J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 33, 23396-23404, August 13, 1999
Proteasomal Degradation and N-terminal Protease Resistance of the
Codon 145 Mutant Prion Protein*
Gianluigi
Zanusso,
Robert B.
Petersen,
Taocong
Jin,
Yi
Jing,
Rima
Kanoush,
Sergio
Ferrari,
Pierluigi
Gambetti, and
Neena
Singh
From the Division of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Case
Western Reserve University, 2085, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
 |
ABSTRACT |
An amber mutation at codon 145 (Y145stop) of the
prion protein gene results in a variant of an inherited human prion
disease named Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker syndrome. The
characteristic features of this disorder include amyloid deposits of
prion protein in cerebral parenchyma and vessels. We have studied the
biosynthesis and processing of the prion protein containing the
Y145stop mutation (PrP145) in transfected human
neuroblastoma cells in an attempt to clarify the effect of the mutation
on the metabolism of PrP145 and to gain insight into the
underlying pathogenetic mechanism. Our results demonstrate that 1) a
significant proportion of PrP145 is not processed
post-translationally and retains the N-terminal signal peptide, 2) most
PrP145 is degraded very rapidly by the proteasome-mediated
pathway, 3) blockage of proteasomal degradation results in
intracellular accumulation of PrP145, 4) most of the
accumulated PrP145 is detergent-insoluble, and both the
detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions are resistant to mild
proteinase K (PK) treatment, suggesting that PK resistance is not
simply because of aggregation. The present study demonstrates for the
first time that a mutant prion protein is degraded through the
proteasomal pathway and acquires PK-resistance if degradation is impaired.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The central pathogenetic event common to all three forms of prion
diseases, sporadic, acquired by infection, and inherited, is thought to
be a change in conformation involving the cellular prion protein
(PrPC).1
PrPC, a 209-amino acid glycoprotein, linked to the plasma
membrane by a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidyl inositol anchor, is
converted into an isoform that is insoluble in nonionic detergents,
resistant to protease degradation, and in some cases, can transmit the
disease (PrPRes) (1-3). Recent NMR studies on recombinant
PrP have shown that the N-terminal domain (23-120 in mouse recombinant
PrP) is highly flexible and has a random coil structure, whereas the
C-terminal region (129-219) contains two short
-sheet structures
and three
-helical domains (4, 5). The major conformational change that causes PrPC to become the pathogenic and infectious
PrPRes isoform is thought to involve refolding of the
region between residues 90 and 112, which would lead to conversion of
the region containing the two short
-sheet structures and of the
first
-helix into a large
-sheet formation (3, 6). However, the
remaining C-terminal structures including the two other
-helices and
the disulfide bond need to be preserved for PrPRes to be
infectious (3, 6).
The events leading to the conversion of PrPC to
PrPRes are, at present, not fully understood. In the
inherited prion diseases, which have only been associated with
mutations in the PrP gene (PRNP), the mutation is believed
to destabilize the mutant PrP (PrPM), which then undergoes
a spontaneous conformational change into the protease-resistant and
pathogenic form (7-9). Twenty-three pathogenic mutations in
PRNP have been reported to date, which are associated with
three phenotypes: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, fatal familial insomnia,
and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease (GSS) (8, 9). Despite
their congenital presence, all mutations cause diseases that become
symptomatic in the adult or advanced age. Of the seven PRNP
mutations associated with GSS, a chronic cerebellar ataxia and dementia
characterized by the presence of prominent amyloid plaques containing
internal PrPM fragments, all are missense mutations except
for the mutation at codon 145 that replaces tyrosine (TAT) with a stop
(TAG) codon (Y145stop) (10-12).
The 145 mutation is especially challenging because it results in the
premature termination of protein synthesis and yields a truncated PrP
(PrP145) that lacks the C-terminal 146-231 amino acids
including the glycosylphosphatidyl inositol anchor, which links PrP to
the cell surface, and the two sites for N-glycosylation,
which are known to stabilize the PrP molecule (13, 14). Thus, although
PrP145 includes the 90-112 segment where the major
conformational changes take place and almost all the ~80-147
internal fragment that is found in PrP amyloid, it lacks the C-terminal
region containing the two
-helices and the disulfide bond, which are
required for the PrPC-PrPRes conversion (15,
16). Moreover, most of the PrP145 is likely to include the
23-90-residue N-terminal region of PrP, which has been shown to be
superfluous for conversion to PrPRes (15-17). Yet, the
Y145stop mutation is associated with a phenotype not basically
different from that of the GSS subtypes associated with other
mutations, which do not result in the truncation of PrPM
(10). The only significant difference is the presence of numerous PrP-amyloid deposits in the cerebral vessels rather than in the brain
parenchyma as in the other GSS subtypes (10-12).
Currently, there are no animal or cellular models of the Y145stop
mutation. Expression of the truncated PrP145 was not
detected in transgenic animals and transfected neuroblastoma cells
following deletion of the 144-231 region, which results in a
PrPM identical in primary structure to that generated by
the Y145stop mutation (17, 18). To examine the effects of this mutation on the metabolism of PrP145, hence to gain a better
understanding of the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of this
GSS variant, we have transfected human neuroblastoma cells with
PRNP constructs carrying the Y145stop mutation or wild type
PRNP. We report, for the first time, that mutant
PrP145 is degraded through the proteasomal pathway.
Inhibition of proteasomal degradation results in the accumulation of
PrP145 in intracellular compartments, including the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the cis-medial-Golgi
compartment, and the nucleus. Most of the accumulated
PrP145 is aggregated and partially resistant to mild
proteinase K treatment. Protease-resistant PrP145 is also
present in the detergent-soluble fraction, suggesting that the
PrP145 protease resistance is not simply because of aggregation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials, Cell Culture Conditions, and Production of Transfected
Cell Lines--
Opti-MEM, fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin,
methionine, and cysteine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, and Lipofectin were from Life Technologies Inc.; hygromycin B and lactacystin were from Calbiochem; Tran35S-label was from
ICN; protein A-Sepharose was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; all other
chemicals were purchased from Sigma. Transfected M17 cells expressing
wild type or mutant prion protein (Y145amber) were generated as
described (13, 19). All cultures were maintained at 37 °C in
Opti-MEM supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum and penicillin-streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere containing 5%
CO2. Cultures of transfected cells were supplemented with
500 µg/ml hygromycin. The following antibodies were used: anti-N, rabbit antiserum to synthetic peptide corresponding to human PrP residues 23-40 (B. Ghetti, Indiana University); 3F4, a monoclonal antibody that recognizes an epitope on human PrP residues 109-112 (R. Kascsak, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities); anti-protein disulfide isomerase (M. Lamm, Case Western
Reserve University), anti-calnexin rabbit immune serum (A. Helenius,
Yale University), anti-
-mannosidase II (M. Farquhar, Univ.
