![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 32, 22705-22712, August 6, 1999
From the Departments of Pharmacology and Internal Medicine,
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-6573
We have isolated the 5' region of the
ecto-5'-nucleotidase (low Km 5'-NT) gene and
established that a 969-base pair (bp) fragment confers cell-specific
expression of a CAT reporter gene that correlates with the expression
of endogenous ecto-5'-NT mRNA and enzymatic activity. A 768-bp
upstream negative regulatory region has been identified that conferred
lymphocyte-specific negative regulation in a heterologous system with a
244-bp deoxycytidine kinase core promoter. DNase I footprinting
identified several protected areas including Sp1, Sp1/AP-2, and cAMP
response element (CRE) binding sites within the 201-bp core promoter
region and Sp1, NRE-2a, TCF-1/LEF-1, and Sp1/NF-AT binding sites in the
upstream regulatory region. Whereas the CRE site was essential in
mediating the negative activity of the upstream regulatory region in
Jurkat but not in HeLa cells, mutation of the Sp1/AP-2 site decreased promoter activity in both cell lines. Electrophoretic mobility shift
assay analysis of proteins binding to the CRE site identified both
ATF-1 and ATF-2 in Jurkat cells. Finally, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate increased the activity of both the core and the 969-bp promoter fragments, and this increase was abrogated by mutations at the
CRE site. In summary, we have identified a tissue-specific regulatory
region 5' of the ecto-5'-NT core promoter that requires the presence of
a functional CRE site within the basal promoter for its suppressive activity.
Ecto-5'-nucleotidase (low Km
5'-NT,1 ecto-5'-NT, EC
3.1.3.5) is an extracellular enzyme that is anchored to the cell
membrane through a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol linkage. The enzyme
dephosphorylates purine and pyrimidine nucleoside monophosphates to the
corresponding nucleosides and generates adenosine from extracellular
AMP. Adenosine may then interact with a family of cognate receptors to
produce a wide range of physiological effects that include the
regulation of cardiovascular and cerebral blood flow (1),
cytoprotection in myocardial and cerebrovascular ischemia (2), and
inhibition of many aspects of immune function (3-6). Adenosine, which
may accumulate to high concentrations in solid tumors, has also been
postulated to be an important factor in stimulating angiogenesis (7),
cancer growth through the increased expression of A1
adenosine receptors (8), and in inhibiting the immune response toward
the malignant tissue (9). Therefore, investigating the regulation of
adenosine-metabolizing enzymes may have important impact on the
understanding of tumor biology.
The activity of ecto-5'-nucleotidase, although variable, is frequently
decreased as a result of neoplastic transformation of cells of
hematopoietic origin (10). In contrast, elevated activity of ecto-5'-NT
has been found in breast carcinoma (11), gastric cancer (12),
pancreatic cancer (13), chronic myelogenous leukemia (10, 14),
cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (15), and Walker 256 carcinoma (16). Human
renal carcinoma cell lines induced to differentiate by butyric acid
have demonstrated both an increase (Cur cell line) and a decrease (Caki
cell line) in ecto-5'-NT activity (17), demonstrating a complex, and
perhaps context-dependent, pattern of ecto-5'-NT expression
in differentiation and malignant transformation.
The expression of ecto-5'-NT in thymocytes, lymphocytes, granulocytes,
and undifferentiated myeloid cells is very low. However, differentiation of myeloid precursors along the monocytic lineage into
macrophages results in a sharp increase in activity (18-20). The
enzyme activity is lower than normal or undetectable in lymphocytes from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and infectious mononucleosis (21) and in CD8+ lymphocytes from AIDS
patients (22). Given the strong immunosuppressive activity of
adenosine, it seems likely that the variability in expression of this
enzymatic activity among lymphoid cell populations has functional
significance. In order to characterize the regulatory elements that
contribute to the transcriptional regulation and tissue-specific
expression of ecto-5'-NT, we have characterized the core promoter and
upstream regulatory regions of the human gene.
Materials--
Fetal calf serum was obtained from HiClone and
Sigma. TRI Reagent, a high efficiency hybridization system, and
Northern/Southern transfer solution were obtained from Molecular
Research Center Inc. (Cincinnati, OH). Restriction enzymes, Klenow
fragment of DNA polymerase, Taq polymerase, and
polynucleotide kinase were from Promega (Madison, WI). Reverse
transcriptase was from Life Technologies, Inc.
D-threo[dichloroacetyl-1-14C]chloramphenicol
(56 mCi/mmol) was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Cells--
The T-lymphoblast cell line K-T1 (23) was obtained
from Dr. D. Sorscher (University of North Carolina). The K562
erythroleukemia cell line (ATCC CCL-243), Jurkat T-cell line (T-ALL
origin), U937 cell line, PC-12 pheochromocytoma, HeLa S3 cervical
carcinoma, and WI-38 fibroblasts were obtained from the ATCC (Manassas,
VA). Jurkat, K-T1, K562, and U937 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. WI-38, PC-12, and HeLa
S3 cell lines were maintained in Eagle's minimal essential medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, nonessential amino acids,
sodium pyruvate, penicillin, and streptomycin.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total cellular RNA (20 µg)
purified by the acid guanidinium thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform method
(24) was electrophoresed in 1% agarose with 50 mM MOPS, pH
7.0, and 1 M formaldehyde buffer. The RNA was transferred
to Nytran nylon membranes overnight, fixed in a vacuum oven at 80 °C
for 30 min, and probed with a randomly primed 1660-bp
AvaI/HindIII cDNA fragment extending from bp
8 to 1668 of the ecto-5'-NT coding region (25). Hybridization was
performed in high efficiency hybridization solution with 50% formamide, with a nylon membrane sandwiched between two Whatman 3MM
papers, in a rotating incubator at 42 °C for 24 h. Blots were washed twice in 1× SSC, 0.2% SDS at room temperature and once at
60 °C and exposed overnight at Plasmid/Promoter Constructs--
The chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase (CAT) vector pCAT-Basic (Promega, Madison, WI) was
used in reporter gene assays to examine ecto-5'-NT promoter activity.
