![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 32, 22679-22685, August 6, 1999
From the Department of Pathology, Yale University Medical School,
New Haven, Connecticut 06520 and the Matrix metalloproteinase activity is instrumental
in processes of cellular invasion. The interstitial invasion of
endothelial cells during angiogenesis is accompanied by up-regulation
of several matrix metalloproteinases, including membrane type 1 matrix
metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP). In this study, we show that endothelial
cells stimulated to undergo angiogenesis by a three-dimensional
extracellular matrix environment increase production of the
transcription factor Egr-1. Increased binding of Egr-1 to the MT1-MMP
promoter correlates with enhanced transcriptional activity, whereas
mutations in the Egr-1 binding site abrogate the increased
transcription of MT1-MMP in the stimulated cells. These data identify
Egr-1-mediated transcription of MT1-MMP as a mechanism by which
endothelial cells can initiate an invasive phenotype in response to an
alteration in extracellular matrix environment, thus functionally
associating MT1-MMP with a growing number of proteins known to be
up-regulated by Egr-1 in response to tissue injury or mechanical stress.
Angiogenesis is a critical component of the adaptations that occur
in response to chronic increases in metabolic activity within tissues
or tumors (1, 2). Defining the regulation of genes involved in early
stages of angiogenesis is fundamental to our understanding of this
process and to the selection of target control points for therapeutics
intended either to augment or to inhibit growth of new blood vessels.
Proteolysis of the capillary basement membrane is thought to be a
prerequisite for subsequent invasion and migration of capillary
endothelial cells into the interstitium, where new capillaries are
established (1). Thus, regulation of protease production by endothelial
cells represents a potentially powerful control point in the
angiogenesis pathway. Matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs)1 comprise a family of
structurally related zinc endopeptidases capable of proteolysis of
numerous components of the extracellular matrix as well as nonmatrix
molecules (3). Production and activation of MMPs correlates strongly
with migratory and invasive behavior in many cell types, including
endothelium (4, 5).
The membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs), which contain a
membrane spanning domain, play a unique role compared with secreted
MMPs because their cell membrane location focuses extracellular matrix
proteolysis on the cell surface, and perhaps specific subdomains of the
cell surface, such as the leading edge of a migrating cell (6). The
most ubiquitous and well characterized MT-MMP, MT1-MMP (MMP-14), is
known to have substrate specificity for diverse extracellular matrices
including collagens type I and III, fibronectin, and tenascin (7).
MT1-MMP was demonstrated recently to be an effective activator of
fibrin, implicating it as an important player in fibrinolytic cascades
(8). In addition to its direct proteolysis of extracellular matrix
components, MT1-MMP, together with tissue inhibitor of matrix
metalloproteinases-2, has been shown to play a pivotal role in the cell
surface tethering and activation of pro-MMP-2 (9, 10). In many tissues,
MMP-2 is produced constitutively, but is found almost entirely in
latent form. MT1-MMP mRNA and protein levels are very low in most
noninvasive cells but are up-regulated in invasive cells, and this
up-regulation correlates with increased activation of MMP-2 (11). Thus,
production of MT1-MMP likely is a major rate-limiting component of
MMP-2 activation.
Despite the correlation between MT1-MMP levels and invasive phenotype,
very little is known about the mechanisms underlying transcriptional
regulation of MT1-MMP mRNA. Our previous studies showed that
up-regulation of MT1-MMP mRNA and protein occurs in microvascular
endothelial cells cultured in a malleable three-dimensional (3D) type I
collagen matrix (12). Under these conditions, the cells adhere to and
reorganize the matrix, establishing tractional forces that, in turn,
elicit invasive and angiogenic behaviors including cell elongation and
migration within the extracellular matrix to form multicell networks
and tubular structures. Production of MT1-MMP correlates with this
phenotype, and treatment of these cultures with MMP inhibitors or
antibodies greatly reduces the ability of these cells to form
capillary-like structures (12-14) Furthermore, invasion and migration
of fibroblasts and carcinoma cells have been attributed to
three-dimensional type I collagen-induced up-regulation of MMPs,
including MT1-MMP, implying that extracellular matrix-dependent signaling may be an important means by
which multiple cell types regulate production of MT1-MMP (15-17).
Taken together with other studies that have examined the effects of tractional force-dependent mechanical stress on cell
behavior (18, 19), there is extensive evidence that adhesion-mediated mechanical forces play a critical role in determining cell phenotype, and in particular, affecting protease production.