California, San-Diego), anti-cathepsin-D (R.A Nixon, Harvard University), and anti-Man-6-phosphate (L. Traub, Washington University School of medicine).
In Vitro Transcription and Translation--
The codon 145 mutant
was originally produced in the phagemid pVZ1, which contains both T7
and SP6 bacteriophage RNA polymerase promoters, using
oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Using a BamHI-cleaved
template, run-on capped RNA was produced using the Cap-scribe system
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as recommended by the manufacturer.
Transcripts were analyzed using ethidium bromide-stained gels to assess
their purity. The in vitro transcription products were
translated into protein using the Promega message-dependent rabbit reticulocyte system with or without added canine pancreatic microsomes (Promega) to cleave the signal peptide. To control for
microsome activity, a transcript derived from
-lactamase was used.
The conditions used in the translation reaction were essentially as
described by the manufacturer.
Metabolic Labeling, Immunoprecipitation, and Western
Blots--
In a typical experiment, 9 × 106 cells
were used for each condition. Equal amounts of total protein was used
from cells expressing either normal or mutant PrP. Immunoprecipitation
and Western blots were performed essentially as described (19), with
the following modifications. For pulse-chase experiments, cells were
preincubated in the presence or absence of the indicated inhibitors
(lactacystin 80 µM,
N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal (ALLN) 80 µM, brefeldin A 5 µg/ml) for 1 h before labeling
with 0.166 mCi/ml of Tran35S-label (ICN) in
methionine-cysteine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 5%
dialyzed serum. Where indicated, appropriate inhibitors were included
in the labeling and chase medium. At the indicated times, the medium
was collected to check any secreted PrP145, and the cells
were lysed in a buffer containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5%
deoxycholate, and 10 mM EDTA in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) containing a
mixture of protease inhibitors. Cell debris was cleared by
centrifugation at 290 × g, and the clarified cell
lysate and medium samples were subjected to immunoprecipitation with
the appropriate antibodies in the presence of 1% bovine serum albumin
and 0.1% N-lauryl sarcosine. Protein-antibody complexes
bound to protein-A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were washed
four times with 0.5 ml of wash buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 0.1% N-lauryl sarcosine, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and bound
protein was eluted by boiling in sample buffer (Tris-HCL, pH 6.8, 3%
SDS, 10% glycerol, 5%
-mercaptoethanol) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE
fluorography. PrP bands were quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis
(Molecular Dynamics). For Western blots, proteins from cell lysates
were precipitated with 5 volumes of cold methanol at
20 °C,
fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and electrophoretically transferred to
Immobilon-P (Millipore) for 2.5 h at 70 volts at 4 °C.
Membranes containing transferred proteins were blocked in Tris-buffered
saline containing 10% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h
at 37 °C and probed with anti-PrP antibodies (anti-N diluted 1:4000,
3F4 diluted 1:50,000, or anti-C diluted 1:3000) dissolved in antibody
dilution buffer (Tris-buffered saline, 1% normal goat serum, and
0.05% bovine serum albumin). Immunoreactive bands were detected with
the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase
(anti-rabbit diluted 1:3000, anti-mouse diluted 1:4000) and visualized
on an autoradiographic film by ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). To quantitate the relative density of immunoreactive bands, exposed autoradiographic film was scanned at 42-mm resolution with a GE10 densitometer and quantitatively analyzed using Quantity One software (PDIG20, QS30).
For biotinylation of surface proteins, untreated, or cells treated with
ALLN for 2 h were biotinylated with 0.2 mg/ml of
sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin in PBS for 15 min on ice.
Excess biotin was quenched with 50 mM glycine (in PBS), and
after three more washes with PBS, the cells were lysed as above and
subjected to immunoprecipitation with 3F4. The immunoprecipitated
proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and electroblotted to
Immobilon-P, and the biotinylated PrP was detected by horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and ECL.
Detection of Associated Chaperone Proteins with
PrP145--
Cells expressing PrPC or
PrP145 were radiolabeled for 2 h in the presence or
absence of 80 µM ALLN and lysed with a nondenaturing buffer containing 1% CHAPS or 2% Triton X-100 in the presence of a
mixture of protease inhibitors. The lysate was subjected to
immunoprecipitation with anti-KDEL (Stressgen), anti-calnexin, or
anti-Grp 94 antibodies (Stressgen) and fractionated by SDS-PAGE to
check co-immunoprecipitation of any of the PrPC or
PrP145 forms with the above ER chaperones. In a parallel
experiment, the PrP was immunoprecipitated from the lysates, and the
presence of any associated chaperones was evaluated by immunoblotting
the electrophoretically transferred proteins by specific antibodies.
Detection of Ubiquitinated PrP--
For detecting ubiquitinated
PrP145, untreated and ALLN-treated PrPC- and
PrP145-expressing cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
3F4 as above. After fractionating on SDS-PAGE, the immunoprecipitated
proteins were transblotted and probed with anti-ubiquitin antibodies
1510, 5-25 (Chemicon), or LB112 (J.Q. Trojanowski, University of
Pennsylvania). Immunoreactive bands were detected with appropriate
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Alternatively,
PrPC and PrP145 cells were transfected with
myc-tagged ubiquitin-expressing plasmids H6M-Ub, or
H6M-Ub K48R (dominant negative ubiquitin mutant) (Ron R. Kopito, Stanford University). Steady state levels of PrPC
and PrP145 were determined in transient transfectants by
Western blotting. To detect ubiquitinated PrP145, transient
transfectants were radiolabeled in the presence of ALLN,
immunoprecipitated with anti-myc antibody to isolate myc-tagged ubiquitin-conjugated PrP145, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Confocal Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
For
immunofluorescent staining of PrP, transfected cells expressing
PrPC or PrP145 were grown on
poly-D-lysine-coated glass coverslips overnight and treated
with lactacystin in complete medium for the indicated times. Control
cells (0 h) received only medium. For washout experiments, cells
treated with lactacystin for 4 h were washed with complete medium,
and incubated in fresh medium for 0-4 h. At the indicated times, cells
were rinsed with PBS and fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at
room temperature. Free aldehyde groups were quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl (in PBS), and the cells were
permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM KCl for 5 min.
Nonspecific sites were blocked with PBS containing 10% goat serum and
0.2% bovine serum albumin, followed by 0.2% gelatin in PBS. Cells
were then incubated with anti-PrP antibody (3F4, diluted 1:25),
followed by fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody for 35-40 min
each. For subcellular immunolocalization, subsequent incubations were
done with anti-calnexin, anti-
-mannosidase II, anti-cathepsin-D, or
anti-mannose-6-phosphate antibodies, respectively, followed by
rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibodies. The cells were rinsed in
PBS, mounted in gel-mount (Biomeda Corp., Fostar City, CA), and
observed using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Bio-Rad). To
compare the fluorescence intensity of lactacystin-treated and washout
samples accurately, all experimental conditions were kept constant,
including antibody titer, total cell confluence, laser strength,
magnification, and basal instrument settings. A single 0.5-µm optical
section was photographed in each case.
Assay of "Detergent Insolubility" and Proteinase K
Resistance--
Aggregation, partial resistance to proteinase K (PK)
digestion, and insolubility in nonionic detergents is the hallmark of PrPRes. However, when applied in this context, detergent
insolubility implies insolubility of PrP in a buffer containing 0.5%
Nonidet P-40 and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate when centrifuged at
100,000 × g for 1 h. Untreated, and cells treated
with lactacystin for two h were lysed at 4 °C in 1 ml of Tris buffer
containing 0.5% of Nonidet P-40 and sodium deoxycholate each. After a
brief centrifugation at 290 × g, cell debris
(P1) was discarded, and the supernatant (S1)
was divided into two equal parts. One part was set aside, and the other
was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C
to obtain a high speed supernatant (S2) and pellet fraction
(P2). The pellet fraction P2 was resuspended in
the same volume of buffer as S2 and sonicated. Equal
aliquots of S1 (before ultracentrifugation), S2, and P2 fractions were immunoblotted with
3F4. The S2 and P2 fractions of
lactacystin-treated cells were also assayed for resistance to mild PK
digestion as described previously (19).
To check if aggregated PrP145 is immunoprecipitated
efficiently, lysates from cells incubated in the presence or absence of
80 µM of ALLN for 2 h were subjected to
ultracentrifugation as described above to separate the S1,
S2, and P2 fractions. Each fraction was
immunoprecipitated with 3F4, and the remaining supernatant was
methanol-precipitated and immunoblotted with 3F4 to detect any
nonimmunoprecipitated PrP remaining in the supernatant. The 15.5-kDa
band was consistently observed in the supernatant of ALLN-treated
cells. However, if the lysates were first boiled in the presence of
0.5% SDS, diluted 5-fold, and then subjected to immunoprecipitation,
no PrP was detected in the supernatant, suggesting that the inefficient
immunoprecipitation of the 15.5-kDa form is because of aggregation.
 |
RESULTS |
PrP145 Is Expressed as Two Isoforms at Steady
State--
On blots immunostained with the anti-PrP antibody 3F4 (to
residues 109-112), the normal or cellular prion protein
(PrPC) migrates as three bands corresponding to the
unglycosylated (U), intermediate (I), and highly glycosylated (H) forms
of 27, 29-30, and ~33-42 kDa, respectively (Fig.
1A). In contrast,
PrP145 migrates as two bands, a lower band of 14 kDa
(PrP14), the expected molecular mass for PrP with the 145 amber
mutation, and an upper, more prominent band of 15.5 kDa (PrP15.5) that
accounts for 66% of the total PrP145 (Fig. 1A).
As expected, both bands are readily detected with the 3F4 and anti-N
antibodies but not with anti-C-terminal antibody (data not shown).
Immunoprecipitation of PrP145 (which includes both PrP14
and PrP15.5) from cells radiolabeled with [35S]methionine
and cysteine for 2 h with the 3F4 antibody shows a similar pattern
(Fig. 1B), except that PrP15.5 accounts for only 25% of the
total PrP145. The cell-associated pool of
PrP145 at steady state is approximately 9 times smaller
than that of PrPC (Fig. 1A). Moreover, <1% of
the PrP145 is recovered from the medium, suggesting that
the low expression of PrP145 is not because of
secretion.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
PrP145 is synthesized as two
forms, one of which retains the N-terminal signal peptide.
A, immunoblotting with the monoclonal antibody 3F4 to PrP
reveals three major PrPC forms of 33-42 kDa
(H), 29-30 kDa (I), and 27 kDa (U).
In contrast, PrP145 migrates as two bands, PrP15.5 (15.5 kDa) and PrP14 (14 kDa), respectively, of which PrP15.5 is more
prominent. B, radiolabeling of PrPC and
PrP145 for 2 h with [35S]methionine and
cysteine followed by immunoprecipitation with 3F4 reveals the same
PrPC and PrP145 pattern as in (A),
but the ratio between PrP14 and PrP15.5 is reversed. C,
PrP145 synthesized with radiolabeled methionine and
cysteine in a cell-free transcription-translation system in the absence
of microsomes (lane 2) co-migrates with PrP15.5 detected in
intact cells (lane 1), confirming that this form includes
the signal peptide. Addition of microsomes results in the 14-kDa
signal-cleaved product (PrP14) (lane 3). When translation is
performed only in the presence of radiolabeled cysteine, PrP15.5 is
synthesized in the absence of microsomes, as expected (lane
4); on addition of microsomes, the PrP14 form is not detected
because the radiolabel-containing N terminus is lost subsequent to its
translocation into the microsomes (lane 5). D,
Following labeling with [35S]methionine and cysteine for
0.5 min and immunoprecipitation, PrP15.5 accounts for 55% of the total
PrP145. The ratio between the two forms reverses after a
2.5-min chase, when PrP14 accounts for 60% of the total, consistent
with the conversion of PrP15.5 to PrP14 (lane 1 versus lane 2). After 30 min of chase, only 16%
of the total PrP145 remains (lanes 1-6).
E, immunofluorescent staining of PrP with 3F4
(green) and of calnexin, an ER marker (red),
shows that PrPC is localized to the cell surface and the
Golgi region (panel 1). Similar staining of
PrP145-expressing cells shows a small amount of
PrP145 at steady state, mainly co-localizing with the Golgi
marker -mannosidase II (red; panel 3). No
co-localization of PrP145 is seen with the ER marker
calnexin (red; panel 2).
|
|
Three experiments were performed to determine whether PrP15.5
represents a form of PrP145 with an uncleaved N-terminal
signal peptide of 22 amino acids: 1) metabolic labeling with
[35S]cysteine, a residue that is present only in the
signal peptide; 2) cell-free translation with radiolabeled methionine
and cysteine or only cysteine in the absence or presence of microsomes
to obtain a translation product with or without the signal peptide,
respectively; 3) a short pulse of 30 s with
35S-labeled methionine and cysteine followed by a chase to
investigate whether PrP15.5 converts to the PrP14 form. Metabolic
labeling of cells with cysteine for 2 h shows only PrP15.5,
whereas both forms are detected when cells are radiolabeled with
methionine and cysteine (data not shown). After cell-free translation
with radiolabeled methionine and cysteine in the absence of microsomes, only PrP15.5 is retrieved, most of which is converted to the PrP14 form
when the microsomes are added co-translationally (Fig. 1C). Translation in the presence of radiolabeled cysteine yields only PrP15.5, which disappears when microsomes are added, confirming that
PrP15.5 includes the N-terminal signal peptide that is lost on addition
of microsomes (Fig. 1C). The bands obtained in
vitro co-migrate with PrP15.5 and PrP14 from radiolabeled cells
(Fig. 1C). The short pulse-chase experiment shows that at
the end of a 30-s pulse, PrP15.5 is predominant and accounts for 55%
of the total PrP145 (Fig. 1D). The ratio between
the two forms is reversed at the end of 2.5 min (Fig. 1D),
whereas the total PrP145 remains unchanged during this time
period. This finding suggests that PrP15.5 is converted into the PrP14
form. Both forms then decrease rapidly during the chase, so that only
16% of total PrP145 remains after 30 min, most of which
consists of PrP14 (Fig. 1D).
Immunofluorescence analysis by double immunostaining with anti-PrP and
an antibody to calnexin, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-specific protein, shows that although PrPC is mostly distributed at
the cell surface and in the Golgi region (Fig. 1E,
panel 1) (19), a very small amount of PrP145 is
detected in an intracellular compartment, and it co-stains with the
Golgi marker
-mannosidase II (Fig. 1E, panel
3). No ER localization is observed with the ER marker calnexin
(Fig. 1E, panel 2), probably because the small
quantity of PrP145 that escapes degradation transits
through the ER very rapidly. No PrP145 is detected on the
plasma membrane either by immunostaining (Fig. 1E,
panels 2 and 3) or cell surface biotinylation
(data not shown), excluding the possibility that PrP15.5 is inserted
into the cell membrane through the signal peptide.
Together, these results show that 1) PrP145 is unstable and
is not detected in the culture medium in significant amounts, 2) PrP15.5 represents a PrP145 form with an uncleaved
N-terminal signal peptide even though it is apparently translocated
efficiently into the ER (see below), 3) no PrP145 is
detected at the cell surface. The very low expression of
PrP145 compared with PrPC suggests that
PrP145 turns over very rapidly. The under-representation of
PrP15.5 after radiolabeling and immunoprecipitation (25%) when
compared with the steady state level by Western blot analysis (66%)
(Figs. 1, A versus B) raises the
possibility that this form is not immunoprecipitated efficiently
because of a change in its conformation, as previously observed with
the PrPM Q217R (19) (see below).
PrP145 Is Rapidly Degraded in a Pre-Golgi Compartment
by the Proteasomal Pathway--
To determine whether
PrP145 is degraded by the lysosomes or in a pre-Golgi
compartment, we carried out pulse-chase analysis either in the presence
of various lysosomal inhibitors (leupeptin, ammonium chloride, or
chloroquine) or by blocking transport beyond the ER-cis-Golgi
compartment by incubating cells at 15 °C or treating them with
brefeldin A (20). Neither the inhibition of lysosomal activity (data
not shown) nor the block of vesicular transport at low temperature
(Fig. 2A) or brefeldin A (Fig.
2B) blocked the degradation of PrP145, although,
as expected, the rate of degradation was slower at 15 °C as compared
with 37 °C (see Fig. 1D). A similar analysis at 37 °C
shows that although PrPC matures into various glycoforms
and is stable, 70% of the total being present after 2 h of chase,
most of the PrP145 disappears rapidly, and only 12%
remains after 2 h (data not shown). Taken together, these results
demonstrate that PrP145 turns over in a pre-Golgi
compartment and is not degraded through the lysosomal pathway.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PrP145 is rapidly degraded in a
pre-Golgi compartment by the proteasomal pathway. A,
following pulse-labeling for 5 min at 37 °C and chase at 15 °C,
PrPC fails to "mature" because of the block of
vesicular transport out of the ER, but it is highly stable up to 4 h of chase (lanes 1-4). In contrast, PrP145
degrades, with only 28% remaining at 2 h and a minimal amount at
4 h of chase (lanes 5-8). BFA, brefeldin A. B, a 5-min pulse and a chase of 0-60 min shows the same
kinetics of degradation either in the absence or presence of brefeldin
A. C, following preincubation, pulse-labeling, and 1 h* and
2 h** of chase in the continued presence of ALLN or lactacystin,
PrP145 degradation is significantly inhibited compared with
untreated cells (left panel) (right panel,
quantitative representation. 1 h*, p < 0.0003; 2 h**,
p < 0.00006; n = 3). The degradation
of untreated samples is similar in panels B and
C; the apparent difference in the figure is because of more
protein at the 0 time point in B than in C.
D, radiolabeling for 2 h in the presence of lactacystin
(lane 1) or ALLN (lane 2) followed by
immunoprecipitation from the cell lysate and culture medium
demonstrates the presence of both intracellular and secreted
PrP145. PrP14 predominates in the intracellular fractions
(lanes 1 and 2), whereas PrP15.5 is
the principal form secreted (lanes 3 and
4).
|
|
Because both membrane and secretory proteins can be degraded through
the proteasomal pathway (21-23), we evaluated this possibility by
treating cells expressing PrP145 with the proteasomal
inhibitor lactacystin or ALLN during pulse-chase experiments. In cells
treated with lactacystin or ALLN, 48 and 36%, respectively, of
PrP145 remain after a 2-h chase, as compared with 12% in
untreated cells (Fig. 2C; p <3 × 10
4 at 1 h*, and p < 6 × 10
5 at 2 h**; n = 3). PrP14 accounts for
most of the protected PrP145 (Fig. 2C). There is
no change in the kinetics of turnover of PrPC in the
presence of ALLN or lactacystin under the same experimental conditions
(data not shown). To check if the PrP145 that accumulates
intracellularly following proteasomal inhibition is ubiquitinated,
ALLN-treated cells were immunoprecipitated with 3F4, and the
immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with a panel of anti-ubiquitin
antibodies to detect any ubiquitinated PrP forms. Alternately,
PrP145 cells were transfected with normal or a dominant
negative mutant of ubiquitin followed by immunoprecipitation with 3F4.
No ubiquitinated PrP145 was detected in either case, and
the co-expression of mutant ubiquitin did not stabilize
PrP145 (data not shown).
To evaluate if PrP145 rescued from proteasomal degradation
is secreted, cells expressing PrP145 were radiolabeled for
2 h in the continuous presence of lactacystin or ALLN, and the
cell lysate and culture medium were subjected to immunoprecipitation
with 3F4. Only PrP15.5 was secreted, although the intracellular pool of
PrP14 exceeded that of PrP15.5 (Fig. 2D). No
PrP145 form was detected in the medium if cells were
labeled in the presence of brefeldin A (data not shown).
Accumulated PrP145 Is Aggregated and Less Sensitive to
Protease Digestion--
To investigate whether the PrP145
that accumulates in the absence of proteasomal degradation is
aggregated, untreated cells and cells treated with lactacystin for
2 h were lysed in a buffer containing the nonionic detergents
Nonidet P-40 and sodium deoxycholate, conventionally used for detecting
aggregated PrP. After pelleting the cell debris (P1) by a
low speed centrifugation, the supernatant (S1) was
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h to separate a
soluble (S2) and an insoluble (P2) fraction. In
untreated cells, almost all of the PrP145 is recovered in
the high speed supernatant or soluble (S2) fraction, and a
small amount of PrP15.5 is detected in the P2 fraction
(Fig. 3A, upper
panel). In lactacystin-treated cells, the amount of PrP145 is at least 4-fold higher, and a significant
proportion of it is present in the pellet (P2) as an
insoluble fraction. This fraction contains mostly PrP15.5 (Fig.
3A, lower panel) and increases in amount with
extended chase time (data not shown). The insolubility of PrP15.5 and
inefficient immunoprecipitation especially in the presence of
proteasomal inhibitors was further confirmed when we subjected
untreated and lactacystin-treated cell lysates to immunoprecipitation
and immunoblotted the remaining supernatant with the same antibody. In
untreated cells, virtually no PrP14 or 15.5 could be detected in the
supernatant, whereas in lactacystin- and ALLN-treated cells,
significant amounts of mostly PrP15.5 remained in the supernatant with
nonimmunoprecipitated proteins. However, when the lysates were boiled
in the presence of SDS before immunoprecipitation, no PrP15.5 remained
in the supernatant in treated or untreated cells (data not shown).
These findings may explain the preferential detection of PrP15.5 in
immunoblots as compared with pulse-labeled immunoprecipitates (see
Figs. 1, A and B) if the presence of the signal
peptide induces a change in its conformation that leads to inefficient
immunoprecipitation. None of the PrP145 forms (PrP14 or
15.5) were associated with any of the ER chaperones, Grp78, Grp94, or
calnexin (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Impairment of proteasomal activity results in
the accumulation of detergent-insoluble and proteinase K-resistant
PrP145. A, untreated cells and cells pretreated
with lactacystin for 2 h were lysed with nonionic detergents, and
cell debris was pelleted by a low speed centrifugation. The low speed
supernatant or detergent-soluble (S1) fraction was
centrifuged at 100,000 × g to obtain high speed
detergent soluble (S2) and insoluble (P2)
fractions. Immunoblotting of an aliquot of each fraction with 3F4 shows
that most of the PrP145 from untreated cells partitions in
the S2 fraction (lane 2), and very little is
recovered in the pellet P2 (lane 3). In
lactacystin-treated cells, in contrast, most of the PrP145
fractionates in the insoluble P2 fraction, where PrP15.5
accounts for virtually all the PrP145 (lane 3)
(the amount of PrP145 in lactacystin-treated lysates is at
least 4-fold higher than in untreated cells. An underexposed fluorogram
is shown for the sake of clarity). B, immunoblotting of
PrP145 present in the soluble (S2) and
insoluble (P2) fractions obtained from cells exposed to
lactacystin for 2 h reveals the presence of PK-resistant
PrP145 in both fractions after treatment with 3.3 µg/ml
of proteinase K. In S2, both PrP14 and 15.5 forms are
present and appear to migrate ~1.5-2 kDa faster after PK treatment,
perhaps because of the generation of a shorter PK-resistant fragment
(lanes 3-6) (see text for alternative explanations). A
significant amount of the PrP15.5 in the P2 fraction also
resists 1 min of PK treatment (lanes 7-10). In contrast,
untreated PrP145 is completely degraded after a 1-min
treatment (lanes 1-2) (untreated PrP145 in
lanes 1 and 2 is overexposed to emphasize its
complete digestion by PK in 1 min).
|
|
The sensitivity to PK of the PrP145 that accumulates
following treatment with lactacystin was tested on immunoblots of
lactacystin-treated cells by digesting the S2 and
P2 fractions with 3.3 µg/ml of PK for 1 to 10 min.
PrPC (data not shown) and untreated PrP145 were
degraded completely after 1 min of PK treatment (Fig. 3B). In contrast, a 1-10-min treatment with PK of S2 fraction
obtained from mutant cells exposed to lactacystin resulted in the
presence of two additional bands of ~14 and ~12 kDa. This finding
suggests that both PrP14 and 15.5 comprise a 1.5-2 kDa smaller
fragment, which is weakly resistant to PK treatment (Fig.
3B). However, the gel mobility of the "PK-resistant"
PrP145 forms makes the interpretation of the data difficult
and the possibility that the two PK-resistant bands represent the
intact and truncated forms of PrP14, whereas PrP15.5 is completely
digested cannot be excluded. Paradoxically, PrP15.5 present in the
insoluble P2 fraction is less PK-resistant, because it is
almost completely digested after a 5-min treatment (Fig.
3B). Nonetheless, after a 1-min treatment, a small amount of
the 1.5-2-kDa lower band is still detectable, supporting the
conclusion that PrP15.5 also generates a smaller PK-resistant fragment
(Fig. 3B). The ~14-kDa and ~12-kDa PK-resistant
PrP145 forms were detected, not only by the 3F4 antibody
but also by an antibody to the PrP N terminus (antiserum to residues
23-40 of PrP) (data not shown). Thus, the PK digestion must occur at the PrP145 C terminus, beyond residue 112, which is
recognized by 3F4, and not around residue 90, as observed in the
full-length PrPRes. Overall, only ~1% of the
PrP145 remains after 10 min of PK digestion (Fig.
3B).
PrP145 Rescued from Proteasomal Degradation Is Found in
the Nucleus--
The intracellular distribution of PrP145
accumulated after inhibition of proteasomal function was analyzed by
immunofluorescence of PrP145 in cells treated with
lactacystin for 0-4 h (Fig. 4). In
untreated cells, PrP145 immunoreactivity
was restricted to the Golgi region, as previously shown
(Fig. 4A, 0 h, left panel; Fig.
1E, panel 3). After incubation with lactacystin
for 1-4 h, the reactivity was detected in punctate and vesicular
structures, although it remained most intense in the Golgi region (Fig.
4A, 1-4 h, left panels). Strikingly, a diffuse PrP staining of the nucleus sparing the nucleolus was also detected with longer treatment (Fig. 4A, 2-4 h,
left panels). Replacement of the lactacystin-containing
medium with normal medium followed by a chase for 4 h gradually
restored the original PrP145 distribution (Fig.
4A, right panels, 0-4 h). PrP
immunoreactivity first decreased in punctate and vesicular structures
(Fig. 4A, 0-1 h, right panels), then
in the nucleus (Fig. 4A, 1-2 h, right panels), and finally was detected only in the Golgi region as in
the untreated cells expressing PrP145 (Fig. 4A,
4 h, right panel). The vesicular staining
co-localized with calnexin, an ER marker (Fig. 4B,
right panel), whereas the reactivity adjacent to the nucleus
co-localized with the Golgi marker
-mannosidase II (Fig.
4B, left panel). Nuclear immunoreactivity of
PrP145 in lactacystin-treated cells co-localized with the
nuclear marker DAPI and was also observed after immunostaining of
deplasticized sections of plastic-embedded cell preparations as well as
with immunofluorescence of isolated nuclear fractions (data not shown). No immunoreactivity was observed in the nuclei of
PrPC-expressing or nontransfected M17 neuroblastoma cells
treated with lactacystin or ALLN for 4 h (data not shown). The
accumulated PrP145 did not colocalize with the late
endosomal-lysosomal marker cathepsin-D or with the lysosomal marker
mannose 6-phosphate (data not shown). Thus, upon inhibition of
proteasomal degradation, PrP145 accumulates in
membrane-bound compartments, including the ER, Golgi apparatus, and the
nucleus.


View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
PrP145 accumulates in
intracellular compartments and in the nucleus. A,
although immunofluorescence of PrP145 in untreated cells is
restricted to the early Golgi cisternae, (0 h, left panel;
Fig. 1E, panel 3), increased amounts of
PrP145 accumulate in the cis-medial Golgi and in
vesicular structures after 1-4 h of lactacystin treatment (left
panels). A diffuse nuclear reactivity, sparing the nucleolus,
appears after 1 h of treatment and peaks at 4 h (left
panels). Chase of lactacystin-treated cells in normal medium for
0-4 h (right panels) gradually restores the original
PrP145 location to the Golgi cisternae (4 h, right
panel). B, in cells treated with lactacystin for 4 h, PrP145 co-distributes with both the
cis-medial Golgi (Merge, left panel)
and ER (Merge, right panel) following double
immunofluorescence of PrP (green) with -mannosidase II, a
cis-medial-Golgi marker (red) (left panel) or
with calnexin, an ER marker (red) (right panel).
The depth within the cell at which Golgi and ER staining is maximal
differs by ~0.1 µm. A single optical section was photographed in
each case at the optimal depth. No nuclear staining was observed in
lactacystin treated nontransfected or PrPC-expressing
cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Y145stop mutation in the human prion protein gene,
PRNP, is associated with a GSS variant of prion disease.
Previous attempts to generate a model of this GSS variant in transgenic
mice and transfected cells have failed because no expression of the
mutant PrP145 could be detected in these models (18, 24).
We now demonstrate that in a transfected cell model, PrP145
is expressed in two truncated forms, one of which conserves the signal
peptide. Both forms are unstable and are rapidly degraded through the
proteasomal pathway. However, both accumulate in significant quantities
in intracellular compartments and become aggregated and weakly
protease-resistant when proteasomal degradation is impaired. These
findings may resolve the dilemma posed by the previous models.
They also widen the spectrum of pathogenetic mechanisms that may be
involved in prion diseases and provide novel avenues of investigation
toward the understanding of this puzzling GSS variant.
The Uncleaved Signal Peptide Predisposes PrP145 to
Aggregation--
Inefficient cleavage of the N-terminal signal peptide
because of naturally occurring mutations within the signal has been shown to be pathogenic in various conditions, but it is unprecedented in prion diseases (25-28). This "proform" appears to accumulate intracellularly and tends to aggregate more readily than the
signal-cleaved form. The inefficient immunoprecipitation of this form
is probably because of a change in conformation of its "soluble"
pool, in addition to the formation of detergent-insoluble aggregates
(see below). Thus, under normal experimental conditions, the amount of
the signal peptide containing PrP145 recovered in
immunoblots is more than four times the amount recovered after
immunoprecipitation. After lactacystin treatment, the signal peptide
containing PrP145 accounts for almost all of the
detergent-insoluble and weakly protease-resistant aggregates that
accumulate intracellularly. With continuous lactacystin treatment, both
the signal-uncleaved and -cleaved forms are secreted into the medium
through a brefeldin A-sensitive pathway, although the signal-uncleaved
form comprises the major secreted form. The preferential detection of
the latter in the medium could be because of its greater stability.
Thus, both forms translocate into the ER lumen, and the
signal-uncleaved form is not inserted in the lipid bilayer through the
signal peptide. This conclusion is consistent with the lack of
detectable PrP145 on the cell surface by either
immunofluorescence or biotinylation. None of the PrP145
forms were found to be bound to any of the major ER-specific chaperones, either in the presence or absence of lactacystin.
PrP145 Is Degraded by the Proteasome--
The
PrP145 has a half-life of ~10 min and at steady state is
nine times less abundant than PrPC. Therefore, it is by far
the most unstable of all the forms of mutant PrP we have examined to
date (13, 19). The lack of all major post-translational modifications
and presence of the signal peptide, both of which target
PrP145 for rapid degradation and aggregation, easily
explain the marked instability of PrP145.
The turnover of both PrP145 forms that persists at 15 °C
and in the presence of brefeldin A point to a pre-Golgi site of
degradation. Following inhibition of proteasomal degradation,
PrP145 accumulates primarily in the ER, Golgi, and in the
nucleus, but apparently not in the late endosomes or lysosomes. The
precise site of PrP145 proteasomal degradation has not been
established in this study. PrP145 might be degraded by
proteasomes on the cytosolic face of the ER membrane, as has been
reported for the T-cell receptor
-chain and other ER luminal and
secretory proteins (29-36). It would then accumulate upstream in the
secretory pathway in the ER and Golgi and also diffuse to the nucleus
from the cytosol when the degradation is blocked. Recently, cytosolic
accumulation of two transmembrane proteins, presenilin-1 and cystic
fibrosis transmembrane regulator, has been described upon inhibition of
proteasomal function (37). We do not observe significant accumulation
of PrP145 in the cytosol after proteasomal inhibition.
Instead, PrP145 seems to be specifically targeted to the
nucleus by a nuclear localization signal that becomes functional when
the carboxyl end of the protein is truncated at residue 145. One type
of nuclear localization sequence comprises one or more clusters of
basic amino acid residues, which, however, lack tight consensus
sequence (38). Interestingly, the N terminus of PrP has a cluster of amino acids (KKRPKP) similar to the SV-40 large T antigen nuclear localization signal (PKKKRKV). Studies are ongoing to establish if this
sequence functions as a cryptic nuclear localization signal.
We did not detect ubiquitinated PrP145 even though our data
prove conclusively that the proteasomal pathway degrades
PrP145. Whether PrP145 is degraded without
ubiquitination as observed for other proteins (29) or is tagged by some
other ubiquitin-like protein (39) remains to be determined.
Applicability of the Present Model to the 145 GSS Human
Disease--
The PrP145 forms present several unusual
characteristics when they are compared with the other mutant PrPs
expressed in transfected cells (13, 14, 19). First, they are highly
unstable and are for the most part rapidly degraded. Second, when
degradation is impaired, they become partially resistant to protease
digestion. Third, paradoxically, the PrP145 is more
protease-resistant in the dispersed than in the aggregated form and, in
this form, the protease-resistant fragments include the intact N
terminus, whereas a 1.5-2-kDa sequence located at the C terminus
remains protease-sensitive. This contrasts with the data from the other
transfected cell models of inherited prion diseases in which the mutant
PrP spontaneously becomes protease-resistant, the protease-resistant
fraction is present only in the aggregated form, and the
protease-resistant core includes residues ~90-231 (14, 19, 41). The
present findings argue that also the N-terminal region of PrP,
including the signal peptide, may aggregate and become weakly resistant
to proteases. Moreover, they indicate that because PrP145
is also resistant to protease treatment in the dispersed state, the
protease resistance is not exclusively because of aggregation but to
other mechanisms such as, for example, the presence of a protective
ligand or the adoption of a
-sheet conformation in a monomeric or
oligomeric state. A recent report supports this assumption (47). It has
also been recently shown that the PrP 121-231 C terminus segment can
adopt a
-sheet conformation at acidic pH, independently of other
segments (40).
The salient histopathological features of the human Y145stop variant of
GSS are the widespread PrP amyloid deposits in vessels and parenchyma
of brain and the presence of intraneuronal fibrillary inclusions called
neurofibrillary tangles, whereas spongiform degeneration is lacking (7,
11, 12). The amyloid deposits have been shown to immunostain with
antibodies raised to the N-terminal 25 amino acids of PrP, indicating
the presence of N-terminal fragment(s) of PrP145 (11). In
addition, an N and C terminus-truncated ~7.5-kDa PrP fragment has
been detected in monomeric and oligomeric forms, which by epitope
mapping is believed to include amino acids 90-147 (12). A ~7.5-kDa
PrP fragment has also been isolated from the amyloid deposits of other
GSS variants associated with PRNP point mutations, and it
has been found to be the only PK-resistant PrP form recovered from the
brain when spongiform degeneration is absent (8, 10, 42). In the P102L
GSS variant, the ~7.5-kDa fragment has been shown to span residues
78-82 to residues 147-150 by sequence and mass spectrophotometric
analyses (42). Therefore, the 7.5-kDa fragment present in the amyloid
deposits of Y145stop GSS variant is likely to include residues ~80 to
~145 and to be the only major PK-resistant PrP fragment present in
the brain parenchyma of subjects affected by this disease.
It is not immediately evident how the findings of the human disease and
the present findings can be reconciled. We did not find a 7.5-kDa PrP
fragment or any fragment of smaller size. Data obtained from cell
models of inherited prion diseases have been compared with those
obtained from brains affected by the corresponding disease in a
previous study (13). It was found that although the cell model does not
form a PK-resistant PrP comparable with that of the disease, it
reproduces the metabolic changes occurring in the mutant PrP in the
brain (13). Therefore, it is reasonable to postulate that PrP14 and
15.5 forms are expressed in the brain of the subjects carrying the
Y145stop PRNP mutation and are in large amount cleared
through the proteasomal pathway. Effective proteasomal degradation of
PrP145 along with the presence of the PrPC
encoded by the normal allele may prevent the expression of disease until adult age. However, a decrease in proteasomal function with advanced age or the low but continuous intracellular accumulation and
secretion of the aggregated and weakly PK resistant PrP145
would result in the formation of the highly amyloidogenic ~7.5-kDa PrP fragment and formation of amyloid deposits. Future studies of
Y145stop GSS variant-affected brains should search for the presence and
distribution of the PrP14 and 15.5 forms. It would be important to
determine whether PrP145 is present in aggregated and
weakly PK-resistant form and whether some of it is located inside the
nucleus. These findings would provide indirect evidence that
proteasomal degradation is impaired in the human disease.
Other neurodegenerative diseases have also been shown to involve the
proteasome. Recently, it has been shown that the proteasomal system
participates in the metabolism of amyloid
peptide, the main
component of the amyloid accumulating in Alzheimer's disease (33). The
presence of PrP145 in the nucleus also provides an
interesting analogy with a group of inherited neurodegenerative
diseases, which include Huntington's chorea and forms of cerebellar
ataxia. In each of these diseases, the presence of polyglutamine repeat
expansions leads the mutated protein to adopt a
-sheet structure and
to form insoluble, ubiquitinated aggregates in the nucleus (43-46),
consistent with proteasomal involvement in these diseases as well.
Studies aimed at evaluating changes in proteasomal function with
advancing age will provide important information regarding the role of
this organelle in the pathogenesis of these disorders and potential
therapeutic approaches.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. A. Tartakoff (Case Western
Reserve University) for helpful discussions and a critical
evaluation of the manuscript. We also thank S. Bowen for secretarial
help, Diane Kofskey and Anuradha Arora for technical help, and Dr.
Kristin Defife and Dr. J. Anderson for use of the confocal microscope.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by funds provided by the National
Institutes of Health (to P. G. and N. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of
Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Case Western Reserve
University, 2085, Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH 44106. Tel.:
216-368-2617; Fax: 216-368-2546; E-mail: nxs2@po.cwru.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PrPC, normal cellular prion protein;
PrP145, mutant prion protein
with a stop codon at residue 145, which comprises two forms of 14 and
15.5 kDa, respectively;
PrP14, the signal peptide-cleaved 14-kDa form
of PrP145;
PrP15.5, signal peptide-uncleaved 15.5-kDa form
of PrP145;
PK, proteinase K;
PrPRes, PrP
resistant to 50 µg/ml of proteinase K treatment at 37 °C for
1 h;
protease-resistant PrP145, fragment of
PrP145 resistant to 3.3 µg/ml proteinase K for 1-5 min
at 37 °C;
PRNP, prion protein gene;
GSS, Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease;
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
ALLN, N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Caughey, B.,
Race, R. E.,
Ernst, D.,
Buchmeier, M. J.,
and Chesebro, B.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
175-181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Pan, K. M.,
Baldwin, M.,
Nguyen, J.,
Gasset, M.,
Serban, A.,
Groth, D.,
Mehlhorn, I.,
Huang, Z.,
Fletterick, R. J.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10962-10966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13363-13383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Donne, D. G.,
Viles, J. H.,
Groth, D.,
Mehlhorn, I.,
James, T. L.,
Cohen, F. E.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
Wright, P. E.,
and Dyson, J. H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13452-13457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Riek, R.,
Hornemann, S.,
Wider, G.,
Glockshuber, R.,
and Wuthrich, K.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
413,
282-288[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Korth, C.,
Stierli, B.,
Streit, P.,
Moser, M.,
Schaller, O.,
Fischer, R.,
Schulz-Schaeffer, W.,
Kretzschmar, H.,
Raeber, A.,
Braun, U.,
Ehrensperger, F.,
Hornemann, S.,
Glockshuber, R.,
Riek, R.,
Billeter, M.,
Wuthrich, K.,
and Oesch, B.
(1997)
Nature
39,
74-77
|
| 7.
|
Parchi, P.,
Gambetti, P.,
Piccardo, P.,
and Ghetti, B.
(1998)
in
Progress in Pathology
(Kirkham, N.
, and Lemoine, N. R., eds)
, pp. 39-77, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK
|
| 8.
|
Ghetti, B.,
and Gambetti, P.
(1999)
in
Genetic Aberrancies and Neurodegenerative Disorders
(Mattson, M., ed)
, Jai Press, Inc., Greenwich, CT, in press
|
| 9.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
(1996)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
61,
473-493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Ghetti, B.,
Piccardo, P.,
Frangione, B.,
Bugiani, O.,
Giaccone, G.,
Young, K.,
Prelli, F.,
Farlow, M. R.,
Dlouhy, S., R.,
and Tagliavini, F.
(1996)
Brain Pathol.
6,
127-145[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Kitamoto, T.,
Iizuka, R.,
and Tateishi, J.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
192,
525-531[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Ghetti, B.,
Piccardo, P.,
Spillantini, M. G.,
Ichimiya, Y.,
Porro, M.,
Perini, F.,
Kitamoto, T.,
Tateishi, J.,
Seiler, C.,
Frangione, B.,
Bugiani, O.,
Giaccone, G.,
Prelli, F.,
Goedert, M.,
Dlouhy, S. R.,
and Tagliavini, F.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
744-748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Petersen, R. B.,
Parchi, P.,
Richardson, S. L.,
Urig, C. B.,
and Gambetti, P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12661-12668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lehmann, S.,
and Harris, D. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21479-21487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Kaneko, K.,
Zulianello, L.,
Scott, M.,
Cooper, C. M.,
Wallace, A. C.,
James, T. L.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10069-10074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Kaneko, K.,
Vey, M.,
Scott, M.,
Pilkuhn, S.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2333-2338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Fischer, M.,
Rülicke,
Raeber, A.,
Sailer, A.,
Moser, M.,
Oesch, B.,
Bradner, S.,
Aguzzi, A.,
and Weissmann, C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1255-1264[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Muramoto, T.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Scott, M.,
Telling, G. C.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
750-755[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Singh, N.,
Zanusso, G.,
Chen, S. G.,
Fujioka, H.,
Richardson, S.,
Gambetti, P.,
and Petersen, R. B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28461-28470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Bonifacino, J. S.,
and Lippincott-Schwatrz, J.
(1991)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
3,
592-600[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Ward, C. L.,
Omura, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
121-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Wiertz, E. J. H. J.,
Tortorella, D.,
Bogyo, M., Yu, J.,
Mothes, W.,
Jones, T. R.,
Rapoport, T. A.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1996)
Nature
384,
432-438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Werner, E. D.,
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13797-13801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Bradner, S.,
Isenmann, S.,
Raeber, A.,
Fischer, M.,
Sailer, A.,
Kobayashi, Y.,
Marino, S.,
Weissmann, C.,
and Aguzzi, A.
(1996)
Nature
379,
339-343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Arnold, A.,
Horst, S. A.,
Gardella, T. J.,
Baba, H.,
Levine, M. A.,
and Kronenberg, H. M.
(1990)
J. Clin. Invest.
86,
1084-1087
|
| 26.
|
Racchi, M.,
Watzke, H. H.,
High, K. A.,
and Lively, M. O.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5735-5740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Ito, M.,
Oiso, Y.,
Murase, T.,
Kondo, K.,
Saito, H.,
Chinzei, T.,
Racchi, M.,
and Lively, M. O.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
91,
2565-2571
|
| 28.
|
Li, Y.,
Bergeron, J. J. M.,
Luo, L.,
Ou, W. J.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
and Kang, C. Y.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9606-9611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Yu, H.,
Kaung, G.,
Kobayashi, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20800-20804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Kopito, R. R.
(1997)
Cell
88,
427-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Hiller, M. M.,
Finger, A.,
Schweiger, M.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1996)
Science
273,
1725-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Qu, D.,
Teckman, J. H.,
Omura, S.,
and Perlmutter, D. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22791-22795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Kim, T. W.,
Pettingell, W. H.,
Hallmark, O. G.,
Moir, R. D.,
Wasco, W.,
and Tanzi, R. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11006-11010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
151-156
|
| 35.
|
Pilon, M.,
Schekman, R.,
and Romisch, K.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4540-4548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Fisher, E. A.,
Zhou, M.,
Mitchell, D. M.,
Wu, X.,
Omura, S.,
Wang, H.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
and Ginsberg, H. N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20427-20434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Johnston, J. A.,
Ward, C. L.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1883-1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Dingwall, C.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1991)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
16,
478-481[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kamitani, T.,
Nguyen, H. P.,
and Yeh, E. T. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14001-14004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Hornemann, S.,
and Glockshuber, R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6010-6014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Rogers, M.,
Yehiely, F.,
Scott, M.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
3182-3186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Parchi, P.,
Chen, S. G.,
Brown, P.,
Zou, W.,
Capellari, S.,
Budka, H.,
Hainfellner, J.,
Reyes, P. F.,
Golden, G. T.,
Hauw, J. J.,
Gajdusek, D. C.,
and Gambetti, P.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8322-8327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Paulson, H. L.,
and Fischbeck, K. H.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
19,
79-107[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
DiFiglia, M.,
Sapp, E.,
Chase, K. O.,
Davies, S. W.,
Bates, G. P.,
Vonsattel, J. P.,
and Aronin, N.
(1997)
Science
277,
1990-1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Davies, S. W.,
Turmaine, M.,
Cozens, B. A.,
DiFiglia, M.,
Sharp, A. H.,
Ross, C. A.,
Scherzinger, E.,
Wanker, E. E.,
Mangiarini, L.,
and Bates, G. P.
(1997)
Cell
90,
537-548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Scherzinger, E.,
Lurz, R.,
Turmaine, M.,
Mangiarini, L.,
Hollenbach, B.,
Hasenbank, R.,
Bates, G. P,
Davies, S. W.,
Lehrach, H.,
and Wanker, E. E.
(1997)
Cell
90,
549-558[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Jackson, G. S.,
Hosszu, L. L. P.,
Power, A.,
Hill, A. F.,
Kenney, J.,
Saibil, H.,
Craven, C. J.,
Waltho, J. P.,
Clarke, A. R.,
and Collinge, J.
(1999)
Science
283,
1935-1937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles: