J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 33, 23061-23067, August 13, 1999
Heat Shock Inhibits Radiation-induced Activation of NF-
B via
Inhibition of I-
B Kinase*
Heather A.
Curry
,
Regina A.
Clemens
,
Sunita
Shah,
Christopher
M.
Bradbury,
Ana
Botero,
Prabhat
Goswami§, and
David
Gius¶
From the Section of Cancer Biology, Radiation Oncology Center,
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
 |
ABSTRACT |
Radiation stimulates signaling cascades that
result in the activation of several transcription factors that are
believed to play a central role in protective response(s) to ionizing
radiation (IR). It is also well established that heat shock alters the
regulation of signaling cascades and transcription factors and is a
potent radiosensitizing agent. To explore the hypothesis that heat
disrupts or alters the regulation of signaling factors activated by IR, the effect of heat shock on IR-induced activation of NF-
B was determined. Irradiated HeLa cells demonstrated transient increases in
NF-
B DNA binding activity and NF-
B protein nuclear localization. In addition, irradiated cells demonstrated increased I-
B
phosphorylation and decreased I-
B
cytoplasmic protein levels,
corresponding temporally with the increase of NF-
B DNA binding. Heat
shock prior to IR inhibited the increase in NF-
B DNA binding
activity, nuclear localization of NF-
B, and the phosphorylation and
subsequent degradation of I-
B. I-
B kinase (IKK)
immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated an increase in IKK catalytic
activity in response to IR that was inhibited by pretreatment with
heat. Kinetic experiments determined that heat-induced inhibition of
NF-
B activation in response to IR decayed within 5 h after
heating. Furthermore, pretreatment with cycloheximide, to block
de novo protein synthesis, did not alter heat shock
inhibition of IR induction of NF-
B. These experiments demonstrate
that heat shock transiently inhibits IR induction of NF-
B DNA
binding activity by preventing IKK activation and suggests a mechanism
independent of protein synthesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
More than half of all cancer patients receive radiation therapy,
thereby emphasizing the need to understand the cellular and molecular
events following exposure to ionizing radiation
(IR).1 IR produces a series
of effects on cells, including lethality, cell cycle arrest, and
induction of mutations and malignant transformation (1, 2). In
addition, IR induces the expression of a variety of cellular genes,
termed early response genes. These genes include c-fos, c-jun, egr-1,
p53, and nf-
b, which are thought to play a central role in the
cellular cytoprotective response to IR (3, 4). These early response
genes encode nuclear transcription factors involved in the transmission
of inter- and intracellular information through multiple signal
transduction pathways (5, 6). In this regard, these gene products may
function in coupled short-term changes in cellular phenotype by
modulating the expression of specific target genes involved in cellular
defenses to various stressors, including the effects of ionizing
radiation (7, 8). Therefore, IR-induced activation of early genes
provides an ideal model system to study the molecular and biochemical
events that occur in response to radiation-induced cellular stress.
The cellular stress induced by heat shock or hyperthermia has profound
effects on many aspects of cellular biochemistry, morphology, and
function and has been shown to greatly enhance the tumoricidal effects
of IR (9). This is demonstrated by a reduction in D0 and
Dq, two parameters that denote the slope and initial
shoulder of the clonogenic cell survival curve that represents cell
sensitivity to IR (10). As a result of clinical studies over the last
20 years, it appears that there is a significant advantage in the use
of heat combined with IR or cytotoxic drugs to enhance tumor cell
killing (11). As such, hyperthermic radiosensitization remains a
powerful model system to investigate the biochemical and molecular
mechanism(s) of radiosensitization. However, despite publication of
numerous observations of heat-induced alterations in subcellular
structures and signaling systems, no consensus regarding the molecular
mechanism of heat-induced radiosensitization has emerged (12). Thus,
the specific mechanism(s) of heat-induced alterations in the cellular
response to IR remains obscure.
The cellular responses to the elevation of surrounding temperatures are
remarkably well conserved across all species from bacteria to mammals
and are primarily mediated at the transcriptional level by preexisting
transcriptional activators, known as heat shock factors (HSFs) (9,
13-15). In addition to HSFs, it appears that several additional signal
transduction cascades are also activated in response to heat including
p38/HOG1 kinase (16), Jun N-terminal kinase (17), mitogen-activated
protein kinase 1 (18, 19), and protein kinase C (20, 21). It has
previously been shown that these signaling pathways are activated by a
wide variety of environmental insults, including IR. The cellular
parameters that influence the effects of heat shock on the cellular
response to IR include molecular oxygen, pH, cell cycle regulation, and DNA repair, all of which rely on signal transduction pathways for the
regulation of these processes (10-12). These experiments indicate that
the signal transduction pathways activated in the cellular response to
elevated temperature may be similar to those elicited by other types of
environmental stress. These results suggest that coupled or competing
interactions between signaling pathways activated by heat shock and IR
may be one mechanism responsible for heat-induced alterations in the
cellular response to IR.
NF-
B is a dimeric transcription factor activated in response to
multiple primary (e.g. viruses, and bacteria) or secondary (e.g. inflammatory cytokines, UV, and IR) agents (22-24).
NF-
B is a heterodimer, primarily composed of a 50-kDa DNA-binding
subunit (p50) and a 65-kDa transactivator (p65 or
rel-A), that is sequestered within the cytosol by
association with an inhibitory protein known as I-
B (6, 25, 26).
Both the p50 and p65 monomers contain Rel regions, approximately 300 amino acids in length, that bind to DNA, interact with each other, and
bind the I-
B inhibitors (25, 27). Activation is posttranslational
and results from the dissociation of the NF-
B:I-
B complex
followed by translocation of the released NF-
B into the nucleus (28,
29). This process leads to increased levels of NF-
B at specific DNA
enhancer sequences in the nucleus resulting in the activation of target
genes. Phosphorylation targets I-
B for protein ubiquitination and
subsequent degradation through a proteasome-dependent
pathway, resulting in dissociation of the NF-
B:I-
B complex
followed by translocation of the released NF-
B into the nucleus (28,
30). A 700-kDa multisubunit protein kinase complex has recently been
identified that contains two kinases, IKK
and IKK
, that
phosphorylate I-
B
at serine residues 32 and 36 (7, 30, 32, 33).
Exposure of tissue culture cells to tumor necrosis factor induces
IKK
and IKK
activity identifying IKK
/
as a critical target molecule.
It has recently been shown that the activities of several early
response genes that function as nuclear transcription factors, including c-fos and c-jun, are altered by exposure to heat shock (34,
35). These results suggest that heat shock and other agents that
produce oxidative stress, such as ionizing radiation and hydrogen
peroxide, may share overlapping pathways to protect the cell from
damage (34-38). Because heating of tumor cells results in significant
alterations in the cellular response to IR, including radiosensitization (10, 12), we hypothesize that one mechanism may
involve heat-induced alterations of signaling pathways that regulate
transcription factors. To investigate this question, we determined the
effects of heat on IR-induced activation of NF-
B. Our study
confirmed the previous observation that NF-
B DNA binding activity is
increased following ionizing radiation (24, 39). In addition, we
determined that IR-induced nuclear localization of NF-
B is preceded
by phosphorylation and degradation of cytoplasmic I-
B. We also
report that IR activates the IKK complex resulting in I-
B
phosphorylation and that heat shock inhibits IR-induced activation of
the IKK. Finally, heat shock inhibition of NF-
B activation in
response to IR appears to be a transient response independent of
de novo protein synthesis, suggesting a mechanism involving
cellular signaling pathways.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture, IR, and Heat Shock Conditions--
HeLa cervical
carcinoma cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated calf serum with penicillin (50 units/ml) and streptomycin (50 units/ml) in a humidified 5%
CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. For treatment with heat or IR,
cells were seeded at 2.5 × 106 cells/10-cm diameter
plate into 1% heat-inactivated calf serum for 48 h prior to
exposure to heat, IR, or both. Cells were heated by submersing
Parafilm-sealed plates in a prewarmed circulating water bath at
45 °C ± 0.1 °C for 15 min. Cells were immediately placed at
37 °C after heating and harvested at various time points. For
radiation experiments, cells were irradiated using a GE Maxitron 250 kV
x-ray machine that contains an enclosed box that maintains a humidified
5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Control cells were placed into a similar box next to the x-ray machine.
Preparation of Cellular Extracts and Nuclear and Cytoplasm
Subcellular Fractionation--
Extracts were prepared for analysis
from whole cells by a rapid method, modified from Dignam (40). For the
isolation of nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extracts HeLa cells were
washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), scraped off the
plates in 1 ml of PBS, 2.5 mM EDTA, and spun down at 14,000 rpm for 2 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was suspended in 400 µl of
Buffer A (40). After incubation for 15 min on ice, Nonidet P-40 was added to a final concentration of 0.1%, the cellular suspension was
vortexed for 10 quick mixings and microcentrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant, representing the cytoplasmic fraction,
was removed and both the supernatant and cell pellet were stored at
80 °C overnight. The nuclear pellet was thawed on ice for 15 min
and suspended in 100 µl of extraction buffer (10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4, 422 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, and 200 µM PMSF),
incubated at 4 °C for 30 min, and spun for 5 min at 14,000 rpm. The
supernatant, representing the nuclear fraction, was placed into a new
Eppendorf tube, and the pellet and supernatant were stored at
80 °C. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford
method (as per the manufacturer's specifications).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)--
EMSAs were
performed as described previously utilizing a
32P-radiolabeled oligonucleotide containing a consensus
NF-
B DNA-binding site (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc). Briefly,
whole cell extracts (10 µg of protein) were isolated as described
previously (40) and incubated with poly(dI-dC) for 10 min on ice to
bind nonspecific DNA-binding proteins followed by addition of
radiolabeled oligonucleotide (approximately 10 fmol, 200,000 cpm of
radiolabeled probe/reaction). Samples were incubated at 25 °C for an
additional 20 min and 5× TBE, glycerol, bromphenol blue solution was
added to the samples prior to sample loading. Supershift experiments
were performed by adding either anti-p65 or anti-p50 antibody (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) to the sample after the initial incubation of
the whole cell protein extract-poly(dI-dC) complex. The
antibody-protein-poly(dI-dC) complex remained on ice for 10 min,
followed by addition of radiolabeled oligonucleotide and incubated for
20 min at 25 °C. For the cold competition experiment, 1 µg of
unlabeled NF-
B oligomer was added to the sample after incubation of
whole cell protein extract-poly(dI-dC) complex on ice for 10 min. The
cold oligomer-protein-poly(dI-dC) complex remained on ice for an
additional 10 min, the radiolabeled oligonucleotide was added, and the
sample was incubated for 20 min at 25 °C. To inhibit protein
synthesis, cycloheximide was added to HeLa cells 45 min prior to heat
shock or IR at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml. All samples were
run on a 4.5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel at 100 V for 45 min.
Gels were dried and exposed to a phosphorimager screen for quantitation
of incorporated radioactivity in each individual band using a STORM 840 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blot
Analysis--
Nuclear or cytoplasmic cellular extracts were prepared
at various time points as described above. Equal amounts of protein (10-30 µg) were mixed with 2× Laemmli lysis buffer and boiled for 5 min. Protein samples were separated on denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to a nitrocellulose filter using a semidry transfer apparatus (Owl, Inc.) (41). Western blotting analysis was
performed using polyclonal antibodies to NF-
B (p65), I-
B
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc), and phosphoserine proteins (Sigma). The nitrocellulose filter was blocked in a 5.0% milk, PBS, 0.01% Tween solution for 1 h followed by the addition of antibodies diluted 1:1000 in a 2.5% milk, PBS, 0.01% Tween solution as per the
manufacturer's specifications and hybridized overnight at room
temperature. The nitrocellulose filter was three times washed in
PBS-Tween for 15 min and incubated with appropriate secondary antibody
(anti-goat or anti-rabbit IgG (Fc) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:1000 dilution)) at room temperature for 1 h. The blot was again washed three times in PBS-Tween for 15 min and then
developed by an enhanced chemiluminescence method (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) on x-ray film (Eastman Kodak).
Immunoprecipitation Western Analysis--
HeLa cells were washed
twice with PBS, scraped off the plates in 1 ml of PBS-2.5
mM EDTA, and spun down at 12,000 rpm for 30 s at
4 °C. Cells were lysed in ELB buffer containing 250 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, and 1%
Nonidet P-40, with 1 mM PMSF, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin for 30 min. Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm
for 30 s, and the supernatant was precleared with protein A and
then immunoprecipitated by incubation with the anti-I-
B antibody and
protein A at 4 °C for 2 h. The samples were centrifuged for 1 min, and the pellets washed three times in lysis buffer. Pellets were
resuspended in 1× running buffer, boiled for 5 min, run on a
denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to nitrocellulose
followed by Western analysis as above.
Isolation of Bacterially Expressed GST-I-
B Wild Type and
Mutant Fusion Proteins--
The C-terminal deletion wild type
(GST-I-
B wild-type (1-138)) pGEX-KG construct (a kind gift from Dr.
Richard B. Gaynor) was transformed into BL21 DE3 bacterial cells. Cell
cultures (1 liter) were grown in LB-amp media to an absorption of 0.7 following the addition 1.0 mM
isopropyl-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 4 h (42).
Bacterial cells were pelleted, resuspended in a mixture of PBS with
10% glycerol and 0.1% Nonidet P-40, sonicated, and centrifuged. The
supernatant was transferred to a new tube and incubated with 1.0 ml of
glutathione agarose matrix beads (Sigma) and 1 mM PMSF for
1 h at 4 °C. The glutathione agarose matrix bead-supernatant
complex was washed three times with dH2O and eluted (as per
the manufacturer's instructions).
Immunoprecipitation I-
B Kinase Assay--
For the IKK assays,
HeLa cells were lysed in ELB buffer, precleared, and immunoprecipitated
with the anti-IKK antibody H744 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc) and
protein A. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times in lysis buffer
and then twice in kinase buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH
7.4), 4 mM MnCl2, 4 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM PMSF, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin. IP pellets were resuspended in 30 µl of kinase
buffer containing 2.5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol) and 0.5 µg of recombinant GST-I-
B (1-138) protein for 30 min at 30 °C. The kinase reactions were terminated by the addition
of sample buffer. Samples were run on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel, dried,
and exposed to the phosphorimager screen for quantitation.
 |
RESULTS |
Heat Shock Inhibits Radiation-induced Activation of NF-
B DNA
Binding--
The activation of NF-
B following exposure to IR has
previously been demonstrated in several cell types (24, 39). To
investigate the process in detail, we first determined the exact time
course of NF-
B activation and the radiation dose required to elicit this effect in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were exposed to 10 Gy of IR,
whole cell extracts were prepared, and NF-
B DNA binding activity was
assessed by EMSAs using an oligomer containing a consensus NF-
B site
(
B). As shown in Fig. 1A,
the DNA binding activity of NF-
B increased roughly 8-fold at 2 and
4 h (lanes 2 and 3) following IR, and this
induction returned to baseline levels at 6 h (lane 4).
The induction of NF-
B DNA binding was first observed between 45 and
60 min (data not shown). Sequentially lower doses of IR produced less
NF-
B-DNA binding in a dose-dependent fashion (data not
shown).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The effect of heat shock and/or ionizing
radiation on DNA binding activity of
NF- B. A, EMSAs of NF- B: B
DNA-binding complexes from HeLa cells treated with 10 Gy of IR. After
2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h, whole-cell extracts (10 µg) from
nonirradiated (lane 1) or irradiated (lanes 2-7)
cells were incubated with a 32P-labeled B DNA probe,
followed by analysis of DNA binding activities. Sections of fluorograms
from native gels are shown. Arrows indicate the position of
NF- B: B DNA complex and nonspecific DNA binding (NS).
B, EMSAs of NF- B: B DNA-binding complexes from control,
nonheated (lane 1) or heated (15 min at 45 °C)
(lanes 2-7) HeLa cells. Following heat shock, whole cell
extracts were isolated and analyzed at identical time points as
above.
|
|
We have previously shown that heat alters the DNA binding activity of
c-Fos/c-Jun (34), suggesting that, similar to other forms of
environmental stress, heat alters the activity of transcription factors. Because heating of tumor cells significantly alters the cellular response to IR (10, 12), we hypothesized heat shock may alter
the cellular signaling pathways induced by IR. To examine whether heat
shock has any effect upon other nuclear transcription factors, the DNA
binding activity of NF-
B was determined following exposure to heat
shock. These results indicate no induction or a slight decrease in
NF-
B DNA binding following heat shock (Fig. 1B). In order
to determine the effect of heat shock prior to IR, HeLa cells were
heated at 45 °C for 15 min, returned to the 37 °C incubator for
45 min, and then exposed to 10 Gy of IR (Fig. 2A). In contrast to cells
exposed to IR alone, treatment with heat prior to IR completely
abolished the IR-induced increase of NF-
B DNA binding observed at 2 and 4 h (Fig. 2A, lanes 3 and 5 versus lanes 4 and I6). These results suggest
that heat shock interferes with IR-induced signaling pathways
regulating NF-
B.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The effect of heat shock prior to ionizing
radiation on NF- B DNA binding activity.
A, EMSAs of NF- B: B DNA-binding complexes from HeLa
cells heated to 45 °C for 15 min, placed into the 37 °C incubator
for 45 min, and treated with 10 Gy of IR. Control, nonheated
(lane 1) or heated (lane 2) cells are shown.
EMSAs from cells that were irradiated (lanes 3, 5, 7, and
9) or heated prior to IR (lanes 4, 6, 8, and
10) and harvested at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h are
shown. Arrows indicate position of NF: B-DNA complex and
nonspecific DNA binding (NS). B, supershift
assays of NF- B: B complex from HeLa cells. Whole cell extracts
from irradiated HeLa cells without antibody (lane 1), with
addition of anti-p65 antibody (lane 2), with anti-p50
antibody (lane 3), or with cold competitor NF- B oligomer
(lane 4) are shown. Arrows indicate position of
the p50:p50 homodimer, p50:p65 heterodimer, and nonspecific DNA binding
(NS).
|
|
Supershifts of IR-induced Activation of NF-
B with Anti-p65 and
p50--
The NF-
B complex consists of either a p50:p50 homodimer
and/or a p50:p65 heterodimer that are activated following exposure to
multiple agents. To investigate whether IR-induced activation of
NF-
B DNA binding was due to an increase in the DNA binding of p65
and/or p50 subunits, supershift experiments were performed. Whole cell
extracts from irradiated cells (Fig. 2B, lane 1) were used
as controls. Following the addition of anti-p65 antibody, the p50:p65
heterodimer gel band was reduced in intensity (lane 2), and
a supershifted band was present (arrow). Similar samples tested with the anti-p50 antibody (lane 3) demonstrated a
decrease in the p65:p50 and p50:p50 bands and the presence of a
supershifted band. These results indicate that the induction of NF-
B
in response to IR results from increased p50 and p65 DNA binding.
Heat Shock Inhibits Radiation-induced Nuclear Localization of
NF-
B--
Although the induction of NF-
B DNA binding following
irradiation has previously been described (24, 27), the cellular signaling pathways responsible for activation have not been extensively studied. To examine these pathways in detail, HeLa cells were irradiated, and cellular extracts were prepared using a subcellular fractionation method to isolate the nuclear and cytoplasmic cellular proteins. In response to IR, Western analysis showed an increase in
NF-
B nuclear protein (using an anti-p65 antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) that was first seen at 0.5 h after radiation, reached a maximum at roughly 1.5 h (Fig.
3A), and returned to baseline
at 6 h (data not shown). In contrast, treatment of HeLa cells with
heat shock prior to irradiation prevented NF-
B nuclear localization
following exposure to radiation (Fig. 3A). The nuclear extracts used in the control samples for heat, IR, and heat prior to IR
in Fig. 3A are identical; however, the ECL exposure time was
greatly increased to visualize the p65 band in the heat and heat prior
to IR Western blots. Western analysis confirmed no change in NF-
B
protein levels in the cytoplasm following exposure to heat shock or
heat prior to IR, excluding the possibility that heat shock degrades
cytoplasmic NF-
B (data not shown). To exclude the possibility that
NF-
B was lost in the isolation of the cytoplasmic and/or nuclear
cellular fractionations, the remaining membrane-DNA pellet was analyzed
by immunoblotting with anti-NF-
B. No difference in NF-
B protein
levels was observed (data not shown). These results suggest that heat
shock inhibits signal transduction pathway(s) upstream of NF-
B
translocation into the nucleus.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The effect of heat, irradiation, or heat
shock prior to irradiation on NF- B and
I- B protein levels. Control, heated, or
heated prior to IR HeLa cells were harvested to separate the nuclear
cellular fraction from the cytoplasmic fraction. A, the
nuclear cellular fractions were analyzed for immunoreactive NF- B
(p65) protein levels from cells that were heated (top
panel), irradiated (middle panel), or heated prior to
IR (bottom panel). 10 µg of cellular protein was separated
by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred onto
nitrocellulose, and processed for immunoblotting with goat polyclonal
antibodies to the p65 subunit of NF- B (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc). B, cytoplasmic subcellular fractions were analyzed for
I- B protein levels from cells that were heated (top
panel), irradiated (middle panel), or heated prior to
IR (bottom panel). 30 µg of cytoplasmic protein was
analyzed as above and immunoblotted with goat polyclonal antibodies to
I- B (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).
|
|
Heat Shock Inhibits Radiation-induced Degradation of Cytoplasmic
I-
B
--
Through a protein-protein interaction, I-
B blocks
recognition of the NF-
B nuclear localization sequence, thus
preventing transport of NF-
B into the nucleus (43). To determine
whether I-
B
is degraded following exposure to IR but prior to
NF-
B nuclear localization, HeLa cells were irradiated and
cytoplasmic I-
B
protein levels were examined at several time
points via Western analysis. In irradiated cells the I-
B
protein
levels initially decreased 1/2 h after IR and return to pre-IR
levels at roughly 3 h (Fig. 3B), and this is in
temporal agreement with the initial increase in NF-
B nuclear protein
levels first observed at 1/2 h (Fig. 3A). Because
heat inhibited NF-
B nuclear localization in response to IR, the
cytoplasmic protein levels of I-
B
were determined in HeLa cells
exposed to heat shock or heat shock prior to IR (Fig. 3A).
Consistent with the above results, heat shock inhibited I-
B
degradation. As above, the membrane/DNA pellet was examined and no
difference in I-
B
protein levels were observed in heated,
irradiated, or heated prior to IR cell pellets (data not shown). These
results suggest that heat interferes with the IR-induced cytoplasmic
signaling events resulting in the degradation of I-
B, thereby
preserving the interaction between NF-
B and I-
B and preventing
the subsequent nuclear localization of NF-
B.
Heat Shock Inhibits Radiation-induced Phosphorylation of
I-
B
--
A host of extracellular stimuli appear to activate
NF-
B via phosphorylation of I-
B
on serine residues 32 and 36 in the C-terminal region of the protein that targets I-
B for
ubiquitination and proteosome-mediated degradation (44). To determine
whether irradiated HeLa cells activate NF-
B via a mechanism
involving the phosphorylation of I-
B, we performed
immunoprecipitation Western assays. HeLa cells were exposed to IR;
I-
B
was immunoprecipitated from cellular lysates, resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to
nitrocellulose; and immunoreactive protein levels were determined using
an anti-I-
B
or an anti-phosphoserine antibody. I-
B
phosphorylation was first observed between 15 and 30 min after IR (Fig.
4A), which is in temporal
agreement with the decrease in I-
B cytoplasmic protein levels that
was initially observed at 1/2 h (Fig. 3B). These
results demonstrate that IR induces the phosphorylation of I-
B and
as such is similar to several other agents that activate NF-
B. When
similar experiments were performed using HeLa cells that were heated
prior to IR (Fig. 4B), no increase in I-
B phosphorylation
was observed. These results suggest a mechanism whereby either heat
shock inhibits IR-induced activation of the kinase complex that
phosphorylates I-
B or heating alters I-
B conformation in a manner
that prevents kinase access to the I-
B phosphorylation site(s).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Determination of
I- B phosphorylation
in response to IR or heat prior to IR. HeLa cells were stimulated
with 10 Gy of IR (A) or heated prior to IR (B)
and lysed. After immunoprecipitation with anti-I- B, the
immunocomplexes were washed, split into equal fractions, separated on a
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel, and blotted on
nitrocellulose, and the immunoreactive levels for I- B (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc.) and phosphoprotein (Sigma, Inc.) were determined.
Arrows indicate the position of I- B and
phosphoprotein.
|
|
Heat Shock Inhibits Radiation-induced Activation of the I-
B
Kinase Complex--
The IKK complex consisting of IKK
and IKK
is
activated by tumor necrosis factor treatment and other agents,
identifying IKK
and IKK
as critical targets for I-
B
phosphorylation and NF-
B activation (29, 32). Because heat shock
inhibits IR-induced phosphorylation of I-
B, we hypothesized that IR
induces the activation of IKK and that exposure to heat shock may
inhibit activation. This was investigated by immunoprecipitation of
IKK
followed by kinase assays performed with a truncated GST-I-
B
(1-138) substrate (42). HeLa cells treated with IR demonstrated
increased IKK phosphorylation of I-
B (8-fold). IKK activation was
first observed at 30 min (Fig.
5A) and was no longer active
at 2 h (data not shown). No increase in phosphorylation was
observed in cells heated prior to IR (Fig. 5A). These
experiments suggest that at least one mechanism for IR-induction of
NF-
B requires activation of the IKK complex and that heat shock
inhibits IR-induced activation of the IKK complex. These results
strongly suggest that heat-induced inhibition of NF-
B DNA binding
involves alterations in cellular signaling pathways that regulate
and/or inhibit cytoplasmic protein kinase complexes such as IKK.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Determination of IKK activity in response to
IR or heat prior to IR. A, HeLa cells from control,
nonheated (lane 1), heated (lane 2), irradiated
(lanes 3 and 5) or heated prior to IR
(lanes 4 and 6) are shown. Cell extracts were
immunoprecipitation with anti-IKK , and the immunocomplexes were
washed and examined for their ability to phosphorylate a wild type
(GST-I- B (1-138)) bacterial fusion protein. Kinase assays were
halted by the addition of running buffer at the indicated times. Shown
is an autoradiograph of 32P-labeled GST-I- B protein.
B, decay kinetics of heat-induced inhibition of IR-induction
of NF- B. HeLa cells were exposed to 10 Gy of IR at 5 and 9 h
after heating, and EMSAs of cells at each time point were performed.
HeLa cells from control, nonheated (lane 1), heated and
isolated after 1 h (lane 2), heated and irradiated
after 1 h (lane 3), and irradiated (lane 4)
are shown as controls. Cells heated (lanes 5 and
7) and cells heated and then irradiated (lanes 6 and 8) at the indicated time points are shown. C,
the effect of cycloheximide (CHX) on heat inhibition of
IR-induction of NF- B DNA binding activity. HeLa cells heated prior
to IR are shown as a control (lane 1). Cycloheximide was
added prior to heat shock (lane 2), prior to IR (lane
3), or prior to heat followed by IR (lane 4). Sections
of fluorograms from EMSAs are shown. Arrows indicate the
position of NF- B and nonspecific DNA-binding complexes
(NS).
|
|
Decay Kinetics of Heat-induced Inhibition of Radiation Induction of
NF-
B--
To investigate the mechanism whereby heat inhibits the
induction of NF-
B by IR, the decay kinetics of this phenomenon were characterized. This was investigated by determining the time interval following exposure to heat during which radiation-induced activation of
NF-
B was inhibited (Fig. 5B). Cells that were unheated
(lane 1), heated and isolated after 1 h (lane
2), heated and irradiated 1 h after heating (lane
3), and exposed to IR only (lane 4) are shown as
controls. Additional HeLa cell samples were either heated and isolated
at 4-h intervals (lanes 5 and 7) or heated and
then irradiated at 4-h intervals after heating (lanes 6 and
8). As seen, 5 h after heat shock, HeLa cells regained
the ability to induce NF-
B DNA binding in response to IR (Fig. 5,
lane 5 versus 6), and activation of NF-
B DNA
binding was maintained through 9 h (lane 8). These
experiments indicate that the inhibition of NF-
B by this particular
heat shock is transient (5 h). The transient nature of this process
suggests that signaling pathways or factors may directly or indirectly
inhibit the induction of NF-
B DNA binding activity.
Heat Inhibition of NF-
B in Response to IR Is Independent of de
Novo Protein Synthesis--
The transient inhibition of IR-induced
activation of NF-
B by heat shock suggests that posttranslational
signaling pathways may be involved rather than protein synthetic
pathways. To examine this question, cycloheximide was added to HeLa
cells 45 min prior to heat shock, IR, or heat shock prior to IR (Fig.
5C). EMSAs of HeLa cells heated prior to IR (Fig. 5C,
lane 1) and pretreated with cycloheximide prior to heat shock
alone are shown as controls (lane 2). HeLa cells treated
with cycloheximide prior to IR alone (lane 3) showed that
radiation-induced activation of NF-
B is independent of de
novo protein synthesis. Finally, pretreatment of HeLa cells with
cycloheximide (lane 4) did not alter heat shock inhibition
of IR-induced activation of NF-
B DNA binding activity. Immunoblotting demonstrated an increase in heat shock protein 70 in the
heat shock alone samples that was almost completely inhibited (roughly
90%) by pretreatment with cycloheximide (data not shown). These
experiments demonstrate that de novo protein synthesis does
not appear to be required for the inhibition of NF-
B in response to
IR and suggests that heat inducible proteins such as heat shock protein
are not involved in this process.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Since its initial discovery, NF-
B has emerged as a central
component of the inducible cellular transcriptional machinery that is
essential for a variety of functions, including growth, immunity, and
T-cell activation (22). A hallmark of NF-
B is its extraordinary
capacity to respond to a diverse range of both physiological and
pathological forms of environmental stress, including, but not limited
to, ionizing radiation (2, 24, 44, 45). It has been suggested, as a
result of work in several different laboratories, that early genes that
function as transcription factors may play a role in tumor cell
survival following exposure to IR (1, 2). Hence, NF-
B provides an
excellent paradigm to study the role of signaling pathways and the
regulation of transcription factors in the cellular response to
IR-induced stress.
Hyperthermia has a long history as a treatment modality for cancer and
has recently been demonstrated to be an excellent adjuvant to
radiotherapy. These results were consistent with in vitro
experiments demonstrating the generalized phenomenon of heat-induced
radiosensitization (10, 12). The underlying biochemical or molecular
biological processes by which heat alters the cellular response to IR
has not been firmly established; however, several possible mechanisms have been suggested. These include heat inhibition of the repair of
IR-induced DNA damage, alterations in cell cycle progression resulting
in tumor cells accumulating at a more radiation-sensitive point in cell
cycle, and changes in tumor microcirculation and pH, all of which rely
on signaling pathways (12, 46, 47). Despite the variety of hypotheses
concerning how heat interacts with IR, the exact mechanism(s)
responsible for this process remains unclear.
In this study, we characterized the initial biochemical steps of
IR-induced activation of NF-
B, and we report that radiation-induced activation of NF-
B is inhibited by prior exposure to heat shock. Using a biochemical cellular fractionation scheme, it was determined that the mechanism of IR-induced activation of NF-
B involves the
phosphorylation and degradation of I-
B that temporally precedes NF-
B nuclear localization. These results suggest that
radiation-induced activation of NF-
B utilizes a transduction pathway
similar to that of several other environmental stressors, including
interleukins, tumor necrosis factor, and phorbol esters (22, 44).
Kinase assays demonstrated that IR activates IKK and heat shock prior to IR appears to inhibit IKK activation. Inhibition of IKK prevents phosphorylation and degradation of I-
B and the subsequent induction of NF-
B DNA binding. The results of these experiments suggest that
heat shock, either directly or indirectly, inhibits or alters the
cytoplasmic signaling pathway(s) regulating NF-
B.
Heat shock inhibition of IR-induced activation of NF-
B appears to be
a transient response and decays by 5 h following heating. This 5-h
interval also corresponds to the time period after heating that is
required for HSF to return to an inactive DNA-binding state (data not
shown). These results suggest a possible temporal relationship between
the activation of the heat shock signaling and the inhibition of
NF-
B induction by IR, both of which last between 4 and 6 h. The
transient nature of heat shock inhibition also suggests a role for
intracellular signaling that, in general, is transient. Interestingly,
this time frame also closely corresponds to the duration for the decay
of heat-induced radiosensitization (13). Finally, cycloheximide was
used to demonstrate that heat shock inhibition of IR-induction of
NF-
B is independent of de novo protein synthesis,
suggesting a mechanism involving cellular signaling pathways. This work
supports a growing body of scientific evidence that the activation of
signaling pathways by heat shock is involved in more than the cellular
response to elevated temperature. Hence, these results raise the
possibility that there are coupled or competing interactions between
signaling pathways activated by heat shock and IR.
These experiments also identify the IKK complex or other signaling
factors upstream of IKK as targets for heat shock inhibition of
IR-induced signaling pathways leading to the activation of NF-
B.
These results raise the following intriguing questions: 1) how is
stress sensed by cellular biomolecules and integrated into pathways
that activate NF-
B; and 2) where is the common point at which the
competing interactions between heat shock and IR converge? One
possibility involves the potential role of the IKK
/
complex as a
common and central target molecule (29, 31). Hence, heat shock may
inhibit upstream signaling factor(s) that directly activate IKK
/
,
perhaps via changes in protein conformation that prevent
phosphorylation by upstream kinase(s). Alternatively, heat shock may
activate distinct signaling factor(s)/pathway(s) that via competing
and/or coupled interactions with IR signaling prevent activation of
IKK.
It has been suggested that the induction of NF-
B in tumor cells
serves as a reparative or protective mechanism following exposure to
agents that induce oxidative stress, such as IR. If this is true, then
one possible mechanism of hyperthermic radiosensitization of tumor
cells may involve heat inhibition of IR-induced activation NF-
B.
This hypothesis fits well with the growing idea that transcription factors play a central role in the cellular response to IR and that in
selected tumors, early gene overexpression predicts for clinical
outcome with definitive radiation therapy (39, 48). Two lines of
previous work suggest a role for NF-
B in cell survival. First,
interleukin-3 and the oncogenic TEL/platelet-derived growth factor
receptor
fusion protein appear to prevent cell death via activation
of NF-
B after cytokine deprivation or exposure to platelet-derived
growth factor receptor
inhibitors (48). Second, ataxia
telangiectasia cells, which are exquisitely sensitive to irradiation
death, become markedly more resistant to radiation death by insertion
of an I-
B
gene that restores IR-induced activation of NF-
B
(27). This result is particularly interesting because ataxia
telangiectasia cells have a deficiency in DNA repair that appears to be
the major cause of IR-induced cell death (39), and heat-induced
radiosensitization appears to result from heat shock inhibition of
DNA-repair (10, 12).
Our work suggests that heat-induced inhibition of NF-
B may provide a
unique paradigm to delineate a novel mechanism for heat-induced alterations in the cellular response to IR, and thus, expand the knowledge of a fundamental clinical observation, radiosensitization of
tumor cells by hyperthermia. Finally, a clearer understanding of
heat-induced changes in radiation-induced activation of early response
genes and their effects on heat-induced radiosensitization may provide
a model system to explore other chemicals or drugs that may have
similar effects on early response genes in the process of radiosensitization.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Joseph L. Roti Roti and Doug R. Spitz for critical review of the manuscript and Carla Thuman and Kathy
Bles for assistance with manuscript preparation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The first two authors contributed equally to this study.
§
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R29 NIH CA69593.
¶
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants 1 K08
CA72602-01 and PO1 CA75556. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Section of Cancer Biology, Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway, St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-9781; Fax:
314-362-9790; E-mail: davidg@radonc.wustl.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IR, ionizing
radiation;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
IKK, I-
B kinase;
HSF, heat shock factor;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
CHX, cycloheximide.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Maity, A.,
Kao, G. D.,
Muschel, R. J.,
and McKenna, W. G.
(1997)
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
37,
639-653[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Weichselbaum, R. R.,
Hallahan, D.,
Fuks, Z.,
and Kufe, D.
(1994)
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
30,
229-234[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Datta, R.,
Hallahan, D. E.,
Kharbanda, S. M.,
Rubin, E.,
Sherman, M. L.,
Huberman, E.,
Weichselbaum, R. R.,
and Kufe, D. W.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
8300-8306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Hallahan, D. E.,
Gius, D.,
Kuchibhotla, J.,
Sukhatme, V.,
Kufe, D. W.,
and Weichselbaum, R. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4903-4907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Hill, C. S.,
and Treisman, R.
(1995)
Cell
80,
199-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Karin, M.,
and Smeal, T.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17,
418-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Holbrook, N. J.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1991)
New Biol.
3,
825-833[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Verma, I. M.,
Stevenson, J. K.,
Schwarz, E. M.,
Van Antwerp, D.,
and Miyamoto, S.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2723-2735[Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Morimoto, R. I.,
Kline, M. P.,
Bimston, D. N.,
and Cotto, JJ.
(1998)
Essays Biochem.
32,
17-29
|
| 10.
|
Dewey, W. C.
(1994)
Int. J. Hyperthermia
10,
457-463[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Connor, W. G.,
Gerner, E. W.,
Miller, R. C.,
and Boone, M. L.
(1977)
Radiology
123,
497-503[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Dewey, W. C.,
Freeman, M. L.,
and Raaphorst, G. P.
(1980)
in
Radiation Biology in Cancer Research
(Meyn, R. E.
, and Withers, H. R, eds)
, pp. 589-613, Raven, New York
|
| 13.
|
Jurivich, D. A.,
Pachetti, C.,
Qiu, L.,
and Welk, J. F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24489-24495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Jurivich, D. A.,
Sistonen, L.,
Kroes, R. A.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1992)
Science
265,
1243-1245
|
| 15.
|
Lindquist, S.,
and Kim, G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5301-5306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Rouse, J,
Cohen, P,
Trigon, S,
Morange, M,
Alonso-Llamazares, A.,
Zamanillo, D.,
Hunt, T.,
and Nebreda, A. R.
(1994)
Cell
78,
1027-1037[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Adler, V,
Schaffer, A.,
Kim, J.,
Dolan, L.,
and Ronai, Z.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26071-26077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Dubois, M. F.,
and Bensaude, O.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
324,
191-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Kamada, Y.,
Jung, U.,
Piotrowski, J.,
and Levin, D. E.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1559-1571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Ritz, M-F.,
Masmoudi, A.,
Matter, N.,
Rogue, P.,
Lang, D.,
Freysz, L.,
and Malviya, A. N.
(1993)
Receptor
3,
311-324[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Wooten, M. W.
(1991)
Exp. Cell Res.
193,
274-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Baeuerle, PA.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Cell
87,
13-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Henkel, T.,
Zabel, U.,
van Zee, K.,
Muller, J. M.,
Fanning, E.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1992)
Cell
68,
1121-1133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Li, N.,
and Karin, M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13012-13017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
649-681[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ghosh, G.,
Vanduyne, G.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Sigler, P. B.
(1995)
Nature
373,
303-310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Zabel, U.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1990)
Cell
61,
255-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Brockman, J. A.,
Scherer, D. C.,
McKinsey, T. A.,
Hall, S. M.,
Qi, X.,
Lee, W. Y.,
and Ballard, D. W.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2809-2818[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Chen, Z.,
Parent, L.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1996)
Cell
84,
853-862[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Traenckner, E. B.,
Pahl, H. L.,
Henkel, T.,
Schmidt, K. N.,
Wilk, S.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2876-2883[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
DiDonato, J.,
Mercurio, F.,
Rosette, C.,
Wu-Li, J.,
Suyang, H.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Karin, M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1295-1304[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Lee, F. S.,
Hagler, J.,
Chen, Z. J.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1997)
Cell
88,
213-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Zandi, E.,
Rothwarf, D. M.,
Delhase, M.,
Hayakawa, M.,
and Karin, M.
(1997)
Cell
91,
243-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Diamond, D. A.,
Parsian, A.,
Hunt, C. R.,
Lofgreen, S.,
Spitz, D. R.,
Goswami, P. C.,
and Gius, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16959-16964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Guyton, K. Z.,
Spitz, D. R.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1996)
Free Radical Biol. Med.
20,
735-741[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Davidson, J. F.,
Whyte, B.,
Bissinger, P. H.,
and Schiestl, R. H.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5516-5121
|
| 37.
|
Polla, BS.,
Kantengwa, S.,
Francois, D.,
Salvioli, S.,
Franceschi, C.,
Marsac, C.,
and Cossarizza, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
6458-6463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Spitz, D. R.,
Li, G. C.,
McCormick, M. L.,
Sun, Y.,
and Oberley, L. W.
(1988)
Radiat. Res.
114,
114-124[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Jung, M.,
Zhang, Y.,
Lee, S.,
and Dritschilo, A.
(1995)
Science
268,
1619-1621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Dignam, J. D.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
182,
194-203[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Ezhevsky, S. A.,
Nagahara, H.,
Vocero-Akbani, A. M.,
Gius, D. R.,
Wei, M. C.,
and Dowdy, S. F.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10699-10704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Liu, F.,
Kwak, Y.,
Bex, F.,
Garcia-Martinez, L. F.,
Li, X. H.,
Meek, K.,
Lane, W. S.,
and Gaynor, R. B.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4221-4234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Luque, I.,
and Gelinas, C.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1213-1224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Henkel, T.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12,
141-179[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Gius, D.,
Cao, X.,
Rauscher, F. J., III,
Cohen, D. R.,
Curran, T.,
and Sukhatme, V. P.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4243-4255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Iliakis, G.,
Seaner, R.,
and Okayasu, R.
(1990)
Int. J. Hyperthermia
6,
813-833[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Kal, H. B.,
Hatfield, M.,
and Hahn, G. M.
(1975)
Radiology
117,
215-222[Abstract]
|
| 48.
|
Besançon, F.,
Atfi, A.,
Gespach, C.,
Cayre, Y. E.,
and Bourgeade, M. F.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
95,
8081-8086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.