase Mutant Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(21): 8124 - 8133. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Werner, J. J. Eloranta, and R. O. J. Weinzierl Archaeal RNA polymerase subunits F and P are bona fide homologs of eukaryotic RPB4 and RPB12 Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2000; 28(21): 4299 - 4305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Orlicky, P. T. Tran, M. H. Sayre, and A. M. Edwards Dissociable Rpb4-Rpb7 Subassembly of RNA Polymerase II Binds to Single-strand Nucleic Acid and Mediates a Post-recruitment Step in Transcription Initiation J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2001; 276(13): 10097 - 10102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pillai, V. Sampath, N. Sharma, and P. Sadhale Rpb4, a Non-essential Subunit of Core RNA Polymerase II of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Important for Activated Transcription of a Subset of Genes J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2001; 276(33): 30641 - 30647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||