JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbaszade, I.
Right arrow Articles by Burn, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abbaszade, I.
Right arrow Articles by Burn, T. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 33, 23443-23450, August 13, 1999


Cloning and Characterization of ADAMTS11, an Aggrecanase from the ADAMTS Family*

Ilgar AbbaszadeDagger , Rui-Qin Liu§, Fude Yang, Stuart A. RosenfeldDagger , O. Harold RossDagger , John R. LinkDagger , Dawn M. EllisDagger , Micky D. Tortorella§, Michael A. Pratta§, Jeannine M. HollisDagger , Richard WynnDagger , Jodie L. DukeDagger , Henry J. GeorgeDagger , Milton C. Hillman Jr.Dagger , Kathleen MurphyDagger , Barbara H. WiswallDagger , Robert A. Copeland, Carl P. Deciccoparallel , Robert Bruckner, Hideaki Nagase**, Yoshifumi Itoh**, Robert C. Newton§, Ronald L. Magolda§, James M. Trzaskos§, Gregory F. HollisDagger , Elizabeth C. Arner§, and Timothy C. BurnDagger Dagger Dagger

From the Departments of Dagger  Applied Biotechnology, § Inflammatory Diseases Research,  Chemical Enzymology, and parallel  Chemical and Physical Sciences, The DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880 and the ** Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Aggrecan is responsible for the mechanical properties of cartilage. One of the earliest changes observed in arthritis is the depletion of cartilage aggrecan due to increased proteolytic cleavage within the interglobular domain. Two major sites of cleavage have been identified in this region at Asn341-Phe342 and Glu373-Ala374. While several matrix metalloproteinases have been shown to cleave at Asn341-Phe342, an as yet unidentified protein termed "aggrecanase" is responsible for cleavage at Glu373-Ala374 and is hypothesized to play a pivotal role in cartilage damage. We have identified and cloned a novel disintegrin metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs that possesses aggrecanase activity, ADAMTS11 (aggrecanase-2), which has extensive homology to ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) and the inflammation-associated gene ADAMTS1. ADAMTS11 possesses a number of conserved domains that have been shown to play a role in integrin binding, cell-cell interactions, and extracellular matrix binding. We have expressed recombinant human ADAMTS11 in insect cells and shown that it cleaves aggrecan at the Glu373-Ala374 site, with the cleavage pattern and inhibitor profile being indistinguishable from that observed with native aggrecanase. A comparison of the structure and expression patterns of ADAMTS11, ADAMTS4, and ADAMTS1 is also described. Our findings will facilitate the study of the mechanisms of cartilage degradation and provide targets to search for effective inhibitors of cartilage depletion in arthritic disease.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Aggrecan is the major proteoglycan of cartilage and is responsible for its compressibility and stiffness. Aggrecan contains two N-terminal globular domains, G1 and G2, separated by a proteolyticaly sensitive interglobular domain, followed by a glycosaminoglycan attachment region and a C-terminal globular domain (G3). The G1 domain of aggrecan interacts with hyaluronic acid and link protein to form large aggregates containing multiple aggrecan monomers that are trapped within the cartilage matrix. Cleavage of aggrecan has been shown to occur at Asn341-Phe342 and Glu373-Ala374 within the interglobular domain, with the cleaved aggrecan being free to exit the matrix since it lacks the G1 domain, which is responsible for formation of the high molecular weight complexes. Results from several studies suggest that cleavage at the Glu373-Ala374 site is responsible for the increased aggrecan degradation observed in inflammatory joint disease. Products resulting from cleavage at the Glu373-Ala374 site have been shown to accumulate in cartilage explants and chondrocyte cultures treated with interleukin-1 and retinoic acid (1-5) and in the synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis and inflammatory joint disease (6, 7). While several characterized matrix metalloproteases (MMP-1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -9 and -13)1 have been shown to cleave at the Asn341-Phe342 site (8-14), they are not responsible for the observed cleavage at Glu373-Ala374. A novel proteolytic activity, termed "aggrecanase," has been hypothesized to be responsible for cleavage at the Glu373-Ala374 site, with the enzyme probably playing a pivotal role in the cartilage damage associated with osteoarthritis and inflammatory joint disease. Despite intensive work, the identity of aggrecanase has remained unknown for over 8 years.

The disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) family of proteases contains more than 20 members having extensive homology to the snake venom metalloproteases (15-17). The ADAMs have been shown to have similar domain arrangements, consisting of pre-, pro-, proteinase, disintegrin-like, cysteine-rich, epidermal growth factor-like, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains. A novel ADAM family member containing multiple carboxy thrombospondin motifs, ADAMTS1 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs), has recently been described in mice (18). ADAMTS1 is structurally conserved with other members of the ADAM family; however, unlike the majority of ADAM family members, it lacks a transmembrane domain and contains unique thrombospondin motifs that are responsible for extracellular matrix binding (18, 19). Early ADAM family members were shown to play roles in sperm-egg fusion and myotube fusion (20, 21). Recently, the enzyme responsible for processing precursor tumor necrosis factor-alpha has been shown to be a disintegrin metalloproteinase (22, 23). Another ADAM family member, kuzbanian, is required for proteolytic processing of the Notch ligand Delta, which is involved in neural cell fate determination (24). However, to date, the function of the majority of ADAMs family members has yet to be elucidated.

In the work reported herein, we describe the purification, cloning, and expression of an aggrecanase from the ADAMTS family, ADAMTS11. Recently, we have also described the purification and characterization of another aggrecanase, ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1), using a different purification protocol from that used to purify ADAMTS11 (25). Since the analysis of the ADAMTS11 sequence revealed extensive homology to ADAMTS4 and murine ADAMTS1, we also examined levels of gene expression for these family members in a variety of normal and arthritic human tissues. ADAMTS11, along with ADAMTS4, is likely to play a key role in inflammatory joint disease and the subsequent cartilage degradation. Thus, the availability of the recombinant protein provides a valuable tool in the effort to identify and characterize therapeutically useful inhibitors.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Purification of Bovine ADAMTS11-- 6.5 liters of bovine cartilage conditioned media containing the aggrecanases were supplemented with l µM leupeptin, 1 µM pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.05% Brij-35, passed through a 1.2-µm filter, and loaded onto a Macro S column. The column was washed with buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) Brij-35), and aggrecanases were eluted with buffer A containing 1.0 M NaCl. The eluted material was passed through a gelatin-agarose column to remove contaminating MMPs (Table I). Prior to the gelatin-agarose column, the eluate from the Macro S column was adjusted to a final concentration of 10 µM XS309 (N3-methyl-(3R)-2-[(2S)-2-[(1R)-2-(hydroxyamino)-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl]-4-methylpentanoyl]hexahydro-3-pyridazinecarboxamide) (26), a hydroxamic acid-based broad spectrum inhibitor of MMPs that is ineffective as an inhibitor of aggrecanase activity, to prevent degradation of the column by MMPs. Material passing through the gelatin-agarose column, containing the aggrecanase activity, was concentrated and loaded onto a phenyl-Sepharose column equilibrated with buffer A containing 10% (w/v) ammonium sulfate without Brij-35. Proteins were eluted with a 10 to 0% ammonium sulfate gradient. Fractions containing aggrecanase activity were pooled and loaded onto a CM column that had been equilibrated with buffer B (50 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5). Proteins were eluted from the column with a 0.1-1.0 M NaCl gradient in buffer B, and fractions with high enzymatic activity were pooled and concentrated. Aliquots of the concentrate were applied to a Sephacryl S-200 column equilibrated with buffer B. The column was eluted isocratically in the same buffer, and fractions containing aggrecanase activity were pooled, concentrated, and injected onto a C4-alkylsilane-derivatized silica HPLC column. Proteins were eluted with a linear gradient from 0 to 50% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid, and fractions were collected and immediately diluted 10-fold with buffer A for analysis of aggrecanase activity.

Two samples of the purified material were fractionated in adjacent wells of a 10% Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gel under nonreducing conditions. One lane was stained with silver, and the other lane was cut horizontally into 22 approximately equal volume slices, each representing a different molecular weight range. The individual slices were crushed and incubated in 100 µl of 20 mM Tris, 10 mM CaCl2 100 mM NaCl, 2.5% Triton X-100 at 4 °C overnight to renature the enzyme and elute it from the gel slice. Two protein bands associated with aggrecanase activity were immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride and subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis.

Determination of Aggrecan Cleaving Activity-- Aggrecanase activity was measured by incubating bovine aggrecanase or recombinant human ADAMTS11 with purified bovine aggrecan monomers as described (27). Reactions were terminated with 20 mM EDTA and Western blotted. Glu373-Ala374 cleavage products were detected using the BC-33monoclonal antibody (28). The hydroxamic acid inhibitors XS309, BB-16 ((2S,3R)-2-methyl-3-(2-methylpropyl)-1-(N-hydroxy)-4-(o-methyl)-L-tyrosine-N-methylamide) and SE206 (2S,5R,6S-3-aza-4-oxo-10-oxa-5-hexyl-2-(methylcarboxamido)-[10]paracyclophane-6-N-hydroxycarboxamide) were synthesized at DuPont Pharmaceuticals as described (26, 29). IC50 values were determined for the inhibitors using conditioned media from stimulated bovine nasal cartilage explant cultures and recombinant human ADAMTS11 as described previously (27).

ADAMTS11 cDNA Cloning and Expression-- Murine EST 569515 (GenBankTM accession no. AA288689) was identified by searching the EST data base with sequences from ADAMTS1 and ADAMTS4. The IMAGE Consortium clone (30) corresponding to EST 569515 was obtained from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL) and sequenced. PCR primers (CGGCCACGACCCTCAAGAACTTT and GCATGGAGGCCATCATCTTCAATCA) designed from the murine sequence were used to amplify a 163-bp product from human heart cDNA. Sequences present in the human amplicon were used to design a PCR primer (GGGAGGATTTATGTGGGCATCA) for use 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Primers designed from a partial 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends clone and the original 163-base pair human amplicon (GGGAGGATTTATGTGGGCATCA and GTGCATTTGGACCAGGGCTTAGA) were used to prescreen a number of available human cDNA libraries. Based on these results, a human liver cDNA library was screened by PCR as described (31). DNA and protein sequences were analyzed using tools in the GCG sequence analysis package (Genetics Computer Group Inc., Madison, WI), with the dendogram in Fig. 1C being obtained using the PileUp program. Our multiple sequence comparisons focused only on ADAMTS1 through ADAMTS4, since the ADAMTS5 through ADAMTS10 gene names and symbols have been reserved for sequences that are not yet in the public domain. The ADAMTS11 sequences are novel and not represented in the ADAMTS5 through ADAMTS10 gene set.2 The open reading frame encoding ADAMTS11 was PCR-amplified with appropriate consensus Kozak sequences for expression in the Drosophila system and subcloned into the pRMHA3 Drosophila expression vector (32). Recombinant protein was expressed as described (32, 33).

Northern Analysis-- A commercially available Northern blot (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) was hybridized with ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 probes derived from the 3'-untranslated regions. Probes were labeled by random priming as described (34). Blots were hybridized and washed as recommended by the manufacturer.

Real Time PCR-- Real time PCR was performed essentially as described (35). Primers and probes were designed from human ADAMTS4 (primers, GACACTGGTGGTGGCAGATG and TCACTGTTAGCAGGTAGCGCTTTA; probe, CAAGATGGCCGCATTCCACGGT), ADAMTS11 (primers, GCTGCCACCACACTCAAGAA and TGGTCATCTCCCAGCTGGTT; probe, CAAGATGGCCGCATTCCACGGT), and partial ADAMTS1 sequences (primers, GGCGCAAATCCGGGTC and CGCCATTCACGGTGCC; probe, TTCCGGAAACCGACCTGGCG) using Primer Express (Perkin-Elmer). Data obtained with commercially available mammalian 18 S ribosomal RNA primers and probes were used to normalize between tissues (Perkin-Elmer). Probes were labeled at the 5'-end with the reporter dye 6-FAM and on the 3'-end with the quencher dye TAMRA (Perkin-Elmer). 1 µg of total RNA from each tissue was DNase I-treated and reverse transcribed as described (36) using random hexamers and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Each PCR utilized the cDNA from 50 ng of starting RNA. All PCRs were performed in triplicate, with copy numbers being calculated by comparing the threshold values for each reaction with a standard curve produced using linearized cDNA for the respective gene. The concentration of the linearized DNAs used in the standard curves were measured using the Molecular Probe, Inc. (Eugene, OR) PicoGreen assay as recommended by the manufacturer. All expression levels are relative, since the initial efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was not accounted for in the copy number calculations. Expression levels between tissues were normalized with 18 S ribosomal RNA. RNAs from normal and diseased tissues were obtained from a commercial vendor (Biochain Institute Inc., San Leandro, CA) with quality being assessed in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels prior to real time PCR experiments. The arthritic tissues used in these studies included fibrous tissue and joint capsule from the femur of a 33-year-old patient with arthritis.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Purification of a Bovine Aggrecanase-- Interleukin 1-stimulated bovine nasal cartilage conditioned medium was chosen as a source for aggrecanase. Purification was followed using an enzymatic activity employing the BC-3 neoepitope antibody, which recognizes the new N terminus formed by cleavage at the Glu373-Ala374 bond (28) as described under "Materials and Methods" (Table I). Analysis of the purified aggrecanase by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with silver staining demonstrated the presence of multiple prominent bands in the range of 40-65 kDa. Analysis of protein eluted from multiple gel slices indicated that aggrecanase activity was associated with two protein bands, centered at approximately 64 and 50 kDa. These two protein bands were immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride and subjected to amino-terminal amino acid sequence analysis. Preliminary sequence of the 64- and 50-kDa proteins suggested that they represented different forms of the same protein (ADAMTS11) and were different from the ADAMTS4 enzyme purified using an affinity resin approach (25).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Protein purification of bovine ADAMTS11
Table I summarizes the purification of 6.5 l of conditioned media from interleukin-1-stimulated bovine nasal cartilage cultures. Activity was assessed using the BC-3 antibody as described under "Materials and Methods." An increase in total activity was seen consistently following purification on the S-column and is likely to be due to the removal of an inhibitory activity present in the starting material.

Identification, Cloning, and Characterization of a Human Aggrecanase-- In parallel with the characterization of the purified aggrecanases, we undertook a data base mining approach to identify sequences in the DNA and protein data bases that had homology to the preliminary N-terminal peptide sequences. Since the initial peptide sequence for the affinity-purified enzyme (ADAMTS4) had significant homology to the N terminus of the murine ADAMTS1 metalloproteinase domain (18), we searched the data bases in order to identify sequences encoding additional members of this family with the potential to encode aggrecanases.

Using ADAMTS1 and partial ADAMTS4 sequences to query the databases, we identified sequences encoded by a murine EST from an 8.5 day embryo library (accession number AA288689) that were 48% identical and 60% similar to a 170-residue portion of the ADAMTS4 metallproteinase domain to query the EST data bases, we identified sequences encoded by a murine EST from an 8.5-day embryo library (accession no. AA288689) that were 48% identical and 60% similar to a 170-residue portion of the ADAMTS4 metalloproteinase domain (data not shown). The 1.5-kb partial cDNA corresponding to the murine EST was sequenced in its entirety and shown to encode sequences that were 95% identical to subsequent N-terminal peptide sequence for both the 64-kDa (39/41 residues) and 50-kDa (21/22 residues) forms of bovine ADAMTS11. These data indicate that the murine cDNA encodes ADAMTS11.

Our initial ADAMTS11 cloning efforts relied on human heart cDNA, since murine ADAMTS1 was shown to be expressed in heart (18), and human osteoarthritic cartilage RNA was unavailable. We were able to amplify a 163-base pair product from human heart cDNA utilizing PCR primers designed from the murine sequence. Primers designed from the human PCR product and a partial 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends clone were then used to screen 2.5 × 106 clones from a human liver cDNA library, which had been prescreened by PCR and shown to contain ADAMTS11 sequences. Two 5.5-kb cDNA clones were obtained, with DNA sequence analysis revealing a 2793-base pair open reading frame preceded by two in-frame stop codons. The deduced protein sequence is 930 amino acids in size and has four potential glycosylation sites (Fig. 1). Sequences from the deduced human protein are 95% (39/41) identical to the N-terminal peptide sequence of bovine ADAMTS11 (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Protein sequence of human ADAMTS11 and comparison with other closely related proteins. A, amino acid sequence deduced from the ADAMTS11 cDNAs is shown aligned to activated forms of murine ADAMTS1 and human ADAMTS4. The pre- and pro-domains were excluded from the alignment, since they are significantly less conserved between the three family members. Residues matching the consensus sequence of the three proteins are shaded. Domains are labeled above the sequence and are delineated by arrows. Sequences corresponding to the N-terminal peptide sequence from bovine ADAMTS11 enzyme are denoted by the line at the start of the metalloproteinase domain; residues that are different in the bovine sequence are shown above the line. The conserved zinc-binding motif and "Met turn" are boxed. A filled circle denotes the location of a potential Cys switch, while asterisks designate potential N-linked glycosylation sites. B, the organization of the signal sequences (SS), pro-domains (Pro), metalloproteinase domains (Protease), disintegrin-like domains (Disin), spacer regions, and thrombospondin motifs (TSP) and submotifs (TSP-sub) are shown for ADAMTS11, murine ADAMTS1, ADAMTS4, and the C. elegans f25 h8.3 protein. The filled circles show the relative positions of glycosylation sites. Only a portion of the 18 C-terminal TSP submotifs are shown for the C. elegans f25 h8.3 protein. C, dendogram showing the relationship of sequences from the data bases that have the highest degree of homology to ADAMTS11.

ADAMTS11 Is a Disintegrin Metalloproteinase-- Human ADAMTS11 is a multidomain protein containing a signal sequence, pro-domain, metalloproteinase domain, disintegrin-like domain, and "spacer domain" located between a thrombospondin type I (TSP) motif and TSP submotif (Fig. 1B). The metalloproteinase domain contains a consensus sequence for a zinc-dependent metalloproteinase with homology to the snake venom metalloproteases and other members of the ADAM family, with the conserved aspartate after the third histidine (Fig. 1A), indicating that it is a member of the adamalysin superfamily (37, 38). The most striking homology was seen with the metalloproteinase domains of murine ADAMTS1 (18), a Caenorhabditis elegans metalloproteinase of unknown function (f25 h8.3 protein, GenBankTM accession no. 1181986) predicted from genomic sequence (39), and ADAMTS4 (25). This latter sequence has recently been deposited in the data bases as clone KIAA0688 (ADAMTS4), an unidentified human gene from a set of size-fractionated human brain cDNA libraries (40, 41). Not surprisingly, the lowest levels of conservation are seen in the pro-domains of these proteins, while the remainder of ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1 are 48 and 50% identical to ADAMTS11, respectively. Other sequences having homology, but at a significantly lower level than those mentioned above, included an unidentified human gene from a brain cDNA library, KIAA0366 (ADAMTS3) (41, 42) and procollagen I N-proteinase (ADAMTS2) (42, 43), both of which are less than 35% identical to ADAMTS11. In contrast, ADAMTS2 and ADAMTS3 are 65% identical and 73% similar to each other. Based on these homologies and sequence alignments, the ADAMTS family members can be clustered into two subfamilies, with ADAMTS1, ADAMTS4, ADAMTS11, and f25 h8.3 being on one branch and ADAMTS2 and ADAMTS3 being on a divergent branch (Fig. 1C). Further analysis indicates that ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1 are more closely related to each other than ADAMTS11, with the former pair likely to have resulted from a duplication after an initial duplication involving ADAMTS11 (Fig. 1C). This interpretation is consistent independent of whether the full-length proteins, the metalloproteinase domains, or disintegrin-like domains are used in the analysis. Analysis of the deduced protein sequences revealed multiple consensus glycosylation sites in ADAMTS11, ADAMTS1, and f25 h8.3, while ADAMTS4 lacks potential sites for glycosylation (Fig. 1B). At present, the relevance of these potential differences in glycosylation status is unknown.

The metalloproteinase domain of ADAMTS11 is preceded by a pro-domain having a potential cysteine switch at Cys209 as well as a cleavage site for furin (residues 257-261), a serine endoprotease that has been implicated in the processing of a wide variety of proproteins (44, 45). It has been proposed that the catalytic activity of MMPs is masked by a conserved cysteine in the pro-domain, a "cysteine switch," that binds to the active-site zinc to inhibit the enzyme (46, 47). Although there are no clear cysteine switch consensus sequences for the ADAMs family (48), Cys209 is conserved in other metalloproteinase-disintegrin family members (18), murine ADAMTS1, and ADAMTS4 and may function as the cysteine switch.

ADAMTS11 contains a number conserved domains that have been shown to be involved in adhesion, including a disintegrin-like domain, a pair of TSP motifs, and a conserved spacer domain between the TSP motifs (16, 18, 19, 49-53). One of the noteworthy differences between the aggrecanase/ADAMTS1 family members is the number of TSP submotifs present in their respective C termini (Fig. 1B). In contrast to the tandem pair of TSP submotifs at the C terminus of ADAMTS1, ADAMTS11 has a single C-terminal TSP submotif, while ADAMTS4 lacks a TSP submotif (Fig. 1B). As mentioned above, data base searches also revealed extensive homology between ADAMTS11 and the C. elegans f25 h8.3 protein. The f25 h8.3 protein is of particular interest, since it contains up to 18 tandem copies of the C-terminal submotif (Fig. 1B).

Expression Analysis of the Aggrecanases and ADAMTS1-- We initially compared the patterns of gene expression for human aggrecanases using Northern analysis (Fig. 2). A 4.3-kb band was seen in ADAMTS4 blots, with expression being present in heart, brain, placenta, lung, and skeletal muscle. For ADAMTS11, the highest expression was seen in placenta with much weaker signals also being observed in heart and brain (Fig. 2). A series of bands hybridized to the ADAMTS11 probe with a strong signal being seen at 12.4, 10.7, 8.6, and 6.6 kb, while a series of weaker bands were present between 5 and 6 kb. Our initial ADAMTS11 cDNAs were from a 5.6-kb transcript in liver; however, we have been able to amplify sequences from placenta using 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends that had longer 3'-untranslated regions (data not shown). Therefore, the longer ADAMTS11 transcripts detected by Northern analysis are likely to result from alternative cleavage/polyadenylation sites in the 3'-untranslated region.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Northern analysis of the aggrecanases. Labeled cDNA sequences from the 3'-untranslated region of ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 were hybridized to a Northern blot. The positions of the RNA markers are shown at the left; the source of RNA is shown at the top of each lane.

We utilized real time PCR to more quantitatively measure the expression of the aggrecanases and ADAMTS1. Real time PCR also allowed us to perform experiments on tissues where we had limiting amounts of RNA. Real time PCR is an extremely sensitive and quantitative method for measuring gene expression, with the assay having a dynamic range of over 7 orders of magnitude. Primers and Taqman probes were designed from ADAMTS11, ADAMTS4, and partial human ADAMTS1 sequences. Expression levels were calculated as described under "Materials and Methods," with the signals for the three genes being normalized between tissues with values obtained with 18 S ribosomal RNA. The assay was validated in initial experiments by comparing Northern data for ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 (Fig. 2) with real time PCR data (Fig. 3), with the data being consistent between the two assays for those tissues compared.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression levels of the aggrecanases and human ADAMTS1. The expression levels of human ADAMTS11, ADAMTS4, and ADAMTS1 were determined by real time PCR in a variety of normal and arthritic tissues. The number of copies of each cDNA present in reverse transcribed total RNA were determined relative to a standard curve produced using cloned cDNAs. All values were normalized to 18 S ribosomal RNA and are displayed in arbitrary units.

Expression of ADAMTS11 was observed in samples from an arthritic patient, rib cartilage, and chondroblastoma (Fig. 3). ADAMTS11 transcripts were also seen in a variety of normal tissues including cervix, uterus, bladder, esophagus, and placenta. ADAMTS4 expression was high in arthritic tissues, with the next highest expression seen in ovary, spinal cord, uterus, bladder, brain, and heart. Similarly, Ishikawa et al. (40) observed high levels of expression for KIAA0688 (ADAMTS4) in brain, ovary, and liver, with moderate levels in heart, testes, and lung. While Ishikawa et al. (40) saw high levels of expression in liver, the low levels of expression in liver that we observed are more consistent with our Northern data (Fig. 2). Human ADAMTS1 was expressed at the highest levels in the arthritic tissues, bladder, aorta, cervix, and uterus.

The relative expression levels of the three genes were compared within individual tissues by determining the number of copies present in the starting cDNA relative to the standard curve. Expression levels for ADAMTS1 were consistently higher than for ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 in all tissues examined with the exception of brain and chondroblastoma, where ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 are expressed at higher levels, respectively. Of the three family members, ADAMTS11 was seen to have the lowest expression levels in the arthritic samples, while ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1 were expressed at 2-3-fold and 6-8-fold higher levels, respectively. In chondroblastoma, ADAMTS1 and ADAMTS4 were expressed at the same relative levels, with ADAMTS11 expression levels being approximately 3-fold higher. In normal rib cartilage, ADAMTS4 was expressed at the lowest levels, with ADAMTS11 and ADAMTS1 being expressed at approximately 4- and 10-fold higher levels, respectively. Since we did not have access to matched arthritic and nonarthritic samples, we could not compare the relative expression levels of these genes in normal and diseased tissues.

ADAMTS11 Has Aggrecanase Activity-- In order to demonstrate that ADAMTS11 cDNA encoded a proteinase with aggrecanase activity, we expressed recombinant full-length ADAMTS11 in the Drosophila S2 system. Multiple immuno- reactive bands were seen by Western analysis in conditioned medium from rADAMTS11 expressing Drosophila S2 cells and not in control cell lines (data not shown). Conditioned media from Drosophila cells expressing recombinant ADAMTS11 were able to cleave aggrecan at the Glu373-Ala374 bond as evidenced by detection of products with the BC-3 antibody, while media from uninduced cells and cells transfected with an empty expression vector lacked activity (Fig. 4A). The aggrecan cleavage patterns were indistinguishable for partially purified conditioned medium from bovine nasal cartilage cultures and Drosophila cells expressing recombinant ADAMTS11 (Fig. 4). No cleavage was seen at the Asn341-Phe342 site, which has been shown to be preferentially cleaved by matrix metalloproteases (data not shown). Several BC-3-reactive products were seen in Western blots (Fig. 4), consistent with previous work that has identified additional cleavage sites for aggrecanases within the C-terminal region of aggrecan (54). The inhibition profile of three peptidic hydroxamates was compared between recombinant ADAMTS11 and the endogenous bovine aggrecanase, which had purified through the CM column step. The rank order of potency was consistent between the recombinant material and endogenous bovine material (Table II), with the IC50 values being slightly lower for the recombinant human material when compared with those observed with the bovine material. The difference in IC50 values is probably the result of species differences or differences in protein binding between the two samples.


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Comparison of recombinant ADAMTS11 (rADAMTS11) and native aggrecanase. A, conditioned media from induced Drosophila S2 cells transfected with empty expression vector (lane 1) and uninduced (lane 2) or induced (lane 3) cells transfected with the recombinant ADAMTS11 expression construct were incubated with aggrecan monomers. B, native aggrecan monomers were treated with conditioned medium from bovine nasal cartilage cultures that had been purified through to the CM column step as described under "Materials and Methods." For native material, the assays were performed in the presence of EDTA to quench the reaction (lane 1) or in the absence of EDTA (lane 2). Glu373-Ala374 reactive material was detected by Western blot using the BC-3 antibody.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Comparison of inhibitor profiles for bovine aggrecanase and recombinant human ADAMTS11
IC50 values were obtained for three hydroxamates that have previously been shown to have differing potencies for bovine aggrecanase (27). Endogenous aggrecanase activity was measured using bovine nasal cartilage material purified through to the CM step as described under "Materials and Methods."


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have described the cloning of a novel disintegrin metalloproteinase and demonstrate that it possesses aggrecanase activity. Our data indicate that the aggrecanase/ADAMTS1 subfamily has multiple members, with the family being conserved from C. elegans through human. The two human aggrecanases and ADAMTS1 described in this report are expressed in a variety of tissues in addition to arthritic tissues; however, it is impossible to draw any broad conclusions about underlying themes of gene expression patterns based on the tissues examined. In situ hybridizations will be required to determine what cell types are responsible for the observed gene expression in each tissue. Based on the broad expression patterns of ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11, it is likely that they have other roles in addition to cartilage remodeling. At present, it is unknown whether any of these genes are up-regulated in inflammatory joint disease due to the limited availability of human RNA from matched normal and arthritic tissues. Animal models will probably be required to address this latter issue. The fact that all three family members are expressed in the limited number of arthritic tissues examined in this report suggests that they are likely to play a role in inflammatory joint disease.

Sequence analysis of ADAMTS11 suggests that the enzyme is synthesized in an inactive pro-form that may be processed by furin during transit through the secretory pathway. This hypothesis is supported by data indicating that the N-terminal peptide sequence of the enzyme purified from bovine cartilage conditioned medium starts immediately C-terminal of a consensus furin cleavage site. Furthermore, inhibition of furin may be responsible for the previously described block in aggrecan cleavage seen in response to a serine-protease inhibitor (55).

ADAMTS11 exhibits the consensus motif, HEXXHXXGXXH, whose three conserved histidine residues are involved in binding of the catalytically essential zinc ion in members of the metzincin superfamily (38). This protein also has an aspartic acid following the third conserved histidine residue, as is found in the adamalysin family, and a conserved methionine downstream of the active site, which is found in members of the metzincin family as part of a "Met turn" (38, 56). While both ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1 have a similar zinc-binding motif, with an aspartic acid residue following the third histidine and a downstream methionine, these two proteins have an asparagine residue between the second and third histidine instead of a glycine. In the metzincins whose crystal structures have been determined, the active site helix is terminated at this invariant glycine residue, which results in the main chain abruptly turning downward into the lower domain of the protein (38). The conserved glycine in each of the enzymes exhibits an identical conformation not accessible to non-Gly residues. This raises the possibility that ADAMTS11 may exhibit subtle structural differences in this region from ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1. However, this has not been observed as any difference in cleavage of aggrecan by ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 or in inhibitor profiles against these two proteases. Further elucidation of the effect of this substitution awaits determination of the crystal structures of these proteases.

ADAMTS11 possesses several different domains that are likely to play a role in adhesion. Disintegrin proteins are found in snake venoms, where they act as inhibitors of platelet aggregation by binding to integrins through a conserved RGD motif (16, 49). Disintegrin-like domains, while lacking the RGD motif, have also been implicated in integrin binding (50, 51). The function of the disintegrin-like domain of ADAMTS11 is unclear; it may allow binding to integrins expressed on the articular chondrocytes (57). The TSP type I motif of thrombospondin has been implicated in binding to matrix macromolecules and cell adhesion (52, 53), with recent data indicating that the TSP motif and submotif of murine ADAMTS1 bind to heparin and the extracellular matrix (18, 19). The TSP motif and submotif of ADAMTS11 may be responsible for binding to the glycosaminoglycans of aggrecan. Consistent with this hypothesis is the observation that deglycosylation of aggrecan decreases the production of Glu373-Ala374 cleavage products by aggrecanases (58). Sequences within the spacer region between the TSP motifs of ADAMTS11 are conserved in all the family members and are likely to provide an additional adhesion motif, since recent studies demonstrate that sequences within the spacer region of murine ADAMTS1 can themselves bind tightly to the extracellular matrix (19). The variable number of TSP submotifs in the ADAMTS family members may lead to altered affinities for glycosaminoglycans, since the TSP submotifs of ADAMTS1 have been shown to play a role in extracellular matrix binding (19).

Comparison of the intron/exon structure of the murine ADAMTS1 gene to the protein domains indicates that the two TSP submotifs are present in the final exon of the gene (59). Based on this observation, the evolution of the variable number of submotifs in ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 is likely to have involved more than the simple deletion of an internal exon encoding an individual TSP submotif. Determination of the exon/intron structure of the three family members is likely to shed light on evolutionary paths that have led to the present diversity in this gene family. A comparison of the promoters for the genes may also provide insight into the different regulatory elements controlling the expression of the family members.

In preliminary experiments, we have identified additional genes that have a high degree of homology to the members of the aggrecanase/ADAMTS1 subfamily. It is unclear if other family members besides ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 will possess aggrecanase activity. However, it is possible that ADAMTS1 has aggrecanase activity given its high degree of homology with ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11, as well as its high level of expression in arthritic tissues. Additional work will focus on the role of the ADAMTS family of enzymes in inflammation and joint disease and the regulation of the respective genes. The availability of recombinant proteins for this family of genes will aid in the identification of specific inhibitors of the different enzymes that will be important tools for deciphering the biological role of the individual family members. In addition, the recombinant proteins will facilitate the development of potential therapeutics for inhibiting aggrecan degradation and the subsequent cartilage damage associated with inflammatory joint disease.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Gary Davis and Paul Gunyuzlu for helpful suggestions during the course of this work and Dr. Jefferey O'Brian for suggestions regarding real time PCR assays. We also thank Julie Bunville, Karen Krakowski, and Laura Bolling for providing DNA sequencing assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF142099.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Applied Biotechnology, The DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Experimental Station E336/237B, P.O. Box 336, Wilmington, DE 19880-0336; Tel.: 302-695-3859; Fax: 302-695-9420; E-mail: Timothy.C.Burn@dupontpharma.com.

2 Human Genome Organization Nomenclature Committee, personal communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MMP, matrix metalloprotease; EST, expressed sequence tag; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; kb, kilobase pair(s); TSP, thrombospondin type I; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sandy, J. D., Neame, P. J., Boynton, R. E., and Flannery, C. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8683-8685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Sandy, J. D., Boynton, R. E., and Flannery, C. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8198-8205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Loulakis, P., Shrikhande, A., Davis, G., and Maniglia, C. A. (1992) Biochem. J. 284, 589-593
4. Ilic, M. Z., Mok, M. T., Williamson, O. D., Campbell, M. A., Hughes, C. E., and Handley, C. J. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 322, 22-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Lark, M. W., Gordy, J. T., Weidner, J. R., Ayala, J., Kimura, J. H., Williams, H. R., Mumford, R. A., Flannery, C. R., Carlson, S. S., Iwata, M., and Sandy, J. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2550-2556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Sandy, J. D., Flannery, C. R., Neame, P. J., and Lohmander, L. S. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 89, 1512-1516
7. Lohmander, L. S., Neame, P. J., and Sandy, J. D. (1993) Arthritis Rheum. 36, 1214-1222[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Fosang, A. J., Neame, P. J., Hardingham, T. E., Murphy, G., and Hamilton, J. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15579-15582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Flannery, C. R., Lark, M. W., and Sandy, J. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1008-1014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Fosang, A. J., Neame, P. J., Last, K., Hardingham, T. E., Murphy, G., and Hamilton, J. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19470-19474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Fosang, A. J., Last, K., Knauper, V., Neame, P. J., Murphy, G., Hardingham, T. E., Tschesche, H., and Hamilton, J. A. (1993) Biochem. J. 295, 273-276
12. Fosang, A. J., Last, K., Neame, P. J., Murphy, G., Knauper, V., Tschesche, H., Hughes, C. E., Caterson, B., and Hardingham, T. E. (1994) Biochem. J. 304, 347-351
13. Fosang, A. J., Last, K., Knauper, V., Murphy, G., and Neame, P. J. (1996) FEBS Lett. 380, 17-20[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Arner, E. C., Decicco, C. P., Cherney, R., and Tortorella, M. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9294-9299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Jia, L. G., Shimokawa, K., Bjarnason, J. B., and Fox, J. W. (1996) Toxicon 34, 1269-7126[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Blobel, C. P. (1997) Cell 90, 589-592[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Black, R. A., and White, J. M. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 654-659[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Kuno, K., Kanada, N., Nakashima, E., Fujiki, F., Ichimura, F., and Matsushima, K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 556-562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Kuno, K., and Matsushima, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13912-13917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Blobel, C. P., Wolfsberg, T. G., Turck, C. W., Myles, D. G., Primakoff, P., and White, J. M. (1992) Nature 356, 248-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Yagami-Hiromasa, T., Sato, T., Kurisaki, T., Kamijo, K., Nabeshima, Y., and Fujisawa-Sehara, A. (1995) Nature 377, 652-656[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Black, R. A., Rauch, C. T., Kozlosky, C. J., Peschon, J. J., Slack, J. L., Wolfson, M. F., Castner, B. J., Stocking, K. L., Reddy, P., Srinivasan, S., Nelson, N., Boiani, N., Schooley, K. A., Gerhart, M., Davis, R., Fitzner, J. N., Johnson, R. S., Paxton, R. J., March, C. J., and Cerretti, D. P. (1997) Nature 385, 729-733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Moss, M. L., Jin, S. L., Milla, M. E., Bickett, D. M., Burkhart, W., Carter, H. L., Chen, W. J., Clay, W. C., Didsbury, J. R., Hassler, D., Hoffman, C. R., Kost, T. A., Lambert, M. H., Leesnitzer, M. A., McCauley, P., McGeehan, G., Mitchell, J., Moyer, M., Pahel, G., Rocque, W., Overton, L. K., Schoenen, F., Seaton, T., Su, J. L., Warner, J., Willard, D., and Becherer, J. D. (1997) Nature 385, 733-736[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Qi, H., Rand, M. D., Wu, X., Sestan, N., Wang, W., Rakic, P., Xu, T., and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (1999) Science 283, 91-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Tortorella, M. D., Burn, T. C., Pratta, M. A., Abbaszade, I., Hollis, J. M., Liu, R., Rosenfeld, S. A., Copeland, R. A., Decicco, C. P., Wynn, R., Rockwell, A., Yang, F., Duke, J. L., Solomon, K., George, H., Bruckner, R., Nagase, H., Itoh, Y., Ellis, D. M., Ross, H., Wiswall, B. H., Murphy, K., Hillman, M. C., Jr., Hollis, G. F., Newton, R. C., Magolda, R. L., Trzaskos, J. M., and Arner, E. C. (1999) Science 284, 1664-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Campion, C., Davidson, A. H., Dickens, J. P., and Crimmins, M. J. (1989) in PCT/GB89/01399
27. Arner, E. C., Pratta, M. A., Trzaskos, J. M., Decicco, C. P., and Tortorella, M. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6594-6601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hughes, C. E., Caterson, B., Fosang, A. J., Roughley, P. J., and Mort, J. S. (1995) Biochem. J. 305, 799-804
29. Xue, C.-B., Cherney, R. J., Decicco, C. P., DeGrado, W. F., He, X., Hodge, C. N., Jacobson, I. C., Magolda, R. L., and Arner, E. C. (1997) in WO 9718207 A2
30. Lennon, G., Auffray, C., Polymeropoulos, M., and Soares, M. B. (1996) Genomics 33, 151-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Israel, D. I. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2627-2631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Bunch, T. A., Grinblat, Y., and Goldstein, L. S. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 1043-1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Rio, D. C., and Rubin, G. M. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 1833-1838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Feinberg, A. P., and Vogelstein, B. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 6-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Gibson, U. E., Heid, C. A., and Williams, P. M. (1996) Genome Res. 6, 995-1001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Huang, Z., Fasco, M. J., and Kaminsky, L. S. (1996) BioTechniques 20, 1012-1020[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Jiang, W., and Bond, J. S. (1992) FEBS Lett. 312, 110-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Stocker, W., Grams, F., Baumann, U., Reinemer, P., Gomis-Ruth, F. X., McKay, D. B., and Bode, W. (1995) Protein Sci. 4, 823-840[Abstract]
39. Wilson, R., et al.. (1994) Nature 368, 32-38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Ishikawa, K., Nagase, T., Suyama, M., Miyajima, N., Tanaka, A., Kotani, H., Nomura, N., and Ohara, O. (1998) DNA Res. 5, 169-176[Abstract]
41. Tang, B. L., and Hong, W. (1999) FEBS Lett. 445, 223-225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Nagase, T., Ishikawa, K., Nakajima, D., Ohira, M., Seki, N., Miyajima, N., Tanaka, A., Kotani, H., Nomura, N., and Ohara, O. (1997) DNA Res. 4, 141-150[Abstract]
43. Colige, A., Li, S. W., Sieron, A. L., Nusgens, B. V., Prockop, D. J., and Lapiere, C. M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2374-2379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Barr, P. J. (1991) Cell 66, 1-3[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Nakayama, K. (1997) Biochem. J. 327, 625-635
46. Springman, E. B., Angleton, E. L., Birkedal-Hansen, H., and Van Wart, H. E. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 364-368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Van Wart, H. E., and Birkedal-Hansen, H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 5578-5582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Shimokawa, K., Jia, L. G., Wang, X. M., and Fox, J. W. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 335, 283-294[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Gould, R. J., Polokoff, M. A., Friedman, P. A., Huang, T. F., Holt, J. C., Cook, J. J., and Niewiarowski, S. (1990) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 195, 168-171[Abstract]
50. Almeida, E. A., Huovila, A. P., Sutherland, A. E., Stephens, L. E., Calarco, P. G., Shaw, L. M., Mercurio, A. M., Sonnenberg, A., Primakoff, P., Myles, D. G., and White, J. M. (1995) Cell 81, 1095-1104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Jia, L. G., Wang, X. M., Shannon, J. D., Bjarnason, J. B., and Fox, J. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13094-13102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Guo, N. H., Krutzsch, H. C., Negre, E., Zabrenetzky, V. S., and Roberts, D. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19349-19355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Guo, N. H., Krutzsch, H. C., Negre, E., Vogel, T., Blake, D. A., and Roberts, D. D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3040-3044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Sandy, J. D., Plaas, A. H., and Koob, T. J. (1995) Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 266, 26-32[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Bryson, H., Bunning, R. A., Feltell, R., Kam, C. M., Kerrigan, J., Powers, J. C., and Buttle, D. J. (1998) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 355, 15-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Bode, W., Gomis-Ruth, F. X., Huber, R., Zwilling, R., and Stocker, W. (1992) Nature 358, 164-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Salter, D. M., Hughes, D. E., Simpson, R., and Gardner, D. L. (1992) Br. J. Rheumatol. 31, 231-234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Pratta, M. A., and Arner, E. C. (1997) Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 22, 453
59. Kuno, K., Iizasa, H., Ohno, S., and Matsushima, K. (1997) Genomics 46, 466-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
K Tahiri, C Korwin-Zmijowska, P Richette, F Heraud, X Chevalier, J-F Savouret, and M-T Corvol
Natural chondroitin sulphates increase aggregation of proteoglycan complexes and decrease adamts-5 expression in interleukin 1{beta}-treated chondrocytes
Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2008; 67(5): 696 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T. C. B. Pollard, S. E. Gwilym, and A. J. Carr
The assessment of early osteoarthritis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2008; 90-B(4): 411 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Fushimi, L. Troeberg, H. Nakamura, N. H. Lim, and H. Nagase
Functional Differences of the Catalytic and Non-catalytic Domains in Human ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 in Aggrecanolytic Activity
J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2008; 283(11): 6706 - 6716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H.-S. Shieh, K. J. Mathis, J. M. Williams, R. L. Hills, J. F. Wiese, T. E. Benson, J. R. Kiefer, M. H. Marino, J. N. Carroll, J. W. Leone, et al.
High Resolution Crystal Structure of the Catalytic Domain of ADAMTS-5 (Aggrecanase-2)
J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2008; 283(3): 1501 - 1507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]