![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 33, 23443-23450, August 13, 1999
From the Departments of Aggrecan is responsible for the mechanical
properties of cartilage. One of the earliest changes observed in
arthritis is the depletion of cartilage aggrecan due to increased
proteolytic cleavage within the interglobular domain. Two major sites
of cleavage have been identified in this region at
Asn341-Phe342 and
Glu373-Ala374. While several matrix
metalloproteinases have been shown to cleave at
Asn341-Phe342, an as yet unidentified protein
termed "aggrecanase" is responsible for cleavage at
Glu373-Ala374 and is hypothesized to play a
pivotal role in cartilage damage. We have identified and cloned a novel
disintegrin metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs that possesses
aggrecanase activity, ADAMTS11 (aggrecanase-2), which has
extensive homology to ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) and the
inflammation-associated gene ADAMTS1. ADAMTS11 possesses a
number of conserved domains that have been shown to play a role in
integrin binding, cell-cell interactions, and extracellular matrix
binding. We have expressed recombinant human ADAMTS11 in insect cells
and shown that it cleaves aggrecan at the
Glu373-Ala374 site, with the cleavage pattern
and inhibitor profile being indistinguishable from that observed with
native aggrecanase. A comparison of the structure and expression
patterns of ADAMTS11, ADAMTS4, and ADAMTS1 is also described. Our
findings will facilitate the study of the mechanisms of cartilage
degradation and provide targets to search for effective inhibitors of
cartilage depletion in arthritic disease.
Aggrecan is the major proteoglycan of cartilage and is responsible
for its compressibility and stiffness. Aggrecan contains two N-terminal
globular domains, G1 and G2, separated by a
proteolyticaly sensitive interglobular domain, followed by a
glycosaminoglycan attachment region and a C-terminal globular domain
(G3). The G1 domain of aggrecan interacts with
hyaluronic acid and link protein to form large aggregates containing
multiple aggrecan monomers that are trapped within the cartilage
matrix. Cleavage of aggrecan has been shown to occur at
Asn341-Phe342 and
Glu373-Ala374 within the interglobular domain,
with the cleaved aggrecan being free to exit the matrix since it lacks
the G1 domain, which is responsible for formation of the
high molecular weight complexes. Results from several studies suggest
that cleavage at the Glu373-Ala374 site is
responsible for the increased aggrecan degradation observed in
inflammatory joint disease. Products resulting from cleavage at the
Glu373-Ala374 site have been shown to
accumulate in cartilage explants and chondrocyte cultures treated with
interleukin-1 and retinoic acid (1-5) and in the synovial fluid of
patients with osteoarthritis and inflammatory joint disease (6, 7).
While several characterized matrix metalloproteases (MMP-1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -9 and -13)1 have been
shown to cleave at the Asn341-Phe342 site
(8-14), they are not responsible for the observed cleavage at
Glu373-Ala374. A novel proteolytic activity,
termed "aggrecanase," has been hypothesized to be responsible for
cleavage at the Glu373-Ala374 site, with the
enzyme probably playing a pivotal role in the cartilage damage
associated with osteoarthritis and inflammatory joint disease. Despite
intensive work, the identity of aggrecanase has remained unknown for
over 8 years.
The disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) family of proteases
contains more than 20 members having extensive homology to the snake
venom metalloproteases (15-17). The ADAMs have been shown to have
similar domain arrangements, consisting of pre-, pro-, proteinase,
disintegrin-like, cysteine-rich, epidermal growth factor-like,
transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains. A novel ADAM family member
containing multiple carboxy thrombospondin motifs, ADAMTS1
(a disintegrin and
metalloproteinase with
thrombospondin motifs), has recently been
described in mice (18). ADAMTS1 is structurally conserved with other
members of the ADAM family; however, unlike the majority of ADAM family
members, it lacks a transmembrane domain and contains unique
thrombospondin motifs that are responsible for extracellular matrix
binding (18, 19). Early ADAM family members were shown to play roles in
sperm-egg fusion and myotube fusion (20, 21). Recently, the enzyme
responsible for processing precursor tumor necrosis factor- In the work reported herein, we describe the purification, cloning, and
expression of an aggrecanase from the ADAMTS family, ADAMTS11.
Recently, we have also described the purification and characterization
of another aggrecanase, ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1), using a different
purification protocol from that used to purify ADAMTS11 (25). Since the
analysis of the ADAMTS11 sequence revealed extensive homology to
ADAMTS4 and murine ADAMTS1, we also examined levels of gene expression
for these family members in a variety of normal and arthritic human
tissues. ADAMTS11, along with ADAMTS4, is likely to play a key role in
inflammatory joint disease and the subsequent cartilage degradation.
Thus, the availability of the recombinant protein provides a valuable
tool in the effort to identify and characterize therapeutically useful inhibitors.
Purification of Bovine ADAMTS11--
6.5 liters of bovine
cartilage conditioned media containing the aggrecanases were
supplemented with l µM leupeptin, 1 µM
pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.05%
Brij-35, passed through a 1.2-µm filter, and loaded onto a Macro S
column. The column was washed with buffer A (50 mM HEPES,
pH 7.5, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.1 M NaCl,
0.05% (v/v) Brij-35), and aggrecanases were eluted with buffer A
containing 1.0 M NaCl. The eluted material was passed through a gelatin-agarose column to remove contaminating MMPs (Table
I). Prior to the gelatin-agarose column, the eluate from the Macro S
column was adjusted to a final concentration of 10 µM
XS309
(N3-methyl-(3R)-2-[(2S)-2-[(1R)-2-(hydroxyamino)-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl]-4-methylpentanoyl]hexahydro-3-pyridazinecarboxamide) (26), a hydroxamic acid-based broad spectrum inhibitor of MMPs that is ineffective as an inhibitor of aggrecanase activity, to prevent
degradation of the column by MMPs. Material passing through the
gelatin-agarose column, containing the aggrecanase activity, was
concentrated and loaded onto a phenyl-Sepharose column equilibrated with buffer A containing 10% (w/v) ammonium sulfate without Brij-35. Proteins were eluted with a 10 to 0% ammonium sulfate gradient. Fractions containing aggrecanase activity were pooled and loaded onto a
CM column that had been equilibrated with buffer B (50 mM
HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5). Proteins were eluted from the column with a 0.1-1.0 M NaCl gradient in buffer B, and
fractions with high enzymatic activity were pooled and concentrated.
Aliquots of the concentrate were applied to a Sephacryl S-200 column
equilibrated with buffer B. The column was eluted isocratically in the
same buffer, and fractions containing aggrecanase activity were pooled, concentrated, and injected onto a C4-alkylsilane-derivatized silica HPLC column. Proteins were eluted with a linear gradient from 0 to 50%
(v/v) acetonitrile in 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid, and fractions
were collected and immediately diluted 10-fold with buffer A for
analysis of aggrecanase activity.
Two samples of the purified material were fractionated in adjacent
wells of a 10% Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gel under nonreducing conditions. One lane was stained with silver, and the other lane was
cut horizontally into 22 approximately equal volume slices, each
representing a different molecular weight range. The individual slices
were crushed and incubated in 100 µl of 20 mM Tris, 10 mM CaCl2 100 mM NaCl, 2.5% Triton
X-100 at 4 °C overnight to renature the enzyme and elute it from the
gel slice. Two protein bands associated with aggrecanase activity were
immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride and subjected to N-terminal
amino acid sequence analysis.
Determination of Aggrecan Cleaving Activity--
Aggrecanase
activity was measured by incubating bovine aggrecanase or recombinant
human ADAMTS11 with purified bovine aggrecan monomers as described
(27). Reactions were terminated with 20 mM EDTA and Western
blotted. Glu373-Ala374 cleavage products were
detected using the BC-33monoclonal antibody (28). The hydroxamic acid
inhibitors XS309, BB-16
((2S,3R)-2-methyl-3-(2-methylpropyl)-1-(N-hydroxy)-4-(o-methyl)-L-tyrosine-N-methylamide) and SE206
(2S,5R,6S-3-aza-4-oxo-10-oxa-5-hexyl-2-(methylcarboxamido)-[10]paracyclophane-6-N-hydroxycarboxamide) were synthesized at DuPont Pharmaceuticals as described (26, 29).
IC50 values were determined for the inhibitors using
conditioned media from stimulated bovine nasal cartilage explant
cultures and recombinant human ADAMTS11 as described previously
(27).
ADAMTS11 cDNA Cloning and Expression--
Murine EST 569515 (GenBankTM accession no. AA288689) was identified by
searching the EST data base with sequences from ADAMTS1 and ADAMTS4.
The IMAGE Consortium clone (30) corresponding to EST 569515 was
obtained from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL) and sequenced. PCR
primers (CGGCCACGACCCTCAAGAACTTT and GCATGGAGGCCATCATCTTCAATCA) designed from the murine sequence were used to amplify a 163-bp product from human heart cDNA. Sequences present in the human amplicon were used to design a PCR primer (GGGAGGATTTATGTGGGCATCA) for
use 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Primers designed from a
partial 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends clone and the original
163-base pair human amplicon (GGGAGGATTTATGTGGGCATCA and
GTGCATTTGGACCAGGGCTTAGA) were used to prescreen a number of available
human cDNA libraries. Based on these results, a human liver
cDNA library was screened by PCR as described (31). DNA and protein
sequences were analyzed using tools in the GCG sequence analysis
package (Genetics Computer Group Inc., Madison, WI), with the dendogram
in Fig. 1C being obtained using the PileUp program. Our
multiple sequence comparisons focused only on ADAMTS1 through ADAMTS4,
since the ADAMTS5 through ADAMTS10 gene names and symbols have been
reserved for sequences that are not yet in the public domain. The
ADAMTS11 sequences are novel and not represented in the ADAMTS5 through
ADAMTS10 gene set.2 The open
reading frame encoding ADAMTS11 was PCR-amplified with appropriate
consensus Kozak sequences for expression in the Drosophila system and subcloned into the pRMHA3 Drosophila expression
vector (32). Recombinant protein was expressed as described (32, 33).
Northern Analysis--
A commercially available Northern blot
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) was hybridized with
ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 probes derived from the
3'-untranslated regions. Probes were labeled by random priming as
described (34). Blots were hybridized and washed as recommended by the manufacturer.
Real Time PCR--
Real time PCR was performed essentially as
described (35). Primers and probes were designed from human
ADAMTS4 (primers, GACACTGGTGGTGGCAGATG and
TCACTGTTAGCAGGTAGCGCTTTA; probe, CAAGATGGCCGCATTCCACGGT), ADAMTS11 (primers, GCTGCCACCACACTCAAGAA and
TGGTCATCTCCCAGCTGGTT; probe, CAAGATGGCCGCATTCCACGGT), and partial
ADAMTS1 sequences (primers, GGCGCAAATCCGGGTC and
CGCCATTCACGGTGCC; probe, TTCCGGAAACCGACCTGGCG) using Primer
Express (Perkin-Elmer). Data obtained with commercially available
mammalian 18 S ribosomal RNA primers and probes were used to normalize
between tissues (Perkin-Elmer). Probes were labeled at the 5'-end with
the reporter dye 6-FAM and on the 3'-end with the quencher dye TAMRA
(Perkin-Elmer). 1 µg of total RNA from each tissue was DNase
I-treated and reverse transcribed as described (36) using random
hexamers and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Each PCR utilized the
cDNA from 50 ng of starting RNA. All PCRs were performed in
triplicate, with copy numbers being calculated by comparing the
threshold values for each reaction with a standard curve produced using
linearized cDNA for the respective gene. The concentration of the
linearized DNAs used in the standard curves were measured using the
Molecular Probe, Inc. (Eugene, OR) PicoGreen assay as recommended by
the manufacturer. All expression levels are relative, since the initial
efficiency of the reverse transcription reaction was not accounted for
in the copy number calculations. Expression levels between tissues were
normalized with 18 S ribosomal RNA. RNAs from normal and diseased
tissues were obtained from a commercial vendor (Biochain Institute
Inc., San Leandro, CA) with quality being assessed in ethidium
bromide-stained agarose gels prior to real time PCR experiments. The
arthritic tissues used in these studies included fibrous tissue and
joint capsule from the femur of a 33-year-old patient with arthritis.