The corresponding promoter fragments were generated by restriction
digests or by PCR as described previously (26). PCR was performed using
Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) followed by five
cycles with Taq polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
The PCR products were cloned into the pCR 2.1 vector (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced. The heterologous ecto-5'-NT/deoxycytidine
kinase (dCK) promoter construct was produced by replacing a
PstI/NdeI fragment encompassing the 5'-NT
proximal promoter fragment and part of the CAT gene from pCAT-Basic
with the corresponding dCK-244 PstI/NdeI fragment
containing the 244-bp dCK promoter (27). Plasmid DNA used for
transfections was purified using Quiagen Maxi columns, and isopropyl
alcohol-precipitated plasmid DNA preparations were further
deproteinated by the sequential treatment with equal volumes of
phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (50:49:1) and twice with chloroform.
Final plasmid DNA preparations were precipitated in the presence of 0.1 M sodium acetate with 70% ethanol, washed with 75%
ethanol, and suspended in H2O at 2 mg/ml. The quality of
DNA was tested on agarose gel electrophoresis with and without
treatment by HindIII and XbaI.
Cell Transfections--
Cells were transfected by
electroporation using a Bio-Rad Gene-Pulser. Approximately 6.0 × 106 Jurkat, K-T1, K562, or U937 cells; 3.0 × 106 HeLa cells; and 1.0 × 106 fibroblasts
were transfected at room temperature in RPMI 1640 medium with equimolar
amounts of the promoter constructs corresponding to 20 µg of control
pCAT-Basic plasmid. Herring sperm DNA was added to a total quantity of
50 µg of DNA/electroporation. Electroporation efficiency was
determined by transfecting separate aliquots of cells with 20 µg of
CAT and Preparation of Nuclear Extracts--
Extracts were made from
logarithmically growing Jurkat T cells according to the method of
Dignam et al. (29) with modifications as described by Blake
et al. (30). Cells were homogenized in buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.75 mM spermidine, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM
EGTA, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 100 nM ocadaic acid), and
the nuclei were recovered by centrifugation at 30,000 × g for 30 s. Nuclear factors were extracted in buffer C
(20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, 20% glycerol, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.75 mM spermidine, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.4 M NaCl,
100 nM ocadaic acid), followed by centrifugation at
30,000 × g for 45 min. The supernatant was dialyzed in
buffer D (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
12.5 mM MgCl2), aliquoted, and stored at
DNase I Footprinting--
Two DNA probes encompassing the 378-bp
fragment (from Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Wild-type and
mutant double-stranded oligonucleotides were generated by annealing
complementary single-stranded oligonucleotides yielding 5'-overhangs;
100 ng was labeled by fill-in using Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase.
Labeled probes were purified on 1 ml of Sephadex-G50 (Sigma) columns.
The flow-through was precipitated with 5'-Nucleotidase Assay--
Ecto-5'-NT activity in cell extracts
was measured in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, buffer containing 20 mM MgCl2, 5 mM
Cell-specific Expression of Ecto-5'-nucleotidase mRNA--
To
determine the level of ecto-5'-NT mRNA in human cell lines,
Northern blot analysis was performed (Fig.
1). A high level of expression of a
single 4.1-kilobase mRNA was observed in cultured human fibroblasts
(WI38), whereas HeLa cells expressed an intermediate level, and PC-12,
U937, Jurkat, K562, and K-T1 cells had low or undetectable levels. The
corresponding ecto-5'-NT enzyme activities in cell homogenates were
319.3 ± 20.6, 29.9 ± 6.1, 6.3 ± 2.4, 2.40 ±
0.62, 0.37 ± 0.17, 0.12 ± 0.14, and 0.40 ± 0.22 nmol/min/mg of protein, respectively (±S.D., 3-5 independent
measurements). There was a 863-fold difference in 5'-nucleotidase
activity between fibroblasts and the Jurkat T-cell line, and relative
enzyme activities in different cell lines corresponded with differences
in the levels of mRNA expression.
Cell-specific Activity of the Ecto-5'-nucleotidase
Promoter--
In order to determine the relative levels of ecto-5'-NT
promoter activity, we transiently transfected several cell lines with the pCAT-Basic reporter construct containing 969, 371, or 201 bp of the
promoter. As shown in Fig. 2, the
full-length 969-bp promoter fragment yielded CAT activity that was
consistently lower than the marginal activity of the pCAT-Basic vector
in Jurkat, K-T1, and K562 cell lines, whereas relative CAT activity in
U937, HeLa, and WI-38 cells was increased by 10-25-fold. Two further deletions of 5'-sequences, producing 371- and 201-bp promoter fragments, caused moderate increases in promoter activity in Jurkat T-cells and K562 cells, no significant changes in U937 and HeLa cells,
and a significant decrease in promoter activity in WI38 fibroblasts
(Fig. 2). These data suggest that the distal 768-bp fragment contains
tissue-specific regulatory elements that function to repress the core
promoter activity in lymphoid (Jurkat and K-T1) and erythroid (K562)
cell lines while enhancing the activity in WI-38 fibroblast. In
general, the promoter activity in transient transfection assays
correlated well with the levels of mRNA and ecto-5'-NT enzymatic
activity in a majority of cell lines.
In Vitro DNase I Footprinting--
To identify regulatory elements
that interact with cognate transcription factors, we performed in
vitro DNase I footprinting analysis using Jurkat T-cell and HeLa
nuclear extracts. Four clusters of putative transcription factor
binding sites were identified within the proximal 770 bp of the
ecto-5'-NT promoter (Fig. 3). We have
generated two DNA probes that encompass cluster I/II and cluster III
and used them in DNase I footprinting analysis with Jurkat T-cell and
HeLa nuclear extracts. Results presented in Fig.
4 demonstrate that within the core
promoter region (cluster I/II) both Jurkat (A) and HeLa
(B) nuclear extracts produce similar protected areas that
coincide with Sp1, Sp1/AP-2, and CRE transcription factor binding
sites. However, within cluster III, a strong protected area coincident
with a TCF-1/LEF-1 consensus binding site (32-34) is present with
extract from Jurkat cells but is absent with HeLa nuclear extracts.
Further upstream, an extensive 22-bp protected area that coincides with
adjacent NF-AT and Sp1 binding sites in Jurkat corresponds to a more
restricted 16-bp protected area representing a single Sp1 site in HeLa
extracts. An additional protected area further upstream coincides with
a NRE-2a/2b transcription factor binding site (35) and is also more
pronounced with the Jurkat T-cell nuclear extract. A protected area
that does not correspond to a known consensus transcription factor
binding site is present at bp Cell-specific Activity of the Upstream Regulatory Region in a
Heterologous System--
To determine whether the silencing/enhancing
activity of the upstream regulatory region is specific for the
ecto-5'-NT promoter or could be reproduced in a heterologous system, we
generated a chimeric promoter construct containing the distal 768 bp of the regulatory region ligated to the 244-bp core promoter of the human
dCK gene (27) (Fig. 5A). As
shown in Fig. 5B, the 5'-NT upstream promoter fragment
decreased CAT expression mediated by the dCK promoter alone in Jurkat
and K-T1 cells by 78%, whereas it had a lesser suppressive effect on
dCK promoter-mediated CAT expression in HeLa cells (decrease by 40%)
and no effect in WI38 fibroblasts. The lack of enhancer activity in
fibroblasts, as seen with the native ecto-5'-NT core promoter (Fig. 2),
suggests that either the dCK core promoter activity was already maximal or that the function of the enhancer is promoter-specific.
Mutational Analysis of the Ecto-5'-NT Core Promoter--
To
further investigate the importance of the Sp1, AP-2, and CRE
transcription factor binding sites within the core promoter region, we
mutated these sites as illustrated in Table
I and tested the respective mutants
individually in transient transfection assays. Data presented in Fig.
6 show that none of the mutations in the
context of the 201-bp core promoter region had any significant effect
in either Jurkat or HeLa cells. However, within the context of the
969-bp promoter fragment, mutation of the CRE site at bp 184-185
produced a dramatic increase of the promoter activity to the level
found with the wild-type 201-bp core promoter region alone in Jurkat
cells, while resulting in a 50% decrease in HeLa cells (Fig. 6).
Mutations at the Sp1 and especially at the Sp1/AP-2 site brought about
significant decreases in promoter activity in both Jurkat and HeLa
cells. In Jurkat T-cells, the wild-type 969-bp promoter activity was
strongly suppressed to a level of 40 ± 10% of pCAT-Basic vector
alone (Fig. 2) and decreased further to 15 ± 10% (± S.D. from
four experiments) of pCAT-Basic with mutation at the Sp1/AP-2 site.
These data suggest that transcription factors binding to the CRE and
Sp1/AP-2 sites may influence the activity of the upstream regulatory
region.
Identification of Transcription Factors Binding to the CRE
Site--
We next employed EMSAs with a probe encompassing the CRE
site to identify cognate transcription factors (Table I). We used a
panel of antibodies recognizing members of the CREB and ATF family of
proteins and c-Fos and c-Jun transcription factors known to dimerize
with members of the CREB family. Results shown in Fig.
7 demonstrate that antibodies recognizing
CREB-1, CREB-2, CREM-1, c-Fos, and c-Jun were not able to supershift
the DNA-protein complexes, whereas antibodies against ATF-1 and ATF-2
caused distinctly decreased intensities of the corresponding lower band
coincident with the appearance of a more pronounced (ATF-1) or a new
(ATF-2) upper band (Fig. 7, A and D). The
intensity of the supershifted band with ATF-2-specific antibody was
similar with nuclear extracts prepared from control and PMA-treated
cells; however, there was a somewhat less pronounced decrease in
ATF-2-specific lower complex intensity with PMA-treated nuclear
extracts (Fig. 7D). Similar results were obtained with
polyclonal antibody against ATF-2 (data not shown). Mutated CRE probe
did not produce specific band shifts (Fig. 7C). These
results suggest that ATF-1 and ATF-2 or closely related proteins
specifically interact with the CRE site in the ecto-5'-NT core promoter
in Jurkat T-cells. In contrast, in HeLa nuclear extract, despite the
presence of strong gel shifts, none of the specific antibodies
described above resulted in a supershifted complexes (data not
shown).
Effect of PMA on Ecto-5'-NT Promoter Activity in Jurkat
T-cells--
We have previously shown that induction of promyelocytic
HL60 cells to differentiate with PMA coincided with a dramatic increase in ecto-5'-NT mRNA level (20). Since the CRE site has been
identified as a PMA-responsive element through the modulation of the
ATF-2 transcription factor (36, 37), we tested the possibility that in
Jurkat T-cells PMA might increase ecto-5'-NT promoter activity through
activation of a transcription factor binding to this site. Results
presented in Fig. 8 show that activity of
the 201-bp promoter fragment was induced up to 3-fold by a 20-h
treatment with 20 nM PMA, whereas the same promoter
fragment with a mutated CRE site was not affected. Furthermore, the
969-bp promoter fragment was activated approximately 17-fold by PMA.
Mutation of the CRE site in the 969-bp fragment increased the promoter
activity as described previously in Fig. 6, and PMA did not further
increase this activity.
Mutational Analysis of the TCF-1/LEF-1 Transcription Factor Binding
Site--
A limited number of promoters or enhancers have been shown
to contain consensus sites for the developmentally important
transcription factors TCF-1 and LEF-1. Their intrinsic ability to bend
DNA has implicated these high mobility group (HMG) proteins in an
architectural role of juxtaposing distantly located transcription
factors. Recent data suggest that TCF-1 may act as a transcriptional
repressor when associated with Groucho (Grg) proteins, and we
hypothesized that this particular function could explain the strong
negative and lymphocyte-specific activity of the upstream regulatory
region within the ecto-5'-NT promoter (38). We have tested the
activities of the wild type and TCF-1/LEF-1-mutated 969-bp ecto-5'-NT
promoter in Jurkat T-cells that endogenously express both TCF-1 and
LEF-1 proteins and in HeLa cells that lack both transcription factors. The results in Fig. 9 demonstrate that
the strong negative activity of the upstream regulatory region in
Jurkat T-cells is not significantly affected by TCF/LEF site
mutagenesis. The same mutations, however, completely eliminated gel
shifts in an EMSA (data not shown), suggesting either that the
TCF-1/LEF-1 transcription factors do not contribute or that elimination
of this site alone is not sufficient to affect the negative activity of
the upstream regulatory region.
The highly variable level of expression of ecto-5'-NT in human and
animal tissues and cells suggests tissue-specific mechanisms controlling the expression of this enzyme. These mechanisms are unknown; therefore, an analysis of the transcriptional regulation of
this gene was undertaken, and in this study we have analyzed the
tissue-specific regulatory elements within the ecto-5'-NT promoter.
Sequence analysis of the 5'-flanking region of the ecto-5'-NT gene
reveals a number of potential transcription factor binding sites within
the 820 bp upstream of the translation start site within the first exon
(26, 39). As illustrated in Fig. 4, these sites were concentrated in
four clusters that contain a number of lymphocyte- and
macrophage-specific, developmentally important, as well as general
transcription factor binding elements. The occupancy of several of
these sites was confirmed by in vitro DNase I footprinting
analysis. The number of potential regulatory elements within the
ecto-5'-NT promoter suggests that there might be a high level of
complexity in the interactions between binding factors, especially
between those localized immediately 5' to the transcription start site
and those further upstream. Deletional analysis of the 5'-upstream
fragment of the ecto-5'-NT gene confirmed that the 969-bp promoter
fragment mediates cell-specific regulation of expression. Deletion of
768 bp at the 5'-end of this fragment eliminated the cell-specific
expression of the reporter gene and suggests that this 768-bp fragment
contains regulatory elements responsible for both the decreased
promoter activity in Jurkat cells as well as the up-regulation in
fibroblasts. Further deletions within the 201-bp fragment decreased the
promoter activity in Jurkat T-cells (data not shown); therefore, we
designated this 201-bp region as the core promoter. The dual and
cell-specific function of the 768-bp upstream regulatory fragment
raises important questions with regard to whether transcription factors
binding to this region confer this specificity as well as how the core promoter activity relates to the upstream regulatory region.
The cell-specific regulation of the ecto-5'-NT promoter may be
conferred by proteins binding to either the core promoter or the
upstream regulatory region. Mutational analysis of the 201-bp core
promoter region led to several important observations. First, while
single mutations at the Sp1, Sp1/AP-2, and CRE binding sites did not
alter the 201-bp core promoter activity, mutation at the CRE had a
profound effect on the promoter activity when analyzed within the
context of the 969-bp fragment. Elimination of the CRE site
dramatically increased the promoter activity in Jurkat T-cells,
suggesting a major role for factors binding at this site in mediating
suppression of core promoter activity by the upstream regulatory
region. In addition, mutation of the Sp1/AP-2 site caused a further
decrease in the low basal activity of the 969-bp promoter fragment in
Jurkat T-lymphocytes and a significant decrease of the promoter
activity in HeLa cells. In combination, these observations suggest that
the regulatory function of the upstream 768-bp fragment requires the
presence of specific transcription factors within the core promoter
region to either down- or up-regulate the rate of ecto-5'-NT
transcription in a cell- or tissue-specific manner. The finding that
the activity of the dCK core promoter, containing a Sp1 and E2F
(half-site) transcription factor binding site, was also inhibited by
the ecto-5'-NT upstream regulatory region, suggests that the CRE site,
while essential for the negative regulation of the ecto-5'-NT promoter,
may not be absolutely required for transcriptional repression mediated
by this region. Nonetheless, the abrogation of PMA responsiveness by
mutation of the CRE site strongly supports an important role for
CRE-binding proteins in regulating ecto-5'-NT activity. The latter
conclusion is consistent with reports that describe the CRE site as a
PMA-responsive element (TRE) (36, 37). The mechanism of PMA-induced
ecto-5'-NT promoter activation is unknown. It is possible, however,
that as reported previously (36), PMA may induce changes in the
composition of protein complexes binding to the CRE site. Although we
have not seen a significant change in the appearance of supershifts
with ATF-2 antibodies in EMSA after pretreatment of cells with PMA (Fig. 7D), the intensity of the lower band did not decrease
as strongly as in the control, suggesting the presence of an increased amount of other protein components in this complex. The identity of
this component and its relevance to the increased promoter activity
after treatment with PMA remain to be established.
The ecto-5'-NT CRE element (TGACGTCG) differs from the
consensus CRE palindrome by one base (underlined). It has previously been shown that single base changes in this cis-acting DNA element may
dramatically influence the binding properties and function of this site
(36, 40). We have shown that, despite the presence of several members
of the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors in both Jurkat and HeLa
cell lines, only antibodies against ATF-1 and ATF-2 interacted with
protein complexes in EMSAs using Jurkat nuclear extracts. As a result
of these interactions, two changes were observed: (a)
decreased intensities of the initial ATF-1 and ATF-2 (lower band)
complexes and (b) the appearance of the corresponding
supershifts. The existence of two distinct gel shifts, each
independently interacting with ATF-1 and ATF-2 antibodies, suggests the
presence of two different species of protein complexes at the CRE site.
The absence, as evidenced by the lack of supershifted bands of these
and several other known CREB/ATF family members as well as c-Jun and
c-Fos proteins, suggests that a different protein(s) bind to this site
in HeLa nuclear extract. These observations, in conjunction with the
higher basal promoter activity and endogenous ecto-5'-NT mRNA
expression in HeLa cells, would suggest that ATF-1 and ATF-2
transcription factors mediate low promoter activity in lymphocytes.
Whether both have the same potency in suppressing the ecto-5'-NT
promoter activity remains to be established.
Mutation of the Sp1/AP-2 site increased the suppressive activity of the
969-bp promoter fragment in Jurkat cells and, interestingly, also
uncovered the potential for the suppression in HeLa cells. This finding
suggests that the intrinsic ability of the upstream regulatory region
to inhibit core promoter activity may represent a more general property
of this fragment and that the tissue- and cell-specific up- and
down-regulation of the promoter activity may be more specifically
mediated by factors binding to CRE and Sp1/AP-2 sites. In that respect,
and due perhaps to the presence of NFAT, TCF/LEF, Ets, and an unknown
transcription factor in Jurkat T-cells, the overall suppressive
activity of the upstream regulatory region is inherently more potent in
Jurkat than in HeLa cells. According to this model, the up-regulation
of promoter activity in tissues that express low to intermediate levels
of ecto-5'-NT would be achieved primarily by derepression. Thus, increased ATF-1 and/or ATF-2 transcription factors binding to the CRE
site would facilitate repression of the promoter activity, whereas
increased binding to the Sp1/AP-2 site would facilitate derepression.
The nature and specific mechanism of the negative activity of the
upstream regulatory region will be a subject for future study. This
region contains several regulatory elements that may potentially
contribute to the repressive effect. One possible candidate is
transcription factor binding to the NRE-2a/2b negative regulatory
element (35, 41); however, the identity of the specific protein(s)
binding to this site has yet to be established. Other candidates,
specific for lymphocytes and of potential importance during
development, are the TCF-1 and LEF-1 transcription factors. These
proteins have been shown to interact with the transcriptional repressor
Groucho (38) and to have an important architectural function in the
context of the TCR *
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant RO1-CA34085 (to B. S. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are:
NT, nucleotidase;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
bp, base pair(s);
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
CRE, cAMP response element;
CREB, CRE-binding protein;
CREM, CRE modulator;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
dCK, deoxycytidine kinase;
EMSA, electrophoretic
mobility shift assay.
Tissue-specific Regulation of the Ecto-5'-nucleotidase
Promoter
ROLE OF THE cAMP RESPONSE ELEMENT SITE IN MEDIATING REPRESSION
BY THE UPSTREAM REGULATORY REGION*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C.
-galactosidase plasmids driven by
-actin promoter and 30 µg of
herring sperm DNA. When the effect of PMA was tested on ecto-5'-NT
promoter activity, co-transfection of
-galactosidase and CAT
constructs was performed to account for variable cell growth rates in
the presence of PMA. Electroporations were performed at 300 V and 960 microfarads (330 V and 960 microfarads for HeLa cells), and cells were
subsequently suspended in 12 ml of RPMI 1640 medium containing 20%
horse serum. After 44-48 h, cells were harvested, washed with cold
PBS, and freeze-thawed three times with 80 µl of 0.25 M
Tris, pH 8.0, containing 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride and 10 µg/ml pepstatin and leupeptin. CAT activity assays
were performed on supernatants following treatment of extracts at
62 °C for 10 min.
-Galactosidase Assays--
Chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase activity was measured at 37 °C in a reaction
medium containing 1 mM dibutyryl CoA (25 µg/assay), 10 µM
D-threo[dichloroacetyl-1-14C]chloramphenicol
(56 mCi/mmol, 0.25 µCi/assay) in 0.25 M Tris, pH 8.0, buffer. The incubation was initiated by the addition of 2-50 µl of
cell extract in a total volume of 125 µl and terminated after 1-6 h
with the addition of 300 µl of xylenes. Following three extractions,
reaction products in the organic phase were counted in a scintillation
counter. Reaction velocity was expressed as cpm converted/h/mg of
protein. Reaction time and extract amount were adjusted so that no more
than 30% of substrate was utilized. The final results are expressed as
the -fold increase or decrease over values obtained with the pCAT Basic
vector alone. To normalize for transfection efficiency, the CAT
activity was divided by the
-galactosidase activity of simultaneous
transfections.
-Galactosidase activity was assayed
spectrophotometrically at 564 nm in 25 mM phosphate buffer,
pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, and 3 mg/ml chlorophenol red-
-D-galactopyranoside at 37 °C. The reaction was
initiated by the addition of 5-25 µl of cell extract and analyzed
for 1 min. The linear portion of the curve was used to compute 0 order reaction rate and expressed as µmol of substrate used/min/mg of protein. The
-galactosidase activity varied by less than 20% in
duplicate cell samples. Protein concentration was assayed by the
Bradford method (28).
70 °C (31).
48 to
426 from the ATG site, cluster I and II, Fig.
4) and 406-bp fragment (from
425 to
832, cluster III) were
generated by PCR with Pfu DNA polymerase. Resulting
fragments were incubated with the Taq polymerase, subcloned
into the pCR 2.1 vector, and digested with the appropriate restriction
enzymes to create a 5'-overhang on the noncoding strand at the 3'-end.
The 3'- ends of the coding strands were filled in with radiolabeled
dCTP using DNA polymerase large Klenow fragment. The resulting probes
were digested at the opposite end to ensure one-strand labeling,
gel-purified on a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel, and eluted by
the "crush and soak" method (29). DNase I footprinting was
performed according to Blake et al.(30). Ten ng of
32P-labeled DNA were incubated with 120 and 240 µg of
Jurkat and HeLa cell nuclear extracts in the presence of 15 µg of
poly(dI-dC), 6.1% glycerol, 0.07 mM EDTA, 0.07 mM EGTA, 7.2 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 39 mM KCl, 7.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.7 mM DTT. The binding reactions were performed at room
temperature for 30 min, after which CaCl2 (2 mM
final concentration) was added, and the probe was digested with DNase I
(Worthington) at room temperature for 3 min. Digestions were terminated
by the addition of 2 volumes of 100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 100 µg/ml proteinase K, and 100 µg/ml glycogen. After an incubation at 37 °C for 20 min, the
samples were extracted with phenol/chloroform, precipitated with
ethanol, resuspended in formamide loading dye, and analyzed on an 8 M urea, 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel.
volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 2.5 volumes of ethanol, washed with
75% ethanol, and resuspended at 20,000 cpm/µl. For competition
experiments, unlabeled wild-type and mutant oligonucleotides were
prepared by using unlabeled deoxynucleotides for fill-in and
precipitated as described above. One µl of probe (approximately 0.1 ng of DNA) was incubated with 8 µg of nuclear extract in the presence
of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 12% glycerol, and 2 µg of poly(dI-dC) (Sigma).
Reactions were preincubated on ice for 10 min in the presence of
competitor or for 30-60 min in the presence of antibodies. Probe was
added to the mixture, and the reaction was incubated at room
temperature for 20 min. The protein-DNA complexes were resolved on
native 4% polyacrylamide (30:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide), 0.5×
Tris-borate-EDTA minigels at 100 V, dried, and autoradiographed. EMSA
supershift experiments were performed with 1 µg of each of the
following antibodies: ATF-1 antibody (sc-241X), ATF-2 (sc-242X), CREB-1
(sc-186X), CREB-2 (sc-200), CREM-1 (sc-440X), c-Jun (sc-1694X), and
c-Fos (sc-413) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA).
-glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM
erythro-9(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA; inhibitor of adenosine
deaminase), and 20 µM [8-14C]AMP. Reaction
products were separated on plastic-supported cellulose (Kodachrome;
Eastman Kodak Co.) in ammonia/butanol/methanol/H20 (1:20:20:60), and corresponding spots were visualized under UV light,
excised, and counted in a scintillation counter.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (92K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Northern blot analysis of
ecto-5'-nucleotidase mRNA levels in human cell lines. Twenty
µg of total RNA were loaded in each lane. Upper
panel, 4.1-kb ecto-5'-NT mRNA; lower
panel, 18 and 28 S rRNA stained with ethidium bromide.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Cell specificity of ecto-5'-nucleotidase
promoter fragment activity in different human cell lines. Promoter
constructs were generated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Values represent the mean ± S.D. of 3-5
independent determinations done in duplicate. *, mean values from two
independent experiments. **, in PC-12 cells, only the 201- and 969-bp
constructs were tested.
579 to
599 only with Jurkat T-cell
nuclear extract.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Sequence of the ecto-5'-nucleotidase promoter
with putative transcription factor binding sites. Four clusters of
binding sites were identified within the proximal 969-bp fragment.
Bases are numbered in relation to the ATG translation start site in the
first exon. Consensus transcription factor binding sites are in
boldface type and underlined. Clusters
I/II and III were analyzed with a DNase I protection assay, and
protected areas are double underlined.
Hypersensitive sites are indicated with arrows.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
DNase I protection assay of the
ecto-5'-nucleotidase promoter fragments corresponding to clusters I/II
and III. Nuclear extracts from Jurkat T-cells (A) and
from HeLa cells (B) were prepared and processed as described
under "Experimental Procedures." DNA markers are shown on the
right. AP-2 footprint represents a combined Sp1/AP-2
transcription factor binding site.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
A, scheme illustrating the chimeric
dCK/ecto-5'-nucleotidase promoter. B, activity of the
ecto-5'-nucleotidase upstream regulatory region in the context of dCK
core promoter in several human cell lines. Values represent the
mean ± S.D. of four independent determinations done in
duplicate.
Sequences of mutated CRE, Sp1, and Sp1/AP-2 sites and of
oligonucleotides used in EMSA

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The effect of mutagenesis of transcription
factor binding sites within the 201- and 969-bp promoters on ecto-5'-NT
promoter activity. Transcription factor binding sites were
subjected to site-directed mutagenesis using the oligonucleotides
outlined under "Experimental Procedures." Values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three independent determinations done in
duplicate.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
EMSA of the CRE binding site with Jurkat
T-cell extract in the presence of antibodies against members of the
CREB and ATF family of transcription factors. A,
incubations performed as described under "Experimental Procedures"
(50 mM KCl). B, incubations performed in the
presence of 70 mM KCl to reduce nonspecific interactions.
Cold oligonucleotide containing the mutated CRE site was added as a
competitor at a 1000-fold excess in the last
lane. C, comparison of gel shift patterns of
mutated (Table I) and wild-type CRE probes. D, the effect of
ATF-2 antibody on the gel shift pattern in the absence and presence of
PMA treatment (20 ng/ml for 24 h).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The effect of PMA on the native and
CRE-mutated 201- and 969-bp promoter fragments in Jurkat T-cells.
Values represent the mean ± S.D. of three independent
determinations done in duplicate.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
The effect of mutation of the TCF-1/LEF-1
transcription factor binding site on the activity of the upstream
regulatory region. Values represent the mean ± S.D. of three
independent determinations done in duplicate.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
enhancer (42, 43). However, since mutation of the
binding site for TCF/LEF did not produce a noticeable change in the
function of this 768-bp fragment (Fig. 8), it is possible that several
interacting transcription factors might form, in a cooperative manner,
a functional higher order nucleoprotein complex in lymphocytes. This
possibility is further supported by our finding that the 768-bp
fragment was able to function independently in the heterologous
promoter system with the 244-bp dCK promoter. Specific cooperation
among Ets, LEF-1, AML, and CRE transcription factors has already been
shown to be important for the function of the TCR
enhancer (42-44).
In this regard, we have noted that the spatial alignment of GATA, Ets, TCF-1/LEF-1, and CRE transcription factor binding sites in the TCR
enhancer closely resembles their location in the ecto-5'-NT promoter
(45). A similar arrangement of these transcription factors was also
found in TCR
and TCR
, CD8, and human immunodeficiency virus
enhancers (46-48). Whether this structural alignment, with an
invariably central position of the relatively rare TCF/LEF site,
carries out a specific function common to these enhancers and the
ecto-5'-NT promoter remains to be established. TCF/LEF transcription
factors have been identified as nuclear targets for Wnt signaling
(49-51), and our current efforts are aimed at establishing whether the
ecto-5'-NT promoter is a target for this evolutionarily conserved and
developmentally important signaling pathway. Since only a single gene
target for Wnt signaling has been identified in mammals to date (52),
the ecto-5'-NT promoter would offer an excellent model to study the
mechanisms of induction of gene expression by this pathway. Thus,
further delineation of the specific interactions involving a higher
order nucleoprotein complex of the ecto-5'-NT promoter may not only
enhance our understanding of how these signaling pathways modulate the
transcription of ecto-5'-NT gene but will also lead to a better
understanding of its function during development and transformation.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
1106 Mary Ellen Jones Bldg., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,
NC 27599-7365. Tel.: 919-966-4340; Fax: 919-966-5640; E-mail:
jozek@med.unc.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Belardinelli, L.,
Linden, J.,
and Berne, R. M.
(1989)
Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis.
32,
73-97[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Ely, S. W.,
and Berne, R. M.
(1992)
Circulation
85,
893-904 3.
Cronstein, B. N.,
Levin, R. I.,
Belanoff, J.,
Weissmann, G.,
and Hirschhorn, R.
(1986)
J. Clin. Invest.
78,
760-770
4.
MacKenzie, W. M.,
Hoskin, D. W.,
and Bly, J.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
3521-3526 5.
Cronstein, B. N.
(1995)
J. Invest. Med.
43,
50-57[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Huang, S.,
Apasov, S.,
Koshiba, M.,
and Sitkovsky, M.
(1997)
Blood
90,
1600-1610 7.
Meininger, C. J.,
and Granger, H. J.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
258,
H198-H206 8.
Khoo, H. E.,
Ho, C. L.,
Chhatwal, V. J.,
Chan, S. T.,
Ngoi, S. S.,
and Moochhala, S. M.
(1996)
Cancer Lett.
106,
17-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Williams, B. A.,
Manzer, A.,
Blay, J.,
and Hoskin, D. W.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
231,
264-269[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Gutensohn, W.,
and Thiel, E.
(1990)
Cancer
66,
1755-1758[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Canbolat, O.,
Durak, I.,
Cetin, R.,
Kavutcu, M.,
Demirci, S.,
and Ozturk, S.
(1996)
Breast Cancer. Res. Treat.
37,
189-193[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Durak, I.,
Perk, H.,
Kavutcu, M.,
Canbolat, O.,
Akyol, O.,
and Beduk, Y.
(1994)
Free Radical Biol. Med.
16,
825-831[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Flocke, K.,
and Mannherz, H. G.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1076,
273-281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Gutensohn, W.,
Thiel, E.,
and Emmerich, B.
(1983)
Klin. Wochenschr.
61,
57-62[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Fukunaga, Y.,
Evans, S. S.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Ueda, Y.,
Tamura, K.,
Takakuwa, T.,
Gebhard, D.,
Allopenna, J.,
Demaria, S.,
Clarkson, B.,
Thompson, L. F.,
Safai, B.,
and Evans, R. L.
(1989)
Blood
74,
2486-2492 16.
Clark, A. R.,
and Docherty, K.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
296,
521-541
17.