In this study, we investigated the regulatory mechanisms underlying
transcriptional up-regulation of MT1-MMP in endothelial cells under
noninvasive or invasive conditions. We found that 3D collagen
matrix-induced MT1-MMP transcriptional activity occurred as a
consequence of increased production and promoter binding of the
transcription factor Egr-1. This finding is notable because it defines
a mechanism for extracellular matrix/mechanical force-sensitive transcriptional regulation of MT1-MMP production and it links MT1-MMP
to numerous vascular cell gene products involved in tissue remodeling
that also are up-regulated by Egr-1 as a result of mechanical stress.
Analysis of Genomic Clone--
A genomic clone of murine MT1-MMP
(pm145) in pBluescript SK containing 4.7 kilobases of 5'-flanking and
untranslated sequence, exon 1 and part of intron 1 (20) was sequenced
bidirectionally using automated dye-labeled sequencing (Keck facility,
Yale University). The sequence was analyzed using the TRANSFAC data
base (21) to identify potential transcription factor binding sites.
Ribonuclease protection assays were performed to locate the
5'-transcription start site(s). Probes were generated by subcloning a
PstI-SacII fragment of pm145 (360-base pair
fragment from MT1-MMP mRNA Half-life Estimation--
MT1-MMP mRNA
half-life was estimated using RNA harvested from cultured rat
microvascular endothelial cells exposed to actinomycin D (ActD) (10 µg/ml). Microvascular endothelial cells were isolated from rat
epididymal fat pad and cultured as described previously (22). For
experiments, cells were either plated as a monolayer on type I collagen
(2D culture) or embedded within a three-dimensional collagen matrix (3D
culture) (23). After 1 day of culture in these conditions, ActD was
added to all cultures. RNA was harvested from cells after 0, 4, 8, 12, and 18 h of ActD treatment, and samples were analyzed by Northern
blotting (12). Following autoradiography, films were scanned, and
MT1-MMP mRNA band intensity was quantitated using Biomax software
(Kodak) and normalized to 28 S ribosomal RNA. Intensities were
expressed as a ratio to the 0 h samples. Results from four
experiments were averaged and expressed as mean ± S.E. mRNA
half-life was estimated using a linear regression best-fit to
mathematically define the decay profile (Cricket Graph 1.1).
Constructs--
Restriction enzyme-generated fragments of the
MT1-MMP genomic clone (SacII site at position
Transient Transfections--
Lipofectamine-based transient
transfections of MT1-MMP promoter sequences and
In a second series of experiments, either Egr-1-pcDNA3 or
pcDNA3 was transiently co-transfected into COS-1 cells together with Northern and Western Blots--
Northern blots for Sp1 and Egr-1
mRNA were performed on total RNA harvested from endothelial cells
cultured for 20 h in either 2D or 3D conditions, using probes
constructed from the Egr-1 expression vector and from murine Sp1
cDNA kindly provided by Dr. Mural Mouradian (National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, MD), and analyzed as detailed above. Endothelial and
COS-1 cells were lysed in 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 1%
Nonidet P-40 in phosphate-buffered saline in the presence of protease
inhibitors (Complete mixture; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and
Western blotting was done using polyclonal antibodies against Sp1 and
Egr-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Histone H1 (Anti-histone H1;
Pharmingen) or vimentin levels in the lysates were used to normalize
loading variations among samples. Enhanced chemiluminescence detection
(Pierce) was performed according to the manufacturer's directions.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays--
Consensus Sp1 and
Egr-1 binding double-stranded oligonucleotides (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology), and complimentary oligonucleotides corresponding to
base pairs Statistics--
Statistical significance for each data set was
tested using the paired, two-tailed Student's t test, with
the significance level set at p < 0.05 (Excel 5.0 software for the Power Mac).
Sequencing of a genomic clone containing 3.3 kilobases of the
murine MT1-MMP 5' noncoding region showed that this gene lacks a TATA
box (Fig. 1A). Consensus
binding sites for transcription factors include Sp1, Egr-1, AP-4,
NF Previously, we demonstrated a significant 3.2 ± 1.1-fold increase
in MT1-MMP mRNA in primary cultures of rat microvascular endothelial cells stimulated to an invasive phenotype by culture within
a 3D type I collagen matrix as compared with noninvasive cells cultured
on a planar coating of type I collagen (2D) (12). Estimations of
MT1-MMP mRNA half-life showed no significant differences when
comparing 2D and 3D cultured cells (t1/2 = 26 and
27 h, respectively), suggesting that transcriptional control of
MT1-MMP is likely a major contributor to the difference in mRNA
levels seen between 2D and 3D cultures (Fig.
2A).
