J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 33, 22993-22998, August 13, 1999
The Structure of the Colony Migration Factor from Pathogenic
Proteus mirabilis
A CAPSULAR POLYSACCHARIDE THAT FACILITATES SWARMING*
M. Mahbubur
Rahman
,
Jean
Guard-Petter§,
Kokila
Asokan
§,
Colin
Hughes¶, and
Russell W.
Carlson
From the
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, The
University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, the
§ Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, United States
Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Athens,
Georgia 30605, and the ¶ Department of Pathology, University of
Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, United
Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
Swarming by Proteus mirabilis is
characterized by cycles of rapid and coordinated population migration
across surfaces following differentiation of vegetative cells into
elongated hyperflagellated swarm cells. It has been shown that surface
colony expansion by the swarm cell population is facilitated by a
colony migration factor (Cmf), a capsular polysaccharide (CPS) that
also contributes to the uropathogenicity of P. mirabilis
(Gygi, D., Rahman, M. M., Lai, H.-C., Carlson, R., Guard-Petter,
J., and Hughes, C. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 17, 1167-1175).
In this report, the Cmf-CPS was extracted with hot water, precipitated
with ethanol, and further purified by gel permeation chromatography.
Its structure was established by glycosyl composition and linkage
analyses, and by one- and two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. The Cmf-CPS
is composed of the following tetrasaccharide repeating unit.
Proteus mirabilis is a pathogenic Gram-negative
bacterium that frequently causes kidney infections, typically
established by ascending colonization of the urinary tract (1-5). It
exhibits a striking form of multicellular behavior, called swarming
migration, in which motile vegetative rods growing on solid media
differentiate into extremely elongated hyperflagellated swarm cells
that undergo rapid and coordinated population migration away from the
initial colony (4, 6, 7).
A transposon mutant of P. mirabilis, WT19, defective in mass
migration of normally differentiated swarm cells, has been reported (8). Genetic analyses identified a lesion in a putative polysaccharide assembly locus, and electron microscopy and gel electrophoresis confirmed the specific loss of a capsular polysaccharide
(CPS).1 This CPS, named Cmf
(colony migration factor)-CPS, was
suggested to facilitate population migration by enhancing medium
surface fluidity and possibly influencing cell-cell interactions. The cmfA
was also attenuated in experimental
uropathogenicity, showing greatly reduced colonization of the urinary
tract (9).
Little is known about the structures of Proteus
polysaccharides, and serology indicates substantial heterogeneity,
with P. mirabilis and the closely related Proteus
vulgaris divided into 49 O-serogroups, and many smooth
strains remain unclassified (10). Analysis of the Cmf-CPS from
wild-type P. mirabilis WT19 (8) indicated that it is an
acidic type II molecule rich in galacturonic acid and
N-acetylgalactosamine and that it can have a phospholipid anchor. This composition showed that it must be structurally different from previously reported, functionally anonomous CPSs from P. mirabilis ATCC49565 (11) and P. vulgaris CP2-96 (12).
The former was reported to consist of a branched trisaccharide
repeating unit of N-acetylglucosamine,
N-acetylfucosamine, and glucuronic acid and the latter of a
tetrasaccharide repeating unit of two glucosyl, one
N-acetylgalactosaminosyl, and one glucuronosyl residue. To
establish the nature of a functionally characterized Proteus polysaccharide and gain a view of the possible common structural features among the polysaccharides of this genus, we report the structure of the Cmf-CPS from P. mirabilis WT19.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions--
P.
mirabilis WT19 strain U6450 (proticine type P3/S1) (13) was
isolated from a chronic urinary tract infection involving renal stone
formation (13). The bacterial cells were grown overnight at 37 °C on
the surface of Brilliant Green agar (BBL, Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD), and colony morphology was examined the next day.
After observing that this culture produced terraced, swarming colonies
that extended across 50% of the agar surface, cells at the edge of the
swarm colony were transferred to Brilliant Green agar again to confirm
the absence of contaminants. Biochemical confirmation of this strain as
Proteus was made using a commercial package of diagnostic
reagents (Enterotube II, Becton-Dickinson) and was confirmed as
P. mirabilis by the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (Ames, IA), although it atypically failed to ferment two
sugars, maltose and xylose.
Isolation and Purification of Cmf-CPS--
Bacteria were grown
in BHI broth, harvested by centrifugation, and washed once in
physiologically buffered saline as described by Lee and Cherniak (14).
Bacterial cells (100 g, wet weight) were suspended in 300 ml of water
and stirred vigorously in boiling water for 30 min. The suspension was
cooled in an ice bath with stirring for 90 min. The cell residue was
removed by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 30 min,
4 °C), the supernatant adjusted to 1% acetic acid, and crude
Cmf-CPS precipitated by the addition of ethanol (2.5 volumes, 24 h,
20 °C). The Cmf-CPS precipitate was collected by centrifugation
(10,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C), washed with ethanol, washed again with acetone, dried, dissolved in water, and lyophilized. This crude Cmf-CPS was suspended in a solution containing 6 ml of
EDTA-phosphate (0.05 M
Na2HPO4/0.005 M EDTA, pH 7.0), 3 mg of DNase (in 3 ml of 0.04 M MgCl2), and 20 mg
of RNase (in 3 ml of 0.04 M MgCl2). This
solution was incubated for 16 h at 37 °C followed by the
addition of proteinase K (4 µg) and incubated again for 16 h at
37 °C. The resulting solution was dialyzed against distilled water
for 48 h and centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 20 min, and the supernatant was lyophilized. The final yield was 800 mg of
crude Cmf-CPS. Crude Cmf-CPS was further purified by gel filtration column (90 × 1.6 cm) chromatography using Sephadex G-150
equilibrated with a buffer solution consisting of 0.2 M
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris base, and 0.25%
deoxycholic acid (DOC), pH 9.25. The content of each fraction was
identified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of DOC
(DOC-PAGE) using 18% acrylamide (15). Gels were fixed in the presence
or absence of Alcian blue (16) and silver-stained (17).
A fraction of the crude Cmf-CPS was also further purified by mild acid
hydrolysis in aqueous 1% acetic acid at 100 °C for 2 h. After
hydrolysis, the solution was cooled and centrifuged (10,000 × g). The supernatant was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 10 ml), and the aqueous layer was fractionated on a Sephadex G-75
column (90 × 1.6 cm). The fractions were assayed for hexose with phenol-sulfuric acid. The resulting Cmf-CPS and oligosaccharide (OS) fractions were lyophilized.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy--
Samples were
prepared for NMR analysis by a 2-fold lyophilization from
D2O and dissolved in 0.5 ml of D2O. Spectra
were recorded at 60 °C. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm, using
sodium 3-trimethylsilylpropanoate-d4 (
H 0.00), and acetone (
C 31.00) as
internal references. All NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AMX-500 or
DRX-600 MHz spectrometers. Two-dimensional DQF-COSY (18), TOCSY (19,
20), and NOESY (21) data sets were collected in phase-sensitive modes
using the States-TPPI (22) method. In these experiments, low power presaturation was applied to the residual water (HOD) signal. Typically, data sets of 2048 (t2) × 512 (t1) complex points were collected with 16 scans
per FID and a sweep width in both dimensions of 6 ppm. The TOCSY
experiments contained MLEV17 (23) mixing sequences ranging from 60 to
320 ms, and the NOESY mixing delay was 200 ms.
A gradient HSQC (24) data set was collected using the echo/anti-echo
method for pure absorption data. A data set of 2048 (t2) × 512 (t1)
complex points was acquired, with 32 and 64 scans per FID. The sweep
width was 7 ppm for proton (F2) and 60 ppm for carbon
(F1). The GARP (25) sequence was used for 13C
decoupling during aquisition. Data were processed typically with a
lorentzian-to-gaussian weighting function applied to
t2 and a shifted squared sine bell function and
zero-filling applied to t1. Data shown were
processed with Felix software (Molecular Simulations, Inc.).
Glycosyl Composition Analyses--
Glycosyl composition of
Cmf-CPS (0.5 mg each) was performed by hydrolysis in 0.5 ml of 2 M trifluoroacetic acid in a closed vial at 120 °C for
3 h. The glycoses in the hydrolysate were reduced with
NaBH4, acetylated, and analyzed by combined gas-liquid
chromatography mass spectrometry (GLC-MS) (26). For the determination
of uronic acid, the Cmf-CPS sample (0.5 mg) was dried in vacuum and
methanolyzed in 1 ml of methanolic 2 N HCl at 80 °C for 16 h.
The resulting methyl glycosides were either trimethylsilylated and
analyzed by GLC-MS (26), or they were reduced with NaBH4
(10 mg) in water (100 µl), acetylated, and analyzed by GLC-MS. The
absolute configurations of the glycoses present were determined by
GLC-MS analysis of the trimethylsilylated (S)-(+)-2-butyl and
(S)-(
)-2-butyl glycosides (27, 28).
Glycosyl Linkage Analyses--
Glycosyl linkage analysis was
carried out using a modified NaOH method (29, 30). The sample (1 mg)
was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (100 µl), powdered NaOH (100 mg)
was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred rapidly at room
temperature for 30 min. Methylation was performed by the sequential
additions of methyl iodide (10, 10, and 20 µl) at 10-min intervals.
After an additional 20 min of stirring, 1 ml of 1 M sodium
thiosulfate was added, and the methylated glycans were recovered in the
organic phase by extraction with chloroform (0.5 ml × 3). The
permethylated product was further purified by reverse-phase
chromatography using a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (31). The methylated
glycan was hydrolyzed with 2 M trifluoroacetic acid
(120 °C, 3 h), reduced with NaB2H4,
acetylated, and analyzed by GLC-MS (26). For the linkage determination
of the uronic acid, the permethylated Cmf-CPS sample (0.5 mg) was dried
in vacuum and methanolyzed in 1 ml of methanolic 2 N HCl at 80 °C
for 16 h. Released, partially methylated methyl glycosides were
N-acetylated with the addition of 200 µl of methanol, 20 µl'of pyridine, and 20 µl of acetic anhydride at room temperature for 5 h and dried in air. The carboxyl methyl ester of uronic acid
was reduced with NaB2H4 (10 mg) in water (100 µl) for 2 h at room temperature, neutralized with acetic acid,
and dried in air with the addition of methanol. The carboxyl reduced
products were hydrolyzed with 2 M trifluoroacetic acid
(120 °C, 3 h), reduced with NaB2H4,
acetylated, and analyzed by GLC-MS (26).
GLC-MS analyses were performed using capillary columns (length, 30 m; inner diameter, 0.32 mm) with helium as the carrier. A DB-5 column
(J & W Scientific) was used for aminoglycosyl derivatives, and an
SP2330 column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) was used for the neutral
glycosyl derivatives.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation and Purification of Cmf-CPS--
Analysis of the crude
Cmf-CPS by DOC-PAGE (Fig. 1) showed that
the crude Cmf-CPS contained some contaminating LPS. The crude Cmf-CPS
was separated from the contaminating LPS by a Sephadex G-150 column
using buffer containing DOC. The DOC-PAGE analysis of the fractions
resulted in a fraction that silver-stained only after fixing the gel in
the presence of Alcian blue (Fig. 1A), a property
characteristic of acidic polysaccharides (32). The low molecular weight
fraction silver-stained after being fixed in the presence or absence of
Alcian blue, a feature that is characteristic of LPS (32). Thus, the
crude Cmf-CPS fraction contained a high molecular weight
Cmf-CPSDOC and a low molecular weight LPS (a lipo-oligosaccharide, LOSDOC).

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
DOC-PAGE analysis of the fractions from
Sephadex G-150 column of the crude Cmf-CPS from P. mirabilis
WT19. Well C contains crude Cmf-CPS prior to
Sephadex G-150 column fractionation. Fractions (5 ml) were collected,
of which 10-µl samples of every other fraction starting with fraction
21 were applied to each well. The gel shown in Panel A was
fixed in the presence of Alcian blue prior to silver-staining, whereas
that shown in Panel B was fixed without Alcian blue.
Fractions 31-45 were combined and comprise purified Cmf-CPS
(Cmf-CPSDOC), and fractions 55-71 were combined and
comprise pure low molecular weight lipopolysaccharide, i.e.
the LOSDOC.
|
|
During the purification of Cmf-CPSDOC described in the
previous paragraph, the sample was subjected to alkaline conditions (pH
9.25) for an extended period of time. Thus, any O-acetyl
substituents, if present, would have been removed. To purify Cmf-CPS
without removal of O-acetyl groups, a portion of crude
Cmf-CPS (50 mg), was hydrolyzed with mild acid and purified by Sephadex
G-75 column chromatography. Two fractions were obtained, the high
molecular weight Cmf-CPSG75 and low molecular weight
oligosaccharides (OSG75) derived from the LOS. The
Cmf-CPSG75 eluted just after the void volume, and the
OSG75 eluted at twice the void volume (not shown). The
yields of Cmf-CPSG75 and OSG75 were 35 and 5 mg, respectively.
Composition Analysis--
The results of glycosyl and fatty acid
composition analyses of Cmf-CPSDOC, LOSDOC,
Cmf-CPSG75, and OSG75 are shown in Table I. Both Cmf-CPSDOC and
Cmf-CPSG75 have very similar glycosyl compositions,
i.e., mannuronic acid, galacturonic acid,
N-acetyl glucosamine, and N-acetyl galactosamine
in a molar ratio of 1:1:1:1. The LOSDOC contains glycosyl
residues characteristic of LPS core oligosaccharides, i.e.,
glucose, galactose, mannose, D,D-heptose, and
L,D-heptose (33). Fatty acid analysis showed
that neither of the Cmf-CPS fractions contained detectable fatty acyl
residues, whereas the LOSDOC contained myristic, palmitic,
and
-hydroxy myristic acids, a result consistent with the presence
of lipid A. Determination of the absolute configurations of the
glycoses present in the Cmf-CPS fractions revealed that all glycoses
had the D-configuration.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Composition of Cmf-CPSDOC, Cmf-CPSG75, LOSDOC,
and OSG75 from P. mirabilis WT19
CR, carboxyl-reduced; G75, Sephadex G-75; , below detectable levels;
+, present in significant quantities but not quantified.
|
|
Glycosyl Linkage Analysis--
Glycosyl linkage analysis was
performed by methylation followed by hydrolysis, reduction, and
preparation of alditol acetates. Linkage analysis of the uronic acid
was performed by methanolysis followed by reduction of the
permethylated sample prior to hydrolysis. The glycosyl linkages of the
Cmf-CPSDOC are shown in Table
II. Prior to carboxyl group
reduction, 3-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), and
3,4-linked N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) were present in a 1:1 ratio. After the carboxyl group reduction, two additional glycosyl residues were observed. The mass spectra and retention times
of their partially methylated alditol acetates were consistent with
3,6-linked mannosyl and 6-linked galactosyl residues with two deuteride
atoms at C-6, showing that these two residues were derived from
3-linked mannuronic acid and terminally linked galacturonic acid,
respectively.
NMR Spectroscopic Analysis--
The 1H NMR spectrum of
the Cmf-CPSDOC (Fig. 2)
confirmed that galactosamine and glucosamine were
N-acetylated, as indicated by a singlet at 2.05 ppm. The
1H NMR spectrum of Cmf-CPSG75 fraction (data
not shown) was identical to that of Cmf-CPSDOC. The absence
of a signal at about
2.10 in either Cmf-CPS fraction indicates that
the Cmf-CPS does not contain O-acetyl substituents. The
anomeric region shows three downfield
-anomeric proton signals
(Table III) at
5.37,
5.17, and
5.00 (JH-1,H-2 not resolved) and one
-anomeric proton signal at
4.79 (JH-1,H-2
7.0 Hz). With the aid of two-dimensional COSY (spectrum not shown),
TOCSY (Fig. 3A), and
broad-band decoupled HSQC (spectrum not shown) analyses, most of the
1H and 13C NMR signals could be assigned
(Tables III and IV). The four glycosyl residues were designated
A-D according to their decreasing anomeric
chemical shifts.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The 1H,1H TOCSY
(A) and 1H,1H NOESY
(B) spectra of P. mirabilis WT19
Cmf-CPSDOC. The signals labeled in bold
type on the NOESY spectrum indicate the strong inter-residue NOE
contacts from which the glycosyl sequence was deduced. The mixing time
for the TOCSY spectrum shown was 120 ms. Complete assignment required
several TOCSY experiments requiring several mixing times ranging from
60 to 320 ms. The spectra for these other experiments are not
shown.
|
|
Residue A has an anomeric signal at
5.37 and a
JH-1,H-2 coupling constant of 3 Hz, indicating
that it is an
-linked residue. The H-1 to H-5 proton signals (Table
III) for residue A were assigned from the COSY and TOCSY
(Fig. 3A) spectra. A large JH-3,H-4
coupling constant (>5 Hz) was observed for A, supporting
the conclusion it has a gluco configuration. The carbon signals (Table IV) from C-1 to C-5 for
residue A were determined from the HSQC spectrum. The C-2
chemical shift of residue A is
54.0, typical of a
nitrogen bearing carbon. The downfield position of the C-3 carbon
signal (
82.2) indicates that residue A is substituted at
this position. Thus, A is the 3-linked
N-acetylglucosaminosyl residue. The carbon chemical shifts from C-1 to C-5 for residue A (Table IV) are also similar to
those previously reported for a 3-linked
-N-acetylglucosaminosyl residue (34).
The anomeric signal for residue B is
5.17 (JH-1,H-2 not resolved), showing that it is
-linked. The proton chemical shifts (Table III) from H-1 to H-5
protons were assigned from COSY (spectrum not shown) and TOCSY (Fig.
3A) spectra. A relatively small
JH-3,H-4 coupling constant (<5 Hz) for residue
B indicates that it has a galacto configuration.
The carbon chemical shifts (Table IV) from C-1 to C-5 for residue
B were assigned from HSQC spectrum. The C-2 chemical shift
of residue B is
50.5, typical of a nitrogen bearing
carbon. The downfield shift of C-3 (
76.6) and C-4 (
79.1)
indicates that residue B is substituted at C-3 and C-4.
Glycosyl linkage analysis (Table II) showed that
N-acetylgalactosamine is the only 3,4-linked aminoglycosyl
residue found in the Cmf-CPS. Therefore, residue B is the
3,4-linked-
-N-acetylgalactosaminosyl residue.
Residue C has an anomeric proton chemical shift at
5.00, (JH-1,H-2 not resolved) indicating that it is
-linked. The proton chemical shifts (Table III) from H-1 to H-5 for
residue C were assigned from the COSY and TOCSY(Fig.
3A) spectra. A small JH-2,H-3
coupling constant (<5 Hz), indicates that the residue C has
a manno configuration. The carbon chemical shifts (Table IV)
from C-1 to C-5 were assigned from HSQC spectrum. The downfield
chemical shift of C-3 (
76.5), indicates that residue C
is substituted at this position. Glycosyl linkage analysis (Table II)
showed only one 3-linked mannuronosyl residue in the Cmf-CPS.
Thus, residue C is the 3-linked mannuronosyl residue.
The anomeric proton chemical shift for residue D is
4.79 (JH-1,H-2 7 Hz) indicating that it is
-linked. The proton chemical shifts (Table III) from H-1 to H-5 for
residue D were assigned from the COSY and TOCSY (Fig.
3A) spectra. The JH-3,H-4 coupling
constant for residue D is similar to that for residue
B (i.e., < 5 Hz), indicating that it has a
galacto configuration. The carbon chemical shifts (Table IV)
from C-1 to C-5 carbon for residue D were determined from
the HSQC spectrum. There is no downfield chemical shift for any carbon of residue D, indicating that it is not substituted. The only terminally linked hexosyl residue observed in the glycosyl linkage
analysis of the Cmf-CPS (Table II) was galacturonic acid. Thus, residue
D is the terminally linked
-galacturonosyl residue.
The sequence of glycosyl residues was determined from a NOESY
experiment (Fig. 3B and Table
V). In addition to intra-residue NOE
contacts to H-2 and H-3, residue A has an NOE contact from
H-1 to H-3 of residue C. Because residue C is
3-linked
-D-mannuronic acid, the sequence shown in
Structure 1 was established.
Residue C has a strong NOE contact from H-1 to H-4 of
residue B (in addition to intra-residue contacts to H-2 and
H-4) indicating that residue C is linked to the 4-position of residue B. Thus, the trisaccharide element A-C-B was established, as shown in Structure 2.
Residue D has a strong NOE contact of H-1 to H-3 of
residue B and a weak contact to H-4 of residue B. Because residue C is linked to the 4-position of residue B, residue D must be linked to the 3-position of residue B. Thus, the tetrasaccharide structure
-A-C-B(D)- was established, as shown in Structure 3.
Residue B has a strong NOE contact from H-1 to H-3 of
residue A, indicating that residue B is linked to
the 3-position of residue A. Thus, the P. mirabilis WT19 Cmf-CPS consist of a tetrasaccharide repeating
unit, -n-, as shown in
Structure 4.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Extracellular polysaccharides are central to bacterial survival,
particularly against the immune defenses of the mammalian host. In
uropathogenic P. mirabilis, the Cmf capsular polysaccharide has also been shown to facilitate the rapid multicellular migration of
elongated hyperflagellated swarm cells, which correlates with the
ability to establish experimental ascending colonization of the urinary
tract and may be coupled to the formation of biofilms (7).
Proteus migration requires close cell-cell contact, with swarm cells aligning along their long axes in multicellular rafts. The
Cmf-CPS may provide a matrix for surface migration of the swarm cell
rafts (35), stabilizing cell-cell contact and facilitating intercellular communication (8, 35). In addition, the acidic CPS is
thought to act as lubricant, creating a fluid environment through which
Proteus can swarm by extracting water from the agar medium
beneath the colony (4, 8). This latter hypothesis is supported by the
observation that increased agar concentration or reduced polysaccharide
biosynthesis, both of which result in a lowered agar/capsular
polysaccharide osmotic activity ratio, reduce migration velocity but do
not inhibit differentiation (4, 8). Surface active agents are produced
by other bacteria that undergo population migration cell rafts,
e.g. the unrelated Myxococcus produces an
extracellular slime during fruiting body development (36).
Increasing the understanding of the apparently multiple roles of
Proteus polysaccharides in colony expansion and virulence requires a knowledge of their structures. Including the Cmf-CPS structure of this report, three Proteus CPS structures have
been described in the literature and are shown in Fig.
4. Although these three structures are
quite different from one another, they have two general similarities.
First, all three structures are acidic in that they all contain at
least one uronosyl residue; the CPS from P. mirabilis
ATCC49565 has a branching terminally linked
-D-glucuronosyl residue, the P. vulgaris CPS
contains a 4-linked
-D-glucuronosyl residue, and the
P. mirabilis WT19 CPS contains 3-linked
-D-mannuronosyl and branching terminally linked
-D-galacturonsyl residues. Second, all three structures have amino sugars; P. mirabilis ATCC59565 CPS contains both
N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylfucosamine,
P. vulgaris CP2-96 CPS contains N-acetylgalactosamine, and
P. mirabilis WT19 CPS contains both
N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine.
Understanding the molecular basis by which these acidic CPSs facilitate
Proteus swarming will require further investigation.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The structures of the CPSs from P. mirabilis WT19 (this report), P. vulgaris
CP2-96 (12), and P. mirabilis ATCC49565
(11).
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
The authors thank Dr. John Gluska for
assistance in obtaining the two-dimensional NMR spectra.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by grants from the United States
Department of Agriculture (9303972 to R. W. C. and J. G. P), the Department of Energy (DE-FG05-93ER20097 to the Complex Carbohydrate Research Center), and the Wellcome Trust (to C. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Complex
Carbohydrate Research Center, The University of Georgia, 220 Riverbend Rd., Athens, GA 30602. Tel.: 706-542-4439; Fax: 706-542-4412; E-mail:
rcarlson@ccrc.uga.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CPS, capsular
polysaccharide;
Cmf, colony migration factor;
DOC, deoxycholic acid;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
OS, oligosaccharide;
GLC-MS, gas-liquid chromatography mass spectrometry;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
LOS, lipo-oligosaccharide;
NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect;
FID, Fourier-induced decay.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kotelko, K.
(1986)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
129,
181-215[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Rubin, R. H.,
Tolkoff-Rubin, N. E.,
and Cotran, R. S.
(1986)
in
The Kidney
(Brenner, B. M.
, and Rector, F. C., eds)
, pp. 1085-1141, W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia
|
| 3.
|
Ebringer, A.,
Khalafpour, S.,
and Wilson, C.
(1989)
Rheumatol. Int.
9,
223-228[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Rauprich, O.,
Matsushita, M.,
Weijer, C. J.,
Siegert, F.,
Esipov, S. E.,
and Shapiro, J. A.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
6525-6538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Stickler, D. J.,
Ganderton, L.,
King, J. B.,
Nettleton, J.,
and Winters, C.
(1993)
Urol. Res.
21,
407-411[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Allison, C.,
and Hughes, C.
(1991)
Sci. Prog. Edinburgh
75,
403-422
|
| 7.
|
Fraser, G. M.,
Furness, R. B.,
and Hughes, C.
(1999)
in
Prokaryotic Development
(Shimkets, L.
, and Brun, Y., eds)
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C., in press
|
| 8.
|
Gygi, D.,
Rahman, M. M.,
Lai, H.-C.,
Carlson, R.,
Guard-Petter, J.,
and Hughes, C.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
17,
1167-1175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Allison, A.,
Emody, L.,
Coleman, N.,
and Hughs, C.
(1994)
J. Infect. Dis.
169,
1155-1158[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Larsson, P.
(1984)
Methods Microbiol.
14,
187-214
|
| 11.
|
Beynon, L. M.,
Dumanski, A. J.,
McLean, J. C.,
MacLean, L. L.,
Richards, J. C.,
and Perry, M. B.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
2172-2177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Rahman, M. M.,
Guard-Petter, J.,
Asokan, K.,
and Carlson, R. W.
(1997)
Carbohydr. Res.
301,
213-220[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Allison, C.,
and Hughes, C.
(1991)
Mol. Microbiol.
5,
1975-1982[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Lee, L.,
and Cherniak, R.
(1974)
Infect. Immun.
9,
318-322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Komuro, T.,
and Galanos, C.
(1988)
J. Chromatogr.
450,
381-387[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Corzo, J.,
Pérez-Galdona, R.,
León-Barrios, M.,
and Gutiérrez-Navarro, A. M.
(1991)
Electrophoresis
12,
439-441[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Tsai, C.,
and Frisch, C. E.
(1982)
Anal. Biochem.
119,
115-119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Piantini, U.,
Sørensen, O. W.,
and Ernst, R. R.
(1982)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
104,
6800-6801[CrossRef]
|
| 19.
|
Braunschweiler, L.,
and Ernst, R. R.
(1983)
J. Magn. Reson.
53,
521-528
|
| 20.
|
Bax, A.,
and Davis, D. G.
(1985)
J. Magn. Reson.
65,
355-360
|
| 21.
|
Wider, G.,
Macura, S.,
Kumar, A.,
Ernst, R. R.,
and Wuthrich, K.
(1984)
J. Magn. Reson.
56,
207-213
|
| 22.
|
Marion, D.,
Ikura, M.,
Tschudin, R.,
and Bax, A.
(1989)
J. Magn. Reson.
85,
393-399
|
| 23.
|
Davis, D. G.,
and Bax, A.
(1985)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
107,
2820-2821[CrossRef]
|
| 24.
|
Davis, A. L.,
Keeler, J.,
Laue, E. D.,
and Moskau, D.
(1992)
J. Magn. Reson.
98,
207-216
|
| 25.
|
Shaka, A. J.,
Barker, P. B.,
and Freeman, R.
(1985)
J. Magn. Reson.
64,
547-552
|
| 26.
|
York, W. S.,
Darvill, A. G.,
McNeil, M.,
Stevenson, T. T.,
and Albersheim, P.
(1985)
Methods Enzymol.
118,
3-40
|
| 27.
|
Gerwig, G. J.,
Kamerling, J. P.,
and Vliegenthart, J. F. G.
(1978)
Carbohydr. Res.
62,
349-357[CrossRef]
|
| 28.
|
Gerwig, G. J.,
Kamerling, J. P.,
and Vliegenthart, J. F. G.
(1979)
Carbohydr. Res.
77,
1-7[CrossRef]
|
| 29.
|
Ciucanu, I.,
and Kerek, F.
(1984)
Carbohydr. Res.
131,
209-217[CrossRef]
|
| 30.
|
McConville, M. J.,
Homans, S. W.,
Thomas-Oates, J. E.,
Dell, A.,
and Bacic, A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
7385-7390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Waeghe, T. J.,
Darvill, A. G.,
McNeil, M.,
and Albersheim, P.
(1983)
Carbohydr. Res.
123,
281-304[CrossRef]
|
| 32.
|
Kim, J. S.,
Reuhs, B. L.,
Rahman, M. M.,
Ridley, B.,
and Carlson, R. W.
(1996)
Glycobiology
5,
433-437
|
| 33.
|
Holst, O.,
and Brade, H.
(1994)
Mol. Biochem. Cell Biol.
1,
135-170
|
| 34.
|
Bock, K.,
Pedersen, C.,
and Pedersen, H.
(1984)
Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem.
42,
193-225
|
| 35.
|
Stahl, S. J.,
Stewart, K. R.,
and Williams, F. D.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
154,
930-937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Dworkin, M.
(1996)
Microbiol. Rev.
60,
70-102[Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Jacobsen, D. J. Stickler, H. L. T. Mobley, and M. E. Shirtliff
Complicated Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.,
January 1, 2008;
21(1):
26 - 59.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Wang, Y. Zhao, M. McClelland, and R. M. Harshey
The RcsCDB Signaling System and Swarming Motility in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium: Dual Regulation of Flagellar and SPI-2 Virulence Genes
J. Bacteriol.,
December 1, 2007;
189(23):
8447 - 8457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Daniels, S. Reynaert, H. Hoekstra, C. Verreth, J. Janssens, K. Braeken, M. Fauvart, S. Beullens, C. Heusdens, I. Lambrichts, et al.
Quorum signal molecules as biosurfactants affecting swarming in Rhizobium etli
PNAS,
October 3, 2006;
103(40):
14965 - 14970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.