Purification of a Bovine Aggrecanase--
Interleukin 1-stimulated
bovine nasal cartilage conditioned medium was chosen as a source for
aggrecanase. Purification was followed using an enzymatic activity
employing the BC-3 neoepitope antibody, which recognizes the new N
terminus formed by cleavage at the
Glu373-Ala374 bond (28) as described under
"Materials and Methods" (Table I).
Analysis of the purified aggrecanase by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis with silver staining demonstrated the presence of
multiple prominent bands in the range of 40-65 kDa. Analysis of
protein eluted from multiple gel slices indicated that aggrecanase activity was associated with two protein bands, centered at
approximately 64 and 50 kDa. These two protein bands were immobilized
on polyvinylidene difluoride and subjected to amino-terminal amino acid
sequence analysis. Preliminary sequence of the 64- and 50-kDa proteins suggested that they represented different forms of the same protein (ADAMTS11) and were different from the ADAMTS4 enzyme purified using an
affinity resin approach (25).
Identification, Cloning, and Characterization of a Human
Aggrecanase--
In parallel with the characterization of the purified
aggrecanases, we undertook a data base mining approach to identify
sequences in the DNA and protein data bases that had homology to the
preliminary N-terminal peptide sequences. Since the initial peptide
sequence for the affinity-purified enzyme (ADAMTS4) had significant
homology to the N terminus of the murine ADAMTS1 metalloproteinase
domain (18), we searched the data bases in order to identify sequences encoding additional members of this family with the potential to encode aggrecanases.
Using ADAMTS1 and partial ADAMTS4 sequences to query the databases, we
identified sequences encoded by a murine EST from an 8.5 day embryo
library (accession number AA288689) that were 48% identical and 60%
similar to a 170-residue portion of the ADAMTS4 metallproteinase domain
to query the EST data bases, we identified sequences encoded by a
murine EST from an 8.5-day embryo library (accession no. AA288689) that
were 48% identical and 60% similar to a 170-residue portion of the
ADAMTS4 metalloproteinase domain (data not shown). The 1.5-kb partial
cDNA corresponding to the murine EST was sequenced in its entirety
and shown to encode sequences that were 95% identical to subsequent
N-terminal peptide sequence for both the 64-kDa (39/41 residues) and
50-kDa (21/22 residues) forms of bovine ADAMTS11. These data indicate
that the murine cDNA encodes ADAMTS11.
Our initial ADAMTS11 cloning efforts relied on human heart
cDNA, since murine ADAMTS1 was shown to be expressed in heart (18), and human osteoarthritic cartilage RNA was unavailable. We were able to
amplify a 163-base pair product from human heart cDNA utilizing PCR
primers designed from the murine sequence. Primers designed from the
human PCR product and a partial 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends
clone were then used to screen 2.5 × 106 clones from
a human liver cDNA library, which had been prescreened by PCR and
shown to contain ADAMTS11 sequences. Two 5.5-kb cDNA clones were
obtained, with DNA sequence analysis revealing a 2793-base pair open
reading frame preceded by two in-frame stop codons. The deduced protein
sequence is 930 amino acids in size and has four potential
glycosylation sites (Fig. 1).
Sequences from the deduced human protein are 95%
(39/41) identical to the N-terminal peptide sequence of bovine ADAMTS11
(Fig. 1A).
ADAMTS11 Is a Disintegrin Metalloproteinase--
Human ADAMTS11 is
a multidomain protein containing a signal sequence, pro-domain,
metalloproteinase domain, disintegrin-like domain, and "spacer
domain" located between a thrombospondin type I (TSP) motif and TSP
submotif (Fig. 1B). The metalloproteinase domain contains a
consensus sequence for a zinc-dependent metalloproteinase with homology to the snake venom metalloproteases and other members of
the ADAM family, with the conserved aspartate after the third histidine
(Fig. 1A), indicating that it is a member of the adamalysin superfamily (37, 38). The most striking homology was seen with the
metalloproteinase domains of murine ADAMTS1 (18), a Caenorhabditis elegans metalloproteinase of unknown function
(f25 h8.3 protein, GenBankTM accession no. 1181986)
predicted from genomic sequence (39), and ADAMTS4 (25). This latter
sequence has recently been deposited in the data bases as clone
KIAA0688 (ADAMTS4), an unidentified human gene from a set of
size-fractionated human brain cDNA libraries (40, 41). Not
surprisingly, the lowest levels of conservation are seen in the
pro-domains of these proteins, while the remainder of ADAMTS4 and
ADAMTS1 are 48 and 50% identical to ADAMTS11, respectively. Other
sequences having homology, but at a significantly lower level than
those mentioned above, included an unidentified human gene from a brain
cDNA library, KIAA0366 (ADAMTS3) (41, 42) and
procollagen I N-proteinase (ADAMTS2) (42, 43), both of which are less
than 35% identical to ADAMTS11. In contrast, ADAMTS2 and ADAMTS3 are
65% identical and 73% similar to each other. Based on these
homologies and sequence alignments, the ADAMTS family members can be
clustered into two subfamilies, with ADAMTS1, ADAMTS4, ADAMTS11, and
f25 h8.3 being on one branch and ADAMTS2 and ADAMTS3 being on a
divergent branch (Fig. 1C). Further analysis indicates that
ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1 are more closely related to each other than
ADAMTS11, with the former pair likely to have resulted from a
duplication after an initial duplication involving ADAMTS11 (Fig.
1C). This interpretation is consistent independent of
whether the full-length proteins, the metalloproteinase domains, or
disintegrin-like domains are used in the analysis. Analysis of the
deduced protein sequences revealed multiple consensus glycosylation
sites in ADAMTS11, ADAMTS1, and f25 h8.3, while ADAMTS4 lacks
potential sites for glycosylation (Fig. 1B). At present, the
relevance of these potential differences in glycosylation status is unknown.
The metalloproteinase domain of ADAMTS11 is preceded by a pro-domain
having a potential cysteine switch at Cys209 as well as a
cleavage site for furin (residues 257-261), a serine endoprotease that
has been implicated in the processing of a wide variety of proproteins
(44, 45). It has been proposed that the catalytic activity of MMPs is
masked by a conserved cysteine in the pro-domain, a "cysteine
switch," that binds to the active-site zinc to inhibit the enzyme
(46, 47). Although there are no clear cysteine switch consensus
sequences for the ADAMs family (48), Cys209 is conserved in
other metalloproteinase-disintegrin family members (18), murine
ADAMTS1, and ADAMTS4 and may function as the cysteine switch.
ADAMTS11 contains a number conserved domains that have been shown to be
involved in adhesion, including a disintegrin-like domain, a pair of
TSP motifs, and a conserved spacer domain between the TSP motifs (16,
18, 19, 49-53). One of the noteworthy differences between the
aggrecanase/ADAMTS1 family members is the number of TSP submotifs
present in their respective C termini (Fig. 1B). In contrast
to the tandem pair of TSP submotifs at the C terminus of ADAMTS1,
ADAMTS11 has a single C-terminal TSP submotif, while ADAMTS4 lacks a
TSP submotif (Fig. 1B). As mentioned above, data base
searches also revealed extensive homology between ADAMTS11 and the
C. elegans f25 h8.3 protein. The f25 h8.3
protein is of particular interest, since it contains up to 18 tandem
copies of the C-terminal submotif (Fig. 1B).
Expression Analysis of the Aggrecanases and ADAMTS1--
We
initially compared the patterns of gene expression for human
aggrecanases using Northern analysis (Fig.
2). A 4.3-kb band was seen in
ADAMTS4 blots, with expression being present in heart, brain, placenta, lung, and skeletal muscle. For ADAMTS11,
the highest expression was seen in placenta with much weaker signals also being observed in heart and brain (Fig. 2). A series of bands hybridized to the ADAMTS11 probe with a strong signal being
seen at 12.4, 10.7, 8.6, and 6.6 kb, while a series of weaker bands were present between 5 and 6 kb. Our initial ADAMTS11
cDNAs were from a 5.6-kb transcript in liver; however, we have been
able to amplify sequences from placenta using 3'-rapid amplification of
cDNA ends that had longer 3'-untranslated regions (data not shown).
Therefore, the longer ADAMTS11 transcripts detected by Northern analysis are likely to result from alternative
cleavage/polyadenylation sites in the 3'-untranslated region.
We utilized real time PCR to more quantitatively measure the expression
of the aggrecanases and ADAMTS1. Real time PCR also allowed us to
perform experiments on tissues where we had limiting amounts of RNA.
Real time PCR is an extremely sensitive and quantitative method for
measuring gene expression, with the assay having a dynamic range of
over 7 orders of magnitude. Primers and Taqman probes were designed
from ADAMTS11, ADAMTS4, and partial human ADAMTS1 sequences. Expression levels were calculated as
described under "Materials and Methods," with the signals for the
three genes being normalized between tissues with values obtained with 18 S ribosomal RNA. The assay was validated in initial experiments by
comparing Northern data for ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11
(Fig. 2) with real time PCR data (Fig.
3), with the data being consistent
between the two assays for those tissues compared.
Expression of ADAMTS11 was observed in samples from an
arthritic patient, rib cartilage, and chondroblastoma (Fig. 3).
ADAMTS11 transcripts were also seen in a variety of normal
tissues including cervix, uterus, bladder, esophagus, and placenta.
ADAMTS4 expression was high in arthritic tissues, with the
next highest expression seen in ovary, spinal cord, uterus, bladder,
brain, and heart. Similarly, Ishikawa et al. (40) observed
high levels of expression for KIAA0688 (ADAMTS4) in brain,
ovary, and liver, with moderate levels in heart, testes, and lung.
While Ishikawa et al. (40) saw high levels of expression in
liver, the low levels of expression in liver that we observed are more
consistent with our Northern data (Fig. 2). Human ADAMTS1
was expressed at the highest levels in the arthritic tissues, bladder,
aorta, cervix, and uterus.
The relative expression levels of the three genes were compared within
individual tissues by determining the number of copies present in the
starting cDNA relative to the standard curve. Expression levels for
ADAMTS1 were consistently higher than for ADAMTS4
and ADAMTS11 in all tissues examined with the exception of
brain and chondroblastoma, where ADAMTS4 and
ADAMTS11 are expressed at higher levels, respectively. Of
the three family members, ADAMTS11 was seen to have the
lowest expression levels in the arthritic samples, while
ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1 were expressed at 2-3-fold
and 6-8-fold higher levels, respectively. In chondroblastoma,
ADAMTS1 and ADAMTS4 were expressed at the same
relative levels, with ADAMTS11 expression levels being
approximately 3-fold higher. In normal rib cartilage, ADAMTS4 was expressed at the lowest levels, with
ADAMTS11 and ADAMTS1 being expressed at
approximately 4- and 10-fold higher levels, respectively. Since we did
not have access to matched arthritic and nonarthritic samples, we could
not compare the relative expression levels of these genes in normal and
diseased tissues.
ADAMTS11 Has Aggrecanase Activity--
In order to demonstrate
that ADAMTS11 cDNA encoded a proteinase with aggrecanase
activity, we expressed recombinant full-length ADAMTS11 in the
Drosophila S2 system. Multiple immuno- reactive bands
were seen by Western analysis in conditioned medium from rADAMTS11
expressing Drosophila S2 cells and not in control cell lines
(data not shown). Conditioned media from Drosophila cells expressing recombinant ADAMTS11 were able to cleave aggrecan at the
Glu373-Ala374 bond as evidenced by detection of
products with the BC-3 antibody, while media from uninduced cells and
cells transfected with an empty expression vector lacked activity (Fig.
4A). The aggrecan cleavage
patterns were indistinguishable for partially purified conditioned
medium from bovine nasal cartilage cultures and Drosophila cells expressing recombinant ADAMTS11 (Fig. 4). No cleavage was seen at
the Asn341-Phe342 site, which has been shown to
be preferentially cleaved by matrix metalloproteases (data not shown).
Several BC-3-reactive products were seen in Western blots (Fig. 4),
consistent with previous work that has identified additional cleavage
sites for aggrecanases within the C-terminal region of aggrecan (54).
The inhibition profile of three peptidic hydroxamates was compared
between recombinant ADAMTS11 and the endogenous bovine aggrecanase,
which had purified through the CM column step. The rank order of
potency was consistent between the recombinant material and endogenous
bovine material (Table II), with the
IC50 values being slightly lower for the recombinant human
material when compared with those observed with the bovine material.
The difference in IC50 values is probably the result of
species differences or differences in protein binding between the two
samples.
We have described the cloning of a novel disintegrin
metalloproteinase and demonstrate that it possesses aggrecanase
activity. Our data indicate that the aggrecanase/ADAMTS1 subfamily has
multiple members, with the family being conserved from C. elegans through human. The two human aggrecanases and ADAMTS1
described in this report are expressed in a variety of tissues in
addition to arthritic tissues; however, it is impossible to draw any
broad conclusions about underlying themes of gene expression patterns
based on the tissues examined. In situ hybridizations will
be required to determine what cell types are responsible for the
observed gene expression in each tissue. Based on the broad expression
patterns of ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11, it is likely
that they have other roles in addition to cartilage remodeling. At
present, it is unknown whether any of these genes are up-regulated in
inflammatory joint disease due to the limited availability of human RNA
from matched normal and arthritic tissues. Animal models will probably
be required to address this latter issue. The fact that all three
family members are expressed in the limited number of arthritic tissues
examined in this report suggests that they are likely to play a role in inflammatory joint disease.
Sequence analysis of ADAMTS11 suggests that the enzyme is synthesized
in an inactive pro-form that may be processed by furin during transit
through the secretory pathway. This hypothesis is supported by data
indicating that the N-terminal peptide sequence of the enzyme purified
from bovine cartilage conditioned medium starts immediately C-terminal
of a consensus furin cleavage site. Furthermore, inhibition of furin
may be responsible for the previously described block in aggrecan
cleavage seen in response to a serine-protease inhibitor (55).
ADAMTS11 exhibits the consensus motif,
HEXXHXXGXXH, whose three conserved
histidine residues are involved in binding of the catalytically
essential zinc ion in members of the metzincin superfamily (38). This
protein also has an aspartic acid following the third conserved
histidine residue, as is found in the adamalysin family, and a
conserved methionine downstream of the active site, which is found in
members of the metzincin family as part of a "Met turn" (38, 56).
While both ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1 have a similar zinc-binding motif, with
an aspartic acid residue following the third histidine and a downstream
methionine, these two proteins have an asparagine residue between the
second and third histidine instead of a glycine. In the metzincins
whose crystal structures have been determined, the active site helix is
terminated at this invariant glycine residue, which results in the main
chain abruptly turning downward into the lower domain of the protein
(38). The conserved glycine in each of the enzymes exhibits an
identical conformation not accessible to non-Gly residues. This raises
the possibility that ADAMTS11 may exhibit subtle structural differences in this region from ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS1. However, this has not been
observed as any difference in cleavage of aggrecan by ADAMTS4 and
ADAMTS11 or in inhibitor profiles against these two proteases. Further
elucidation of the effect of this substitution awaits determination of
the crystal structures of these proteases.
ADAMTS11 possesses several different domains that are likely to play a
role in adhesion. Disintegrin proteins are found in snake venoms, where
they act as inhibitors of platelet aggregation by binding to integrins
through a conserved RGD motif (16, 49). Disintegrin-like domains, while
lacking the RGD motif, have also been implicated in integrin binding
(50, 51). The function of the disintegrin-like domain of ADAMTS11 is
unclear; it may allow binding to integrins expressed on the articular
chondrocytes (57). The TSP type I motif of thrombospondin has been
implicated in binding to matrix macromolecules and cell adhesion (52,
53), with recent data indicating that the TSP motif and submotif of murine ADAMTS1 bind to heparin and the extracellular matrix (18, 19).
The TSP motif and submotif of ADAMTS11 may be responsible for binding
to the glycosaminoglycans of aggrecan. Consistent with this hypothesis
is the observation that deglycosylation of aggrecan decreases the
production of Glu373-Ala374 cleavage products
by aggrecanases (58). Sequences within the spacer region between the
TSP motifs of ADAMTS11 are conserved in all the family members and are
likely to provide an additional adhesion motif, since recent studies
demonstrate that sequences within the spacer region of murine ADAMTS1
can themselves bind tightly to the extracellular matrix (19). The
variable number of TSP submotifs in the ADAMTS family members may lead
to altered affinities for glycosaminoglycans, since the TSP submotifs
of ADAMTS1 have been shown to play a role in extracellular matrix binding (19).
Comparison of the intron/exon structure of the murine
ADAMTS1 gene to the protein domains indicates that the two
TSP submotifs are present in the final exon of the gene (59). Based on
this observation, the evolution of the variable number of submotifs in
ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 is likely to have involved more than the simple
deletion of an internal exon encoding an individual TSP submotif.
Determination of the exon/intron structure of the three family members
is likely to shed light on evolutionary paths that have led to the
present diversity in this gene family. A comparison of the promoters
for the genes may also provide insight into the different regulatory
elements controlling the expression of the family members.
In preliminary experiments, we have identified additional genes that
have a high degree of homology to the members of the aggrecanase/ADAMTS1 subfamily. It is unclear if other family members besides ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 will possess aggrecanase activity. However, it is possible that ADAMTS1 has aggrecanase activity given its
high degree of homology with ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11, as well as its high
level of expression in arthritic tissues. Additional work will focus on
the role of the ADAMTS family of enzymes in inflammation and joint
disease and the regulation of the respective genes. The availability of
recombinant proteins for this family of genes will aid in the
identification of specific inhibitors of the different enzymes that
will be important tools for deciphering the biological role of the
individual family members. In addition, the recombinant proteins will
facilitate the development of potential therapeutics for inhibiting
aggrecan degradation and the subsequent cartilage damage associated
with inflammatory joint disease.
We thank Dr. Gary Davis and Paul Gunyuzlu for
helpful suggestions during the course of this work and Dr. Jefferey
O'Brian for suggestions regarding real time PCR assays. We also thank Julie Bunville, Karen Krakowski, and Laura Bolling for providing DNA
sequencing assistance.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF142099.
2
Human Genome Organization Nomenclature
Committee, personal communication.
The abbreviations used are:
MMP, matrix
metalloprotease;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
kb, kilobase pair(s);
TSP, thrombospondin type I;
HPLC, high
pressure liquid chromatography.
Cloning and Characterization of ADAMTS11, an
Aggrecanase from the ADAMTS Family*
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Applied Biotechnology,
§ Inflammatory Diseases Research, ¶ Chemical
Enzymology, and
Chemical and Physical Sciences, The DuPont
Pharmaceuticals Company, Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware
19880 and the ** Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
has been
shown to be a disintegrin metalloproteinase (22, 23). Another ADAM family member, kuzbanian, is required for proteolytic processing of the
Notch ligand Delta, which is involved in neural
cell fate determination (24). However, to date, the function of the
majority of ADAMs family members has yet to be elucidated.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Protein purification of bovine ADAMTS11

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Protein sequence of human ADAMTS11 and
comparison with other closely related proteins. A,
amino acid sequence deduced from the ADAMTS11 cDNAs is
shown aligned to activated forms of murine ADAMTS1 and human ADAMTS4.
The pre- and pro-domains were excluded from the alignment, since they
are significantly less conserved between the three family members.
Residues matching the consensus sequence of the three proteins are
shaded. Domains are labeled above the sequence
and are delineated by arrows. Sequences corresponding to the
N-terminal peptide sequence from bovine ADAMTS11 enzyme are denoted by
the line at the start of the metalloproteinase domain;
residues that are different in the bovine sequence are shown
above the line. The conserved zinc-binding motif
and "Met turn" are boxed. A filled
circle denotes the location of a potential Cys switch, while
asterisks designate potential N-linked
glycosylation sites. B, the organization of the signal
sequences (SS), pro-domains (Pro),
metalloproteinase domains (Protease), disintegrin-like
domains (Disin), spacer regions, and thrombospondin motifs
(TSP) and submotifs (TSP-sub) are shown for
ADAMTS11, murine ADAMTS1, ADAMTS4, and the C. elegans
f25 h8.3 protein. The filled circles show
the relative positions of glycosylation sites. Only a portion of the 18 C-terminal TSP submotifs are shown for the C. elegans
f25 h8.3 protein. C, dendogram showing the
relationship of sequences from the data bases that have the highest
degree of homology to ADAMTS11.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Northern analysis of the aggrecanases.
Labeled cDNA sequences from the 3'-untranslated region of
ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS11 were hybridized to a
Northern blot. The positions of the RNA markers are shown at the
left; the source of RNA is shown at the top of
each lane.

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Expression levels of the aggrecanases and
human ADAMTS1. The expression levels of human ADAMTS11,
ADAMTS4, and ADAMTS1 were determined by real time
PCR in a variety of normal and arthritic tissues. The number of copies
of each cDNA present in reverse transcribed total RNA were
determined relative to a standard curve produced using cloned
cDNAs. All values were normalized to 18 S ribosomal RNA and are
displayed in arbitrary units.

View larger version (82K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Comparison of recombinant ADAMTS11
(rADAMTS11) and native aggrecanase. A,
conditioned media from induced Drosophila S2 cells
transfected with empty expression vector (lane 1)
and uninduced (lane 2) or induced
(lane 3) cells transfected with the recombinant
ADAMTS11 expression construct were incubated with aggrecan monomers.
B, native aggrecan monomers were treated with conditioned
medium from bovine nasal cartilage cultures that had been purified
through to the CM column step as described under "Materials and
Methods." For native material, the assays were performed in the
presence of EDTA to quench the reaction (lane 1)
or in the absence of EDTA (lane 2).
Glu373-Ala374 reactive material was detected by
Western blot using the BC-3 antibody.
Comparison of inhibitor profiles for bovine aggrecanase and recombinant
human ADAMTS11
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Applied
Biotechnology, The DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Experimental Station E336/237B, P.O. Box 336, Wilmington, DE 19880-0336; Tel.:
302-695-3859; Fax: 302-695-9420; E-mail:
Timothy.C.Burn@dupontpharma.com.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Sandy, J. D.,
Neame, P. J.,
Boynton, R. E.,
and Flannery, C. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
8683-8685 2.
Sandy, J. D.,
Boynton, R. E.,
and Flannery, C. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
8198-8205 3.
Loulakis, P.,
Shrikhande, A.,
Davis, G.,
and Maniglia, C. A.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
284,
589-593
4.
Ilic, M. Z.,
Mok, M. T.,
Williamson, O. D.,
Campbell, M. A.,
Hughes, C. E.,
and Handley, C. J.
(1995)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
322,
22-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Lark, M. W.,
Gordy, J. T.,
Weidner, J. R.,
Ayala, J.,
Kimura, J. H.,
Williams, H. R.,
Mumford, R. A.,
Flannery, C. R.,
Carlson, S. S.,
Iwata, M.,
and Sandy, J. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2550-2556 6.
Sandy, J. D.,
Flannery, C. R.,
Neame, P. J.,
and Lohmander, L. S.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
89,
1512-1516
7.
Lohmander, L. S.,
Neame, P. J.,
and Sandy, J. D.
(1993)
Arthritis Rheum.
36,
1214-1222[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Fosang, A. J.,
Neame, P. J.,
Hardingham, T. E.,
Murphy, G.,
and Hamilton, J. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15579-15582 9.
Flannery, C. R.,
Lark, M. W.,
and Sandy, J. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1008-1014 10.
Fosang, A. J.,
Neame, P. J.,
Last, K.,
Hardingham, T. E.,
Murphy, G.,
and Hamilton, J. A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19470-19474 11.
Fosang, A. J.,
Last, K.,
Knauper, V.,
Neame, P. J.,
Murphy, G.,
Hardingham, T. E.,
Tschesche, H.,
and Hamilton, J. A.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
295,
273-276
12.
Fosang, A. J.,
Last, K.,
Neame, P. J.,
Murphy, G.,
Knauper, V.,
Tschesche, H.,
Hughes, C. E.,
Caterson, B.,
and Hardingham, T. E.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
304,
347-351
13.
Fosang, A. J.,
Last, K.,
Knauper, V.,
Murphy, G.,
and Neame, P. J.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
380,
17-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Arner, E. C.,
Decicco, C. P.,
Cherney, R.,
and Tortorella, M. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9294-9299 15.
Jia, L. G.,
Shimokawa, K.,
Bjarnason, J. B.,
and Fox, J. W.
(1996)
Toxicon
34,
1269-7126[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Blobel, C. P.
(1997)
Cell
90,
589-592[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Black, R. A.,
and White, J. M.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
654-659[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Kuno, K.,
Kanada, N.,
Nakashima, E.,
Fujiki, F.,
Ichimura, F.,
and Matsushima, K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
556-562 19.
Kuno, K.,
and Matsushima, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13912-13917 20.
Blobel, C. P.,
Wolfsberg, T. G.,
Turck, C. W.,
Myles, D. G.,
Primakoff, P.,
and White, J. M.
(1992)
Nature
356,
248-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Yagami-Hiromasa, T.,
Sato, T.,
Kurisaki, T.,
Kamijo, K.,
Nabeshima, Y.,
and Fujisawa-Sehara, A.
(1995)
Nature
377,
652-656[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Black, R. A.,
Rauch, C. T.,
Kozlosky, C. J.,
Peschon, J. J.,
Slack, J. L.,
Wolfson, M. F.,
Castner, B. J.,
Stocking, K. L.,
Reddy, P.,
Srinivasan, S.,
Nelson, N.,
Boiani, N.,
Schooley, K. A.,
Gerhart, M.,
Davis, R.,
Fitzner, J. N.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Paxton, R. J.,
March, C. J.,
and Cerretti, D. P.
(1997)
Nature
385,
729-733[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Moss, M. L.,
Jin, S. L.,
Milla, M. E.,
Bickett, D. M.,
Burkhart, W.,
Carter, H. L.,
Chen, W. J.,
Clay, W. C.,
Didsbury, J. R.,
Hassler, D.,
Hoffman, C. R.,
Kost, T. A.,
Lambert, M. H.,
Leesnitzer, M. A.,
McCauley, P.,
McGeehan, G.,
Mitchell, J.,
Moyer, M.,
Pahel, G.,
Rocque, W.,
Overton, L. K.,
Schoenen, F.,
Seaton, T.,
Su, J. L.,
Warner, J.,
Willard, D.,
and Becherer, J. D.
(1997)
Nature
385,
733-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Qi, H.,
Rand, M. D.,
Wu, X.,
Sestan, N.,
Wang, W.,
Rakic, P.,
Xu, T.,
and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
(1999)
Science
283,
91-94 25.
Tortorella, M. D.,
Burn, T. C.,
Pratta, M. A.,
Abbaszade, I.,
Hollis, J. M.,
Liu, R.,
Rosenfeld, S. A.,
Copeland, R. A.,
Decicco, C. P.,
Wynn, R.,
Rockwell, A.,
Yang, F.,
Duke, J. L.,
Solomon, K.,
George, H.,
Bruckner, R.,
Nagase, H.,
Itoh, Y.,
Ellis, D. M.,
Ross, H.,
Wiswall, B. H.,
Murphy, K.,
Hillman, M. C., Jr.,
Hollis, G. F.,
Newton, R. C.,
Magolda, R. L.,
Trzaskos, J. M.,
and Arner, E. C.
(1999)
Science
284,
1664-1666 26.
Campion, C., Davidson, A. H., Dickens, J. P., and Crimmins,
M. J. (1989) in PCT/GB89/01399
27.
Arner, E. C.,
Pratta, M. A.,
Trzaskos, J. M.,
Decicco, C. P.,
and Tortorella, M. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6594-6601 28.
Hughes, C. E.,
Caterson, B.,
Fosang, A. J.,
Roughley, P. J.,
and Mort, J. S.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
305,
799-804
29.
Xue, C.-B., Cherney, R. J., Decicco, C. P., DeGrado, W. F., He, X., Hodge, C. N., Jacobson, I. C., Magolda, R. L., and Arner, E. C. (1997) in WO 9718207 A2
30.
Lennon, G.,
Auffray, C.,
Polymeropoulos, M.,
and Soares, M. B.
(1996)
Genomics
33,
151-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Israel, D. I.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
2627-2631 32.
Bunch, T. A.,
Grinblat, Y.,
and Goldstein, L. S.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
1043-1061 33.
Rio, D. C.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
1833-1838 34.
Feinberg, A. P.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1983)
Anal. Biochem.
132,
6-13[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Gibson, U. E.,
Heid, C. A.,
and Williams, P. M.
(1996)
Genome Res.
6,
995-1001 36.
Huang, Z.,
Fasco, M. J.,
and Kaminsky, L. S.
(1996)
BioTechniques
20,
1012-1020[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Jiang, W.,
and Bond, J. S.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
312,
110-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Stocker, W.,
Grams, F.,
Baumann, U.,
Reinemer, P.,
Gomis-Ruth, F. X.,
McKay, D. B.,
and Bode, W.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
823-840[Abstract]
39.
Wilson, R.,
et al..
(1994)
Nature
368,
32-38[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Ishikawa, K.,
Nagase, T.,
Suyama, M.,
Miyajima, N.,
Tanaka, A.,
Kotani, H.,
Nomura, N.,
and Ohara, O.
(1998)
DNA Res.
5,
169-176[Abstract]
41.
Tang, B. L.,
and Hong, W.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
445,
223-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Nagase, T.,
Ishikawa, K.,
Nakajima, D.,
Ohira, M.,
Seki, N.,
Miyajima, N.,
Tanaka, A.,
Kotani, H.,
Nomura, N.,
and Ohara, O.
(1997)
DNA Res.
4,
141-150[Abstract]
43.
Colige, A.,
Li, S. W.,
Sieron, A. L.,
Nusgens, B. V.,
Prockop, D. J.,
and Lapiere, C. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2374-2379 44.
Barr, P. J.
(1991)
Cell
66,
1-3[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Nakayama, K.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
327,
625-635
46.
Springman, E. B.,
Angleton, E. L.,
Birkedal-Hansen, H.,
and Van Wart, H. E.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
364-368 47.
Van Wart, H. E.,
and Birkedal-Hansen, H.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5578-5582 48.
Shimokawa, K.,
Jia, L. G.,
Wang, X. M.,
and Fox, J. W.
(1996)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
335,
283-294[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Gould, R. J.,
Polokoff, M. A.,
Friedman, P. A.,
Huang, T. F.,
Holt, J. C.,
Cook, J. J.,
and Niewiarowski, S.
(1990)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
195,
168-171[Abstract]
50.
Almeida, E. A.,
Huovila, A. P.,
Sutherland, A. E.,
Stephens, L. E.,
Calarco, P. G.,
Shaw, L. M.,
Mercurio, A. M.,
Sonnenberg, A.,
Primakoff, P.,
Myles, D. G.,
and White, J. M.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1095-1104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Jia, L. G.,
Wang, X. M.,
Shannon, J. D.,
Bjarnason, J. B.,
and Fox, J. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13094-13102 52.
Guo, N. H.,
Krutzsch, H. C.,
Negre, E.,
Zabrenetzky, V. S.,
and Roberts, D. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19349-19355 53.
Guo, N. H.,
Krutzsch, H. C.,
Negre, E.,
Vogel, T.,
Blake, D. A.,
and Roberts, D. D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3040-3044 54.
Sandy, J. D.,
Plaas, A. H.,
and Koob, T. J.
(1995)
Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl.
266,
26-32[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
55.
Bryson, H.,
Bunning, R. A.,
Feltell, R.,
Kam, C. M.,
Kerrigan, J.,
Powers, J. C.,
and Buttle, D. J.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
355,
15-25[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
56.
Bode, W.,
Gomis-Ruth, F. X.,
Huber, R.,
Zwilling, R.,
and Stocker, W.
(1992)
Nature
358,
164-167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Salter, D. M.,
Hughes, D. E.,
Simpson, R.,
and Gardner, D. L.
(1992)
Br. J. Rheumatol.
31,
231-234 58.
Pratta, M. A.,
and Arner, E. C.
(1997)
Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc.
22,
453
59.
Kuno, K.,
Iizasa, H.,
Ohno, S.,
and Matsushima, K.
(1997)
Genomics
46,
466-471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K Tahiri, C Korwin-Zmijowska, P Richette, F Heraud, X Chevalier, J-F Savouret, and M-T Corvol Natural chondroitin sulphates increase aggregation of proteoglycan complexes and decrease adamts-5 expression in interleukin 1{beta}-treated chondrocytes Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2008; 67(5): 696 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. B. Pollard, S. E. Gwilym, and A. J. Carr The assessment of early osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2008; 90-B(4): 411 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fushimi, L. Troeberg, H. Nakamura, N. H. Lim, and H. Nagase Functional Differences of the Catalytic and Non-catalytic Domains in Human ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 in Aggrecanolytic Activity J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2008; 283(11): 6706 - 6716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-S. Shieh, K. J. Mathis, J. M. Williams, R. L. Hills, J. F. Wiese, T. E. Benson, J. R. Kiefer, M. H. Marino, J. N. Carroll, J. W. Leone, et al. High Resolution Crystal Structure of the Catalytic Domain of ADAMTS-5 (Aggrecanase-2) J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2008; 283(3): 1501 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||