Egr-1 Mediates Extracellular Matrix-driven Transcription of
Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase in Endothelium*
, and
Department of
Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic
Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
395 to
39 from ATG) into Bluescript followed by
transcription with either T7 or T3 polymerase to generate sense and
antisense riboprobes labeled with [32P]UTP, which were
gel-purified prior to use in ribonuclease protection assays. The RPAII
kit (Ambion) was used according to manufacturer's directions, using
20-40 µg of total RNA (isolated from NIH 3T3 cells, day 11 mouse
embryo, or mouse placenta) and 1.5 × 105 cpm of probe
per sample. Samples were analyzed first on a 11 × 15-cm 5%
acrylamide denaturing gel and then on a 8% acrylamide denaturing
sequencing gel to provide better size resolution of the protected
fragments. Ambion century markers and [
-32P]dATP
end-labeled 10- and 25-base pair DNA ladders were used as size markers.
The assay was repeated five times using multiple preparations of RNA
and probes. Start sites were calculated by approximating the band size
of each protected fragment and calculating their corresponding
distances from the ATG codon, with the assumption that RNase
degradation occurred only from the 5'-end of the probe.
39 as the
3'-end) were subcloned into the pGL3 Basic reporter vector (Promega)
for use in transient transfection assays. Additional truncation
constructs of the MT1-MMP-luciferase constructs were generated using
Erase-a-Base (Promega) and sequenced to define the sites of the
resultant truncations. Mutations of the Egr-1 and Sp1 binding sites
(refer to Fig. 4A) were made to the
300-base pair
truncation construct using site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene) and
confirmed by sequencing.
-Galactosidase cDNA (originating from pCMV
)
(CLONTECH) was subcloned into pcDNA3
(Invitrogen) for use as a normalization vector for transient
transfections (
-galactosidase-pcDNA3). An Egr-1-pcDNA3
expression vector was generated using the full-length human Egr-1
coding sequence kindly provided by Dr. Vikas Sukhatme (Harvard Medical
School, Boston, MA).
-galactosidase-pcDNA3 were performed on primary cultures of rat
microvascular endothelial cells (passages 5-9), according to
manufacturer's directions (Life Technologies, Inc.). On day 2, cells
were trypsinized and split into 2D and 3D culture conditions (23). On
day 3, cells were lysed in reporter lysis buffer (Promega) and assayed
for luciferase (luciferase assay system; Promega) and
-galactosidase
activity (Galacto-Light Plus; Tropix) according to the manufacturers'
directions. Luminescence was detected with a Lumat 9500 (EG&G Wallac).
Data were normalized for
-galactosidase activity and then expressed
as fold increase in comparison to the light output of pGL3 Basic
(promoterless, enhancerless luciferase construct) samples. Results from
four independent experiments, each with duplicate wells, were averaged.
-galactosidase-pcDNA3 and either pGL3-Basic or
MT1-MMP(
300)-luciferase. Cells were lysed after 48 h and assayed
for luciferase activity as described above.
303 to
284 (wild-type) and
309 to
276 (mutants)
(synthesized by Critical Technologies Laboratory, Yale University; see
Fig. 4A for sequence details) of the MT1-MMP promoter were
annealed and end-labeled using [32P]ATP. Enriched sources
of Egr-1 (in vitro transcribed and translated using Promega
TNT system) and recombinant Sp1 (Promega) were used to define the
binding patterns of these transcription factors to wild-type and
mutated MT1-MMP oligonucleotide sequences. Nuclear extracts of
endothelial cells cultured in two or three dimensions (20 h) were
prepared using a mini-extraction procedure, with modifications (24). 3D
cultures were treated with ActD (10 µg/ml), treated with collagenase
for 15 min to release cells from the gel, and then pelleted and
resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline containing protease
inhibitors. 2D endothelial cells were treated with ActD and then
scraped into phosphate-buffered saline containing protease inhibitors.
