![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 34, 23683-23686, August 20, 1999
,
§,
,
From the
Departament d'Enginyeria Química,
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Avinguda Diagonal 647, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain, the § Engelhardt Institute of
Molecular Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova 32, 117984 Moscow, Russia, and the ¶ Unité de Chimie Organique,
Institut Pasteur, Rue Dr. Roux 28, 75724 Paris, France
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A detailed picture of hydration and counterion
location in the B-DNA duplex d(GCGAATTCG) is presented. Detailed data
have been obtained by single crystal x-ray diffraction at atomic
resolution (0.89 Å) in the presence of Mg2+. The
latter is the highest resolution ever obtained for a B-DNA oligonucleotide. Minor groove hydration is compared with that found in
the Na+ and Ca2+ crystal forms of the related
dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG). High resolution data (1.45 Å) of the
Ca2+ form obtained in our laboratory are used for that
purpose. The central GAATTC has a very stable hydration spine identical
in all cases, independent of duplex length and crystallization
conditions (counterions, space group). However, the organization of the
water molecules (tertiary and quaternary layers) associated with the central spine vary in each case.
When the first dodecamer structure in the B-form was established,
a "spine of hydration" was found in the minor groove (1). Recent
high resolution data on the same dodecamer (2-5) have shown that a
series of water hexagons may build up on the spine of hydration.
However, some of the water-water distances are too long to be
considered hydrogen bonds, and they correspond rather to Van der Waals
contacts. An additional result of the studies mentioned above is that
either K+ (3) or Rb+ (5) may partially occupy
the water sites. It has also been suggested (2) that Na+
may also occupy the water sites, but this suggestion has been challenged (4, 6).
The use of flash cooling and synchrotron radiation allows a much higher
resolution in the x-ray diffraction data of oligonucleotides than was
possible a few years ago. As a result, a much greater detail on water
and ion distribution can be obtained. The detailed study of water and
ions around DNA is interesting in itself, but it is also relevant to
understand protein-DNA interactions. It has been suggested (7, 8) that
water-mediated polar contacts may contribute to the specificity of
protein-DNA recognition. A better understanding of water structure
around DNA is essential to ascertain the eventual role of ions and
hydration waters in DNA interactions. The data obtained from high
resolution oligonucleotide structures will be of great value in this sense.
Here we report the arrangement of water and divalent cations in the
related structures of d(GCGAATTCG) in the presence of Mg2+
(resolution = 0.89 Å) and the calcium form of d(CGCGAATTCGCG) (resolution = 1.45 Å). The high resolution achieved with these structures allows us to position with certainty many of the water and
ions in the crystal. Thus, the influence of either monovalent (Na+) or divalent (Mg2+, Ca2+)
cations can be ascertained. The structure of the water spine is very
clear and allows us to determine which water molecules occupy fixed
positions. Hydrogen bonds and Van der Waals contacts can be clearly distinguished.
The nonamer was crystallized, using a batch method, in sitting drops
containing 0.5 mM DNA duplex, 1 mM acridine
(Arg4) drug-peptide adduct, 20 mM sodium
cacodylate buffer, pH 7, 100 mM MgCl2, and 35%
MPD.1 Crystals grow in
approximately 2 months to a typical size of 0.6 x 0.4 x 0.4 mm.
The dodecamer crystallization is described elsewhere (9, 10). For data
collection, crystals were mounted in a fiber loop and immediately
flash-cooled at 120 K under a nitrogen vapor stream using an Oxford
Cryosystems Cryostream. Data were collected using synchrotron radiation
at EMBL beam line X11 in the DESY (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron)
Hamburg Outstation on a 345-mm MAR Research imaging-plate scanner.
Three sets of data were collected at resolution cut-offs 0.89, 1.5, and
2.64 Å to avoid saturation of the high intensity reflections. The data were processed and reduced with DENZO and SCALEPACK software packages (11).
The nonamer structure previously reported (12) at 2.05 Å resolution
was used as a starting model. It was refined in XPLOR 3.8 (13) with a
least-square target between 30 and 1.1 Å (Rfree = 0.248;
Rfactor = 0.222). Simulated annealing protocols were employed. After running some cycles with XPLOR, we switched to SHELXL
(14), where anisotropic refinement was carried out with some conjugate
gradient cycles using the maximum resolution. The remaining structure
was built into 2 Fo Refinement details for the high resolution structure of the dodecamer
are reported elsewhere (10). Crystal data and refinement statistics for
both structures are listed in Table I.
Stereo views are shown in Fig. 1. The
hydration spine, counterions, and their associated waters are also
shown in the figure. In the case of the dodecamer in the R3 space
group, a detailed comparison with the standard
P212121 structure (2) is presented
elsewhere (10).
![]()
ARTICLE
TOP
ABSTRACT
ARTICLE
REFERENCES
Fc electron density maps generated with
SHELXPRO. The refinement converged at Rfactor = 0.145 for
all data between 30 and 0.89 Å (F > 4
). A very
clear Cl
ion was found between two Mg2+ ions.
Two poorly ordered sodium ions (Bfactors = 24.1 and 71.6 Å2) near phosphate groups were tentatively assigned on the
basis of several short distances (<2.6 Å) to neighbor water
molecules. They were located on the major groove in regions where the
solvent is not well ordered. They are not shown in the figures. The
drug-peptide complex used in the crystallization was not found in the
crystal. We expect to decrease the Rfactor by modeling the
disordered regions.2 To our
surprise only 110 water molecules could be precisely located, compared
with 86 that were found in the structure reported (12) at 2.05 Å. An
additional 5 molecules had closely spaced (<0.5 Å) alternative
positions. Many other sites with partial occupancy appear to be
present. No molecule of the MPD used for crystallization could be
located. It appears that most of the rather large spaces available for
solvent molecules are in a poorly ordered glassy state. However, there
are regions that have a highly ordered water network, probably
influenced by the presence of Mg2+ ions.
Crystallographic and refinement statistics

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Stereo views showing the d(GCGAATTCG) nonamer
and the d(CGCGAATTCGCG) dodecamer. Divalent cations are given as
large spheres, and water molecules are given as small
spheres. Only the water molecules present inside the minor groove
and those associated with ions are shown. Cl
is
represented as a larger sphere in the upper left
corner. It is placed between two Mg2+ ions and
interacts with the N4 atom of C2 and with waters associated with
Mg2+ ions. Only the ions present in the asymmetric unit are
shown. Each duplex has additional interactions with symmetry related
ions. For the dodecamer, the terminal cytosines are disordered, whereas
the terminal guanines lie in the minor groove of neighboring molecules,
as described elsewhere (9, 10). Some of the phosphate groups of the
nonamer have double conformations, not shown in the figure for the sake
of clarity.
The atomic resolution achieved with the nonamer data is clearly evident
in Fig. 2. The characteristic triplet
interaction of this nonamer (12) is shown in the figure. Comparison of
the duplex structure of d(GCGAATTCG) with the data obtained at a lower resolution (12) does not show any significant difference (root mean
square excluding phosphates between both structures is 0.33 Å). The
main difference is that in our study four phosphate groups are
disordered and have at least a double conformation. In Fig. 1, only the
major conformation is represented. Alternative phosphate positions are
available at the reported Nucleic Acid Database file. The strong
similarity between the two structures determined at different
resolutions gives confidence in the data presently available on
oligonucleotide structures that have been obtained mostly at
resolutions around 2.5 Å (Ref. 2). This is itself an important
conclusion of the work reported here, although the most interesting new
data obtained relate to the organization of water and ions around DNA,
as we will show below.
|
In Fig. 3 we present the minor groove
hydration for the Na+, Ca2+, and
Mg2+ duplexes. All three spines have been superimposed by
using waters P2, P3, and P4 in the primary hydration layer and S3 and
S4 in the secondary layer. The nomenclature of Shui et al.
(3) is used. They distinguish four hydration layers at increasing
distances from the bottom of the minor groove. From Fig. 3 it is
obvious that the superposition of the five water molecules mentioned
above is excellent. Waters at either end of the spine (P1, P5) are no longer so well superimposed. Oligonucleotides of different lengths crystallized with different counterions (Na+,
Mg2+, Ca2+) in different space groups
(P212121, R3) are compared in the figure. It is evident that the central AATT sequence contains a quite
rigid spine of hydration, first described by Drew and Dickerson (1),
which is very stable. The minor groove is also very narrow in all three
cases, although in the nonamer case it is about 0.6 Å wider at the
center, as already reported (12).
|
A tertiary layer of hydration is also clear in all cases. Each water molecule in the secondary layer has an additional hydrogen-bonded water molecule. However, the orientation of water molecules in the tertiary layer with respect to those in the secondary layer is different in all three cases. For example, in the nonamer case the S2 water has two associated waters instead of one in the tertiary layer.
The quaternary layer of hydration is quite different in all cases. Many
of the waters are not hydrogen bonded with those of the tertiary layer
as evident in Fig. 3. In fact, they are associated with chains of
waters that interact with the phosphate groups of the same and neighbor
duplexes. They should not be considered an integral part of the minor
groove water spine because their position depends on the interactions
in the crystal. In the nonamer crystal structure, the position of water
molecules near the P1 side of the spine is very well defined, whereas
they are mainly disordered on the P4/P5 side. Such differences are due
to the fact that the two ends of the duplexes lie in different regions of the crystal and have different interactions with neighbor duplexes. The water molecules associated with the P1 end of the minor groove water spine form a system of polygons and solvent chains that interconnect three nonamer molecules and several ions
(Mg2+, Cl
) in the crystal.
The ends of the water spine (sites P1 and P5) are also very different in the three cases shown in Fig. 3, due in part to the presence of divalent cations in these regions. In the case of the nonamer, for example, instead of a single P1 water molecule there are two water molecules at this level, one interacting with cytosine and the other with guanine.
The results presented demonstrate that the GAATTC sequence has a very well defined water spine associated with the narrow minor groove of the AATT central region. This water spine has two very well defined and constant layers, with a somewhat variable third layer. On top of the latter layer, a system of water molecules defines a set of pentagons/hexagons and chains of water molecules. The exact geometry depends on the sequence, the length of the duplex, and the crystallization conditions used in each case. The presence of strongly associated water molecules in the A(A/T)T and AT base steps may contribute to stabilizing the conformational features of these base steps, which are known to vary very little (15, 16) in different oligonucleotides. Thus, to interpret the detailed structural features of different DNA sequences, the roles of water and ions should be taken into account.
Finally, we should discuss the role of the divalent cations in the structure of the duplexes. The high resolution structure of d(GCGAATTCG) includes several ions (Table I). Because the d(GCGAATTCG) duplex has 16 negative phosphate charges, some charges remain to be neutralized in each asymmetric unit, probably by additional disordered Mg2+/Na+ ions that have not been detected. In fact, some electron density peaks that have been assigned to water molecules may correspond to such ions because they show some short contacts. The Mg2+ ions are mainly involved in the interaction among different duplexes in the crystal, but none of them are found in the region of the minor groove water spine. Instead, two Mg2+ ions are found at both ends of the minor groove and in fact interact with the ends of the water spine, as shown in Fig. 3. A similar situation is found in the R3 structure, where Ca2+ ions are present at similar positions, as shown in Figs. 1 and 3.
Although the minor groove is considered to be (17) a very electronegative region, it appears that the geometry of the AATT region with its associated water spine allows neither hydrated Ca2+ nor Mg2+ to penetrate inside the minor groove. However, in oligonucleotides with a different sequence (18-20), which have a wider minor groove, hydrated divalent cations do penetrate into the minor groove. The influence of sequence has also been confirmed by NMR experiments showing that hydrated Mn2+ ions do not penetrate the A4T4 minor groove but do penetrate into T4A4 (21).
The eventual substitution of some of the molecules in the water spine by Na+ ions has been a question of debate (2, 4-6, 22), although it appears that either Rb+ (5) or K+ (3) may indeed replace, in part, some of the water molecules. In fact, the latter ions have a larger ionic radius more suitable than Na+ for the geometry of the minor groove.
In summary, high resolution studies allow an improved knowledge of ion
and water distribution around oligonucleotides. However, the
relationship between water structure after flash-cooling and water
structure at room temperature is not clear, and further studies are
required in this direction. In fact, we found that only a limited
number of solvent molecules occupies well defined sites, and most of
the waters appear to be in a disordered, glassy state. Some of the
counterions could not be located, because the oligonucleotide negative
charges are not fully neutralized. Also no MPD molecule was found to
occupy any definite position. In fact no MPD molecule has been found in
any oligonucleotide crystal. In the protein crambin, also studied (23)
at high resolution (0.83 Å); and only one ethanol molecule could be
located, although crystals were obtained around 70% ethanol
concentration. The absence of MPD in this and in all the reported
oligonucleotide structures may indicate that either MPD is excluded
from the crystals or is always disordered.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. G. DeTitta and J. Luft for advice on crystallization and Drs. V. Tereshko and L. Williams for sending manuscripts before publication.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work has been supported in part by the Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica (Grant PB93-1067), the Generalitat de Catalunya (Grant 1997SGR-135), and the Training and Mobility of Researchers (Large Scientific Facilities) program of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory Hamburg Outstation (ERBFMGECT980134).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates for both crystal structures are available in the Nucleic Acid Database under accession numbers BD0014 for the dodecamer and BD0016 for the nonamer.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
34-934016688; Fax: 34-934017150; E-mail: subirana@eq.upc.es.
2 M. Soler-López, L. Malinina, and J. A. Subirana, work in progress.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MPD, 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol; P, primary water layer; S, secondary water layer.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Drew, H. R., and Dickerson, R. E. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 151, 536-556 |
| 2. | Shui, X., McFail-Isom, L., Hu, G., and Williams, L. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 8341-8355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Shui, X., Sines, C., McFail-Isom, L., VanDerveer, D., and Williams, L. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 16877-16887[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Tereshko, V., Minasov, G., and Egli, M. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 470-471[CrossRef] |
| 5. | Tereshko, V., Minasov, G., and Egli, M. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 3590-3595[CrossRef] |
| 6. | Neidle, S. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 754-756 |
| 7. | Otwinowski, Z., Schevitz, W., Zhang, R.-G., Lawson, C. L., Joachimiak, A., Marmorstein, R. Q., Luisi, B. F., and Sigler, P. B. (1988) Nature 335, 321-329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Billeter, M., Güntert, P., Luginbühl, P., and Wüthrich, K. (1996) Cell 85, 1057-1065[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Liu, J., Malinina, L., and Subirana, J. A. (1998) FEBS Lett. 438, 211-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Liu, J., and Subirana, J. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem., in press |
| 11. | Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 |
| 12. | Vlieghe, D., Van Meervelt, L., Dautant, A., Gallois, B., Précigoux, G., and Kennard, O. (1996) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 52, 766-775[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Brünger, A. T. (1996) X-PLOR Manual, version 3.851 , Yale University Press, New Haven, CT |
| 14. | Sheldrick, G. M., and Schneider, T. R. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 319-343 |
| 15. | El Hassan, M. A., and Calladine, C. R. (1997) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 355, 43-100 [CrossRef] |
| 16. |
Subirana, J. A,
and Faria, T.
(1997)
Biophys J.
73,
333-338 |
| 17. | Young, M. A., Jayaram, B., and Beveridge, D. L. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 59-59 |
| 18. | Quintana, J. R., Grzeskowiak, K., Yanagi, K., and Dickerson, R. E. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 225, 379-395[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Yuan, H., Quintana, J. R., and Dickerson, R. E. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 8009-8021[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Goodsell, D. S., Grzeskowiak, K., and Dickerson, R. E. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1022-1029[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Hud, N. V., and Feigon, J. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 5756-5757[CrossRef] |
| 22. | McFail-Isom, L., Sires, C. C., and Williams, L. D. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., in press |
| 23. | Teeter, M. M., Roe, S. M., and Heo, N. H. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 230, 292-311[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhou, S. Krueger, and S. K. Gregurick A coarse graining approach to determine nucleic acid structures from small angle neutron scattering profiles in solution Nucleic Acids Res., November 10, 2005; 33(19): 6361 - 6371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Ponomarev, K. M. Thayer, and D. L. Beveridge Ion motions in molecular dynamics simulations on DNA PNAS, October 12, 2004; 101(41): 14771 - 14775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rueda, E. Cubero, C. A. Laughton, and M. Orozco Exploring the Counterion Atmosphere around DNA: What Can Be Learned from Molecular Dynamics Simulations? Biophys. J., August 1, 2004; 87(2): 800 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rozners and J. Moulder Hydration of short DNA, RNA and 2'-OMe oligonucleotides determined by osmotic stressing Nucleic Acids Res., January 9, 2004; 32(1): 248 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ahmad, H. Arakawa, and H. A. Tajmir-Riahi A Comparative Study of DNA Complexation with Mg(II) and Ca(II) in Aqueous Solution: Major and Minor Grooves Bindings Biophys. J., April 1, 2003; 84(4): 2460 - 2466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Korolev, A. P. Lyubartsev, A. Laaksonen, and L. Nordenskiold On the Competition between Water, Sodium Ions, and Spermine in Binding to DNA: A Molecular Dynamics Computer Simulation Study Biophys. J., June 1, 2002; 82(6): 2860 - 2875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hizver, H. Rozenberg, F. Frolow, D. Rabinovich, and Z. Shakked DNA bending by an adenine-thymine tract and its role in gene regulation PNAS, June 28, 2001; (2001) 151247298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Tereshko, C. J. Wilds, G. Minasov, T. P. Prakash, M. A. Maier, A. Howard, Z. Wawrzak, M. Manoharan, and M. Egli Detection of alkali metal ions in DNA crystals using state-of-the-art X-ray diffraction experiments Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2001; 29(5): 1208 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liu and J. A. Subirana Structure of d(CGCGAATTCGCG) in the Presence of Ca2+ Ions J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 1999; 274(35): 24749 - 24752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Soler-Lopez, L. Malinina, and J. A. Subirana Solvent Organization in an Oligonucleotide Crystal. THE STRUCTURE OF d(GCGAATTCG)2 AT ATOMIC RESOLUTION J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2000; 275(30): 23034 - 23044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hizver, H. Rozenberg, F. Frolow, D. Rabinovich, and Z. Shakked DNA bending by an adenine-thymine tract and its role in gene regulation PNAS, July 17, 2001; 98(15): 8490 - 8495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |