![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 32, 22770-22774, August 6, 1999
From the Department of Biochemistry, New York University Medical
Center, New York, New York 10016
In the absence of heme, Hap1 is associated with
molecular chaperones such as Hsp90 and Ydj1 and forms a higher order
complex termed HMC. Heme disrupts this complex and permits Hap1 to bind to DNA with high affinity, thereby activating transcription. Heme regulation of Hap1 activity is analogous to the regulation of steroid
receptors by steroids, which involves molecular chaperones. Steroid
receptors often exist as monomers when associated with molecular
chaperones in the absence of ligand but as dimers when activated by
steroids. Furthermore, previous studies indicate that dimerization
might be important for heme activation of Hap1. We therefore determined
whether Hap1 is a monomer or oligomer in the absence of heme. By
coeluting two Hap1 size variants and by comparing DNA binding
properties of the HMC and Hap1 dimer, we show that Hap1 is a
preexisting dimer in the HMC. Further, increasing overexpression of
Hap1 caused progressive increases in Hap1 DNA binding and
transcriptional activities. Our data suggest that in the absence of
heme, Hap1 exists as a dimer, and the two subunits act cooperatively in
DNA binding. Hap1 repression is caused, at least in part, by inhibition
of the DNA binding activity of the preexisting dimer.
Dimerization is a common mechanism by which the activity of
numerous important biological macromolecules can be regulated. These
molecules include receptors for growth hormones (1, 2), steroid
hormones (3), other cellular signals (4, 5), and numerous transcription
factors (6, 7). The transcriptional activators of the yeast Gal4 family
also require dimerization for DNA binding and transcriptional
activation (8, 9). This family includes at least 52 transcription
factors that control a wide array of diverse processes ranging from
carbon source utilization to oxygen utilization and drug resistance (8,
9). These members all contain a C6 zinc cluster that recognizes a CGG
triplet (9-15). Although the DNA binding properties of the C6 zinc
cluster proteins are well characterized, the molecular mechanisms by
which these members act to control transcription in response to various signals are largely unclear. Interestingly, recent data suggest that,
like steroid hormone receptors, certain members of the yeast Gal4
family such as Hap1 and Pdr1 (16, 17) are regulated by Hsp90 and Hsp70
molecular chaperones. In particular, Hap1 is a heme-responsive
transcriptional activator, which promotes transcription of genes
required for respiration and for controlling oxidative damage in
response to oxygen/heme (18-20). In the absence of heme, Hap1 is bound
to cellular proteins including Hsp82 (the yeast homologue of Hsp90) and
Ydj1, forming a higher order complex termed HMC1 (17, 21, 22). Hap1 DNA
binding and transcriptional activities are repressed in this complex.
Heme disrupts the HMC and permits Hap1 to bind to DNA as a dimer with
high affinity, thereby activating transcription. The formation and
disruption of the HMC are the key events in Hap1 repression in the
absence of heme and subsequent activation by heme. How does the HMC
repress Hap1, and how does the disassembly of the HMC lead to Hap1 activation?
In the case of steroid hormone receptors, a plethora of reports
suggested a model for how molecular chaperones control their activities
(23-25). In the absence of hormone, steroid hormone receptors form
heteromeric complexes containing a receptor monomer, a dimer of Hsp90,
and several other proteins including Hsp70 and Ydj1 (23-26). Hormone
binding causes the dissociation of Hsp90 and other proteins, permitting
steroid hormone receptors to dimerize and bind to DNA with high
affinity and activate transcription (23-25). This suggests that
dimerization is an important event leading to the activation of steroid
hormone receptors. In the case of Hap1, we envisioned two ways by which
Hap1 activity could be controlled by the HMC. First, Hap1, like steroid
hormone receptors, could exist as a monomer in the HMC and is thus
repressed. When the HMC disassembles in the presence of heme, Hap1 is
free to dimerize and bind to DNA with high affinity, thereby activating transcription. Second, Hap1 could already be a dimer in the HMC, but
its activity is inhibited by molecular chaperones in the HMC. The
disruption of the HMC by heme would then relieve this inhibition, thereby leading to Hap1 activation. Previous experiments indicated that
the Hap1 dimerization domain plays a role in heme regulation (17);
however, it is not clear whether it acts by controlling dimerization or
by making molecular interactions critical for Hap1 activity.
In this report we describe a series of experiments aimed at
distinguishing whether Hap1 is monomeric or oligomeric in the HMC.
First, the two size variants of Hap1 coeluted on affinity columns in
the absence of heme. Second, DNA mobility shift assays showed that the
HMC recognizes various Hap1-binding sites in a manner similar to Hap1
dimer binding but completely different from monomer binding. Third,
increasing overexpression of Hap1 caused graded increases in Hap1 DNA
binding and transcriptional activation in the absence of heme,
indicating that overexpression of Hap1 can functionally titrate out
molecular chaperones. Together, these results strongly suggest that in
the absence of heme, Hap1 is a preexisting oligomer in the HMC.
Yeast Strains and Cell Growth--
Cells used for
Plasmid Construction--
To construct the expression plasmids
for His6-Hap1 and His6-Hap1 Preparation of Yeast Extracts and DNA Mobility Shift
Assays--
Yeast cell extracts were prepared according to previously
established protocols (17, 22). Briefly, yeast cells bearing expression
plasmids were grown to A0.5 and induced with 2%
galactose for 6 h or for specified times (see Fig. 5). Cells were
harvested and resuspended in three packed cell volumes of buffer (20 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.3 M NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
1 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin). Cells were then
permeabilized by agitation with four packed cell volumes of glass
beads, and extracts were collected as described (29). Protein
concentrations of extracts were determined by Bradford assays.
DNA binding reactions were carried out in a 20-µl volume with 5%
glycerol, 4 mM Tris, pH 8, 40 mM NaCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 3 µg of salmon sperm DNA, 10 µM ZnOAc2, 300 µg/ml bovine serum albumin as described (22). Approximately 0.01 pmol of labeled oligonucleotides and 20-µg extracts or eluate containing approximately 200 ng of total proteins were used in each reaction. The
reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 1 h and
then loaded onto 3.5 or 4% polyacrylamide gels in 1/3 Tris borate/EDTA
for gel electrophoresis at 4 °C. The intensity of bands
representing the HMC and dimeric complex was quantified by using
the PhosphorImagerTM system (Molecular Dynamics).
Purification of the HMC and Coelution of Hap1 and
His6-Hap1 Western Blotting--
For Western blotting, whole cell extracts
and the eluate from Ni-NTA columns were first separated on 7%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride or nitrocellulose membranes. Hap1 was visualized by using a
purified antibody against the Hap1 DNA binding sequence and a
chemiluminescence Western blotting kit (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), as described previously (17).
Fusion of the GST or His6 Tag to the Hap1 N
Terminus Has No Effect on Heme Regulation or the Formation of the
HMC--
To characterize biochemically the HMC and to determine
whether it contains a Hap1 monomer or oligomer, we purified the
complex. We fused the GST or His6 tag to the Hap1 N
terminus and determined how tagged Hap1 fusions respond to heme and how
they form the HMC. As shown in Fig.
1A, both His6-Hap1
and GST-Hap1 responded to heme in the same way as Hap1; they showed a
low level of activity in the absence of heme, and heme greatly
stimulated their activity. Like Hap1, GST-Hap1 and
His6-Hap1 formed a high molecular weight complex (HMC) and
bound to DNA with low affinity (Fig. 1B). Heme disrupted
this complex and permitted Hap1 to bind to DNA as a dimer with high
affinity. These results show that fusion of His6 and GST
tags to Hap1 has no effect on heme responsiveness of tagged Hap1 fusion
proteins and HMC formation. Therefore, the tagged Hap1 fusions can be
used to purify the HMC. We initially tested purification by using both
GST-Hap1 and His6-Hap1. We prepared extracts from cells
expressing a high level of GST-Hap1 and His6-Hap1 from the
GAL1-10 promoter. We then loaded the extracts onto
glutathione or Ni-NTA columns, respectively. We found that both
GST-Hap1 and His6-Hap1 were highly enriched on the columns,
but bound GST-Hap1 could not be easily eluted for unknown reasons.
However, the bound His6-Hap1 complexes could be
successfully eluted by using imidazole. As shown in Fig. 1C,
Hap1 was highly enriched in the eluate compared with crude extracts,
and several other proteins were coeluted with Hap1 (see Ref. 17). These
proteins also cofractionated with His6-Hap1 on a Superose 6 column and were cross-linked to His6-Hap1 (Ref. 17 and data
not shown) but were not retained on the Ni-NTA column when extracts
containing Hap1 (not His6-Hap1) were used. These results
strongly suggest that these proteins were bound to Hap1, not to Ni-NTA
beads. The two most abundant proteins, p70
(Hsp70)2 and p60, are in a
molar ratio of about 1:1 to His6-Hap1. Further, as
expected, the purified HMC bound to DNA with low affinity; heme
disrupted the HMC and permitted Hap1 to bind to DNA with high affinity
(at least 10-fold higher) (Fig. 1D). This confirms the
previous observation that Hap1 DNA binding activity is repressed in the
HMC (17, 21, 30).
His6-Hap1 The HMC Binds to Various Hap1-binding and Mutated Sites in a Manner
Similar to Dimer Binding but Totally Different from Monomer
Binding--
The coelution experiment suggests that Hap1 is a
preexisting dimer or possibly a higher oligomer in the HMC in the
absence of heme. We further ascertained this idea by testing whether
Hap1 subunits in the HMC are physically close enough to function
together as a dimer. We examined the manner by which the HMC binds to
various DNA sites. Hap1 contains a conserved C6 zinc cluster that
recognizes a CGG triplet (31). A Hap1 dimer binds cooperatively to
asymmetric DNA sites containing a direct repeat of CGG triplets
(consensus sequence: CGGnnnTAnCGG) (31, 32). The two C6 zinc clusters are positioned in tandem to recognize the two CGG triplets in a direct
repeat (32, 33). Mutating any of the conserved nucleotides leads to
reduced Hap1 binding affinity (31). However, when Hap1 is mutated or
engineered so that it cannot form a stable dimer, it binds to DNA as a
monomer with low affinity (32). These previous studies clearly
demonstrated that the affinity of Hap1 monomeric binding is identical
whether one or more CGG triplets are present in the DNA sites (32),
apparently because a Hap1 monomer can make contacts with only one CGG
triplet. The low DNA binding affinity of the HMC may result from
monomer binding because the HMC contains a Hap1 monomer or from
weakened dimer binding due to the interference by molecular chaperones.
If the HMC contains only one Hap1 subunit (a monomer), it should bind
identically to various Hap1-binding and mutated sites with one or more
CGG triplets. However, if the HMC contains two Hap1 subunits (a dimer)
and the C6 zinc clusters are close enough to function together, it
should bind to various DNA sites in a manner similar to the Hap1 dimer
formed in the presence of heme (32).
Therefore, we determined and compared the ways by which the HMC and
Hap1 dimer bind to various Hap1-binding and mutated sites. These sites
include UAS1/CYC1 (Fig. 3,
lanes 1 and 2); a chimeric site containing a
half-site of UAS1/CYC1 and a half-site of
UAS/CYC7 (lanes 3 and 4);
UAS/CYC7 (lanes 5 and 6); a consensus
Hap1 site, HC1 (CGGACTTATCGG, lanes 7 and 8); M1,
a mutant site with the second CGG of HC1 changed to CCG
(CGGACTTATCCG, lanes 9 and 10); M2, a
mutant site with the conserved T in the spacer changed to C
(CGGACTCATCGG, lanes 11 and 12); and M3, a double
mutant site that combines mutations in M1 and M2
(CGGACTCATCCG, lanes 13 and 14) (32). Clearly, Fig. 3 shows that the HMC did not bind
identically to these sites, strongly arguing against the idea that the
HMC contains a Hap1 monomer. Instead, the HMC and Hap1 dimer bound to
these sites in a similar manner. The HMC binding was observed at
UAS1/CYC1, UAS/CYC7, the chimera, and the HC1
site, where the affinity of Hap1 dimer binding is known to be high (31,
32) (Fig. 3, lanes 1-8). At the M2 site, dimer binding was
weaker, and HMC binding was barely observable. Binding by both HMC and Hap1 dimer was not observed at the M1 and M3 sites that contain only
one CGG triplet. Quantitation showed that the intensity of the HMC band
varied to about the same degree as the intensity of the Hap1 dimer band
at these sites. The data strongly suggest that the HMC, like the Hap1
dimer formed in the presence of heme, requires a complete site
containing a direct repeat of two CGG triplets for binding, suggesting
that the HMC recognizes DNA as a Hap1 dimer, not a monomer.
To further verify this result, we carried out competition experiments.
We examined the effects of various unlabeled DNA sites on HMC and Hap1
dimer binding to the radiolabeled consensus HC1 site (Fig.
4). We used unlabeled HC1, M1, M2, and M3
oligonucleotides to compete with the binding of HMC and Hap1 dimer to
the radiolabeled HC1 site. The cold HC1 oligonucleotides completely
out-competed DNA binding by the HMC and Hap1 dimer (compare lanes
3 and 4 with lanes 1 and 2), M2
oligonucleotides competed slightly with the binding by the HMC and Hap1
dimer to labeled HC1 (compare lanes 7 and 8 with
lanes 1 and 2), and M1 and M3 did not compete
with (perhaps M3 even enhanced) the binding at labeled HC1 (compare lanes 5, 6, 9, and 10 with
lanes 1 and 2). Quantitation showed that these
oligonucleotides competed with the HMC and dimer binding to the same
extent. These results again showed that the HMC and the Hap1 dimer
behaved similarly when binding to various DNA sites. These DNA binding
experiments (see Figs. 3 and 4) strongly suggested that the HMC, like
the Hap1 dimer formed in the presence of heme, cooperatively binds to
DNA as a dimer.
Increasing Overexpression of Hap1 Leads to Graded Increases in Hap1
DNA Binding and Transcriptional Activities in the Absence of
Heme--
The above results suggest that the HMC is a preexisting Hap1
dimer, bound and repressed by molecular chaperones. Thus, we expect
that heme should cause the dissociation of molecular chaperones in the
HMC, thereby leading to Hap1 activation. To test this idea, we
attempted to purify Hap1 in the presence of heme. However, this
experiment was not successful because heme binds strongly to the
columns (heme is known to be a very sticky molecule, and it stuck to
all kinds of beads we tested, including Ni-NTA beads). When extracts
were loaded onto the column in the presence of heme, most of the heme
stuck to the beads on the top of the column and became ineffective in
dissociating the HMC. We also tried to dissociate Hap1 from the HMC by
purifying Hap1 from denatured yeast extracts. However, Hap1 is very
labile under denaturing conditions, and we were not able to recover any
full-length Hap1 from the Ni-NTA columns (the longest contained only
the DNA-binding domain).
Despite these setbacks, we obtained evidence suggesting that
overexpression of Hap1 indeed functionally titrates out the molecular chaperones in the HMC (Fig. 5). As the
Hap1 protein level increased, Hap1 DNA binding activity progressively
increased (Fig. 5A). First, more and more HMC formed (Fig.
5A, lanes 2, 4, 6, and
8). Second, the amount of the HMC reached its limit,
presumably because the molecular chaperones were titrated out, and
extra Hap1 formed the lower molecular weight, dimeric Hap1 complex (DC)
(Fig. 5A, lane 8). Further, as the Hap1
expression level gradually rose, Hap1 transcriptional activity in
vivo simultaneously increased, even in the absence of heme (Fig.
5B). Hap1 activity reached a significant level (about
50-fold higher than the basal transcription level) under the condition
that the smaller DC formed (see Fig. 5B, 8-h induction time,
and Fig. 5A, lane 8), although this level of
activity was still 10-fold less than Hap1 activity in the presence of
heme (see Fig. 1A). Together, these results suggest that
titration of molecular chaperones in the HMC is functionally linked to
Hap1 transcriptional activation.
In this report, we begin to probe the mechanism by which Hap1 is
repressed in the HMC. We present strong evidence suggesting that Hap1
is a preexisting dimer or possibly higher oligomer in the HMC in the
absence of heme. First, Hap1 and His6-Hap1 Previously, it was postulated that in the absence of heme, Hap1 is
prevented from dimerization by other proteins in the HMC; thus, it
cannot bind to DNA with high affinity and activate transcription (22,
34). Heme presumably disrupts the HMC, so Hap1 is free to dimerize and
thus bind to DNA with high affinity, thereby activating transcription
(22, 34). Our data argue against this simple dimerization model. The
data show that in the absence of heme, Hap1 preexists as a dimer or
possibly higher oligomer. Further, the two subunits of the preexisting
dimer act cooperatively in DNA binding; disrupting the interaction of
one subunit with one CGG triplet completely abolished HMC binding.
Clearly, because of the interference of molecular chaperones, the DNA
binding affinity of the HMC is greatly reduced compared with that of
the Hap1 dimer formed in the presence of heme (see Figs. 1, 3, 4, and
5). The low DNA binding affinity of the HMC may result from weakened
Hap1-Hap1 dimer interactions, weakened Hap1-DNA interactions, or both.
In any case, the two Hap1 subunits of the HMC are very likely in direct
physical contact with each other because they must be close enough to
recognize simultaneously the two CGG triplets, separated by only six
base pairs (31, 32).
Taken together, these results suggest a new model for how heme
regulates Hap1 activity. In the absence of heme, Hap1 exists as a dimer
in the HMC, but its DNA binding and perhaps transcription-activating activities are inhibited by molecular chaperones. When heme binds to
Hap1, it may induce certain Hap1 conformational changes, disrupting the
inhibitory interactions imposed on the preexisting Hap1 dimer by
molecular chaperones in the HMC. Consequently, the inhibition on Hap1
is relieved and allows the Hap1 dimer to bind to DNA with high
affinity, thereby leading to Hap1 activation. This model predicts that
dissociation of molecular chaperones in the HMC should lead to Hap1
activation. Indeed, data shown in Fig. 5 suggest that molecular
chaperones can be functionally titrated out by overexpression of Hap1,
and this titration leads to significant increases in Hap1 DNA binding
and transcriptional activities. This model provides a new example of
how the activity of a dimeric transcription factor can be controlled.
Perhaps the activity of many other dimeric transcription factors, such
as Mal63 and Pdr1 of the Gal4 family, is also regulated in this manner.
*
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant
MCB-96174720 and National Institutes of Health Grant GM53453 (to
L. Z.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2
T. Hon, A. Hach and L. Zhang, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
HMC, higher
molecular weight complex;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
DC, dimeric Hap1 complex;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
NTA, nitrilotriacetic Acid.
The Yeast Heme-responsive Transcriptional Activator Hap1 Is a
Preexisting Dimer in the Absence of Heme*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase assays and for extract preparation were grown as
described previously (17). Yeast strains used were MHY200
(MATa ura3-52 leu2-3, 112 his4-519 ade1-100 hem1-
100 hap1::LEU2) (27), L51 (MAT
a leu2-2, 2-112 his4-519 ade1-100
ura3-52 hap1::LEU2 trp1::HISG), and JEL1
(MAT
leu2 trp1 ura3-52 nprb1-1122 pep4-3
His3::pGAL10-Gal4).
Kpn, a DNA
fragment encoding Met-Arg-Gly-Ser-His-His-His-His-His-His was
synthesized and inserted into the SamI site of the Hap1 and Hap1
Kpn expression plasmids, SD5-HAP1 and
SD5-HAP1
Kpn (28). The resulting plasmids express Hap1 and
Hap1
Kpn with the MRGS-His6 tag at their N termini. To
construct GST-Hap1, a DNA fragment encoding GST was inserted into the
SamI site of the Hap1 expression plasmid,
SD5-HAP1. The correct clones were identified by restriction digestion and confirmed by sequencing.
-Galactosidase Assay--
Yeast MHY200 cells, with the
HEM1 (encoding for
-aminolevulinate synthase, the first
enzyme in heme synthesis) (27) and HAP1 genes deleted, were
transformed with yeast high copy 2 µm replicating plasmid expressing
wild type Hap1, GST-Hap1, or His6-Hap1 from the
GAL1-10 promoter and a
UAS1/CYC1-TATA-lacZ reporter plasmid as described
previously (17, 22). Cells were grown in synthetic complete medium
containing 2% raffinose with limiting amounts of heme precursor
-aminolevulinate (2 µg/ml) or high amounts of 5-aminolevulinate
(250 µg/ml) to approximately A0.5. Cells were
then induced with 2% galactose for 7 h or for specified times (see Fig. 5) and harvested for determination of
-galactosidase as
described previously (22).
Kpn--
To purify the HMC or test the
coelution of Hap1 and His6-Hap1
Kpn, Ni-NTA superflow
beads (QIAGEN) were packed in a column and equilibrated with buffer
containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM
dithiothreitol. Then, extracts were loaded onto the column at the rate
of approximately 5 ml/h. Columns were subsequently washed with 150-200
column volumes of the equilibration buffer containing 20 mM
imidazole. The HMC complexes were eluted with buffer containing 250 mM imidazole. The eluate was further concentrated on
Centricon 10 (Amicon) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and DNA mobility shift assays.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Fusion of the GST or His6 tag to
the Hap1 N terminus does not affect Hap1 heme responsiveness or
the formation of the HMC. A, the activities of
wild type Hap1, GST-Hap1, and His6-Hap1 in heme-deficient
(Low) or heme-sufficient (High) cells are shown.
2 µm plasmids expressing wild type Hap1, GST-Hap1, and
His6-Hap1 from the GAL1-10 promoter were
transformed into yeast
hap1
hem1 cells (27) bearing the
UAS1/CYC1-lacZ reporter.
-Galactosidase assays were
carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures." Plotted
data are averages of values obtained from at least three independent
transformants, and standard deviations were within 20%. B,
DNA binding complexes formed by Hap1, GST-Hap1, and
His6-Hap1 in the presence or absence of heme are shown.
Extracts containing Hap1 (lanes 1 and 2),
GST-Hap1 (lanes 3 and 4), and
His6-Hap1 (lanes 5 and 6) were
incubated with radiolabeled DNA in the absence (lanes 1,
3, and 5) or presence (lanes 2,
4, and 6) of 5 ng/µl heme. The reaction
mixtures were analyzed on a 4% polyacrylamide gel.
His6-Hap1 (lane 6) may appear to migrate faster
than Hap1 in the presence of heme, likely because the band is much more
intense and spread. C, purified proteins by the Ni-NTA
column are shown. Shown are the eluted peak fraction (ELU,
~2 µg) and unpurified whole cell extracts (EXT, ~25
µg). The identity of the His6-Hap1 band was verified by
Western blotting using antibodies against MRGS-His6
(QIAGEN) (see "Experimental Procedures"). D, DNA binding
complexes formed by the purified Hap1 complex in the presence and
absence of heme are shown. Approximately 0.2 µg (total protein amount
in the fraction) of purified HMC was incubated with radiolabeled
DNA in the absence (lane 1) and presence (lane 2)
of 5 ng/µl heme and then analyzed on a 3.5% polyacrylamide gel. The
positions of the HMC and DC are marked. Note that this gel and those
shown in Figs. 3 and 4 contained a lower percentage of acrylamide than
the one shown in B.
Kpn and Hap1 Coelute on the Ni-NTA
Column in the Absence of Heme--
After determining the appropriate
conditions for purifying the HMC, we investigated whether Hap1 is a
dimer/oligomer in the HMC by coelution. We imagined that if Hap1 exists
as an oligomer in the HMC, two different Hap1 size variants should be
complexed together in the HMC and thus should coelute on the column
that retains one form of the size variants. However, if Hap1 exists as
a monomer in the HMC, two Hap1 size variants should not be complexed
together and should not coelute on the column. Because all Hap1 domains
except for the activation domain are required for forming a stable HMC,
we used His6-Hap1
Kpn (containing Hap1 residues 1-1309
but not residues in the activation domain) and Hap1 as two size
variants. Longer Hap1 size variants were not used because of
difficulties in cloning and expressing long Hap1 derivatives. We
coexpressed His6-Hap1
Kpn and Hap1 in yeast cells and
prepared extracts from these cells under the condition that all Hap1
forms the HMC (22). We then loaded the extracts containing both
His6-Hap1
Kpn and Hap1 (Fig.
2, lane 2) onto a Ni-NTA
column. As a control, we loaded extracts containing only Hap1 (Fig. 2, lane 1) onto a Ni-NTA column (for reasons unclear,
His6-Hap1
Kpn appeared to be expressed at a higher level
than Hap1; see Fig. 2, lanes 1 and 2). We then
extensively washed these columns and eluted them with imidazole. We
found that Hap1 coeluted with His6-Hap1
Kpn, and the
ratio of Hap1 to His6-Hap1
Kpn in the eluate was similar to the ratio in crude extracts (Fig. 2, compare lane 4 with
lane 2). Further, no Hap1 was found in the eluate when the
extracts did not contain His6-Hap1
Kpn (Fig. 2,
lane 3), suggesting that the retention of Hap1 on the column
was not attributable to nonspecific binding to Ni-NTA beads. These
results suggest that Hap1 is in a dimeric or possibly higher oligomeric
form in the absence of heme in the HMC.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Hap1 coelutes with
His6-Hap1
Kpn in the absence of
heme in the Ni-NTA column. Extracts (EXT) were prepared
from cells expressing Hap1 (lane 1) or both Hap1 and
His6-Hap1
Kpn (lane 2) under the condition
that all Hap1 forms the HMC (see Fig. 1D). The extracts were
loaded onto Ni-NTA columns and washed extensively. The eluate
(ELU) from the column loaded with extracts containing Hap1
(lane 3) and the eluate from the column loaded with extracts
containing both Hap1 and His6-Hap1
Kpn (lane
4) were analyzed on a 7% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to
Western blotting by using an antibody against Hap1. The original
extracts (lanes 1 and 2) were also
analyzed.

View larger version (95K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Comparison of DNA binding by the HMC and Hap1
dimer at various sites. Extracts containing Hap1 were incubated
with radiolabeled oligonucleotides containing UAS1/CYC1
(lanes 1 and 2), a chimeric site
(CGCTATTATCGG) containing a half-site from UAS1/CYC1 and a
half-site from UAS/CYC7 (lanes 3 and
4), UAS/CYC7 (lanes 5 and
6), a consensus site HC1 (CGGACTTATCGG) (lanes 7 and 8), mutant site M1 (CGGACTTATCCG)
(lanes 9 and 10), M2 (CGGACTCATCGG)
(lanes 11 and 12), and M3
(CGGACTCATCCG) (lanes 13 and
14) in the absence (lanes 1, 3,
5, 7, 9, 11, and
13) or presence (lanes 2, 4,
6, 8, 10, 12, and
14) of 2.5 ng/µl heme. The reaction mixtures were analyzed
on a 3.5% polyacrylamide gel (note that this is a gel with a lower
percentage of acrylamide than the one in Fig. 1). The positions of the
HMC, DC, and free probe are marked.

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The competition of the binding of the HMC and
DC to radiolabeled HC1 by unlabeled oligonucleotides containing various
Hap1-binding sites. The eluate containing His6-Hap1
was incubated with radiolabeled oligonucleotides with 0 (lanes
1 and 2) or 250 ng (lanes 3-10) of
unlabeled HC1 (lanes 3 and 4), M1 (lanes
5 and 6), M2 (lanes 7 and 8), or
M3 (lanes 9 and 10) in the absence (lanes
1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) or
presence (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8,
and 10) of 2.5 ng/µl heme. The positions of the HMC, DC,
and free probe are marked.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Increasing overexpression of Hap1 leads to
graded increases in Hap1 DNA binding and transcriptional
activation. A, Hap1 overexpression causes the titration
of the HMC and the formation of the smaller DC in the absence of heme.
Cells bearing the Hap1 expression plasmid driven by the
GAL1-10 promoter were grown to A0.5
in noninducing medium and then induced with 2% galactose for 1 (lanes 1 and 2), 2 (lanes 3 and
4), 4 (lanes 5 and 6), or 8 (lanes 7 and 8) h. Cells were subsequently
harvested, and extracts were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Extracts were incubated with
radiolabeled DNA in the presence (lanes 1, 3,
5, and 7) or absence (lanes 2,
4, 6, and 8) of 2.5 ng/µl heme. The
reaction mixtures were analyzed on a 3.5% polyacrylamide gel. The
positions of the HMC and the smaller DC are marked. B,
increasing overexpression of Hap1 permits Hap1 to gain significant
transcriptional activity in heme-deficient cells. The yeast
hap1
hem1 cells (27) bearing the Hap1 expression
plasmid driven by the GAL1-10 promoter and a Hap1-driven
reporter were grown in noninducing medium under heme-deficient
conditions and then induced with 2% galactose for 0, 1, 2, 4, or
8 h. Cells were subsequently harvested for
-galactosidase
assays as described under "Experimental Procedures." Plotted data
are averages of values obtained from three independent transformants,
and standard deviations were within 20%.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Kpn coeluted
on the Ni-NTA column in the absence of heme (Fig. 2). Second, DNA
binding analysis of the HMC showed that the HMC binds to various DNA
sites in a manner similar to Hap1 dimer binding but not monomer binding
(32) (see Figs. 3 and 4). Third, increasing overexpression of Hap1
leads to increased DNA binding, the formation of the smaller Hap1
dimeric complex, and a significant level of Hap1 transcriptional
activity in the absence of heme. These results suggest that Hap1
repression in the absence of heme is due, at least in part, to the
interference of DNA binding of the preexisting Hap1 dimer by molecular
chaperones. If the HMC was not a preexisting dimer in the absence of
heme, and heme were required for Hap1 dimerization, then overexpression
of Hap1 would not lead to the formation of the smaller dimeric complex.
Further, the correlation between the increase of Hap1 transcriptional
activity in vivo (Fig. 5B) and the increase of
Hap1 DNA binding activity from both the HMC and DC in vitro
(Fig. 5A) suggests that the titration of molecular
chaperones is functionally important for Hap1 activation.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: New York University
Medical Center, 550 First Ave., New York, NY 10016. Tel.: 212-263-8506; Fax: 212-263-8166; E-mail:
zhangl02@mcrcr0.med.nyu.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Kelly, P. A.,
Postel-Vinay, M. C.,
Finidori, J.,
Edery, M.,
Sotiropoulos, A.,
Goujon, L.,
and Esposito, N.
(1994)
Acta Paediatr. Suppl.
399,
107-111[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Lodish, H. F.,
Hilton, D. J.,
Klingmüller, U.,
Watowich, S. S.,
and Wu, H.
(1995)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
60,
93-104 3.
Forman, B. M.,
and Samuels, H. H.
(1990)
New Biol.
2,
587-594[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Salzmann, M.,
and Bachmann, M. F.
(1998)
Mol. Immunol.
35,
271-277[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Stock, J.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
825-827[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Lamb, P.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(1991)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
16,
417-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Jones, N.
(1990)
Cell
61,
9-11[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Johnston, M.
(1987)
Microbiol. Rev.
51,
458-476 9.
Gardner, K. H.,
Anderson, S. F.,
and Coleman, J. E.
(1995)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2,
898-905[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Marmorstein, R.,
Carey, M.,
Ptashne, M.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1992)
Nature
356,
408-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Marmorstein, R.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2504-2512 12.
Levine, J.,
Tanouye, L.,
and Michels, C. A.
(1992)
Curr. Genet.
22,
181-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Reece, R. J.,
and Ptashne, M.
(1993)
Science
261,
909-911 14.
Siddiqui, A. H.,
and Brandriss, M. C.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
4706-4712 15.
Sirenko, O. I.,
Ni, B.,
and Needleman, R. B.
(1995)
Curr. Genet.
27,
5509-5516
16.
Hallstrom, T. C.,
Katzmann, D. J.,
Torres, R. J.,
Sharp, W. J.,
and Moye-Rowley, W. S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1147-1155 17.
Zhang, L.,
Hach, A.,
and Wang, C.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3819-3828 18.
Creusot, F.,
Verdiere, J.,
Gaisne, M.,
and Slonimski, P. P.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
204,
263-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Pfeifer, K.,
Kim, K. S.,
Kogan, S.,
and Guarente, L.
(1989)
Cell
56,
291-301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Zitomer, R. S.,
and Lowry, C. V.
(1992)
Microbiol. Rev.
56,
1-11 21.
Fytlovich, S.,
Gervais, M.,
Agrimonti, C.,
and Guiard, B.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
1209-1218[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Zhang, L.,
and Guarente, L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14643-14647 23.
Pratt, W.,
and Toft, D.
(1997)
Endocr. Rev.
18,
306-360 24.
Pratt, W. B.
(1998)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
217,
420-434[Abstract]
25.
Bohen, S. P.,
Kralli, A.,
and Yamamoto, K. R.
(1995)
Science
268,
1303-1304 26.
Johnson, J.,
Corbisier, R.,
Stensgard, B.,
and Toft, D.
(1996)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
56,
31-37[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Haldi, M. L.,
and Guarente, L.
(1995)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
248,
229-235[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Turcotte, B.,
and Guarente, L.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
2001-2009 29.
Pfeifer, K.,
Prezant, T.,
and Guarente, L.
(1987)
Cell
49,
19-27[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Zhang, L.,
and Guarente, L.
(1994)
Genetics
136,
813-817[Abstract]
31.
Zhang, L.,
and Guarente, L.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2110-2119 32.
Zhang, L.,
and Guarente, L.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
4676-4681[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
King, D. A.,
Zhang, L.,
Guarente, L.,
and Marmorstein, R.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
64-71[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Zhang, L.,
Bermingham, M. O.,
Turcotte, B.,
and Guarente, L.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2851-2855
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. D. von Gromoff, M. Schroda, U. Oster, and C. F. Beck Identification of a plastid response element that acts as an enhancer within the Chlamydomonas HSP70A promoter Nucleic Acids Res., October 18, 2006; 34(17): 4767 - 4779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wu and R. Wang Carbon Monoxide: Endogenous Production, Physiological Functions, and Pharmacological Applications Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2005; 57(4): 585 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Vasileuskaya, U. Oster, and C. F. Beck Mg-Protoporphyrin IX and Heme Control HEMA, the Gene Encoding the First Specific Step of Tetrapyrrole Biosynthesis, in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1620 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hon, H. C. Lee, Z. Hu, V. R. Iyer, and L. Zhang The Heme Activator Protein Hap1 Represses Transcription by a Heme-Independent Mechanism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1343 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lan, H. C. Lee, S. Tang, and L. Zhang A Novel Mode of Chaperone Action: HEME ACTIVATION OF Hap1 BY ENHANCED ASSOCIATION OF Hsp90 WITH THE REPRESSED Hsp70-Hap1 COMPLEX J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 27607 - 27612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hon, A. Dodd, R. Dirmeier, N. Gorman, P. R. Sinclair, L. Zhang, and R. O. Poyton A Mechanism of Oxygen Sensing in Yeast: MULTIPLE OXYGEN-RESPONSIVE STEPS IN THE HEME BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAY AFFECT Hap1 ACTIVITY J. Biol. Chem., December 12, 2003; 278(50): 50771 - 50780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Lee, T. Hon, C. Lan, and L. Zhang Structural Environment Dictates the Biological Significance of Heme-Responsive Motifs and the Role of Hsp90 in the Activation of the Heme Activator Protein Hap1 Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2003; 23(16): 5857 - 5866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Lee, T. Hon, and L. Zhang The Molecular Chaperone Hsp90 Mediates Heme Activation of the Yeast Transcriptional Activator Hap1 J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 7430 - 7437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hon, H. C. Lee, A. Hach, J. L. Johnson, E. A. Craig, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and L. Zhang The Hsp70-Ydj1 Molecular Chaperone Represses the Activity of the Heme Activator Protein Hap1 in the Absence of Heme Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2001; 21(23): 7923 - 7932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||