Both samples were pelleted, resuspended in 400 µl of hypotonic buffer
(10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1× Complete mixture, 0.5 mM sodium
orthovanadate). After a 15-min incubation on ice, 25 µl of 10%
Nonidet P-40 was added, and the cell suspension was incubated for 5 min
on ice and then pelleted (700 × g for 5 min). The
crude nuclear pellet was resuspended and incubated for 20 min in
hypertonic solution (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 420 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1× Complete mixture, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate). After a 15-min spin (14,000 × g), glycerol was added to the supernatant (final
concentration, 10% (v/v)), protein concentration was determined using
BCA (Pierce), and extracts were used immediately in EMSA reactions or
were frozen (
80 °C). Gel shift reactions consisted of 5 × 104 cpm oligonucleotide probe, binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol), 1 µg of poly(dI·dC), 500 ng of salmon sperm DNA, 1 µl of TNT
reaction or recombinant Sp1, or 5-10 µg of cellular lysate. For
supershift assays, 1-2 µl of the appropriate antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) was added to the reaction and incubated for 15 min prior
to gel loading. Reactions were electrophoresed on a 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel followed by autoradiography.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B, and Nkx-2 (murine tinman homolog) but not AP-1 or AP-2, and
there are no typical transforming growth factor-
, hypoxia, or shear
stress response elements. The apparent absence of both a TATA box and
common phorbol ester- and growth factor-inducible elements within the
murine MT1-MMP promoter region are characteristics shared with the
MMP-2 promoter but contrast with most other MMP genes, which are known
to be regulated strongly by AP-1, AP-2, and transforming growth
factor-
responses (25, 26). Multiple transcription start sites, as identified by ribonuclease protection assay, were localized to a region
260 to
200 base pairs 5' of the ATG codon (Fig. 1B). The
use of a cluster of multiple start sites is consistent with a TATA-less
promoter.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Analysis of the murine MT1-MMP 5' noncoding
region. A, the sequence of the noncoding region of
MT1-MMP and locations of consensus transcription factor binding sites
and transcription start sites (arrows) are shown.
B, transcription start sites were defined using ribonuclease
protection assay. Multiple protected fragments (arrows)
correspond to a cluster of start sites at the positions indicated
(relative to the ATG codon). Blot shown is representative of five
experiments.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
MT1-MMP mRNA half-life and
transcriptional activity in 2D- and 3D-stimulated cells.
A, MT1-MMP mRNA half-life in 2D and 3D endothelial cells
was estimated by analysis of mRNA decay time course following ActD
treatment of 2D and 3D cells. Open circles and closed
circles delineate 2D and 3D MT1-MMP mRNA profiles,
respectively. RNA blots (n = 4) were probed with a
MT1-MMP cDNA probe and analyzed using densitometry, with the band
intensity at each time point calculated as a ratio to the time 0 point
(mean ± S.E.). Estimated MT1-MMP mRNA decay curves were not
significantly different between 2D (t1/2 = 26 h) and 3D (t1/2 = 27 h) cultured cells
(p > 0.05). B, transcriptional activities
of full-length and truncated MT1-MMP promoter-luciferase constructs
were tested in 2D (open bars) and 3D (hatched
bars)-stimulated endothelial cells. Luciferase activities of each
sample were normalized to
-galactosidase activity and then expressed
as fold increase above promoterless luciferase activity (Basic).
Vertical bar to the left of the graph shows the
location of consensus transcription factor sites relative to the
truncations. Results are presented as mean ± S.E. of four
independent experiments.
Transcriptional activity of the MT1-MMP promoter region was assessed in
endothelial cells using full-length and truncated promoter sequences
coupled to the reporter gene encoding luciferase. Comparisons were made
between the transcriptional activity of cells cultured in 2D with that
of cells in 3D. The full-length MT1-MMP promoter activity was 2.4-fold
higher in 3D compared with 2D cells (Fig. 2B). Although
transcriptional activity varied moderately with truncations of distal
5' noncoding regions, the region between
300 and
220 base pair was
sufficient to provide both a low level of basal activity in 2D and
2.2-fold enhanced transcriptional activity in 3D, and thus was
considered to contain the nominal elements necessary to enhance
transcription in 3D-stimulated endothelial cells.
Within the region between
300 and
220 lies a GC-rich sequence
(
288 to
275) that contains overlapping consensus binding sites for
Sp1 and Egr-1. It has been demonstrated that Sp1 and Egr-1 compete for
binding to such regions, with higher levels of transcription occurring
when Egr-1 rather than Sp1 is bound to the promoter (27). Applying the
hypothesis that a similar pattern of Sp1 and Egr-1 control would be
involved in regulation of the MT1-MMP promoter, the endogenous levels
of Sp1 and Egr-1 were assessed in 2D and 3D cultures of rat
microvascular endothelial cells. Egr-1 and Sp1 mRNA and protein
products were detectable in both 2D and 3D conditions. After 20 h
of 3D culture, Egr-1 mRNA was 2.2 ± 0.2-fold greater than in
2D cultured cells, whereas Sp1 mRNA was 0.62 ± 0.13 that of
2D cultured cells (Fig. 3A). Similarly, Sp1 protein levels in 3D were unchanged (0.99 ± 0.14), whereas Egr-1 protein levels were increased 2.2 ± 0.18-fold in 3D
(Fig. 3B), providing support for the involvement of Egr-1
rather than Sp1 in mediating the 3D collagen matrix induction of
MT1-MMP.
|
EMSA analyses, using oligonucleotides containing either wild-type or
mutated MT1-MMP promoter sequences (Fig.