Prager, M. D.,
and Kanar, M. C.
(1984)
Cancer Lett.
24,
81-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Thompson, L. F.,
Saxon, A.,
O'Connor, R. D.,
and Fox, R. I.
(1983)
J. Clin. Invest.
71,
892-899
19.
Thompson, L. F.,
Ruedi, J. M.,
O'Connor, R. D.,
and Bastia, J. F.
(1986)
J. Immunol.
137,
2496-2500[Abstract]
20.
Spychala, J.,
Mitchell, B. S.,
and Barankiewicz, J.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
158,
4947-4952[Abstract]
21.
Quagliata, F.,
Faig, D.,
Conklyn, M.,
and Silber, R.
(1974)
Cancer Res.
34,
3197-3202 22.
Salazar-Gonzales, J. F.,
Moody, D. J.,
Giorgi, J. V.,
Martinez-Maza, O.,
Mitsuyasu, R. T.,
and Fahey, J. L.
(1985)
J. Immunol.
135,
1778-1787[Abstract]
23.
Smith, S. D.,
Morgan, R.,
Link, M. P.,
McFall, P.,
and Hecht, F.
(1986)
Blood
67,
650-659 24.
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Misumi, Y.,
Ogata, S.,
Hirose, S.,
and Ikehara, Y.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
2178-2183 26.
Spychala, J.,
and Mitchell, B. S.
(1994)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
370,
683-687[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Chen, E. H.,
Johnson, E. E.,
Vetter, S. M.,
and Mitchell, B. S.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
1660-1668
28.
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Dignam, J. D.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489 30.
Blake, M. C.,
and Azizkhan, J. C.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
4994-5002 31.
Zimmermann, A.,
Gu, J. J.,
Spychala, J.,
and Mitchell, B. S.
(1996)
Adv. Enzyme Regul.
36,
75-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Waterman, M. L.,
and Jones, K. A.
(1990)
New Biol.
2,
621-636[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
van de Wetering, M.,
Oosterwegel, M.,
Dooijes, D.,
and Clevers, H.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
123-132[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Giese, K.,
Amsterdam, A.,
and Grosschedl, R.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
2567-2578 35.
Oh, C. K.,
Neurath, M.,
Cho, J. J.,
Semere, T.,
and Metcalfe, D. D.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
323,
511-519
36.
Costa, M.,
and Medcalf, R. L.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
237,
532-538[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Jiang, K.,
Spyrou, G.,
and Rokaeus, A.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
246,
192-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Levanon, D.,
Goldstein, R. E.,
Bernstein, Y.,
Tang, H.,
Goldenberg, D.,
Stifani, S.,
Paroush, Z.,
and Groner, Y.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11590-11595 39.
Hansen, K. R.,
Resta, R.,
Webb, C. F.,
and Thompson, L. F.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
167,
307-312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Holmberg, M.,
Leonardson, G.,
and Ny, T.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
231,
466-474[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Ogbourne, S.,
and Antalis, T. M.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
331,
1-14
42.
Giese, K.,
Kingsley, C.,
Kirshner, J. R.,
and Grosschedl, R.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
995-1008 43.
Mayall, T. P.,
Sheridan, P. L.,
Montminy, M. R.,
and Jones, K. A.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
887-99 44.
Hernandez-Munain, C.,
Roberts, J. L.,
and Krangel, M. S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3223-3233 45.
Leiden, J. M.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
11,
539-570[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Leiden, J. M.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
6,
231-237[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Hambor, J. E.,
Mennone, J.,
Coon, M. E.,
Hanke, J. H.,
and Kavathas, P.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7056-7070 48.
Sheridan, P. L.,
Sheline, C. T.,
Cannon, K.,
Voz, M. L.,
Pazin, M. J.,
Kadonaga, J. T.,
and Jones, K. A.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2090-2104 49.
Behrens, J.,
von Kries, J. P.,
Kuhl, M.,
Bruhn, L.,
Wedlich, D.,
Grosschedl, R.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1996)
Nature
382,
638-642[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
50.
Huber, O.,
Korn, R.,
McLaughlin, J.,
Ohsugi, M.,
Herrmann, B. G.,
and Kemler, R.
(1996)
Mech. Dev.
59,
3-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Molenaar, M.,
van de Wetering, M.,
Oosterwegel, M.,
Peterson-Maduro, J.,
Godsave, S.,
Korinek, V.,
Roose, J.,
Destree, O.,
and Clevers, H.
(1996)
Cell
86,
391-399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
52.
He, T. C.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Rago, C.,
Hermeking, H.,
Zawel, L.,
da Costa, L. T.,
Morin, P. J.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1998)
Science
281,
1509-1512 53.
Costa, M.,
Shen, Y.,
Maurer, F.,
and Medcalf, R. L.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
258,
123-131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Mare, R. Iatta, M. T. Montagna, C. Luberto, and M. Del Poeta APP1 Transcription Is Regulated by Inositol-phosphorylceramide Synthase 1-Diacylglycerol Pathway and Is Controlled by ATF2 Transcription Factor in Cryptococcus neoformans J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 36055 - 36064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Niemela, T. Henttinen, G. G. Yegutkin, L. Airas, A.-M. Kujari, P. Rajala, and S. Jalkanen IFN-{alpha} Induced Adenosine Production on the Endothelium: A Mechanism Mediated by CD73 (Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase) Up-Regulation J. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 172(3): 1646 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Spychala, E. Lazarowski, A. Ostapkowicz, L. H. Ayscue, A. Jin, and B. S. Mitchell Role of Estrogen Receptor in the Regulation of Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase and Adenosine in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 708 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|