4A), were performed to
determine Egr-1 and Sp1 binding profiles. Recombinant Egr-1 interacted
with the wild-type MT1-MMP oligonucleotide and could be supershifted
with specific antibodies to Egr-1 (Fig. 4B). Mutant oligonucleotides 1 and 3, both containing a GG to TA mutation within
the Egr-1 binding site, blocked Egr-1 binding. Binding of Egr-1 to
mutant 2 (GG to TA mutation in the 5' Sp1 site) was unaffected. Mutant
4 (multiple G to T point mutations within both Sp1 and Egr-1 sites)
allowed partial binding of Egr-1. Recombinant Sp1 also bound to the
MT1-MMP wild-type oligonucleotide (Fig. 4B). Antibodies to
Sp1 depleted the Sp1 gel shift band. Sp1 interacted strongly with
mutant sequences 2 and 3, very weakly with mutant 1, and not at all
with mutant 4. Recombinant AP2, which also binds to a GC-rich sequence
(5'-CCCCAGGC-3') did not shift the MT1-MMP oligonucleotide (data not
shown).
|
We next assessed the gel-shift profiles of nuclear extracts from 2D and
3D endothelial cells. A gel-shift complex that could be supershifted
with an Egr-1 antibody was detectable in nuclear extracts of both 2D
and 3D cells (Fig. 4C). However, the Egr-1 gel shift band
was much more prominent in the lanes of 3D-stimulated extract.
Antibodies to Sp1, Ap2
, or WT (Wilms' tumor product) did not
compete off or supershift the gel shifted complexes.
Evidence for functional involvement of Egr-1 in enhancing MT1-MMP
transcription was obtained using two approaches. First, COS-1 cells
were transiently transfected with the MT1-MMP(
300)-luciferase construct in combination with either cDNA encoding full-length Egr-1 (Egr-1-pcDNA3) or the empty expression vector (pcDNA3). Co-transfection with the Egr-1-pcDNA3 construct resulted in
2.7-fold higher activity of the MT1-MMP promoter than was seen for the MT1-MMP promoter in combination with pcDNA3 alone (Fig.
5A).
|
Secondly, we tested the role of endogenous Egr-1 in enhancing
endothelial cell transcription of MT1-MMP in 3D culture. Rat microvascular endothelial cells were transfected with the wild-type MT1-MMP(
300) promoter-luciferase construct or one of four mutated MT1-MMP(
300) promoter constructs, which contained the same series of
mutations in the Egr-1/Sp1 binding sites as used in EMSA (Fig. 4A). Luciferase activities of the mutated constructs were
compared with the wild-type construct following culture of the
endothelial cells in 2D or 3D. As seen in Fig. 2B, wild-type
MT1-MMP promoter constructs exhibited approximately 2.5-fold greater
activity in 3D compared with 2D cells. Mutants 1 and 3, which by EMSA
lacked the ability to interact with Egr-1, failed to exhibit
significantly greater luciferase activity in 3D-stimulated cells.
However, mutants 2 and 4, which provided full or partial binding of
Egr-1 by EMSA, both exhibited significant increases in luciferase
activity in 3D-stimulated cells (Fig. 5B). The ability to
bind Sp1 (mutants 2 and 3) or reduced ability to bind Sp1 (mutants 1 and 4) did not correlate with enhancement of transcription in 3D. Thus,
enhanced MT1-MMP transcription upon 3D stimulation appears to be
dependent on and entirely attributable to binding of Egr-1.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mechanisms underlying transcriptional regulation of MT1-MMP are relevant to understanding the cellular events that trigger the invasive phenotype displayed by endothelial cells during angiogenesis. In particular, the role of matrix-initiated signaling in angiogenesis is recognized but not well understood. We present the novel finding that the transcription factor Egr-1 acts to enhance transcription of MT1-MMP in endothelial cells under conditions that involve mechanical stress exerted via the extracellular matrix and that mimic events involved in angiogenesis.
Egr-1 is known to be an important activator for multiple endothelial
cell genes transcribed during vascular remodeling, including platelet-derived growth factors A and B, tissue factor, and
transforming growth factor-
(27, 28). Those studies demonstrated
that increasing levels of Egr-1 displaced the basal transcription
factor Sp1 from the promoter, resulting in a significantly greater rate of transcription. The results of our analysis suggest that
transcriptional regulation of MT1-MMP in endothelial cells is similar
to but not entirely consistent with this paradigm. Although both
recombinant Sp1 and Egr-1 interacted with the MT1-MMP promoter in
EMSAs, we did not see the expected band corresponding to Sp1 binding to the MT1-MMP promoter in 2D cell extracts. Rather, these assays detected
a faint Egr-1/DNA complex in gel shift in the 2D extracts and a
prominent Egr-1/DNA complex in the 3D-stimulated extracts. This
observation implies that the amount of Egr-1 present rather than the
Sp1 to Egr-1 ratio determines transcription rate of MT1-MMP in these
cells. Thus, the increased level of Egr-1 in 3D collagen-stimulated cells results in enhanced transcription of MT1-MMP. However, because the contribution of surrounding DNA sequences on transcription factor
binding is removed in EMSAs, we do not rule out the possible involvement of Sp1 in binding to the MT1-MMP promoter and regulating basal transcription rates. The potential also exists for modulation of
Egr-1-induced transcriptional activity via factors binding to sites
currently uncharacterized in the surrounding regions, as has been
observed with other promoters (28).
Egr-1 levels increase in endothelial cells upon wounding or increased shear stress, or during cyclic mechanical stretching of mesangial cells (27, 29, 30). It is well established that tractional forces develop within collagen matrices as cells attach, elongate, and migrate (19, 31, 32), and it is likely that these forces provide the trigger for production of Egr-1 in our model. Consistent with a mechanical stress induction of Egr-1, and subsequent transcription of MT1-MMP, the time course of increase in Egr-1 and MT1-MMP mRNA upon 3D stimulation (hours rather than minutes) correlates more closely with the processes of cell elongation and matrix contraction rather than with the initial adhesion event.2 Notably, both shear stress and mechanical stretch are hypothesized to trigger angiogenesis in skeletal and coronary muscle in vivo (33), and increased Egr-1 levels are detectable in skeletal muscle under angiogenesis-promoting conditions (34).
The corresponding promoter region of the human MT1-MMP is not yet published, and thus the extent of species-specific differences in transcriptional regulation remains to be determined. It is known that phorbol ester treatment enhances MT1-MMP synthesis 2-3-fold in endothelial cells of human origin but not in rodent cells (12, 14, 35), implying the existence of some unique transcriptional control elements.
Because of the apparent co-regulated production of MT1-MMP and MMP-2 in many cell types, including endothelial cells in 3D culture, the use of common regulatory mechanisms to drive transcription of both genes has been hypothesized. However, we have not found evidence for consensus Egr-1 sites in the rat MMP-2 promoter, and neither are there consensus binding sites within the MT1-MMP promoter for the transcription factor YB1, which is an essential factor for MMP-2 transcription in mesangial cells (36). Thus, although common intracellular signaling pathways may initiate up-regulation of transcription factors required for production of MT1-MMP and MMP-2, it is unlikely that a common transcription factor co-ordinates production of both enzymes. This divergence in signaling could account for the constitutively high levels of MMP-2 and low but inducible levels of MT1-MMP present in many cells versus the constitutively high levels of MT1-MMP and inducible levels of MMP-2 found in other cell types, such as murine T lymphocytes (37). Similarly, production of MT1-MMP and the tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-2 is both spatially and temporally co-ordinated during mouse embryogenesis (20), but a review of the human tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-2 promoter (38) failed to identify consensus Egr-1 binding sites.
By demonstrating MT1-MMP transcriptional regulation via Egr-1, we add
support to the preexisting evidence that Egr-1 is a key transcription
factor involved in the initiation of a migratory and invasive phenotype
in endothelium. We predict that Egr-1-mediated enhancement of MT1-MMP
transcription is not endothelial cell-specific but that similar control
occurs in other cell types that induce MT1-MMP mRNA in response to
a change in extracellular matrix environment (15-17). Will this
include regulation of MT1-MMP production in metastatic tumor cells?
Studies to date on the role of Egr-1 in tumor cell phenotype are
contradictory. One study has linked increased Egr-1 levels to increased
malignancy of prostate tumors (39). However, the majority of studies
define Egr-1 as having a tumor suppressor effect, likely by means of
its antiproliferative and differentiating effects mediated through
induction of transforming growth factor-
(40). Given our evidence
for Egr-1 induction of MT1-MMP in endothelial cells, it will be
worthwhile to examine the possibility that Egr-1 is involved in
maintaining the abnormally high levels of MT1-MMP so frequently
observed in invasive tumor cells.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We appreciate Adeline Tucker's technical assistance with cell culture.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Supported in part by United States Public Health Service Grants RO1-HL5108 (to J. A. M.) and F23-HL09983 (to T. L. H.) and by funding from Cleveland Clinic Foundation (to S. S. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St., LH 115, New Haven, CT 06520. Tel.: 203-785-2763; Fax: 203-785-7303.
2 T. L. Haas, D. Stitelman, S. J. Davis, S. S. Apte, and J. A. Madri, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; MT, membrane-type; 3D, three-dimensional; 2D, two-dimensional; ActD, actinomycin D; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Pepper, M. S.
(1997)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
17,
605-619 |
| 2. | Hanahan, D., and Folkman, J. (1996) Cell 86, 353-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Woessner, J. F., Jr. (1994) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 732, 11-21[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Birkedal-Hansen, H. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 728-735[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Mignatti, P., and Rifkin, D. B. (1996) Enzyme Protein 49, 117-137[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Nakahara, H.,
Howard, L.,
Thompson, E. W.,
Sato, H.,
Seiki, M.,
Yeh, Y.,
and Chen, W. T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7959-7964 |
| 7. | d'Ortho, M. P., Will, H., Atkinson, S., Butler, G., Messent, A., Gavrilovic, J., Smith, B., Timpl, R., Zardi, L., and Murphy, G. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 250, 751-757[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Hiraoka, N., Allen, E., Apel, I. J., Gyetko, M. R., and Weiss, S. J. (1998) Cell 95, 365-377[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Sato, H., Takino, T., Okada, Y., Cao, J., Shinagawa, A., Yamamoto, E., and Seiki, M. (1994) Nature 370, 61-65[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Nagase, H. (1998) Cell Res. 8, 179-186 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Sato, H., Okada, Y., and Seiki, M. (1997) Thromb. Haemostasis 78, 497-500[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Haas, T. L.,
Davis, S. J.,
and Madri, J. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3604-3610 |
| 13. | Montesano, R., and Orci, L. (1985) Cell 42, 469-477[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Chan, V. T., Zhang, D. N., Nagaravapu, U., Hultquist, K., Romero, L. I., and Herron, G. S. (1998) J. Invest. Derm. 111, 1153-1159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Azzam, H. S.,
and Thompson, E. W.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
4540-4544 |
| 16. | Gilles, C., Polette, M., Seiki, M., Birembaut, P., and Thompson, E. W. (1997) Lab. Invest. 76, 651-660[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Tomasek, J. J.,
Halliday, N. L.,
Updike, D. L.,
Ahern-Moore, J. S.,
Vu, T.-K. H.,
Liu, R. W.,
and Howard, E. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7482-7487 |
| 18. | Roskelly, C. D., Srebrow, A., and Bissell, M. J. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 736-747[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Chicurel, M. E., Chen, C. S., and Ingber, D. E. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 232-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Apte, S. S.,
Fukai, N.,
Beier, D. R.,
and Olsen, B. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25511-25517 |
| 21. | Heinemeyer, T., Wingender, E., Reuter, I., Hermjakob, H., Kel, A. E., Kel, O. V., Ignatieva, E. V., Ananko, E. A., Podkolodnaya, O. A., Kolpakov, F. A., Podkolodny, N. L., and Kolchanov, N. A. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 364-370 |
| 22. |
Madri, J. A.,
and Williams, S. K.
(1983)
J. Cell Biol.
97,
153-165 |
| 23. |
Madri, J. A.,
Pratt, B. M.,
and Tucker, A. M.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
106,
1375-1384 |
| 24. | Pang, H., Miranda, K., and Fine, A. (1998) Biochem. J. 333, 209-213 |
| 25. | Vincenti, M. P., White, L. A., Schroen, D. J., Benbow, U., and Brinkerhoff, C. E. (1996) Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expression 6, 391-411[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Crawford, H., and Matrisian, L. M. (1996) Enzyme Protein 49, 20-37[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Khachigian, L. M., Lindner, V., Williams, A. J., and Collins, T. (1996) Science 271, 1427-1431[Abstract] |
| 28. |
Silverman, E. S.,
and Collins, T.
(1999)
Am. J. Pathol.
154,
665-670 |
| 29. | Schwachtgen, J. L., Houston, P., Campbell, C., Sukhatme, V., and Braddock, M. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2540-2549[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Akai, Y.,
Homma, T.,
Burns, K. D.,
Yasuda, T.,
Badr, K. F.,
and Harris, R. C.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
C482-C490 |
| 31. | Vernon, R. B., and Sage, E. H. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 147, 873-883[Abstract] |
| 32. | Chiquet, M., Matthisson, M., Koch, M., Tannheimer, M., and ChiquetEhrimann, R. (1996) Biochem. Cell Biol. 74, 737-744[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Hudlicka, O. (1998) Microcirculation 5, 7-23 |
| 34. | Michel, J. B., Ordway, G. A., Richardson, J. A., and Williams, R. S. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 277-285 |
| 35. | Foda, H. D., George, S., Conner, C., Drews, M., Tompkin, D. C., and Zucker, S. (1996) Lab. Invest. 74, 538-545[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Mertens, P. R.,
Harendza, S.,
Pollock, A. S.,
and Lovett, D. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22905-22912 |
| 37. | Graesser, D., Mahooti, S., Haas, T., Davis, S., Clark, R. B., and Madri, J. A. (1998) Lab. Invest. 78, 1445-1458[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | De Clerck, Y. A., Darville, M. I., Eeckhout, Y., and Rousseau, G. G. (1994) Gene 139, 185-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. |
Eid, M.,
Kumar, M. V.,
Iczkowski, K. A.,
Bostwick, D. G.,
and Tindall, D. J.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
2461-2468 |
| 40. | Liu, C., Calogero, A., Ragona, G., Adamson, E., and Mercola, D. (1996) Crit. Rev. Oncog. 7, 101-125[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Munkert, U. Helmchen, M. J. Kemper, M. Bubenheim, R. A. K. Stahl, and S. Harendza Characterization of the transcriptional regulation of the human MT1-MMP gene and association of risk reduction for focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis with two functional promoter SNPs Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 16, 2008; (2008) gfn576v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mimori, T. Fukagawa, Y. Kosaka, K. Ishikawa, M. Iwatsuki, T. Yokobori, S. Hirasaki, Y. Takatsuno, H. Sakashita, H. Ishii, et al. A Large-Scale Study of MT1-MMP as a Marker for Isolated Tumor Cells in Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow in Gastric Cancer Cases Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2008; 15(10): 2934 - 2942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. W.M. van Hinsbergh and P. Koolwijk Endothelial sprouting and angiogenesis: matrix metalloproteinases in the lead Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2008; 78(2): 203 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Pritchard, S. Roychowdhury, M. R. McMullen, L. Guo, G. E. Arteel, and L. E. Nagy Early growth response-1 contributes to galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver injury in mice Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): G1124 - G1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Misra, H. Lee, A. Singh, K. Huang, R. K. Thimmulappa, W. Mitzner, S. Biswal, and C. G. Tankersley Global expression profiles from C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse lungs to determine aging-related genes Physiol Genomics, November 14, 2007; 31(3): 429 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Haas, J. L. Doyle, M. R. Distasi, L. E. Norton, K. M. Sheridan, and J. L. Unthank Involvement of MMPs in the outward remodeling of collateral mesenteric arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2429 - H2437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-J. Li, W. Ning, M. A. Matthay, C. A. Feghali-Bostwick, and A. M. K. Choi MAPK pathway mediates EGR-1-HSP70-dependent cigarette smoke-induced chemokine production Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): L1297 - L1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Miller, M. J. Nolan, J. Choi, T. Koga, X. Shen, B. Y. J. T. Yue, and P. A. Knepper Lactate Treatment Causes NF-{kappa}B Activation and CD44 Shedding in Cultured Trabecular Meshwork Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1615 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Park, A. Kim, J.-H. Oh, and A.-S. Chung Methylseleninic acid inhibits PMA-stimulated pro-MMP-2 activation mediated by MT1-MMP expression and further tumor invasion through suppression of NF-{kappa}B activation Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 837 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Ning, Y. Dong, J. Sun, C. Li, M. A. Matthay, C. A. Feghali-Bostwick, and A. M. K. Choi Cigarette Smoke Stimulates Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Activity via EGR-1 in Human Lung Fibroblasts Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2007; 36(4): 480 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Barbolina, B. P. Adley, E. V. Ariztia, Y. Liu, and M. S. Stack Microenvironmental Regulation of Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in Ovarian Carcinoma Cells via Collagen-induced EGR1 Expression J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4924 - 4931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Greenlee, Z. Werb, and F. Kheradmand Matrix Metalloproteinases in Lung: Multiple, Multifarious, and Multifaceted Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 69 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Cummins, N. von Offenberg Sweeney, M. T. Killeen, Y. A. Birney, E. M. Redmond, and P. A. Cahill Cyclic strain-mediated matrix metalloproteinase regulation within the vascular endothelium: a force to be reckoned with Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H28 - H42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sayasith, K. A Brown, J. G Lussier, M. Dore, and J. Sirois Characterization of bovine early growth response factor-1 and its gonadotropin-dependent regulation in ovarian follicles prior to ovulation. J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 37(2): 239 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] |